250:
at all. And that's because you have no idea about them. How many successes in "afrique noire". I’m not insulting you, but I warn you that you’re not great at editing a Dalida article. Neither did I. I tried a couple of years ago so I stopped. Because we are too narrow head. You draw all your view on her business from
Lesneur's book, which is not 100% valid at all. What are the disagreements with barclay? What decline in popularity in the second half of the 60s? Le temps des fleurs is a major moment in her career! Coincied with the Arts-lettres and De Gaulle recognitions! You are keen on one way of looking at her. I mean, it's wrong to catch one way of looking at a certain thing. It is important to look from all sides.
324:
France. Only serious charts were La bourse and Music hall. They ran shortly in 50s. Gladly they recorded Dalida's prime success. It is fully hard to work with you as you don't want an other opinions. You have 2/3 mediocre books as your sources + tons of invalid unimportant charts. You can't write on wiki with that... You didn't even understand what did I wanted to say with medal 1968 and de gaulle... I think you are not competent to work on this article and please leave it just as I left it as I am also not competent to write an encyclopedic artice about dalida.
356:, whether you refute them, like them or not. Yes, these are the official rankings. You can then invent anything you want, but rankings were already established in several countries, in Germany from the 1950s, in France as well as in Italy from the 1960s. Rankings on sales and distributions in jukeboxes existed before sometimes. Inevitably I cannot appear competent in your eyes since precisely I come to thwart the false things that you broadcast.
289:
relate only to sales. I want proof of this in the evocation of her first visit to the USA, her invitation to Iran, or even her fight against AIDS in France. But this is still only a draft. More contributions will follow, don't worry. What's more, it's not a question of rewriting the article alone but of finishing this sandbox in order to present it in the talk page and then make other modifications. You have drawn inferences too actively.
482:
551:
25:
246:
business for a long time, longer than you. I think your approach with full rewrite is wrong because first of all you are not a native english speaker and I see a bunch of geeks in the whole sentence composition. I am in a same situation as you... Your sandbox texts are not at all like on the pages that are "featured article", like Elvis
Presley, Beyonce, Cher... Follow their example.
293:
can discuss this or that source, we can review the writing of a sentence to be published, but we cannot discuss this or that opinion, or the questioning of factual elements because they do not suit us.And in this way we could finally carry out a real encyclopaedic work together, as I do with other users. But this does not prevent me from reading you with attention.
377:
Unfortunately, what had to happen happened. You have been blocked. However, I will have tried everything to inform you of the way in which you intervened on various pages of Dalida. Many users have warned you. It's really sad to come to this. It is difficult to understand your astonishment at what is
245:
I see that in the sandbox you are doing a complete rewrite of Dalida's article. You know, you can't just show up on your own and write everything from scratch on the main page. Let's discuss via talk page. You understand that we all have different opinions and we have to agree. Some have been in this
440:
The song has sold over a million records. The sources you removed indicate this and these are the official prints/sales. Once again, you impose your reading of things and sweep away all solid references required by
Knowledge... Continue your counterproductive actions. You are exploding violations to
249:
Secondly, everything revolves around sales for you. Just records and millions millions. And you completely neglect the real artist contextual side. What made her popular in every other period. Dalida white dress from 1967 to 1977 at the latest ... that should be an accent. You don’t mention concerts
498:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original
292:
Finally, it is not a question of presenting opinions in this page and for any other article but sourced information (reliable sources, secondary, etc ...), intelligible facts. To give you an image, Knowledge is not the local bistro. And you continue to revoke referenced information all the time. We
256:
Dalida was singer of concerts, tv appeareances, context and story, full of meaningfull songs. Her career can't be told through singles, albums and sales primarly. That should be aside info in text. Look at Edith Piaf wiki. Imagine you now want to rewrite it, and base it only on sales. It would look
323:
How can't you understand how the sales and charts are only a "print in paper" of the success a certain song makes. First, that page you linked for charts is null. That is nothing official or important. Second, charts overall are null. The were no serious charts in that period. Nothing until 90s in
408:
I will leave the 1 milllion sales for the sake of our relationship here, but the table has to be fixed and the section name. Also the composition of lines by you is horrific and I have to retrieve it to my composition. You just group it all under one paragraph. You know, I trasnslated from german
304:
But you can clearly see that here again, what separates us, you and me, is that I simply collect and integrate factual, real, referenced and therefore verifiable information. On the contrary, you do not adopt any holistic vision of things and fabricate or relay false information for lack of solid
288:
The sandbox is in progress. And I'm not a fan of Dalida. And this is the first time that I have worked on this artist. I am responding to a request made by users regarding the chaotic state of this article. Coming back to the sandbox, how is it different from an encyclopedic article? It does not
404:
Dear
Elonora, 1 mistake - you removed the section name. It is important. It has to stay because of wikilinks. 2 mistake - charts and sales. It did not sold 1 000 000. It is false propaganda info. The page you use as a source is not valid. 3 mistake - the table: On engl wiki there is no flags in
351:
Today Dalida's main article cannot remain as it is. This is even claimed, do you have seen the banner posted? Once again you criticize secondary and reliable, even irrefutable sources. You have no counter-argument other than to say that they don't suit you : "charts overall are null". Here are
305:
secondary sources, without real verifications. Moreover, it is enough to see my interventions concerning your contributions to realize it. I pass the lie on this famous "consensus" behind which you were hiding concerning the nationality of the singer but which no longer holds today. Sincerely.
222:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on
296:
Also there is no correlation between the presentation of the medal by De Gaulle and the song "Le temps des fleurs". The song was a great success but by no means a major success on the scale of her career. We can see that on the year of release,
156:
Sorry if my
English sentences are sometimes convoluted. Sometimes the intended meaning of my sentences must not be expressly the same as that imagined... being Spanish. Don't hold it against me. Normally, I try to do my best.
617:
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on
459:
Your changes have been revoked by another user to revert to my version. I completed his contribution. I also took the liberty of taking up some syntax errors and duplicates on your old contribution.
575:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
257:
like a disaster text. Every second sentence would be "the song sold ___ much". Don't invent content where it doesn't exist, I'm telling you in a friendly way for everyone's benefit.
624:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the
603:
301:
of the hits of the year 1968. I believe to see that your readings of the facts are somewhat skewed explained by your devotion to this artist (don't take it the wrong way).
519:
to learn what images you can or cannot upload on
Knowledge. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a
476:
580:
559:
500:
490:
219:
204:
359:
Aside, all actions reported by other users that you are doing can lead to you being blocked. Already for edit wars, but now may amount to vandalism I think.
545:
198:
540:
506:
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a
645:
235:
253:
If you care about editing an article together properly, you should contact some writers or serious wiki editors with many years of experience.
499:
copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the
450:
368:
346:
314:
188:
147:
611:
586:
468:
387:
166:
70:
117:
portrays prehistoric goddess figures falling under the words of the newly ascendant God of Moses. It is one scene of the film
610:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,
441:
many principles of wikipedia and it is putting you in a bad situation that could have been avoided. It's really regrettable.
641:
536:
629:
625:
568:
524:
223:
215:
507:
282:
132:
620:
48:
44:
96:
74:
208:
66:
32:
31:
Hello, and welcome to
Knowledge. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to
434:
520:
564:
494:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the
231:
637:
532:
101:
614:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
240:
427:
339:
275:
59:
19:
207:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of
184:
128:
515:
298:
227:
92:
8:
612:
requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license
110:
456:
415:
374:
327:
263:
180:
153:
124:
47:, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please
119:
88:
36:
523:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the
460:
442:
399:
379:
360:
306:
158:
139:
77:
423:
335:
271:
52:
606:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
571:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have
353:
55:, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
114:
495:
550:
409:
wiki Am tag page and used their sources. I invented nothing...
24:
179:
No problem at all. I understand the limitations of language.
599:
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
405:
charts table. If you don't know the rules, avoid this wiki.
567:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
214:
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from
563:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
113:
of Dalida's song "Paroles, paroles" The animation artist
35:
have been undone by an automated computer program called
65:
The following is the log entry regarding this message:
595:
the original replaceable fair use template, replacing
628:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
138:I didn't know that. Thank you for sharing. 😃
477:File source problem with File:Dalida 80's.png
106:Thanks for working on the Dalida biography.
83:ANN scored at 1 on 2021-09-25T10:26:34+00:00
546:Replaceable fair use File:Dalida 80's.png
510:and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
199:License tagging for File:Dalida 80's.png
226:. Thank you for your cooperation. --
224:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
13:
549:
480:
23:
14:
656:
587:Di-replaceable fair use disputed
569:first non-free content criterion
211:to indicate this information.
630:Media copyright questions page
525:Media copyright questions page
97:10:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
1:
67:Memorias (Camilo Sesto album)
58:For help, take a look at the
33:Memorias (Camilo Sesto album)
109:Just for fun, have you seen
7:
10:
661:
354:the official Dalida charts
189:02:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
167:02:04, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
148:23:02, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
133:22:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
43:ClueBot NG makes very few
581:the file description page
646:14:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
604:the file discussion page
541:14:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
488:Thank you for uploading
469:10:32, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
464:
451:23:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
446:
435:23:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
388:02:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
383:
369:23:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
364:
347:22:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
315:22:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
310:
299:this song is ranked 49th
283:21:16, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
162:
143:
626:non-free content policy
236:23:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
554:
508:request for undeletion
501:image description page
485:
28:
589:|<your reason: -->
557:Thanks for uploading
553:
484:
203:Thanks for uploading
27:
597:<your reason: -->
560:File:Dalida 80's.png
521:list of your uploads
513:Please refer to the
491:File:Dalida 80's.png
209:image copyright tags
205:File:Dalida 80's.png
573:no free equivalent
555:
486:
378:happening to you.
29:
583:and add the text
431:
343:
279:
652:
623:
598:
591:
516:image use policy
483:
420:
418:
332:
330:
268:
266:
102:Dalida animation
660:
659:
655:
654:
653:
651:
650:
649:
619:
596:
584:
548:
481:
479:
430:
416:
402:
342:
328:
278:
264:
243:
241:Dalida? Dalida!
228:ImageTaggingBot
201:
120:Seder-Masochism
104:
22:
12:
11:
5:
658:
634:Adeletron 3030
632:. Thank you.
608:
607:
600:
547:
544:
529:Adeletron 3030
478:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
421:
401:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
357:
333:
318:
317:
302:
294:
290:
269:
242:
239:
200:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
172:
171:
170:
169:
111:this animation
103:
100:
85:
84:
63:
56:
53:report it here
21:
20:September 2021
18:
16:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
657:
648:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
622:
615:
613:
605:
601:
594:
588:
582:
578:
577:
576:
574:
570:
566:
562:
561:
552:
543:
542:
538:
534:
530:
527:. Thank you.
526:
522:
518:
517:
511:
509:
504:
502:
497:
493:
492:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
439:
438:
437:
436:
433:
432:
429:
425:
419:
417:Dalida Editor
410:
406:
389:
385:
381:
376:
372:
371:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
350:
349:
348:
345:
344:
341:
337:
331:
329:Dalida Editor
322:
321:
320:
319:
316:
312:
308:
303:
300:
295:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
281:
280:
277:
273:
267:
265:Dalida Editor
258:
254:
251:
247:
238:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
212:
210:
206:
190:
186:
182:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
168:
164:
160:
155:
151:
150:
149:
145:
141:
137:
136:
135:
134:
130:
126:
122:
121:
116:
112:
107:
99:
98:
94:
90:
82:
79:
76:
72:
68:
64:
61:
57:
54:
50:
49:read about it
46:
42:
41:
40:
38:
34:
26:
17:
633:
616:
609:
592:
572:
558:
556:
528:
514:
512:
505:
489:
487:
457:DalidaEditor
414:
413:
411:
407:
403:
375:DalidaEditor
326:
325:
262:
261:
259:
255:
252:
248:
244:
213:
202:
118:
108:
105:
87:Thank you.
86:
80:
60:introduction
30:
15:
412:Cordially,
260:Cordially,
218:, click on
181:Binksternet
154:Binksternet
125:Binksternet
428:message me
340:message me
276:message me
123:. Cheers!
115:Nina Paley
89:ClueBot NG
37:ClueBot NG
621:this link
496:copyright
461:Elenora.C
443:Elenora.C
380:Elenora.C
361:Elenora.C
307:Elenora.C
220:this link
216:this list
159:Elenora.C
140:Elenora.C
75:Elenora.C
565:fair use
45:mistakes
422:please
334:please
270:please
71:changed
579:Go to
400:Am tag
642:edits
593:below
537:edits
638:talk
533:talk
465:talk
447:talk
424:ping
384:talk
365:talk
336:ping
311:talk
272:ping
232:talk
185:talk
163:talk
144:talk
129:talk
93:talk
69:was
602:On
426:or
338:or
274:or
81:(t)
78:(u)
73:by
644:)
640:•
590:}}
585:{{
539:)
535:•
503:.
467:)
449:)
386:)
367:)
313:)
234:)
187:)
165:)
146:)
131:)
95:)
51:,
39:.
636:(
531:(
463:(
455:@
445:(
382:(
373:@
363:(
309:(
230:(
183:(
161:(
152:@
142:(
127:(
91:(
62:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
