User talk:DoRD/Archive 6

3469: 31: 1805:. I'm not particularly well-versed with IPv6 yet, but I can tell you this rule of thumb: Comcast, Time-Warner RoadRunner, AT&T U-verse and many other residential ISPs allocate a /64 block of IPv6 addresses to each customer. Since this is RoadRunner, it is probably safe to say that the customer's IP address is 2605:e000:96c0:af00::/64, so it can be blocked without affecting anyone outside their household. For some basics of IPv6, you might want to take a look at 3416: 1517:

officiousness that was going on in that thread may not have been germane to this RfA, but it would have been worth dealing with anyway. All you said was that it isn't a block reason. That's true, but an editor who objects to a user's real name because one of its syllables coincides with a nasty word in English (not the language of the real name) needs dealing with. That's a bit more important than keeping the RfA pristine, isn't it? Cheers, --

1087: 850: 390: 547:. That's not constructive. that is you making a personal attack. That's your personal opinion about conduct, not a discussion about a specific edit as it pertains to a policy. Then you come here and use words like "douchbaggery" and "jerk". I'm sure DoRD will be able to explain to you why you've handled this wrong from the start. On top of all of this, I haven't edited that article since Sept. Breezing into my page 1996: 1782: 1828:

that many. BTW, according to the WHOIS, Time Warner allocated 2605:E000::/32, which is an even higher number. I started reading Jasper's page, and, as usual, I followed it in the beginning and then get lost because most of these kinds of pages skip steps they assume you already know. It seems to say that a range block of /64 is okay at one point, but then I lost the thread when I plowed on.--

3754:

That's Elizabeth Grey and Josh. As to my account page I did copy some of the template from another user and I'm happy to update, I thought I was following a standard. Happy to arrange a call or Skype or to write a letter to prove I am indeed a real person... Im a Monthy Python fan too! Especially meaning of life. Thank you for your consideration,

2880:. Can we please have his current IP Range blocked for 1-2 months? Even if it takes multiple rangeblocks to cover his current IP Range, his history of editing and his current pattern of vandalism/sockpuppeteering certainly warrants this. If a rangeblock wouldn't work, then we need to take this to the Wikimedia Stewards. 3891:

position to block those who do not agree with him. This might have something I see on his Talk page - he is employed by the European Comission - which should make him more careful when editing critics of the European Comission? Can I report this abuse of an administrator's position please? AyreSmith1

3045:

Heh, I didn't even see that, so should I still stick with the Soap account or make Keep the master on everything? And while I'm waiting your response, forgive me for asking sort of the same question I asked earlier, but as the report is now archived, can I just move the report and the archive will go

2026:

My apologies for the frivolous Sock Puppet report. I am sorry to have wasted everyone's time, I truly am. It was not my intention. I seem to have misunderstood the process. If somebody would be so kind as to visit my talk page and suggest how I should best proceed about this IP editor, I would really

1976:

People know the sockmaster as "Doctorlaw", so that's why I said that, but I'm not able to dig into the case at the moment (I'm stuck on my iPad for the weekend) so I could be giving less than optimal advice. ;) As for the move, yes, I suppose the move subpages option would work. You'd want to leave a

1842:

Yes, the IPv6 address space is so large (2) that it is inconsequential to allocate a /64 to one customer, and when I see a need to block an IPv6 address like I mentioned above, I almost always nuke the entire /64 because blocking a single address (out of 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 available) is bound

751:

Yes, that's all very nice, but I'm here to ask questions about what is acceptable behaviour or not. So what does it have to do with anything? You're responding to every last message defensively, as if you think I'm here to complain to the Head Master. Kindly stop. I'm just looking for my answers, and

609:

If the attitude and the language he used there are perfectly acceptable on wikipedia I can accept that as an answer and I can adjust my expectations of wikipedia accordingly. I just wanted to run it by an admin to check, rather than to just assume things. I appreciate the time you're taking to clear

153:

Well, after going back over the evidence, I have had to change my conclusions in the case. I'm not very familiar with Sinbad Barron, either, but I did see one possible connection from Cannot be detected. However, the account's contributions and some other technical evidence point squarely at Evlekis,

4408:

Ahh...yes, your SPI link would have been useful in that situation. I have made a couple of slight modifications to your idea and left it in the sandbox. I know I've solved this problem before, but the answer is escaping me at the moment - your version leaves a space before the closing parenthesis if

4089:

Sorry about your keyboard. Way back in ancient times, a computer operator spilled a cup of coffee that he had set down on the top of a mainframe computer belonging to a large company. The shit (coffee grounds) hit the (computer) fan and caused $ 1M in damage, which included downtime of the computer.

2961:

Sucks for us. But if the vandalism continues, or even worsens, this sort of action would need to be taken if it truly is the only way to make him stop. By the way, is this guy rangeblocked right now? If he is, we might not see him again for a while. PS, the IP Range 192.0.0.0/3 had been rangeblocked

2498:

Without evidence that blocks have been evaded, simply threatening to change IP addresses isn't sockpuppetry. There are hundreds or thousands of editors using that ISP, so there is no way we can sift through all their contributions to find out if the threat has been carried out. If you find evidence,

2299:

Okay, I'm pretty sure that X96lee15 is aware that you object to the edits by Dragonron and their socks, but it is also clear that X96lee15 objects to you removing the edits from their talk page. My suggestion to you is to stop watching X96lee15's talk page. Dragonron is posting there simply to annoy

2054:

apology really wasn't necessary. Looking through the anon's contributions, it is pretty clear that they are not new to the project, but beyond that, I have no idea who it might be. By logging out to edit, the editors you mentioned in your report would have little to gain, but much to lose if caught.

1827:

When I use 2605:E000::/64 in your calculator, it says the number of IPs affected is 18446744073709551616. Is that to be read as a "normal" number? If so, it's staggering. Am I missing something, or it just that there are so many IP addresses available, it's not that big a deal for an ISP to allocate

1063:

I've listed the accounts from oldest to newest. The only support I have for possible sock puppetry is the SPA-like behavior in the article, the edit warring, and the fact that accounts keep popping up as the article gets more and more push-back from experienced editors. I can't act on my own because

770:

You've heard a couple of answers: Two admins have told you that your conduct is out of line. One of them directly said he didn't see anything wrong with what I did on that talk page. And why would I be defensive? It's not like you've engaged in personal attacks. Oh wait, you DID, more than once. Put

3661:

Eh... I'm not saying that I don't. There weren't any blocks that last time I checked (February 6), and the Active Rangeblock list was outdated, so I really had no way of knowing. I just wanted to make sure, because I was very concerned I saw that some of the last few rangeblocks expired on the 5th,

1961:

Hmm, I'm happy not to change the master - less work for me - but I'm curious why you think it should remain as is. Rschen has now archved the report, but I'd like a little more explanation for the future. Are you saying I would have done two separate moves, archives first? I remember when I started

2653:

we can do to stop him? Are rangeblocks (or global blocks for that matter) actually useless against his current IP Range? There has to be something else we can do besides sitting there and waiting for him to make his next move. From his history of editing, it has taken long-term Rangeblocks to stop

3753:

Hi there, apparently I was flagged as a sock puppet. Please can you investigate and look me up anywhere including tens of mentions of me attending conferences and being a real person? I'm not sure why someone tried to edit my account page, and I did notice my coworkers indeed using the same IP.

2987:

as the master. Yet, there is no report for Soapamalkanmaime and thus there's no link to the correct report on the user pages. I'd like to move the report to Soapamalkanmaime as the master and then change the few tags there are for Mr Yoke Llully to Soapamalkanmaime so everything is consistent. In

3890:

I see you blocked my account AyreSmith on the instigation of Peregrine981. He claimed there had been no discussion of changes to Open Europe. On the contrary there is a whole discussion including me and others on teh Talk page but Peregrine981 has consistently reversed the edits and abused his

3361:

were both marked as confirmed by Tiptoety and I blocked them. They have each posted unblock requests claiming that it is a false positive as they are coworkers and share the same IP for that reason. I'm hesitant to unblock at this point since I can't verify whether their explanations match the

990:

command, and that their edit summaries are almost the same as the ones from you when you moved the page. I'll say it again: Just because two editors disagree with you doesn't mean that there is sockpuppetry involved. However, if you still feel like pursuing this, you must file a case as I have

3593:

Could we please have a rangeblock enforced on this guy's IP Range (if possible)? Even if we have to resort to using multiple separate blocks to cover his current IP Range, I believe that it would be well worth the effort if it could be done, because he isn't letting up, and because he is also

1769:

There has been a fair amount of block evasion from IPs of the master. I haven't yet blocked the latest IP, although I'm prepared to do that as it's obvious. However, I'm trying to determine whether a range block is justified, what it should be if so, and what the impact would be. According to

1865:

do you issue a range block. None of the pages I've looked at tells you the mechanics for administrators. From looking at your log, I'm guessing that in the address to be blocked I stick in "2605:e000:96c0:af00::/64" without the quotation marks. Is that right? Is there anything else I need to

432:

There are two reasons I don't bother tagging most LTA socks: WP:DENY and because there are simply so many of them. DENY isn't really in play with this guy, he's just very persistent about getting his imaginary record company into the encyclopedia, so feel free to tag them if you wish. These

1880:

That's correct. You can specify anything from the abbreviated notation (2605:e000:96c0:af00::/64 up through a full address (2605:E000:96C0:AF00:C8DF:7C1A:6D08:71A8/64) and MediaWiki will do the rest. I don't know of any particularly good references, unfortunately, but here are the official

2758:

I'm sure that attention has a lot to do with it. However, if I stop, it wouldn't help anything. He was vandalizing long before I picked up on him, and he will still vandalize as often as he wants to, as long as he is able to create more socks. PS, the rangeblock calculator indicates that

126:

How did you make the Cognoscerapo - Sinbad Barron connection? I'd like to detect socks better, and I'm not very familiar with Sinbad Barron. Presumably Sinbad Barron is stale from a checkuser perspective so there are fewer privacy concerns, but if you're not allowed to say, you don't have

1516:

Hi DoRD. I really don't think you should have done that. In one edit, you simultaneously made your own comment and hatted the discussion. I'm sure you wouldn't have meant it like this, but be that as it may, that looks like grabbing the last word. Either discuss or hat, but not both. The

3064:, I'd go with Soapamalkanmaime so that I didn't have to retag the socks and rename the cats, but YMMV. And yeah, the "move subpages" checkbox should take care of the archive, but like I said before, you'll want to go back and nuke the archive redirect afterward since it is unneeded. — 1330:

Oh wait -- I just saw that my request was declined (though I can edit). What does this mean? Are my edits okay? I just think political terms don't belong in the first paragraph of entries on poets but in a "personal" section. Is this about that? B17 12:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

2477:!! What he is saying is that he will change his IP address to avoid blocks. Yes the two IP addresses have edited at completely different times and yes the first one is no longer blocked but I know that it is the same user through my experience. Surely if someone is admitting that: 134:. I'm certainly not criticising other people who have tried to identify sockmasters and clean up the mess - it's just that an environment with multiple overlapping sockmasters (and a few false-flag accounts) makes it very difficult to be certain of the owner 100% of the time... 2337:

I never watched his talk page. I would not be alerted to edits there if I did not go through sock account edits and find he's sent him a stupid warning about me. And I wouldn't revert if you didn't revert. The content should not be there and it should not matter who removes

2075:

Hi DoRD. You blocked me on June 16, 2013. My talk page and email got revoked by another admin called Elockid. I Know you think I might sock again but this is important: Can you restore iPhonehurricane95's talk and email because I need to submit an appeal at WP:BASC. Thanks,

2055:

Clearly the anon is at odds with you over gun control, but while their editing - particularly their edit summaries - may be contentious, I didn't see anything that looks like an attack to me. If their behavior escalates, I will be glad to look into it, though. Cheers —

1083:

Looking back in the article history, I see User:Khj0604, with the same "khj" as the first account above, but that is obviously a reference to the singer's name. As for these accounts, there is enough similarity in the behavior, so I checked and found that they are

3923:

or the conflicts surrounding the page, but you have now used at least a dozen different accounts to push your views on that and other pages. This account has also been blocked, and if you feel that I have used my tools improperly, feel free to contact the ArbCom

734:

I'm glad that you caught the not so subtle hint. Dragging up something that was resolved 3 months ago is usually not the norm. Many pages would have already archived that discussion. I'd also note that ES&L made a point of the issue being "ages ago" as well.

507:

a message about his behaviour that was just so horrible that I just could not resist speaking up. He responded by calling me a troll. So I do not think he'll respond to users calling him out on his behaviour. I'm not sure if there's a wikipedia policy handling

2672:

I have blocked mobile ranges before - one sockmaster forced me to block several ranges from this same mobile provider, in fact. I'm not willing, however, to block this particular range as it is far too busy. What was done in the past is not applicable today.

2617:

Rangeblocks in the past to stop his vandalism, once in February 2012, and another time in August 2013. At this point, I think that a 1-2 year rangeblock of his IP Range may be our only solution at this point, especially if IpH95 continued creating new socks.

808:) to user talk pages. The person linked to your user page in the signature and my talk page, so a person complained to me on my talk page despite me not having made the edit. They have been blocked. I have an idea who is responsible, but it's just a hunch. -- 1991:

I try not to edit using touch screen devices I own. I'm always afraid I'll screw things up. There's a note in the case now that Globalprofessor is the oldest known confirmed account. I'm going to assume that your possible "less than optimal advice" is sound

717:

Niteshift36, thanks for repeatedly telling me it was 3 months ago. Though that really doesn't answer any of my questions plus I already knew this because conversations have dates on them. DoRD, would you say you agree with EatsShootsAndLeaves's conclusions?

4058:, and I just blocked two more. :\ Anyway, I had to replace my keyboard because someone (not to be named) spilled a beverage on it. I broke a fingertip practicing softball on Sunday, so my online activity may be somewhat reduced for the time being. — 154:

so I amended my statement. Granted, it is sometimes difficult to sort out the true master behind sock accounts, particularly with certain ISPs, but I took my best guess. Unfortunately, it was wrong this time. Thank you for prompting me about this. —

3362:

evidence, I think it would be best if a checkuser were to comment on that first. I've asked Tiptoety and another checkuser to comment on whether the evidence matches their explanations, but neither of them have done so. Could you look into it?

1107:

Sorry, I've been so busy with IP proxies that I didn't notice your response. Is it better to open a case rather than just block them? Seems to me I could block them based on the confirmation even though I'm involved. I'll do whatever you think

2722:

on IPhonehurricane95 and all of his associated sockpuppets and IP Ranges. If this doesn't work, then an admin should create a bot that automatically blocks/reverts the edits of any and all accounts originating from this sockmaster's IP Range.

3096:

moving the archive subpage, and it worked, but I was too chicken to try it, particularly because I wasn't sure how I would undo it if it didn't work. I've also changed all the puppets to point to the Soap account. Right or wrong, it's now

2513:

Even though he has admited that he has already changed his IP address in malice ? noting that he uses the word "again". Well it looks like again, once he gets going I will have to go through the procedure of reporting him to admin for

498: 2962:

by another admin before for 1 1/2 months, under 3 separate rangeblocks in February-March 2012, due to excessive vandalism and IP socking from IPhonehurricane95 (while he was operating under the username of Typhoonwikihelper).

629:

What you may not realize is that the person I was in a dispute with is an admin. He's perfectly capable of handling it and navigating the system. I'm sure that if he felt action was needed 3 months ago, he knows where to go.

2558:

You commented that the IP Address from which he was operating were very mobile. But wouldn't a rangeblock work on that IP Range? And if it can't, then I think that we need to take this to the Wikimedia Foundation Admins.

2420:

Yeah, I don't think that's what I had in mind - I'm thinking of something more recent. Anyway, this Cody and his friend were editing from a school, so it could just be the typical bored-kid-in-the-computer-lab vandalism.

2988:

fact, I have this problem when I block a new puppet on duck, which happened recently, without opening up the SPI. I tag them as Soapamalkanmaime, but each time it bothers me. Do you agree that I should do this? Thanks.--

2130:

I've seen blocks like that before, and I'm sure that the original block length was specified as 2 years, but for some reason, the software spits it out like that. I guess it's close enough, though. Strange bug, maybe?

1813:, if you're interested. As for seeing a range's contributions, as far as I can tell, the contributions gadget doesn't work for IPv6 addresses, and other than CU, I don't know any way of viewing them at one time. — 2188:

I looked at that account due to the suspicious username, but it appears that they are related to the blocked accounts in the recent Zarbon case. If you give me a username or IP, I will see what I can do about it.

599:

I apologize for making it sound like a personal attack. I suppose I let my emotions get the better of me. I am referring to his comments on the previously linked talk page. Here it is again for your convenience:

619: 532: 1931:

Can I move this to the correct master while it's both archived and not archived? I've never done it in that state before. I started to do it but then chickened out. The SPI clerk procedures don't address it

1778:. I'm not great with range blocks of IPv4 addresses, but at least I have a bit better grasp of it. I've never range blocked Pv6s. What do you suggest? Any extra tutoring on the issue would also be helpful ( 1462:

I've had some further discussion with the editor (on her talk page). Can you check to see if her explanation of her editing history correlates to reality? Or is it all through Powerhouse Management IPs?—

2304:

that they consider removing the trolling when they see it. There is no harm in removing it, and as I said, its only purpose is to harass another editor. I know that this isn't an ideal solution, and my

3778: 1947:

Frankly, I'd leave it where it is unless there is some pressing need to move it it the older account. But yes, it can be done by moving the archive and the active case separately and then archiving. —

1664: 2940:

The whole point is that stewards would have to place such large rangeblocks as 192.0.0.0/3, 42.0.0.0/9, and 64.0.0.0/2 in order to get him to stop. And that is something that stewards definitely will

2837:

First off, the software won't let us block any ranges larger than /16, and even then, we only block that many addresses in cases of extreme abuse. So, no, those suggested blocks won't be happening. —

1770:

MediaWiki: "The best guideline for assessing collateral damage for an IPv6 rangeblock is to check the WHOIS and actual amount of activity from the range." The master appears to be always editing from

890:, the first user seems to be a newcoming in this case very relative to the second. Also, there is no particular reason for a user, but be suspicious for a likely sockpuppet to refer it for checking.-- 311: 1268:

I am quite surprised with the outcome of the MfD against Ivan Clarin. Do you have a link for the background of your action (blocking for sockpuppetry) because I guess we will see that guy again.

221: 1356:

Hello again -- I was blocked for a few minutes and then I logged back in and can edit again. Could you explain if I am doing anything incorrect? B17 19:34, 26 December 2013 (UTC) thank you.

4076:? I didn't look at the characteristic edits of Gbgfbgfbgfb and their puppets, but there are the obvious letter-jumbling names that are very similar between the two masters. Also, what about 2263:

Could you also help me deal with the user who this guy keeps leaving messages? X96lee15 refuses to allow me to remove the trolling from his user talk because me doing so apparently violates

761: 580: 3831: 3781:(formerly Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Stuckos) has just filed an unblock request. I was wondering if you or DeltaQuad could take a look at it since the block was based on CU data. 3284:

Good question, but CU didn't give me the answer I was expecting. This account isn't even close technically or geographically to Dragonron, aka SweetPotatoSalad, TranquilityResides, etc. —

2145:

A bit like some of the early models of calculator - which would display 9.9999999 instead of 10 on some calculations. This block is at 67.187.21.48, who is combining whining and ranting.

4459: 4458:

The thing is, the two latest suspects are on different ranges than any of the confirmed socks, so I'm not sure what to make of them, but I'll try to take another look later today.

3017:

Okay...well, I suppose a move to that account would be fine since that is how the socks have been tagged and how the cats are named, but the oldest account I saw in the case was

2799:

I know, his IPs are all over the place, which makes it that much worse. However, blocking the following ranges would cover all of his IPs, and should still be just as effective:

1532:

Yes, you are correct. I went there intending to hat part of the discussion, but ended up commenting as well, so I will go ahead and unhide the discussion. Thanks for the note. —

2983:

because he's had more experience with this report, but he's been busy in real life and not active here for over two weeks. The problem is most of the puppets are blocked with

727: 686: 3481: 4171:

Ahh, I should've known...I missed it as well. He has been very busy lately, both here and on other projects. I'll take a look there in a bit, and thanks for the heads up —

3570: 1843:

to be ineffective. For practical purposes, you can consider an IPv6 /32 to be the same as an IPv4 /16 block, but CU is currently limited to checking /48. Jasper also has a

4436: 1448:

Thanks for letting me know, but it looks like the block is warranted. Just from their talk page edits, they seem to be very unfamiliar with how things work around here. —

1030: 585:

Indeed, your personal attack here is out of line, and I caution you against doing it again. In any case, I don't have any idea of what behavior you are referring to. —

3731:

No, I checked TranquilityResides as part of another investigation. Levineps has yet to be endorsed by a clerk, so I haven't taken much time to look at the evidence. —

3350: 2972: 1177: 780: 744: 639: 560: 2687:

You mean that this range changes too often? But if that's the case, isn't there something that we can do? Would taking this to the Wikimedia Foundation admins help?

2456: 753: 719: 611: 572: 524: 4421:

a case. Anyway, I do think that the idea is a good one, so if you can get the formatting right, please feel free to incorporate it into the live template. Cheers —

4337:

Would you be amenable to training me as a SPI Clerk, I know it's very busy and it needs assistance and I think that I am established enough to be able to help out.

305: 3662:

and when he returned to make more socks. But if he's blocked now, then I guess we're good for the time being. No new activity from him so far, as of early Feb 8.

4224: 3848: 3249: 1569: 657:

Well, I read about 2/3 of that talkpage ... still not sure what I'm looking for that would lead to "jerk" or "douchebaggery" suggestions. Nothing that violates

2492: 1962:

the move process thinking I would do one move that there was a box to move subpages (which I never check). Would checking that have allowed me to do one move?--

1068:. Rather than taking it to SPI (partly laziness), I thought I'd ask your views. It's possible that they are just meat puppets or even unrelated fans, but ... -- 1762: 594: 1924: 1171: 448: 4437: 4376:, if you might have guessed how come I, someone without the tools felt the need to have a link to SPI case page of the blocked user, it was actually after 3242: 3833: 3256: 544:" You cited nothing specif, just came to my page, littering it with comments like "I can't resist letting you know how disgusted I am with your attitude" 4452: 4443:

Hey, DoRD, I pinged you on this. Perhaps you didn't see it or you don't wish to respond. I just need to know so it doesn't sit there in limbo. Thanks.--

3638: 3569:

Yeah, he went quiet for a while, but is back to creating a couple of socks a day again. :( Anyway, the abuse log entries for him, particularly those in

2523: 2115:

Is there a particular reason for a block of "1 year, 364 days, 18 hours, 10 minutes and 48 seconds"? Would it be different if a leap year came into it?

3811: 2973: 2997: 702: 3354: 3223: 2462: 693:

In the interest of saving time, a number of editors participated and the material was included in a way that satisfied both sides..... 3 months ago.

3607: 116: 3625:, etc. His February socks all have this naming scheme so far, and he will probably continue doing so in order to vandalize articles and to harass 2956: 2935: 2921: 2772: 2753: 2732: 2713: 2667: 2644: 2590: 1795: 939: 4495: 1941: 1639: 1617: 1605: 1046: 4275: 571:

both here and in my comment to you, Niteshift36. I am not sure what you are trying to achieve with quoting part of my message out of context. --

4257: 4145: 3796:

Hmm...I think that the account must have ended up in the list by mistake. Please unblock and move the case back to the previous name. Thanks —

1763: 1014: 397: 2979:

My apologies for picking on you again. Think of it as a tribute to your approachability and knowledge. :-) I wanted to leave this message for

1740: 1490:

Sorry! I'm not sure how I missed your question, but the account has been confirmed as a sockpuppet of User:Critic11 by myself and Jpgordon. —

908:, you are welcome to submit a sockpuppetry case, of course, but I can tell you that there is not enough evidence to make a convincing case. — 3990: 3687: 3588: 2399: 2323:

I will revert any future trolling on my talk page related to Ryulong. The bigger problem is, IMO, his reverting of changes to my talkpage. —

2218: 1925: 824:

Actually, I'm about 99.6% certain who it was, based on the fact that you blocked some sleeper accounts of theirs a few days ago. Shocking. --

757: 723: 673:

that shows violations, it's simply someone passionately defending a position when backed into a bit of a corner. Oh, it was also ages ago.

615: 576: 528: 4361: 3671: 3656: 2904: 2889: 2846: 2832: 2794: 2696: 2682: 2627: 2608: 2568: 2545: 2508: 2104: 3726: 3691: 3211: 2222: 1433:

directly, based primarily on the same evidence that made me believe the range block was working properly. Intervene or not as you see fit.—

3582: 4227:- see edit filter 58, he was using the sandbox to find a way around the filter. Please check for sleepers/IP if you're around. Thanks, 2430: 2415: 1621: 1210: 381: 4002: 3554:

I knew Harold Cook (British actor) and Dr. Who (2013 TV series) seemed familiar, but my memory failed me. I'll do better next time. :)

3324:

I heard the quacking, too, but I can only guess that this is either MEAT or someone else trying to get Ryulong in trouble. <sigh: -->

2815:, given his pattern of vandalism and a refusal to stop sockpuppeting. If I'm wrong and there was an invalid imput, could you please use 2599:

mobile" range, and Rschen7754 is correct, many innocent editors would be affected by a block - what we refer to as collateral damage. —

834: 4322: 4304: 4290: 3983: 3823: 3805: 3511: 3447: 3433: 3404: 3390: 2351: 2169:

What case was this related to? Because my dear friend is back and stirring up shit seeing as no one did a check on them the last time.—

2064: 1754: 1040: 4251: 4213: 4197: 4180: 3949: 3740: 1699: 1314: 1296: 1255: 1237: 3911: 3854:

Because the accounts are so painfully obvious, I usually don't, but I do monitor a couple of abuse filters designed to catch them. —

3219: 324: 291: 163: 4430: 4264: 4090:

What was most impressive was the company didn't fire the operator as it was common for people to do this. He was only reprimanded.--

3790: 3078:

Okay, thanks, I'll try to take care of it tomorrow. I'm kinda tired now and will soon go off-wiki and on to dinner and relaxation.--

2332: 1771: 1644: 1633: 1000: 961: 917: 865: 3763: 3193: 3179: 3161: 2444: 2394: 2318: 2294: 2280: 2256: 2238: 2198: 2154: 2140: 3106: 2613:

Then why don't we exempt the innocent users/IPs? That is something that admins are able to do. Also, we had to resort to at least

952:. It is against checkuser policy to run a check without proper evidence, so no CU will run a check to provide evidence for you. — 4507: 4489: 4471: 4127: 4113: 4099: 4067: 4045: 3877: 3863: 3563: 3334: 3319: 3293: 3087: 3073: 3055: 3046:

along with it, or do I have to check subpages when I move the report (someone ought to write a script for lame people like me)?--

3040: 3012: 2009: 1986: 1971: 1956: 1908: 1894: 1875: 1856: 1837: 1822: 1404: 1222: 1148: 1134: 1117: 1102: 484: 470: 442: 427: 409: 4072:

Thanks, DoRD. I tagged Irotentbre. I'm a little confused, though, on one point. Is there a relationship between Gbgfbgfbgfb and

3885: 1555: 1541: 2385:

That rings a bell, but I can't put my finger on it at the moment. At any rate, I blocked Cody and his friend as VOAs. Cheers —

2379: 1499: 1471: 1457: 983: 1485: 4381: 4204:(ec)...and there are at least two other related cases. It'll be a few hours, but I'll see about tying together what I can. — 3493: 2553: 1209:), as they have similar behavioral characteristics and the IP has been making personal attacks against the clerks working on 542:

I have send user Niteshift36 a message about his behaviour that was just so horrible that I just could not resist speaking up

234: 3955: 3230: 3215: 3203: 1183: 458: 4384:) to become visible only when a page exists. So thought to let you know that if you think it is useful you may add it. -- 3371: 2655: 1610: 1077: 357: 3278: 1844: 4346: 4165: 4402: 4377: 4236: 3769: 3266: 3248: 317: 3543: 2944:

do; there would be much more collateral, and they would definitely have their steward bit removed if they did that. --

2182: 2041: 1676: 1228:

The range has been blocked, but dynamic IP addresses like this should not be tagged. Happy holidays to you as well. —

545: 4352:

Thank your for your interest in helping out, but unfortunately, I don't really have the time to take on a trainee. —

3595: 2365: 1737: 1721: 1592: 1526: 3708: 3522:

Thank for putting the comment about rangeblocks for the ACC process as it is good to avoid the backlog when we can!

1281: 839:

Given that I have blocked a number of his socks in the last couple of days, I'm guessing that it's Evlekis again. —

818: 4313:

in extraordinary circumstances, and even then, only if it is really needed. In the case above, it is not needed. —

4193: 3907: 3722: 3028: 2952: 2917: 2749: 2709: 2640: 2586: 2085: 1398: 1372: 1347: 1160: 189: 3748: 2741:. I think that all the attention that you are drawing to this is just making him want to cause more disruption. -- 2124: 1847:. Anyway, I have gone ahead and blocked the /64 for a month, but certainly feel free to extend it as necessary. — 267: 2214: 1604:

When you have a moment, please take a look at the above talk page. I'm inclined to accept their unblock request.

147: 4185:

There's several open SPIs floating around that are actually him, with info from some CU actions on loginwiki. --

2718:

I mean the Wikimedia Stewards, or it could be the people who are in charge of Wikimedia. I think that we should

2532:

they have changed their IP address. We require evidence that they are actively socking or evading a block. Even

2244: 1683: 1287:

I don't have a link yet. The case is under discussion, and I will have more information in a few days. Cheers —

4030: 3146: 1711: 1056: 1034: 1006: 976: 932: 899: 227: 1327:

My page looks fixed this morning and thank you! Merry day after Christmas! B17 12:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

806: 433:

particular socks usually show up in edit filter 58 and/or 583 if you're interested in tracking them. Cheers —

4480:, but I did finally get around to running some checks in the case and have posted my results there. Cheers — 2036: 1206: 1024: 680: 511: 4373: 2574:

We risk blocking a lot of innocent people in the process. And the same would be true if we referred this to

1724: 1442: 351: 130:

In the past there has been some confusion around who controls which socks - there are several examples like

3549: 3166:

Well could you at least semi-protect X96lee15's user talk? He keeps restoring Wiki-star/Dragonron's edits.—

3152:

A couple of IPs have been blocked, but like I have said, I am not comfortable blocking the mobile range. —

2877: 1899:

I'm aware of that page, but I didn't see anything on it that said how to do it on the block form. Thanks!--

4017:. I blocked them, but it was rather confusing as to what they were doing, although none of it was good. I 4014: 2370:

Do you remember the 'Cody' sockpuppets? I'm wondering about the recent arrival of Cody the history man...

1428: 368: 337: 3517: 3459: 1597: 652: 201: 131: 2926:

Eh, not really. But if it works, why bother with it? Wait... Is this guy under a rangeblock right now??

1416: 375: 261: 4342: 3667: 3634: 3603: 2931: 2885: 2828: 2820: 2768: 2728: 2692: 2663: 2623: 2564: 2519: 2488: 2470: 2081: 1563: 1511: 344: 38: 4258: 3598:. I believe that his current actions would warrant at least a 1-3 year block on his current IP Range. 1882: 948:". If you wish to go forward with a sockpuppetry case, you must follow the instructions at the top of 278: 247: 3759: 3694:? The case is still marked as "CU requested", and I was confused. Thanks for any enlightenment. — 1246:

case on Evlekis? This sockpuppetry has been ongoing for many months now, with dozens of sockpuppets.

97: 285: 4367: 3979: 3961: 3559: 3344: 2162: 1422: 675: 452: 364: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3302:

has indeffed the new user for block evasion (not unreasonable based on duck, but ...). Meanwhile,

1381: 4139: 3965: 3204: 2466: 2410: 1714:

out, to see whether it needs adjusting up or down, based on collateral damage potential? Thanks!

887: 120: 4494:

No problem, I know how busy you are. Fortunately, I was off-wiki and the wonderful and tireless

1189: 4219: 3260: 1410: 1251: 1218: 1007: 274: 254: 4281:

No, autoblocks will remain in place, but the exempt user will be able to edit through them. —

2483:

then he clearly trying to evade the admins on Knowledge and something should be done about it.

2027:

appreciate it. Thank you all for your time, and again I apologize for the trouble. be well. --

1624:? Frankly, the explanation that the other accounts belong to a friend rings hollow with me. — 4338: 4300: 4271: 3819: 3786: 3663: 3630: 3613:

FYI, if this guy keeps up his current pattern of naming his socks, his next socks should be:

3599: 3489: 3443: 3400: 3367: 2984: 2927: 2881: 2824: 2764: 2724: 2688: 2659: 2619: 2560: 2515: 2484: 2077: 2033: 1806: 1734: 1718: 1652: 923:

Isn't quite the suspicion? Could they please run a checkuser so I can use it as evidence? --

800: 776: 740: 698: 635: 601: 568: 556: 520: 331: 4380:

of Atama, that I thought it might be useful. After your concern, I have tried modifying it (

2778: 1667:. Is that good enough grounds to run a CU to see if there's more spam from the same source? 4266:

So when an IP block-exempt user edits from an IP address, are any autoblocks on it lifted?

4232: 4190: 4161: 3903: 3895: 3755: 3719: 3681: 3022: 3003:

I'm heading out for the evening, but I'll take a look at the case, etc., in the morning. —

2949: 2914: 2746: 2706: 2637: 2583: 2110: 2021: 1672: 1392: 1368: 1360: 1343: 1335: 1308: 1275: 183: 2719: 8: 4008: 3700: 3555: 2980: 2208: 1598: 1263: 883: 241: 143: 4295:

If IP block exemption doesn't extend to other users there's no reason not to grant it.

3130: 2405: 2328: 1682:

Yes, I frequently find spambot farms in that filter, so after taking a look, I blocked

1322: 1065: 1050: 972: 928: 895: 832: 816: 215: 3468: 4332: 3975: 3937: 3358: 3173: 3140: 3120: 2440: 2375: 2345: 2274: 2232: 2176: 2150: 2120: 1200: 1018: 991:

pointed out - you cannot use a Quick CheckUser request for suspected sockpuppetry. —

105: 4036:

Sorry for the delay, but I'm stuck using an iPad for at least a few more hours... —

2300:

you, and another facet of DENY is a refusal to react to trolling. I also suggest to

4296: 4267: 4153: 4055: 3931: 3815: 3782: 3527: 3485: 3439: 3409: 3396: 3378: 3363: 3210:

I see you CU-blocked him, so I thought I should let you know he is mentioned in an

2163: 2047: 2029: 1731: 1715: 873: 772: 736: 694: 666: 631: 552: 504: 4503: 4448: 4228: 4187: 4157: 4123: 4095: 4073: 4026: 4018: 3899: 3873: 3844: 3716: 3644: 3315: 3274: 3102: 3083: 3051: 3018: 2993: 2946: 2911: 2743: 2703: 2634: 2580: 2005: 1967: 1937: 1904: 1871: 1833: 1791: 1668: 1387: 1364: 1339: 1303: 1270: 1247: 1214: 1144: 1113: 1093:

to be one in the same. If you want to open a case, I'll comment there as well. —

1073: 658: 499:

Is a user being a jerk and kicking up a huge fuss about things against any rules?

466: 423: 197: 179: 3424:, but it is also possible that the IP they're using is a business connection. — 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4485: 4467: 4426: 4357: 4318: 4310: 4286: 4247: 4209: 4176: 4149: 4109: 4063: 4041: 3998: 3945: 3925: 3859: 3801: 3736: 3695: 3652: 3578: 3539: 3507: 3429: 3386: 3330: 3289: 3238: 3189: 3157: 3126: 3069: 3036: 3008: 2909:

You realize that all stewards can do about the matter is rangeblocks, right? --

2900: 2842: 2790: 2738: 2678: 2604: 2541: 2504: 2426: 2390: 2314: 2290: 2252: 2204: 2194: 2136: 2100: 2060: 1982: 1952: 1890: 1852: 1818: 1750: 1695: 1629: 1588: 1551: 1537: 1522: 1495: 1453: 1292: 1233: 1130: 1122: 1098: 996: 957: 913: 861: 844: 670: 590: 480: 438: 405: 159: 139: 47: 17: 3184:

If X96lee15 requests that their talk page be protected, I will consider it. —

4385: 3626: 3307: 2536:

evidence, blocks are ineffective if the user can change addresses at will. —

2324: 2301: 2264: 1481: 1467: 1438: 1243: 968: 949: 924: 905: 891: 825: 809: 662: 551:

after the fact to express your opinion is not going to be productive either.

169: 3647:, and how do you know that blocks haven't been put in place already? Best — 2816: 2000:). If you change your mind, let me know. Thanks, as always, for your help.-- 192:) is a sock also, but I can't tell from your block who is the banned user.-- 3310:, even though the first time I told him to leave it for an administrator.-- 3303: 3299: 3167: 3134: 2436: 2371: 2339: 2306: 2268: 2226: 2170: 2146: 2116: 2070: 1196: 1162: 879: 752:

then I'll adjust my expectations of Knowledge as needed and I'll move on. -

475:

I don't see anything in their behavior to indicate that they're related. —

2781:

calculator has apparently been given invalid input, as that is the entire

2575: 986:

they used is mostly generated by the Wikimedia software when one uses the

3920: 3523: 3349:

Hi DoRD, could you help me with a couple unblock requests? It relates to

175: 4499: 4477: 4444: 4119: 4091: 4051: 4022: 3869: 3840: 3810:

Ok, I've unblocked and changed all the tags etc. The SPI's new home is

3770: 3311: 3270: 3098: 3079: 3047: 2989: 2001: 1963: 1933: 1900: 1867: 1829: 1802: 1787: 1705: 1140: 1109: 1069: 462: 419: 193: 4104:

Wow! $ 49 for a new keyboard sounds cheap in comparison. And...YGM. —

1195:

can be tagged and blocked as a possible sock of blocked sockpuppeteer

4481: 4463: 4422: 4353: 4314: 4282: 4243: 4205: 4172: 4105: 4059: 4037: 3994: 3941: 3928:. To appeal your block, log in with your primary account and use the 3855: 3797: 3732: 3648: 3574: 3535: 3503: 3425: 3382: 3326: 3285: 3234: 3185: 3153: 3065: 3032: 3004: 2896: 2838: 2786: 2674: 2600: 2537: 2500: 2422: 2386: 2310: 2286: 2248: 2190: 2132: 2096: 2092: 2091:

No. You may email them directly through the mailing list as detailed

2056: 1978: 1948: 1886: 1848: 1814: 1746: 1745:

Yep, I see. Sorry I missed you, but I've got to sleep some time ;) —

1691: 1625: 1620:. Have you seen the remarkably similar unblock requests from some of 1583: 1547: 1533: 1518: 1491: 1449: 1288: 1229: 1126: 1094: 992: 987: 953: 909: 857: 840: 586: 476: 434: 401: 155: 4077: 3306:, who can be headstrong, has twice removed Beautyfrisco's report at 2285:

Alright, I'll take a look after I deal with the Dragonron stuff. —

1477: 1463: 1434: 4498:

took care of all the clerking associated with the new sock farm.--

3960:

I wonder if you would be willing to look at an unblock request at

942:, that section of the page can only be used for a "situation that 2243:

I see. I'll comment at the IHeartUM case in a bit, but I've just

3412:, except for Hhighimpact059, the accounts listed in the SPI are 1575:

Notifying you due to your prior investigation of related case.

3534:

You're welcome, and I'll continue to do that where possible. —

1977:

redirect for the main page, but not for the archive, though. —

1861:

Thanks. I've saved the most stupid question for last, which is

1638:

Nope, hadn't seen those. I'll defer to your judgement. Cheers,

805:

Someone pretending to be you made a few vandalistic edits (see

1810: 1688:(It appears that I selected the wrong block reason for one...) 1663:

seems to be a spambot and was about to AIV him when I noticed

2701:

I'm not sure what you mean by Wikimedia Foundation admins. --

3964:. It relates to a range block you placed, which you can see 2309:

skills may not be the best, but this is the way I see it. —

4021:

one page they created and rolled back some edits. Thanks.--

2782: 414:

Is there a reason why you don't tag them? Any objection to

300: 3351:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Hhighimpact059/Archive

2480:

No worries about the IP Address, I'll just change it again

2475:

No worries about the IP Address, I'll just change it again

3839:

Were you going to check for additional socks/sleepers? --

2819:

to calculate his IP Range, given the data of his IPs in

1774:, but I don't see how I'm supposed to see activity from 1659: 967:Ιn any case, τhe edits are enough to form a suspicion.-- 3573:, are what I use for confirmation these days. Cheers — 1570:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Ali Mohammad Khilji

210: 4242:

Charming. I'll add that to my list of things to do. —

1809:. Also, the IPv6 range calculator I typically use is 1772:

2605:E000:: - 2605:E000:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF

4438:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Katrina Villegas

3834:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/HENRY_APPLEGATE

3993:for the background on the webhost block. Cheers — 3812:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Master Beherit 3594:creating new socks every single day. He made more 2974:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Yoke Llully 1710:Hey, DoRD, when you get a chance, could you check 2499:I'll be glad to look at the case again. Cheers — 2463:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/24.188.32.225 2457:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/24.188.32.225 4417:space before the dividing bullet point if there 938:As I told you on your talk page, and as it says 117:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Cognoscerapo 4152:, as are the ones you just blocked as socks of 3092:It's done. I could swear I've done this before 2528:We can't just block the latest IP because they 1730:Nevermind, someone else got it. Thanks anyway! 4146:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Trieddyson 4144:Hey, could you check the accounts I posted at 2219:and made a case that was closed with no action 1764:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Monterrosa 1690:Anyway, thanks for keeping an eye on these. — 3991:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Jakandsig 3381:, I'll take a look at them in the morning. — 2632:We can't for IPs, especially dynamic ones. -- 1926:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Doctorlaw 4462:, there might be another sockmaster here. — 2203:I had recently identified the sockmaster as 2050:, I apologize for the delayed response, but 3484:by a large margin for two months in a row! 847:) 13:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC) ...annnd 3779:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Kimse 540:You own words show your error. You said " 3214:, in case you didn't already know that. 1125:. I went ahead and blocked all three. — 1211:Evlekis's sockpuppet investigation page 14: 4259:Knowledge:SPI#Quick CheckUser requests 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3589:February 2014 IPhonehurricane95 socks 2595:I think I wrote that it was a "very 1993: 1779: 519:An example of his lovely demeanour: 25: 3596:threats of abusing other users here 3395:Thank you, I really appreciate it. 3133:. Can you block his range already?— 2895:Blocks have already been placed. — 2435:Finke is what I couldn't remember. 754:2001:980:A4CB:1:C4D6:2A5D:5305:7D91 720:2001:980:A4CB:1:C4D6:2A5D:5305:7D91 612:2001:980:A4CB:1:C4D6:2A5D:5305:7D91 573:2001:980:A4CB:1:C4D6:2A5D:5305:7D91 525:2001:980:A4CB:1:C4D6:2A5D:5305:7D91 23: 3438:Ok, thanks for looking into this. 771:the whip away, the horse is dead. 24: 4521: 3971:The editor who uses the pseudonym 3475:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 3233:, I have commented at the SPI. — 2649:So... You're saying that there's 982:You do realize, I hope, that the 3714:I've gone ahead and fixed it. -- 3690:mean that you performed a CU on 3467: 3414: 1994: 1780: 1085: 848: 388: 29: 3777:Hi DoRD, the oldest account in 3269:) a sock of SweetPotatoSalad?-- 3231:Someone not using his real name 3216:Someone not using his real name 3125:I found the original master is 1168:Hello DoRD, I was wondering if 461:) is not a Jude Enemy puppet?-- 123:was likely to be Sinbad Barron. 4413:a case, and my version leaves 2223:there is a misplaced open case 945:does not involve sock puppetry 13: 1: 4472:14:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 4453:00:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 4252:15:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC) 4237:15:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC) 4214:16:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 4198:16:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 4181:16:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 4166:16:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 4128:02:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 4114:01:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 4100:00:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 4068:13:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC) 4046:15:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 4031:02:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC) 4003:21:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC) 3984:21:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC) 3950:19:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 3912:18:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 3878:19:42, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 3864:19:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 3849:18:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 3824:03:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC) 3806:02:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC) 3791:01:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC) 3764:04:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC) 3741:13:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 3727:06:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 3709:06:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 2554:IPhonehurricane95 Sockpuppets 2469:has quite openly said on the 2465:what you are missing is that 2225:with a new sockpuppet found.— 1500:22:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC) 1486:21:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC) 1472:23:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 1458:17:02, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 1443:01:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 1315:19:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 1297:19:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 1282:18:55, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 1256:15:44, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 1238:22:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC) 1223:18:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC) 1149:21:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1135:21:13, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1118:21:05, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1103:17:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1078:16:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1001:16:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 977:15:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 962:14:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 933:14:23, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 918:01:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 900:00:10, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 866:13:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 835:04:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 819:04:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 781:14:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 762:04:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 745:02:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 728:20:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 703:19:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 687:19:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 669:going on, but unless I see a 640:19:25, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 620:19:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 595:18:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 581:19:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 561:18:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 533:18:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 516:, so I'm asking you here. :) 485:14:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 471:22:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 443:16:01, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 428:15:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 410:04:45, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 202:02:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 3956:Webhostblock unblock request 3919:I don't know anything about 3886:I'm not a sock puppet either 3672:08:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC) 3657:11:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC) 3639:07:47, 7 February 2014 (UTC) 3608:07:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC) 3583:02:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC) 3564:01:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC) 3544:17:56, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 3512:22:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 3494:22:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 3448:19:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 3434:14:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 3405:03:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 3391:03:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 3372:03:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 3335:20:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 3320:20:29, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 3294:20:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 3279:20:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 3243:20:59, 1 February 2014 (UTC) 3224:18:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC) 3194:01:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 3180:22:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC) 3162:21:01, 1 February 2014 (UTC) 3147:18:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC) 3107:22:13, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 3088:02:29, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 3074:02:23, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 3056:01:28, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 3041:14:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 3013:00:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 2998:00:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 2957:09:53, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 2936:09:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 2922:09:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 2905:09:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 2890:09:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 2847:01:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 2833:00:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 2813:I highly recommend 3-5 years 2795:14:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC) 2773:04:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC) 2754:06:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 2737:One thing that does work is 2733:05:16, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2714:04:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2697:04:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2683:03:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2668:02:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2645:02:48, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2628:02:47, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2609:12:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2591:07:23, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2569:07:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2546:16:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2524:15:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2509:15:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2493:15:35, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2445:10:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2431:01:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2416:23:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2395:22:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2380:21:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2352:21:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2333:17:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2319:17:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2295:15:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2281:15:30, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2257:15:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2239:15:27, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2199:15:22, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2183:15:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2155:20:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2141:19:43, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2125:19:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2105:18:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2086:18:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2065:13:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2042:18:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC) 2010:17:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC) 1987:17:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC) 1972:14:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC) 1957:04:17, 25 January 2014 (UTC) 1942:00:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC) 1909:17:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 1895:17:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 1876:17:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 1857:16:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 1838:16:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 1823:16:13, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 1796:15:32, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 1755:14:10, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 1741:09:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 1725:07:32, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 1700:17:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC) 1677:16:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC) 567:I did cite your comments on 164:21:29, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 148:20:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 7: 1645:03:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 1634:13:41, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 1611:05:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 1593:17:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 1556:08:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 1542:00:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 1527:00:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 10: 4526: 4309:I disagree. We only grant 3129:. I also have a thread at 2471:Talk:Chattan Confederation 2247:three related accounts. — 1578:Thank you for your time, 447:Thanks. I'm assuming that 4508:00:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 4490:12:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC) 4431:00:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC) 4403:23:48, 4 March 2014 (UTC) 4362:22:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 4347:20:40, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 4323:16:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 4305:16:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 4291:16:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 4276:16:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 3466: 2761:his IP Range is 0.0.0.0/0 2366:Just a thought before bed 1883:mw:Help:Range blocks/IPv6 3962:User talk:John Mayor ERS 3205:User:TranquilityResides 2467:User talk:69.119.124.12 888:User talk:Tco03displays 512:Personal attack removed 121:User:Cannot be detected 4372:Hello DoRD. Regarding 3705:(no relation to Jimbo) 3645:I do know how to count 2720:request a Global Block 1008:Kim Hyun-jung (singer) 4476:Sorry for the delay, 4225:User:Mutatedstructure 3936:template as outlined 3766:12 Feb 2014 Krystian 3749:I'm not a sock puppet 3482:Most active checkuser 3250:User:SweetPotatoSalad 3229:Thanks for the note, 2985:User:Soapamalkanmaime 1807:User:Jasper Deng/IPv6 602:Talk:Fox_News_Channel 569:Talk:Fox_News_Channel 521:Talk:Fox_News_Channel 42:of past discussions. 3989:Hi, JBW, please see 3550:The Deadly TV series 178:, I'm assuming that 4382:the sandbox version 3518:On Range blocks ACC 3460:A barnstar for you! 1845:less daunting guide 1599:User talk:Limbojazz 1301:Okay, I will wait. 984:"same edit summary" 884:User talk:LordFixit 3926:Audit subcommittee 2783:IPv4 address space 2307:dispute resolution 1564:Sock investigation 1512:Hatting at the RfA 1242:Should there be a 1213:. Happy holidays, 878:I do not have any 665:. Maybe a little 3973: 3915: 3898:comment added by 3707: 3499: 3498: 3422:indistinguishable 3359:User:PrestonDorey 1377: 1363:comment added by 1352: 1338:comment added by 1161:Possible sock of 653:talk page stalker 515: 503:I have send user 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4517: 4400: 4395: 4390: 4368:Template:Unblock 4339:Hell In A Bucket 4154:User:Cantseeshit 4080:on my talk page? 4056:User:Gbgfbgfbgfb 3969: 3935: 3914: 3892: 3703: 3692:the Levineps SPI 3664:LightandDark2000 3631:LightandDark2000 3600:LightandDark2000 3502:Thanks, Mark! — 3471: 3464: 3463: 3418: 3417: 3345:Unblock requests 3176: 3170: 3143: 3137: 3131:WP:ANI#Wiki-star 2928:LightandDark2000 2882:LightandDark2000 2825:LightandDark2000 2765:LightandDark2000 2725:LightandDark2000 2689:LightandDark2000 2660:LightandDark2000 2620:LightandDark2000 2561:LightandDark2000 2516:QuintusPetillius 2485:QuintusPetillius 2413: 2408: 2348: 2342: 2277: 2271: 2235: 2229: 2179: 2173: 2164:User:CHECKEDUSER 2078:Phonehurricane95 2040: 2039: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1689: 1662: 1642: 1608: 1432: 1405:deleted contribs 1376: 1357: 1351: 1332: 1313: 1306: 1280: 1273: 1194: 1193: 1174: 1089: 1088: 852: 851: 830: 814: 685: 683: 678: 656: 509: 392: 391: 386: 384: 347: 327: 325:deleted contribs 303: 296: 294: 257: 237: 235:deleted contribs 213: 207:Those accounts, 132:Neutral Fair Guy 119:, you said that 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4525: 4524: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4441: 4396: 4391: 4386: 4370: 4335: 4262: 4222: 4142: 4140:Ginsuloft socks 4078:this discussion 4074:User:Jude Enemy 4011: 3958: 3929: 3893: 3888: 3837: 3775: 3773:unblock request 3756:KrystianSzastok 3751: 3684: 3643:Thank you, but 3591: 3552: 3520: 3462: 3415: 3355:User:DIZwikwiki 3347: 3253: 3208: 3174: 3168: 3141: 3135: 3123: 2977: 2556: 2459: 2411: 2406: 2368: 2346: 2340: 2275: 2269: 2233: 2227: 2177: 2171: 2167: 2113: 2073: 2032: 2028: 2024: 1995: 1929: 1781: 1767: 1708: 1687: 1658: 1655: 1640: 1606: 1602: 1566: 1514: 1390: 1384: 1358: 1333: 1325: 1304: 1302: 1271: 1269: 1266: 1175: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1086: 1011: 876: 856:, of course. — 849: 826: 810: 803: 681: 676: 674: 650: 501: 418:tagging them?-- 389: 360: 340: 320: 299: 298: 270: 250: 230: 209: 208: 172: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4523: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4474: 4440: 4435: 4434: 4433: 4369: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4334: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4261: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4221: 4220:More Ginsuloft 4218: 4217: 4216: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4150:User:Ginsuloft 4141: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4084: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4048: 4010: 4007: 4006: 4005: 3957: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3887: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3836: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3774: 3768: 3750: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3683: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3590: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3556:Anna Frodesiak 3551: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3519: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3497: 3496: 3478: 3477: 3472: 3461: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3346: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3252: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3207: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3127:User:Wiki-star 3122: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3015: 2981:Reaper Eternal 2976: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2907: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2654:him, as noted 2593: 2555: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2511: 2461:In regards to 2458: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2403: 2367: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2297: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2166: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2112: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2023: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 1928: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1881:instructions: 1766: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1684:three accounts 1654: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1622:these accounts 1601: 1596: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1383: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1324: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1265: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1172:188.29.107.118 1165: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1139:Heh, thanks.-- 1061: 1060: 1044: 1028: 1010: 1005: 1004: 1003: 965: 964: 921: 920: 875: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 802: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 748: 747: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 607: 606: 605: 604: 583: 565: 564: 563: 500: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 449:Swagalicious22 174:Hey, based on 171: 168: 167: 166: 136: 135: 128: 124: 111: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 18:User talk:DoRD 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4522: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4479: 4475: 4473: 4469: 4465: 4461: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4439: 4432: 4428: 4424: 4420: 4416: 4412: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4401: 4399: 4394: 4389: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4363: 4359: 4355: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4344: 4340: 4324: 4320: 4316: 4312: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4302: 4298: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4273: 4269: 4265: 4260: 4253: 4249: 4245: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4215: 4211: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4196: 4195: 4192: 4189: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4178: 4174: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4163: 4159: 4155: 4151: 4148:? These are 4147: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4111: 4107: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4097: 4093: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4028: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3972: 3967: 3963: 3951: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3933: 3927: 3922: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3913: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3835: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3803: 3799: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3772: 3767: 3765: 3761: 3757: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3725: 3724: 3721: 3718: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3699: 3698: 3693: 3689: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3628: 3627:User:Earth100 3624: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3561: 3557: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3529: 3525: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3500: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3480: 3479: 3476: 3473: 3470: 3465: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3420: 3411: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3298:Interesting. 3297: 3296: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3265: 3262: 3258: 3251: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3206: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3171: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3144: 3138: 3132: 3128: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3097:consistent.-- 3095: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3027: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2986: 2982: 2975: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2955: 2954: 2951: 2948: 2943: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2920: 2919: 2916: 2913: 2908: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2752: 2751: 2748: 2745: 2740: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2721: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2712: 2711: 2708: 2705: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2643: 2642: 2639: 2636: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2616: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2592: 2589: 2588: 2585: 2582: 2577: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2512: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2481: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2414: 2409: 2407:Berean Hunter 2401: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2353: 2349: 2343: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2303: 2298: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2278: 2272: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2236: 2230: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2213: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2180: 2174: 2165: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2053: 2049: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2038: 2035: 2031: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1927: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1777: 1773: 1765: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1739: 1736: 1733: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1723: 1720: 1717: 1713: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1685: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1661: 1653:Spambot farm? 1646: 1643: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1609: 1600: 1595: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1585: 1579: 1576: 1573: 1571: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1430: 1427: 1424: 1421: 1418: 1415: 1412: 1409: 1406: 1403: 1400: 1397: 1394: 1389: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1328: 1316: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1278: 1274: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1205: 1202: 1198: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1173: 1164: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1058: 1055: 1052: 1048: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1002: 998: 994: 989: 985: 981: 980: 979: 978: 974: 970: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 946: 941: 937: 936: 935: 934: 930: 926: 919: 915: 911: 907: 904: 903: 902: 901: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 867: 863: 859: 855: 846: 842: 838: 837: 836: 833: 831: 829: 823: 822: 821: 820: 817: 815: 813: 807: 801:Rude impostor 782: 778: 774: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 759: 755: 750: 749: 746: 742: 738: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 725: 721: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 704: 700: 696: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 684: 679: 672: 668: 664: 660: 654: 649: 648: 641: 637: 633: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 617: 613: 603: 598: 597: 596: 592: 588: 584: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 543: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 530: 526: 522: 517: 513: 506: 486: 482: 478: 474: 473: 472: 468: 464: 460: 457: 454: 450: 446: 445: 444: 440: 436: 431: 430: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 412: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 383: 380: 377: 374: 370: 366: 363: 359: 356: 353: 350: 346: 343: 339: 336: 333: 330: 326: 323: 319: 316: 313: 310: 307: 302: 293: 290: 287: 284: 280: 276: 273: 269: 266: 263: 260: 256: 253: 249: 246: 243: 240: 236: 233: 229: 226: 223: 220: 217: 212: 206: 205: 204: 203: 199: 195: 191: 188: 185: 181: 177: 165: 161: 157: 152: 151: 150: 149: 145: 141: 133: 129: 125: 122: 118: 114: 113: 112: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4442: 4418: 4414: 4410: 4397: 4392: 4387: 4378:this comment 4371: 4336: 4263: 4223: 4186: 4143: 4012: 3976:JamesBWatson 3970: 3959: 3894:— Preceding 3889: 3838: 3776: 3752: 3715: 3704: 3696: 3688:this comment 3685: 3682:Levineps SPI 3622: 3618: 3614: 3592: 3553: 3521: 3474: 3421: 3419:Technically 3413: 3348: 3304:User:Ryulong 3263: 3257:Beautyfrisco 3254: 3209: 3124: 3093: 3061: 3025: 2978: 2945: 2941: 2910: 2875: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2760: 2742: 2702: 2650: 2633: 2614: 2596: 2579: 2557: 2533: 2529: 2479: 2478: 2474: 2460: 2369: 2211: 2168: 2114: 2111:Just a query 2074: 2051: 2025: 2022:My Apologies 1932:precisely.-- 1930: 1862: 1786:). Thanks.-- 1775: 1768: 1709: 1656: 1603: 1582: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1567: 1515: 1425: 1419: 1413: 1407: 1401: 1395: 1386:I reblocked 1385: 1359:— Preceding 1334:— Preceding 1329: 1326: 1309: 1276: 1267: 1203: 1186: 1180: 1167: 1090: 1062: 1053: 1037: 1021: 966: 944: 943: 922: 877: 853: 827: 811: 804: 608: 548: 541: 518: 502: 455: 415: 393: 378: 372: 361: 354: 348: 341: 334: 328: 321: 314: 308: 301:Qasdssaassds 288: 282: 271: 264: 258: 251: 244: 238: 231: 224: 218: 186: 173: 137: 109: 78: 43: 37: 4297:Peter James 4268:Peter James 4156:. Thanks, 4009:Please look 3921:Open Europe 3816:Mark Arsten 3783:Mark Arsten 3486:Mark Arsten 3440:Mark Arsten 3397:Mark Arsten 3364:Mark Arsten 3212:ongoing SPI 2878:this threat 2801:192.0.0.0/3 2779:range block 2030:Sue Rangell 1732:Writ Keeper 1716:Writ Keeper 1568:Please see 1264:Surprise... 1066:WP:INVOLVED 773:Niteshift36 737:Niteshift36 695:Niteshift36 632:Niteshift36 610:this up. -- 553:Niteshift36 505:Niteshift36 400:. Cheers — 376:investigate 286:investigate 36:This is an 4229:NawlinWiki 4158:NawlinWiki 3900:Ayresmith1 3832:Regarding 3771:User:Kimse 3686:Hi. Does 3060:If it was 3019:Keepsgames 2809:64.0.0.0/2 2805:42.0.0.0/9 2576:m:Stewards 2514:vandalism. 2473:page that 1776:that range 1669:Jackmcbarn 1657:I noticed 1546:Thanks. -- 1423:block user 1417:filter log 1388:Bseventeen 1382:Bseventeen 1365:Bseventeen 1340:Bseventeen 1323:Thank you! 1305:The Banner 1272:The Banner 1248:Epicgenius 1215:Epicgenius 398:Jude Enemy 345:block user 338:filter log 255:block user 248:filter log 180:Qasaasassa 138:Have fun; 98:Archive 10 4333:SPI Clerk 4118:Thanks.-- 4050:Finally. 3121:Dragonron 2817:this link 2205:Dragonron 1660:Mr51ronju 1429:block log 1091:Confirmed 988:move page 854:Confirmed 667:WP:BATTLE 396:socks of 394:Confirmed 365:CheckUser 352:block log 275:CheckUser 262:block log 140:bobrayner 106:Odd socks 90:Archive 8 85:Archive 7 79:Archive 6 73:Archive 5 68:Archive 4 60:Archive 1 4496:Callanec 4054:, it is 3908:contribs 3896:unsigned 3868:Okay. -- 3623:Earth110 3619:Earth109 3615:Earth108 3267:contribs 3029:contribs 2325:X96lee15 2302:X96lee15 2221:and now 2215:contribs 1811:this one 1641:Tiptoety 1618:Tiptoety 1607:Tiptoety 1399:contribs 1373:contribs 1361:unsigned 1348:contribs 1336:unsigned 1207:contribs 1184:contribs 1057:contribs 1047:Wild1004 1041:contribs 1025:contribs 969:Katcheic 925:Katcheic 906:Katcheic 892:Katcheic 880:edit war 874:checking 828:Jprg1966 812:Jprg1966 659:WP:CIVIL 549:3 months 459:contribs 318:contribs 228:contribs 211:Adaasads 190:contribs 115:Over at 110:Hi DoRD, 4019:deleted 3932:Unblock 3300:Legoktm 3169:Ryūlóng 3136:Ryūlóng 3094:without 2739:WP:DENY 2651:nothing 2437:Peridon 2372:Peridon 2341:Ryūlóng 2270:Ryūlóng 2245:blocked 2228:Ryūlóng 2172:Ryūlóng 2147:Peridon 2117:Peridon 1197:Evlekis 1163:Evlekis 1108:best.-- 1015:Longkhj 671:WP:DIFF 39:archive 4409:there 3524:Jab843 3308:WP:AN3 2823:list? 2807:, and 2412:(talk) 2265:WP:TPO 1476:Ping?— 1244:WP:LTA 950:WP:SPI 682:&L 663:WP:NPA 382:cuwiki 292:cuwiki 4500:Bbb23 4478:Bbb23 4445:Bbb23 4411:isn't 4120:Bbb23 4092:Bbb23 4052:Bbb23 4023:Bbb23 3870:Jakob 3841:Jakob 3701:wales 3377:Hey, 3312:Bbb23 3271:Bbb23 3099:Bbb23 3080:Bbb23 3048:Bbb23 3031:). — 2990:Bbb23 2002:Bbb23 1964:Bbb23 1934:Bbb23 1901:Bbb23 1868:Bbb23 1866:do?-- 1830:Bbb23 1803:Bbb23 1788:Bbb23 1190:WHOIS 1141:Bbb23 1110:Bbb23 1070:Bbb23 882:with 463:Bbb23 420:Bbb23 194:Bbb23 170:Socks 16:< 4504:talk 4486:talk 4482:DoRD 4468:talk 4464:DoRD 4449:talk 4427:talk 4423:DoRD 4374:this 4358:talk 4354:DoRD 4343:talk 4319:talk 4315:DoRD 4311:IPBE 4301:talk 4287:talk 4283:DoRD 4272:talk 4248:talk 4244:DoRD 4233:talk 4210:talk 4206:DoRD 4194:7754 4191:chen 4177:talk 4173:DoRD 4162:talk 4124:talk 4110:talk 4106:DoRD 4096:talk 4064:talk 4060:DoRD 4042:talk 4038:DoRD 4027:talk 4015:this 3999:talk 3995:DoRD 3980:talk 3966:here 3946:talk 3942:DoRD 3940:. — 3938:here 3904:talk 3874:talk 3860:talk 3856:DoRD 3845:talk 3820:talk 3802:talk 3798:DoRD 3787:talk 3760:talk 3737:talk 3733:DoRD 3723:7754 3720:chen 3697:Rich 3668:talk 3653:talk 3649:DoRD 3635:talk 3604:talk 3579:talk 3575:DoRD 3560:talk 3540:talk 3536:DoRD 3528:talk 3508:talk 3504:DoRD 3490:talk 3444:talk 3430:talk 3426:DoRD 3410:Mark 3401:talk 3387:talk 3383:DoRD 3379:Mark 3368:talk 3357:and 3331:talk 3327:DoRD 3316:talk 3290:talk 3286:DoRD 3275:talk 3261:talk 3239:talk 3235:DoRD 3220:talk 3190:talk 3186:DoRD 3158:talk 3154:DoRD 3103:talk 3084:talk 3070:talk 3066:DoRD 3052:talk 3037:talk 3033:DoRD 3023:talk 3009:talk 3005:DoRD 2994:talk 2953:7754 2950:chen 2932:talk 2918:7754 2915:chen 2901:talk 2897:DoRD 2886:talk 2876:See 2843:talk 2839:DoRD 2829:talk 2821:this 2791:talk 2787:DoRD 2785:. — 2777:The 2769:talk 2750:7754 2747:chen 2729:talk 2710:7754 2707:chen 2693:talk 2679:talk 2675:DoRD 2664:talk 2656:here 2641:7754 2638:chen 2624:talk 2605:talk 2601:DoRD 2597:busy 2587:7754 2584:chen 2578:. -- 2565:talk 2542:talk 2538:DoRD 2534:with 2520:talk 2505:talk 2501:DoRD 2489:talk 2441:talk 2427:talk 2423:DoRD 2400:This 2391:talk 2387:DoRD 2376:talk 2338:it.— 2329:talk 2315:talk 2311:DoRD 2291:talk 2287:DoRD 2253:talk 2249:DoRD 2209:talk 2195:talk 2191:DoRD 2151:talk 2137:talk 2133:DoRD 2121:talk 2101:talk 2097:DoRD 2095:. — 2093:here 2082:talk 2071:BASC 2061:talk 2057:DoRD 2052:your 2006:talk 1983:talk 1979:DoRD 1968:talk 1953:talk 1949:DoRD 1938:talk 1905:talk 1891:talk 1887:DoRD 1885:. — 1872:talk 1853:talk 1849:DoRD 1834:talk 1819:talk 1815:DoRD 1801:Hey 1792:talk 1751:talk 1747:DoRD 1712:this 1696:talk 1692:DoRD 1673:talk 1665:this 1630:talk 1626:DoRD 1616:Hi, 1589:talk 1584:Cirt 1552:talk 1548:Stfg 1538:talk 1534:DoRD 1523:talk 1519:Stfg 1496:talk 1492:DoRD 1482:talk 1468:talk 1454:talk 1450:DoRD 1439:talk 1411:logs 1393:talk 1369:talk 1344:talk 1310:talk 1293:talk 1289:DoRD 1277:talk 1252:talk 1234:talk 1230:DoRD 1219:talk 1201:talk 1178:talk 1145:talk 1131:talk 1127:DoRD 1114:talk 1099:talk 1095:DoRD 1074:talk 1064:I'm 1051:talk 1035:talk 1031:나는우리 1019:talk 997:talk 993:DoRD 973:talk 958:talk 954:DoRD 940:here 929:talk 914:talk 910:DoRD 896:talk 886:but 862:talk 858:DoRD 845:talk 841:DoRD 777:talk 758:talk 741:talk 724:talk 699:talk 636:talk 616:talk 591:talk 587:DoRD 577:talk 557:talk 529:talk 481:talk 477:DoRD 467:talk 453:talk 439:talk 435:DoRD 424:talk 406:talk 402:DoRD 387:are 332:logs 306:talk 297:and 242:logs 216:talk 198:talk 184:talk 176:this 160:talk 156:DoRD 144:talk 4488:) 4470:) 4460:FYI 4429:) 4360:) 4321:) 4289:) 4250:) 4212:) 4179:) 4112:) 4066:) 4044:) 4013:at 4001:) 3978:" ( 3948:) 3862:) 3804:) 3739:) 3655:) 3581:) 3571:#58 3542:) 3510:) 3432:) 3389:) 3333:) 3292:) 3255:Is 3241:) 3192:) 3160:) 3072:) 3039:) 3011:) 2942:not 2903:) 2845:) 2793:) 2681:) 2615:two 2607:) 2544:) 2530:say 2507:) 2429:) 2393:) 2317:) 2293:) 2255:) 2197:) 2139:) 2103:) 2063:) 2048:Sue 1985:) 1955:) 1893:) 1863:how 1855:) 1821:) 1753:) 1698:) 1632:) 1540:) 1498:) 1478:Kww 1464:Kww 1456:) 1435:Kww 1295:) 1236:) 1133:) 1123:Meh 1101:) 999:) 960:) 916:) 864:) 661:or 593:) 483:) 441:) 408:) 369:log 312:tag 279:log 222:tag 162:) 127:to. 4506:) 4451:) 4419:is 4415:no 4345:) 4303:) 4274:) 4235:) 4188:Rs 4164:) 4126:) 4098:) 4029:) 3982:) 3968:. 3934:}} 3930:{{ 3910:) 3906:• 3876:) 3847:) 3822:) 3814:. 3789:) 3762:) 3717:Rs 3670:) 3637:) 3629:. 3621:, 3617:, 3606:) 3562:) 3530:) 3492:) 3446:) 3403:) 3370:) 3353:. 3325:— 3318:) 3277:) 3222:) 3178:) 3175:琉竜 3145:) 3142:琉竜 3105:) 3086:) 3062:me 3054:) 2996:) 2947:Rs 2934:) 2912:Rs 2888:) 2831:) 2811:. 2803:, 2771:) 2763:. 2744:Rs 2731:) 2704:Rs 2695:) 2673:— 2666:) 2658:. 2635:Rs 2626:) 2581:Rs 2567:) 2522:) 2491:) 2443:) 2421:— 2404:— 2378:) 2350:) 2347:琉竜 2331:) 2279:) 2276:琉竜 2267:.— 2237:) 2234:琉竜 2217:) 2189:— 2181:) 2178:琉竜 2153:) 2131:— 2123:) 2084:) 2034:✍ 2008:) 1970:) 1940:) 1907:) 1874:) 1836:) 1794:) 1706:CU 1686:. 1675:) 1591:) 1581:— 1572:. 1554:) 1525:) 1484:) 1470:) 1441:) 1375:) 1371:• 1350:) 1346:• 1254:) 1221:) 1147:) 1116:) 1076:) 975:) 931:) 898:) 779:) 760:) 743:) 726:) 718:-- 701:) 677:ES 638:) 618:) 579:) 559:) 531:) 523:-- 469:) 426:) 416:my 371:) 358:CA 281:) 268:CA 200:) 146:) 94:→ 64:← 4502:( 4484:( 4466:( 4447:( 4425:( 4398:S 4393:M 4388:S 4356:( 4341:( 4317:( 4299:( 4285:( 4270:( 4246:( 4231:( 4208:( 4175:( 4160:( 4122:( 4108:( 4094:( 4062:( 4040:( 4025:( 3997:( 3974:" 3944:( 3902:( 3872:( 3858:( 3843:( 3818:( 3800:( 3785:( 3758:( 3735:( 3666:( 3651:( 3633:( 3602:( 3577:( 3558:( 3538:( 3526:( 3506:( 3488:( 3442:( 3428:( 3399:( 3385:( 3366:( 3329:( 3314:( 3288:( 3273:( 3264:· 3259:( 3237:( 3218:( 3188:( 3172:( 3156:( 3139:( 3101:( 3082:( 3068:( 3050:( 3035:( 3026:· 3021:( 3007:( 2992:( 2930:( 2899:( 2884:( 2841:( 2827:( 2789:( 2767:( 2727:( 2691:( 2677:( 2662:( 2622:( 2603:( 2563:( 2540:( 2518:( 2503:( 2487:( 2439:( 2425:( 2402:? 2389:( 2374:( 2344:( 2327:( 2313:( 2289:( 2273:( 2251:( 2231:( 2212:· 2207:( 2193:( 2175:( 2149:( 2135:( 2119:( 2099:( 2080:( 2059:( 2037:✉ 2004:( 1992:( 1981:( 1966:( 1951:( 1936:( 1903:( 1889:( 1870:( 1851:( 1832:( 1817:( 1790:( 1749:( 1738:♔ 1735:⚇ 1722:♔ 1719:⚇ 1694:( 1671:( 1628:( 1587:( 1550:( 1536:( 1521:( 1494:( 1480:( 1466:( 1452:( 1437:( 1431:) 1426:· 1420:· 1414:· 1408:· 1402:· 1396:· 1391:( 1367:( 1342:( 1291:( 1250:( 1232:( 1217:( 1204:· 1199:( 1192:) 1187:· 1181:· 1176:( 1143:( 1129:( 1112:( 1097:( 1072:( 1059:) 1054:· 1049:( 1043:) 1038:· 1033:( 1027:) 1022:· 1017:( 995:( 971:( 956:( 927:( 912:( 894:( 860:( 843:( 775:( 756:( 739:( 722:( 697:( 655:) 651:( 634:( 614:( 589:( 575:( 555:( 527:( 514:) 510:( 479:( 465:( 456:· 451:( 437:( 422:( 404:( 385:) 379:· 373:· 367:( 362:· 355:· 349:· 342:· 335:· 329:· 322:· 315:· 309:· 304:( 295:) 289:· 283:· 277:( 272:· 265:· 259:· 252:· 245:· 239:· 232:· 225:· 219:· 214:( 196:( 187:· 182:( 158:( 142:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index