7875:? Some of the IP addresses haven't edited this year, but the others did and more than once, as well as the named user accounts. Even if some accounts are stale, couldn't it be looked at on behavioral pattern alone? And could you also explain to me why you say there is no abuse between the socks? If the socks are reverting to each other's edits to promote the initial edit of one account, is that not abuse of accounts? Also, the fact that one made an initial edit on the Belly Dance article, where they added content that was not in the source they cited, and they also named the source something it really was not (the source was a fiction/fantasy novel and not a factual book as they claimed). And then to have two other accounts say the exact same thing later on, using the exact same source, is that not fraud and abuse of accounts? The reason I feel this is a serious matter is because the pattern is very alike to Plouton2's socks. This person could be starting up again with new accounts, wouldn't that be considered an evasion of block? If you look at the Plouton2 case, there's over 55 sock accounts blocked. The list I provide follows the same pattern (many accounts targeting same articles), same editing style, same interests. The interconnectivity you displayed does not include all the articles or the socks I listed. As shown in the diffs, some of the socks I listed reverted to socks of Plouton2 and not edits from Plouton2's account alone. What are the chances that any random user would say the exact same thing as another user in the exact same article and then to use the exact same source which is fiction? Could you please have another look at the case? I really would appreciate it. Thank you.
1685:
nominators. Do I think they represent the community as a whole? from 150 to 200 people vote in most successful RfAs, less for obviously failing ones, so that is a reasonable cross-section, but again, if you don't vote, that isn't the fault of the community. Adding a new layer of bureaucracy isn't going to make the process less bureaucratic or more fair, and opens up so many layers of abuse as to make the idea dead in the water as the community is not likely to give up what little control they have in the process. Knowledge is a project, not a government. Unlike citizens of a government, the citizens at
Knowledge are directly involved with the goals, creating an encyclopedia. The only reason we allow a republican style leadership for government is that we don't want to have to deal with all the individual decisions, so we delegate (vote for) that responsibility to someone else. The citizens of Knowledge don't have that many things to deal with, just individual issues and the "election" of admin, Arbs, Checkusers and Oversighters. Those are already positions that take care of problems so that individual citizens don't have to. Again, feel free to support whatever initiative you choose. No matter how enthusiastic some may be on that Signpost article, I'm pretty sure that the few hundres people that vote semi-regularly at RfA are not likely to endorse it, so it would be dead on delivery. That makes the issue moot. My only point is that moving power away from the average user is always a bad idea, and empowering a few people at the top who have shown only that they are good politicians, well, that is always bad.
8348:
consensus for certain awards to be included that everyone agreed on. The remainder were not discussed because Tib42 failed to return in a reasonable period of time. New consensus should easily have been able to be formed for a number of the awards. The problem was that when Tib42 did come back his attempt at discussion was poor. He attempted to re-discuss the ones we already had consensus to include and tried to discuss including ‘’all’’ of the awards rather than choosing the most notable of the remaining ones he wanted to include. I was busy at the time and didn’t desire to dive in to discussing all of those points. Because I was busy, I attempted to “pass the buck” rather than telling him to start with one or two of the awards he felt were most notable; however, nobody else took part in the discussion. He can’t be blamed for reinserting the material when nobody would discuss it with him. I’m having some technical trouble, so I can’t see the revert. But there wasn’t specific consensus not to include a number of the awards that he wanted to reinstate. (On behalf of
182:
new clerks, and the existing CUs are so swamped, I'm thinking that is why they don't want to train new clerks themselves. You can always work it as a nonclerk, nonadmin observer. Adding diffs, offering opinions as to likelihood, etc. Not much different than ANI, except the stakes are much higher, so it takes more caution and a lot more research. That is likely a problem for you though, since each case takes a lot of research. About half the clerking requires the bit, which is part of the problem. The other is that it is a thankless and sometimes tedious job, which is why it is so hard to get admin to volunteer. It is, however, an excellent step toward adminship if you do it well, whether you clerk or just help out with cases. Be forewarned, there is a bit of a learning curve and you have to start slow, which might be why some people don't stick with it. It is also very rewarding work, so it is worth the high price.
917:
more about making sure the oldest account is listed as the Master, then moving everything if it isn't. Fixing bad formatting. Knowing when you need to do a history merge, and when you need to do a copy/paste. This is mainly when you have a case like "Bob" is the master, "Alice" is the puppet, then CU discovers they are both really socks of "Charlie", so you have to do a history merge (admin bit required). Or you discover that puppet master "Doug" and puppetmaster "Ernie" are really the same person, so you have combine cases. Or you have the same master "Alice" and the sock "Bob", but you find out that "Bob is really a sock of "Charlie", and not related to "Alice", but "Alice already has an archive, so you have to copy page (and attribute) everything to a new page for
Charlie. Clerking is mainly paperwork. Much of the blocking and comparing can be done by patrolling admin, although
4368:, I decided to look into his contribution history because I figured that, with the nonexistent user page/talk page, he was likely new. And sure enough, the account is newly registered -- registered on the 14th of this month. But when I looked into his contribution history, I noticed a striking similarity between his article interests and edit summary style and that of Ewawer's. On the 14th, Rogr101 made the following edit summary expressions: "(Ce)," "Expand intro," "Tidy up bit," and "More tidy up." These are all expressions that Ewawer uses often. While other editors use these expressions, it is usually sparingly with regard to the last three; I have come across none that use them as often as Ewawer, especially "Tidy up." And although Ewawer doesn't always capitalize his edit summaries, he sometimes does, such as
8467:
as each one of you have insisted. What I cannot understand is, when somebody else included the Hoover medal, nobody objected and there was no discussion at all. But when I am attempting to include that which is common knowledge and from secondary and tertiary sources, you guys are objecting to it. Surely this is not a positive way forward. What does Bbb23 find so objectionable in what I am saying? I have clearly stated my reasons and you can engage. Furthermore, Dennis I object to an insinuation that I do not belong to the category of 'generally not improving the encyclopedia'. I am trying to improve an article that is important to so many
Indians. Others will do the same for other articles. Is that not the spirit in which all of this is supposed to work? --
8214:
mentor is on the case and I trust that there will be a proper resolution and forward progress. There is a lesson here. If Raiden/Deidra's editing and advice had not been so obviously off-base, where someone noticed right away that she had no business being an adopter, who knows how many new users she would have negatively affected. We are all so fragile and innocent when we first enter
Knowledge's front door. We trust what the residents tell us. But, I'm not sure anything can be done except to be watchful. And, lastly, I certainly don't apologize or feel at all badly about raising a little drama which, according to
6061:
whether deliberately or accidentally, I can't be sure, but the second eliminates the possibility of too narrow an interpretation of the first. For example, an edit in an RFA stating that so and so is a terrible editor is arguably not an edit about the process. The second sentence covers that possibility. However, if someone asks a question on MF's talk page about a GAN, and MF responds that the main editor does seem to understand
English, that should not, IMO, be a violation. If he follows it up by saying, not only doesn't the editor know English, but he shouldn't be an admin, then that crosses the line.--
1572:. Once you take away their right to choose admins, you have stripped away their most basic right in a community: the right to choose who gets the tools to block, protect and delete. Cronyism and other forms of abuse will always be present or suspected. It would quickly become more controversial and more hated than the current system. Removing RfA and replacing it with an elected committee who will hand select admin is a bad idea. It is bad for editor retention, the overall level of happiness and trust here, and it is completely counter to everything I have been working toward.
4477:
are in Ewawer's range of article interests and has used edit summary style that is signature of Ewawer's editing. I certainly don't want Ewawer blocked. I was conflicted about what to do on this matter, but didn't even seriously consider starting a sockpuppet investigation because of what I stated above. Although Ewawer's formatting is often "off," Knowledge-formatting wise, and he often adds unsourced material, his editing is generally beneficial to
Knowledge. I was waiting until Rogr101 responds to decide whether or not to add a Welcome template to Rogr101's talk page.
8262:
understand that as well. We are all human, we all make mistakes. I think both of you meant well, so I'm not inclined to get mad at anyone. I suggest that you work with your mentor, Keilana (who I happen to think the world of, by the way) and in a year, you will be ready to mentor others. I will go flog Buster with a wet noodle. Well, maybe not. But I think you both understand what I'm talking about. We all just need to breath deep and remember that even the best of us make mistakes, including me (all the time, actually). We all good folks, just remember that.
3282:
shortcomings. The solution I suggested on that one Arb's page has been taken so far out of context as to dilute my original intent, which was to reduce some drama, not add politics, but seems moot at this point. I don't blame anyone as it is a heated affair with widely varying opinions. Like other heated debates, sometimes a message gets lost in a sea of pitchforks and torches. What affects me most is that many of the people I respect the most have either retired or become inactive due to this debacle. That list includes people I consider mentors and compatriots.
6388:
will not accept such moves from the community. They’ve resisted multiple good-faith ideas, proposals, &c., and still have not really even accepted that there is a problem. I personally think that ArbCom is the best route at this point, and really the only option that hasn’t been exhausted. Writing a request shouldn’t be that hard, and I’d be certainly willing to help out in the event that that was decided. Either way, action must be taken, soon. I don’t think it is appropriate to let this drift into the past yet again.
4785:
6581:
oversighted isn't evidence, it is lack of evidence. This is why I said it has to go to Arb. As an admin, I can't even see the edits. I am not going to blindly take the word of anyone, this is a ban discussion, after all. It isn't personal, I'm also not accepting
Ironholds or the Oversighters's opinions blindly. Arbs all have Oversight tools. There is some evidence that it wasn't really outing as well. Honestly, I have no opinion on whether the evidence supports banning or not, as I haven't seen it.
3692:
1947:
1159:
31:
6746:
4330:
4255:
4114:
2815:
1374:
7890:
board bringing these matters up, I would have to list the suspected socks there, and chances are those boards would send me back here to open an SPI first to see if they should be treated as one user vs many users behaving the same way. And instead of jumping around from board to board, I felt it was best to start with an SPI before reporting the user(s). Please read the 'edit summary' here of one of the suspected socks I had listed
5379:
6355:
and become part of the solution, merge the political projects together so they aren't biased. (the others have similar problems, but aren't active). I don't know, but it isn't likely a small thing. The discussion we started actually helped because it stopped the disruption itself, giving us a little time to figure out how to deal with the inherent bias without having to rush. But it is time to make a move, one way or another.
3264:
isn't running again, I have no idea who of those is running and who isn't outside of him. Being an Arb is a thankless job and I'm quite sure it is a pain in the ass, so I try to cut a little slack, but I am frustrated at the choices that a few of them have made recently. In spite of what others may think, Malleus is rather incidental to my frustration and my concern is with the consistency and equity with the system
7617:
eventually run, any feedback on how to improve myself as a contributor would be much appreciated. (I know that right now I'm at least six months out from running. This is because of work/personal commitments that have kept me from editing
Knowledge at consistent levels for the time being, and because of a low-ish percentage of articlespace edits that I'm seeking to improve.) Thanks in advance for any response.
4886:, nothing else to know about that right, you being a librarian is plenty qualification enough. Next, File movers do a lot of things that admin do as well, which is to change the file names from "DCS19293.jpg" to something useful like "Red 1956 Chevrolet Corvette convertible.jpg" and maybe add a category or two, then go back in all the places it was linked and repair to the new name. Reading up on
4492:
block and explain it in better detail than I can. That is what it boils down for admin: how sure are you? Kind of sure? Not good enough. Reasonably sure? Not good enough. Better than 80% sure? Probably good enough to block. After all, waiting costs nothing, but blocking (and being wrong) can cost an editor. When you are wrong, that is a real person on the other end of that signature.
8245:. I did not cause the problem he is talking about, and he has wrongly accused me. So, please ignore this issue he has caused. Buster7- I'm really disappointed that you would do such a thing. I don't want to hear any more of the "why's". Please. I really think that you're nice, but don't spread my business around like dirt. It's insulting and unfair. And stop stalking me. It's uncomfortable.
4879:
451:
has been in a while, with just 20 open and 5 pending or closed. We were at over 40 open for a very long time, which means we aren't handling them in a timely fashion. It does come in waves, and I think we are understaffed to deal with even a moderate peak. CUs and clerks need to do more than just work SPI. Not healthy to only spend time there and not edit and work other areas.
6143:. I rarely give permissions and only to people I've researched a great deal or whom I am very familiar. I'm stingier with them than most, I suppose, and those guys know what to look for and do a much better job at determining than I possibly can. Honestly, I'm so overbooked I can't keep up with the load I have to do more research. I haven't even been able to do any real
4215:
it) there wasn't a stomach to start a case. I don't have a problem with those that take issue with
Malleus, but this is not a "brave" way to deal with the concerns. At a glance, your case looks like a "now that we have a foot in the door, lets slam the door wide open" situation as well. Any editor who is not in the public favor, such as Malleus, doesn't stand a chance.
4540:
not responding to my query on his talk page reinforces my suspicion that these two are the same person. But there's not enough evidence for others to go on, and at least, if they are the same person, he's not using both accounts to get his way at an article. Not yet at least. I'll leave you or someone else to add a
Welcome template on Rogr101's talk page.
7893:. Doesn't that fall under 'personal attack' according to Knowledge's guidelines? So if this user is in fact using socks, there may be more of those kind of edit summaries and I don't feel that would be considered editing in a civil manner. I may not be available on Monday or Tuesday but I'm not sure yet, so I just wanted to get this in now. Thank you.
8300:. Results are the guru. Had I not interceded who knows how many new editors might have been affected. I'm not the least bit interested in the emotional machinations of a child. False witness, indeed. I always admit my mistakes. This fiasco was not one of them. You will find me under the dresser in the corner over there with the rest of the
529:. The lynch mob mentality has been in full swing in your absence. Take a look at Malleus at Arb, where someone asked for a clarification of a previous rule and it turned into a motion to ban, when the reporter wasn't even complaining about Malleus. He is one vote away from a ban, after following the rules of the previous sanctions.
7986:
account. Not to mention the long history of this user and the past 55 or so sock accounts. I appreciate you looking again. If you don't have the time for this case, maybe another clerk can take a look then? There's also been some new evidence where Fleris has made new reverts that reverted to an IP address located in Greece as well.
3469:
falls into that classification and doesn't require a debate. The offending party should simply strike or remove the comment and clarify. If they do that, I would personally consider it sufficient to just move on. The goal is to facilitate reasonable conversation, which can get heated sometimes, but using
8429:
That is true. If needed, it shouldn't be difficult to get someone uninvolved to look at it. He is a bit bullheaded, but as Ryan pointed out, his question had gone unanswered. To be frank, I am less inclined to be patient with a single minded SPA than I am someone who is generally trying to improve
8240:
Buster. I can't believe you would blame me for that. That wasn't even my fault that was someone elses! I realized that you over react and you "alert the media" which I really don't appreciate. You've made me feel threatened and alone. You've been really welcoming and nice, but now, I've realized that
8119:
This issue deals directly with Editor Retention and how New Editors should be protected from factors they know nothing about. They dont know but they are being fed poisoned food. That may be extreme but only to express my alarm and fear. The new users this editor adopts are, without a doubt, in harms
7641:
I'm finishing up one right now, but have been tied with Arbitration and other drama filled events as of late. I will try to take a look in the next day or two and see if the basics are there for a full review and respond here. I would rather wait than be sloppy about these kinds of things, and I've
7466:
I think all that is a bit presumptive, and I'm more inclined to let the community's voice be heard on it. It is at WP:RFAR and I was actually hoping they would take it, even if as less than a full case, so that something with some teeth can be achieved. For now, I would remain neutral on your idea,
7217:
You're the CU, I will adjust as needed. Normally if a CU just says "no technical connection", I do go and try to compare behavior, it just looked like you had already done that step, based on your wording, and that no one else needed to duplicate the efforts. I will give it a look later if someone
6886:
If it works correctly, you should get "user" and "page" tabs that open up into sub-menus that have links to all kinds of useful things like rights, logs, contributions, subpages, blocks, wikichecker, and geolocate (only works on IPs). It looks like it has extra things in there for admins that I can't
6879:
Since I've stolen a few tools from your commons.js page, I thought I'd let you know about one that I've been working on. I pieced it together using code from a current Gadget and code from a retired user who wrote a predecessor to the gadget. (I had been using the gadget but didn't like it because it
6580:
Actually, I've been pretty consistent about these things, that everyone at Knowledge should be treated fairly and equitably, regardless of how popular or unpopular they are. I haven't given an opinion on whether or not he should be banned, my opinion was based solely on process. The fact that it was
6559:
In my view you generally get things right, but your comments at ANI and the arbcom request case are surprising. You say, we don't know enough to evaluate. Well, two members of the oversight team saw the material; one suppressed it, the other agreed (posting on ANI) that that was the right decision.
6387:
What we had on the talk page was essentially an RfC. There is no reason to go through the process of starting a formal version. Retitling and merging are a waste of time. These have been tried before (I proposed a retitling discussion about a year ago), and they will not work. The project “hierarchy”
5547:
of those that are on strike to peacefully voice their opinions. There is no leadership that I'm aware of, only a group of deeply concerned people who are being mislabeled and reviled for being loyal volunteers. There is room for all opinions here, and the lack of tolerance for them is symptomatic of
4604:
One more thing: Before this discussion is archived, I wanted to note here that they are both currently editing film-related articles. So if there is ever a sockpuppet case brought up against Ewawer in the future, that could be presented as evidence. Other than that, I don't have much more to state on
4539:
Well... Just like I expected (and as noted, it is characteristic of Ewawer), Rogr101 didn't reply. He continued editing after the message, and a few hours after he stopped, Ewawer finally continued editing; I saw this when it was happening, but am just now commenting here about it. Obviously, Rogr101
4214:
Yes, it wasn't my idea and I wouldn't have recommended it. The reporting party wasn't sure how to determine "involved", so I kind of listed even though I'm not really involved, per our standard definition. I do believe they have made an enormous jump there, going to a motion because (as one arb put
3455:
I don't have the link, so I'm having to offer an opinion based only on your statement. To me, if someone simply says "that is false and libelous", then that isn't so much a legal threat as a personal attack, and should be removed as such. Calling an action "libel" implies intent, that the statement
697:
I have to be honest, I agree with you assessment that no index is the best thing for this stuff, but I am totally unfamiliar with consensus on page in user space using them. I also checked the archives and see a bunch of RFC/Us that don't have no index in them. Is this a user space only thing? I'm
450:
I understand. I've mentioned the shortage to some CUs, who likely already knew that of course, but really had not heard anything but silence on the subject, so I have no idea if they agreed or not. I've noticed some Arbs getting more involved in CU as well. It does look more caught up today than it
181:
You have to sign up there to clerk, and I've been begging for us to take on new clerks but none of the CUs have been willing to. As it is now, my trainer retired, Tiptoety, and I'm still "just a trainee" so I can't train. We are in a catch 22, with not enough clerks and not enough trainers to train
8406:
In response to this discussion and the note left on my talk page, I have no patience for editors who resurrect content issues that have already clearly reached consensus with a rehash of the arguments they lost before. That said, although I have no problem reverting the changes (within limits), as I
7985:
Thank you. If CU can only go back 90 days, I believe a few of these accounts edited within the past 90 days, Koyrda66, Fleris, 212.251.116.91, 212.251.116.20. And then on behavior alone, it is a long list, but the fact that these accounts reverted to the same edits of the others should be taken into
7729:
I hate to do this, but I really don't have the time to do either right now. I still have one unfinished, and a ton of other projects that aren't finished, and I just don't want to half way do something. Plus work has picked up a great deal and I don't have as much time to spend. I just don't want
7442:
I see no reason to agree to an interaction ban, nor should one be imposed. It has been many months since I have said anything rude to YRC, and I have no intention of resuming. As for starting the ANI thread on outing -- that was an entirely proper action on my part: for those (like me) who did not
7201:
where one of the parties was editing thru a proxy, and another admin blocked as a duck. I'll mark a case checked if I've checked but want someone else to look at it - but I have only recently started doing this, I used to leave it as open before, so say if you would prefer me to do that. I'll close
7196:
Hi Dennis. I didn't realise you'd closed it. Dominus Vobisdu and IRWolfie have also presented some evidence based on behaviours that a CU couldn't identify as the edits are all too old. In such cases I'll mark it as checked, but won't close it because closer examination of the behaviour evidence may
6617:
I need a little admin break, so I won't be around much through this weekend, if at all. Can't remember taking a single day off here in 6 months, and I need to get outdoors. You know, go look at that big yellow ball in the sky, do some yardwork, fresh air and all that. If something needs looking at
6296:
I think if you still feel you've got a community option left to try, it's probably worth trying it. This Wikiproject hasn't been all over DRN/AN/ANI/Jimbo's talkpage, so it doesn't have the feel to me of a major conduct issue (at least not yet). If you want to bring an RfAR, you really need to show
6281:
Other than ArbCom, the best option seems to me to be, maybe, to propose a retitling or merger of the project with WikiProject Politics, and maybe filing an RfC on the proposal, saying basically, as per RGloucester above, that the basic preliminary discussion seems to have ended, and time has come to
5990:
never even answered my concern. That he didn't vote (but didn't officially recuse) is not the same, particularly since my concerns were never even acknowledged after politely but directly being expressed on his talk page. You guys know how I am, I'm funny about "respect" that way. But, it isn't my
5985:
to Malleus, even if the discussion is about an FA or article, for as soon as someone says "he is at RfA", Malleus must shut up or risk banning again. Why they chose to word this so poorly, when clarity would have been just as easy, I have no idea. Arb has jumped out of the frying pan, and into the
5871:
Thanks, Dennis...I reverted all the garbage from the Notable list in that article several days ago, and as of yet, none of it has re-appeared. The only problem I had is the absolute stupidity in the comments at the userpage. Sorry, I know...AGF. The only good faith I can offer is that the editor,
4860:
Hi Dennis, I'd like to ask for another set of permissions, as you suggested in your RfA review for me. Even though pending changes isn't enabled, I think I'd be a competent reviewer. You seem to have given me a good lookover for that review, but if you'd like to know any more before giving me such a
4491:
Just keep an eye out. If I block someone, I have to be able to explain in fine detail why, they they are related, and how I've ruled "coincidence". There is no doubt that you would know better than I here, as you are familiar and "gut instinct" can play a role. If you had the admin bit, you could
4476:
Yes, again looking at the articles Rogr101 has edited and analyzing the contribution histories of those articles, I see how it can be stated that there isn't yet much of an overlap; that's the only thing that adds doubt in my head that they are the same person, because Rogr101 is editing topics that
2904:
for opinions. ;) I like the existing one at Stevens city, by a large margin. The colors provide additional information and the compact nature makes it easier to compare months. I've only done a couple of those charts, and wouldn't have even considered using your first example, which is larger and
2226:
I respect if an Arb thinks the ban should take place, even if I strongly disagree. I do think it should have been a case, not a motion in an unrelated request for clarification, which looks like a backdoor attempt to ban him, even if it isn't. And yes, I completely agree that some changes might be
1804:
I've made a couple of minor comments in other areas. Will have to ponder more before adding anything else. Civility is more a concept than a tangible thing, so we have to be really careful how we define what is and isn't civil. The idea that we shouldn't use ad hominem on talk pages I agree with,
1731:
And I appreciate the sincere and thoughtful discussion. Even though my opinion hasn't changed on this one proposal, I've gained some experience understanding why some want the AdminCom or similar, so that helps me as well. And of course, you are always welcome to come here and discuss any topic, I
1557:
management doesn't work very well in a volunteer organization. Redundancy and handling everything at the lowest possible level does work, which is why many organization shun top down methods. They can be inefficient and bad for morale, as people at the lowest level are less emotionally invested in
1216:
I was being generic, and I am a Yankee, so I'm not familiar with all the other old services. If I were looking at CU data, I likely would learn it soon enough, I suppose. But it was likely and old style service, based on her cryptic response. I have trouble reading Elen sometimes, but CUs have to
854:
user has used the same IPs, to pick up new accounts you didn't know about. Checking for sleepers takes longer and is only done when that is likely to be the issue. You have to ask for a sleeper check manually, and they might not run it anyway. CU has final decision on all things CU. I can't even
8466:
I am not sure what you mean by SPA and other such comments. I am new to wikipedia editing and I decided to start because I am interested in this particular person since he is a personal hero to several people from India, including myself. I have attempted to put together data for every single award
7913:
accounts. I will go and check the ONE current editor, but you presented a wall of info that was mainly very, very stale. If an account hasn't edited in the last couple of months. No admin is likely to spend the great deal of time needed to establish a link, with the goal of "stopping" the editor,
6589:
seen the evidence to make the decision, some who have personal vendettas, is not optimal. He is already blocked, a short delay while we do this the right way, the fair way, doesn't cost us anything. So I haven't disagreed (or agreed) with your conclusion, I just want us to do this the right way,
6354:
The last two or three weeks, I've been really thinking about alternatives, trying to avoid Arb simply because I prefer to handle problems at the lowest level possible. I've got a couple of ideas, but I need a few days off, then come back with a fresh perspective. Maybe we just need to all join up
6227:
The problem being that it is election season for ArbCom, I fear, and I would imagine a desire to not take on anything for a few months, which is unfortunate. I've emailed a few times asking for guidance, and Elen was kind enough to reply back to ask more info, but I haven't seen anything in reply.
5916:
Malleus is topic banned from making edits concerning the RFA process anywhere on the English Knowledge. As an exception, he may ask questions of the candidates and express his own view on a candidate in a specific RFA (in the support, oppose, or neutral sections), but may not engage in any threaded
4443:
Overlap is different than Editor A stopping on Monday, and Editor B starting on Tuesday. They have to be intermingled. I'm not saying "no", I'm saying wait a bit. The one has only had one edit since the second editor started. Jumping into an investigation too soon is the primary cause of "might
2715:
I came across this article indirectly through CSD. A nightmare. I removed entire sections from it that made me cringe to look at them, and then I stopped before I slashed the article any further. If you're feeling masochistic - or, better still, if one of your page stalkers is an expert in Islam -
2670:
So my instinct was right. Back when I patrolled regularly, the backlog was closer to 15 to 20 days, but I tried to always work from the back to keep any from falling off the fact of the page. You miss the "low hanging fruit", but that was never my goal, it was to cleanup after they had a go at it
2521:
And I'm much more tolerant of pointy discussion on my talk page than at ANI, where my objective is to reduce drama and keep the discussion moving in as positive a fashion as possible. Since MONGO and I have very different opinions on a variety of issues (but no animosity toward each other), I felt
2505:
is the tone of a rightwinger who is listening to too much rightwing talk radio. Obviously MONGO does not like that observation, because it's accurate. He couldn't say that he doesn't occasionally sound like Glenn Beck, and I was trying to give him the feedback that he does, and that it doesn't help
2211:
I'm no fan of Malleus but there's no arguing that he's a first class content editor and perhaps one of the best and most prolific we have. That makes him very much a Wikipedian, and Jclemens comment was beyond the pale. Bit late now, but it might have set a precedent to have taken him to
911:
It depends. But no, if a CU uses a "checkuserblock" I can not unblock them regardless. That is a special type of block, meaning "I know things you don't". Technically, it is just a block, but the summary will indicate that it is a cu block and reversing one can get you desysoped. Also, not every
7889:
Just one more thing to add. The reason I came to the SPI board first was so that the suspected socks could be investigated to see if they are in fact 'one' user. The concerns I have go beyond that - which involve fraud, ethnical/cultural issues, etc. But I had a feeling that if I went to any other
7778:. He appears to not have been given any warning about legal threats before being blocked out of hand. Obviously the editor is a bit clueless, with the block evasion, but it certainly doesn't merit the indefinite block (has anyone actually explained the issue to him, he doesn't know what's going on
7307:
Kind of late, since he is already blocked. Annoying works with people who are unresponsive when you have tried time and time again to communicate with them, but they won't talk page, AND they haven't been blocked yet....but are about to be. This edit was not only blocked, and it looks like a ban
4372:
There are some users' editing habits that I know so well that I'd recognize them almost instantly and I believe this to be the case with Rogr101, and I commented as much on his user talk page. So where do I go with this from here? It doesn't seem that this needs reporting since the Ewawer account,
3640:
No problem, I'm always open to explaining my actions, particularly when they aren't obvious at first blush. I generally revert socks/trolls as a rule, and if anyone reverts me, I leave it alone and out of respect for the regular editors of that article. At the end of the day, the quality of the
3468:
as well. There are circumstances where the phrase might be used and the totality of the statement could be said to have "a chilling effect" (the standard for legal threat) as well, but context matters. If it is a borderline case, it is better to just handle as a personal attack, since it clearly
3281:
My comment "It appears I have little support" was referring only to the lack of interested parties on that one Arb's page. As to the level of support elsewhere on Knowledge, I feel very fortunate that many editors have been quite generous in their overall support, as well as very forgiving for my
3263:
If you concern is about Jclemens, NewYorkBrad, Calisper, SirFozzie, David Fuchs, Elen of the Roads, Xeno or PhilKnight, I think they are up for election in November and the best way to handle it is to vote, as no proceeding would likely be done in time to make a difference. I heard that SirFozzie
1286:
Finally getting to listen to it now. Had to down a pair of plum trees, 20 footers, log and stack the brush. Tired now. That is an unusual blend of flamenco, with just a touch of Middle-east blended in, and a nice syncopated beat behind it. Reminds of something I would listen to in my medicinal
916:
indef a sock, but I see exceptions a few times a week, ie: the Master's name is actually a bad user name, so we just swap them around and indef it, and let them keep the sock after a short vacation. Stuff like that. That is the key, learning the nuances. But the "clerking" part of SPI Clerks is
8347:
In regards to Tib42, he’s not entirely at fault. He attempted to discuss the issue and we sort of “wikifilibustered” by not engaging in discussion. The discussion wasn’t a long one in which overwhelming consensus was reached after a good discussion on all points. The discussion was closed with
8304:
fuzzballs. Or, maybe I'll retire to that safe room that was reserved for you. The only good thing about all this is to meet Cindaruse and Keindra. Last comment:I did not over-react. Now I'm a stalker. Someone needs to sit this child down and explain how things work around here. I have removed all
7908:
Ok, went back and looked. The main reason I closed it because almost all the editors haven't edited recently. Not even in the last few months. This raises two problems: 1. CU can only check back 90 days, so CU would be useless. 2. It would have to be determined solely by behavior. This is a
4428:
You mean article overlap? Like I stated, they have that. And per my analysis above, I'm certain that both editors are the same person. Then again, I have been familiar with this editor since 2007. But I don't see anything that indicates that he needs to be blocked. It's just that even though he's
1684:
You already have the right to nominate and vote for the actual admin, but you choose to not do so. It doesnt' take even 5 hours to do a reasonable background search. I do admin reviews all the time. And you do rely on your own searching, the opinions of others you trust who are voting, and the
1552:
moving forward, and do a great many admin reviews, in addition to participating in most RfAs. I'm of the belief that as we grow, we need to shift more power away from the top, and empower non-admins as well. The plan you are supporting would do the exact opposite, by concentrating more power in
970:
Regarding "in depth checks", the only way a check could not be in depth is if the checkuser on the case decided simply not to look at half of the data returned by the check, in which case he should almost certainly not be a checkuser. This is especially true since the tool can often tell you that
8213:
got involved because of (1) all the hard work that was required to fix the confusion that one of Raiden/Deidras adoptees caused at an article, (2) supported the fact that Raiden/Deidra's improper instructions caused the confusion, and (3) removed the Adoption Box from Raiden/Deidra's page. Her
7616:
I noticed that you stated on your user page that you were willing to give editor reviews to people mildly interested in RfA. I've been mulling over an adminship run for a while and am looking for feedback on how to improve myself in preparation for this. Regardless of whether or not I decide to
5700:
scanner will only allow access by yourself and neccesary Foundation personnel (The folks you see with the white lab coats and the golden shoulder epillettes. The folks without the epillettes are Security). Your use of the room is completely self-determined and, once you enter, assistance will be
4524:
Thanks, Dennis. I don't want Ewawer blocked, though, as mentioned. Not unless he inappropriately continues to use both accounts, if he is operating both accounts that is. But whether Rogr101 is Ewawer or not, I think it's safe to state that he isn't new to editing Knowledge. He might have been a
1867:
if it wasn't at all on topic. That is only when I'm an uninvolved editor. I think you will always have to have it removed by someone uninvolved (no need to be an admin really) for the concept to be accepted. While it isn't currently policy, I think most admin would support an uninvolved editor
1651:
I want the right to democratically nominate a proxy, someone I trust to speak for me in this selection process. That is, I want a say in who becomes an admin, but I don't want to have to put in 5, 10, or 20 hours doing the background research necessary to do that well, and neither should all the
1633:
representative selection process, not less. Presently admins are selected by whoever turns up at RfA, and as far as I can see, most !voters are doing so on flimsy criteria. I rarely !vote because I rarely know enough about the candidate to make a valuable judgment; and that is the case with many
1095:
A likely scenario where a check for sleepers might take longer is if socks are found over a relatively wide dynamic range that is also shared by other, unrelated users. In that case, separating the wheat from the chaff might take considerably longer (especially if the range is busy) than if the
611:
He is a new user, so I don't want to block him off the bat. I left a polite but blunt notice on his talk page, explaining why he can't add the material back without going to the talk page, and explaining he will be blocked if he continues to edit war. Most of the time, this is enough to either
6266:
Dennis, there's only so many ways I can say this - and I seem to have said it several times now. If you want to get Arbcom involved in this, you will have to bring a case. The Committee can't say whether or not it would take a case unless someone lays the evidence out on all sides, and it can
6060:
This may not be the right venue, but what the heck. First, I'll agree the wording isn't ideal. We may yet (shudder) be facing a clarification request. Back on point, I read it a bit more narrowly. The ban relates to the RFA process, in the first sentence. It is broadened slightly in the second,
8261:
Buster is harmless, a little fuzzball, he just got a little bent out of shape. You shouldn't be adopting people yet Deidra, and the damage it can cause got him upset, maybe a little too much, but his heart was in the right place. Your heart was in the right place by wanting to help people, I
3855:
Someone had to stop his madness ;) And since I've been dragged into the current Arb debacle by being named as an involved party (really, I wasn't, but I didn't have much of a choice once declared), I guess it is poking a little fun at myself, while reminding us all what we are really here for,
1116:
Oh no Deskana, never apologize for educating me, I'm genuinely interesting in understanding better for probably obvious reasons. And thanks for your explanation as well Coren. The more I know, the more effective I can be. Often, I will have an idea of the range that is likely to be used by
921:
admin Clerks do both. Some don't actually. We have a couple clerks that mainly shuffle papers rather than make blocks. All Clerks are expected to do more than do the blocks, however, and must shuffle the paperwork. It is not too hard to learn, but there are very specific ways to do it. I
5779:
And now a new IP is adding more defamation. see last section. Not as severe, but at a loss. Can I just delete this obvious nonsense? Silly season applies to more than just the election. Just realized the time back east, so I am just gonna ignore til tomorrow. sorry to bother you so late.
5026:
No problem. I have done the exact thing once or twice as a clerk, outlined a beautiful explanation of how the two editors "must" be the same, to have the CU reply on the investigation page only with the line "Where is the abuse?" That takes the air of your balloon after all that work, so I
4525:
different registered user or editing as only an IP before now, but editors who are truly new to Knowledge don't use "Ce" (which is of course short for "copyedit") in their edit summaries when they edit Knowledge...unless they learn it; it's something you learn from others while editing here.
3625:
Gotcha! I was confused that such an experienced admin would have made that revert, but it makes sense that you were viewing it through a different lens based on data I was not seeing; I do think the content as provided, even by a potential sock, is a huge improvement over the prior content,
2958:
so far, but want to get a wide variety of opinions before I go nuts and start editing away. So far it's 1 for compact and colors, 2 for large and intuitive and 1 on the fence. I am thinking of a way to somehow create one that is both large and intuitive, but has the colors...kind of a
7946:
I've looked, and I can't definitively link. It is possible, but I'm not convinced enough to block. I notice they reported you to SPI, and you got a block (later overturned) so I have to wonder if it is a personal issue between the two of you. This would be beyond the scope of SPI.
4429:
been around since 2007, he's unfamiliar with most of Knowledge's policies and guidelines. If he participated in talk page discussions more often, he wouldn't be. But there is also the option of just reading up on those things oneself, which I don't believe he's done for the most part.
3509:
I'm not touching on the NLT aspect as others have already done so. However, although I am unsure how it works in the US, here in the UK libel and slander have one principle difference in law: the former is written and the latter is spoken. Either can be defamation of character etc. -
2081:
Heh, none of us makes that much difference, but, collectively, we may have some soothing influence. At the moment, I'm just waiting to see if my close of the latest ANI discussion holds. I probably won't be around tonight, though. All I can do is hope that people will stop piling it
8241:
I was wrong about you. You're really nice, so don't take this the wrong way, but I can't believe you would do such a horrible thing to me! Dennis,you don't mind, please ignore the issue. If you don't want to, it's okay, but I'd like you to. Also Dennis, Buster7 has accused me under
3105:
I think everyone would agree with you that consistency is a good thing and why fix what ain't broken. I will put it up for a !vote once I get all the bugs worked out on WP:MOS, but I have a feeling it won't come out on top. :) Thanks for your opinion (you too Go Phightins!). -
2457:
I have left notices in a number of venues, formally asking Jclemens to recuse himself. As I've said everywhere, it isn't personal, it is about protecting the integrity of the process. He did finally strike the one comment, which is helpful, but doesn't erase the obvious bias.
1567:
We have some exceptional talent at Knowledge. Our best authors are not admin. They are people who don't want to be bothered with mopping up, and just want to create content. They depend on a system that allows them to be left alone, yet they can participate at any level
6028:. That they exist is enough to ban him. Actually, the remedy is "block", but it will instantly be at Arb with a ban discussion, the way this one degraded when it was only a clarification request. There are a number of people willing to file it there, of this I am sure.
7283:
966:
Checking for sleepers creates no difference in how long it takes to carry out the check; it might take much more time or may take much less time, depending on the nature of the technical evidence. If anything, checking for sleepers is easier and less time consuming, not
3072:
I have to admit that I like consistency in the encyclopedia. Whatever we choose, it should probably be used wiki-wide. That might need a larger discussion once you have fine tuned it on one of the MOS pages, and a bot to change all the cities if your ideas won out.
7400:
I've asked, and so has YRC, for a mutual interaction ban between YRC and Nomoskedasticity. By all means formalise what Prioryman proposes here, but please leave the thread open while we await Nomo's response; and the sub-thread calling for a boomerang is unresolved.
5980:
This was ill worded from the beginning. Again. As soon as Malleus mentions someone who is at RfA on his talk page, even if the discussion isn't about the RfA, someone will drag him to Arb Enforcement. That means that anyone who files a RfA will instantly become
7419:
Has anyone asked Nomo about an IBAN? There's no proposal or voting on one on AN/I. I would suggest dealing with Nomo/YRC and myself/YRC as two distinct issues - whether Nomo agrees to an IBAN or not has no bearing on YRC and I agreeing (as we have already done).
440:
The "real" discussion is ongoing on the functionary mailing list between the checkusers. It really is just my fault: we obviously all perceived the need for new clerks, but I didn't notice the talk starting yesterday afternoon before I decided being bold. :-)
2020:
If you weren't so important to keeping ANI less horrible, I'd tell you to unwatch it. Maybe if you left, the vitriol would rise to a level where it ceases all functioning. Soon enough people would learn to solve their problems without begging for a ban or a
6183:
Until the final outcome of Pending Changes is known, it appears that admins have apparently (and probably wisely) self-imposed a moratorium on granting Reviewer rights. There are already over 5,000 editors with this right so there is no urgency.
922:
wouldn't endorse or decline or do anything "clerky" until you are listed as a clerk. They haven't accepted you as clerk yet, although it is obvious that I think you would do well enough that I was willing to bump you to the head of the line as a trainee.
5475:
That is a left over right that isn't currently active. I've not given, as I don't want it to look like hat collecting with an unusable user right. I still need to read up more about pending changes myself, I'm not sure how any of that is going to work.
392:
a discussion started about promotions – so I ended up jumping the gun and overriding everyone else by fiat. :-) I hope you'll forgive me if I say that you shouldn't consider my promoting you as valid until the discussion takes its course. I didn't even
6282:
make a decision. If, as some projects, including Conservatism, have done in the past, and the Conservatism project talk page is redirected to the WikiProject Politics talk page, I think most of the problems might be at least basically addressed. Maybe.
4960:
and have given the required information and evidence there. I believe it would be quite easy for any SPI clerk like you to have a review over it and endorse/approve it so that Investigation completes soon, and we all get the results soon ;) Regards.
5872:
and I still think it is just one or a connected group, legitimately feels that these people belong and do not understand the concept of notability, and are apparently ready to lie, fabricate or whatever else it takes to get their people on a list.
6838:
I was just thinking I needed to thank you for submitting. That is my third, I've upped my ratio to one every two years! I'm still working on the auto articles, which I'm hoping to have to at least GA quality by the time I get them to mainspace.
2171:, and he did this right before Arb elections this year, which is unfortunate timing for him as I sincerely doubt that the public will forget this. It is one thing to support the ban, everyone has opinions and I respect that, but to declare him
8008:
It is not a personal issue. My case was already discussed with the Arb Committee. The case I provided here shows diffs with evidence and has nothing to do with anything else. If you like me to ask another Administrator to look at this, I will.
6680:
Ignoring all rules, I unilaterally accord Dennis permission to take the weekend off without an RfC to decide. I'm not on strike (yet) and though I can't do it as well as Dennis I will be quite happy to hold the fort alone...
3779:
I am far from the best editor we have here, that is certain, and have never reviewed a GA, but I will be happy to take a look and offer any assistance I can. Even though I'm an old man, I am still a student when it comes to quality prose.
7384:
YRC and I have both agreed to a voluntary IBAN, as proposed on AN/I, and I've offered to withdraw my request for a site ban so that we can move on from this matter. Would you be up for implementing the IBAN and updating AN/I on the result?
1780:
While I think about that, can I just say we've got a real problem at Knowledge with the general quality of argument. I'm no expert rhetorician but I've read a little about it and ours is crap. One major element of this is the tolerance for
2580:
I have been going through and patrolling some of the unpatrolled user talk pages and I was wondering if there is a specific reason that the earliest pages listed there are only a month old? Are pages automatically patrolled after a month?
337:
Ouch. Real life is the first priority. My wife has been gone for days, family illness, and just got home. That is MY priority right now, just being with the most important person in my life. So I will wish you all a good evening. :)
5848:
As I have pointed out to GTW, during the protection period, I will be verifying the current information for this HS and for Whitney Young, another Chicgoland HS article with potential vandal presense. I'm not sure if WYHS is protected.
6702:
That didn't work out so well. I've received more email in the last 24 hours than you can shake a stick at, plus the YRC/ANI/Arb issue. sigh... Will try to take a break again after the Wikiproject Conservatism case is over, I guess.
3162:
I don't like it as well. The other chart, the colors varied according to the numbers. Higher numbers had different colors, so it showed a gradient. This was true for rain, highs, lows, sunshine, etc. Now it is just flat numbers.
6564:
a problem. (Now, on top of that, I saw it before it was oversighted -- even if one doesn't agree that it was outing, there was an aggressive, taunting quality to it that amounts to a blatant violation of the civility restriction.)
7504:
Hi Dennis. I've read other editors' descriptions of your mentorship experience but I don't think I've read a comprehensive summary from you. If you have posted it, could you please point me to it; if you haven't, would you like to?
5891:
5701:
provided within 24 hours (They are a bit short-staffed). Just make yourself comfortable in the middle of the room. The padding and the lack of furniture are for your protection. Someone will be with you shortly. Have a nice day! ```
793:
Cool gruel - lol - learning is a tough process - so it seems - (no link though...) - pages moved to process are automatically NOINDEX-ed but pages in userspace are not and need NOINDEX-ing to stop them appearing in google results -
5339:
I see it is at MfD, I've voiced in there. Best to leave it to that discussion. I wasn't sure if we agreed on that point or not, glad to see we do. As a community, we need to stop nickel and diming our editors over minor things.
3393:
Hey man, I understand there is a good bit of admin politics going on right now, so I hopefully won't take up much of your time. I was just wondering, if a user expresses an opinion in a talk page that one sentence in an article is
2506:
his case one bit. Not an "attack", just an honest question and some honest feedback -- pointedly formulated, yes, but at least it's no libelous lie of the sort MONGO likes to tell. Anyway, just wanted to get that off my chest. --
7871:
Hi. I see that you are away for the weekend so don't worry about replying to this until you get back. I have some concerns about the SPI case I had opened recently. Could you please explain to me why you dismissed this case --
2769:
I no longer see an email tab when I look at your page. I have something sensitive I would like to discuss with you. I am not sure if it is a matter of settings or what, but I have email enabled so could you drop me a line?
595:
seems intent on causing a edit war with contributions which are unreferenced and appear to be POV. I would be grateful for your advice on whether you consider the page should be protected. With best regards, as ever, David.
3015:
are cool to me and different from everything else, but then again so am I. :) I figure people will say "don't rock the boat" and keep things as they are, which is cool. I can accept that, I just like being different. :) -
2909:
more in order to glean information from it. The second one seems more intuitive. Might be because I'm used to it, but I think the compact nature and colors are the real reason. "Tacky" isn't a big deal to me if it is more
6121:
Hello Sir,I recently got rollback rights after some good work related to vandalism and apart from that i want to get reviewer rights too then what to do and where to improve myself so i will able to grab reviewer rights in
1553:
fewer people. When I said I would hand in my admin bit and retire Knowledge if that type of policy was enacted, I wasn't being melodramatic. And I wouldn't be alone. Too much power at the top always leads to corruption.
3991:". As I would not say Mitt Romney is against abortion except for rape victims I would say except for cases of rape. Also If you could check out the talkpage for Tom Smith for that sections other problems it would be great
1471:
I've replied there. Seems to be a bit of overreactions in a situation where they could just add a touch more criticism if they felt it was necessary, without changing the quality of the article, and without delisting it.
7311:. Actually, that entire ban discussion was premature and not in good form. The indef seems to have support. If he can "get it", he can request an unblock. I may look it closer tomorrow, I'm likely out for the night.
8369:
Actually, he is an SPA who may have a COI and has only continued to add them back, pushing the bounds of good faith to its limit. Granted, it shouldn't have been ignored. I removed the final warning from his page....
2500:
I'm fine with the redaction, as long as it's done by an uninvolved person. Just to make this very clear though: I understand that my question may be read as an attack of sorts. But it was a completely sincere question.
6023:
Oh Ryan, to answer your question: Yes, if he said something polite as he did to you, it would be grounds to permanently ban him. The wording is quite clear, and doesn't differentiate positive and negative comments.
6880:
removed a lot of helpful tabs (like watch/unwatch), and I didn't like the older code because it didn't have nearly the same functionality as the gadget.) Anyway if you'd like to take it for a test drive, the code is
5324:
and it could use some level heading admining from you; I would consider it a personal favor if you'd be willing to mediate. I'm done with it now, better things to do and what not. Thanks if you can offer any help.
3436:
Context is going to be the determing factor. Compare "this is false and I'm concerned it may be libelous" to "this is false and libelous and you must remove it now or face further action". Got an example in mind?
7343:
Oy, I've injected myself a bit in this matter, but I'm not ready to go out on a limb. It was all amazingly hasty, was it not? But he is still a problem editor. That doesn't mean he is beyond redemption, however.
4894:
should give you a good idea of the need and the hows, and I would recommend that as a next step. This should be pretty easy for you and I would guess to see you back in a week for the bit so you can work on it.
3227:
you have overwhelming support. I'm sure you're more well-versed in the ins and outs of Wiki-policy than I. What is the correct process to attempt to remove an arb who refuses the requests of the people to recuse?
7301:
5937:
Where would I get some clarification on this? Or Dennis, do you have a thought? Is Malleus allowed to discuss a specific RfA with the person who is or was running? For example, would the comments he left at
407:
I've reverted the SPI page and will tell Ryan. I've had one email from my trianer, and none from anyone else. I have no idea who the "real" is, which makes learning and doing rather difficult and confusing.
2167:
That has to be the stupidest act a "neutral" party can commit, and the most biased thing I've seen come out of an Arb at Arbitration. Jclemens received just 60% of the vote resulting in a one year term last
1504:
Hi. Thanks for the response. I have been expecting this day since this user appeared in WP:FAC and said those things. You guys were also worried but about something else that I don't remember. Best regards,
3268:. It is about the greater principle at work more than this individual case. Outside of elections, I am not sure what the removal process is, although I'm not ready to sign on to removing anyone just yet.
6585:, I expect us, as a community, to treat YRC the same as we would treat you or I, and make sure that before we permanently ban someone, that a fair process has been followed. Allowing 100 people who have
6483:
Dennis is away over the weekend so I hope you'll not mind me answering here. The page has now been full protected by another admin. It does seem as if 76.232.253.147 has more experience than their 24
990:
Thanks for the clarification. I can't remember where, but I was told sleeper checks took extra time, by a CU. That is odd. But most importantly, I'm glad you corrected my errors Deskana, thank you.
4948:
2045:
Oh, I'm not so sure that I make that much difference. Drama seems to find its way there just fine whether or not I'm there. I will try to keep an eye out, but have a few things going on here as well.
1334:, both of which have always evoked strong emotions. The story behind Freddie's is particularly moving, and I had always considered him the greatest male vocalist of the era. Moody day, I suppose.
6311:
Actually, the members were all over ANI before the discussion started, and then the problems stopped, and the project founder hasn't replied to any email or edited since DGG made his first edit.
8143:
Not sure what can be added on the talk page, but I agree that this is not a user we want adopting people for a variety of reasons. They don't understand policies or how things really work here.
1450:
5930:
5907:
4196:
1544:
I can tell a lot of thought went into your perspective and I respect your opinion, but this isn't the first time I've seen the idea of replacing RfA with a selection committee. I've started
1035:
That is a likely explanation. I can read httpd logs all day long, but have never seen the voodoo tools that actual CUs use, a non-CU can never understand until they have the tools in hand.
4976:
Excellent detective work, serious. But there is no abuse. Ie: no crossover in edits, no deception at AFD, so I have to assume it really is two editors that share an IP, which is allowed.
1612:
You assert that electing representatives to select and manage admins will "shift power to the top." Accountable representatives are neither above nor below the community as a whole, they're
1786:
7796:
He needs to stop using that other account, which is still socking and wait a week. I'm completely sympathetic here, but he is compounding it. I'm out of pocket this weekend (see above),
3578:. The content you reverted was actually a significant improvement over the original content in terms of both formatting and informational value, and was most definitely not a vandal edit.
2291:
I think he agrees. I didn't notice it at the time or I might have been tempted to do what Floq did, put a block template on his talk page for personal attacks, as a shot across the bow.
1067:
Indeed. These misunderstandings didn't actually affect the way you preform your duties as a clerk, so it's not really a problem in my opinion. Still, I couldn't keep my mouth shut. :-) --
6267:
evaluate the situation. None of us is going to go look at the project talkpage and say "yes, bring a case". So either bring a case or don't. It is up to you, not up to the Committee. --
5986:
fire with this one. New elections are coming up, so a partial fresh crop of Arbs will get to cut their teeth on this one soon enough, I promise. Oh well, no one asked my opinion, and
4970:
1104:
we're doing them that changes (for instance, we normally wouldn't checkuser on a very transparent duck unless there were reasons to believe that there might be more socks sleeping). —
7574:
Since he officially "rejected" me as his mentor due to my opining, and the case is ongoing, I would likely hold off. It is in the history of his talk page if anyone were interested.
4377:
attempt (albeit the wrong way to do it). We can wait for a reply, but Ewawer usually doesn't reply on his user talk page or discuss matters at/take matters to an article talk page.
963:
In terms of how one uses the checkuser tool, there's no substantial difference between checking two accounts for a relation to each other and checking a single account for sleepers.
328:
I'm still trying to fix some things in Real Life that are consuming an inordinate amount of my time. I've been out of work for a year now, this does tend to mess up priorities. —
5692:, brings to mind special arrangements that have been made to provide for your well being pursuant to your inevitable mental health issues. A special safe room has been prepared by
5737:
4590:
Nah. I meant it that I don't want the guy blocked (unless he resorts to using both accounts to get his way at an article), and, as we've agreed, there just isn't enough evidence.
5199:. Personally, I've had enough and don't care anymore. Sorry to be so negative on your talk page but it's just annoying when some of us work so hard and then this keeps happening.
5075:
is deleting entire sections which have journal article citations. Can you please take a look? I'm writing to you cause I think you are the admin who were looking into this page.
1096:
socks were found in a relatively narrow range or pretty much by themselves – in which case the sleepers stick out like sore thumbs and are easy to see. The point is, the actual
3593:
Ah, I had reverted because it was a blocked troll sock that had made that edit, but I will trust your judgement if you think it is best to put it back. Thanks for the heads up.
7443:
know Prioryman's RL identity, YRC's conduct amounted to outing, a conclusion reached also by two oversighters. (The only way to read my actions otherwise is to believe that I
6907:
Ah, sounds interesting. I will give it a spin either late tonight or tomorrow, I like to really debug new scripts so they don't go crazy and block Jimbo or anything. Thanks!
4703:
Can you userfy this article for me please, I am quite sure this fellow passes the notability guidlines such as WP:AUTHOR and GNG. I asked Boing, but he is on strike currently.
6340:
Yes, I'll take that back, they were at one point. But it really is your move - do you see a community process working, or some alternative tactic, or is RfAR the only resort.
5743:
4444:
be, but not enough evidence yet" which means a connection isn't made, and you've tipped them off. I suggest waiting a few days to see what happens, but keeping an eye out.
397:
consensus was being build; I was just clearly thinking along the same lines as everybody else alone in my room while the real discussion was taking place elsewhere. :-) —
6949:. You can copy them into your userspace if you'd like, changing the Adjwilleys to Dennis Browns. (The 1st links to the 2nd once). The second link is a direct copy-paste of
287:
Well, DoRD is still active and Berean's trainer so I think that this particular decision is his to take. :-) That said, he might simply not have thought about it yet. —
5900:
5606:
Galt is a "character" (which may be a prerequisite to become a User) but, to date, no one has assummed his moniker. User:Eubank must have read, and enjoyed, the novel. ```
6652:
First, there are no other admins - aren't they all on strike or something? Second, you need to clear this with your supervisor. Finally, enjoy your well-deserved break.--
4956:
Hello Dennis! Happy to see and talk to you after many weeks. I just recently came back after a short Wikibreak of about a month. I have started a quite simple SPI report
8305:"hooks" regarding this editor from my watchlist. I'll bet a dollar to a donut that some new miss-step is right around trhe corner. AGF goes only so far. 'nuff said. ```
7144:
Could you please reopen the SPI on Logical 1 until Elen has time to respond to the comments just made by IRWolfie and myself? I think you closed it prematurely. Thanks.
6784:
4171:
2100:
I don't want to have to get heavy handed if it doesn't, but the drama needs to stop, that is certain. I'm dropping a note here and there, trying to smooth things over.
5806:
5755:
5466:
1920:
is uncontroversial and if we explicitly disallow it on article talk pages, eliminating it will be as simple as pointing at the policy or guideline that disallows it. --
912:
sock is indef. And I can unblock an indef sock if I want to, assuming I have a reason. There are no black and white rules, but there are rules of thumb. So yes, you
8018:
5436:
2563:
2511:
734:
Thanks Dennis I have asked at AN - its just common practice as I have experienced, I am also unaware of a link to the exact action - - so lets see what Admins say -
530:
8115:, is insisting on adopting other "fresh from the incubator" new users. Considering assorted factors it can only lead to the detriment of the New Users she adopts.
677:
page - I have explained on his talkpage - If he doesn't replace the noindex at his earliest convenience please assist in explaining the situation to him - thanks -
7198:
6349:
5893:
4062:
4000:
2979:
Keep in mind, many people don't have wide screens, or use mobile devices. There are good reasons for a compact table and contrasting color besides just "looks".
5601:
1658:
cluster of editors who turn up at RfA are doing a good job; do you think they represent my values; do you think they truly represent the community as a whole? --
102:
8080:
8050:
7995:
7941:
7779:
7730:
to do a half way job, and I know that I'm going to be very busy for the next couple of months. Sorry, but I have to decline, in order to be fair to you both.
4185:
3370:
3237:
2412:
I have no idea what is happening, but it beats the hell out of real life right now. Jclemens seems to be the subject of at least two major notice boards. WTF?--
7914:
if they have already stopped. It is pointless and CU data is only kept for 90 days, so it is useless as well. Again, I will go back and check the one now.
5673:
Uh, just because the user page is a redlink doesn't mean the account isn't registered. It has a talk page and even contribs (dating back to 2005, but still).
4849:
4817:
4099:
4033:
2698:
2665:
2635:
1252:. So the magic ball indicates that Nole (as Fancy Smith) now uses that as his mobile provider. I don't know what grannies use wherever Spar Strangled lives...
891:
You could unblock the master, right? To my knowledge, socks are indeffed, never to be unblocked, masters are blocked and treated as any other blocked editor.
7277:
7245:
6675:
6382:
6276:
2175:
and unilaterally declare him a non-Wikipedian just adds to the drama and makes blowups like tonight happen, as it declares "open season" on a fellow editor.
1023:
You're welcome. The amount of time it takes to check for sleepers does vary on a case by case basis. Perhaps they were referring to that case specifically. --
150:
6603:
6533:
6519:
6306:
6291:
6210:. There is little left to say there, and I’m rather concerned that the discussion will go nowhere, as it has in the past. Do you know anything of interest?
7190:
6502:
OK, my thanks to you! the IP and I will discuss things on the article's talk until the full protection is lifted. S/he seems amenable enough. Thanks again!
5623:
4745:
4040:
657:
639:
7696:
7669:
5503:
5054:
5021:
5003:
3528:
It is the same here, libel is written, slander is spoken. Accusing someone of either is incivil or a personal attack if it isn't substantiated, however.
3448:
3218:
2567:
2549:
2165:
1916:
is very easy to identify: it addresses the motives or competency of the interlocutor. That's about as easy to recognise as a secondary source. Recognising
702:
him to do this, even if I agree it is the best thing to do. Not sure of the authority of such a statement, simply because I've not run across it before.
7456:
3962:
3930:
3295:
As for Dan Fogelberg, that was worth a smile. I've heard a few comparisons to different people, but I don't see it. At least no on has said I look like
3067:
2485:
2452:
2421:
1499:
7974:
7757:
7714:
7601:
7569:
7551:
7371:
6730:
6690:
3901:
3500:
3328:
3252:
3209:
3190:
3120:
3100:
3030:
3006:
2973:
2941:
1929:
1895:
1858:
1832:
1759:
1726:
1712:
1667:
1599:
1465:
808:
788:
752:
729:
578:
559:
7120:
6431:
6399:
6255:
3818:
3807:
2273:
I understand, but at the same time Jclemens's statement has become an unfortunate rallying point, tending to heat things up more than cool things off.--
1361:
1314:
735:
6174:
6104:
6072:
6055:
6018:
2438:
2072:
2036:
1997:
1866:
limits it to the author of the comment, granted, but more than a few times I have replaced the offending comments with <uncivil comment removed: -->
1172:
949:
906:
882:
826:
209:
160:
Want some help? Maintenance is much easier for me while I'm at school than content creation. If you help me learn to clerk SPI I'll be able to help.
8289:
7830:
7812:
7429:
7410:
7044:
7025:
6966:
6934:
3883:
2879:? I perfer the former as it is less tacky, has more information and is easier to read. The latter is the standard one to use. What do you think? -
7338:
6548:
5839:
5683:
5430:
5196:
3974:
3752:
3672:
3635:
3620:
1244:
8322:
8204:
8174:
6193:
5957:
5866:
5575:
5261:
5217:
4599:
4585:
4534:
4519:
4486:
4471:
4438:
4419:
2257:
2221:
1074:
1062:
1030:
1018:
7856:
6993:
6866:
5917:
discussions relating to RFA. An uninvolved admin may remove any comments in violation of this remedy, and may enforce it with blocks if necessary.
5718:
5589:
5367:
5295:
5186:
5154:
4757:
3555:
3519:
2406:
1525:
8457:
8420:
8397:
8218:
and User:slowking4]], is what I did. Both Editor Retention and New Editor Protection are more important than the feelings of one lone editor. ```
7642:
put off working the one review as this has been a frustrating weekend at enwp, and I didn't want to do a subpar job on the one I'm working on now.
6661:
3423:
3155:
2893:
2758:
2498:
2443:
Agree with Rschen7754. I'm impressed by what you've had to say. I go around sputtering and you've articulated it all quite succinctly. Well done.
2357:
2321:
2282:
2202:
2145:
2127:
2091:
2015:
1144:
829:
because a checkuser was done two days ago. It doesn't seem like that last checkuser was a super in depth one. Should a checkuser be done there?
478:
445:
435:
365:
332:
323:
291:
282:
250:
218:
8254:
5969:
5789:
5774:
5661:
5642:
4692:
2802:
1964:
1165:
1158:
8137:
7800:
going on, plus I need time off. I popped in with my alt just to make the one observation as I didn't want to leave anything important hanging.
6511:
6497:
5881:
4940:
4922:
4242:
1634:
others here. If I and they were to put in the time to form a deep and nuanced understanding of each candidate before voting, we'd be wasting an
8235:
4614:
4549:
4263:
Message added 10:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
4122:
Message added 21:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
3767:
for GA.Will you please review it.I hope you help me as you said "You are willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask." Thank You and kind regards.
1805:
but should already be covered by policy. I tend to not block over it, and instead hat discussion or try to mediate, unless my hand is forced.
1382:
Message added 16:34, 21 October 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
6833:
5112:
3987:" which seems to me politcally charged language meant to be unfairly biased against his position with the neutral way I tried to include was "
214:
Dennis, in the absence of a formal mechanism that I know of, I hereby dub you "A clerk". You can take Ryan as a padawan if you want. :-) —
7494:
7309:
5287:
5076:
3980:
1117:
registered users simply by the archives, so that is useful to know. I probably should have deduced that, but hadn't had a reason to before.
2212:
AN/I ! With Arb elections coming up, perhaps it's not only time to get some reforms to RfA, but Arbcom needs a big shake up too.
8468:
5543:
Not sure. I'm not on strike, I'm not protesting, I'm attempting to engage both sides and seek a peaceful resolution, while supporting the
4957:
4950:
1433:
7394:
2228:
525:. swearing, silly things, etc. I would suggest erring on the very conservative side for a bit, making that borderline only because it is
7211:
2558:
You sure were uninvolved enough, and I accept that reducing drama at AN/I is necessary. No argument from me on either of those points. --
7635:
6736:
4364:
Hey, Dennis. Mind giving me your take on this, especially since you deal with double (or multiple/various) accounts all the time? After
2379:
Wow, I just noticed that Floq didn't just template Jclemens, but actually blocked him. Again...wow. She has balls, gotta admire that.
850:
You have two types of CU: A regular CU where they compare two people, and "check for sleepers" where they search the logs to see if any
7153:
1616:
the community. In relation to the admins, "above" is a fair descriptor, but in relation to the rest of the community, they're one with.
120:
8094:
4643:
Laughed my ass off at the "Has anyone seen my paw". I'm sure it's an old one, but it caught me at just the right time I suppose. —
4208:
2645:
592:
515:
130:
8363:
5119:
I've replied at ANI about the issue. You aren't at a stage that you need admin, you need to try to talk it out on the talk page or
4777:
4712:
4345:
4166:
4058:
3713:
7514:
4386:
4315:
605:
116:
5812:
I've semi-protected the regular page for a month, which should slow down some of the action. Let me know if I need to do more.
5396:
1941:
7902:
7884:
5537:
4392:
The key is looking for either overlap or evasion of sanctions/blocks/scrutiny. If they are the same, not sure I see that yet.
3773:
2515:
1428:
8452:
8392:
8284:
8169:
8045:
7969:
7936:
7752:
7664:
7596:
7546:
7489:
7366:
7333:
7272:
7240:
7185:
7115:
7020:
6972:
6929:
6861:
6725:
6640:
6426:
6404:
I agree, and I promise I won't walk away. We need to figure out which is the best solution this coming week and move forward.
6377:
6333:
6250:
6169:
6099:
6050:
6013:
5834:
5570:
5498:
5425:
5362:
5256:
5181:
5149:
5049:
4998:
4917:
4844:
4812:
4740:
4687:
4580:
4514:
4466:
4414:
4237:
4094:
4028:
3957:
3878:
3802:
3747:
3667:
3615:
3550:
3495:
3388:
3365:
3323:
3185:
3095:
3001:
2936:
2866:
2753:
2693:
2630:
2544:
2480:
2401:
2352:
2316:
2252:
2197:
2122:
2067:
1992:
1890:
1827:
1754:
1707:
1594:
1494:
1356:
1309:
1239:
1139:
1057:
1013:
944:
877:
783:
724:
634:
554:
473:
430:
360:
318:
277:
245:
204:
7790:
5457:
gives some info about Autochecked users, but I would personally like to use and see it on my own by experiencing it. Regards.
4870:
4195:
I noticed your comment at the MF clarification request. Requesting clarification of an Arbcom decision has always been risky:
123:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
7202:
if there seems nothing to be done, or nothing else to be done. And occasionally I'll archive if it's better off the board. --
7134:
7087:
7073:
6803:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
2598:
1798:
1536:
1280:
126:
6645:
6221:
5962:
Appears not, from the look of it, which is somewhat unfortunate, but... I dunno. At least it's clearer than what it was. -—
5084:
2227:
due. Everyone should go give their opinions in the current RfC on the election, particularly the section secret balloting.
7685:
7624:
6574:
6477:
6461:
5939:
2559:
2507:
691:
7844:
5333:
5286:
Besides my edits as Cavann89, I had never edited Turkish page before. Feel free to proceed with any investigation though.
3935:
A little silliness is helpful to keep me from taking myself too serious, something we all fall prey to from time to time.
3195:
That's where the differences lie...some like the gradient, some don't. Leaves me kind confused on what I should do. :S -
3923:
3299:
3060:
2502:
3849:
3831:
3587:
2861:
2779:
2731:
Out of my league. I would say ask Drmies, but he and about a dozen others are on strike. I'm not very active myself.
1210:
1188:
401:
8445:
8385:
8277:
8162:
8038:
7962:
7929:
7745:
7657:
7589:
7539:
7482:
7359:
7326:
7265:
7233:
7178:
7108:
7013:
6922:
6854:
6752:
6718:
6633:
6419:
6370:
6326:
6243:
6162:
6133:
6092:
6043:
6006:
5827:
5563:
5491:
5418:
5355:
5249:
5174:
5142:
5042:
4991:
4910:
4837:
4805:
4733:
4680:
4573:
4507:
4459:
4407:
4230:
4190:
4087:
4021:
3950:
3871:
3795:
3740:
3660:
3608:
3543:
3488:
3358:
3316:
3178:
3088:
2994:
2929:
2746:
2725:
2686:
2623:
2537:
2473:
2394:
2345:
2309:
2245:
2190:
2115:
2060:
1985:
1883:
1820:
1747:
1700:
1587:
1487:
1349:
1302:
1232:
1132:
1050:
1006:
937:
870:
776:
717:
627:
547:
466:
423:
353:
311:
270:
238:
197:
5453:. I already have three other user rights which i do my usual Knowledge work with them. Technical information given at
4197:
here's one where I nearly wound up topic banned from all arts articles because I tried to get clarification on wording
7891:
7379:
6901:
6140:
5680:
5548:
the larger issues. I feel like I'm the only sane person here, which is the first sign of insanity I have been told.
5450:
5159:
Ok, that was an error, i"m at too many places at once. Still, provide some diffs if you are going to make a claim.
5090:
I'm assuming this user may be another sockpuppet, judging by their contributions. It's a repeat of past edits on the
3405:
Seems to me, saying something is 'libel' is much the same as saying something is slanderous and it's not a big deal.
532:
Other examples exist as well. The community has become trigger happy and ham-fisted as of late. It is discouraging.
296:
Ah, you are correct, sir. Thank you. Glad to see you back, I've been looking for you on the back of milk cartons.
175:
94:
89:
84:
72:
67:
4659:
844:
2434:
2292:
1274:
Just been playing along with him and have got a sore on my index finger on my right hand from flamenco shredding!♦
59:
6560:
The fact that we can't see the material shows that there was a problem; it shouldn't be used to argue that there
8342:
3844:
3641:
article is more important. I know some admin get defiant about reverting out good material, but I don't. While
982:
6488:
contribs would have accumulated, but without further evidence I would hesitate to make a case of sockpuppetry.
8071:
Thank you and certainly no offense intended. I am just pretty confident about this case. Thanks for your time.
7560:
Thanks. I had read that before. I was hoping for a summing-up from your perspective, but don't feel obliged. --
5597:
4305:
1108:
7678:
Thanks! Don't feel any need to rush. I really just appreciate that someone is taking time to look in general.
4369:
4365:
8076:
8014:
7991:
7898:
7880:
7521:
1446:
107:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
5472:
I don't think that group does what you think it does. There are only TWO editors with that right as of now.
5403:
We should give the benefit of the doubt when we can. I don't always get it right, but I will keep trying.
4248:
4107:
2785:
That's odd, I can see Mr. Brown's email tab. Perhaps refresh the screen, or close the browser and reload? --
4768:
4265:
4124:
4054:
3996:
3723:
3626:
regardless of source, but no worries, that's why we employ so many eyes, and thanks much for your efforts!
2825:
2656:
2589:
1384:
1250:
494:
591:
Hello again Dennis, Sorry to trouble you again, but could I ask you to look at the above named page. User
388:
Turns out that, between the last time I check fun-l this morning and my knighting you this evening, there
8358:
8185:.{Your adoptee needs advice}.... I assume good faith on the part of Deidra. I also assume poor judgement.
8183:
Thanks for your response. I have sent User Keilana a copy of my message to you with the added thought....
7797:
7447:
have known Prioryman's RL identity -- but I take some pride in not knowing about these stupid feuds...)
7207:
7160:
6671:
6345:
6302:
6272:
5446:
5438:
4855:
4353:
3682:
3431:
3138:
3038:
2876:
8100:
7078:
6947:
3906:
Nice one, Dennis. The funny part about that is that it's true, that would be a reason to block someone.
1367:
1271:
1090:
7611:
7452:
6804:
6790:
6570:
2604:
Good question. I think you may be right, but I really don't know. Would probably need to ask over at
670:
38:
7149:
6950:
6777:
6764:
6077:
Well, at the last clarification request, they just tightened the noose, with yet more vague wording.
5593:
5509:
5373:
4760:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (It's the Fjozk discussion).
4708:
4320:
4273:
4132:
2833:
1392:
653:
601:
488:
4718:
That had a lot of controversy, give me a bit to look at it again, I've been kind of swamped today.
3011:
This is true, but I am different. :) I go against the norm and against the grain. Things like the
8112:
8072:
8010:
7987:
7894:
7876:
7692:
7631:
7139:
5462:
5027:
understand. And that is why I didn't just say "Where is the abuse?" and explained it instead. ;)
5017:
4966:
3443:
2823:
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
1663:
1558:
the success of the organization, due to being disconnected from all administrative decision making.
7126:
7064:
5510:
498:
6465:
5454:
5008:
Thanks for the compliment. I believe you are right Dennis, it can be freely closed as the actual
4761:
4050:
3992:
3914:
3051:
2649:
2582:
2448:
2417:
2169:
2161:
Malleus has never been a Wikipedian, no matter how many otherwise constructive edits he has made.
1863:
1510:
1461:
6618:
in a timely manner, I would ask you check with another admin until Monday or Tuesday. Thanks!
6524:
You posted in the section about the interaction ban, but your text seems to about the site-ban.
5746:
down for SPI and a revdel on the subsection Rudman? Thanks in advance. There be games afield!
5690:
I feel like I'm the only sane person here, which is the first sign of insanity I have been told'
5473:
8440:
8380:
8272:
8157:
8033:
7957:
7924:
7805:
7740:
7708:
7652:
7584:
7565:
7534:
7510:
7499:
7477:
7406:
7354:
7321:
7260:
7228:
7203:
7173:
7103:
7008:
6917:
6849:
6813:
6713:
6667:
6628:
6599:
6544:
6414:
6365:
6341:
6321:
6298:
6268:
6238:
6207:
6157:
6087:
6038:
6001:
5822:
5558:
5486:
5413:
5350:
5317:
5244:
5169:
5137:
5064:
5037:
4986:
4905:
4832:
4800:
4728:
4675:
4568:
4502:
4454:
4402:
4225:
4082:
4016:
3945:
3897:
3866:
3790:
3735:
3655:
3603:
3538:
3483:
3419:
3353:
3311:
3248:
3233:
3203:
3173:
3149:
3114:
3083:
3024:
2989:
2967:
2924:
2887:
2741:
2681:
2618:
2532:
2468:
2389:
2340:
2304:
2240:
2185:
2110:
2055:
1980:
1925:
1878:
1854:
1815:
1794:
1742:
1722:
1695:
1582:
1554:
1532:
1482:
1344:
1297:
1227:
1127:
1045:
1001:
932:
865:
803:
771:
747:
712:
686:
622:
573:
542:
510:
461:
418:
348:
306:
265:
233:
192:
47:
17:
8107:
and provide assistance. Any other Administrative Page stalkers are invited. An inexperienced
6745:
7769:
7448:
7129:
7082:
7068:
6757:
6566:
6395:
6287:
6217:
5677:
4698:
4374:
4340:
3758:
1958:-- you'll see what I mean if you look at the last couple posts. I'm going real life tonight.
1275:
383:
7030:
I'm so offended. Seriously though, no pressure, no rush, oh, and good luck with that storm.
6794:
223:
You need to grant the same to Berean Hunter, whom I will freely admit is a superior clerk.
8104:
7289:
7145:
6067:
5950:
5311:
4704:
4181:
4159:
4046:
2431:
2029:
1960:
899:
837:
649:
597:
168:
4039:
Thanks man for taking the time to check it out, also our paths did cross once before here
1849:
is a universally-recognised logical fallacy; it is inappropriate on article talk pages. --
8:
8250:
7852:
7826:
7786:
7680:
7619:
7425:
7390:
7038:
6987:
6960:
6895:
6455:
5926:
5655:
5636:
5458:
5013:
4962:
4887:
3840:
3438:
1764:
You may be changing my mind. I'll keep you informed. I've a bit on my mind at the moment.
586:
8408:
8147:
seems to have adopted them, according to their talk page. You might try pinging her.
7775:
7467:
as it is already at two venues yet that isn't on the table as a remedy at either. Yet.
7297:
7058:
6800:
6529:
6507:
6473:
5877:
5802:
5785:
5770:
5751:
5668:
5392:
4751:
4308:
3985:
he believes abortion should be banned with no exceptions, including for victims of rape
3907:
3709:
3631:
3583:
3044:
2857:
2795:
2775:
2708:
2605:
2493:
2444:
2413:
2268:
1506:
1457:
1421:
1266:
1257:
1206:
1184:
7873:
6943:
Ha! That sounds like a good idea. In that case, the pages you'll want to look at are:
2807:
That didn't work, but I found a link somewhere that got me to the email a user screen.
1841:
I'm proposing a change in practice. That is, presently, it is not permitted to remove
8431:
8371:
8314:
8263:
8227:
8215:
8196:
8148:
8129:
8024:
7948:
7915:
7801:
7731:
7703:
7643:
7575:
7561:
7525:
7506:
7468:
7402:
7345:
7312:
7251:
7219:
7164:
7094:
6999:
6908:
6840:
6704:
6686:
6619:
6595:
6540:
6493:
6405:
6356:
6312:
6229:
6201:
6189:
6148:
6078:
6029:
5992:
5858:
5813:
5710:
5615:
5585:
5549:
5529:
5477:
5404:
5341:
5321:
5235:
5211:
5160:
5128:
5106:
5028:
4977:
4896:
4823:
4791:
4719:
4666:
4610:
4595:
4559:
4545:
4530:
4493:
4482:
4445:
4434:
4393:
4382:
4358:
4216:
4073:
4007:
3936:
3893:
3857:
3781:
3726:
3646:
3594:
3529:
3474:
3415:
3344:
3302:
3244:
3229:
3197:
3164:
3143:
3108:
3074:
3018:
2980:
2961:
2951:
2915:
2881:
2732:
2672:
2609:
2523:
2459:
2380:
2331:
2295:
2231:
2217:
2176:
2101:
2046:
1971:
1921:
1869:
1850:
1806:
1790:
1733:
1718:
1686:
1659:
1573:
1528:
1519:
1473:
1335:
1288:
1218:
1118:
1068:
1036:
1024:
992:
976:
923:
856:
795:
762:
739:
703:
678:
613:
565:
533:
502:
497:- I don't think reverting of vandal alterations such as this would be a violation of
452:
409:
339:
297:
256:
224:
183:
146:
137:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
6971:
I just got to thinking...it's a pretty big page to debug, so maybe this might help:
1954:
And the sharks are circling. If you're online tonight, please keep a tight watch on
6829:
6609:
6389:
6283:
6211:
5966:
5674:
5331:
5291:
5080:
4891:
4638:
4336:
3813:
3768:
3569:
3515:
2764:
1152:
2136:
Anything you can do to help in that regard would be appreciated, at least by me.--
8416:
8349:
7163:. She would just open it herself anyway, she is an CU, which outranks a clerk.
6787:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page
6657:
6123:
6062:
5943:
5762:
5195:
It's been going on for years now, the history of the article shows all. Plus see
4177:
4152:
3989:
he believes abortion should be banned with no exceptions, including cases of rape
3826:
3704:
Thanks for everything you do to keep the wikipedia running, relevant and useful!
3470:
3043:
I agree that the second one is much more informative at a glance than the first.
2721:
2428:
2278:
2141:
2087:
2022:
2011:
892:
830:
665:
161:
7284:
Re: I'm always willing to try "annoying" before I try "aggressive" as a solution
3456:
was made with the sole purpose of damaging a person's reputation. It is also a
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
8246:
8210:
8023:
You are always welcome to get a second opinion, and no offense will be taken.
7848:
7822:
7782:
7421:
7386:
7033:
6982:
6955:
6890:
5982:
5922:
5650:
5631:
5628:
Seeing that as a redlink makes me want to change my username this very minute.
5517:
5320:, likely because you're smarter than I am. Atm I am engaged in an edit war on
5091:
5065:
5009:
4784:
4652:
3836:
3691:
3642:
3461:
3341:
3012:
2872:
648:
Dennis, Many thanks for your help. We'll see how it goes. Best regards, David.
1332:
1329:
1323:
1320:
8242:
7866:
7293:
6525:
6503:
6485:
6469:
6116:
6025:
5987:
5873:
5798:
5781:
5766:
5747:
5388:
5120:
4936:
4866:
4555:
4373:
thus far, has not been editing since the 16th and since this may have been a
4293:
4204:
3764:
3705:
3627:
3579:
3465:
2853:
2788:
2771:
2155:
1955:
1946:
1549:
1545:
1442:
1414:
1253:
1202:
1193:
Not AOL. Most likely Vodafone mobile broadband or a similar UK service, e.g.
1180:
855:
unblock an official CU block (marked as CU block), or I risk losing the bit.
6976:
4006:
I've checked the sources and have added to the talk page as a 3rd opinion.
1249:
Hackneyhond edited from 212.183.128.72 for instance, which is a Vodafone IP
8306:
8219:
8188:
8144:
8121:
6874:
6682:
6666:
Go. Chop wood, or whatever. Place will still be here when you come back. --
6489:
6185:
5850:
5702:
5607:
5521:
5200:
5095:
5072:
4606:
4591:
4541:
4526:
4478:
4430:
4378:
4283:
4142:
3296:
2843:
2327:
2213:
1402:
1198:
1071:
1027:
979:
142:
138:
5742:
Dennis, could you please take a look at the above (edits this month, from
493:
Hi Dennis - I was wanting to revert this clear vandal edit - its a BLP -
6825:
6554:
5963:
5326:
4822:
Out of pocket for a while, will see if I can get back to this in a bit.
4354:
3511:
2947:
2575:
155:
5127:
talking about socks isn't proper without substantiation, ie: evidence.
2900:
When you are asking me for content opinions, this can only mean you are
1451:
Knowledge:Featured article review/Microsoft Security Essentials/archive1
8412:
8353:
6772:
6653:
5697:
5234:
I understand, I have at least a dozen windows open and searching now.
2955:
2717:
2709:
2326:
Now SilverSeren is arguing that Jclemens was "right" in the comment at
2274:
2137:
2083:
2007:
1105:
820:
521:
I think the key would be to make sure it fits the narrow definition of
442:
398:
329:
288:
215:
3983:
were an editor trying to describe Smith's Position on Rape says that "
3473:
phrases or words is unhelpful and should be avoided and/or corrected.
7250:
Ah, I see they already have and blocked, and it is already archived.
4647:
1100:
to be done are pretty much the same in either case; it's mostly just
959:
There seem to be a few misunderstandings here. Let me clear them up.
6944:
4329:
7093:
Hoping to give a listen later today. Actually busy for a change.
6975:
the difference between my code and the "official" MediaWiki gadget
5903:
of 9-1, the Arbitration Committee has passed the following motion:
5378:
4932:
4862:
4200:
3722:
Thank you for the kindness! I've safely stored the original in my
3574:
Hi Dennis. I just wanted to let you know I reverted your revert to
612:
start a dialog, or for them to "get it". If it continues, ping me.
108:
5647:
Nevermind. It's already registered. All the good names are taken.
4335:
I'm giving out cookies to all of the Admins I see today :3 Enjoy!
3243:
BTW, why is there a picture of Dan Fogelberg on your user page?:)
564:
Yes - Right. Very best wishes in your real life. Thanks Dennis. -
3575:
2426:
I thought your comments regarding Jclemens' vote were spot on. --
736:
Knowledge:Administrators_noticeboard#NOINDEX-ing_of_evidence_page
6817:
4260:
Hello, Dennis Brown. Please check your email; you've got mail!
4119:
Hello, Dennis Brown. Please check your email; you've got mail!
4072:
Ah, well my poor memory insured a neutral reply nonetheless :)
2820:
Hello, Dennis Brown. Please check your email; you've got mail!
1379:
Hello, Dennis Brown. Please check your email; you've got mail!
4176:
I took your advice, so please check AN under the above title.
761:
make sense, but that doesn't mean Wikipedians will do it ;)
6769:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was
5516:
This "administrative strike thing" reminds me of the novel,
5012:
policy is not being violated. Thanks again for your review.
1175:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
5696:. It is just down the hall, third door on the left side. A
1868:
redacting obviously rude and unrelated comments that way.
6785:
Template:Did you know nominations/Knight's Spider Web Farm
4665:
A skeleton walks into a bar and orders a beer and a mop.
3892:
Thank you, any bit of fun and joy deeply appreciated ;) --
2522:
that I was uninvolved enough to make that determination.
1194:
112:
7199:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Leontopodium alpinum
5894:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility enforcement
5738:
Talk:Highland Park High School (Highland Park, Illinois)
1845:
on article talk pages. I would like it to be mandatory.
6297:
that there are some serious conduct issues in there. --
5520:. Which makes me wonder...which one of you is Galt? ```
3645:
is a good idea, the quality of the article trumps it.
1912:
I don't think it has to wait for an uninvolved editor:
1789:
if you have the time. It's possibly the wrong venue. --
1785:
on article talk pages. I'd appreciate your thoughts on
111:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
6998:
Still haven't tried it yet. I've been so dang busy.
2158:
for helping start the latest uproar with his comment "
7909:
time consuming method when you are trying to connect
6206:
I was wondering if there was any news with regard to
5991:
battle, and I hope to not be named as a party again.
3141:
with the new climate chart box. What do you think? -
6783:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
1171:
Message added 10:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC). You can
3398:, would that user likely become banned as making a
1287:youth ;-) Hard to describe the emotion it evokes.
4558:account would be warranted if you are confident.
827:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000
5197:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Ledenierhomme
2330:. This is the issue that just keeps on giving.
8209:Just to wrap this in a bow and put it to bed...
7063:If you want a cool album to listen to check out
3464:and can result in sanction. This is covered by
1319:Just in the mood for some stuff from childhood.
757:Well, then we both may learn something new. It
5094:article. I refuse to be dragged into edit wars.
4758:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1166:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole
1164:Hello, Dennis Brown. You have new messages at
103:Disambiguation link notification for October 20
5906:Remedy 4 ("Malleus Fatuorum topic banned") of
5316:For some reason you've decided to stay out of
5125:The other editor has been here a few years, so
4172:Your reverting of 'socks/trolls' using Twinkle
971:some of the data does not need to be examined.
6520:It looks like you posted in the wrong section
5912:is vacated, and replaced with the following:
1717:I'll think about what you've said. Thanks. --
1524:I responded to your comment at the Signpost.
7774:John was involved when he made the block of
6883:importScript('User:Adjwilley/cactions.js');
4958:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/DeeJermo
4951:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/DeeJermo
4861:permission, I'd be happy to oblige. Thanks,
2871:Which of these climate charts look better?
1652:other editors here. Do you really think the
1179:New socks were added to the investigation.
5765:writes with exactly the same style. Quack.
6460:Sorry to bother you, but an obvious sock (
4756:Hello. There is currently a discussion at
4554:I'm at work and a bit tied, but filing an
3377:The following discussion has been closed.
6761:was updated with a fact from the article
6464:) currently performing mass deletions on
5940:User talk:Ryan Vesey/Archive 11#Well said
3975:Opinion requested from John D. Rockerduck
1449:, you might be willing to participate in
673:- User has reverted my noindexing of his
7292:, editing here since 2005, but no more.
7067:. Last track isn't the best though... ♦
1945:
5761:The IP's all WHOIS to Stanford and the
3411:Appreciate if you could clear this up,
14:
3812:I will be very happy,if you review it.
1950:What the situation visually looks like
1732:appreciate your methods in doing so.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7288:Wanna practice that on another user?
3979:I was wondering if you could look at
1331:, followed by Freddie Mercury's last
7524:until he removed me as his mentor.
6740:
6462:Special:Contributions/76.232.253.147
4264:
4123:
2959:"best-of-both-worlds" kinda deal. -
2824:
1434:FAR of Microsoft Security Essentials
1383:
1325:. Then I had to play Annie Lennox,
825:I requested CU then undid myself at
25:
7128:, great version of Come Together.♦
5449:user right for testing on pages in
23:
5445:Hello Dennis, I would like to use
5377:
4253:
4112:
3219:"It appears I have little support"
2813:
1372:
1157:
24:
8486:
8095:Something requires your attention
7821:Cheers for the reply, good luck.
6141:Knowledge:Request for permissions
5921:For the Arbitration Committee, --
5451:Knowledge:Pending changes/Testing
2608:, then tell me so we both know.
6744:
6737:DYK for Knight's Spider Web Farm
6590:the objective and fair way, for
4877:
4783:
4328:
3981:Political positions of Tom Smith
3690:
29:
8296:I think it's time for me to go
8101:User talk:SarahStierch#Adoption
6820:) 16:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
6771:... that painted and lacquered
1942:Blood in the wiki-water tonight
1441:As a party involved in the 2nd
5592:? It would seem not... yet...
3389:Libel as a synonym for slander
2867:Need Your Opinion on Something
13:
1:
7701:I'd be interested too, fwiw.
7522:User talk:Youreallycan/YRC2.0
5892:Arbitration motion regarding
1447:Microsoft Security Essentials
8458:21:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
8421:12:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
8398:11:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
8364:02:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
8323:15:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
8290:21:58, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
8255:21:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
8236:06:14, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
8205:13:52, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
8175:13:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
8138:05:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
8081:02:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
8051:22:00, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
8019:21:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7996:21:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7975:21:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7942:20:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7903:19:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
7885:20:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
7857:18:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7831:13:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
7813:12:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
7791:12:09, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
7758:23:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7715:04:00, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
7697:23:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
7670:01:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
7636:01:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
7602:12:52, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7570:12:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7552:11:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7515:08:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7495:11:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7457:09:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7430:08:24, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7411:08:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7395:07:53, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7372:00:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
7339:23:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7302:23:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7278:14:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7246:14:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7218:else doesn't beat me to it.
7212:12:59, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7191:01:48, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7154:01:37, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7135:21:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7121:14:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7088:12:36, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7074:20:35, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
7045:21:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
7026:21:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
6994:00:03, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
6967:21:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
6935:20:57, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
6902:20:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
6867:01:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
6834:01:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
6731:13:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
6691:02:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
6676:00:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
6662:00:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
6646:00:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
6604:12:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
6575:08:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
6549:22:55, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
6534:22:47, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
6512:00:56, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
6498:00:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
6478:22:08, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
6432:00:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
6400:00:52, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
6383:00:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
6350:00:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
6307:23:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
6292:23:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
6277:22:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
6256:22:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
6222:22:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
6194:02:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
6175:21:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
6134:21:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
6105:22:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
6073:21:54, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
6056:21:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
6019:21:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5970:20:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5958:20:21, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5931:19:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5882:23:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5867:21:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5840:11:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5807:03:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5790:03:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5775:01:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5756:00:59, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5719:14:15, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5684:19:50, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5662:19:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5643:19:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5624:17:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5602:16:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5576:14:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5538:14:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5504:12:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5467:11:48, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5431:11:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5397:04:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5368:11:04, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5334:01:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
5296:22:09, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5262:22:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5218:22:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5187:21:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5155:21:45, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5113:21:43, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5085:21:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5055:20:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5022:20:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
5004:20:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4971:19:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4941:20:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4923:19:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4871:18:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4850:17:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4818:16:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4778:16:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4746:19:54, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4713:11:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4693:13:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4660:03:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4615:15:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4600:18:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
4586:18:08, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
4550:18:05, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
4535:22:22, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
4520:18:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
4487:16:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
4472:16:02, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
4439:15:51, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
4420:15:08, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
4387:10:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
4346:10:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4316:10:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4269:at any time by removing the
4243:12:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4209:05:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4186:01:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4167:21:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
4128:at any time by removing the
4100:12:43, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
4063:23:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
4034:22:51, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
4001:21:36, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3963:21:34, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3931:21:22, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3902:21:19, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3884:21:11, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3850:19:14, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3819:19:21, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3808:19:11, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3774:19:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3753:17:05, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3714:16:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3673:17:03, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3636:16:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3621:15:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3588:15:08, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3556:14:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3520:14:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3501:14:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3449:14:07, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3424:13:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3371:21:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3329:13:27, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3253:12:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3238:12:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3210:19:48, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3191:10:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3156:02:41, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
3121:19:55, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
3101:19:47, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
3068:19:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
3031:19:42, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
3007:19:18, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
2974:18:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
2942:17:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
2894:17:50, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
2862:04:21, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
2829:at any time by removing the
2803:03:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
2780:03:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
2759:01:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
2726:01:19, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
2699:01:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
2666:01:15, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
2636:21:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2599:21:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2568:14:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2550:13:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2516:12:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2486:14:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2453:11:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2439:06:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2422:03:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2407:00:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2358:00:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2322:00:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2283:00:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2258:23:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
2222:23:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
2203:23:23, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
2146:23:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
2128:22:54, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
2092:22:48, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
2073:22:43, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
2037:22:40, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
2016:22:36, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1998:22:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1965:22:28, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1930:17:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
1896:16:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
1859:16:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
1833:15:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
1799:14:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
1760:19:17, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1727:16:37, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1713:15:02, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1668:03:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1600:02:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1546:WikiProject Editor Retention
1537:01:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1500:11:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
1466:08:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
1429:16:34, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1388:at any time by removing the
1362:19:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1315:18:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1281:13:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1245:19:21, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1211:19:10, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1201:) used by Nole in the past.
1189:10:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
1145:21:39, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
1109:21:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
1075:21:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
1063:21:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
1031:21:26, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
1019:21:25, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
983:21:20, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
950:21:11, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
907:21:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
883:20:53, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
845:20:45, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
809:22:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
789:20:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
753:20:55, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
730:20:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
692:20:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
658:16:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
640:16:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
606:15:54, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
579:13:01, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
560:11:39, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
516:02:44, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
479:14:31, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
446:14:20, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
436:11:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
402:03:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
366:01:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
333:01:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
324:01:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
292:01:04, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
283:00:59, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
251:00:58, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
219:00:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
210:00:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
176:00:32, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
151:12:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
7:
7798:Lexington Barbecue Festival
7197:confirm identity - as with
5447:Knowledge:Autochecked users
5439:Knowledge:Autochecked users
1970:Just got on wiki....jeez...
1550:Request for Admin Sanctions
10:
8491:
4191:Requests for clarification
1548:, tried to get the policy
1217:be cryptic for a reason.
8411:sanctioning the editor.--
7380:Voluntary interaction ban
7308:discussion at the boards
7159:Elen has explained it on
5983:He Who Shall Not Be Named
5385:Thanks for believing! :)
4605:this topic at this time.
3763:Hi,Dennis.I've nominated
3689:
2905:actually requires you to
8113:User talk:RAIDENRULES123
6799:and it will be added to
6778:Knight's Spider Web Farm
6765:Knight's Spider Web Farm
6602:) (alt of Dennis Brown)
3380:Please do not modify it.
1638:amount of valuable time.
8343:On behalf of Ryan Vesey
6805:Did you know? talk page
5688:@Dennis. Your comment,
5455:Special:ListGroupRights
4949:Nice to see you again,
1195:http://www.three.co.uk/
5919:
5382:
5071:This is very tedious.
4258:
4117:
2818:
1951:
1629:This will result in a
1377:
1162:
18:User talk:Dennis Brown
8359:What did I break now?
6824:Congrats, Mr. Admin!
5914:
5381:
4257:
4116:
3724:Ronco™ Barnstar Vault
2817:
1949:
1376:
1161:
42:of past discussions.
8105:User talk:Brybry1999
7290:User talk:Bull-Doser
6466:Genocides in history
6147:in a week. Sorry.
5909:Civility Enforcement
5797:NM, he self deleted.
5594:William M. Connolley
3856:creating articles.
3698:The Admin's Barnstar
499:my agreed conditions
255:Oh, and thank you.
139:opt-out instructions
8430:the encyclopedia.
8407:did yesterday, I'm
8109:(fill in the blank)
8073:ProfessionalScholar
8011:ProfessionalScholar
7988:ProfessionalScholar
7895:ProfessionalScholar
7877:ProfessionalScholar
6775:are sold as art at
6026:It is a binary test
4931:Thanks! Will do. --
4856:Requesting reviewer
3815:25 CENTS VICTORIOUS
3770:25 CENTS VICTORIOUS
3683:A barnstar for you!
2671:for a week or so.
1272:Some Arabic flavour
121:fix with Dab solver
8303:
7810:(aka Dennis Brown)
7612:Editor/RfA review?
5584:You'll be wanting
5383:
4890:, then patrolling
4342:(Prefect Helpdesk)
4337:Meva / CHCSPrefect
4266:remove this notice
4259:
4125:remove this notice
4118:
4051:John D. Rockerduck
3993:John D. Rockerduck
3845:List of good deeds
3408:I could be wrong,
3139:Stephens City page
2952:User:Gerda Arendt
2946:Nah, I have asked
2826:remove this notice
2819:
2006:It isn't pretty.--
1952:
1385:remove this notice
1378:
1173:remove this notice
1163:
129:• Join us at the
8456:
8448:
8443:
8396:
8388:
8383:
8362:
8321:
8301:
8288:
8280:
8275:
8234:
8203:
8173:
8165:
8160:
8136:
8117:What can be done?
8049:
8041:
8036:
7973:
7965:
7960:
7940:
7932:
7927:
7843:I left a comment
7811:
7756:
7748:
7743:
7668:
7660:
7655:
7600:
7592:
7587:
7550:
7542:
7537:
7493:
7485:
7480:
7370:
7362:
7357:
7337:
7329:
7324:
7276:
7268:
7263:
7244:
7236:
7231:
7204:Elen of the Roads
7189:
7181:
7176:
7119:
7111:
7106:
7042:
7024:
7016:
7011:
6991:
6964:
6933:
6925:
6920:
6899:
6865:
6857:
6852:
6811:
6810:
6798:
6729:
6721:
6716:
6668:Elen of the Roads
6644:
6636:
6631:
6430:
6422:
6417:
6381:
6373:
6368:
6342:Elen of the Roads
6337:
6329:
6324:
6299:Elen of the Roads
6269:Elen of the Roads
6254:
6246:
6241:
6173:
6165:
6160:
6103:
6095:
6090:
6054:
6046:
6041:
6017:
6009:
6004:
5865:
5838:
5830:
5825:
5717:
5672:
5659:
5640:
5622:
5588:then. Do we have
5586:User:Balph Eubank
5574:
5566:
5561:
5536:
5511:Who is John Galt?
5502:
5494:
5489:
5429:
5421:
5416:
5374:A kitten for you!
5366:
5358:
5353:
5322:User:Sally Season
5260:
5252:
5247:
5185:
5177:
5172:
5153:
5145:
5140:
5053:
5045:
5040:
5002:
4994:
4989:
4921:
4913:
4908:
4848:
4840:
4835:
4816:
4808:
4803:
4744:
4736:
4731:
4691:
4683:
4678:
4658:
4584:
4576:
4571:
4518:
4510:
4505:
4470:
4462:
4457:
4418:
4410:
4405:
4366:reverting Rogr101
4351:
4350:
4343:
4321:A cookie for you!
4241:
4233:
4228:
4098:
4090:
4085:
4066:
4049:comment added by
4032:
4024:
4019:
3961:
3953:
3948:
3882:
3874:
3869:
3806:
3798:
3793:
3751:
3743:
3738:
3719:
3718:
3671:
3663:
3658:
3619:
3611:
3606:
3567:
3566:
3554:
3546:
3541:
3499:
3491:
3486:
3432:talk page stalker
3369:
3361:
3356:
3327:
3319:
3314:
3212:
3189:
3181:
3176:
3158:
3123:
3099:
3091:
3086:
3039:talk page stalker
3033:
3005:
2997:
2992:
2976:
2940:
2932:
2927:
2896:
2801:
2757:
2749:
2744:
2697:
2689:
2684:
2634:
2626:
2621:
2548:
2540:
2535:
2484:
2476:
2471:
2405:
2397:
2392:
2356:
2348:
2343:
2320:
2312:
2307:
2294:. Exceptional.
2272:
2256:
2248:
2243:
2201:
2193:
2188:
2173:persona non grata
2154:In part, I blame
2126:
2118:
2113:
2071:
2063:
2058:
1996:
1988:
1983:
1963:
1894:
1886:
1881:
1831:
1823:
1818:
1758:
1750:
1745:
1711:
1703:
1698:
1598:
1590:
1585:
1498:
1490:
1485:
1427:
1360:
1352:
1347:
1313:
1305:
1300:
1243:
1235:
1230:
1143:
1135:
1130:
1061:
1053:
1048:
1017:
1009:
1004:
948:
940:
935:
881:
873:
868:
787:
779:
774:
728:
720:
715:
638:
630:
625:
558:
550:
545:
523:obvious vandalism
489:vandal reverting?
477:
469:
464:
434:
426:
421:
364:
356:
351:
322:
314:
309:
281:
273:
268:
249:
241:
236:
208:
200:
195:
134:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
8482:
8450:
8446:
8441:
8390:
8386:
8381:
8356:
8313:
8282:
8278:
8273:
8226:
8211:Editor Cindamuse
8195:
8167:
8163:
8158:
8128:
8043:
8039:
8034:
7967:
7963:
7958:
7934:
7930:
7925:
7809:
7750:
7746:
7741:
7713:
7711:
7706:
7688:
7683:
7662:
7658:
7653:
7627:
7622:
7594:
7590:
7585:
7544:
7540:
7535:
7487:
7483:
7478:
7449:Nomoskedasticity
7364:
7360:
7355:
7331:
7327:
7322:
7270:
7266:
7261:
7238:
7234:
7229:
7183:
7179:
7174:
7140:SPI on Logical 1
7132:
7113:
7109:
7104:
7085:
7071:
7043:
7036:
7018:
7014:
7009:
6992:
6985:
6965:
6958:
6927:
6923:
6918:
6900:
6893:
6859:
6855:
6850:
6788:
6748:
6741:
6723:
6719:
6714:
6638:
6634:
6629:
6567:Nomoskedasticity
6424:
6420:
6415:
6392:
6375:
6371:
6366:
6331:
6327:
6322:
6248:
6244:
6239:
6214:
6167:
6163:
6158:
6131:
6097:
6093:
6088:
6070:
6065:
6048:
6044:
6039:
6011:
6007:
6002:
5857:
5832:
5828:
5823:
5709:
5666:
5660:
5653:
5641:
5634:
5614:
5568:
5564:
5559:
5528:
5496:
5492:
5487:
5423:
5419:
5414:
5360:
5356:
5351:
5329:
5254:
5250:
5245:
5214:
5208:
5204:
5179:
5175:
5170:
5147:
5143:
5138:
5109:
5103:
5099:
5047:
5043:
5038:
4996:
4992:
4987:
4915:
4911:
4906:
4885:
4881:
4880:
4842:
4838:
4833:
4810:
4806:
4801:
4787:
4775:
4766:
4738:
4734:
4729:
4685:
4681:
4676:
4657:
4655:
4644:
4578:
4574:
4569:
4512:
4508:
4503:
4464:
4460:
4455:
4412:
4408:
4403:
4341:
4332:
4325:
4324:
4312:
4303:
4298:
4290:
4288:
4282:
4278:
4272:
4268:
4256:
4249:You've got mail!
4235:
4231:
4226:
4149:
4147:
4141:
4137:
4131:
4127:
4115:
4108:You've got mail!
4092:
4088:
4083:
4065:
4043:
4026:
4022:
4017:
3955:
3951:
3946:
3928:
3921:
3912:
3876:
3872:
3867:
3848:
3847:
3816:
3800:
3796:
3791:
3771:
3745:
3741:
3736:
3694:
3687:
3686:
3665:
3661:
3656:
3613:
3609:
3604:
3548:
3544:
3539:
3493:
3489:
3484:
3446:
3441:
3435:
3382:
3363:
3359:
3354:
3338:
3337:
3321:
3317:
3312:
3206:
3200:
3196:
3183:
3179:
3174:
3152:
3146:
3142:
3117:
3111:
3107:
3093:
3089:
3084:
3065:
3058:
3049:
3042:
3027:
3021:
3017:
2999:
2995:
2990:
2970:
2964:
2960:
2934:
2930:
2925:
2902:really desperate
2890:
2884:
2880:
2850:
2848:
2842:
2838:
2832:
2828:
2816:
2798:
2792:
2786:
2751:
2747:
2742:
2691:
2687:
2682:
2663:
2654:
2628:
2624:
2619:
2596:
2587:
2542:
2538:
2533:
2478:
2474:
2469:
2399:
2395:
2390:
2350:
2346:
2341:
2314:
2310:
2305:
2266:
2250:
2246:
2241:
2195:
2191:
2186:
2120:
2116:
2111:
2065:
2061:
2056:
1990:
1986:
1981:
1959:
1888:
1884:
1879:
1864:WP:REMOVEUNCIVIL
1825:
1821:
1816:
1752:
1748:
1743:
1705:
1701:
1696:
1592:
1588:
1583:
1492:
1488:
1483:
1424:
1418:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1401:
1397:
1391:
1387:
1375:
1368:You've got mail!
1354:
1350:
1345:
1307:
1303:
1298:
1278:
1237:
1233:
1228:
1176:
1137:
1133:
1128:
1094:
1055:
1051:
1046:
1011:
1007:
1002:
942:
938:
933:
875:
871:
866:
806:
802:
798:
781:
777:
772:
750:
746:
742:
722:
718:
713:
689:
685:
681:
632:
628:
623:
576:
572:
568:
552:
548:
543:
513:
509:
505:
471:
467:
462:
428:
424:
419:
358:
354:
349:
316:
312:
307:
275:
271:
266:
243:
239:
234:
202:
198:
193:
124:
117:check to confirm
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
8490:
8489:
8485:
8484:
8483:
8481:
8480:
8479:
8409:not comfortable
8361:
8350:User:Ryan Vesey
8345:
8097:
7869:
7772:
7709:
7704:
7702:
7686:
7681:
7625:
7620:
7614:
7502:
7382:
7286:
7146:Dominus Vobisdu
7142:
7130:
7083:
7069:
7061:
7031:
6980:
6953:
6888:
6887:see obviously.
6884:
6877:
6814:The DYK project
6753:28 October 2012
6739:
6683:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
6614:
6557:
6522:
6490:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
6458:
6390:
6212:
6208:WP:Conservatism
6204:
6186:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
6124:
6119:
6068:
6063:
5897:
5763:User:Joseacosta
5740:
5648:
5629:
5514:
5443:
5376:
5327:
5314:
5212:
5206:
5202:
5107:
5101:
5097:
5069:
4954:
4878:
4876:
4858:
4769:
4762:
4754:
4705:Darkness Shines
4701:
4653:
4645:
4641:
4362:
4323:
4313:
4310:
4299:
4294:
4291:
4286:
4280:
4276:
4274:You've got mail
4270:
4262:
4254:
4251:
4193:
4174:
4150:
4145:
4139:
4135:
4133:You've got mail
4129:
4121:
4113:
4110:
4044:
3977:
3924:
3915:
3908:
3839:
3835:
3829:
3814:
3769:
3761:
3685:
3572:
3444:
3439:
3429:
3396:false and libel
3391:
3378:
3221:
3204:
3198:
3150:
3144:
3115:
3109:
3061:
3052:
3045:
3036:
3025:
3019:
2968:
2962:
2888:
2882:
2869:
2851:
2846:
2840:
2836:
2834:You've got mail
2830:
2822:
2814:
2796:
2790:
2767:
2713:
2657:
2650:
2590:
2583:
2578:
2496:
2214:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
1944:
1522:
1436:
1422:
1416:
1410:
1405:
1399:
1395:
1393:You've got mail
1389:
1381:
1373:
1370:
1276:
1269:
1177:
1170:
1155:
1088:
823:
804:
800:
796:
748:
744:
740:
698:not sure I can
687:
683:
679:
668:
650:David J Johnson
598:David J Johnson
589:
574:
570:
566:
511:
507:
503:
491:
386:
158:
131:DPL WikiProject
105:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
8488:
8478:
8477:
8476:
8475:
8474:
8473:
8472:
8471:
8461:
8460:
8424:
8423:
8401:
8400:
8357:
8344:
8341:
8340:
8339:
8338:
8337:
8336:
8335:
8334:
8333:
8332:
8331:
8330:
8329:
8328:
8327:
8326:
8325:
8318:
8310:
8231:
8223:
8200:
8192:
8178:
8177:
8133:
8125:
8096:
8093:
8092:
8091:
8090:
8089:
8088:
8087:
8086:
8085:
8084:
8083:
8060:
8059:
8058:
8057:
8056:
8055:
8054:
8053:
8001:
8000:
7999:
7998:
7980:
7979:
7978:
7977:
7868:
7865:
7864:
7863:
7862:
7861:
7860:
7859:
7836:
7835:
7834:
7833:
7816:
7815:
7771:
7768:
7767:
7766:
7765:
7764:
7763:
7762:
7761:
7760:
7720:
7719:
7718:
7717:
7699:
7673:
7672:
7613:
7610:
7609:
7608:
7607:
7606:
7605:
7604:
7555:
7554:
7501:
7500:YRC mentorship
7498:
7464:
7463:
7462:
7461:
7460:
7459:
7435:
7434:
7433:
7432:
7414:
7413:
7381:
7378:
7377:
7376:
7375:
7374:
7285:
7282:
7281:
7280:
7248:
7194:
7193:
7141:
7138:
7124:
7123:
7060:
7057:
7056:
7055:
7054:
7053:
7052:
7051:
7050:
7049:
7048:
7047:
6938:
6937:
6882:
6876:
6873:
6872:
6871:
6870:
6869:
6809:
6808:
6749:
6738:
6735:
6734:
6733:
6698:
6696:
6695:
6694:
6693:
6664:
6613:
6608:
6607:
6606:
6556:
6553:
6552:
6551:
6521:
6518:
6517:
6516:
6515:
6514:
6457:
6454:
6453:
6452:
6451:
6450:
6449:
6448:
6447:
6446:
6445:
6444:
6443:
6442:
6441:
6440:
6439:
6438:
6437:
6436:
6435:
6434:
6259:
6258:
6203:
6200:
6199:
6198:
6197:
6196:
6178:
6177:
6118:
6115:
6114:
6113:
6112:
6111:
6110:
6109:
6108:
6107:
6021:
5975:
5974:
5973:
5972:
5934:
5896:
5890:
5889:
5888:
5887:
5886:
5885:
5884:
5862:
5854:
5843:
5842:
5795:
5794:
5793:
5792:
5739:
5736:
5732:
5731:
5730:
5729:
5728:
5727:
5726:
5725:
5724:
5723:
5722:
5721:
5714:
5706:
5694:The Foundation
5645:
5619:
5611:
5590:User:John Galt
5579:
5578:
5533:
5525:
5518:Atlas Shrugged
5513:
5508:
5507:
5506:
5459:TheGeneralUser
5442:
5435:
5434:
5433:
5399:
5375:
5372:
5371:
5370:
5313:
5310:
5309:
5308:
5307:
5306:
5305:
5304:
5303:
5302:
5301:
5300:
5299:
5298:
5273:
5272:
5271:
5270:
5269:
5268:
5267:
5266:
5265:
5264:
5223:
5222:
5221:
5220:
5190:
5189:
5157:
5116:
5115:
5092:Turkish people
5068:
5066:Turkish people
5063:
5062:
5061:
5060:
5059:
5058:
5057:
5014:TheGeneralUser
4963:TheGeneralUser
4953:
4947:
4946:
4945:
4944:
4943:
4926:
4925:
4857:
4854:
4853:
4852:
4820:
4753:
4750:
4749:
4748:
4700:
4697:
4696:
4695:
4640:
4637:
4636:
4635:
4634:
4633:
4632:
4631:
4630:
4629:
4628:
4627:
4626:
4625:
4624:
4623:
4622:
4621:
4620:
4619:
4618:
4617:
4423:
4422:
4375:WP:Fresh start
4361:
4352:
4349:
4348:
4333:
4322:
4319:
4309:
4261:
4252:
4250:
4247:
4246:
4245:
4192:
4189:
4173:
4170:
4120:
4111:
4109:
4106:
4105:
4104:
4103:
4102:
4037:
4036:
3976:
3973:
3972:
3971:
3970:
3969:
3968:
3967:
3966:
3965:
3887:
3886:
3828:
3825:
3824:
3823:
3822:
3821:
3760:
3757:
3756:
3755:
3717:
3716:
3701:
3700:
3695:
3684:
3681:
3680:
3679:
3678:
3677:
3676:
3675:
3571:
3568:
3565:
3564:
3563:
3562:
3561:
3560:
3559:
3558:
3523:
3522:
3504:
3503:
3460:assumption of
3452:
3451:
3390:
3387:
3384:
3383:
3374:
3373:
3336:
3335:
3334:
3333:
3332:
3331:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3283:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3271:
3270:
3269:
3256:
3255:
3223:It appears to
3220:
3217:
3216:
3215:
3214:
3213:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3132:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3128:
3127:
3126:
3125:
3124:
3070:
3013:Ottawa version
2868:
2865:
2821:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2766:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2716:take a look.--
2712:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2639:
2638:
2577:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2560:195.14.220.127
2553:
2552:
2508:195.14.220.127
2495:
2492:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2441:
2424:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2324:
2286:
2285:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2206:
2205:
2149:
2148:
2131:
2130:
2095:
2094:
2076:
2075:
2040:
2039:
2018:
2001:
2000:
1943:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1836:
1835:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1570:if they choose
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1521:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1456:Best regards,
1438:Hello, Dennis
1435:
1432:
1380:
1371:
1369:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1317:
1268:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1169:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
973:
972:
968:
964:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
886:
885:
822:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
667:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
643:
642:
588:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
490:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
385:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
253:
157:
154:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
8487:
8470:
8465:
8464:
8463:
8462:
8459:
8455:
8454:
8449:
8444:
8438:
8437:
8434:
8428:
8427:
8426:
8425:
8422:
8418:
8414:
8410:
8405:
8404:
8403:
8402:
8399:
8395:
8394:
8389:
8384:
8378:
8377:
8374:
8368:
8367:
8366:
8365:
8360:
8355:
8351:
8324:
8320:
8319:
8316:
8312:
8311:
8308:
8299:
8295:
8294:
8293:
8292:
8291:
8287:
8286:
8281:
8276:
8270:
8269:
8266:
8260:
8259:
8258:
8257:
8256:
8252:
8248:
8244:
8243:false witness
8239:
8238:
8237:
8233:
8232:
8229:
8225:
8224:
8221:
8217:
8212:
8208:
8207:
8206:
8202:
8201:
8198:
8194:
8193:
8190:
8186:
8182:
8181:
8180:
8179:
8176:
8172:
8171:
8166:
8161:
8155:
8154:
8151:
8146:
8142:
8141:
8140:
8139:
8135:
8134:
8131:
8127:
8126:
8123:
8118:
8114:
8110:
8106:
8102:
8082:
8078:
8074:
8070:
8069:
8068:
8067:
8066:
8065:
8064:
8063:
8062:
8061:
8052:
8048:
8047:
8042:
8037:
8031:
8030:
8027:
8022:
8021:
8020:
8016:
8012:
8007:
8006:
8005:
8004:
8003:
8002:
7997:
7993:
7989:
7984:
7983:
7982:
7981:
7976:
7972:
7971:
7966:
7961:
7955:
7954:
7951:
7945:
7944:
7943:
7939:
7938:
7933:
7928:
7922:
7921:
7918:
7912:
7907:
7906:
7905:
7904:
7900:
7896:
7892:
7887:
7886:
7882:
7878:
7874:
7858:
7854:
7850:
7846:
7842:
7841:
7840:
7839:
7838:
7837:
7832:
7828:
7824:
7820:
7819:
7818:
7817:
7814:
7807:
7803:
7799:
7795:
7794:
7793:
7792:
7788:
7784:
7780:
7777:
7776:Boundarylayer
7770:Boundarylayer
7759:
7755:
7754:
7749:
7744:
7738:
7737:
7734:
7728:
7727:
7726:
7725:
7724:
7723:
7722:
7721:
7716:
7712:
7707:
7700:
7698:
7694:
7690:
7689:
7684:
7677:
7676:
7675:
7674:
7671:
7667:
7666:
7661:
7656:
7650:
7649:
7646:
7640:
7639:
7638:
7637:
7633:
7629:
7628:
7623:
7603:
7599:
7598:
7593:
7588:
7582:
7581:
7578:
7573:
7572:
7571:
7567:
7563:
7559:
7558:
7557:
7556:
7553:
7549:
7548:
7543:
7538:
7532:
7531:
7528:
7523:
7519:
7518:
7517:
7516:
7512:
7508:
7497:
7496:
7492:
7491:
7486:
7481:
7475:
7474:
7471:
7458:
7454:
7450:
7446:
7441:
7440:
7439:
7438:
7437:
7436:
7431:
7427:
7423:
7418:
7417:
7416:
7415:
7412:
7408:
7404:
7399:
7398:
7397:
7396:
7392:
7388:
7373:
7369:
7368:
7363:
7358:
7352:
7351:
7348:
7342:
7341:
7340:
7336:
7335:
7330:
7325:
7319:
7318:
7315:
7310:
7306:
7305:
7304:
7303:
7299:
7295:
7291:
7279:
7275:
7274:
7269:
7264:
7258:
7257:
7254:
7249:
7247:
7243:
7242:
7237:
7232:
7226:
7225:
7222:
7216:
7215:
7214:
7213:
7209:
7205:
7200:
7192:
7188:
7187:
7182:
7177:
7171:
7170:
7167:
7162:
7158:
7157:
7156:
7155:
7151:
7147:
7137:
7136:
7133:
7131:Dr. ☠ Blofeld
7127:
7122:
7118:
7117:
7112:
7107:
7101:
7100:
7097:
7092:
7091:
7090:
7089:
7086:
7084:Dr. ☠ Blofeld
7080:
7076:
7075:
7072:
7070:Dr. ☠ Blofeld
7066:
7046:
7040:
7035:
7029:
7028:
7027:
7023:
7022:
7017:
7012:
7006:
7005:
7002:
6997:
6996:
6995:
6989:
6984:
6978:
6974:
6970:
6969:
6968:
6962:
6957:
6951:
6948:
6945:
6942:
6941:
6940:
6939:
6936:
6932:
6931:
6926:
6921:
6915:
6914:
6911:
6906:
6905:
6904:
6903:
6897:
6892:
6881:
6868:
6864:
6863:
6858:
6853:
6847:
6846:
6843:
6837:
6836:
6835:
6831:
6827:
6823:
6822:
6821:
6819:
6815:
6806:
6802:
6796:
6792:
6786:
6782:
6780:
6779:
6774:
6768:
6767:
6766:
6760:
6759:
6758:Did you know?
6754:
6750:
6747:
6743:
6742:
6732:
6728:
6727:
6722:
6717:
6711:
6710:
6707:
6701:
6700:
6699:
6692:
6688:
6684:
6679:
6678:
6677:
6673:
6669:
6665:
6663:
6659:
6655:
6651:
6650:
6649:
6648:
6647:
6643:
6642:
6637:
6632:
6626:
6625:
6622:
6612:
6605:
6601:
6597:
6593:
6588:
6584:
6579:
6578:
6577:
6576:
6572:
6568:
6563:
6550:
6546:
6542:
6538:
6537:
6536:
6535:
6531:
6527:
6513:
6509:
6505:
6501:
6500:
6499:
6495:
6491:
6487:
6482:
6481:
6480:
6479:
6475:
6471:
6467:
6463:
6433:
6429:
6428:
6423:
6418:
6412:
6411:
6408:
6403:
6402:
6401:
6397:
6393:
6386:
6385:
6384:
6380:
6379:
6374:
6369:
6363:
6362:
6359:
6353:
6352:
6351:
6347:
6343:
6339:
6338:
6336:
6335:
6330:
6325:
6319:
6318:
6315:
6310:
6309:
6308:
6304:
6300:
6295:
6294:
6293:
6289:
6285:
6280:
6279:
6278:
6274:
6270:
6265:
6264:
6263:
6262:
6261:
6260:
6257:
6253:
6252:
6247:
6242:
6236:
6235:
6232:
6226:
6225:
6224:
6223:
6219:
6215:
6209:
6195:
6191:
6187:
6182:
6181:
6180:
6179:
6176:
6172:
6171:
6166:
6161:
6155:
6154:
6151:
6146:
6142:
6138:
6137:
6136:
6135:
6132:
6130:
6129:
6122:future.Thanx!
6106:
6102:
6101:
6096:
6091:
6085:
6084:
6081:
6076:
6075:
6074:
6071:
6066:
6059:
6058:
6057:
6053:
6052:
6047:
6042:
6036:
6035:
6032:
6027:
6022:
6020:
6016:
6015:
6010:
6005:
5999:
5998:
5995:
5989:
5984:
5979:
5978:
5977:
5976:
5971:
5968:
5965:
5961:
5960:
5959:
5956:
5955:
5954:
5949:
5948:
5947:
5942:be outlawed?
5941:
5936:
5935:
5933:
5932:
5928:
5924:
5918:
5913:
5911:
5910:
5904:
5902:
5895:
5883:
5879:
5875:
5870:
5869:
5868:
5864:
5863:
5860:
5856:
5855:
5852:
5847:
5846:
5845:
5844:
5841:
5837:
5836:
5831:
5826:
5820:
5819:
5816:
5811:
5810:
5809:
5808:
5804:
5800:
5791:
5787:
5783:
5778:
5777:
5776:
5772:
5768:
5764:
5760:
5759:
5758:
5757:
5753:
5749:
5745:
5735:
5720:
5716:
5715:
5712:
5708:
5707:
5704:
5699:
5695:
5691:
5687:
5686:
5685:
5682:
5679:
5676:
5670:
5669:edit conflict
5665:
5664:
5663:
5657:
5652:
5646:
5644:
5638:
5633:
5627:
5626:
5625:
5621:
5620:
5617:
5613:
5612:
5609:
5605:
5604:
5603:
5599:
5595:
5591:
5587:
5583:
5582:
5581:
5580:
5577:
5573:
5572:
5567:
5562:
5556:
5555:
5552:
5546:
5542:
5541:
5540:
5539:
5535:
5534:
5531:
5527:
5526:
5523:
5519:
5512:
5505:
5501:
5500:
5495:
5490:
5484:
5483:
5480:
5474:
5471:
5470:
5469:
5468:
5464:
5460:
5456:
5452:
5448:
5440:
5432:
5428:
5427:
5422:
5417:
5411:
5410:
5407:
5402:
5401:
5400:
5398:
5394:
5390:
5386:
5380:
5369:
5365:
5364:
5359:
5354:
5348:
5347:
5344:
5338:
5337:
5336:
5335:
5332:
5330:
5323:
5319:
5297:
5293:
5289:
5285:
5284:
5283:
5282:
5281:
5280:
5279:
5278:
5277:
5276:
5275:
5274:
5263:
5259:
5258:
5253:
5248:
5242:
5241:
5238:
5233:
5232:
5231:
5230:
5229:
5228:
5227:
5226:
5225:
5224:
5219:
5215:
5209:
5205:
5198:
5194:
5193:
5192:
5191:
5188:
5184:
5183:
5178:
5173:
5167:
5166:
5163:
5158:
5156:
5152:
5151:
5146:
5141:
5135:
5134:
5131:
5126:
5122:
5118:
5117:
5114:
5110:
5104:
5100:
5093:
5089:
5088:
5087:
5086:
5082:
5078:
5074:
5067:
5056:
5052:
5051:
5046:
5041:
5035:
5034:
5031:
5025:
5024:
5023:
5019:
5015:
5011:
5007:
5006:
5005:
5001:
5000:
4995:
4990:
4984:
4983:
4980:
4975:
4974:
4973:
4972:
4968:
4964:
4959:
4952:
4942:
4938:
4934:
4930:
4929:
4928:
4927:
4924:
4920:
4919:
4914:
4909:
4903:
4902:
4899:
4893:
4889:
4884:
4875:
4874:
4873:
4872:
4868:
4864:
4851:
4847:
4846:
4841:
4836:
4830:
4829:
4826:
4821:
4819:
4815:
4814:
4809:
4804:
4798:
4797:
4794:
4790:
4786:
4782:
4781:
4780:
4779:
4776:
4774:
4773:
4767:
4765:
4759:
4747:
4743:
4742:
4737:
4732:
4726:
4725:
4722:
4717:
4716:
4715:
4714:
4710:
4706:
4699:Marcel Leroux
4694:
4690:
4689:
4684:
4679:
4673:
4672:
4669:
4664:
4663:
4662:
4661:
4656:
4650:
4649:
4616:
4612:
4608:
4603:
4602:
4601:
4597:
4593:
4589:
4588:
4587:
4583:
4582:
4577:
4572:
4566:
4565:
4562:
4557:
4553:
4552:
4551:
4547:
4543:
4538:
4537:
4536:
4532:
4528:
4523:
4522:
4521:
4517:
4516:
4511:
4506:
4500:
4499:
4496:
4490:
4489:
4488:
4484:
4480:
4475:
4474:
4473:
4469:
4468:
4463:
4458:
4452:
4451:
4448:
4442:
4441:
4440:
4436:
4432:
4427:
4426:
4425:
4424:
4421:
4417:
4416:
4411:
4406:
4400:
4399:
4396:
4391:
4390:
4389:
4388:
4384:
4380:
4376:
4371:
4367:
4360:
4356:
4347:
4344:
4338:
4334:
4331:
4327:
4326:
4318:
4317:
4314:
4306:
4304:
4302:
4297:
4285:
4275:
4267:
4244:
4240:
4239:
4234:
4229:
4223:
4222:
4219:
4213:
4212:
4211:
4210:
4206:
4202:
4198:
4188:
4187:
4183:
4179:
4169:
4168:
4165:
4164:
4163:
4158:
4157:
4156:
4144:
4134:
4126:
4101:
4097:
4096:
4091:
4086:
4080:
4079:
4076:
4071:
4070:
4069:
4068:
4067:
4064:
4060:
4056:
4052:
4048:
4042:
4035:
4031:
4030:
4025:
4020:
4014:
4013:
4010:
4005:
4004:
4003:
4002:
3998:
3994:
3990:
3986:
3982:
3964:
3960:
3959:
3954:
3949:
3943:
3942:
3939:
3934:
3933:
3932:
3929:
3927:
3922:
3920:
3919:
3913:
3911:
3905:
3904:
3903:
3899:
3895:
3891:
3890:
3889:
3888:
3885:
3881:
3880:
3875:
3870:
3864:
3863:
3860:
3854:
3853:
3852:
3851:
3846:
3842:
3838:
3833:
3820:
3817:
3811:
3810:
3809:
3805:
3804:
3799:
3794:
3788:
3787:
3784:
3778:
3777:
3776:
3775:
3772:
3766:
3765:Uttar Pradesh
3759:Uttar Pradesh
3754:
3750:
3749:
3744:
3739:
3733:
3732:
3729:
3725:
3721:
3720:
3715:
3711:
3707:
3703:
3702:
3699:
3696:
3693:
3688:
3674:
3670:
3669:
3664:
3659:
3653:
3652:
3649:
3644:
3639:
3638:
3637:
3633:
3629:
3624:
3623:
3622:
3618:
3617:
3612:
3607:
3601:
3600:
3597:
3592:
3591:
3590:
3589:
3585:
3581:
3577:
3557:
3553:
3552:
3547:
3542:
3536:
3535:
3532:
3527:
3526:
3525:
3524:
3521:
3517:
3513:
3508:
3507:
3506:
3505:
3502:
3498:
3497:
3492:
3487:
3481:
3480:
3477:
3472:
3467:
3463:
3459:
3454:
3453:
3450:
3447:
3442:
3433:
3428:
3427:
3426:
3425:
3421:
3417:
3412:
3409:
3406:
3403:
3401:
3397:
3386:
3385:
3381:
3376:
3375:
3372:
3368:
3367:
3362:
3357:
3351:
3350:
3347:
3343:
3340:
3339:
3330:
3326:
3325:
3320:
3315:
3309:
3308:
3305:
3300:
3298:
3294:
3293:
3292:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3280:
3279:
3278:
3277:
3276:
3275:
3267:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3259:
3258:
3257:
3254:
3250:
3246:
3242:
3241:
3240:
3239:
3235:
3231:
3226:
3211:
3207:
3201:
3194:
3193:
3192:
3188:
3187:
3182:
3177:
3171:
3170:
3167:
3161:
3160:
3159:
3157:
3153:
3147:
3140:
3122:
3118:
3112:
3104:
3103:
3102:
3098:
3097:
3092:
3087:
3081:
3080:
3077:
3071:
3069:
3066:
3064:
3059:
3057:
3056:
3050:
3048:
3040:
3035:
3034:
3032:
3028:
3022:
3014:
3010:
3009:
3008:
3004:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2987:
2986:
2983:
2978:
2977:
2975:
2971:
2965:
2957:
2953:
2949:
2945:
2944:
2943:
2939:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2922:
2921:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2895:
2891:
2885:
2878:
2874:
2864:
2863:
2859:
2855:
2845:
2835:
2827:
2806:
2805:
2804:
2800:
2799:
2794:
2793:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2777:
2773:
2760:
2756:
2755:
2750:
2745:
2739:
2738:
2735:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2711:
2700:
2696:
2695:
2690:
2685:
2679:
2678:
2675:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2664:
2662:
2661:
2655:
2653:
2648:your answer.
2647:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2637:
2633:
2632:
2627:
2622:
2616:
2615:
2612:
2607:
2603:
2602:
2601:
2600:
2597:
2595:
2594:
2588:
2586:
2569:
2565:
2561:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2551:
2547:
2546:
2541:
2536:
2530:
2529:
2526:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2504:
2499:
2487:
2483:
2482:
2477:
2472:
2466:
2465:
2462:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2440:
2437:
2436:
2433:
2430:
2425:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2414:Amadscientist
2411:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2404:
2403:
2398:
2393:
2387:
2386:
2383:
2359:
2355:
2354:
2349:
2344:
2338:
2337:
2334:
2329:
2325:
2323:
2319:
2318:
2313:
2308:
2302:
2301:
2298:
2293:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2270:
2269:edit conflict
2265:
2264:
2259:
2255:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2238:
2237:
2234:
2229:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2204:
2200:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2183:
2182:
2179:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2163:
2162:
2157:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2129:
2125:
2124:
2119:
2114:
2108:
2107:
2104:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2074:
2070:
2069:
2064:
2059:
2053:
2052:
2049:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2038:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2019:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
1999:
1995:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1978:
1977:
1974:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1962:
1957:
1948:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1897:
1893:
1892:
1887:
1882:
1876:
1875:
1872:
1865:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1834:
1830:
1829:
1824:
1819:
1813:
1812:
1809:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1757:
1756:
1751:
1746:
1740:
1739:
1736:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1710:
1709:
1704:
1699:
1693:
1692:
1689:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1656:
1655:self-selected
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1637:
1632:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1615:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1601:
1597:
1596:
1591:
1586:
1580:
1579:
1576:
1571:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1556:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1512:
1508:
1507:Codename Lisa
1503:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1496:
1491:
1486:
1480:
1479:
1476:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1458:Codename Lisa
1454:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1439:
1431:
1430:
1426:
1425:
1420:
1419:
1404:
1394:
1386:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1342:
1341:
1338:
1333:
1330:
1328:
1324:
1321:
1318:
1316:
1312:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1295:
1294:
1291:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1273:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1225:
1224:
1221:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1174:
1167:
1160:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1092:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1054:
1049:
1043:
1042:
1039:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1010:
1005:
999:
998:
995:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
981:
978:
969:
965:
962:
961:
960:
951:
947:
946:
941:
936:
930:
929:
926:
920:
915:
910:
909:
908:
905:
904:
903:
898:
897:
896:
890:
889:
888:
887:
884:
880:
879:
874:
869:
863:
862:
859:
853:
849:
848:
847:
846:
843:
842:
841:
836:
835:
834:
828:
810:
807:
799:
792:
791:
790:
786:
785:
780:
775:
769:
768:
765:
760:
756:
755:
754:
751:
743:
737:
733:
732:
731:
727:
726:
721:
716:
710:
709:
706:
701:
696:
695:
694:
693:
690:
682:
676:
672:
659:
655:
651:
647:
646:
645:
644:
641:
637:
636:
631:
626:
620:
619:
616:
610:
609:
608:
607:
603:
599:
594:
580:
577:
569:
563:
562:
561:
557:
556:
551:
546:
540:
539:
536:
531:
528:
524:
520:
519:
518:
517:
514:
506:
500:
496:
480:
476:
475:
470:
465:
459:
458:
455:
449:
448:
447:
444:
439:
438:
437:
433:
432:
427:
422:
416:
415:
412:
406:
405:
404:
403:
400:
396:
391:
367:
363:
362:
357:
352:
346:
345:
342:
336:
335:
334:
331:
327:
326:
325:
321:
320:
315:
310:
304:
303:
300:
295:
294:
293:
290:
286:
285:
284:
280:
279:
274:
269:
263:
262:
259:
254:
252:
248:
247:
242:
237:
231:
230:
227:
222:
221:
220:
217:
213:
212:
211:
207:
206:
201:
196:
190:
189:
186:
180:
179:
178:
177:
174:
173:
172:
167:
166:
165:
153:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
132:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
8451:
8435:
8432:
8391:
8375:
8372:
8346:
8315:
8309:Buster Seven
8307:
8297:
8283:
8267:
8264:
8228:
8222:Buster Seven
8220:
8197:
8191:Buster Seven
8189:
8184:
8168:
8152:
8149:
8145:User:Keilana
8130:
8124:Buster Seven
8122:
8116:
8108:
8098:
8044:
8028:
8025:
7968:
7952:
7949:
7935:
7919:
7916:
7910:
7888:
7870:
7802:Farmer Brown
7773:
7751:
7735:
7732:
7679:
7663:
7647:
7644:
7618:
7615:
7595:
7579:
7576:
7562:Anthonyhcole
7545:
7529:
7526:
7507:Anthonyhcole
7503:
7488:
7472:
7469:
7465:
7444:
7403:Anthonyhcole
7383:
7365:
7349:
7346:
7332:
7316:
7313:
7287:
7271:
7255:
7252:
7239:
7223:
7220:
7195:
7184:
7168:
7165:
7143:
7125:
7114:
7098:
7095:
7077:
7062:
7019:
7003:
7000:
6928:
6912:
6909:
6885:
6878:
6860:
6844:
6841:
6812:
6776:
6770:
6763:
6762:
6756:
6724:
6708:
6705:
6697:
6639:
6623:
6620:
6616:
6615:
6610:
6596:Farmer Brown
6591:
6586:
6582:
6561:
6558:
6541:Farmer Brown
6523:
6459:
6425:
6409:
6406:
6391:RGloucester
6376:
6360:
6357:
6332:
6316:
6313:
6249:
6233:
6230:
6213:RGloucester
6205:
6168:
6152:
6149:
6144:
6127:
6126:
6120:
6098:
6082:
6079:
6049:
6033:
6030:
6012:
5996:
5993:
5952:
5951:
5945:
5944:
5920:
5915:
5908:
5905:
5898:
5859:
5853:Buster Seven
5851:
5833:
5817:
5814:
5796:
5741:
5733:
5711:
5705:Buster Seven
5703:
5693:
5689:
5616:
5610:Buster Seven
5608:
5569:
5553:
5550:
5544:
5530:
5524:Buster Seven
5522:
5515:
5497:
5481:
5478:
5444:
5424:
5408:
5405:
5387:
5384:
5361:
5345:
5342:
5315:
5312:Sally Season
5255:
5239:
5236:
5201:
5180:
5164:
5161:
5148:
5132:
5129:
5124:
5096:
5073:User:Turco85
5070:
5048:
5032:
5029:
4997:
4981:
4978:
4955:
4916:
4900:
4897:
4888:WP:FILEMOVER
4882:
4859:
4843:
4827:
4824:
4811:
4795:
4792:
4788:
4771:
4770:
4763:
4755:
4739:
4723:
4720:
4702:
4686:
4670:
4667:
4646:
4642:
4579:
4563:
4560:
4513:
4497:
4494:
4465:
4449:
4446:
4413:
4397:
4394:
4363:
4300:
4295:
4292:
4236:
4220:
4217:
4194:
4175:
4161:
4160:
4154:
4153:
4151:
4093:
4077:
4074:
4045:— Preceding
4038:
4027:
4011:
4008:
3988:
3984:
3978:
3956:
3940:
3937:
3925:
3917:
3916:
3909:
3894:Gerda Arendt
3877:
3861:
3858:
3830:
3801:
3785:
3782:
3762:
3746:
3730:
3727:
3697:
3666:
3650:
3647:
3614:
3598:
3595:
3573:
3549:
3533:
3530:
3494:
3478:
3475:
3457:
3416:HafniumDrive
3413:
3410:
3407:
3404:
3400:legal threat
3399:
3395:
3392:
3379:
3364:
3348:
3345:
3322:
3306:
3303:
3297:Clint Howard
3265:
3245:Joefromrandb
3230:Joefromrandb
3224:
3222:
3199:Neutralhomer
3184:
3168:
3165:
3145:Neutralhomer
3137:Updated the
3136:
3110:Neutralhomer
3094:
3078:
3075:
3062:
3054:
3053:
3046:
3020:Neutralhomer
3000:
2984:
2981:
2963:Neutralhomer
2935:
2919:
2916:
2911:
2906:
2901:
2883:Neutralhomer
2870:
2852:
2789:
2787:
2768:
2752:
2736:
2733:
2714:
2692:
2676:
2673:
2659:
2658:
2651:
2629:
2613:
2610:
2592:
2591:
2584:
2579:
2543:
2527:
2524:
2497:
2479:
2463:
2460:
2427:
2400:
2384:
2381:
2378:
2351:
2335:
2332:
2315:
2299:
2296:
2251:
2235:
2232:
2196:
2180:
2177:
2172:
2160:
2159:
2121:
2105:
2102:
2066:
2050:
2047:
2031:
2030:
2024:
2023:
1991:
1975:
1972:
1953:
1922:Anthonyhcole
1917:
1913:
1889:
1873:
1870:
1851:Anthonyhcole
1846:
1842:
1826:
1810:
1807:
1791:Anthonyhcole
1782:
1779:
1753:
1737:
1734:
1719:Anthonyhcole
1706:
1690:
1687:
1660:Anthonyhcole
1654:
1653:
1635:
1630:
1613:
1593:
1577:
1574:
1569:
1529:Anthonyhcole
1523:
1493:
1477:
1474:
1455:
1440:
1437:
1415:
1413:
1411:
1355:
1339:
1336:
1326:
1308:
1292:
1289:
1270:
1238:
1222:
1219:
1199:Hutchison 3G
1192:
1178:
1138:
1122:
1119:
1101:
1097:
1087:
1056:
1040:
1037:
1012:
996:
993:
974:
958:
943:
927:
924:
918:
913:
901:
900:
894:
893:
876:
860:
857:
851:
839:
838:
832:
831:
824:
782:
766:
763:
758:
723:
707:
704:
699:
674:
669:
633:
617:
614:
590:
553:
537:
534:
526:
522:
501:- thoughts?
492:
472:
456:
453:
429:
413:
410:
394:
389:
387:
359:
343:
340:
317:
301:
298:
276:
260:
257:
244:
228:
225:
203:
187:
184:
170:
169:
163:
162:
159:
136:
106:
78:
43:
37:
8099:Please see
7079:She's good!
6795:quick check
6781:in Vermont?
6773:spider webs
6456:Sock puppet
6284:John Carter
5675:Writ Keeper
5441:for testing
5437:Requesting
4789:In progress
4355:User:Ewawer
2948:User:Drmies
2445:Truthkeeper
1277:Dr. Blofeld
587:Wow! Signal
384:A goof am I
36:This is an
8111:new user,
7520:It was at
7059:Cool album
6791:here's how
6139:I suggest
6128:zeeyanketu
6064:SPhilbrick
5698:palm print
4752:ANI notice
4178:Tim98Seven
3266:as a whole
2956:User:RexxS
2710:Naqshbandi
2494:MONGO Beck
1961:Nobody Ent
1918:ad hominem
1914:ad hominem
1847:Ad hominem
1843:ad hominem
1783:ad hominem
1267:Jesse Cook
141:. Thanks,
95:Archive 15
90:Archive 14
85:Archive 13
79:Archive 12
73:Archive 11
68:Archive 10
8302:dustballs
8298:on strike
8247:DEIDRA C.
7849:Pelarmian
7823:IRWolfie-
7783:IRWolfie-
7422:Prioryman
7387:Prioryman
7161:talk page
7034:Adjwilley
6983:Adjwilley
6956:Adjwilley
6891:Adjwilley
6592:ourselves
6202:Any news?
5923:Lord Roem
5651:Adjwilley
5632:Adjwilley
4892:new files
4772:Strikeout
4764:Automatic
4289:template.
4148:template.
3918:Phightins
3837:Gilderien
3832:Brilliant
3462:bad faith
3055:Phightins
2849:template.
2660:Strikeout
2652:Automatic
2593:Strikeout
2585:Automatic
1520:Responded
1408:template.
914:generally
125:Read the
60:Archive 5
8453:Join WER
8393:Join WER
8285:Join WER
8170:Join WER
8120:way. ```
8046:Join WER
7970:Join WER
7937:Join WER
7911:eighteen
7753:Join WER
7682:elektrik
7665:Join WER
7621:elektrik
7597:Join WER
7547:Join WER
7490:Join WER
7367:Join WER
7334:Join WER
7294:Tijfo098
7273:Join WER
7241:Join WER
7186:Join WER
7116:Join WER
7021:Join WER
6930:Join WER
6862:Join WER
6818:nominate
6801:DYKSTATS
6726:Join WER
6641:Join WER
6611:On break
6539:Fixed.
6526:Tijfo098
6504:ColaXtra
6470:ColaXtra
6427:Join WER
6378:Join WER
6334:Join WER
6251:Join WER
6170:Join WER
6100:Join WER
6051:Join WER
6014:Join WER
5988:Jclemens
5874:Gtwfan52
5835:Join WER
5799:Gtwfan52
5782:Gtwfan52
5767:Gtwfan52
5748:Gtwfan52
5571:Join WER
5499:Join WER
5426:Join WER
5389:DeeJermo
5363:Join WER
5257:Join WER
5182:Join WER
5150:Join WER
5050:Join WER
4999:Join WER
4918:Join WER
4845:Join WER
4813:Join WER
4741:Join WER
4688:Join WER
4639:dogs ...
4581:Join WER
4515:Join WER
4467:Join WER
4415:Join WER
4238:Join WER
4095:Join WER
4059:contribs
4047:unsigned
4029:Join WER
3958:Join WER
3879:Join WER
3803:Join WER
3748:Join WER
3706:Besieged
3668:Join WER
3628:Besieged
3616:Join WER
3580:Besieged
3570:Oct 2012
3551:Join WER
3496:Join WER
3440:Garamond
3414:Thanks!
3366:Join WER
3324:Join WER
3186:Join WER
3096:Join WER
3002:Join WER
2937:Join WER
2877:this one
2873:This one
2854:Gtwfan52
2772:Gtwfan52
2765:Question
2754:Join WER
2694:Join WER
2631:Join WER
2545:Join WER
2481:Join WER
2402:Join WER
2353:Join WER
2317:Join WER
2253:Join WER
2198:Join WER
2156:Jclemens
2123:Join WER
2068:Join WER
1993:Join WER
1891:Join WER
1828:Join WER
1755:Join WER
1708:Join WER
1636:enormous
1595:Join WER
1555:Top down
1495:Join WER
1357:Join WER
1310:Join WER
1254:Tijfo098
1240:Join WER
1203:Tijfo098
1181:Tijfo098
1153:Talkback
1140:Join WER
1058:Join WER
1014:Join WER
945:Join WER
878:Join WER
784:Join WER
725:Join WER
675:evidence
635:Join WER
555:Join WER
527:possible
474:Join WER
431:Join WER
361:Join WER
319:Join WER
278:Join WER
246:Join WER
205:Join WER
109:Tri-Five
6583:However
6145:editing
5010:WP:SOCK
4607:Flyer22
4592:Flyer22
4542:Flyer22
4527:Flyer22
4479:Flyer22
4431:Flyer22
4379:Flyer22
4359:Rogr101
3827:Blocked
3643:WP:DENY
3576:GoalRef
3471:pointed
3458:de jure
3342:WP:DENY
2021:block.
1098:actions
1072:ɐuɐʞsǝp
1028:ɐuɐʞsǝp
980:ɐuɐʞsǝp
967:harder.
671:noindex
666:noindex
593:Tdp1001
143:DPL bot
39:archive
8433:Dennis
8373:Dennis
8354:Frood!
8265:Dennis
8150:Dennis
8026:Dennis
7950:Dennis
7917:Dennis
7733:Dennis
7705:Steven
7645:Dennis
7577:Dennis
7527:Dennis
7470:Dennis
7445:should
7347:Dennis
7314:Dennis
7253:Dennis
7221:Dennis
7166:Dennis
7096:Dennis
7001:Dennis
6973:Here's
6910:Dennis
6842:Dennis
6826:Drmies
6706:Dennis
6621:Dennis
6486:WP:SPA
6407:Dennis
6358:Dennis
6314:Dennis
6231:Dennis
6150:Dennis
6080:Dennis
6069:(Talk)
6031:Dennis
5994:Dennis
5964:Isarra
5815:Dennis
5551:Dennis
5479:Dennis
5406:Dennis
5343:Dennis
5288:Cavann
5237:Dennis
5162:Dennis
5130:Dennis
5121:WP:DRN
5077:Cavann
5030:Dennis
4979:Dennis
4898:Dennis
4825:Dennis
4793:Dennis
4721:Dennis
4668:Dennis
4561:Dennis
4556:WP:SPI
4495:Dennis
4447:Dennis
4395:Dennis
4311:berate
4218:Dennis
4075:Dennis
4009:Dennis
3938:Dennis
3859:Dennis
3783:Dennis
3728:Dennis
3648:Dennis
3596:Dennis
3531:Dennis
3512:Sitush
3476:Dennis
3466:WP:NPA
3346:Dennis
3304:Dennis
3166:Dennis
3076:Dennis
2982:Dennis
2917:Dennis
2912:usable
2791:Jethro
2734:Dennis
2674:Dennis
2646:here's
2644:Well,
2611:Dennis
2606:WT:NPP
2525:Dennis
2461:Dennis
2382:Dennis
2333:Dennis
2297:Dennis
2233:Dennis
2178:Dennis
2103:Dennis
2048:Dennis
1973:Dennis
1956:WP:ANI
1871:Dennis
1808:Dennis
1735:Dennis
1688:Dennis
1575:Dennis
1475:Dennis
1443:WP:FAC
1417:Jethro
1337:Dennis
1290:Dennis
1220:Dennis
1120:Dennis
1069:(ʞɿɐʇ)
1038:Dennis
1025:(ʞɿɐʇ)
994:Dennis
977:(ʞɿɐʇ)
925:Dennis
858:Dennis
801:really
764:Dennis
745:really
705:Dennis
684:really
615:Dennis
571:really
535:Dennis
508:really
454:Dennis
411:Dennis
341:Dennis
299:Dennis
258:Dennis
226:Dennis
185:Dennis
8469:Tib42
8436:Brown
8413:Bbb23
8376:Brown
8268:Brown
8216:Sarah
8153:Brown
8029:Brown
7953:Brown
7920:Brown
7736:Brown
7710:Zhang
7687:SHOOS
7648:Brown
7626:SHOOS
7580:Brown
7530:Brown
7473:Brown
7350:Brown
7317:Brown
7256:Brown
7224:Brown
7169:Brown
7099:Brown
7004:Brown
6913:Brown
6845:Brown
6709:Brown
6654:Bbb23
6624:Brown
6562:isn't
6410:Brown
6361:Brown
6317:Brown
6234:Brown
6153:Brown
6117:Query
6083:Brown
6034:Brown
5997:Brown
5953:Vesey
5899:By a
5818:Brown
5554:Brown
5545:right
5482:Brown
5409:Brown
5346:Brown
5328:Sædon
5240:Brown
5203:Turco
5165:Brown
5133:Brown
5098:Turco
5033:Brown
4982:Brown
4901:Brown
4828:Brown
4796:Brown
4724:Brown
4671:Brown
4564:Brown
4498:Brown
4450:Brown
4398:Brown
4370:here.
4221:Brown
4162:Vesey
4078:Brown
4012:Brown
3941:Brown
3862:Brown
3786:Brown
3731:Brown
3651:Brown
3599:Brown
3534:Brown
3479:Brown
3445:Lethe
3349:Brown
3307:Brown
3169:Brown
3079:Brown
2985:Brown
2920:Brown
2907:think
2737:Brown
2718:Bbb23
2677:Brown
2614:Brown
2528:Brown
2464:Brown
2385:Brown
2336:Brown
2328:WP:AN
2300:Brown
2275:Bbb23
2236:Brown
2181:Brown
2138:Bbb23
2106:Brown
2084:Bbb23
2082:on.--
2051:Brown
2032:Vesey
2008:Bbb23
1976:Brown
1874:Brown
1811:Brown
1738:Brown
1691:Brown
1578:Brown
1478:Brown
1340:Brown
1293:Brown
1223:Brown
1123:Brown
1106:Coren
1041:Brown
997:Brown
928:Brown
902:Vesey
861:Brown
852:other
840:Vesey
767:Brown
708:Brown
618:Brown
538:Brown
457:Brown
443:Coren
414:Brown
399:Coren
344:Brown
330:Coren
302:Brown
289:Coren
261:Brown
229:Brown
216:Coren
188:Brown
171:Vesey
16:<
8417:talk
8317:Talk
8251:talk
8230:Talk
8199:Talk
8132:Talk
8103:and
8077:talk
8015:talk
7992:talk
7899:talk
7881:talk
7853:talk
7845:here
7827:talk
7806:talk
7787:talk
7693:talk
7632:talk
7566:talk
7511:talk
7453:talk
7426:talk
7407:talk
7391:talk
7298:talk
7208:talk
7150:talk
7065:this
7039:talk
6988:talk
6977:here
6961:talk
6946:and
6896:talk
6875:Tool
6830:talk
6687:talk
6672:talk
6658:talk
6600:talk
6571:talk
6545:talk
6530:talk
6508:talk
6494:talk
6474:talk
6396:talk
6346:talk
6303:talk
6288:talk
6273:talk
6228::/
6218:talk
6190:talk
5946:Ryan
5927:talk
5901:vote
5878:talk
5861:Talk
5803:talk
5786:talk
5771:talk
5752:talk
5744:here
5713:Talk
5656:talk
5637:talk
5618:Talk
5598:talk
5532:Talk
5463:talk
5393:talk
5318:this
5292:talk
5213:Talk
5108:Talk
5081:talk
5018:talk
4967:talk
4937:talk
4883:Done
4867:talk
4709:talk
4648:Ched
4611:talk
4596:talk
4546:talk
4531:talk
4483:talk
4435:talk
4383:talk
4301:lisk
4296:Basa
4205:talk
4182:talk
4155:Ryan
4055:talk
3997:talk
3898:talk
3841:Chat
3834:. --
3710:talk
3632:talk
3584:talk
3516:talk
3420:talk
3249:talk
3234:talk
3205:Talk
3151:Talk
3116:Talk
3026:Talk
2969:Talk
2954:and
2889:Talk
2858:talk
2776:talk
2722:talk
2564:talk
2512:talk
2503:This
2449:talk
2435:7754
2432:chen
2418:talk
2279:talk
2218:talk
2168:year
2142:talk
2088:talk
2025:Ryan
2012:talk
1926:talk
1855:talk
1795:talk
1787:this
1723:talk
1664:talk
1631:more
1533:talk
1527:. --
1511:talk
1462:talk
1258:talk
1207:talk
1185:talk
919:most
895:Ryan
833:Ryan
759:does
700:tell
654:talk
602:talk
495:diif
395:know
164:Ryan
147:talk
8187:```
7867:SPI
7781:).
6751:On
6587:not
6555:YRC
6125:---
5849:```
5123:.
4933:BDD
4863:BDD
4284:ygm
4279:or
4201:Kww
4143:ygm
4138:or
3301::)
2875:or
2844:ygm
2839:or
2576:NPP
1614:of
1445:of
1403:ygm
1398:or
1327:Why
1102:why
805:can
797:You
749:can
741:You
688:can
680:You
575:can
567:You
512:can
504:You
390:was
156:SPI
127:FAQ
113:Cid
8442:2¢
8439:-
8419:)
8382:2¢
8379:-
8352:)
8274:2¢
8271:-
8253:)
8159:2¢
8156:-
8079:)
8035:2¢
8032:-
8017:)
7994:)
7959:2¢
7956:-
7926:2¢
7923:-
7901:)
7883:)
7855:)
7847:.
7829:)
7808:)
7789:)
7742:2¢
7739:-
7695:)
7654:2¢
7651:-
7634:)
7586:2¢
7583:-
7568:)
7536:2¢
7533:-
7513:)
7505:--
7479:2¢
7476:-
7455:)
7428:)
7409:)
7401:--
7393:)
7356:2¢
7353:-
7323:2¢
7320:-
7300:)
7262:2¢
7259:-
7230:2¢
7227:-
7210:)
7175:2¢
7172:-
7152:)
7105:2¢
7102:-
7081:♦
7010:2¢
7007:-
6979:.
6952:.
6919:2¢
6916:-
6851:2¢
6848:-
6832:)
6793:,
6755:,
6715:2¢
6712:-
6689:)
6674:)
6660:)
6630:2¢
6627:-
6594:.
6573:)
6547:)
6532:)
6510:)
6496:)
6476:)
6468:.
6416:2¢
6413:-
6398:)
6367:2¢
6364:-
6348:)
6323:2¢
6320:-
6305:)
6290:)
6275:)
6240:2¢
6237:-
6220:)
6192:)
6159:2¢
6156:-
6089:2¢
6086:-
6040:2¢
6037:-
6003:2¢
6000:-
5929:)
5880:)
5824:2¢
5821:-
5805:)
5788:)
5773:)
5754:)
5734:.
5600:)
5560:2¢
5557:-
5488:2¢
5485:-
5465:)
5415:2¢
5412:-
5395:)
5352:2¢
5349:-
5294:)
5246:2¢
5243:-
5216:)
5207:85
5171:2¢
5168:-
5139:2¢
5136:-
5111:)
5102:85
5083:)
5039:2¢
5036:-
5020:)
4988:2¢
4985:-
4969:)
4939:)
4907:2¢
4904:-
4869:)
4834:2¢
4831:-
4802:2¢
4799:-
4730:2¢
4727:-
4711:)
4677:2¢
4674:-
4654:?
4651::
4613:)
4598:)
4570:2¢
4567:-
4548:)
4533:)
4504:2¢
4501:-
4485:)
4456:2¢
4453:-
4437:)
4404:2¢
4401:-
4385:)
4339:-
4287:}}
4281:{{
4277:}}
4271:{{
4227:2¢
4224:-
4207:)
4199:.—
4184:)
4146:}}
4140:{{
4136:}}
4130:{{
4084:2¢
4081:-
4061:)
4057:•
4018:2¢
4015:-
3999:)
3947:2¢
3944:-
3910:Go
3900:)
3868:2¢
3865:-
3792:2¢
3789:-
3737:2¢
3734:-
3712:)
3657:2¢
3654:-
3634:)
3605:2¢
3602:-
3586:)
3540:2¢
3537:-
3518:)
3485:2¢
3482:-
3422:)
3402:?
3355:2¢
3352:-
3313:2¢
3310:-
3251:)
3236:)
3225:me
3208:•
3202:•
3175:2¢
3172:-
3154:•
3148:•
3119:•
3113:•
3085:2¢
3082:-
3047:Go
3029:•
3023:•
2991:2¢
2988:-
2972:•
2966:•
2950:,
2926:2¢
2923:-
2914:.
2892:•
2886:•
2860:)
2847:}}
2841:{{
2837:}}
2831:{{
2778:)
2743:2¢
2740:-
2724:)
2683:2¢
2680:-
2620:2¢
2617:-
2566:)
2534:2¢
2531:-
2514:)
2470:2¢
2467:-
2451:)
2429:Rs
2420:)
2391:2¢
2388:-
2342:2¢
2339:-
2306:2¢
2303:-
2281:)
2242:2¢
2239:-
2230:.
2220:)
2187:2¢
2184:-
2164:"
2144:)
2112:2¢
2109:-
2090:)
2057:2¢
2054:-
2014:)
1982:2¢
1979:-
1928:)
1880:2¢
1877:-
1857:)
1817:2¢
1814:-
1797:)
1744:2¢
1741:-
1725:)
1697:2¢
1694:-
1666:)
1584:2¢
1581:-
1535:)
1484:2¢
1481:-
1464:)
1453:.
1406:}}
1400:{{
1396:}}
1390:{{
1346:2¢
1343:-
1322:,
1299:2¢
1296:-
1229:2¢
1226:-
1209:)
1187:)
1129:2¢
1126:-
1093:)
1047:2¢
1044:-
1003:2¢
1000:-
975:--
934:2¢
931:-
867:2¢
864:-
821:CU
773:2¢
770:-
738:-
714:2¢
711:-
656:)
624:2¢
621:-
604:)
544:2¢
541:-
463:2¢
460:-
441:—
420:2¢
417:-
350:2¢
347:-
308:2¢
305:-
267:2¢
264:-
235:2¢
232:-
194:2¢
191:-
149:)
119:|
64:←
8447:©
8415:(
8387:©
8279:©
8249:(
8164:©
8075:(
8040:©
8013:(
7990:(
7964:©
7931:©
7897:(
7879:(
7851:(
7825:(
7804:(
7785:(
7747:©
7691:(
7659:©
7630:(
7591:©
7564:(
7541:©
7509:(
7484:©
7451:(
7424:(
7405:(
7389:(
7361:©
7328:©
7296:(
7267:©
7235:©
7206:(
7180:©
7148:(
7110:©
7041:)
7037:(
7032:~
7015:©
6990:)
6986:(
6981:~
6963:)
6959:(
6954:~
6924:©
6898:)
6894:(
6889:~
6856:©
6828:(
6816:(
6807:.
6797:)
6789:(
6720:©
6685:(
6670:(
6656:(
6635:©
6598:(
6569:(
6543:(
6528:(
6506:(
6492:(
6472:(
6421:©
6394:(
6372:©
6344:(
6328:©
6301:(
6286:(
6271:(
6245:©
6216:(
6188:(
6164:©
6094:©
6045:©
6008:©
5967:༆
5925:(
5876:(
5829:©
5801:(
5784:(
5769:(
5750:(
5681:♔
5678:⚇
5671:)
5667:(
5658:)
5654:(
5649:~
5639:)
5635:(
5630:~
5596:(
5565:©
5493:©
5461:(
5420:©
5391:(
5357:©
5290:(
5251:©
5210:(
5176:©
5144:©
5105:(
5079:(
5044:©
5016:(
4993:©
4965:(
4935:(
4912:©
4865:(
4839:©
4807:©
4735:©
4707:(
4682:©
4609:(
4594:(
4575:©
4544:(
4529:(
4509:©
4481:(
4461:©
4433:(
4409:©
4381:(
4357:/
4307:⁄
4232:©
4203:(
4180:(
4089:©
4053:(
4041:1
4023:©
3995:(
3952:©
3926:!
3896:(
3873:©
3843:|
3797:©
3742:©
3708:(
3662:©
3630:(
3610:©
3582:(
3545:©
3514:(
3490:©
3434:)
3430:(
3418:(
3360:©
3318:©
3247:(
3232:(
3180:©
3090:©
3063:!
3041:)
3037:(
2996:©
2931:©
2856:(
2797:B
2774:(
2748:©
2720:(
2688:©
2625:©
2562:(
2539:©
2510:(
2475:©
2447:(
2416:(
2396:©
2347:©
2311:©
2277:(
2271:)
2267:(
2247:©
2216:(
2192:©
2140:(
2117:©
2086:(
2062:©
2010:(
1987:©
1924:(
1885:©
1853:(
1822:©
1793:(
1749:©
1721:(
1702:©
1662:(
1589:©
1531:(
1513:)
1509:(
1489:©
1460:(
1423:B
1351:©
1304:©
1260:)
1256:(
1234:©
1205:(
1197:(
1183:(
1168:.
1134:©
1091:←
1089:(
1052:©
1008:©
939:©
872:©
778:©
719:©
652:(
629:©
600:(
549:©
468:©
425:©
355:©
313:©
272:©
240:©
199:©
145:(
133:.
115:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.