User talk:Delicious carbuncle/Archive 9

1405:

common with much of the internet) can do little about minors viewing inappropriate material. It is arguable that the responsibility of protecting minors from such material rests not with Knowledge but parents and those giving minors access to the internet - and thus it is a fair debating point as to whether or not Knowledge ought to take any steps to prevent minors participating (and our views will legitimately differ here). However, deliberately encouraging minors to view inappropriate material is beyond the limits of that wiki debate - and certainly not a matter to joke about. A philosophical debate about children protection and censorship is not within the scope of this project. --

2172:

I'm not really good at editing this stuff and writing it was a real challenge for me. I have a lot going on as well but believe this is important and should be on Knowledge. I do appreciate that there are standards and will strive to remain within the guidelines. I was able to track down two folks that basically added themselves to the article in a rather blatant attempt at self promotion. I told them that if they are going to "dabble" they need to keep what they post in compliance... or stay out. I'm pretty sure they won't be a problem anymore. One of the really pleasant things about bikers is that we do have a belief in respect and follow a hierarchy of sorts.

2600:

problems, particularly ones that have received push-back from other editors. As I mentioned, I will be adding further examples later, but in the meantime maybe you would be willing to go through the statement/evidence with that in mind, and perhaps consider some edits. For example, I don't think there is an obvious problem with the Jepson and Dyas-Elliott redirects. I'm also not sure adding references to articles with negative information/titles in them will be the strongest evidence to outsiders, though I agree that if there are lots more examples it does show a pattern. Just a thought. --

3452: 2135:

in darn near every motorcycle magazine I have ever read. Another has published a magazine been published in at least two anthologies, been a major contributor to special editions in periodicals and has a book out with another one the way. Another has been has a book out, a CD, has performed all over the East coast, been interviewed on radio been in at least a couple of anthologies and is like the others, well known in the field. All of the people listed are well known in their area or poetry.

3228: 1623: 2217:

also well known in poetry in general. I found independent articles in the Boston Globe and WGBN Boston on two of them and the biggest one of all, with the most ink out there is Dr. Martin Jack Rosenblum. I was able to find a story from the UWM Post in Milwaukee where he teaches. This guy headed up the Archives for Harley Davidson and has more ink than anyone I know having been a regular contributor to dozens of magazines. Let me know if this story works. I think it is in compliance with

2338: 2294:

someone was inserting garbage links or something). Anyway, I checked out your contributions and I suddenly didn't care about grammar and punctuation errors on the site anymore. I think I could gear my efforts toward fighting vandals and people who are just trying to get their own websites in the links sections of articles. So, I guess what I'm getting at is that I'd like some direction from you. Is there a certain page or program you use to alert you to dubious posts?

4268: 3819:, a case in which the person with whom I am now banning from interacting was de-sysopped. I suggest that Fut Perf is acting out in a misguided attempt to support his colleague, which would be a misuse of the tools. I had hoped that they would unblock me and correct the block log themselves, but they appear to have gone inactive just at the time I left my request for them. Can someone please unblock me now and have a word with Fut Perf? Thanks. 1184:) is an author or a spirituality author be added to the bio again? It was removed for some odd reason, as was her actual page on here, but being an author is her primary profession now. I guess, given the debates going on, I'd be pushing it to note that she also has a publishing company called Goddessy and it is documented along with her 24 books via Amazon. Being an "author" or owning a publishing company is not controversial to state. 4030: 3891: 3717: 3491: 3266: 4231:. I made my comment at 18:14 UTC, ErrantX responded at 18:25 UTC. I made no further comments on their talk page or anywhere else about Prioryman, although I had made other edits. At 7:24 UTC the next day you blocked me. The admin who placed the interaction ban hadn't seen fit to block me. No other admin blocked me. Yet, many hours later, you -- an admin with a personal involvement in this from your association with Prioryman in 1972: 4695: 168:, but I'm sure good sources can be found if someone wants to look for them. At least it is better than the original source. I just used that Cardone example because it was convenient. I don't edit Scientology-related articles or their talk pages, since I was warned for my sole edit to the BLP of someone who isn't even identified as a Scientologist. Thanks for your message and looking into this. 1027:"Google it." I think this has run its course. Good luck with your insinuations that the Internet will rage with commentary about someone's sexuality due to the inclusion of a category at the bottom of their Knowledge article. If you want your pointless last word like so many people do, and like you did before the discussion closed on the talk page, feel free to take up your arguments there. 4978:. However, an editor has now suggested that I should have informed those who contributed to the discussion that it had been reopened, so I am doing so. It is very likely that nobody had any more to add, but if you would have done so then I apologise for not informing you at the time. If you do wish to say any more about it then it will be necessary to open a new section at 2255:. Well someone did and did a fine job. The article has received a major re-do and looks wonderful. It has been abbreviated considerably but the meat of the article remains. The work of Diane Wakoski was emphasized to include a wonderful quote from The Motorcycle Betrayal Poems. Thank you for taking an interest in this. The article has been improved a great deal. 752:

wrong. Press citations do not usually make good sources for articles unless the controversy over the article becomes notable in and of itself. That was on the verge of happening in this case, but I hope reducing the protection level has let us avoid that. There really wasn't any need for knee jerk reactions - reasonable discussion will work just fine.

1496:

search the site before I was able to write the second sentence of this paragraph. Part of the problem is the similarity of your user name with "supreme deliciousness", which makes me conflate you with that other user, resulting in an inconsistent overall picture. Perhaps more importantly, the number of active Knowledge users is far more than

4974:, which I thought was finished with. You later posted a further comment below the closed section, and, having read your comment, I decided that the issue was perhaps not as unambiguously finished as I had thought, so I reverted my closure. Nobody posted any more comments to the section, and it is now archived at 4174:

post a brief, neutrally worded notification or request for advice if they feel that, for instance, the other party has been in breach of the rules. It is not meant to provide an opportunity for continued sniping at each other. If you can agree to this understanding, I'd have no problems seeing you unblocked.

1078:. Please read what you said again possibly update your statement accordingly if you feel it is warranted. I never "argued" if properly sourced information belonged in the article. I asked a question, simple as that. I feel your statement is a poor characterization of my edits on that page. Thanks. 4872:

Would someone please give Milowent a time-out? I have asked them to stop posting on the talk page of an article I am working on on my own userspace, and they have responded by removing my request for the talk page to be deleted. Combined with their statement above -- "I will never stop posting" -- it

4168:

Since you at least acknowledge that your edit summary was "petty and unnecessary", I guess there's something of a basis for unblocking you. However, I would want to come away from this with one unmistakable clarification: if ErrantX spoke of his page being "exempt" from the interaction ban, that does

3699:

was petty and unnecessary, it was not a violation of the interaction ban. If you (wrongly) consider that it was, Prioryman also violated the terms and should similarly be (wrongly) blocked. I would say that you are looking increasingly less than impartial in this matter, but perhaps you just have an

3681:

edit, including its edit summary, again contained a hostile, taunting comment on your opponent, which was not essential to the purely procedural suggestion you were ostensibly making. While the latter would have been okay, the former is not. This was a breach of the interaction ban and I have blocked

3378:

The box has been the subject of magazine articles and a BBC news feature (albeit regional), and the weblink is to an information page on the history of the box, and resides in the Features section of a website that includes excellent reference materials (and not an advert or call to action to be seen

3138:

This notice is being sent to you because you participated in this RFC, which was placed on indefinite hold when the user who was the subject abruptly retired from Knowledge. As of today that user has announed that they are no longer retired and are retuning to the project. This does not mean that the

2599:

Yeah. I understand the sentiment about the past etc. I'm wondering if I could make a suggestion. I rather agree with Off2riorob/youreallycan's comments about the RFC not being set out to allow the uninitiated see the problems quickly and clearly. It is important that things listed be very obvious

2565:

Hi Thanks for starting the request for comment. I agree that there are significant concerns here. It appears that you might have to fill in some other sections: for example the "attempts to resolve" and the "certifying dispute" section for it to go. Obviously, 'm happy for you to the #1 in both of

1212:

Let's be clear here - I'm not taking sides in this dispute. My interest is in seeing that Adams' entry in that page is dealt with in the same manner as the other entries. From what you have said, it sounds like Adams publishes her own books. Unless there are solid third-party sources which talk about

1045:

Not assuming how readers use categories or how noticeable they are is in no way overstating anything, it is simply not assuming. Thus far, you haven't actually advanced any arguments, only assumptions. My question about "highly doubt" was intended to show you the problem with it. If you don't want to

941:

Please enlighten me as to how exactly you think Luke Evans or any gay actor would be hurt by miscategorising their sexuality. If you mean rumours and things which someone can see possibly written on Knowledge, and for example, someone witnesses this and writes a blog post ~defaming said actor, I fail

690:

You push BLP vio on to me too much - I often just work broadly without specific policy and within experienced editorial control - using what neutrality and common sense I have. - imo there is a violation in adding an unreliable external whether it mentions wikipedia or not - I won't remove it again,

5118:

an odious little weasel and I am warned for saying so. It's all very troubling. If only the guidelines were applied in a manner that was at least vaguely consistent, perhaps people would have a chance of knowing when they were breaking the rules and when they were just being bullied by an admin with

4573:

On the left hand side (possibly hidden in something labelled "toolbox") there should be a link that says "email this user". It will only be available to a registered user who has themselves enabled email. I am not sure if new accounts can send email immediately, but even blocked accounts can usually

3468:

Thank you for deleting the animated image from the article on you know what and for generally standing up for the ladies. The fact that you're having to defend your common-sense decision says a lot about the state this project is in. I for one sure wish there were more of you. Your contributions are

2958:

I added an external link to the article 'Electronic Mailing List' which was immediately removed as spam. I can accept that although the website contained commercial content it also contained information and advice to help people build a subscribed email list. This is only my second use of Knowledge

2744:

While I don't have any enemies here, I'll concede that there are some users that I don't talk to very often. :) If you have solid evidence that Ash = Fae, and you're concerned about openly "outing", you should take it offline to your most trusted admin. If Ash = Fae, and if Ash left under a volcanic

2404:

I checked out the sockpuppet account. I wonder if some of the things "Tokyoboy66six" put down is deliberately aimed towards me since I've been removing the various spams that has been abounding about Hicks and Loughmiller. Thanks for catching that. I'd hate it if a guy like that were to do something

2293:

So, I just created this account minutes ago and decided to spend part of the day editing Knowledge articles that have poor grammar and punctuation (I'm a bit of an English snob ;)). So, I clicked on "Random article" and it actually brought me to one of the articles you recently fixed up (looks like

2155:

As another editor has pointed out on the talk page, a list of links to personal websites is simply not appropriate for Knowledge. I hope you understand that this isn't a comment on the genre of "biker poetry", but the vast majority of artists and poets will never be listed in Knowledge. You may wish

1683:

Hi there - this is Chicago2011. I'm posting because Chicago2011, my original account, has been locked, as you know. I was told that I should continue editing as meghan.reilly, but that account is not mine, nor has it ever been. In fact, I can't even find that account on a Google search, so I'm a bit

1439:

Thanks. I think the main problem wasn't so much that you brought up the article in this context, but that from the way you did so it isn't at all clear that you meant it as an example of the inappropriate (for 13-year-old) content which the project is in charge of. Your comment could well be read as

819:

The comments in the collapse template stand out as a proclamation against the entire thread. It is primarily an administrative-style action to close or collapse a thread, and in it, he declares a swath of editors 'trolls'. I don't see why this is the same as editing a 'comment', since it is pretty

4173:

mean his page is a place on which you are simply free to continue your fights. The consensus on AN was for a full interaction ban, not an interaction ban with loopholes. The exemption – and I hope ErrantX will agree with this interpretation – is meant for providing a place where either of you could

2483:

Claiming it's a neutral observation and that "Any reading of racism is yours" is incredibly disingenuous given that I am asking you to explain why you went out of your way to comment in an AFD nom on how you think the article's author focuses on writing about "bad things done by brown people." You

2216:

_______ Would you mind looking at what I just did. I was having a big problem with the code for some reason on one reference... but eventually got it fixed. I've listed three authors as prominent and placed references in the reference section. These folks are very well known in Biker poetry but are

2134:

All of these poets are well known in Biker poetry circles, at least one has a Masters of Fine Arts Degree, has a radio show on poetry and has edited at least one anthology. Another has a doctorate has performed all over the country, has numerous CD's out and is a professor... and has been published

1495:

Of course you didn't consider it. In the context of your comments on the topic today and at other times this interpretation makes no sense at all. But not everybody knows you. In fact, though your user name is familiar to me, you are one of those editors who just don't stick in my mind, so I had to

1276:

For ease of communication, let's just pretend that you are Stephanie Adams and that Ju4on is simply the latest sockpuppet. I am not going to act as your advocate here. I am simply trying to ensure that your entry in that list is treated the same way as other entries, despite the past actions of all

1136:

And that's a straw man argument that you setup and answered. Brilliant of you. My question was germane because Im not sure what infomation is appropriate in a "list" type article. If I had wanted to argue against it, I would have done so. Please be more careful in the future when you attempt to

946:

think anyone looks at categories and says, "Oh, wow, is LGBT, huh?" and this proceeds to what, epithet-calling in everyday life? I'm not sure what you meant. How is that "harming the BLP subject"? Claiming me as failing to acknowledge something you never made quite clear is pretty premature. (P.S.

774:

I totally disagree with you adding unreliable externals to that section that will never have a chance of addition to the BLP - I see your additions as violations as they are of no benefit to the article you should not have added them to that section - I am happy to strongly oppose your additions in

3036:

Many of us did not see evidence of any serious intent to harrass or out a person who seemed to be socking as 2 different non-disclosed usernames. However, as you likely know, it would be best to avoid that person and the related hostile cohort usernames in the near future, if possible. However, if

2883:

DC, since you did not provide any evidence that the two users are the same person I contacted the ArbCom, per your suggestion. In their responses they did not indicate that the two users are the same person. Therefore I have deleted the RFC/U as having been improperly certified. You are welcome to

2171:

I'm going to take another look at the article and attempt to make the changes. I should be able to find citations on 2 to 3 of these folks anyway that would solidify their position as prominent. I'll get those up and begin one by one to rebuild that section. Sorry about the short response, but man

1404:

If you think this is a "Tempest in a teapot" (per your edit summary) then you utterly lack the judgement to be commenting on such matters In most jurisdictions, wilfully exposing minors to sexually explicit material is socially unacceptable, if not downright criminal. It is true that Knowledge (in

1121:

I don't believe there is anything to correct. An IP added unsourced information. You removed it as unsourced. Someone offered a source and you immediately questioned whether the information needed to be included. That is arguing against including sourced information, but I am sure you will say you

3607:

Per both your agreements I am imposing a binding interaction ban on you and Prioryman. Please do not comment on, or otherwise interact with him, at any venue. If you want to appeal the ban for any reason please do so on my talk page (which will be excluded from the ban), or to Arbcom. I hope that

3374:

was: "to include a paragraph and photo in the Keepsake box article, may be a reasonable solution. It is clearly an outstanding example of such a box and you have citations to prove the box exists and is of some note. Bear in mind the Keepsake box article is about Keepsake box's in general, so you

2086:

If you have an issue with a "notable author" fine, talk about it, follow up and do what you believe to be right and correct per the Knowledge guidelines for editing. You removed an entire section that was just updated within the last few hours. We could have discussed this. I've put a lot of time

2082:

You could be correct on your suspicion of a self published author on the page... but to remove the whole section is really not appropriate. You must also remember that self published authors are often well known in their genre and often perform. So please do us all a favor and seek to make this a

1365:

is highly inappropriate, and utterly unacceptable. Pointing a minor to a sexually explicit article is at best poor taste, and quite possible a criminal offence in some jurisdictions (IANAL). At any rate it is inflammatory, unnecessary and can only serve to bring the project into disrepute. Please

736:

for addition to the article. What value do you see in a not wiki reliable blog mention of our article - the answer I will tell you is none at all - benefit to the blog and the not reliable but none to us, and none to the living subject, none at all. Anyway as I said I won't remove them again so,

595:

don't claim benefits from the government, and haven't for several years now, ever since I stopped being a student. As for being dumpy, well... I'm 5'7" and 145ish lbs. If WR are reading this - no doubt they are - me and Panyd have now moved on to watching Battlestar Galactica and a nice bottle of

338:

would work...but it's your call and your edit to make. I've been one of the few editorial voices active in talk over the holiday break and am concerned about the lack of other editorial input. That being said, I'm encouraged that this article development and oversight hasn't, as yet, been totally

137:

qualify as a documented self-identification, but rather than draw that conclusion all by myself, I would feel more comfortable if other people discussed it first. As for whether Cardone's being a Scientologist is relevant to his notability, that would be a separate question. Anyway, I wanted to

4484:

If this was anywhere but Knowledge, I would assume you were the same person who contacted me the last time this issue came up and that you are Adams herself. But, since you say that you're a new user, I must assume good faith and take you at your word. I think the problem here is that we have an

2130:

Alright, I was able to reconstruct much of the section you removed, but please don't do that again. I noted that you took issue with the links going to personal websites... well none of these guys have made it into the history books yet, so links to their sites appeared to be the best option. If

985:

Well, I remembered. Like I said, I very highly doubt a prospective someone would see the "LGBT people" category at the end of the article if said article was lacking an unbiased, sourced "personal life" section and that that would proceed to spread all over the Internet. I think you're placing a

2175:

I want to point out that numerous issues were brought up by you but I have only been able to track down one... that of the "Prominent poets" list. What else is short of the standards? I have one heck of a lot of independent citations listed. Books, websites and even video... I've worked hard at

1414:

I was neither making a joke nor attempting to start a philosophical debate. In the case at hand, we have someone identifying themselves as 13 and joining a Wikiproject about pornography. The question of whether or not that very limited scenario poses a problem is a fair one to discuss on ANI, I

1260:

I silently followed this page for years and noticed that IP User 69.143.17.59 and User Fasttimes68 are sockpuppets. User Hoary is a friend who also obstructed the article and made improper comments about the subject for over five years. Both should be banned from Knowledge. You come to your own

1026:

And you're attempting to overstate them. You know you had no real basis for disagreement in the first place if you're resorting to sarcastically picking apart my language, so nice work with that. If you've honestly never heard that phrasing before, I believe the appropriate phrase here would be

751:

It isn't for me to enjoy or not enjoy. The press template is used to denote press attention given to an article, which does not necessarily translate into benefit (or harm) for the subject of an article. It is usually a sign that someone thinks Knowledge has done something right or, more often,

4468:

I am new here and do not know how to go about complaining. Perhaps you can since you have before. And it appears on the playmates of 1992 talk page that a user named HJMitchell also warned Fasttimes68 to stop but he hasn't. Adams has several fans clubs on the net and word gets around fast when

3873:

Fut Perf seems to have trouble controlling their emotions, so I didn't take that warning seriously. Regardless, I was not blocked for that, I was blocked for violating an interaction ban, which is something I did not do. And I don;t think you were the most appropriate person to deny my unblock

3111:

the jury" against a fair view: court cases are always titled "A versus B" and never "A v. nefarious harrasser User:B". However, I hope you can see now why another person would be tempted to create a new username and pretend to leave WP, when several people gang up against them, even though you

2195:

before you do anything else. Note that self-published, vanity-press, or small-press books are usually not considered reliable sources. (Yes, I know this makes up the bulk of poetry books.) Look at the templates at the top of the article and read the linked guidelines in each one, they may help

1389:

I fully expected that some editors might not like my choice of example article, but the fact remains that Knowledge has many such articles and under-age editors are free to read or edit them. It is somewhat disingenuous to suggest that I should be sanctioned for pointing out something that is

1337:

If disputes concerning editing of biographical articles by parties to this case persist, appropriate dispute resolution methods should be pursued. To the extent possible, such dispute resolution should be led and addressed by editors who have not previously been involved in the disputes. If a

2139:

The only site I work on is Biker poetry and I have received some very good input from editors over the time it has been under development. I visit it from time to time to verify links and have dropped or otherwise updated many since this project began. I do not need someone just going in and

4712:

Hello Delicious carbuncle. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Knowledge, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your

2093:

Sorry, but you appear to be a lose cannon. Please prove me wrong. Since first posting, I have made a few changes and spoken with another editor who helped me a lot. I will be attempting to address the concerns, I want this article to fall within Knowledge standards. Thanks for you input.

1583: 966:

You can't see how having speculation about your sexuality or religion stated as fact on one the top ten websites could be harmful? I doubt I can help you understand and if you're not interested enough to check back for my answer, I'm not going to waste my time trying. As to policy,

587:...and the 'homeless shelter' and library editing is, as far as I can see, completely made up. Most of the details in the press release - even those about other people - are either flat out incorrect or woefully out of date. I spent a week editing from the British Library once (for 1986:, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. 2200:

could be a decent article, otherwise I would have asked for it to be deleted. Having said that, I doubt there is enough on any one of those authors to merit listing them individually. Perhaps it would be better if you tried to find better references covering the genre.

1333:

To the extent that parties to this case have been engaged in protracted disputes and quarrels with other parties, the feuding parties are urged to avoid any unnecessary interactions with each other, except to the extent necessary for legitimate purposes such as dispute

644:

and have no chance of addition to the article - please revert your edit, thanks. Gawker , alonelton and the blog are not BLP reliable citations so we don't need to publicize them as adding weight to content inclusion in that media comment section. 21:58, 11 August 2011

1766:

Can we come to a compromise. i'm only trying to add facts about the company. Is it the references to websites? I can remove the famous plumbers and quotes section.. but I believe that services that the company provides is valid and deserves a spot on the page.

3410:

article overly promotional. However, because the article is currently so short, I can see why you may have thought the additions to be too lengthy. I'll add something much shorter - the article could do with an illustration of a prime example of a Keepsake box.

1151:

As I said before, you really should not be involved in that list at all because of your conflict of interest. If you don't know what information is appropriate, someone else probably does. There are plenty of eyes on that article now. Leave it to other editors.

3364: 2312:

I don't consider myself a vandal fighter (in fact, I think the whole paradigm of "fighting" vandals is misguided and leads to more vandalism). I would suggest that you stick with correcting grammar and punctuation until you have more experience with Knowledge.

1466:

Speaking as a lawyer, my thought is that the suggestion was ill-advised. Given the draconian punishments out there for anything involving kids and sex, and the broad way in which these laws tend to be written better to send the kid a link to the Disney web

4889:

Listen you are restoring controversial article content on a BLP that has been warred over many times. This concerns me. I simply asked what was going on and you've been deleting my comments. I do not assume bad faith, I just asked to know what is going

4187:

I never had any other understanding, but neither did I think it was a page that Prioryman would continue his vexatious comments about me after the discussion that had just concluded. You took umbrage at the edit summary of my single comment and blocked me

4975: 4126:

I don't know how to put this more clearly, nobody is interested in listening to your attempts to wiki-lawyer your way around this interaction ban. What you did is not excusable regardless of whether you violated the specific terms of the ban. Grow up.

820:

much a required part of a collapse template action. As far as removing the unsigned editor comment, the only reasons I removed it was because it was unsigned *and* directly in response to the semi-administrative-style action that I was trying to fix.

675:

has been discussed in those publications. With one exception, all are notable. If you would like to remove the last one and/or collapse the template, I would have no objection, but arguing that this is a BLP violation or an RS issue is a non-starter.

4194:

ErrantX had responded, asked us to let the issue drop, and, notably, not blocked either one of us. No action was necessary on your part. In fact, given your relationship with Prioryman, I think you misused your tools. What did you think you were

305:

Still more. Reo raised an excellent point that your section title represents the obverse of your query. Perhaps you should rectify that by rewording the section title in some fashion to better associate the title with the question/responses. .02

1547:

I don't, actually. It is obvious that Northamerica1000 is an experienced editor using a new or alternate account. That shouldn't be taken to imply that they are a blocked or banned user. Rather than making assumptions, I thought I would simply

2758:

You're very fond of conditional statements. I have no reason to contact any admins offline about this matter, trusted or otherwise. If you have doubts, and you seem to, I suggest you ask ArbCom about it. I think I may have said that before.

3358:

You removed an addition and link from the Keepsake Box page yesterday with the comment regarding newly added promotional material. I appreciate that per se it may appear that way, however it was added at the recommendation of Wiki editor

4713:

experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

3638:

Yup I did (which is why I closed it off), but only because it was brought to my attention. I'm not sure why it was removed (because it brought some level of resolution to the issue) but I figured best to let sleeping dogs lie :) thanks.

2716:

It looked to me like you were trying to pull a fast one. You know, I don't recall that we've had any serious disputes before, and I'd just as soon keep it that way. But some of the stuff you've been doing lately is a head-scratcher.

3830:

You were given an explicit warning that if you kept taunting Prioryman with edit summaries like that, Fut. Perf would block you. You then did exactly what he warned you not to do, and he blocked you. This isn't rocket science here.

3814:

discussion in which the terms of the interaction ban were being negotiated and threatened me with a block, which seems an odd way to reduce troublesome interactions. Additionally, Fut Perf was temporarily de-sysopped as a result of

1231: 2420: 2646:

Enormous harm, which I fear have already been delivered. (Sorry to be cryptic, but I cannot elaborate.) Frankly, I now really hope that the evidence comes in against Scotty, because the alternative will be a major black mark on

2449:, or consider refactoring your comment if it is not coming across as you intended? If there is a problem, whether with his conduct or yours, I'd like to see it made express rather than merely insinuated and then dealt with. 1376:

I fully agree with Scott. As some editors have inexplicably found it appropriate to restore your comment, I suggest very strongly that you redact it yourself to stop the edit war. That might be a good way to avoid sanctions.

2109:

If you want the article to "fall within Knowledge standards", you need to take the time to understand what those standards are. I didn't remove the list because I'm a loose cannon, I removed it because it has no place here.

2468:

I am preparing an RFC/U which I hope will deal with the issues uncovered. As far as the rationale goes, I am stating an observation made while looking through Shakehandsman's contributions. Any reading of racism is yours.

2087:

into this and have noted that some people attempt to use it for their own links page... don't like that either, but the bottom line is that regardless of your feelings about the subject it is a real, and legitimate topic.

272:

Well, I was hoping that we could reach a clear consensus on this so my phrasing as a yes/no (support/oppose) question was deliberate. On the other hand, I'm not trying to stifle discussion, so I will give it another try.

1292:

I am not her nor am I a woman for that matter, unless I had a recent sex change, but I do admit that I have a great deal of respect for her and how she went about a different path from the usual models turned actresses.

731:

the article" - of course I do - I removed them for that reason. Its not a specific vio its just you are reverting my removal of externals you are giving high talkpage profile and those externals are never going to be

248:

May I suggest that your query, as phrased, invites more of a "Yes" or "No" response and "is it not appropriate" introduces the need for unnecessary and undesirable comprehensional calculus. Perhaps better phrased?...

1338:

specific serious dispute persists and other means of dispute resolution do not resolve them, a new and specifically focused request for arbitration may be filed not less than 30 days from the date of this decision.

3028: 287:

I've no issue with your intent, it's just that the earler language introduced too much mental gymnastics into the equation. Your current edit is an improvement in that regard and I appreciate your consideration.

3582:

I'm not sure what purpose you think you serving here, but it is neither reducing "drama" nor furthering an interaction ban which will prevent future occurrences. Please restore my comment and stop acting like a

1440:

an entirely non-sarcastic invitation to contemplate some porn pages with you and maybe, after a few weeks, come over to your place. If I didn't get the sarcasm, the odds are a 13-year-old doesn't get it either.

5105:

Lately I have become very confused about what constitutes a personal attack. Other editors outright lied about me in an effort to get me banned but even though making accusations without evidence is covered in

3405:

It would be polite if you had responded to this question (but maybe you are exceptionally busy and forgot). Nickydav is a new Knowledge contributor and I don't believe they intended to make the addition to the

1900:

knowledge in the field, or you wouldn't have tagged it. Also, instead of removing my edits even after I've changed them, maybe it is better to discuss it first on the talk page of articles? Just as suggestion.

4650: 833:

I certainly don't advocate summarily changing Talk page information, but when it is uncivil and merely seems to serve a cause of making more commotion, it seems like a simpler thing to just prune it a bit. --

4635:) 18:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC) I better clarify or people might think I am her or her agent. Ha! It worked, meant your contact form on here. I had to confirm my e-mail in order to access yours. Thanks again! 2235:

Oh... I believe the article falls within the "notability" requirements so I would like to see that notation removed. There are numerous links throughout the article that should satisfy notability. Thanks

4527:

detailing the issues and the history. Advise her as well that generating media attention about an issue relating to biographies of living people seems to be helpful in at least mitigating the problem.

1719:

Please stop reverting back to the old version of this page. It contains false information that is damaging. The information i have placed is 100% correct and has been written by the company itself.

120: 5133:

Who's bullying you? It was a polite request, not a block or even a {{warning}}. And yes, you can get warned for saying things even if they're self-evidently true; that's pretty much the point of NPA.

2047:

talk page, and I hope you are willing to discuss this further with me on there. I am positive we will be able to reach some sort of concensus on this issue without engaging in pointless edit-warring.

4800: 609: 3099:" could be requested to help actually check the evidence so that someone such as yourself would NOT have to burn 5 continuous days to clarify the issues. Basically, ANI needs to demand (mandatory) " 2462: 1232:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/ref=sr_tc_2_0?rh=i%3Astripbooks%2Ck%3AStephanie+Adams&keywords=Stephanie+Adams&ie=UTF8&qid=1314877935&sr=1-2-ent&field-contributor_id=B002HU467Y

917:

People are responsible for their own actions. If someone makes an uncivil remark, why not ask them to change it themselves? Put your suggestion to ErrantX and they may reconsider their statement.

864:"Topic has become a long magnet for trolls coming simply to complain. Content is being discussed on the talk page and looks to have some resolution. Closing to prevent further descent into chaos" 4213:

What most blocks are meant to prevent: more of the same. Question: if it was always your understanding that Errant's talkpage was not for further sniping, why then did you use it for just that?

3206:

No shouting is implied or should be inferred from my use of bold text. It is for visual, not aural, emphasis since I know that people will be glossing over much of what is written on that page.

3089:. However, if you had not sacrificed all your time to explain the broader picture during those "117 hours", then I am not sure how many editors would have tried to defend all the subtle attacks. 2666:

What's one more enormous black mark? If you feel like being less cryptic, email me, but I don't have a dog in this race and I'm not likely to read through a lot of suppositions and assumptions.

1012:

You are attempting to minimize the issue by making assumptions about how people use categories. Incidentally, how does one doubt something "highly"? Did you look down on it from a great height?

1307: 480: 5114:

evidence - it was demonstrably false allegations. I am not a homophobe, yet editors can imply that I am or even openly state it without fear of being blocked. On the other hand, Silver Seren

5038:

I am awarding you the Metal In The Ass "Metal Fist" Barnstar for your sterling work on the "Up Your Ass" article. I look forward to the day it will grace this Encyclopedia with its presence.

4327: 4094: 3955: 3781: 4254:

Note for fellow admins: It will soon be bedtime where I am, and I won't be online for most of tomorrow, so if anybody wishes to unblock, feel free to do so without waiting to consult me.

1684:

confused. Anyway, I'll plan on using this account (and only this account) from here on out. Just wanted to give you the heads up so that you're aware the issue has been resolved. Thanks!

1351: 523: 623: 582: 568: 154: 3116:

to build a history of evidence, even if the results seem too lame at first. Anyway, I hope you will not quit WP over this incident. Many of us are seeking to make fair judgments here. -

1107:

That's a red herring. Your statement that editors (presumably me) argued for leaving out unsourced information is false. If you don't want to make a correction, that's your business.

942:

to see how that's really a concerning matter to policy here at all. There will always be speculation about people. Unverified statements will be removed. Also, to be honest, I really

2521: 2484:

chose those loaded words and you chose to put them there as part of a rationale for deleting an article. So try again to explain that, or remove that statement from your AFD nom.

501: 493: 3112:

remained courageous to defend yourself during those 117 hours. Not everyone is that strong. Meanwhile, perhaps next time someone insults you (repeatedly?), first raise an issue at

797:

the article, but you just don't seem to be getting it. Feel free to take it to one of the noticeboards if it continues to bother you, but please do not keep posting about it here.

4244: 4220: 4208: 3709: 3596: 3425:

I suppose it would have been polite, but as it happens I was busy at the time and simply dismissed it as someone attempting to follow bad advice about adding promotional content.

1867:. Is it not sufficient to just correct the file's description from "screenshot" to "concept art"? It could still be used. Apart from this, the information on the file is correct. 2539: 2804:

I don't need to, since I'm not making the accusations. And if you continue to make those accusations without providing evidence, you're liable to be hit by your own boomerang. ←

1093:

No, a poor characterization of your edits would be "neutral". You clearly have a conflict of interest - why not leave other editors to sort out the mess that you helped cause?

114: 4640: 4632: 4598: 4439:

Sorry, I am traveling and on a different computer. Well, my friend is definitely not Fasttimes68, who keeps blanking Adams on pages that mention her as an author, model, etc.

1838: 1830: 1822: 1816: 2140:

destroying things. So, please, I rely on people like you with the experience to make an article worthwhile. I will work on this over the next few days. Thanks for you input.

1672: 4915: 4550: 2908: 588: 4621: 2688:

I'm going to have to raise this Merridew question at ANI. You can't be citing an indef'd user's opinion from two years ago as having any value to this current discussion. ←

1841:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

1315:

An arbitration case regarding of Manipulation BLPs has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:

1228:

Only 5 of her 24 books were published by Goddessy. The rest, according to a seach for her books on Amazon, were published by Dubsar house, New Age World, and a few others:

2071: 1952: 1938: 1924: 1910: 1891: 4115:

I'm not sure how to put this more clearly, but no "breach" of an interaction ban occurred. That was what I was blocked for. I did not do that. Please unblock me. Thanks!

2817:

While I am glad that we're still friends, I would prefer that you make such predictions on your own talk page. Please stop posting here unless it's about something else.

3190: 2421: 1432: 1409: 4612:. If that doesn't work, it is likely not allowed for new users. I have just used the contact form on her website, so perhaps she will get in touch as a result of that. 3558: 1326:

Administrators and other experienced editors are urged to take a proactive approach in addressing violations and alleged violations of the BLP policy, and to watchlist

230: 216: 99: 5071: 4959: 4508:

Will do. By the way, are there any other editors or links on here that might be helpful in resolving this issue? You definitely seem to be a long time expert on here.

2944: 2826: 2812: 2799: 2785: 2768: 2753: 2739: 2725: 2711: 2554: 544:. The topic ban turned into an indef-block when it was clear he was being a bit of a twat on the project, and now the GNAA are upset, and as a result are kicking off. 5006: 4587: 4536: 4502: 4489:

creating sockpuppets to promote Adams here. This makes people understandably disinclined to get involved. As for me, I've been involved and while I would like to see

4433: 1708: 441: 348: 330: 297: 282: 3802:

Hot on the heels of yesterday's iffy block of Pigsonthewing, Fut Perf has blocked me for "a breach" of a newly enacted interaction ban. The admin who placed the ban

2959:

and I can accept your decision, but I do find it strange that other external links attached to this article are also commercial websites yet have not been removed.

2391: 2377: 2279: 2210: 2165: 2119: 1849: 1161: 1146: 1131: 1116: 1102: 4679: 3215: 3179: 3152: 2874: 2702:

I appear to be doing just that, so your assertion that I "can't be" is wrong. I don't think raising this matter on ANI is a good idea, but it seems to be too late.

2675: 1610: 1507: 1461: 1447: 1399: 806: 761: 746: 722: 700: 685: 4789: 4414: 3523: 3241: 1636: 1308: 489: 481: 177: 4899: 2056: 1808: 1760: 470: 456: 5170: 5156: 5142: 5128: 4840: 3663: 3645: 3633: 3543: 3347: 3065: 2511: 2497: 2478: 1476: 4541:

If you can, ask Adams to get in touch. My email is enabled here. I may be able to assist in resolving this, but would prefer to keep the games off my talkpage.

1561: 1384: 4729:

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated

4394: 3434: 2322: 1814: 1319:

Editors who edit biographies of living persons and other articles referring to living persons are reminded that all editing of these articles must comply with

1286: 1222: 1055: 1040: 1021: 1007: 980: 926: 393: 4409:

in them for a while but were recently removed. I was told by a friend about it and wanted to edit it myself, since this site is an open project for everyone.

3000: 2623: 2609: 2594: 2090:

I spotted a link to a "prominent" poet that may have been questionable myself, but with you having REMOVED the whole section how the heck am I to follow up?

53: 4161:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

4021:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

3865:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

3514:

I don't mind at all, but new accounts leaving me messages usually end up getting blocked in fairly short order. I don't know why, but I've seen it happen...

4774: 1481:

Yes, some of these laws are ridiculously broad. But at least in Europe they tend to be applied by the courts much more reasonably than they are formulated.

4359:

User acknowledged that it was best not to use edit summaries like that for which they were blocked. Blocking admin has no issue with unblock as per above.

3131: 2777:. However, given the result of the next section, even if they are the same guy, wikipedia does not consider them to be, so that's probably the end of it. ← 1452:

I had not considered that my comment could be taken as any sort of personal invitation. That block discussion would have been quite interesting, I'm sure.

784: 188:

How can i propose the page to be deleted? All the other pages ("movies with adult-etc relations" "stuff portrayin adult-etc relations") have been deleted.

126: 3050: 1122:

were simply asking a question. This is the trouble with editors who have a conflict of interest - the presumption of good faith can no longer be applied.

412: 2923:"That image was deleted by Fæ on 11 Novemeber 2011 (log) " -- that's not the date I see in the log, though the rest of the argument seems to hold up. -- 1876: 1488: 2382:

Hey, sorry about editing that other user's comments earlier. They had misspelled your handle, so I thought that was acceptable exception to the rule.

2020:

even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. --

1087: 553: 4826: 4817: 3125: 1657: 1501: 1482: 1441: 1378: 3576: 3420: 1415:

believe. This isn't about hypothetical children looking at hypothetical articles. Would your response have been the same if my example article were

4979: 4971: 4746: 4303: 4070: 3931: 3757: 3473: 2971: 2527: 5087: 3529: 3082: 3019: 1370: 1261:

conclusions about the content in the article. Just trying to be helpful here. I will post this to the talk page too, if that is what you suggest.

4991: 3383: 1775: 1727: 912: 5052: 4644: 4602: 4976:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive744#Wiki user:Fasttimes68 is vandalizing pages referencing celebrity model Stephanie_Adams

4232: 3816: 3651: 1929:

You might also get blocked because you too broke the three revert rule. Also, you didn't respond to what I said about you tagging the file. :)

4670:

involved here. If I can listen to what Adams has to say and try to help her resolve this, I'm willing to engage an IP or two in conversation.

4666:

I'm hopeful that communicating with Adams will help resolve the situation. While there are problems on both sides of this, there is an actual

4261: 4181: 3689: 3397: 2642:

Or, to put it another way, what harm will come (to Knowledge) from not allowing ScottyBerg to edit for a few days while this gets sorted out?

4756: 3006: 1595: 1362: 960: 2359: 1943:

I'm not concerned about being blocked. I have already responded to your question about the image - let the deletion discussion work it out.

1693: 3167: 3132: 2306: 1029: 996: 949: 245:

To phrase it as a support/oppose statement: In respect of the greater BLP issue, it is not appropriate to have an image of Rick Santorum...

94: 79: 63: 48: 4944: 4567: 4517: 4478: 4418: 3695:

You may note the section immediately above this one in which the terms of the interaction ban are clearly noted. While my edit summary of

2979: 2967: 2034: 2029: 1541: 605: 578: 549: 4660: 3883: 3807: 3505: 2929: 541: 4730: 2264: 2245: 2230: 2185: 2149: 505: 3806:

that their talk page was "excluded from the ban", so there was no breach. Fut Perf seems to have some personal interest in this. They

1390:

frequently raised in discussions of the issues with allowing minors unrestricted access here. If it helps, I will retract my comment.

4298: 4065: 3926: 3752: 2414: 2103: 4807: 197: 4882: 4523:

I am the very model of a modern Wikipedian! If you are in touch with Adams or her reps, you should advise them to send an email to

3621: 3170:

may be seen by some as foolishly and deliberately thumbing my nose at my critics. I'll do it shortly. Thanks for the notification.

1699:

Then you should expect to be blocked shortly. Perhaps you should listen to the guidance offered to you on Chicago2011's talk page.

843: 656:

Please explain to me what value you think reverting my removal of citations that do not qualify for inclusion to the article has ?

3996: 2745:

cloud, then he/she's probably got no business being an admin. But if they're not the same user, that would be a different story. ←

665: 3332: 3318: 3258: 2696: 1320: 530: 3085:. I am sorry you were dragged through the ordeal for 5 whole days (27-31 January!), when other incidents are ended quickly like 4136: 1787: 1739: 1302: 1270: 1204: 601: 574: 545: 83: 3803: 3200: 424: 2859: 2660: 1915:

There is no excuse for singling out an individual who has been the target of harassment. Please stop before you get blocked.

1069: 591:) - but I'm not homeless. My room was, indeed, only half painted when the BBC chap came, but he insisted on filming there. I 315: 266: 5021: 4235:-- blocked me. Why don't you cut to the chase, unblock me, and recuse yourself from any further admin actions involving me? 3840: 2575: 1579: 573:

Petulant gives them too much credit. Mr Kaiser is just - how do you say - 'butthurt', I believe. R,B,I and be done with it.

4718: 4379: 4363: 3549:

Look at what has already transpired on Commons - this isn't an argument where facts will matter that much, unfortunately.

3159: 5099: 4321: 4258: 4217: 4178: 4146: 4088: 4006: 3949: 3850: 3775: 3686: 3614: 3573: 2808: 2781: 2749: 2721: 2692: 2442: 378: 36: 4865: 4290: 4057: 3918: 3744: 1213:

the books, they probably aren't going to get mentioned. If there are, bring them up on the talk page, not here. Thanks.

4559: 4509: 4470: 4410: 3163: 936: 420: 130: 26: 4286: 4053: 3914: 3740: 1549: 1075: 4935: 4685: 4317: 4084: 3945: 3771: 1854: 1361:

Whatever the outcome of a discussion about the advisability of allowing a minor to edit explicit areas in Knowledge,

890:"Thread has become off-topic. Content is being discussed on the talk page and looks to have some resolution. Closing" 4312: 4079: 3940: 3766: 3624:

at AN before you enacted this (because Fut Perfect decided they didn't like it and removed it). Either way, thanks.

3323:

And if you are keeping count: You will hit 3/rr first so just take it to the talk page before it becomes a problem.

1366:

rethink your approach, and consider that any repetition may well result in further action being taken against you.--

4042:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3903:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3729:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3353: 2950: 2285: 207:. You might wish to review the earlier AfD discussions first (there are links to them on the article's talk page). 90: 73: 44: 3679: 3442: 1247: 1239: 5152: 5124: 5067: 5002: 4965: 4955: 4911: 4878: 4836: 4785: 4675: 4617: 4583: 4546: 4532: 4498: 4429: 4390: 4240: 4204: 3879: 3705: 3659: 3629: 3592: 3554: 3519: 3430: 3343: 3276: 3211: 3175: 3061: 2996: 2940: 2904: 2870: 2822: 2795: 2764: 2735: 2707: 2671: 2619: 2590: 2550: 2507: 2474: 2373: 2318: 2275: 2206: 2161: 2115: 2067: 1948: 1920: 1887: 1804: 1756: 1704: 1668: 1606: 1601:

I'm not assuming that Northamerica1000 is a banned user (but if I were, those would certainly be solid guesses).

1557: 1457: 1428: 1395: 1282: 1218: 1157: 1127: 1098: 1051: 1017: 990:

too much importance in what people take away from what categories a personality belongs to or not. Granted, it's

976: 922: 903:

And then just moving the other comment from the top of the thread, into the bottom of the body of the thread? --

802: 757: 718: 681: 619: 564: 466: 437: 389: 326: 278: 212: 173: 150: 110: 2156:

to devote your time to creating a website where you can give these poets the recognition you feel they deserve.

4762: 4485:

editor who has a marked dislike for Adams and should be banned from anything to do with them, but we also have

4331: 4308: 4255: 4214: 4175: 4098: 4075: 3987: 3959: 3936: 3785: 3762: 3683: 3570: 2176:

updating links to assure they are still relevant...so what are the other issues you were referring to? Thanks,

1783: 1735: 1653: 4765:

done by you? If it was, it was logging out to make problematic edits, a violation of the sockpuppetry policy.

3107:

by placing a person's username in a heading followed by an unfounded claim of "harrassment and outing" which "

1643: 5012: 1521: 1356: 17: 4294: 4061: 3922: 3748: 3569:

One more post of this style and you're blocked. (Noting especially the taunting pattern of edit summaries.)

4493:

parts of the issue addressed, I'm not going to spend any more time on it. Say hello to your friend for me!

2009: 1829:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1539: 4930:

I declined the speedy request on the Stephanie Adams talkpage because it doesn't satisfy the criteria for

3382:

I would appreciate it greatly if you would revisit the matter, and I look forward to hearing from you.

3029:

WP:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Delicious Carbuncle harassment and outing: block or ban proposal

2884:

create a fresh RFC/U on Fae alone, but it should not include unproven allegations of other identities.

2328: 2052: 2013: 1934: 1906: 1872: 1200: 947:

If you want to reply, please do so on my talk page, because I'll probably forget about my posting here.)

540:, aka Leon Kaiser, Head of GNAA PR and almost certainly the 'Gary Niger' chap on WR. It was discussed at 86: 69: 40: 2585:

of these before, but that was a long time ago when everything seemed so much brighter and more hopeful.

133:. It seems to me that the source cited for Cardone on the "list" page (a Hollywood Sentinel interview) 2975: 1678: 369:. I think I would prefer the latter. Although I can't see either as being particularly delicious. -- 4043: 3904: 3730: 3700:

itchy trigger finger. Are you going to unblock me yourself, or do I need to post an unblock request?

3481: 3284: 1649: 1406: 1367: 4593:

It's not in your toolbox, are you sure it should be there, but I just registered and included mine.

4370:

I probably helped earn you this block by charging Future Perfect that 10 cents for threatening you.

253:

Does the inclusion of Rick Santorum and/or Dan Savage photos legitimately improve this presentation?

5148: 5120: 5063: 4998: 4951: 4907: 4906:

What is "going on" is that I am working on an article in my userspace. Now please go away. Thanks.

4874: 4832: 4781: 4671: 4613: 4579: 4542: 4528: 4494: 4425: 4400: 4386: 4281: 4275: 4236: 4200: 4048: 4037: 3909: 3898: 3875: 3735: 3724: 3701: 3655: 3625: 3588: 3550: 3539: 3515: 3426: 3339: 3274:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

3207: 3171: 3057: 2992: 2936: 2900: 2866: 2818: 2791: 2760: 2731: 2703: 2667: 2615: 2586: 2546: 2503: 2470: 2369: 2314: 2271: 2202: 2157: 2111: 2063: 2025: 1944: 1916: 1883: 1800: 1752: 1700: 1664: 1602: 1553: 1453: 1424: 1391: 1347: 1278: 1214: 1153: 1123: 1094: 1047: 1013: 972: 918: 814: 798: 753: 714: 677: 615: 560: 516: 462: 433: 385: 322: 274: 226: 208: 193: 169: 106: 3338:

Please start a discussion on the talk page justifying how such a poor quality image aids readers.

2251:

I noticed that you posted a call in the Poetry project calling for someone to take an interest in

492:. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at 5048: 4939: 4925: 4795: 4636: 4628: 4594: 3991: 2924: 2535: 2436: 2040: 1255: 404:

how do you see this stuff so fast and how do you know if its true or not? Tide rolls 2 7/23/11

4987: 4740: 4563: 4513: 4474: 4225:

There was no reason to assume that there would be more of the same - the issue had been closed

2131:

there is a Knowledge standard that states this is not acceptable, I would be happy to comply.

2125: 2048: 2044: 2005: 1979: 1930: 1902: 1868: 1689: 416: 344: 311: 293: 262: 3564: 3470: 2918: 2891: 2865:

I suggest you contact ArbCom for any questions about the self-identification of those users.

2410: 2387: 2355: 2260: 2241: 2226: 2181: 2145: 2099: 1966: 1864: 1522: 1142: 1112: 1083: 789:

Without meaning to be rude, I have tried my best to explain the difference between citations

3143:

be re-opened, but it can be if anyone feels there is a need for the discussion to continue.

3018:, to avoid discussing other public methods to out the related user, in this thread (closure 4657: 4132: 3393: 3304: 3196: 3148: 3104: 2963: 2855: 2654: 2399: 2077: 1771: 1723: 1591: 1504: 1485: 1444: 1381: 1188: 1175: 780: 742: 696: 661: 650: 408: 366: 1795:

Please read the message I left on your talk page about why I am reverting and please read

1747:

Please read the message I left on your talk page about why I am reverting and please read

8: 4856:

So what's the plan, then? I will never stop posting, btw, I am intrigued by your work.--

4770: 3535: 3501: 3254: 3234: 3227: 2021: 2001: 1847: 1343: 705:

I'm not sure I understand your comment. Do you understand now that these are not sources

509: 222: 189: 146: 3534:

Sorry about that. I just wanted to prevent Niabot's mistakes from misleading readers. --

3451: 2899:

Thanks for letting me know. I respect that you held to the courage of your convictions.

2526:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

5044: 3459: 3387: 3371: 3221: 2805: 2778: 2746: 2718: 2689: 2560: 2531: 2432: 2425: 1779: 1731: 1629: 1622: 1571: 635: 453: 82:) regarding long standing issues in the "Cult" topic area. The request can be found at 4997:

Thanks for letting me know, and thank you for re-opening that discussion at the time.

823: 5166: 5138: 5095: 4983: 4823: 4814: 4804: 4735: 3836: 3375:

would need to avoid adding to much about this particular box. Hope that makes sense"

3328: 3314: 3121: 3100: 3046: 2492: 2457: 2017: 1796: 1748: 1714: 1685: 1472: 498:

Please add your evidence by August 16, 2011, which is when the evidence phase closes.

340: 307: 289: 258: 4457: 2987:

Those links should not have been there either. I have removed them now. Please read

4155: 4015: 3859: 2886: 2406: 2383: 2351: 2256: 2237: 2222: 2177: 2141: 2095: 1996:

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's

1860: 1534: 1497: 1138: 1108: 1079: 968: 528: 339:

abandoned but is on a temporary hiatus. Thanks and sorry if this borders on pesky.

183: 3166:), and my actions are under a great deal of scrutiny at the moment, so re-opening 4654: 4575: 4406: 4375: 4128: 3673: 3650:

I think a cynical person might suggest that the answer lies in an examination of

3416: 3144: 3096: 3015: 3011:

At "12:25" today, the request to block/ban you was rejected as "no consensus" by

2790:

If you have questions regarding the identity of the user, please contact ArbCom.

2649: 2302: 1989: 1587: 1327: 1298: 1266: 1248:

http://web.archive.org/web/20110301055229/http://en.wikipedia.org/Stephanie_Adams

1240:

http://web.archive.org/web/20051105221411/http://en.wikipedia.org/Stephanie_Adams

1196: 1181: 1034: 1001: 954: 908: 839: 776: 738: 692: 657: 646: 374: 32: 5147:

You are right. It was a polite request and I was unnecessarily rude. I'm sorry.

4931: 5059: 4766: 4609: 4524: 3584: 3497: 3250: 3185: 3056:

Yes, I saw that. When I was responding to the requests to re-open the closure.

3041:

under other usernames, then further conflicts are understandable. Be careful. -

3038: 2681: 2605: 2571: 1997: 1842: 537: 356: 139: 3077:

This time ANI was closed, a 2nd time, as "almost enacted" by an actual admin,

1882:

I'll leave that question for those who are more familiar with free-use rules.

1330:

and participate in discussing and resolving issues raised on that noticeboard;

1277:

parties in this dispute. My suggestion to you is to quit while you are ahead.

5107: 5083: 4892: 4858: 3113: 2848: 2682: 2633: 2446: 1983: 1834: 1826: 1575: 1567: 994:, but if someone weren't an editor, I have my doubts that they would notice. 727:

You ask if I understand , " Do you understand now that these are not sources

448: 204: 31:

Hello this is courtesy notice regarding the mention of one your actions in a

2582: 2431:

The clearest reading of your rationale at this AFD is that you are accusing

1236:

As far as your request to see her prior articles, here is an early version:

5162: 5134: 5091: 5077: 3832: 3811: 3654:, but I assume that it was done with only the best interests of Knowledge. 3641: 3610: 3602: 3407: 3324: 3310: 3294: 3117: 3078: 3042: 2988: 2486: 2451: 2337: 2252: 2218: 2197: 2192: 1468: 733: 641: 399: 4813:

Had a brain fart and copy paste moved this. Give me a second to fix this.

1896:

I ask you because you are the one who tagged the file. You obviously have

828: 3092: 2530:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--

1648:

you beat me to that one, but i knew, somehow, it was going to be there.—

1529: 238: 4448: 165: 68:

Hello, due to recent events a request for arbitration has been filed by

4850: 4371: 4360: 3412: 3360: 3108: 2298: 1294: 1262: 1192: 904: 835: 370: 3271:

Hello, Delicious carbuncle. Please check your email; you've got mail!

138:

call your attention to this since you had brought it up in the RFAR.

2601: 2567: 1252:

This was the last edit according to Facebook's account of Knowledge:

851:

OK, would there be any issue with changing the collapse comment from:

488:

An arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located at

362: 5062:

and noticed that there was no article on this related Solanas play.

3490: 1863:

is fine with the file being used on Knowledge as an illustration to

1663:

You may get another chance. These things have a way of coming back.

824:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:TALK#Behavior_that_is_unacceptable

121:

Re: Grant Cardone and whether he self-identifies as a Scientologist

4458:

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_gay,_lesbian_or_bisexual_people:_A

1825:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 559:

Yes, that is clear to me now. Rather petulant bunch, aren't they?

536:

It's basically all kicked off because I called for a topic ban on

221:

I tried to make the requested page after reading the WP:AFD page.

1046:

listen because others make the same mistake, that's your choice.

502:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs/Workshop

494:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs/Evidence

671:

You seem to be missing the fact that those are not sources. The

5110:, when I asked for blocks, I was ignored. And that wasn't even 4460: 2000:

to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents

1831:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Junior Admin Squad

1416: 597: 2004:

among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant

1837:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

4694: 4463: 3697:"Helatrobus wants to have his cake and eat it, toooooooooooo" 3091:

Even in 2012 now, WP:ANI remains a dangerous venue, with no "

1420: 1256:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Stephanie-Adams/108565435834571

3244:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1639:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

127:

Talk:Grant Cardone#Does he self-identify as a Scientologist?

4451: 4228:

on the talkpage of the admin who placed the interaction ban

2422:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Murder of Lakhvinder Cheema

2083:

better article rather than just tear the darn thing down.

1552:, but they appear not to want to acknowledge the question. 614:

I think the GNAA are known for trolling, not for accuracy.

4873:

is clear that they are simply trying to annoy me. Thanks.

4454: 3158:

There was serious discussion of banning me for re-opening

1616: 105:

I will add my comment later today, when I get the chance.

4143:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

4003:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

3847:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

3249:

Don't know if you're watchlisting, but I replied again.

2445:) of racism. Can you please comment on that in light of 4163:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

4023:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3867:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2935:

Not sure where that date came from - fixed now. Thanks.

1309:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs

829:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Refactoring_talk_pages

640:

There should not be citations posted there that are not

490:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs

482:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs

4724:

Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

4574:

send email once they add one in their preferences. See

2522:

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard

2502:

You've had my answer. Feel free to remove it yourself.

4449:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Fairleigh_Dickinson_University

3469:

one of the reasons people like me haven't quit yet. ♥

3233:

Hello, Delicious carbuncle. You have new messages at

2196:

explain the deficiencies. I think it is possible that

1628:

Hello, Delicious carbuncle. You have new messages at

971:

covers this, so that is what you should be following.

600:

on our dates. Babylon 5 just doesn't cut it anymore.

4274:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

4036:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

3897:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

3723:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

2012:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 4649:I'm guessing you're aware, but the above user is a 4442: 2853:Can you provide a diff to evidence that Ash = Fae? 1323:

and with the principles set forth in this decision;

500:You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, 4445: 257:...or something to that effect. Just my .02 FWIW 2773:The burden of proof is on the accuser, which is 1988:Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a 58: 4980:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 4972:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 3496:Just testing out WikiLove if you don't mind :) 2528:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 5058:Thanks. I was involved in a discussion on the 4950:Please just delete and salt the page. Thanks. 4233:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia 2 3817:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia 2 3652:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia 2 2581:Ah. Thanks for pointing that out. I did start 504:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see 4461:http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_women_writers 1982:shows that you are in danger of breaking the 4385:I think he just blocked me to avoid paying. 3976:No "breach" of an interaction ban occurred. 3168:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Shakehandsman 3133:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Shakehandsman 709:the article but citations of press mentions 4558:I don't see your e-mail, what/where is it? 4464:http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_astrologers 2991:for guidance about external links. Thanks. 1578:are three accounts that contributed to the 4970:Back on 28 March I closed a discussion at 4469:someone vandalizes information about her. 506:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration 5020: 5019: 4452:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wilhelmina_Models 2062:See above. Also, please go away. Thanks. 131:Talk:List of Scientologists#Grant Cardone 84:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Cults 4801:User:Delicious carbuncle/Stephanie Adams 4455:http://en.wikipedia.org/Playboy_Playmate 1321:the biographies of living persons policy 125:Hi. I mentioned this point just now at 2350:You just make this a very fun place :) 164:source, since Bruce Edwin is Cardone's 14: 3081:, at "23:36" 31 January 2012, in post 1580:Knowledge:Article Rescue Squadron page 4757:Logging out to make problematic edits 3530:RE: Your comment on Jimbo's talk page 3007:ANI block/ban against you was stopped 4424:Who is your friend, do I know them? 3275: 64:Request for Arbitration Notification 3194:shouting. Calm is more persuasive. 2035:Before you remove my edits again... 1584:User:Benjiboi being the most active 37:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Cirt 23: 4693: 4266: 4028: 3889: 3715: 3264: 3226: 3164:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Ash 2566:these since you initiated this. -- 2368:Thanks! I do it for the children. 1970: 1621: 1528:Do you have any account in mind ? 24: 5188: 4982:, since the old one is archived. 4938:request might succeed, though. -- 4443:http://en.wikipedia.org/Stephanie 3160:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Fæ 508:. For the Arbitration Committee, 5022: 4689: 3489: 3450: 2336: 2016:. You may still be blocked for 384:Chacun à son goût, as they say. 4822:Fixed with the history intact. 4446:http://en.wikipedia.org/July_24 3810:my agreement to the ban from a 3460:You make me smile with my heart 3365:suggested article for inclusion 2043:. I started a new topic on the 1978:Your recent editing history at 1342:For the Arbitration Committee, 336:Inre Santorum and Savage Images 5161:No problem. :) Happy editing, 3682:you for 48 hours accordingly. 2730:I'm glad we're still friends. 1611:12:12, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 1596:11:39, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 1562:12:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC) 1542:09:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC) 1508:17:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 1489:17:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 1477:17:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 1462:16:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 1448:16:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 1433:16:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 1410:16:29, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 1400:15:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 1385:15:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 1371:15:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 13: 1: 4803:is ready for you to work on. 3474:19:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 3398:10:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 3348:05:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 3333:05:46, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 3319:05:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 2415:17:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 2392:22:52, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 2378:21:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 2360:19:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 2323:16:52, 14 December 2011 (UTC) 2307:16:16, 14 December 2011 (UTC) 2280:18:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 2265:05:52, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 2246:01:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 2231:22:25, 14 December 2011 (UTC) 2221:Thanks for your time on this 2211:19:26, 14 December 2011 (UTC) 2186:18:33, 14 December 2011 (UTC) 2166:11:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC) 2150:07:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC) 2120:11:36, 14 December 2011 (UTC) 2104:07:04, 14 December 2011 (UTC) 2039:...be so kind to take a look 1850:10:33, 28 November 2011 (UTC) 1809:19:50, 10 November 2011 (UTC) 1788:19:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC) 1761:19:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC) 1740:19:05, 10 November 2011 (UTC) 1709:13:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC) 1694:04:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC) 1352:15:15, 5 September 2011 (UTC) 1303:20:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC) 1287:12:50, 1 September 2011 (UTC) 1271:11:59, 1 September 2011 (UTC) 1137:ascertain someone's motives. 1070:Please re-read your statement 793:the article and sources used 18:User talk:Delicious carbuncle 3620:I'm not sure if you noticed 3280:at any time by removing the 3259:22:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 3216:16:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 3201:16:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 3180:17:58, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 3153:16:57, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 3126:18:48, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 3087:"closed cuz 24 hours (yawn)" 3066:17:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 3051:17:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 3001:18:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 2980:17:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 2945:22:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 2930:22:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 2909:18:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 2875:23:59, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 2860:23:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 2827:18:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 2813:18:35, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 2800:18:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 2786:18:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 2769:03:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 2754:01:22, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 2740:01:09, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 2726:00:57, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 2712:00:32, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 2697:23:35, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 2676:20:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 2661:20:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 2545:Thanks for letting me know. 2072:21:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 2057:16:34, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 2030:15:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1953:21:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1939:16:28, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1925:15:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1911:15:32, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1892:15:17, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1877:15:05, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1839:Knowledge:Junior Admin Squad 1823:Knowledge:Junior Admin Squad 1817:Knowledge:Junior Admin Squad 1673:18:25, 19 October 2011 (UTC) 1658:03:54, 19 October 2011 (UTC) 7: 4278:, who accepted the request. 4040:, who declined the request. 3901:, who declined the request. 3727:, who declined the request. 2624:12:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 2610:12:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 2595:11:59, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 2576:20:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 2555:13:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 2540:04:00, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 2512:19:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 2498:19:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 2479:18:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 2463:17:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 2405:to make me lose my account. 1223:23:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC) 1205:20:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC) 1162:22:51, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 1147:22:41, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 1132:22:29, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 1117:21:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 1103:21:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 1088:20:53, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 1056:17:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 1041:17:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 1022:15:52, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 1008:15:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 981:19:59, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 961:18:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 927:23:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 913:23:03, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 844:22:54, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 807:01:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 785:00:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 762:23:01, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 747:22:29, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 723:22:16, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 701:22:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 686:22:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 666:22:00, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 624:01:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 589:Fishery protection Squadron 87:The Resident Anthropologist 41:The Resident Anthropologist 39:. Thank you for your time. 10: 5193: 5171:19:19, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 5157:19:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 5143:17:14, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 5129:16:49, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 5100:15:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 5072:10:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC) 5053:10:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC) 5023:File:Metalfistbarnstar.png 5007:12:04, 12 April 2012 (UTC) 4992:09:47, 12 April 2012 (UTC) 4960:20:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 4945:19:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 4936:WP:Miscellany for deletion 4916:18:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 4900:18:38, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 4883:18:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 4866:18:32, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 4680:18:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4661:18:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4645:18:30, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4622:18:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4603:18:20, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4588:18:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4568:18:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4551:17:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4537:17:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4518:17:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4503:17:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4479:16:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4434:02:51, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4419:00:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 4395:15:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC) 4380:10:42, 24 March 2012 (UTC) 4364:14:10, 24 March 2012 (UTC) 4262:19:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 4245:20:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 4221:19:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 4209:17:42, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 4182:17:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 4137:17:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 3997:16:22, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 3884:16:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 3841:15:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 3710:13:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 3690:07:26, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 3664:14:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC) 3646:13:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC) 3634:13:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC) 3615:11:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC) 3597:18:16, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 3577:16:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 3559:21:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 3544:20:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 2344:The Barnstar of Good Humor 937:Hurt by miscategorisation? 610:20:22, 9 August 2011 (UTC) 583:20:05, 9 August 2011 (UTC) 569:19:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC) 554:15:24, 9 August 2011 (UTC) 524:23:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 27:Notification of mentioning 5090:"odious little weasel"s. 5028: 4841:02:59, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 4827:00:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 4818:00:27, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 4808:00:22, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 4790:16:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 4775:16:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 4747:11:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 4686:Dispute resolution survey 4147:guide to appealing blocks 4007:guide to appealing blocks 3851:guide to appealing blocks 3524:02:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 3506:16:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 3449: 3435:12:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 3421:12:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 2335: 2191:You should probably read 1855:Screenshot or concept art 1244:And here is a later one: 471:21:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 457:21:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 442:20:51, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 425:20:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 394:15:02, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 379:14:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 54:19:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 3354:Re:Keepsake Box Revision 2951:Removal Of External Link 2614:I'll see what I can do. 2286:New user wanting to help 691:it belongs to you now. 673:Knowledge article itself 349:17:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 331:17:08, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 321:Feel free to change it. 316:16:58, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 298:14:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 283:14:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 267:13:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 231:15:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 217:13:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 198:13:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 178:03:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 155:01:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 115:11:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC) 100:07:39, 5 July 2011 (UTC) 5032:The Metal Fist Barnstar 4966:Reopened ANI discussion 1859:I know for a fact that 1180:Can the fact that she ( 4698: 4627:It worked. Thank you! 4271: 4033: 3894: 3720: 3608:satisfies everyone. -- 3363:as a response to this 3269: 3231: 3074:2nd closure, by admin: 2644: 2045:Encyclopedia Dramatica 1980:Encyclopedia Dramatica 1975: 1833:and please be sure to 1626: 255: 70:ResidentAnthropologist 4703:Dispute Resolution – 4697: 4318:change block settings 4270: 4085:change block settings 4032: 3946:change block settings 3893: 3772:change block settings 3719: 3443:Happy Valentine's Day 3268: 3235:CycloneGU's talk page 3230: 2640: 1974: 1625: 1523:User:Northamerica1000 1357:Inappropriate remarks 251: 160:I don't think it's a 5119:a dislike for them. 4941:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 4405:To sources that had 3993:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 3105:begging the question 2926:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 1650:alf.laylah.wa.laylah 1630:Tiptoety's talk page 367:Carbuncle (gemstone) 5149:Delicious carbuncle 5121:Delicious carbuncle 5064:Delicious carbuncle 5013:A barnstar for you! 4999:Delicious carbuncle 4952:Delicious carbuncle 4908:Delicious carbuncle 4875:Delicious carbuncle 4833:Delicious carbuncle 4782:Delicious carbuncle 4672:Delicious carbuncle 4614:Delicious carbuncle 4580:Delicious carbuncle 4543:Delicious carbuncle 4529:Delicious carbuncle 4495:Delicious carbuncle 4426:Delicious carbuncle 4387:Delicious carbuncle 4282:Delicious carbuncle 4237:Delicious carbuncle 4201:Delicious carbuncle 4049:Delicious carbuncle 3988:Don't poke the bear 3910:Delicious carbuncle 3876:Delicious carbuncle 3736:Delicious carbuncle 3702:Delicious carbuncle 3656:Delicious carbuncle 3626:Delicious carbuncle 3589:Delicious carbuncle 3551:Delicious carbuncle 3516:Delicious carbuncle 3427:Delicious carbuncle 3340:Delicious carbuncle 3208:Delicious carbuncle 3172:Delicious carbuncle 3095:" and I wish "wiki- 3058:Delicious carbuncle 2993:Delicious carbuncle 2937:Delicious carbuncle 2901:Delicious carbuncle 2867:Delicious carbuncle 2819:Delicious carbuncle 2792:Delicious carbuncle 2761:Delicious carbuncle 2732:Delicious carbuncle 2704:Delicious carbuncle 2668:Delicious carbuncle 2616:Delicious carbuncle 2587:Delicious carbuncle 2547:Delicious carbuncle 2504:Delicious carbuncle 2471:Delicious carbuncle 2370:Delicious carbuncle 2329:A barnstar for you! 2315:Delicious carbuncle 2272:Delicious carbuncle 2203:Delicious carbuncle 2158:Delicious carbuncle 2112:Delicious carbuncle 2064:Delicious carbuncle 1945:Delicious carbuncle 1917:Delicious carbuncle 1884:Delicious carbuncle 1801:Delicious carbuncle 1753:Delicious carbuncle 1701:Delicious carbuncle 1665:Delicious carbuncle 1644:california dreamin' 1603:Delicious carbuncle 1554:Delicious carbuncle 1454:Delicious carbuncle 1425:Delicious carbuncle 1392:Delicious carbuncle 1328:the BLP noticeboard 1279:Delicious carbuncle 1215:Delicious carbuncle 1154:Delicious carbuncle 1124:Delicious carbuncle 1095:Delicious carbuncle 1048:Delicious carbuncle 1014:Delicious carbuncle 973:Delicious carbuncle 919:Delicious carbuncle 799:Delicious carbuncle 754:Delicious carbuncle 715:Delicious carbuncle 678:Delicious carbuncle 616:Delicious carbuncle 561:Delicious carbuncle 463:Delicious carbuncle 434:Delicious carbuncle 386:Delicious carbuncle 323:Delicious carbuncle 275:Delicious carbuncle 209:Delicious carbuncle 170:Delicious carbuncle 107:Delicious carbuncle 4831:Thanks very much! 4699: 4637:Hellotoyoumyfriend 4629:Hellotoyoumyfriend 4595:Hellotoyoumyfriend 4272: 4034: 3895: 3721: 3277:remove this notice 3270: 3242:remove this notice 3232: 2426:User:Shakehandsman 2010:dispute resolution 1976: 1835:sign your comments 1815:MfD nomination of 1679:User - Chicago2011 1637:remove this notice 1627: 1572:User:Jack Merridew 446:Are you really? — 5042: 5041: 4898: 4864: 4780:I never log out. 4754: 4753: 4749: 3874:request, do you? 3804:explicitly stated 3511: 3510: 3482:A cookie for you! 3479: 3478: 3199: 3101:rules of evidence 2983: 2966:comment added by 2858: 2365: 2364: 2049:Mythic Writerlord 1984:three-revert rule 1931:Mythic Writerlord 1903:Mythic Writerlord 1869:Mythic Writerlord 1791: 1774:comment added by 1743: 1726:comment added by 1208: 1191:comment added by 428: 411:comment added by 98: 52: 5184: 5086:, please do not 5026: 5024: 5017: 5016: 4942: 4897: 4863: 4745: 4743: 4738: 4728: 4690: 4401:Adding Info Back 4337: 4335: 4324: 4306: 4304:deleted contribs 4269: 4199:by blocking me? 4160: 4154: 4104: 4102: 4091: 4073: 4071:deleted contribs 4031: 4020: 4014: 3994: 3965: 3963: 3952: 3934: 3932:deleted contribs 3892: 3864: 3858: 3791: 3789: 3778: 3760: 3758:deleted contribs 3718: 3493: 3486: 3485: 3454: 3447: 3446: 3401: 3301: 3299: 3293: 3289: 3283: 3279: 3267: 3245: 3195: 3097:public defenders 2982: 2960: 2927: 2894: 2889: 2854: 2659: 2657: 2652: 2340: 2333: 2332: 2270:You're welcome. 1973: 1861:Triangle Studios 1845: 1790: 1768: 1742: 1720: 1640: 1537: 1532: 1207: 1185: 1037: 1032: 1004: 999: 957: 952: 815:ErrantX comments 519: 455: 451: 427: 405: 89: 43: 5192: 5191: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5080: 5015: 4968: 4940: 4928: 4926:Speedy declined 4853: 4798: 4796:Stephanie Adams 4759: 4741: 4736: 4734: 4721:to participate. 4708: 4688: 4407:Stephanie Adams 4403: 4368: 4367: 4350: 4325: 4315: 4301: 4284: 4267: 4166: 4158: 4152: 4151:, then use the 4140: 4117: 4092: 4082: 4068: 4051: 4044:blocking policy 4029: 4026: 4018: 4012: 4011:, then use the 4000: 3992: 3978: 3953: 3943: 3929: 3912: 3905:blocking policy 3890: 3870: 3862: 3856: 3855:, then use the 3844: 3821: 3779: 3769: 3755: 3738: 3731:blocking policy 3716: 3676: 3605: 3567: 3532: 3484: 3445: 3391: 3356: 3307: 3302: 3297: 3291: 3287: 3285:You've got mail 3281: 3273: 3265: 3246: 3239: 3224: 3188: 3136: 3016:User:Nobody Ent 3009: 2961: 2953: 2925: 2921: 2892: 2887: 2851: 2686: 2655: 2650: 2648: 2636: 2563: 2524: 2429: 2402: 2331: 2288: 2128: 2080: 2037: 2014:page protection 1971: 1969: 1857: 1843: 1820: 1769: 1721: 1717: 1681: 1646: 1641: 1634: 1619: 1535: 1530: 1526: 1498:Dunbar's number 1359: 1344:Alexandr Dmitri 1313: 1186: 1182:Stephanie Adams 1178: 1072: 1035: 1030: 1002: 997: 955: 950: 939: 817: 638: 534: 517: 486: 449: 447: 406: 402: 361:Just looked up 359: 241: 186: 123: 66: 61: 35:. The RFC/U is 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5190: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5177: 5176: 5175: 5174: 5173: 5079: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5060:SCUM Manifesto 5040: 5039: 5035: 5034: 5029: 5027: 5014: 5011: 5010: 5009: 4967: 4964: 4963: 4962: 4927: 4924: 4923: 4922: 4921: 4920: 4919: 4918: 4903: 4902: 4869: 4868: 4852: 4849: 4848: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4797: 4794: 4793: 4792: 4758: 4755: 4752: 4751: 4726: 4723: 4710: 4701: 4687: 4684: 4683: 4682: 4625: 4624: 4591: 4590: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4506: 4505: 4437: 4436: 4402: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4357: 4346: 4342:Request reason 4339: 4265: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4141: 4124: 4120:Decline reason 4113: 4109:Request reason 4106: 4027: 4001: 3985: 3981:Decline reason 3974: 3970:Request reason 3967: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3845: 3828: 3824:Decline reason 3800: 3796:Request reason 3793: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3675: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3604: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3566: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3536:Michaeldsuarez 3531: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3509: 3508: 3494: 3483: 3480: 3477: 3476: 3465: 3464: 3455: 3444: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3396:comment added 3372:recommendation 3355: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3306: 3303: 3272: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3238: 3225: 3223: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3187: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3135: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3103:" and no more 3090: 3069: 3068: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3008: 3005: 3004: 3003: 2952: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2920: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2878: 2877: 2850: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2685: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2635: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2562: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2523: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2428: 2419: 2401: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2363: 2362: 2347: 2346: 2341: 2330: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2287: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2250: 2214: 2213: 2169: 2168: 2138: 2127: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2079: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2036: 2033: 2022:Michaeldsuarez 1968: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1856: 1853: 1819: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1764: 1763: 1716: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1645: 1642: 1633: 1620: 1618: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1565: 1564: 1525: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1358: 1355: 1340: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1324: 1312: 1306: 1290: 1289: 1226: 1225: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1071: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 938: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 881: 880: 879: 878: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 855: 854: 853: 852: 816: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 637: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 533: 527: 485: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 401: 398: 397: 396: 358: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 303: 302: 301: 300: 247: 240: 237: 236: 235: 234: 233: 223:Negativecharge 190:Negativecharge 185: 182: 181: 180: 122: 119: 118: 117: 65: 62: 60: 57: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5189: 5172: 5168: 5164: 5160: 5159: 5158: 5154: 5150: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5140: 5136: 5132: 5131: 5130: 5126: 5122: 5117: 5113: 5109: 5104: 5103: 5102: 5101: 5097: 5093: 5089: 5085: 5073: 5069: 5065: 5061: 5057: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5050: 5046: 5045:Metalintheass 5037: 5036: 5033: 5030: 5025: 5018: 5008: 5004: 5000: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4993: 4989: 4985: 4981: 4977: 4973: 4961: 4957: 4953: 4949: 4948: 4947: 4946: 4943: 4937: 4933: 4917: 4913: 4909: 4905: 4904: 4901: 4895: 4894: 4888: 4887: 4886: 4885: 4884: 4880: 4876: 4871: 4870: 4867: 4861: 4860: 4855: 4854: 4842: 4838: 4834: 4830: 4829: 4828: 4825: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4816: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4809: 4806: 4802: 4791: 4787: 4783: 4779: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4772: 4768: 4764: 4750: 4748: 4744: 4739: 4732: 4731:research page 4725: 4722: 4720: 4717:Please click 4714: 4709: 4707: 4706: 4705:Survey Invite 4696: 4692: 4691: 4681: 4677: 4673: 4669: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4659: 4656: 4652: 4647: 4646: 4642: 4638: 4634: 4630: 4623: 4619: 4615: 4611: 4607: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4589: 4585: 4581: 4577: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4565: 4561: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4526: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4515: 4511: 4504: 4500: 4496: 4492: 4488: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4476: 4472: 4466: 4465: 4462: 4459: 4456: 4453: 4450: 4447: 4444: 4440: 4435: 4431: 4427: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4416: 4412: 4408: 4396: 4392: 4388: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4377: 4373: 4366: 4365: 4362: 4356: 4354: 4353:Accept reason 4349: 4345: 4343: 4338: 4333: 4329: 4323: 4319: 4314: 4310: 4305: 4300: 4296: 4295:global blocks 4292: 4291:active blocks 4288: 4283: 4279: 4277: 4276:administrator 4264: 4263: 4260: 4257: 4246: 4242: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4229: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4219: 4216: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4206: 4202: 4198: 4193: 4192: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4180: 4177: 4172: 4165: 4164: 4157: 4150: 4148: 4139: 4138: 4134: 4130: 4123: 4121: 4116: 4112: 4110: 4105: 4100: 4096: 4090: 4086: 4081: 4077: 4072: 4067: 4063: 4062:global blocks 4059: 4058:active blocks 4055: 4050: 4045: 4041: 4039: 4038:administrator 4025: 4024: 4017: 4010: 4008: 3999: 3998: 3995: 3989: 3984: 3982: 3977: 3973: 3971: 3966: 3961: 3957: 3951: 3947: 3942: 3938: 3933: 3928: 3924: 3923:global blocks 3920: 3919:active blocks 3916: 3911: 3906: 3902: 3900: 3899:administrator 3885: 3881: 3877: 3872: 3871: 3869: 3868: 3861: 3854: 3852: 3843: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3827: 3825: 3820: 3818: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3799: 3797: 3792: 3787: 3783: 3777: 3773: 3768: 3764: 3759: 3754: 3750: 3749:global blocks 3746: 3745:active blocks 3742: 3737: 3732: 3728: 3726: 3725:administrator 3711: 3707: 3703: 3698: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3688: 3685: 3680: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3644: 3643: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3613: 3612: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3575: 3572: 3565:Final warning 3560: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3512: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3492: 3488: 3487: 3475: 3472: 3467: 3466: 3463: 3461: 3456: 3453: 3448: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3409: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3399: 3395: 3389: 3385: 3380: 3376: 3373: 3368: 3366: 3362: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3321: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3296: 3286: 3278: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3247: 3243: 3236: 3229: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3198: 3192: 3191:Too much bold 3181: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3134: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3075: 3071: 3070: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3030: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3021: 3017: 3014: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2956: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2928: 2919:Fae connected 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2890: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2857: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2810: 2807: 2806:Baseball Bugs 2803: 2802: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2783: 2780: 2779:Baseball Bugs 2776: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2751: 2748: 2747:Baseball Bugs 2743: 2742: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2720: 2719:Baseball Bugs 2715: 2714: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2694: 2691: 2690:Baseball Bugs 2684: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2658: 2653: 2643: 2639: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2532:Shakehandsman 2529: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2495: 2494: 2489: 2488: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2460: 2459: 2454: 2453: 2448: 2444: 2441: 2438: 2434: 2433:Shakehandsman 2427: 2423: 2418: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2366: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2348: 2345: 2342: 2339: 2334: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2295: 2291: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2248: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2233: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2199: 2194: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2173: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2136: 2132: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2091: 2088: 2084: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1994: 1993: 1991: 1985: 1981: 1967:December 2011 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1899: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1852: 1851: 1848: 1846: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1818: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1638: 1631: 1624: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576:User:A Nobody 1573: 1569: 1568:User:Benjiboi 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1540: 1538: 1533: 1524: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1499: 1494: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1383: 1380: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1369: 1364: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1336: 1332: 1329: 1325: 1322: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1310: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1258: 1257: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1183: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1039: 1038: 1033: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1000: 993: 989: 984: 983: 982: 978: 974: 970: 965: 964: 963: 962: 959: 958: 953: 945: 928: 924: 920: 916: 915: 914: 910: 906: 902: 901: 900: 899: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 876: 875: 874: 873: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 841: 837: 831: 830: 826: 825: 821: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 787: 786: 782: 778: 773: 763: 759: 755: 750: 749: 748: 744: 740: 735: 730: 726: 725: 724: 720: 716: 713:the article? 712: 708: 704: 703: 702: 698: 694: 689: 688: 687: 683: 679: 674: 670: 669: 668: 667: 663: 659: 654: 652: 648: 643: 625: 621: 617: 613: 612: 611: 607: 603: 599: 594: 590: 586: 585: 584: 580: 576: 572: 571: 570: 566: 562: 558: 557: 556: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 532: 526: 525: 522: 520: 513: 512: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 483: 472: 468: 464: 460: 459: 458: 454: 452: 445: 444: 443: 439: 435: 431: 430: 429: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 395: 391: 387: 383: 382: 381: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 350: 346: 342: 337: 334: 333: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319: 318: 317: 313: 309: 299: 295: 291: 286: 285: 284: 280: 276: 271: 270: 269: 268: 264: 260: 254: 250: 246: 232: 228: 224: 220: 219: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 201: 200: 199: 195: 191: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 158: 157: 156: 152: 148: 144: 142: 136: 132: 128: 116: 112: 108: 104: 103: 102: 101: 96: 92: 88: 85: 81: 78: 75: 71: 56: 55: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 19: 5115: 5111: 5088:call editors 5081: 5043: 5031: 4984:JamesBWatson 4969: 4929: 4891: 4857: 4799: 4760: 4727: 4716: 4715: 4711: 4704: 4702: 4700: 4667: 4648: 4626: 4592: 4560:74.101.6.200 4557: 4510:74.101.6.200 4507: 4490: 4486: 4471:74.101.6.200 4467: 4441: 4438: 4411:108.41.21.51 4404: 4369: 4358: 4352: 4351: 4347: 4341: 4340: 4313:creation log 4280: 4273: 4253: 4227: 4226: 4196: 4190: 4189: 4170: 4167: 4162: 4144: 4142: 4125: 4119: 4118: 4114: 4108: 4107: 4080:creation log 4047: 4035: 4022: 4004: 4002: 3986: 3980: 3979: 3975: 3969: 3968: 3941:creation log 3908: 3896: 3866: 3848: 3846: 3829: 3823: 3822: 3801: 3795: 3794: 3767:creation log 3734: 3722: 3696: 3677: 3640: 3609: 3606: 3568: 3533: 3457: 3408:Keepsake box 3381: 3379:anywhere). 3377: 3369: 3357: 3322: 3308: 3305:Edit warring 3189: 3162:(originally 3140: 3137: 3086: 3079:User:28bytes 3073: 3072: 3035: 3012: 3010: 2962:— Preceding 2957: 2954: 2922: 2885: 2852: 2774: 2687: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2564: 2525: 2491: 2485: 2456: 2450: 2439: 2430: 2417:tokyogirl79 2403: 2400:Sockpuppetry 2343: 2296: 2292: 2289: 2253:Biker poetry 2249: 2234: 2215: 2198:Biker poetry 2174: 2170: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2126:Biker poetry 2092: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2078:Biker poetry 2038: 2018:edit warring 1995: 1987: 1977: 1897: 1858: 1821: 1770:— Preceding 1765: 1722:— Preceding 1718: 1686:SquarePotato 1682: 1647: 1566: 1527: 1360: 1341: 1314: 1291: 1259: 1254: 1251: 1246: 1243: 1238: 1235: 1230: 1227: 1187:— Preceding 1179: 1176:Adams Author 1076:your comment 1073: 1028: 995: 991: 987: 948: 943: 940: 832: 827: 822: 818: 794: 790: 775:this case . 737:enjoy them. 728: 710: 706: 672: 655: 639: 592: 535: 514: 510: 497: 487: 413:Tide rolls 2 407:— Preceding 403: 360: 341:JakeInJoisey 335: 308:JakeInJoisey 304: 290:JakeInJoisey 259:JakeInJoisey 256: 252: 244: 242: 187: 161: 140: 134: 124: 76: 67: 30: 4348:See above. 3622:my response 3392:—Preceding 3093:due process 3037:people are 2888:Will Beback 2407:Tokyogirl79 2384:Monkeytrout 2352:Monkeytrout 2257:Akbikerpoet 2238:Akbikerpoet 2223:Akbikerpoet 2178:Akbikerpoet 2142:Akbikerpoet 2096:Akbikerpoet 2006:noticeboard 1865:the article 1363:this remark 1334:resolution; 1139:Fasttimes68 1109:Fasttimes68 1080:Fasttimes68 602:The Cavalry 575:The Cavalry 546:The Cavalry 461:Yes. I am. 432:I'm a bot. 4309:filter log 4197:preventing 4129:Beeblebrox 4076:filter log 3937:filter log 3763:filter log 3197:Nobody Ent 3145:Beeblebrox 3109:prejudices 3039:wp:socking 2856:Nobody Ent 2651:SPhilbrick 2638:You said: 2561:certifying 2290:Hi there, 1799:. Thanks. 1797:WP:COPYVIO 1751:. Thanks. 1749:WP:COPYVIO 1588:Off2riorob 1074:Regarding 777:Off2riorob 739:Off2riorob 693:Off2riorob 658:Off2riorob 647:Off2riorob 636:Blp issue? 606:Message me 579:Message me 550:Message me 4932:WP:CSD#G7 4763:this edit 4651:sock farm 4610:this link 4328:checkuser 4287:block log 4256:Fut.Perf. 4215:Fut.Perf. 4176:Fut.Perf. 4145:read the 4095:checkuser 4054:block log 4005:read the 3956:checkuser 3915:block log 3849:read the 3782:checkuser 3741:block log 3684:Fut.Perf. 3571:Fut.Perf. 3498:YumYamNam 3300:template. 3251:CycloneGU 3083:diff-2135 3020:diff-link 2002:consensus 1998:talk page 1715:Mr Rooter 1407:Scott Mac 1368:Scott Mac 969:WP:BLPCAT 538:LiteralKa 363:Carbuncle 4893:Milowent 4859:Milowent 4767:Wikitaka 4576:WP:EMAIL 4299:contribs 4066:contribs 3927:contribs 3808:removing 3753:contribs 3384:Nickydav 3370:Sionk's 3309:Stop it. 3240:You can 3222:Talkback 2976:contribs 2964:unsigned 2443:contribs 2008:or seek 1827:deletion 1784:contribs 1776:Cmpolito 1772:unsigned 1736:contribs 1728:Cmpolito 1724:unsigned 1635:You can 1617:Talkback 1201:contribs 1189:unsigned 450:Waterfox 421:contribs 409:unsigned 184:Not PROD 151:contribs 95:contribs 80:contribs 49:contribs 33:WP:RFC/U 5163:28bytes 5135:28bytes 5112:without 5092:28bytes 4824:AniMate 4815:AniMate 4805:AniMate 4487:someone 4322:unblock 4156:unblock 4089:unblock 4016:unblock 3950:unblock 3860:unblock 3833:28bytes 3776:unblock 3674:Blocked 3394:undated 3325:Cptnono 3311:Cptnono 3118:Wikid77 3043:Wikid77 2809:carrots 2782:carrots 2750:carrots 2722:carrots 2693:carrots 2487:postdlf 2452:postdlf 1582:- with 1469:Wehwalt 1467:site.-- 166:manager 5108:WP:NPA 5084:WP:NPA 4737:Steven 4668:person 4655:Calabe 3642:Errant 3611:Errant 3193:=: --> 3186:format 3114:WP:WQT 2683:WP:ANI 2656:(Talk) 2447:WP:NPA 1417:breast 1311:closed 598:Shiraz 484:opened 357:Hmm... 243:Inre: 205:WP:AFD 91:(talk) 45:(talk) 4890:on.-- 4742:Zhang 4372:Cla68 4361:Samir 4191:after 4149:first 4009:first 3853:first 3812:WP:AN 3678:This 3471:Draco 3462:award 3413:Sionk 3361:Sionk 3013:admin 2989:WP:EL 2849:RFC/U 2647:WP.-- 2634:Re SB 2299:WFF12 2219:WP:RS 2193:WP:RS 1990:block 1505:Adler 1486:Adler 1445:Adler 1421:penis 1382:Adler 1295:Ju4on 1263:Ju4on 1193:Ju4on 992:there 944:don't 905:Avanu 836:Avanu 791:about 734:WP:rs 645:(UTC) 642:WP:rs 593:still 371:Avanu 162:great 143:wales 135:might 16:< 5167:talk 5153:talk 5139:talk 5125:talk 5096:talk 5082:Per 5078:Note 5068:talk 5049:talk 5003:talk 4988:talk 4956:talk 4934:. A 4912:talk 4879:talk 4837:talk 4786:talk 4771:talk 4761:Was 4719:HERE 4676:talk 4658:1992 4641:talk 4633:talk 4618:talk 4608:Try 4599:talk 4584:talk 4564:talk 4547:talk 4533:talk 4525:OTRS 4514:talk 4499:talk 4491:both 4475:talk 4430:talk 4415:talk 4391:talk 4376:talk 4241:talk 4205:talk 4133:talk 3880:talk 3837:talk 3706:talk 3660:talk 3630:talk 3603:IBAN 3593:talk 3585:dick 3555:talk 3540:talk 3520:talk 3502:talk 3458:The 3431:talk 3417:talk 3388:talk 3344:talk 3329:talk 3315:talk 3255:talk 3212:talk 3176:talk 3149:talk 3141:must 3139:RFC 3122:talk 3062:talk 3047:talk 2997:talk 2972:talk 2968:Nfds 2955:Hi, 2941:talk 2905:talk 2893:talk 2871:talk 2823:talk 2796:talk 2765:talk 2736:talk 2708:talk 2672:talk 2620:talk 2606:talk 2602:Slp1 2591:talk 2572:talk 2568:Slp1 2551:talk 2536:talk 2508:talk 2493:talk 2475:talk 2458:talk 2437:talk 2424:and 2411:talk 2388:talk 2374:talk 2356:talk 2319:talk 2303:talk 2276:talk 2261:talk 2242:talk 2227:talk 2207:talk 2182:talk 2162:talk 2146:talk 2116:talk 2100:talk 2068:talk 2053:talk 2041:here 2026:talk 1949:talk 1935:talk 1921:talk 1907:talk 1898:some 1888:talk 1873:talk 1805:talk 1780:talk 1757:talk 1732:talk 1705:talk 1690:talk 1669:talk 1654:talk 1607:talk 1592:talk 1574:and 1558:talk 1536:king 1502:Hans 1483:Hans 1473:talk 1458:talk 1442:Hans 1429:talk 1396:talk 1379:Hans 1348:talk 1299:talk 1283:talk 1267:talk 1219:talk 1197:talk 1158:talk 1143:talk 1128:talk 1113:talk 1099:talk 1084:talk 1052:talk 1018:talk 977:talk 923:talk 909:talk 840:talk 803:talk 781:talk 758:talk 743:talk 719:talk 697:talk 682:talk 662:talk 651:talk 620:talk 565:talk 531:this 529:Re: 518:Talk 467:talk 438:talk 417:talk 400:how? 390:talk 375:talk 365:and 345:talk 327:talk 312:talk 294:talk 279:talk 263:talk 227:talk 213:talk 203:See 194:talk 174:talk 147:talk 141:Rich 129:and 111:talk 74:talk 4332:log 4171:not 4099:log 4046:). 3990:.-- 3960:log 3907:). 3786:log 3733:). 3390:) 3367:. 3295:ygm 3290:or 3022:): 2775:you 2583:one 1550:ask 1419:or 1036:112 1003:112 988:bit 956:112 877:to: 729:for 707:for 542:ANI 239:.02 59:add 5169:) 5155:) 5141:) 5127:) 5116:is 5098:) 5070:) 5051:) 5005:) 4990:) 4958:) 4914:) 4896:• 4881:) 4862:• 4851:Hi 4839:) 4788:) 4773:) 4733:. 4678:) 4653:. 4643:) 4620:) 4601:) 4586:) 4578:. 4566:) 4549:) 4535:) 4516:) 4501:) 4477:) 4432:) 4417:) 4393:) 4378:) 4355:: 4344:: 4326:• 4320:• 4316:• 4311:• 4307:• 4302:• 4297:• 4293:• 4289:• 4243:) 4207:) 4159:}} 4153:{{ 4135:) 4122:: 4111:: 4093:• 4087:• 4083:• 4078:• 4074:• 4069:• 4064:• 4060:• 4056:• 4019:}} 4013:{{ 3983:: 3972:: 3954:• 3948:• 3944:• 3939:• 3935:• 3930:• 3925:• 3921:• 3917:• 3882:) 3863:}} 3857:{{ 3839:) 3826:: 3798:: 3780:• 3774:• 3770:• 3765:• 3761:• 3756:• 3751:• 3747:• 3743:• 3708:) 3662:) 3639:-- 3632:) 3595:) 3587:. 3557:) 3542:) 3522:) 3504:) 3433:) 3419:) 3346:) 3331:) 3317:) 3298:}} 3292:{{ 3288:}} 3282:{{ 3257:) 3214:) 3178:) 3151:) 3124:) 3064:) 3049:) 2999:) 2978:) 2974:• 2943:) 2907:) 2873:) 2825:) 2811:→ 2798:) 2784:→ 2767:) 2752:→ 2738:) 2724:→ 2710:) 2695:→ 2674:) 2622:) 2608:) 2593:) 2574:) 2553:) 2538:) 2510:) 2496:) 2477:) 2461:) 2413:) 2390:) 2376:) 2358:) 2321:) 2305:) 2297:-- 2278:) 2263:) 2244:) 2229:) 2209:) 2184:) 2164:) 2148:) 2118:) 2102:) 2070:) 2055:) 2028:) 1951:) 1937:) 1923:) 1909:) 1890:) 1875:) 1807:) 1786:) 1782:• 1759:) 1738:) 1734:• 1707:) 1692:) 1671:) 1656:) 1609:) 1594:) 1586:- 1570:, 1560:) 1531:Mt 1500:. 1475:) 1460:) 1431:) 1423:? 1398:) 1350:) 1301:) 1285:) 1269:) 1221:) 1203:) 1199:• 1160:) 1145:) 1130:) 1115:) 1101:) 1086:) 1054:) 1031:Ss 1020:) 998:Ss 979:) 951:Ss 925:) 911:) 842:) 805:) 795:in 783:) 760:) 745:) 721:) 711:of 699:) 684:) 664:) 653:) 622:) 608:) 581:) 567:) 552:) 511:NW 496:. 469:) 440:) 423:) 419:• 392:) 377:) 347:) 329:) 314:) 296:) 281:) 265:) 229:) 215:) 196:) 176:) 153:) 149:· 113:) 93:•( 47:•( 5165:( 5151:( 5137:( 5123:( 5094:( 5066:( 5047:( 5001:( 4986:( 4954:( 4910:( 4877:( 4835:( 4784:( 4769:( 4674:( 4639:( 4631:( 4616:( 4597:( 4582:( 4562:( 4545:( 4531:( 4512:( 4497:( 4473:( 4428:( 4413:( 4389:( 4374:( 4336:) 4334:) 4330:( 4285:( 4259:☼ 4239:( 4218:☼ 4203:( 4179:☼ 4131:( 4103:) 4101:) 4097:( 4052:( 3964:) 3962:) 3958:( 3913:( 3878:( 3835:( 3790:) 3788:) 3784:( 3739:( 3704:( 3687:☼ 3658:( 3628:( 3591:( 3574:☼ 3553:( 3538:( 3518:( 3500:( 3429:( 3415:( 3400:. 3386:( 3342:( 3327:( 3313:( 3253:( 3237:. 3210:( 3174:( 3147:( 3120:( 3060:( 3045:( 2995:( 2970:( 2939:( 2903:( 2869:( 2821:( 2794:( 2763:( 2734:( 2717:← 2706:( 2670:( 2618:( 2604:( 2589:( 2570:( 2549:( 2534:( 2506:( 2490:( 2473:( 2455:( 2440:· 2435:( 2409:( 2386:( 2372:( 2354:( 2317:( 2301:( 2274:( 2259:( 2240:( 2225:( 2205:( 2180:( 2160:( 2144:( 2114:( 2098:( 2066:( 2051:( 2024:( 1992:. 1947:( 1933:( 1919:( 1905:( 1886:( 1871:( 1844:œ 1803:( 1778:( 1755:( 1730:( 1703:( 1688:( 1667:( 1652:( 1632:. 1605:( 1590:( 1556:( 1471:( 1456:( 1427:( 1394:( 1346:( 1297:( 1281:( 1265:( 1217:( 1195:( 1156:( 1141:( 1126:( 1111:( 1097:( 1082:( 1050:( 1016:( 975:( 921:( 907:( 838:( 801:( 779:( 756:( 741:( 717:( 695:( 680:( 660:( 649:( 618:( 604:( 577:( 563:( 548:( 521:) 515:( 465:( 436:( 415:( 388:( 373:( 343:( 325:( 310:( 292:( 277:( 261:( 225:( 211:( 192:( 172:( 145:( 109:( 97:) 77:· 72:( 51:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index