625:
morally right but less morally wrong than not terminating the pregnancy. But Eric's knowledge of catholicism (and most things to do with religion) is so poor it is almost funny. He has a lot of opinions based on minimal knowledge. And writers on wikipedia who do know facts, whether they themselves are religious (like Harris) or non-religious (like me) are driven to distraction by his POV polemics (eg, his determination to quote a doctor about medical procedures in a biographical article - not once does the doctor in the long quote even mention MT, whom the article is supposedly about!) - and to stop that text being moved to a place where it might have some relevance), his hilarious lack of knowledge, and most bizarre of all, his
697:
for pointing out the shambles that is the current article. And cutting needless captions that simply repeat claims in the article, rather than simply let the readers reach their own conclusions on the image of MT with Baby Doc's wife, leads to revertions. Spelling corrections are lost in Eric's revertions. I have fixed the center command in the captions three or four times, only to find Eric reverting and producing versions that, not merely are POV with their captions, but also don't follow wiki layout guidelines. And because Eric can't get his way on his captions, his text, his context, his layout he is now calling on Jimbo to ban me, this time for real. This is
2646:
have been reduced. So I focused my energy on organizing the evidence for the arbitration case, which seemed the appropriate task given my role in bringing the case. At the same time, given the nature of mediation, it's my impression that what goes on there would generally be inappropriate to bring into the evidentiary portion of an arbitration case, so I assumed that any coordination and consultation needed to be between yourself and the arbitrators directly. Also, since I have no authority over arbitration I thought that stepping outside my role of merely presenting the case might be seen as inappopriate.
1161:) Either way Ireland or the UK, they were flavoured before they were flavored, not that that matters a toss (as does the fact the potato chips were invented in America). There are NOT two different variants in the article. The article contains no specific US spellings according to my Word spellchecker. So this arguement holds no water. You should have respected the original contribution (you may recall that I flagged this issue to JTD at the time). After you changed flavour to flavor (however long ago it was) "flavour" managed to find its way back into the article (nothing to do with me) and then
1148:
was introduced with
British English spellings. The arguments favouring the insidious mutation from flavour to flavor could be applied to all articles that use British spellings, and I don't want to see British spellings gradually expunged from Knowledge simply because once in a while an American comes along and thinks he's fixing an article, by changing it to American spellings. The general rule as I understand it is that the spellings of the person who contributed the text should be retained.
1759:. The references to them actually doing this didn't show up in print until the middle ages, and it seems it was an offhand comment even in that case. It would appear that simple physics would make the task difficult anyway, if one needed 10g per square meter (a low number I'd say), salting the earth for 50 miles around Carthage would require tens of millions of kilograms of salt. While I wouldn't put it past the Romans, I doubt even they would find this one worth doing.
663:
agenda perceives as the truth. You yourself had the experience of Eric's tone and attitude when you tried to mediate. I am fed up having to try to correct ludicrous statements, simplistic claims and patiently wrong information from religious articles Eric POVs. And then putting up with attacks for a supposed 'pro-catholic bias', or censoring the truth from Eric, who then plays the 'martyr' to religious fanaticism when his polemics are turned into proper NPOV texts. lol
643:, not even days, of the protection, is blatently breaking elementary sysop rules. Others have had their powers removed for doing something like that. And threatening bans is something no developer engaged in an edit war should ever ever ever do. So yes, Eric broke elementary rules left, right and centre. NPOV rules in the article, sysop powers in unprotecting the page, developer and sysop powers in threatening bans.
2184:
2603:
most relevant (at the time of your talk page comments, that would have been in original request on the
Request for arbitration page). I'm sorry you were not informed but the case has been open for some time now in a very public place. Of course, we still welcome anything you may have to offer (esp since we are not in the voting stage yet). --
2387:
this with "the television series Star Trek: The Next
Generation"? Or I could add a sentence after what's there now mentioning that this was changed to "no-one" in The Next Generation. I don't want to leave it as it is, as Star Trek changed it for good reason, and I don't think we should let it stand with sexist language, either.
147:, etc. Moving to ] goes against standard media caption style and would involve the wholescale renaming of pages covering elections and all sorts of events from all over the globe. You are talking about hundreds if not thousands of pages having to be renamed and go against standard caption style, which is often called the
2247:. Apparantly someone has done the reverse in the past. I got the message to contact an administrator. I'm an absolute newbie so I just picked one admin from the list: you. A lot of people have heard about the painter Caravaggio, almost nobody about Merisi. So what is the procedure to get the requested move? Thanks
1363:? I don't know if the "research group" story is credible (see Michael3's user page), but I don't think you can infer from the username that it is definitely Michael and thus worthy of auto-reversion regardless of worthiness. Has this account made any other edits which decided the matter for you? (Also see note on
118:?. I am afraid that wiki is about to make a major captioning error. It seems to be voting to putting the year first when naming elections, sports events, etc. While people often do so in spoken english, in titles and captions it doesn't do so, because to do so makes the year the central fact, whereas in reality
2449:
disingenuous complaint. I assume that this behaviour is some sort of experiment; someone trying to make a point about wiki procedures; a student writing a paper about online communities, etc. I suggest, with all due respect to 10101, that you continue to block them every time they do something stupid
2386:
without, as far as I can see, noting your reasons on the talk page. From your edit summary, "Star Trek the series", I gather that your objection was that in the article "the television series Star Trek" refers to the original series and not to The Next
Generation? Would it be OK with you if I replace
2366:
Hi Dante. Just for info, if it's useful for your mediation I can set up a separate area on the bboard for you. This can be set to private or public and I can also set criteria such as who can delete posts (except that Erik and I will always be able to delete, but Erik won't do so and I will only do
1602:
so they do not need to be censored. Aside from that, I think declarations of bias / background are generally helpful on contentious subjects such as this, although I'm pretty sure that if I added the same declarations for all the
Catholic writers, it would immediately be reverted ("Are you implying a
1382:
don't give me much faith. It is my assertion that there is sufficient evidence to support my actions. Of course, people are free to disagree with me, that's what makes this world such a wonderful place. :) Seriously though, the
Michael3 account is either Michael or else it is intentionally using his
691:
include information on the criticism made of MT. But any attempt to shorten and tighten the segment on criticism which covers 70% of the text (and most of the headlines, and all bar one of the pictures, and most of the 'additional reading'), or to move the full unedited text to a page where it can be
2395:
Thanks for the explanation. I wasn't aware that this version is better known; in that case, we should perhaps leave it as it is. I thought about ways to explain that it was changed, but since this is the introductory paragraph that would put too much weight on Star Trek instead of split infinitives.
1147:
The expression Potato Chips is perfectly well understood in the UK (some brands of crisps even say "Potato Chips" on the packet), other than that I don't see any wording that favours
American spelling. The article is not exclusively about an American subject and the subject of flavoured potato chips
696:
without editing, is greeted with screams of censorship. Merely trimming a quote that has the exact same point made in two sentences by removing one and replacing it with ' . . . ' leads to reverts. Correcting the grammar leads to revertions. Gareth Owen was verbally abused by
Eloquence on the wiki-L
634:
JT, keep in mind that you're making a lot of assumptions and stating them as fact... the fact that most of them are negative and about Erik isn't really becoming. Eloquence isn't some crazed vandal, he's an intelligent person who seems to be trying to make
Knowledge a better place. Antaganozing such
615:
HI Dante, I was trying to put a detailed explanation for the changes on the talk page, but it is rather hard to do so when Eric within seconds of seeing an article he doesn't like, blanks it, lists it on the VfD page and blanket reverts everything I do. This isn't the first time that Eric highjacked
531:
21st
Century Transcendentalism is not a religion and does not advocate (request belief, membership or anything else) anything; it stands for religious rationality in the 21st Century. If Knowledge can describe what atheists, Christianity, Islam, Bokononism thinks then why can not I as a 21st Century
2645:
At that point, naturally, notifying you of the arbitration case was no longer necessary, and I figured it wasn't my position to tell you what to do or not to do with the mediation. And if the mediation had succeeded, that would have been wonderful and perhaps the scope of the arbitration case might
2632:
I just discovered on mav's talk page that apparently having concurrent mediation and arbitration seems to have turned into somewhat of a fiasco here. I apologize for any action (or rather, omission) on my part that contributed to the problem. I did know of the request for mediation, but when I last
1601:
is appropriate. It was of course added by one of the many MT apologists, but I think it's a good thing it is there -- I have tolerated similar sentences on other articles as they seem to keep the apologists at bay. It seems that if someone is an atheist their arguments can be immediately discounted
1288:
This is what he delated he claimed it was unsigned (you decide) MY ANSWER RickK it has become evident to I that you dont like what I am doing I ask you why? Are you being resectful to wiki's? I'd say NO. This lack of respect leads me to believe that we must break the police state that wiki. That is
671:
Frankly, JT, I don't think EITHER of you have behaved as paragons of Wikiquette in this situation. :) That being said, how about you agree to "let him win" for the time being whether he's right or not. If he is willing to do the same thing then we can all go back to worrying about important things,
84:
For a few reasons. First of all, people searching for the Pandæmonium of Milton are unlikely to use the ligature spelling in the search bar, so Pandaemonium should probably not be an article just on the film. Second of all, it seems to be common practice to append (movie) or (film) to a movie title
2602:
and its evidence page (and this case was accepted while I was on a leave of absence). I still don't see where your name is mentioned. The two comments you did make were on the talk page for the main requests page. If you want to get noticed in the future then leave your post closest to where it is
662:
My edits simply were a response to criticism by others on the talk page who complained that what he was adding in was not NPOV, too long and in places largely irrelevant. He ignored them and hinted that they too (surprise, surprise) were engaged in trying to silence the truth, or what Eric and his
652:
page. Since it's otherwise unsourced, I'll give Erik the benefit of the doubt on this one until he confirms or denies his role in the unprotection. Also, to be fair, he didn't really threaten a ban, no more than Ed did last week or so... I don't think anyone took him seriously that he was going to
624:
in the cases of rape and incest, abortion is wrong. Anyone with a high school grasp of Roman Catholicism and abortion knows that. The anglican communion has a marginally different stance, that abortion is wrong but that in the case of rape and incest, abortion may be the 'lesser of two evils', not
200:
I agree that it would've been much better if PP had mentioned his concerns in a comment before removing the vote, and I agree that it would've been better if PP had said explicitly in his edit summary what he was doing, but if anybody disagrees with the removal, it's a simple matter to put it back
2649:
Anyway, I'm not looking to blame anyone, and least of all you (in fact, on reviewing the mediation dialogue I'm quite impressed with your patience and effort to hear both sides out). I think the underlying disputes have caused a great deal of frustration for everyone, and unfortunately we seem to
1717:
DA, You may have noticed (or not) that the WPProjCrypto now has a discussion page for cypher v cipher. I added a summary list of the views of those I was even partially informed of, but could not recall yours. Assuming you wish to jump into a TT, you might consider looking over the discussion, or
1702:
the people and angels in question have been placed outside Hell, in the Vestibule, I believe. Whether or not this was the darkest place, I think that this quote is trying to give a false impression that Dante thought such people to be the worst possible sinners. And I would guess that Dante would
1739:
Re your post: I think you may have gone a little overboard on decapitation. It seems to be common policy to not link EVERY SINGLE potentially linkable word/phrase, but only ones that are relevant. For example, I question your linking of chemical, face, and lips in the article, to name a few. :)
766:
Thanks, Dante. Unfortunately, I know little about russenorsk. I wasn't aware of it's existence before I read about it on Knowledge ;-) Conserning Saami, I guess it could be listed as an official language in some way, as it is administrative language (with Norwegian) in some municipalities. It's
453:
Hi Dante, we are going to be starting development on the wikipedia API in Python soon. One of our members has already written a large amount of code, so I would like to send it to you. I need your e-mail address, so maybe you could use the e-mail this user feature to send it to me? Thanks.
158:
As you may guess, I do think wiki's proposed to system would amount to a pointless waste of energy in remaining vast numbers of pages, especially when it is to a format that is generally not used in titles and captions but only in speech. And this debate is all about titles. So I am canvassing
1412:
The reason I took a combative attitude as you put it was because I saw somebody doing something unproductive just on the principle of it with no regard of anything else. Now if you deal with these things all the time and were just in some kind of automatic mode, then I can understand and I'll
1220:
after my last edit, and hence I wasn't planning to change it back again. I have no intention of changing it to read crisps throughout. I'm sorry if you find that this "hybrid" article is offensive, but I do not intend to force this issue and further. Whatever... we'll see how long it lasts as
1644:
to the Arbitration Committee and all other interested parties, but before we do so, we want to check with the rest of the Mediation Committee. Please review the statement and let me know if you approve, wish to make/suggest changes, or have another way you'd like to suggest that we proceed.
415:. They look fine so far, although a bit short on, for example, behaviour. I might be able to help out on that, although I'm too busy at the moment. I'm not sure of the value of links from the genus names for these species, since they are monospecific or nearly so. Keep up the good work!
1652:
on the bottom half of the page, but we wanted to confirm that there was agreement on our being co-chairs for the period noted there before we post the statement. Also, if people are amenable to our serving as co-chairs, I will add that information to the Mediation Committee page.
308:
By all means go ahead... I had assumed they would be unblocked in short order, I certainly didn't intend the blocks to last forever. I could have sworn that there was some conversation about someone unblocking them... but I guess we never did... Good catch on that, by the way.
1077:- depending how quickly you get this message the article merge may still be in progress - with all appropriate redirects. Give me a shout if you spot anything I manage to screw up - but hopefully at the end of it all our river dolphin coverage will be signicantly improved.
535:?Transcendentalism Today Org.? with Kurt Kawohl as its founder has been accepted by and is a member of: IONS - Institute of Noetic Sciences, World Interfaith Congress, United Communities of Spirit, Alliance for Spiritual Community, Interfaith Voices for Peace And Justice,
1500:
I won't standardise the various German/Polish debates... but I will slowly, oh so slowly, try to get consensus in each chat for them on the overall ikipedia naming convention. Hopefully that will leave us with less fights to try to break up... well, I can hope, anyway.:)
758:). I think we are just waiting for you to join us and the whole committee is joined up there. Sorry if you didn't get all the previous messages, there seemed to be problems in getting hold of you - but I think everything we've talked about so far is there. Regards --
348:
Michael has been hard-banned multiple times. Michael knows Jimbo's email address and HAS emailed him on occassion. As a banned user he has no right to edit the Knowledge and all users have the full authority to see to it that any edits he makes do not remain. See also:
629:
that he knows what he is talking about and that everything he writes on religion is based on knowledge, not prejudice. And of course that everyone else is biased and engaged in cover ups to 'protect' religion when they engage in professional editing and NPOVing.
647:
I certainly agree that a sysop unprotecting a page that was protected due to an edit war that he/she is involved in is unacceptable. The problem is, the only evidence I can find that Eloquence is the one who unprotected it is Angela's blurb to that effect on the
616:
a religious topic and tried to turn it into a polemic, often with comically incompetent results. On Mother Teresa, for example, he claimed that MT's conviction that abortion was wrong in the case of rape and incest was extreme even by RC standards. Actually that
1582:
You're obviously interested in the subject, so can I invite to join the Wikiproject:Cryptography? No required participation or effort. You obviously like to write, and no matter what your knowledge of technical crypto, the crypto corner garden needs weeding.
1703:
have no such beliefs. Indeed, the quote itself feels more like something invented by modern days activists to give them another rhetorical device for their dubious battles. Anyway, I maybe wrong, and maybe you have good evidence that Dante really said this.
1867:. There's now a provisional Table of Contents to work with, and for the next 68 days or so there'll be an "Article of the Day" scheme: each day there'll be a particular article highlighted for reviewing and fixing. There's two templates for this purpose:
1743:
You may be right. I maintain it's better to have too many links than too few. But that aside, "chemical" may not be the most useful link, but I don't see a problem with linking "face" and "lips" when discussing signs of life in a decapitated head...
2436:
talk to me next time before you block me. If someone had been able to talk to me (other than with insults), I may have been able to do something productive. I urge you to try to talk before you block. (By the way, I was blocked, not banned.) ←
882:
Yes. :D. I love MediaWiki messages! My ideal wikipedia would be one where no regular text existed in articles. All edits would be done to MediaWiki pages and different messages would be placed in the articles. This would cause quite some
1205:
I am currently engaged in two arguments on Knowledge and I have decided not to continue this one, which is why I said "do what you like". I certainly have no intenting on changing the article (after 3 reversions I usually call a halt).
423:
Thanks for the lookover. There's TONS of information on the external sites that are linked on the pages, but I don't have the time to go through it all. ;) As for the Family links, I was just following standard formatting over at the
337:
If he wants Jimbo to publicly respond (and perhaps confirm the hard ban) rather than privately, then that's Michael's choice. Also, you are kind of deciding what Jimbo gets to see on his user page, and I'm not sure if that is right.
333:
About Michael. If he wants to complain to Jimbo, then why not let him? I really can't see him e-mailing Jimbo about his long-running problems with the Knowledge - yet he needs to communicate with Jimbo to have the hard ban lifted.
1322:
1413:
apologize. But if there is one thing I can't take, it's seeing someone "following orders" with no regard of anything else. The fact that you admitted that the edits were benign (and even verified it yourself) boggles the mind. --
134:
etc because the the fact that it is an election is the main fact to know, that it is a general/presidential/local/state/congressional election central. We have been following this rule for ages on wiki, so we have everything from
462:
I have no idea what to make of your comment. Many wikipedians are friendly and supportive, of the few that arent -- jtdirl tops the list. He is abusive, rude, and deceitful, on a daily basis he attacks me and other users.
205:, then that's a more serious matter). I do think there needs to be some sort of policy on who can and can't vote if voting is to work, but of course, that doesn't forgive PP's actions (assuming they need forgival). --
2650:
have gotten our wires crossed a little bit. If there's anything you think I still should do here, please let me know and I will try to fix what I can, as I would rather solve problems than create more of them. --
1810:, it seems that the first step is to identify one or more members of the committee who are willing to mediate in this case, although before proceeding it will be necessary to clarify the goals of the mediation.
2599:
1046:
2637:
attempt to satisfy the Arbitration Committee's "prerequisites"). I did not realize you had managed to get an active mediation going - quite an accomplishment, by the way - until you posted your message to
151:
rule. After all, people if they are searching for a page on an election will use the name of the election as their entry point for a list (particularly if they don't know the year). Typing in a search for
1327:
Glad to oblige. I like admins to operate like a school of fish where trolls are concerned -- give them too many targets to drive anyone off successfully. :-) Keep up the excellent work, and enjoy this:
171:
My pleasure, DA. Not a very good article, I don't know much about them - never seen one. But a whole lot better than none at all, I guess. Maybe I can find a picture on the web somewhere that we can use.
2227:
These articles are likely to be some of the earliest English Knowledge content to get turned into a print version, and any help in making them as good as possible would be much appreciated. Thanks!
1405:
The discussion was never about whether Michael or Michael3 was a banned user or not. That's why I considered that edit of yours to be both condescending and a misrepresentation of my position. --
1069:
Hi Dante. I am back doing some more work on the river dolphins that you did originally. Basically because throughout the rest of the cetaceans we are following Rice (1998) for classification (see
1677:
I've made a change to the statement to add in llywrch's comment. Please let me know if you object. Unless anyone dislikes this change I will pass on the statement tomorrow evening. Regards --
211:
My actions are forgivable because they are not problematic. The edit history remains, and everything can be restored. It's a simple matter to put it back. If I were to unilaterally remove it
1888:
1864:
1175:
BTW - at the time you said "I have no objection to the article going the other way, however, I was just standardizing as I thought was most appropriate given the article as it stood."
2633:
glanced at it shortly before requesting arbitration, it seemed to be somewhat stale and making no progress (not surprising as the initial request didn't seem sincere and looked like a
1517:
Sincere appologies for any mischaracterisation Dante, but I'm at a loss about what you thought was unfair in my summary. Perhaps you can help me out, and clear up my confusion. Yours,
1429:
1333:
1221:
flavour. I have seen a number of articles which have lost British spellings (this was the point I was originally trying to make) and was only trying to push back the inevitable tide.
1116:
Edwards has not dropped out yet. Expected to announce on Wednesday, US East coast time. So I've changed all mentions of this to expectations of announcing it on Wednesday. Thanks.
658:(cur) (last) . . 04:50, 20 Oct 2003 . . Eloquence (removing protection for now (I was involved so I won't edit for another few hours if Jtdirl won't, but others should be able to))
1636:
While Anthony has agreed to mediation, so far, there has been no response from another party in order to begin working on the Anthony mediation. We have drafted a statement at
1254:
919:
I must echo Angela....how bizarre. To this day, I think I can claim that Mythrandia is the only user I know of who actually got fully angry at me (over the nonsense article
1725:
It's fascinating to watch. Reminds me a bit of what I imagine the Times (London) letter page might be like. Odd phrase that, no? Anyway, see or hear from you there, I hope.
1568:
384:
Dear Dante- Really the World War II page is gruesome. Take a look at it. The writer(s) don't tell the story in sequence. It's (in the words of George Bush "bad, real bad").
2157:
If you find problems that you can't fix (or it's too much effort), it would be very helpful if you could place a note on the Talk: page. Articles need to be checked for 1)
973:
Sorry, but I removed Haiti from Main page. I share your interest in third world politics, and it would be good to have these happenings covered here, but the guidelines on
2502:
1768:
1165:
then changed those references back to flavor and that is when I restored "flavour" again. It was his actions to which I was refering when I described it as insidious.
800:
1195:
There are hundreds and hundreds of "hybrid" articles on Knowledge, where subsequent authors have chosen to respect the spellings originally used. Please do likewise.
867:
Actually, to be fair to the poster of the request for a link exchange, i should tell you that I added that issue to the FAQ after he posted asking for the exchange.
2450:
as I do not believe wikipedia has enough spare time and labour to deal with stuff like this, an obvious and possibly deliberate distraction from the work in hand.
1630:
387:
July seems to be the centenial of the birth of Eric Blair (aka George Orwell). I recently was reviewing his guide to good writing. He was death on passive voice.
1626:
1014:
892:
872:
2291:
923:
or something like that). If he dropped back in to attempt exoneration, well....so weird. Thanks for letting me know. I have to assume you reverted? :)
89:
to be a generally unwise idea to have two articles that differ only by "punctuation" (ligature, umlauts, accent marks, etc.) be about different things. --
2481:
2451:
2325:
605:
115:
729:
Hi. Look what I did! Don't be mad, k? I figured it was better than nothing, and Ed told me to take my problems there, so... let me know what you think?
1488:. Unfortunately there are far fewer taxoboxes in alignment than there are out. Now that you know, please use a "good" taxobox as a template. *grins* -
589:
2283:
1684:
1010:
888:
868:
373:
BTW, is Weezer76 Michael or not? If not (and several users now seem to think so) , then weezer76 should not appear on the list of Michael's aliases.
2498:
701:
the first time Eric has done this in articles on religious themes, but not to the same extreme extent, and his behaviour at this stage is tiresome.
296:
they're probably dynamic IPs anyway (if you checked, and you know they're static IPs, say so in the ban comment so folks like me will know - thanks)
852:
When editing the main page, re-arrange the order of the links so that they all the rows line up as evenly as possible. Keep up the top-notch work,
2527:
I'll be in Palo Alto Friday, and hoping to meet up with nohat before chilling at the SAP compound; any chance you'd be free for an early dinner?
608:-- however, it's an AOL dialup and it's aready changed once, so be prepared. I must go to sleep now...so it's up to you to defend the realm ;) --
1533:
159:
support to vote down what I think is a flawed, ill thought through and pointless that originated initially with our mosrt infamous troll (in the
676:
on my watchlist is about to be made public. ;) Seriously, both of you need to calm down. Neither of you is coming up roses in this situation. --
2287:
1817:
1774:
795:
I also left a comment on that page so that others will hopefully do the same. As for the signature, it's sort of a trick, I set my nickname to
768:
536:
1707:
1616:
1549:
920:
2617:
2570:
Hi from Adrian. I can't see why you deleted my public domain photo of two macaws. WP particularly values PD pics (as all my pics on WP are)
576:
photo. It's possible that's not him; I'd never heard anything about his being photographed one way or the other. I originally got it from
390:
Anyway, no intent to be nasty. The WWII page needs some serious blue-pencil work and I hope that between us all we can get it squared away.
154:
U.S. presidential election throws up a clear orderly list of US presidential elections, with the disambigulation year at the end uniformly.
1798:
1770:
974:
517:
513:
259:
20:13 21 May 2003, Dante Alighieri blocked 192.139.27.18 (contribs) (unblock) (User has made 5 edits since Feb 21 2003, all were vandalism)
2461:
He/she knew precisely what they were doing. I will always block that kind of nonsense. "Disingenous" is perhaps even a bit charitable. --
2320:
Thanks for the quick action Dante! Also, in case this is helpful to you, you can view the framework I've used in the past for mediations
1872:
1790:
1508:
841:
715:
to clarify once and for all what people think about the current article and what we should do about it. Please express your opinion. lol
1231:
For sure. I wasn't reverting you, personally. I was reverting the other guy, it was only later that I remembered what had gone before.
263:
470:
When RK comes back I want to nominate him for sysop (again) I dont ask for much, but I ask that you support his nomination. Sincerely-
85:
when there exists an article at the same name (even if it's a variant "spelling). Lastly, I'm not sure it's a policy, but it seems to
1729:
783:. I would also note the identification (or guess) on the image's description page that way it can be used correctly in other places.
2615:
I'm so sorry, Dante. I don't remember you sending me an e-mail of what you told me about. Was it sent to the right e-mail address?
2413:
on whether or not to use the term "terrorist" to describe the 9/11 attacks. I'd be interested in hearing your view on the subject.
364:
I didn't know about Michael e-mailing Jimbom, but Jimbo chose to reply to him anyway, in the manner that I predicted that he would.
1820:. The more people who are willing to mediate, the better, as this will provide more options for the two users to try to agree on.
1592:
2639:
1289:
why I am not asking but I am demanding series of reforms to our project thank you for you time.--Plato 02:55, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
862:
69:
be about the film? I don't see the point of giving the page about the film a more complex title when the simpler title is free (
2214:
318:
Funny stuff. Michael's vandalized my page a few times, but nothing compared to what he does to Zoe's and Hephaestos' pages.
1698:
Hi, I have noted the quote on your front page, which you attribute to Dante. Are you really certain that Dante said this? In
516:
etc.. It allows pages which contain information that may be out of date in the future to be easily checked, by searching for
1444:
Dante, can you tell me what was with the Michael3, Michael33 affair, it seems to me like an "Sockpuppet"/Apr. Fool's joke?--
2066:
1693:
1657:
1637:
2350:
Just wanted to say that if you ever need help to move things along, just let me know and I'll do my best to help. Thanks,
272:
08:12 28 May 2003, Dante Alighieri blocked 65.219.41.104 (contribs) (unblock) (garden variety vandalism, more of the same)
248:
Sorry - I just wanted to deprive him of the interaction with normal people he obviously thrives on, but I'll stop now.
1868:
1032:
754:
Hi Dante, I'm not sure if you are aware but we are discussing a lot of the mediation issues at the new bulletin board (
54:
50:
46:
38:
1424:
instead for bringing a heated discussion to a peaceful end, demonstrating you're definitely fit to be an administrator:
1485:
269:
07:13 28 May 2003, Dante Alighieri blocked 66.81.139.91 (contribs) (unblock) (more random vandalism from this IP range)
2574:
there is plenty of space for three pics. Finally, I believe my pic to be of very good quality. Best Wishes, Adrian -
1895:
1712:
1471:
PS. I just saw the vandalism that was done from this ip number. PPS. And apparently I can now edit again. Thanks. --
442:
122:
the event is is central, the year the disambigulation point. For example, media outlets caption election coverage as
1073:
for more), I am going to do the same for the Indus and Ganges River Dolphins. The merged article is taking shape at
2264:
1968:
1781:
1641:
723:
140:
27:
2610:
836:
275:
22:20 28 May 2003, Dante Alighieri blocked 217.33.151.148 (contribs) (unblock) (made junk article at Dates, twice)
186:"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of great moral crisis."
2410:
2059:
1622:
1070:
262:
00:17 28 May 2003, Dante Alighieri blocked 200.168.118.100 (contribs) (unblock) (continually putting nonsense at
1031:
2071:
1574:
1074:
225:. However, I woasked for the FULL adress and the press officer name who gave User:Jtdirl the photo. Thank you.
34:
1845:
1794:
1323:
Blindly supporting the wiki-hierarchy in its sinister goal of destroying democracy and freedom across the net
954:
Hey. Any word on what level of math the Mandelbrot book requires going in in order to understand it? Thanks!
635:
a person isn't helpful. Right or wrong, perhaps you should avoid saying things that are so very inflammatory?
1858:
1579:
Dante, I keep stumbling over your edits in the crypto articles and have finally decided to drop you a note.
1973:
1438:
780:
501:
144:
2501:
and would be happy to know your opinion too. What languages do you understand / contribute? Have you seen
2404:
1813:
And just FYI, there has also been quite a bit of chatter on the WikiEN mailing list about similar issues.
1268:
722:
2114:
1961:
1648:
Also, in that statement we refer to ourselves as co-chairs of the committee. There was discussion at the
1518:
1510:
2290:
for a mediator, and he has listed his preferences in descending order, and you're next on the list (see
2254:
2196:
2119:
828:
2466:
1398:
1141:
639:
And yes, a sysop unprotecting a page that was protected to stop an edit war he was a participant of,
428:
article, and didn't bother to ditch them when I copied the data over to the river dolphin article. --
136:
17:
2627:
1292:
A user has the perfect right to delete things from their talk page. As I plan on doing right now.
961:
649:
278:
02:12 29 May 2003, Dante Alighieri blocked 24.45.148.244 (contribs) (unblock) (3 vandalizations of
1756:
Sorry for the tardy reply. The reference in the article is rather common these days, for instance
1364:
774:
240:
I like to think the best of people. It'll probably get me stabbed or raped one of these days. --
2021:
1816:
If you are willing to act as the mediator in this case, please leave a brief note stating so at
2587:
2109:
2016:
1923:
1241:
As you should know, there is a mediation message board. I have made numerous requests there.
751:
Hello, could you tell me what your email adress is, or write to anthere8atyahoo.com ? thanks
232:
Heh heh. DW is one prize prat! Next thing he'll want Ann's fingerprints! :-) What a nutcase.
1757:
2462:
1918:
1903:
1762:
1394:
1371:
677:
441:
ideas about how to make the VFD page more user-friendly and more decisive. They are on the
429:
354:
310:
90:
1283:
906:. It seems to be the only edit he's made under that IP though. Maybe your warning worked?
742:
8:
2240:
1216:
Ah... I see what you were on about now. I had assumed that you restored the article with
505:
319:
101:
74:
1158:
Flavoured crisps were invented in Ireland (Although Golden Wonder say they invented them
221:
Thank you for volunteering a part of the information I requested on the photo posted by
2161:(Factchecking: Are there any mistakes? Is the writing precise? Are sources cited?), 2)
1537:
1050:
1024:
Your pictures of Tapirs is up now put up 3 for you to chose from sorry about the delay
712:
61:
Okay, if the place decsribed by Milton is Pandæmonium (with ligature), and the film is
2492:
1586:
We'd be glad to have you formally. Not that it matters really... this _is_ the WP....
350:
2651:
2190:
2011:
1610:
1341:
1235:
1225:
1210:
1199:
1189:
1179:
1169:
1152:
931:
924:
577:
562:
542:
Did I really acidentally vote for you? I hope you have corrected my silly mistake!
464:
216:
2480:
Yup. well done and thanks - block, and block again and again as required please! :)
1797:
but also about his general conduct around POV editing and unencyclopedic behaviour.
1484:
You're welcome! The edits I made bring Pollack into alignment with the standards in
592:
page on VfD. Sorry, but it doesn't seem to be appropriate as it is so little known.
2621:
2575:
2383:
2371:
2271:
2228:
1852:
1681:
1556:
1472:
1464:
998:
997:
article -- that is basically just a skeleton with links to various offspring, like
910:
394:
100:
Hmmm... I did think of that, but... well... Oh, all right, you've convinced me. --
2377:
1350:
2604:
2357:
2340:
2313:
1913:
1830:
1670:
1368:
1297:
1106:
1092:
1081:
903:
853:
581:
471:
293:
in any case, with only five edits, a ban isn't really in tune with soft security.
1631:
Knowledge:Requests_for_mediation#Issue_of_Anthony's_reverts_and_alleged_trolling
2600:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Gzornenplatz, Kevin Baas, Shorne, VeryVerily
2326:
User:Bcorr/new articles#Mediation Proposal between GrazingshipIV and Kingturtle
2174:
1793:
and associated TALK page. Specific complaint about his anti-Semitic comment on
1607:
1434:
1414:
1406:
1385:
1379:
1058:
1039:
993:
Quite right, but mentionin of the uprising in any case wouldn't be on the main
965:
948:
884:
817:
808:
788:
730:
416:
301:
249:
241:
206:
2551:
Ah well, looks like this was too hard to arrange on short notice. Next time!
2515:
2506:
1699:
1598:
1502:
1489:
1453:
1356:
1117:
1025:
840:
_< Think you can do the appropiate move? I had/have to do other things. --
821:
412:
2367:
so on request). Let me know if this is of use to you any time. Regards --
2277:
2207:
Describe cryptanalysis of digital signatures -- what are the various notions
1751:
1248:
1049:. They already address the issues Sam raises above, I've emailed specifics.
847:
2555:
2544:
2531:
2417:
2414:
1704:
1552:
is the person to tell this to though. It's beyond my ability to change it.
1360:
1232:
1222:
1207:
1196:
1186:
1176:
1166:
1149:
1002:
986:
955:
837:
Wikisource:Manifesto of the Communist Party - Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels
745:
580:; the picture of Geronimo is legit, but I can't 100% vouch for the rest. -
551:
543:
521:
455:
193:
2581:
2396:
I guess historical sexist language can go uncommented once in a while :-)
2292:
Knowledge:Requests_for_mediation#VeryVerily_and_Gzornenplatz.2C_Kevin_Baas
1567:
Thanks for your great work on WMDs. I think it is a very important topic.
480:
I believe another admin deleted that photo already for being a copyvio. --
2368:
2268:
2248:
1849:
1807:
1745:
1678:
1553:
1258:
1138:
1132:
907:
759:
716:
702:
664:
597:
446:
233:
226:
222:
173:
164:
500:
Just wondering - what's the extra heading you've added to the bottom of
2438:
2427:
2397:
2388:
2351:
2334:
2307:
2300:
Would you mind letting them know whether or not that is a possibility?
2260:
2244:
1824:
1664:
1445:
1316:
1304:
1293:
1274:
1162:
1129:
1103:
1089:
1078:
609:
593:
493:
481:
401:
1562:
163:
persona) some months ago and survived as an idea after SM was banned.
1463:
It seems you have blocked me. (ip: 213.224.83.136) Can I ask why? --
930:
Thanks for the note! I dub thee Dante, Protector of the Archives. :)
829:
804:
784:
489:
374:
341:
1844:
Hi Dante, please could you vote on the potential new members of the
1428:
1332:
1159:
1057:
Hey, whats going on? I thought we were gonna mediate and stuff... ?
1009:
hah. 3 years old. I need to start pressing the refresh button. ;-)
550:
As I'm sure you have noticed, I already fixed it. Did I miss any?
2321:
1649:
1242:
673:
2522:
1734:
755:
2552:
2541:
2540:
Cool. I'll be coming from Oakland at ~3, and am free until 9...
2528:
2263:
has applied to join the mediation committee. There is a vote at
1726:
1597:
Dante, I'm not sure removing the "were all atheists" sentence on
1589:
767:
official status is however only limited to those municipalities.
573:
425:
2297:
If you can't do it, that's fine and I can ask llyrwch or moink.
1338:
In honor of noble and polite service in defense against trolls.
1863:
Hi, quick note to let you know about what's happening with the
2426:
2234:
977:
state that articles on current events should only be added if
944:
596:
has suggested moving it to meta which I think is a good idea.
2564:
1135:
1001:. Maybe I will put together something later this evening. --
994:
982:
2499:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Dog breeds#is: List of dog breeds
2183:
1839:
1818:
Knowledge:Requests_for_mediation#User:AndyL_and_User:WHEELER
1479:
1437:(who has probably made too many enemies with regards to the
1393:
Michael. Either way I consider the edits to be vandalism. --
1310:
290:
a 30 days ban is a little excessive for (for eg) five edits.
2503:
Knowledge:WikiProject Dog breeds/Templates/InterWiki (main)
1532:
Thanks for deleting my user page & thanks for the tip!
1099:
279:
2598:
Dante - I informed everybody who signed their name to the
2169:(Copyedits: Grammar and spelling, phrasing, structure) 4)
1543:
1527:
1064:
779:
Hi, I noticed that you identified some of the images from
2177:? Do we document all relevant points of view?) — Thanks!
1882:
1420:
Ok, instead of an anti-barnstar accept this (additional)
981:(logical I think) -- and this is not (yet) the case with
1625:
referred a case to us which it had considered regarding
2514:
Thank you for the answer. Success at the show! Regards
2165:(Any obvious omissions? Does it need illustration?) 3)
189:
we try to operate always according to these fine words
2593:
1495:
1467:
23:21, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC) (now posting from another IP)
803:
for a small explanation. You still use 3 or 4 tildes.
572:
Somehow I missed your comment the other day about the
532:
Transcendentalist describe what I think? Bias, maybe?
687:
I am simply trying to get an NPOV article, one which
2563:
1656:Please take a moment to comment on these issues at
1273:
If that be so Dante, than user:RickK is a vandal.--
116:
Knowledge talk:Naming conventions (years in titles)
1123:
902:What a strange thing to do. I assume it is assume
578:http://digilander.libero.it/magaangela/capiInd.htm
1548:I agree. I really miss the links at the bottom.
979:the article is updated with the relevant context
1780:A few days ago, AndyL listed a request on the
1315:Hey Dante any relation to the real Dante???--
943:Hi, thanks for the tip, I found the image on
756:http://boards.wikimedia.org/viewforum.php?f=1
400:thanks for the help on my newspaper machine.
255:You've blocked some IPs for a month or so...
1047:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Bryan Derksen
975:Knowledge:Selected Articles on the Main Page
816:thank you for cleaning up my mispellings on
744:if you are not registered to the ml. Thanks
1873:Template:WikiReaderCryptographyAOTD-Verbose
1791:Knowledge:Requests for comment/User:WHEELER
1303:I didnt know, the policies with talk page--
1038:Here are my talking points and references.
863:Advertising and the FAQ on the village pump
561::-( now the only vote for my logo has gone
1621:More than two weeks ago, on April 25, the
2411:Straw poll on use of the term "terrorist"
2409:Dante, there is a straw poll going on at
2215:(See all to-do lists for this WikiReader)
839:. Sorry, I forgot to tell you that. : -->
820:, speeling is not my strongest ability.
672:like whether or not the fact that I have
2497:Halló Dante, I posted some questions at
2267:if you want to participate. Regards --
1784:page between User:WHEELER and himself:
1378:Sure? No. But the subsequent actions of
1253:Eh, I summarized all of the comments on
512:Dante. There is a reason for the use of
351:this email from the mailing list archive
2640:Knowledge talk:Requests for arbitration
1629:and a number of other user to us here:
1257:, didn't get any ban warnings there...
528:Please voice your opinion on deletion.
14:
2322:here and the mediation bulletin board
1617:Request regarding Mediation Committee
445:. I'd welcome your observations. lol
2620:. As I said on my own talk page. --
2611:The E-mail you just tried to send me
2382:Hi Dante -- you reverted my edit to
1769:Request for mediator in the case of
1658:User:Bcorr/mediation statement draft
1638:User:Bcorr/mediation statement draft
2265:Knowledge:Mediation_Committee#Grunt
2239:Hi Dante, I tried to move the page
1875:. The smaller one looks like this:
1869:Template:WikiReaderCryptographyAOTD
1033:User:Sam Spade/Mediation with Bryan
23:
2259:Hi Dante, just a note to say that
1640:that we would like to post on the
1486:Knowledge:WikiProject Tree of Life
215:; then, there might be a problem.
24:
2663:
1859:WikiProject Cryptography mailshot
1806:After discussing the matter with
443:Knowledge talk:Votes for deletion
300:So I'm going to unblock them. :)
2182:
1782:Knowledge:Requests for mediation
1441:articles to "win" a sysop vote)
1427:
1331:
1269:Altering comments is vandalism??
724:Knowledge:Requests for mediation
620:the RC stance on abortion, that
437:Hi Dante, I've put forward some
183:Hallo Dante! we love your motto
141:U.S. presidential election, 1932
2255:Mediation Committee application
2061:Block cipher modes of operation
1389:to make others believe that it
1365:User talk:Meelar#WikiExperiment
1071:Knowledge:WikiProject Cetaceans
604:Thanks for the quick action on
1075:Ganges and Indus River Dolphin
830:Wikisource:Communist Manifesto
65:(without ligature), why can't
13:
1:
2628:Mediation/Arbitration overlap
2303:I hope all is well with you.
1846:Knowledge:Mediation Committee
1795:Talk:Early_National_Socialism
1718:even adding your position to
492:is much better than mine. :)
2423:] 23:11, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
1694:About the moral crisis quote
1439:Israeli-Palestinian conflict
1255:Talk:Artifical consciousness
781:Plants and animals of Belize
775:Plants and animals of Belize
502:Knowledge:Votes for deletion
145:Irish general election, 2002
7:
1963:Message authentication code
945:http://www.nationmaster.com
741:Hello :-) please read this
35:AE/BE issues (french fries)
10:
2668:
2324:and a very similar one at
1865:WikiReader in Cryptography
1855:00:05, Jul 24, 2004 (UTC)
1673:01:46, May 13, 2004 (UTC)
1559:21:38, Apr 20, 2004 (UTC)
1261:22:33, Mar 23, 2004 (UTC)
1045:Mine are at the bottom of
958:00:07, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC) (
913:00:43, Feb 10, 2004 (UTC)
797:]] | [[User talk:Dori|Talk
711:Hi, I've called a vote on
546:02:12, Aug 28, 2003 (UTC)
476:23:23, Aug 16, 2003 (UTC)
411:Hi, saw your email on the
393:Now, with three tildies …
132:Presidential Election 2000
2654:07:38, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2624:22:56, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2607:19:05, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2441:19:18, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
2316:19:07, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
2231:01:49, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
2213:
2204:
2181:
2153:
1885:
1765:12:18, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1748:18:57, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1713:spellyng, or spelling ???
1613:03:59, May 7, 2004 (UTC)
1571:22:46, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1540:20:42, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1521:19:43, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1319:04:34, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1307:06:51, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1300:06:39, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1277:23:17, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1095:18:49, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
1084:17:10, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
1061:23:09, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
1053:04:16, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
1042:11:14, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
1028:23:15, 2004 Feb 13 (UTC)
989:12:50, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)
951:23:13, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
927:00:48, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
844:21:19, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)
791:20:00, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)
762:18:49, 25 Jan 2004 (UTC)
735:12:34, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)
719:23:05, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC)
667:19:54, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
612:05:01, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
600:21:44, Oct 2, 2003 (UTC)
554:13:52, Aug 28, 2003 (UTC)
524:21:54, 25 Aug 2003 (UTC)
508:00:29, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)
496:03:28, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC)
484:02:53, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC)
137:UK general election, 1970
18:User talk:Dante Alighieri
2590:00:33, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2578:09:47, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2536:21:45, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2509:04:19, 2004 Nov 2 (UTC)
2469:23:50, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)
2454:11:32, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
2391:19:46, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
2374:17:03, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
2343:21:21, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
2274:22:14, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
2251:07:30, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
2173:(Is it written from the
1833:18:34, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
1730:18:24, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
1708:07:25, 23 May 2004 (UTC)
1685:19:58, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
1650:mediation bulletin board
1505:17:26, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1492:17:48, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1456:20:46, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1448:04:43, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1417:02:29, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1409:02:03, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1401:01:43, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)
1374:01:38, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1344:00:53, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1284:RickKs accused vandalism
1238:01:27, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1228:00:32, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1213:00:05, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1202:23:52, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1192:23:45, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1182:23:28, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1172:23:22, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1155:22:56, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1144:08:12, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1120:02:56, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
1109:09:54, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
1019:00:14, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC)
1005:18:10, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)
962:User talk:DanteAlighieri
934:00:52, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
897:00:25, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
877:00:09, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
856:18:49, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)
824:20:08, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
811:20:17, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)
771:22:59, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
705:21:22, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
680:20:50, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
650:Knowledge:Protected page
641:within a couple of hours
584:03:59, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
565:17:41, 28 Aug 2003 (UTC)
458:13:40 21 Jul 2003 (UTC)
449:00:40 17 Jul 2003 (UTC)
419:12:25 14 Jul 2003 (UTC)
404:09:26 13 Jul 2003 (UTC)
322:05:25 29 Jun 2003 (UTC)
304:20:13 28 Jun 2003 (UTC)
244:05:48 27 Jun 2003 (UTC)
236:03:18 27 Jun 2003 (UTC)
229:03:09 27 Jun 2003 (UTC)
196:13:40 18 Jun 2003 (UTC)
167:01:53 18 Jun 2003 (UTC)
73:is only a redirect). --
2518:08:56, 2004 Nov 2 (UTC)
2484:00:07, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2400:14:56, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
2360:01:33, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
1889:WikiReader Cryptography
1801:05:31, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
1593:16:12, 1 May 2004 (UTC)
1475:14:31, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
1088:The merge is now done.
835:Everything is still at
432:12:33 14 Jul 2003 (UTC)
377:10:25 12 Jul 2003 (UTC)
344:07:28 8 Jul 2003 (UTC)
313:20:17 28 Jun 2003 (UTC)
286:You may consider that:
201:(if he then removes it
77:23:28 6 Jun 2003 (UTC)
2493:WikiProject Dog breeds
2405:"Terrorism" straw poll
2110:Export of cryptography
1642:Requests for mediation
1575:your crypto land edits
1569:Get-back-world-respect
1519:The Trolls of Navarone
1511:The Trolls of Navarone
357:22:14 8 Jul 2003 (UTC)
114:Have you voted yet on
104:00:47 7 Jun 2003 (UTC)
93:00:39 7 Jun 2003 (UTC)
1623:Arbitration Committee
326:thanks alot. Anthere
128:General Election 2000
2378:Star Trek the series
1891:— article of the day
1351:Michael3 is Michael?
799:in preferences. See
2241:Michelangelo Merisi
2056:Wednesday, 27 July
2167:Quality of writing
2106:Thursday, 28 July
1355:Are you sure that
1185:Do what you like.
713:Talk:Mother Teresa
474:
2588:Christopher Mahan
2278:Mediation request
2225:
2224:
2220:
2219:
2200:
2199:
2191:Digital signature
2149:
2148:
2101:
2100:
2062:
2051:
2050:
2012:Digital signature
2008:Tuesday, 26 July
2003:
2002:
1964:
1953:
1952:
1899:
1898:
1752:Salting the earth
1720:current standings
1249:Altering comments
848:friendly reminder
606:User:64.12.96.199
588:Hi, I listed the
472:
2659:
2582:From Chris Mahan
2576:Adrian Pingstone
2558:
2547:
2534:
2384:split infinitive
2356:
2339:
2312:
2195:
2194:
2186:
2125:
2124:
2077:
2076:
2060:
2027:
2026:
1979:
1978:
1962:
1958:Monday, 25 July
1929:
1928:
1910:Sunday, 24 July
1894:
1893:
1883:
1878:
1877:
1829:
1669:
1627:Anthony DiPierro
1606:is biased?!").--
1431:
1335:
1243:Lirath Q. Pynnor
999:History of Haiti
733:
192:on of the upper
149:where what, when
2667:
2666:
2662:
2661:
2660:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2630:
2613:
2596:
2584:
2568:
2556:
2545:
2532:
2525:
2495:
2463:Dante Alighieri
2431:
2407:
2380:
2354:
2337:
2310:
2280:
2257:
2237:
2221:
2189:To-do list for
1914:Playfair cipher
1900:
1861:
1842:
1827:
1778:
1754:
1737:
1715:
1696:
1667:
1619:
1577:
1565:
1546:
1530:
1515:
1498:
1482:
1395:Dante Alighieri
1353:
1325:
1313:
1286:
1271:
1251:
1126:
1067:
1036:
865:
850:
833:
777:
731:
727:
678:Dante Alighieri
610:BCorr ? Брайен
520:on Jan 1 2004.
430:Dante Alighieri
355:Dante Alighieri
311:Dante Alighieri
180:
179:Jun 2003 (UTC)
91:Dante Alighieri
26:Archived talk:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2665:
2629:
2626:
2612:
2609:
2595:
2592:
2583:
2580:
2567:
2562:
2561:
2560:
2549:
2524:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2510:
2494:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2486:
2485:
2473:
2472:
2471:
2470:
2456:
2455:
2430:
2425:
2406:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2379:
2376:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2345:
2344:
2333:Thanks again,
2330:
2329:
2279:
2276:
2256:
2253:
2236:
2233:
2223:
2222:
2218:
2217:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2202:
2201:
2179:
2178:
2151:
2150:
2147:
2146:
2144:
2142:
2140:
2138:
2136:
2134:
2132:
2130:
2128:
2122:
2117:
2112:
2107:
2103:
2102:
2099:
2098:
2096:
2094:
2092:
2090:
2088:
2086:
2084:
2082:
2080:
2074:
2069:
2064:
2057:
2053:
2052:
2049:
2048:
2046:
2044:
2042:
2040:
2038:
2036:
2034:
2032:
2030:
2024:
2019:
2014:
2009:
2005:
2004:
2001:
2000:
1998:
1996:
1994:
1992:
1990:
1988:
1986:
1984:
1982:
1976:
1971:
1966:
1959:
1955:
1954:
1951:
1950:
1948:
1946:
1944:
1942:
1940:
1938:
1936:
1934:
1932:
1926:
1921:
1916:
1911:
1907:
1906:
1901:
1886:
1881:
1860:
1857:
1841:
1838:
1836:
1804:
1803:
1777:
1767:
1753:
1750:
1736:
1733:
1714:
1711:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1688:
1687:
1618:
1615:
1576:
1573:
1564:
1563:cryoto project
1561:
1545:
1542:
1529:
1526:
1524:
1514:
1507:
1497:
1494:
1481:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1458:
1450:
1403:
1402:
1386:modus operandi
1380:User:Michael33
1352:
1349:
1347:
1324:
1321:
1312:
1309:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1270:
1267:
1264:
1250:
1247:
1246:
1125:
1122:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1066:
1063:
1056:
1035:
1030:
1022:
1007:
1006:
971:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
900:
899:
864:
861:
859:
849:
846:
832:
827:
826:
818:Current Events
814:
813:
812:
776:
773:
764:
750:
738:
726:
721:
709:
708:
707:
706:
682:
681:
660:
659:
655:
654:
637:
636:
602:
586:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
556:
555:
540:
526:
510:
498:
486:
478:
473:戴眩sv
468:
460:
451:
435:
434:
433:
413:river dolphins
409:
407:
398:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
368:
367:
366:
365:
359:
358:
328:
324:
320:Koyaanis Qatsi
316:
315:
314:
298:
297:
294:
291:
284:
283:
276:
273:
270:
267:
260:
253:
246:
238:
198:
181:
178:
169:
109:
108:
107:
106:
105:
95:
94:
80:
59:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2664:
2655:
2653:
2647:
2643:
2641:
2636:
2625:
2623:
2619:
2618:
2608:
2606:
2601:
2591:
2589:
2579:
2577:
2573:
2566:
2559:
2554:
2550:
2548:
2543:
2539:
2538:
2537:
2535:
2530:
2517:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2508:
2504:
2500:
2483:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2453:
2448:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2440:
2435:
2429:
2424:
2422:
2420:
2415:
2412:
2399:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2390:
2385:
2375:
2373:
2370:
2359:
2353:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2342:
2336:
2332:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2315:
2309:
2304:
2301:
2298:
2295:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2275:
2273:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2252:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2232:
2230:
2216:
2212:
2206:
2205:
2203:
2198:
2193:
2192:
2185:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2145:
2143:
2141:
2139:
2137:
2135:
2133:
2131:
2129:
2127:
2126:
2123:
2121:
2118:
2116:
2113:
2111:
2108:
2105:
2104:
2097:
2095:
2093:
2091:
2089:
2087:
2085:
2083:
2081:
2079:
2078:
2075:
2073:
2070:
2068:
2065:
2063:
2058:
2055:
2054:
2047:
2045:
2043:
2041:
2039:
2037:
2035:
2033:
2031:
2029:
2028:
2025:
2023:
2020:
2018:
2015:
2013:
2010:
2007:
2006:
1999:
1997:
1995:
1993:
1991:
1989:
1987:
1985:
1983:
1981:
1980:
1977:
1975:
1972:
1970:
1967:
1965:
1960:
1957:
1956:
1949:
1947:
1945:
1943:
1941:
1939:
1937:
1935:
1933:
1931:
1930:
1927:
1925:
1922:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1912:
1909:
1908:
1905:
1902:
1897:
1892:
1890:
1884:
1880:
1879:
1876:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1856:
1854:
1851:
1847:
1837:
1834:
1832:
1826:
1821:
1819:
1814:
1811:
1809:
1802:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1783:
1776:
1772:
1766:
1764:
1760:
1758:
1749:
1747:
1741:
1732:
1731:
1728:
1723:
1721:
1710:
1709:
1706:
1701:
1700:Divine Comedy
1691:
1686:
1683:
1680:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1672:
1666:
1661:
1659:
1654:
1651:
1646:
1643:
1639:
1634:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1614:
1612:
1609:
1605:
1600:
1599:Mother Teresa
1595:
1594:
1591:
1587:
1584:
1580:
1572:
1570:
1560:
1558:
1555:
1551:
1541:
1539:
1535:
1525:
1522:
1520:
1512:
1506:
1504:
1493:
1491:
1487:
1474:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1466:
1461:
1460:Hello Dante,
1457:
1455:
1449:
1447:
1442:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1430:
1425:
1423:
1418:
1416:
1410:
1408:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1387:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1373:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1348:
1345:
1343:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1329:
1320:
1318:
1308:
1306:
1301:
1299:
1295:
1290:
1281:
1278:
1276:
1266:
1262:
1260:
1256:
1245:
1244:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1219:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1203:
1201:
1198:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1183:
1181:
1178:
1173:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1145:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1134:
1131:
1121:
1119:
1108:
1105:
1101:
1098:I started on
1097:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1083:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1062:
1060:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1043:
1041:
1034:
1029:
1027:
1021:
1020:
1018:
1017:
1012:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
991:
990:
988:
984:
980:
976:
970:
969:
967:
963:
957:
952:
950:
946:
933:
929:
928:
926:
922:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
912:
909:
905:
898:
896:
895:
890:
886:
881:
880:
879:
878:
876:
875:
870:
860:
857:
855:
845:
843:
838:
831:
825:
823:
819:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
793:
792:
790:
786:
782:
772:
770:
763:
761:
757:
752:
748:
747:
743:
739:
736:
734:
725:
720:
718:
714:
704:
700:
695:
690:
686:
685:
684:
683:
679:
675:
670:
669:
668:
666:
657:
656:
651:
646:
645:
644:
642:
633:
632:
631:
628:
623:
619:
613:
611:
607:
601:
599:
595:
591:
585:
583:
579:
575:
564:
560:
559:
558:
557:
553:
552:{ MB | マイカル }
549:
548:
547:
545:
544:{ MB | マイカル }
539:
538:
533:
529:
525:
523:
519:
515:
509:
507:
503:
497:
495:
491:
488:Your edit on
485:
483:
477:
475:
467:
466:
459:
457:
450:
448:
444:
440:
431:
427:
422:
421:
420:
418:
414:
408:
405:
403:
397:
396:
391:
388:
385:
376:
372:
371:
370:
369:
363:
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
347:
346:
345:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
321:
312:
307:
306:
305:
303:
295:
292:
289:
288:
287:
281:
277:
274:
271:
268:
265:
261:
258:
257:
256:
252:
251:
245:
243:
237:
235:
230:
228:
224:
219:
218:
214:
209:
208:
204:
197:
195:
190:
187:
184:
177:
175:
168:
166:
162:
156:
155:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
124:Election 2000
121:
117:
112:
103:
99:
98:
97:
96:
92:
88:
83:
82:
81:
78:
76:
72:
68:
64:
58:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
31:
19:
2652:Michael Snow
2648:
2644:
2634:
2631:
2616:
2614:
2597:
2585:
2571:
2569:
2526:
2523:this Friday?
2496:
2482:82.35.17.203
2452:82.35.17.203
2446:
2433:
2432:
2418:
2408:
2381:
2365:
2305:
2302:
2299:
2296:
2282:Hi Dante --
2281:
2258:
2238:
2226:
2188:
2170:
2166:
2163:Completeness
2162:
2158:
2154:
1887:
1862:
1843:
1835:
1822:
1815:
1812:
1805:
1788:
1779:
1775:User:WHEELER
1761:
1755:
1742:
1738:
1735:Decapitation
1724:
1719:
1716:
1697:
1689:
1662:
1655:
1647:
1635:
1620:
1603:
1596:
1588:
1585:
1581:
1578:
1566:
1547:
1531:
1523:
1516:
1509:Comments on
1499:
1483:
1462:
1459:
1451:
1443:
1433:
1426:
1421:
1419:
1411:
1404:
1390:
1384:
1354:
1346:
1342:Jwrosenzweig
1340:
1337:
1330:
1326:
1314:
1302:
1291:
1287:
1279:
1272:
1263:
1252:
1240:
1230:
1217:
1215:
1204:
1194:
1184:
1174:
1157:
1146:
1127:
1115:
1068:
1055:
1044:
1037:
1023:
1016:
1013:
1008:
978:
972:
959:
953:
942:
932:Jwrosenzweig
925:Jwrosenzweig
901:
894:
891:
889:--Sennheiser
874:
871:
869:--Sennheiser
866:
858:
851:
834:
815:
796:
778:
765:
753:
749:
740:
737:
728:
710:
698:
693:
688:
661:
640:
638:
626:
621:
617:
614:
603:
590:Möller's law
587:
571:
563:Matthewmayer
541:
537:user:kkawohl
534:
530:
527:
511:
499:
487:
479:
469:
465:Pizza Puzzle
461:
452:
438:
436:
410:
406:
399:
392:
389:
386:
383:
340:
336:
332:
329:
325:
317:
299:
285:
254:
247:
239:
231:
220:
217:Pizza Puzzle
212:
210:
202:
199:
191:
188:
185:
182:
170:
160:
157:
153:
148:
131:
127:
123:
119:
113:
110:
86:
79:
70:
67:Pandaemonium
66:
63:Pandaemonium
62:
60:
42:
29:
25:
2622:Mike Garcia
1513:'s userpage
1473:Jan Hidders
1465:Jan Hidders
1128:thanks! :)
960:moved from
921:Tyranokatta
717:FearÉIREANN
703:FearÉIREANN
665:FearÉIREANN
447:FearÉIREANN
395:PaulinSaudi
234:FearÉIREANN
223:User:Jtdirl
165:FearÉIREANN
161:Susan Mason
111:Hi Dante,
2505:? Regards
2445:This is a
2428:User:10101
2286:has asked
2284:Kevin Baas
2245:Caravaggio
2235:Caravaggio
2171:Neutrality
1848:. Thanks.
1771:User:AndyL
1163:User:Lefty
1104:Pete/Pcb21
1090:Pete/Pcb21
1079:Pete/Pcb21
1011:--Ed Senft
947:. Cheers,
904:Mythrandia
854:Kingturtle
653:ban you...
627:conviction
582:Hephaestos
518:as of 2003
514:as of 2003
2635:pro forma
2120:(History)
2072:(History)
2022:(History)
1974:(History)
1924:(History)
1840:Mediation
1608:Eloquence
1480:taxoboxes
1435:Dissident
1422:originale
1415:Dissident
1407:Dissident
1311:Sup Dante
1059:Sam Spade
1040:Sam Spade
966:Dysprosia
949:AxelBoldt
885:confusion
732:JackLynch
506:Oliver P.
490:Patchouli
417:jimfbleak
250:jimfbleak
242:goatasaur
207:Camembert
176:11:23 18
102:Oliver P.
75:Oliver P.
55:Archive 5
51:Archive 4
47:Archive 3
43:Archive 2
39:Archive 1
2586:Thanks.
2516:Gangleri
2507:Gangleri
2306:Thanks,
2159:Accuracy
1823:Thanks,
1663:Thanks,
1604:Catholic
1544:New skin
1534:Mdchachi
1528:Nickname
1503:Jamesday
1490:UtherSRG
1454:Hyacinth
1452:Thanks.
1357:Michael3
1118:Fuzheado
1065:Dolphins
1026:Belizian
822:OneVoice
694:en masse
674:clitoris
504:for? --
264:Gyuricza
1705:Watcher
1361:Michael
1233:Mintguy
1223:Mintguy
1208:Mintguy
1197:Mintguy
1187:Mintguy
1177:Mintguy
1167:Mintguy
1150:Mintguy
1003:Viajero
987:Viajero
956:Kwertii
769:Wolfram
746:Anthere
574:Cochise
522:Mintguy
426:Cetacea
28:Clovis
2594:ArbCom
2447:highly
2434:Please
2421:uadell
2372:(talk)
2369:sannse
2358:Брайен
2341:Брайен
2314:Брайен
2272:(talk)
2269:sannse
2249:Pethan
2229:— Matt
2155:Notes:
2115:(Talk)
2067:(Talk)
2017:(Talk)
1969:(Talk)
1919:(Talk)
1850:Angela
1831:Брайен
1808:sannse
1746:Lukobe
1682:(talk)
1679:sannse
1671:Брайен
1554:Angela
1550:Gwicke
1496:Polish
1367:.) --
1259:ugen64
1218:flavor
1107:(talk)
1093:(talk)
1082:(talk)
908:Angela
760:sannse
598:Angela
302:Martin
227:ChuckM
194:sailor
174:Tannin
30:et al.
2565:Macaw
2439:10101
2398:Fpahl
2389:Fpahl
2352:BCorr
2335:BCorr
2308:BCorr
2261:Grunt
1825:BCorr
1799:AndyL
1763:Maury
1665:BCorr
1538:Talk
1446:Plato
1317:Plato
1305:Plato
1294:RickK
1275:Plato
1051:Bryan
995:Haiti
985:. --
983:Haiti
692:read
594:Bcorr
494:RickK
482:Jiang
439:other
402:Dmsar
213:again
203:again
16:<
2467:Talk
2288:here
2197:edit
2175:NPOV
1896:edit
1871:and
1789:see
1773:and
1399:Talk
1298:Talk
1265:---
1124:Bees
1100:Boto
842:Maio
809:Talk
805:Dori
801:this
789:Talk
785:Dori
689:must
622:even
375:Arno
342:Arno
330:Hi.
280:1950
120:what
71:i.e.
2605:mav
2572:and
2553:+sj
2542:+sj
2529:+sj
2294:).
2243:to
1904:MRR
1722:.
1359:is
1236:(T)
1226:(T)
1211:(T)
1200:(T)
1190:(T)
1180:(T)
1170:(T)
1153:(T)
964:by
699:not
143:to
139:to
2642:.
2465:|
2416:–
2187:—
1744:--
1727:ww
1660:.
1633:.
1590:ww
1536:|
1397:|
1391:is
1296:|
1102:.
887:.
807:|
787:|
618:is
456:MB
353:--
309:--
130:,
126:,
87:me
57:.
53:,
49:,
45:,
41:,
37:,
33:,
2557:+
2546:+
2533:+
2419:Q
2355:|
2338:|
2328:.
2311:|
1853:.
1828:|
1668:|
1611:*
1557:.
1372:V
1369:V
1142:m
1139:i
1136:t
1133:p
1130:O
1015:!
968:)
911:.
893:!
873:!
282:)
266:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.