User talk:DMacks/Archive 5

1657:

is clearly what is going on here. If you think that my behavior is somehow more egregious than Orangeman2's, which you seem to based on the edits of each of our Talk pages, then I would respectfully submit that you have things completely backwards. This is an edit war that has been going on since last September and every attempt I have made to actually IMPROVE THE ARTICLE has been thwarted by this person who probably shouldn't even be editing the article in the first place due to Conflict of Interest issues. I'm not pretending to be an angel here, but I'm not just wantonly being a jerk either, there is a back story here and I would ask that you please just look at the whole picture before "taking sides". Also, any help with moderating the article itself would be great, whether from you or another editor. Bottom line is, after many months, I am done trying to compromise with someone who is paid to protect this guy's image.

3410:

several interested people, have memorized the periodic table, and am interested both in its listing of "discovered" and "potentially capable of being discovered" elements (as was Mendeleev) and don't think the table should be limited by someone's decision as to how many elements should be listed based on chemical considerations (or even physical considerations) if it seems logical and/or argumentative as to how many there or might be. And the IUPAC has evidently fouled up by trying to surround their limited existing table with restrictions which will have to be corrected. So What!! Well I suggest that there should be a caveat (probably on a talk page) saying that here are various ways of extending a periodic table chart and here they are and you take your pick. And let the best and most useful table prevail.

3852:

possible. We must then explain that point, and even then, a person may simply shrug his shoulders and move on not knowing that this point is passed between 83 and 84. I am content to post a "pedestrian" sign at bismuth that says "here is the end of the road for stable, electrically neutral, elements". Many periodic tables also include this fact by noting that two elements of atomic number lower than 83 are not stable, and the entire string of elements above 83 are shown to be instable. Such periodic tables usually indicate this with some symbol that is either filled or unfilled. If authors and periodic table printers feel it is "interesting"-enough to include for the public to see, I see no justification to have such a fact removed from the public eye just because someone finds it uninteresting.

1674:

for even the most minor votes, which are covered NOWHERE in public sources, that this person works closely with the Senator. Also, who would be so zealous about keeping any and all new information off a State Senator's Knowledge article? This started over 9 months ago when Orangeman2 (under an IP at the time) was automatically just reverting any and all edits to the article, until they were told by admins to stop. I'm using common sense here, based on a pattern of behavior, not just pulling things out of thin air. Like I said, my approach to this article is a recent phenomenon spawned my months of frustration. If I'm not allowed to "out" people, how should I go about reporting conflict of interest issues? I'm not too familiar with the inner workings of Knowledge so any help is appreciated.

3993:

I say that WP is huge and we have enough pages to cover each aspect of a topic...if it's not within the scope of the PT as currently constructed (i.e., periodicity/trends or the origins of the current layout), there's probably some other page where the content belongs instead. Science always raises questions, but the beauty of an encyclopedia (and especially a highly-interlinked one such as WP) is that you can jump to or search for a secondary page about whatever one finds intersting or curious and learn specifically about it. We don't need to have a single page about all aspects of everything related to a major topic. If a secondary page is missing something or is incomplete, would be great to get it improved so that readers specifically interested in the

3366:

forum, which in this case would be the Philosophy forum. There are existing links to at least one other philosophy forum on a number of Knowledge 'philosophy' pages. The only difference between that forum and the one I was linking to is the age of the forum and the number of existing posts. If I link directly to the Philosophy forum of the Knowledge Research Forum, I believe this should be acceptable. This forum contains no advertising, and is especially intended as a place where original research can be posted, which cannot be posted on Knowledge. I respect your need to keep spam off Knowledge, but linking to a forum where the applicable topic can be discussed and original research can be posted should not be considered a spam links.

3418:) 01:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)PS I was able to memorize the periodic table because I discovered that the individual chemical series can be broken down into the following order: Row 1 = 2; Row 2 = 2; Row 3 = 8 (equals 2+4 and 2); Row 4 = 8 (equals 2+4 and 2); Row 5 = 18 (equals 2+4+4 + 2+4 and 2) Row 6 = 18 (equals 2+4+4 + 2+4 and 2); Row 7 = 32 (equals 2+4+4+4 + 2+4+4 + 2+4 and 2); and Row 8 = 32 (equals 2+4+4+4 + 2+4+4 + 2+4 and 2). And the very last 2 are elements 119 and 120. So I'm pretty sure that elements 119 and 120 belong to the position as shown in the Janet periodic periodic table. 1738:

simply have Debicella reflected in the most favorable light possible. Unfortunately, this is not the case and I find myself on a bit of a quixotic mission in maintaining the article. That said, I admit I'm not perfect and that some of my edits probably went overboard in the past. But the main thing is, I've always tried to do what's best for the article, not for me or for any political entities, and I'm still trying. I want the subject portrayed accurately and I believe the legitimate, sourced claims by supporters, detractors, and neutral parties alike, should be respected.

3744:, which gives you very specific guidelines about what makes a company notable enough to merit an article: "A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject." Has your company reached that level yet, or do you need to wait a while for the company to grow and get noticed (and written about!) by others before it's ready for an article? Also, sometimes it's hard to judge one's own company: a 3856:(particularly Chemistry. It is in fact, a worthy landmark on the periodic table just as much the violation of Hund's rule at Z=24 and Z=29 for chromium and copper respectively (half-filled, low-lying s-shells) -- among other examples. The whole concept of orbitals (1s, 2s, 2p, 3s...etc) may be inherently wrong, and these are basic, fundamental facts about the elements -- which you apparently find uninteresting? How can we, as a scientific community, fail to report a fact to the public (no matter how obscure)... or as J.J. Thomson noted: 4183: 31: 369: 3426:) 03:07, 1 August 2009 (UTC) And would you believe that Row 9 will be 50 (equals 2+4+4+4+4 + 2+4+4+4 + 2+4+4 + 2+4 and 2). I hope so. And I think you might find some chemical significance related to the series breakdown. And I would appreciate your comments re this subject matter before your archive bot archives it into forgetfulness, because I'm very interested in this subject and I'm assuming you are too. 2355: 1159:. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Knowledge, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Knowledge, in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- 565: 3992:

Content looks better now. I assume you realize how important it is to be objective in science...indeed "interesting" is what tipped me off (as well as citing such an idea to an entire undergrad physics text, if I recall Halliday correctly). Careful with presuming my perspective ("revisionist"). Again

3764:

A NASCAR website mentioned us as a sponsor as well as local radio stations in the southern GA area for our donations to boys and girls clubs throughout the country. These may not be the sources Knowledge is looking for but I can assure you our company works with several professional athletes, we just

3409:

Thank you for helping me my periodic table formatting polemic organized and hope you understand that I'm not trying to promote a personal POV but merely move from a trivial to more important considerations of the attributes proposed to be helpful to the cognizance of the intelligent user. I, like the

2898:

Thankyou for the advice. I hate the idea of something that was discussed in the media so much not having a single mention on Knowledge. I never realized that internal debates lead to these kinds of omissions, it really highlights the fact that while Knowledge is an excellent tool it's no substitute

2840:

I have to admit that there is some truth to your acusation that I want to evade the discussion going on in the talk pages of the Letterman article. After reading the link you posted I decided to try to see if I can get a compromise edit of a few sentences. My view in posting the dispute to a larger

3958:

as an example. Other periodic tables show the atomic numbers of unstable elements with open-face text. Still others indicate this fact with an asterisk or other symbol. Pointing out this fact, at face value, begs a reader's question, "Why?" "Why are these elements unstable?" "Why is it that when you

3935:

that a weasel phrase is a greater offense than having a statement removed by a user (moreso, an administrator) who chooses to characterize the statement as not being interesting. Such revisionist thinking is part of why nearly every scientist today believes (if not insists or demands) that a quantum

3365:

The guidelines you and Dougweller referred me to are subject to interpretation. It is clear that whenever administrators believe an external link to a forum is appropriate, it remains. You noted that I was linking to the entire forum (unacceptable), rather than linking to the appropriate area of the

1707:

Sorry for going on and on here, but you have clearly hit a nerve and I am beyond fed up with this article. If you want evidence of where the GOOD FAITH is here just look at the edit history of the article itself. Who has been the one making major content improvements and cleaning up the article? And

1656:

DMacks, please look into the full, EXTENSIVE history of this article. Orangeman2's intentions are NOT good. All attempts at good faith on my part have been stymied at every turn and I am exhausted. My only goal at this point is to prevent the article from being censored by a Debicella staffer, which

3930:

I suspect you were a bit irked by the phrasing I happened to use. I admit, I hadn't reviewed my comment before posting a reply to your revision here (I didn't realize that I had written "interesting" in the comment -- nor that is a "weasel" phrase. Perhaps it because I started using Knowledge a few

3251:

Thanks for your comments. I think those two things I deleted were totally silly and irrelevant and added nothing to the articles. If I write something to that effect in the comments when I delete it again, are you just going to go and revert it again? If so, I will drop it, since I'm not looking to

2158:

adding obvious POV statements regarding the content of the music itself. As far as I understand it, giving ISBN numbers as references don't cut it to bolster a case especially when the reference is going to be biased in one direction anyway. I suppose the best solution to this specific problem is

2144:

Thanks for stepping in DMacks. Actually, I was preparing to get in touch with dispute resolution when I saw your message on my talk page. I have no problem with adding a after the section on bands that I'm fairly certain don't belong in this category. My contention is that many of the bands and

1722:

Yup, I have no idea the specifics and I don't really have time to moderate fully. My goal is to stamp out the edit-war, which neither of you are going to win and makes everyone angry and less willing to work towards consensus and so I looked at only at the most recent few comments by both of you. I

639:

Your userpage, you're welcome to watch for and undo any vandalism that happens there. If it becomes an ongoing problem, any admin can help you by blocking a problematic editor or preventing some users from editing your page. The case here appears to be a brand new editor making his first edits (and

3904:

truly exceptions to some rule). The idea of an island of stability really is important, but the idea of "Bi is significant because it's highest in that region" only makes sense if you clearly define why the region itself is clearly defined, etc. I think the important and interesting thing actually

3323:

The link I have been posting is for a new forum called the Knowledge Research Forum. It contains sub-forums where any individual can post original research on the topic - which cannot be posted on Knowledge. It has always been accepted for appropriate forum links to be placed in the external links

1757:

Who else but someone who campaigned vigorously against Debicella would take such an interest in this article? I am definitely a pro-Debicella partisan (not a staffer), but the above anonymous user feigns neutrality while trying to make the article read like a piece of Janice Andernen (Debicella's

1690:

Furthermore, I whole-heartedly reject the label of "anti-Debicella partisan" constantly thrown at me by this other user. I am trying to create a good article that includes BOTH sides. Apparently trying to include anything that reflects negatively at all on the Senator makes me "anti-Debicella". In

1673:

Also, the first "outing" that ever occurred was Orangeman2 accusing me of being someone named "Mike Brown" who I am not and have never met. I will stop with the identity accusations, although it is readily obvious from the amount of intimate knowledge that this person has of Debicella's rationales

1495:

I am not honestly sure how Knowledge works with posting and writing and having members view your work. You deleted my information about my organization and I am not sure why. I was hoping you could give me some insight beyond telling me that this sight is not my personal web service, which I don't

860:

Hello. As an add on to the above, I also ask if you would unprotect the article 2NE1. You probably protected it because it was not an official group when the page was made. Now, since they are official, I ask that you unprotect it. They have already gained much popularity, and if Knowledge doesn't

173:

recognize this was at least partially more inappropriate-ness. I was acting purely on the basis of the content-removal and word-change (because the topic is specifically the Taiwan-driven economy, and "Taiwan" is the term used in cited ref). I actually have no idea what the flag situation is, feel

4255:

There is an ongoing problem with throw-away registered accounts. That means semi-protection doesn't block it and 0RR or other zero-tolerance/blocking of accounts won't stamp out the problem either. It's based on Twitter rumor or other silliness, so likely blow over in a few days or so, and we can

3903:

phrase, even worse than my claim that it isn't interesting because there's no explanation of this subjective claim. The text you wrote included two elements beyond Bi, so "Bi is the highest something" isn't even true on its face, so you need a specific explanation why Bi is special (and those are

3102:

As far as I am concerned, I am just waiting for the transwiki then it can be closed. I don't know if it is worth waiting before closing, that is your call. I would like to see the result of the transwiki since if they don't transfer the entire article (e.g. only the bald definition), it may still

2256:

I'm new to Knowledge so sorry if my questions are a bit too obvious for the senior Knowledge users. I contacted the author of an image of the actual Airbus 310 aircraft of the Yemenia Flight 626 and asked him if he could possibly let me use the image in Knowledge and the article of the airplane's

217:

I only recently got alerted to the ongoing problem in the Taiwan-vs-ROC article messes, so I don't know all the major long-term-problematic editors yet. Based on behavior, does seem reasonable. There are lots of anons from two distinct IP-spaces who are at least clones of each other if not actual

150:

To be fair, as the article talks about economic rather than political entities, the appellation "Taiwan" is probably the more preferable, less ambiguous and more neutral term compared to "ROC". But I don't think you should have reverted to the flag of the Chinese Taipei Olympic Team regardless of

1737:

Fair enough. Thank you. Yeah, I'm pretty much at wit's end. I honestly want to see a good article, and I would be more than happy to work in concert with Orangeman2, as I have done many times in the past, if I felt their primary aim was to actually create a quality, balanced article, rather than

3940:

page is a comment about the "sea of severe instability" -- such a rare phrase (google yields only 6 results when quoted exactly, one being wikipedia, and at least three others being posts by users on yahoo). This part of the sea of instability, I think, holds many more clues as to the cause of

3798:

for things that have already been reported elsewhere, so things need to be sourced back to someone else's writings. It's really (some would say discouragingly:( difficult for new companies to get their article started. I'm going off-line now, will be back tomorrow, can discuss more if you like.

2655:

I did not revert anything, I merely tried to stop the edit war by preventing edits by new/unestablished editors. Long-standing/established editors are welcome to continue editing and fix vandalism. I don't know anything about the topic itself, so I'm not taking a stand on which is the "correct"

3283:

Please revisit the I have added a rebuttal with extra references. I understand if you think I am overzealous, but I think if you look at all of my edits you will find I have contributed to other pages with the same topic with out linking back to Happy Endings? I though that was the point of

3122:

Your call, I am happy either way, I just wanted to make it visible for discussion but nobody else seems particularly to care so I am confident to go ahead whatever I decide is best, I think? (e.g. if I decide a DAB page is best then I doubt anyone is going to complain if they haven't already.)

3954:

I also must beg to differ in that the post was not "fairly off-topic for the PT article" as you claim. Many (if not all) periodic tables that list the atomic mass of each element cite the mass of the most stable isotope of unstable elements instead, printing the mass value in parentheses. See

4513:

The last sock case above verified that YesNoJoe was Lil Lez, but brought up no other accounts even though HINSTAMAN has been around before then. I'm still not entirely sure this new one is Lil Lez... but the uncanny similarities leave me uncomfortable. I wondering if you could take a look at

3851:

significant, and not a very commonly known fact about the periodic table of elements. It is our responsibility, as members of the scientific community, to convey simple facts like this to the general public. It is not sufficient to say that there is some point at which stability is no longer

3855:

The comment I wrote may not be of interest to you, but to remove it because you do not find it interesting is purely self-serving and at worst a bad revisionist approach to Knowledge. This fact about the elements is not very well-known, particularly to undergraduates of any scientific field

3098:

You left a message on my talk page about these articles and whether any more needs to be done, and asking for a status update. I don't know where you wanted me to put the update, so I am replying directly to you, but please copy this to the RFM or to my talk page if you think that better.

985: 1723:

do quite often see an otherwise more-rational editor can be pushed beyond his breaking point in these situations. Will try to look back at the article and history if I have a chance. I will end by saying that if you two keep edit-warring while discussing, I'll simply block both of you.

3106:

I know it says the transwiki process is "automated" but I presume this means a human editor takes it and adds appropriate tags for Wiktionary (e.g. parts of speech, etymology, puts references in their form etc, link back to WP:en) and so I don't know what the result of that would be.

2884:, so if and when this eventually does prove to be more important than just a flash-in-the-pan, might be worth re-pursuing. Unless a major topic is rapidly evolving and has serious impact, WP is better served by being a bit more deliberate and waiting for media frenzies to die down. 3912:. But the elements that happen to delineate it are interesting in relation to the island, not in relation to the current layout of the periodic table we use (it's not part of the PT history, electronic rationale, periodic trends, etc.) so it's fairly off-topic for the PT article. 3660:

So for example, Under Armour could have a page but we cant?? Because we make 500,000 a year and they make millions? I am confused. Other companies talk about their background and who they market and work with. What rules do I have to follow to be able to have my company on here?

222:, and I'll indef Eeeeeewtw next time he's out-of-line even based on his own pattern of mis-behavior. Any ideas if Taiwanrox8 or others are named-account socks also? Would be great to have at least a few current accounts to cross-ref to boost the likelihood of getting a CU hit. 2501:, which lean towards stating (with whatever qualification or specific terminology needed) the claimed high value per cites. If there is an issue with the reliability of the cited works, the talk-page is a good place to work out an improved wording that clarifies that issue. 1792:. I have no problem with you or anyone else undoing it earlier if things settle down. You are a kind soul - I think I would have blocked them both for 2 or 3 days the way they were going at it. I'll drop a note re: the protection on the article talk page as well. Take care, 2549:

Published books are not "just any source on the internet". And there are numerous cited sources on the various IQ articles and mentioned in the Sidis discussions explaining why IQ isn't a well-defined measurement at the extremes (i.e., not simple probability distribution).

3793:

If you have some reliable source (a URL, bibliographic info for a newspaper mention, etc.) about those types of things, that's enough to get going--at that point I would let it stay pending a wider discussion among editors. The real issue is that wikipedia is explicitly

2257:

crash. He agreed to do us but requested that the original link to the photo is provided and that he gets full accreditation for the shot. My question is what kind of "copyright tag" should I use when I upload the image and use it the crash article. Thanks in advance.

3941:

instability beginning with Z=84 than the island of stability. In fact, in my work, one finds similar features of the sea of severe instability in the vicinity of 43 and 61. These features are not obvious in other work. Furthermore, these landmarks at 43, 61 and 83

1408: 2389: 312:

I'll let him passively vanish as he says he's trying to do, but I'll indef +no-edit-talk if he tries to take parting shots beyond his existing incoherent manifesto-of-sorts (which I'm leaving alone...leave him his shovel should he want the hole any deeper.

2671:

Tajik, there is/was no edit war on that page; I was simply removing vandalism from a new user due to a recent news event. I'm sorry if I deleted something that you put in, and as the page is semi-protected you can still make whatever change you wanted.

3388:

Your "only difference" sounds like a pretty big difference indeed when considering the value and acceptance of these types of sites. Note that my comment was multiple independent reasons...resolving the direct-link issue does not help compliance with

3591:

I wanted to see if I could discuss with you not having our page removed. I was trying to introduce my new sports apparel company and I was removed for advertising. Other companies are on here as well, so I was wondering why I am being removed.

2758:

If you're claiming there is supression, you need a reliable cite that supports the claim that it is suppression of his ideas or devices. People die (even under unreported or sudden circumstances) and ideas get abandoned all the time...that's not

3516:

Anytime;)And you are right--they are out in full force today. I have over 700 edits in reverts(including warning templates) today. I haven't seen vandalism this strong before. Since I was free today...I pretty much sat at my computer reverting

110:

Thank you! :-) I don't know much about this guy and whether the corruption stuff is true, but this article seems to be very prone to vandalism. Maybe one should think about applying for a semi-protection so that IP-users can't edit it anymore.

2039:. So that leaves the intro...1 paragraph (about 10% by line-count) of the whole article is viable content. I have to say too, even if the intro were kept and the other material written from scratch, the article would still have probably been 3349:

specifically contradicts your claim. Also, your site doesn't sound notable in its genre and you're spamming for the whole site, not adding specific links to specific parts of the site you claim are relevant. Feel free to seek third opinion.

3765:

dont have people writting about us, which is fine. Our company is on the rise and Skechers filed a suit against us for having our logos conflict with their marketing abilities. I guess we can try back when someone cares to write about us.

3267:

Feel free to start a discussion on the talk-page of the article to get others' input if you like. The purpose of article talk-pages is to discuss the article once it's clear there are conflicting ideas about what or how to include content.

3114:

article gets transwiki'd then I will delete it (unless the transwiki does anyway) but I could see the situation where the bald definition gets translated but not the reference to Fowler. I have some problems with the Fowler article anyway

2420:

The ed. made numerous improvements in the proposed article, at User:Extolmonica/Youth United -- enough to cause me to change my view at Deletion Review to keep--you might want to check again--I'd like to know if you agree or disagree.

761:

article is *energy suppression* which is a conspiracy theory, you seem to think that it is *free energy* (and further 'perpetual motion energy' which is pseudo-science). i did re-read the article, and stand by previous comment. cheers.

2841:

forum was to put more eyes on the problem, and bring in a larger pool of editors. If the idea of a compromise edit is not accepted where do you think I should proceed? Should I even be pursuing this matter? Thanks for your help.

2153:

is a specific window of artistry (just like surf music is to 60's rock - if the Beatles hadn't come along the entire genre of 60's rock would have been completely different, n'cest pas?) However, my biggest issue right now is with

2779:

I dont have a problem open the URL each time. Extracts from it: "A death that we should say was very mysterious. Ed had become quite paranoid about being located". I will find the original document that prompted me to write this.

3936:

mechanical interpretation of all things small is essentially demanded by Nature. This selective history is not science. I had wanted to cite the island of stability -- but much moreso the sea of instability. However, on the

1848:

while cleaning the uncategorized articles. You said in the talk page on 2008 that you'll delete this if it is no longer needed. I'm not familiar with the bug report about this article but I think you should take a look at

2484:

You're welcome to include alternative info and/or qualify statements as "according to..." (i.e., present different positions from different sources), but as an editor, you can't make conclusions or do your own reasoning.

1758:

last opponent) campaign literature. (Including direct quotes). The article is being moderated now, but please do not take this person to be someone who edits Knowledge regularly-- they are here for political purposes.

1222:

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described

1388: 2763:

of them. The book-link gave me a page that said the book could not be displayed, which is why I said on the talk-page that need actual information about the book itself, not just a URL to the google-books copy of it.

3859:"No fact discovered about the atom can be trivial, nor fail to accelerate the progress of physical science, for the greater part of natural philosophy is the outcome of the structure and mechanism of the atom." 837:

Hi. I understand that this page was deleted multiple times and protected because of notability issues, but they've been receiving a lot of (Korean) press attention lately, and their first single debuted today.

1396: 943:. Even without the "self-identification", they have to be the same user, given the adversarial and arrogant attitude in edit summaries/talk pages, and the unusual mainspace edits (sheer, liquor etc.). Cheers, 1691:

fact, I have taken many "pro" and neutral items brought in by Orangeman2 and incorporated them into "my" versions, and even looked up additional sources, etc. The same courtesy has never been extended to me.

1103:, AP would be completely prohibited from making any edits to WP at all, and they could be blindly reverted regardless of their merit. Per LM's comments though, AP's comments as usual don't even have merit. 2569: 2106:

All material on Delta Epsilon Psi's page is taken from the Delta Epsilon Psi web page and/or derivative Chapter specific sites and other websites and events affiliated and hosted by Delta Epsilon Psi.

3210: 2159:

to rewrite the verbiage so that it is decidedly NPOV rather than the opposite. I'd love to hear your opinion (and please understand, I have no intentions whatsoever to turn this into an edit-war).

1961:

Investigating further, does the Atlantic City Public Library have permission to copy the amazon user reviews? Amazon's website clearly claims copyright on all material and prohibits republication.

1400: 4475:). Although checkuser didn't bring it up and the account has been editing since June, editing patterns are a bit like Lil Lez. I'm not fully convinced it's Lil Lez though; only time will tell. — 3005:

You're welcome! Even the process, though "simpler", isn't really "clear" if you're used to how it had been previously. The bots aren't able to cope with things that aren't "perfectly done" yet:(

143:(PRC). Moreover, the anon editor that you reverted was simply restoring the status quo prior to a POV-pushing edit made by a pro-PRC editor who substituted the ROC national flag with that of the 3931:

days ago.) If it is a weasel phrase, it would have been more useful to note so, rather than remove the statement entirely and state that it's "not that interesting". I certainly must, however,

3945:

part of the periodicity of Nature. This is why I may have inadvertently used the word "interesting" in my posted text -- to draw attention to the fact that there are indeed unstable elements.

1845: 1217: 418: 3167:

Please don't remove my contribution to the talk page on the Rob Levin article again. You might not like the content, but that doesn't give you the right to eliminate it from the talk page.

2574:

Never thought to use way back machine, your comment suggested I should have used appropriate tagging to ask for help instead of removing the reference, what is the appropriate tag. Thanks.

2947: 3229: 3214: 1897:

Please provide complete and specific details of the unambiguous copyright infringement you claim. The URL you provide is accessible only to patrons of the Alantic City NJ Library system.

692: 1032:

legal threats after being warned that this was not acceptable. You made it appear that he had not retracted this remark, and he was blocked for it. Please be more careful in the future.

2527:. Type in 195 and 196 and see that the density is between 1.1995993e-10 and 7.7689299e-11 (1 in 5 422 117 250 and 1 in 12 871 785 598). So, by the very definition of IQ, there need to 2035:. Copy'n'pasting and then changing a word here and there isn't a productive way to write an article that's really in your own words. The workshops list appears to be cut'n'pasted from 2899:

for Google. But I do think your right, it's really not worth the endless argument shifting consensus would require. So I am taking your advice and giving up the attempt. Thanks.

380: 3549:

about this "trend", and it appears there is an interest in this article to exist. Can you restore the article so sources can be added and it can be brought up to standards? thanks

2493:

is prohibited as a core policy. I would also note that the exceptionally high IQ value is supported by several published books that do not appear to be self-published, so it meets

2589: 3217:. The rationale is that most of the pages that have been so categorized contain information not only about the human genes, but also the corresponding genes in other organisms. 3053:

and they added the tag confirming it. My default assumption is "copyvio is copyvio"...I asked OTRS only because the talk-page made a specific and credible-sounding claim for it.

2872:...trying to evade normal consensus/discussion definitely makes your position look weaker to an outsider trying to mediate. The dispute is already on admin radar due to apparent 4515: 1020: 3773: 3720: 3669: 3629: 3600: 3225: 1319: 1236: 717:

that seems to be a mis categorization, as article doesn't talk much about perpetual motion machines, but about theories behind supposedly suppressed technologies. cheers.

363: 1708:

who has been the one blindly reverting and adding "explanations" of bills completely without sources? Just please look at the edit history. That's all I ask. Thank you.

1143: 767: 722: 677: 4289: 2242: 1983: 4303: 3252:

get into a pissing match with a stranger online. But I believe that the deleted paragraphs are totally ignorant and unnecessary sentences that deserve to be deleted.

667:

if the page is about pseudoscience, i'm sure you can add that category to it. otherwise, it would be good to categorize the link the way the article is categorized.

2086:

You're welcome. It's a sock-drawer I'm not very familiar with, so if there's any tagging or list of these that needs updating, please do or let me know where/what.

1507: 696: 3712:

Is there anyway you can take the page you deleted and look through it and help me edit the material in it so we can keep it on Knowledge. I am new to Knowledge.

1041: 348:

I'll give him "once more". What I'm seeing is blockable as simple vandalism, and COI is just icing on that foul-tasting cake. Welcome to this side of wikipedia:/

3455: 2178:

Hi there. I made some changes in the IIPM article but wanted your inputs on the same so wanted to request you to if possible visit the page and help me out. Tks

1943:. You will want to check with him about this URL. However, I can easily find the same text on numerous other sites just by googling. And regardless of whether 1901: 1288: 284: 1168: 449: 2523:? Just punch in median 100 SD 15 and IQ (x1) 250. In results in a density of 1.2212453e-15, that is 1 in 9 007 199 454 524 001. That does not fit in to the 495:

Noticed you're online... I'm trying to fix/create a dab page but forgot to move the original page (to keep its history) before turning it into a dab page.

3785: 3732: 3681: 3612: 3480: 2696: 1986:. You can resume here the argument "...other groups that are actually called Murdock Group...". Now the object is intelligible also for a poll. Thanks -- 1533: 1496:

believe it is, I truly just want to share our project. Are you able to constructively assist me so I can repost and share our work? Please let me know.

1392: 306: 3808: 3757: 3706: 3653: 3488: 1404: 424:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

2251: 1766: 1636: 1578: 2266: 4462: 4322: 2226: 2198: 2124:

Yes, I know that, and that's why several editors have repeatedly removed it: including content taken from somewhere else is a copyright violation.

1582: 1284: 255:'s edits actually remove the expression "Republic of China" or "ROC" in favour of "Taiwan" (or some variation thereof), the exact opposite of what 2814:

EVula's resolved comment in that section made me giggle, but your subsequent "resolved" comment made me snort coffee over my monitor. Bravo. ;) ~

1542: 3139: 2016: 1915: 1156: 112: 4096: 1947:

can see the initially-claimed URL (do you know if I can or not?), a copyvio is a copyvio even if the original is not available to all for free.

1717: 1700: 1683: 1666: 1624:. He is a state politician, and both myself and an anti-Debicella partisan just go back and forth with edits. It was moderated once before by 4051: 2856:

Getting more eyes is a good way to try to break deadlocks on editorial disputes (if and how much to include, possible alternate wordings), but

2211: 1135: 1112: 771: 740: 726: 708: 2613: 1927: 1211: 1190: 3830:

that's not that interesting:) At some point, we pass the point of stability, so *some* element has to be it. Nothing overtly special about Bi

3781: 3728: 3677: 3608: 3195: 3157: 2953:

I felt that it fell under the category blatant hoax, and could therefore be deleted under G3. Let me know if you disagree, and I'll restore.

1889: 1348: 823: 4374: 4140:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are 3402: 3359: 2964: 2719: 1747: 1732: 1609: 1562: 1527: 1071:, and then come back here to your talk page and let me know what the heck AP (or whomever) is on about? I would be forever in your debt. 3277: 2095: 333:

I am new to this sort of thing. Do we deal with this sort of stuff as vandalism or COI? How far does he have to go to get banned for COI?

3541:

hi, I noticed you were on the deletion logs for this page.. it seems to be salted. I'm not sure if you know but there has been some local

3435: 2908: 2893: 2281: 2133: 1809: 1056: 322: 4424: 4386: 4196: 3381: 3339: 3079: 3062: 2946: 2625: 1625: 897: 611:

Someone posted something hateful on my page, Iunno who it was, but I'm assuming I should go to you if someone does something like that?

4588: 4568: 4554: 4508: 4490: 4456: 4442: 4419: 3014: 2979: 2407: 2381: 2348: 2056: 1956: 1881: 1870: 1594: 554: 357: 272: 231: 212: 4256:

knock down the protection again. But at this time, evidence is that nothing less than full-prot would stop this wave of BLP vandalism.

3505: 3460:

The information pertaining to listership is incorrect and sourced from a blog. The correct information is found at the Knowledge page:

2880:

to include it vs lack of specific cites to back up claims claims of lasting/larger impact, you're fighting a decidedly up-hill battle.

952: 196:

sock. Apparently, this user has been using "throwaway" IP accounts ever since I tagged the primary account as a possible sockpuppet of

4265: 4249: 4006: 3577: 2559: 2544: 2510: 2024: 1970: 1482: 1464: 1272: 911: 681: 3583: 2665: 2478: 2205: 2168: 653: 4108: 1372: 1368: 1855: 1585:

that this footballer played for the Maltese national team, and seems to be getting rather hot under the collar about the deletion.

1440: 1364: 183: 4171: 2850: 1412: 4217: 3393:, which is a guideline that has strong consensus to follow and you don't seem to have compelling arguments to make an exception. 3134: 1331: 1148: 1089: 2990:

Thanks for fixing the template and sorry for the problems. Seem like the move instructions aren't as clear as they used to be.--

1778: 1648: 2437: 1511: 1178: 429: 3027:

Hey ya DM, how do I find out if an article's OTRS content has been cleared so I don't make the same mistake like I did on the

2876:

on the "include it" position. My gut is that given the current level of rational explanations based on content guidelines why

2830: 2800: 1026: 876: 4284: 4271: 4212: 4189: 4182: 4035: 2118: 2000: 1900:"* (Deletion log); 01:13 . . DMacks (talk | contribs) deleted "One second after" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of 1068: 788:

Hey, I was just fixing it since it had been messed up by someone else! I changed it BACK to Mountain Dew from Mountain Jew!

763: 718: 673: 290: 3921: 3496:

That's nice, but why are you telling me this? You'll have to be very specific about what action of mine you are discussing.

1902:

http://library.atlantic.city.lib.nj.us/index.php?option=com_collection&task=view&catid=14&id=1525&Itemid=818

1352: 4276:

Thank you for correcting my edit, I totally forgot that we can move pages and there is no need to create a whole new page.

3968:

Simply removing a pertinent comment for personal pedantic reasons is bad science. --TJ LaFave 13:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

3318: 3116: 2934: 2857: 2773: 2704: 2581: 1360: 1356: 855: 4081: 3313: 3043: 803: 174:

free to make it correct...annoying when a nugget of viable edit gets done as part of a larger apparent simple vandalism:(

120: 4133: 3168: 2192: 2010:

I'm confused as to why entry has been deleted. I updated it with material that is not from Web site but in my own words.

1570: 795: 631: 4404: 3446:

For protecting Aitias' talk page. I've blocked all the IPs. It's sad someone would want to vandalize like that. Thanks.

2807: 4536: 4355: 4154: 4137: 3373: 3331: 3176: 1995: 1839: 1739: 1709: 1692: 1675: 1658: 1503: 1309: 919: 3529: 2835: 2187: 1834: 1420: 1416: 1304: 4533: 4359: 3777: 3724: 3673: 3604: 3261: 3253: 3241: 2077: 1345: 1301: 839: 201: 163: 2339:

My network connection keeps freezing right now. Maybe will be stable in a few hr and I'll try to reverse that mess.

1257: 4158: 3293: 3087: 2999: 2941: 2080: 1774: 1644: 601: 394: 342: 302: 3450: 731:

Reread the article. Most of the description and specific examples are various sorts of perpetual-motion machines.

4472: 3206:

Hi. I am not sure where to post this, but since you started the discussion, I thought I would bring it up here.

2796: 2749: 2246: 585: 519: 479: 433: 398: 2681: 2432: 2333: 1436: 940: 846:

in both Chinese and Korean media. As the protecting admin, would you be able to unprotect? Thanks in advance.

4529: 4208: 3984: 3890: 3183: 1923: 1432: 1428: 1174: 842:

from the past week discuss the new single (according to Google News), while general articles about them number

659: 483: 3558: 2649: 1012: 383:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: 4299: 4124: 3814: 3484: 3309: 2303: 2208: 2001: 1615: 4119: 3908:

the island--there's lots of important science involving it. We actually have a whole article devoted to the

3748:

makes it hard to write a viable, objective article that doesn't come across sounding like an advertisement.

975: 4410:

Thanks. I nuked a bunch more of her crap. If another sock appears, CU can bring down some heavier hammers.

4242: 3523: 2733:

I'm confused. How much evidence is required to add something to wiki? And the book is an invalid document?

2728: 2146: 1802: 829: 3819:

I must disagree with your comment -- the reason as to why you felt it necessary to undo my comment on the

1553:

ever having existed. If someone tells me an actual specific page-name, I'll be happy to research further.

508: 139:(ROC), if by "entire" you mean the extent of effective control by the Republic of China as opposed to the 4226: 2633: 2164: 2139: 1571: 1424: 1224: 627: 606: 376: 140: 97: 4042:

Well, the bug is still present, but it's been demonstrated well enough I guess. I re-direct-redirected.

3644:

guidelines. (sorry for all the jargon/acronyms there...you can follow the links to see what they mean).

3304:

for warning Cmancmancman. I was just about to warn him until I saw what you did. Again, thanks! Cheers.

1628:, but the anti-Debicella partisan now wants to revert that language to one biased against the subject. 811: 504: 4078: 3568:

took care of it. Glad we can have an actual article now rather than a pile of childish nonsense there!

2101: 1817: 1490: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 38: 4447:

Ayup, and kill't. Thanks again for staying on top of this...guess we'll see what happens in a month:/

2808: 1822:

Yes, after rereading the article I have to agree with you. I have removed the prod tag and nominated

1380: 4204: 4030: 3468:

Which indicates that his actual listenership is 8.25 million and he is placed 4th behind Glen Beck.

1978: 1232: 1127: 1081: 1062: 402: 125: 105: 2520: 4295: 3542: 3305: 3284:

wikipedia, write what you know (what can be referenced). I look forward to hearing what you think.

3020: 2929: 2585: 2498: 2202: 1199: 928: 1263:

Heh:) It's always interesting to see what non-chemistry things people do with a PhD in chemistry.

843: 503:

to that place (which is currently about game calls). Then please insert what I have for game call

417:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

200:. He or she even took the trouble to make a personal attack against another editor on my talk page 4380: 3518: 3172: 799: 758: 688: 4351: 4334: 4150: 3377: 3335: 3153: 2700: 2686: 2365: 2315: 2173: 2160: 1743: 1713: 1696: 1679: 1662: 1590: 948: 861:

have an article on an extremely popular band, then there's something wrong. Thanks in advance.

545:. That's right? I see you've already fixed the hatnotes on the now-not-generically-named page. 2155: 4068: 4016: 3257: 3201: 2074: 1298: 1241: 4539:. If they are, I'd be more convinced that this is Lil Lez; otherwise, back to square one. — 4027: 3972: 3878: 3843:

as an element, but the fact that there is a "point of stability" which is "passed" between

3769: 3716: 3665: 3596: 3472: 3369: 3327: 2904: 2846: 2784: 2737: 2577: 2415: 2262: 2114: 2031:

The bulk of the article prose (2 of 3 paragraphs) differed by less than a dozen words from

1911: 1770: 1762: 1640: 1632: 1538: 1499: 1228: 1207: 1186: 1164: 1119: 1096: 1073: 1037: 872: 791: 783: 615: 467: 299: 4310: 8: 4466: 4141: 4022: 3994: 3937: 3909: 3565: 3289: 3130: 2970:

Not opposed. Looking further, editor that created it has a history of problematic edits.

2924: 2869: 2792: 2745: 2532: 2439: 2238: 2032: 1470: 1283:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at

932: 866: 475: 437: 410: 3028: 3021: 4583: 4564: 4549: 4523: 4504: 4485: 4452: 4437: 4415: 4399: 4370: 4318: 4261: 4092: 4047: 4002: 3980: 3917: 3886: 3804: 3753: 3702: 3649: 3641: 3573: 3501: 3398: 3355: 3273: 3191: 3058: 3010: 2995: 2985: 2975: 2960: 2889: 2769: 2715: 2661: 2656:

version and I'm not endorsing anything in the version as it stood when I protected it.

2609: 2601: 2555: 2506: 2400: 2377: 2344: 2326: 2277: 2222: 2129: 2091: 2052: 2020: 1966: 1952: 1919: 1866: 1728: 1605: 1558: 1523: 1478: 1460: 1278: 1268: 1108: 1052: 893: 819: 736: 704: 649: 550: 538: 445: 353: 338: 328: 318: 268: 227: 208: 179: 116: 4559:

800-Thug's edits to that file are not Windows pathnames (HINSTAMAN's edits). Oh well.

3689:

Again, an article about a company needs to explain something about how the company is

3534: 2531:

9 007 199 454 524 001 people for an IQ of 250 to be achievable. Again, IQ is based on

2318:

back. I tried yesterday but Lil Lez kept removing my speedy tag. Thanks in advance. —

757:

i guess this will have to end with disagreement. while i think that the main focus of

4347: 4162: 4145: 4057: 3839:

the point. It is not a comment made with regards to any particularly significance of

3246: 3237: 3162: 2677: 2597: 2297: 2183: 1586: 1152: 944: 641: 640:

then he undid them himself). Those sorts of tests happen a lot...you could place a {{

136: 126: 3956: 2036: 1788:

Hi DMacks. I just fully protected this page for a month in response to a request at

218:

socks. The IPs keep changing, so checkuser might be hard to nail down, but even so,

4328: 4237: 4219: 4176: 3900: 3554: 3441: 2692: 2637: 2619: 2540: 2524: 2474: 2069: 1936: 1890: 1798: 1327: 1293: 1253: 957: 907: 851: 490: 260: 248: 197: 47: 17: 4112: 1117:

This appears to be someone who just won't be ignored. Thank you for your help!

564: 135:

I think there's a misunderstanding here. The article does talk about the "entire"

4102: 3835:

This is a purely revisionist mind-set. The fact that "some element has to be it"

3633: 3463: 3149: 2900: 2842: 2645: 2640:

is totally irrelevant in Xinjiang and in China. It should be removed. Take care.

2486: 2462: 2450: 2287: 2258: 2110: 2062: 2044: 1991: 1203: 1182: 1160: 1033: 623: 460: 294: 252: 236: 3637: 2311: 2040: 393:

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4496: 4166: 4063: 3820: 3741: 3694: 3625: 3621: 3447: 3431: 3423: 3415: 3390: 3346: 3299: 3285: 3126: 3069: 3050: 3033: 2788: 2741: 1789: 885: 862: 644:}} warning on his talkpage so he could (hopefully!) see the error in his ways. 471: 425: 256: 244: 219: 189: 144: 2466: 2306:) for continued inappropriate page moves. I was wondering if you could delete 463:

have Vandalism a lot of article, i think you need block this guy, yhank you.

4576: 4542: 4519: 4478: 4430: 4392: 3976: 3882: 3745: 2991: 2955: 2881: 2873: 2865: 2428: 2395: 2321: 1876: 1850: 1823: 1621: 1577:

Could you please restore this article, which you deleted as an expired prod.

1444: 1384: 1315: 1242: 1100: 1010: 973: 936: 596: 580: 514: 454: 441: 334: 264: 204: 169:

The editor has a long pattern of inappropriate edits and based on the ones I

159: 3870:, in my doctoral research on electrostatics. Then, confirmed in a textbook. 1376: 1028:

caused a lot of trouble and led to an editor being blocked. He was removing

3740:

I don't know anything about your company, so I'll again again refer you to

3476: 3233: 3221: 2916: 2673: 2629: 2490: 2293: 2179: 1195: 884:

Unprotected. Make sure the article you write meets our minimum standards (

4560: 4500: 4448: 4411: 4366: 4314: 4257: 4232: 4088: 4043: 3998: 3913: 3800: 3749: 3698: 3690: 3645: 3569: 3550: 3511: 3497: 3394: 3351: 3269: 3187: 3111: 3092: 3088: 3054: 3006: 2971: 2885: 2864:

to do so. The dispute-resolution page mentions several ways to do that...

2765: 2711: 2657: 2605: 2551: 2536: 2502: 2494: 2470: 2445:

If an source clearly contradicts a definition is it still reliable? Read

2373: 2340: 2273: 2218: 2150: 2125: 2087: 2048: 1962: 1948: 1862: 1793: 1724: 1601: 1554: 1519: 1474: 1456: 1323: 1287:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

1264: 1249: 1104: 1048: 903: 889: 847: 815: 732: 700: 645: 546: 349: 314: 223: 175: 3959:

put just so many protons in the nucleus of an atom it becomes unstable?"

4129: 3145: 2815: 2641: 2232: 1987: 619: 368: 2860:

is not the right venue for resolving disputes, merely for finding out

2497:

enough to state it (with cite given). See also various discussions on

1248:

Thanks. I guess I need to get to work on actually improving it now...

4278: 4116: 3546: 3427: 3419: 3411: 3324:

section of Knowledge pages. So I believe your warning is unfounded.

2636:

which was not part of the edit war or involved with the dispute. The

1550: 1518:

Who are you, what organization, and what page are you talking about?

534: 526: 496: 3232:

instead. Where can I request that this move be modified? Cheers.

2570:

Fixing of my edit to Death Erection (removing broken reference link)

3535: 2423: 1827: 1448: 1000: 963: 155: 4136:. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to 2693:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_July_1

984: 542: 530: 500: 3464:

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_most-listened-to_radio_programs

2710:

Article is in main-space now, and looks fine to me. Good work!

1940: 939:

in edits from the first IP (hence the block) and now also here

4389:. Just thought I'd let you know, in case you're interested. — 1322:. I have csd:vand on it but it may need monitoring. regards -- 1218:

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

577:

For using the mop with precision and in short order. Cheers! —

2369: 2307: 4199:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2695:, I have made some contribution to this discussion. Regards 428:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 4532:) left the same type of content on the file that HINSTAMAN 931:

that you have been having some "conversation" with is also

831: 3144:

Thank you for the code, and the ability to read my code! —

405:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 3103:

have to stay and the same main point still exists, then.

2515:

Perhaps I am a bit confused here but are you saying that

2067:

For the sock block of the newest MascotGuy incarnation.—

2388: 397:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 188:

It seems that the editor in question is a sockpuppet of

3823:

page regarding the instability of neutral elements for

3640:

if it were an actual article instead of userpage)--see

2446: 1095:

Looks like AP (see IP-tracking followup to his post to

1021:

Please be more careful when reverting alleged vandalism

499:

should be temporarily deleted to allow for the move of

3213:, the consensus was that this category should be name 2519:

source on Internet beats simple math? Did you look at

1067:

I was wondering if you could do me the favor to go to

2197:

I'd like to say that the reason was confidential but

999:

To DMacks, for contributions to scientific articles.

2457:

today is 195. Any estimate higher than this is also

364:

Proposed deletion of Hydrogen cyanide/CAS searchable

2145:artists he wants to include actually belong in the 1144:

NowCommons: File:Grubbs Catalyst 2nd Generation.png

4290:hi, I nominated Ergogenic aid for speedy deletion. 4066:'s article. I really appreciate it. :) Regards -- 3997:can learn about it properly and more completely. 2453:and it will be more than obvious that maximum IQ 1620:DMacks, we could use some moderation on the page 3119:), but that will have to wait for another time. 3456:Listenership sourcing issues and incorrectness. 1285:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1157:Commons:File:Grubbs Catalyst 2nd Generation.png 285:I-210 or whatever he wants to call himself now 2868:is a good one. However, you'll want to avoid 2604:for more info. Thanks for noticing this one! 2272:Will check it out and follow up in a few hr. 1600:Restored pending consensus there to keep it. 3624:) or for pages about non-notable companies ( 2624:Hi DMacks. While reverting the edit war of 1318:by creating the same deleted content under 507:into Game call, and what I had for calling 3182:I'm not stating an opinion. Please follow 2217:Don't worry, your secret is safe with me. 1532:I think he is talking about Swagbucks - 4188:Hello, DMacks. You have new messages at 2252:Support request regarding image copyright 539:this old revision of now-called Game call 4337:. Don't know where that guy came from!? 4225:Can't the article go under some sort of 3866:this fact on my own a few years ago!!!! 2921:Ah, I see. Thank you for the reversion. 1314:The editor has baypassed your block on 902:Thanks. :) You can check it out. :P 3874:TJ LaFave 02:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC) 3211:Category talk:Human genes by chromosome 3140:Re: RFC Bot flagging of broken requests 2292:Hi there DMacks, I noticed you blocked 1149:File:Grubbs Catalyst 2nd Generation.png 379:template has been added to the article 14: 1179:Commons:File:Grubbswatersolublecat.png 982: 511:into Calling. Hope this makes sense. — 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 935:. Both have identified themselves as 3117:A Dictionary of Modern English Usage 2858:Knowledge:Editor assistance/Requests 1846:Beta-hydroxy1butyryl-CoA/layout-test 289:I gave him a final warning already: 25: 2948:Not Another Teen Movie AGAIN (2003) 2691:Hi, I request you to please see to 2201:edit summary is much more correct. 23: 4181: 4107:Hi DMacks. There might be some of 3620:Knowledge is not for advertising ( 3230:Category:Human_genes_by_chromosome 3215:Category:Genes by human chromosome 1227:). If interested, please email me 693:Category:Perpetual motion machines 367: 192:, who I believe might itself be a 24: 4614: 4573:Gah, back to square one it is. — 3584:Stitches Sportswear- Deleted Page 2041:deleted due to lack of notability 571:The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar 4190:A More Perfect Onion's talk page 2535:and is not an absolute scale. -- 2387: 2353: 983: 563: 29: 4309:No evidence of that action per 1984:News Corp also called... resume 1939:per the copy-vio tag placed by 1861:Gone. Thanks for the reminder. 381:Hydrogen cyanide/CAS searchable 4111:that would benefit from being 3184:Knowledge:Talk page guidelines 2600:}}. See its documentation and 1338:Flagged the site via XLinkBot: 1175:File:Grubbswatersolublecat.png 869:) 5:340, 6 May 2009 (-6 GMT) 292:. Maybe it's time to indef? -- 13: 1: 4516:File:T.I. - Dead and Gone.jpg 4461:Might want to keep an eye on 3220:Despite the above consensus, 2489:never beats anything because 2002:Heritage Conservation Network 436:, where it may be deleted if 4365:Yeah, that was a weird one! 3630:User:Stitches Sportswear LLC 3319:Your warning regarding edits 3286:You Can't Clap with One Hand 3226:Category:Genes by chromosome 2206:waits for audience applause, 2147:Contemporary Christian music 2013:I appreciate your insights. 1320:Bangla book by humayun ahmed 927:You will probably find that 695:, which is a subcategory of 7: 4589:05:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 4569:05:04, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 4555:00:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 4509:07:08, 14 August 2009 (UTC) 4491:04:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 4457:06:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 4443:04:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 4375:07:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 4360:07:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 4323:16:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 4304:04:16, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 4285:06:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 4266:23:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 4250:22:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 4213:19:41, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 4172:21:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 4120:06:19, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 4097:18:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 4082:18:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 4062:Thank you for your help on 4052:15:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 4036:21:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC) 4007:15:27, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 3922:03:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC) 3809:07:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 3786:07:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 3758:07:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 3733:07:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 3707:07:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 3682:06:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 3654:06:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 3613:06:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 3224:has moved the old category 3067:Sweet as, cheers for that. 2461:false. So, I argue that my 2193:The suspense is killing me! 1572:Jean Pierre Mifsud Triganza 525:Alright, I deleted the old 403:Knowledge's deletion policy 10: 4619: 4333:Thanks for your help with 3578:15:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 3559:06:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 3530:22:23, 8 August 2009 (UTC) 3506:04:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 3489:01:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 3451:18:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 3436:17:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC) 2203:Enter CambridgeBayWeather, 1840:Is this page still needed? 1310:Attept to circumvent block 920:Blocked editor at it again 484:02:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 450:01:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 358:19:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC) 343:19:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC) 323:05:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC) 307:04:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC) 273:12:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC) 232:07:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC) 213:07:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC) 141:People's Republic of China 4420:21:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC) 4405:03:29, 25 July 2009 (UTC) 4203:Humorous reply provided 4134:good article reassessment 4132:has been nominated for a 3899:"It is interesting" is a 3403:21:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 3382:21:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 3360:21:23, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 3340:21:16, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 3314:20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 3294:01:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 3278:15:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC) 3262:14:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC) 3242:06:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC) 3196:04:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 3177:02:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 3158:17:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC) 3135:18:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 3080:00:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 3063:09:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 3044:09:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 3015:19:31, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 3000:19:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 2980:18:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 2965:18:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 2942:05:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 2909:17:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 2894:07:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 2851:07:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 2831:09:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC) 2801:19:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 2774:19:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 2632:, you have also reverted 2247:16:14, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 2227:04:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 2212:04:49, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 2188:09:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2169:22:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 2134:21:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 2119:21:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 2096:06:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 2081:06:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 2057:06:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 2025:00:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 1996:03:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 1971:06:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 1957:06:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 1928:04:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 1882:15:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 1871:14:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 1856:01:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 1835:15:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 1826:. Thanks for the input! 1810:04:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 1779:03:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 1748:16:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 1733:15:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 1718:15:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 1701:15:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 1684:15:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 1667:14:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 1649:10:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 1610:20:00, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 1595:19:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 1563:15:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 1543:20:56, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 1528:16:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 1512:15:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 1483:08:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 1465:07:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 1332:07:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 1305:06:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 1273:03:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 1258:01:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 989: 562: 426:proposed deletion process 388:Test completed months ago 184:18:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC) 164:17:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC) 151:which term we are using. 121:18:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC) 4272:Re:Cut'n'paste page-move 3110:Of course if the entire 2809:Schrödinger's cat at ANI 2720:17:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 2705:15:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 2682:18:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 2666:17:20, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 2650:17:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 2614:16:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 2590:16:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 2560:02:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 2545:20:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC) 2511:19:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC) 2499:Talk:William James Sidis 2479:17:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC) 2433:00:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 2408:19:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 2382:14:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 2349:00:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 2334:00:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 2282:00:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 2267:10:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 1237:15:10, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 1212:12:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1200:Commons:File:SAM (1).png 1191:07:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1169:07:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1136:03:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1113:21:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 1090:02:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 1057:00:43, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 1042:00:42, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 962:You deserve a barnstar. 814:is the change you made. 430:speedy deletion criteria 4495:Yeah, it's only a half- 4385:And I have initiated a 3862:I was quite pleased to 3774:Stitches Sportswear LLC 3721:Stitches Sportswear LLC 3670:Stitches Sportswear LLC 3601:Stitches Sportswear LLC 2836:The Letterman article's 1013:19:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC) 976:19:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC) 953:22:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 912:04:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 898:01:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 877:22:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 856:03:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 824:17:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 804:17:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 772:15:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 759:free energy suppression 741:15:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 727:14:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 709:13:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 689:Free energy suppression 682:12:08, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 654:04:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 632:03:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 602:01:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 586:01:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 555:01:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 520:01:09, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 4186: 4113:transferred to Commons 2366:Busta (disambiguation) 2316:Busta (disambiguation) 2047:for some guidelines). 1097:Loadmaster's talk-page 697:Category:Pseudophysics 660:free energy suppresion 440:to delete is reached. 395:criteria for inclusion 372: 4185: 4125:Amino acid GAR notice 3815:Revisionist Histories 1616:Dan Debicella Article 1423:Reports - Knowledge: 434:Articles for Deletion 432:or it can be sent to 399:What Knowledge is not 371: 42:of past discussions. 4518:and check to see if 4205:A More Perfect Onion 4138:good article quality 3746:conflict of interest 3636:(it would also fail 2729:Alexander Chernetski 2459:per definition of IQ 2314:to make way to move 1893:book review deletion 1198:is now available as 1177:is now available as 1151:is now available on 537:, and then imported 239:is almost certainly 4023:1,4-dichlorobenzene 3995:island of stability 3938:island of stability 3910:island of stability 3566:User:King of Hearts 3306:Rascal the Peaceful 2533:normal distribution 2521:the link I provided 2440:William James Sidis 2140:Jesus music article 607:User page sabotaged 4197:remove this notice 4187: 2102:Delta Epsilon Psi. 1818:Re: PROD of Uday08 1491:Support in writing 993:The E=mc² Barnstar 373: 4499:. Got a CU link? 4425:Here we go again. 4387:sockpuppetry case 4358: 4247: 4170: 3989: 3975:comment added by 3895: 3881:comment added by 3789: 3772:comment added by 3736: 3719:comment added by 3685: 3668:comment added by 3616: 3599:comment added by 3492: 3475:comment added by 3372:comment added by 3330:comment added by 3078: 3042: 2804: 2787:comment added by 2754: 2740:comment added by 2580:comment added by 1979:Resume discussion 1931: 1914:comment added by 1875:You're welcome.-- 1833: 1807: 1805:So let it be done 1800: 1782: 1765:comment added by 1652: 1635:comment added by 1502:comment added by 1451: 1153:Wikimedia Commons 1134: 1088: 1063:In you spare time 1018: 1017: 840:About 45 articles 794:comment added by 635: 618:comment added by 591: 590: 487: 470:comment added by 377:proposed deletion 137:Republic of China 127:Four Asian Tigers 106:Abdul Taib Mahmud 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4610: 4586: 4579: 4552: 4545: 4488: 4481: 4440: 4433: 4402: 4395: 4346: 4342: 4281: 4245: 4240: 4235: 4231: 4220:Robert Pattinson 4200: 4148: 4087:You're welcome! 4074: 4071: 3988: 3969: 3894: 3875: 3788: 3766: 3735: 3713: 3684: 3662: 3615: 3593: 3526: 3521: 3491: 3469: 3384: 3342: 3209:As discussed at 3076: 3075: 3068: 3040: 3039: 3032: 3029:Białystok Ghetto 3022:Białystok Ghetto 2958: 2937: 2932: 2927: 2870:WP:FORUMSHOPping 2828: 2803: 2781: 2753: 2734: 2638:Turkish language 2592: 2525:World population 2403: 2398: 2391: 2360: 2357: 2356: 2329: 2324: 2161:SkagitRiverQueen 2072: 1937:One second after 1930: 1908: 1891:One Second After 1879: 1853: 1832: 1803: 1799: 1781: 1759: 1651: 1629: 1549:I don't see any 1546: 1514: 1343: 1296: 1291:. Thank you.— 1132: 1124: 1118: 1086: 1078: 1072: 1009: 1005: 987: 980: 979: 972: 968: 880: 830:Unprotection of 806: 687:Yes, and it is: 634: 612: 567: 560: 559: 486: 464: 416: 415: 409: 261:User:Nationalist 249:User:Nationalist 243:a sockpuppet of 198:User:Nationalist 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:User talk:DMacks 4618: 4617: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4609: 4608: 4607: 4584: 4577: 4550: 4543: 4486: 4479: 4438: 4431: 4400: 4393: 4383: 4381:Lil Lez returns 4340: 4331: 4311:article history 4292: 4279: 4274: 4243: 4238: 4233: 4223: 4218:Protection for 4201: 4194: 4179: 4127: 4105: 4072: 4069: 4060: 4019: 3970: 3876: 3817: 3767: 3714: 3663: 3594: 3586: 3539: 3524: 3519: 3514: 3470: 3458: 3444: 3367: 3325: 3321: 3302: 3249: 3204: 3165: 3142: 3096: 3073:Esradekan Gibb 3071: 3070: 3037:Esradekan Gibb 3035: 3034: 3025: 2988: 2954: 2951: 2935: 2930: 2925: 2919: 2838: 2816: 2812: 2782: 2735: 2731: 2689: 2622: 2575: 2572: 2465:beats the used 2451:High IQ society 2443: 2418: 2401: 2396: 2358: 2354: 2327: 2322: 2290: 2254: 2235: 2195: 2176: 2142: 2104: 2070: 2065: 2005: 1981: 1909: 1895: 1877: 1851: 1842: 1820: 1806: 1760: 1630: 1618: 1579:User:Stew jones 1575: 1536: 1497: 1493: 1399:• Discussions: 1342:deshiboi.com: 1312: 1294: 1281: 1246: 1229:Encyclopaedia21 1220: 1146: 1128: 1120: 1082: 1074: 1065: 1023: 1007: 1001: 970: 964: 960: 922: 870: 835: 789: 786: 764:212.200.240.137 719:212.200.240.137 674:212.200.240.137 662: 613: 609: 493: 465: 461:User:Taiwanrox8 457: 413: 407: 406: 366: 331: 287: 253:User:Taiwanrox8 237:User:Taiwanrox8 130: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4616: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4382: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4330: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4291: 4288: 4273: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4222: 4216: 4193: 4180: 4178: 4175: 4126: 4123: 4104: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4064:Kareena Kapoor 4059: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4021:You done with 4018: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3925: 3924: 3873: 3828:. You noted: " 3821:Periodic Table 3816: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3763: 3761: 3760: 3710: 3709: 3695:this guideline 3659: 3657: 3656: 3585: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3538: 3533: 3513: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3457: 3454: 3443: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3406: 3405: 3363: 3362: 3320: 3317: 3301: 3298: 3281: 3280: 3248: 3245: 3203: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3164: 3161: 3141: 3138: 3095: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3024: 3019: 3018: 3017: 2987: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2950: 2945: 2918: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2837: 2834: 2811: 2806: 2777: 2776: 2730: 2727: 2725: 2723: 2722: 2688: 2685: 2669: 2668: 2621: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2582:82.132.136.204 2571: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2455:per definition 2442: 2436: 2417: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2351: 2289: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2253: 2250: 2239:- Mike Beckham 2234: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2194: 2191: 2175: 2174:Need your help 2172: 2149:article since 2141: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2103: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2064: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2004: 1999: 1980: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1894: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1841: 1838: 1819: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1804: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1704: 1703: 1687: 1686: 1670: 1669: 1617: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1581:has presented 1574: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1541:comment added 1530: 1492: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1311: 1308: 1280: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1245: 1240: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1193: 1145: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1022: 1019: 1016: 1015: 996: 995: 990: 988: 959: 956: 921: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 875:comment added 834: 828: 827: 826: 785: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 712: 711: 661: 658: 657: 656: 608: 605: 589: 588: 574: 573: 568: 558: 557: 492: 489: 456: 453: 391: 390: 365: 362: 361: 360: 330: 327: 326: 325: 286: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 257:User:Eeeeeewtw 245:User:Eeeeeewtw 190:User:Eeeeeewtw 147:Olympic Team. 145:Chinese Taipei 129: 124: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4615: 4590: 4587: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4553: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4538: 4535: 4531: 4528: 4525: 4521: 4517: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4498: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4489: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4474: 4471: 4468: 4464: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4441: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4426: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4417: 4413: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4403: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4388: 4376: 4372: 4368: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4344: 4343: 4336: 4324: 4320: 4316: 4312: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4301: 4297: 4294:Best wishes, 4287: 4286: 4283: 4282: 4267: 4263: 4259: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4248: 4246: 4241: 4236: 4228: 4221: 4215: 4214: 4210: 4206: 4198: 4191: 4184: 4174: 4173: 4168: 4164: 4160: 4156: 4152: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4135: 4131: 4122: 4121: 4118: 4114: 4110: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4083: 4080: 4079: 4076: 4075: 4065: 4053: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4037: 4033: 4032: 4029: 4024: 4017:Soft redirect 4008: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3991: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3978: 3974: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3957: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3944: 3939: 3934: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3907: 3902: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3871: 3869: 3865: 3860: 3857: 3853: 3850: 3846: 3845:83<Z<84 3842: 3838: 3833: 3831: 3827: 3822: 3810: 3806: 3802: 3797: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3722: 3718: 3708: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3655: 3651: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3628:); I deleted 3627: 3623: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3589: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3537: 3532: 3531: 3527: 3522: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3466: 3465: 3461: 3453: 3452: 3449: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3408: 3407: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3348: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3316: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3297: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3244: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3218: 3216: 3212: 3207: 3202:Category move 3197: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3169:74.129.107.64 3160: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3137: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3118: 3113: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3094: 3090: 3081: 3077: 3074: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3041: 3038: 3031:page? Cheers 3030: 3023: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2962: 2957: 2949: 2944: 2943: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2933: 2928: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2833: 2832: 2829: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2810: 2805: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2762: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2726: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2684: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2441: 2435: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2399: 2390: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2352: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2325: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2302: 2299: 2295: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2249: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2210: 2209:not a sausage 2207: 2204: 2200: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2171: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2157: 2152: 2148: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2076: 2073: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2011: 2008: 2003: 1998: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1905: 1903: 1898: 1892: 1883: 1880: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1854: 1847: 1837: 1836: 1831: 1830: 1825: 1811: 1808: 1801: 1797: 1796: 1791: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1706: 1705: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1689: 1688: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1672: 1671: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1627: 1623: 1622:Dan Debicella 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1573: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1547: 1544: 1540: 1535: 1531: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1469:Pushed up to 1468: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1455: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1347: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1316:Humayun Ahmed 1307: 1306: 1303: 1302: 1300: 1297: 1290: 1286: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1244: 1243:Humayun Ahmed 1239: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1194: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1137: 1133: 1131: 1126: 1122: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1085: 1080: 1076: 1070: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1014: 1011: 1006: 1004: 998: 997: 994: 991: 986: 981: 978: 977: 974: 969: 967: 955: 954: 950: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 925: 913: 909: 905: 901: 900: 899: 895: 891: 888:especially). 887: 883: 882: 881: 878: 874: 868: 864: 858: 857: 853: 849: 845: 841: 833: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 808: 807: 805: 801: 797: 796:213.100.58.78 793: 773: 769: 765: 760: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 742: 738: 734: 730: 729: 728: 724: 720: 716: 715: 714: 713: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 685: 684: 683: 679: 675: 671: 668: 665: 655: 651: 647: 643: 638: 637: 636: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 604: 603: 600: 599: 598: 587: 584: 583: 582: 576: 575: 572: 569: 566: 561: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 523: 522: 521: 518: 517: 516: 510: 506: 502: 498: 488: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 462: 452: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 422: 420: 419:its talk page 412: 404: 400: 396: 389: 386: 385: 384: 382: 378: 370: 359: 355: 351: 347: 346: 345: 344: 340: 336: 324: 320: 316: 311: 310: 309: 308: 304: 301: 297: 296: 291: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 235: 234: 233: 229: 225: 221: 216: 215: 214: 210: 206: 202: 199: 195: 191: 187: 186: 185: 181: 177: 172: 168: 167: 166: 165: 161: 157: 152: 148: 146: 142: 138: 133: 128: 123: 122: 118: 114: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4575: 4574: 4541: 4540: 4526: 4477: 4476: 4469: 4429: 4428: 4391: 4390: 4384: 4339: 4338: 4335:79.24.91.199 4332: 4293: 4277: 4275: 4230: 4224: 4202: 4146:TonyTheTiger 4128: 4106: 4077: 4067: 4061: 4026: 4020: 3942: 3932: 3905: 3872: 3867: 3863: 3861: 3858: 3854: 3848: 3844: 3840: 3836: 3834: 3829: 3824: 3818: 3795: 3762: 3711: 3658: 3590: 3587: 3540: 3515: 3467: 3462: 3459: 3445: 3374:74.211.54.12 3364: 3332:74.211.54.12 3322: 3303: 3282: 3250: 3222:User:Cydebot 3219: 3208: 3205: 3166: 3143: 3125: 3121: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3072: 3036: 3026: 2989: 2952: 2926:bibliomaniac 2923: 2922: 2920: 2877: 2861: 2839: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2778: 2760: 2732: 2724: 2697:Maihunggogoi 2690: 2687:Youth United 2670: 2630:User:Fuzbaby 2623: 2573: 2528: 2516: 2458: 2454: 2444: 2422: 2419: 2416:Youth United 2394: 2393: 2361: 2320: 2319: 2300: 2291: 2255: 2237:As you were 2236: 2196: 2177: 2143: 2109: 2105: 2068: 2066: 2033:the original 2015: 2012: 2009: 2006: 1982: 1944: 1906: 1899: 1896: 1843: 1828: 1821: 1794: 1756: 1740:69.37.244.16 1710:69.37.244.16 1693:69.37.244.16 1676:69.37.244.16 1659:69.37.244.16 1619: 1587:Phil Bridger 1576: 1534:Codenamecody 1504:24.5.108.222 1494: 1471:WP:BLACKLIST 1397:COIBot-Local 1381:MER-C X-wiki 1337: 1313: 1292: 1282: 1247: 1221: 1196:File:SAM.png 1147: 1130: 1121: 1084: 1075: 1069:my Talk page 1066: 1029: 1024: 1002: 992: 965: 961: 945:Freestyle-69 926: 924:Hi DMacks, 923: 859: 836: 787: 784:Mountain Dew 672: 669: 666: 663: 610: 595: 594: 593:Thank you! — 592: 579: 578: 570: 513: 512: 494: 458: 423: 392: 387: 374: 332: 293: 288: 263:like to do. 240: 193: 170: 153: 149: 134: 131: 109: 78: 43: 37: 4109:your images 3971:—Preceding 3877:—Preceding 3768:—Preceding 3715:—Preceding 3664:—Preceding 3642:WP:USERPAGE 3595:—Preceding 3588:Hi DMacks, 3564:Looks like 3517:vandalism;) 3471:—Preceding 3368:—Preceding 3326:—Preceding 3254:198.3.128.3 3112:False scent 3093:False scent 3089:False Scent 2783:—Preceding 2761:suppression 2736:—Preceding 2602:WP:DEADLINK 2576:—Preceding 2438:Your rv of 2386:Thank you. 2151:Jesus music 1910:—Preceding 1761:—Preceding 1631:—Preceding 1537:—Preceding 1498:—Preceding 1449:AboutUs.com 1445:domaintools 1389:Links on en 1387:• Reports: 1344:Linksearch 1289:JonasanRat7 871:—Preceding 790:—Preceding 614:—Preceding 466:—Preceding 194:Nationalist 36:This is an 4341:Chimpanzee 4163:WP:CHICAGO 4130:Amino acid 4031:Farmbrough 3634:WP:CSD#G11 3296:GiselleRI 2986:Cobra move 2901:Datacharge 2843:Datacharge 2259:Gunner0095 2111:Junkyboy55 1935:I deleted 1767:Orangeman2 1637:Orangeman2 1443:• Domain: 1435:• Google: 1349:(insource) 1279:ANI notice 1204:Erwin85Bot 1183:Erwin85Bot 1161:Erwin85Bot 1047:Ah sorry. 1034:Beeblebrox 1025:This edit 664:hi there, 411:dated prod 329:John Lesch 295:Rschen7754 98:Archive 10 4463:HINSTAMAN 4244:• C • E • 4227:probation 4070:Bollywood 4058:Thank You 3901:WP:WEASEL 3638:WP:CSD#A7 3547:LA Weekly 3525:MannGreek 3520:Schnitzel 3448:Acalamari 3247:July 2009 3163:Rob Levin 3127:SimonTrew 2789:Seb-Gibbs 2742:Seb-Gibbs 2634:this edit 2626:User:Ohtx 2467:WP:V#SELF 2027:Srparnes 1626:AlekseyFy 1551:Swagbucks 1411:• COIBot- 1377:Spamcheck 933:this user 929:this user 863:xojycyjox 535:Game call 527:Game call 497:Game call 472:Eeeeeewtw 459:this guy 442:Mark Hurd 438:consensus 90:Archive 7 85:Archive 6 79:Archive 5 73:Archive 4 68:Archive 3 60:Archive 1 4530:contribs 4520:808-Thug 4473:contribs 4356:Contribs 4195:You can 4177:Talkback 3985:contribs 3977:Tjlafave 3973:unsigned 3933:disagree 3891:contribs 3883:Tjlafave 3879:unsigned 3864:discover 3782:contribs 3770:unsigned 3729:contribs 3717:unsigned 3693:, using 3678:contribs 3666:unsigned 3609:contribs 3597:unsigned 3543:coverage 3485:contribs 3473:unsigned 3370:unsigned 3328:unsigned 3049:I asked 2992:Flash176 2956:decltype 2797:contribs 2785:unsigned 2750:contribs 2738:unsigned 2620:Xinjiang 2598:deadlink 2578:unsigned 2487:WP:SYNTH 2463:WP:SYNTH 2304:contribs 2045:WP:GROUP 2017:Srparnes 1924:contribs 1916:Apportum 1912:unsigned 1878:Lenticel 1852:Lenticel 1775:contribs 1763:unsigned 1645:contribs 1633:unsigned 1583:evidence 1500:unsigned 1419:, & 1405:advanced 958:Barnstar 937:Lysdexia 844:over 200 792:unsigned 642:uw-test1 628:contribs 616:unsigned 597:Eustress 581:Eustress 529:, moved 515:Eustress 491:DAB help 480:contribs 468:unsigned 335:Dolive21 265:Alpha77a 205:Alpha77a 154:Best -- 113:DavidDCM 4585:xplicit 4551:xplicit 4497:WP:DUCK 4487:xplicit 4439:xplicit 4401:xplicit 4239:• A • R 4234:• S • C 4167:WP:LOTM 4103:Commons 3847:. This 3841:bismuth 3742:WP:CORP 3691:notable 3626:WP:CORP 3622:WP:SPAM 3545:in the 3536:Jerkin' 3477:Tseay11 3391:WP:ELNO 3347:WP:ELNO 3234:Boghog2 3051:WP:OTRS 2674:Fuzbaby 2402:xplicit 2328:xplicit 2294:Lil Lez 2288:A favor 2180:Wifione 2063:Thanks, 1539:undated 1401:tracked 1373:wikt:fr 1369:wikt:en 1099:). Per 1030:his own 886:WP:BAND 873:undated 670:cheers 543:Calling 531:Calling 501:Calling 220:WP:DUCK 39:archive 4561:DMacks 4501:DMacks 4449:DMacks 4412:DMacks 4367:DMacks 4329:Thanks 4315:DMacks 4280:■ MMXX 4258:DMacks 4089:DMacks 4073:Dreamz 4044:DMacks 3999:DMacks 3914:DMacks 3825:Z: --> 3801:DMacks 3750:DMacks 3699:DMacks 3646:DMacks 3632:under 3570:DMacks 3551:riffic 3498:DMacks 3442:Thanks 3395:DMacks 3352:DMacks 3300:Thanks 3270:DMacks 3188:DMacks 3055:DMacks 3007:DMacks 2972:DMacks 2886:DMacks 2882:WP:CCC 2874:WP:SPA 2866:WP:RFC 2766:DMacks 2712:DMacks 2658:DMacks 2606:DMacks 2552:DMacks 2537:Ainali 2503:DMacks 2471:Ainali 2374:DMacks 2364:Moved 2341:DMacks 2310:under 2274:DMacks 2219:DMacks 2156:Walter 2126:DMacks 2088:DMacks 2049:DMacks 1963:DMacks 1949:DMacks 1941:User:7 1907:```` 1863:DMacks 1844:Found 1824:WP:CSD 1795:Xymmax 1725:DMacks 1602:DMacks 1555:DMacks 1520:DMacks 1475:DMacks 1457:DMacks 1437:search 1393:COIBot 1365:simple 1324:Triwbe 1265:DMacks 1250:Drmies 1105:DMacks 1101:WP:NLT 1049:DMacks 904:SKS2K6 890:DMacks 848:SKS2K6 816:DMacks 810:Nope. 733:DMacks 701:DMacks 691:is in 646:DMacks 547:DMacks 401:" and 350:DMacks 315:DMacks 224:DMacks 176:DMacks 3868:First 3154:cool! 3146:harej 2642:Tajik 2529:exist 2491:WP:OR 2370:Busta 2308:Busta 2075:dαlus 2043:(see 1988:Caceo 1849:it.-- 1421:XWiki 1417:Local 1299:dαlus 1125:Paine 1079:Paine 620:DRUOX 455:Hello 16:< 4565:talk 4537:done 4524:talk 4505:talk 4467:talk 4453:talk 4416:talk 4371:talk 4352:Talk 4348:User 4319:talk 4300:talk 4296:Rich 4262:talk 4209:talk 4142:here 4117:Leyo 4115:. -- 4093:talk 4048:talk 4028:Rich 4003:talk 3981:talk 3918:talk 3887:talk 3832:". 3805:talk 3796:only 3778:talk 3754:talk 3725:talk 3703:talk 3674:talk 3650:talk 3605:talk 3574:talk 3555:talk 3502:talk 3481:talk 3432:talk 3428:WFPM 3424:talk 3420:WFPM 3416:talk 3412:WFPM 3399:talk 3378:talk 3356:talk 3336:talk 3310:talk 3290:talk 3274:talk 3258:talk 3238:talk 3192:talk 3173:talk 3150:talk 3131:talk 3059:talk 3011:talk 2996:talk 2976:talk 2961:talk 2917:Sari 2905:talk 2890:talk 2847:talk 2793:talk 2770:talk 2746:talk 2716:talk 2701:talk 2678:talk 2662:talk 2646:talk 2628:and 2610:talk 2586:talk 2556:talk 2541:talk 2507:talk 2495:WP:V 2475:talk 2469:. -- 2449:and 2429:talk 2378:talk 2362:Done 2345:talk 2298:talk 2278:talk 2263:talk 2243:talk 2223:talk 2199:this 2184:talk 2165:talk 2130:talk 2115:talk 2092:talk 2053:talk 2037:here 2021:talk 2007:Hi. 1992:talk 1967:talk 1953:talk 1920:talk 1867:talk 1790:RFPP 1771:talk 1744:talk 1729:talk 1714:talk 1697:talk 1680:talk 1663:talk 1641:talk 1606:talk 1591:talk 1559:talk 1524:talk 1508:talk 1479:talk 1461:talk 1441:meta 1413:Link 1353:meta 1328:talk 1269:talk 1254:talk 1233:talk 1225:here 1208:talk 1202:. -- 1187:talk 1181:. -- 1165:talk 1109:talk 1053:talk 1038:talk 949:talk 941:here 908:talk 894:talk 867:talk 852:talk 832:2NE1 820:talk 812:This 800:talk 768:talk 737:talk 723:talk 705:talk 678:talk 650:talk 624:talk 551:talk 509:here 505:here 476:talk 446:talk 354:talk 339:talk 319:talk 269:talk 259:and 228:talk 209:talk 180:talk 160:talk 132:Hi, 117:talk 4534:has 4159:bio 4144:.-- 3943:are 3512:RE: 3228:to 3152:) ( 2878:not 2862:how 2517:any 2424:DGG 1904:)" 1829:ERK 1409:RSN 1155:as 1123:^) 1077:^) 1003:Axl 966:Axl 541:to 247:or 241:not 171:did 156:ran 4567:) 4507:) 4455:) 4427:— 4418:) 4373:) 4354:| 4350:| 4345:- 4321:) 4313:. 4302:) 4264:) 4229:? 4211:) 4169:) 4095:) 4050:) 4038:. 4034:, 4025:? 4005:) 3987:) 3983:• 3920:) 3906:is 3893:) 3889:• 3849:is 3837:is 3826:83 3807:) 3784:) 3780:• 3756:) 3731:) 3727:• 3705:) 3680:) 3676:• 3652:) 3611:) 3607:• 3576:) 3557:) 3528:. 3504:) 3487:) 3483:• 3434:) 3401:) 3380:) 3358:) 3338:) 3312:) 3292:) 3276:) 3260:) 3240:) 3194:) 3186:. 3175:) 3156:) 3133:) 3091:// 3061:) 3013:) 2998:) 2978:) 2963:) 2907:) 2892:) 2849:) 2799:) 2795:• 2772:) 2752:) 2748:• 2718:) 2703:) 2680:) 2664:) 2648:) 2612:) 2596:{{ 2588:) 2558:) 2543:) 2509:) 2477:) 2447:IQ 2431:) 2392:— 2380:) 2372:. 2368:→ 2347:) 2312:G6 2280:) 2265:) 2245:) 2233:Re 2225:) 2186:) 2167:) 2132:) 2117:) 2094:) 2071:Dæ 2055:) 2023:) 1994:) 1969:) 1955:) 1926:) 1922:• 1869:) 1777:) 1773:• 1746:) 1731:) 1716:) 1699:) 1682:) 1665:) 1647:) 1643:• 1608:) 1593:) 1561:) 1526:) 1510:) 1481:) 1473:. 1463:) 1447:• 1439:• 1433:de 1431:- 1429:fr 1427:- 1425:en 1415:, 1407:- 1403:- 1395:- 1391:- 1385:gs 1383:• 1379:• 1375:• 1371:- 1367:- 1363:- 1361:fr 1359:- 1357:de 1355:- 1351:- 1346:en 1330:) 1295:Dæ 1271:) 1256:) 1235:) 1210:) 1189:) 1167:) 1129:(^ 1111:) 1083:(^ 1055:) 1040:) 951:) 910:) 896:) 854:) 822:) 802:) 770:) 739:) 725:) 707:) 699:. 680:) 652:) 630:) 626:• 553:) 482:) 478:• 448:) 421:. 414:}} 408:{{ 375:A 356:) 341:) 321:) 305:) 271:) 251:. 230:) 211:) 203:. 182:) 162:) 119:) 111:-- 94:→ 64:← 4578:Σ 4563:( 4544:Σ 4527:· 4522:( 4503:( 4480:Σ 4470:· 4465:( 4451:( 4432:Σ 4414:( 4394:Σ 4369:( 4317:( 4298:( 4260:( 4207:( 4192:. 4165:/ 4161:/ 4157:/ 4155:c 4153:/ 4151:t 4149:( 4091:( 4046:( 4001:( 3979:( 3916:( 3885:( 3803:( 3776:( 3752:( 3723:( 3701:( 3697:. 3672:( 3648:( 3603:( 3572:( 3553:( 3500:( 3479:( 3430:( 3422:( 3414:( 3397:( 3376:( 3354:( 3334:( 3308:( 3288:( 3272:( 3256:( 3236:( 3190:( 3171:( 3148:( 3129:( 3115:( 3057:( 3009:( 2994:( 2974:( 2959:( 2936:5 2931:1 2903:( 2888:( 2845:( 2826:a 2824:c 2822:z 2820:a 2818:m 2791:( 2768:( 2744:( 2714:( 2699:( 2676:( 2660:( 2644:( 2608:( 2584:( 2554:( 2539:( 2505:( 2473:( 2427:( 2397:Σ 2376:( 2359:Y 2343:( 2323:Σ 2301:· 2296:( 2276:( 2261:( 2241:( 2221:( 2182:( 2163:( 2128:( 2113:( 2090:( 2051:( 2019:( 1990:( 1965:( 1951:( 1945:I 1918:( 1865:( 1769:( 1742:( 1727:( 1712:( 1695:( 1678:( 1661:( 1639:( 1604:( 1589:( 1557:( 1545:. 1522:( 1506:( 1477:( 1459:( 1326:( 1267:( 1252:( 1231:( 1206:( 1185:( 1163:( 1107:( 1051:( 1036:( 1008:¤ 971:¤ 947:( 906:( 892:( 879:. 865:( 850:( 818:( 798:( 766:( 735:( 721:( 703:( 676:( 648:( 622:( 549:( 533:→ 474:( 444:( 352:( 337:( 317:( 303:C 300:T 298:( 267:( 226:( 207:( 178:( 158:( 115:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index