User talk:DGG/Archive 0.0 Reminders

3325:

Corporation Dominique Molina Echopass Emmanuel Gregory Lemelson Ethan Bearman Fundology Game Cooks GatherSpace (company) Genius Inside Global Met Coal Corporation Go Try It On GroundWork Heel That Pain (company) Heliospectra ITelagen Inflection (company) Inigral John Uustal Jonathan Cardella Junk It! Legitmix Loyaltyworks (company) MarketLive Max Cartier MediCortex Mike Macadaan Misty Lown Neal Creighton, Sr Network Capital NewYorkStay ONEHOPE Oren Laurent PCN Technology (company) PeopleSmart Pneuron PressPad RepairClinic.com ResumeBear Review Boost (company) SJ (musician) Security Innovation SocialSoft Steven M. Neil Sweetcouch TableTopics Talk:Brendan Wallace Talk:Confio Talk:CrowdOptic Talk:David Kiger Talk:Dominique Molina Talk:Ethan Bearman Talk:Fundology Talk:Genius Inside Talk:Kevin R. Foote Talk:Legitmix Talk:Max Cartier Talk:Mike Macadaan Talk:NewYorkStay Talk:ONEHOPE Talk:Oren Laurent Talk:RepairClinic.com Talk:SJ (musician) Talk:Steven M. Neil Talk:Tee Ashira Talk:Tom Dyson Talk:Tsebo Outsourcing Group Talk:WorldEscape Tee Ashira Telly (website) Tom Dyson Tom Hoban (entrepreneur) Tom Kemp (entrepreneur) Tsebo Outsourcing Group Virool Waterfield Group WorldEscape Zipwhip

4722:

diagnostic of either autobiography or promotionalism. It's generally of very little interest to an ordinary reader, unless the person is famous or the career extremely unusual. The person it does interest is of course the subject, and the only source also can only be the subject, who can pretty much say whatever they care to about this. (It's also one of the very few possible ways of fleshing out a minimal article--the other possibilities are generally hobbies, minor charities, schooling details, and family history--and a disproportionate discussion of any of this is also diagnostic of autobio or promotionalism). Another diagnostic sign is unnecessary see alsos or linking, both present here; similarly diagnostic is a list of too many professions in the infobox. We're too focused on whether or not a subject should have an article; we need to think more, how much of an article should there be?

3469:..." Second, the attempt to list the executives of all the divisions, and the very long list of services in the infobox, all of which are totally routine for an advertising agency. The article was nominated for deletion by a reliable editor, and any admin here would unquestionably have deleted it. Even were this rewritten, you have no usable references according to the WP:GNG. The AdAge material is not visible, though I will try to find a place to see it. (if it is widely available in subscribing libraries, it's usable, if it's more restrictive, it isn't--but it in any case needs a specific link or reference. and should give a sourced quotation. ) Everything else is a mention or a press release. If you are the largest agency in the country, it should be possible to write an article, but you need to first find good independent news and magazine sources that say it. 2043:] are appropriate--dignitaries meeting each other are PR, as are group photos of the participants. They may make good PR, and good content for the organizational websites, but they add nothing that cannot be said in words as far as the encyclopedic purpose is concerned. Yes, it's important to show the soldiers from the two countries working together I agree with you on that--it adds a demonstrative element beyond what words can do, but perhaps once per article is sufficient, and also those few that show actual military joint activities, rather than just training. Excessive use of what would be a good thing if used in small quantities is a sign of promotionalism--saying the same point over and over again. But, as I mentioned, since nobody owns an article, neither you nor I need decide this. 4654:

guess. And in addition to scanning the ones about to be deleted I sometimes check the deleted ones also, to check anything obvious, though it's much slower.Even keeping anything with any possibilities, about 90% at least will get deleted, which greatly reduces the problem for the second round. I suggest it would be best rewritten by using the material there and starting over, since it is indeed rather confused. The online history of the group is a decent source, tho not independent, and since they seem to have won a national prize, they are probably notability --there should be newspaper sources for that. There must be books on barbershop, and they should mention it. If not, it'll be deleted 6 months or so from now, and no harm is done. Anyway, that's the way I'm now thinking about these.

2804:

the original language used.) And it certainly must not be used in the section heading.: we do not make moral judgements, and through things are reported as there are, summaries must ber as absolutely neutral as possible. that goes for edit summaries also: loaded words should never be used there. And we consider the very word "allegations" to be non-neutral. And the entire section should be summarized, to avoid disproportionate weight. If negative information is reported disproportionately or loaded words used more than necessary, it gives the impression of holding a grudge, not of NPOV writing. It is my responsibility to prevent anyone from using Knowledge for such a purpose, just as it is to prevent it being used to cover-up serious matters.

465:

expansive. They cover a great deal more than dishonesty. At the very least the phrase should be added "when they arise in matters that are before the Arb Com."-- you may think that's implied, but if something can be misinterpreted, so it will be. Anyway, do you think that in the academic world charges of dishonesty are handled all that well in general? The questions that arise in the homeopathy article need a knowledge of how the medical literature work, and others will deal with other questions. To the extent I understand them its not a question of being dishonest, but a question of whether something is being used in somewhat beyond what the source indicates--essentially a matter of proper weight.

5940:

such an index without doing more is not acceptable--it's like adding articles from an index of towns without adding some sort of identification. I think it has been definitely established that describing a species is sufficient for notability,. If someone should insist I can fit it within the GNG, because there are always subsequent works on the group of organisms discussing the species. (I used to make similar arguments regularly, before WP:PRIOF was so definitively accepted) The effort spent in an AfD would be better spent in doing the work. The relevant task force can be asked to do it if the orginal ed. doesn;t. Botany is not my specialty, but I can give it a try in a week or two.

1199:

but can not be verified; there have also been many articles on such that are not notable, or in some cases even non-existent, and can not be verified for that reason. It can be genuinely hard to tell. As for rewriting, persistence is the key--my advice generally i to wait for one or two more sources; many things do work the third or 4th time Like many people here, I have my own list of articles that ought to be able to stay, but haven't been able to, and a similar list of ones that ought to go, and are unaccountably kept. Any group working the way we do is going to be inconsistent. Your plan to work on other things in the meanwhile is the rational one.

6395:

as I did not include the author and the complete name of the article when I cited. I also understand that being a vice-presinde of an organziation is not notable, but being a president of a global organization is considerend a notable information? As he will become president in 2016 because elected Senior vice president automaticaly becomes its president of the future mandate. Would not this be a reason enough to have this profile now? As regards the conflict of interest, I transparently showed my identity. I work for the companby and I thought it would be usefull to have this profile before an important international congress taking place next week.

6241:

ideas in a chronological history) , but it wouldn't solve the problem of citing. Routine facts about the history of a university can be taken from their web site, but this is overly interpretive. I took a few dates from there, but one of the dates was hard to interpret and I'd need to check with other sources. The problem extends to other articles--those about the founder and related entities. They all share the same text. This is a research project, and I do not really have the time for it What I can do , and routinely do for universities, is to expand the academic courses section a little. I'll wait for you , though.

5020:. So I suppose there could be an article on "Investigative methods of heuristics", which I think is what was intended. The "Heuristics in judgment and decision making" article seems basically like a more technical presentation of the material in the "Heuristics" article, I do not think it a very good title but I can not immediately think of a better. I'm going to remove the prod and change the title to "Investigative methods in heuristics", and put a note essentially copying what I said here on the article talk p. this discussion. I may try to edit it myself, but they probably could do it better. 1628:

it perhaps mean that it's flexible to accommodate different concepts? And what is "perspective alignment in individuals" ? I think I know what you may have in mind, but I'd have to guess. 3/most of the semantics section seems standard concepts, not particular to this scheme 3a/ Ditto for the sections on ".1 Multi-perspective Situational Modelling" and especially "Structured brainstorming" 4./The "Example is a tutorial, and not appropriate content 5/and most important, I continue to see no references at all to show that anyone except the people who developed it think it important.

1168:. i wish they wouldn't make statements that are factually incorrect. Tom Star said it was a hoax, and then looked like a hoax, then notable but not progressing. ALR went to mediation, and ignored the mediation suggestions. I wrote the thing twice; i doubt that any article would be acceptable. Now as to speculating about motivation: either it's a mindset, and commanding the writing of others, and deleting when frustrated with the conduct of others, or an active censorship to maintain secrecy through obscurity effort; it dosn't really matter since the outcome is the same. 4822:

has been to write the article on the book, which I think a poor decision unless almost nothing is known about the author. A person may always go on to do additional things (in particular, write additional books), but opportunity to expand the article is very rare for a book (it might for example get made into a film, or attract a censorship controversy) . In this case a few other things are known about the author, and there is one somewhat important publication in addition.) So I think there's enough to justify the article on the author, merging in the material on the book.

4718:

1978:. WP requires that all material be either in the public domain or licensed under a free license, by which we mean a CC-BY-SA license, which irrevocably gives everyone in the world the right to copy, reuse, and modify the material. Permission for WP to use it is not sufficient--WP is a 💕, which intends its content to be used freely for any purpose, even commercial, as long as attribution is given and the material remains freely licensed. Any use of material not under such a license is limited to brief quotations. We do not permit any compromise with this. 818:

doubt that the subject is notable and that there is plenty of reliable source. If it is presented as science, it's problematic, but, then again, lots of stuff is presented as science that actually is very poorly understood, there are peer-reviewed journals in the field of psychiatry and psychotherapy, filled with articles that are basically informed speculation. And, by the way, the techniques worked, and still work, many of them. But it's a very difficult field to do controlled research in. The hot place right now, as far as my own experience would suggest, is

1931:. The most common beginning words of the titles of such books is however, A guide to information sources in (subject), In any case, it can be much expanded, and I will do so: I know of over a hundred, many in multiple editions. Perhaps it should be List of guides to information sources, because dozens of them are notable individually--there will be substantial reviews for most of them; or perhaps not, because there are some that should be included but may not be, and, more important, I don't immediately want to write all the articles. 4982:, meaning that even I will put it someone will still AfD it in a day or two. Its a pointless risk. I do however would like to thank you for your hard work making such individuals notable, because sometimes they don't have bios even on their Universities websites (that's why I skip on it and move on), or they do, and its in foreign language (I speak and understand Russian and English). Sometimes I might use Google Translate, but that's not much, its only gives me a glimpse of certain news agency that is native to that region.-- 5271: 4040: 2011:. We do not absolutely prohibit it, but we do examine such edits very closely for objectivity. As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without COI; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. 5813:

a news item or a tech article that interests me (a lot of tech articles, the reason why I have done a lot pages on tech startups), I start doing research. Knowledge is usually where I turn first, and when the bigger names associated with the news I'm reading isn't there, I do the work myself. I tend to dig as deep as possible, finding out any details surrounding the subject, which I think has lead to my being noticed as to supplying perhaps too much information on my pages.

6188:

there was indeed a some things yesterday in my life and I didn't get to it; I may not today either, but I certainly expect to by Tuesday. (possibly in cases like this I should submit, mark as reviewing, and then rewrite.), Frankly, I only bother with the whole AfC overhead in order to order not to disrupt whatever stats & categories the system produces; otherwise, I would just move to mainspace and then edit out all the AfC-specific stuff, or edit and then move.

6144:

831:

resources. Whether or not bilateral stimulation is important (other forms of BL stim are now used, perhaps more commonly than eye movement) is controversial, and it's entirely possible that any other hypnotic technique would work, in the hands of a skilled practitioner. Skilled at what? At developing rapport and trust. (Remember the stereotypical hypnotic induction, the hypnotist holding up a pendulum, or moving a finger back and forth in front of the subject?). --

4789:. The refusal to answer justify edits, the IDHT. The overall pattern of disruption that's making collaborative editing much more difficult. This is a conduct problem, not a content problem. I thought that perhaps if there was consensus that Ms. Lutz had a true COI (i.e. an affiliation), then Ms. Lutz might back off (whether by being forced to observe COI guidelines, or voluntarily). Do you think this is better suited to another forum such as ANI or RFC/U? -- 5901: 4169:

The guy is quite a case. He is easy to google, but it's the articles from well known sources are hard to track. It's easier to find those sources (or the leads to them) in his own videos (since they feature clips). How can you link articles from wikis in other languages?? I tried, but when I open the wiki text of an article to see how it's done I can't find it. When I'm done with whatever I do (and if I do), where do I present my case for review??--

6123: 419:

needs consensus, you are adopting for the demands of a single case the total opposite, calling for the selection of a small body to do the same, and with the most drastic penalties over anyone who departs from it, and no power of appeal from it. Well, I hope we will consider ourselves left with at least the power to abolish it. Before doing something like this, you need a general discussion with the community. I'm surprised at you.

2037:. Actually, I noticed that photograph to which you might be referring, in the California-Ukraine article . I noticed it as a very good photograph, though there is nothing to indicate the field as being in the Ukraine But there is no need for the duplicative photographs of soldiers practicing treating casualties in the Illinois-Poland article--onei s sufficient; and I do not think purely ceremonial photographs such as 5593:

do not think personally I would have approved it, but people can differ about things like that, and when they do , speedy is not appropriate. My question now is whether to try to fix it or send it to AfD. I see almost no independent sources (the citations are written in such a way as to obscure that). I'm as concerned about the services section & the overdetailed infobox, but I suppose both can be dealt with.

5402:

section in that article about the company. From the point of view of an encyclopedia, that's the best way. From the pt of view of getting maximum publicity, it might be otherwise. The accepted standard for an article being accepted is a 50% chance of passing AfD. It might pass. I'm not going to accept articles that are technically justified but I think inappropriate. What other people may do is up to them.

4842:

all commercial systems is unlikely, but it might still be widely used 3/In this field. conference papers can be as important as journal articles, 4/The key point is therefore, whether Orun's work is widely recognized, and this is best seen by whether it is cited. There are several scientists by that name, but Google Scholar seems to list this particular individual as AB Orun. The citations are

1041:

become much more widespread in the subsequent 8 years, though usually with the second meaning. The true evidence is job advertisements, (though I filled out just yesterday yet another survey on what people called themselves). Blended librarian is an utterly unsuccessful neologism which seems to have been used by one person only, &I regard the wp article as essentially promotional.

5850:

they would be unwilling to discuss. But in general the first step would be reducing it to size (I've made a minimal start at this--I think this is usually best done stepwise, explaining each step.) ; it will probably be reverted. If so the second step should be nominating it for AfD on the grounds that it is excessively promotional and unfixable, and must be deleted and started over.

4850:,cited 70 times. None of his other work is highly cited, and most of the work in his CV appears to be in relatively minor places. 5/One major discovery is nonetheless sufficient, but whether this is sufficiently major, I cannot tell, as I am not an expert in the subject. AfD is therefore the way to determine it, but it isn't a question of good faith, just an ordinary one of notability 3067:

Their web page calls them a "global think tank"; such sources as I can find call them a consultancy. I suspect they might perhaps be best characterized as an advocacy organization. Their claimed connection with the RSA seems to be that they were originally inspired by a talk there by a distinguished person. The section of "membership" is link spam. See also the article on

2024:

relevant government units, and do not show importance. There should however be newspaper articles available for all of these, but they must b independent, not essentially copies of press releases. Additionally, such sources can show undisputed facts, but they can not be used for conclusions, such as the success of the programs, which must be shown by outside sources.

4376:. Thank you very much. Everyone is welcomed to play with my sandbox, specially if they are going to make contribs as good as yours. What do you mean "salted"? (No, literally - I'm not familiar with the term). I tried with the templates for references, but I kept getting them wrong. Do you think the sandbox is ready to become an article? What else should I edit?-- 4954:

the most cited paper, and the current position--not just the place but the title. And find their university website. Google alone does rather well for this, or find the university web page & search from there. This gives other people a chance to easily expand the article, and gives you a start when you get back to it. And add that "underconstruction" tag!

1716:

depend upon you, but upon the community. Once I get the material, and if I think it will support an article, I will do what I can, because I think you might well be notable--but that won't help unless there are sources to show it according to our rules, because I am not the one to decide if the article gets kept, nor is anything kept because someone

5419:

either case. And, more importantly, while I personally I think the company and the product are separately notable, I don't think a merged page would do either topic harm. But that leaves the page in an odd bind: you can't approve it because it should be merged, and it can't be merged because it isn't in the mainspace. Is there any way around this? —

796:

leave it to others t pick out the worst duplications, but I'll support the merges. Dealing with fringe social science is very much harder than science, because the boundaries are not as clear. I think there is real social science, and am convinced that this subject is far outside it, but it's not as easy to make a convincing argument.

1176:. verifiable material is supressed from wiki. this philosophical conflict between inclusionist and exclusionist, really has no end. i conclude that i don't need the heartburn here. i can tilt at windmills closer to home in the flesh. i was serious when i said to ALR that i can provide the public protests similar to those at 826:, where traditional therapeutic techniques have be very ineffective, but ... it's brief, unknown mechanism, and could destabilize a whole industry. Current treatment for PTSD without using EMDR might involve a visit a week, at upwards of $ 100 per visit, for years. EMDR has been known to dramatically reverse PTSD symptoms in 3763:. The personal communications are another matter. There are two ways to use them; best is for someone to publish a conventional book using them, that can then be cited; as an alternative, if they are in public archive and have been summarized properly in detail in a finding aid on he web or in print, that can be cited. 4550:

the circumstances, there should be no need for another AfD unless something is added that addresses substantially the concerns, If it is re-created again, let me know, and if it's no better I will block further re-creation--if she does eventually do something notable, then Requests for Undeletion will restore it.

3755:

overwhelmingly the better known term, which is a criterion we normally use. However, I'm not particularly concerned about it for the moment--articles are easy to move, and this should be discussed, not settled between the two of us. (As for titles, for your present title we would normally drop the Inc. from the end.)

6394:

Thank you for your input. It is very much appreciate it. I understand what you say about the style, but I do not understand about the sources. There aren't any blogs or online newsletters. Most of them are online versions of business newspapers and magazines in Romania. I may have been wrong about it

6240:

It's hard to tell who copied whom. As far as I know the material is reasonably accurate though considerably ideological--and quite incomplete for the later period, making it only a very rough paraphrase, to the extent that none of it would be copyvio (It's a little difficult to change the series of

6187:

when I come upon an article I intend to fix and improve, if I'm sure I can get to it immediately, I sometimes accept and then rewrite--but I only do that if I can do the editing immediate. In this case, I wasn't quite sure, so I did my alternatively technique, submit and then rewrite; In this case

6143:

5939:

If he is on the list of abbreviations, then there are species; my understanding is that the abbreviations are not assigned otherwise. It's just a matter of doing the work. I will ask the ed. who submitted the article, because it wasn't good practice to do such a skimpy job of it: entering names from

5849:

by precedent. members of the City Council in NYC and Chicago are generally notable. So the problem is the excessive length & detail of the article. As the ed. is not a single purpose editor for her or the group, but one with general interests and many excellent contrtibutions, I would not assume

5795:

After you do Moon, take a look at the others. I am deliberately not nominating many of them for deletion yet, in order to first gauge the feeling of the community and give you a chance to respond, as you are doing . I have deliberately not started fixing the fixable ones yet, to give you a chance to

5393:

Reworded some phrases more straightforwardly: for example, replaced "the company began turning over the management of Titanium's desktop application toolkit to the community" with "Appcelerator...decided to end development of Titanium's desktop application toolkit" and replaced "Appcelerator acquired

5234:

As for categories, I can not find that we ever had a category Logistics Companies of New Zealand. Are there any other such companies? If not, we usually don't make a category for a single company, but because there is a possibility that there will subsequently be articles on other companies, I can do

5015:

history. Or "musicology" as distinct from practical instruction in music. But there are also such valid topics as "Methods of X" -- I've taught a course on "biological methods" which was devoted to a orientation for beginning grad students of research techniques of various sorts, and there are many

4751:

The FDU article was a special case, being in my field of interest, and in an area where I specially look for problems of promotionalism and COI, & know the pattern well enough to judge them. -Personally I though the issues in both fairly clear at even a quick reading --I only went into the detail

4549:

there is nothing in the new article that was not either present in the old one or mentioned at the AfD. Ref 4 in the nerw article links to a page saying she wrote a novel, but I can't find it in WorldCat. I have therefore listed it for G4, as it is better that some other admin confirm what I saw. In

3472:

Our current best practice for people acting as press agents for a company is to submit the article through WP:Articles for creation, which gives people here a chance to review it. The rules about promotional articles, though, apply there also. Try rewriting it neutrally, with good sources, but do it

1252:

well i don't know what you mean by sound enough. when they delete it as a hoax, when it isn't; when they delete it as unauthoritative, and unencyclopedic when it is, i can only reach the conclusion that no article however good would be allowed to stay. i shouldn't invoke the wrath of god: how about

817:

and Bandler and Grinder's study of how well-known therapists actually did their work, as distinct from the generally very unscientific theories they often formulated as rationalizations, were pioneering efforts in the field. I wouldn't call it science, exactly, it's more like engineering. There is no

413:

you say it is intended to cover all subjects--I think that's a total perversion of the spirit of wikipedia, and I sincerely hope the community is persuaded to reverse you and take back the power. What you are essentially proposing to do is establish a small board of censors with a veto power over the

6300:

nor am I sure. Some of the various Swiss business schools and their faculty are difficult to judge. I think this needs a more general discussion, and I am trying to decide whether to send to MfD, or accept and send to AfD. It will get more attention at AfD, but doing it that way is a rather unusual

6226:

web page uses links to Knowledge articles as the article did. It might have been copied from Knowledge (making it an unreliable source) although it is unattributed. Some of the content in the article is more than a decade old so it's possibly older than the AMU webpage. I'm going on holiday tomorrow

6183:

because I am in the process of rewriting a small amount of possibly copyvio material, and adding details of her books, and I then intend to accept the article. Since she meets the standard of WP:PROF Criterion 5, there is a very great likelihood that it will pass AfD, & this is a type of article

6139:

5812:

Sure, I will rework the Moon page and make my way through the others. As far as my process for choosing topics, there's no secret there. Right now, I'm taking care of small child at home, and find I have a bit more than the usual time to spend online during the day, so I read a lot. When I'm reading

5620:

I looked at the article in the deWP. I see the article there is more up-to-date, but otherwise similar to what you submitted here. What you need to do is write so as to emphasize less the virtues of being able to contribute to a good environmental cause when using the service, and making much less

5010:

the current title is indeed somewhat confusing, and it is not easy to separate the topics discussed in that article from heuristics in general. The study of X is usually simply called X. There are of course some distinctions, such as historiography, but historiography is not the study of history but

4759:

every major contributor to be motivated by some form of COI, whether as personal advocacy or paid editing can make little difference. I dislike our entire current approach to this--trying to identify individual editors and their organizational affiliations is relatively unimportant. What matters is

4168:

Well, I'd be losing peer help. But if there's no other way around it (seriously, nothing??) I guess that's what I'll have to do. Originally I wanted to request the article and maybe help providing some sources. Is there any way to get that sort of deal? Or maybe some sort of "trial article" dynamic.

3758:

With respect to the article contents itself, the main problem is the reliance upon archival sources. It is expected here that readers are able to check the material in an article, and we normally refer to only published material. (Archives are mentioned, buy putting in an external link or a footnote

3728:

It will be a little tricky, as it's a very experienced and generally trustworthy editor--and someone I know personally to be reliable. We all make mistakes. See a little above at Integrationalism for a really stupid one of my own. And I may perhaps be more sensitive to detecting PR, because most of

3416:

This is not an unusual situation for professional societies. Personally, I'd simply include them all, if they cover a wide enough field & are the leading national societies. This is an area where the GNG is useless. Reliable information about them is typically only found in their own newsletters

3066:

moved. Check also earlier versions--I undeleted the entire history. I'll mention that a key problem with the article is the unsourced claims of being exceptionally important. The sources in the article, as said at the AfD are either self published or the speeches of their founder or mere mentions.

2951:

seems reasonable--just go ahead. I will look at some of the more extensive articles and do some trimming. (and some splitting--they include the bios of the Directors of the various institutes, but these people are sufficiently notable that they should be covered separately). I suggest you copy this

1860:

I responded on the article talk page. Please remember that anyone can edit an article, not just you and me. When I edit, I do so not an administrator with any special authority, but just an editor of some experience in knowing what will make an article that the community will consider acceptable.

1749:

I continue to see no sources about the organization, just some reports it has issued; the article still appears mainly promotional. I removed some of the worst of it, unsuitable even for user space. As I have no COI, & as it might be notable, when I have a chance in a week or two I may try to

1737:

sorry, DGG - I was kidding about the being fired - humor doesn't transfer well online. We absolutely are not hoping to be on Knowledge for business purposes, but we truly believe that we are notable and interesting, and worth folks knowing about. You certainly seem to have a lot to handle. I went

1316:

which in a general article contains a quote from someone at the institute. But the article is being deleted as promotional: 3 different admins have now agreed. Most of the article talks about how it all the vice presidents, and the locations of the various buildings. If you can find and post here

1198:

covert installations are always a problem here, as are elite organizations that shun publicity, secret fraternities, businesses that don't deal much with the public, people who work in not very visible capacities, and such like. There have been a number of articles on such that are probably notable,

996:

I'll look at it again--and probably post something on the website. Assuming the article is a reliable source, and the key fact that would make it so is the comment from the editor of the Haworth journal, the question is whether a two journal sample is representative. Every commercial publisher has

890:

I think spread of printing is the better title. The printing press is a machine. The operation of using it is printing. Are we concerned primarily with the existence of the machine, or its use? Your comments about Asian printing are however correct, so the title could better be changed to the spread

5791:

around the only actual item clearly making for notability, his book, eliminating the promotional links and other puffery. Second, & only if you choose to, perhaps you can explain to me the basis on which you choose your topics. (That's entirely optional on your part -- nobody here has the right

5592:

I have removed the tag. My apologies, for though we do not have a rule, I think it is usually against the spirit of WP:CSD to speedy an article approved by a reliable WPedian, unless something like undetected copyvio is found. Even if it gets much worse, it can be reverted to the approved state. I

5437:

You have found one of the problems in AfC reviewing--it's easier to concentrate on the details. As for the merging, there are several ways, all of them non-obvious. I'm going to approve it, saying I'm approving it for merging. Then I leave it to you to merge the content. Say you are merging in the

4841:

I see no reason to think it bunk, but rather the question is notability, whether Orun has in fact discovered a widely used method. 1/. I see no books-- no.1 is a paper in a conference publication, and International GIS sourcebook is just a chapter in one. 2/ the claim that the sensor is used in

4821:

is technically notable because of the reviews, according to WP:BOOK, which is a looser criterion than almost anything else in WP. In the case of an author of one notable book, and nothing else of significance, we have a choice of writing the article on the book or the author. Sometimes the decision

4717:

4653:

I've undeleted it, which should be good for 6 months. My current principle is to keep from G13 anything that has possibilities. I started thinking that I would keep only the ones I myself wished to work on, but that was before Hasteurbot started going so fast. There's no time to think now, just to

3895:

I think the reason he came here is because for at least one of them, I had removed the speedy G5 tag, and JBW deleted it anyway. The situation with these is uncertain and there is no real solution, but as I understand G5 we may but do not have to speedy delete the article (I almost always do delete

3766:

That's what our guidelines are. I didn't write them, but I must tell you what the consensus is about them. Remember also you don't own the article. If someone else should want to merge material and get consensus for it, they can do so. I always think the most important thing is article content and

3468:

wrote are first, the use of extravagantly promotional language: its "thousands of global employees create ideas that move brands, products and people from nearly 40 offices in 33 countries. ... delivers innovative communications strategies that drive business results ... creativity is world renown,

3428:

The best way to cover these, as I think you suspect, is to write an article on the series of conferences, or to make the main content of the article the series of conferences. We are so lamentably weak in doing these for many of the most important international conferences that this article is not

3396:

Carl Stokes (Baltimore) is better. . They all need some edits to remove adjectives of praise. And the legislative history should include only bills that they are actually primarily responsible for, with a 3rd party source to prove it, not one of several sponsors. Concentrate on factual things, such

3341:

yes, there is nothing more amusing that taking a statistical report from an organization and finding the holes in it. I used to get library statistics and do this for my class--nice to have another opportunity. Unlike then, I have other things to do, or I could have kept going for pages. Academic

3290:

yes, there are problems in how to deal with this and the similar not quite certain cases in the group. There are two possible ways of thinking about them: In the past, we have usually tended to AGF; at present, the extent of the problem is inclining us otherwise. My own feeling is still to use G11

3232:

works dealing with the topic of elementary and secondary educational curriculums. They seem prominent enough that I would expect them to be easily findable, though not perhaps online. The main article seems to have some relevant material that could be used. If it truly hard to find outside their

1988:

As I mentioned, material published by the uS Government is in the public domain, and so is material published by a certain few individual US states, such as California. (This does not apply to photographs or other material they reprint from elsewhere, which may already be under copyright). Material

1654:

Thank you for the feedback. I will attempt to address these points. Regarding 5/, there are references to articles published in bptrends and trizjournal, which are both respected publications. Do these not count as independent authorities saying this is important? If not, what kind of references do

1627:

well, 1/you overdid the detail a little. 2/the first paragraph is unclear: what is "situation improvement" ? I don't think it's an English phrase 2a/ much of the rest is unclear also, such as "power of expression is derived from the interpretation of the models made by the people using it." Does

1543:

I agree the title is not right-- but it's more specific than anti-scottish sentiment--there is a true overlap. I have not yet thought of a better title, or I would have suggested it The material I picked was from the first 20 gbook hits, there seemd to be thousands of others. I wonder what's is the

1325:

published reliable sources but not press releases, or material derived from press releases, that talks about the work of the institute, I will restore the article and rewrite it for you so it is not promotional. It will take extensive rewriting, not normal editing, and I do not want to do it if it

962:

curious. There's nothing i see that should have caused it--it's not even a name problem, because they list his father. I suggest you take a look at some comparable articles for other Ambassadors and see what you find. And try Yahoo and some other search engines also. Then I suggest asking at the

657:

I've started rewording the main one. But db-a7 cannot be used for schools, so remove that from the table--they need prod. You also need to separate out the three different possibilities of no assertion of notability, no references to prove notability, and spam. Additionally, the term vanity is very

446:

I don't think you're quite correct here; it's perfectly normal, in my experience, for charges of academic dishonesty to be heard before (or appealed to) a single, cross-disciplinary group. The proposed SAB is essentially intended to be a Knowledge parallel to such proceedings (minus the imposition

422:

I can not see how any small group can possibly take such responsibilities and prepare to discharge them honestly. There's nowhere where a small commission has that sort of universal power across all subjects--there are always a large number of editors, divided into subject committees. The only role

61:

Hi, thanks for your thoughtful reply. There seems to be a lot of hostility and misunderstanding around this issue, so I hope we can reach a satisfactory conclusion. If I go for my MLIS, I'll do the UW's distance-learning program, since I don't really want to move to Seattle. It sounds like a lot of

5249:

Now, do you have any good sources that say what you just said about the significance? That's the sort of material we need. I don;t think most of the user will realize the significance unless it's pointed out to them, and we can't say it on the basis of your own original analysis, even if it seems

5213:

What pages do you think should be there? The company is large enough we might want to go down one level for clarity, but not beyond that. If we agree, I can do the merge. I think the larger articles can be still clear if written so each company name--especially the overall name-- is written only

4953:

the first & 3rd seem notable ; I need to check the 2nd further. But you can't blame people for not seeing it, because citations in GS are not the formal standard of notability , tho they do tend strongly to indicate it. I see you've been trying to add additional info. Try as a minimum to add:

4721:

A reason for hesitation is the apparent promotionalism. The very decision to write two articles here is so characteristic of promotional writing that I treat it as a diagnostic sign. The elaborate discussion of how an individual happened to get interested in starting out in their field is also

3324:

4Cabling Aasted American Writers and Artists Inc. Amvona Bizible Brendan Wallace Brosix (Company) Bunndle CHMB (company) Campus Apartments Certified Disaster Recovery Engineer Chris Hobart ClassDojo Cleeng Confio CrowdOptic DDC Advocacy David Kiger David Schwedel (entrepreneur) Digital Prospectors

2803:

The matter must be included, but it can be done a little more subtly than you did it, as I shall demonstrate there. Among the techniques for doing this is use the word once in the article as a quotation; it need not be repeated. (And we'd need the quote not just in English translation, but in

1715:

Anyone paid to put entries in Knowledge who is paid by results is inevitably going to be disappointed; we almost always remove such articles. Nor do organizations "join" wikipedia; rather, individuals edit on topics that interest them. Whether or not you have a page, and what it says, does not

1040:

cybrarian is now standard; digital librarian was just become standard in 01 with an ambiguity between a person who was concerned with the use of (prebuilt) electronic resources (like myself) or a person who was concerned with the production (and secondarily the use) of digital collections; It has

916:

yes there are problem--I will follow up. These library consortia sometimes are just a purchasing arrangement, Sometimes have other roles & are important. We need some standardized way of dealing with them From the available ghits, it indicates this is just a non-notable purchasing arrangement,

489:

Well, perhaps. But, as the remedy says, "The precise manner in which the Board will... conduct its operations will be determined with appropriate community participation". The remedy is a general statement of intent, not an exhaustive policy regarding how the SAB will operate in practice; that's

5418:

Interesting. I'm surprised to hear you have notability objections; I thought you were concerned mainly with point-of-view, style, and so forth. Since you ask, from the standpoint of publicity, it really makes no difference whether there are two articles or one—the information would be the same in

4226:

Well, it is still a weak baby, but the sandbox is here. I still have no clue on how to tie the articles from other wikipedias. I started with the Swedish article and added information as second hand sources allowed me. I think I could go on looking for more stuff of the sort, but in my experience

3705:

I appreciate you are doing that. You might send a friendly note to the AfC reviewer (time consuming, I know) explaining promotional language. Many of the AfC reviewers have taken heat recently for declining articles with reliable sources, so momentum may have swung the other direction. All the

3211:

OK...if you do have time, it would be helpful if you can point to a few exemplary and specific issues. People have sometimes asked for more criticism integrated into the article, for example, but we need to find reliable sources to draw this from (blogs and personal websites not really qualifying

2023:

A Knowledge article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. All or almost all the sources in the articles are from the

1710:

tell them that they have no business pressuring you, because it is not under your control. We are not an advertising medium where the end result depend upon your diligence. What you have said about getting paid on the basis of your success in getting the article in wikipedia is a clear indication

418:

articles. For it does affect all the content--the sourcing is in practice what determines what content is included. You are in one moment totally reversing the basic power structure here--after years of saying that arb com will not involve itself with content, and that this remains something that

4784:

reassurance that Knowledge is an independently written encyclopedia that isn't directly corrupted by money and special interests. This is especially true in the political sphere. In any case, this is an aside. Ultimately the problem from my personal perspective isn't Ms. Lutz's bias, which I can

795:

sorry I missed it. I have long felt a considerable degree of sympathy with the noms views, and am delighted to find that others agree at least in part. Of course, as you and others said, deleting the whole batch is ridiculous, but I would certainly hope for a certain amount of condensation. I'll

464:

If its intended with that narrow a purpose, you might want to reword it accordingly, for that's not how it reads to me. Authority to examine "complaints regarding the use of sources in Knowledge" is alarmingly broad. And the 3 numbered circumstances in where it is proposed to be used are quite

5401:

Looking at not the details but the basic problem, the company seems to be known for one product only and its extensions, and I don't really think it's justified to have two articles. About half the existing article is really about Titanium and could be merged in--the rest could be used as a new

5109:

Sure. As I said, I can do the basics of putting the general sketch into idiomatic English. I have only an ordinary graduate student's knowledge of German, but I can do that much, and I like the exercise. I will try to to get the technical vocabulary hopelessly wrong, butorganizational names are

4145:

There have been so many previous deletions, that the best thing to do would be to go to Deletion Review. I suggest you make a talk page draft first, with the new references that you have found included. Then make your case, and be sure to mention the articles in the other WPs. If you can make a

3420:

The afc as submitted should have been deleted immediately before G13 got to it as promotional and mostly copyvio--it's essentially a republication of their objectives and a list of officers. Web sites need to be read carefully: I notice their claim is not to be the largest Canadian organization

2030:

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective

4467:

full answer forthcoming, probably this evening. This topic field is not my specialty , and I need to check a number of things some information before I can give you advice. And it will be only advice, challenged actions at WP are ultimately determined by the community, not individuals, and the

4193:

You wont lose help. I'll help you. More later. The references are in the *text* of the other language article usually, not in the references section; If you find them just copy them as they are to the corresponding part of your text, and add a translation of the title. But I will take a look

3572:

Understand. Google scholar gives a lot of evidence of the contribution of the Myklestad Method with over 200 references to its use from 1946 to 2013. I'll be out on travel for 10 days or so but will provide additional documentation on the other points when I return. Thanks for the constructive

4343:

And I've now turned a redlink blue by changing the initial to "I" instead of "İ". If you see a redlink which looks as if it ought to be blue, it can be worth doing a bit of a search to find the article at a slightly variant title (people with or without middle initials, or a Bill/William-type

830:

the original clinical trials did that. But I haven't followed recent research in the field. The connection with NLP? Well, NLP was largely rooted, when used for therapy, in the inner resources for change that already exist in the patient, and the EMDR techniques are similar in awakening those

3754:

It seems to me all the current material on the light would fit very well into your article, and could always be expanded later if someone wanted to do more on the technology--at present it isn't on any more technical a level than yours. I think the article should go under the light, which is

5156:

I've been in contact with the subject of the article. Apparently, he's been able to find the reference (proof) he needs. I do not have a copy of the article containing the links-- finding them was a tedious task. Are you able to reproduce the deleted article or email it to me, links and

3896:

such articles, but a few are worth rescuing). In a situation like that, it is wrong for any one admin to insist on imposing his view across the board, after other make an opposite decision. The Wheel-warring definition makes this not wheel-warring, but I think it comes pretty close.

812:

I happened to see this, I came here for another reason, and I'm under voluntary restriction, but .... I assume this won't be controversial and that it will be welcome. I became aware of and studied NLP for a few years (through reading and practice, not with an NLP practitioner.)

967:. Of course, what Google does is known to be impenetrable from outside, and, after all, our purpose is not to provide a feed of articles to them. Still it's curious. We did change some talk pages so they would not be indexed, but it should absolutely not have affected articles. 2895:

the articles there certainly still need work: classic promotional institutional pages, in many cases, (much probably copied, and needs ref to the sources, though it US-PD) and overly brief summaries in others. Perhaps if its just the two of us we could simply divide them up.

4725:

My recommendation then, is a merge/redirect on the book, and a drastic trim on the author. My experience is that when this is done, if it is reverted, then it does indicate a stubborn promotional purpose rather than just a misunderstanding of WP, and then it's time for AfD.

447:

of sanctions, which will continue to be done by the Committee based on the recommendations of the SAB); it's not meant to be a body for deciding content, in other words, but a body for ruling on whether some editor has been intellectually dishonest in their use of sources.

1504: 4307:). As I said when I mentioned the article here at first, I'm neutral about the content but was just keen to ensure that if we had an article it was at, or linked from, the "salted" title "Bill Still". Looking good now. It can be easier to format references if you use 2395:

Hi DGG. The 'written like an advertisement' warning box has been at the top of the Ruby McGregor-Smith article for four months. Without knowing what's wrong with the content I'm unable to improve/resolve it. Could you get back to me when you have a moment? Many thanks

1075:

what i find impossible to understand is the multiple opposition to the article. it would seem among the most obvious of topics. I explained there a little further. And after all, with one or two more published comments, it could be inserted again even if deleted now.

2696:

Hi - Just wanted to check if you think you'll be able to review soon. I appreciate all the help and guidance you have provided thus far. If you would prefer that I look for help from another editor at this point, that is fine - please just let me know. Thank you!

244:

I shall do as I usually do, wait for someone else to open it and then support overturn & relist. I don't like feeling isolated more than the inevitable. Your comments in the AfD already made clear that you had a neutral attitude, just as I would have expected.

164:

I think a cat might be a good idea, to complement "administrators willing to make difficult blocks" and all the others - but can't think of anything succint enough at the moment. "Administrators willing to be reverted" sends the wrong message to me - got any ideas?

5185:

I think it would in any case be a good idea to start there, merging the smallest, so I will support you. But please declare any conflict of interest; not that there need be any, for I have cleaned up similar article groups in the same way as you are proposing.

891:

of the european tradition of printing or some synonymous phrase. I will comment there at greater length. I have long been unhappy with the use of "Printing Press" as a convenient term for the system of producing printed books that developed in western europe.

1772:

If you can view other people's, they can view yours'. What you mean, I suspect, is that you did not know that google indexes it. They do. I don't think they should, and we could prevent it by technical means, but the consensus here so far as been otherwise.

5438:

edit summary. Then change the article on him to a redirect. I'll look in a few days to see if help is needed. If you have additional information on the company at some point, such as if it makes other notable products, you can reverse the merge by yourself.

1720:

it is notable. I will work on it in a week or two, not immediately; I have my own priorities. I don't get paid for this, you know--none of us do. I am willing to write the article from scratch, nonetheless, because I think it will help the encyclopedia.

2912:

I would certainly be glad to help out. I looked through some of them and your right theres definately some work to be done. I also noticed there seemed to be some that weren't tagged yet. I was also wondering if you think it would be ok if I did a couple

3186:

Re-reading, I used a more exact tag, on both it and the main article. I've added a mention why on each. I'm not sure how extensively I will have time to get involved in this closed circle of articles, but I call attention to problems when I see them.

2925:

I would like to expand the title on the template to spell out Institutes of Health. Of course I would leave the existing one as a redirect. I have had a couple folks ask me what it meant already (along with WikiProject SIA and AAA) so it might help a

4317:

etc, which you can use from the "cite" button on the editing bar. And note the "ISBN" trick: by putting it in capitals, and replacing the equals by a space, we get an automatic link to a search page where readers can check the book in Worldcat etc.

1355:

In practice, it would help to have links. But I am almost certain that most of them are articles merely mentioning the center , or studies where the center played a role, not about the center. The most likely is the JAMA article, & I'll check

2726:

It will be this weekend. I know I've said it before two or three times, but I'm feeling embarrassed enough to actually do it, instead of trying to learn something I haven't done before (last week, the new version of the New Pages list, this week,

2824:

DGG's a tenured and well-respected administrator with a reputation for even-handedness and an excellent grasp of our policies. You would save everyone's time if you just took his advice on how to present such a controversy without disputing it.

426:

Even in the organization of Citizendium, this power is delegated to what, even in their small organization, is over a hundred experts, grouped into several dozen disciplinary committees, and a fairly large board to resolve difficulties between

5524: 6261: 4266:

For linking the article to the corresponding articles in other WPs, there's a more modern way, but the older way still works: w place at the bottom ] using the WP two letter abbreviations. The reverse entires will get made automatically.

380:--is the expert board in the Homeopathy case meant to deal only with homeopathy? I'm a little puzzled how you can find a board of experts capable of making decisions on all subjects. But at least the decision should say one way or the other. 325:

Beyond the book mentioned on the page, I'm completely at sea. I'd never heard of it before, & I'm completely unqualified to comment. A quick google comes up 15300, led by CTV, which is probably just a reprint, & a bunch of hits for

6270:

More so, but it will be rather tricky to write a proper article. As you will see, I've started rewriting, but this is one of the situations where it will be necessary to verify the degrees claimed, as no trust may be placed in their web

4843: 1065: 682:

Fortunately, I entered IT in the 70s, and embraced "egoless programming" ... I'm pretty laid-back about changes, and have no illusions that I "own" these templates or protocols, so any changes to "soften" or bring them more in line with

3688:

yes, thanks. I didn't come on it by chance--I'm actively looking among recent accepted AfCs for promotional articles, because some of the reviewers seem to not recognize them--or possibly not even know that they shouldn't be accepted.

3511:.The main problem is not additional facts, it's rewriting to remove the advertising, especially from the first part. Try doing it without adjectives entirely. List only the principal line of business in the infobox, and only the CEO. 2343:

deletion mechanism, and since anyone could have stopped the deletion while the prod was running, our practice is that it will be restored for any good faith editor who wants to work on it. I will restore it to your user space as

1066: 5217:

For the article I worked on last night, I removed the navbox for Toll Companies because they were listed as well in the see alsos. They should be listed just one place or another, but either will do. Which do you think better?

2001:, which applies to all material, free or unfree, copied or paraphrased. Anything taken from an outside source must be attributed to the source explicitly. This goes beyond copyright--it's a basic convention of responsible writing. 4495:

Interesting. The media stories are substantial and semi-independent. I think they represent the PR technique we will find hardest to deal with, the generation of apparently respectable stories. I can't call it A7 or G11.

3544:

The notability of a scientist depends on the extent to which his work is cited. For publications in his period, there will not necessarily be complete information, but see what you can find in GoogleScholar/Scopus/Web of

4957:

An alternative way of working would be to keep these pages as user subpages until you have built up enough material, and then move them. That way you can work at your own speed without people taking unfounded objections.

3953:

we have always accepted an entry in Gale's Contemporary Literary Criticism & their similar series as notability , even if they call a figure minor. The article is in need of some cutting, which I will do tomorrow.

1955: 1819: 2106:. I'm pretty happy that they included content from an analyst report, because this is something volunteers will never have access to otherwise, but I feel we could use feedback on the BLP issues and any anti-promo tips. 6291: 5458:

first, but I doubt I'll hear any. Generally, I feel paid editors shouldn't edit the mainspace directly (which is why I spent all that time at AfC), but since you'll be keeping an eye out, I think this merge won't be an

5064:

I can;t exactly put my finger on it, or figure out how to improve it, but it gives a hint of the tone often associated with promotional articles. I think it's a matter of there being the same kind of things to say.

2364: 2031:

supporters, or intended to produce a favorable public impression of the program --that sort of content is considered promotional. WP is an encyclopedia, not a vehicle for promotion of even the most worthwhile things.

3291:

instead of G5 when in doubt, but to use G11 rather more liberally than in the past. I think others feel the same about G11 at least--in practice, the G11 criterion is becoming "too promotional to be worth fixing"

4678:

I guess we'll leave it at that then. I've been moving stuff into mainspace if I can find at least one decent source, even if the article is poor and unreferenced, but I have nothing of that quality for this one.

3537:

We do not consider who's who and related publications a reliable source, because the subject of the article controls what is being written. They can however be used for the plain facts of birth, education and so

1265:

upon the christians? The sophomoric popularity contest that wikipedia has become, is not the only way to prove rightness. (i say that with regret, not anger, knowing your efforts in this regard). i can become

6348:

the term is devised by Ryan, & my feeling is that it is probably a trivial variant, but this is a field laden by such & things I think ridiculously trivial variants have sometimes been taken seriously.

2164:

we perhaps should talk first. The main thing I think it needs is citations. I could put in a few dozen/hundred quickly. then of course it needs articles on all or most of them--that part I do not want to do.

1848: 5538:. I would simply have fixed it myself, but I had difficulties rewriting some of the statements in the article, which were value judgements that would have had to be eliminated if they could not be sourced. 2922:

I would like to add the project to the Joint projects list of WPUS. The articles are already covered by both projects so it might help them a little and slightly increase the visibility of the NIH project.

4146:

reasonable case for restoration, with the option for anyone who wants to take it to AfD , I think you've got a decent chance, though consensus at DRV is unpredictable, just as it is everywhere at WP.

3878:

Because from previous discussions I know that he is a staunch deletionist for punitive reasons - I also know that there are others who believe that G5 is nothing more than WP shooting itself in the foot.

6070: 3408: 5214:

once or twice in it, as I did last night for Toll Global Resources. You'll see how I handled the subcompany names there. I haven't checked if there are redirects, but if not, you or I can make them. .

3037: 5126: 4780:

shouldn't be deemphasized in this way. COI isn't just about bias; it's also about setting some rules about who is and is not allowed to contribute and in what ways, in order to give readers at least

3254: 310: 3548:

Alternative notability depends on the books being used as standard works, with substantial reviews. Get information on editions and library holdings from Worldcat, and try to find reviews of them.

5394:

Nodeable...in order to strengthen its mobile application analytics for enterprise customers" with "Appcelerator bought Nodeable...seeking to strengthen its mobile application analytics offerings.

3233:

own publications, then it's similar to the problem we have with many topics: if nobody from the main stream of discussion has covered their methods , are they notable outside their own group ?

6073:

for improvement. I've moved it there to avoid confusion with earlier versions elsewhere. It cannot stay there long. I'll make some additional suggestions on your user talk page in a few hours.

3837: 1236:

many things are deleted that ought to be kept, and many kept that ought to be deleted. Just concentrate on getting the article sound enough to stand. It's the only way to show you were right.

4394:) - after the 3 Deletion discussions on the title, I suppose. Derived from ancient (or symbolic?) practice of spreading salt over your enemies' fields so that they couldn't grow crops again - 6354:

It would need check of all the refs to see whether they are actually about his variant or whether the term is used generically--in a sense, most therapies have or think they have a structure.

5110:

always a problem, as it is generally our practice to translate some but not all of them, as many do not have an exact English equivalent. I leave the more knowledgable to fill in the gaps.

6260: 353:

The name is used primarily for the actual area, not just the pilgrimage. The article does have some elements that are either jocular or derived from a tourist brochure. I'll check on them.

4627: 2608:

No problem - I appreciate that you have been keeping me posted. Yesterday I spent some time updating dead reference links since Stevens switched over to a new website. Thank you again.

125: 3045: 1912: 4227:(I'm a very lapsed wikieditor, who once new all the technical stuff I'm bothering you with) it's never a good idea to do too much of an article without participation of other people.-- 3784: 3001: 2427:. I've been wrong before, and that's the purpose of AfD. to see what others think. I suggest that a more compact and less hagiographic article might help persuade people to keep it. 5016:

topics liker "Mathematical methods of economics," or "Statistics in archeology." I have in front of me a useful little book from the Modern Langaguage Association of America called

3604:

A good example of the two-pairs-of-eyes effect. I apologise for templating you: I was using the CSDHelper script, and was surprised (and amused) when it told me who it had notified.

5890: 5685: 3057: 2640:

Hi DGG -- Just wanted to check if you have a sense of when you may be able to review. I am getting pressed for an update and want to report back with the latest. Thank you again!

5340: 3748: 3453: 1589: 6167: 6115: 6013:

Thanks for catching it; Probably I'm going to try a merge of the content from the individual articles. There's a problem with articles on such health-care systems in general.

5892: 5687: 3147: 3052: 872: 234: 123: 1993:.I note that almost all material from other country's governments (and the UN) is not in the public domain--the US is almost unique in this generous provision for free use. 2952:

discussion onto the talk p. of the project. I appreciate it very much that you're getting this re-started--I confess I had entirely forgotten that I meant to work on this.

1846: 822:, which is still quite mysterious as to how it works, but it does work, any my own experience confirms that, and I see it working with others. It works, spectacularly, with 5172: 5150: 4935: 3664: 3252: 1447: 1311: 2017:. Nobody owns a WP page, and anything you write is subject to editing by anyone--as an official editor you are no more entitled to determine the content than anyone else. 273:

on Knowledge; deleting it and saying "no merge target exists" is a recipe for wasted efforts that clashes with my eventualist outlook. If I revive it, I'll let you know.

5367: 5002: 3046: 2850:

I've neglected following up this one. I'll email you about it in a few minutes, as some of it is indeed on OTRS, and I need to give an opinion about individual motives.

2279: 1498: 1156:, if they mean that you need a judicial order or whistle blower, no, but that's a higher standard than merely confirmation, by sources with editors subject to lawsuit. 742: 612: 269:

I just don't see the urgency in deleting non-BLP, non-promotional articles which are on the cusp of notability. The event is certainly noteworthy enough to get coverage

46: 1750:

write an article about it. Anyone else without COI is welcome to try , of course, and I certainly would encourage them to do so. End of discussion here, please.

6290: 3002: 5708: 4785:

handle fairly well; rather it's her stonewalling and combativeness over even the smallest details that reflect poorly on ALEC. Every edit, every source is contested,

2747:

and trying to decipher horribly machine translated Japanese news sources. So, yeah. But i've pledged to work through the PAIDHELP page today and get everything done.

4094: 6321: 3342:

grade for the article, B+ (as of the time it was written--if someone presented it now it would be a B- for outdated sources), grade for the deletion argument, C-.

4786: 6396: 5037: 1060: 2098:

Muchos grassius. I would prefer not to handle the Request Edit queue, but since nobody else is, I cleared up a good 15 requests that were mostly fairly obvious.

4468:

community is not always consistent. In the meantime, please read 2005's response on his talk page to another editor in the section above his response to you.

2007:

You are apparently editing on behalf of a group of outside organizations, as part of your job. This creates a conflict of interest. For our rules on this, see

235: 5301: 3053: 2718: 2381:

Could you highlight the promotional content? I need examples of adjectives of praise so I can request another editor improves the content accordingly.Thanks

2240: 505: 3862:

JamesBWatson is quite active today. If JamesBWatson deleted them, why don't you ask him? Why would you expect any other admin to unilaterally override him?—

1380:

Kindly email me the text of the JAMA article, which is the only one that might possibly prove notability. It is not available on line that I can determine.

5284: 4053: 622: 509: 5760: 4905: 4639: 4061: 3937: 3923: 3173: 3111: 2649: 2617: 2280: 578: 6357:

key quote from the article: "however as of yet academic studies in this promising area are still relatively sparse" implies the 3 & 4 cannot be met.

3145: 5470: 5449: 5430: 5413: 5320: 4108: 3579: 3577: 2972: 2698: 2641: 2609: 2577: 2527: 2130: 339: 6427: 6410: 3417:& websites, and in financial reports of their activities. Anything in a third party source is very apt to be nonsubstantial or derived from there, 6084: 5368: 5001: 3856: 3130: 2235: 1969: 1220: 782: 566: 526: 5621:

detail about just to what extent you are green. The way I look at it, the article has to be addressed to the general public, not prospective users.

5261: 3353: 2834: 2176: 494: 451: 282: 256: 6235: 6202: 5875: 5861: 5735: 5549: 5374: 5166: 5113:

As a rule, it's better to ask for a translation than to simply copy the page--the process goes more easily. The place to do that is. in this case,

4692: 4665: 4009: 3995: 3979: 3965: 3038: 3022: 2405: 1522: 1449: 939: 107: 6371: 5031: 4798: 4771: 4737: 4586: 4561: 2758: 2738: 902: 423:

of the ultimate editor-in-chief or board exercising this function, is to appoint them, and to decide the differences between the different groups.

215:

They are I think a well-established market research organization,--but in any I may remember wrong, and will check on both parts of it tomorrow.

6312: 6282: 6166: 6158: 6053: 5229: 5197: 5158: 5049: 5038: 4539: 4178: 4140: 3888: 3871: 3380: 2938: 2706: 2603: 2585: 2535: 2513: 2223: 2203: 1656: 772: 734: 709: 669: 650: 598: 318: 5359: 5076: 4516:

Thanks. I thought that's what you would say. You can see what I was getting at though. Have to leave it as it is then, I suppose.

3525: 2271: 2116: 2085: 1811: 1784: 1761: 1732: 1439: 1367: 1337: 1008: 364: 5822: 5485: 5114: 3778: 2815: 1611: 978: 66: 6252: 6106: 5670: 5646: 5140: 4927: 4897: 4614: 4447: 4425: 4385: 4337: 3484: 3440: 3244: 3221: 3198: 2470: 2390: 2376: 1664: 1639: 1160:, well the media attention during y2k was not trivial, the NYTimes article is about the NRO, and this installation is several paragraphs, the 723:

I also learned programming that way--and I too use it as the model for here--it is the only practical way for large scale projects like this.

226: 6114: 6008: 5951: 5604: 5506: 4861: 4525: 4507: 4278: 4236: 4205: 4157: 3829: 3808: 3565: 2987: 2963: 2907: 2787: 2305: 1052: 819: 327: 308: 4991: 4969: 4479: 3629: 3613: 3599: 3154: 3098: 3082: 2861: 1942: 1899: 1555: 1487: 1467: 1105: 1087: 150: 6024: 4832: 4488: 4363: 3740: 3721: 3700: 3302: 3285: 3272: 2494: 1838: 1283: 1247: 1231: 1193: 1135: 908: 807: 94: 62:

fun, but I have to do my research and determine if the extra money I would be making would be worth the extra debt I'd be taking on! Latr,

3089:

nod*. Concur; I'll have a dig around at a future point, and if I can't fix it I'll probably come back you to unmove and redelete it. Ta!

1872: 1686:

again you do not understand. What is needed is articles not where you make studies, but where some other group discusses your importance.

5967: 5920: 3907: 3797:

yes, it did. But I hadn't checked Echo today, It's not as if it were some sufficiently visual obnoxious banner that you can't ignore it.

3421:

devoted to AIDS research, which is probably Canadian Federation for AIDS Research, but the largest Canadian association of AIDS research

2877: 2679: 2561: 2486: 2424: 2321: 1579: 1210: 840: 476: 298: 3970:

THanks for the reply. I guess I'm missing something, because he's not coming up on Gale, and mentions in NYT, etc. are not substantial.

5928: 5635:

I'm working on this--it will take a while to give a complete response, and even so, I rather doubt the other editor will be satisfied.

4806: 4459: 3678: 3178: 204: 5375: 4702: 4390:"Salted" means that it's been made impossible to create a new article at that title, without the intervention of an administrator ( 441: 391: 5291: 5118: 4567: 4068: 1957: 93:

Another thing that happens is the article itself sometimes is not tag for deletion even though the article is listed at AfD. See

2743:

Hey, i've been procrastinating plenty myself. How long has it been since I helped out at PAIDHELP? I spent yesterday working on

1314: 3729:

what I do here these days is looking for it. Sometimes in fact I'm oversensitive, judging by consensus of good people at AfD.

3261:

restored. Thanks for letting me know, because this in the 1/2 of 1% of false positives in this group of several hundred socks.

3554:

The way to make credirects is to make a page under the alternate form of the name, with the contents reading only #Redirect]

3277:

Thank you for restoring the page. I don't believe it's a false positive, but I'll take that up with the admin who unblocked. —

1964: 1950: 1415: 1391: 5885: 5792:

to ask who someone else actually is, directly or by implication. Just ignore the request if you like--I won't ask again.) .

5486: 5296: 4755:

ALEC is an inherently controversial article as are all articles on political lobbying group, and one where I would expect

3139: 1917: 1140:

i'm sure there are, as i'm sure all the delete voters are, it's just their conduct that is not so good on this occasion. (

504: 5977: 5807: 5335: 4745: 4296: 3388: 196: 4603:, thanks; it is now clearly enough to pass speedy; I'm not sure of AfD, but all I suggest for now is some condensation. 2438: 430:

I am preparing a longer rebuttal. I am truly surprised at you--I can not believe you have thought out the implications.

5680: 5241: 3397:

as the elections, not on the positions, which belong in an political advertisement Let me know when you are ready.~DGG

2840: 1985:

of unfree material; not just the words must be changed, but the arrangement into sentences and the sequence of ideas.

1697: 964: 5576: 5525: 4574: 997:

at least a few low quality journals. So it would need to be used carefully. I'll comment further there in a few days.

345: 6210: 3677: 2592:

I still haven't forgotten. Some discussions this last week were rather long to deal with, & I'm a little behind.

764: 703: 642: 570: 87: 5465: 5425: 4752:

into order to make plain the nature of the very stubborn opposition of the COI editor, to some extent as an example.

4240: 6061: 5084: 1564:, "Two Worlds: an Edinburgh Jewish childhood." Shows how wrong it was for it to be deleted. I rarely use the term 3138: 2929:

There are several articles that aren't tagged yet that I would like to add to the project if you think that's ok.

4538: 3496: 1016: 287:

Yes, good people of all tendencies can usually agree on practical action and the merits of compromise positions.

113: 864: 6377: 6320: 5716: 5584: 5277: 5270: 3068: 1878: 1712: 625:

as the first one in the table, since it has the verbiage that I'm pruning from all the others ... I also added

535: 530: 372: 4760:

the editing. In that respect, I see some problems not previously discussed there. and I will make a comment.

1792: 1124:

There are some good people at the Military wikiproject. Go there specifically & ask for help fixing it.

5096: 2978:

and updated the template example on the project page. I will add it to the WPUS Joint prokects list shortly.

2047: 1030: 954: 539: 2184: 853:

As I understand GFDL, it has to be kept as a redirect to preserve the edit history. I'll make that change.

5930: 5122: 3160: 1918: 1526: 949: 880: 406:

Whether an editor has otherwise substantially violated any portion of the sourcing policies and guidelines.

1927:

it's an appropriate article; I'm not sure there is a really standard term. The one I used in teaching was

5766: 4620: 3448: 3425:. It may in fact be not just the largest but the only Canadian national organization of AIDS researchers 2354: 1619: 522: 3333: 1854: 1600:

commented. the problems are quite radical. With the socks gone, we can see some rationality about this.

544: 6400: 5480: 5455: 4974:

As I expressed on his talkpage that I need a second opinion, so no, I wasn't blaming anyone. As far as

4645: 4046: 4039: 2841: 2453: 2103: 1982: 77: 1144:) the russian source, and the inside defense source use caveats, however, the NYTimes, (Bamford), the 6351:

It would need a check of textbooks etc to see is his approach is generally recognized as distinctive.

6211: 6191:

BTW, as for the earlier decline, I intend to follow up on that because I think the reason was wrong.

6147:

BTW, as for the earlier decline, I intend to follow up on that because I think the reason was wrong.

5978: 4073: 3759:

to the place they are located.). The catalogs are no problem, since I see they are all on the web at

3167: 2147: 5526:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Michael_L.J._Apuzzo#Michael_L.J._Apuzzo

3928:

Hi, I don't know whether you saw the question above, so I am drawing your attention to it. Regards

1302: 5085: 3914:

If you are unwilling to restore the articles, is it possible to let me have copies of them? Thanks

2795: 2345: 2286: 2154: 1345: 556: 278: 4028: 3159: 6416:

Based on what you say, the article is fixable. I will take another look tomorrow in more detail.

6385:

There are two questions: can an article be written on him, and is the present article acceptable.

6336: 5871: 5535: 4883: 4686: 4005: 3975: 3945: 3789: 2887: 1113: 1023: 1017: 986: 55: 3502:.References in any language are acceptable, but if not in English, translate at least the title. 6227:

for a week but when I return I'll add more content to the article as it is sorely lacking now.

5986: 5717: 5514: 5460: 5420: 5054: 4874: 4869: 4794: 4582: 4570: 3650: 3531: 2753: 2446: 2250: 2211: 2066: 1879: 1535: 72: 182:

I just saw "This admin encourages other admins to be bold in reverting his admin actions." at

5839: 5101: 4635: 4573:, as having written novels, not her. I've also found yet another draft of the Carola article 3933: 3919: 3884: 2702: 2645: 2613: 2581: 2531: 2219: 2059: 2048: 1565: 1031: 768: 697: 646: 574: 317: 131: 41: 3166: 6406: 5771: 5743: 5731: 5381: 4847: 4083: 4023: 2126: 2112: 1907: 917:

but my memory is they also do significant lobbying. I will check and go ahead accordingly.

335: 158: 1067:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/United States presidential election, 2016 (2nd nomination)

8: 5818: 5787:

I have two suggestions: first, you could show the integrity of your editing by rewriting

2415: 1990: 1738:

back to the content and compared to like organizations (AHRQ and Advisory Board Company.]

684: 552: 491: 448: 274: 4817:

This is a genre of music I am no expert in, but the situation is fairly clear. Her book

4713:

This is a genre of music I am no expert in, but the situation is fairly clear. Her book

3541:

Has the U Texas document been published on the web, or elsewhere. If so, you can use it.

1560:

I've consulted an expert. The actual best source was already in the article as written:

6233: 6032: 5867: 5665: 5162: 4940: 4831: 4681: 4487: 4118: 4001: 3971: 3217: 2830: 2768: 2744: 2401: 2386: 1676: 1660: 1518: 1481: 935: 876: 6342:

My impressions is that it is basically promotionalism & I would even consider G11

5659:

I get the sense they are fairly new at this and are genuinely interested in feedback.

4776:

Sorry, I just saw this. I appreciate your perspective on this, though I do think that

3767:

references, and I will be very glad to accept your article when it is properly cited.

3573:

comments. See now that I really didn't do my homework before starting on this project.

5557: 5329: 5044: 4790: 4626:

Thanks a lot for your comments on my talk page. I've undeleted and listed the debate

4578: 4521: 4443: 4395: 4381: 4311: 4232: 4174: 4136: 3823: 2983: 2934: 2748: 548: 4060: 2214:

article. It looks some interesting reading, if you have the time and interest. ----

5788: 5627: 4987: 4907: 4631: 3929: 3915: 3880: 3814: 3609: 3551:

What is really needed, is awards he has been given, not just those named after him.

3361: 3094: 2215: 2155: 1270:

in meat-space, and i will give due credit to ALR and TomStar for their part in the

693: 82: 48: 3760: 6003: 5727: 3717: 3278: 2148: 2122: 2108: 1591: 1279: 1227: 1189: 1024: 987: 331: 183: 6345:

It gives indications of copypaste, is particular the large unsourced paragraphs.

4241:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonmatonis/2012/05/31/the-case-for-monetary-freedom/

3672: 3403: 2054: 638: 5912:(NOTE: It was kept as NO CONSENSUS). I will renominate. DGG (at NYPL) -- reply 5834: 5814: 5781: 5700:(NOTE: It was kept as NO CONSENSUS). I will renominate. DGG (at NYPL) -- reply 5612: 5205: 5055: 4944: 4818: 4714: 4416: 4391: 4354: 4328: 2447: 2340: 2251: 1271: 688: 400:

Whether an editor has engaged in misrepresentation of sources or their content.

4129: 6423: 6367: 6308: 6278: 6248: 6228: 6198: 6154: 6102: 6080: 6049: 6020: 5963: 5947: 5913: 5857: 5840: 5803: 5756: 5701: 5661: 5642: 5600: 5572: 5545: 5502: 5445: 5409: 5355: 5316: 5257: 5225: 5193: 5136: 5072: 5027: 4965: 4936: 4923: 4893: 4857: 4808: 4777: 4767: 4733: 4704: 4661: 4610: 4600: 4557: 4503: 4475: 4274: 4201: 4153: 4104: 3991: 3961: 3903: 3867: 3847: 3804: 3774: 3736: 3696: 3660: 3625: 3595: 3561: 3521: 3480: 3436: 3376: 3349: 3298: 3268: 3240: 3213: 3194: 3126: 3078: 3031: 3018: 2959: 2903: 2873: 2857: 2826: 2811: 2783: 2734: 2675: 2599: 2557: 2509: 2482: 2466: 2434: 2397: 2382: 2372: 2331: 2317: 2301: 2267: 2199: 2192:

I'll check the sources later today. I have some familiarity with the company

2172: 2081: 2060: 2008: 1938: 1895: 1868: 1834: 1820:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of extraordinary diseases and conditions

1807: 1780: 1757: 1728: 1693: 1635: 1607: 1575: 1561: 1551: 1514: 1513:

Thought you'd like to know, I've made a renaming proposal for this category.

1463: 1435: 1411: 1387: 1363: 1333: 1243: 1206: 1131: 1101: 1083: 1048: 1004: 974: 931: 924: 898: 860: 836: 803: 730: 665: 630: 594: 472: 437: 387: 360: 294: 252: 222: 192: 146: 100: 34: 17: 5348:

I'll get to it very soon, thanks for reminding me. He seems to meet WP:PROF

5177: 4517: 4439: 4377: 4302: 4228: 4170: 4132: 3819: 2979: 2930: 2245: 1297: 1267: 1216: 1177: 166: 5127:

Knowledge:Requested articles/Social sciences/Military and military history

2121:

Ryan said he would take a look after his Wikibreak, so I'll wait for him!

5519: 4983: 3817:

people? I can't find it - if we do can you add it to Bollen's article? --

3605: 3090: 2142: 1473: 787: 752: 205: 118: 63: 1093:

we lost this one: probably worth a DRV or a modification to NOT CRYSTAL

6033: 5991: 4533: 3707: 3030: 1711:

that you ought not to have written the article in the first place--see

1275: 1223: 1185: 1173: 763:

for the ineligible ones ... more pre-epiphany thinking, I guess. :-) —

518: 6223: 6122: 1219:. and the fact that this group was fast deleted is troubling (to me). 691:

as the "master", and I'll replicate the changes. :-) Happy Editing! —

4407: 4371: 4345: 4319: 1169: 3409:

Knowledge:Articles for creation/Canadian Association of HIV Research

3228:

I did comment; but we need to find discussions of their methods in

1888:

removed, and am addingjustification on the talk p. will watch-list.

873: 6418: 6362: 6303: 6273: 6243: 6193: 6149: 6097: 6075: 6044: 6015: 5958: 5942: 5852: 5798: 5751: 5637: 5595: 5567: 5540: 5497: 5440: 5404: 5350: 5311: 5252: 5220: 5188: 5131: 5067: 5022: 4960: 4918: 4888: 4852: 4762: 4728: 4656: 4605: 4552: 4498: 4470: 4433: 4401: 4299:, to show willing (hope you don't mind me playing in your sandbox, 4269: 4196: 4148: 4099: 3986: 3956: 3898: 3863: 3842: 3799: 3769: 3731: 3691: 3655: 3620: 3590: 3556: 3516: 3475: 3431: 3371: 3344: 3293: 3263: 3235: 3189: 3121: 3073: 3013: 2954: 2898: 2868: 2852: 2806: 2778: 2729: 2670: 2594: 2552: 2504: 2477: 2461: 2429: 2367: 2312: 2310:

I've now made a response. Let me know if I can help with anything.

2296: 2262: 2194: 2167: 2076: 1933: 1890: 1863: 1829: 1802: 1775: 1752: 1723: 1688: 1630: 1602: 1570: 1546: 1458: 1430: 1406: 1382: 1358: 1328: 1258: 1254: 1238: 1201: 1181: 1126: 1096: 1078: 1043: 999: 969: 919: 893: 855: 832: 798: 725: 660: 589: 467: 432: 382: 355: 289: 247: 217: 187: 141: 5328: 4239:. Ps: I'm not sure how it fits but he's mentioned by Forbes here 1827:

no problem. I may not have been clear enough in the first place.

1262: 5018:

Introduction to scholarship in modern languages and literatures

1114: 403:

Whether an editor has used unreliable or inappropriate sources.

5956:

I've got the material, but I still have to forma it properly.

3618:

I would much rather be templated, than not told of my errors.

2502:

haven't forgotten: I will get there tomorrow or this weekend.

6262:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Professor Michael Nimier

5454:

Thank you, that seems reasonable. I'll ask for objections on

4846:. 4/The key paper appears to be the first, whose abstract is 35: 6222:

it's now copyvio free. A curiosity I've noticed is that the

5287:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

4056:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3588:

my error, of course; I can't imagine how I came to make it.

1503: 1310:

the only references you have from outside the institute are

884:

_Spread_of_the_printing_press-2008-07-20T07:31:00.000Z": -->

883: 874:

_Spread_of_the_printing_press-2008-07-20T07:31:00.000Z": -->

4125: 3047:

Talk:British Studies Seminar, University of Texas at Austin

2102:

BTW - if you care to, I haven't gotten any feedback yet on

1913:

Ping about Knowledge talk:WikiProject user warnings/Testing

1800:

any editor can do this. it does not take an administrator.

823: 4033: 3003:

Graduate Library School, University of Chicago, 1928-1989.

637:

to the table for the Guidelines that are not eligible for

621:, indicating that they have not been created yet, and put 4128:

report, that's 3 unconnected soures outside Google books

1491:(good god I nearly put "xxx" rather than ~~~~ by mistake) 1472:

Thanks, I'll help if needed - hopefully tomorrow. Yours,

5565:

warned. Let me know if it continues & I will block.

5341:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Michael L.J. Apuzzo

3785:

Kliegl Bros. Universal Electric Stage Lighting Co., Inc.

3749:

Kliegl Bros. Universal Electric Stage Lighting Co., Inc.

3454:

deleted page (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)

2363:

copyvio: first section copied almost word for word from

4825:

A reason for hesitation is the apparent promotionalism.

6360:

Doesn't the APA have a WP working group of some sort?

4078: 236:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Amadou Cisse (student)

5534:

I just gave you some detailed advice on your talk p.

5173:

Response to proposed deletion of Kavi Workspace page

5151:

Follow-Up to Deletion Review Decision: Peter Pakeman

5091: 4438:. What's next? Should we get another peer review? -- 6042:Yes, I'll go back and fix it. thanks for noticing. 2281:

Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative

1499:

CfD nomination of Category:Library types by subject

6292:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Straub 2576:Thank you for the update - very much appreciated! 1164:book has a page or two, and there is a chapter in 5390:Cut down and reorganized the section on Titanium. 5369:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Sven Voelpel 5309:Thanks, but I have a good deal more to do there. 5117:or wherever it fits best in the pages listed at 3155:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Sven Voelpel 3119:Thanks, but I have a good deal more to do there. 1221:Campaign for the Accountability of American Bases 658:strongly depreciated---people find it insulting. 5989:. It looks like a quasi-disambiguation page. -- 3462:I shall look at the other article you mentioned. 3369:I'll give you some advice in the next few days. 3039:Jacob School of Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1450:The American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 5039:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Siyani Chambers 3761:http://Www.klieglbros.com/catalogs/catalogs.htm 2866:tomorrow, actually--it's a little complicated. 1061:A centralised discussion which may interest you 5115:Knowledge:WikiProject Germany/Article requests 3813:K :) Btw, did you mean we have a category for 3514:, Please check with me before moving it back. 3464:The problem about promotionalism with the one 4566:Thanks for that. Actually, the 4th reference 3984:I will double check that, probably tomorrow. 2719:Regarding the Stevens Institute of Technology 2241:J.O. Patterson, Sr., Nazis, syphilis, etc ... 1849:List of extraordinary diseases and conditions 820:Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing 6176:You pop up quite often on my watchlist, too. 6132:You pop up quite often on my watchlist, too. 4916:Ok , I will take another look at it. thanks 4344:difference, or subtle spelling variations). 3505:.References behind paywalls are acceptable, 1428:I'll see what I can do tonight or tomorrow. 5302:a very good edit of the arno tausch article 3112:a very good edit of the arno tausch article 2550:"I haven't forgotten. I'll get there soon. 2425:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Deon Swiggs 1215:i note that ALR is doing his magic over at 6071:User:Porterwritewiki/Carbone Smolan Agency 6095:thanks for letting me know. I commented. 5726:I will try to remove the promotionalism. 3857:Deletions in terms of G5 of four articles 3174:List of principal conductors by orchestra 3071:which I am thinking of sending to AfD. 2973:WikiProject National Institutes of Health 2294:thanks, I'll be making a response there. 2236:List of principal conductors by orchestra 1989:from most states requires a license--see 1970:Kansas-Armenia National Guard Partnership 783:Social Science Research Resources Network 687:is fine by me ... I suggest that you use 615:to show the "unimplemented" protocols in 6121: 5387:Dropped the entire partnerships section. 5376:International Journal of e-Collaboration 3255:Certified Penetration Testing Consultant 1590:Notifying of featured article review of 5495:I will work on it at NYPL next Monday. 5119:Knowledge:Requested articles/By country 5050:Changes to Dody Weston Thompson Article 2360:Promotional:use of adjectives of praise 1958:Center for Economic and Policy Research 14: 5276:Hello, DGG. You have new messages at 4406:to advise on the article's readiness. 4045:Hello, DGG. You have new messages at 2668:I shall try to get to it this evening. 2104:Talk:YouSendIt#Draft_for_consideration 6069:I have moved the deleted version to 3838:Category:ISI highly cited researchers 3820:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3011:It will get it, but not immediately. 2475:Not yet ready--see my comments there. 5784:, I've been hoping to hear from you. 5487:Festival of Neglected Romantic Music 5121:or the subject oriented sections at 4980:anyone can remove it in several days 4596:== Australian Doctors for Africa == 3140:Festival of Neglected Romantic Music 2495:Stevens Institute of Technology page 909:National Research Libraries Alliance 611:Kewl! I've updated & rearranged 561:has made me question the need for a 23: 5985:Also, this article is an odd one, 5269: 4577:, and have "no-indexed" it. Best, 4460:Question regarding a wiki deletion 4038: 1502: 965:Knowledge:Village pump (technical) 126:User:Abd/AfD: formula for conflict 24: 6443: 4097:, which is certainly preferable. 3179:Curriculum of the Waldorf schools 1313:,which does not mention it, and 5899: 1326:has no chance of being notable. 1184:in order to provide notability. 5011:rather the study of how people 4069:How do i lock a page? Need Help 3507:if you have actually seen them. 3497:User:Moonsoomee/Cheil Worldwide 6126:DGG popping up on my watchlist 3649:I already tried this April at 3069:Corporate Responsibility Group 3058:User:Sladen/Tomorrow's Company 2406:09:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC) 2210:I just added some refs to the 1981:We additionally do not permit 979:18:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 13: 1: 6168:AfC/Professor Nathalie Martin 6116:AfC/Professor Nathalie Martin 5808:22:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 5761:05:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC) 5749:commented on your user page. 5736:19:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 5671:19:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC) 5647:03:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC) 5605:01:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 5577:04:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC) 5292:Stephen Marks article request 5077:04:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC) 5032:10:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 4992:09:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 4970:05:42, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 4928:07:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 4898:23:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 4862:03:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 4799:07:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 4772:00:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 4526:02:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 4508:08:45, 17 November 2013 (UTC) 4480:17:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 4448:08:25, 17 November 2013 (UTC) 4426:22:20, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 4386:21:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 4364:22:32, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 4338:22:19, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 4279:19:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 4237:06:36, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 4206:13:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC) 4179:05:38, 12 November 2013 (UTC) 4158:03:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC) 4141:03:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC) 3938:07:41, 2 September 2013 (UTC) 3083:16:46, 27 November 2012 (UTC) 2177:15:51, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 2131:16:21, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 2117:21:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC) 2086:20:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC) 1965:Stephen Marks article request 1951:Bibliography of Encyclopedias 1523:10:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 1488:22:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 1468:20:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 1284:16:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 1248:17:02, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 1232:15:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 1009:05:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 5931:Hubertus Antonius van der Aa 5893:Ken Pugh (Fellow Consultant) 5688:Ken Pugh (Fellow Consultant) 5550:06:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC) 5507:21:13, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 5471:23:46, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 5450:23:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 5431:22:53, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 5414:21:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 5360:21:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC) 5321:00:56, 18 January 2014 (UTC) 5297:Andrew Tomas Deletion Review 5167:22:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC) 5125:-- in this case it would be 5123:Knowledge:Requested articles 4738:23:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC) 4693:20:14, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 4666:18:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 4640:04:44, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 4615:10:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 4587:11:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 4562:23:43, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 4109:00:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 4029:Schulich Leader Scholarships 3850:) 04:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC 3161:Hubertus Antonius van der Aa 3148:Ken Pugh (Fellow Consultant) 3131:00:56, 18 January 2014 (UTC) 3099:20:13, 8 December 2012 (UTC) 1943:16:06, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 1919:Guide to information sources 1527:Talk:Tom Tucker (Family Guy) 1211:21:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 1194:20:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 1136:18:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 1106:10:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1088:00:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 1053:02:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 881:Spread of the printing press 865:03:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 299:23:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 283:23:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 257:23:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 227:06:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 197:22:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 151:19:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 7: 5336:Ref: Your recent nomination 5262:02:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 5230:18:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 5141:00:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 4978:tag is going, it says that 4906:Speedy deletion contested: 4746:Request for COIN assistance 4047:UnicornTapestry's talk page 4010:01:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 3996:22:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC) 3980:00:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC) 3966:04:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC) 3924:07:14, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 3908:20:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 3889:19:35, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 3872:19:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 3830:03:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 3809:06:01, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 3779:21:30, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 3389:Baltimore County Councilman 2878:09:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 2862:23:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC) 2339:It was only deleted by the 841:23:43, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 808:18:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 108:17:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 10: 6448: 6428:03:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC) 6411:16:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 6372:23:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC) 6313:05:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 6283:02:56, 11 April 2014 (UTC) 6253:23:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC) 6236:20:16, 30 March 2014 (UTC) 6203:01:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC) 6178:01:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC) 6159:01:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC) 6134:01:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC) 6107:21:30, 21 March 2014 (UTC) 6085:02:30, 22 March 2014 (UTC) 6054:03:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC) 6025:18:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC) 6009:18:12, 19 March 2014 (UTC) 5968:04:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 5952:19:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC) 5921:21:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 5886:Request to Userfy the Page 5709:21:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 5681:Request to Userfy the Page 5456:Talk:Appcelerator Titanium 5242:Pine River Capital article 4569:, referred to her sister, 3578:Speedy deletion declined: 2842:City University of Seattle 2487:19:19, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 2471:17:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 2391:10:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC) 1612:22:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 1317:one reference providing 940:16:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 930:OK, thanks for the reply. 587:feedback coming tomorrow. 365:14:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 176:at 19:48, January 23, 2008 6212:Aligarh Muslim University 6184:I'm rather familiar with. 6140:I'm rather familiar with. 6062:Re Carbone Smolan Agency 5979:WellStar Douglas Hospital 5876:02:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 5862:20:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC) 5823:15:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 5198:23:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC) 5003:Methodology of heuristics 4000:Sir, thank ye in advance. 3741:22:57, 31 July 2013 (UTC) 3722:18:25, 31 July 2013 (UTC) 3701:16:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC) 3665:23:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC) 3653:. It was closed as keep. 3630:23:27, 30 July 2013 (UTC) 3614:22:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC) 3600:18:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC) 3566:01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC) 3526:01:13, 30 July 2013 (UTC) 3485:19:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 3441:23:34, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 3381:05:48, 19 July 2013 (UTC) 3354:23:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC) 3303:00:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC) 3286:15:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 3273:08:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 3245:15:57, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 3222:09:14, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 3199:05:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 3168:WellStar Douglas Hospital 3023:01:19, 20 July 2012 (UTC) 2835:05:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 2816:23:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 2759:21:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 2739:21:28, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 2680:16:25, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 2650:16:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 2272:02:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC) 1873:17:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 1812:01:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 1655:you think are necessary? 1580:04:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 1556:02:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 1456:yes, I can rewrite them. 903:08:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 340:03:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 88:AfD notification proposal 67:16:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 5086:The 33 Strategies of War 2988:15:25, 29 May 2012 (UTC) 2968:I moved the template to 2964:06:05, 27 May 2012 (UTC) 2939:02:39, 27 May 2012 (UTC) 2908:02:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC) 2788:03:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 2707:11:55, 2 July 2012 (UTC) 2618:13:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 2604:03:48, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 2586:20:00, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 2562:19:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 2536:21:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC) 2514:05:18, 11 May 2012 (UTC) 2439:15:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 2423:the AfD will decide, at 2377:15:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 2346:User:JonathanMayUK/Wayra 2322:03:58, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 2306:00:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC) 2224:17:39, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 2204:15:52, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 1929:guides to the literature 1900:22:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 1839:21:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 1785:21:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1762:03:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1733:20:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 1698:11:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 1665:20:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 1640:20:53, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 1440:21:27, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 1416:20:34, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 1392:20:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 1368:17:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 1338:17:24, 24 May 2009 (UTC) 773:18:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 735:17:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 710:16:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 670:16:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 651:21:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 599:21:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 579:21:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 495:13:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 477:04:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 452:04:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 442:03:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 392:01:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 6330:in process of rewriting 5536:User talk:207.151.120.4 5466:my conflict of interest 5426:my conflict of interest 4297:a little gentle tidying 4095:Brian Anderson (writer) 1713:WP:Conflict of Interest 1568:, but it applies here. 1018:The Librarian franchise 490:still to be developed. 346:St. Patrick's Purgatory 114:Content policy analysis 6378:Urgent Advice required 6322:User:Wjpierce3/sandbox 6127: 5987:WellStar Health System 5909:I commented , thanks.~ 5718:Picsolve International 5697:I commented , thanks.~ 5585:Childline South Africa 5274: 4043: 3718:I'm no IP, talk to me! 2459:I'll get there today. 2212:Science Citation Index 1880:Intelligence (journal) 1544:19th c. novelists.... 1525:= Merge discussion at 1507: 1146:Intelligence Community 1121: 373:Sourcing dispute board 208:, & Barnes Reports 6125: 5273: 5097:IT New York deletion? 4787:sometimes dishonestly 4042: 3429:my highest priority. 2049:Cultural intelligence 1566:political correctness 1506: 1120: 1032:Blended librarianship 955:Google Search Results 4882:commented there.See 4430:Then it's up to you 3495:.I have moved it to 2005:conflict of Interest 1404:I have emailed you. 1261:, or the revenge of 950:UMN Primate Research 124:Request you look at 47:Actual usage of the 5767:Lloyd Bancaire Page 4807:Candidate for AfD? 4703:Candidate for AfD? 4621:Notability question 4398:. I'll leave it to 4093:I see it's now at 3673:Ted Eisenberg et al 3449:Nils Otto Myklestad 3404:Crown Disposal, Inc 2776:I have just begun. 2355:Ruby McGregor-Smith 2055:Cross necklace page 1620:Southbeach Notation 6128: 5481:Disruptive Editing 5285:remove this notice 5278:Slon02's talk page 5275: 4941:Kyonoshin Maruyama 4646:Great Lakes Chorus 4054:remove this notice 4044: 3054:Tomorrow's Company 3041:and possible merge 2745:Man With A Mission 2526:Great, thank you! 2454:Strayer University 2185:What's in a name ? 1960:(PRODded, now AFD) 1508: 877:Spread of printing 815:Structure of Magic 739:OK, I've modified 613:WP:FLAG-/templates 97:, for example. -- 78:sampling deletions 6177: 6133: 5469: 5461:N at Appcelerator 5429: 5421:N at Appcelerator 4976:underconstruction 4396:Salting the earth 4074:Anthony W. Ulwick 4062:Khaldoun Almhanna 3681:(deleted article) 3499:for improvements. 3330: 3329: 2260:commented there. 1492: 1486: 178: 139:commented there. 6439: 6413: 6397:Cristina Butunoi 6231: 6175: 6131: 6006: 6000: 5997: 5994: 5903: 5902: 5789:Michael Jay Moon 5669: 5463: 5423: 5288: 5250:sensible to me. 4908:UFP Technologies 4884:WP:Summary style 4689: 4684: 4437: 4423: 4414: 4405: 4375: 4361: 4352: 4335: 4326: 4316: 4310: 4306: 4057: 3826: 3815:ISI_Highly_Cited 3714: 3713: 3643: 3642: 3580:Integrationalism 3334:Busman's holiday 3317:Extended content 3313: 3312: 3283: 3282: 2977: 2971: 2796:CityU of Seattle 2756: 2751: 2287:Mentioned you... 2156:Milking the bull 1983:Close paraphrase 1855:Lockwood's Books 1490: 1484: 1480: 1478: 885: 875: 758: 757: 751: 746: 636: 635: 629: 620: 560: 542: 167: 106: 103: 49:European Library 6447: 6446: 6442: 6441: 6440: 6438: 6437: 6436: 6404: 6380: 6339: 6337:DGG or stalkers 6325: 6295: 6265: 6229: 6215: 6172: 6120: 6064: 6037: 6004: 5998: 5995: 5992: 5982: 5934: 5904: 5900: 5897: 5888: 5844: 5837: 5774: 5769: 5746: 5728:'DGG (at NYPL)' 5721: 5692: 5683: 5660: 5630: 5615: 5587: 5560: 5529: 5522: 5517: 5490: 5483: 5384: 5379: 5372: 5343: 5338: 5333: 5304: 5299: 5294: 5289: 5282: 5244: 5208: 5180: 5175: 5153: 5104: 5099: 5094: 5089: 5059: 5052: 5047: 5042: 5007: 5005:– advice needed 4948: 4911: 4877: 4872: 4836: 4812: 4748: 4708: 4687: 4682: 4648: 4623: 4597: 4544: 4536: 4518:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 4492: 4462: 4431: 4417: 4408: 4399: 4369: 4355: 4346: 4329: 4320: 4314: 4308: 4300: 4124:I just found a 4121: 4086: 4081: 4076: 4071: 4066: 4058: 4051: 4036: 4031: 4026: 3948: 3946:Richard Grayson 3859: 3840:I've added it. 3828: 3824: 3792: 3790:Del of interest 3787: 3751: 3709: 3708: 3683: 3675: 3644: 3583: 3534: 3456: 3451: 3411: 3406: 3391: 3364: 3336: 3331: 3326: 3318: 3280: 3279: 3258: 3181: 3176: 3171: 3164: 3157: 3152: 3143: 3114: 3061: 3050: 3043: 3035: 3006: 2975: 2969: 2890: 2888:WikiProject NIH 2845: 2798: 2771: 2754: 2749: 2721: 2497: 2456: 2451: 2418: 2357: 2334: 2289: 2284: 2255: 2248: 2243: 2238: 2187: 2159: 2152: 2149:Nova Publishers 2145: 2069: 2064: 2057: 2052: 1972: 1967: 1962: 1953: 1922: 1915: 1910: 1883: 1857: 1852: 1822: 1795: 1679: 1622: 1595: 1592:William Monahan 1538: 1501: 1482: 1474: 1453: 1348: 1321:coverage from 1305: 1300: 1142:the quote above 1119: 1070: 1063: 1035: 1028: 1025:Camp Rising Sun 1021: 991: 988:Nova Publishers 957: 952: 911: 887: 790: 785: 755: 749: 748: 747:to replace the 740: 712: 633: 627: 626: 616: 567:discussion page 533: 517: 513: 375: 348: 322: 315: 309:Msg for you on 239: 210: 184:User_talk:Bovlb 172: 161: 134: 129: 121: 116: 101: 98: 90: 85: 80: 75: 58: 56:Librarian stuff 53: 44: 39: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6445: 6435: 6434: 6433: 6432: 6431: 6430: 6409:comment added 6389: 6388: 6387: 6386: 6379: 6376: 6375: 6374: 6358: 6355: 6352: 6349: 6346: 6343: 6338: 6335: 6334: 6333: 6332: 6331: 6324: 6319: 6318: 6317: 6316: 6315: 6294: 6289: 6288: 6287: 6286: 6285: 6264: 6259: 6258: 6257: 6256: 6255: 6214: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6206: 6205: 6185: 6180: 6179: 6171: 6165: 6164: 6163: 6162: 6161: 6141: 6136: 6135: 6119: 6113: 6112: 6111: 6110: 6109: 6090: 6089: 6088: 6087: 6063: 6060: 6059: 6058: 6057: 6056: 6036: 6031: 6030: 6029: 6028: 6027: 5981: 5976: 5975: 5974: 5973: 5972: 5971: 5970: 5933: 5927: 5926: 5925: 5924: 5923: 5910: 5898: 5896: 5891:Nomination of 5889: 5887: 5884: 5883: 5882: 5881: 5880: 5879: 5878: 5843: 5838: 5836: 5833: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5829: 5828: 5827: 5826: 5825: 5796:improve them 5793: 5785: 5773: 5770: 5768: 5765: 5764: 5763: 5745: 5742: 5741: 5740: 5739: 5738: 5720: 5715: 5714: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5698: 5691: 5686:Nomination of 5684: 5682: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5676: 5675: 5674: 5673: 5652: 5651: 5650: 5649: 5629: 5626: 5625: 5624: 5623: 5622: 5614: 5611: 5610: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5586: 5583: 5582: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5559: 5556: 5555: 5554: 5553: 5552: 5528: 5523: 5521: 5518: 5516: 5515:Servisomething 5513: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5489: 5484: 5482: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5476: 5475: 5474: 5473: 5435: 5434: 5433: 5396: 5395: 5391: 5388: 5383: 5380: 5378: 5373: 5371: 5366: 5365: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5342: 5339: 5337: 5334: 5332: 5327: 5326: 5325: 5324: 5323: 5303: 5300: 5298: 5295: 5293: 5290: 5281: 5268: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5264: 5243: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5232: 5215: 5207: 5204: 5203: 5202: 5201: 5200: 5179: 5176: 5174: 5171: 5170: 5169: 5152: 5149: 5148: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5103: 5100: 5098: 5095: 5093: 5090: 5088: 5083: 5082: 5081: 5080: 5079: 5058: 5056:Brian Halligan 5053: 5051: 5048: 5046: 5043: 5041: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5006: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4955: 4947: 4945:Kum Kum Khanna 4934: 4933: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4910: 4904: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4876: 4875:Seeking advice 4873: 4871: 4870:Wendy Grantham 4868: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4835: 4830: 4829: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4823: 4819:Empire of Dirt 4811: 4805: 4804: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4791:Dr. Fleischman 4753: 4747: 4744: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4723: 4719: 4715:Empire of Dirt 4707: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4647: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4622: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4590: 4589: 4543: 4537: 4535: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4511: 4510: 4491: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4461: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4366: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4120: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4085: 4082: 4080: 4077: 4075: 4072: 4070: 4067: 4065: 4059: 4050: 4037: 4035: 4032: 4030: 4027: 4025: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 3947: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3858: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3818: 3791: 3788: 3786: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3764: 3756: 3750: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3682: 3676: 3674: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3582: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3569: 3568: 3552: 3549: 3546: 3542: 3539: 3533: 3532:Myklestad pt.2 3530: 3529: 3528: 3512: 3509: 3503: 3500: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3470: 3455: 3452: 3450: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3426: 3418: 3410: 3407: 3405: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3390: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3363: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3335: 3332: 3328: 3327: 3323: 3320: 3319: 3316: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3257: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3180: 3177: 3175: 3172: 3170: 3165: 3163: 3158: 3156: 3153: 3151: 3146:Nomination of 3144: 3142: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3113: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3060: 3051: 3049: 3044: 3042: 3036: 3034: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3005: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2942: 2941: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2889: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2844: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2797: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2770: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2720: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2606: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2496: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2455: 2452: 2450: 2448:A.L.A. catalog 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2417: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2361: 2356: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2333: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2288: 2285: 2283: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2254: 2252:Review journal 2249: 2247: 2244: 2242: 2239: 2237: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2186: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2158: 2153: 2151: 2146: 2144: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2099: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2068: 2067:IOP_Publishing 2065: 2063: 2058: 2056: 2053: 2051: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2032: 2028:Promotionalism 2025: 2018: 2012: 2002: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1986: 1971: 1968: 1966: 1963: 1961: 1954: 1952: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1921: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1882: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1856: 1853: 1851: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1821: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1794: 1793:ECRI Institute 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1678: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1594: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1537: 1536:Jews and Scots 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1500: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1452: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1347: 1346:ECRI Institute 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1304: 1303:ECRI Institute 1301: 1299: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1272:radicalization 1196: 1152:book do not. 1148:book, and the 1118: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1090: 1069: 1064: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1034: 1029: 1027: 1022: 1020: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 990: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 956: 953: 951: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 910: 907: 906: 905: 886: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 789: 786: 784: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 743:Flag-templates 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 708: 675: 674: 673: 672: 655: 654: 653: 604: 603: 602: 601: 582: 581: 563:WP:FLAG-MOVIES 512: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 482: 481: 480: 479: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 428: 424: 420: 408: 407: 404: 401: 397: 396: 395: 394: 374: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 347: 344: 343: 342: 330:"diet food". 321: 316: 314: 307: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 285: 262: 261: 260: 259: 238: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 209: 203: 202: 201: 200: 199: 170: 160: 157: 156: 155: 154: 153: 133: 130: 128: 122: 120: 117: 115: 112: 111: 110: 89: 86: 84: 81: 79: 76: 74: 73:Ronn Torossian 71: 70: 69: 57: 54: 52: 51:by librarians? 45: 43: 40: 38: 33: 32: 31: 28: 27: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6444: 6429: 6425: 6421: 6420: 6415: 6414: 6412: 6408: 6402: 6398: 6393: 6392: 6391: 6390: 6384: 6383: 6382: 6381: 6373: 6369: 6365: 6364: 6359: 6356: 6353: 6350: 6347: 6344: 6341: 6340: 6329: 6328: 6327: 6326: 6323: 6314: 6310: 6306: 6305: 6299: 6298: 6297: 6296: 6293: 6284: 6280: 6276: 6275: 6269: 6268: 6267: 6266: 6263: 6254: 6250: 6246: 6245: 6239: 6238: 6237: 6234: 6232: 6225: 6221: 6217: 6216: 6213: 6204: 6200: 6196: 6195: 6190: 6189: 6186: 6182: 6181: 6174: 6173: 6169: 6160: 6156: 6152: 6151: 6146: 6145: 6142: 6138: 6137: 6130: 6129: 6124: 6117: 6108: 6104: 6100: 6099: 6094: 6093: 6092: 6091: 6086: 6082: 6078: 6077: 6072: 6068: 6067: 6066: 6065: 6055: 6051: 6047: 6046: 6041: 6040: 6039: 6038: 6035: 6026: 6022: 6018: 6017: 6012: 6011: 6010: 6007: 6002: 6001: 5988: 5984: 5983: 5980: 5969: 5965: 5961: 5960: 5955: 5954: 5953: 5949: 5945: 5944: 5938: 5937: 5936: 5935: 5932: 5922: 5919: 5918: 5917: 5911: 5908: 5907: 5906: 5905: 5894: 5877: 5873: 5869: 5865: 5864: 5863: 5859: 5855: 5854: 5848: 5847: 5846: 5845: 5842: 5841:Eva Moskowitz 5824: 5820: 5816: 5811: 5810: 5809: 5805: 5801: 5800: 5794: 5790: 5786: 5783: 5780: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5775: 5762: 5758: 5754: 5753: 5748: 5747: 5737: 5733: 5729: 5725: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5719: 5710: 5707: 5706: 5705: 5699: 5696: 5695: 5694: 5693: 5689: 5672: 5667: 5663: 5658: 5657: 5656: 5655: 5654: 5653: 5648: 5644: 5640: 5639: 5634: 5633: 5632: 5631: 5619: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5606: 5602: 5598: 5597: 5591: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5578: 5574: 5570: 5569: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5551: 5547: 5543: 5542: 5537: 5533: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5527: 5508: 5504: 5500: 5499: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5488: 5472: 5467: 5462: 5457: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5447: 5443: 5442: 5436: 5432: 5427: 5422: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5411: 5407: 5406: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5392: 5389: 5386: 5385: 5377: 5370: 5361: 5357: 5353: 5352: 5347: 5346: 5345: 5344: 5331: 5322: 5318: 5314: 5313: 5308: 5307: 5306: 5305: 5286: 5279: 5272: 5263: 5259: 5255: 5254: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5245: 5233: 5231: 5227: 5223: 5222: 5216: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5209: 5199: 5195: 5191: 5190: 5184: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5168: 5164: 5160: 5155: 5154: 5142: 5138: 5134: 5133: 5128: 5124: 5120: 5116: 5112: 5111: 5108: 5107: 5106: 5105: 5102:Re:thearticle 5087: 5078: 5074: 5070: 5069: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5057: 5040: 5033: 5029: 5025: 5024: 5019: 5014: 5009: 5008: 5004: 4993: 4989: 4985: 4981: 4977: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4967: 4963: 4962: 4956: 4952: 4951: 4950: 4949: 4946: 4942: 4938: 4937:Sang Won Kang 4929: 4925: 4921: 4920: 4915: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4909: 4899: 4895: 4891: 4890: 4885: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4863: 4859: 4855: 4854: 4849: 4845: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4837: 4834: 4824: 4820: 4816: 4815: 4814: 4813: 4810: 4809:Wendy Fonarow 4800: 4796: 4792: 4788: 4783: 4779: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4769: 4765: 4764: 4758: 4754: 4750: 4749: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4730: 4724: 4720: 4716: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4706: 4705:Wendy Fonarow 4694: 4691: 4690: 4685: 4677: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4673: 4672: 4667: 4663: 4659: 4658: 4652: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4641: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4625: 4624: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4607: 4602: 4601:User:Eastmain 4599: 4598: 4588: 4584: 4580: 4576: 4572: 4568: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4559: 4555: 4554: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4541: 4540:Carola Darwin 4527: 4523: 4519: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4500: 4494: 4493: 4490: 4481: 4477: 4473: 4472: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4449: 4445: 4441: 4435: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4424: 4422: 4421: 4415: 4413: 4412: 4403: 4397: 4393: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4373: 4367: 4365: 4362: 4360: 4359: 4353: 4351: 4350: 4342: 4341: 4339: 4336: 4334: 4333: 4327: 4325: 4324: 4313: 4304: 4298: 4294: 4293: 4280: 4276: 4272: 4271: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4242: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4198: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4159: 4155: 4151: 4150: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4138: 4134: 4130: 4127: 4123: 4122: 4110: 4106: 4102: 4101: 4096: 4092: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4063: 4055: 4048: 4041: 4011: 4007: 4003: 4002:Jimsteele9999 3999: 3998: 3997: 3993: 3989: 3988: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3977: 3973: 3972:Jimsteele9999 3969: 3968: 3967: 3963: 3959: 3958: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3900: 3894: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3860: 3849: 3845: 3844: 3839: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3821: 3816: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3806: 3802: 3801: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3771: 3765: 3762: 3757: 3753: 3752: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3733: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3715: 3712: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3693: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3680: 3666: 3662: 3658: 3657: 3652: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3641: 3627: 3623: 3622: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3592: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3581: 3571: 3570: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3558: 3553: 3550: 3547: 3543: 3540: 3536: 3535: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3518: 3513: 3510: 3508: 3504: 3501: 3498: 3494: 3493: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3477: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3433: 3427: 3424: 3419: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3373: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3346: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3322: 3321: 3315: 3314: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3295: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3284: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3265: 3260: 3259: 3256: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3237: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3191: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3169: 3162: 3149: 3141: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3123: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3075: 3070: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3059: 3055: 3048: 3040: 3033: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3015: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3004: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2974: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2956: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2921: 2920: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2900: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2870: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2854: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2843: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2823: 2822: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2808: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2780: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2760: 2757: 2752: 2746: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2731: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2672: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2596: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2506: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2479: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2463: 2458: 2457: 2449: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2431: 2426: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2369: 2365: 2362: 2359: 2358: 2347: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2314: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2298: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2282: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2264: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2253: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2196: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2169: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2157: 2150: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2107: 2105: 2100: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2078: 2074:I responded. 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2062: 2061:Library theft 2050: 2042: 2040: 2038: 2036: 2035:Illustrations 2033: 2029: 2026: 2022: 2019: 2016: 2013: 2010: 2006: 2003: 2000: 1997: 1992: 1987: 1984: 1980: 1979: 1977: 1974: 1973: 1959: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1935: 1930: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1920: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1881: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1859: 1858: 1850: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1777: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1754: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1725: 1719: 1714: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1690: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1632: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1604: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1593: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1567: 1563: 1562:David Daiches 1559: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1548: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1489: 1485: 1479: 1477: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1455: 1454: 1451: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1432: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1330: 1324: 1320: 1315: 1312: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1253:the wrath of 1251: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1203: 1197: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1154:authoritative 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1128: 1123: 1122: 1116: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1091: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1080: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1033: 1026: 1019: 1010: 1006: 1002: 1001: 995: 994: 993: 992: 989: 980: 976: 972: 971: 966: 961: 960: 959: 958: 941: 938: 937: 933: 929: 928: 926: 922: 921: 915: 914: 913: 912: 904: 900: 896: 895: 889: 888: 882: 878: 866: 862: 858: 857: 852: 851: 850: 849: 842: 838: 834: 829: 825: 821: 816: 811: 810: 809: 805: 801: 800: 794: 793: 792: 791: 774: 770: 766: 762: 754: 744: 738: 737: 736: 732: 728: 727: 722: 721: 720: 719: 711: 707: 705: 702: 699: 695: 690: 686: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 671: 667: 663: 662: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 632: 624: 619: 614: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 600: 596: 592: 591: 586: 585: 584: 583: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 558: 554: 550: 546: 541: 537: 532: 528: 524: 520: 515: 514: 511: 507: 496: 493: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 478: 474: 470: 469: 463: 462: 461: 460: 453: 450: 445: 444: 443: 439: 435: 434: 429: 425: 421: 417: 412: 411: 410: 409: 405: 402: 399: 398: 393: 389: 385: 384: 379: 378: 377: 376: 366: 362: 358: 357: 352: 351: 350: 349: 341: 337: 333: 329: 324: 323: 320: 319:Polyglycoplex 312: 300: 296: 292: 291: 286: 284: 281: 280: 276: 272: 268: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 258: 254: 250: 249: 243: 242: 241: 240: 237: 228: 224: 220: 219: 214: 213: 212: 211: 207: 198: 194: 190: 189: 185: 181: 180: 179: 177: 174: 163: 162: 152: 148: 144: 143: 138: 137: 136: 135: 132:Fiat Justicia 127: 109: 105: 104: 96: 92: 91: 68: 65: 60: 59: 50: 42:Mainz Psalter 37: 30: 29: 26: 25: 19: 18:User talk:DGG 6417: 6405:— Preceding 6361: 6302: 6272: 6242: 6219: 6192: 6148: 6096: 6074: 6043: 6014: 5990: 5957: 5941: 5915: 5914: 5895:for deletion 5851: 5797: 5772:Paid editor? 5750: 5744:Joey Ciccone 5703: 5702: 5690:for deletion 5636: 5594: 5566: 5539: 5496: 5439: 5403: 5382:My AfC draft 5349: 5330:Forth Bridge 5310: 5251: 5219: 5187: 5130: 5066: 5021: 5017: 5012: 4979: 4975: 4959: 4917: 4887: 4851: 4781: 4761: 4756: 4727: 4680: 4655: 4604: 4579:Voceditenore 4551: 4497: 4469: 4419: 4418: 4410: 4409: 4357: 4356: 4348: 4347: 4331: 4330: 4322: 4321: 4268: 4195: 4147: 4098: 4084:book critics 4024:AfC question 3985: 3955: 3897: 3841: 3798: 3768: 3730: 3710: 3690: 3654: 3619: 3589: 3555: 3515: 3506: 3474: 3465: 3461: 3430: 3422: 3370: 3343: 3292: 3262: 3253:deletion of 3234: 3229: 3188: 3150:for deletion 3120: 3072: 3032:Rumi's Kimia 3012: 2953: 2897: 2867: 2851: 2805: 2777: 2728: 2669: 2593: 2551: 2503: 2476: 2460: 2428: 2366: 2311: 2295: 2261: 2193: 2166: 2101: 2075: 2034: 2027: 2020: 2014: 2004: 1998: 1991:WP:COPYRIGHT 1975: 1932: 1928: 1908:uw templates 1889: 1862: 1828: 1801: 1774: 1751: 1722: 1717: 1687: 1629: 1601: 1569: 1545: 1475: 1457: 1429: 1405: 1381: 1357: 1327: 1322: 1318: 1268:Lindis Percy 1237: 1217:Menwith Hill 1200: 1178:Menwith Hill 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1125: 1095: 1092: 1077: 1042: 998: 968: 934: 918: 892: 854: 828:one session, 827: 814: 797: 760: 724: 700: 692: 685:WP:CONSENSUS 659: 617: 588: 562: 506:WP:FLAG-PROF 466: 431: 415: 414:contents of 381: 354: 311:WP:FLAG-PROF 288: 277: 270: 246: 216: 186: 175: 168: 159:Re: question 140: 99: 6224:AMU history 4632:Mark Arsten 4571:Emma Darwin 3930:Paul venter 3916:Paul venter 3881:Paul venter 2699:QueenCity11 2642:QueenCity11 2610:QueenCity11 2578:QueenCity11 2528:QueenCity11 2416:Deon Swiggs 2216:Steve Quinn 1319:substantial 765:72.75.78.69 694:72.75.78.69 643:72.75.78.69 623:WP:FLAG-BIO 571:72.75.78.69 510:WP:FLAG-BIO 328:Slim Styles 206:Cal Nichols 6034:Pitscottie 5866:Thanks! -- 4833:Ahmet Orun 4489:Engage:BDR 4295:I've done 4119:Bill Still 3825:reply here 3545:Knowledge. 2769:Thank you! 2123:CorporateM 2109:CorporateM 2021:Notability 1999:Plagiarism 1677:ECRI again 1174:deontology 1166:Deep Black 1162:Intel Comm 1150:Deep black 519:Krocodylus 332:Trekphiler 5815:Amsterdad 5782:Amsterdad 5558:Vandalism 5045:Bérardier 4542:recreated 4194:tonight. 2015:Ownership 1976:Copyright 1323:3rd party 1274:process. 1257:upon the 1170:teleology 639:WP:CSD#A7 313:talk page 275:Cool Hand 271:somewhere 6230:James086 5628:Feedback 5283:You can 5159:Xave2000 4757:a priori 4683:Spinning 4312:cite web 4052:You can 4034:Question 3362:Legiotex 3214:hgilbert 2827:Jclemens 2398:Vivj2012 2383:Vivj2012 1847:Drv for 1657:Mbonline 1515:Cgingold 1259:Sophists 1255:Socrates 1182:Pine Gap 1117:deletion 932:Zagalejo 704:contribs 102:Jreferee 83:Printing 6407:undated 6301:route. 6170:Comment 6118:Comment 5459:issue.— 4440:20-dude 4392:WP:SALT 4378:20-dude 4303:20-dude 4229:20-dude 4171:20-dude 4133:20-dude 3836:it's 3679:Outsell 3473:there. 3230:general 3212:here). 2980:Kumioko 2931:Kumioko 2926:little. 2913:things. 2341:WP:PROD 1263:Hypatia 879:==: --> 689:WP:PROF 536:protect 531:history 5929:About 5835:E.Coli 5613:Ecosia 4984:Mishae 4778:WP:COI 4079:update 3706:best, 3606:JohnCD 3091:Sladen 2750:Silver 2041:] or 2009:WP:COI 1718:thinks 1476:Verbal 1180:, and 1158:trivia 1115:DCEETA 540:delete 516:P.S.: 492:Kirill 449:Kirill 6424:talk 6368:talk 6309:talk 6279:talk 6271:site. 6249:talk 6220:think 6199:talk 6155:talk 6103:talk 6081:talk 6050:talk 6021:talk 5964:talk 5948:talk 5858:talk 5804:talk 5757:talk 5643:talk 5601:talk 5573:talk 5546:talk 5503:talk 5446:talk 5410:talk 5356:talk 5317:talk 5258:talk 5226:talk 5194:talk 5137:talk 5092:Chiel 5073:talk 5028:talk 5013:write 4966:talk 4924:talk 4894:talk 4858:talk 4768:talk 4734:talk 4688:Spark 4662:talk 4611:talk 4558:talk 4504:talk 4476:talk 4275:talk 4202:talk 4154:talk 4105:talk 3992:talk 3962:talk 3904:talk 3848:talk 3805:talk 3775:talk 3737:talk 3711:78.26 3697:talk 3661:talk 3626:talk 3596:talk 3562:talk 3522:talk 3481:talk 3437:talk 3377:talk 3350:talk 3299:talk 3281:rybec 3269:talk 3241:talk 3195:talk 3127:talk 3079:talk 3019:talk 2960:talk 2904:talk 2874:talk 2858:talk 2812:talk 2784:talk 2755:seren 2735:talk 2727:AfC.) 2676:talk 2600:talk 2558:talk 2510:talk 2483:talk 2467:talk 2435:talk 2373:talk 2332:Wayra 2318:talk 2302:talk 2268:talk 2200:talk 2173:talk 2082:talk 2039:] or 1939:talk 1276:Dogue 1224:Dogue 1186:Dogue 759:with 569::-) — 565:(see 557:views 549:watch 545:links 427:them. 36:SPARC 16:< 6401:talk 5916:here 5872:talk 5819:talk 5732:talk 5704:here 5666:talk 5662:Span 5206:Toll 5178:Toll 5163:talk 5157:all? 4988:talk 4943:and 4848:here 4844:here 4795:talk 4782:some 4636:talk 4628:here 4583:talk 4575:here 4522:talk 4444:talk 4382:talk 4372:PamD 4368:Hi, 4233:talk 4175:talk 4137:talk 4131:. -- 4126:WHDT 4006:talk 3976:talk 3934:talk 3920:talk 3885:talk 3868:talk 3610:talk 3218:talk 3095:talk 2984:talk 2935:talk 2831:talk 2703:talk 2646:talk 2614:talk 2582:talk 2532:talk 2402:talk 2387:talk 2246:List 2220:talk 2127:Talk 2113:Talk 1956:Re: 1896:talk 1869:talk 1835:talk 1808:talk 1781:talk 1758:talk 1729:talk 1694:talk 1661:talk 1636:talk 1608:talk 1576:talk 1552:talk 1519:talk 1483:chat 1464:talk 1448:Re: 1436:talk 1412:talk 1388:talk 1364:talk 1334:talk 1298:ECRI 1280:talk 1244:talk 1228:talk 1207:talk 1190:talk 1172:not 1132:talk 1102:talk 1084:talk 1049:talk 1005:talk 975:talk 925:talk 899:talk 861:talk 837:talk 824:PTSD 804:talk 769:talk 731:talk 698:talk 666:talk 647:talk 631:Prod 595:talk 575:talk 553:logs 527:talk 523:edit 508:and 473:talk 438:talk 388:talk 361:talk 336:talk 295:talk 279:Luke 253:talk 223:talk 193:talk 169:east 147:talk 95:this 64:Katr 6419:DGG 6403:) 6363:DGG 6304:DGG 6274:DGG 6244:DGG 6194:DGG 6150:DGG 6098:DGG 6076:DGG 6045:DGG 6016:DGG 5959:DGG 5943:DGG 5868:JBL 5853:DGG 5799:DGG 5752:DGG 5638:DGG 5596:DGG 5568:DGG 5541:DGG 5520:FYI 5498:DGG 5441:DGG 5405:DGG 5351:DGG 5312:DGG 5253:DGG 5221:DGG 5189:DGG 5132:DGG 5068:DGG 5023:DGG 4961:DGG 4919:DGG 4889:DGG 4853:DGG 4763:DGG 4729:DGG 4657:DGG 4606:DGG 4553:DGG 4499:DGG 4471:DGG 4434:DGG 4411:Pam 4402:DGG 4349:Pam 4323:Pam 4270:DGG 4197:DGG 4149:DGG 4100:DGG 4064:AfD 3987:DGG 3957:DGG 3899:DGG 3864:Kww 3843:DGG 3800:DGG 3770:DGG 3732:DGG 3692:DGG 3656:DGG 3651:AfD 3621:DGG 3591:DGG 3557:DGG 3538:on. 3517:DGG 3476:DGG 3466:you 3432:DGG 3423:ers 3372:DGG 3345:DGG 3294:DGG 3264:DGG 3236:DGG 3190:DGG 3122:DGG 3074:DGG 3014:DGG 2955:DGG 2899:DGG 2869:DGG 2853:DGG 2807:DGG 2779:DGG 2730:DGG 2671:DGG 2595:DGG 2553:DGG 2505:DGG 2478:DGG 2462:DGG 2430:DGG 2368:DGG 2313:DGG 2297:DGG 2263:DGG 2195:DGG 2168:DGG 2143:CRL 2077:DGG 1934:DGG 1891:DGG 1864:DGG 1830:DGG 1803:DGG 1776:DGG 1753:DGG 1724:DGG 1689:DGG 1631:DGG 1603:DGG 1571:DGG 1547:DGG 1459:DGG 1431:DGG 1407:DGG 1383:DGG 1359:DGG 1329:DGG 1239:DGG 1202:DGG 1127:DGG 1097:DGG 1079:DGG 1044:DGG 1000:DGG 970:DGG 936:^^^ 920:DGG 894:DGG 856:DGG 833:Abd 799:DGG 788:NLP 761:N/A 726:DGG 661:DGG 641:. — 618:RED 590:DGG 468:DGG 433:DGG 416:all 383:DGG 356:DGG 290:DGG 248:DGG 218:DGG 188:DGG 173:718 142:DGG 119:LCC 6426:) 6370:) 6311:) 6281:) 6251:) 6218:I 6201:) 6157:) 6105:) 6083:) 6052:) 6023:) 5996:am 5993:At 5966:) 5950:) 5874:) 5860:) 5821:) 5806:) 5759:) 5734:) 5645:) 5603:) 5575:) 5548:) 5505:) 5448:) 5412:) 5358:) 5319:) 5260:) 5235:it 5228:) 5196:) 5165:) 5139:) 5129:. 5075:) 5030:) 4990:) 4968:) 4939:, 4926:) 4896:) 4886:. 4860:) 4797:) 4770:) 4736:) 4664:) 4638:) 4630:. 4613:) 4585:) 4560:) 4534:CV 4524:) 4506:) 4478:) 4446:) 4384:) 4340:" 4315:}} 4309:{{ 4277:) 4235:) 4204:) 4177:) 4156:) 4139:) 4107:) 4008:) 3994:) 3978:) 3964:) 3936:) 3922:) 3906:) 3887:) 3870:) 3807:) 3777:) 3739:) 3720:) 3699:) 3663:) 3628:) 3612:) 3598:) 3564:) 3524:) 3483:) 3439:) 3379:) 3352:) 3301:) 3271:) 3243:) 3220:) 3197:) 3129:) 3097:) 3081:) 3021:) 2986:) 2976:}} 2970:{{ 2962:) 2937:) 2906:) 2876:) 2860:) 2833:) 2814:) 2786:) 2737:) 2705:) 2678:) 2648:) 2616:) 2602:) 2584:) 2560:) 2534:) 2512:) 2485:) 2469:) 2437:) 2404:) 2389:) 2375:) 2320:) 2304:) 2270:) 2222:) 2202:) 2175:) 2129:) 2115:) 2084:) 1941:) 1898:) 1871:) 1837:) 1810:) 1783:) 1760:) 1731:) 1696:) 1663:) 1638:) 1610:) 1578:) 1554:) 1529:== 1521:) 1466:) 1438:) 1414:) 1390:) 1366:) 1336:) 1282:) 1246:) 1230:) 1209:) 1192:) 1134:) 1104:) 1086:) 1051:) 1007:) 977:) 927:) 901:) 863:) 839:) 806:) 771:) 756:}} 753:db 750:{{ 745:}} 741:{{ 733:) 668:) 649:) 634:}} 628:{{ 597:) 577:) 555:| 551:| 547:| 543:| 538:| 534:| 529:| 525:| 475:) 440:) 390:) 363:) 338:) 297:) 255:) 225:) 195:) 149:) 6422:( 6399:( 6366:( 6307:( 6277:( 6247:( 6197:( 6153:( 6101:( 6079:( 6048:( 6019:( 6005:頭 5999:a 5962:( 5946:( 5870:( 5856:( 5817:( 5802:( 5755:( 5730:( 5668:) 5664:( 5641:( 5599:( 5571:( 5544:( 5501:( 5468:) 5464:( 5444:( 5428:) 5424:( 5408:( 5354:( 5315:( 5280:. 5256:( 5224:( 5192:( 5161:( 5135:( 5071:( 5026:( 4986:( 4964:( 4922:( 4892:( 4856:( 4793:( 4766:( 4732:( 4660:( 4634:( 4609:( 4581:( 4556:( 4520:( 4502:( 4474:( 4442:( 4436:: 4432:@ 4420:D 4404:: 4400:@ 4380:( 4374:: 4370:@ 4358:D 4332:D 4305:: 4301:@ 4273:( 4243:. 4231:( 4200:( 4173:( 4152:( 4135:( 4103:( 4049:. 4004:( 3990:( 3974:( 3960:( 3932:( 3918:( 3902:( 3883:( 3866:( 3846:( 3822:| 3803:( 3773:( 3735:( 3716:( 3695:( 3659:( 3624:( 3608:( 3594:( 3560:( 3520:( 3479:( 3435:( 3375:( 3348:( 3297:( 3267:( 3239:( 3216:( 3193:( 3125:( 3101:— 3093:( 3077:( 3056:→ 3017:( 2982:( 2958:( 2933:( 2902:( 2872:( 2856:( 2829:( 2810:( 2782:( 2733:( 2701:( 2674:( 2644:( 2612:( 2598:( 2580:( 2556:( 2530:( 2508:( 2481:( 2465:( 2433:( 2400:( 2385:( 2371:( 2348:. 2316:( 2300:( 2266:( 2218:( 2198:( 2171:( 2125:( 2111:( 2080:( 1937:( 1894:( 1867:( 1833:( 1806:( 1779:( 1756:( 1727:( 1692:( 1659:( 1634:( 1606:( 1574:( 1550:( 1517:( 1462:( 1434:( 1410:( 1386:( 1362:( 1332:( 1278:( 1242:( 1226:( 1205:( 1188:( 1130:( 1100:( 1082:( 1047:( 1003:( 973:( 923:( 897:( 859:( 835:( 802:( 767:( 729:( 706:) 701:· 696:( 664:( 645:( 593:( 573:( 559:) 521:( 471:( 436:( 386:( 359:( 334:( 293:( 251:( 221:( 191:( 171:. 145:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.