User talk:Cuchullain/Archive 9

914:

well and seems balanced and suitably scholarly to me... I'll be interested to see what happens to the article afterwards now, and how much it continues to evolve and change from this point. On this latter point, I've played around to try and address Ottava's comments (from the Talk page) on overlapping images but can't figure out how to do it, though it does occur to me that whether they 'sandwich' text or not is entirely down to the screen resolution of each user; a lower resolution, as on my old stand-alone PC, would remove the overlap, whilst a higher one would increase it :-/ Incidentally, looking over the article I noticed that we have a 'Further Reading' section that I hadn't noticed before, which includes my monograph -- is this ok, given my role? (though not in this part of it) I tried hard to avoid any COI and POV when writing the article and don't want to leave us open to any question (hopefully I managed otherwise on these two points; I used it only where it seemed appropriate...); shall I remove? Warm regards,

3034:, and as such it was impossible to verify whether it was important to the subject of the article or not. This is the main thing. However, by my personal knowledge of the Arthurian legend, I find it unlikely that such a citation will be found - "Code Geass" just has not made much impact on Arthurian literature or scholarship (clearly it might be important in other realms). Even in your statement, "Galahad" was only used as the name for a giant robot; Galahad himself does not appear, and so this is a passing mention rather than a modern reinterpretation. We can't list every pop culture item that has ever mentioned Galahad, or else this would be a trivia omnibus rather than an encyclopedia.-- 3987:

though, is this new rigor in imposing "notability" may prove counterproductive to the presentation of all there is to know in the world. In my first years in Knowledge, which correspond to yours, the big rigor was in making Knowledge NPOV, which is definitely a good goal; however, now the rigor is NOT, notability. Certainly one should exclude vanity pages of some of us, but one should not be so ready to condense everything down to the point that it does not contain every possible human thought. It is the inclusiveness of Knowledge that causes it to popup on google searches in the first place. That is how I first discovered Knowledge. Knowledge should be

3932:

is for that reason that Knowledge in the past has somewhat used IMDb data favorably. It is not only you that has edited out IMDb references but also others. Considering that Knowledge is more easily edited than IMDb, isn't it a little disingenuous of us to disparage IMDb, which is more difficult for anyone to edit than Knowledge? Granted, there seems to be a greater attention to resourcing data adequately, but I am not clear about what has made IMDb so inadequate all of a sudden. BTW, on a lighter note, I too am interested in Arthurian legend. I know that it is not part of Geoffrey Monmouth or Thomas Mallory or Tennison, but I like the line in

930:

tell the sandwiching is, as you say, the result of screen resolution. It looks fine on my screen, so I can't tell what he's going on about. The "Further reading" section I went ahead and removed entirely, as all four books that appeared there were already used in the "references" section ("further reading" sections here are usually used to include useful sources that were not cited in the article.) Your name and your book obviously still appear in the article, but no one I've heard has even suggested that there's any conflict of interest or of POV. The article is excellent, and I'm happy to have worked with you on it. Cheers, my friend.--

855:

regarding lesser saints that do not have articles. As a dab page, it will include very little information about these saints beyond the links to their articles, and I fear that for some of these entries, this is the only page where this content appears. I am not proficient enough on the topic to feel comfortable creating articles (or stubs) for all of them myself. What I can do is move the content to the talk page in case anyone wants to use it in the future. Please let me know if you don't like the way it turns out. I'm happy to have help in making it right!

2406:"at least get the wording right", without giving any thought that the word change was actually intended. You also neglect that the prior versions prevailed for quite some time beforehand, until you, Kman... and Russ have apparently opted for another version and arguably have edit warred just the same. So, you too will have to explain yourself and, as yet (and particularly as an administrator), haven't. Next time, instead of giving a false impression of impartiality, perhaps you should let someone else intervene. I will edit accordingly. 31: 3133:

definite Biblical/traditional history POV to promote and apparently never gives references himself. I've since done a number of edits, duly referenced, only to find them pruned to the bone, reverted, or altered in an unacceptable fashion. All I sought to do in the paragraph in dispute was give the accepted mainstream opinion on Gomer and the Cimmeriaid as found in any decent book on Welsh/Celtic history and linguistics. Too many diffs to give them all, but the latest is typical:

3532:

reasons Arthur is of mention if he wasnt a real part of history in Britain? If he made use of Nennius, yet this man's work, or even he himself, was a figment of fantasy (a forgey with intent to forge, I think the agrgument is), dont you think his cause for the inclusion of Arthur in his story would have been null (if you consider the purpose of his book was to impose a chivalric romance of Christendom on the people of Britain, all familiar with the traditions of the past)?

4142: 3415: 3082: 2873: 3956:. I do not object to using it along with secondary sources written by the scholars of the field, or with linking to it on film pages so the user can glean the info they cover which we do not. But it should never be used in place of real scholarly sources. The fact that the IMDb is harder to edit than Knowledge doesn't matter, as Knowledge does not use Knowledge articles as sources. The bottom line is, in my opinion good tertiary sources, from 484:

itself is most certainly NOT about that. You're mistaking a small part for the whole, and I'd be just as set against adding Christian Mythology as a category, or any others that represent a part of the games background rather than the whole. If you really want to add the Category, put it on the discussion page and let's get some other input. I'd hate for this to turn into a revert war, after all. Better to discuss it than risk that.

158: 4197: 3136:. Oh, and I now see he's just responded to my restoration of the edit and warning of taking it to mediation by slapping a POV-section tag. Could you please take a look and see what you think? If you are too busy or have no wish to get involved I quite understand but would appreciate some guidance as to where to turn for possible assistance without neccessarily going through a formal mediation process. Best wishes, 608:, has written a book in his real world capacity as a scholar that convincingly argues that Arthur never existed, but was rather a kind of folklore hero who was written into Britain's shadowy early history over time. Hrothgar would be a good person to talk to, but he's been busy. Other scholars have always argued that there was a historical person behind the legends, the most notable one I can think of is 1085:

specific innacuracies, I would appreciate it if you could point them out. The hadith dealing with Aisha's age of 9 at the time of consummation of marriage is cited by a number of Islamic scholars when defending marriage to children of that age. Iranian religious scholars have used this as the basis for Iran's current law stating that marriages can be consummated at this age. This is, sadly, a fact.

118:, while yet other commentators think that the works are contemporary. Like I said previously, the subject matter is an area where the beginners stray in at their peril. Nothing is "simple" about this subject matter (because of the uncertainty over dates and the different takes offered by the various authors) and it is no good trying to convey otherwise. 1650:"That line is of no importance to the a biography, judging by the fact that no other sources have backed it up. / If you believe it is in fact important, I would encourage you to find a source that directly discusses the supposed backlash Sparks has received over her comment, and doesn't just make a passing, unattributed reference to it. 1678:, says that you should not include criticism about living people especially when done properly. Third, mentioning that there is a "backlash" (or "criticism" or "anger") against someone's statement is not negative especially when it ACTUALLY happened and the person even responded by saying that she wished had phrased it differently. - 3736:

but got railroaded. I have the page on my watch list but somehow missed all this. I reverted the age back to the way it was before that guy showed up, and between the two of us we clearly have more of a consensus than he does. I'd appreciate if you keep an eye on it in the near future in case he tries to rip it apart again.

2801:, which says "merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia." I don't recall leaving reference to Harry Potter in there; I removed another one again today, as it's even less notable than the ones you reinstated, as Merlin never actually appears.-- 3229:(This is a policy, not a guideline). When trying to reach agreement or compromise, I always comment on the wording of the article, and NEVER the editors themselves, and I strongly urge you to do the same. If you do make any further personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, appropriate steps will be taken. 3986:

Thanks for the explanation. I would guess that the implimentation of a rigorous policy of providing good sourcing is in the wake of the accusation in past years that Knowledge is a joke in the academic world. Scholars like you are working to make it the resource it should be in this respect. My fear,

3904:

Well, best of luck with the grad school if you do it -- I'm sure you'll do very well :-) As to my research, I've got a couple of new academic articles out and the new book is just about there, so it's all going pretty well atm -- my main problem is finding enough time to do everything I want/need to!

3778:

Wow... Did you know this was due?! Nearly gave me heart-attack when logged in and saw the page unprotected and so many edits! I'm not even going to try and filter any legit changes (vandalism seems to be being reverted quickly) until the article drops off the main page, I'm thinking... Incidentally,

3589:, and Geoffrey of Monmouth (according to him "Riothamus" was just a title). My point was, if we want a quote from a respected scholar who believes in a historical Arthur, he's probably the best around. Berresford-Ellis is just not as respected in the field, and Morris' book has been widely criticized. 3531:

to the life of the latter, and vicer verser. This proves if anything Geoffry M's work references someone else, an actual king, other than Arthur, yet it still uses evidence of a real Arthur as a figure in British history to fit this continental hero's deeds with events in Britain. Can you suggest any

3127:

Hello Cuchullain, how are you? I sincerely hope the "messianic return" business is water under the bridge by now and that we are back where we were as fellow editors putting veracity and verifiablity above all else. I have a request to make. My interest in things Welsh led me to the article about the

2405:

Of course you have an opinion and preference, since you reverted and restored the prior version while invoking consensus which either doesn't exist or which you/others haven't demonstrated. You indicate you restored the 'most establish (sic) version', but just beforehand commented for said editor to

1982:

Honestly, I want to see what information I put into it and completely re-write it (off wikipedia) and then get it authorised by someone like yourself for review before putting it up. I can assure you it will not be an attack article but I would really liek to see the info I used. But, if I did create

1722:

I did not look at the link you gave me, user talk is hardly the venue for discussing changes to articles. Why didn't you just correct the article in the first place? It was poorly sourced, controverted material, so I stand by my opinion that it should have been removed as it was. The onus is of users

1480:

The problem is that none of that "significant coverage" has made it into the article. It's not our job to unmangle mangled negative comments about living persons, it's our job to remove them when we see them. The current bit about Sparks being "criticized" for her comments does not say who criticized

929:

Thanks for your kind words, Hrothgar. I'm also interested to see how the page changes from here on out, and I know Wrad, myself and others will try to make sure the changes are positive. As for Ottava's comments, I'm well past the point of listening to him about his personal nitpicks. As far as I can

503:

Hi Cuchullain. The Annals of Ulster from Circa C5th to C13th quotes on: Cluain Airthir. Inc “Death of Uter Pendragon, king of England, to whom succeeded his son, King Arthur, who instituted the Round Table”: Death of Aed son of Colgu, king of Ind Airthir: Rónán son of Tuathal, king of Ind Airthir

3931:

Fellow user and admin: what is this sudden disparaging of IMDb? Look at the articles on films, they utilize the IMDb title numbers. Certainly IMDb can be a reliable source for determining who stars in one film or another. IMDb is comprehensive in its presentation of film data, and I would suppose it

2534:

I will not stop removing tags you've placed in bad faith. You are well aware that the US sense of American is not a neologism but a perfectly legitimate use of the word, and the only one common in English. Those articles make it clear they are discussing American topics. If you can think of a better

2317:

Hi Cuchullain. Can you please continue the discussion talk page for "Aisha" so we can resolve the issue? I'd like to have a discussion so we can both agree to something that meets Knowledge's standards, and move forward. I won't be able to check this page, so it'd be great if you can continue on the

1563:

There has been no significant coverage of criticism about Sparks' comments, at least judging by what has been added to the article. I count one single passing comment in one improperly formatted cite to an Australian news website (it is improperly cited, just a link is not a citation). And I fail to

951:

Same here, and thanks for that, I just wanted to make sure we were 100% beyond reproach :) I'm going to be less around for the next few weeks, as I finish off the last two chapters of a book and do the final edits on two articles before sending them back to their journals, but feel free to email me

590:

The problem is that the Annals of Ulster were not written until the 15th century, well after the period they're describing. In this case it seems clear the author is relying on earlier annals for his infomation about Arthur. It would be best to include a secondary source by a reliable modern scholar

552:

In the many debates of whether King Arthur and the Round Table were fact or fiction. - Do these ‘facts’ quoted in a ‘verified’ and ‘reliable source,’ merit its inclusion in Wikepedia? Also, with respect to your academic knowledge of such historical research and studies, truthfully; King Arthur, fact

3690:

There is an ongoing issue with Kung Fu Man over an edit dispute which is getting out of hand, and I'm fairly certain the user is relying on sockpuppets to make revisions to the article. Check the revision history yourself to verify this. Also, I've been receiving harassing comments and threats from

3610:

as the only early sources for the legend, that's just wrong. As we've discussed on the talk page there are a number of earlier sources, and later ones that reference earlier material, which contain glimpses of the legend. The thing is, none of them treat Arthur as a historical leader who fought the

3290:

and I am sure anyone but yourself would share that assessment. Knowledge policy is indisputably to discuss edits, not editors, and you should be made aware of this. However, your response continues to make comments that seem calculated solely to antagonize and provoke and exacerbate this, which is

3165:

Good to hear from you, Enaidmawr. I will definitely take a look at that. I've run into that individual before, and I must say I found dealing with him extremely unpleasant. The first step will be engaging on the talk page (whether or not he cooperates, it'll be good to have that as a base). I'll go

3132:

a few months ago. I made a simple and innocuous edit (or so I thought) about the supposed Welsh connection. Should have watched the page, but didn't. Came across it again the other day to find the entire edit had been reverted as "unsourced POV", and that by an editor who, it would seem, has a very

2686:

Hi I saw you added a merge proposal at the top of the Ashley Todd article, but you didn't follow up with the rationale on either the article talk page or the Presidential Election page. Unless you start the discussion, the tag should be removed, as there was no desire to to this during the AfD that

2100:

Yeah, all going fine atm - just finished proofing an article for Dumville's new journal. Enaidmawr has made a couple of edits to the piece again, which I wouldn't make, but I'll leave it with you now, unless you want me to weigh in again :) He has some interesting material and I think it would be

1460:

article. Although you may feel the controversy behind her statement at the 2008 VMA is "lame" or "gossip", the incident did occur and there was significant coverage of it by reliable sources. I agree that the section has become "mangled", but this is because careless editors have added opinions and

1092:

You also mentioned that the issue was dealt with 'adequately in the relevant forum', however the article you directed me to (which I am grateful for, but I had already read) did raise briefly the issue of Aisha's age but made no mention of the ongoing significance of this hadith in justifying child

1003:

You seemed to have an interest in this. There is some drastic editing going on without any discussion on the Talk page. I reduced some of the POV language in the lead, but the lead is now all about the political process. He hasn't done too much to the narrative in terms of sourced materials, but

3821:

Well, having taken the time to look it over, it seems that the King Arthur page has remained pretty much as it was, so there is little that needs reworking/revising -- although the deluge of dubious edits and necessary reverts continue! Incidentally, thank you for your kind words and your watchful

3751:

I'll keep an eye on it. I initially let it go because (a) I was tired of dealing with it, and (b) one of the sources he removed, the Hutton book, doesn't actually comment on Bloody Mary in the context of the folk magic it discusses. I was planning on finding something that connected Bloody Mary to

3735:

I just now noticed this article had been gutted of almost all its content by an overzealous editor citing policies he didn't understand. Claiming that sections citing academic books that were fully sourced were somehow "original research" is clearly bogus. You said as much in your response to him,

1084:

You commented that the article I quoted was unreliable, and while FPM does have an editorial slant (as do the majority of think tanks, journals and magazines that deal with religious and political matters) the research quoted by Spencer and UNICEF was entirely accurate. If you think there were any

913:

Thank you, I appreciate that. At the same time, I have to say that I probably wouldn't have got much further than a couple of extra references without your encouragement, so I'm grateful for that too :) Anyhow, I'm proud of the article we've all produced at the end of this long process; it works

762:

The other edit—your removal of the word "almost" from the opening paragraph—I'm going to go ahead and revert. While the Jax City Council does have general authority over the entire county (acting essentially as the county board), I'm fairly certain that Baldwin and the Beaches are still cities on

571:

You can't take the Annals of Ulster as being pure fact, or any of the annals or even the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. Bias at the time especially by the Monks who compiled the annals, infusing them with Christian elements, make them bad sources for basing "facts" on. And yeah if you read the passage you

812: 2207:

than edit warring. That user has made nearly no constructive edits, especially not to that article; most of his or her edits consist of adding those apologetics sites to that one article. I've responded to you on the talk page, but the links need to stay out until Peacekeeper has justified their

854:

Hey there, I just realized we've been reverting each other in regard to whether this page is a dab page or not. Sorry about that, I wasn't paying attention to the fact that I'd done it twice! I can turn this into a proper dab page, but if I do, there is quite a bit of content that will be lost

778:

You may be right about the city limits. The City of Jacksonville does have authority over the entire county, but the beaches and Baldwin do have their own governments and their own signs telling you when you're entering or leaving them. It's a pretty minor distinction, as Jacksonville still has

483:

While I can applaud your enthusiasm about your chosen areas of expertise, I believe you're mistaken in trying to apply the logic that because a Christian artifact and King Arthur are in a game, that means the game revolves around Arthurian legends. The part does not make the whole, and the game

3794:

I had no idea, last time I checked it wasn't even on the rotation yet. You're right about just waiting a bit to try and tune it back up to concert pitch; any good edit right now is just as likely as a bad one to get swallowed up in the deluge. Once again, many thanks and congratulations on the

544:

I believe the existence of any historical person, as fact or fiction, research should not be unduly influenced in geographical location &/or such identities, ie British, Welsh, Irish, Scottish or English. {NB: W.I.S.E; Placenames and persons are often assosiated, by genealogical ancestries

133:

No commentator claims Parzival is "contemporary" to Chretien's work, it must have come after it, as it is based on it, and I have never heard a date earlier than the 13th century. At any rate, the other major versions from any time period (Robert de Boron, the Lancelot-Grail, the Post-Vulgate,

1572:

of an article, not the content of the article. That line is of no importance to the a biography, judging by the fact that no other sources have backed it up. If you believe it is in fact important, I would encourage you to find a source that directly discusses the supposed backlash Sparks has

4014:; although, that would not be a bad source. I remember that when Arthurian legend was presented to me in high school that they used T.H. White to present Arthur's early life, Malory to present his young and middle adult life, and Tennyson to present his passing. Did you like the recent film 2777:

I'm not really bothered one way or the other, but would appreciate a policy link that justifies your removal. You left the Harry Potter reference, even though it even states that Merlin isn't a major character, but removed two references: one of which has Merlin being revealed as a previous

1292:

The feasibility section has always been a tightrope. It's hard to explain sufficiently why people study the possibility of hybridization without wandering into OR. What I would love to find is a reliable secondary source that summarized why the genetic barriers are real but not proven to be

1635:

I gave you a source for various articles in which this is mentioned, did you read any of them? Or do you seriously expect EACH article to be cited for one sentence? And although the citation is not complete, it is not "improper" simply because it doesn't have EVERY attribute a footnote can

1212:

I left a note for discussion. If that fails (which, considering how Codex has behaved in the past, seems imminent), I'm going to start a page move request, which I think will likely succeed, considering that only Codex has ever expressed dissatisfaction with the move. Please do weigh

758:

Hey, Cuch, I'm taking slight issue with your most recent edit to Jacksonville. Regarding the removal of the mention of the statue, I'm wondering what your reason was. Do you just think it's too trivial for the intro, or what? I'll leave it alone until you have a chance to respond.

2187:

I'd like to invite both you and Peacekeeper-89 to discuss your ongoing "edit war" on the article's talk page to see if perhaps a solution can be found to the current situation, rather than the (in my opinion) pointless back and forth editing that's happening at the moment. cheers

2645:? There is an editor making POV editions, original research, conflict of interest, etc. He wont respond on the talk page, he just keeps reverting everything I do to maintain the neutrality of the article. I'd justlike a second opinion, and maybe some advice/help dealing with it. 3549:

are the only extant texts on the legend which apparantly grew around them and the subject they record. If Arthurian theories rest on the mere possibility thesse may be void, in a climate of extreme scarcity of original documentation, along with their basic corroboration by the

2515: 3244:

Calm down. First off, that wasn't two "distinct" statements, it was a single statement to a single editor which I copied to his page. And there's nothing uncivil about what I said, nor was it made to you - that statement is about as colorless as it could be. I have read

3576:

I suggested a quote from Geoffrey Ashe because he is (a) one of the dwindling number of scholars who believe strongly in a historical Arthur, and (b) is widely respected by other scholars in his field. As for his theories, my understanding is that he proposes Riothamus

2379:

I have no opinion about which version should be preferred. I reverted to the most establish version I could find; the version that was protected on September 28. Notice that as soon as that previous protection expired the page was once again subjected to edit warring,

730:

It doesn't matter who moved it in the first place, or why - moving it back requires admin powers (because deletion and undeletion is involved). That's the only way to preserve the page history. If you want it moved back to Noah Kalina you should go to requested

134:

Malory) have the grail as a cup or dish. The point of the intro is to summarize what the article says, currently it gives a concise and clear summary of what will come later. All the other versions are discussed in detail where it's appropriate in the article.--

3014:

I do not understand why it was reverted and deleted. Is this simply by your own personal distaste or are there other reasons? Please let me know, as I would rather prefer not to continually edit the Galahad article if we are at a disagreement about the entry.

1465:, it would be more cooperative of you to revert the section to a previous version. I understand that this may take more time, but that would be much more productive then simply deleting information you may think is "lame", "gossip" or "mangled". Thanks! - 1528:

If you were to read the article you would see that fans have criticized her. The direct quote is "While many fans have been supportive of her stance, others have been angered by the implication that those who don't abstain are "sluts"." The citation

2792:

We decided on the talk page not to include every piece of fiction that includes Merlin, but only those that are either very important works as pieces of Arthurian literature, or in which Merlin is the main character. The applicable guidelines are

1523:

The current bit about Sparks being "criticized" for her comments does not say who criticized her, and the citation is not done correctly, and it greatly distends this incredibly minor occurrence in relation to other material. It needs to stay

1088:

The concern over the relationship between Islamic law and child brides is not a 'fringe, minority perspective'. Many governments, including that of the UK, aswell as organisations such as UNICEF have expressed very deep concern over the issue.

2259:

It's on you as the one introducing or re-introducing the controverted material to source it and make sure it is well written. It's not the job of everyone else to clean up after you, and I certainly don't appreciate my good edits being called

2516:

http://books.google.com/books?id=zQqtgpqvHL0C&pg=PR20&lpg=PR20&dq=%22mexicans+are+americans%22&source=web&ots=d0BhkYu2Ag&sig=auR8b5RYUdDt-JNuD0yI1FmhgwY&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=8&ct=result

3861:), which will help me pay for graduate school if I stay there. I plan on pursuing an MA in English literature with a focus on medieval literature, though this all depends on extenuating factors like time, money, and my girlfriend's plans. 2491:

Would you please stop removing the Globalize tag? Hispanics live across the entire world, including the Philippines, Mexico, and Spain. Latinoamericans live in Latinoamerican societies, like Mexico and Colombia. Stop pushing neologisms.

1645:

Obviously your bias against including this is making it hard for you to see this. Obviously the material is of great enough importance that the issue has been big within Entertainment news, as proven by the link you decided to not

668:. There was absolutely no discussion on any talk page for this move. A couple of comments in an AfD for Noah Kalina that suggested a move is not in any way in process nor consensus. A proposed merge tag would be more proper. -- 3874:

I hope all is going well with your research. I try to keep up with the Arthurian world, but find myself having less free time these days. I recall you saying some time ago you were finishing up another book? How goes it with

2428:

Calm down. It wasn't a matter of enforcing whatever opinion you believe I have, it was a matter of finding the most consensual version I could and protecting the page from the ongoing revert wars. You can believe I protected

4090:

for regarding the grammar as incorrect on the article's talk page immediately after my previous edit of the page, but unfortunately neglected to put a notice of the discussion in my edit summary. Please discuss the matter

3224:

This sort of uncivil language about a fellow editor is not permitted by site policy, nor is it acceptable by any standard of decency, and it seems calculated only to infuriate. If you have not done so already, please read

2057:

Thanks, Thomas. It looks much better now, hopefully this will finally convince Enaidmawr. I'll do some polishing work soon to get the article up to concert pitch; I want to get to expanding it as discussed at the talk page

3166:

over everything and see what I can do. Hopefully he will listen to reason and we can resolve this amiably; if not, there are a few more simple forms of dispute resolution that won't involve a huge amount of work, such as

1508: 3193:

Diolch yn fawr, Cuchullain. It's getting rather late even for me, accustomed as I am to burning the proverbial midnight oil, but I'll get back tomorrow. Why should we give in to this sort of behaviour? Cofion cynnes,

2159:

I removed it because it was just one mention, I didn't think it was important enough for the article. We can't list every modern retelling (or modern story that uses some aspect of the Grail legend.) It's nothing

1564:

see how it could be considered "more productive" of me to rewrite rather than remove improperly cited material about a living person, when that material is of no importance to the topic of the article. As for the

2101:

very appropriate used elsewhere on the page and in wiki (the 'son of prophecy' page, perhaps), but we have to be careful not to read 12th century notions into 9th century texts etc etc. Cheers and all the best,

227:

It was just a mistake, i hit the return key too quickly and it filled in the text from a previous edit summary. I meant to say "not only called American". The undo feature does not remove botched edit summaries,

3951:

Thanks for the kind words. As you note, it's not just me who's against using the IMDb in place of scholarly sources. My problem with it is that it's not compiled by the scholars of the field, and that it's a

2384:. The only option was to protect the page again. I notice you have engaged in revert warring at that page several times under this IP alone. This time you will have to resolve the issue through discussion.-- 1640:

And I fail to see how it could be considered "more productive" of me to rewrite rather than remove improperly cited material about a living person, when that material is of no importance to the topic of the

2781:

I only reinstated the content because it had been deleted without any kind of explanatory edit summary and you did supply that, but I'd like to know what guidelines I should follow in the future. Thanks.

3991:

encyclopedia of the 21st century that contains everything. In that way it could be considered the Aristotle of the modern world. That is my desire; however, with proper primary, secondary, and tertiary

4227: 4216: 4208: 4190: 2005:

Sorry, no dice. A new article will have to be just that - a new article, and will have to be reliably sourced, give an explanation for why it's notable, and not defamatory, if you hope it to be kept.--

3509:

I saw you thought Geoffry Ashe was a worthy reference on the Arthur historicity debate. From what I can gather his theories look resonable. Only one slight problem is he seems to disregard the extant

376:

I see your point; I wasn't comfortable reverting all her changes. It's just that her edit is good and bad at the same time. Please ask her to improve article without deleting sourced information. --

1354:

No problem. I'm not sure why the one of them was a redirect to Thule. Somewhere I saw that there is a preference for one bersion of the spelling over another but I can't remember now which it was.

635:

in the 12th century. However, many of the early stories describe Arthur's court as including great warriors from all over the place, so that's certainly where the idea of the Round Table started.--

3905:

One day I hope I'll manage to get around to working on another wiki article...! (am quite tempted by Havelok, as this has been the focus of some of my work recently). All the best as always,

3348:. I made one small tweak - Wyeth was an illustrator; the author was Paul Creswick who has so faded into the mist that there isn't even a stub about him in Knowledge, though it's possible his 870:

Your changes are a great improvement. Most of the Saturnini listed there were never going to have their own articles, but if they end up getting one they can be added back easily. Good work.--

2364:

is uncalled for, since it's dealt with on the talk page. As well, please explicitly point out (with links) the consensus which supports the current version -- I suspect you can't or won't.

3936:

of young Arthur to Merlin: "What should one do when one is sad?" to which Merlin replies, "The best thing to do when one is sad is to learn something." You have chosen a splendid vocation.--

3313:

Look, I apologize if I offended you. However, I think the amount of offense you've taken is all out of proportion with what was actually said. I stand by my statements about your editing at

3844:

I think it's all working out. The FA version of the article still stands and there are several devoted editors keeping watch to make sure it doesn't suffer too much from mediocre revisions.

2433:

all you wish, but the protection was to stop the pointless revert warring you and others have been engaged in. You can voice your opinion on the talk page; I notice you haven't done that.--

301:

needs to go their either, as no one will type in or click on Tupac Amaru if they're only looking for Tupac, but that's just me. You might could add it to the See also section if you want.--

1316:. In part because Paleoeskimo and Palaeoeskimo already redirect there. But also because there appears to be some overlap, especially with the middle Paleoeskimo period and Dorset culture. 1573:

received over her comment, and doesn't just make a passing, unattributed reference to it. As it is it is poorly sourced negative material about a living person, and needs to stay out.--

3685: 4269:. There's now a circular redirect with no history, but from the Talk page there clearly was once a real article there. I'm a bit hazy about moves but I think you broke something! 4188: 708:

I'm seeing your point. But this does need to be reverted back as a non-admin simply moved the page with no discussion nor any kind of consensus. I opened a move discussion. --

1627:

is a guideline for topics but it is also a guideline for what is worth mentioning within an article or not. If you think there is another guideline for that, PLEASE present it.

3752:

the broader divination ritual/game but I got busy doing other things. I'll continue to keep an eye on the page, I think it's clearly superior now, if incompletely sourced.--

1911:

or change that dab page to reflect your move, so readers were left with a bit of a problem. It's not a big deal; the status quo just seemed like the easiest way to fix it.--

830:

one of the best articles on Knowledge! It has slowly evolved into an excellent introduction regarding the legends of Arthur and your efforts were integral to that endeavor!

2594:

I'd appreciate if you can also come on this (second thread), where I want to get other wikipedians' opinions on when is a non-English source admissible and when is it not.

4240:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click

1187: 548:

What I'm asking is - The Annals of Ulster verified King of England Uther Pendragon died 467ad, and his son King Arthur succeeded him and instituted the Round Table. Ergo,

519:

I'm not sure what you're asking. The first one appears to just be an Irish copy of the British genealogies. The others seem to refer to the placename Airthir, which is in

3710:. In short, it's bad form to ask many random editors to enter into a content dispute. For my part, I know nothing about the subject so I can't help one way or another.-- 504:

died: : The slaying of Congal son of Éicnech, king of Int Airthir, in Ráith Escla &c. Are these genealogical references to Arthurs; Irish Airthir descendants/Clans?

173: 4253: 1674:

First, saying that it is poorly source does not negate that the source itself IS reliable (no worries though, I'll fix that). Second, NOTHING, especially nothing at

1333:, which was the original target). It's better to have a stub that can be expanded than risk confusing people by redirecting to just one of the various cultures.-- 4230:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 2968: 612:. Personally I'm agnostic about it - I think there may have been a real Arthur, but at this point we have almost nothing we can say about him with any certainty. 2017: 1992: 1973: 3384:

You're welcome. I have an old edition of the Creswick. His name isn't even on the title page, which just says "illustrated by N. C. Wyeth", though his name

1954: 3238: 1481:

her, and the citation is not done correctly, and it greatly distends this incredibly minor occurrence in relation to other material. It needs to stay out.--

1361: 1345: 1081:

I think we have a slight disagreement over an edit on the 'Muhammad's Wives' page, and I wanted to see if I could politely address some of your concerns.

188: 2298: 2283: 2239: 2197: 1631:

I count one single passing comment in one improperly formatted cite to an Australian news website (it is improperly cited, just a link is not a citation)

1023:

Your additions to the Lumbee page are not only clearly uneducated but deliberately disparaging. Feel free to leave something constructive and unbiased.

3963:

And I also quite like your quote from Merlin. While it did not come from Geoffrey or Malory or Tenyson, it did originate with one of the great masters,

3329: 3300: 3277: 2672: 426: 3914: 3887: 3831: 3812: 3631: 3563: 3500: 3405: 2964: 2110: 2083: 986: 961: 942: 432: 123: 4165:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4126: 3442:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 3109:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2900:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2474: 2445: 2415: 2396: 2220: 2139:. You removed that and I would like to know why. If I have violated some policy about articles I apologise, but please inform me if that is the case. 4343: 4027: 3461: 2569: 2547: 3722: 2528: 2276: 4001: 3979: 3286:

Please re-read what I wrote above. You copied the same personal attack to two distinct talkpages, as I stated. It is indeed a gross violation of

3024: 2957: 2145: 448: 4296: 2755: 1947: 1275: 1099:

This is intended as a friendly and non-personal message, and it'd be great if any differences could be solved through friendly, spirited debate.

900: 882: 647: 562: 535: 345: 313: 280: 240: 3213: 3203: 3182: 2977: 2172: 1603:

There has been no significant coverage of criticism about Sparks' comments, at least judging by what has been added to the article. / As for the

184: 3764: 2717: 1418: 1255: 1238: 1225: 796: 743: 717: 703: 458:

I've reverted your exclusion of the Monaco novels and the re-inclusion of the Rohmer film, and opened a discussion in the article discussion. -

3788: 3064: 3046: 2857: 2178: 1109: 581: 4108: 2626: 2345: 1923: 1093:

marriages. This consequence of Muhammad's marriage is of immense significance, and is entirely relevant to a page dealing with his marriages.

146: 3159: 3145: 2598: 2319: 1855: 1830: 1739: 1687: 1585: 1550: 1493: 1030: 294: 119: 2845:

Yeah, I was going to add a section on the development of the figure over time, and perhaps split the Celtic literature material into that.--

2813: 2606: 3673: 3397: 3379: 2737: 3795:

article being put up, it's clearly some of Knowledge's finest work, and one of the best encyclopedia articles on Arthur that's out there.

2035:

Hey there, I've made a contribution to try and re-use some of the material in a more legitimate way; how does it look? ok? All the best,

1537:(see #2 Footnote). Finally, although you seem to think this is a "minor occurrence" you seem to be unable to prove that it does not meet 1541:

for notability. Before removing things please at least try and make an argument using something besides opinion to support your belief. -

165: 4183: 2695: 192: 2486: 1764:

thing. The first doesn't exist; the second notes "similarities" rather than direct influence; the third explicitly agrees with the IP (

4087: 2654: 2786: 2702: 2577: 2327: 1323: 779:

authority over them even within their limits, since as you say it acts as the county. I'd like to see something definite about this.

4064: 4018:? There was much speculation mixed in it. I was intrigued in that they even brought in patristic Christian theology into the mix.-- 3745: 3367:

Thanks. Nice catch on Creswick, to my knowledge the source I used didn't say anything about him. Funny how these things work out.--

3253:. However your revert warring against Enaidmawr demonstrated that you were ignoring the positions and conclusions of others, which 3004: 2044: 772: 3945: 1957:, who originally deleted the page) a good reason for why you want to see it. As it was originally deleted as an attack page and a 4284:

Thanks for catching that. Some kind of error resulted in the deletion of all the page history. I've corrected it now (I think).--

3257:

a violation of the civility policy. The fact that you got so defensive about this simple post, and about Enaid's good editing at

3122: 1899:(as far as I could tell), and the first to have an article here to my knowledge. However, I mostly reverted you because you left 1723:

who want to include or re-introduce material to do the work of backing it up. It is now somewhat better, though I still think it

513: 221: 3000: 2918: 1176: 1121: 408: 3482: 864: 2589: 2373: 2356:

I find your actions and edits, obviously in support of a specific version at the 'America' disambiguation page, objectionable.

493: 2583: 1983:

another horrendous page then ban me. This is the only way I can asure you I will not do that I think. Hop ethis makes sense.

396: 2117:- there is no mention of it at all: it is only there if you add it from your own consideration of William of Newburgh etc... 1438: 4103: 4055: 2972: 2939: 2761: 2723: 2466: 2407: 2365: 2153: 1904: 1869: 1206: 4317: 4241: 3150:

Oh, and now he's also slapped a 3RR warning on my talk page, without actually giving his signature. Ye gods! What a joke.

2312: 1515:

It's not our job to unmangle mangled negative comments about living persons, it's our job to remove them when we see them.

1065: 923: 473: 4132: 4069: 3770: 2678: 2306: 2291: 2251: 152: 3691:

this user and am not sure where to turn for help. Please get involved and try to act as the voice of reason. Thank you.

1727:

a very minor point that ought not be in a biography at all. At any rate the page is off my watchlist now, so good day.--

677: 4278: 4148: 3692: 3655: 3437: 2247: 1988: 1943: 1708: 1654:

One single passing comment? Once again, did you even check the link I gave you? Exactly how many mentions do you need?

1474: 1400: 3700: 683:

That may be, but moving by copy and paste, as you did, is not proper - it destroys the page history. In order to move

385: 371: 1329:

There are various groups of indigenous arctic peoples that populated the area before the Dorset (and long before the

1164: 127: 2839: 1013: 839: 4338: 4291: 4121: 3974: 3882: 3807: 3759: 3717: 3668: 3626: 3495: 3374: 3324: 3272: 3177: 3041: 2952: 2852: 2808: 2750: 2712: 2667: 2621: 2542: 2440: 2391: 2340: 2271: 2215: 2167: 2078: 2012: 1968: 1935: 1918: 1825: 1734: 1580: 1488: 1413: 1340: 1270: 1250: 1220: 1042: 981: 937: 877: 791: 738: 698: 642: 530: 421: 340: 308: 275: 235: 216: 141: 3361: 2982:

Myself and another user made the following contribution to the "Galahad in popular culture" section in the past:

1889: 1812: 97: 89: 84: 1302: 3728: 2113:

p.s. I would def say that 'clear' needs removing - it is not that there is no 'clear' mention of return in the

753: 433: 72: 67: 59: 1453: 1449: 206:? I'm not bothered by your edits there, just curious about that edit summary. Please reply on your talk page, 3220:"I've run into that individual before, and I must say I found dealing with him extremely unpleasant..." (etc) 1984: 1939: 1929: 1818:

Much better. One thing though, why did you move around the other sections? Is that a style guideline thing?--

1358: 1320: 1117: 572:

get the answer on the Ind Aithir bit - it's clearly saying those are kings from a kingdom called Ind Aithir.

2590:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability#When_is_an_.27English_verifiable.27_source_available.3F

550:

King Arthur actually succeeded as King of England in 467ad, and instituted his Round Table Knights in 467ad.

197: 4079: 3249:

a number of times, thank you, and nothing I said could be construed as uncivil, and it was certainly not a

2584:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability#How_exactly_are_foreign_language_sources_verifiable.3F

2282:

sorry, but it is vandalism to try to suppress the truth, why don't you live up to your Irish hero's name? (

1375: 1096:

If you feel I unfairly left out any perspectives or facts from this article, please feel free to add them.

1070: 1038: 399:. I believe this user has continued to engage in the disputed behavior, and I need another person to sign. 258: 604:

As to whether Arthur was fact or fiction, that's long been a matter of debate. A fellow Knowledge editor,

179: 4037: 3858: 2362: 2359: 2357: 1519:

It may not be your "job" to unmangle things, but, like I said, it certainly is more productive to do so.

439:

If it is not too much trouble, I would like you to express your view. Not many people visit the page.

4212: 4166: 3926: 3443: 3296: 3234: 3110: 2901: 2863: 2767: 2650: 1877: 1772:

until after his movie was made. He said his main inspiration was David Cronenberg's first film, 1975's

1434: 1382: 498: 404: 38: 3134: 2557: 2027: 293:

Tupac Shakur should not be listed on that page, as Tupac Amaru is only part of his name, according to

3910: 3827: 3784: 3559: 3527: 3478: 2634: 2106: 2040: 1061: 957: 919: 169: 2705:

already. I have no opinion either way, I was just trying to make sure both articles were included.--

1181: 203: 4099: 2798: 2728:

Hi, Thanks for giving the reasoning for the decision when closing the AfD debate - most helpful.

2470: 2411: 2381: 2369: 2193: 1355: 1317: 847: 414:

I chipped in. If you need more let me know. He certainly seems to be a long-term disruptive user.--

172:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 4219:

has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (

4311: 3641: 2565: 2524: 1908: 1896: 1765: 1127: 478: 362:

Lima's improvements will be welcome but not when she deletes wholesale and refuses to discuss. --

4051: 3729: 3696: 2302: 2287: 2243: 2135:

I added a short notice about the Grail in one of Neil Gaiman's short stories under the section

1936:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Andrea_Minichiello_Williams&action=edit&redlink=1

1172: 1053: 453: 4141: 3822:

eye over the page! What are you planning to do with the degree now you have it? All the best,

3414: 3081: 2872: 2778:

incarnation of the central character and the other of which had him as a recurring character.

2495: 2231:

You should make constructive edits rather than vandalizing pages by deleting whole sections.

1664: 4258: 4153: 4023: 3997: 3941: 3430: 3292: 3230: 3097: 2935: 2888: 2646: 2510: 2500: 2180: 2127: 1670:

As it is it is poorly sourced negative material about a living person, and needs to stay out.

1443: 1430: 1195: 400: 3008: 4335: 4288: 4274: 4249: 4118: 3971: 3906: 3879: 3823: 3804: 3780: 3756: 3714: 3707: 3686:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Final_Fantasy_Legend_name_translation_woes.2C_mk._II

3665: 3623: 3555: 3492: 3474: 3371: 3321: 3269: 3174: 3038: 2986: 2949: 2849: 2805: 2747: 2733: 2709: 2664: 2618: 2539: 2437: 2388: 2337: 2268: 2235: 2212: 2164: 2102: 2075: 2036: 2009: 1965: 1961:

violation, and you're the one who wrote it, I am skeptical about why you want to view it.--

1915: 1822: 1731: 1661: 1577: 1485: 1410: 1337: 1307: 1267: 1247: 1217: 1105: 1057: 1026: 978: 953: 934: 915: 896: 874: 860: 788: 735: 695: 639: 605: 558: 527: 509: 489: 418: 357: 336: 305: 271: 232: 212: 138: 47: 17: 2660:

Sure thing, I'll look into. If he won't discuss his changes, then we may have a problem.--

1907:, in which case there's no need for a longer title. Also, you did not include any link to 8: 4238:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that

4160: 4094: 4043: 3466: 3199: 3155: 3141: 2923: 2914: 2827: 2505: 2351: 2189: 2149: 1507:

What do you mean by this? Look, the "significant coverage" can easily be seen by doing a

1009: 665: 657: 390: 3554:, dont you think this is beyond the pale of reasonableness? It is purely opinionation!! 4328: 4179: 3741: 3706:

In response to your copying a notice to various editors about your dispute, please see

3339: 2692: 2561: 2520: 1503:"The problem is that none of that "significant coverage" has made it into the article." 1396: 1369: 1235: 1203: 1148: 835: 768: 713: 673: 105: 1075:

I saw you edited a post I made, and I wanted to cc you a message I sent to Itaqallah.

4226:

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting

4083: 3517: 3060: 3020: 2835: 2642: 2635: 1658: 1655: 1168: 1167:) the difference between Naime and Aymon is clearly given on the first page. Thanks- 1161: 1113: 577: 466: 257:(popped up on my watchlist). Actually, shouldn't there be a mention of the artist on 2614:

I will definitely contribute, and hopefully we'll come to a resolution. Thank you.--

4302: 4059: 4019: 3993: 3937: 3511: 3457: 2990: 2931: 2819: 2794: 2602: 2323: 2226: 1885: 1724: 1287: 1191: 1034: 1018: 848: 684: 4332: 4285: 4270: 4245: 4235: 4204: 4115: 3968: 3953: 3876: 3801: 3753: 3711: 3662: 3620: 3489: 3368: 3318: 3266: 3265:. You need to take a step back and reconsider what this whole dispute is about.-- 3171: 3035: 2946: 2846: 2802: 2744: 2729: 2706: 2661: 2615: 2536: 2434: 2385: 2334: 2265: 2209: 2161: 2072: 2006: 1962: 1912: 1840: 1819: 1753: 1728: 1704: 1683: 1574: 1546: 1482: 1470: 1424: 1407: 1334: 1264: 1244: 1214: 1142: 975: 931: 892: 871: 856: 802: 785: 732: 692: 636: 554: 524: 505: 485: 415: 381: 367: 331: 302: 266: 229: 207: 135: 4220: 3525:. His connection of Arthur with this Riothamus draws on the similarities of the 952:

via the address on my webpage if anything comes up etc etc. All the very best,

330:

Done ;) I have also watchlisted that page in case of vandalism issues and such.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3473:

Could use your level head over at this article, if you have the time... Cheers

3218:

You wrote (about me) on two distinct talkpages, including this one just above:

3195: 3151: 3137: 2910: 2261: 2204: 1863: 1313: 1048: 1005: 996: 908: 763:

their own and are not located within the city limits of Jax propers. Regards,

625:

As to the Round Table, that's certainly fictional - it is not mentioned before

444: 2333:

As soon as I can I will respond to all your points at the article talk page.--

891:

Thanks. Sorry about the confusion. I'm glad someone's keeping an eye on me!

4231: 4175: 3737: 3679: 3651: 3393: 3357: 3287: 3262: 3250: 3246: 3226: 3167: 3003:, who holds the highest title of "Knight of One" among the elite unit called 2688: 1958: 1675: 1624: 1604: 1565: 1538: 1462: 1457: 1392: 1330: 1298: 1260: 1231: 1199: 831: 764: 709: 669: 631: 609: 1388:

early. Probably unprotect, as it was only getting a few bad edits per week?

3056: 3016: 2831: 1534: 573: 459: 250: 249:

That explains it. Guess it was a wierd coincidence that I happened to edit

4215:

from Knowledge. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because

3072: 1839:

Oh, the IP wasn't me :) I just have the article watchlisted from the big "

520: 3964: 3771: 3467: 3453: 3421: 3088: 3031: 2924: 2680: 1881: 827: 688: 658: 3104: 4266: 4259: 4075: 2995: 2895: 2879: 2462: 1873: 1848: 1805: 1700: 1679: 1542: 1466: 1153: 377: 363: 2930:

Thanks for sorting out those two disambigs - it was a bit of a mess.

4047: 3522: 2783: 1780:, but it does have some parallels... If you really want to see where 440: 3602:

I can't understand your last paragraph. If you are appealing to the

1461:

uncited information. However, since Knowledge encourages editors to

811: 784:

And yes I thought the statue bit was way too trivial for the lead.--

4324: 4303: 4196: 3647: 3389: 3353: 2820: 1294: 254: 157: 2582:

Hello! I wanted to point your attention towards this discussion:

1137: 591:

discussing whether or not this work (or any work) can be trusted.

2535:

title, suggest that, but your tags are entirely inappropriate.--

2430: 1156:

are not the same person. In the modern French folio version of

4046:, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the 3030:

That was quite some time ago, yes? I removed it because it was

2771: 2766:

I don't contribute to WP often so I only just noticed that you

1900: 1804:(1989)." Posted here to avoid unnecessary drama. All the best, 1133: 997: 664:

For such a major move, this needs discussion and be decided by

3314: 3291:

all being noted, since the record speaks plainly for itself.

3258: 3129: 1768:): "James Gunn, who defended his film by saying he never saw 298: 262: 2799:

Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of information

2071:

At any rate I hope all is well with you and your research.--

3611:

Saxons. That only early Welsh sources that do that are the

3425: 3092: 3007:. Ironically, Galahad was struck down and destroyed by the 2883: 626: 2511:

http://www.international.ucla.edu/lac/publications/las.asp

2501:

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/latinamerican?view=uk

2496:

http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861727807/hispanic.html

1760:

Hi. I've had a quick look at the three cites used for the

1374:

Hi. Just checking whether you meant to unprotect the page

174:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (6th nomination)

4114:

Oops, didn't see your comment. I'll respond over there.--

3857:

As for my degree, I've gotten a "real job" at my school (

3800:

And thanks about the degree, it was a long time coming.--

1406:

Yeah, I didn't mean to remove it, thanks for the catch.--

3646:

I just saw that you got your degree; congratulations! -

1895:

Well, she was the earliest, the most important entry at

2701:

I only placed the tag because someone had placed it at

1293:

insurmountable. That's really the point of that section

974:

Best of luck with your book, I can't wait to read it.--

2963:

You are right, it totally violated every POV policy...

2506:

http://www.askoxford.com/languages/es/toi_las/?view=uk

4058:, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, 1132:

I noticed that you changed an edit I made concerning

4211:, by another Knowledge user, requesting that it be 3581:the historical Arthur, whose legend influenced the 3352:has never been out of print (I'd have to check). - 164:An article that you have been involved in editing, 1456:) removed a notable and well cited section of the 1623:to be added to the article. And, yes, in general 3960:to JSTOR, do not rely on other tertiary sources. 4006:I am glad to hear that it was from T.H.White's 2770:my edit that reinstated some references to the 2297:you are so biased, stop vandalizing the page! ( 3055:I see. I agree with your decision and edit. -- 1934:Hello, can I view the material that was here: 1872:is the best known Gisela ? Gisela is a common 1611:of an article, not the content of the article. 1607:guideline you quoted, that has to do with the 1568:guideline you quoted, that has to do with the 1429:Thanks for the comments on my chunkey rewrite! 1152:, you will see that Namo and Rinaldo's father 4010:and not only from the play and screenplay of 1868:Hello Cuchullain, how did you establish that 4078:article. However, I strongly disagree with 253:'s article when I saw that edit summary at 3779:congrats on the degree :-) All the best, 3406:DYK for The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood 1619:or against inclusion, not something which 434:Talk:War of Heaven#Appeal for intervention 4228:Category:Disambig-Class King Arthur pages 4217:Category:Disambig-Class King Arthur pages 4209:Category:Disambig-Class King Arthur pages 4191:Category:Disambig-Class King Arthur pages 4157:was updated with a fact from the article 3434:was updated with a fact from the article 3101:was updated with a fact from the article 2892:was updated with a fact from the article 2703:United States presidential election, 2008 1876:in Germany and there are number of other 809: 553:or fiction? Round Table, ditto? Regards. 4054:. You can see the hook for the article 3521:, from what I read on the Wiki article 3214:Warning for Personal Attacks against me 2978:Galahad in popular culture (Code Geass) 202:How or what did you mean when you said 110:Some commentators claim that Wolfram's 14: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2687:happened the last two da. Thanks. -- 1776:" and "...definitely not a remake of 397:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Esimal 4331:, the parentheses were not needed.-- 4074:Thank you for your attention to the 2996:Code Geass: Lelouch of the Rebellion 1905:Gisela (daughter of Pepin the Short) 1870:Gisela (daughter of Pepin the Short) 1448:Hello. You seem to have repeatedly ( 114:dates from decades after Chretien's 25: 1794:Return of the Alien's Deadly Spawn 1615:Significant coverage is a criteria 1140:. If you check out name indexes in 23: 4195: 3438:The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood 3346:The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood 2487:Hispanic and Latinoamerican, again 156: 24: 4355: 3619:which are based directly on it.-- 2999:. It is piloted by the character 2588:And I started a new thread here: 2578:Discussion on non-English sources 2556:I have responded in my talk page 2203:This is more a case of reverting 1378:, or just mistakenly removed the 1243:At the bottom of the talk page.-- 4140: 3488:No worries, I'll check it out.-- 3413: 3080: 2989:is used as the name of a custom 2871: 2641:Would you mind taking a look at 1666:, this list just goes on and on. 810: 691:, an admin will have to do it.-- 29: 3123:A humble request for assistance 4203:Hello, this is a message from 3119:18:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 2154:18:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 2111:08:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 2084:22:46, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 2045:21:52, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 1993:08:38, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 1974:22:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 1948:20:37, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 1924:20:25, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1890:05:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1856:22:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1847:debate of 2007. All the best, 1831:21:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1813:20:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1740:23:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1709:22:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1688:22:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1586:21:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1551:20:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1494:19:36, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1475:19:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1439:23:59, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 1419:22:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1401:22:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1004:decided it was all "biased".-- 13: 1: 4344:02:38, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 4318:02:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 4309:Why was the dab not needed? 4297:23:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 4279:23:16, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 3915:21:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 3674:08:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3656:01:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3632:23:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC) 3564:15:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 3501:16:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 3483:21:25, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 3462:16:26, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 3398:04:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 3380:03:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 3362:03:55, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 3330:18:30, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 3301:18:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 3278:18:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 3239:12:27, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 3204:02:30, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 3183:02:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 3160:02:11, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 3146:02:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 3065:09:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 3047:05:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 3025:03:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 2958:15:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2940:16:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 1362:15:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 1346:07:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 1324:06:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 265:dab be listed there instead? 4254:18:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 4184:13:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 4127:00:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 4109:05:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 4065:05:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 4028:16:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 4002:16:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 3980:02:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 3946:01:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 3888:17:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3832:13:43, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 3813:23:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 3789:19:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 3263:far too invested in the page 2973:05:01, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 2919:07:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC) 2858:23:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC) 2840:23:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC) 2814:15:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC) 2787:22:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 2762:Merlin Literature References 2756:18:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 2738:09:55, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 2724:Christian Witness Ministries 2718:16:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC) 2696:00:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC) 2673:23:06, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 2655:04:03, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 2627:23:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 2607:08:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC) 2570:00:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 2548:22:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 2529:21:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 1533:done correctly according to 1509:simple search on Google News 259:Tupac Amaru (disambiguation) 7: 4234:. Feel free to contact the 4207:. A tag has been placed on 4133:DYK for Palamedes (romance) 4086:is correct. I had outlined 4070:Edits to Flat Earth article 3859:University of North Florida 3765:00:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 3746:13:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 3723:00:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 3701:01:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 3684:Please see this discussion 2475:18:04, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 2446:17:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 2416:16:34, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 2397:15:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 2374:15:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 2346:04:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 2328:04:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 2307:15:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2292:15:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2277:15:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2252:14:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2221:01:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 2198:22:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 2173:18:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC) 2018:15:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1953:You'll have to give me (or 1303:16:57, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 1276:20:40, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 1256:20:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 1239:18:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 1226:16:55, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 1207:06:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 1177:00:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 1122:00:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 826:Thanks for helping to make 582:19:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 153:AfD nomination of Wikitruth 10: 4360: 3388:on the spine. Poor man. - 2463:Your comment has been read 1066:13:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 3528:Historia Regum Britanniae 2313:Discussion on Aisha's age 1043:20:17, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 1014:12:56, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 987:03:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC) 962:21:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 943:19:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 924:19:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 816: 744:20:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 718:20:33, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 704:20:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 678:20:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 648:18:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 563:16:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 536:22:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 514:20:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 494:01:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 474:20:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 449:12:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 427:03:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 409:22:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 386:23:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 372:17:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 182:of receiving this notice? 4008:The Once and Future King 901:17:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 883:16:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 865:13:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 840:20:29, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 797:16:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 773:00:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 545:&/or descendancies.) 346:04:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 314:16:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 281:07:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 241:06:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 222:06:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 193:00:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 147:16:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC) 128:12:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC) 4167:Did you know? talk page 3444:Did you know? talk page 3111:Did you know? talk page 2902:Did you know? talk page 1909:Gisela (disambiguation) 1897:Gisela (disambiguation) 1784:came from, though, see 4265:Hi. I think you moved 4200: 4052:Knowledge:Did you know 3730:Bloody Mary (folklore) 3661:Thanks so much, PKM!-- 3615:and works such as the 1725:greatly overemphasizes 1463:edit instead of delete 1054:Knowledge:Meetup/Tampa 754:Boundaries and statues 168:, has been listed for 161: 4199: 3541:The fact remains the 3261:, shows that you are 3005:The Knights of Rounds 2826:Are you going to add 2181:Criticism of Muhammad 1930:read deleted material 1230:Where's the note? -- 1194:moved the pages, but 1158:Les Quatre Fils Aymon 820:The Original Barnstar 160: 42:of past discussions. 4082:that the grammar of 3168:Requests for Comment 2993:in the anime series 1539:wikipedia guidelines 1071:RE: your recent edit 18:User talk:Cuchullain 4327:just redirected to 4161:Palamedes (romance) 4044:Palamedes (romance) 4042:Hi. I've nominated 4038:Palamedes (romance) 3583:Historia Britanniae 3128:Biblical character 2828:Valentine and Orson 1778:Night of the Creeps 1770:Night of the Creeps 1762:Night of the Creeps 1535:wikipedia guidlines 1356:CambridgeBayWeather 1318:CambridgeBayWeather 1312:I redirect that to 1056:-- You're invited! 4329:Coraline (novella) 4201: 3927:IMDb and Knowledge 3613:Historia Brittonum 3001:Bismarck Waldstein 2864:DYK for Der Pleier 1878:noteworthy Giselas 1198:just reverted. -- 1149:Orlando Innamorato 499:Arthur = Airthir ? 251:Tupac Amaru Shakur 198:I don't understand 162: 4341: 4294: 4173: 4172: 4124: 4107: 3977: 3885: 3810: 3762: 3720: 3671: 3629: 3604:Historia Britonum 3518:Historia Britonum 3498: 3450: 3449: 3377: 3327: 3275: 3180: 3117: 3116: 3044: 2955: 2908: 2907: 2855: 2811: 2753: 2715: 2670: 2643:Red Horn (legend) 2636:Red Horn (legend) 2624: 2545: 2443: 2431:the wrong version 2394: 2343: 2274: 2255: 2238:comment added by 2218: 2170: 2137:Modern retellings 2081: 2015: 1971: 1921: 1828: 1737: 1583: 1491: 1416: 1391:That's all :) -- 1383:pp-semi-vandalism 1343: 1273: 1253: 1223: 1124: 1108:comment added by 1102:Thanks, eja0012 1045: 1029:comment added by 984: 940: 880: 845: 844: 794: 741: 701: 645: 533: 471: 424: 344: 311: 279: 238: 220: 183: 144: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4351: 4339: 4314: 4292: 4213:speedily deleted 4205:an automated bot 4149:January 23, 2009 4144: 4137: 4136: 4122: 4097: 4062: 3975: 3883: 3808: 3760: 3718: 3669: 3627: 3617:Annales Cambriae 3587:Annales Cambriae 3512:Annales Cambriae 3496: 3417: 3410: 3409: 3375: 3325: 3293:Til Eulenspiegel 3273: 3231:Til Eulenspiegel 3178: 3084: 3077: 3076: 3073:DYK for Kairo-kō 3042: 2953: 2875: 2868: 2867: 2853: 2809: 2751: 2713: 2679:Merge notice on 2668: 2647:Heironymous Rowe 2622: 2543: 2441: 2392: 2382:including by you 2341: 2272: 2254: 2232: 2216: 2168: 2079: 2013: 1969: 1919: 1853: 1826: 1810: 1735: 1581: 1489: 1431:Heironymous Rowe 1414: 1387: 1381: 1376:at the same time 1341: 1271: 1251: 1221: 1196:Codex Sinaiticus 1103: 1024: 982: 938: 878: 849:Saint Saturninus 814: 807: 806: 792: 739: 699: 685:Everyday (video) 643: 531: 470: 467: 464: 422: 401:The Evil Spartan 334: 309: 297:. I don't think 269: 261:? Or should the 236: 210: 177: 142: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4359: 4358: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4316: 4312: 4307: 4263: 4194: 4135: 4072: 4060: 4040: 3954:tertiary source 3929: 3907:Hrothgar cyning 3824:Hrothgar cyning 3781:Hrothgar cyning 3776: 3774:on frontpage... 3733: 3682: 3644: 3642:Congratulations 3556:WikieWikieWikie 3475:Hrothgar cyning 3471: 3408: 3342: 3251:personal attack 3216: 3125: 3075: 3009:Lancelot Albion 2980: 2928: 2866: 2824: 2764: 2726: 2684: 2639: 2580: 2489: 2354: 2315: 2233: 2229: 2185: 2130: 2103:Hrothgar cyning 2037:Hrothgar cyning 2030: 2028:Arthur's return 1932: 1903:redirecting to 1866: 1849: 1841:box office bomb 1806: 1758: 1446: 1427: 1385: 1379: 1372: 1310: 1290: 1190:is open again. 1184: 1143:Orlando Furioso 1130: 1128:Naimon vs Aymon 1073: 1058:Hires an editor 1051: 1021: 1001: 954:Hrothgar cyning 916:Hrothgar cyning 911: 852: 805: 756: 662: 606:Hrothgar cyning 501: 481: 479:Fate/Stay Night 468: 460: 456: 437: 393: 360: 332:Lord Sesshomaru 267:Lord Sesshomaru 208:Lord Sesshomaru 200: 178:Do you want to 155: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4357: 4347: 4346: 4310: 4306: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4262: 4257: 4225: 4224: 4193: 4189:No content in 4187: 4171: 4170: 4145: 4134: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4092: 4084:this quotation 4080:your assertion 4071: 4068: 4039: 4036: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4004: 3961: 3928: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3816: 3815: 3797: 3796: 3775: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3732: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3681: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3643: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3504: 3503: 3470: 3465: 3448: 3447: 3418: 3407: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3341: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3281: 3280: 3215: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3186: 3185: 3124: 3121: 3115: 3114: 3085: 3074: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3050: 3049: 2979: 2976: 2961: 2960: 2927: 2922: 2906: 2905: 2876: 2865: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2823: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2763: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2725: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2683: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2638: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2579: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2551: 2550: 2488: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2467:216.234.60.106 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2408:216.234.60.106 2400: 2399: 2366:216.234.60.106 2353: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2314: 2311: 2280: 2279: 2228: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2190:Deconstructhis 2184: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2142:Kind regards, 2129: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1977: 1976: 1955:Travellingcari 1931: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1834: 1833: 1757: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1672: 1667: 1652: 1647: 1643: 1637: 1633: 1628: 1613: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1526: 1520: 1517: 1512: 1505: 1497: 1496: 1445: 1442: 1426: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1359:Have a gorilla 1349: 1348: 1321:Have a gorilla 1314:Dorset culture 1309: 1306: 1289: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1183: 1182:Míkmaq/Mi'kmaq 1180: 1129: 1126: 1072: 1069: 1050: 1047: 1020: 1017: 1000: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 967: 966: 965: 964: 946: 945: 910: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 886: 885: 851: 846: 843: 842: 823: 822: 817: 815: 804: 801: 800: 799: 781: 780: 755: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 723: 722: 721: 720: 661: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 546: 539: 538: 500: 497: 480: 477: 455: 454:Percival edits 452: 436: 431: 430: 429: 392: 389: 359: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 286: 285: 284: 283: 244: 243: 199: 196: 176:. Thank you. 154: 151: 150: 149: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4356: 4345: 4342: 4336: 4334: 4330: 4326: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4315: 4305: 4298: 4295: 4289: 4287: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4261: 4256: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4244: 4243: 4237: 4233: 4229: 4222: 4218: 4214: 4210: 4206: 4198: 4192: 4186: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4168: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4156: 4155: 4154:Did you know? 4150: 4146: 4143: 4139: 4138: 4128: 4125: 4119: 4117: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4105: 4101: 4096: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4067: 4066: 4063: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4045: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3990: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3978: 3972: 3970: 3966: 3962: 3959: 3955: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3889: 3886: 3880: 3878: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3860: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3814: 3811: 3805: 3803: 3799: 3798: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3773: 3766: 3763: 3757: 3755: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3731: 3724: 3721: 3715: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3688: 3687: 3675: 3672: 3666: 3664: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3633: 3630: 3624: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3565: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3530: 3529: 3524: 3520: 3519: 3514: 3513: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3502: 3499: 3493: 3491: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3469: 3464: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3445: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3433: 3432: 3431:Did you know? 3427: 3423: 3419: 3416: 3412: 3411: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3378: 3372: 3370: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3344:Nice work on 3331: 3328: 3322: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3302: 3298: 3294: 3289: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3279: 3276: 3270: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3222: 3221: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3184: 3181: 3175: 3173: 3169: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3148: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3120: 3112: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3100: 3099: 3098:Did you know? 3094: 3090: 3086: 3083: 3079: 3078: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3048: 3045: 3039: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3012: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2997: 2992: 2988: 2983: 2975: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2959: 2956: 2950: 2948: 2945:No problem.-- 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2926: 2921: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2903: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2891: 2890: 2889:Did you know? 2885: 2881: 2877: 2874: 2870: 2869: 2859: 2856: 2850: 2848: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2822: 2815: 2812: 2806: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2785: 2779: 2775: 2773: 2769: 2757: 2754: 2748: 2746: 2743:No problem.-- 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2719: 2716: 2710: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2694: 2690: 2682: 2674: 2671: 2665: 2663: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2637: 2628: 2625: 2619: 2617: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2595: 2592: 2591: 2586: 2585: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2562:Deepstratagem 2559: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2549: 2546: 2540: 2538: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2521:Deepstratagem 2518: 2517: 2513: 2512: 2508: 2507: 2503: 2502: 2498: 2497: 2493: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2447: 2444: 2438: 2436: 2432: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2398: 2395: 2389: 2387: 2383: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2360: 2358: 2347: 2344: 2338: 2336: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2310: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2295: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2278: 2275: 2269: 2267: 2263: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2222: 2219: 2213: 2211: 2206: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2183:article edits 2182: 2174: 2171: 2165: 2163: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2140: 2138: 2133: 2128:removed facts 2116: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2085: 2082: 2076: 2074: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2019: 2016: 2010: 2008: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1975: 1972: 1966: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1925: 1922: 1916: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1857: 1854: 1852: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1829: 1823: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1756: 1741: 1738: 1732: 1730: 1726: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1671: 1668: 1665: 1662: 1659: 1656: 1653: 1651: 1648: 1644: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1632: 1629: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1612: 1608: 1606: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1587: 1584: 1578: 1576: 1571: 1567: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1527: 1525: 1521: 1518: 1516: 1513: 1510: 1506: 1504: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1495: 1492: 1486: 1484: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1459: 1458:Jordin Sparks 1455: 1451: 1444:Jordin Sparks 1441: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1420: 1417: 1411: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1389: 1384: 1377: 1363: 1360: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1347: 1344: 1338: 1336: 1332: 1331:Thule culture 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1322: 1319: 1315: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1277: 1274: 1268: 1266: 1262: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1254: 1248: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1218: 1216: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1165:2-07-037501-3 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1145: 1144: 1139: 1135: 1125: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1046: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1007: 999: 988: 985: 979: 977: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 963: 959: 955: 950: 949: 948: 947: 944: 941: 935: 933: 928: 927: 926: 925: 921: 917: 902: 898: 894: 890: 889: 888: 887: 884: 881: 875: 873: 869: 868: 867: 866: 862: 858: 850: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 824: 821: 818: 813: 808: 798: 795: 789: 787: 783: 782: 777: 776: 775: 774: 770: 766: 760: 745: 742: 736: 734: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 719: 715: 711: 707: 706: 705: 702: 696: 694: 690: 686: 682: 681: 680: 679: 675: 671: 667: 660: 649: 646: 640: 638: 634: 633: 632:Roman de Brut 628: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 611: 610:Geoffrey Ashe 607: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 589: 583: 579: 575: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 560: 556: 551: 547: 543: 542: 541: 540: 537: 534: 528: 526: 522: 518: 517: 516: 515: 511: 507: 496: 495: 491: 487: 476: 475: 472: 465: 463: 451: 450: 446: 442: 435: 428: 425: 419: 417: 413: 412: 411: 410: 406: 402: 398: 388: 387: 383: 379: 374: 373: 369: 365: 347: 342: 338: 333: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 315: 312: 306: 304: 300: 296: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 282: 277: 273: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 247: 246: 245: 242: 239: 233: 231: 226: 225: 224: 223: 218: 214: 209: 205: 195: 194: 190: 186: 181: 175: 171: 167: 159: 148: 145: 139: 137: 132: 131: 130: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4308: 4264: 4239: 4236:bot operator 4202: 4174: 4159: 4158: 4152: 4095:David Wilson 4073: 4041: 4015: 4011: 4007: 3992:sources ;)-- 3988: 3957: 3933: 3930: 3777: 3734: 3693:74.242.123.2 3689: 3683: 3645: 3616: 3612: 3607: 3603: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3551: 3546: 3542: 3526: 3516: 3510: 3472: 3451: 3436: 3435: 3429: 3385: 3349: 3345: 3343: 3254: 3223: 3219: 3217: 3149: 3126: 3118: 3103: 3102: 3096: 3013: 2994: 2984: 2981: 2962: 2929: 2909: 2894: 2893: 2887: 2825: 2780: 2776: 2765: 2727: 2685: 2640: 2596: 2593: 2587: 2581: 2519: 2514: 2509: 2504: 2499: 2494: 2490: 2355: 2316: 2299:Manjushri222 2296: 2284:Manjushri222 2281: 2240:Manjushri222 2230: 2208:inclusion.-- 2186: 2144: 2141: 2136: 2134: 2131: 2114: 1933: 1867: 1850: 1844: 1807: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1761: 1759: 1754: 1698: 1669: 1649: 1639: 1630: 1620: 1616: 1610: 1602: 1569: 1530: 1522: 1514: 1502: 1447: 1428: 1390: 1373: 1311: 1308:Paleo-Eskimo 1291: 1261:Talk:Mi'kmaq 1185: 1169:NYArtsnWords 1157: 1147: 1141: 1131: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1080: 1077: 1074: 1052: 1022: 1002: 912: 853: 819: 761: 757: 663: 630: 549: 502: 482: 461: 457: 438: 394: 375: 361: 358:Neither do I 201: 163: 115: 111: 109: 78: 43: 37: 4061:Redtigerxyz 4050:as part of 3965:T. H. White 3772:King Arthur 3468:King Arthur 3422:28 November 3089:22 November 2932:Millstream3 2925:Gold digger 2681:Ashley Todd 2352:RE: America 2318:talk page. 2234:—Preceding 2160:personal.-- 1800:(1983) and 1790:Basket Case 1192:Kwamikagami 1188:controversy 1104:—Preceding 1025:—Preceding 828:King Arthur 689:Noah Kalina 659:Noah Kalina 391:Sign an RFC 36:This is an 4333:Cúchullain 4286:Cúchullain 4246:CSDWarnBot 4116:Cúchullain 4088:my reasons 4076:Flat Earth 3969:Cúchullain 3958:Britannica 3877:Cúchullain 3802:Cúchullain 3754:Cúchullain 3712:Cúchullain 3663:Cúchullain 3621:Cúchullain 3490:Cúchullain 3369:Cúchullain 3350:Robin Hood 3340:Robin Hood 3319:Cúchullain 3267:Cúchullain 3172:Cúchullain 3036:Cúchullain 2991:Knightmare 2947:Cúchullain 2896:Der Pleier 2880:9 November 2847:Cúchullain 2803:Cúchullain 2745:Cúchullain 2730:Springnuts 2707:Cúchullain 2662:Cúchullain 2616:Cúchullain 2537:Cúchullain 2435:Cúchullain 2386:Cúchullain 2335:Cúchullain 2266:Cúchullain 2210:Cúchullain 2162:Cúchullain 2073:Cúchullain 2007:Cúchullain 1963:Cúchullain 1913:Cúchullain 1874:given name 1820:Cúchullain 1729:Cúchullain 1575:Cúchullain 1483:Cúchullain 1408:Cúchullain 1370:Kubla Khan 1335:Cúchullain 1265:Cúchullain 1263:, sorry.-- 1245:Cúchullain 1215:Cúchullain 1154:Duke Aymon 976:Cúchullain 932:Cúchullain 893:SlackerMom 872:Cúchullain 857:SlackerMom 786:Cúchullain 733:Cúchullain 693:Cúchullain 637:Cúchullain 555:Stephen2nd 525:Cúchullain 506:Stephen2nd 486:Nezu Chiza 416:Cúchullain 303:Cúchullain 230:Cúchullain 228:however.-- 136:Cúchullain 106:Holy Grail 98:Archive 15 90:Archive 11 85:Archive 10 4048:Main Page 3523:Riothamus 3196:Enaidmawr 3152:Enaidmawr 3138:Enaidmawr 3032:unsourced 2911:Gatoclass 2795:WP:TRIVIA 2774:article. 2262:vandalism 2146:Iacobaeus 2115:Englynion 1006:Parkwells 666:consensus 521:Airgíalla 166:Wikitruth 79:Archive 9 73:Archive 8 68:Archive 7 60:Archive 5 4325:Coraline 4323:Because 4304:Coraline 4267:'A'ishah 4260:'A'ishah 4176:Dravecky 3738:DreamGuy 3606:and the 3547:Historia 3105:Kairo-kō 2821:Woodwose 2689:Fuzheado 2597:Thanks. 2248:contribs 2236:unsigned 2227:Buddhism 2205:linkspam 1938:please. 1845:edit war 1796:(1983), 1792:(1982), 1641:article. 1393:Quiddity 1288:Humanzee 1232:Evertype 1200:Evertype 1118:contribs 1106:unsigned 1039:contribs 1027:unsigned 832:Awadewit 765:Unschool 731:moves.-- 710:Oakshade 687:back to 670:Oakshade 255:American 185:Terraxos 170:deletion 116:Perceval 112:Parzival 4012:Camelot 3934:Camelot 3875:that?-- 3708:CANVASS 3608:Annales 3543:Annales 3057:Willsun 3017:Willsun 2987:Galahad 2832:Johnbod 1802:Society 1786:Shivers 1782:Slither 1774:Shivers 1755:Slither 1425:Chunkey 1138:Paladin 1110:Eja0012 803:Thanks! 574:Mabuska 462:Arcayne 295:the MOS 180:opt out 39:archive 4232:WP:WMD 4221:CSD C1 4091:there. 4016:Arthur 3967:;) .-- 3585:, the 3552:Regnum 3454:PFHLai 3288:WP:CIV 3247:WP:CIV 3227:WP:CIV 2772:Merlin 1901:Gisela 1882:Inwind 1864:Gisela 1676:WP:BLP 1625:WP:GNG 1605:WP:GNG 1566:WP:GNG 1134:Naimon 1049:Meetup 1031:Jas392 1019:Lumbee 998:Lumbee 909:Thanks 120:Wfgh66 3680:Help! 3315:Gomer 3259:Gomer 3130:Gomer 2965:Gavin 2768:undid 2361:This 2058:soon. 1851:Steve 1808:Steve 1701:Ektar 1680:Ektar 1646:read. 1636:have. 1621:needs 1609:topic 1570:topic 1543:Ektar 1467:Ektar 1213:in.-- 1078:Hi, 378:Kabad 364:Kabad 341:edits 299:Tupac 276:edits 263:Tupac 217:edits 16:< 4275:talk 4271:andy 4250:talk 4242:here 4180:talk 4104:cont 4100:talk 4056:here 4024:talk 3998:talk 3942:talk 3911:talk 3828:talk 3785:talk 3742:talk 3697:talk 3652:talk 3560:talk 3545:and 3515:and 3479:talk 3458:talk 3426:2008 3394:talk 3358:talk 3297:talk 3235:talk 3200:talk 3156:talk 3142:talk 3093:2008 3061:talk 3021:talk 2969:talk 2936:talk 2915:talk 2884:2008 2836:talk 2797:and 2784:Rpeh 2734:talk 2693:Talk 2651:talk 2603:talk 2599:Omer 2566:talk 2558:here 2525:talk 2471:talk 2412:talk 2370:talk 2324:talk 2320:Omer 2303:talk 2288:talk 2264:".-- 2244:talk 2194:talk 2150:talk 2132:Hi! 2107:talk 2041:talk 1989:talk 1944:talk 1886:talk 1798:Xtro 1766:here 1705:talk 1684:talk 1547:talk 1524:out. 1471:talk 1435:talk 1397:talk 1299:talk 1186:The 1173:talk 1162:ISBN 1114:talk 1062:talk 1035:talk 1010:talk 958:talk 920:talk 897:talk 861:talk 836:talk 769:talk 714:talk 674:talk 627:Wace 578:talk 559:talk 510:talk 490:talk 445:talk 441:Lima 405:talk 395:See 382:talk 368:talk 337:talk 272:talk 213:talk 204:this 189:talk 124:talk 4313:Bar 4147:On 4020:drb 3994:drb 3989:the 3938:drb 3648:PKM 3579:was 3420:On 3390:PKM 3354:PKM 3317:.-- 3170:.-- 3087:On 3011:." 2878:On 2309:). 2179:re: 1985:AWT 1959:BLP 1940:AWT 1617:for 1295:Kww 1146:or 1136:at 629:'s 523:.-- 4277:) 4252:) 4223:). 4182:) 4169:. 4151:, 4102:· 4026:) 4000:) 3944:) 3913:) 3830:) 3787:) 3744:) 3699:) 3654:) 3562:) 3481:) 3460:) 3452:-- 3446:. 3428:, 3424:, 3396:) 3386:is 3360:) 3299:) 3255:is 3237:) 3202:) 3158:) 3144:) 3113:. 3095:, 3091:, 3063:) 3023:) 3015:-- 2971:) 2938:) 2917:) 2904:. 2886:, 2882:, 2838:) 2830:? 2782:-- 2736:) 2691:| 2653:) 2605:) 2568:) 2560:. 2527:) 2473:) 2465:. 2414:) 2372:) 2326:) 2305:) 2294:) 2290:) 2250:) 2246:• 2196:) 2152:) 2109:) 2043:) 1991:) 1946:) 1888:) 1880:. 1843:" 1788:, 1707:) 1686:) 1663:, 1660:, 1657:, 1549:) 1531:is 1473:) 1437:) 1399:) 1386:}} 1380:{{ 1301:) 1175:) 1120:) 1116:• 1064:) 1041:) 1037:• 1012:) 960:) 922:) 899:) 863:) 838:) 771:) 716:) 676:) 580:) 561:) 512:) 492:) 469:() 447:) 407:) 384:) 370:) 339:• 274:• 215:• 191:) 126:) 94:→ 64:← 4340:c 4337:/ 4293:c 4290:/ 4273:( 4248:( 4178:( 4123:c 4120:/ 4106:) 4098:( 4093:— 4022:( 3996:( 3976:c 3973:/ 3940:( 3909:( 3884:c 3881:/ 3826:( 3809:c 3806:/ 3783:( 3761:c 3758:/ 3740:( 3719:c 3716:/ 3695:( 3670:c 3667:/ 3650:( 3628:c 3625:/ 3558:( 3497:c 3494:/ 3477:( 3456:( 3392:( 3376:c 3373:/ 3356:( 3326:c 3323:/ 3295:( 3274:c 3271:/ 3233:( 3198:( 3179:c 3176:/ 3154:( 3140:( 3059:( 3043:c 3040:/ 3019:( 2985:" 2967:( 2954:c 2951:/ 2934:( 2913:( 2854:c 2851:/ 2834:( 2810:c 2807:/ 2752:c 2749:/ 2732:( 2714:c 2711:/ 2669:c 2666:/ 2649:( 2623:c 2620:/ 2601:( 2564:( 2544:c 2541:/ 2523:( 2469:( 2442:c 2439:/ 2410:( 2393:c 2390:/ 2368:( 2342:c 2339:/ 2322:( 2301:( 2286:( 2273:c 2270:/ 2260:" 2242:( 2217:c 2214:/ 2192:( 2169:c 2166:/ 2148:( 2105:( 2080:c 2077:/ 2039:( 2014:c 2011:/ 1987:( 1970:c 1967:/ 1942:( 1920:c 1917:/ 1884:( 1827:c 1824:/ 1736:c 1733:/ 1703:( 1699:- 1682:( 1582:c 1579:/ 1545:( 1511:. 1490:c 1487:/ 1469:( 1454:2 1452:, 1450:1 1433:( 1415:c 1412:/ 1395:( 1342:c 1339:/ 1297:( 1272:c 1269:/ 1252:c 1249:/ 1236:✆ 1234:· 1222:c 1219:/ 1204:✆ 1202:· 1171:( 1160:( 1112:( 1060:( 1033:( 1008:( 983:c 980:/ 956:( 939:c 936:/ 918:( 895:( 879:c 876:/ 859:( 834:( 793:c 790:/ 767:( 740:c 737:/ 712:( 700:c 697:/ 672:( 644:c 641:/ 576:( 557:( 532:c 529:/ 508:( 488:( 443:( 423:c 420:/ 403:( 380:( 366:( 343:) 335:( 310:c 307:/ 278:) 270:( 237:c 234:/ 219:) 211:( 187:( 143:c 140:/ 122:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index