User talk:Crosstemplejay/Archive 1

1793:(ec)I'm also concerned about your welcome template. The statement, "No matter how little you may know about a topic, check it out on Wiki, if you find it, add to it or make changes backed with references" is misleading. It only mentioned references in the context of making changes. However, in the vast majority of cases, editors should not be adding unreferenced material to any Knowledge articles. Only material that truly cannot be challenged can be added unreferenced. I think it would be better to add some wikilinks in there and change the phrasing to clarify that people should add information that is 3654: 2538: 2378: 31: 3355: 1213: 2194:

violation of policy if they don't violate said policy, right? I'm happy to wikify these articles to your liking, but please point to what part of the Wikification guidelines you think those two articles violate--or BLP, which you're now directing me toward instead. These articles have four references apiece, and every sentence is referenced--do the BLP guidelines call for more, and if so, can you point me to a specific clause where they do?

3863: 3783: 866: 682: 527: 319: 216: 2294: 821: 778: 634: 3607:. You may want to occassionally go back and check on it to see if anyone left any comments (I will keep an eye on it as well. It might take a couple days before it gets reviewed. Good job! I don't do a lot of writing about Africa, and it's really rare to find someone in the community who really is on top of developing content on indigenous African concerns keep it up! 19:08, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 2698:, the page you are trying to edit is protected. That is why you cannot edit it. It is done to prevent vandalism. In order to edit such pages with a padlock sign on, you have to have permission. The commonest one you may need to do so is being a member of the autoconfirmed group. This is gotten after 10 good edits and being on Wiki for 4 days. Hope this helped.-- 3430: 2978:). I just created it today, so of course it's all a little messy in the start, but I'd love it if you could give me some pointers to what it actually is that needed cleanup. I'm a little fuzzy on what it is that needs improvement and what doesn't. Thanks! And of course I'll continue editing until I have a result I'm happy with. 1564:, sorry for any harm I may have caused to certain WP contributors. I must say everything I have done so far in WP has been out of my best intentions. I have carefully gone through the various text and will make the necessary changes. Thanks a lot. Hope you change my block. To err is human to forgive - divine. Crosstemplejay 1182:. Second, you are making too many of the same action a minute, approaching bot-like speeds. I expect that you have nothing but good intentions, but I'd really prefer if you could adhere to the guidelines. If you feel any part of this is unclear, please reply here and we can work out any misunderstandings. Thanks! 3346:

I appreciate you welcoming me onto Knowledge. I hope to be a great wikipedian too. I wanted to edit your userpage but I could not. I think you have an excellent userpage. With time I hope to build mine too. I want to offer you a barnstar I saw, Please place this on your userpage if you do not mind. I

2048:

Thanks for the advice, I would however, like to tell you that one of first problems on WP was having my articles deleted, this I attribute to the fact that I did not have the right mentorship when I first arrived. I therefore like to welcome newbies and then show then how things are done so that from

1859:

After seeing from the comments above that this appears to be a running issue, I'm provisionally removing the tag from the page. However, if you'd like to let me know what additional sources you'd like to see via the article's talk page, I'll be glad to work with you to address any concerns. All best,

1443:

and understand that your actions, while well meaning, are far over the edge in terms of their anxiousness to get things out. Should you continue to quickly tag items I will raise the concern on the appropriate forums that you are not doing a service to the project and ask for your twinkle privilages

1293:

for speedy deletion with the reason "CSD-A7". While that's a valid reason for speedy deletion in general, this page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because the article gives sufficient assertion of notability. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging

3322:

about making personal attacks. However, in reviewing that user's talk page, I'd say you've gone overboard. One welcoming-type section is quite sufficient; bombarding someone with five in fifteen minutes is unlikely to be appreciated. I acknowledged your own newbie status in an earlier post, to which

3268:

Hi there. I noticed you removed the references I added to the Barrhead High School page. I included these so that the source may be cited and that my changes were verifiable. I'd just like to ask why you removed them, leaving a big ugly notice at the bottom of the page about reftags and such. Surely

2285:

are unneccessary, as there doesn't seem to be a problem with those articles for an expert to address. The template documentation says: "Important: After adding this template to an article, please state on the article's talk page the issue that you think an expert needs to address. Unexplained expert

1200:

Syrthiss, thanks for you continuing to watch over me. I totally understand your request, sorry for slipping over. I have tried from yesterday to avoid putting in the phrase: "THANKS FOR YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS" rather i am encouraging them to add to Wiki. I will however stop my welcoming if it is causing

3002:

which outlines the manual of style for dates and numbers. We don't tend to link dates at all, and the format "29 February 2008" would be preferred to "the 29th of February 2008". It's not a big deal, but if you're going to be creating lots of these, it's probably be easier for you to change the one

1345:

and you used on a plant/animal article! Also for catimprove please note that for quite a few articles three categories might be all that is needed. Also please take a lot more time when considering whether to tag an article for speedy deletion because an incorrect tag can scare off new users, which

2949:

OK, NP, go ahead and do that if you want (but capitalise References please); it would have been far quicker to do it right off than to place a tag. And you might remove the tag, which is misplaced. If you want an article to clean up, I can probably suggest one to you. That might be more productive

2075:

while I carefully wrote this article following each and every rule of Knowledge and carefully using every - every word in my article, because I know the rules and how important the contribution should be. Please if you could reconsider putting the ad tag on my page. God bless you and Thank You for

1594:

Please see my comments on this article's page. I am sure that you have a job to do but it would do no harm for you to know that comments written in such an arbitrary and curt fashion cause considerable offence to those who have written an article in good faith. I found it totally crushing! I have

2596:

for deletion. I see that you have gone through most of the procedures desirable when doing so, including notifying the article's creator - but you do not seem to have stated your reasons for prodding it anywhere (the most common place is in the proposed deletion template itself, immediately after

3484:

and almost any of the areas could use help and the big advantage of hopping around the various backlogs is that you learn alot about what is means to organize, develop and generally present information on WIkipedia, because you get a chance to read a bit of the good, bad and absolutely atrocious

2193:

I appreciate that you think my articles "have potential," but that isn't the issue here; the issue is putting tags on articles that don't appear to require them, without pausing to clarify your reasons. I'm fairly inexperienced with Knowledge, but it does seem to me unwise to flag articles as in

1610:

Weglinde, I am very sorry for causing you so much. I accept the fact that my actions were flawed, though I had no intention of vandalising your work. It was a mistake. Once again sorry. I hope you will continue to contribute to WP. Please accept this as a peace offering. Crosstemplejay 21:59, 15

413:

Hi crosstemplejay. This article which you created contains lots of details about optometry in general, but not very much on the status and the history of the profession in Ghana. I suggest that you add more material on the history, and (which you have done) the regulatory body. I was thinking of

3479:

A bit of advice, looking at your edit history, I notice that you are doing high volume of edits welcoming of new users, which is great, but don't push yourself to the point of burnout. I too am a really high volume editor, and found that several months ago that I had worked myself into a rut of

2119:

reliable sources, and an inline citation for every sentence; when I asked you for clarification (above), you declined to do so. This marking appears to me to be equally unjustified--I can only assume you're doing these in great haste, as several users above have suggested. I'm happy to make any

1126:

I also have a couple of concerns, if you're willing to listen. (1) We typically don't leave welcome messages on accounts that haven't edited, mostly because often it is unclear if the person has any intent on staying or just makes an account because they are prompted to. (2) You are welcoming

940:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

748:

601:

385:

282:

1177:

I've been talking to a few administrators whose opinion I trust, and seeing as you haven't changed your behavior I'm going to have to strongly recommend you cut back / slow down on your welcoming. First, as I said above you are welcoming users who have no edits yet, which is contrary to the

2030:

amount of time in the user talk space. It's great to contribute to the community, but posting when you exceed certain thresholds for edit counts is frowned upon by the community and seems that you're more interested in the social networking rather than building an encyclopedia. Your large

2031:

percentage of user space edits is to the point that should you stand for advanced privilages (such as administrator) several people would have significant problems with your candidacy. I suggest you take a day or two to consider what you can do to help build (or maintain) an encyclopedia.

3200:

Hello again, I see you're creating a lot of articles about constituencies. Could you make sure you add a sentence to the lead saying what the article is about? I got quite confused reading one as I thought it was about a person, as it starts with eg. "Joses Asare-Akoto is the member of

1031:

text from the article as they were copyright infringements. Regarding the three images in the article, you haven't answered whether they were your own work. I located sources from them below that I believe are the originators. I have requested speedy deletion of them on the Commons.

1233:(recently updated) - it will make your patrolling so much easier for you, and if there's anything that is still not clear, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. You may even wish to make your own suggestions for improvement of the NPP page. Happy editing! -- 1843:

as needing reliable sources, but I didn't see any elaboration on the talk page. Currently it's sourced from two BBC stories, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch... would you not consider these as meeting the criteria? Thanks for any guidance you can give. Best wishes,

1216:

Hi Crosstemplejay/Archive 1. Thank you for patrolling new pages. Patrolling is an essential function at Knowledge, not only to prevent the wrong kind of pages staying online, but also to do some basic research and tag them for attention. The article you tagged

2442:

How many categories do you think it belongs in? Its a browser based game, that the only category that it fits in. And one is actually enough. If you can think of others it might belong it, it'd make more sense to just add them yourself, instead of putting a tag down there.

3892:

or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our

3812:

3509:

Hi CrossTempleJay! You asked me to improve the categories on my page (which I greatly appreciate - it reads and looks a lot better now!) Would you mind revisiting the page and either giving your blessing or telling me what more I can do to improve the page? Thank you!

1687:

Abhishek191288 the problem arose because we happened to have been editing the same page at the same time. I rather decided to give your edits preference hence the change. I think I rather deserve recommendation from you. --Crosstemplejay 18:22, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

1904:

I'm sorry to say I'm still having trouble understanding your objection. Can you point me to the specific criterion you're seeing that I'm missing? It appears to me that I have four reliable sources here. Is there a particular threshhold that I haven't noticed

2372:

I am writing to elucidate why a clean up tag was posted on my recently created page Zerona. I would like to ensure my article adheres to all necessary policies and procedures that have been established here at Knowledge. I look forward to your response.

1225:

would have been better tagged with a {{Db-multiple|A1|A7}} to save placing two separate templates on the page. You should also remember to place the special warning template on the creator's talk page (I've done this for you this time).

3485:

articles that find their way on to Knowledge. Then you can bring that new experience to the content that you develop in the future! Just some advice though, as I said you are doing stuff that is valuable for everyone as it is! Happy editing!

2416:

Ryanmasu11, I put the tag there because articles need to have leads, sections, references etc to make them stand out as a good one. Good article though but just try to break them up into various heading to make the text look and read better.

1458:

Hasteur, thanks for the advice but if a new contributor starts an article that is against the norms of WP I believe that that work ought to be rightly sanctioned so that we do not encourage spams etc. Crosstemplejay 18:39, 15 April 2011

1719:

Abhishek191288, thanks a lot, it took me some time to understand what you meant by my signature not being in line. I realized that my preferences page had been saved in a funny manner thereby causing that problem. Thanks once again.

3201:

parliament...". Also, you can't use Knowledge as a reference, so it's best to keep links to articles as wikilinks, in the see also section if they don't fit elsewhere, not in the references section. Lastly, try to watch links to

906:. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Knowledge. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 3884:

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

3804:

2289:

Please slow down and take the time to read through each article carefully and think about whether it needs tags. If you're not sure you can always leave it unpatrolled. I see you've created quite a few nice articles yourself

2597:"concern=" - only a few words are needed). I can see several reasons why you would have PRODded the article, some reasonably good, others not. But, to help other editors, you really should have given your actual reasons. 351:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read 248:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read 949:

the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the

714:, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 1201:

a problem. Hope you continue to check up on me. But, I still am expecting my barnstar. LOL. are you on facebook or something? Would love to chat sometime. Thanks once again. Crosstemplejay 18:40, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

2474:

Dream focus, I placed the tag there so you could try and add more categories to the one you have this is because as I read through your work I realized that it was a recent game. It would just be better if you add

3480:

making really insignificant edits on pages which I felt didn't bring me happiness. You are a volunteer, so its important to make sure that you are entertained while working on Knowledge as well. We have a massive

477:

because all articles on Knowledge are of common ownership. This does not discourage or prevent you from improving the article, however, since your edits are accounted for and credited in the page history. Thanks.

1801:. Like CutOffTies, I do find the welcoming of new users to be a positive thing, but I feel it may be disconcerting to them if they get conflicting information about what may or may not be proper WP behavior. 932: 942: 750: 603: 387: 284: 930:(just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on 738:(just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on 591:(just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on 375:(just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on 272:(just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on 794: 740: 653: 593: 670: 515: 857: 1506:

you tagged an article as unreferenced, when it clearly had three references listed in a references section (and one was even inline cited!). Your tagging could drive away new editors (please read

1155:

I will heed the advise, then maybe you will award me a barnstar. LOL. hope to check you out more you have a very impressive record both in life and on Knowledge. Once again, thanks. God bless.

896:. First, thank you for your contribution; Knowledge relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - 786: 734: 707: 675: 302: 1703:. Your signature as of now is: Crosstemplejay. PS: A sugnature must link to your talk page or user page or both. Please read the links I have provided and kindly change your signature. 766: 619: 1412:

before tagging any more "difficult" pages. NPP takes a little getting used to, so it might be an idea to slow down and concentrate on tagging the less ambiguous new articles first.

624: 963: 2922: 2800:: To aid you in replying, I attach here the text of the whole article as it currently stands. Please specify precisely which aspects thereof in your opinion require clean-up: 2793: 954:

and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Knowledge looks forward to your future contributions.

274: 1111:

Please be careful about where you are putting your welcome pages. At least one of the recent ones has been created on the userpages of users, not their talk pages. Thanks!

1323: 204: 3032:

Belovedfreak, thanks for the correction. Will implement them promptly. And for the second part of your concern, I am indeed going to build them all up. Thanks once again.--

2927:

Clean up has to do with you article structure, though it is a stub, you could put the heading ==references== on top of the reflist. That should make it look more wikified.

2307: 1135:

to correct either of these, but in my opinion it would be nice if you could slow down your welcoming or reserve it only for when you notice a new user first edit. Thanks!

665: 2072: 377: 3504: 3323:

you didn't reply, on this page. I'm not sure it's a good thing that welcoming other newbies is your primary activity here, but in any case please use moderation. Thanks.

3209:. I'm nitpicking a bit now, but as you're creating so many articles at once, by copy/pasting, it would be helpful to iron out these issues before you do too many more. -- 3558: 3521: 3442:

For, as a new user, really embracing the principles and approaches of the community and making every effort to welcome new users and improve content where you are able!

3145: 307: 403: 3153: 3137: 1931:

Khazar, my tag was just to alert you so no one would nominate your good article for speedy deletion. If you have added more to the article in terms of references for

1439:. Tagging something for A7 so soon after creation is extremely hostile to new editors. Have you observed that the editor is still in their first hour. Please read 3161: 2959: 2936: 2778: 2352: 2338: 2324: 2315:, its always nice to hear and see others commenting about my effort, especially in the constructive way you go about you concerns. I have duly noted them. Thanks. -- 2171:

I am commenting on your articles because I believe they have potential. Again I responded to your early request on your talk page. You can check. Have a good day. --

1453: 1205: 501:

at the same time, and confusing each other. I'll stop for a while since you are still adding to the article. Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge. Cheers —

268: 241: 209: 102: 2695: 2678: 968: 1021: 3720:. To do this manually you would go to the page and after being redirected to the band article, you would click on the link at the top of the article which says " 2707: 371: 344: 312: 1670:, a signature must link to either your talk page or user page or both. In your case, it does not link to either, hence I suggest that you change the same asap. 3767: 3550: 3538: 3513: 3121: 3927: 3847: 3619: 1729: 1714: 2728: 2664: 2593: 2583: 2100: 3253: 3237: 3057: 3041: 2998:

Hi, I noticed you creating a few articles on districts in Ghana. I presume you're working from a template, or copy/pasting; you might be interested to read

2686: 3102: 2639: 2484: 1537:. You need to stop and review your edits before making them. Note to other admins: This block can be lifted early if the user understands what's going on. 959: 2742: 2466: 2426: 2157:'s is important that you add a lot more references. It is a good article just do a little more to make it stand tall. Keep going, it will soon be great.-- 1882:'s is important that you add a lot more references. It is a good article just do a little more to make it stand tall. Keep going, it will soon be great.-- 1784: 1580: 3749: 3667: 3412: 3129: 2555: 2391: 1824: 2505:

for someone who has made zero constructive contributions to the encyclopedia, whose every edit has been reverted, and who is now indefinitely blocked.

2058: 1692: 1397: 3633: 3598: 3494: 3474: 3024: 2220: 2180: 2166: 1944: 1914: 1891: 1374: 3332: 3080: 1429: 1276: 840: 1810: 1565: 1077: 2609: 2049:

my mistakes they may learn to do better. I must say that I seriously work on NPP so my sole work on WP is not only welcoming. Thanks once again. --

1281: 1191: 1144: 3692: 2575: 1755: 1648: 1247: 955: 852: 2770: 2626:

The company is focused on providing royalty free music that can be quickly and easily created to a custom length using their patented software.

2526: 2440: 2434: 1745: 1623: 510: 3190: 2655:

I have seen the changes you have made. Add more to the article to wikify it. I will review the work to remove the tag soon. Great work so far.

2148: 1972: 1869: 487: 3700: 3604: 3220: 2672: 1092:

in Ghana recently, and I decided to expand it. If you help with the expansion in the next couple days, I would definitely share DYK credit!

839:}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's 652:}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's 3465:, thank you very much. You have made my day today. I will continue to work every so hard to ensure that my work on Knowledge is top draw.-- 2620: 832: 813: 3284: 3228:

Hello too, do you mind if I call you my guiding article angel? I will promptly address the concerns. Thank you very much Belovedfreak. --

1529:

You have been warned several times to slow down in your new page patrolling. Perhaps this will finally get your attention. Please review

1476:) when it's unsourced and borderline vandalism. I've removed the material - please discuss with me or on the talk page before re-adding. 1380:

Please note that I have declined the speedy as the player would be kept in an AfD. To Crosstemplejay, please note what I said before and

983:

template from the article until the discussion is complete. Also, I removed information from the article that you copied and pasted from

1767: 1503: 199: 1519: 1242: 911: 296: 193: 2027: 3830: 2993: 2085: 1681: 1179: 184:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out

2238:

Thanks for patrolling new pages. When you use a BLP prod, please be sure to check carefully that there really are no references. On

2016: 1647:

You want this article to be deleted - shouldn't you try to give reasons ?? Obviously, someone removed your message - was it you????

1604: 1048: 3898: 3818: 2581: 1853: 1635: 438: 2261: 3569: 2647: 1492: 1360: 926: 892: 859: 150: 3070:

seems to be mixed up with another place. Please sort that. Plerase remove those red linked categories form all and replace with

3691:. It was still in the process of being created and adding info. I checked on it today, and now it's gone! Why did this happen? 3178: 1656: 1420: 1314: 946: 806: 754: 671: 607: 516: 492: 391: 308: 288: 205: 155: 120: 1595:

written several articles for wikipedia and have enjoyed doing so but will approach any future efforts with great trepidation.

1341:

when tagging articles for deletion and clean up. I saw you recently tag an article as an unreferenced BLP, but BLP stands for

1120: 1101: 3395: 3312: 2115:

as in need of wikification? Earlier today you marked one of my articles as in need of sources despite its already containing

907: 898: 811: 645: 626: 587: 552: 520: 292: 189: 3910: 2513:

whether they're here to be constructive or destructive. This is a simple matter of reviewing their recent edits (the syntax

1747:

that has some obvious mistakes with the link and the lack of a link. Also, it's proper to refer to Knowledge as Knowledge, "

3707: 3647: 3378: 2492: 460: 98: 3581: 2987: 2632:

The company is focused on providing royalty free music that can be made to a custom length using their patented software.

3878: 3110: 2551: 2407: 2282: 2278: 1553: 1355: 3710:(linked at the top of every page under "my contributions") you would see that the article is not deleted. Rather it was 136:

on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

3451: 3276: 3071: 2564: 2252:

tag, which is quite a common mistake. You can tell because of the red error message at the bottom of the page. Best, --

1168: 79: 71: 66: 2207:

My suspicion is that this flagging will turn out to be erroneous, as we seemed to agree that your earlier flagging of

2040: 3714:

to the article on the band. If you want to access the page without being redirected, click on this form of the link:

2750: 2129: 1413: 1307: 1473: 984: 2725: 3295:

Can you please stop messaging me (& others)? You've messaged me 8 (eight) times now, fixing your own edits!!!

2298:, so you can understand how annoying it is for article creators to have inaccurate tags added to their articles.-- 3195: 3003:

you're working from. Also, I'm not sure if you're planning to go back and make major edit on each of these - the

2955: 2918: 2789: 2334: 2303: 2257: 2239: 1548: 1497: 1487: 1204: 560: 2120:

changes you'd suggest, but for now I'm removing the tag unless you'd care to come to the article to justify it.

1384:. Also review the criteria before tagging an article for speedy deletion; appearing in a World Cup is clearly a 1984: 498: 433: 3897:

for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see

3817:

for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see

2623:

with 'This article is written like an advertisement.' I think I see what you mean and I made these changes:

1739: 1631: 1068:

for more information on copyrights and how they apply to Knowledge. If you have any questions, let me know.--

443: 140: 101:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 3263: 3169: 1832: 875: 691: 536: 328: 225: 145: 114: 94: 2242:, there were references but they weren't displaying properly because the creator had forgotten to add the 1754:

While it's admirable to leave your personalized message to new users, there's clear benefits to using the

2682: 2010: 1589: 917:

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding

835:, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{ 648:, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{ 991:. I will check the rest of the article and if you have any questions on Knowledge policy, let me know.-- 3923: 3843: 3763: 3615: 3594: 3534: 3481: 3470: 3408: 3233: 3098: 3037: 2951: 2932: 2914: 2785: 2766: 2738: 2703: 2660: 2544: 2537: 2480: 2422: 2348: 2330: 2320: 2312: 2299: 2253: 2176: 2096: 2054: 2026:

I'm not sure what your intended purpose here at Knowledge is, however I observe that you're spending a

1940: 1887: 1820: 1780: 1725: 1436: 1409: 828: 782: 641: 568: 483: 408: 106: 38: 3745: 3554: 3517: 3174: 1576: 2497:

Hi, Crosstemplejay. I see you're new here, and I well remember that there's a steep learning curve.

1346:

Knowledge needs. Remember that Twinkle is a privilege, not a right, and it can be removed from you.

843:. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - 793:}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's 656:. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - 563:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

3906: 3826: 3660: 3653: 2638:

Can I remove the tags of editors when I think I have fixed the issue, or should I get an OK first?

2162: 1699:. You have customised your signature from your preferences, but it does not meet the guidelines at 1403: 1370: 882: 698: 543: 454: 335: 232: 47: 17: 1744:

Hello, have you proofread the "Help Tips" you are leaving on user pages? I came across this one

3889: 3809: 2643: 2081: 2066: 1465: 1083: 572: 1229:

There is currently a drive to improve the quality of patrolling - you can help! Please read

3775: 3280: 3248: 3215: 3052: 3019: 2755:

Thanks for the advice on my new article, I have added the sections. 21:37, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

1661: 1642: 824: 802: 762: 725:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

637: 578:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

399: 362:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

356: 259:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

253: 160: 559:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 3088: 3075: 1150: 1128: 1106: 848: 661: 479: 177: 1261:

The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7.

3894: 3814: 3755: 3741: 3328: 3272: 3186: 2983: 2722: 2605: 2522: 2498: 2403: 2384: 2377: 2208: 1840: 1833: 1763: 1619: 1572: 1065: 1057: 719: 615: 564: 181: 2900: 8: 3919: 3902: 3870: 3839: 3822: 3790: 3759: 3611: 3590: 3563: 3530: 3466: 3404: 3391: 3374: 3308: 3290: 3229: 3094: 3033: 2928: 2762: 2734: 2699: 2656: 2614: 2476: 2418: 2344: 2316: 2172: 2158: 2092: 2050: 1936: 1883: 1816: 1776: 1721: 1706: 1700: 1673: 1667: 1543: 1482: 1366: 1073: 1028: 1017: 996: 449: 185: 1255:

Hello Crosstemplejay. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

3729: 3711: 3696: 3206: 3202: 2077: 1806: 1652: 1600: 1187: 1164: 1140: 1116: 771: 506: 470: 427: 170: 124:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type 3122:

Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news

715: 3879:

http://ghanaelections2008.blogspot.com/2008/09/presidential-aspirants-to-sign_27.html

3725: 3341: 3243: 3210: 3047: 3014: 2887: 2571: 2502: 2136: 2036: 1627: 1515: 1449: 1393: 1351: 1328: 1238: 1009: 988: 798: 758: 395: 3716: 3677: 3629: 3577: 3490: 3447: 3420: 2715: 2531: 2444: 2246: 2216: 2144: 2125: 1968: 1910: 1865: 1849: 1385: 1334: 1212: 1097: 977: 844: 657: 466: 3429: 1963:

To clarify, those sources have been in there from the first post of the article.--

347:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under 244:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under 3324: 3182: 2979: 2969: 2719: 2601: 2518: 2399: 2271: 2001: 1759: 1524: 1466: 1274: 1089: 836: 790: 649: 611: 474: 473:, that you have been signing your name into the article. This is not allowed per 348: 245: 129: 1222: 1218: 711: 710:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

556: 555:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3794: 3776: 3387: 3370: 3319: 3304: 3130:

Low-hanging fruit and sustainability; Qwiki on iPad; sceptic critic; brief news

3067: 3007: 2849: 2367: 2106: 2021: 1696: 1559: 1538: 1507: 1477: 1440: 1290: 1283: 1069: 1013: 992: 352: 249: 3855: 3737: 2975: 2872: 2783:

Hi! What exactly did you think needed cleaning up in this stub-sized article?

2112: 1990: 1802: 1596: 1534: 1530: 1342: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1256: 1249: 1230: 1183: 1160: 1136: 1112: 951: 903: 502: 419: 415: 165: 2071:

Good day! Please if you could explain me why have you put Ad tag on my page

2813: 2567: 2230: 2032: 1798: 1511: 1445: 1389: 1347: 1259:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 1234: 1044: 1039: 3733: 3625: 3573: 3486: 3462: 3443: 2212: 2140: 2121: 1964: 1906: 1861: 1845: 1794: 1093: 874:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

690:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

535:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

327:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

224:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

2091:

I have re-examined your article and have removed. Good day to you too.--

3798: 2833: 1264: 827:

to Knowledge. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a

640:

to Knowledge. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a

3546:

I suppose that would be helpful!! :) Here is the link to the article:

3074:. Please remove "PLaces" and "Casablanca from the infoboxes. Thanks♦ 2817: 1571:

I have fixed a formatting error in your post. Hope you don't mind --

3354: 3732:

back to band per talk page discussion". The article was completely

3603:

It looks good. I moved the nomination you wrote on my talk page to

2999: 2974:

Hi! Were you the one who added the cleanup tag to my new article? (

2809: 112:

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called

3269:

it's better to cite sources than leave the page unfinished, no?

2853: 2845: 465:. I have noticed that in articles that you have created, such as 3624:

No problem, it's always nice to help people who are interested,

2563:

For the record, the right page to ask for Rollback rights is at

2211:

was. For now I've removed the tags, pending further explanation.

1365:

Why speedy delection? He is a player with World Cup Appareances!

3605:

Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_May_1

3093:, thanks for the correction. I have made the necessary changes. 2875:(in Italian). Riserva Naturale Pian di Spagna e Lago di Mezzola 2841: 2829: 2825: 1053: 1005: 902:. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for 1472:

Hi. I'm not sure why you reinstated material to this article (

785:

notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with

3874: 3856: 2439:

I'm curious about your recent edit to a page I just created.

118:. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the 3670:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2558:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2394:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1035: 1001: 936: