User talk:Ckatz/Archive 7

2377:

19.5 as previously planned. Although the airport branch is not operated as a spur line as had been planned at some point, it is impossible to reflect that easily without appearing confusing. The issue is more than just a nomenclature issue. For example, it is possible to operate a train from the Airport to Richmond also, and this would constitute another line. However, without clear agreement on terms this could also be called a service. If line means track than we could say that two types of service operate on the Canada Line. However, in that case we would run into such terms as express service, or full-stop service along a single line. If service were introduced from Surrey City Center to Lougheed Mall, what would this be called? Millennium Line to Lougheed Mall maybe? and Millenium Line to King George? In this case it would be more elegant to simply give the line a new name to reflect its unique route. Whether we have the imagination to go beyond Surrey-Coquitlam Line, or simply give up on naming lines and just give destinations only, such as Coquitlam via New Westminster, or Surrey City via New Westminster. The former would then change to Vancouver via Lougheed mall after passing New Westminster. We could also resort to numbers such as 1,2,3, etc, like the bus. In bus terminology this would be a route, but I don't think this term is used for railways or metro. I will do some more research, and it may be possible to enhance the Line(disambiguation) entry in Knowledge. Cheers

2586:

laptop and my IT people do check histories sometimes). On my IP page, you had mentioned my comment about you counselling people "as if" you were an admin. I wanted you to know that it was not apparent to me at that time you indeed were an admin - as I rushed through your archive, and I certainly meant no insult by it. I hope you understand there are a lot of people on Wiki who are not admins who give good advice - and I just thought you might be one of those. So please, accept my apology - as I realise now how insulting it sounded at the time. Okay? Again, if you can find the part in the Television Project about listing former characters, I really want to read it so I will be a good editor. Please understand my confusion, as I don't see this on every CSI page or every TV show..so it did appear it was a "preference" when you replaced Vanessa so many times. I am more than willing to learn from you, as other than this incident - your edits are always right on in my opinion and I have never had a problem finding the Wiki reference behind them. Cheers, Trista

2261:

their link placed ahead off all the official ones, as if it's the most important; the Salmon Arm/Shuswap "contributor" did the same...no doubt that's part of the same course/seminar in how to use Knowledge to promote your whatever-whatsit as it's a recurrent pattern. I'm thinking that maybe a special template be designed for COI/SPA-spam/CoC users that's both welcoming and stern, cautioning them not to use Knowledge for purely mercenary efforts and giving links to all the relevant MOS/NOT/OWN/COI-AUTO/peacock/essay etc etc things that if they want to "use Knowledge to promote themselves", they should do it properly so they don't make more work for less mercenary-minded contributors/editors such as yourself and myself and so many others who wind up cleaning up the garbage (over and over).....RDs and municipalities also seem to be "in on it"....and I know the Public Affairs Bureau has been actively "massaging" all kinds of articles to its own ends, though that's more political than commercial-based....

7688:

advertisement". With all respect - have You visited the linked site? I know the rules of adding links in Knowledge and especially the attempt to prevent any kind of spam, but do You really concider a link to an international bibliography of the secondary literature dealing with fantastic film als spam? With all modesty: this bibliography is the only regulary updated genre bibliography of that kind which is available on the Internet for free. It has nearly 59.000 literature titles listet, both books and articles, including annotations and reviews (which, in this combination, is also unique as far as I know), and it's a high quality source for researchers which is mentioned in many academical sites and link lists. Of course it's not as big as, let's say, the IMDB (after all, it's a personal project which I'm working on since the early 1990s), but it's a serious project, elaborated, reliable and running for many years. And, as I mentioned before, it's a non-profit project free of charge for all users.

1568:

issue here involves the reversal of the repeated deletion of properly referenced material by a single-purpose IP editor. I had no part in the original posting of that material, I had not contributed content to the article, and I had no prior involvement with the IP. My only prior edits to the page involved a few minor style guide issues, so to say I was an "active" editor on the page or that I "frequented" the page is completely incorrect. There is no parallel here at all - as supported by the comments at the AN/I review, wherein at least two other admins have stated that my actions were appropriate given the IP's actions. I could understand your point if I had actually contributed any content to the article, or been a part of the creation process there - but I was not. Again, I appreciate your input, but we will have to agree to disagree with regards to your assertions. --

2156:

whole section of microbreweries listed that do not meet the notability criteria. I would like to nominate most if not all for a speedy deletion. Otherwise please explain to me and the rest of the reading public how those listings - which are nothing short of a yellow page advertising sheet - are notable?????? I will post this comment at the D'ark Night Film Festival deletion discussion page since you guys were so zealous in wiping out most of the comments that made sense out of the discussion. I will monitor your progress and in the absence of a satifactory and consistent conduct this issue may be brought forth to the attention of a major news outlet. Thanks and keep up the good work. I will keep a box of kleenex tissue ready for you in case you need it.

2281:

they are most needed. You have interrupted me in the midst of my edit, just as I was about to fix an error in one of my entries. While my change to the lead was significant it does not represent an error. Unless you can show me otherwise, the terminology is consistent with transit usage elsewhere, where track sharing occurs. I used other Knowledge articles for reference. Since you didn't mention any specific issue it is not possible to go into any further detail. But before you chastise me, I recommend you discuss the issue with me, as I am certainly open to correction, if necessary. You certainly have ample experience. You refer to a serious error. If so, then this should be easy to proof. What discrepancies are you referring to?

3036:

person wishing to get a fuller picture is now able to do so with the other links I provided, which are all bona fide, but have been largely ignored. The positive reviews are introduced as "some" or a minority. Admittedly, my first posting editorialized and I have dropped all of that language. I appreciate your desire to keep the post neutral and have endeavored to do that by including much of your language as well as adding links to the negative reviews, but obviously, one person's neutral is another's skewed. Thus goes the world... That said, this has been an intelligent conversation, I respect your point of view and truly hope we have reached a place we can both live with.

5291:.) Please note that your claims that this is related to any sort of "personal problem" with you are completely unfounded, and that I did not actually block your account. I did, however, notice an apparent similarity between the various accounts involved, especially given the focus on specific content and the timing, and as such I requested a standard check to get an opinion from the editors who specialize in that aspect of Knowledge's operations. This is a straightforward process that is requested frequently when situations such as this arise. It is important to remember that the decision is based on their independent assessment of your contributions, 2855:

of positive quotations. I think where it stands now is, as they say, fair and balanced. It's clear the film was "panned" by most leading critics (although the NYTimes was not a 'pan') and it is equally clear that the film had its defenders. Again, the positive quotes are not used elsewhere (like on RT or Meta, other than the Salon quote) and provide a counterweight to all the negative quotes which are very accessible on the other sites. I'm also going to add that the film was picked to show at a special screening at the Breckenridge Film Festival, a small festival, but of note because it is curated by NBC's film critic, Jeffery Lyons. Thanks, Abel

1477:

absolutely black and white, but the issue here was a content dispute...not one of pure vandalism. Using admin tools in a content dispute of which an admin is party has resulted in administrators losing their bit before. I'm not threatening you here. I'm pointing out that this has happened. You disagreed with the edits being performed, and thought it worthy of a block. There's no problem with that. But, actually taking the action? That's very well into the grey area, and arbcom has ruled previously that it's sufficient to lose your admin bit over. It would have taken very little effort to request assistance from an uninvolved administrator.

2881:

place where these reviews are accessible? Reading this, I don't think anyone would be under any delusion as to whether the film received mostly negative reviews from various sources. In fact, as compared to your original submission, this version contains many more specific references and links to these negative reviews. Links which I put in the interest of being balanced. Let's please not go back and forth on this. It clearly reads at this point as it should, to wit: There were mostly bad reviews in major publications, but there were several overlooked exceptions which can be seen 'here'. End of story.

4933:

donations and offers research services in order to fund itself. I see no reason here to delete links to the Software Top 100, especially since other sources of similar information are all commercial entities: Forbes has a commercial magazine, Software 500 is published by (commercial) Software Magazine, IDC and Gartner do not even publish their paid lists. The fact that they seek to make profit does not disqualify them, and neither does it disqualify the Software Top 100, if I understand the OR policy correctly. Do you agree with this line of thinking? --

1649:

lot of great work by Ckatz in defending WP, both in removing spam and reverting vandalism. A misguided editor (or spammer) can refuse to "get it", and can click "undo" in a few seconds. I hope administrators will be able to take suitable action without thinking "Oh, I did some incidental editing on this page, so I'd better spend five minutes writing a summary of the situation for another admin to review, then they can interrupt their work and spend five minutes reviewing the situation, before deciding that it really is a

3578:

took out anything which is not just factual. This article were put in wiki by request of my collegues as they think that the method of dealing with stress that I developed with my colleagues within last 10 year is really different form any other methods, scientifecly rooted and effective. As I see it in my article I did anything needed: - defined it, - gave the hystory and refferd to others (not related with me) who thinks at the same direction, so rider can make own judgement - described ideas and the methodology

3093:. My question is this: All articles are advertisements or promotions in some way or another because the viewpoint gets exposure, the subject gains press and the publisher gets acknowledgment, so why aren't the other reviews from Tv.com or Allmovies or Rottentomatoes that remain on wiki also considered advertisement or promotion? They are in essence free PR tools for the studios, and the large corporations that own those websites. More important, this policy tends to create a monopoly on viewpoints. Thanks. 662:

sources I did notice there are many pages on wikipedia where a comment made is supported by more than one reference. The point here may boil down to: are you opposing the reference for alleged lack of notability? or are you opposing the comments made in the page that says a few industry watchers had doubts and reservations at the Galactica series and that there is in fact a reference that supports it? Let me break it down for you, the comments added make the article on Galactica more in-depth and

647:

opinions that are available from many sources on the internet? Most people use an encyclopedia in looking up obscure but factual information and that is how a reference source is invaluable. If Knowledge aspires simply to repeat the information from other websites and only from the well-known sources is there really any reason for it to be there? Please share this comment with your fellow editors at Knowledge. Thank you for your patience and for thinking through a vital issue before responding.

4268:

to let people know that we're out there being a platform for speakers and ideas and that we're an independent out there doing it for free and not that many people know about us or get to enjoy what we are doing. I got the idea when browsing wikipedia and saw external links on on various pages to to TED's webcasts. I worried that there may be a COI but I thought that providing external links to speakers lectures would be ok as I was trying to contribute to the spirit of free information and ideas.

5598: 5001: 31: 5161:"Knowledge articles may include links to web pages outside Knowledge, but they should not normally be used in the body of an article. They must conform to certain formatting restrictions. Such pages could contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy." 2320:

train to Richmond Center, while people who transfer at Bridgeport will at most wait 3 minutes. However, the 19.2 kilometer figure is misleading too, since it suggests that the line is that long, while no line is longer than 15.7 km. An alternate possibly more appropriate description would be to say that the line is 14.5 kilometers long with a 4.7 kilometer airport spur at Bridgeport Station or alternatively a 15.7 kilometer line with 3.4 kilometer spur to Richmond.

1547:

undone (and it was by the same user). If need be, I can do the research to show you where this has possibly happened before, but it is not necessary to demonstrate to you that it is important to stay well clear of violating this principle of Knowledge. I've already done that with the links above. I encourage you to seek outside input from another administrator in cases where it is not blatant vandalism (such as "this show was gay", or "i loved this show", etc). --

4846:

only topics I have edited have been on stereo vision. I will certainly add to other articles when I see fit but I'm not going to go out and look for articles to contribute to just so I can post. Aside from that, how can anyone ever get started on wikipedia if you flag their first and only post and cite the SPA rules? I may not be a seasoned contributer but I have one thing in common with even the heaviest poster, we both started with our first post.

5337:! (After trying to fix and discuss one-on-one, of course.) The WikiProject's talk page is pretty active with some solid editors, and we don't always agree with each other, either. :P For what we just experienced, though, the editor's credibility was pretty much destroyed from the get-go. I don't think that some of his points (like with negative reviews) were invalid, but it was all presented with such vitriol. :P Anyway, happy editing, yeah? — 4877:* Typical accuracy of 95% or higher. * Can provide directional counts through a wide variety of entrance types and sizes. * Can filter object based on height and object type (eliminate or include counting of carts and children) * Lower total cost of ownership (no battery replacement, no additional hardware on-site, power and data provided over standard cat5 802.3af Power-over-Ethernet) * Accurate in high or low volume environments. 3947:

it "presents the Organization's vast archive of knowledge on agriculture and food security within a single Web-based portal, with groupings by country and thematic area." And with so many people dying from hunger I thought we could help in some way but letting the world know about the countries situation. Maybe we can analyse together each country and leave some of the links. Please let me know on how to proceed. Thanks again. --

5180:

feature existing on almost all "notable" non-profit websites. Case in point, please look at the links included under the term sleep disorder, Alzheimer's disease, and juvenile diabetes - to name a few. Some of the organizations listed are already well known, others are not well known - yet a common feature existing on these websites will be a donation button. Most buttons are prominently placed in the header of NPO websites.

8863:. The idea is to advise experts from suitable institutions how they might contribute to articles, including how they might add links to their own institutions. I think the general plan is excellent, but obviously some care needs to be taken to avoid driving a tunnel through WP:EL because already it is sometimes difficult to explain why it is necessary to revert links added by SPA accounts. This is just FYI, no reply needed. 7483:, was now far more notable than at the time the first article was written. Then, the magazine had released only one issue. Today, it boasts eight issues with a ninth and tenth in the making. A simple Google search will demonstrate that the publication by no means lacks notability as was initially presumed. Therefore, I would like to ask you to reconsider your decision to remove this page. I thank you kindly for your time. 4653:

non-profit nature. It is not fair for certain websites and businesses to receive mention and thus free advertising merely because they meet the site's notability standards. In the case why should, besides the ever trumpeted notability standards, rottentomatoes be allowed to be listed in a movies external links while an individual film critics website not be. It still relates to the material in the article. Please respond.

403: 2324:

line and a truncated line 11.0 kilometers long. It is not the job of an encylopedia to put things the way Tranlink states things, but to put it in a way that is consistent within the encyclopedia. Anyways I may try one more edit along these lines later to see if we can come up with something we can both agree on, is correct, and that does not deviate drastically from the way the service has been introduced.

4904:. One issue is that the encyclopedic article is just presenting an overview and is in no way intended to cover each product development. When I get a chance to look at your comments, I'll try to discover why those other external links you mention are present, and think about whether the list of links needs to be pruned. There is no need to reply here, just put a new message at the above link. 3238:

and information on Gibraltar. Apparently it has been deleted because it is 'advertising" The Gibraltar Magazine contains adverts in exactly the same way The Gibraltar Chronicle and all the other publications and radio stations mentioned do so I fail to see why it is considered invalid and 'deleteable' whereas the other listings are legitimate. Please review your policy. Many thanks

1653:." Of course the community has to be alert for admins who get pushy in an edit war, but this case is far removed from any kind of abuse and I regret that Ckatz has had to expend so much energy on this nonproductive issue. If anyone wants to discuss this further, you are welcome to visit my talk page, although that would not be very satisfying because I am an extremely minor entity. 5149:

neurodegenerative disorders: macular degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease, and glaucoma. AHAF has given grants to high caliber scientists at some of the world’s top research institutions. A list of current awards is available on our website: . Also, please see our questions and answers page. This page in particular is of great help to anyone who has macular degeneration (MD): .

297:

with no fees, no storage of user information or any other form of solicitation unlike both the Equilar and European Executive Compensation Visualizulizer links. Mercer too sells thier studies and services. Can you explain why these links as well as the one that I saw for Payscale and other profiles of companies are acceptable and a useful and free link that I added is not?

3368:

for two reasons, firstly most of the 'top ten' hits appear not to be independent and second I think that the micronation is much more likely to have hits on the internet than the building possibly skewing results as there may be many offline sources that mention the building. I've started a requested move discussion - something I think you should have done.

6455:

the external link to my website where the students can practise the English tenses free of charge. You should also know that I earn a lot of money from Adsense on my website, that is 20 cents a day on average. If you consider such a link a spam link, what kind of link is not a spam? I look forward to you reply. --Petr Kulaty 17:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

8019:"in production" and we have a source that says it will debut on October 2, 2009 and we have a source that says there will be 20 episodes so that info should also be in the infobox, I don't see why it should not be in infobox. Also it should not have "in production" in "|first_aired =" as that is for the shows debut date, it should be in "| status =", see 5625:) 18:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC) he is still continuing to hound me. can you ask him nicely to never contact me again or comment on anything i'm commenting on. if there is an issue with something i've done, i am sure an admin somewhere will detect it and take the appropriate action. i don't want this guy harassing me. it is getting creepy now 3032:

on these two other sites as your main source, and that's understandable given their prominence. However, I would hate to think Knowledge is a slave to conventional wisdom which can be found elsewhere, but is rather a place where a user can find and/or post additional, accurate and elucidating information which cannot be found elsewhere.

2397:

Waterfront, it WILL not receive a new name. Even if there was a service from Surrey Central to Lougheed Centre (which is very unlikely considering there are no switches from the Skybridge to the M-line, going past Columbia wouldn't solve anything), I don't see why it should have another name because it does not have its exclusive branch.

6689:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 1786:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 1436:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 4883:* Easy installation. * Overhead mounting prevents tampering and blocked sensors. * IP addressable and highly scaleable (embedded architecture eliminates the need for PCs or servers on-site). * Mounting options are available from 8-40 feet. * Operates indoors and outdoors. * Supports additional metrics. 2908:

opinions. I am trying to correct the record. Thankfully, Knowledge exists to do just that. I understand that it may have seemed otherwise to you. Please note the citations to the specific negative reviews were originally added by me. I made the mistake of including the VV article and subsequently corrected it.

8729:

I've commented on the talk page, but I'll add here that the "job" quote cannot be used to speculate about his job security, just as we cannot use the "creepy" comment. Nor can we speculate about CBS and their policies, or Letterman's status with regards to those policies. Simply put, a lot of details

6915:

I truly feel like this is ridiculous. I have relevant, informative links that abide by all guidelines. I have no affiliation and nothing to gain. Just spending some free time on the internet sharing information about an activity that I love. What is the purpose of removing the link I just posted?

6080:

Whatever one thinks about its current status, Six of One's history makes it a notable organisation - Patrick McGoohan himself accepted the position of honorary president in 1977 and held it until his death this year, and the organisation has been featured, mentioned or approached for comment numerous

6042:

I have examined both the regulatory page you cite and the sites in question and find nothing in the former that justifies deleting the latter. If you are unable to quote something from the page which disqualifies any or all of those sites from inclusion, you have no grounds or right to remove them. I

4854:

I'm not sure why it would not be allowed as it provides resources and suggested readings for those who are interested in people counting and other customer metrics. Also, the page is title "People Counter" which in itself is a product and in fact the Embedded Stereo Vision solution was developed with

4845:

I apologize for not communicating view your talk page. I'm not familiar with the wiki conventions as I have not done anything here before so I sent the email which is my preferred means of communication for most matters. I read the SPA and pretty much the only thing that I see I fit under is that the

4723:

Hi CKatz: I recenlty left you an email message asking you why you edit out some external links and leave certain ones there. If you have a tip or rationale to share, our community and many contributors would appreciate it. I notice that while you didn't answer my email, you were online and removed an

4626:

musicial i would have gladly put it into the article. If i saw any reason why we should include the list of mytharc episodes in the article i would, but since its already mentioned in over 10 articles, the main being the episode list and the mythology releases. And much of the information from season

4393:

As mentioned, there are issues with the writing style, the organization, and other aspects. The lead paragraph was much stronger in its previous incarnation, whereas the revised one appears somewhat unfocused. I've just come online for today, and will be able to actually sit down and give an in-depth

4271:

I'm really sorry that you think its just promotional (in one sense it is - but not in a commercial context). I want to ask if what I was doing is really wrong? Honestly, I just wanted to contribute and let people listen to the lectures - and I was linking directly to the webcast of the speakers - not

4267:

But we've really had some amazing lectures here, the filmings got better and I've been putting up links to webcasts such as - James Lovelock on the vanishing face of gaia; Ken Robinson; Tod Machover; Niall Ferguson; Stanley Greenberg; Will Self and Martin Rowson on political satire. I was just trying

3970:

that you reverted, I noticed that the changes made were not at all consistent with the edit summary. One particlarly stood out. It was a change from "]" to "]" and seemed to go completely against the spirit of what the editor was claiming to do so I checked and found a few more items (reversion of an

2854:

Understood re. needing to put the negative in along with the positive. I removed the Village Voice quote because it was written by a critic who unfairly saw a rough cut of the film. I also put links at the bottom for other positive reviews, choosing to not overload the thing with a conspicuous amount

1567:

even remotely similar to the incidents you have referenced. Those cases involved editors (admins) who had been, and remained, directly involved in the articles in question. They had participated in the pages, they were content contributors, and they used their bit to their advantage. The "Wolf426" IP

706:

Of course it does make it notable if you are writing an unbiased and comprehensive info sheet on a particular topic. Did you read the first paragraph or did you only skip through to the last few sentences? At any rate if you persist I will defer to your "expertise" since you obviously have a vested

468:

Hey, I noticed you reverted my additions to Future. I added a reference and changed an updated caption. Please let me know if this is all done correctly or what I should do to correct these items. Thank you. I am happy to bring this information to the page, so I want to be sure I do it correctly as I

8650:

Specific Applications, buUuk is probably no more or less notable than any of the other applications listed. It is the first app with AR content on the iPhone with significant Asian content and probably the most popular iPhone Lifestyle app in Asia. I'll leave you to decide on whether the information

8542:

I fail to see how this exchange is "impolite"; if anything, your replies to date have been far more provocative than mine. I've removed these links as an administrative action, one that was begun after noting the suspicious pattern in which they were, for the most part, added. There is no reason for

7682:

again you have deleted all links to the "Bibliography of Fantastic Film" without a proper explanation. You did not reply to my email which describes the nature of the bibliography and why I think it is a usefull addition to the related Knowledge articles, nor did you answer to the note at this site.

7658:

You have removed links to the "Bibliography of Fantastic Film" from the "science fiction film" and the "horror film" page because of a spam verdict. I think that links to external sources who offer the Knowledge users a wide range of additional (in this case bibliographical) information are not spam

5183:

I ask that you re-consider your opinion about AHAF's website and also examine whether or not the information provided on the AHAF site will be of assistance to those with MD, family members, and the MD research community. I think that you will find that in all cases we are a relevant resource. For

4533:

The truth is even if you have the power to revert my edits, you can't do it if you havn't through it probably. But again, its a reason why nearly all of the sources in my sandbox one is the same as the old remaining one. + how can i use the remaining information that i didn't include if i can't find

4120:

I've replied on your talk page, but in a nutshell, you have to stop adding the link. As the site owner, you are in a conflict of interest - and as an editor here, you are not following the consensus process. Two separate editors have disagreed with your link, yet you continue to restore it, which is

3731:

Hi, In the Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone article I stated that the film released in India as harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone in India along with the US but was reverted. It somehow seems that facts are not easily accepted and are changed without verification. I am providing the link

3237:

Hi - to the Gibraltar entry under "communication" and Newspapers/periodicals I have added a link for The Gibraltar Magazine to the links for other publications in Gibraltar however it has been deleted twice. The Gibraltar Magazine is a legitimate publication which contains a wide variety of features

3005:

encourage you to discuss future changes on the article's talk page instead of simply reverting. Otherwise, we run the risk of this devolving into an edit war. If you remain unconvinced as to the role Knowledge plays in covering material, we can certainly seek additional input regarding the article.

2880:

And as a corrective to other sites which unfairly ignore the positive reviews, inserting links to other positive reviews is not promoting anything. They exist. They're out there. And unfortunately, the other sites which are not guided by the same rules as Knowledge, ignore them. Shouldn't there be a

2793:

My own opinion is that when a bunch of critics pan a film - but several defy the trend and praise it, there may be something very interesting at hand. In the case of this film, which I thought was wonderful (obviously), I think there will be a backlash toward the positive. But if I hadn't seen the

2540:

want you blocked for a 3RR violation. I personally have been trying to clean up some of the CSI pages of the fictional information and vandalism - which does NOT apply to your edits. If you could please show me where the rule on current/past characters is - I will certainly leave edits such as yours

2260:

has taken an interesting in trimming the peacockery and brochurism, and I tried to be polite with User:Tourism Ucluelet about what's acceptable and what's not and what the MOS is and such, but they clearly haven't listened. In DVancouver's case it's a clear business agenda - especially when you see

1590:

The point here is that it wasn't vandalism. Multiple people in the thread agree it was a content dispute. Some disagree. But, there's plenty enough that agree that it is obviously not a black/white issue. If it was vandalism, pure and simple, I'd be in perfect agreement with you. But, it wasn't. I'm

1546:

As to my general assertions that a casual review found other cases where you may have erred in this regard, I did find such. I felt there was enough in what I found that another set of eyes should be alerted to have a look at the record. Further, that the closing of the thread by a user needed to be

809:

The MOS has not been changed regarding delinking of dates and the committee has sat on their collective butt for 5 months doing nothing with their "temporary" injunction. Linking dates like the date a show aired or the date a sneaker was released to the market serves absolutely no purpose. These are

244:

Ello Ckatz, I have hit undo on your recent undos of my contributions of the history of lit journals. I can't see what your edit contributes other than to make narrower a general understanding of this subj--other than that it gives an ad-copy sounding boosterism to the Yale journal. My point was that

192:

I've undone your revert on this page, largely because your revert comment suggested you had not read either my comments on the two edits that lead to that point, or the comment on the talk page (although to be fair I was probably still typing that). I'm not against your reasoning, but it seems wrong

8598:

You are apparently ignoring the explanations I've already provided, the indication that there has been a concerted effort to spam this site, the fact that the information in question can easily be sourced from what would be a more appropriate source anyway, and the assessment by a second admin that

8230:

I see you removed an external link (not my addition, I hasten to add). I am not quite sure why. As the page stands, it is neutral and says it lists the laws etc etc. So on the article page itself it seems pretty innocent. Deliberately I have not gone to the page, so as not to confound my query that

7478:

apparently under the impression that the article submitted the second time around was no more than a recreation of the initially deleted version. This was not the case. The second article represented a significant improvement in that it contained far more information and sources while the article's

6776:

Yeah, I don;t know why but you deleted crucial information about What If Sports, specifically the fact that they run a soccer simulation program. Maybe you think that just because I'm a newbie, means that I like a taste of reckless vandalizing, especially pages on Whatifsports. However I don't know

5990:

needs to be justified simply does not fly in that context, but applies only to disputing them when they are put up in the first place. I have told you that I see nothing on WP:EL to justify your deletion, and therefore have restored them. I submit that the fact that I agreed with the removal of the

5368:

Welcome to Knowledge. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Knowledge. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the

4616:

which is a FA. I'm getting this strange feeling that i'm the blue zone right now. Yes but you, the problem is, broken links was not the only thing i removed, un-reliable sources was also a big part of the refernces i removed. Second over half of the article is plot summaries and fan information and

4585:

The pages were compared, and the immediate impression was that the old one was better off as the "current" version, to be used as a base. The revised lead was very problematic, and some of the reordering also appeared to be that way. There were also quite a few references that were removed as "dead

4068:

I read the policies, again, for wikipedia (I am an attorney), and I am well within guidelines. I correspond with the leading academics studying runaways and take the issue very seriously. Most important, I strive to remain objective. Hence my blog is not posted for that reason. I am also trying

3946:

Thanks for your message. I just work for the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and we are trying to link every Member State information to each country. I know it seems a little bit weird at the begining or not maybe understood at first sight, but as it's stated on our site,

3577:

Dear Mr. Ckatz I understand taht you are busy and will really appretiate your unswer promise not to write you again and not to argue, but please help me I really do not understand. It was delited few hour befor you for same suspect. I did not see any advertizing even in that version. So, anyvay I

3541:

about this situation. There's the list of release dates to include, but no mention of precedence. I found one film that was released for film festivals in one year, then publically the next, and it used the earlier year for the release date. That was earlier today, so I'll have to try to find it

3035:

Again, I think that anyone reading this post would easily conclude that the majority of opinions were negative. It is in the lead paragraph, the Variety quote the links to several other negative reviews which are deemed "pans", and the statistics from rt and meta speak for themselves.. However, a

3031:

CKATZ, All of the quotes you reference are available on one or both of the sites you reference (meta and rotten). All but one of the quotes I reference are included on those sites, and that one, from The AV Club is actually a mixed review and the quote reflects that ambivalence. You are depending

2789:

Hi there. I saw your corrections for the critical response page. I'm fine with keeping the references to metacritic and rottentomatoes and thank you for respecting my inclusion of the positive quotes. If people want the negative reviews, they are unfortunately, all too easy to find. This was a good

2348:

Any revised wording would still have to reflect the "one line" concept, as that is how the line will be described (and though of) by the public. Translink is (in all likelihood) going to be describing runs as "Canada Line to Richmond-Brighouse" and "Canada Line to YVR-Airport", as this would mirror

2319:

Regardless of what Translink calls it there will be two lines. When people board in Vancouver they will have to pick one or the other. However, the way I put it may initially cause confusion. It will be the same when people get on the train Downtown and realize they have to wait six minutes for the

2280:

I see you have made numerous contributions to Knowledge. Thank you for all your work. I appreciate Knowledge and took on the challenge of contributing something myself. This is my first article, and I have put considerable effort into it. Generally I have supported my entries with references, where

1834:

The reason why I replaced and removed some is because the stations on the Expo Line that is a transfer station, I thought, should have only the Millennium Line box, not both. Also, if you look at my user page, you'll see that I'm from Vancouver, so telling me that you can transfer on any station is

1648:

Sorry I missed commenting at the ANI, so I would like to do so here. I'm sure Hammersoft and Tony are pursuing a noble ideal, but it is too far from reality to be taken seriously. I have followed a number of spammers and their attempts to exploit WP by adding promotional links, and I have noticed a

1591:

very disappointed with your answer here. Do you not see the problem inherent in this behavior? I'm trying to keep this amicable. I really am. If you fail to understand how serious this is the behavior is going to be repeated. I'd rather not see that happen, and feel it would be necessary to follow

1041:

I'm not assessing either HMV258 or Pmanderson's actions, as that is the clerk's domain. Neither am I interested in taking sides. However, in this situation, you are clearly a third party intervening where you should not. There is enough drama on the pages associated with this matter; please let the

976:

action and asking you to please stay out of it. If there is a problem either way, you are best off allowing the clerks to handle it - that is their job after all. They will either revert HWV258's actions, or remove Pmanderson's comments. I mean you no disrespect, but there really is no need for you

580:

Hello Ckatz. I noticed that you deleted my link from the External Links section of the wikipedia entry on Salt Spring Island. I am curious as to why you did this as it is the most valuable online resource pertaining to Salt Spring Island that is available. It is the most current and accurate map of

296:

I got an email from you today rejecting the external link that I added to the topic of executive compensation today. I added this link because I saw two links from organizations that provide similar services already there. The link that I attached is to a free wizard that allows users to research

8710:

I have no idea whether Letterman violated CBS policy and i have no idea where this part of the story is going to go -- but as of today, the "I hope to keep my job" portion of the event is rivalling the extortion plot for column inches, so, in a good faith attempt at compromise, i have retitled the

7790:

What is the proper process for adding content as it is certainly legitimate. There are dozens of companies like this and most ARE notable. Please define notable if you think otherwise! Please help me understand this. If there is something wrong with the content let me know. Do I need to leave

7718:

the links without seeking consensus to do so, and that you are adding the links despite having a direct conflict of interest in doing so. Given your relationship with the site, you cannot add links to it, and would have to convince other editors of the site's merits in order to see if they feel it

7713:

Again, we are not a directory service. Many quality sites do not have links, specifically because we try to avoid giving preferential treatment. Keep in mind that this is not a knock against your particular site, but instead a reflection of the established consensus with regards to links, which we

6796:

What exactly do you expect to be merged from that article? The entire thing is pretty much just original research, and any descriptions of the attacks in the series are best kept to the episode articles. If you absolutely need something to be merged, I guess the two first paragraphs and one or two

6454:

I noticed that you had removed all the external links from the pages I have written for Knowledge about English tenses (past simple, continuous, future simple etc.) I spent several days creating these Knowledge pages and utilized my twenty years long teaching experience. The only reward for me was

6104:

As Masem point out above, fansites need to be written by a recognized authority, meaning, as a minimum, sufficient notability for biographies. Until Six of One has its own WP entry, it's not notable, so I'm removing the link to the fansite page which provides no information that isn't available in

6039:

I made no such "equation." What I did was point out that once something has been in place for a significant amount of time, one who wishes to remove it must justify the removal. If it is justified, this would be done quite easily, and I find your extreme resistance to making any such attempt quite

5502:

Hi. Thanks for contacting me, but I feel sorry that my move has been reversed without having heard any opposition for a week about that move in the discussion page. I think that it is also a mistake to call BSG a "2004 TV series" when it is well-known that it ended in 2009, i.e. 5 years later. The

4867:

These devices are IP addressable and have the ability to capture and send counting, service, queueing, and various other metrics as well as record a video stream to validate system results. No additional on-site computer or data aggregation hardware is required. All image processing and behavioral

4674:

established notability independently, as they receive far more of a boost from being mentioned here than Knowledge's articles do by including their content. While I can understand your concern at having your site rejected in favour of a competitor's (although the roles are somewhat different), you

4088:

The entry, overall, sucks. Let's work together to improve it. Go to the site and see for yourself. If you wish, I will email you the draft of my new piece and you can see for yourself that I am very critical of the U.S. response. I would even welcome you making contributions as an author on the

4057:

Please stop removing the external link I added to stop-runaway-production.com. I don't sell anything or advertise anything. The site is dedicated to the study of runaway production and film policy, and is bias free. The site is the best resource for researching runaway production on the web, a

3790:

Hello, I just tried, a couple of times, to make constructive changes to the article named "Continents" as such article has very notable flaws. For example, the name of the continent is Oceania, and not "Australia" as the article indicates. Anyway, I tried to fix that flaw among others but the page

3688:

Hi Ckatz! I understand where you blocked me from editing Bowen Island Politics, although I'm not sure why you blocked me from being able to discuss with you or other administrators...could you please explain that one? It left me with no recourse to follow Wiki guidelines as 1. the deletions were

3367:

I disagree with your unilateral move of these articles. As someone had moved them in the first place I'd have thought it would have been obvious that your move would have been contreversial and so should have had some discussion first. Personally I diasagree with your arguement about google hits

3140:

I'm curious as to why you removed the link I added - XScriptorium is a valuable asset to the AE community. We cover expresssions and scripts which are integral to working with AE and of all the expressions and scripting resources out there we feature the largest collection. Please note that we are

2585:

Hello, Ckatz - Trista here. I am at home and logged in on with the user name I plan to be using whenever possible to make my edits (I'm working on my supervisor to let me log in at work on my lunch breaks. Otherwise bringing my cement block of a laptop in to work as the same rules apply to my work

2531:

I was just about to send you a note here, but you replied on the Noticeboard first. Could you please refer me to the TV Guideline section where it says deceased characters belong in the main cast list in both the info box and the following show summary? I only ask because I only see you doing this

2376:

Thanks Ckatz. Your latest version gives a more accurate reflction of the line and contributes numbers which are not often used in the promotional literature. The more precise measurement of the track length also automatically allows some people to see that the track is now only 19.2 km rather than

2323:

But this would still be technically incorrect. Since most people will travel the "main"line and not the airport spur, the 14.5 kilometer length would be preferred. The airport section could be seen as a turnaround for picking up bus riders from Bridgeport. In this sense there would still be a long

2234:

Hi; I note your 2nd reversal of DVancouver's SPA-spam, and as you probably noticed I reverted one too. There's an increased growth in sites masquerading as legitimate tourism sites which are actually cash-generating ad-hit-based sites, no doubt with web optimization in place to bump them ahead of

2155:

Ckatz, following your speedy deletion of almost most of the comments made about notability and the inappropriate means through which you and your colleagues deleted the references and even that independent film festival, I did a little bit of research on your wikipedia pages. Turns out there is a

2000:

Hi Ckatz, I noticed your major edit there. Just one thing: "User access to Google Docs is currently supported through Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.12 and newer versions, Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 and 8, Safari 3 and 4 beta, Google Chrome 1.0.154.48, and Opera." Is it necessary to specify the platform

825:

I prodded the Arbcom about this issue. The poll on the topic was concluded over a month ago and the results were overwhelmingly to keep the standard as written (no linking of dates unless relevant). 208 votes compared to a combined total of 84 for the other 3 options. This should have already been

661:

That was the only source that could be found at nearly the time the series was launched that had a differing viewpoint from the mainstream cheers and which had ramifications that were substantiated later on by the manner in which the series producers managed the show. If you can dig up additional

6742:

has ended it's first season than it is currently in it's second season. Each of the series will begin their respective seasons so please allow me to update the season of each respective show. I'm relatively new and I noticed that some CBS series are scheduled to begin their current seasons, so it

5179:

AHAF's website is not a spam website and it does fit into the ideal of what should be included as a link per wikipedia's description. If you are referring to our "donate now" button within the site wrapper as spam then please also take a look at other non-profit's donation buttons. It is a common

5148:

To date, AHAF's program, Macular Degeneration Research, has committed over $ 8.7 million dollars to peer-reviewed biomedical research. AHAF, as a whole, has committed over $ 100 million to peer-reviewed biomedical research aimed at developing treatments and cures for three devastating age-related

4263:

I'd like to explain why and what these external links are. I work for the RSA (Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts Manufactures and Commerce) - one of the things (believe sometimes the only thing) that I passionatley value and believe in is that it runs an amazingly big free public events

4259:

Firstly, please don't think that I don't want to be a wiki-editor or contribute generally to the amazing collaborative endeavor that is wikipedia - I'm really not that web/tech savy so I started with adding external links - I really want to be honest, they have been for work purposes - but also a

2907:

Hopefully you have seen my previous note regarding the Village Voice quote. Feel free to quote from The New York Times if you prefer. I have removed the additional citations to other sites as well. It looks about right. I do take exception, however to your accusations that I am offering my own

2034:

Anyhow, not sure it was a "major edit", as I was really just trimming and rearranging to pass the time after reverting the spam link. However, since you brought it up, the express details probably aren't needed there either; the article was/still is a bit heavy on minute details that are probably

1542:

in their support of this principle. You would be well advised to stay well away from the grey area on this issue. Taking the additional step of asking another administrator to step in takes little time and entirely avoids this problem. Further to the productive editing of the encyclopedia, having

5647:

I posted an addition to Clydesdale Bank's entry, as there is a satirical song about them on Youtube, and their charges are under investigation, not just as part of the ongoing OFT case, but also as part of a fraud investigation. Is there a reason you deleted the link. Stupid question! Of course

4191:

He's a sockpuppet. He was given the chance to admit that he'd made a mistake in the SPI. He chose to lie yet again. I submit that an indef block is truly in order. The socking was intentional and they communicated with each other to throw us off the scent. I'd offer a perma-ban if it weren't the

3755:

Big Home video has exclusive rights to market and distribute movies and DVD/Blu-Rays from Warner catalogues in India. Check the press release from Yahoo!. Another proof wold be the fact that movie channels in India air it as Sorcerer's Stone and not Philosopher's Stone. One example would be the

3270:

Okay it's now been explained that I shouldn't have put external link in the body text of my entry, so I have added again without the external link (I thought the other link was external but it's to a page). Please please don't delete it this time! The magazine is legitimate and as valid as the

2396:

line with it splitting up at Bridgeport. There is no spur line. The trains alternate between YVR and Brighouse. A service does not need a unique name, although I would have liked it to be named "Canada Line" and "Airport Line". The Expo Line is eventually have a service running from Metrotown to

2296:

The error lies in referring to the line as being two lines, and in describing it as the "third and fourth lines" in the area. All Translink information describes the Canada Line as a singular line, and it is not up to us to reinterpret it as "two lines". Furthermore, your description in the lead

1626:

After a few metres of text have been written at ANI on it, and you still hadn't addressed the issue (no one has), is there a protocol (stated or implied) that I should talk-page or email you first? You know that I think a lot of your writing skills and strategic talent: I've said so. And I'm not

8706:

Letterman seems to have thought there would be an impact on his career, hence his statement "I hope to protect my job." His concern was not a joke; CBS's stated policy on employer-employee sexual relationships may have been violated. I have cautiously added several news sources that explain the

4004:

I was wondering if it was a straight revert, given the wide range of changes (many of which did not fit the edit summary). Good work on tracking down the older version. Given what you've said, is there any point in me sifting through the changes, or should I just leave it for the page regulars?

3692:

I'm also stuck trying to figure out why you would delete my section when i re-post it the same...again, there's seemingly no one to reach consensus with. Could you please advise me on what to do (I suppose re-write it, but how, what parts, is there anything crossing Wiki guidelines etc.). I'd

2445:

Hi Ckatz, thanks for the note. I've noted the past behavior and dropped him a little note about that. I see this unblock as either acknowledging a now valuable editor turning over a new leaf and positively contributing to the site....or someone shortly to use the rope they've been given to hang

1961:

Now, I suspect that you are wary of these external links because they come from a "commercial" Website. Fair enough. I myself frequently share those suspicions. But I think that if you clicked on these links and read the content, your mind would be changed. And, I'll remind you, The Motley Fool

218:

I have warned this user again against his unexplained deletions. They have a history of unexplained deletions of images throughout Knowledge, and a seeming refusal to engage in discussions about it, with anyone. I'm having a hard time assuming good faith on an editor who removes content without

4652:

Knowledge while it is not intended as an advertising vehicle indirectly functions as such. Websites and businesses that have references or articles to them on Knowledge receive increased exposure in other words free advertising. There is a monetary value to mention on a wiki despite the site's

4465:

With all due respect, I have briefly expressed my concerns; as well, it does take a certain period of uninterrupted time to review and note the full extent of the issues. Apologies if it is not fast enough, but I've a lot on my plate right now. However, I will say that - while your efforts are

4264:

programme holding over 150 events a year for anyone to come and attend. We also record the events and provide free podcasts of them. Recently - I guess a year ago we started filming our events (something akin to TED but with on a much terribly low budget and one person doing the camera work).

3056:

I'm sorry, didn't realize that the IP had been spamming (although the links from that IP all look to be relevant external content). As I'm a member of the site linked to, I may have a conflict of interest; it still seems to be a pertinent and appropriate link. I'll leave it for you to decide,

2247:

the only source of information on some places and are open to being corrected...and they always play by the rules, or try to. I'm fairly certain at some recent tourism-business conference there must have been a seminar on "how to use Knowledge to promote your business/town" as there's been an

1476:

At this thread, you indicated annoyance with me. Fair enough, but I wanted to take a moment to explain. You have been an active editor on the article in question in this thread. What you were performing were edits that were reverting things that were not clearly vandalism. The line here is not

646:

This is an issue that does not require a PhD in Communications or Journalism to answer. Many wikipedians go around brandishing this mantra when it is supposed to be a guideline. How useful is an encyclopedia if it only contains information on well known-sources and well-known and established

8124:

No, we would put "1" (or "2", however many air). The following week, "3", and so on. Look, I understand your confusion as the doc isn't too clear, but the established convention as used on all series articles is that we update only based on aired episodes. That is why changes prior to air are

7915:

Just trying to understand where to draw the line. You can mention some caompanies but not others. What is the litmus test as to whether you can or can not. Is it strictly your opinion? If a service had a wiki page, would it then be acceptable to link to it? Would that make it acceptable?

4769:

for the guidelines on what should be in external links. Essentially, Knowledge is not a directory with every possible link, and only links that really add encyclopedic value should be added. Of course there are many articles where that rule has not been observed, and you might like to help by

884:

If I had totally deleted the thread, then either someone would have seen that it's gone, assumed it was a mistake that it was deleted, so reverted my decision, or people would keep adding their own threads since they don't see anything on the board. This solution is an attempt to keep denying

781:, Knowledge is not a directory service. Please note that this should in no way be interpreted as a comment on the quality of either your web site or your competitor's. Simply put, it is a reflection of the consensus reached regarding what sites should and should not be listed. Thanks again. -- 6063:, "Links normally to be avoided": "Links to blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority (this exception is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities always meet Knowledge's notability criteria for biographies)." -- 5921:

Any thoughts on my revisions of the critics' reviews so far? I'm trying to make them "fuller" rather than soundbites that could be splattered across some commercial for the film. Also, I have to agree with Inurhead about undue weight; I think it would be most appropriate to keep it to only

4932:

web site, it seems to be a means of pushing their services. Thoughts?) I have some thoughts ;-) The Software Top 100 is overseen by a not for profit foundation, that publishes the Software Top 100 for free every year, according to a published and stringent methodology. The foundation accepts

3182:

I think it is important that the public knows that, at least according to one source, Bruno has been generating a critical reaction from the Hollywood gay community. Is it necessary to have more than one source verify this, if we make it clear that the information only comes from one source?

2825:

Hello... thanks for the note. Unfortunately, I didn't have the time to finish earlier, and I suspect you may not prefer the rewrite that I've since done. The reality is that we are obligated to include what is said about the film, even if it is negative, as this is an encyclopedia article. I

1627:

necessarily against you here—not at all—but why don't you defend yourself, on the only topic that matters ? I have to go to bed soon. I look forward to hearing from you (calmer); I certainly would like to collaborate with you, if there's ever a topic or project. I'm open to your suggestions.

6587:

As the site includes the most extensive, up-to-date listing of micronations currently available from any source, I believe that it is directly relevant to the subject of those articles, and that its inclusion within them would significantly complement the existing content, and enhance their

7687:

I'm new as a signed-in Knowledge member but I'm a long time user and there is something that I don't understand. I habe recently added links to my "Bibliography of Fantastic Film" on the "horror film" and "science fiction film" sites. You deleted these link by arguing that they "seem to be

7818:

So adding the information without the links would be fine? There are company listings such as CNN, etc. These are notable companies. Just because one person's opinion differs certainly does not make it the rule. CNN is no different than any other news agency, yet they have a listing.

5073:

I know that wikipedia uses nofollow tags, I'm not trying to add it thinking it is going to be a valuable link for SEO. I'm simply adding it because I see other links there of equal or less value, so why not allow the Kelowna.com link? If not, please remove all the other "spammy" links.

4849:

You also say that this is not the place for the latest product yet you have allowed direct product links from Cognimatics and Irisys in the first two external links. This was the only reason that I posted the link to the product in the external links page. As for the second link I posted

4978:

award for malicious deletes. Hooray. Feel good inside today? Did you delete enough of other people's contributions yet? Oh, I'm sure you'll have plenty more time to do it. Stay up all night! I'm sure you will. Enlist more friends (um, I mean sock puppets!) Oh yeah, and please get a life!

8252:

Hey, thanks for the question. Unfortunately, in this case, it is a site that appears to have been spammed across just about any article the site's people could get away with. There were over 150 links to the site when I first noticed it, many of which were spammed by an IP in 2008 and a

5369:

text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~user:orngjce223 ☺ how am I typing? 21:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

810:

not historic dates. Not linking those dates was a good policy. My question is: How long will this "temporary" (and IMHO nonsensical) injunction be in effect? At some point, "temporary" stops being temporar and becomes policy....and policy can't simply be changed the way they did it.

5991:

link to The Prisoner Appreciation Society (once you expanded your deletion beyond the lone link you removed in the first place to include that and two others) not only shows objectivity on my part, but proves that I have examined both the WP:EL page and the external sites. I hereby

5387:

However, I have never looked up the Kosovo War, be it on my own computer, or any other computer. My only idea as to how this happened was somebody used my computer while I was away. I do not wish to be blocked from editing, and would like to know how this warning could be removed.

4514:

and i think its bad judgement of you reverting my edits to the article without reading through the article proparly, with only reading the lead which i myself thought was a bit weak from the start. What you are saying is that you reverted an edit which you don't what is included or

5175:

3. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Knowledge article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons."

5144:

We at the American Health Assistance Foundation (AHAF) would like to clear up a misrepresentation regarding our organization. Macular Degeneration Research (MDR) is one of three programs that fall under the American Health Assistance Foundation (AHAF), a non-profit organization.

8125:

reverted immediately, as there are too many variables that can affect a scheduled airdate. Will it air at that day and time? Realistically, of courcse. However, we have no way of knowing if an unexpected event (natural or man-made) will occur and disrupt scheduling, so we wait. --

4470:

parts of the rewrite, rather than the other way around. I won't be able to give it a solid read for a few days yet, but if that doesn't work for you than I can assist in calling for a third opinion. (Probably the best bet is to post at the Television project talk page, given that

2114:

Hi Ckatz, I just found that my update to " List of free software project directories" page has been rolled back. Just wanted to check the reason for the roll back. If I have violated any guidelines, knowing that will be helpful for me in my future updates. Thanks. -Balaje Sankar

4076:

Deleting again will be a disservice to the advancement of film study. In short, I am offended by your actions and can't understand why you would censor information that is educational. We should want people to know about this issue, not be deprived of information sources.

8775:

Catherine, the use as you added it implies there is an issue with his job status. There is no evidence to suggest that, and we are not here to speculate, imply, or any other such task. If you are adamant about the line, get consensus on the talk page - but you need to do that

1480:

There's no issue with an administrator blocking a vandal from a page the administrator frequents. There is a serious issue with regards to an administrator blocking someone over content disputes on an article the administrator frequents. ArbCom has been very clear about this.

4669:

RT and Metacritic have established notability as aggregate review sites, and as such are considered to add value to article content from that perspective. Simply put, Knowledge benefits more from the use than the site does. The case is reversed for individual sites that have

1957:

I can go on and on, but after having found SwitchYard Media's stories, first linked to on a Website concerned with economy/market history, I discovered the value of a great many of their articles, and I became an admirer of their concise content and visual presentation.

5184:

those impacted by MD, the AHAF website provides information, news updates, questions answered by M.D.s and Ph.D.s, and a community. For researchers studying MD, the AHAF website provides information regarding grant submission and research that we currently support.

626:

Also, looking back through the history of the article I can see that it used to be much longer. It is not necessary to list every single lie that Janitor has made, however readers unfamiliar with scrubs might be interested in the types of lies that the Janitor tells.

581:

the island available and is free for anyone to print a copy for their own personal use. It is the only map with a searchable and clickable street index,the only source for info pertaining to hiking trails, routes and trailheads on Salt Spring Island. The map found at

930:

Why was my autobiography considered vandalism, it was of my stage name, I'm a rapper signed to CrimeLab Ent. in Hillsboro OR, I was told to make a wiki page 'bout myself as a form of "putting myself out there", I apologize if I disrespected the site in anyway. -

543:

There's a difference between quoting someone and copying the entire blog, that's a violation of copyright. The article references the blog entry, links to it, and tells a reader that Zach Braff has confirmed he will be in 6 episodes of season 9. Nothing more is

2466:

I put "or" in because I did not want to run out of text space in the edit summary box by posting the whole lot. Even though I think "hit and run" would be a better term, I am willing to leave it as it is. I have no interest in pointlessly edit warring. Thanks.

2566:

it says this, and directs us not to remove former characters - I would be able to understand it better. I am certainly trying to follow all of the Wiki rules, but I have seen much conflicting info on this, none of it official. That is why I am asking for the

1940:

I understand and respect the mission of Knowledge -- and your role as a guardian of its content -- but I am at a loss at how an external link that provides rich and descriptive information about a select subject can be deemed "inappropriate," let alone SPAM!

4764:

Mail is only for really confidential communication; if you have a problem with a specific article, you should comment on the talk page of that article. Or, as you have done, you could ask here if wondering about what a specific editor has done. Please read

267:

Thanks for the note. Unfortunately, you need to supply a citation from a reliable source that indicates there actually is a controversy ovewr this. WE can't publish opinions. Please feel free to ask if you need more information about this. Thanks again.

8496:

Wispanow, you comments are uncalled for and unnecessarily provocative. With respect to edit summaries, I have made every effort to be polite; the summaries involved in our exchange, while short due to the limitations of the comment field, reflect that:

8253:

single-purpose editor in the past few days. Many of the links were added as "references" to basic information that should come from more reliable sources, while other links were used to replace existing links from government sources. Hope this helps. --

107:

Hi Ckatz, could I ask you again to unprotect the dates section of the MoS? You seem to have protected it indefinitely, even though there are no issues that I can see, and you were involved in editing it. Is there any reason normal editing can't resume?

4061:

My forthcoming article is very critical of the U.S. state incentives. By deleting the link, you are depriving people of a comprehensive resource to study the issue, which has a massive library of reports not otherwise available to educate the public

8181:

list aired episodes in the infobox, with the other details going in the body copy. (With respect to your example, no "20 (2 aired)", just "2".) Other points raised include the fact that while 20 episodes may be planned for, they are not all actually

8231:

on the page it looks innocent, if it goes to a rabidly pro-cap pun page hgmm perhaps that is not ideal for the neutrality of the article, but on the other hand an external link is quite explicitly "not our problem" so it should be OK to link to it?

5957:

Straw arguments don't make you guys seem unbiased. Try another tactic. Go ahead and delete everything. Blank the whole page for all I care. You are only destroying Knowledge and invalidating the integrity of your own contributions to other pages.

2061:

I watchlisted Google Docs because it's transforming my work with international clients. I can't wait for Google Wave, which I hope will be less clunky, more frequent to refresh, and more flexible in formatting. Have you seen the demos on YouTube?

3617:

article but don't really have time to expand it. A quick glance through the revision history seems to indicate the article has been cut down so there may also be some salvageable material in some of the old versions. The same editor also prodded

3214:. I am contacting you because you are one of the top ten editors of the article by number of edits. Would you be willing to work on improving the article? If so, you may wish to comment on the review page and join the discussion on the talk page 2181:? Should we play it safe and put the file up for deletion? The fact that the Turkish user as gone to such lengths about this matter adds weight to his claim. It is quite plausible that the file was uploaded with the wrong license by a new user. 2256:. I brought this subject up, indirectly, at the Wikimedia Canada talkpage although spoke of it there in terms of "outreach' to such groups (inclusive of museums and FN govs) to teach them how to contribute properly; I see another editor at 5375:

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ckatzchatspy 18:55, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

4072:

My work has been cited in other academic journals as well, including an Austrailian professor and a policy advisor to a US Senator. Many of the sources and external links on the page are from groups or reporters that I actually know.

327:

I support your clean-up of my contribution (which I would have cleaned-up myself). Although I think the single source is sufficient in light of the way the sentence is phrased, I will continue adding sources during the next few days.

6093:: "in 1978 it was second only to the Trekkies in membership numbers for a tv series fan base and had more members than the Campaign For Nuclear Disarmament"). Accordingly I am restoring a Six of One link. --03:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 5515:, as I explained in the discussion page and it is shown in the Battlestar Wiki and other fan sites. Nevertheless I will respect this (IMO seriously flawed) decision and will not move it again. --jofframes 14:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 5139: 1282:

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please email me

514:

You should be able to quote someone directly from myspace. Why would you change his quote. This is a direct confirmation from Braff himself and should be on this page for it's historical value. I am not sure what the problem is.

3791:

keeps reverting to the previous version, and I've even been told that I'm committing "vandalism." Is this how you treat people who make an intend to help other people to get accurate information from this already-skeptic source?

1811:

I deleted your filter (181) as filtering usernames on account creation is the job of the username blacklist (now part of the title blacklist), which can block new usernames more efficiently and effectively than the abusefilter.

2760:

Per the e-mail that the user sent me and my quick discussion with Luna, i've unblocked the account. I'll keep a close eye on the user to make sure he's on the right path. Should things go awry, we can always reblock. Cheers,

5749:

Whew. I was hoping I wasn't bothering you, as you seem busy. BTW, if you have any suggestion as to how to address the 60-odd edits that were (improperly) made, that are referenced in the discussion, that would be great as

5212:

You have rejected my edits to the Jack Welch bio on the grounds that they were unreferenced. I am baffled by this as I included 2 references, one of which was book Welch himself wrote. Could you give me more explanation?

1103:

another editors comments, not removing them outright as you have done. And even if it DID say remove, I'd still take issue with every point you've listed: 3: we're not discussing an article, we're discussing arbitration, 4:

6886:

In short, the post is being reverted because it does not meet Knowledge's Manual of Style, and introduces excessive detail and trivia into the article. I'll try to add some links for you to read later this evening. Cheers.

6955:

I am not new at this. I have contribute before using my IP in french. But's this is my first war and I really really care about and I am going to do what's it take. So I am going to try to convince all the others for now.

4450:

you are good at reverting but not given reasons for why you revert. If you don't give information which can improve my text, i can very well just add it again since my one does breach some guidelines the old one didn't.

1724:

do that, but until it actually happens... For the same reason, we don't update episode counts until a new episode actually airs, and we list series as "present" rather than a future, scheduled end date. Hope this helps.

3549:

and see what others might say? For now, I'm going to leave the year as they are. Inurhead's broken 3RR already, but I don't feel the need to join him there. I'm just glad he finally (!) took things to the talk page.

3159:. If you believe the link is useful for Knowledge readers, a good approach would be to add a section to the talk page of the article and ask if an editor who is familiar with the article would consider adding the link. 1164:

as they do not relate directly to the linking or delinking or dates. If Pmanderson believes I did wrong, he should pursue action at the appropriate location. Thank you for any assistance you can provide in this matter.

122:

Hello... you asked about this a while back, and I replied on the dates talk page, asking if people wanted the section unprotected. (The section was isolated and protected when consensus was reached to unlock everything

6283: 4031:

I've already looked through it and could only find two changes of value, which I've already fixed. The vast majority of the changes in the edit re-inroduced errors that had been corrected in the subsequent 280 edits.

3386:

fair to correct what appeared to be an improper decision to move the micronation article and replace it with one about a building. The correct procedure would have been to move the micronation article as done, create

5559:

I might be wrong but I believe that on August 21 you backed out a number of edits that I had been making to wikis for different ski resorts. In my mind those were valid links and not spam for the following reasons.

4058:

fact that the leading scholars on the subject will attest to, because they praised me for creating it. I authored a Ivy League law review article on the topic which was favorable to Canada, where I know you live.

3271:

other entries! (okay deleted again just saying Gibraltar has a monthly magazine called The Gibraltar Magazine - nolink at all. Why is this less valid than it having a newspaper, radio station etc???? Please tell me

6370:

Sorry, but can you tell the other user that an award which receives coverage from major media publishers deserves inclusion in an article, and that IMDb is not a reliable source because it is user written. Can you?

5382:

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Knowledge's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Kosovo War. Alansohn (talk) 19:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)"

1944:

The links that I added for the Bull and Bear Market entry in Market Trends provide in depth academic-like study of specific Wall Street trends and shine light on information otherwise not available on Knowledge.

8760:

than that we are "speculating." Given your adamant removal policy of such important material, i am now going to return this matter to the topic's own talk page. Discussing it with you here is going nowhere. cat

8284:

says "3RR is a bright line where action now becomes almost certain if not already taken. It is not an "entitlement" to revert a page a specific number of times. Administrators can and will still take action on

3557:

is boring tonight, I'll try to look through some of the other things he's blindly reverting. The article is a bit on the puffy side right now - only good things allowed by IH and trivial information included.

3572: 7683:

Why don't you let the users of Knowledge decide wetcher this link is relevant or not? Do give them a chance to build up their own opinion here is a copy of parts from the email I sent you earlier this month:

6335: 6012:

You are incorrect in presuming that "there for some time" equates to a right to be there. The links fail the "what not to include" section, and are not necessary given the presence of professional sources.

5479:

is a protected page, can you please do the honors and delete from that page the sentence that now reads: "* Locations of birth and death are given subsequently rather than being entangled with the dates."

4801:

I emailed you yesterday regarding the changes that I made on the people counter post but have not heard back from you so I wanted to post here. Please email me or hit my talk page so we can discuss things.

7791:

the site addresses out? I feel that this suits the topic well and is a directly related to this. If it belongs elsewhere, let me know. I intend to keep adding it until I receive an valid complaint.

5767:

Thanks. Might you have any suggestion as to how to address the 60-odd edits that were (improperly) made, referenced in that discussion? The editor has been asked to revert, but has not done so. Tx.--

2956:" Glatzer aims to wring laughter out of this desperation but succeeds only in producing a series of contrived characters and situations that make The Breakfast Club look like an unfiltered documentary." 3132: 6169:

Yeah, I typed in something about how What If Sports had a fantasy soccer program. It's true. I don't know why you got rid of it, maybe you aren't familiar with WIS but there is a fantasy soccer thing.

7747:

It was not me. That IP vandalized several of my pages. Thank you for the help. Their entire contribution history is all attacks at me. I don't know what I did, but it isn't me. Thanks for the help.

1873:. Any edits made by this user are to be rolledback on the spot (as you did), but then those page are supposed to be semiprotected (unless it is a page that has a lot of constructive ips editing it) 3726: 3151:

Don't take it personally. Many hundreds of people are repeatedly trying to add links to Knowledge and it is necessary that they be resisted. Your edit summary ("Added a new link") did not establish

8514:"Restore tag; this should be cited, I presume, but the source that was present was a spammed link and as such removed across dozens of articles. That doesn't negate the need to have a source here." 1667: 3985:. The only difference is that "organization" has been changed to "Organisation". I haven't been able to find an exact reversion, but the version that has been reverted to is most certainly before 2826:

understand that it may be difficult for the cast and crew, but that is what what is required by Knowledge's policies of neutrality. Please feel free to ask if you have any questions about this. --

1497: 6252: 1161: 7627:

Ah, sorry - thought I'd commented on that. The planet (etc.) articles don't use astrological symbols in that manner, so they were reverted from the lead sentence. Sorry for the inconvenience. --

5681: 7876:

The text benefits the companies you've listed, but not the article. I think you'd be hard-pressed to argue that Pickled Productions is anywhere near comparable to Apple, Fox, and Chase Bank. --

7692:

For now I have reversed your editing of the related articles. I welcome any kind of constructive argumentation and critique, from you as well as from any other reader/participant of Knowledge.

6565: 1623:, actually, and even hedged by saying "I may be wrong". I was critical of the user on three potential counts. You may be upset, but I was certainly not damning, was I? Please give me that much. 4703:

Hi, you removed a link to the World Futures Studies Federation giving the edit summary "rm EL." which I don't know what that means but the organisation is a consultant to the United Nations.

1277: 911:

article were not spam and are consistent with how many other articles document the availability of TV series online. I have posted in greater detail on the Adam-12 talk page for discussion. -

1595:

to make it clear this behavior is not acceptable. All you had to do was ask another administrator to be involved. It's quite simple. Would you please do so in the future so we avoid this? --

6089:

cast and crew. Less easy for me to back up with citations, but nonetheless probably still true, is that Six of One had a pioneering and important position in the history of TV fan culture (

1241:, and other digital video editor companies have. I'm going to provide citations and update the page — if you have more concerns, let's work together to make it better. Thanks graciously. -- 165:

template available to accomplish consenus changes via the talk page. Continued protection still helps to prevent any of the protagonists at the AC case from prejudicing themselves further.

4871:

The incorporation of stereo data into the image processing and analytics allows the stereo camera to operate reliably and accurately in normal, high, low, and varying lighting conditions.

3341:

the micronation article, and that the house doesn't appear especially notable outside of the US (at least, as compared to the micronation) the present arrangement seemed best. Thoughts? --

1000: 417:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 8820:

to your watchlist for the time being? They're part of this issue too, but in terms of article exposure, they're a bit on the fringe, so some more eyes on them is probably a good idea.

6591:

However, before I iniate that discussion I firstly wanted to disclose that I'm the owner and primary author of www.listofmicronations.com. Secondly, in order to avoid any suggestion of

5202: 5169:

1. Knowledge articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the subject's official site, if any. The official site should typically be listed first.

4420:

Just tell me what you mean with "writing style", bad grammar, lousy writte etc.. Is m one unfocus or the one standing their now. Let's talk more about this when you have time, okay. --

2992:"Without a trace of tempo or one shred of narrative pacing, What Goes Up is not really a movie; it's the cheapest kind of amateurishness that looks like it was shot with a cell phone. " 755:

Hello, I understand your directory service comment, so I apologize for adding the link, but why is a competitor of Castanet's allowed to be on the page then? ie. kelowna.com. Thanks.

1484: 245:

the criteria that decides who is "oldest" is debated. And I think the fact that we're having this discussion is proof of that--yes indeed there is some debate surrounding this issue.

424:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

8584:

The 4th and last time: Please give reasons why ESPECIALLY THIS LINK can't be used. Some "link-spam" is no reason for THIS link. You didn't reply to any of my answers and questions.

7901:

Not even close, I would agree that none of these companies are at the level of CNN. So it is better to leave out examples? Just say that there are companies that fill this void?

6360: 5574:

My thought is that only allowing links to the ski resort itself is too limiting. The site that I linked to provides online interactive trail maps which, as a skier, I find useful.

3601: 8234:

I repeat, I did not make this link and don't really care if it comes or goes. My concern rests solely that you have removed someone else's NPOV or if POV at least a balanced one.

7976: 7513:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 5379:

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kosovo War. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Katieh5584 (talk) 18:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

4617:

soom in a whole impossible to source or come close to a reference of any kind. You as an administrator who is elected to keep wikipedia referenced and by all means 100% accurate.

3337:

Thanks for the note. I noticed that, but given that the micronation was more popular in terms of Google hits, the fact that the hatnote was an aside from someone opposed to even

2646:

The previous version was structured better. If you wish to mention the arcs, I would suggest integrating them into the existing season-by-season format and trimming that down. --

1710: 5172:

2. An article about a book, a musical score, or some other media should link to a site hosting a copy of the work if none of the "Links normally to be avoided" criteria apply.

1965:

Perhaps I have misjudged your intent for removing these links. If so, I sincerely apologize and will cease and desist, my egregious linking behavior will be forever silenced.

1696: 1523: 8635:

Hi, you removed information added to the "Specific Applications" section about an iPhone application called buUuk. Did this information contravene the guidelines in some way?

4829:

reads like a promotion, whereas the rest of the material in the article is generic, encyclopedic information, as is wanted here. This is not the place for the latest product.

4627:

5 to 9 seems to fit perfectly in a season or episode article since they don't actually talk about the series itself, with some few exceptions. Remember i've kept the old lead.

3581:

Pleas, help me with yor experience - why do you think it was advertisement? What do I need to change to be adequate with my intention to provide people with the information?

1150: 1147: 4168:

more focused, through piping I guess. I do not believe more than a tiny proportion of readers would hit a "hidden" link that looks as though it's to a whole country article.

1129: 1292: 4868:

analytics are performed on the camera and data is delivered at configurable time intervals, thereby making embedded stereo vision people counting a low bandwidth solution.

2536:- though I admit I have not check every one of your TV show edits to see if you do it elsewhere. I do not want to get into any dispute with you - which is why I put that I 1510: 1205:

I understand. Thanks for your input at the page though. What a mess. I can't wait to leave date-delinking issues behind so that I can get back to editing articles. Cheers.

8649:

I see you've removed the information on buUuk once again, but this time with the question "Why is it notable?". The section of the page is headed Current Applications: -->

5265:

If you have a problem with my participation on Knowledge you can open the dialogue here. I will be happy to discuss it with you here in front of all the Knowledge folks.

4534:

any references to support them? If i could i would have used them! While i admit my one has some problems that needs solving, the one standing has more problems than mine.

3689:

from an anonymous source so I had no way to reach consensus 2. could not appeal to you or a third neutral administrator 3. go to arbitration. Thanks for any explanation.

3168: 3051: 1003:

of the original comments could have been handled better. I guess I should have asked Pmanderson to voluntarily remove his comments before taking action. I'm learning too.

4858:

All of that being said, I reread the original post and can see how it reads like a promotion so I have rewritten it and posted below. Please let me know what you think.

3779: 3748: 3442: 3069: 4864:

Embedded Stereo Vision devices use two camera lenses in order to incorporate height data into the onboard intelligence algorithms and greatly increase system accuracy.

4065:

Ir's ironic that you delete my link when the one below it, for FTAC, is a very biased site that hates Canadian policies. I even called them out in my first article.

2940:

ignore what has been said about the film. If it were only one bad review in a sea of praise, perhaps - but look at the comments from the major press that we didn't use:

2936:

Abel, the concerns I expressed about your edits are based on your previous posts, where you have indicated a desire to avoid the negative press. As for the article, we

8173:. If you're not convinced by my explanations, please refer to the recent discussions at the Television project, where this came up a few days back with regards to the 7998: 6782: 6174: 4964: 3563: 2616: 8002: 6427:

them to do so. (It would only be notable if they were producing new episodes that were first broadcast on This TV.) Keep in mind that the series is in syndication on

6259:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 4509:, either than that its just the same with the exception of the lead i created, which i've now replaced with the old one. What i'm saying the only difference was the ' 2425:

Ckatz, 2+2 = 4. Do we need multiple consensus over that fact? Srebrenica genocide was a fact. Why do we need consesus over that? Can you please elaborate? Thank you.

739:

biggest contributor to the article, I ask you to help me verify these claims. It will be a very big disappointment to see the article demoted due to this problem...

623:

I'll repeats myself and say that the rollback feature is meant to be used on content that is clearly vandalism. It sounds like it doesn't allow comments to be left.

8427:

You gave no reason against Procon. Only "Link-spam" (by one or probably some (a few?) more wikipedians or IPs), but this are TOO FEW REASONS to delete this source.

5701: 4641: 4568: 4460: 4445: 4429: 4386: 4366: 707:

interest and for my part I am a power user of Knowledge and only moonlight on occasion as an editor/contributor. So hey more power to you if it makes you happy!

8730:

with regards to this matter may well be better suited to Wikinews, as we have to look at the bigger picture to determine what is news and what is encyclopedic. --

8543:

you to issue "warnings" and make spurious claims regarding politeness, as you have done. Furthermore, keep in mind that the spammed site was tagged onto the line

5052:

link? Its a news website dedicated to Kelowna and has more local full time reporters than any other news organization in Kelowna and has the most current news.

4144: 3938: 2253: 1918:

I just wanted to thank for your intervention against that XxxLRKistXxx sock whatever his name is. The disruption in these articles was becoming intolerable. --

1099:

NONE OF THOSE BULLET POINTS APPLIES TO REMOVAL OF COMMENTS. It explicitly says, prior to the very first bullet point, that the following items are exceptions to

300:

European Executive Compensation Data Visualizer 2006 2007 CEO Compensation from Equilar Executive Remuneration - Analytical article by Mercer/CEO Forum Group

3707: 497:

We cannot copy content directly from MySpace, even when sourced. The meat of the blog entry has already been integrated into the section its supposed to be in--

6348: 3065: 1870: 1528: 4357:

Can you tell me were these problems are "writing style, organization (especially the lead), and other aspects that warrant the revert." so i can fix them.. --

3721: 3077: 1502: 1489: 736: 8678: 8659: 8636: 6778: 6170: 5198: 4276: 1976: 1877: 1779: 889:

keep people informed. DENY's a great thing to do, but not at the expense of keeping people ignorant to the situation. I hope this makes me action clearer. --

599: 6920:

The link is simply unfit for inclusion. Your assessment that it "abides by all guidelines" is erroneous; please feel free to familiarize yourself with our

1853:

Ehh...I get the logic, but I feel it's too complicate to figure out for someone who just reads it, without having any explanation that you just gave me. --

5666: 5578: 5551: 3589: 3211: 2206:

I've been monitoring Commons, and it appears the file attribution has now been adjusted to allay his/her concerns. That would seem to address the issue. --

1563:

Hammersoft, I appreciate your taking the time to reply, and I have reviewed the above cases. One thing that became immediately clear is that this block is

1234: 8298: 5783:

If there's consensus regarding the format, it shouldn't be a problem if people wish to restore the previous version (essentially, undoing the changes). --

4855:

the primary purpose of counting people so not allowing it to be included in the post leaves off a significant contribution to people counting as a topic.

2239:- didn't take that one out, as it pretends to be a webzine/online newspaper but its content is really nothing special...we've always made an exception of 155:(e/c with CKatz) Just a comment here, there is an ArbCom case reaching its late stages, so normal editing should resume soon in any case. And there is an 8756:

The "job" quote was not "used to speculate" about anything. He said it. I am reinserting it. You'd better have a better reason to cut his full paragraph

8219: 7510: 7499: 7475: 6511: 5586: 5259:

I read the claims you wrote to get me banned. Your information is untrue, irrelevant, and seems to be the result of a personal problem you have with me.

4654: 3084: 2378: 2330: 2282: 2130: 8532:"Hello... please do not restore the link to the "procon" site. Links to this site have been added en masse by single-purpose accounts and IPs, such as 6495: 6463: 6106: 5214: 4886: 4803: 3956: 3822:

The place to discuss content disputes is on the talk page of the article. You may even find earlier discussions regarding the points that concern you.

3478: 3094: 2763: 8380:

Hello... please do not restore the link to the "procon" site. Links to this site have been added en masse by single-purpose accounts and IPs, such as

7401:

The purpose of adding this text to this site was to add another source of information on the al-Khwarizmi. I don't quite understand the objection.

5648:

there is a reason: can you explain the reason please? I obviously did a no-no, and if you could let me know what it is - I shall avoid it in future.

3102: 7963: 7945: 7931: 7917: 7902: 7854: 7827: 7799: 6682: 6535: 6330: 6183: 5059:- a local tv station that no one watches (which is why its been on the auction block). How is that link any less spammy than a link to Kelowna.com? 4080:

I want to work with you and keep this cordial, but I can't resist pointing out that your pro-Canada stance calls into question your objectivity.

3037: 3001:

Obviously, we're not here to trash a film - but we also cannot selectively pick-and-choose reviews that only cast it in a positive light. As such, I

2916: 2889: 2863: 2808: 2580: 2541:

and Vanessa Ferlito alone. Alright? Again, I do not want a dispute with you. Trista (not able to log in at work - please reply by IP as I am NOT the

2109: 1109: 1025: 955: 8246: 5827:

I have undeleted the page, as you were right, it shouldn't have been deleted as the rfd was only for non notable asteroids. Thanks for spotting it.

4181: 2595: 2392:

I would like to comment to this, as this has been been going off like crazy in my watchlist. As far as I'm concerned, Ckatz is right, there is only

1988: 1515: 8533: 8430: 8381: 7699: 7666: 6196: 6138: 6094: 5194: 4968: 4744: 4607: 4492: 4411: 3850: 3802: 2683: 2663: 1948:

Those links offer: 1) Market data: ie. percentages and point increases and declines in the Dow Jones Industrial Average during the stated periods.

6272: 6208: 4947: 3912: 664:

the reference is notable in at least one respect that you are ignoring and that is that it was possibly the only dissenting viewpoint at the time.

7460: 7404: 6188:

I missed adding a headline above - my message is not related to the vandalism message, it relates to the Salt Spring Island page. ````slinctank

5085: 4229: 3948: 3187: 1919: 932: 860: 611: 562: 523: 477: 308: 198: 8686: 8671: 8644: 7594: 6932:. By all means, expand the article with more references to reliable sources, more relevant information, more free pictures, just no more links. 5817: 5759: 5720: 8747: 8059: 6871: 6312: 5706: 4988: 4323: 2620: 2554: 2419: 1932: 1429: 835: 770: 425: 7971: 5492: 5426: 3971:

update that I'd made to a citation fairly recently, removal of "US" from some GDP figures that had been discussed on 17 June, removal of some

2640: 2104: 7497: 6674: 5822: 5776: 3275: 3246: 3109: 2434: 1954:

3) and, a description of the economic, business and political conditions that contributed to the rallies and sell-offs at those given times.

1885: 1742: 1701:

The reason that I ask is because I heard that you removed the category 2010s American television series and I wanted to know why you did so.

1242: 6928:. Entirely too much effort goes into removing spammy junk from WP, and without that effort, our articles would be no more useable than the 5836: 5312: 4913: 4838: 4256:

I'm really new to wikipedia and have just started editing. I've been adding external links (to the webcasts of thecharity that I work at).

2413: 561:

I see what you are saying. I still think having the actual quote to the fans for historical purposes is important, but I am not the editor.

7958: 7522: 6610: 5997:

that you quote something specific from the page which you have claimed supports your deletions that actually does so, or drop the issue. --

5467: 5448: 5007: 5000: 1456: 798: 8797: 8770: 4787: 4692: 4466:

certainly appreciated - I do feel that the rewrite has sufficient issues with it that we are better off keeping the original in place and

4275:

If I'm being inappropriate - I really do apologise - but if you think I'm adding some value I'd really like to continue adding the links.

4211: 4041: 4022: 3831: 2366: 2314: 2223: 700: 458: 8203: 8164: 8142: 8119: 8089: 6448: 6132: 6114: 4186: 3932: 3433: 2699:

I was confused the first time my addition to the page disappeared, so I added it back in its entirety before discovering your comments.

1556: 1120: 1094: 575: 555: 508: 285: 8046:

says that "| num_episodes =" is for "The number of episodes produced (a reliable source is required if greater than the number aired)."

7893: 7644: 6075: 6054: 6040:

telling. Blankly asserting "The links fail..." does not establish as fact that they do in any way, shape, or form whatsoever. I repeat:

6030: 5800: 5743: 1604: 1179:

I don't feel comfortable removing the proposals, given that it is an ArbCom page. However, I have left a comment stating that I feel it

1059: 1036: 994: 148: 8630: 8270: 7736: 6663: 6260: 6242: 6178: 6146: 5611: 5152:

AHAF has earned the Better Business Bureau (BBB) Wise Giving Alliance seal of approval and the AHAF website meets HONcode standards.

5014: 4138: 2005:

Version 4 is for the Mac (there's a Windows version, too, but I don't know the numbering). BTW, I think it's no longer a beta version.

1859: 1848: 750: 8616: 8593: 8564: 8483: 8454: 8401: 6736:

I appreciate your concern, but I am just updating the seasons. The seasons can be updated if they are in production. If a series like

3677: 3513: 722: 677: 656: 174: 6904: 6324:

Rather than three non-sourced/ megrely sourced articles about each individual book, one lightly sourced article about the series? --

5967: 5863: 3760: 3526:

Evidently, I've got this stubborn streak in me! Absolutely no connection to all of this, just happened to click from the posting on

3358: 2520: 1369: 8072:, which was cancelled before all of the episodes aired. In that case, the sources justify listing more than what actually aired.) -- 5097: 4974:

Writing to yourself doesn't prove you aren't a sock puppet. So for instigating this (minimally), Ckatz, I'm giving you your coveted

1585: 1213: 1200: 1011: 966: 360: 7953: 7939: 7925: 7910: 7866: 7839: 7811: 6806: 6791: 6726: 6417: 3554: 3450: 3412: 3377: 2453: 2083: 2075: 2056: 1640: 1307: 391: 5944: 5912: 4284: 3910: 3425:

It's hardly surprising that a Web-based entity wins the ghits argument, which is why we don't use ghits to arbitrate page titles.

3227: 2980:"Mr. Coogan doesn't seem altogether comfortable with his part, which, like the story, undergoes a number of unconvincing changes." 2446:

themselves and gain an indefinite block. I've seen it go both ways with editors with their history and will watch with interest -

8860: 8855:

In case you haven't noticed, there is a proposal to develop a WP:GLAM guideline (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums, see

8177:. As with your case, there were references indicating a planned run of "x" episodes. However, despite that, the convention is to 1864: 819: 7492: 6797:

sentences about "New Bern" could form some sort of "setting" section or something similar. Either way, I'd rather avoid an AfD.

5333:

of us. In the future, if you see similar behavior or some other issue with a film article, don't hesitate to notify editors at

4727:

I and others in our community would appreciate you sharing your editing premise, which appears proprietary and selective, here.

4662: 4349: 3702: 3622:

and I really just don't have time to keep up with these – it's unfortunately much easier to prod than fix or expand articles. --

2167: 2024:

Uh-oh... are we editing the same articles now? Perhaps we're sockpuppets of each other?!? What a concept, after all this time...

1173: 570: 535: 489: 8841: 8374: 8337: 6686: 5295:

simply because I raised the question. If you wish to take issue with their conclusions, you'll need to take it up with them. --

4894: 4811: 2714: 1783: 1433: 940: 370:

Dear Ckatz, you blocked IP 121.222.226.83 indefinitely on 6 May. IP addresses should almost never be indefinitely blocked. See

348: 6786: 4612:

That may be true, but how can an article reach GA status if it has broken links everywhere? The structure was copied from the

3886:? It seems Fasach Nua has a history of removing non-free images from articles for no reason and I see a lot of stuff in their 316: 234: 8064:

This comes up every so often; sourced or not, the convention is that we only update season and episode counts in the infobox

6526:

I look forward to working with you over coming months to improve and significantly extend Knowledge's micronation content. --

6352: 6006: 5460: 4942: 4084:

Let's refrain from a dispute. My link furthers knowledge of runaway production at a higher level than most other sources.

3654: 3567: 3073: 2479: 2122: 1951:

2) Dates & duration of the trends: ie, the start and finish of each market move and the number of days that they lasted.

920: 260: 8036: 7714:

try to keep to a minimum. Furthermore, there are several issues that complicate this, most notably that you have repeatedly

7445: 6484:

Wondered why you keep reverting the link to the Promo Video for Airwolf Themes' wiki? It is a relevant link to the article.

4112: 3981:

tags that had been discussed on 25 June, etc). A bit more checking revealed that the edit is almost a complete reversion to

3210:

may lose FA status? The article was listed for FAR on June 18 but there wasn't much response. It has since been listed as a

2487: 8667: 7994: 6707: 5272: 5187:

If you choose to re-include a link to AHAF's website under the term macular degeneration, please use www.ahaf.org/macular.

5040: 3642: 3312: 3201: 2779: 2612: 2572: 2546: 1984: 1764: 607: 8723: 8703:"Unless the relationships have a notable impact on his career or public standing, the focus is still the extortion event" 8384:

and others. In some cases, these accounts have deleted valid government sources in favour of their own URLs. Thank you. --

6380: 8322: 7571: 7539: 6640: 6256: 5410: 5395: 5222: 3906: 3597: 3195: 2790:

place to counter the wave of negativity with the truth that several smart and respected critics liked / loved the movie.

2515: 2270: 2145: 1827: 762: 8536:

and others. In some cases, these accounts have deleted valid government sources in favour of their own URLs. Thank you."

8413:

08:28, 3 October 2009: I requested to give reasons for "Procon spam". Can't see any spam by this nonprofit organization.

7547: 6831: 6237: 5634: 3127: 3045: 2605:

I Agree. You must open up to non - member. Don't think non - member has not brain. Sorry if some sentence is violence.

1271: 8762: 7707: 7674: 7506: 7466: 6520: 6303: 3862: 3542:

again. I've found several sources that say 2008, and several that say 2009. Most perplexing, even without the drama!

2748: 2734: 2706: 2440: 2200: 2191: 2159: 1263: 1157: 1153: 945: 714: 669: 648: 641: 8186:

as of yet. If the series is cancelled during its run, several of these episodes may never even be scripted or shot. --

6284:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Inurhead continued incivility and edit warring at The Hurt Locker

5280: 5155:

The information that we provide for those with macular degeneration is updated regularly and independently reviewed.

5035: 3899: 3814: 1822: 872: 7785: 6826: 6766: 6702: 6690: 6554: 6503: 6471: 6164: 5889: 5352: 5134: 4121:

a real problem. You are far better off offering your knowledge on the talk page where it can be properly assessed. --

3998: 3989:. It's a rather peculiar edit from a well established editor and I can't see why he'd wipe out 280 previous edits. -- 3694: 3395:

as a disambiguation page for those two articles. I've proposed just such a move at the move discussion you opened. --

3116: 2626: 1801: 1787: 1620: 1437: 386: 342: 252: 6755:

have their scheduled seasons updated so I figured to do so on some series that are beginning their seasons anyway.

6081:

times by national media in the UK and elsewhere. Six of One also conducted or supported a large amount of important

5403: 2386: 2338: 2290: 8333: 7862: 7835: 7807: 6628: 6385: 6307: 5432: 4756: 3914: 3287: 3258: 3023: 2924: 2897: 2871: 2816: 2497:

Been meaning to thank you for undoing that rascal, Stan Shunpike's, edit to my User page on the 17th. Good eye!

1143: 1117: 1033: 963: 636: 463: 375: 116: 6944: 6604: 5473: 3631: 1250: 8812:

Given the fact that you've offered to watchlist Letterman for issues, would you also consider temporarily adding

8358: 8353: 7766: 7427: 7126:"Movieline's Hollywood Life" (USA) 1 November 2003, Vol. 14, Iss. 10, pg. 88-89, by: Dennis Hensley, "SuperMan" 6376: 6204: 5686:

Seeing as it's neutrally written, not even from a human perspective, shouldn't it be stated it's the only planet

5546: 5531: 4752: 4637: 4564: 4456: 4441: 4425: 4382: 4362: 4345: 4299: 4290:

We wish you well, but Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a place to promote causes, however worthwhile. There are

4108: 3858: 3810: 3115:

I notice you've had problems with this user in the past. Just wanted to give you notice I've started a thread at

2843: 2679: 2636: 2197: 1716:

No problem - the rationale is that we generally avoid "crystal-ball" type categories and tags. The series may be

925: 735:

The article seems to contain too many unverified claims. Concerning the fact that this is your scope and you are

392: 371: 7621: 7123:"Just!" (Estonia) January 2005, Iss. 11, pg. 18-19, by: Ivar Kümnik, "Tom Welling - superpoiss Smallville'ist" 5476: 5249: 4957: 2018: 1414: 337: 8872: 8294: 7430:

by 173.32.221.202. His/her edits were factually correct, and there was no explanation for the revert. Thanks! (

6519:

Knowledge always welcomes a diversity of opinion, so you might wish to consider registering as a member of the

5674: 5670: 5287:

Sorry for the delay in responding, as I've been off-line for a few weeks. (I've also replied to this matter at

5093: 4919: 4237: 3462: 3331: 2968:"An unusually subdued Coogan does his best, but this is the kind of pretentious nonsense he usually satirizes." 1908: 1662: 902: 868: 804: 531: 485: 291: 206: 3921: 3141:

not for profit - there is no advertising whatsoever on our site - it's purely an AE community-driven project.

1927: 1327: 897: 7760: 4718: 3683: 3636: 1470: 1446: 8151:. As I said before after episodes start airing you could change it to "20 (2 aired as of October 2, 2009)". 7780: 7412: 6967: 4241: 1346: 683:

Being "possibly the only dissenting viewpoint at the time" does not make the site or its opinion notable. --

8290: 7769: 7566: 7120:

Article "Premiere" (USA) September 2005, Vol. 19, Iss. 2, pg. 27, by: Donahue, Ann, ""Play Misty For Me""

6347:

In an attempt to help determine consensus on this matter, I have established a poll, which you may wish to

4793: 4647: 4248: 3717: 3490: 3283: 3254: 2236: 2150: 585:

is the most encyclopedic source of info pertaining to avian and marine life in and around the island also.

5726:

Sorry, didn't see that note. I'll take a look at the page. Cheers, and thanks for following up on this. --

3986: 3982: 3967: 3735: 1108:

failed to gain consensus and IS CONTROVERSIAL, 11: it remained on topic, the subject being your comment. —

8837: 8790: 8740: 8719: 8609: 8557: 8394: 8306: 8263: 8196: 8148: 8135: 8095: 8082: 8043: 8020: 7886: 7729: 7637: 7587: 6897: 6879: 6656: 6441: 6215: 6023: 5977: 5905: 5856: 5793: 5736: 5456: 5305: 4685: 4600: 4485: 4404: 4131: 4049: 4015: 3670: 3506: 3405: 3351: 3294: 3016: 2944:"About as cruddy as a cruddy little indie can get, especially given a cast that should've known better. " 2836: 2691: 2656: 2359: 2307: 2216: 2049: 1842:

Question: If Commercial Drive has both the M and E boxes, then why does Broadway only have the M one? --

1828: 1735: 1578: 1362: 1193: 1052: 1016:

I'm failing to see the logic in this. If it's up to the clerks, then shouldn't it be up to the clerks to

987: 791: 745: 693: 278: 141: 2349:

what they do with the other lines. I have reworked the lead to reflect the main/branch/length issues. --

2089: 8469:

I am warning you: Don't delete this source without giving a reason for especially deleting THIS source.

6372: 6268: 6085:

research, including Steven Ricks' video documentaries and various convention interviews and panels for

5940: 5885: 5348: 5130: 4633: 4560: 4452: 4437: 4421: 4378: 4358: 4341: 2675: 2632: 449:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 410: 239: 94: 38: 6595:

I intend to refrain from adding the link myself, should the eventual consensus support my proposal. --

1024:

is clear as glass that removal of another editors comments is not okay except on your own talk page. —

8008: 6356: 6325: 6225: 5869: 5318: 5104: 4714: 3174: 2507: 2473: 2229: 2126: 1769: 1706: 1692: 1498:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Dbachmann#Administrators:_use_of_administrative_tools_in_a_dispute

1288: 227: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 6120: 3660:

Blocked, edits removed, and I've asked for the URLs to be added to the blacklist at Meta. Cheers. --

8682: 8663: 8640: 8520:"I requested to give reasons for "Procon spam". Can't see any spam by this nonprofit organization." 7944:

P.S. When we are done discussing does this get deleted and do I need to do it? Still learning...

7418: 6771: 6609: 6423:

The fact that MGM is broadcasting repeats of its own production is not notable; in fact, one would

5630: 5622: 5604: 5597: 5507:

cannot be applied to this move, because the established nickname in the wider BSG community is not

5276: 5116: 5028: 4280: 4260:

cause I really belive in, otherwise I just wouldn't do it (especially on a saturday afternoon...).

3090: 2753: 2720: 2576: 2550: 2187: 2100: 1980: 1881: 1020:

in the first place? Not up to HWV258 to claim ownership over a page/section which he does not own?

603: 6631:) blanked his block notice; like he's blanked every warning against him for edit warring previous. 8359: 8106:)." When episodes start airing then you could change it to "20 (2 aired as of October 2, 2009)". 7846:

So are Fox News, Apple Inc., Microsoft and even Chase Bank. It is just a bank, why so notable?

7757: 7558: 7541: 6929: 6762: 5582: 5414: 5399: 3887: 3732:

to the official home video website for India so that the name can be verified from there. Thanks

3713: 3593: 3519: 3453:, and the editor who initiated the move cannot undo it since the page is now protected. Thanks, 3107: 2591: 2297:

incorrectly gave the impression that there were two distinct lines totalling 30.2 km of track. --

2235:"official" sites and even Knowledge pages in google and other search engines; there's another on 1806: 1748: 766: 211: 1071: 8828: 8807: 8766: 8715: 8436:"tertiary source with unknown quality control": Authors are named and additional info is given. 8276: 7650: 7456: 7441: 6297: 5207: 4658: 4037: 3994: 3869: 3837: 2849: 2710: 2382: 2334: 2286: 2163: 2142: 1762: 1318:

activated in "my preferences" so I click one and it tagged it, and I quickly deleted the tag.--

1267: 841: 718: 673: 652: 159: 8700:

subhead back from "Sex with interns and staff" to "Extortion attempt" with this comment line:

8547:. There is no reason why this text cannot be referenced from an official government source. -- 846:

please help us to make OUG topic we tried many times for this but it got Deleted every time

8581:"administrative action": Your idea to make the administrative action or some rules or voting? 8316: 8158: 8113: 8053: 8030: 6811: 6669: 6540: 6499: 6467: 6411: 6264: 6110: 5413:

shows that the IP was used to perform certain edits. As per the information at the bottom of

5245: 5218: 4890: 4807: 4158: 3785: 3775: 3744: 3698: 3538: 3430: 3265: 3232: 3098: 2771: 2754: 2458: 2136: 831: 815: 382: 356: 256: 7100: 7004: 977:

to intervene (and it would be best given the tensions that are prevalent if you did not). --

435:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

8655: 8327: 8301:

with Trust Is All You Need but he still reverted. Also I was not trying to edit war at the

7990: 7967: 7949: 7935: 7921: 7906: 7858: 7850: 7831: 7823: 7803: 7795: 7775: 7618: 6622: 6600: 6577: 6531: 6491: 6459: 6337: 6248: 6192: 6050: 6002: 5813: 5772: 5755: 5716: 5658: 5519: 5488: 5444: 5391: 5288: 5268: 5081: 4740: 4225: 4096: 3846: 3798: 3585: 3527: 3242: 3061: 3041: 2920: 2912: 2893: 2885: 2867: 2859: 2812: 2804: 2784: 2702: 2608: 2499: 2468: 2118: 1972: 1702: 1688: 1600: 1552: 1303: 1284: 1259: 1221: 1137: 1113: 1029: 959: 856: 758: 710: 595: 519: 473: 454: 333: 248: 220: 8147:

I am not going to edit war and I am not being disruptive as I am reverting your edits per

5874:

Don't waste your breath responding to him. I don't see a collaborative future with him. —

1962:(another link on the same article), is a for profit site as well -- and quite a good one! 666:

Thank you for paying attention to this aspect of an issue some editors may be unaware of.

131:

the section, especially while the arbitration case is still under way. Hope this helps. --

8: 8242: 7703: 7670: 7527: 7024:

Seeing Through 'The Fog' (2006) (V) (also archive footage) .... Himself - 'Nick Castle'

6636: 6200: 6142: 6098: 5626: 5618: 5542: 5527: 5334: 5021: 4960: 4901: 4748: 4340:

which you edited yourself. So what do you think needs fixing. Tell me so i can fix it! --

4329: 4295: 4104: 3854: 3806: 3559: 3388: 3125: 2450: 2172: 2096: 1995: 618: 5986:

are removing them, claiming to do so according to WP:EL. Your repeated claim that their

4959:

I gotta tell you - I'm impressed that I could be a sock of someone without knowing it!

4503:

Most if not all the information on the article is their. The only big difference is the

8868: 8589: 8479: 8450: 8370: 8221: 7772: 7577:

Hey, thanks for the note. No problem at all - I've done that before as well. Cheers. --

7534: 7408: 6933: 6910: 6758: 6698: 6550: 5963: 5591: 5422: 5140:

Macular Degeneration: Response to External Link - American Health Assistance Foundation

5089: 4984: 4909: 4834: 4783: 4698: 4559:

The truth is, if would/had given a list of what needed fixing i would gladly fix it. --

4319: 4233: 4153: 3952: 3928: 3895: 3827: 3650: 3627: 3608: 3486: 3308: 3191: 3164: 2587: 2492: 2266: 2035:

better left to either a comparison table or the software's FAQ pages. (Any thoughts on

1923: 1680: 1668: 1658: 1485:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Abd_and_JzG#Use_of_administrative_tools_in_a_dispute

1375: 1311: 1233:

page is being updated; it's not meant to be advertising but a legit wiki presence like

1156:

Pmanderson to move his edits to a more suitable location—which he did (I even politely

1152:) removed edits that didn't belong in my arbitrator-requested section. I then politely 936: 864: 632: 566: 553: 527: 506: 481: 365: 312: 202: 170: 7078:

Superman: The Early Years (Behind the Scenes of Smallville) (2002) (TV) .... Himself

6916:

Why would you and the other person who has been undoing my link even bother? -MBailey

3766: 2794:

movie or these other reviews and only saw rottentomatoes, I'd never give it a chance.

409:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

8817: 8691: 8302: 8009: 7452: 7437: 6875: 6291: 5832: 4938: 4771: 4336: 4204: 4033: 3990: 3961: 3458: 3327: 2744: 2730: 2696:

Is that better? I don't know how to attach comments to my edits, so I couldn't ask.

2430: 2406: 2182: 1820: 1755: 1684: 1672: 1383: 1342: 1337:

I had no idea what the heck I just did, I was sorta freaking out, I'm really sorry!--

1323: 1315: 916: 894: 582: 439:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

102: 6588:

usefulness and the level of informativeness they communicate to the general reader.

6290:

and with Inurhead. FYI in case you wish to add any comments about the situation. --

3920:'s contribs to be a little strange since they look like bulk (semi?)automated edits 3155:

the link was desirable, and the site does not strike the casual observer as suiting

2095:. I hope the edit summary makes clear the reason why; if not please let's discuss. 8310: 8152: 8107: 8047: 8024: 7518: 7488: 7419: 6963: 6925: 6818: 6731: 6646:

Thanks for the note; he seems to have left the most recent one in place. Cheers. --

6559: 6405: 6317: 5697: 5497: 5254: 5241: 4994: 4778:

who have tried to add the link with no explanation as to how it helps the article.

4613: 3771: 3740: 3712:

Hi again , Ckatz, The last post was by me but i had forgotten to log in. Sorry! --

3426: 3317: 3300: 3279: 3250: 3223: 2275: 2178: 1461: 1410: 1246: 827: 811: 378: 352: 8474:

And even it it's difficult for you: Try to be polite even in your edit summaries.

6090: 3842:

And by the way, the link to send an e-mail at the top of the page does not work.

8850: 8788: 8738: 8697: 8607: 8555: 8392: 8348: 8261: 8194: 8133: 8080: 7884: 7754: 7742: 7727: 7635: 7610: 7585: 7552: 6895: 6654: 6618: 6596: 6527: 6439: 6287: 6277: 6233: 6128: 6071: 6046: 6021: 5998: 5903: 5854: 5809: 5791: 5768: 5751: 5734: 5712: 5639: 5570:

the site is relevant to the ski resort (i.e. they show the trails in that resort)

5484: 5452: 5357: 5325: 5303: 5111: 4975: 4683: 4598: 4483: 4402: 4176: 4129: 4013: 3879: 3668: 3520: 3504: 3403: 3373: 3349: 3014: 2834: 2654: 2533: 2521: 2357: 2305: 2214: 2070: 2047: 2036: 2013: 1890: 1733: 1635: 1596: 1576: 1548: 1524:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar_2#Admin_actions_between_parties_barred

1511:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Tango#Use_of_administrative_tools_in_a_dispute

1451: 1419: 1360: 1297: 1191: 1133: 1050: 985: 879: 789: 691: 450: 329: 276: 212: 184: 139: 109: 47: 17: 8526:"the site was spammed (added repeatedly) by an IP and a single-purpose account." 7115: 6998: 6545:

Why did you remove apparently valid and useful external links from the article?

6479: 3303:? No need to reply if you want to handle it yourself; I'll watch with interest. 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

8238: 7600: 6950: 6632: 5936: 5881: 5538: 5523: 5344: 5262:

Further,the process took place behind closed doors and I was never contacted.

5237: 5126: 4826: 4100: 3546: 3322:

Just in case you wondered — the move of the micronation was suggested at AFD.

3120: 2447: 1913: 1797: 1650: 414: 396: 322: 8171:

what you are proposing is contrary to the established practice for the infobox

7033:

TV Guide CloseUp: Behind the Scenes of 'Smallville' (2004) (TV) .... Himself

4925: 8864: 8813: 8585: 8475: 8446: 8366: 8281: 6990: 6984:

and I would like to add these but it doesnt work, can you please add them? :

6854: 6848:

and I would like to add these but it doesnt work, can you please add them? :

6802: 6738: 6694: 6592: 6546: 6397: 6386: 6365: 5959: 5808:

Tx. Will do. A half hour of my life that I will never get back, though...--

5662: 5418: 5227: 4980: 4953: 4905: 4830: 4822: 4779: 4775: 4710: 4315: 4311: 4303: 3924: 3891: 3823: 3646: 3623: 3619: 3534: 3482: 3304: 3160: 2670: 2525: 2262: 1896: 1654: 1332: 1105: 1021: 951: 628: 545: 498: 446: 436: 429: 418: 166: 6777:

why you think you can do this when the truth is out there and will be shown.

4675:

have to remember that we are not looking at it from the same perspective. --

4149:

Do you agree that these articles would be much more helpful to the readers?

3215: 7027:... aka See Through the Fog: The Making of 'The Fog' (USA: DVD box title) 6972: 6921: 6751: 6722: 6581: 6573: 6341: 6060: 5828: 5437:

Specifically, please direct me to the rules on what an excessive quote is.

4934: 4766: 4307: 4216: 4197: 3454: 3323: 3156: 2740: 2726: 2426: 2400: 1813: 1592: 1338: 1319: 1160:

to move the edits for him). Any actions I did are outside the scope of the

912: 890: 778: 3496:

Thanks for the note; I've cleaned up the page per your request. Cheers. --

8068:. (The "sourced' bit you've mentioned is more relevant to series such as 7514: 7484: 6959: 5691: 3975: 3530:

and just don't like to see someone bull things through and ignore folks.

3468: 3219: 2542: 1442: 1388: 1206: 1166: 1087: 1004: 741: 728: 3573:

stress surfing (was delited‎ (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)

8782: 8732: 8601: 8549: 8386: 8341: 8255: 8188: 8127: 8074: 7878: 7751: 7721: 7629: 7579: 6889: 6836: 6745: 6717: 6648: 6433: 6229: 6124: 6064: 6015: 5897: 5848: 5785: 5728: 5297: 5062:

And its apparently OK to have links to a site that doesn't even exist,

4851: 4677: 4592: 4477: 4396: 4169: 4123: 4007: 3917: 3909:

on AIV and RFPP, even though there seems to be no reason to do so, see

3883: 3693:

really appreciate that as am a bit stumped right now. Again, thanks. --

3662: 3614: 3498: 3397: 3369: 3343: 3008: 2828: 2648: 2351: 2299: 2208: 2063: 2041: 2006: 1775: 1727: 1628: 1570: 1376: 1354: 1238: 1185: 1044: 979: 783: 685: 270: 133: 6720:

has reverted those changes. Just FYI. I've reverted those additions.

6119:

Suggest this discussion could be more appropriately conducted on the

5930: 5875: 5338: 5120: 5109:

Hello, there is a reexamination of the " in film" classification for

3923:

this seems to indicate that this editor is certainly not a newbie. --

3207: 2460: 1792: 1619:

look before I leapt. Were my comments "damning"? I thought they were

8508:"If you don't like the original source, explain why or add another." 6569: 5711:

Hi again. Please see my request above of August 23. Many thanks.--

1310:, so I undid that real quick, and the reason it happened was I have 127:

for that section.) Following the request, there was no consensus to

8305:

article as I said before I reverted your edits per what it says at

6798: 6313: 5846:

is great service. Thanks for addressing this so quickly. Cheers. --

4706: 3446: 3392: 3133:(Reverted edits by Osturm (talk) to last version by 98.227.156.250) 2257: 2249: 402: 8856: 4334:

Help me out on whats wrong Ckatz? i didn't need discussion on the

1229:

Friendly greetings Ckatz! Thanks for watching over Knowledge. The

849:

now it ask for Registered user for create this Page This Page Oug

8422:

And we can see that You are acting strongly against Procon. IMHO:

7154:"Entertainment Weekly" (USA) 23 November 2001, Vol. 1, Iss. 627 7018:- Episode dated 25 September 2006 (2006) TV episode .... Himself 6401: 6390: 2240: 2092: 1230: 1222: 908: 194: 7434:

Please respond here; I will have your page watchlisted. Thanks!)

7072:- Episode dated 22 December 2002 (2002) TV episode .... Himself 7039:- Episode dated 21 December 2004 (2004) TV episode .... Himself 7009:"Live with Regis and Kathie Lee" .... Himself (1 episode, 2006) 5564:

there are no advertisements on the site that shows the trail map

4929: 4069:

to get a new URL that removes the "fight" word from the URL.

1869:

this user is not a new user. They are a sock of Nangparbat. See

1529:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar_2#Summary_desysopping

8545:"Prostitution in Germany is legal along with brothel ownership" 7606: 7090:- Episode dated 16 October 2001 (2001) TV episode .... Himself 6713: 6678: 6255:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the 4821:

confidential stuff. I had a look at your edits – please review

4221:

I added a link to frelance marketplace. What's wrong with it?

3727:

About Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone release in India

2248:

outbreak of this kind of thing lately; see the edit history at

1538:

Note that in all of these cases, the arbitration committee was

1503:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Dbachmann#Dbachmann_reminded

7081:

The 59th Annual Golden Globe Awards (2002) (TV) .... Himself

6224:

page. Could you unblock it? Or at least make it a redirect to

4817:

On Knowledge, we discuss things in the open. Mail is only for

1278:

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

197:

dab page by the complete muddle over the Canadian Halifax. --

5929:

s Derek Elley for a negative viewpoint. What do you think? —

5233: 3875: 1490:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Abd_and_JzG#JzG_admonished

7051:- Episode dated 4 April 2004 (2004) TV episode .... Himself 7036:"Last Call with Carson Daly" .... Himself (1 episode, 2004) 5614:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

5236:. Should Spong be considered unreliable? I'm asking because 5017:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

4632:

I'll probably ask the users at the televison wikiproject. --

3533:

So, what to do? I can't see a clear guideline (contrary to

8445:

Please give reasons why ESPECIALLY THIS LINK can't be used.

7609:? You didn't provide an explanation in the edit summary. -- 7066:- Episode dated 21 May 2002 (2002) TV episode .... Himself 6685:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 6221: 5417:, you can create an account and log in to avoid confusion. 5329:. It was a bit dismaying to see how the editor reacted to 3794:

I would be more than happy to discuss this matter, Hector

2039:, seeing as how I was there as well?) Thanks in advance. -- 1782:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 1432:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 7532:

Restoring the DP moons to the list broke its sortability.

3874:

Could you take a look at the image removals going on with

1076:

Deleting material not relevant to improving the article...

8651:

should be added back to this section. Have a nice life.

7042:'Smallville' Backstage Special (2004) (TV) .... Himself 7030:

TV Guide Specials: TV Families (2005) (TV) .... Himself

3382:

You're welcome to disagree, of course, but I felt it was

2739:

I again urge you to discuss your edits at the talk page.

1516:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Tango#Tango_desysopped

1425: 729: 8169:

Listen, I don't know how many times I have to say this:

7977:

Why deleting new informations on the Knight Rider Movie?

7105:

Was in Angela Via's 2000 music video, "Picture Perfect"

7101:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0919991/filmoseries#tt0279600

7012:... aka "Live with Regis & Kelly" (USA: new title) 7005:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0919991/filmoseries#tt0279600

6743:

would be only natural to update the seasons. Shows like

5063: 3481:

for a summary of a few things that need fixing. Thanks.

2725:

I look forward to your continuation of the discussion.

2631:

Why did you revert the arc sections on the SGA page? --

950:

Why are we removing another editors comments? How does

7075:

The Teen Choice Awards 2002 (2002) (TV) .... Himself

7045:

The Teen Choice Awards 2004 (2004) (TV) .... Himself

7021:

The Teen Choice Awards 2006 (2006) (TV) .... Himself

6712:

I noticed you reverted some external links linking to

5365:"User talk:82.114.66.108 Jump to: navigation, search 4590:

them as dead links while retaining the information. --

1871:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nangparbat/Archive

7054:"E! News Daily" .... Himself (2 episodes, 2002-2004) 6516:

I note your interest in the subject of micronations.

6431:

networks, and Knowledge is not a television guide. --

5067: 5056: 5049: 4724:

external link I added within hours of me posting it.

1543:

another set of eyes look at the situation is helpful.

777:

It's not, and thank you for pointing it out. Per our

7151:"TV Guide" (USA) 8 December 2001, Vol. 49, Iss. 49 4880:* Accurate in both high and low light environments. 3089:

Hi, Ckatz, just want to get clarification regarding

1531:(essentially a final warning to the admins involved) 1042:

clerks do their job, without muddying the waters. --

7930:Added again, no links. Let me know your thoughts. 7087:... aka "Extra: The Entertainment Magazine" (USA) 5682:

Shouldn't the Earth article say "known to mankind"?

3477:from me and, unfortunately, from UNID. Please look 1128:Hi Ckatz. Could I ask you to consider removing the 8711:subhead "Sex with interns and extortion attempt" 8433:has added only a few links and is already blocked. 7987:David Metlesits News Editor Knight Rider Hungary 6816:An RfC has been made in regard to this dispute. — 1084:If a thread has veered off its original subject... 583:http://www.mapofsaltspring.com/mapofsaltspring.pdf 303: 8502:"alt. cite needed; part of extensive ProCon spam" 4436:So when is this so-called review gonna happen? -- 3645:(UNID) and note spam info in the edit summaries. 219:explanation and then warns people who revert it. 7139:"TV Guide" (USA) 10 May 2003, Vol. 51, Iss. 19 5070:a country music radio station? You kidding me? 4298:links to Knowledge (you can see some of them at 3449:? There is a speedy tag there, for the 3st time 8410:I like to end discussions where i started them. 7981:Glen A. Larson himself had said it personally. 7605:Could you explain your reversion of my edit to 7145:"Veronica" (Netherlands) 2 March 2002, Iss. 9 7111:===Publicity (Cover Magazines and articles)=== 5982:Those links have been there for some time, and 4730:A quick look at the page history reveals this. 4373:Seriously, i'm been looking over my article of 3052:re link to external review on 'The Next Doctor' 351:? Thanks in advance for the informative answer. 8340:edit. Yes, your naming method is a good idea. 4770:removing them. I had a look at the history of 4164:The only challenge is to arrange them so they 1457:Someone has begun discussing your edits at ANI 426:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/White elephant 7063:- 2004--03-16 (2004) TV episode .... Himself 4294:of people who would like to add thousands of 3299:What is the right way to handle the promo at 850: 8289:even if it does not violate 3RR." I am not 7116:http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0919991/publicity 7015:... aka "Live with Regis" (USA: new title) 6617:Hi there, just thought you should know that 5552:Deletion of external links to ski trail maps 5008:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Trotline 3708:Bowen Island Politics - sorry, didn't log in 8530:(additional explanation on your talk page) 6512:Invitation to join Wikiproject Micronations 6043:again demand that you produce such a quote. 4475:has been out of production for a while.) -- 3085:Question Regarding External Links Submitted 1080:Removing personal attacks and incivility... 7069:"The View" .... Himself (1 episode, 2002) 4314:. In brief, please do not add your links. 2177:What do you think about the discussion at 7060:... aka "E! News Live" (USA: new title) 6991:http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0919991/awards 6855:http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0919991/awards 6184:Missed headline: Salt Spring Island edits 4924:Ckatz, regarding your edit on this page: 4586:links", whereas the usual practise is to 2110:List of free software project directories 1615:Ckatz, I've toned down your title, and I 374:. I've reduced the block to three months. 7662:I therefore restored the related links. 5603:Hello, Ckatz. You have new messages at 5232:Noticed you removed it as a source from 5006:Hello, Ckatz. You have new messages at 3983:this much earlier version of the article 8599:site is not suitable as a reference. -- 8293:, I am reverting original research per 7451:This doesn’t matter anymore. Thanks! — 7426:Hi Ckatz! I’m curious why you reverted 7084:"Extra" .... Himself (1 episode, 2001) 5055:But its apparently OK to have links to 3117:Knowledge:Wikiquette_alerts#User:VitasV 1895:Sure, no problem. Thanks for the note! 445:This is an automatic notification by a 14: 7136:"CFQ Spotlite" (USA) 2004, Iss. Fall 7057:... aka "E! News Live Weekend" (USA) 6220:Hello Mr. , I noticed you blocked the 4622:If i could have found any sources for 2420:Response to (and a question for) Ckatz 1933:So-called spamming with external links 1720:to go into the 2010s, and it probably 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 8098:says that "| num_episodes =" is for " 5823:50000 Quaoar Simple English Knowledge 5048:Whats the problem with me adding the 4948:Hey - did you know I'm a sock of you? 4145:Better links in "Anglican Communion"? 3939:FAO Country Profiles "External links" 2668:It is structured the same way as the 588:Please let me know why you did this. 8015:The show debuts this Friday so it's 7959:Thanks for the help as I am learning 7048:"T4" .... Himself (1 episode, 2004) 6228:or a disambiguation page? Thanks. -- 5707:Request for change at protected page 5468:Request for change at protected page 5190:Thank you for your consideration. 5115:. Can you review the discussion at 4852:http://www.brickstream.com/resources 2001:for each of these browsers? I guess 1876:Anyways, thanks for your help today 1146:)? My actions that are in question ( 25: 8287:disruptive editors for edit warring 7557:I got the wrong edit with Twinkle. 7148:"Rolling Stones" (USA) March 2002 6487:SF 20:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC) 6400:airing on MGM's television network 6282:I have started a new discussion at 5477:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) 5411:Special:Contributions/82.114.66.108 5362:i recently received this warning: 4187:I absolutely endorse a longer block 3905:I also just noticed Yworo reported 2674:, or is my one not clear enough? -- 1492:(didn't lose bit, but 'admonished') 576:High Res Map of Salt Spring Island. 23: 8631:Edits to page on Augmented Reality 7129:"YM Stars" (Canada) 2001, pg. 57 6243:List of micronations status review 6105:better-referenced form elsewhere. 5596: 4999: 4926:World's largest software companies 3441:Hi! Could you perform the move of 3212:Featured Article Removal Candidate 2571:on this. Thank you, Ckatz. Trista 751:removing Castanet.net from Kelowna 401: 24: 8883: 8365:Give reasons for "spammed link". 7479:subject, the online magazine the 7474:A while ago you removed the page 6336:Poll concerning external link at 5567:I am not affiliated with the site 5158:Per Knowledge regarding links - 4928:and your remark: (looking at the 2562:Again, if you could direct me to 1968:Yours sincerely, Portraitsketch 1505:(didn't lose bit, but 'reminded') 1302:Hello, I accidentally tagged the 469:am still new to posting. Thanks 8104:if greater than the number aired 6792:Locations in Jericho (TV series) 5240:doesn't mention it either way.-- 2084:Sorry to have to do this, but .. 1162:date-delinking proposed decision 1072:Knowledge:TPO#Others.27_comments 304:http://en.wikipedia.org/PayScale 29: 8102:(a reliable source is required 8100:The number of episodes produced 5323:Hello, glad to be of help with 3613:I added some references to the 2252:and talkpage comments there re 1865:Regarding 86.153.128.233 et al. 1382:Can you respond to my question 1183:be removed. Hope this helps. -- 591:sincerely, Kenneth M. Fersht. 372:Knowledge:Blocking IP addresses 8758:right before the last sentence 8204:18:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 8165:18:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 8143:17:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 8120:17:30, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 8090:17:20, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 8060:17:17, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 8037:17:08, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 8003:00:26, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 7972:22:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7954:19:16, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7940:19:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7926:18:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7911:18:51, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7894:18:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7867:18:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7840:18:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7812:18:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7781:02:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7737:02:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7708:02:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 7675:09:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 7645:06:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 7622:22:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 7595:21:09, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 7572:21:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 7548:17:17, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 7523:12:26, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 7493:16:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 7461:23:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 7446:01:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 7413:14:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 7142:"SFX" (UK) May 2002, Iss. 91 6968:04:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 6945:03:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 6905:00:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 6880:23:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 6832:17:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 6807:20:10, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 6787:20:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 6767:01:58, 18 September 2009 (UTC) 6727:04:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 6703:21:22, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 6664:05:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 6641:03:53, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 6605:02:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 6555:07:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 6536:01:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 6449:23:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 6418:23:11, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 6381:19:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 6361:06:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 6331:06:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 6308:05:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 3427:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 2241:http://www.britishcolumbia.com 13: 1: 7395:Also how can I put pictures? 6867:Also how can I put pictures? 6273:01:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 6238:02:37, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 6209:17:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 4272:various bits of our website. 3767:Indiatelevision Press Release 1687:the 2010s television series? 1070:Locke_Cole, please note from 999:Thank you. I realise that my 895:Champion of the Frozen Wastes 6714:http://www.ourprattville.com 6708:Mtp1960 external links edits 6683:featured article review here 5117:Talk:The Hurt Locker#Re-open 5041:external links / kelowna.com 4825:. The material you added to 4377:, what the crap is wrong? -- 3545:Maybe post this question to 3202:Vancouver article needs help 2237:Salmon Arm, British Columbia 1839:not to take it that way. :D 1780:featured article review here 1430:featured article review here 779:guideline for external links 347:Hi, Why did you canceled my 7: 8873:06:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 8842:04:25, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 8798:04:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 8771:03:54, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 8748:02:54, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 8724:01:30, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 8687:00:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 8672:00:56, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 8645:03:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC) 8617:22:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 8594:21:55, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 8565:17:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 8484:13:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 8455:13:29, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 8402:10:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 8375:16:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC) 8354:03:13, 2 October 2009 (UTC) 8323:20:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 8307:Template:Infobox Television 8271:08:12, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 8247:07:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 8149:Template:Infobox Television 8096:Template:Infobox Television 8044:Template:Infobox Television 8021:Template:Infobox Television 7659:but an helpfully addition. 6980:I'm having trouble editing 6844:I'm having trouble editing 6179:21:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 6147:00:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 6133:13:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 6115:11:36, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 6076:23:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC) 6055:23:19, 29 August 2009 (UTC) 6031:21:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 6007:21:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 5968:00:07, 29 August 2009 (UTC) 5945:23:55, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 5913:23:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 5890:23:37, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 5864:20:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 5837:20:07, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 5818:21:40, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 5801:19:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 5777:18:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 5760:06:22, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 5744:06:01, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 5721:05:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 5702:09:19, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 5675:08:18, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 5635:23:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 5587:17:25, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 5547:14:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 5493:05:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 5472:Hi. Per the discussion at 5461:00:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 5427:01:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 5404:00:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 5353:00:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 5313:23:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 5281:20:29, 14 August 2009 (UTC) 5250:12:35, 15 August 2009 (UTC) 5223:15:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC) 5203:18:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 1829:Template:TransLink Services 851:http://en.wikipedia.org/Oug 413:. The nominated article is 10: 8888: 7505:An editor has asked for a 7467:Gatehouse Gazette deletion 6253:featured list removal here 5605:Theserialcomma's talk page 5135:01:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 5119:and share your thoughts? — 5098:06:43, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 5036:04:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 4989:03:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 4969:02:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 4943:09:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 4914:08:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC) 4895:18:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 4839:03:36, 1 August 2009 (UTC) 4788:03:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 4757:17:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC) 4719:16:20, 1 August 2009 (UTC) 2441:Unblock of Das Ansehnlisch 2160:Contributions/75.84.21.239 1753:Thanks for the heads-up. – 946:Date delinking arbitration 907:The links I posted in the 642:how notable is a reference 8220:Removed external link at 7786:Changes I made to Ripping 6687:featured article criteria 6226:Phun (2D Physics Sandbox) 6165:What If Sports FC Dynasty 6091:Roger Goodman, co-founder 4900:Please put your ideas on 4812:17:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 4774:and observed a couple of 4693:20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 4663:20:15, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 4642:20:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 4608:20:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 4569:20:02, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 4493:19:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 4461:19:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 4446:17:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 4430:18:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 4412:17:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 4394:read-through later on. -- 4387:17:51, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 4367:10:38, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 4350:10:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 4324:12:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 4285:11:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 4242:04:24, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 4212:08:41, 25 July 2009 (UTC) 4182:11:21, 24 July 2009 (UTC) 4139:10:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC) 4113:09:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC) 4042:08:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC) 4023:05:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC) 3999:02:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC) 3957:10:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC) 3933:20:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 3900:20:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 3863:20:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 3832:02:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 3815:20:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 3780:21:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC) 3749:11:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC) 3722:17:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 3703:17:12, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 3678:03:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 3655:01:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 3632:23:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 3602:20:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 3568:21:12, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 3514:05:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 3491:05:03, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 3443:Wirtland (disambiguation) 3128:10:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 3103:23:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 3078:20:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 3046:19:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 3024:17:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 2844:21:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 2780:19:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 2749:02:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 2735:17:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 2715:22:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 2684:22:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 2664:21:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 2641:21:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 2627:Your edit on the SGA page 2621:08:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 2596:02:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 2581:17:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 2555:17:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 2516:14:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 2488:08:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 2454:08:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC) 2435:04:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 2414:04:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 2387:02:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 2367:23:55, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 2339:23:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 2315:23:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 2291:22:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 2271:17:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 2224:22:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2201:13:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2168:09:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 2146:05:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 2141:Replied at my talk page. 2131:14:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 2105:13:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 2076:09:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 2057:07:52, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 2019:07:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 1989:01:22, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 1928:00:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 1835:kind of offensive, but I 1784:featured article criteria 1434:featured article criteria 432:with four tildes (~~~~). 343:Could you please explain? 8714:Cordially, cat yronwode 6922:external links guideline 6521:WikiProject Micronations 6286:regarding the issues at 5433:Wiki Rules on Quotations 5165:"What should be linked: 4302:). You can read more at 3463:18:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 3434:10:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 3413:10:05, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 3378:10:00, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 3359:05:38, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 3332:05:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 3313:11:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC) 3288:08:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC) 3259:14:00, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 3228:08:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 3196:19:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 3169:11:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 1909:23:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 1886:22:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 1860:07:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 1849:06:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 1823:06:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC) 1802:02:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 1765:23:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1743:20:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1711:20:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1697:20:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1675:Are Going Into the 2010s 1663:00:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 1641:18:38, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1605:17:37, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1586:17:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1557:14:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1471:13:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 1447:11:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1415:23:25, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1370:21:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1352:No harm done. Cheers. -- 1347:21:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1328:21:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1293:15:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 1272:01:16, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 1251:04:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 1214:09:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 1201:09:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 1174:07:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 1121:23:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1095:23:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1060:23:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1037:23:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1012:23:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 995:23:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 967:23:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 941:06:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 921:04:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 898:19:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 873:09:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 836:03:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 820:03:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 799:00:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 771:00:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 746:18:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 723:09:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 701:08:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 678:08:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 657:08:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 637:21:54, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 612:20:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 571:02:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 556:02:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 536:02:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 509:01:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 490:01:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 464:Scrubs Future additions. 459:01:10, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 387:20:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC) 361:19:30, 14 May 2009 (UTC) 338:07:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC) 317:18:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 286:16:54, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 261:16:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 235:11:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 207:10:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 175:00:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 149:00:29, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 117:23:50, 10 May 2009 (UTC) 8360:Prostitution in Germany 8295:WP:No original research 6930:Million Dollar Homepage 5415:User talk:82.114.66.108 4861:Embedded Stereo Vision 4776:single purpose accounts 1463:weburiedoursecretsinthe 926:I was just wondering... 7719:warrants inclusion. -- 6564:Hi there. I'm shortly 6257:featured list criteria 5601: 5004: 4956:figured it out, see? 4930:www.softwaretop100.org 4920:Software Top 100 is OK 4304:single purpose account 3000: 2988: 2976: 2964: 2952: 903:Adam-12 Link Deletions 805:So here is my question 406: 292:rejected external link 8066:after an episode airs 7133:Magazine cover photo 5600: 5066:It just redirects to 5064:http://www.ckov63.com 5003: 4952:No - really! I am! 4159:Religion_in_Australia 3684:Bowen Island Politics 3637:More attention needed 2989: 2977: 2965: 2953: 2941: 2254:User:Tourism Ucluelet 1621:a model of politeness 437:articles for deletion 419:What Knowledge is not 405: 42:of past discussions. 8696:Hi, you changed the 7498:Deletion review for 6578:List of micronations 6338:List of micronations 6249:List of micronations 5690:to support life?---- 5289:User talk:Kingwarren 4794:People counter edits 4648:Promotional material 4312:conflict of interest 4249:Conflict of interest 3756:turner channel POGO. 3091:the message you sent 2151:The Notability Issue 2091:your last change to 1565:in no way whatsoever 1304:Knowledge:Notability 1256:Chatz. Thank you. 428:. Please be sure to 8838:"I'm listening...." 8707:issue, with refs. 6480:Airwolf Themes link 6327:The Red Pen of Doom 6216:Phun page protected 5978:Prisoner Ext. Links 4902:Talk:People counter 4300:WT:WikiProject Spam 4050:Runaway productions 3389:Wirtland (building) 3295:Advert on user page 2972:New York Daily News 2692:Chuck episode names 972:Locke, I'm undoing 8471:Stop the Edit-war. 8291:disruptive editing 8222:Capital Punishment 7096:===Other works=== 6987:The reference is: 6851:The reference is: 5612:remove this notice 5602: 5513:Re-imagined Series 5068:http://www.b103.ca 5057:http://chbcnews.ca 5050:http://kelowna.com 5015:remove this notice 5005: 4154:Religion_in_Canada 3761:Yahoo! Movies news 3714:Wednesday vagabond 3206:Did you know that 1681:As The World Turns 1669:As The World Turns 1235:Red Giant Software 1018:remove the comment 430:sign your comments 407: 240:Literary magazines 8829:Peace and Passion 8818:Stephanie Birkitt 8795: 8745: 8716:Catherineyronwode 8675: 8658:comment added by 8614: 8562: 8399: 8321: 8303:Stargate Universe 8268: 8201: 8163: 8140: 8118: 8087: 8058: 8035: 8010:Stargate Universe 7993:comment added by 7984:Yours sincerley, 7891: 7870: 7853:comment added by 7843: 7826:comment added by 7815: 7798:comment added by 7734: 7642: 7592: 7511:Gatehouse Gazette 7500:Gatehouse Gazette 7481:Gatehouse Gazette 7476:Gatehouse Gazette 6902: 6830: 6661: 6508: 6494:comment added by 6476: 6462:comment added by 6446: 6416: 6247:I have nominated 6212: 6195:comment added by 6121:article talk page 6028: 5910: 5861: 5798: 5741: 5678: 5661:comment added by 5536: 5522:comment added by 5503:discussion about 5475:, and given that 5464: 5447:comment added by 5394:comment added by 5310: 5271:comment added by 5101: 5084:comment added by 4772:Saltspring Island 4760: 4743:comment added by 4690: 4605: 4490: 4409: 4337:Stargate Atlantis 4245: 4228:comment added by 4209: 4136: 4116: 4099:comment added by 4020: 3888:talk page history 3866: 3849:comment added by 3818: 3801:comment added by 3675: 3605: 3588:comment added by 3511: 3410: 3356: 3291: 3262: 3245:comment added by 3175:Deletion on Bruno 3081: 3064:comment added by 3021: 2996:New York Observer 2929: 2915:comment added by 2902: 2888:comment added by 2876: 2862:comment added by 2841: 2821: 2807:comment added by 2705:comment added by 2661: 2611:comment added by 2545:already in Wiki) 2514: 2412: 2364: 2312: 2230:DVancouver et al. 2221: 2195: 2121:comment added by 2054: 1992: 1975:comment added by 1774:I have nominated 1770:Doctor Who at FAR 1740: 1685:Days of Our Lives 1673:Days of Our Lives 1583: 1424:I have nominated 1367: 1308:a speedy tag "G1" 1262:comment added by 1198: 1057: 992: 954:not apply here? — 876: 859:comment added by 796: 761:comment added by 713:comment added by 698: 615: 598:comment added by 539: 522:comment added by 493: 476:comment added by 377:Have a nice day! 283: 251:comment added by 193:to condition the 146: 115: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 8879: 8834: 8787: 8780:restoring it. -- 8737: 8674: 8652: 8606: 8554: 8518:(your response) 8506:(your response) 8391: 8351: 8346: 8319: 8315: 8313: 8260: 8193: 8161: 8157: 8155: 8132: 8116: 8112: 8110: 8079: 8056: 8052: 8050: 8033: 8029: 8027: 8005: 7883: 7869: 7847: 7842: 7820: 7814: 7792: 7779: 7726: 7634: 7616: 7584: 7569: 7565: 7561: 7544: 7537: 7420:Canadian English 6941: 6936: 6926:Wikiproject Spam 6894: 6825: 6772:Whatifsports.com 6725: 6716:. It seems that 6653: 6566:going to propose 6507: 6488: 6475: 6456: 6438: 6414: 6410: 6408: 6328: 6318:Inkworld trilogy 6294: 6265:Piano non troppo 6263:. With regards, 6211: 6189: 6088: 6084: 6068: 6020: 5933: 5928: 5902: 5878: 5853: 5790: 5733: 5694: 5677: 5655: 5615: 5535: 5516: 5463: 5441: 5406: 5341: 5302: 5283: 5123: 5100: 5078: 5031: 5018: 4759: 4737: 4717: 4682: 4614:Lost (TV series) 4597: 4482: 4401: 4244: 4222: 4208: 4205: 4202: 4179: 4174: 4128: 4115: 4093: 4012: 3980: 3974: 3916:While I thought 3865: 3843: 3817: 3795: 3736:Official Website 3667: 3604: 3582: 3503: 3475:Big Welcome Back 3402: 3348: 3301:User:PeterJames1 3290: 3272: 3261: 3239: 3123: 3080: 3058: 3013: 2928: 2909: 2901: 2882: 2875: 2856: 2833: 2820: 2801: 2778: 2776: 2768: 2755:Strontiumsulfate 2721:Freaks and Geeks 2717: 2653: 2623: 2512: 2504: 2498: 2486: 2483: 2411: 2409: 2403: 2398: 2356: 2304: 2213: 2185: 2179:Talk:Lunar phase 2133: 2073: 2068: 2046: 2016: 2011: 1991: 1969: 1858: 1847: 1818: 1758: 1732: 1638: 1633: 1575: 1467: 1464: 1413: 1407: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1395: 1392: 1386:please? Thanks, 1359: 1274: 1210: 1190: 1170: 1091: 1049: 1008: 984: 875: 853: 788: 773: 725: 690: 614: 592: 551: 548: 538: 516: 504: 501: 492: 470: 275: 263: 231: 225: 164: 158: 138: 114: 112: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 8887: 8886: 8882: 8881: 8880: 8878: 8877: 8876: 8853: 8832: 8810: 8793: 8743: 8698:David Letterman 8694: 8653: 8633: 8612: 8560: 8397: 8363: 8349: 8342: 8330: 8317: 8311: 8279: 8266: 8225: 8199: 8159: 8153: 8138: 8114: 8108: 8085: 8054: 8048: 8031: 8025: 8013: 7988: 7979: 7961: 7889: 7848: 7821: 7793: 7788: 7748: 7745: 7732: 7653: 7640: 7614: 7603: 7590: 7567: 7563: 7559: 7555: 7542: 7535: 7530: 7507:deletion review 7503: 7469: 7423: 7112: 7097: 7091: 7073: 7067: 7064: 7052: 7040: 7019: 7001: 6993: 6975: 6953: 6937: 6934: 6913: 6900: 6865: 6864: 6861: 6860:Details of post 6857: 6839: 6814: 6794: 6774: 6734: 6721: 6710: 6672: 6659: 6615: 6572:be added as an 6562: 6543: 6514: 6489: 6482: 6457: 6444: 6412: 6406: 6394: 6368: 6353:203.214.132.100 6345: 6326: 6322: 6292: 6288:The Hurt Locker 6280: 6245: 6218: 6190: 6186: 6167: 6086: 6082: 6066: 6026: 5980: 5931: 5926: 5908: 5876: 5872: 5870:The Hurt Locker 5859: 5825: 5796: 5739: 5709: 5692: 5684: 5656: 5642: 5616: 5609: 5594: 5554: 5517: 5500: 5470: 5442: 5435: 5389: 5360: 5339: 5326:The Hurt Locker 5321: 5319:The Hurt Locker 5308: 5266: 5257: 5230: 5210: 5142: 5121: 5112:The Hurt Locker 5107: 5105:The Hurt Locker 5079: 5043: 5029: 5019: 5012: 4997: 4950: 4922: 4884: 4878: 4796: 4738: 4704: 4701: 4688: 4650: 4603: 4488: 4407: 4332: 4251: 4223: 4219: 4206: 4198: 4189: 4177: 4170: 4147: 4134: 4094: 4092:What say you? 4052: 4018: 3978: 3972: 3964: 3941: 3880:User:Fasach Nua 3872: 3844: 3840: 3796: 3788: 3729: 3710: 3686: 3673: 3639: 3611: 3583: 3575: 3524: 3521:The Hurt Locker 3509: 3471: 3408: 3354: 3320: 3297: 3273: 3268: 3240: 3235: 3204: 3198:Ben (Llama623) 3177: 3135: 3121: 3113: 3087: 3066:Pulpygraymatter 3059: 3054: 3019: 2948:Chicago Tribune 2910: 2883: 2857: 2852: 2839: 2802: 2787: 2772: 2764: 2762: 2758: 2723: 2700: 2694: 2659: 2629: 2606: 2569:Wiki Guidelines 2534:Vanessa Ferlito 2529: 2522:Vanessa Ferlito 2508: 2505:Paine Ellsworth 2500: 2495: 2484: 2471: 2469:Police,Mad,Jack 2464: 2443: 2422: 2407: 2401: 2399: 2362: 2310: 2278: 2232: 2219: 2175: 2153: 2139: 2123:161.225.196.111 2116: 2112: 2086: 2071: 2064: 2052: 2037:Google Notebook 2014: 2007: 1998: 1970: 1935: 1916: 1893: 1867: 1854: 1843: 1832: 1814: 1809: 1807:AbuseFilter 181 1772: 1756: 1751: 1749:My de-adminship 1738: 1703:Ericthebrainiac 1689:Ericthebrainiac 1677: 1636: 1629: 1581: 1465: 1462: 1454: 1422: 1405: 1402: 1399: 1396: 1393: 1390: 1387: 1380: 1365: 1335: 1300: 1285:Encyclopaedia21 1280: 1257: 1227: 1208: 1196: 1168: 1089: 1055: 1006: 990: 948: 928: 905: 882: 854: 844: 807: 794: 756: 753: 733: 708: 696: 644: 621: 593: 578: 549: 546: 517: 502: 499: 471: 466: 400: 368: 345: 325: 294: 281: 246: 242: 229: 223:Canterbury Tail 221: 216: 213:User:Fasach Nua 187: 162: 156: 144: 110: 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 18:User talk:Ckatz 12: 11: 5: 8885: 8852: 8849: 8848: 8847: 8846: 8845: 8809: 8808:Just a request 8806: 8805: 8804: 8803: 8802: 8801: 8800: 8791: 8751: 8750: 8741: 8693: 8690: 8679:Strangebuttrue 8660:Strangebuttrue 8637:Strangebuttrue 8632: 8629: 8628: 8627: 8626: 8625: 8624: 8623: 8622: 8621: 8620: 8619: 8610: 8582: 8572: 8571: 8570: 8569: 8568: 8567: 8558: 8540: 8539: 8538: 8534:User:Proconorg 8528: 8522: 8516: 8510: 8504: 8489: 8488: 8487: 8486: 8472: 8462: 8460: 8459: 8458: 8457: 8440: 8439: 8438: 8437: 8434: 8431:User:Proconorg 8428: 8424: 8423: 8417: 8416: 8415: 8414: 8411: 8405: 8404: 8395: 8382:User:Proconorg 8362: 8357: 8329: 8326: 8278: 8277:Re: Admin note 8275: 8274: 8273: 8264: 8224: 8218: 8217: 8216: 8215: 8214: 8213: 8212: 8211: 8210: 8209: 8208: 8207: 8206: 8197: 8175:Cleveland Show 8136: 8083: 8012: 8007: 7995:81.182.197.131 7978: 7975: 7960: 7957: 7899: 7898: 7897: 7896: 7887: 7787: 7784: 7744: 7741: 7740: 7739: 7730: 7695:Regards again 7652: 7651:External Links 7649: 7648: 7647: 7638: 7602: 7599: 7598: 7597: 7588: 7554: 7551: 7529: 7526: 7502: 7496: 7468: 7465: 7464: 7463: 7428:the anon edits 7422: 7417: 7393: 7392: 7391: 7390: 7389: 7388: 7387: 7386: 7385: 7384: 7383: 7382: 7381: 7380: 7379: 7378: 7377: 7376: 7375: 7374: 7373: 7372: 7371: 7370: 7369: 7368: 7367: 7366: 7365: 7364: 7363: 7362: 7361: 7360: 7359: 7358: 7357: 7356: 7355: 7354: 7353: 7352: 7351: 7350: 7349: 7348: 7347: 7346: 7345: 7344: 7343: 7342: 7341: 7340: 7339: 7338: 7337: 7336: 7335: 7334: 7333: 7332: 7331: 7330: 7329: 7328: 7327: 7326: 7325: 7324: 7323: 7322: 7321: 7320: 7319: 7318: 7317: 7316: 7315: 7314: 7313: 7312: 7311: 7310: 7309: 7308: 7307: 7306: 7305: 7304: 7303: 7302: 7301: 7300: 7299: 7298: 7297: 7296: 7295: 7294: 7293: 7292: 7291: 7290: 7289: 7288: 7287: 7286: 7285: 7284: 7283: 7282: 7281: 7280: 7277: 7276: 7275: 7157: 7132: 7110: 7108: 7095: 7093: 7089: 7071: 7065: 7062: 7050: 7038: 7017: 7000: 6997: 6995: 6989: 6974: 6971: 6952: 6949: 6948: 6947: 6924:and check out 6912: 6909: 6908: 6907: 6898: 6862: 6859: 6858: 6853: 6838: 6835: 6813: 6810: 6793: 6790: 6779:Robertojuanez1 6773: 6770: 6733: 6730: 6709: 6706: 6677:has nominated 6671: 6668: 6667: 6666: 6657: 6614: 6608: 6561: 6558: 6542: 6539: 6513: 6510: 6481: 6478: 6452: 6451: 6442: 6393: 6384: 6367: 6364: 6344: 6334: 6321: 6311: 6279: 6276: 6244: 6241: 6217: 6214: 6185: 6182: 6171:Robertojuanez1 6166: 6163: 6162: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6158: 6157: 6156: 6155: 6154: 6153: 6152: 6151: 6150: 6149: 6034: 6033: 6024: 5979: 5976: 5975: 5974: 5973: 5972: 5971: 5970: 5950: 5949: 5948: 5947: 5916: 5915: 5906: 5871: 5868: 5867: 5866: 5857: 5824: 5821: 5806: 5805: 5804: 5803: 5794: 5780: 5779: 5747: 5746: 5737: 5708: 5705: 5683: 5680: 5641: 5638: 5627:Theserialcomma 5619:Theserialcomma 5608: 5595: 5593: 5590: 5577:Best regards, 5572: 5571: 5568: 5565: 5553: 5550: 5499: 5496: 5469: 5466: 5434: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5386: 5359: 5356: 5320: 5317: 5316: 5315: 5306: 5273:74.176.216.241 5256: 5253: 5229: 5226: 5209: 5208:Jack Welch bio 5206: 5168: 5164: 5141: 5138: 5106: 5103: 5077:Regards, Rob 5042: 5039: 5011: 4998: 4996: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4961:Ravensfire2002 4949: 4946: 4921: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4882: 4876: 4844: 4842: 4841: 4827:People counter 4798:Hello Ckatz, 4795: 4792: 4791: 4790: 4700: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4686: 4649: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4629: 4628: 4619: 4618: 4610: 4601: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4486: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4405: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4331: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4308:external links 4277:Intelligentelf 4250: 4247: 4218: 4215: 4196:first time. - 4188: 4185: 4162: 4161: 4156: 4146: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4132: 4087: 4083: 4051: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4026: 4025: 4016: 3963: 3960: 3940: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3871: 3870:Image removals 3868: 3839: 3838:Link to e-mail 3836: 3835: 3834: 3787: 3784: 3758: 3757: 3728: 3725: 3709: 3706: 3685: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3671: 3643:124.185.18.187 3638: 3635: 3610: 3607: 3574: 3571: 3560:Ravensfire2002 3539:WP:FilmRelease 3523: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3507: 3470: 3467: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3406: 3362: 3361: 3352: 3319: 3316: 3296: 3293: 3267: 3264: 3234: 3231: 3203: 3200: 3176: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3144:Best regards, 3134: 3131: 3112: 3106: 3086: 3083: 3053: 3050: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3017: 2984:New York Times 2931: 2930: 2904: 2903: 2851: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2837: 2786: 2783: 2757: 2752: 2722: 2719: 2693: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2657: 2628: 2625: 2613:125.25.121.250 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2573:24.176.191.234 2547:24.176.191.234 2528: 2519: 2494: 2491: 2463: 2457: 2442: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2421: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2360: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2308: 2277: 2274: 2243:as they often 2231: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2217: 2174: 2171: 2152: 2149: 2138: 2135: 2111: 2108: 2097:Philip Trueman 2088:I have undone 2085: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2050: 2032: 2030: 2027: 2025: 1997: 1994: 1977:Portraitsketch 1934: 1931: 1915: 1912: 1904: 1901: 1892: 1889: 1878:Thegreyanomaly 1866: 1863: 1831: 1826: 1808: 1805: 1771: 1768: 1750: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1736: 1676: 1666: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1624: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1579: 1560: 1559: 1544: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1478: 1453: 1450: 1421: 1418: 1379: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1363: 1334: 1331: 1299: 1296: 1279: 1276: 1255: 1226: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1194: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1082:". Point 11: " 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1053: 1014: 988: 947: 944: 927: 924: 904: 901: 881: 878: 843: 842:Please Help Us 840: 839: 838: 806: 803: 802: 801: 792: 752: 749: 732: 727: 704: 703: 694: 643: 640: 620: 617: 600:GulfIslandMaps 577: 574: 559: 558: 512: 511: 465: 462: 415:White elephant 399: 397:White elephant 395:nomination of 390: 367: 364: 344: 341: 324: 321: 293: 290: 289: 288: 279: 241: 238: 215: 210: 186: 183: 182: 181: 180: 179: 178: 177: 142: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 8884: 8875: 8874: 8870: 8866: 8862: 8858: 8844: 8843: 8839: 8831: 8830: 8825: 8824: 8823: 8822: 8821: 8819: 8815: 8814:Joe Halderman 8799: 8796: 8794: 8789: 8785: 8784: 8779: 8774: 8773: 8772: 8768: 8764: 8759: 8755: 8754: 8753: 8752: 8749: 8746: 8744: 8739: 8735: 8734: 8728: 8727: 8726: 8725: 8721: 8717: 8712: 8708: 8704: 8701: 8699: 8689: 8688: 8684: 8680: 8676: 8673: 8669: 8665: 8661: 8657: 8647: 8646: 8642: 8638: 8618: 8615: 8613: 8608: 8604: 8603: 8597: 8596: 8595: 8591: 8587: 8583: 8580: 8579: 8578: 8577: 8576: 8575: 8574: 8573: 8566: 8563: 8561: 8556: 8552: 8551: 8546: 8541: 8537: 8535: 8529: 8527: 8523: 8521: 8517: 8515: 8511: 8509: 8505: 8503: 8499: 8498: 8495: 8494: 8493: 8492: 8491: 8490: 8485: 8481: 8477: 8473: 8470: 8467: 8466: 8465: 8464: 8463: 8456: 8452: 8448: 8444: 8443: 8442: 8441: 8435: 8432: 8429: 8426: 8425: 8421: 8420: 8419: 8418: 8412: 8409: 8408: 8407: 8406: 8403: 8400: 8398: 8393: 8389: 8388: 8383: 8379: 8378: 8377: 8376: 8372: 8368: 8361: 8356: 8355: 8352: 8347: 8345: 8339: 8335: 8325: 8324: 8320: 8314: 8308: 8304: 8300: 8297:and I try to 8296: 8292: 8288: 8283: 8272: 8269: 8267: 8262: 8258: 8257: 8251: 8250: 8249: 8248: 8244: 8240: 8235: 8232: 8228: 8223: 8205: 8202: 8200: 8195: 8191: 8190: 8185: 8180: 8176: 8172: 8168: 8167: 8166: 8162: 8156: 8150: 8146: 8145: 8144: 8141: 8139: 8134: 8130: 8129: 8123: 8122: 8121: 8117: 8111: 8105: 8101: 8097: 8093: 8092: 8091: 8088: 8086: 8081: 8077: 8076: 8071: 8067: 8063: 8062: 8061: 8057: 8051: 8045: 8041: 8040: 8039: 8038: 8034: 8028: 8022: 8018: 8011: 8006: 8004: 8000: 7996: 7992: 7985: 7982: 7974: 7973: 7969: 7965: 7956: 7955: 7951: 7947: 7942: 7941: 7937: 7933: 7928: 7927: 7923: 7919: 7913: 7912: 7908: 7904: 7895: 7892: 7890: 7885: 7881: 7880: 7875: 7874: 7873: 7872: 7871: 7868: 7864: 7860: 7856: 7852: 7844: 7841: 7837: 7833: 7829: 7825: 7816: 7813: 7809: 7805: 7801: 7797: 7783: 7782: 7778: 7777: 7774: 7771: 7768: 7763: 7762: 7759: 7756: 7753: 7738: 7735: 7733: 7728: 7724: 7723: 7717: 7712: 7711: 7710: 7709: 7705: 7701: 7696: 7693: 7690: 7689: 7684: 7680: 7677: 7676: 7672: 7668: 7663: 7660: 7656: 7646: 7643: 7641: 7636: 7632: 7631: 7626: 7625: 7624: 7623: 7620: 7617: 7613: 7608: 7596: 7593: 7591: 7586: 7582: 7581: 7576: 7575: 7574: 7573: 7570: 7562: 7550: 7549: 7546: 7545: 7540: 7538: 7525: 7524: 7520: 7516: 7512: 7508: 7501: 7495: 7494: 7490: 7486: 7482: 7477: 7472: 7462: 7458: 7454: 7450: 7449: 7448: 7447: 7443: 7439: 7435: 7433: 7429: 7421: 7416: 7414: 7410: 7406: 7402: 7399: 7396: 7278: 7274: 7273: 7272: 7271: 7270: 7269: 7268: 7267: 7266: 7265: 7264: 7263: 7262: 7261: 7260: 7259: 7258: 7257: 7256: 7255: 7254: 7253: 7252: 7251: 7250: 7249: 7248: 7247: 7246: 7245: 7244: 7243: 7242: 7241: 7240: 7239: 7238: 7237: 7236: 7235: 7234: 7233: 7232: 7231: 7230: 7229: 7228: 7227: 7226: 7225: 7224: 7223: 7222: 7221: 7220: 7219: 7218: 7217: 7216: 7215: 7214: 7213: 7212: 7211: 7210: 7209: 7208: 7207: 7206: 7205: 7204: 7203: 7202: 7201: 7200: 7199: 7198: 7197: 7196: 7195: 7194: 7193: 7192: 7191: 7190: 7189: 7188: 7187: 7186: 7185: 7184: 7183: 7182: 7181: 7180: 7179: 7178: 7177: 7176: 7175: 7174: 7173: 7172: 7171: 7170: 7169: 7168: 7167: 7166: 7165: 7164: 7163: 7162: 7161: 7160: 7159: 7158: 7155: 7152: 7149: 7146: 7143: 7140: 7137: 7134: 7130: 7127: 7124: 7121: 7118: 7117: 7109: 7106: 7103: 7102: 7094: 7088: 7085: 7082: 7079: 7076: 7070: 7061: 7058: 7055: 7049: 7046: 7043: 7037: 7034: 7031: 7028: 7025: 7022: 7016: 7013: 7010: 7007: 7006: 6996: 6992: 6988: 6985: 6983: 6978: 6970: 6969: 6965: 6961: 6957: 6946: 6942: 6940: 6931: 6927: 6923: 6919: 6918: 6917: 6906: 6903: 6901: 6896: 6892: 6891: 6885: 6884: 6883: 6881: 6877: 6873: 6868: 6856: 6852: 6849: 6847: 6842: 6834: 6833: 6828: 6823: 6822: 6821: 6812:Re: Big Three 6809: 6808: 6804: 6800: 6789: 6788: 6784: 6780: 6769: 6768: 6764: 6760: 6759:Raldonscale25 6756: 6754: 6753: 6748: 6747: 6741: 6740: 6739:The Mentalist 6729: 6728: 6724: 6719: 6715: 6705: 6704: 6700: 6696: 6692: 6688: 6684: 6680: 6676: 6670:Canada at FAR 6665: 6662: 6660: 6655: 6651: 6650: 6645: 6644: 6643: 6642: 6638: 6634: 6630: 6627: 6624: 6620: 6612: 6607: 6606: 6602: 6598: 6594: 6589: 6585: 6583: 6579: 6575: 6571: 6567: 6557: 6556: 6552: 6548: 6541:Netley Castle 6538: 6537: 6533: 6529: 6524: 6522: 6517: 6509: 6505: 6501: 6497: 6493: 6485: 6477: 6473: 6469: 6465: 6461: 6450: 6447: 6445: 6440: 6436: 6435: 6430: 6426: 6422: 6421: 6420: 6419: 6415: 6409: 6404:not notable? 6403: 6399: 6398:Stargate SG-1 6392: 6388: 6387:Stargate SG-1 6383: 6382: 6378: 6374: 6363: 6362: 6358: 6354: 6350: 6343: 6339: 6333: 6332: 6329: 6319: 6315: 6310: 6309: 6305: 6302: 6299: 6295: 6289: 6285: 6275: 6274: 6270: 6266: 6262: 6258: 6254: 6250: 6240: 6239: 6235: 6231: 6227: 6223: 6213: 6210: 6206: 6202: 6198: 6194: 6181: 6180: 6176: 6172: 6148: 6144: 6140: 6136: 6135: 6134: 6130: 6126: 6122: 6118: 6117: 6116: 6112: 6108: 6103: 6102: 6100: 6096: 6092: 6079: 6078: 6077: 6073: 6069: 6062: 6058: 6057: 6056: 6052: 6048: 6044: 6038: 6037: 6036: 6035: 6032: 6029: 6027: 6022: 6018: 6017: 6011: 6010: 6009: 6008: 6004: 6000: 5996: 5995: 5989: 5985: 5969: 5965: 5961: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5953: 5952: 5951: 5946: 5942: 5938: 5934: 5925: 5920: 5919: 5918: 5917: 5914: 5911: 5909: 5904: 5900: 5899: 5894: 5893: 5892: 5891: 5887: 5883: 5879: 5865: 5862: 5860: 5855: 5851: 5850: 5845: 5841: 5840: 5839: 5838: 5834: 5830: 5820: 5819: 5815: 5811: 5802: 5799: 5797: 5792: 5788: 5787: 5782: 5781: 5778: 5774: 5770: 5766: 5765: 5764: 5763: 5762: 5761: 5757: 5753: 5745: 5742: 5740: 5735: 5731: 5730: 5725: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5718: 5714: 5704: 5703: 5699: 5695: 5689: 5679: 5676: 5672: 5668: 5664: 5660: 5652: 5649: 5645: 5637: 5636: 5632: 5628: 5624: 5620: 5613: 5606: 5599: 5589: 5588: 5584: 5580: 5579:Mountainrelic 5575: 5569: 5566: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5557: 5549: 5548: 5544: 5540: 5533: 5529: 5525: 5521: 5514: 5510: 5506: 5495: 5494: 5490: 5486: 5481: 5478: 5474: 5465: 5462: 5458: 5454: 5450: 5446: 5438: 5428: 5424: 5420: 5416: 5412: 5409: 5408: 5407: 5405: 5401: 5397: 5396:82.114.66.108 5393: 5384: 5380: 5377: 5373: 5370: 5366: 5363: 5355: 5354: 5350: 5346: 5342: 5336: 5332: 5328: 5327: 5314: 5311: 5309: 5304: 5300: 5299: 5294: 5290: 5286: 5285: 5284: 5282: 5278: 5274: 5270: 5263: 5260: 5252: 5251: 5247: 5243: 5239: 5235: 5225: 5224: 5220: 5216: 5205: 5204: 5200: 5196: 5191: 5188: 5185: 5181: 5177: 5173: 5170: 5166: 5162: 5159: 5156: 5153: 5150: 5146: 5137: 5136: 5132: 5128: 5124: 5118: 5114: 5113: 5102: 5099: 5095: 5091: 5087: 5083: 5075: 5071: 5069: 5065: 5060: 5058: 5053: 5051: 5046: 5038: 5037: 5034: 5032: 5025: 5024: 5016: 5009: 5002: 4990: 4986: 4982: 4977: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4966: 4962: 4958: 4955: 4945: 4944: 4940: 4936: 4931: 4927: 4915: 4911: 4907: 4903: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4892: 4888: 4881: 4875: 4872: 4869: 4865: 4862: 4859: 4856: 4853: 4847: 4840: 4836: 4832: 4828: 4824: 4820: 4816: 4815: 4814: 4813: 4809: 4805: 4799: 4789: 4785: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4768: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4758: 4754: 4750: 4746: 4742: 4736:````Suzanne 4734: 4731: 4728: 4725: 4721: 4720: 4716: 4712: 4708: 4694: 4691: 4689: 4684: 4680: 4679: 4673: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4665:Scotland1099 4664: 4660: 4656: 4643: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4630: 4625: 4621: 4620: 4615: 4611: 4609: 4606: 4604: 4599: 4595: 4594: 4589: 4584: 4583: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4525: 4524: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4516: 4512: 4508: 4507: 4502: 4494: 4491: 4489: 4484: 4480: 4479: 4474: 4469: 4464: 4463: 4462: 4458: 4454: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4443: 4439: 4435: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4431: 4427: 4423: 4419: 4413: 4410: 4408: 4403: 4399: 4398: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4372: 4368: 4364: 4360: 4356: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4338: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4289: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4282: 4278: 4273: 4269: 4265: 4261: 4257: 4254: 4246: 4243: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4227: 4214: 4213: 4210: 4203: 4201: 4195: 4184: 4183: 4180: 4175: 4173: 4167: 4160: 4157: 4155: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4140: 4137: 4135: 4130: 4126: 4125: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4114: 4110: 4106: 4102: 4098: 4090: 4085: 4081: 4078: 4074: 4070: 4066: 4063: 4059: 4055: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4024: 4021: 4019: 4014: 4010: 4009: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3984: 3977: 3969: 3959: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3944: 3934: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3919: 3915: 3913: 3911: 3908: 3907:85.241.105.44 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3867: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3816: 3812: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3792: 3786:Editing Pages 3783: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3768: 3764: 3762: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3737: 3733: 3724: 3723: 3719: 3715: 3705: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3690: 3679: 3676: 3674: 3669: 3665: 3664: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3634: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3621: 3620:Sharp LH-0080 3616: 3606: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3590:Ivan Kirillov 3587: 3579: 3570: 3569: 3565: 3561: 3556: 3555:All-Star game 3551: 3548: 3543: 3540: 3536: 3535:user:Inurhead 3531: 3529: 3522: 3515: 3512: 3510: 3505: 3501: 3500: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3466: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3435: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3414: 3411: 3409: 3404: 3400: 3399: 3394: 3390: 3385: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3360: 3357: 3355: 3350: 3346: 3345: 3340: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3315: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3292: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3266:External link 3263: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3233:Entry deleted 3230: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3199: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3184: 3180: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3145: 3142: 3138: 3130: 3129: 3126: 3124: 3118: 3111: 3105: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3082: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3049: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3033: 3025: 3022: 3020: 3015: 3011: 3010: 3004: 2999: 2997: 2993: 2987: 2985: 2981: 2975: 2973: 2969: 2963: 2961: 2957: 2951: 2949: 2945: 2939: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2906: 2905: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2845: 2842: 2840: 2835: 2831: 2830: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2798: 2795: 2791: 2782: 2781: 2777: 2775: 2769: 2767: 2756: 2751: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2737: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2718: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2697: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2672: 2671:Stargate SG-1 2667: 2666: 2665: 2662: 2660: 2655: 2651: 2650: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2624: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2565: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2539: 2535: 2527: 2526:CSI: New York 2523: 2518: 2517: 2513: 2511: 2506: 2502: 2490: 2489: 2481: 2478: 2475: 2470: 2462: 2456: 2455: 2452: 2449: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2423: 2415: 2410: 2404: 2395: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2368: 2365: 2363: 2358: 2354: 2353: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2322: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2313: 2311: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2273: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2225: 2222: 2220: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2199: 2198: 2193: 2189: 2184: 2180: 2170: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2148: 2147: 2144: 2137:Courtesy note 2134: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2107: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2077: 2074: 2069: 2067: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2055: 2053: 2048: 2044: 2043: 2038: 2033: 2031: 2029:<grin: --> 2028: 2026: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2017: 2012: 2010: 2004: 1993: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1966: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1952: 1949: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1911: 1910: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1902: 1899: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1874: 1872: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1840: 1838: 1830: 1825: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1817: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1794: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1767: 1766: 1763: 1760: 1759: 1744: 1741: 1739: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1674: 1670: 1665: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1642: 1639: 1634: 1632: 1625: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1584: 1582: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1566: 1562: 1561: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1522: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1509: 1504: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1469: 1468: 1458: 1449: 1448: 1445: 1444: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1417: 1416: 1412: 1409: 1408: 1385: 1378: 1371: 1368: 1366: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1295: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1275: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1224: 1215: 1212: 1211: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1199: 1197: 1192: 1188: 1187: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1172: 1171: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1148: 1145: 1142: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1122: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1085: 1081: 1078:". Point 4: " 1077: 1073: 1069: 1068: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1002: 998: 997: 996: 993: 991: 986: 982: 981: 975: 971: 970: 969: 968: 965: 961: 957: 953: 943: 942: 938: 934: 923: 922: 918: 914: 910: 900: 899: 896: 892: 888: 877: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 852: 847: 837: 833: 829: 824: 823: 822: 821: 817: 813: 800: 797: 795: 790: 786: 785: 780: 776: 775: 774: 772: 768: 764: 763:24.67.253.203 760: 748: 747: 744: 743: 738: 731: 726: 724: 720: 716: 712: 702: 699: 697: 692: 688: 687: 682: 681: 680: 679: 675: 671: 667: 665: 659: 658: 654: 650: 639: 638: 634: 630: 624: 616: 613: 609: 605: 601: 597: 589: 586: 584: 573: 572: 568: 564: 557: 554: 552: 542: 541: 540: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 510: 507: 505: 496: 495: 494: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 461: 460: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 438: 433: 431: 427: 422: 420: 416: 412: 404: 398: 394: 389: 388: 384: 380: 376: 373: 363: 362: 358: 354: 350: 340: 339: 335: 331: 320: 318: 314: 310: 306: 305: 301: 298: 287: 284: 282: 277: 273: 272: 266: 265: 264: 262: 258: 254: 250: 237: 236: 233: 232: 226: 224: 214: 209: 208: 204: 200: 196: 190: 176: 172: 168: 161: 160:editprotected 154: 153: 152: 151: 150: 147: 145: 140: 136: 135: 130: 126: 121: 120: 119: 118: 113: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 8854: 8835: 8827: 8811: 8786: 8781: 8777: 8763:64.142.90.33 8757: 8736: 8731: 8713: 8709: 8705: 8702: 8695: 8677: 8648: 8634: 8605: 8600: 8553: 8548: 8544: 8531: 8525: 8519: 8513: 8507: 8501: 8468: 8461: 8390: 8385: 8364: 8343: 8331: 8328:the sock rot 8286: 8280: 8259: 8254: 8237:best wishes 8236: 8233: 8229: 8226: 8192: 8187: 8183: 8178: 8174: 8170: 8131: 8126: 8103: 8099: 8078: 8073: 8069: 8065: 8016: 8014: 7986: 7983: 7980: 7962: 7943: 7929: 7914: 7900: 7882: 7877: 7845: 7817: 7789: 7765: 7750: 7746: 7725: 7720: 7715: 7697: 7694: 7691: 7686: 7685: 7681: 7679:Dear Ckatz, 7678: 7664: 7661: 7657: 7655:Dear Ckatz, 7654: 7633: 7628: 7611: 7604: 7583: 7578: 7556: 7533: 7531: 7504: 7480: 7473: 7470: 7453:SpikeToronto 7431: 7425: 7424: 7403: 7400: 7397: 7394: 7156: 7153: 7150: 7147: 7144: 7141: 7138: 7135: 7131: 7128: 7125: 7122: 7119: 7113: 7107: 7104: 7098: 7092: 7086: 7083: 7080: 7077: 7074: 7068: 7059: 7056: 7053: 7047: 7044: 7041: 7035: 7032: 7029: 7026: 7023: 7020: 7014: 7011: 7008: 7002: 6994: 6986: 6981: 6979: 6976: 6958: 6954: 6938: 6914: 6893: 6888: 6869: 6866: 6850: 6845: 6843: 6840: 6819: 6817: 6815: 6795: 6775: 6757: 6752:The Simpsons 6750: 6744: 6737: 6735: 6711: 6673: 6652: 6647: 6625: 6616: 6590: 6586: 6582:Micronations 6563: 6544: 6525: 6518: 6515: 6486: 6483: 6453: 6437: 6432: 6428: 6424: 6395: 6369: 6346: 6342:Micronations 6323: 6316:redirect to 6300: 6293:AnmaFinotera 6281: 6246: 6219: 6187: 6168: 6041: 6019: 6014: 5993: 5992: 5987: 5983: 5981: 5923: 5901: 5896: 5873: 5852: 5847: 5843: 5826: 5807: 5789: 5784: 5748: 5732: 5727: 5710: 5688:known to man 5687: 5685: 5653: 5650: 5646: 5643: 5617: 5576: 5573: 5558: 5555: 5512: 5508: 5504: 5501: 5482: 5471: 5439: 5436: 5385: 5381: 5378: 5374: 5372:August 2009 5371: 5367: 5364: 5361: 5330: 5324: 5322: 5301: 5296: 5292: 5264: 5261: 5258: 5231: 5211: 5192: 5189: 5186: 5182: 5178: 5174: 5171: 5167: 5163: 5160: 5157: 5154: 5151: 5147: 5143: 5110: 5108: 5076: 5072: 5061: 5054: 5047: 5044: 5026: 5022: 5020: 4951: 4923: 4885: 4879: 4874:Advantages: 4873: 4870: 4866: 4863: 4860: 4857: 4848: 4843: 4818: 4800: 4797: 4735: 4732: 4729: 4726: 4722: 4702: 4681: 4676: 4671: 4655:Scotland1099 4651: 4623: 4596: 4591: 4587: 4513: 4510: 4505: 4504: 4481: 4476: 4472: 4467: 4400: 4395: 4374: 4335: 4333: 4291: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4258: 4255: 4252: 4220: 4199: 4193: 4190: 4171: 4165: 4163: 4148: 4127: 4122: 4091: 4086: 4082: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4067: 4064: 4060: 4056: 4053: 4034:AussieLegend 4011: 4006: 3991:AussieLegend 3965: 3945: 3942: 3873: 3841: 3793: 3789: 3782:Parthashome 3770: 3765: 3759: 3751:Parthashome 3739: 3734: 3730: 3711: 3691: 3687: 3666: 3661: 3640: 3612: 3580: 3576: 3552: 3544: 3532: 3525: 3502: 3497: 3474: 3472: 3440: 3401: 3396: 3383: 3347: 3342: 3338: 3321: 3298: 3269: 3236: 3205: 3185: 3181: 3178: 3152: 3146: 3143: 3139: 3136: 3114: 3088: 3055: 3034: 3030: 3012: 3007: 3002: 2995: 2991: 2990: 2983: 2979: 2978: 2971: 2967: 2966: 2959: 2955: 2954: 2947: 2943: 2942: 2937: 2853: 2850:What Goes Up 2832: 2827: 2799: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2785:WHAT GOES UP 2773: 2765: 2759: 2738: 2724: 2707:24.36.248.90 2698: 2695: 2669: 2652: 2647: 2630: 2604: 2568: 2563: 2537: 2530: 2510: 2501: 2496: 2476: 2465: 2444: 2393: 2379:Whatever2009 2375: 2355: 2350: 2331:Whatever2009 2329: 2303: 2298: 2283:Whatever2009 2279: 2244: 2233: 2212: 2207: 2196: 2183:Sillyfolkboy 2176: 2158: 2154: 2143:Orderinchaos 2140: 2113: 2087: 2065: 2045: 2040: 2008: 2002: 1999: 1967: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1953: 1950: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1937:Dear Ckatz, 1936: 1917: 1898: 1897: 1894: 1875: 1868: 1855: 1852: 1844: 1841: 1836: 1833: 1815: 1810: 1791: 1773: 1757:Juliancolton 1754: 1752: 1731: 1726: 1721: 1717: 1700: 1678: 1647: 1630: 1616: 1574: 1569: 1564: 1539: 1518:(desysopped) 1460: 1455: 1441: 1423: 1389: 1381: 1358: 1353: 1336: 1301: 1281: 1264:76.176.9.168 1254: 1228: 1207: 1189: 1184: 1180: 1167: 1140: 1127: 1100: 1088: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1048: 1043: 1017: 1005: 983: 978: 973: 949: 929: 906: 886: 883: 848: 845: 808: 787: 782: 754: 740: 734: 715:75.84.21.239 705: 689: 684: 670:75.84.21.239 668: 663: 660: 649:75.84.21.239 645: 625: 622: 590: 587: 579: 560: 513: 467: 443:Please note: 442: 441: 434: 423: 408: 369: 349:last editing 346: 326: 319:Deb Nielsen 307: 302: 299: 295: 274: 269: 243: 228: 222: 217: 191: 188: 137: 132: 128: 124: 106: 78: 43: 37: 8654:—Preceding 8524:(3rd note) 8512:(2nd note) 8500:(1st note) 8332:Please see 8312:Powergate92 8154:Powergate92 8109:Powergate92 8049:Powergate92 8026:Powergate92 7989:—Preceding 7849:—Preceding 7822:—Preceding 7794:—Preceding 7528:Please note 7114:reference: 7099:reference: 7003:reference: 6982:Tom Welling 6846:Tom Welling 6675:User:Oei888 6496:SurgeFilter 6490:—Preceding 6464:Petr Kulaty 6458:—Preceding 6407:Powergate92 6191:—Preceding 6107:Ghughesarch 5657:—Preceding 5518:—Preceding 5509:Reimagining 5505:Reimagining 5443:—Preceding 5390:—Preceding 5267:—Preceding 5242:Kung Fu Man 5215:Ndickinson1 5080:—Preceding 4887:Chris.mcrae 4804:Chris.mcrae 4739:—Preceding 4624:The X-Files 4375:The X-Files 4330:Help me out 4296:promotional 4224:—Preceding 4095:—Preceding 4054:Hi Ckatz, 3845:—Preceding 3797:—Preceding 3772:Parthashome 3741:Parthashome 3695:24.82.96.85 3641:Please see 3584:—Preceding 3241:—Preceding 3110:User:VitasV 3095:Callisrocks 3060:—Preceding 2911:—Preceding 2884:—Preceding 2858:—Preceding 2803:—Preceding 2766:Icestorm815 2701:—Preceding 2607:—Preceding 2588:TristaBella 2543:User:Trista 2173:Delete file 2117:—Preceding 1996:Google Docs 1971:—Preceding 1459:. Thanks, 1258:—Preceding 1074:—Point 3: " 855:—Preceding 828:Niteshift36 812:Niteshift36 757:—Preceding 709:—Preceding 619:RE: janitor 594:—Preceding 518:—Preceding 472:—Preceding 379:AdjustShift 353:Orimosenzon 253:91.106.1.19 247:—Preceding 36:This is an 8861:discussion 8859:) in this 8299:discuss it 8227:Hi there, 8023:for info. 7964:Jeffcsmith 7946:Jeffcsmith 7932:Jeffcsmith 7918:Jeffcsmith 7903:Jeffcsmith 7855:Jeffcsmith 7828:Jeffcsmith 7800:Jeffcsmith 7471:Dear Sir, 6911:Ridiculous 6746:Family Guy 6619:Systemizer 6611:Systemizer 6597:Gene_poole 6528:Gene_poole 6137:Agreed. -- 6047:Tbrittreid 5999:Tbrittreid 5895:Sigh... -- 5810:Epeefleche 5769:Epeefleche 5752:Epeefleche 5713:Epeefleche 5644:Hi there, 5556:Hi CKatz, 5485:Epeefleche 4733:Thank you 4699:Futurology 3966:Regarding 3918:User:Yworo 3884:User:Yworo 3615:Zilog Z380 3609:Zilog Z380 3391:, and use 3179:Hi there, 3137:Hi Ckatz, 3057:however. 3038:Abelparish 2917:Abelparish 2890:Abelparish 2864:Abelparish 2809:Abelparish 2493:Thank You! 1776:Doctor Who 1597:Hammersoft 1549:Hammersoft 1377:Talk:Earth 1306:page with 1239:Sony Vegas 1154:encouraged 1134:Pmanderson 1110:Locke Cole 1026:Locke Cole 956:Locke Cole 885:attention 451:Erwin85Bot 366:Your block 330:Loremaster 189:Hi Ckatz. 111:SlimVirgin 95:Archive 10 8692:Letterman 8239:SimonTrew 7700:Athenaion 7667:Athenaion 7415:Aratak80 6633:Simonm223 6570:this site 6314:Inkheart‎ 6197:Slinctank 6139:RW Dutton 6095:RW Dutton 5988:inclusion 5539:jofframes 5524:Jdemarcos 5483:Thanks.-- 5195:Sdisandro 5045:Mr Katz, 4745:Slinctank 4506:structure 4101:Depauldem 3987:this edit 3968:this edit 3962:Australia 3851:Ector2008 3803:Ector2008 3473:That's a 3208:Vancouver 2461:Sam Tyler 2448:Peripitus 2408:Speak up! 1718:scheduled 1540:unanimous 826:handled. 103:MoS dates 90:Archive 9 85:Archive 8 79:Archive 7 73:Archive 6 68:Archive 5 60:Archive 1 8865:Johnuniq 8826:Thanks, 8668:contribs 8656:unsigned 8586:Wispanow 8476:Wispanow 8447:Wispanow 8367:Wispanow 8184:produced 7991:unsigned 7863:contribs 7851:unsigned 7836:contribs 7824:unsigned 7808:contribs 7796:unsigned 7716:restored 7405:Aratak80 7398:Thanks, 6870:Thanks, 6732:Response 6695:Dabomb87 6629:contribs 6576:to both 6560:Heads-up 6547:Vicarage 6504:contribs 6492:unsigned 6472:contribs 6460:unsigned 6304:contribs 6205:contribs 6193:unsigned 6087:Prisoner 6083:Prisoner 5960:Inurhead 5671:contribs 5663:Amoslinz 5659:unsigned 5651:Cheers, 5610:You can 5592:Talkback 5532:contribs 5520:unsigned 5498:BSG move 5457:contribs 5445:unsigned 5440:Thanks 5419:Johnuniq 5392:unsigned 5269:unsigned 5255:trotline 5094:contribs 5086:Mogtnomr 5082:unsigned 5013:You can 4995:Talkback 4981:Inurhead 4976:WP:TROUT 4954:Inurhead 4906:Johnuniq 4831:Johnuniq 4780:Johnuniq 4753:contribs 4741:unsigned 4473:X-Files 4468:adapting 4316:Johnuniq 4238:contribs 4230:Narco223 4226:unsigned 4194:apparent 4109:contribs 4097:unsigned 4089:site. 3949:MontseBL 3925:Tothwolf 3892:Tothwolf 3859:contribs 3847:unsigned 3824:Johnuniq 3811:contribs 3799:unsigned 3647:Johnuniq 3624:Tothwolf 3598:contribs 3586:unsigned 3483:Johnuniq 3465:Witizen 3447:Wirtland 3393:Wirtland 3318:Wirtland 3305:Johnuniq 3284:contribs 3255:contribs 3243:unsigned 3188:Llama623 3186:Thanks! 3161:Johnuniq 3074:contribs 3062:unsigned 3003:strongly 2960:LA Times 2925:contribs 2913:unsigned 2898:contribs 2886:unsigned 2872:contribs 2860:unsigned 2817:contribs 2805:unsigned 2797:Thanks, 2703:unsigned 2609:unsigned 2480:contribs 2402:єmarsee 2276:Hi Ckatz 2263:Skookum1 2258:Ucluelet 2250:Ucluelet 2119:unsigned 1985:contribs 1973:unsigned 1920:Athenean 1655:Johnuniq 1312:Friendly 1260:unsigned 1144:contribs 1132:made by 933:Jettasin 869:contribs 861:Nsaini10 857:unsigned 759:unsigned 711:unsigned 629:Reub2000 608:contribs 596:unsigned 563:Laddiega 544:needed-- 532:contribs 524:Laddiega 520:unsigned 486:contribs 478:Laddiega 474:unsigned 411:deletion 309:Dnsalary 249:unsigned 199:Starbois 167:Franamax 8851:WP:GLAM 8070:Firefly 7743:Thanks. 7568:Windows 7536:Serendi 6872:Rahaf92 6863:{{{2}}} 6723:Mahanga 6718:Mtp1960 6402:This TV 6396:How is 6391:This TV 6278:ANI FYI 5941:contrib 5924:Variety 5886:contrib 5829:Yotcmdr 5750:well.-- 5640:comment 5511:, but 5358:Warning 5349:contrib 5335:WT:FILM 5238:WP:VG/S 5131:contrib 4935:BalderV 4200:Arcayne 4192:user's 3943:Hello! 3553:If the 3547:WP:Film 3455:Witizen 3451:already 3384:equally 3324:Nyttend 2741:Dlabtot 2727:Dlabtot 2538:did not 2427:Bosniak 2093:Neptune 1891:Lockbox 1816:Prodego 1679:Aren't 1452:Wolf426 1420:Sun FAR 1339:Cubs197 1320:Cubs197 1316:Twinkle 1298:My edit 1231:NewBlue 1223:NewBlue 1209:HWV258 1169:HWV258 1158:offered 1101:EDITING 1090:HWV258 1007:HWV258 1001:removal 913:Ithizar 909:Adam-12 891:Deskana 880:Re: ANI 195:Halifax 185:Halifax 39:archive 8857:m:GLAM 8778:before 8350:(talk) 8282:WP:3RR 8094:Again 7764:Ø Ŧ 7619:(talk) 7607:Uranus 7601:Uranus 7560:Fences 7515:Ottens 7485:Ottens 6960:Mobifr 6951:Mobifr 6939:DrNick 6882:Rahaf 6681:for a 6679:Canada 6593:WP:COI 6425:expect 6349:review 6059:Under 5994:demand 5693:occono 5654:Amos 4823:WP:SPA 4819:really 4178:(talk) 3528:WP:ANI 3339:having 3276:Meioow 3247:Meioow 3220:Sunray 2938:cannot 2451:(Talk) 2072:(talk) 2015:(talk) 2003:Safari 1914:Thanks 1778:for a 1637:(talk) 1466:garden 1443:SkyBon 1428:for a 1243:Torley 1181:should 1106:WP:RPA 1022:WP:TPO 952:WP:TPO 742:SkyBon 323:Fringe 129:unlock 125:except 8783:Ckatz 8733:Ckatz 8602:Ckatz 8550:Ckatz 8387:Ckatz 8256:Ckatz 8189:Ckatz 8128:Ckatz 8075:Ckatz 8042:Also 7879:Ckatz 7722:Ckatz 7630:Ckatz 7615:cobra 7612:Cyber 7580:Ckatz 7564:& 7553:Sorry 7438:Spike 6890:Ckatz 6827:stalk 6649:Ckatz 6613:again 6574:WP:EL 6568:that 6434:Ckatz 6373:TIAYN 6366:Sorry 6230:SF007 6125:RomaC 6061:WP:EL 6016:Ckatz 5898:Ckatz 5849:Ckatz 5786:Ckatz 5729:Ckatz 5449:Dogyo 5298:Ckatz 5234:Voldo 5228:Spong 4767:WP:EL 4678:Ckatz 4634:TIAYN 4593:Ckatz 4561:TIAYN 4478:Ckatz 4453:TIAYN 4438:TIAYN 4422:TIAYN 4397:Ckatz 4379:TIAYN 4359:TIAYN 4342:TIAYN 4124:Ckatz 4008:Ckatz 3876:Linux 3663:Ckatz 3537:) in 3499:Ckatz 3398:Ckatz 3370:Dpmuk 3344:Ckatz 3157:WP:EL 3119:. -- 3048:Abel 3009:Ckatz 2829:Ckatz 2800:Abel 2676:TIAYN 2649:Ckatz 2633:TIAYN 2564:where 2532:with 2352:Ckatz 2300:Ckatz 2209:Ckatz 2192:edits 2042:Ckatz 1837:tried 1728:Ckatz 1593:WP:DR 1571:Ckatz 1355:Ckatz 1333:Oops! 1186:Ckatz 1045:Ckatz 980:Ckatz 784:Ckatz 686:Ckatz 550:16888 503:16888 271:Ckatz 134:Ckatz 16:< 8869:talk 8816:and 8767:talk 8720:talk 8683:talk 8664:talk 8641:talk 8590:talk 8480:talk 8451:talk 8371:talk 8344:Tony 8338:this 8336:and 8334:this 8318:Talk 8243:talk 8179:only 8160:Talk 8115:Talk 8055:Talk 8032:Talk 7999:talk 7968:talk 7950:talk 7936:talk 7922:talk 7907:talk 7859:talk 7832:talk 7804:talk 7704:talk 7671:talk 7519:talk 7489:talk 7457:talk 7442:talk 7432:P.S. 7409:talk 6999:Self 6977:Hi, 6964:talk 6876:talk 6841:Hi, 6803:talk 6783:talk 6763:talk 6749:and 6699:talk 6691:here 6637:talk 6623:talk 6601:talk 6580:and 6551:talk 6532:talk 6500:talk 6468:talk 6429:many 6413:Talk 6377:talk 6357:talk 6351:. -- 6340:and 6298:talk 6269:talk 6261:here 6251:for 6234:talk 6222:phun 6201:talk 6175:talk 6143:talk 6129:talk 6111:talk 6099:talk 6067:ASEM 6051:talk 6003:talk 5964:talk 5937:talk 5932:Erik 5882:talk 5877:Erik 5844:that 5842:Now 5833:talk 5814:talk 5773:talk 5756:talk 5717:talk 5698:talk 5667:talk 5631:talk 5623:talk 5583:talk 5543:talk 5528:talk 5489:talk 5453:talk 5423:talk 5400:talk 5345:talk 5340:Erik 5277:talk 5246:talk 5219:talk 5199:talk 5127:talk 5122:Erik 5090:talk 5030:Talk 4985:talk 4965:talk 4939:talk 4910:talk 4891:talk 4835:talk 4808:talk 4784:talk 4749:talk 4659:talk 4638:talk 4565:talk 4515:not. 4511:lead 4457:talk 4442:talk 4426:talk 4383:talk 4363:talk 4346:talk 4320:talk 4310:and 4306:and 4292:lots 4281:talk 4253:Hi, 4234:talk 4217:link 4172:Tony 4166:look 4105:talk 4038:talk 3995:talk 3953:talk 3929:talk 3896:talk 3890:. -- 3882:and 3855:talk 3828:talk 3807:talk 3776:talk 3763:and 3745:talk 3718:talk 3699:talk 3651:talk 3628:talk 3594:talk 3564:talk 3487:talk 3479:here 3459:talk 3431:talk 3374:talk 3328:talk 3309:talk 3280:talk 3251:talk 3224:talk 3216:here 3192:talk 3165:talk 3147:Ole 3108:Re: 3099:talk 3070:talk 3042:talk 2921:talk 2894:talk 2868:talk 2813:talk 2774:Talk 2745:talk 2731:talk 2711:talk 2680:talk 2637:talk 2617:talk 2592:talk 2577:talk 2551:talk 2524:and 2474:talk 2459:RE: 2431:talk 2383:talk 2335:talk 2287:talk 2267:talk 2188:talk 2164:talk 2127:talk 2101:talk 2066:Tony 2009:Tony 1981:talk 1924:talk 1903:fold 1900:Hers 1882:talk 1798:talk 1793:Cirt 1788:here 1722:will 1707:talk 1693:talk 1683:and 1671:and 1659:talk 1651:duck 1631:Tony 1601:talk 1553:talk 1438:here 1411:Talk 1384:here 1343:talk 1324:talk 1314:and 1289:talk 1268:talk 1247:talk 1225:page 1149:and 1138:talk 1130:edit 974:your 937:talk 917:talk 865:talk 832:talk 816:talk 767:talk 719:talk 674:talk 653:talk 633:talk 604:talk 567:talk 528:talk 482:talk 455:talk 421:"). 383:talk 357:talk 334:talk 313:talk 257:talk 230:talk 203:talk 171:talk 8792:spy 8742:spy 8611:spy 8559:spy 8396:spy 8265:spy 8198:spy 8137:spy 8084:spy 8017:not 7888:spy 7731:spy 7639:spy 7589:spy 7543:ous 7509:of 6899:spy 6820:CIS 6799:TTN 6658:spy 6584:. 6443:spy 6389:on 6025:spy 5984:you 5907:spy 5858:spy 5795:spy 5738:spy 5331:all 5307:spy 5293:not 4687:spy 4672:not 4602:spy 4588:tag 4487:spy 4406:spy 4133:spy 4017:spy 3878:by 3672:spy 3508:spy 3469:BWB 3445:to 3407:spy 3353:spy 3153:why 3018:spy 2838:spy 2658:spy 2503:^) 2394:one 2361:spy 2309:spy 2245:are 2218:spy 2190:) ( 2051:spy 1737:spy 1617:did 1580:spy 1426:Sun 1364:spy 1195:spy 1086:". 1054:spy 989:spy 887:and 793:spy 737:2nd 730:Sun 695:spy 547:Jac 500:Jac 447:bot 393:AfD 280:spy 143:spy 8871:) 8840:) 8769:) 8722:) 8685:) 8670:) 8666:• 8643:) 8592:) 8482:) 8453:) 8373:) 8309:. 8245:) 8001:) 7970:) 7952:) 7938:) 7924:) 7909:) 7865:) 7861:• 7838:) 7834:• 7810:) 7806:• 7749:-- 7706:) 7698:-- 7673:) 7665:-- 7521:) 7491:) 7459:) 7444:) 7436:— 7411:) 7279:}} 6973:Hi 6966:) 6943:! 6935:Hi 6887:-- 6878:) 6837:Hi 6824:| 6805:) 6785:) 6765:) 6701:) 6693:. 6639:) 6603:) 6553:) 6534:) 6523:: 6506:) 6502:• 6474:) 6470:• 6379:) 6371:-- 6359:) 6306:) 6271:) 6236:) 6207:) 6203:• 6177:) 6145:) 6131:) 6123:? 6113:) 6101:) 6074:) 6053:) 6045:-- 6013:-- 6005:) 5966:) 5943:) 5939:• 5888:) 5884:• 5835:) 5816:) 5775:) 5758:) 5719:) 5700:) 5673:) 5669:• 5633:) 5585:) 5545:) 5537:-- 5534:) 5530:• 5491:) 5459:) 5455:• 5425:) 5402:) 5351:) 5347:• 5279:) 5248:) 5221:) 5201:) 5193:-- 5133:) 5129:• 5096:) 5092:• 5023:NW 4987:) 4967:) 4941:) 4912:) 4893:) 4837:) 4810:) 4786:) 4755:) 4751:• 4705:~ 4661:) 4640:) 4567:) 4459:) 4451:-- 4444:) 4428:) 4385:) 4365:) 4348:) 4322:) 4283:) 4240:) 4236:• 4207:() 4111:) 4107:• 4040:) 4032:-- 4005:-- 3997:) 3979:}} 3976:cn 3973:{{ 3955:) 3931:) 3898:) 3861:) 3857:• 3830:) 3813:) 3809:• 3778:) 3747:) 3720:) 3701:) 3653:) 3630:) 3600:) 3596:• 3566:) 3489:) 3461:) 3429:- 3376:) 3330:) 3311:) 3286:) 3282:• 3274:— 3257:) 3253:• 3226:) 3218:. 3194:) 3167:) 3101:) 3076:) 3072:• 3044:) 3006:-- 2927:) 2923:• 2900:) 2896:• 2874:) 2870:• 2819:) 2815:• 2770:• 2747:) 2733:) 2713:) 2682:) 2639:) 2619:) 2594:) 2579:) 2553:) 2509:(^ 2433:) 2405:• 2385:) 2337:) 2289:) 2269:) 2166:) 2129:) 2103:) 1987:) 1983:• 1926:) 1884:) 1800:) 1790:. 1761:| 1725:-- 1709:) 1695:) 1661:) 1603:) 1555:) 1440:. 1345:) 1326:) 1291:) 1270:) 1249:) 1237:, 1116:• 1112:• 1032:• 1028:• 962:• 958:• 939:) 919:) 893:, 871:) 867:• 834:) 818:) 769:) 721:) 676:) 655:) 635:) 610:) 606:• 569:) 534:) 530:• 488:) 484:• 457:) 385:) 359:) 336:) 328:-- 315:) 268:-- 259:) 205:) 173:) 163:}} 157:{{ 64:← 8867:( 8836:( 8833:☮ 8765:( 8718:( 8681:( 8662:( 8639:( 8588:( 8478:( 8449:( 8369:( 8241:( 7997:( 7966:( 7948:( 7934:( 7920:( 7905:( 7857:( 7830:( 7802:( 7776:E 7773:R 7770:E 7767:H 7761:L 7758:L 7755:E 7752:H 7702:( 7669:( 7517:( 7487:( 7455:( 7440:( 7407:( 6962:( 6874:( 6829:) 6801:( 6781:( 6761:( 6697:( 6635:( 6626:· 6621:( 6599:( 6549:( 6530:( 6498:( 6466:( 6375:( 6355:( 6320:? 6301:· 6296:( 6267:( 6232:( 6199:( 6173:( 6141:( 6127:( 6109:( 6097:( 6072:t 6070:( 6065:M 6049:( 6001:( 5962:( 5935:( 5927:' 5880:( 5831:( 5812:( 5771:( 5754:( 5715:( 5696:( 5665:( 5629:( 5621:( 5607:. 5581:( 5541:( 5526:( 5487:( 5451:( 5421:( 5398:( 5343:( 5275:( 5244:( 5217:( 5197:( 5125:( 5088:( 5033:) 5027:( 5010:. 4983:( 4963:( 4937:( 4908:( 4889:( 4833:( 4806:( 4782:( 4747:( 4715:G 4713:. 4711:T 4709:. 4707:R 4657:( 4636:( 4563:( 4455:( 4440:( 4424:( 4381:( 4361:( 4344:( 4318:( 4279:( 4232:( 4103:( 4036:( 3993:( 3951:( 3927:( 3894:( 3853:( 3826:( 3805:( 3774:( 3743:( 3716:( 3697:( 3649:( 3626:( 3592:( 3562:( 3485:( 3457:( 3372:( 3326:( 3307:( 3278:( 3249:( 3222:( 3190:( 3163:( 3122:œ 3097:( 3068:( 3040:( 2998:) 2994:( 2986:) 2982:( 2974:) 2970:( 2962:) 2958:( 2950:) 2946:( 2919:( 2892:( 2866:( 2811:( 2743:( 2729:( 2709:( 2678:( 2635:( 2615:( 2590:( 2575:( 2549:( 2485:☺ 2482:) 2477:· 2472:( 2429:( 2381:( 2333:( 2285:( 2265:( 2194:) 2186:( 2162:( 2125:( 2099:( 1979:( 1922:( 1880:( 1856:] 1845:] 1796:( 1705:( 1691:( 1657:( 1599:( 1551:( 1406:3 1403:8 1400:F 1397:J 1394:T 1391:C 1341:( 1322:( 1287:( 1266:( 1245:( 1141:· 1136:( 1118:c 1114:t 1034:c 1030:t 964:c 960:t 935:( 915:( 863:( 830:( 814:( 765:( 717:( 672:( 651:( 631:( 602:( 565:( 526:( 480:( 453:( 381:( 355:( 332:( 311:( 255:( 201:( 169:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index