User talk:Canoe1967

5428:. I then brought it up on the talk page but only two of us had any input there. One subject had the same image deleted about 20 times at commons until I walked her through the OTRS hoops. She was willing to provide more images of herself but gave up after all the abuse she received here. I have seen others have their articles trimmed unfairly after they ask at the help desk about how to provide an image. The help desk and other forums like the BLPN are full of editors that like to adjust articles with their own agendas after they are mentioned and brought into the radar. Some like to trim them back further than they should be and others like to include as much tabloid crap as they think they can get away with. I think many just enjoy having power over notable people. Either sling mud or demean them to 3 sentences of Knowledge article. Many PR editors are treated unfairly for similar reasons. As I said in the section above we should create varying levels of COI templates as we have with vandal templates. I do agree that most want huge fluffy articles but instead of explaining it well enough to them we revert their edits and then continue to trim the article more than it should be. Many end up blocked as well. Some sort of filtering system is needed to keep the 15% but if we had some sort of training for them then we may get that up to a higher number. A method was mentioned at Jimbo's talk page for paid a editng policy. If they stay within a guideline we write then we wouldn't be allowed to harass them or their edits. We could also have a new project page to discuss all of the PR edits. New PR editors should be directed to a board first before they get in too much trouble and fill talk pages and edit histories with all the dirty laundry that shouldn't belong there.-- 6291:

take a break from editing GMO articles but you seem to just continue with BS which will probably lead to drama boards if you don't clue in. I don't think I have ever edited the Monsanto page so I don't know why you wish me to edit on its talk page. The GMO controversy page is a huge mess that I feel you are trying to control the content and format with. Anything I have said on its talk page was not treated in good faith and is a waste of time as long as you are allowed to own the article. The recall was a health related issue and belongs in the health section. The recall was a health related issue and belongs in the health section. The recall was a health related issue and belongs in the health section. The recall was a health related issue and belongs in the health section. The recall was a health related issue and belongs in the health section. I repeated that a few times to see if it will finally sink in. I think the source said it was 'the biggest recall of its type' but didn't clarify which type it was claiming to be. The way it was worded it could have meant GMO or food recalls. It may even be the biggest GMO food recall up to 2000. Food recalls have been larger since and I haven't looked into other GMO recalls yet. You have stated more than once, including falsely in article space, that Kraft made the shells. They did not. If you had actually read the sources this should have been obvious. Since it seems you are not reading sources then this just adds to my feelings that you are OR now as well as COI and POV. As to your last statement "This is all stated clearly in the LA Times article you provided." You obviously didn't read it so don't even pretend that you had.--

8091:

that I am aware of. Your argument (at the level of detail) for how a merge should be done is based on your preference, not policy or guideline. How it useful, for creating better articles, to criticize the process by which is a merge is done, I do not understand at all. But sure you can criticize that. Then bring evidence that it happened the way you said it did (it did not) and evidence that the process you advocate is the one dictated by policy or guideline. And that is probably something to do at a drama board as it has nothing really to do with content. The result does. So let's say you disagree with the result. OK.. said plainly, that would be something like - "content that I found useful, NPOV and well sourced was left out of the merge, for instance "XXXXXXX". Let's re-introduce it or undo the merge to get it back into article space." Nobody could argue with that. To claim as you do, that the merge results - the content - was created with a POV, that I "cherry-picked" - all go to accusing me of bad faith. And you offer no difs, no evidence. Just a wild, blanket condemnation.

6276:

to the public. I am happy to talk about my work with anybody. I don't understand what grounds you would raise for some administrator action, in any case. Finally with respect to content on the Monsanto page.. (the discussion belongs on its Talk page but briefly): I was surprised you stopped talking on the GM controversies page - I responded to what you wrote both overall (yuor accusations of bad faith) and content-wise, and was looking for you to come back on the issues, and you just apologized for the accusations and then stopped talking. I am still open to discussing the Taco Bell thing more. Please come with facts backed by sources on "biggest recall ever"; and with respect to the recall itself, Kraft did the recall (they make the Taco Bell products that are sold retail) - the FDA did not do it, so I don't understand why you are saying they did much less using that as a justification for putting this under "health". This is all stated clearly in the LA Times article you provided. Do come back and talk more!

7027:

filtered USA version of Google. I won't give you my links yet because that may bias your results. I only touched the tip of the deep web on it but I did come across some big icebergs. I will be busy the next few days so I need to focus on the far too many discussions I have open now, here and at commons. I think that health vs environment issue has stalled as no consensus on the talk page. Once that is confirmed then I will try Arbcom. ANI or Rfc will just be more drama fests of POV editor against POV editor and not look at things like descriptive headings, secondary sources, and reader expectations. The failed DR proved that. ANI and RfC may cause more blocks as well. I have also asked for off-wiki investigations. You could try ANI or RfC if you think they will help. If they turn into drama fests then I will just walk away to Arbcom where that crap usually isn't tolerated.--

4159:

was that Sheindlin and Douthit were suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuued. Not Big Ticket Television. Nowhere is Big Ticket Television named in the lawsuit. It says Douthit is. So I have no idea where you get off making a content dispute out of this when it wasn't want. And I full well do plan on informing an administrator if you continue to. I don't care what you take it as. You're misrepresenting the source and being belligerent. As it was, I had agreed to scale it down, then you decided to instigate a content dispute. And if you actually new the subjects you were arguing about as opposed to just belligerently jumping in, you'd know that none of this is still in litigation. The first 2 are from 2007 and the last one was settled out of court several weeks ago. So again, you're wrong!

6109:

discussions. He read the talk page and thought that the article was a big POV push from both sides. To him it seemed like 'whitewashing' but I can't remember the exact term he used. I didn't read all of the talk page drama but did notice the COI Monsanto accusations. I didn't edit the talk page but followed the links to ANI(?) and voiced an opinion there. If it is being censored/whitewashed by Monsanto or those who have strong beliefs against the anti-GMO 'fringe' then that should be a major concern for the projects. I may ask at commons if other languages have the same issues. I almost took it to Arbcom myself this morning but that mark-up and criteria looks like a confusing mess to me. I did create

6854:. I have always understood that content shouldn't be changed during those. I didn't see any edit warring so I didn't realize that. When the third image came along that was 2013, I changed out the 2010 one as a normal article update. When NS got very angry it really surprised me. I didn't even realize that he was the photographer until much later. I still think we shouldn't keep an older image in the article if a newer one is available. This is the second time I have walked away from it. The only reason I came back after the first is because everyone else had given up. I think Anna and I were all that was left and I thought she started a new vote. That is why I changed it again because 3/4 of the 4863:, with wrong dates. I can see reasons for discussing which dates to include but to edit war and use a bit to try and bully others is why GiantSnowman will have his input to my talk page removed. If he wants to not follow 'probable sense' then that is his choice and I will just remove them. I use 'copyedit (minor)' because I set default to leave an edit summary to allow saving and that one seems to fit the best from the drop down choices. If there was a 'remove probably sensless material' then I could use that as it follows the guideline. I could manually type and edit summary but I don't want to waste anymore time then I have to when he knows full well why his comments are removed.-- 6232:

have done over the last year-and-a-few-months to make these articles informative and compliant with the 5 pillars. Others have done a lot, too. I am proud of the work that I and others have done. And I have done it in good faith with respect to Knowledge's ideals, policies, and guidelines. And I am happy when new people come and do more work in that same spirit. Again, I understand that people you talk to on the phone may be displeased, but what is your evidence that Knowledge has a "bad reputation among the general public", broadly speaking? Or even narrowly speaking with respect to the GM suite of articles? Best regards,

6793:

email the BLP and find out whether he is impressed with your image or ask one that is in contact with him? I assume he is not impressed with your actions regarding it. The only reason I replaced it in the first place is because we found newer images on Flickr from 2013. If it means that much to you to keep it in the article, then go ahead and wheel war with Anna, block anyone that disagrees, and OWN the whole article yourself. You are personally involved because of your image, you are abusing your tools, and now threatening blocks. If I do get blocked I may decide to take this straight to ANI from my talk page.--

4959:

with the correct hoops jumped. I still don't like the fact that BLP articles have the infobox images get older and older as fans upload them and then replaced with a youthful one after they die. Our main focus should be our readers and I feel they would like to see the best image in the infobox not the ones that show their age. I have had a few battles over these and just walked away as well. I did win a few though. Anyway, enough of my issues and sorry rant on so much when you are just trying to close an ANI issue. I thank you for your help and hope many will learn from it. --

2137: 2228:, and myself. I have only had one interaction with Sensei48 that I can think of when they reverted an edit of mine and HammerFilmFan is similar except I may have responded to them on article talk pages. With Sensei48 you decided for some reason to join us on her talk page about the revert. With HammerFilmFan you filed a 3RR on one revert they did of mine plus some IP reverts. That 3RR was declined. With me this list is incredible if admin wishes to do a checkuser on your edits and mine they may feel as I do that you seem to be hounding me all over en:wp as well as 5522:

the vandalism templates. These templates could link to a new PR project that we could create for them. Mike may agree to use our template for some of the mellower COI edits and then wait for them to chime in at the project page before blocking them. The project page could be full of our 15 to 35% that could help with each other's articles. Whoever gets to new PR and COI editors first at the help desk or other drama boards may still be an issue but if we can get a project link into the main help page and COI pages that may avert a lot of damage and drama.--

5264:"Don't even bother trying to edit the article. Request changes on the talk page. If no one sees them then use a request template. Below are links to our policies and guidelines on these issues as well as links to talk pages of blocked COI accounts. If you decide to ignore this very sound advice then you can expect to be blocked and the article stubbed to three sentences with one lame image. This basically means you only have two options: play by the rules the community has set out or find yourself in a deep hole here and a deeper one with your clients." 5712: 3507:

Weather Channel" in it since (1) it was their naming system that apparently prompted you to create the article in the first place, and (2) it was in fact TWC that made winter storm naming notable and therefore eligible for its own article. With the very vague title "Winter storm naming", I agree with you that the article will be in flux; perhaps forever if the title isn't changed or its purpose isn't well-defined. I believe it would be very helpful if you, as the article's creator, would give your thoughts in the article's

830:

sources that state 1944 and that the 1947 ones seem to just STFU. Although they may be just being thorough about their source checks before they respond. On the matter of the original sock. I went back in their edit histories and did find a few edits that were improvements to other articles and later reverted by admin after the investigation. They were good edits and I may just add the diffs to the talk pages and see if another editor wants to re-add them so I can avoid all the bullshit that I had to go through before.--

7545:. We killed of a good friend of the editor using RS that had the wrong person named. He is still very much alive. PrimalHawaii was attacked by many and almost blocked in his efforts to simply provide accurate material. After the way he was treated he has since left the projects and we lost a potentially very good editor. He could have contributed much material from his knowledge and experience, but after it was sourced. He did provide sourced material to expand the article greatly before he left.-- 9657: 9554: 5682: 5118: 5096: 5074: 4330: 2944: 2691: 1149: 277: 9153: 901: 8128:

our readers, etc. That is why we are having an RfC on it now. Since there was no discussion on which material was to be merged then how did you decide? Flip a coin, dart at a board, or your POV? In order to have a NPOV merge we need to unmerge, discuss changes, and then decide on whether the all remaining material will coatrack the main article with too much material about one product. Our readers would consider that spam in the same way as if we took all the material from

3654: 2389: 6958:. There is no opinion from the other side that I have found in any source. Therefore the RS should be used in both articles that glyphosates can case CCD according to him. They wrote it off on the talk pages claiming that the notable bee person was a 'fringe theorist'. No other editors may wish to push to include it in both articles so I may do so myself. Our readers deserve material such as this because it is sourced. For some strange reason CCD isn't even mentioned in 3709: 3273:

understand about that? If you honestly can't decipher that comment, then your editing is even more concerning. I'm not at all saying that the content should've been changed based solely on that request - it absoultely should not have been - but let's not pretend his request couldn't be understood. Finally, your latest barb ("Who's the one with the rude behaviour now?") only serves to substantiate what I've been saying about your inappropriate tone and behavior. --

10118: 10085: 10072: 10059: 10046: 10033: 10020: 10007: 9969: 9956: 9943: 9928: 9894: 9851: 9829: 9802: 9785: 9720: 9688: 9141: 8686: 2906: 1831:, professor of political science at State University of New York at Cortland, are discussing, such as the availability of weapons by Holmes under current Colorado law, which is entirely relevant to the article on the Aurora shooting. In fact, I can't think of a single argument that would make it irrelevant. So no, you don't have my permission to move this discussion. Further, you still don't show any sign of understanding what content forking is. 9739: 9873: 876: 8860: 984: 9985: 5782: 1330: 21: 848:. Furthermore, you really, really need to understand that your emails to various people constitutes original research and is therefore pointless. If you genuinely want to improve the article, I suggest you familiarize yourself with WP policies, rather than trying to rewrite the rules to make work that which won't. At this point I'll just take it back to the talk page, as my friendly note has very clearly fallen on deaf ears. 9630: 6051: 6031: 1925: 4495:

I can't see why the two admins that keep removing it don't discuss it first. I can only assume that they think they are special because they have an admin bit and can do anything they want to anyone. This is typical of far too many admins on Knowledge. Abuse power and expect no actons. I may yet take it to the community and have consenus decide there. I will give them a while to think about their actions first though.--

6261:

The discussion on the talk page did have limited input. I just walked away until it goes to Arbcom where I will bring a whole list of these issues. I still can't find that article I noticed where Monsanto was improperly in the lead. Does anyone here remember removing something like "Monsanto produces 90% of the world's...." from near the bottom of a small lead? The article was a GMO one but not about Monsanto.--

7899: 9588: 1205:"I intend to be rigorous about the COI issue." <--This seems to be a statement made by an editor that doesn't seem to focus on the article and just focuses on another editor. I would consider this as COI toward an editor and not the article. I offered to help you before on the article an you basically told me to fuck off. With an attitude like that I can see why you are alone with it now.-- 10106: 2182: 1475: 1409: 10131: 2769: 5230:

even more conflicting COI advice, which is a big problem I'm already contributing to by writing the essay at all. I was surprised to see the doc positioned as being pro-COI (if anything anti), but maybe I have a skewed perspective. It is more instructions-oriented, while WP:COI (last I read anyway) was focused on labeling people and came off as contentious.

7343:

but have plenty of attitude, have come and started making very strong claims, in a very uncivil manner. I have no doubt that you have good intentions; what I struggle with is the consistent insinuation that there is paid editing/COI going on. I voted for quick delete on the MaM article because this is pretty much what I feared would happen. So life goes.

4903:

at all to begin with. Rather than "escalate", if problems with Bwilkins, or anyone for that matter, arise, try to get a third party opinion through ANI or just asking someone like myself. Rather than likely get yourself in trouble by "escalating", you may find someone who can support you if you're right, or explain things to you better if you're wrong.

6114:

or walk away from them and let truly neutral editors balance them. I also noticed that Monsanto is mentioned in the lead of one of the GMO articles where it shouldn't be. I don't know which side put it there either to spam the company name in the lead or blame them in the lead for producing 90% of the world's GMO product headed by that article.--

4920:

unless another mass shooting happens with loads of crap added to articles on it. Those are the only cases where we need to act quickly and boldly as editors and admin. I have been avoiding those articles lately and just try to explain how to get pictures for them according to the rules at en:wp and commons. I still don't like the fact that

7732:

sympathetic to them, don't want our readers to know about the first GMO recall, and possibly the largest food recall. It isn't going to go away so they may need to get used to the fact that mainstream media may be corruptible but Knowledge isn't. It belongs in the health section, as well as other sections, and probably the lead as well.--

4933:

should use fair use images like these in articles but I think our reader's like to see what the subjects looked like. I don't know why I keep ending up in huge disputes over images as I did with most of these. Cosplay I can easily walk away from as it has some good and almost legal images (one was just redlinked from a commons deletion).

2175:

Obama's twitter, the Popes Sunday mass, etc, etc. is fine for a while. If you come up with any valid points at all I would be interested in how others will respond to them, but I don't think I will be responding to your repeats over, and over, and over, and over after I give you the same valid answers, over, and over, and over, and over.

4294:

it wasn't her. I removed it as sourced to the subject twice now. If they want to use en:wp as a battle ground as to who is who it wouldn't be the first time. It may end up at drama boards all over, OTRS, DNA tests, the White House, the Vatican, the Hague, and the bathroom wall at Grand Central Station before those two are done. From:

8909:

go that route, or they can simply ask for a name, address, account number, etc. I can understand editors being adamant about including their POV in articles but many at Knowledge seem to be far beyond that and determined to censor/whitewash articles to make Monsanto and other interests happy with their phony image in articles.--

4137:. And you also should be glad I don't consider the admin intervention as a 'block threat'. Others may consider it so though. There is no consensus on inclusion of any of the material and loading it up with pointy quotes from subjects that are still in litigation is not the correct way to treat contentious BLP article material.-- 2717: 6323:

claim. I understand that this is somehow very obvious to you but it is not to me, and Knowledge is about collaboration which requires communication. I am very open to talking - if you check out talk page of that article you will see that i have engaged in many discussions, including a current one over a proposed addition by

4240:. I'm sure you mean well, but you can't use ANEW as a personal sounding board for whether your edits are appropriate. You need to familiarize yourself with the policies and guidelines that apply to content disputes and edit warring. If you have questions, depending on what they are, you can ask at one of the noticeboards, like 1015:"Contentious material about living persons (or recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing." 5204:

have seen him deal with. My main focus lately has been images/pictures for the projects. I have had much success with emails to get images or better ones from subjects as anyone may view from my commons uploads and history. Our main focus should be 'good' articles for our readers. This doesn't mean advertising/promotion and

7397:

your opinion 1000:1. If you want an opinion article on it then go write a blog. It doesn't matter how the article came about. It has a health section so that is where it belongs. I have yet to find a source that claims it to be an environmental recall. I am sorry for ignoring opinion but you continue to ignore sources.--

7812:

types whining about that. When I worked on the farm we gave animals penicillin. There was a warning to administer epinephrine if they showed signs of anaphylaxis. I asked where the epinephrine was stored. "We don't have any. Allergic animals aren't worth buying drugs for." No argument from me, thus no controversy.--

7592:

administrative action against you. I warned you to stop, and you did not. (This is NOT how I want to spend my wikitime but you refuse to stop personally attacking me even though I have asked you to, repeatedly. Enough.) The next thing you will get from me will be a notice of the filing. Sorry it came to this.

792:(ec)@Nomoskedasticity - I will avoid that article if I can and sorry if my edits seemed wrong to many. I can well understand why editors need to go off topic to help the discussion and article. It just isn't a thing that I normally do. You are a good editor and I hope we can just drop this with no bad blood.-- 8481:

am personally a bad egg. I am really sick of his and other editors' accusations of bad faith. But if I need to recalibrate - if what they are doing is just fine, I am very interested in hearing that. That would be hard but better to be in line with what AGF means in practice than be unhappy all the time.

6429:(ec) If you are speaking to me, I don't give a rat's ass about it either. I do however give one if edits are done to Knowledge by COI editors. It seems that far to many editors believe the POV is not balanced. If it was balanced we wouldn't have it all over the drama boards. On Jytdog's user page he states: 9496:. You have valuable insights to contribute and it will be so much more pleasant and most importantly, efficiently productive, if you would just.. well, be nice, and recognize that nobody has all the answers and everybody can have something useful to contribute. Thanks again, and good luck in any case. 9482:

I wondered what happened to you! I am sorry for your computer trouble, Canoe. Huge bummer. I am glad you call the notion that somebody trashed your stuff due to your work on Monsanto/GMO stuff, "paranoid." whew. I just wanted to say, that while I found it very difficult to work with you because

8616:

I wasn't asking you a question, and it's up to you whether or not you respond. However, there is a different kind of "response" that I very much expect of you: that you understand that I was giving you legitimate advice, and that if your future edits reflect a rejection of that advice, you are likely

8127:

I still don't consider them attacks. I was not the one that opened the RfC after questioning the merge. You now are suggesting that we should unmerge it after arguing that we shouldn't. Many besides myself will disagree on how the merge was done. There was very little input, much material was lost to

7811:

Thank you. It seems that whole article is a mess. The article should be about controversies. Much of the material isn't even controversial. For instance at the end of the allergy section it mentions that GM can be used to remove allergens from existing foods. I don't see any Greenpeace or tree-hugger

7612:

Canoe I have been an editor here longer than you and I understand very very well the sourcing requirements. If you review sourcing on any of my edits you will see that I always strive to find RS that are acceptable to any side in any debate. NY Times, 2ndary reviews by the best people in that field

7371:

I agree that anybody can edit any article!! Of course! The issue is that if one is ignorant, one should come with some humility... be ready to really listen and read and dialog and work. Well one should always be ready to listen and read and dialog and work but it is all the more important if you

7178:

Why are you calling this "informing"? I asked about Canoe's take on an RfC - which if anyone decided to go ahead with, would be known to everyone at the talk page. There is nothing sneaky about filing, talking about filing, or even ask for help in filing an RfC - which is the least sneaky thing ever.

6949:

That is why some editors believe that every sentence should have a secondary source. Primary sources are cherry picked by both sides from their personal points of view. Any opinions in articles should be RS quoted with an RS quote to counter from the other side on the contentious material to keep the

6792:

2010 image remain in the article. You edit warred with another admin over it and abused your tools to lock the page after you replaced your image in it. The only reason you unlocked the page is because you got chewed out on the talk page of a BLP that is actually active on that page. Did you think to

6290:

I will try and clarify your wrongness point by point. The blatant mention of Monsanto in the lead was not in the MaM article. I don't feel your work on any of these GMO articles is an improvement but just you pushing your COI POV and owning the articles. I have told you more than once that you should

6275:

The MaM article has that mention of Monsanto, if I remember right. I don't recall seeing it anywhere else but have not looked. wrt to the Arbcom, as I have written on the Monsanto page and above, I think my work and others has dramatically improved the quality of these articles and made them useful

6136:

So strange to me! I don't know any editors in the real world... interesting concept to discuss articles on the phone. If you are interested, I will give you my take on the GM articles... don't want to just push my perspective on you, so let me know if you want my perspective and I will be happy to

6113:

as an acid test to see if that article is treated the same way in its inevitable AfD. That AfD may get other opinions on the other issues as well. The GMO articles I have looked at seem far too contentious for just regular articles. Editors that do have a POV issue with them should either declare COI

5521:

doesn't have a birthplace in his article because of a dispute on his talk page. He may never get one if we can't sort it out. With PR we could create more COI templates for PR editors and BLP subjects that just want an image change or album added. We could have varying degrees of mellow to harsh like

5208:

nor does it mean two sentence stubs with both sentences verified by six reliable sources. If more of us could look at Knowledge from a reader's point of view then the project would vastly improve. I feel they would like at least one picture, no 'puff and fluff', and no endless BLP details about every

4958:

and tagged it as well. I decided to stop there before getting accused of drive by tagging. There are probably 1000s of similar articles but quietly created and below the radar. I kinda promised at Mr. Wales talk page to write a 'How to Images' so I think I will start that to help others upload images

4690:

I apologize for their actions. Their approach, while technically acceptable, was rather rash and aggressive. I wish they had bothered to discuss it like I'm doing, so we could come to an understanding. While I have the ability to unlock your user page, I want to make sure there's consensus first, as

4669:

because it wasn't worth the effort for one of 1000s of images. Even though one of my images may be a better fit in that article, I doubt the editors that own the article will ever allow it. After I left ANI my page was brought up. I didn't realize it was even brought up as a violation but thought the

4664:

I agree with your points after reading the policy and later ANI entries. I just don't like the way it was handled. I was taken to ANI for edit warring on a lame article that is still a huge mess of fan OR and few sources to back up the huge text. I decided to walk away from both when they recommended

4563:

No - prevention is more powerful than the cure. Vandalism is not humourous, nor acceptable. What you're suggesting is that we should allow your inflammatory statement because someone else can deal with the repercussions. That's pure BS, and most certainly is not our role, and certainly removes the

4544:

That discussion was about me edit warring in an article. I walked away from that ANI when I walked away from that mess of an article. I avoid most drama boards when I can because I have far better things to to with my time then read endless drivel. If you want to create another ANI about my user page

4293:

on the article. Most of it is probably true but sourced to a blog page written by the subject. There is a difference between thinking you know who your mother is, claiming to know who your mother is, and having it kept in en:wp. The one she names as her mother in her blog complained at help desk that

4158:

has nothing to do with how much material is in the article, copycat. Read the guideline page you gave me as opposed to just sending it to me. If you actually read that page you'd know it has to do with reporting evenly all sides of the source provided. I reported all side of the source provided which

3935:

which I don't understand can you answer my question there and explain it to me? If I'm off base with the second one I really need to know how if I am not to repeat it in the future, the first one I do understand and agree it should be RevDel'd but I did make every attempt to make the second something

3200:

At the time both dates were unreferenced, you were relying on somebody (possibly) claiming to be the subject but not providing any sources. I didn't weasel add anything - I founds sources which supported a DOB I believed, at the time, to be correct. Just because I believe that something, supported by

2246:

Canoe, if you won't fix a problem you introduced into the article, then I'm forced to escalate the matter. I'm sorry you feel hounded, but if you continue to ignore these issues when they are raised, then I will have to ask others to look at them. Since, you refuse to fix the problem, that's what I

1793:

at the State University of New York at Cortland who has commented on the subject of the Colorado shooting and gun laws. Are you saying we shouldn't cite expert sources on this subject? On what policy do you base this? And are you also saying we shouldn't discuss the lax Colorado gun laws that made

1740:

discuss it in the article. You can't simply say "I DON'T LIKE IT" and argue we should move it to another article. In case you haven't figured it out by now, I am neither looking for your "respect" nor do I require it. Your actions in this regard have been completely transparent. You're pushing a

1286:

How do you know they are copy vio? Someone slapped a tag on an image that is still in OTRS. You may wish to look at that system closer. I don't know why this wikidrama keeps bleeding over to commons where most wp assholes lose very quickly. I still don't know why you were in such a hurry to bully the

1063:

It didn't appear that there was a conclusive consensus established. While I can't see a big deal with the picture, I don't think you can just say "I don't see a problem. Done deal." if someone raises a BLP concern. What I can see from the edit history is people edit warring over something that didn't

8631:

I redacted it because I had edited the wrong talk page. The talk page it was intended for has been corrected since. The two edit summaries made sense to me. I was simply asking which readers had requested the material. With the other summary the material was ordering in a way that didn't balance the

8480:

Thanks for looking. In my book, accusing editors of coatracking and adding "Monsanto advertising" to articles is ABF; on the merge issue he is accusing me directly of violating process (with no basis), and cherry-picking and POV pushing content, with no basis, no dif's - just the assumption that I

7559:

You apparently have no idea why I am frustrated as your response doesn't speak to it. And that is your constantly judging me. Above, out of the blue, you do it again. What I find frustrating in dealing with you is your complete pre-judging of me - talking about me all the time instead of content -

7540:

I can understand your frustration. Like many editors you wish to use personal opinion, experience, and primary documents to edit articles. This is not our policy though. We should avoid articles if we have a strong opinion on the subject. We may have extensive experience in a field but that does not

7342:

I have been working on the whole GM suite for over a year. They achieved reasonable stability about six months ago and have been worked on with relative civility. It was only when the March Against Monsanto article was created that people like you, Canoe, who self-admittedly know little about GMOs

7325:

It probably is due for ArbCom. What we should do is just walk away from all the GMO articles. After they get edited to make Monsanto and GMO look better than Jesus then the hole will be just that much deeper when ArbCom and the Canadian media look into it. We may wish to wait for media reports first

7245:

Really? You both suggest i go to a COI noticeboard and "never do this again"? You realize all i have done to ask Canoe his thoughts about an RfC over the number of participants at MAM? This is scary, seriously. You are both on record saying this. This reminds me of large corporations who try to stop

6322:

I did not understand your reasoning for including this recall under the health section; I still don't, as you have not responded there. I do hear you repeating above, that you believe "the recall is a health issue", but repeating a claim many times is not making an argument - it is just repeating a

6309:

Hi, I will not continue discussing content that belongs on article Talk pages here... it gets too confusing. Along those lines, I did make a mistake referring to Talk pages above- you and I were indeed talking on the GM controversies article, not the Monsanto article. Sorry that error. I will say

5609:

You are very welcome. I emailed the creator at the Uni but he may be gone until Sept. I don't think we need to worry about any deletions but you know how people can be here. If you ever want to upload a picture then remember the copyright rules about the photographer and the sculpture in the US. See

5472:

I think what is needed is a great deal of optimization. There is far too much drama-mongering around the topic, when what is needed is hard-work and thoughtful discussion, in order to create clearer instructions, establish standards, build processes and better deter bad behavior. When compared to an

5423:

I can understand all of your points. My main issues are the way the ones are treated that just wish to do a minor change to an article. When the BLP subjects wish to simply update an image they are treated the same way as PR editors that want to create brochures here. I tried to fix this on the main

5374:

When it comes to factual corrections, unsourced contentious material, and other significant problems, we should provide a high degree of customer service in these areas. They shouldn't have to learn how to edit Knowledge, or even provide sources and/or alternative text. CREWE is right in this regard

5203:

that has had very little input after I was reverted. You and Mike may be opposite poles of COI 'changes' to articles. As I said in the section above we should create an essay that 'counters' yours to link views from another side. I fully understand Mike's actions on this issue and other ones that I

5039:

that was an attempt to inventory all the outdoor sculpture in the United States at that time. (I was the SE Michigan co-ordinator) After it was over (though listings can still be added or corrected) the Smithsonian got the information and around maybe 1998 (to make up a date) went on line with it.

4877:

You need not explain yourself further, despite what others may say, you're allowed to remove talk page info outright, as long as its not block messages. That being said, we kind of got off subject here. As I was saying earlier, if you confirm that you won't re-add the part about vandalism, I can get

4582:

Do you have any idea how authoritarian you're coming off here, Bwilkins? "This desk belongs to the company, misbehaving drone. I'm going to restrict your access to your desk while you think about what you've done". Barf. A little humour and tolerance when dealing with good-faith contributors would

4494:

There is a big difference between vandalizing Knowledge and messaging a user page. I see little difference between by message and a trout slap. If it does get abused then one editor can just ask another to stay off their page which is a more correct action than edit warring and locking my user page.

3785:

And which editor would that be? Several SPA and ip accounts have been editing for the subject. Contacting OTRS is what they should do in the future. Ive been watching this article recentely to watch for COI edits that violate policies as well as BLP. And when an editor reverts your bold removal

3620:

Participating is completely different than owning. The current discussion already includes talk about the title. I'm not sure why you're so resistant to improving the article you started, but you have to do what you think is best. Weather wars... haha. That would be a good movie title. Suggest it to

3368:

Good to hear, Canoe. Was watching this whole imbroglio and hoping we wouldn't lose you to the Rage. This place is far from perfect, but it doesn't need to be. Just needs to be functional enough to build an encyclopedia. Next time you need to rant, feel free to use my talk page as a verbal dumping

1347:

yes a relible source has been posted a few infact but any edit request is opposed because there no consensus, its been at ani but the admins dnt want to get involved one did and beraged with talkj posts saying this a scandel type things. i am hoping the request for comment will get more neutral with

1303:

That is another joke. If you would take the time to pop over to commons you may notice that 90% of wp editors wonder why they can't upload every image they find on the net that doesn't have a copyright watermark on it. They are a new editor and they were bullied to the point of being blocked without

1255:

Rude my fucking ass. You are the rude one that reverts edits on 'possible' copy vio that are still in OTRS. The uploader is responsible for the image not other editors. When that image passes OTRS I am going to laugh long and hard. Did you even bother to read the image page on commons? We are not in

1082:

I don't know where this COI bullshit is coming from. The BLP requested an updated image. An editor uploaded one under fair-use. It was speedy deleted and the image that can possibly affect his career was placed back in and I kept removing it. I have sent an email to the BLP since my block to request

630:

Me as well. I know WP has policies, but I think we can ignore all rules here. Many may look in WP first for a list of online directories. That is far better than getting all the spam from google for them. I added their postal code list to the postal code article. You may wish to spam check the other

9491:

article (which you in fact started under a different name) which is a valuable addition to Knowledge. Additionally our discussions around that led me to learn a lot more about Starlink, for which I am personally grateful to you. So thanks, for both things. If you do come back and start working

8908:

I would like to know as well, Roxy. If a corporation sends me money then I could easily stop giving their sympathetic editors a hard time. I may even join their side for enough cash. Money talks as well being a very good persuader. My email is turned on an my PayPal account is valid if they wish to

8419:

Most of this points we are discussing at the RfC now. The reason the RfC was created is because another editor was critical of how the merge was done. If you consider criticism of edits as being attacks then that is your view. Many edits are criticized without being labeled as attacks. If they were

8001:

falls foul of any BLP policy. If you see something in the future you think should be redacted can you please just mention it at the talk page or ask someone (anyone) else if it should be removed. Editing others comments is seen by many here as the height of rudeness and it is probably best to tread

7702:

Being or not being allergenic is not the reason it was controversial though. The lack of silo segregation, the ignored reports to the government, the false claims after the fact by the government, etc, were what made it controversial. I can see why so many lack trust in the industry and government

7683:

allergenic, and that was due to the longer time it takes to break down, compared to other Bt proteins, and the lack of data in what Aventis produced proving that it was not allergenic. Something that is unknown based on lack of data, is very different from something that is known from experimental

7396:

Are you saying I am "ignorant" in the field 'food controversy'? I have worked in the field and know it quite well. I have worked with crops, eggs, chickens, pigs, beef, as well as many other places dealing with food. You keep voicing your opinion that it was not a health issue. The sources outweigh

7381:

if you would respond on the Talk page, in the part where I explain how the content got to be where it is, and what the benefits of that location are. That would be so... collegial. So wikipedia-like. Really talking, really working toward consensus, which is very different from arguing relentlessly

7026:

which Google doesn't search. I also found some Canadian RS in Google.ca. Google.com I don't trust because they filter by country. Each country can ask Google to filter searches, I think. Log on to Google.ca and see if you can find the same RS. You may need an proxy IP from Canada or you may get the

6260:

since it was the first GMO recall, possibly the biggest food recall, very notable, etc. It does belong in the health section as its own section because of its impact and the fact that the recall was by the FDA and not the EPA. To bury it way down in the environment section is wrong in so many ways.

5319:

Yup, I think WP:COI will never be very good, because the community is unable to reach consensus and there is no decision-making authority to create reasonable compromise. Hence we have a fragmented group of conflicting documents that continue to frustrate PRs. The essay is actually much better than

4973:

Your userpage has been unlocked. Sorry people came on so aggressive. I think Admin get so tired with dealing with difficult people that sometimes they come off a little too jaded when its not really warranted. I see it a lot, online or otherwise, so I suppose its just part of human nature, not that

4902:

I've mentioned at ANI that I intend to unlock your page, and will do so shortly barring any sort of massive uprisal against me or something. As far Bwilkins goes, is there any common article or project you guys both work on? If not, then hopefully it just won't be necessary for you guys to interact

4778:

their requests...." I don't know why 'probably' is used to modify 'sensible'. It doesn't seem to make sense in any of the many dialects of English that I am well versed in. I may bring that up for a re-wording at the talk page of the policy I found it in. I should ask at the UK, USA, Canada, India,

4675:

on another matter is not the way it should have been handled and I doubt this is allowed in wp. I am still waiting for my page to be unlocked and an apology. Until then Bwilkins will not be allowed on my pages without me dragging him to ANI. If he doesn't undo it within 24hrs then he will be banned

4509:

It's already been to the community - many times, and your own userpage was there as well. There is no difference whatsoever between vandalizing an article and/or a userpage - all are owned by the WMF, and all are subject to the same rules and policies, even BLP. Userpages and usertalkpages exist

4384:

Yes I am mellower now. I try to walk away from the anal edit wars. I have been working a lot at commons to get more images in articles. One whined here when I added to the cosplay aricle. I simply found a better image and they seem to have backed off now. The one they kept reverting I did manage to

3588:

I must say, I don't understand how the creator of an article can be neutral on its title. The title is precisely what determines how the article should be developed. Again, you did not answer what you specifically intended the article to be about. That in itself would go a long way to resolving the

3539:

It sounds like you have no interest in helping to resolve the confusion about the purpose of the article that you created. Of course, that is your choice. You didn't even address what your intent was when you created the article; whether it was meant to be an article solely about TWC's winter storm

3506:

I agree with you. The editor who removed the word "controversy" from the title completely changed the context of the article. (Was there consensus for that move? If so, I can't find it. Would you be allowed to move it back to the orginal title?) Further, I believe that the title should include "The

2860:

You should be able to upload the one to commons with template {heir}. I can't see anyone coming out of the woodwork with the other. It does look like a professional shot that was taken by a government photographer though. I don't think regular press were in China at the time. The pilot had sent the

1097:

The COI is that you are in contact with the subject and editing on their behalf. Fair use images cannot be used when free images are available. If the subject wants to use a different image, have them place it in the public domain and then suggest the change on the talk page and be fully up front

769:

Given what these guidelines say about others' objections, I think it's reasonable to anticipate that others are likely to object. If you really want to remove your comments -- and certainly if you want to remove others' comments -- my suggestion is that you ask those affected first. You appear to

8937:

Are you trying to put words in my mouth? I don't see how you consider it as an attack page. It is just an evidence page to show facts. I do believe that some editors are very adamant about the censorship and whitewashing of articles. Policy won't allow me to claim they are being paid to edit. Some

8188:

Read what I wrote. I was offering YOU language that would be an AGF way to say that content was left out that should have been put in. "So let's say you disagree with the result. OK.. said plainly, that would be something like - "content that I found useful, NPOV and well sourced was left out of

8090:

You just refuse to get it. You disagree with how a merge was done -- that is fine and good. You can criticize the process, and you can critize the result. To the best of my knowledge, at the level of detail you are describing there is no single way to do a merge described in policy or guideline,

8067:

I don't see how you consider me acting in bad faith. The correct way to merge that article is to trim it through consensus and then merge all of the remaining material. Many others on that page agree that we should unmerge it, discuss changes, and then merge any remaining material. If there is too

7093:

yet? I am still trying to explain how it belongs in the health section of the controversies article. They want it buried way down in environment/escapes. No reader would ever expect to find it there. If it wasn't so notable and well sourced then Monsanto would have tried to delete it by now. If it

6710:

Well I accepted it was right the article needed to be about the landmark legal appeal establishing an equal right for open justice for detained psychiatric patients in England and Wales, and incidentally about Haines himself rather than vice versa. Regarding Scarlett Keeling, those sources seem to

6414:

What sort of strange circles do you guys move in? I don't think I've ever met a person IRL who gives a rats ass about GMO one way or the other. Would you like to comment on whether you have connections to the Anti-GMO movement? This is not an accusation, this is an opportunity for you to provide a

5408:

The biggest problem is that PRs create complex strategies for Twitter and Facebook, hire expert consultants and invest a monumental amount of time, but often just delegate Knowledge to an intern that doesn't spend more than five minutes. So the community can author a mountain of guides, devote all

5229:

Orange and I agree on more things than you would think and I'm not sure positioning us as being in opposition of each other is quite right. However, I would say if it is overly pro-COI, lets fix it. If other perspectives need to be incorporated, lets put them in. The absolute last thing we need is

5020:

PS I am registered at Sculpture Community.Net but stopped going years ago because I got very little value out of it. Were I to return (and I just got a new password,) I'd post somewhere that I'm a wikipedian looking for pictures and permissions. I suspect that the best you could get was 100 or so

3593:

other than theirs. It is notable. And the controversy surrounding it is also notable. It looks like participation in the article has almost completely stopped. Apparently, the editors previously involved have decided to move on now that the AfD is over. In any case, I hope appropriate improvements

3544:

was simply to keep the article. And the closing admin's decision was without prejudice to rename, which means it's up to editors to discuss and reach consensus about a possible title change. Again, I found no consensus for the title change. Most importantly, the AfD decision had nothing to do with

3272:

Snowman, you said "the poor grammar means it is near-impossible to accuratlely decipher the IP's intention/desire". I'm sorry, but that's complete nonsense. The IP said, very simply and clearly, that the date of birth was wrong and that it should be changed to 21.06.1945. What, exactly, didn't you

3241:

And if you don't understand why your "the IP's obvious poor grammar" comment was rude, then there's no point in anyone explaining it to you. That goes for other inappropriate and aggressive comments you've posted. Denying the obvious - about the IP's signature and your grammar comment - do nothing

3160:

Snowman, who cares about the editor's grammar? I have to say that it really surprises me that you're an administrator based on the types of rude, sarcastic, defensive, and other inappropriate comments you've been posting. Admins should be de-escalating problems, not creating them. Very sad to see.

418:

I don't have a WP account. The image I have is on my computer (not online anywhere yet) -- which is currently in the shop (HD crash) -- hopefully, the file will be recovered. Currently using a borrowed laptop; and need owner's password to access google docs; and if I remember correctly, you can't

7376:

even though I have explained that twice. You haven't dealt with that or even acknowledged it or talked about. You parachuted in and demanded the change you wanted and started hollering "COI" the instant I didn't agree with you. That is pure crazy. No real dialog, no responding to me. This is

7273:

Since we're all aware of the issues around Monsanto articles, this has nothing to do with Knowledge's canvassing policy. Furthermore, I don't see how Jytdog can claim to be victimized when their pro-Monsanto POV continues to advance further and further across dozens of pages. In fact I think it's

6493:

won't evaluate it unless you or someone else raises it there. You didn't do that, so far as I can tell, but it would have been more civil than putting that tag on the article talk page. ArbCom isn't going to look into it unless there is a formal request for arbitration, and the dispute resolution

6231:

article. Whatever their perspective on GMOs, readers can now come to wikipedia and find reliable information about GM crops, GM food, regulation of GM crops and food, and the controversies. This is a good, good thing. Groupuscule, I would be very happy to walk you or anybody through the work I

5583:

It moved when clicked it which is probably better than I could have done. Looks good so far. You should add a button labeled 'I want to write a brochure.' that links them to a near clone of our article on spam. Re-write the lead of the spam article. "Spam is mainly defined as PR editors trying to

3215:

Adding the date to the google search is POV and OR. Why would you believe an unsourced date in an article? The reason they are unsourced is because the editor probably couldn't find a source. As I have said before it is atrocious how wp treats blp articles. Far too many want them to be unsourced,

2431:

Yes, the best thing to do with images in commons is simply delete them. The article must have gone thought ten different images over the past few years, and the current licensing on the main image is the only one acceptable. The Eriksen family must be making a lot of money from aggressively suing

2416:

You are very welcome. I hope we can find more detail on the controversy for either article. It seems the images of the real one are up for deletion in commons. I think the copyright holders enjoy filing legal actions. They may yet file one on WMF. I would rather we avoid spending our WMF funds on

1019:

On Talk, Canoe1967 made a claim that the image violated some portion of WP:BLP and summarily removed it. Other editors reverted the image. This seemed to turn into an edit war over the inclusion of the image. Seems like this was poorly handled and not quite in line with how the BLP policy says to

7591:

Really, so before you heard anything about me, but just after saw my first edit on your Taco Bell Recall article, you went and looked at my user page? Hm. In any case, by calling my account an SPA you have taken a step too far. Again. I will spend my upcoming wikitime preparing and filing an

7326:

before we go to ArbCom. The COI board will just be another waste of space the same as ANI, DR, and all the other drama boards were. Everybody beaks off but no action is taken. ArbCom may end up the same but if we wait for it to hit the media then Arcom will be forced to act or have egg on face.--

6930:

Hi Canoe. I think I agree with you, especially that editors on both "sides" actually believe that they are right. A lot of times, when different editors have different sincere views of things, it can look to editors with one of those views that the other editors, with the other view, are somehow

6455:

Hypothetically if he was a biotech researcher it does not mean he has a COI in any way. It does indicate that he's probably got a pretty informed perspective on the topic. You do realise that astrologers edit the astrology article, and you think scientists editing science related articles is the

6251:

has most listed. If this GMO issue goes to Arbcom then someone is sure to contact the media about it. I am sure Monsanto is aware of the articles here but all groups on the other side may not be. Would anyone like to take it to Arbcom sooner than later? The articles, to me, seem like editors are

4919:

I remember the name but not from where or whether we have ever interacted. I have had run-ins with many arrogant admins though and he could have been one of them. I do hope that he realizes how wrong his actions were and doesn't act so rashly with his bit in the future. We aren't in a hurry here

4841:

for ABC both responded promptly. The wire service said they used "government records" and while Hal Erickson isn't responsible for sourcing the dates he did confirm that 1944 is correct. He has the credit for her bio at Rovi. Her bio at IMDB credited Hal Erickson at one point as well, I think. I

829:

I doubt it is another sock or meat of the other socks. I still expect Rovi to change their date. I have sent their legal dept. an email recently which totals two sent to Rovi. I have yet to hear back from the publisher of the book. It does seem strange that I received prompt emails back from the

9439:

I still have hope. One weird thing is, if any of those regulars are actual PR shills for Monsanto or their lawyers, they aren't very good at it. (Their arguments at the talkpages seem amateurish, compared to other political activists I've seen here.) Especially Jytdog-- have you seen his latest

8221:

The last remaining consensus version should have been merged en masse. If that is not satisfactory would you agree to unmerge it so we can trim it and then discuss whether it would coatrack the article or not? As it is now it is hard to do this from the history versions without opening each one

7477:

I can understand that. I am going to give the media a while to report it. If they don't we should take it to ArbCom anyways. Ignoring valid sources and using personal opinion is not the way to write articles here. I think I figured out a way to get media attention. I should know soon if it will

5159:

Thank you!. Very rarely does anyone listen to the rare sense that I do make occasionally. A very harsh but within policy/guidelines essay may actually cause the 'hose of sewage' to filter its water thoroughly and behave better here. We should also create different templates for COI on user talk

4932:

is another one that is still in review. I uploaded it to replace a another image that wasn't the best. This is the one most media use so I trust their choice over an editor's. I emailed her school and I think the mayor to see if we could get one licenced but no response yet. Many don't agree we

2174:

I have used those often. I will wait for others to respond though. I think a discussion by only three people on the delete page, the article talk page, 2 times at a laughable ANI, my talk page, other article talk pages, Jimbo's talk page, 3 pages on commons, 2 on meta, Paris Hilton's face book,

1877:

I've deleted my comments for a second time. If you add it again for a third time, I'll remove it again and file a noticeboard report. Again, I told you that I did not want my comments moved to that page. You are, of course, free to do whatever you like on your user page, including deleting my

8495:

I am sorry if you feel offended at our comments. You claim to be the one that selected material for the merge. Other editors are criticizing the way it was selected besides myself. If the last consensus version of the article were added en masse then our readers may see it as coatrack/spam for

7075:

I think I am going to walk away from that article again as a lost cause. I have called for off-wiki investigations that should be changing things soon. We should all walk away and then phone Monsanto to re-write the article. Then they will have more egg on face when fur hits fan. Articles like

6108:

No problem. I didn't record it but called back to get permission to paraphrase it on the projects. The caller read the article, went to another page for a bit, came back and was amazed that it had changed. I went through the history and explained about consensus/material flux and the talk page

3573:

as well as others, I ran into too many reverts and edit conflicts while in AfD. I usually let the dust settle to work on them. The title should be reached by consensus. Once that is decided then the article can be formatted to suit the title. I am neutral on the title at this point so my input

3429:

He is very wise. I trained his son who is a Colonel now. I still have the General on my resumes as a reference as well as the Chief of the Little Shuswap Indian band that I used to work for. I grew up in the Shuswap and keep trying to get back there but lack of good work and the 'sunshine tax'

3353:

Thank you. I think I will tone down. It reminds of a talk the General gave us one time. "Remember boys and girls, when you go home on leave after this war try to remember the climate change. When your mother invites the Bishop to dinner, do not lean over to him and say 'Pass the fucking spuds,

2339:

It is not contentious. The only contention is whether the charges will become more serious (ie: murder). As for the "suspects", there is a thread on the talk page that explains the problem relating to the infobox template - "suspects" vs "accused". These named people are in the Indian criminal

7214:

and I am writing this as a courtesy to make sure you are both aware of the guideline. The next time either of you do it or mention doing it, I am staring an ANI about the behavior. I am really sick of the witch hunt mentality. If you have grounds for these accusations, bring them to to the

3242:

but decrease your credibility. For the record, the IP's grammar was perfectly acceptable for a help desk comment. He said, "Date of birth incorrect. 21.06.1945 is OK. Jan Mak". There are some really great admins out there. Hopefully, you will learn from their example on how to treat others. --

398:

Either I can't figure out how to revert, or I don't have admin access, or something. Btw, I have a copy on my computer that I have adjusted (histogram) that is more of a digital restoration rather than "improvement". I'll figure out a way to upload to Google docs, or get a Picasa account or

7731:

The recall was for health reasons. It was controversial for other reasons as well. Perhaps it should go in the lead with referral in other sections. My addition to the article was deleted. I created a stand alone article that you and others don't agree with. It seems that Monsanto, and those

1024:

and a couple of the other editors in their edit summaries said "Reverted good faith edits by Canoe1967" (although this appears to be part of a templated response by Twinkle). Point being if they are willing to claim the edits were in good faith, why were they going against BLP guidelines and

8556:- I don't think "person X" merged the article right. They're just a rabid "Stance Y" fighter, always spreading their propaganda all over Knowledge. This garbage needs to be removed. They're probably just trying to brainwash the public, I bet that's all they do in real life too. Etc Etc Etc." 7429:

Etropy study. Want to guess how successful that was? Ended up at the MEDRS noticeboard where I was schooled on the many horrible things about the source, and this info never saw the pages of Knowledge, I assure you. Jtydog remembers this one, he was front and center (and very civil all the

8104:

have to personalize arguments to make a point. Just say what you want without the vitriol, and be specific. Like on the controversies article, if you just say "why is this content here" instead of "why is that monsanto advertisement here" things can actually move forward - in other words,

1126:

SPI that other editors tried on me. I still don't know why editors are stalking my edits and articles created and trying to piss me off. I even gave you huge assistance in a BLP article that you were alone in trying to fix. Not even a thank you for that. I still find this bullshit totally

6494:

process hasn't progressed to where they would be satisfied that other avenues have already been explored, so the odds are low that they would accept a case now. But I already reverted the tag from the talk page, as I said below. You need to read that, because it also links to a thread at

4829:. I think I was taken to ANI over it but can't remember the result. I just walked away and let the others fight it out on the article talk page. I see that GiantSnowman did manage to keep an incorrect year in the article as well as the correct one but I no longer care. I had similar with 1287:

the other editor and their image. Again, all within minutes. Why does no one have any patience on wp? You did not upload the image, commons will deal with any possible copy vio, you just seem to be another focused bully that doesn't like it when others tell them to shut up and fuck off.--

6327:

where I am supporting his/her addition and other members of the supposed "cabal" are opposing it. Finally, you are mischaracterizing me. Please stop accusing me in this inappropriate way, and please do bring this to any board you wish. You are the one creating the drama. Thank you.

5198:

I would be glad to look it over again for you. I first noticed it when a subject had problems adding an image to their article and requested assistance at help desk where I think you linked it. They were treated very harshly on their talk page and at the help desk. Months later I tried

2265:

Again, local consensus does not at any time override or supersede core polices. NPOV and our other policies are clear on this. We don't replace the name of a source with a generic term. That you persist in this kind of disruption is troubling. I'm going to start composing my report.

6578:

How can it be considered a personal attack? He admits to not reading sources before changing my material and also stated "...and I am already familiar with the incident." As his reason for adding material without reading sources. He did add explanations later but I won't comment on

3175:

Because the poor grammar means it is near-impossible to accuratlely decipher the IP's intention/desire. My comments have been not rude, sarcastic, defensive, and otherwise inappropriate, if you feel differently some diffs would be welcome so I can re-phrase/apologise as appropriate.

9424:

to the detriment of our Knowledge reputation in the real world. They tag team revert any sourced and relative material that is negative to Monsanto, its products, and GMO. I still think we can have their crap corrected and the articles fixed but it will take time and effort to do

1735:

works, nor am I talking about any "gun debate". An encyclopedic article on the shooting covers all major aspects, including topics about Colorado gun law that made it possible and the reaction to those laws in context of the shooting. If 10,000 reliable sources discuss this, then

6908:

at Remender, just rambunctiousness, since nobody seems to have a deep beef with anyone else, just maybe eagerness, coffee jitters, some insomnia maybe, and adrenaline. What they used to call "nerves". I'm slowly learning that the drama is so high only when the stakes are so low.

5021:

very recent sculptures who'd agree and I have little interest in using those sorts of images. But if you wish we can try it. If you do post send me a link and I'll show up too. But I think it is a good idea to know pretty exactly what we are looking for before posting there.

6931:

involved in some kind of ulterior motive and working together – but it actually turns out that everyone just has their own opinions, and Knowledge works by putting people with different opinions together and getting them to work it out collaboratively. And there definitely

754:

There seems to be a clash in WP policies then. One says that they are subject to removal (the same as irrelevant material in articles). At this point we should use the 'discuss cycle' to reach consensus on whether I can remove all irrelevant material, just mine, or none at

8981:

I do think he has the time. He may not sign it on principle though. A person like Mr. Wales should not have to respond to simple requests to sign guest books. It would be the same as someone asking him to send a signed photograph even though a pre-paid return envelope was

5285:"On another point, Mr. Wales himself brought up paid editing policy/guideline changes on his talk page a while ago. It died with very little input. It was suggested that a project be created to form an outline to take to RfC, village pump, etc. That is as far as it went.-- 6976:

I heard about that story about the guy in Illinois and his bees - I spent about two hours looking for reliable sources on that story and was not able to find any. In the absence of any I have written this off as rumor/"rural myth". But I would be open to seeing a RS on

5345:

There are very few PRs here that are actually willing to devote the time necessary to do good work, so I think warning them up-front that they will not be successful without investing the time is a good way to scurry them off, while skimming out ones that may be helpful.

5504:

I have had good success with getting images through email but many failures as well. I have provided links to the lame images we have of them and 'threatened' that some fool may upload a lame picture from a fan for articles that don't have them. I think I did that with

4193:"Two of the nationally syndicated show's producers have filed separate lawsuits in the last two months against the show's production company, claiming that they were treated with less justice than most of the people who appeared before the wise-cracking TV judge. From: 9510:

If that is what caused your problem, I'd be tempted to stay away from all Monsanto related articles if I were you, just to be safe. It might screw up your computer even more. Have you tried switching it off and then on again? You can never be too careful, can you!

7961:

I had a response to one email that indicated his people are looking into it. I don't know if it may be a costume issue with the BBC or other. I will send a reminder email soon. We could put a green hair on the only image we have and that may blackmail them into action

2282:

Canoe, I feel some responsibility for your behavior. I want to apologize for stressing you out. I'll try and give you some breathing room. Again, I'm sorry. BTW, feel free to speedy PEW. It might be a good learning experience for you. Talk to you in a few days.

5454:

Absolutely. And many of these problems like civility, deletionism and undue are problems we have in general that are exacerbated by COI. Images are an area where I would expect us to do the legwork, as the images themselves are valuable and difficult to obtain other

6825:

Mistakes have been made by 4 editors, including me. Everyone who boldly changed the image in the article erred to greater or lesser degree by not waiting for a clear, all-!votes-inclusive consensus. I erred by not insisting that discussion not be broken by sections

5244:

I apologize if I misunderstood your stance. I just felt your essay was a good 'nutshell' version of numerous COI, wp:paid, NPOV, and other pages that COI editors could read easily and follow the links. If I were to write an essay about it then it would be short and

4265:

In this instance I'm puzzled by your edits. I'm not familiar with bebo, but it does not appear to be a reliable source unless one could confirm that the biographical information is in fact posted by Raven. If you wanted to investigate that, you could try posting at

3216:

undue, tabloids. Mentioning Mr. Mak's grammar is highly un-called for. What part of Dutch don't you understand? If you can't come up with better arguments and keep repeating the same lame ones, then I will remove them and ask you not to post on my talk page again.--

1229:

That image looks like shit! I assume you know nothing about photography. You have had another editor banned because the BLP agrees that it is a shit image. If you want a BLP to look like shit in a wp article then you will have a hard time finding others to back you

4779:

Belize , Toronto, and Down Under village pumps policy to see if makes more sense to them. 'Sensible' is an easy term to understand but one may need some 'sense' to understand it. 'Probably sensible' reads like the sensible thing to do may not be the probable one.--

7560:

and your unwillingness to respond to what I actually write about content. The very first time we interacted, you came out at me guns blazing about my putative COI. I am interested to learn where you got the impression of me that you did. Do tell, if you like.

1381:

I couldn't be bothered to waste any more time on your childish antics. You are spewing crap in every dispute forum you can find on the matter. I hope you continue to waste your time on that article because this will prevent you from pissing off editors in other

6743:

I can only suggest whether you can propose a Murder of Scarlett Keeling or something, as suggested in the AfD I think. I would be happy to add my view at the time in any debate that arose as I saw it, and to contribute something towards an article as I saw it.

7650:

We still don't have consensus on which section of health it belongs in. Allergies section is not correct because it isn't controversial because it is allergenic. It was controversial because the government and company knew about it beforehand as well as other

5040:

The SOS! listing should include all the markings on the sculpture, so a © should show up. Because it is the Smithsonian Institute behind it, it is usually accepted as a good source. Later we can talk about what it ment to have volunteers do the field work.

3088:

Final warning for your attitude/language/attacks, I've told you before. It is not the 'wrong' birth date, plenty of sources say 1948 - whereas your 'reliable source' for 1945 clearly cannot be trusted seeing as it says he is Swedish when he is actually Dutch!

3930:

I added a comment made by one of the editors in question they had posted on their talkpage with use of the word we and personal knowledge of the situation to say that they had a COI and a COI only without specifics, it is still being said it's a violation of

6227:- instead there was just paragraph after paragraph of negative content in the GM-related articles, often repeated verbatim across the articles, much of it badly sourced and untrue or half-true. I really mean that - I wrote almost the whole main body of the 1276:

You are being rude by cussing me out for reporting a user who kept uploading COPYVIO IMAGES WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED! I'm trying to be civil and you just want a fight, which you aren't getting one anyways. Get that stick out of your butt and pay attention. Good

6899:

It's quite normal and human to unintentionally drag intensity from other discussions into new discussions without meaning to. It's sort of about the accumulation of annoyances; it all gets to be just too much. So then we just have to take a step back, read

9467:

I am avoiding en:wp because of the Monsanto/GMO fiasco. My hard drive was corrupted and all my login, passwords, IP, etc. info was compromised at WMF servers. I can't point fingers but I am paranoid that my edits to Monsanto and GMO articles may be the

6555:

Thanks for the prompt reply, Canoe. Just to let you know, I don't think your justification is strong enough for calling out a COI on this. I'd urge you to take the flag down. The fact you placed it midway through your two person discussion over at

2341:

Maybe we should take this to the article talk page? It being 0330 here, I'm off to bed shortly anyway but, honestly, unless you want to strip all the names etc out of the thing then this looks like a well-intentioned but poor application of BLP. -

4633:. Vandalize, by Knowledge definition, is a bad faith edit. As such, you're essentially saying "Put this on people's user pages against their will, when they don't want it there". If people wanted it there, then it wouldn't be vandalism, right? So 2661:

Yes, that's exactly what I meant, thank you. :-) I know that DSLRs don't "see" some lenses and you have to go to MF with them. But I'm not sure how the camera records the data. Please let me know how your experiment turns out. Nice lens btw. :-)

2646:

You noticed that 0 mm lens and 0 f-stop as well I see. I don't know how the camera got that. I will try to take a picture with no lens in the daylight and see what the EXIF data reads. I have a new 300mm Vivitar lens that I haven't tried yet as

8938:

seem to be editing on company time and company computers. Either the companies sanction their edits or don't care that their employees are violating policies and possibly breaking the law. I do wish that I would get paid to back off though.--

6246:

I think most mainstream press avoids reporting on Knowledge because we are their biggest competition. We have been in the news many times and a few were because of corporations, governments, and others trying to censor or white wash content.

4937:

was a very nice treasure that we just discovered at the deletion review is public domain and has been since 1970. I don't know how the museum will react when they find out because they sell various versions for media use, prints, and even an

3549:

is. Without doing that, a potentially solid article makes little sense. In any case, I'll leave any further discussion to the article's talk page. Feel free to participate there if you change your mind and want to help resolve the problems.

5636:

Yeah, I agree. Good enough. Let it percolate. (And I don't want to freak the guy out or distract him with all our subtleties. I find OTRS actually does a great job of bridging the Wiki-world to "civilian" comprehension gap when getting

8312:

2) It is possible (we are all human) that I made some bad judgements in doing the merge, that no one else working on the article at the time caught. Please show me content, with sources, that I left out that you believe were wrongly left

7574:

I got it from the first paragraph of your user page. You work in the field, have an SPA account to edit in that field to ensure your 'public perception' of it. We go by sources not the perceptional opinion you seem to want to force on our

8581:

Frankly I think that you guys should get off Canoe1967's back. He hasn't done anything wrong. This micromanaging and hairsplitting serves no useful purpose. If editors are misconstruing disagreements as attacks, they need to get over it.

4725:

How exactly will you "ban" him from your userpages forever? Unless there's some policy I'm missing, you can't forbid anyone from speaking on your talk page (except, of course, through an interaction ban decided by community consensus). —

2451:

so it may be safe to edit with your changes. Many will agree it should have a section like that, but many won't. If they give you a hard time like they try with me then you can either fight back or walk away.I doubt anyone will lose an

7094:

existed before the protest as an article then they may have read it and mentioned it to the media. A 12 year old controversy that many editors knew about and just kept under the rug in GMO escapes. See the section above about causes.--

652:"My edits (the ones you reverted) were not coatracking. I intend to be rigorous about the COI issue." <--This seems to be a statement made by an editor that doesn't seem to focus on the article and just focuses on another editor.-- 6488:

I agree with IRWolfie about that. I'm interested in aquarium fishes and neuroscience, amongst a lot of other things, but it doesn't mean that I have a COI in editing there. Canoe, there are some process things I want you to realize.

5398:

I would go so far as to publish this criterion and tell PRs asking for help to check themselves against it. One way (but not the only way) to verify #2 is if they learn to edit in other places, which very few PRs will be willing to

4545:

then feel free to do so. Unless you can find 20+ vandals that have done so after reading my page then I see no harm in a sense of humour. It seems ANI doesn't have a sense of humour at all so I will probably get screwed there again.

1304:

anyone even trying to explain it to them. If I had been involved earlier I would have set them straight with a simple 'Learn the copyright shit!' type statement instead of playing edit war, image tag, block editor games with them.--

8879:

in the past, the consensus has typically been that pages currently being used to prepare for dispute resolution are kept, but attack pages or pages used for activities outside of accepted dispute resolution processes are deleted.

7134:

About the recall article, maybe in all reality every article that shows symptoms of POV editing with regard to GMOs should be handed to ArbCom. I think that has been suggested, or something like that... i'm not sure how it works.

7377:

what I meant. You don't seem at all interested in really talking (actually responding to me when I write) - but time after time you have ignored what I wrote and have just brought up new arguments for your position. I would

3460:

to call someone an asshole (so they don't step on a mine and blow them and their colleagues up, f'rinstance), but round here you're much better off just shouting it into the monitor and not committing it to the "Save" button.

6601:

claims he is COI. I feel he should take a break from editing GMO articles to show other editors that he is not editing using his own POV which is on his user page is: "I'm interested in biotechnology, intellectual property,

6991:

Canoe, the example you give is what I was talking about when I said some things are the rumor-of-the-day. The solution to having only one primary source is not to say that the absence of other primary sources means that we

3318:

How many Jan Mak articles are there on Knowledge? One. And, as you are well aware, the discussion on the article's talk page now includes two sources which show the exact date of birth given by the IP editor claiming to be

6675:

You are very welcome. It may have been one of those lower notabilty 50/50 cases if the subject had requested deletion or it were a negative article about the subject. It is negative but about the process not the subject.

6441:= GMO. The way I read policy then the template is used correctly. Since everyone is so upset about it I will remove it until Arbcom or the COI notice board have their input. They may wish to add it back or they may not.-- 254: 3564:

Like many articles I have created it seems they are put up for AfD too quickly and for the wrong reasons. When that one was first put up for AfD I was trying to work on it at the same time as defending it in AfD. With

3487:

That article may be in flux for a while. It was originally titled as a controversy and then consensus changed the title. We may have to revisit the title and scope. We could change it back to the controversy, re-title

7108:

I have pleaded that it be turned over to ArbCom, as i cannot fight this on my own. And i don't think anyone should have to fight to edit Knowledge. I sure as hell don't have to anywhere else here. Cheers, and thanks.

4813:"The removal of material from a user page is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents. There is no need to keep them on display and usually users should not be forced to do so." from 9978: 6202: 7084:

make me wonder if they did truly leave the projects. They may outnumber those of us that want to write articles without editor POV but they will lose out in the long run. It will just be another entry like BP in

4850:

and recieved no response either. Until the sources change their dates then we are doomed to keep both in the articles it seems. I have brought up Rovi as a poor source for birth and death dates numerous times at

9063:

If he hasn't for various reasons then that would make yours very special for being the first one. He may sign it: "This is probably the first and only guestbook I will ever sign. I am signing it because....."--

8524:

You are the one that personalized it when you claimed to do the merge unilaterally using your own judgment. If the others were aware of that earlier then they would have directed criticism toward your edits as

6758:

You could probably have the deleting admin userfy it to your space under that name. Once the new material is added then we can re-open the same AfD with a link to your userspace to work on the article and view

6310:

that I do not attempt to "control" any article. If you look at my history of edits, you will see that I spend a lot of time working on "health claims" as was noted by an involved third party in the MaM ANI in

6077:

before you go whining to drama boards with your heads up high instead of up your backsides where they are now. What part of improper template was hard to understand? You should do more reading and less beaking

5174:

Haha, you're very welcome. One clarification: the exact term OM used was "appropriately harsh". And, yes, the templates idea is great, too. You better stop now. Two great ideas in one night is a lot to handle.

3760:

I was aware of it. If someone were to make a collapsable one then it may look better and not dominate talk pages. To me it seems to say "You are new, please read all of these links thoroughly before you get in

1904:

edits are allowed. If other editors wish to cite policy/guidelines they are allowed to seek consensus. Making inane, childish comments on the talk pages of articles and users does not help the project though.--

7831: 3396:. If so see if it has the sculptor and other details as to its creation. I assume he has a statue somewhere in Van and that is the most likely place. The park itself could probably use better images as well.-- 6876:

Yep. Luckily it wasn't and isn't a dispute, in my opinion, just a bit of overeager boldness and some rush to judgment. I just hope everyone can slow down on the trigger finger in future. Thanks for replying.

5409:

our time to helping them, but at the end of the day, a lot of us are just spammers looking for a quick hit. The trick is to quickly shove-off the 85%, so we can devote our resources to helping the other 15%.

3901:

I have please read the comment, I modified it again and I will continue to revert it. That is a easily confirmed comment, links are on the comment and Jimbo himself acknowledgedthat there was Paid editing.

1818:

the other editor involved in the relevant discussion if they wouldn't mind moving the discussion. In this case, I mind and I would ask that you do not move this discussion to that talk page because it has

6821:

It is standard practice to leave the extant image in place during discussion, so NS's revert of your removal was appropriate. I think the article lock was correct, but an uninvolved admin should have done

4002:

Which comment? The one where I said I would remove material that consensus has agreed to leave out, or the one that you need other editors to agree that Knowledge should read like a bs tabloid huffpost?--

9976: 7861:

None of the articles I've created or expanded, and had DYKs for, have had edit warring or AfD issues. Hot-button issues like GMO are just nightmare controversy magnets, and editors get knocked around a

5209:

traffic ticket, trivial dirty laundry from ex-wives, minor business issues, environmental group complaints about their fur coat, and blog sites that claim they were shoplifters at the age of 14, etc. --

2340:

justice system, no-one else is being sought, some have already admitted guilt/complicity etc. I think that in this instance you are being over-cautious and, believe me, I am usually cautious <g: -->

7878:

in mind and b) keep going for DYK. I'm not saying you should only do non-controversial stuff, just try it for a while. It's ok to incubate articles in your userspace, to avoid people hounding you. --

692:

Stay on topic: Talk pages are for discussing the article, not for general conversation about the article's subject (much less other subjects). Keep discussions focused on how to improve the article.

7866:

there; it takes an Australian-rules football state of mind to hang in at those articles. I encourage you to continue to a) create high-quality new articles, and expand existing articles, neutrally,

4797:

allowed to remove other's comments from their user/talk page as long as its not things like active block messages. Please, this nitpicking isn't helping. Lets just work on getting this wrapped up.

3201:

sources, was correct does not mean I have a POV; just because I am interested in a sport means I have a COI - what a ridiculous thing to say. I'm also intrigued where my apparent OR has come from?

3287:

Sigh, I'll be as clear as I can - do we 100% know what article the IP was talking about? No. Do we know that the IP was the subject of oour article on Jan Mak? No. It is sensible to assume he is

2325:

With current events that are still unfolding it is best to remove contentenious material then seek consensus as to what if any should be added back. Possibly facing charges is wp:crystal, yes.--

6606:

of both." (my bold). If he is willing to discuss his edit history, POV statements, and lack of response to questions on the issues at COINB, then that board may agree to remove the templates.--

326: 7679:

and for you, Canoe, to be so focused on content about Starlink and keeping getting the basic facts wrong, is frustrating. The concern the EPA had about the Bt protein in Starlink was that it

7246:

any organizing or unionizing by workers, running around corners to see if anyone is whispering about rising up... separating people so everyone is kept in the dark and powerless. Just saying.

1182:

Ooops. Could you; as admin change my edit summary to reflect that? I wouldn't want to cause any confusion. Perhaps use the term '14 days or more' in case some don't know what a fortnight is?--

372:

I haven't thought of that, sounds like a good idea. However, I think I have the translation situation under control. I just wish the de article had citations for the bio information. Btw...

10001: 5035:

The Smithsonian data base SIRIS has several different types of listings. Early ones were mostly collected from museums and are not that good. Around 1992-93 there was an initiative called

4859:

with very little response so I couldn't be bothered trying to change the guidelines to avoid it as a source for dates as we did with IMDB. I started a list of ones that I have come across,

9821: 9440:

rantings at Jimbo's talkpage? I'm also astounded that the COI/N for Jytdog was closed after only one admin looked into it, and that admin has ties to GMO and a questionable interpretation.

4270:. In the meantime, I would be leery of using it as a source. However, you removed the material about Raven's mother, but you left intact all the rest of the material supported by bebo. Why? 10027: 9712: 5854: 1248:

Hey, no need to be rude. Just pointing out the facts there, buddy. And apparently you're such an expert on photography, why don't YOU pick out another image you think its so great, huh??

6223:

Groupuscule, I hear you that people who call you on the phone find the GMO articles to be slanted, but the articles are a heck of a lot better than they were last spring, when there was

5517:. I try to focus on images for projects but keep getting dragged into long an useless discussions about other issues. Lately I have just taken to walking away and letting them win. The 3410:

Will do, be driving past there on my way home from the Shuswap. Got some Drop photos as well, I'll link you when I've time to upload them. Heed the General, he sounds like a wise man.

411:-- Btw, that new image wasn't really "higher resolution", it was simply enlarged -- compare the two, the smaller one actually is much sharper and less grainy. ~E 19:58, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 194: 7498:

at the end of the MaM notice board discussion, where you said "I had never heard of the GMO controversy until the phone call I received." Sorry if I misconstrued something about that.

6818:

that "personal" image, back when there were only two to consider, so NS is clearly not married to it. And NS has been quite willing to entertain all comers as new images have surfaced.

2489:

The defintion of Rabbi is very broad. He seems to meet our wikipedia definition. In that case no editor can remove the term from the article. It will just cause edit wars and blocks.--

10079: 10053: 9130: 122: 6382:

Nope. Just wanted to respond to what you wrote, where you seemed to me (and I may be wrong) claiming that I have some relationship with that editor. Just clarifying that I do not.

9124: 9112: 9023:

and add a sig similar to: "Hi Miss Bono. I don't normally sign guestbooks on request, but after viewing responses from other editors I decided to go against my norm in this case."--

8784: 2932: 1741:

POV and attempting to override NPOV in the process. NPOV "cannot be superseded by other policies or guidelines, or by editors' consensus." Is this making sense? Adhering to NPOV

70: 5826:

Thanks for the pointers. I did the dummy edit to the AfD. The article talk page summary I left should suffice. I doubt anyone will revert. I will consider it case closed for now.--

4695:. I will work on that. On your side of things, just to make it official, you do literally agree that, if your user page is unlocked, you'll remove the part about vandalism, right? 9963: 9777: 7274:

inappropriate for Jytdog to intervene in every single talk page discussion discussion that relates to Monsanto or GMOs. In the past year, Jytdog has made by far the most edits to

2196: 2025: 9272:

to the detriment of our Knowledge reputation in the real world. I still think we can have their crap corrected and the articles fixed but it will take time and effort to do so.--

6151:

I think I am going to avoid them for a while. When the recall article survives Afd then I will probably just work on that one and link it to others. That won't be as much fun as

3958:

I respect your opinion which I believe is off base and regret that you will not explain to me the policy. I won't ask you again and instead ask someone more amenable to helping.

6954:

and the bees. A very notable bee person had 15 years of research disappear on him. He had Bees that were resistant to glyphosate as well has data that was linked to it causing

1083:

a better free image and he is working on getting us one. I see no reason why we can't remove the existing image until the new one arrives. We could include both in that case.--

9913: 9772: 9235:

Jeesh, Canoe. One does NOT share facts about GMOs on Knowledge unless those facts are positive! When will you ever learn? We do have rules here, ya know. (Big hug to you...)

4928:

is okay but it would still be nice if we had one for commons from friends of family. We are only allowed approx 300px wide with fair use so they never look great in articles.

5872:

We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

9640: 9578: 3589:

problems. If my hunch is correct, you wrote it specifically about TWC's winter naming, which I believe makes sense. After all, there is no other prominent naming system for

10040: 9111: 8238:

And you have no basis in policy or guideline for how you are saying this "should have been done". if an "unmerge" happens and if so, how, will be decided on the Talk page.

4275:

As for the procedural issue, regardless of who supposedly has the burden, I would start a topic on the article talk page about the content. I wouldn't continue reverting.--

10092: 10014: 9886: 384:

Please revert and chew my ass out in the comment section. You may also mention something like "Do not revert this image! Upload other versions as new files", type thing.--

1794:

it possible for the shooter to carry out this crime? That's strange, since we have dozens of reliable sources discussing this. I'm sorry, but you cannot override NPOV.

1127:

unbelievable. I will continue to edit but probably only in ref and help desks where some other petty, power-tripping editors are far below the line of any decent input.--

10094: 9843: 9618: 9346:

Of course, I can't believe I didn't think of it. Well, assuming this thing is resolved and we still have a federal government in a few weeks, I'll just try again! Best,

7459:

yep, petrarchan you brought that source to the MEDRS notice board where it was unanimously shot down as failing MEDRS. There is nothing of my personal preference there.

2356:

Actually, I'll copy this entire thread over to the article talk page. My apologies for raising it here - it really is not the best venue, and I suspect it may end up at

4946:

which is I think is spam of the website that is mentioned in it and then used as a source. It seems cosplay has a huge clique here. That was the first one I checked in

884:

An article on a non-notable video, used in a military press-conference like hundreds of other videos from aircraft targeting pods and probably fails WP:NOTNEWS as well.

10066: 9950: 9920: 1646: 5490:

It would really be quite achievable to increase the number of helpful PRs from say 15% to 35%, while decreasing harmful ones, just by doing a better job on our side.

10100: 8785: 444: 6729:. Feel free to copy/paste my links and statement with out attribution. I declare my statements in this Talk:Canoe1967/Albert Haines case section as public domain.-- 9794: 8068:

much remaining then it will unbalance the main article. Many of our readers will see this as Monsanto spam in a chemical article. If we took all the material from

6160: 6156: 1777:

Wow, you've completely misunderstood what forking is all about. Adding sources that discuss Colorado gun violence and gun laws in terms of the Aurora shooting is

1660: 8872:

I've had it watchlisted since it was created, so Canoe, you should be aware that other editors can see what you are putting there. I assume that it's about this:

7840:

I probably won't bother with DYK again. New articles have so much edit warring and AfD that it is hard to do anything with them in the short time frame for DYK.--

4252:, if it involves general assistance for editors, to name a few. If you think only an administrator can help you, you can go to the talk page of an admin or go to 2917:

No problem. Seems they tried to delete the PD image over at commons. I re-tagged it as a slower review. It should be able to stay as a PD work by a CA employee.--

9937: 8807: 4488: 3347: 9677: 8189:

the merge, for instance "XXXXXXX". Let's re-introduce it or undo the merge to get it back into article space." Nobody could argue with that. " Mother of god.

7833: 3039: 4793:

Please, everyone calm down. No, you can't formally ban someone from your user/talk page, and yes, its in bad taste to just delete others comments, but people

4640:

I think it can be argued that the "Adminpedia" part is okay without the comment on vandalism, but you've got to work with me here. Let me know your thoughts.

10151: 7372:

are new to a) a field and b) an article that has had a bunch of people working on it for a long time. On the health issue, I really believe that right now,

6685: 2560: 1642: 864: 844:

So... let me get this straight. You're planning to re-add material of a indefinitely banned editor? You may be new to wikipedia, but that would constitute

480: 6850:

of which image to include. I came in late because I saw a request to vote in a project on my watch list. I thought is was just content discussion and not a

4363:"The discontinuation means that Kodak will no longer produce any colour reversal films - commonly used to create slides." An IP added it to the talk page.-- 3511:. I don't care which side of the issue editors are on, but I think it's vital that a determination be made about the article's defined purpose and title. -- 513: 10146: 1851:

I've deleted it. As you were previously informed, per talk page guidelines, you did not have my permission to move my comments. Feel free to brush up on

8792:

I considered adding Template:Infobox person, but decided not to. That way we have more place for photographs, which are far more valuable than infoboxes.

7210:- I have said several times that there are appropriate boards for dealing with COI. You are both are coming very close to the disruptive behavior called 3936:

useable to at least say we had a COI using comments from the user made on their talkpage. I would appreciate some guidance in this issue if I'm off base.

3666:

Thank you for your help on the Machinima Virtual Filmmaking page, you were the first to reply on the talk page and provided some very useful information

9693: 1656: 734:

Editing—or even removing—others' comments is sometimes allowed. But you should exercise caution in doing so, and normally stop if there is any objection.

3771:

I feel you are being very pointy and disruptive. If you have an issue with another editor then bring it up on their talk page and not the article one.--

2615: 2503:

So at least make the article accurate. They are using obscure newspapers rather than stating what chief rabbi of israel said about him and wiki sources.

1761:

And now, give an example of how discussing gun violence and gun laws in an article about a violent gun attack is "undue weight"? Good luck, my friend!

8833: 8617:

to run into trouble. Really, I appreciated your recent apology, and I want you to avoid trouble. But how you conduct yourself is under your control. --

5718: 137: 9380: 9344:

Due to a lapse in government funding, the Capitol Visitor Center will be closed and all tours of the Capitol have been suspended until further notice.

5584:

sneak BS edits into Knowledge. They are caught very quickly, many are blocked, and some are even fired for embarrassing their company in the media."--

4997:

The best option if there is a concern with a user's page is to draw their attention to the matter via their talk page and let them edit it themselves!

4615:

Unless you unlock my page to fix it then don't bother posting here ever again! If you have a problem with me then send someone else to deal with it!--

4613:

The best option if there is a concern with a user's page is to draw their attention to the matter via their talk page and let them edit it themselves!

4547:

The best option if there is a concern with a user's page is to draw their attention to the matter via their talk page and let them edit it themselves!

736:" The above comment by Nomoskedasticity is clearly an objection. You should respond by indicating that you will not do it again. Also, please follow 259: 10112: 8654:, instead of deleting the comments, unless you believe that what you have said is so egregious that it is better to replace it with a placeholder. -- 7977: 4173:

All the sources say that suit was "filed against the production company". Can you find a source that states suits were filed against the other two?--

1543: 1521: 1499: 6711:

show her case having some ongoing national and international political ramifications and media analysis so I'm not sure why it wouldn't be notable.

4043: 9698: 6677: 6152: 5759: 3508: 1520:

That picture would be a perfect one for the "early life" section - putting it alongside the part where we talk about her family. What do you think?

596:

I tend to be very brief and to the point, which some find upsetting. I'm happy to explain further and sorry if my editing or comments upset you. --

4676:

from my pages forever. I will also request an interaction ban between us. He used his tools and policies improperly and I am not very impressed.--

9908: 9811: 5611: 4360: 2079:

Then please don't ask me questions I can't answer for you according to format policies. Format them in a way I can or don't bother asking them.--

8675: 3853: 3826: 3808: 3780: 3322:

So please stop what you are doing. I'm starting to think that perhaps you keep defensively repsonding to plain logic simply to be disruptive. --

2895: 8873: 6523: 5668: 5510: 2528: 1466: 1367: 1169: 96: 6311: 3331: 3306: 3282: 3267: 3251: 3183: 3170: 3155: 2722:. because the artist is deceased, you can use a "fair use" photo that you upload here at english wikipedia (use upload file in the toolbox). 2107:

You can sign each question in place, so I can answer them in place. Otherwise is looks very confusing as to which ones I am answering. Duh!--

6832:

It's all going to be alright. Everyone just needs to not behave precipitously, or threaten too much, or edit-war, or be too verbose (me). --

6214: 3988: 3967: 3945: 3925: 3911: 3896: 2731: 1391: 1214: 845: 779: 705: 683: 661: 8947: 8932: 7077: 5835: 4942:. That cosplay article is still a huge mess but I will just walk away from it. The angry editor suggested other articles and I came across 3073: 3053: 3033: 3017: 3005: 2548: 341: 86: 7783:

Fair enough. I don't know enough about the issue so I can't take a position. Based on your comment I have removed the second tag I added.

7703:

when their health is involved. And why is the article rife with material that isn't controversial? It reads like a detailed crop report.--

7320: 5184: 5169: 3748: 3638: 3603: 3583: 3559: 3534: 3520: 3501: 3143: 1441: 1425: 575:: "Disputes about links can be addressed through the normal dispute-resolution process, particularly at the external links noticeboard."-- 554: 534: 499: 428: 408: 393: 9547: 8903: 8591: 8434:

canoe, i am not bringing these issues up with other editors, because right now no one else is personalizing the criticisms. ONLY YOU ARE.

7266: 5848: 4222: 4206: 4182: 4168: 4146: 2745: 2578: 2518: 2512: 2498: 2035: 808:

Too mention the video as relating to a BLP is a violation of policy. There is no RS that confirms he had anything to do with the video.--

9650: 9400: 9281: 9255: 8963: 8918: 8722: 7998: 7487: 7335: 7291: 7199: 7173: 7155: 7129: 7103: 6680:

is a similar case that went the other way. The Keeling case is back in the news so someone may wish to see if it is notable enough now.

6560:

makes it look quite a lot like a personal attack. And given the recent ANI over sockpuppet and specifically astroturfing allegations at

6319: 5744:

Also, I don't think notability tags should have been added to all of the other sculptures in Vancouver as well, but that's just me... --

5320:

WP:COI, but the essay is easy for me to improve, while a PR person re-writing policy would naturally make people uncomfortable. Oh well.

4985: 4968: 4914: 4889: 4872: 4808: 4706: 4685: 4651: 4624: 4504: 3443: 3424: 3405: 3383: 3225: 3208: 3113: 3096: 817: 614:"Disputes about links can be addressed through the normal dispute-resolution process, particularly at the external links noticeboard."-- 9446: 7949: 7821: 7792: 7759: 7660: 6802: 6424: 6366:

You seem to be rather defensive of another editor here. I could think sock or meatpuppet but without looking into it further I won't.--

5578: 4597: 4072:

After reading the sources I do believe it may be notable enough to remain. Try not to make a mess of it and others may not notice it.--

3866:

That didn't take long. Let me know which sock accounts you try to create now so I can have a laugh at those as well. Bye.............--

3847: 3802: 1995: 1551: 1529: 1507: 475: 458: 367: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 9477: 9434: 8889: 8848: 8776: 8745: 8663: 8641: 8626: 8607: 8039: 7971: 7036: 7017: 6971: 6944: 6693: 6663: 6511: 5593: 5560: 5531: 5499: 5437: 5418: 5355: 5294: 5239: 5218: 4788: 4759: 4741: 4107: 1496: 1191: 9520: 9095: 9072: 9058: 9032: 9014: 8991: 8801: 8572: 8490: 7919: 7688:

allergenic. I am not arguing that the Starlink content should be in one place or another - we just need to keep the facts straight.

7638: 7468: 7450: 7224: 7061: 6637: 6615: 6588: 6469: 6450: 5049: 5030: 5008: 4934: 4386: 3875: 3693: 2870: 2855: 2841: 2802: 2627: 2601: 2475: 2461: 2313: 2292: 2275: 2256: 2208: 2067: 2019: 1978: 1887: 1872: 1840: 1803: 1770: 1754: 1720: 1622: 1600: 1155: 1148: 1136: 856: 839: 801: 764: 749: 667: 9567: 9375: 8382: 8352: 8322: 7806: 7081: 6768: 6753: 6738: 6720: 6705: 6391: 6241: 6095: 4577: 4558: 4539: 4081: 2978: 2671: 2656: 2116: 2102: 2088: 1313: 1296: 1265: 1239: 55: 9329: 9307: 8711:

Ive started a new discussion at the Taco Bell GMO article. Both of you please, please response, but to me, not each other. Thanks!

8016: 7992: 7892: 7849: 7238: 5910: 4666: 4448: 4094:

etc. You should try not to make the article look like a tabloid piece or it may be deleted as POV pushing. You could try asking at

2046: 1119: 9505: 9405: 8706: 8534: 8519: 8505: 8443: 8429: 8291: 8277: 8247: 8231: 8198: 8181: 8167: 8145: 8122: 8085: 8055: 7911: 7741: 7726: 7712: 7697: 7601: 7584: 7554: 7535: 7507: 7420: 7406: 7391: 7352: 6986: 6918: 6886: 6871: 6841: 6573: 6549: 6375: 6337: 6300: 6285: 6270: 6186: 6172: 6146: 6123: 6087: 4482: 4463: 4389:

after they tried to delete it here. After a little research we found that it is actually public domain. They are trying to delete

4372: 2351: 2334: 1105: 9359: 9181: 8396: 8366: 7279: 6257: 4315: 4284: 4054: 4038: 4024: 4011: 2926: 2426: 1092: 1034: 490:

Can this image be uploaded as an "Other version", instead of replacing current file (unless/until there is a concensus)? ~Eric F

9454: 7495: 3473: 2880: 770:

do good work here in other respects and I don't want bad blood between us -- my suggestion is meant as genuinely constructive.

731:, the section titled "How to use article talk pages" tells you what you should add. The section titled "Editing comments --: --> 640: 623: 605: 584: 9860: 9619: 9537: 8822: 8473: 8336: 8305: 8214: 7955: 7622: 7569: 6361: 5655: 5627: 4436: 4422: 4402: 3363: 2369: 2027: 9663: 9656: 9369: 6935:

a difference between sources that reflect mainstream scholarly analysis, and sources that promulgate the rumor-of-the-day. --

6807:

I disagree with all extreme opinions here. Canoe, I think you were being unfair and provocative by referring to the image as

5734: 4390: 3996: 3730: 1220: 1174: 1073: 1054: 3525:

I think consensus was reached at the deletion discussion that is linked at the top of the talk page in the banner section.--

9670: 9571: 7629:

Then why don't you accept the fact that all of the sources consider it a health controversy and not an environmental one?--

5695: 5615: 5176: 5131: 5109: 5087: 4470: 4347: 3881: 3630: 3595: 3551: 3512: 3323: 3274: 3243: 3162: 3135: 3102:

I no longer give a shit! Go ahead and fuck up the article! I will have a good laugh when egg hits face after shit hits fan.

2961: 2708: 2592:

No worries. I will probably have time this afternoon to take a closer, critical look at the article to work to improve it.

2073: 1828: 1790: 1694: 1652: 1638: 1433: 1361: 1162: 546: 526: 517: 491: 420: 400: 290: 8460:

And you just will just not get it! There are lots of ways to criticize content and sources without making it a criticism

6689: 5726: 4842:

emailed Rovi at least four times to either confirm or correct their date and never recieved any responses. I also emailed

1375: 542: 9867: 9217: 8923:

So this is an admittance that it's an attack page on certain editors who you continue to believe are being paid to edit?

2723: 2504: 2006:? Are you going to piss off more editors and admin with your POV now by dragging me to another ANI? You may wish to read 965: 646: 378: 9764: 8996:

Yeah, that's why I think it is least likely that he signs it :) But I really appreciate your comment on his talk page :D

3675: 320: 9757: 9248: 7717:

You just made an argument that the Starlink incident was not a health controversy at all, but rather a regulatory one.

7443: 7411:

I was just going to fix where I said "the health issue" to read "the Starlink recall issue", sorry for that confusion.

7313: 7300:

jtydog no more intimidation tactics and no more bullying or trying to stifle conversations. It did no good whatsoever.

7259: 7192: 7148: 7122: 3979:

another. There are more. Article talk pages should not be abused to push a POV. They are for discussing the article.--

1957: 1666: 1397: 358:

You are very welcome. Did you ask in the de:talk page for the article for any Germans that may wish to help on en:WP?--

224: 2736:

Thanks. I managed to upload a good cropped image under fair use. I hope to get more images of his sculptures though.--

1256:

a hurry here. To block an editor, delete an image, and edit war like children, all within minutes is total bullshit.--

101: 91: 9595:

Hello Canoe1967, Miss Bono has given you an lovely bat, to wish you a Happy Halloween! You see, these things promote

9390: 8813:

My apologies - there is no 3RR for an article in your userspace. Taking that off my watchlist. My apologies again.

6924: 6681: 3594:

can be made to the article so that it won't continue to cause confusion for readers as to exactly what it's about. --

2633: 1984: 1963: 1946: 1064:

need an edit war. If the image is gone for a day, how much does that hurt anything? Why did it have to be rushed? --

467: 450: 249: 6431:"I work at a university. I'm interested in biotechnology, intellectual property, and the public perception of both." 3148:

Is that a signature, or is that just an example of the IP's obvious poor grammar? No way of telling which is which.

6651: 3471: 2319: 1852: 996:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2247:

have to do. Your summary of Hammer's 4RR in 24 hours indicates that there's still a major communication problem.

9132: 8866: 7086: 6528: 6248: 5603: 5062: 4847: 3315:. The section title of his help desk thread was "Jan Mak" and the IP editor said the date of birth was incorrect. 2448: 2189: 1708: 8767:

Since you drew my attention to it, I'm going to give it a couple reads and maybe make some more trims and such.

5425: 2704: 2697: 2690: 718:. The comments were about whether a particular text needs to be in the article and thus were entirely relevant. 283: 276: 9838: 9185: 6023: 4921: 4573: 4535: 4427:

Thank you for the support. I doubt I will be leaving anytime soon and it is nice that a few have faith in me.--

3843: 3798: 3239: 3127: 1856: 933: 728: 593:

Take your time looking over the policies and guidelines. There's no rush, and I see you're relatively new here.

560: 6557: 6002: 2533: 1043:

editor on BLPN, the editor's talk page, and the article's talk page soundly rejected there was a BLP issue. --

9599:

and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a lovely bat! Enjoy!

8282:

1) Please show me, in policy or guideline, where it says that a merge has to be done as you describe. Thanks.

5736: 5702: 5192: 4951: 4336: 4329: 4120: 3699: 3644: 2410: 1913: 977: 714:

The comments from Abhayakara and Nomoskedasticity that you deleted do not meet any of the criteria listed in

47: 27: 9316:

Terrific. As it happens, I had to reschedule my visit for two weeks hence—next Friday, October 11, it's on.

6457: 4343: 2957: 106: 9229: 7924: 5014: 2753: 2052: 1919: 1680: 244: 83: 9421: 9295: 9269: 9201: 9177: 8172:"Let's re-introduce it or undo the merge to get it back into article space." from your statement above.-- 7856: 7067: 6564:, I'd tread exceedingly carefully, as people will already be primed to kick off over this kind of thing. 4925: 3479: 3393: 2562: 2304:

You are very welcome. Most of the time my sense of humour gets bad response from editors who have none.--

949: 925: 889: 865: 151: 127: 9881:

None of the entities mentioned has a Knowledge article that can provide the reader with more information

9744:

Just wanted you to know I very much understand what you went through here. There never was any chance.

6535: 6163:

which is my only AfD failure out of about 10. 9/10 isn't that bad for my controversial creations here.--

3916:

I will keep removing it and claim 3RR exemption for removal of contentious material as to BLP policy.--

3010:

He doesn't claim to be the Jan Mak we have an article on. He doesn't claim to be called Jan Mak at all.

9996: 9729: 9020: 8828: 8697:

This is probably a good move forward since many editors consider you as an incredible waste of space.--

6669: 6598: 6228: 5752: 3963: 3941: 3907: 1827:

discussing gun laws in Colorado and gun politics in the U.S. I am discussing what expert sources like

1559: 1482: 1336: 775: 679: 78: 9385: 9342:

And then just this week, while trying to confirm my plans to visit the Capitol this week, I saw this:

8736:

The new name sounds like it is due. I also adjusted my notes above. Feel free to adjust the wording.--

6256:

to Taco bell unilaterally which I was not impressed with. I still feel more material on it belongs in

9702: 9459: 9160: 8928: 8061: 6726: 6438: 6210: 6016: 5800: 5673: 4974:

it makes it okay. Let me know if you need help in the future. Best of luck working with image stuff.

3832: 3787: 2634: 2524: 2241: 2126: 1348:

no knowledge or bias editors like yourself who will review it with the sources and make a consensus--

1324: 1319: 997: 908: 270: 164:{{Citation |last= |first= |year= |title= |publisher= |publication-place= |page= |url= |accessdate= }} 8550:- I don't believe "person X" merged the article right. It favors "stance Y's" thoughts too strongly. 7750:. I suggest you get consensus for a larger section before you suggest including it in the lead. :-) 7684:

data. (btw, much of the allergies subsection under the Health section, is also concerns about what

9816: 9609: 9395: 8677: 8464:. You just don't seem to understand how to interact on Talk and discuss content, not contributors. 6955: 5790:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

5770: 5180: 5124: 5117: 5102: 5095: 5080: 5073: 4929: 4125: 3726: 3634: 3599: 3555: 3516: 3327: 3278: 3247: 3166: 3139: 2897: 2763: 2584: 1688: 1632: 1497:

http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Paris+Hilton/NBC+Universal+2011+Winter+TCA+Press+Tour+Star/Ikr_c4U1KsZ

1462: 1437: 1355: 991: 869: 550: 530: 522: 495: 424: 404: 9119: 6074: 4378: 3541: 73: 9376:

http://e360.yale.edu/feature/tracking_the_causes_of_sharp__decline_of_the_monarch_butterfly/2634/

5820: 5390:

Are willing to invest a substantial amount of time/resources to contribute in a thoughtful manner

5153: 5057: 5036: 4164: 3754: 3489: 2727: 2508: 305: 204: 178: 8076:

it would have the same effect. Our readers would think the article is full of McDonald's spam.--

6415:

clarification if you wish to. I will certainly clarify any such thing if it is requested of me.

4066: 9752: 9605: 9516: 9417: 9406:

http://insects.about.com/b/2013/03/18/monsanto-milkweed-and-the-declining-monarch-migration.htm

9265: 9243: 8959: 8899: 8854: 8717: 8587: 7934: 7542: 7541:

make us a reliable published source. We go with reliable published sources. This reminds me of

7438: 7308: 7254: 7187: 7143: 7117: 6561: 6100: 6024: 4980: 4909: 4884: 4803: 4701: 4646: 4593: 4564:

aspect of YOUR responsibility to not only the project as a whole, but the rules you agreed to (

4354: 3420: 3379: 3303: 3264: 3205: 3180: 3152: 3093: 3070: 3050: 3030: 3014: 3002: 2950: 2943: 2890: 2885: 2483: 6352:

from any of the GM pages... not one of the people who edit with any frequency on those pages.

5200: 3434:, we could use a shot of their 'leaving Spuzzum' sign. One sign, same message on both sides.-- 1627:

I count six users who have noted the absence of relevant gun law and gun control information:

42: 9623: 9289: 8755: 7788: 7755: 7287: 7049: 6782: 6159:

were though. They didn't have as much vitriol as the GMO issues have. I still hope to revive

5792: 5745: 5722: 5663: 4834: 3959: 3937: 3903: 3118:

Snowman, I'm sorry to say that you were wrong when you said (above), "He doesn't claim to be

2574: 771: 675: 471: 454: 265: 168: 5384:

For those that want to actually author content, I would check them against three criterion:

9488: 9146: 8924: 8885: 8772: 8659: 8622: 8343:

3) Please demonstrate that each item in 2) reflect "cherry-picking" or POV-pushing. Thanks.

7234: 7211: 7090: 7013: 6940: 6659: 6507: 6253: 6206: 6110: 5882: 5877: 5765: 5688: 5681: 5574: 5556: 5495: 5414: 5351: 5235: 4939: 4814: 4734: 4228: 4194: 3469: 3022:

I am trying to be as clear as I can - what evidence is there that the IP was talking about

2754: 2520: 1986:-Removed a very sloppy, incoherent, edit and replaced the good material in the next edit.-- 1547: 1525: 1503: 1487: 973: 823: 732:

Others' comments" tells you what you can and cannot remove. That section starts by saying "

209: 111: 2136: 234: 8: 9679: 9088: 9051: 9007: 8975: 8797: 8691: 7169: 6633: 6569: 6465: 6420: 6324: 6010: 5775: 5045: 5026: 4943: 4860: 4843: 4672: 4630: 4518:, the fact that they are subject to the same rules is obvious. Yes - a you already know 4115: 3722: 3671: 3480: 2851: 2798: 2623: 2597: 2471: 2288: 2271: 2252: 2204: 1883: 1868: 1836: 1799: 1766: 1750: 1716: 1702: 1684: 1628: 1618: 1458: 1349: 745: 419:

simply upload images to Google docs, must have Picasa "web album" or something,. ~Eric F

156: 146: 9596: 9484: 7229:

And if Jytdog comes to have reason to do that, I will be in full agreement with him. --

6749: 6716: 5887: 5067: 4565: 4527: 4160: 3043: 2937: 2911: 2684: 2667: 2640: 2225: 2221: 2098: 1895: 1860: 572: 313: 299: 7983:

According to policy unsourced BLP statements can be removed from article talk pages.--

4833:

and gave up on that one as well. With Ms. Locke's article I emailed all four sources.

4526:

the discussion that you were already made aware of. There's no abuse by admins here (

9991: 9861: 9747: 9525: 9512: 9460: 9413: 9351: 9321: 9296:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/Category:National_Statuary_Hall_Collection_1963_to_1977

9261: 9238: 8955: 8895: 8712: 8583: 8024: 8013: 7433: 7303: 7249: 7207: 7182: 7138: 7112: 6646:

I have reverted the personal attack, although the claim can certainly be examined at

5711: 5205: 5143: 4975: 4904: 4879: 4818: 4798: 4747: 4696: 4641: 4629:

Please see my response at ANI. As I said there, the problem is that you use the word

4585: 3570: 3412: 3371: 3300: 3299:

the subject - but we cannot be sure at all. My barb was merely in response to yours.

3261: 3202: 3177: 3149: 3090: 3067: 3047: 3027: 3011: 2999: 894: 463: 140:

case in UK parliament now, book written, movie released, so it now meets notability.

8954:

Just to be clear, I think your accusations, or insinuations, Canoe, are bonkers. --

9645: 9533: 9501: 9442: 9207: 8839:

They all don't need separate articles. One Monsanto product article will do fine.--

8818: 8730: 8647: 8568: 8515: 8486: 8469: 8439: 8392: 8378: 8362: 8348: 8332: 8318: 8301: 8287: 8273: 8243: 8210: 8194: 8163: 8118: 7907: 7883: 7802: 7784: 7751: 7722: 7693: 7618: 7597: 7565: 7531: 7503: 7464: 7416: 7387: 7348: 7283: 7220: 6982: 6914: 6901: 6882: 6837: 6808: 6545: 6387: 6357: 6349: 6333: 6281: 6237: 6225:

literally no information in Knowledge on what foods were actually derived from GMOs

6182: 6142: 5506: 5148: 4947: 4290: 4155: 4134: 3932: 3389: 2570: 2365: 2347: 2007: 1674: 1142: 1102: 955: 737: 671: 565: 141: 132: 4512:

for purposes compatible with the Knowledge project and acceptable to the community

2969:

I would like to call you an ignorant asshole, but wp guidelines frown upon that.--

2232:. It is very difficult for 'us' do do anything when other editors act like this.-- 437:

I've set up a Picasa album, and set copyright stuff to 'Creative Commons' licence:

9225: 8881: 8768: 8655: 8618: 7644: 7230: 7009: 7005: 6936: 6655: 6503: 6456:

issue? You should have a look at what is actually considered a COI on wikipedia:

5570: 5552: 5518: 5491: 5410: 5347: 5231: 5138: 4955: 4729: 4583:

go a long way towards making this a more pleasant place to volunteer one's time.

4280: 4091: 4047: 4017: 3817:. "Removing harmful posts, including personal attacks, trolling and vandalism."-- 3721:

Thanks for your helpful advice for my contribution for Culture of Second Life :)

3566: 3462: 3311:

Snowman, please stop this nonense. Of course we "100% know" he was talking about

2984: 2720: 2679: 2003: 1966: 1588: 1584: 1069: 1030: 969: 352: 219: 199: 189: 9401:

The Monarch Butterfly Decline, and What You Can Do About It | Cool Green Science

2379: 9560: 9553: 9469: 9426: 9299: 9273: 9079: 9064: 9042: 9024: 8998: 8983: 8939: 8910: 8840: 8793: 8737: 8698: 8650:, you may want to follow what it says there, in terms of using strike-through, 8633: 8599: 8526: 8497: 8421: 8223: 8173: 8137: 8077: 8047: 8031: 7984: 7963: 7941: 7841: 7813: 7747: 7733: 7704: 7652: 7630: 7576: 7546: 7479: 7398: 7327: 7165: 7095: 7053: 7028: 6963: 6863: 6794: 6760: 6730: 6697: 6647: 6629: 6607: 6580: 6565: 6490: 6461: 6442: 6416: 6367: 6315: 6292: 6262: 6164: 6115: 6079: 5892: 5841: 5827: 5619: 5585: 5523: 5429: 5286: 5210: 5161: 5041: 5022: 5000: 4960: 4950:

and decided to walk away before I decided to tag more for DR. From that one in

4864: 4856: 4852: 4780: 4751: 4677: 4616: 4550: 4496: 4474: 4455: 4428: 4394: 4364: 4307: 4245: 4237: 4214: 4198: 4174: 4138: 4099: 4095: 4073: 4030: 4003: 3980: 3917: 3888: 3867: 3818: 3772: 3765: 3740: 3685: 3667: 3575: 3526: 3493: 3435: 3397: 3355: 3260:

poor, and the intention is unclear. Who's the one with the rude behaviour now?

3217: 3105: 2970: 2918: 2862: 2847: 2833: 2822: 2794: 2737: 2648: 2619: 2593: 2585: 2540: 2490: 2467: 2453: 2418: 2357: 2326: 2305: 2284: 2267: 2248: 2233: 2200: 2108: 2080: 2059: 2011: 1987: 1970: 1949: 1905: 1879: 1864: 1832: 1795: 1762: 1746: 1732: 1712: 1698: 1614: 1610: 1592: 1451: 1417: 1383: 1305: 1288: 1257: 1231: 1206: 1183: 1128: 1084: 849: 831: 809: 793: 756: 741: 715: 697: 653: 632: 615: 601: 576: 385: 359: 333: 2998:

Jan Mak at all. We should not take an anon's unsupported claim over a source.

229: 10140: 9493: 9189: 8876: 7282:, and other related articles—maybe it's time for them to step back a little. 6997: 6829:

Everyone's opinions have shifted and adapted as new images have been offered.

6745: 6712: 6621: 6495: 6434: 5651: 5545: 4569: 4531: 4418: 4323: 4267: 4257: 4249: 4241: 3976: 3972: 3814: 2829: 2663: 2611: 2607: 2441: 2229: 2094: 1901: 937: 347: 214: 184: 8373:

4) If you can do neither 1) nor 3), please withdraw your criticism. Thanks.

6061:; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. 6041:; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. 1935:; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. 52: 9355: 9347: 9325: 9317: 9197: 9193: 9173: 9169: 8003: 7875: 7871: 5810: 5514: 4830: 4826: 4692: 4515: 4511: 4253: 4229: 3622: 2163: 2040: 1221: 945: 941: 921: 917: 7426: 7008:, simply because you think that other editors would not want to add it. -- 6318:. And as I mentioned in the Talk page of the GM controversies article in 4393:

but I will just make a new sub and take a picture of that to replace it.--

3653: 2388: 9903: 9529: 9497: 8814: 8564: 8511: 8482: 8465: 8435: 8388: 8374: 8358: 8344: 8328: 8314: 8297: 8283: 8269: 8239: 8206: 8190: 8159: 8114: 7929: 7903: 7879: 7867: 7798: 7718: 7689: 7614: 7593: 7561: 7527: 7499: 7460: 7412: 7383: 7344: 7216: 6978: 6910: 6878: 6833: 6788:

I consider that very uncivil. You have done nothing but insist that your

6541: 6383: 6353: 6329: 6277: 6233: 6178: 6138: 5906: 5473:

area like AfC, COI instructions/processes are remarkably under-developed.

3708: 3626: 2361: 2343: 2298: 2058:

You are very welcome. The only reason I left is because the pay sucked.--

1670: 1199: 1099: 929: 9391:

In Midwest, Monarch Butterflies’ Flutters May Be Far Fewer - NYTimes.com

9037:

That would be wonderful :D, I wonder if Jimbo has ever sign a guestbook

4213:

Did you actually find a source as to who the suits were filed against?--

3887:

You cannot make claims about a BLP in an article talk page without RS.--

3238:

Snowman, Again, the IP clearly signed his comment with the name Jan Mak.

9221: 7425:

Canoe, you're reminding me of the time I tried to add information from

6951: 6059:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made

6039:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made

4276: 3392:

could you see if there is a statue of him there? It is for the article

2433: 2214: 1933:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made

1065: 1044: 1026: 1013:

While it is not likely to be a harmful image, the BLP policy is clear:

9738: 9487:

in those discussions, ultimately your work led to the creation of the

8563:

Thanks for your comments, Sergecross. Adjusting my parameters. Thanks.

5566: 4298:"Bebo combines community, self-expression and entertainment, enabling 4260:

unless you are reporting a serious incident, not just for a question.)

245:

http://wikimediafoundation.org/Resolution:Biographies_of_living_people

8133: 8113:

which is a conversation stopper. You need to stop with the attacks!

8073: 3739:

You are very welcome. Let me know if you need any more help at all.--

3684:

You are very welcome. Let me know if you need any more help at all.--

3316: 2990:

Ah, apologies - I knew I'd seen it somewhere. He doesn't claim to be

597: 3456:

That explains something - in a military situation, sometimes you've

1789:

into a different article. In any case, we have expert sources like

1457:

No problem =) Have a good day (Or night depends on where ya are). -

79:

http://www.philosophy.umn.edu/people/FacultyProfile.php?UID=kahnx009

64: 9260:

The problem is that the articles are censored and whitewashed by a

8859: 7275: 7023: 5647: 4414: 2861:

photo, so I assume the government gave him at least the one copy.--

1609:

understand what STICK and POINT refer to here. Have you ever read

1329: 116: 5969: 5962: 5955: 5948: 5941: 5934: 5927: 20: 10125: 9125:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:Canoe1967/Monsanto and GMO

9113:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:Canoe1967/Monsanto and GMO

8129: 8069: 6846:

I am sorry if I misunderstood. I didn't realize it was an actual

6814:

image. Keep in mind NS is the one who called for a discussion of

4774:"If a user asks you not to edit their user pages, it is probably 3431: 3320: 3312: 3131: 3119: 3023: 2991: 2417:

defense lawyers though. It may be cheapest to just delete them.--

1567:

Click on the "Show" link to the right to see the full discussion

9420:. Mainstream editors don't seem to notice or care that they are 9396:

http://www.flightofthebutterflies.com/conservation-preservation/

9268:. Mainstream editors don't seem to notice or care that they are 6725:

Someone should ask the closing admin first. Then it could go to

4635:

it can only be interpreted as causing trouble and breaking rules

2569:

Hi, I just saw your last edit summary. I am sorry about that. --

2539:

article and edit war there. Far more important to the project.--

2197:

Knowledge:The difference between policies, guidelines and essays

9579:

I don't know if you celebrate Halloween but... Happy Halloween!

9412:

The problem is that articles are censored and whitewashed by a

5842: 2432:

what they see as infringement. -- 11:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

1878:

comments. But, you cannot move my comments wherever you want.

327:

License tagging for File:Nun killing a grizzly with a broom.ogg

10105: 10002:

Orphaned non-free image File:Hungarian Testing Board logo2.jpg

4295: 3130:"Jan Mak". Now it certainly doesn't prove that he actually is 9822:

Orphaned non-free image File:Diamond logo-PSauce-outlined.gif

5551:

No idea. I can play with it a bit and see how far I can get.

4671:

by removing it. To delete it without discussion with me as a

3492:

and then include the other naming material in that article.--

1399: 10028:

Orphaned non-free image File:BC Sports Hall of Fame logo.jpg

9713:

Orphaned non-free image File:Marilyn calendars 1953 1952.png

9673:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

9574:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

8754:

Thanks. I was just snickering over it is all. You could put

7898: 6252:

trying to push their POVs far too much. Someone re-directed

5787:

Hello, Canoe1967. Please check your email; you've got mail!

5698:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

5134:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

5112:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

5090:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

4350:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3786:

of a TP comment, you should not remove again short of BLP.

2964:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2711:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1165:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

293:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

10130: 9587: 9492:

on GMO-related stuff again, I hope it is with civility and

2768: 2536: 2401:

Thank you Canoe1967 for your help in getting us started!!!

239: 10054:

Orphaned non-free image File:Council of Canadians logo.jpg

9381:

Roundup-ready crops killing habitat of monarch butterflies

8420:

attacks then no one would be allowed to criticize edits.--

1810:

Wrong, again. Best practice encoded by our guidelines is

1025:

reverting without a consensus having been established? --

1022:

We may not always immediately see what another editor sees

9192:. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek 8786:

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alice Vickery Drysdale.jpg

7374:

you have no idea how the material came to be where it is

6959: 6950:

articles NPOV. I noticed this recently when looking into

6433:

I consider this as being employeed in the GMO field. See:

5393:

Demonstrate a willingness to read and follow instructions

3545:

determining exactly what the article is about and what a

2933:

Quick note on educational assignment related to Machinima

2034:

As a result of the discussion the page has been moved to

940:. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek 10080:

Orphaned non-free image File:1953 Playboy centerfold.jpg

9964:

Orphaned non-free image File:Women of Wrestling logo.png

9778:

Orphaned non-free image File:1953 Playboy centerfold.jpg

6161:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/The luckiest man in Iraq

6157:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Storm naming controversy

4195:

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=4081369&page=1

7781:

Response to Canoe's comment 14:44, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

6996:

include it. And no one should add material in order to

6624:

account that made 8 edits. Being interested in a topic

6073:

You two should learn to read edit summaries as well as

235:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ngawangchodron/3426239674/

9914:

A page you started (Trudeau family) has been reviewed!

9773:

File:CGI Machinima sample film.ogg listed for deletion

7940:

Yes, that is where I got the Monsanto COI link from.--

7834:

Template:Did you know nominations/Taco Bell GMO recall

6696:. There should be more RS as the case moves forward.-- 6534:

Seconded. I assume you are familiar with the line at

6502:

happening now, and you need to pay attention to it. --

4821:

knows that he should not post here this is because of

2793:

Thanks for your recent insights, I will try them out.

1125:

What a joke that was. Just like that <redacted: -->

9641:

Notification of automated file description generation

9196:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 8598:

Please ask a basic question if you expect response.--

5513:

was nice enough to pose for me in Calgary and so was

4413:

Hang in there, ground pounder. No last stands. :)

1098:

that it is their request (declaring the COI).--v/r -

944:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 9887:

Orphaned non-free image File:Schillings law logo.png

9019:

Thank you again but never give up hope. He may just

7215:

appropriate board. If you do not, please let it go.

5160:

pages. Various levels such as we have for vandals.--

990:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

9844:

Orphaned non-free image File:Shrewsbury Town FC.svg

7164:Why is it that you informed Canoe but no one else? 5387:

Have objectives reasonably aligned with Knowledge's

5375:- we have a responsibility to be fair and accurate. 3134:, but your claim that he never said it is false. -- 3058:What an over-reaction, what crap will hit what fan 10067:Orphaned non-free image File:Ch aviaton logo a.png 10041:Orphaned non-free image File:Newman's Own logo.jpg 10015:Orphaned non-free image File:Round Square logo.jpg 9951:Orphaned non-free image File:Round Square logo.jpg 9386:Two-way Monarch Migration Map | Monarch Watch Blog 8510:No one is personalizing it like you are. No one. 6065:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 6045:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 3295:he was referring to the article of that name, and 3126:Jan Mak at all." He most certainly did. He signed 1939:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 10101:File:Christopher Dorner.jpg listed for discussion 9416:that outnumbers those that are try to uphold the 9264:that outnumbers those that are try to uphold the 4385:add to other articles though. I found this image: 4016:Yes, that one. I take it you want it to remain. — 10138: 9979:User:Canoe1967/Centennial Voyageur Canoe Pageant 9921:Orphaned non-free image File:Infortrend-logo.gif 9795:Orphaned non-free image File:Infortrend-logo.gif 9604:Spread the goodness of a lovely bat by adding {{ 8894:Where do I sign up for my Big Farmer cheque? -- 8111:rhetorical question with a harsh criticism in it 7896:has some rather noisy partisan scrum activity - 6678:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Scarlett Keeling 6153:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Political gaffes 1161:Message added 01:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC). You can 51:is the unique login of this user for all public 9938:Orphaned non-free image File:PETA logo 2013.png 9612:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 8496:Monsanto. I hope this is a little more clear.-- 7667:It is not true that the Bt protein in Starlink 5612:File:Photograph of tourists permission form.png 4878:your user page unlocked. Can you confirm this? 4489:Adminpedia/Deletionist aspect of your user page 2403:James W. Pickens 22:25, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1785:are the one who is advocating forking material 10113:Orphaned non-free image File:Tom Kelley Sr.jpg 7022:I found 4- 5 secondary sources on it from the 694:Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal. 9200:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may 8808:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 6498:where your actions are being discussed. That 6096:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 4924:is being hosted without valid rational IMHO. 4454:Please discuss it on the article talk page.-- 2716:hi, here is the siris search for John Weaver 2162:please select the appropriate template. Only 948:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may 10152:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 9662:Hello, Canoe1967. You have new messages at 9559:Hello, Canoe1967. You have new messages at 9184:. During a dispute, you should first try to 8875:. When similar pages have been discussed at 6652:WP:ANI#Problem now spreading to another page 6458:Knowledge:COI#Categories_of_COI_on_Wikipedia 5687:Hello, Canoe1967. You have new messages at 5123:Hello, Canoe1967. You have new messages at 5101:Hello, Canoe1967. You have new messages at 5079:Hello, Canoe1967. You have new messages at 4335:Hello, Canoe1967. You have new messages at 4236:Hi, Canoe, I removed the above comment from 3348:Hang in there man and don't get banned again 3062:(and I doubt we have) got the date of birth 2949:Hello, Canoe1967. You have new messages at 2696:Hello, Canoe1967. You have new messages at 1542:I think it's ok, it's actually pretty cool. 1154:Hello, Canoe1967. You have new messages at 932:. During a dispute, you should first try to 282:Hello, Canoe1967. You have new messages at 10147:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 9694:Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians 9216:below this notice, but you should read the 4670:two admin were just being <redacted: --> 3831:File a complaint at AN/I then. Good day. 3046:is widely used/respected across Knowledge. 2881:TUSC token 763853c8e7dbd0ba9894665382433fd8 2036:User:Canoe1967/Gun debates in article space 1342:unfortnally neither side is willing to comp 964:below this notice, but you should read the 230:https://dl.dropbox.com/u/50919224/clock.xml 8834:Suggestions about pages to delete or merge 6904:again. I still don't think we're having a 4256:if it's serious enough. (I wouldn't go to 2719:; here is a photo of the artist on a blog 1572:The following discussion has been closed. 7978:Changing other peoples talk page comments 4935:File:Nighthawks by Edward Hopper 1942.jpg 4387:File:Nighthawks by Edward Hopper 1942.jpg 1823:to do with this curent discussion. I am 7893:We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks 6536:Knowledge:COI#Noticeboards_and_templates 4667:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 3388:Thank you as well. Btw, if you are near 2767: 2517:Canoe, this IP is a self confessed sock 1039:There were two editors with COIs. Every 9909:Speedy deletion nomination of Al Oeming 9812:Additions to the WikiPage of Jack Welch 9182:Genetically modified food controversies 7280:genetically modified food controversies 6258:Genetically modified food controversies 3430:prevent it. If you are driving through 2028:Knowledge:Gun debates in article space 10139: 8109:so we can discuss it, rather asking a 7080:created by those that make edits like 6686:Article with her mentioned first of 35 6650:. I have furthermore reported this at 6524:DYK nomination of Taco Bell GMO recall 5669:National Lampoon magazine -- website?? 4549:From the two wikilinks you provided.-- 2093:You can answer below my comment. Duh. 1170:Request for Luckiest Man in Iraq Video 41: 4822: 4391:File:Yellow Submarine Second Life.png 306: 31:. Canoe1967 has not edited Knowledge 9528:that is not constructive. Bad dog! 5791: 5616:File:Copyright information image.png 4823:User_talk:Canoe1967#Jan_Mak.E2.80.8E 4637:. Can't you see how that's not okay? 4471:Knowledge:Cosplay images in articles 4248:, if it involves living persons, or 3813:Your posts seem trollish to me. See: 2535:then? I think I will go back to the 2142:This article is being discussed for 2131: 1156:Knowledge:Reference_desk/Mathematics 15: 9548:Statuary hall mission: accomplished 6018:Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge 5849:Welcome to The Knowledge Adventure! 4837:and the wire service that supplied 4750:another admin I banned from here.-- 4693:the Admin's version of edit warring 4306:, discover, curate and share..." -- 4244:, if it involves reliable sources, 4090:Other editors may consider that as 846:editing on behalf of banned editors 13: 10129: 10116: 10104: 10083: 10070: 10057: 10044: 10031: 10018: 10005: 9983: 9967: 9954: 9941: 9926: 9892: 9871: 9849: 9827: 9800: 9783: 9718: 9655: 9628: 9586: 9552: 9151: 9120:Archive of the harmless user page. 8858: 6558:Talk:Taco Bell GMO recall#Copyvio? 6049: 6029: 5888:The Teahouse new editor help space 5878:The Knowledge Adventure Start Page 5852: 5780: 5680: 5116: 5094: 5072: 4328: 2942: 2689: 2606:Also next time, please be sure to 1923: 1863:, all of which you have violated. 1328: 1147: 982: 899: 874: 275: 225:User:JackofOz/Unresolved questions 14: 10163: 9758: 8756:some bull-$ %&# by a PR shill 7920:Making sure that you have seen it 5610:these two images I made to help: 3038:Plenty of sources say 1948 - see 1711:). A new RFC will bring in more. 250:Knowledge:WikiProject Cooperation 28:This user may have left Knowledge 9753: 9737: 9686: 9139: 8684: 7897: 5710: 4449:Please stop spamming your photos 3707: 3652: 3574:probably wouldn't matter much.-- 3256:Not clearly signed, the grammar 2904: 2387: 2180: 2135: 1853:Knowledge:Refactoring talk pages 1473: 1407: 1120:Concern re possible legal threat 481:Direct link to image from Picasa 300: 123:Knowledge:(ignore previous link) 19: 9748: 9133:Monsanto modified wheat mystery 8158:advocated for doing an unmerge. 8046:You are very welcome as well.-- 7087:List of Knowledge controversies 6249:List of Knowledge controversies 6075:Template:Dubious#Incorrect_uses 4848:Patrick McGilligan (biographer) 2449:Knowledge:Most vandalized pages 1948:-Removed a blatant BLP issue.-- 71:User:Canoe1967/Monsanto and GMO 9862:ArbCom elections are now open! 9651:Deletion of Decade of Darkness 9330:18:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC) 9308:16:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC) 9256:06:25, 29 September 2013 (UTC) 9230:21:34, 26 September 2013 (UTC) 9096:12:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC) 9073:20:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 9059:19:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 9033:19:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 9015:18:57, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 8992:18:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 8964:21:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 8948:21:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 8933:21:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 8919:19:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 8904:19:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC) 8890:18:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC) 8849:21:38, 10 September 2013 (UTC) 8222:individually by each editor.-- 7956:12th Doctor free license image 7886:) 06:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC) 7746:I'm sure you're familiar with 7613:for MEDRS, that sort of thing. 7494:btw Canoe, I was referring to 6439:Criticism_of_patents#Criticism 5883:The Knowledge Adventure Lounge 5424:help page and it was reverted 4922:File:James Holmes, cropped.jpg 1857:Knowledge:Talk page guidelines 1605:I'm sorry, but you clearly do 729:Knowledge:Talk page guidelines 314: 1: 9447:07:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 9370:Monsanto starving butterflies 9186:discuss controversial changes 9164:from editing for a period of 8823:18:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC) 8713: 7179:This question is just weird. 7089:back in March. Have you seen 6597:I also noticed that at least 6012:About The Knowledge Adventure 5737:Gate to the Northwest Passage 4976: 4952:Category:Photography by genre 4905: 4880: 4799: 4697: 4642: 4108:18:18, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 4082:07:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 4055:06:35, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 4048: 4039:06:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 4025:06:18, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 4018: 4012:05:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 3997:your comment about me on BLPN 3989:04:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 3968:04:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 3946:04:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 3926:03:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 3912:03:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 3897:03:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 3854:05:51, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 3836: 3827:05:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 3809:05:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 3791: 3781:05:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 3749:21:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 3731:10:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 3694:21:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 3676:09:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 3639:23:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 3604:20:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 3584:20:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 3560:19:49, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 3535:18:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 3521:17:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 3502:15:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 3474:10:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC) 3444:23:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 3425:23:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 3406:22:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 3384:22:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 3364:22:27, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 3332:21:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3307:20:32, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3283:20:21, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3268:20:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3252:19:49, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3226:20:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3209:20:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3184:19:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3171:19:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3156:18:41, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3144:18:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3114:10:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3097:10:48, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3074:10:33, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3054:10:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3034:10:13, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3018:10:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 3006:09:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 2979:22:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC) 2958:22:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC) 2927:05:00, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 2549:10:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2529:10:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2513:10:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2499:10:46, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2476:03:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2462:02:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2447:It was recently removed from 2427:02:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2370:03:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 2352:03:30, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 2335:03:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 2195:It may also help if you read 1965:-Removed a template that was 934:discuss controversial changes 912:from editing for a period of 332:Eh? Get stuffed, hoser-bot!-- 9568:15:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC) 9538:19:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC) 9521:14:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC) 9506:13:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC) 9478:22:22, 26 October 2013 (UTC) 9455:Let's get back to business.. 8718: 8632:neutrality of the article.-- 6862:. I hope this makes sense.-- 6852:disputed issue of contention 6620:The "one other editor" is a 5796:at any time by removing the 5646:Peace, firepower-man. ;-) 4981: 4910: 4885: 4804: 4702: 4647: 4520:it was being discussed first 4514:. As you already know from 4289:I posted there to avoid the 3882:Reverting Talk page comments 3833: 3788: 2871:18:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC) 2856:18:41, 24 January 2013 (UTC) 2842:18:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC) 2803:16:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 2746:23:33, 15 January 2013 (UTC) 2732:20:22, 15 January 2013 (UTC) 2705:00:18, 15 January 2013 (UTC) 2074:Posting comments in comments 7: 10093:Nomination for deletion of 9868:Proposed deletion of Sniffy 9435:15:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC) 9422:Knowledge:Gaming the system 9360:15:43, 9 October 2013 (UTC) 9282:15:07, 7 October 2013 (UTC) 9270:Knowledge:Gaming the system 8802:12:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC) 8777:22:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 8746:21:59, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 8723:00:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 8707:00:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 8664:18:41, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 8642:18:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 8627:16:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 8608:00:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 8592:23:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8573:20:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8535:19:22, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8520:18:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8506:17:49, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8491:17:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8474:17:46, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8444:18:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8430:17:07, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8397:18:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8383:16:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8367:18:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8353:16:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8337:18:43, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8323:16:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8306:18:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8292:16:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8278:16:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8248:18:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8232:17:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8215:18:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8199:17:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8182:17:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8168:17:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8146:16:43, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8123:16:27, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8086:16:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 8056:23:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 8040:22:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 8017:08:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 7993:01:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 7972:17:53, 20 August 2013 (UTC) 7950:13:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC) 7912:06:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC) 7850:03:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 7822:16:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 7807:17:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 7793:15:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 7760:03:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 7742:10:43, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 7727:10:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 7713:17:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 7698:17:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 7661:14:44, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 7639:21:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 7623:21:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 7602:21:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 7585:21:08, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 7570:20:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 7555:18:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 7536:21:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7508:19:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7488:19:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7469:19:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7451:18:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7421:16:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7407:15:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7392:15:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7353:13:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7336:13:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7321:04:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7292:02:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7267:04:57, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7239:00:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7225:23:53, 11 August 2013 (UTC) 7200:04:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7174:23:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC) 7156:00:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7130:00:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 7104:23:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC) 7062:22:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC) 7052:may explain my OP better.-- 5565:I've started working on it 4926:File:Christopher Dorner.jpg 4483:23:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 4296:http://www.bebo.com/c/about 4098:for advice and assitance.-- 3394:John Hendry (industrialist) 3024:the subject of this article 2672:10:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 2657:10:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 2628:19:50, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2602:19:37, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2579:03:12, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2563:The Thin Blue Line (emblem) 2047:17:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC) 994:, who declined the request. 647:Deleting talk page comments 543:Please see "talkback" here. 379:Der Untergang der „Titanic‟ 181:my lighest cam is too heavy 175:<ref name="My Cat"/: --> 172:Details of ref</ref: --> 152:Correlative-based fallacies 128:World Architecture Festival 10: 10168: 9021:Knowledge:Ignore all rules 7037:21:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 7018:21:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 6987:20:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 6972:19:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 6945:14:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 6919:11:12, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 6887:07:20, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 6872:11:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC) 6842:10:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC) 6803:03:10, 8 August 2013 (UTC) 6769:20:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC) 6754:20:35, 7 August 2013 (UTC) 6739:00:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC) 6721:23:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6706:21:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6664:18:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6638:21:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6616:16:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6589:16:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6574:16:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6550:16:12, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6512:22:51, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6470:22:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6451:22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6425:22:07, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6392:12:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6376:11:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6362:21:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC) 6338:12:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6301:11:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 6286:21:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC) 6271:21:20, 5 August 2013 (UTC) 6242:19:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC) 6229:Genetically modified foods 6215:16:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC) 6187:17:07, 3 August 2013 (UTC) 6173:17:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC) 6147:16:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC) 6124:16:35, 3 August 2013 (UTC) 6088:20:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC) 5990:The Veil of Verifiability 5987:The Neutral Point of View 5984:Small Changes, Big Impact 5911:17:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 5125:Moonriddengirl's talk page 5103:Moonriddengirl's talk page 5081:Moonriddengirl's talk page 4846:who published the book by 4344:17:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 4316:22:53, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 4285:13:30, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 4223:23:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 4207:22:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 4183:22:49, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 4169:22:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 4147:22:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 2314:03:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC) 2178: 1471: 342:15:15, 24 April 2012 (UTC) 10117: 10095:Template:Quantity/sandbox 10084: 10071: 10058: 10045: 10032: 10019: 10006: 9968: 9955: 9942: 9927: 9893: 9850: 9828: 9801: 9784: 9719: 9585: 9218:guide to appealing blocks 7206:A note to both Canoe and 6925:Figured out the GMO thing 6727:Knowledge:Deletion review 6604:and the public perception 5836:00:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC) 5760:00:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC) 5727:18:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC) 5419:23:05, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 5356:21:15, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 5295:19:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 5240:18:54, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 5219:16:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 5201:Help_talk:Contents#Images 5185:03:27, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 5170:03:22, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 4337:Mdennis (WMF)'s talk page 3706: 3651: 3291:Jan Mak, and sensible to 3122:- he doesn't claim to be 2994:- he doesn't claim to be 2635:2012 Delhi gang rape case 2386: 2293:10:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 2276:08:28, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 2257:08:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 2242:08:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 2209:06:24, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 2146:. If you wish to discuss 2117:18:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 2103:18:32, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 2089:08:13, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 2068:07:39, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 2020:09:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1996:09:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1979:09:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1958:09:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1914:03:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1888:03:21, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1873:03:17, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1841:03:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1804:02:54, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1771:02:41, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1755:02:16, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1721:01:56, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1623:01:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1601:01:49, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1552:21:28, 27 July 2012 (UTC) 1530:21:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC) 1508:20:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC) 1467:03:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 1442:01:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 1426:01:28, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 1392:21:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC) 1376:Let's try to resolve this 1368:18:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC) 1314:04:30, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 1297:03:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 1266:03:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 1240:03:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 1215:16:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 966:guide to appealing blocks 857:21:01, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 840:18:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 818:03:08, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 802:19:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 780:19:08, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 765:18:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 750:18:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 706:16:58, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 684:11:33, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 662:06:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 321:00:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 284:ReelAngelGirl's talk page 9765:04:18, 8 June 2014 (UTC) 9664:Ottawahitech's talk page 9610:User:Miss Bono/Halloween 9473: 9430: 9303: 9277: 9068: 9028: 8943: 8914: 8844: 8741: 8702: 8678:The luckiest man in Iraq 8637: 8603: 8530: 8501: 8425: 8227: 8177: 8141: 8081: 8051: 8035: 8002:carefully in this area. 7988: 7967: 7945: 7845: 7817: 7737: 7708: 7656: 7634: 7580: 7550: 7483: 7402: 7331: 7099: 7057: 7032: 7004:add something to make a 6967: 6956:Colony collapse disorder 6867: 6798: 6764: 6734: 6701: 6628:mean someone has a COI. 6611: 6584: 6446: 6371: 6296: 6266: 6168: 6119: 6083: 5831: 5656:17:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC) 5628:17:14, 6 July 2013 (UTC) 5623: 5594:05:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 5589: 5579:05:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 5561:05:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 5532:02:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 5527: 5500:01:35, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 5438:00:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 5433: 5290: 5214: 5165: 5050:19:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 5031:16:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 5009:11:59, 10 May 2014 (UTC) 5004: 4986:21:02, 18 May 2013 (UTC) 4969:18:58, 18 May 2013 (UTC) 4964: 4930:File:Rehtaeh Parsons.jpg 4915:14:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC) 4890:14:10, 18 May 2013 (UTC) 4873:13:26, 18 May 2013 (UTC) 4868: 4809:15:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4789:15:38, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4784: 4760:14:22, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4755: 4742:14:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4707:14:25, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4686:14:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4681: 4652:13:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4625:10:30, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4620: 4598:14:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4578:10:22, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4559:10:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4554: 4540:09:35, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4505:02:43, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 4500: 4478: 4464:13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC) 4459: 4437:22:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC) 4432: 4423:22:40, 13 May 2013 (UTC) 4403:22:33, 13 May 2013 (UTC) 4398: 4368: 4311: 4218: 4202: 4178: 4142: 4103: 4077: 4034: 4007: 3984: 3921: 3892: 3876:02:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 3871: 3822: 3776: 3744: 3689: 3579: 3530: 3497: 3439: 3401: 3359: 3221: 3109: 2974: 2922: 2898:Storm naming controversy 2866: 2837: 2828:Ooops! It may have been 2741: 2698:SarahStierch's talk page 2652: 2612:blatant personal attacks 2544: 2494: 2457: 2422: 2330: 2320:2012 gang rape & BLP 2309: 2237: 2112: 2084: 2063: 2015: 1991: 1974: 1953: 1909: 1596: 1575:Please do not modify it. 1421: 1387: 1309: 1292: 1261: 1235: 1210: 1192:21:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 1187: 1137:14:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 1132: 1106:21:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 1093:18:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1088: 1074:19:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1055:18:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1035:18:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 978:06:03, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 870:The luckiest man in Iraq 835: 813: 797: 760: 701: 657: 641:20:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 636: 624:20:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 619: 606:19:52, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 585:19:25, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 580: 555:23:49, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 535:04:50, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 502:21:10, 10 May 2012 (UTC) 500:20:56, 10 May 2012 (UTC) 389: 363: 337: 298:Thank You!! It perfect! 240:http://paulkrassner.com/ 8867:Listed in your subpages 8030:You are very welcome.-- 6529:COI at GM controversies 5981:An Invitation to Earth 5978:Say Hello to the World 5905:questions, you can ask 5604:Thanks, crop looks good 5063:Transport in Antarctica 5037:Save Outdoor Sculpture! 4373:11:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 4029:That one = which one?-- 3490:Tropical cyclone naming 2190:Policies and guidelines 1745:improving the project. 476:01:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 459:22:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 429:20:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 409:19:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 394:19:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 368:22:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC) 205:File:Marisa get out.png 179:Kite aerial photography 10134: 10122: 10109: 10089: 10076: 10063: 10050: 10037: 10024: 10011: 9988: 9973: 9960: 9947: 9932: 9918: 9898: 9876: 9855: 9839:Wayne Gretzky 99 Award 9833: 9806: 9789: 9724: 9660: 9637: 9633: 9591: 9557: 9418:Knowledge:Five pillars 9266:Knowledge:Five pillars 9156: 8863: 7890:: Ha, I take it back: 7543:User talk:PrimalHawaii 6562:March Against Monsanto 6054: 6034: 6025:March Against Monsanto 5996:Looking Good Together 5857: 5785: 5689:HCNicholls's talk page 5685: 5121: 5099: 5077: 4333: 2947: 2775: 2694: 1928: 1333: 1152: 987: 904: 879: 561:Булла, Виктор Карлович 509:Thanks for the upload! 280: 10133: 10120: 10108: 10087: 10074: 10061: 10048: 10035: 10022: 10009: 9987: 9971: 9958: 9945: 9930: 9917: 9896: 9875: 9853: 9831: 9804: 9787: 9722: 9659: 9636: 9632: 9624:Hal Erickson (author) 9590: 9556: 9212:Your reason here ~~~~ 9176:and violation of the 9155: 8862: 6540:If you are sure..." 6053: 6033: 5856: 5784: 5703:Some baklava for you! 5684: 5193:How WP:COI would read 5120: 5098: 5076: 4835:Hal Erickson (author) 4522:- both removals were 4332: 4121:Pan Pacific Vancouver 3660:The Original Barnstar 3128:his help desk comment 2946: 2771: 2693: 2610:before you make such 2411:Re:The Little Mermaid 2395:The Original Barnstar 2148:intermediate deletion 1927: 1398:Kile Glover death on 1332: 1151: 986: 960:Your reason here ~~~~ 924:and violation of the 903: 878: 446:Link to Picasa Album? 279: 9977:Your draft article, 9489:Starlink corn recall 7925:GMO Myths and Truths 7091:Taco Bell GMO recall 6998:"right great wrongs" 6254:Taco Bell GMO recall 6201:Relevant discussion 6111:Taco Bell GMO recall 5893:Knowledge Help pages 5015:This is a good place 4815:Knowledge:User pages 3715:The Special Barnstar 3509:talk page discussion 2951:Eyesnore's talk page 2846:Yes, that's me too. 2166:may remove this tag. 2053:Re: Infantry service 1920:Courtesy 3RR warning 514:signature image file 512:Can you access this 210:Defence Scheme No. 1 119:of deleted articles. 9708:- proposed amenment 9680:Winter storm naming 9561:WWB Too's talk page 9204:by adding the text 8107:ask a real question 7382:for your position. 7296:I have asked.. er, 7068:Question re MAM RfC 6684:based on the case. 6325:User:Semitransgenic 4944:Cosplay photography 4861:User:Canoe1967/Rovi 4825:. It carried on at 4776:sensible to respect 3848:central scrutinizer 3803:central scrutinizer 3700:A barnstar for you! 3645:A barnstar for you! 3540:naming system. The 3481:Winter storm naming 2380:A barnstar for you! 1983:19:31, 28 July 2012 1962:01:27, 29 July 2012 1945:04:01, 29 July 2012 1175:"for another week"? 952:by adding the text 890:Rob de Luca picture 157:Westmoreland v. CBS 147:Knowledge:ImageSize 10135: 10123: 10110: 10090: 10077: 10064: 10051: 10038: 10025: 10012: 9997:Copyright Research 9989: 9974: 9961: 9948: 9933: 9899: 9877: 9856: 9834: 9807: 9790: 9730:A brownie for you! 9725: 9671:remove this notice 9661: 9634: 9592: 9572:remove this notice 9558: 9194:dispute resolution 9157: 8864: 8829:About the articles 7797:Please see above. 7673:no reliable source 6670:Albert Haines case 6055: 6035: 5993:The Civility Code 5858: 5793:remove this notice 5786: 5696:remove this notice 5686: 5132:remove this notice 5122: 5110:remove this notice 5100: 5088:remove this notice 5078: 4844:St. Martin's Press 4348:remove this notice 4334: 3975:is one policy and 2962:remove this notice 2948: 2776: 2709:remove this notice 2695: 2561:Hi Canoe1967, per 2226:User:HammerFilmFan 2222:User talk:Sensei48 2026:MfD nomination of 1929: 1861:Knowledge:Civility 1781:forking. In fact, 1560:Removal of POV tag 1483:Your email request 1337:Rangers FC Dispute 1334: 1163:remove this notice 1153: 988: 942:dispute resolution 905: 880: 291:remove this notice 281: 9770: 9769: 9616: 9615: 9526:User:Roxy the dog 9461:Monster (company) 9414:Knowledge:FACTION 9262:Knowledge:FACTION 9202:appeal this block 9178:three-revert rule 9091: 9085: 9054: 9048: 9010: 9004: 8062:Whining crap x 12 7857:talk page stalker 7832:Some comments on 7782: 7526:argh. Just argh. 7208:User:Petrarchan47 6538:that starts with 6348:btw I don't know 6000: 5999: 5732: 5731: 5674:Osian Ellis image 5206:yellow journalism 4819:User:GiantSnowman 4748:User:GiantSnowman 3736: 3735: 3681: 3680: 3571:Jennifer Graylock 2608:assume good faith 2408: 2407: 2170: 2169: 2127:Re: Out of colons 1848: 1847: 1364: 1358: 1325:A kitten for you. 1320:Oversight request 950:appeal this block 926:three-revert rule 866:Proposed deletion 537: 319: 271:RE:Angel wing gif 161:#2013041310001871 39: 38: 33:since 11 May 2014 10159: 10119: 10086: 10073: 10060: 10047: 10034: 10021: 10008: 9986: 9970: 9957: 9944: 9935: 9929: 9901: 9895: 9874: 9858: 9852: 9836: 9830: 9817:WT:PW Discussion 9809: 9803: 9792: 9786: 9762: 9760: 9755: 9750: 9741: 9734: 9733: 9727: 9721: 9707: 9703:Canadian English 9701: 9690: 9689: 9674: 9631: 9583: 9582: 9575: 9483:of your lack of 9345: 9253: 9251: 9246: 9241: 9215: 9154: 9143: 9142: 9094: 9092: 9090: 9086: 9081: 9057: 9055: 9053: 9049: 9044: 9013: 9011: 9009: 9005: 9000: 8720: 8715: 8688: 8687: 8387:and no response. 8357:and no response. 8327:and no response. 8296:and no response. 8205:And no response. 8011: 7997:There is no way 7901: 7872:reliable sources 7860: 7780: 7448: 7446: 7441: 7436: 7318: 7316: 7311: 7306: 7264: 7262: 7257: 7252: 7197: 7195: 7190: 7185: 7153: 7151: 7146: 7141: 7127: 7125: 7120: 7115: 6599:one other editor 6350:User:Ohconfucius 6052: 6032: 6019: 6013: 5972: 5965: 5958: 5951: 5944: 5937: 5930: 5924: 5923: 5855: 5817: 5815: 5809: 5805: 5799: 5795: 5783: 5771:Cosplay pictures 5755: 5748: 5747:Another Believer 5714: 5707: 5706: 5699: 5507:Margaret Trudeau 5135: 5113: 5091: 4983: 4978: 4948:Category:Cosplay 4912: 4907: 4887: 4882: 4839:Today in History 4806: 4801: 4737: 4732: 4704: 4699: 4649: 4644: 4596: 4591: 4588: 4572: 4534: 4351: 4291:Streisand effect 4052: 4051: 4022: 4021: 3960:Hell In A Bucket 3938:Hell In A Bucket 3904:Hell In A Bucket 3852: 3851: 3850: 3838: 3835: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3793: 3790: 3711: 3704: 3703: 3656: 3649: 3648: 3467: 3423: 3418: 3415: 3390:John Hendry Park 3382: 3377: 3374: 2965: 2908: 2907: 2764:Congratulations! 2712: 2391: 2384: 2383: 2184: 2183: 2139: 2132: 1926: 1577: 1564: 1563: 1477: 1476: 1432:Thanks a lot! -- 1415: 1411: 1410: 1362: 1356: 1352: 1344: 1343: 1224:picture dispute. 1166: 1051: 1050: 985: 963: 902: 877: 854: 772:Nomoskedasticity 676:Nomoskedasticity 631:3 links there.-- 520: 316: 311: 308: 302: 294: 138:Scarlett Keeling 133:Anthony Trewavas 97:Failure to yield 23: 16: 10167: 10166: 10162: 10161: 10160: 10158: 10157: 10156: 10137: 10136: 10128: 10115: 10103: 10098: 10082: 10069: 10056: 10043: 10030: 10017: 10004: 9999: 9994: 9984: 9982: 9966: 9953: 9940: 9924: 9923: 9916: 9911: 9906: 9890: 9889: 9872: 9870: 9865: 9847: 9846: 9841: 9825: 9824: 9819: 9814: 9798: 9797: 9781: 9780: 9775: 9746: 9732: 9716: 9715: 9710: 9705: 9699: 9696: 9691: 9687: 9684: 9675: 9668: 9653: 9648: 9643: 9638: 9629: 9627: 9620:Speedy deletion 9581: 9576: 9565: 9550: 9464: 9457: 9372: 9343: 9292: 9249: 9244: 9239: 9237: 9232: 9205: 9198:page protection 9152: 9149: 9144: 9140: 9137: 9116: 9089: 9080: 9078: 9052: 9043: 9041: 9008: 8999: 8997: 8978: 8925:Thargor Orlando 8869: 8857: 8836: 8831: 8810: 8789: 8758:if you want ;-) 8733: 8694: 8689: 8685: 8682: 8064: 8027: 8005: 7980: 7958: 7937: 7932: 7927: 7922: 7854: 7837: 7647: 7444: 7439: 7434: 7432: 7314: 7309: 7304: 7302: 7260: 7255: 7250: 7248: 7193: 7188: 7183: 7181: 7149: 7144: 7139: 7137: 7123: 7118: 7113: 7111: 7070: 6927: 6785: 6672: 6531: 6526: 6207:Thargor Orlando 6177:OK, good luck! 6103: 6098: 6050: 6030: 6028: 6021: 6017: 6011: 6008: 5970: 5963: 5956: 5949: 5942: 5935: 5928: 5853: 5851: 5846: 5823: 5821:Those deletions 5818: 5813: 5807: 5803: 5801:You've got mail 5797: 5789: 5781: 5778: 5773: 5768: 5758: 5753: 5746: 5741: 5705: 5700: 5693: 5678: 5676: 5671: 5666: 5606: 5548: 5519:14th Dalai Lama 5195: 5156: 5154:Your essay idea 5151: 5146: 5141: 5136: 5129: 5114: 5107: 5092: 5085: 5070: 5065: 5060: 5058:Hello Canoe1967 5017: 4956:Pet photography 4735: 4730: 4589: 4586: 4584: 4568: 4530: 4491: 4451: 4381: 4361:Found a source. 4357: 4352: 4341: 4326: 4233: 4131: 4123: 4118: 4069: 4049: 4019: 3999: 3884: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3797: 3796: 3795: 3768: 3757: 3755:Just a heads up 3702: 3647: 3567:Political gaffe 3484: 3463: 3416: 3413: 3411: 3375: 3372: 3370: 3350: 2987: 2966: 2955: 2940: 2935: 2914: 2909: 2905: 2902: 2893: 2888: 2883: 2825: 2773:Thumbs Up Award 2766: 2761: 2713: 2702: 2687: 2682: 2643: 2638: 2589: 2566: 2521:Darkness Shines 2486: 2466:Ok, Thank you. 2444: 2413: 2404: 2382: 2322: 2301: 2217: 2192: 2187: 2186: 2181: 2171: 2129: 2076: 2055: 2031: 1924: 1922: 1898: 1731:That's not how 1697:), and myself, 1585:Knowledge:STICK 1573: 1562: 1490: 1485: 1480: 1479: 1474: 1454: 1408: 1406: 1403: 1378: 1350: 1339: 1327: 1322: 1226: 1202: 1177: 1172: 1167: 1160: 1145: 1122: 1048: 1046: 1003: 998:blocking policy 983: 980: 953: 946:page protection 900: 897: 892: 875: 873: 850: 826: 649: 568: 563: 381: 355: 350: 329: 295: 288: 273: 268: 220:Michelle Thomas 200:Michael Behagen 190:Greatrex Newman 67: 60: 59: 12: 11: 5: 10165: 10155: 10154: 10149: 10127: 10124: 10114: 10111: 10102: 10099: 10097: 10091: 10081: 10078: 10068: 10065: 10055: 10052: 10042: 10039: 10029: 10026: 10016: 10013: 10003: 10000: 9998: 9995: 9993: 9990: 9981: 9975: 9965: 9962: 9952: 9949: 9939: 9936: 9922: 9919: 9915: 9912: 9910: 9907: 9905: 9902: 9888: 9885: 9884: 9883: 9869: 9866: 9864: 9859: 9845: 9842: 9840: 9837: 9823: 9820: 9818: 9815: 9813: 9810: 9796: 9793: 9779: 9776: 9774: 9771: 9768: 9767: 9742: 9731: 9728: 9714: 9711: 9709: 9697: 9695: 9692: 9685: 9683: 9678:Nomination of 9676: 9667: 9654: 9652: 9649: 9647: 9644: 9642: 9639: 9635: 9626: 9622:nomination of 9617: 9614: 9613: 9601: 9600: 9593: 9580: 9577: 9566:Message added 9564: 9551: 9549: 9546: 9545: 9544: 9543: 9542: 9541: 9540: 9523: 9463: 9458: 9456: 9453: 9452: 9451: 9450: 9449: 9409: 9408: 9403: 9398: 9393: 9388: 9383: 9378: 9371: 9368: 9367: 9366: 9365: 9364: 9363: 9362: 9335: 9334: 9333: 9332: 9311: 9310: 9291: 9288: 9287: 9286: 9285: 9284: 9158:You have been 9150: 9148: 9145: 9138: 9136: 9131:Nomination of 9129: 9128: 9127: 9122: 9115: 9110: 9109: 9108: 9107: 9106: 9105: 9104: 9103: 9102: 9101: 9100: 9099: 9098: 8977: 8974: 8973: 8972: 8971: 8970: 8969: 8968: 8967: 8966: 8952: 8951: 8950: 8868: 8865: 8856: 8855:September 2013 8853: 8852: 8851: 8835: 8832: 8830: 8827: 8826: 8825: 8809: 8806: 8805: 8804: 8788: 8783: 8782: 8781: 8780: 8779: 8762: 8761: 8760: 8759: 8749: 8748: 8732: 8729: 8728: 8727: 8726: 8725: 8693: 8690: 8683: 8681: 8676:Nomination of 8674: 8673: 8672: 8671: 8670: 8669: 8668: 8667: 8666: 8611: 8610: 8595: 8594: 8578: 8577: 8576: 8575: 8558: 8557: 8551: 8544: 8543: 8542: 8541: 8540: 8539: 8538: 8537: 8477: 8476: 8457: 8456: 8455: 8454: 8453: 8452: 8451: 8450: 8449: 8448: 8447: 8446: 8408: 8407: 8406: 8405: 8404: 8403: 8402: 8401: 8400: 8399: 8371: 8370: 8369: 8341: 8340: 8339: 8310: 8309: 8308: 8280: 8266: 8265: 8264: 8263: 8262: 8261: 8260: 8259: 8258: 8257: 8256: 8255: 8254: 8253: 8252: 8251: 8250: 8219: 8218: 8217: 8132:and put it in 8095: 8094: 8093: 8092: 8072:and put it in 8063: 8060: 8059: 8058: 8043: 8042: 8026: 8023: 8022: 8021: 8020: 8019: 7979: 7976: 7975: 7974: 7957: 7954: 7953: 7952: 7936: 7935:wikipediocracy 7933: 7931: 7928: 7926: 7923: 7921: 7918: 7917: 7916: 7915: 7914: 7836: 7830: 7829: 7828: 7827: 7826: 7825: 7824: 7809: 7775: 7774: 7773: 7772: 7771: 7770: 7769: 7768: 7767: 7766: 7765: 7764: 7763: 7762: 7669:is allergenic. 7646: 7643: 7642: 7641: 7627: 7626: 7625: 7610: 7609: 7608: 7607: 7606: 7605: 7604: 7557: 7523: 7522: 7521: 7520: 7519: 7518: 7517: 7516: 7515: 7514: 7513: 7512: 7511: 7510: 7496:your statement 7475: 7474: 7473: 7472: 7471: 7368: 7367: 7366: 7365: 7364: 7363: 7362: 7361: 7360: 7359: 7358: 7357: 7356: 7355: 7271: 7270: 7269: 7204: 7203: 7202: 7162: 7161: 7160: 7159: 7158: 7132: 7069: 7066: 7065: 7064: 7046: 7045: 7044: 7043: 7042: 7041: 7040: 7039: 6989: 6926: 6923: 6922: 6921: 6896: 6895: 6894: 6893: 6892: 6891: 6890: 6889: 6830: 6827: 6823: 6819: 6784: 6781: 6780: 6779: 6778: 6777: 6776: 6775: 6774: 6773: 6772: 6771: 6682:This is a book 6671: 6668: 6667: 6666: 6643: 6642: 6641: 6640: 6595: 6594: 6593: 6592: 6591: 6530: 6527: 6525: 6522: 6521: 6520: 6519: 6518: 6517: 6516: 6515: 6514: 6479: 6478: 6477: 6476: 6475: 6474: 6473: 6472: 6409: 6408: 6407: 6406: 6405: 6404: 6403: 6402: 6401: 6400: 6399: 6398: 6397: 6396: 6395: 6394: 6346: 6345: 6344: 6343: 6342: 6341: 6340: 6316:User:Nil Einne 6218: 6217: 6198: 6197: 6196: 6195: 6194: 6193: 6192: 6191: 6190: 6189: 6129: 6128: 6127: 6126: 6102: 6101:GMO phone call 6099: 6097: 6094: 6093: 6092: 6091: 6090: 6068: 6067: 6062: 6048: 6047: 6042: 6027: 6022: 6009: 6007: 6001: 5998: 5997: 5994: 5991: 5988: 5985: 5982: 5979: 5975: 5974: 5967: 5960: 5953: 5946: 5939: 5932: 5922: 5921: 5920: 5919: 5918: 5917: 5916: 5915: 5914: 5913: 5899: 5898: 5897: 5896: 5895: 5890: 5885: 5880: 5850: 5847: 5845: 5840: 5839: 5838: 5822: 5819: 5788: 5779: 5777: 5774: 5772: 5769: 5767: 5764: 5763: 5762: 5750: 5740: 5733: 5730: 5729: 5715: 5704: 5701: 5692: 5679: 5677: 5675: 5672: 5670: 5667: 5665: 5662: 5661: 5660: 5659: 5658: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5638: 5631: 5630: 5605: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5596: 5547: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5481: 5480: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5476: 5475: 5474: 5463: 5462: 5461: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5456: 5445: 5444: 5443: 5442: 5441: 5440: 5403: 5402: 5401: 5400: 5396: 5395: 5394: 5391: 5388: 5379: 5378: 5377: 5376: 5369: 5368: 5367: 5366: 5365: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5361: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5332: 5331: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5326: 5325: 5324: 5323: 5322: 5321: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5301: 5300: 5299: 5298: 5297: 5274: 5273: 5272: 5271: 5270: 5269: 5268: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5249: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5222: 5221: 5194: 5191: 5190: 5189: 5188: 5187: 5177:76.189.109.155 5155: 5152: 5150: 5147: 5145: 5142: 5140: 5137: 5128: 5115: 5106: 5093: 5084: 5071: 5069: 5066: 5064: 5061: 5059: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5053: 5052: 5016: 5013: 5012: 5011: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4989: 4988: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4857:Knowledge:RS/N 4853:Knowledge:BLPN 4771: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4657: 4656: 4655: 4654: 4638: 4609: 4608: 4607: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4490: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4467: 4466: 4450: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4406: 4405: 4380: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4356: 4355:Thanks anyway! 4353: 4342:Message added 4340: 4327: 4325: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4272: 4271: 4262: 4261: 4232: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4210: 4209: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4150: 4149: 4130: 4124: 4122: 4119: 4117: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4085: 4084: 4068: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4058: 4057: 3998: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3883: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3846: 3801: 3767: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3756: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3734: 3733: 3723:Rosiesievers20 3718: 3717: 3712: 3701: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3679: 3678: 3663: 3662: 3657: 3646: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3631:76.189.111.199 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3596:76.189.111.199 3552:76.189.111.199 3513:76.189.111.199 3483: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3349: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3324:76.189.111.199 3275:76.189.111.199 3244:76.189.111.199 3233: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3163:76.189.111.199 3136:76.189.111.199 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 2986: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2956:Message added 2954: 2941: 2939: 2936: 2934: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2913: 2910: 2903: 2901: 2896:Nomination of 2894: 2892: 2891:Flickr bidness 2889: 2887: 2886:Select Medical 2884: 2882: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2824: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2765: 2762: 2760: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2703:Message added 2701: 2688: 2686: 2683: 2681: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2642: 2639: 2637: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2604: 2588: 2586:Moshe Friedman 2583: 2582: 2581: 2565: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2485: 2484:Moshe Friedman 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2443: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2412: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2402: 2398: 2397: 2392: 2381: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2321: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2279: 2278: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2216: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2191: 2188: 2179: 2177: 2176: 2168: 2167: 2140: 2130: 2128: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2054: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2030: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2002:Why can't you 1999: 1998: 1981: 1960: 1942: 1941: 1936: 1921: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1897: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1829:Robert Spitzer 1807: 1806: 1791:Robert Spitzer 1787:you don't like 1774: 1773: 1758: 1757: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1685:BritishWatcher 1643:213.168.117.36 1629:Martinevans123 1579: 1578: 1569: 1568: 1561: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1489: 1486: 1484: 1481: 1472: 1470: 1469: 1459:Knowledgekid87 1453: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1434:76.189.114.180 1402: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1377: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1351:Andrewcrawford 1338: 1335: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1300: 1299: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1269: 1268: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1243: 1242: 1225: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1159: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1121: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1017: 1011: 1002: 1001: 981: 906:You have been 898: 896: 893: 891: 888: 887: 886: 872: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 825: 822: 821: 820: 805: 804: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 722: 721: 720: 719: 709: 708: 689: 688: 687: 686: 648: 645: 644: 643: 627: 626: 611: 610: 609: 608: 594: 588: 587: 567: 564: 562: 559: 558: 557: 547:184.76.225.106 539: 538: 527:184.76.225.106 518:184.76.225.106 510: 506: 505: 504: 503: 492:184.76.225.106 485: 484: 478: 461: 441: 440: 439: 438: 421:184.76.225.106 415: 414: 413: 412: 401:184.76.225.106 399:something. ~E 380: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 354: 351: 349: 346: 345: 344: 328: 325: 324: 323: 287: 274: 272: 269: 267: 264: 263: 262: 257: 252: 247: 242: 237: 232: 227: 222: 217: 212: 207: 202: 197: 192: 187: 182: 176: 173: 167:<ref name=" 165: 162: 159: 154: 149: 144: 135: 130: 125: 120: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 89: 81: 76: 66: 63: 62: 40: 37: 36: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 10164: 10153: 10150: 10148: 10145: 10144: 10142: 10132: 10107: 10096: 9980: 9934: 9900: 9882: 9879: 9878: 9863: 9857: 9835: 9808: 9791: 9766: 9763: 9761: 9756: 9751: 9743: 9740: 9736: 9735: 9726: 9704: 9681: 9672: 9665: 9658: 9625: 9621: 9611: 9607: 9603: 9602: 9598: 9594: 9589: 9584: 9573: 9569: 9562: 9555: 9539: 9535: 9531: 9527: 9524: 9522: 9518: 9514: 9509: 9508: 9507: 9503: 9499: 9495: 9490: 9486: 9481: 9480: 9479: 9475: 9471: 9466: 9465: 9462: 9448: 9445: 9444: 9438: 9437: 9436: 9432: 9428: 9423: 9419: 9415: 9411: 9410: 9407: 9404: 9402: 9399: 9397: 9394: 9392: 9389: 9387: 9384: 9382: 9379: 9377: 9374: 9373: 9361: 9357: 9353: 9349: 9341: 9340: 9339: 9338: 9337: 9336: 9331: 9327: 9323: 9319: 9315: 9314: 9313: 9312: 9309: 9305: 9301: 9297: 9294: 9293: 9290:Statuary hall 9283: 9279: 9275: 9271: 9267: 9263: 9259: 9258: 9257: 9254: 9252: 9247: 9242: 9234: 9233: 9231: 9227: 9223: 9219: 9213: 9209: 9203: 9199: 9195: 9191: 9187: 9183: 9179: 9175: 9171: 9167: 9163: 9162: 9134: 9126: 9123: 9121: 9118: 9117: 9114: 9097: 9093: 9087: 9084: 9076: 9075: 9074: 9070: 9066: 9062: 9061: 9060: 9056: 9050: 9047: 9040: 9036: 9035: 9034: 9030: 9026: 9022: 9018: 9017: 9016: 9012: 9006: 9003: 8995: 8994: 8993: 8989: 8985: 8980: 8979: 8965: 8961: 8957: 8953: 8949: 8945: 8941: 8936: 8935: 8934: 8930: 8926: 8922: 8921: 8920: 8916: 8912: 8907: 8906: 8905: 8901: 8897: 8893: 8892: 8891: 8887: 8883: 8878: 8874: 8871: 8870: 8861: 8850: 8846: 8842: 8838: 8837: 8824: 8820: 8816: 8812: 8811: 8803: 8799: 8795: 8791: 8790: 8787: 8778: 8774: 8770: 8766: 8765: 8764: 8763: 8757: 8753: 8752: 8751: 8750: 8747: 8743: 8739: 8735: 8734: 8724: 8721: 8716: 8710: 8709: 8708: 8704: 8700: 8696: 8695: 8679: 8665: 8661: 8657: 8653: 8649: 8645: 8644: 8643: 8639: 8635: 8630: 8629: 8628: 8624: 8620: 8615: 8614: 8613: 8612: 8609: 8605: 8601: 8597: 8596: 8593: 8589: 8585: 8580: 8579: 8574: 8570: 8566: 8562: 8561: 8560: 8559: 8555: 8552: 8549: 8546: 8545: 8536: 8532: 8528: 8523: 8522: 8521: 8517: 8513: 8509: 8508: 8507: 8503: 8499: 8494: 8493: 8492: 8488: 8484: 8479: 8478: 8475: 8471: 8467: 8463: 8462:of the editor 8459: 8458: 8445: 8441: 8437: 8433: 8432: 8431: 8427: 8423: 8418: 8417: 8416: 8415: 8414: 8413: 8412: 8411: 8410: 8409: 8398: 8394: 8390: 8386: 8385: 8384: 8380: 8376: 8372: 8368: 8364: 8360: 8356: 8355: 8354: 8350: 8346: 8342: 8338: 8334: 8330: 8326: 8325: 8324: 8320: 8316: 8311: 8307: 8303: 8299: 8295: 8294: 8293: 8289: 8285: 8281: 8279: 8275: 8271: 8267: 8249: 8245: 8241: 8237: 8236: 8235: 8234: 8233: 8229: 8225: 8220: 8216: 8212: 8208: 8204: 8203: 8202: 8201: 8200: 8196: 8192: 8187: 8186: 8185: 8184: 8183: 8179: 8175: 8171: 8170: 8169: 8165: 8161: 8157: 8153: 8152: 8151: 8150: 8149: 8148: 8147: 8143: 8139: 8135: 8131: 8126: 8125: 8124: 8120: 8116: 8112: 8108: 8103: 8099: 8098: 8097: 8096: 8089: 8088: 8087: 8083: 8079: 8075: 8071: 8066: 8065: 8057: 8053: 8049: 8045: 8044: 8041: 8037: 8033: 8029: 8028: 8018: 8015: 8012: 8010: 8009: 8000: 7996: 7995: 7994: 7990: 7986: 7982: 7981: 7973: 7969: 7965: 7960: 7959: 7951: 7947: 7943: 7939: 7938: 7913: 7909: 7905: 7900: 7895: 7894: 7889: 7885: 7881: 7877: 7873: 7869: 7865: 7858: 7853: 7852: 7851: 7847: 7843: 7839: 7838: 7835: 7823: 7819: 7815: 7810: 7808: 7804: 7800: 7796: 7795: 7794: 7790: 7786: 7779: 7778: 7777: 7776: 7761: 7757: 7753: 7749: 7745: 7744: 7743: 7739: 7735: 7730: 7729: 7728: 7724: 7720: 7716: 7715: 7714: 7710: 7706: 7701: 7700: 7699: 7695: 7691: 7687: 7682: 7678: 7677:is allergenic 7675:that says it 7674: 7670: 7666: 7665: 7664: 7663: 7662: 7658: 7654: 7649: 7648: 7640: 7636: 7632: 7628: 7624: 7620: 7616: 7611: 7603: 7599: 7595: 7590: 7589: 7588: 7587: 7586: 7582: 7578: 7573: 7572: 7571: 7567: 7563: 7558: 7556: 7552: 7548: 7544: 7539: 7538: 7537: 7533: 7529: 7525: 7524: 7509: 7505: 7501: 7497: 7493: 7492: 7491: 7490: 7489: 7485: 7481: 7476: 7470: 7466: 7462: 7458: 7457: 7456: 7455: 7454: 7453: 7452: 7449: 7447: 7442: 7437: 7428: 7424: 7423: 7422: 7418: 7414: 7410: 7409: 7408: 7404: 7400: 7395: 7394: 7393: 7389: 7385: 7380: 7375: 7370: 7369: 7354: 7350: 7346: 7341: 7340: 7339: 7338: 7337: 7333: 7329: 7324: 7323: 7322: 7319: 7317: 7312: 7307: 7299: 7295: 7294: 7293: 7289: 7285: 7281: 7277: 7272: 7268: 7265: 7263: 7258: 7253: 7244: 7243: 7242: 7241: 7240: 7236: 7232: 7228: 7227: 7226: 7222: 7218: 7213: 7209: 7205: 7201: 7198: 7196: 7191: 7186: 7177: 7176: 7175: 7171: 7167: 7163: 7157: 7154: 7152: 7147: 7142: 7133: 7131: 7128: 7126: 7121: 7116: 7107: 7106: 7105: 7101: 7097: 7092: 7088: 7083: 7079: 7074: 7073: 7072: 7071: 7063: 7059: 7055: 7051: 7048: 7047: 7038: 7034: 7030: 7025: 7021: 7020: 7019: 7015: 7011: 7007: 7003: 6999: 6995: 6990: 6988: 6984: 6980: 6975: 6974: 6973: 6969: 6965: 6961: 6957: 6953: 6948: 6947: 6946: 6942: 6938: 6934: 6929: 6928: 6920: 6916: 6912: 6907: 6903: 6898: 6897: 6888: 6884: 6880: 6875: 6874: 6873: 6869: 6865: 6861: 6857: 6853: 6849: 6845: 6844: 6843: 6839: 6835: 6831: 6828: 6824: 6820: 6817: 6813: 6810: 6809:Nightscream's 6806: 6805: 6804: 6800: 6796: 6791: 6787: 6786: 6783:Rick Remender 6770: 6766: 6762: 6757: 6756: 6755: 6751: 6747: 6742: 6741: 6740: 6736: 6732: 6728: 6724: 6723: 6722: 6718: 6714: 6709: 6708: 6707: 6703: 6699: 6695: 6691: 6687: 6683: 6679: 6674: 6673: 6665: 6661: 6657: 6653: 6649: 6645: 6644: 6639: 6635: 6631: 6627: 6623: 6619: 6618: 6617: 6613: 6609: 6605: 6600: 6596: 6590: 6586: 6582: 6577: 6576: 6575: 6571: 6567: 6563: 6559: 6554: 6553: 6552: 6551: 6547: 6543: 6537: 6533: 6532: 6513: 6509: 6505: 6501: 6497: 6492: 6487: 6486: 6485: 6484: 6483: 6482: 6481: 6480: 6471: 6467: 6463: 6459: 6454: 6453: 6452: 6448: 6444: 6440: 6436: 6435:Biotechnology 6432: 6428: 6427: 6426: 6422: 6418: 6413: 6412: 6411: 6410: 6393: 6389: 6385: 6381: 6380: 6379: 6378: 6377: 6373: 6369: 6365: 6364: 6363: 6359: 6355: 6351: 6347: 6339: 6335: 6331: 6326: 6321: 6317: 6313: 6308: 6307: 6306: 6305: 6304: 6303: 6302: 6298: 6294: 6289: 6288: 6287: 6283: 6279: 6274: 6273: 6272: 6268: 6264: 6259: 6255: 6250: 6245: 6244: 6243: 6239: 6235: 6230: 6226: 6222: 6221: 6220: 6219: 6216: 6212: 6208: 6204: 6200: 6199: 6188: 6184: 6180: 6176: 6175: 6174: 6170: 6166: 6162: 6158: 6154: 6150: 6149: 6148: 6144: 6140: 6135: 6134: 6133: 6132: 6131: 6130: 6125: 6121: 6117: 6112: 6107: 6106: 6105: 6104: 6089: 6085: 6081: 6076: 6072: 6071: 6070: 6069: 6066: 6063: 6060: 6057: 6056: 6046: 6043: 6040: 6037: 6036: 6026: 6020: 6014: 6006: 6005: 5995: 5992: 5989: 5986: 5983: 5980: 5977: 5976: 5973: 5968: 5966: 5961: 5959: 5954: 5952: 5947: 5945: 5940: 5938: 5933: 5931: 5926: 5925: 5912: 5908: 5904: 5900: 5894: 5891: 5889: 5886: 5884: 5881: 5879: 5876: 5875: 5874: 5873: 5871: 5868: 5867: 5866: 5865: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5861: 5860: 5859: 5844: 5837: 5833: 5829: 5825: 5824: 5812: 5802: 5794: 5761: 5756: 5749: 5743: 5742: 5739: 5738: 5728: 5724: 5720: 5716: 5713: 5709: 5708: 5697: 5690: 5683: 5664:Snowden image 5657: 5653: 5649: 5645: 5644: 5643: 5642: 5635: 5634: 5633: 5632: 5629: 5625: 5621: 5617: 5613: 5608: 5607: 5595: 5591: 5587: 5582: 5581: 5580: 5576: 5572: 5568: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5558: 5554: 5550: 5549: 5533: 5529: 5525: 5520: 5516: 5512: 5508: 5503: 5502: 5501: 5497: 5493: 5489: 5488: 5487: 5486: 5485: 5484: 5483: 5482: 5471: 5470: 5469: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5450: 5449: 5448: 5447: 5446: 5439: 5435: 5431: 5427: 5422: 5421: 5420: 5416: 5412: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5397: 5392: 5389: 5386: 5385: 5383: 5382: 5381: 5380: 5373: 5372: 5371: 5370: 5357: 5353: 5349: 5344: 5343: 5342: 5341: 5340: 5339: 5338: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5318: 5317: 5316: 5315: 5314: 5313: 5312: 5311: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5296: 5292: 5288: 5284: 5283: 5282: 5281: 5280: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5275: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5260: 5259: 5258: 5257: 5256: 5255: 5254: 5243: 5242: 5241: 5237: 5233: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5220: 5216: 5212: 5207: 5202: 5197: 5196: 5186: 5182: 5178: 5173: 5172: 5171: 5167: 5163: 5158: 5157: 5133: 5126: 5119: 5111: 5104: 5097: 5089: 5082: 5075: 5051: 5047: 5043: 5038: 5034: 5033: 5032: 5028: 5024: 5019: 5018: 5010: 5006: 5002: 4998: 4995: 4994: 4987: 4984: 4979: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4966: 4962: 4957: 4954:I discovered 4953: 4949: 4945: 4941: 4936: 4931: 4927: 4923: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4913: 4908: 4901: 4900: 4891: 4888: 4883: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4870: 4866: 4862: 4858: 4854: 4849: 4845: 4840: 4836: 4832: 4828: 4824: 4820: 4816: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4807: 4802: 4796: 4792: 4791: 4790: 4786: 4782: 4777: 4773: 4772: 4761: 4757: 4753: 4749: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4740: 4739: 4738: 4733: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4720: 4719: 4718: 4717: 4708: 4705: 4700: 4694: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4683: 4679: 4674: 4668: 4663: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4659: 4658: 4653: 4650: 4645: 4639: 4636: 4632: 4628: 4627: 4626: 4622: 4618: 4614: 4611: 4610: 4599: 4595: 4592: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4575: 4571: 4567: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4556: 4552: 4548: 4543: 4542: 4541: 4537: 4533: 4529: 4525: 4521: 4517: 4513: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4502: 4498: 4493: 4492: 4484: 4480: 4476: 4472: 4469: 4468: 4465: 4461: 4457: 4453: 4452: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4420: 4416: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4404: 4400: 4396: 4392: 4388: 4383: 4382: 4379:You behavin'? 4374: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4359: 4358: 4349: 4345: 4338: 4331: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4301: 4297: 4292: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4282: 4278: 4274: 4273: 4269: 4264: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4235: 4234: 4231: 4224: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4211: 4208: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4192: 4191: 4184: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4166: 4162: 4161:AmericanDad86 4157: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4148: 4144: 4140: 4136: 4133: 4132: 4128: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4093: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4083: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4070: 4056: 4053: 4045: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4023: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4001: 4000: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3978: 3974: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3956: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3934: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3909: 3905: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3886: 3885: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3864: 3855: 3849: 3845: 3839: 3837:green rosetta 3830: 3829: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3816: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3804: 3800: 3794: 3792:green rosetta 3784: 3783: 3782: 3778: 3774: 3770: 3769: 3759: 3758: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3737: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3719: 3716: 3713: 3710: 3705: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3682: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3664: 3661: 3658: 3655: 3650: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3619: 3618: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3592: 3591:winter storms 3587: 3586: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3572: 3568: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3548: 3543: 3542:AfD consensus 3538: 3537: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3486: 3485: 3482: 3475: 3472: 3470: 3468: 3466: 3459: 3455: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3422: 3419: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3381: 3378: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3352: 3351: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3314: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3305: 3302: 3298: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3266: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3240: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3207: 3204: 3199: 3198: 3185: 3182: 3179: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3154: 3151: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3095: 3092: 3087: 3086: 3075: 3072: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3052: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3032: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3016: 3013: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3004: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2988: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2952: 2945: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2915: 2899: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2826: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2774: 2770: 2759: 2757: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2724:198.24.31.118 2721: 2718: 2715: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2699: 2692: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2645: 2644: 2636: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2614:like you did 2613: 2609: 2605: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2590: 2587: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2567: 2564: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2519: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2505:68.174.123.10 2502: 2501: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2487: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2450: 2446: 2445: 2435: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2415: 2414: 2400: 2399: 2396: 2393: 2390: 2385: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2323: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2302: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2281: 2280: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2264: 2263: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2230:User:Arcandam 2227: 2223: 2219: 2218: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2193: 2173: 2172: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2138: 2134: 2133: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2077: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2056: 2048: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2037: 2033: 2032: 2029: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 2000: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1982: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1944: 1943: 1940: 1937: 1934: 1931: 1930: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1900: 1899: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1849: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1775: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1759: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1739: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1693: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1665: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1637: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1576: 1571: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1455: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1414: 1405: 1404: 1401: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1380: 1379: 1369: 1365: 1359: 1353: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1331: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1302: 1301: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1285: 1284: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1254: 1253: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1228: 1227: 1223: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1203: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1164: 1157: 1150: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1124: 1123: 1107: 1104: 1101: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1081: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1016: 1012: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 999: 995: 993: 992:administrator 979: 975: 971: 967: 961: 957: 951: 947: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 919: 915: 911: 910: 885: 882: 881: 871: 867: 858: 855: 853: 847: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 828: 827: 819: 815: 811: 807: 806: 803: 799: 795: 791: 790: 781: 777: 773: 768: 767: 766: 762: 758: 753: 752: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 730: 726: 725: 724: 723: 717: 713: 712: 711: 710: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 690: 685: 681: 677: 673: 670:, please see 669: 665: 664: 663: 659: 655: 651: 650: 642: 638: 634: 629: 628: 625: 621: 617: 613: 612: 607: 603: 599: 595: 592: 591: 590: 589: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 569: 556: 552: 548: 544: 541: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 519: 515: 511: 508: 507: 501: 497: 493: 489: 488: 487: 486: 482: 479: 477: 473: 469: 465: 462: 460: 456: 452: 448: 447: 443: 442: 436: 432: 431: 430: 426: 422: 417: 416: 410: 406: 402: 397: 396: 395: 391: 387: 383: 382: 371: 370: 369: 365: 361: 357: 356: 343: 339: 335: 331: 330: 322: 318: 317: 310: 309: 303: 301:ReelAngelGirl 297: 296: 292: 285: 278: 266:list of metal 261: 258: 256: 253: 251: 248: 246: 243: 241: 238: 236: 233: 231: 228: 226: 223: 221: 218: 216: 215:Laurie Holden 213: 211: 208: 206: 203: 201: 198: 196: 193: 191: 188: 186: 185:Susan Bernard 183: 180: 177: 174: 170: 166: 163: 160: 158: 155: 153: 150: 148: 145: 143: 139: 136: 134: 131: 129: 126: 124: 121: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 69: 68: 65:Notes to self 61: 57: 54: 50: 49: 44: 43:Unified login 34: 30: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 9925: 9891: 9880: 9848: 9826: 9799: 9782: 9749:petrarchan47 9745: 9717: 9682:for deletion 9513:Roxy the dog 9441: 9240:petrarchan47 9236: 9211: 9174:edit warring 9165: 9159: 9147:Block notice 9135:for deletion 9082: 9045: 9038: 9001: 8987: 8960:patronize me 8956:Roxy the dog 8900:patronize me 8896:Roxy the dog 8714:Sergecross73 8680:for deletion 8651: 8584:Coretheapple 8554:Unacceptable 8553: 8547: 8461: 8155: 8110: 8106: 8101: 8007: 8006: 7962:(kidding).-- 7891: 7887: 7863: 7685: 7680: 7676: 7672: 7668: 7435:petrarchan47 7431: 7378: 7373: 7305:petrarchan47 7301: 7297: 7251:petrarchan47 7247: 7184:petrarchan47 7180: 7140:petrarchan47 7136: 7114:petrarchan47 7110: 7001: 6993: 6932: 6905: 6859: 6855: 6851: 6847: 6815: 6811: 6789: 6625: 6603: 6539: 6499: 6430: 6224: 6064: 6058: 6044: 6038: 6003: 5902: 5901:If you have 5869: 5766:Nude Marilyn 5735: 4996: 4977:Sergecross73 4906:Sergecross73 4881:Sergecross73 4838: 4831:Sondra Locke 4827:Talk:Jan Mak 4800:Sergecross73 4794: 4775: 4728: 4727: 4698:Sergecross73 4643:Sergecross73 4634: 4612: 4546: 4523: 4519: 4303: 4299: 4230:Marion Raven 4126: 4067:Don't Delete 3714: 3659: 3623:George Lucas 3590: 3547:winter storm 3546: 3464: 3457: 3354:asshole!'"-- 3296: 3292: 3288: 3257: 3123: 3101: 3063: 3059: 2995: 2900:for deletion 2772: 2755: 2394: 2220:us meaning: 2164:Paris Hilton 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2144:pre-deletion 2143: 2041: 2039: 1938: 1932: 1824: 1820: 1815: 1811: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1742: 1737: 1705: 1691: 1677: 1663: 1657:173.74.10.29 1649: 1635: 1606: 1574: 1488:Paris Hilton 1412: 1222:Lisa Gerrard 1045: 1040: 1021: 1014: 1008: 989: 959: 922:edit warring 913: 907: 883: 851: 824:Sondra Locke 733: 693: 445: 434: 312: 304: 46: 32: 26: 9485:WP:CIVILITY 9443:El duderino 8982:provided.-- 8692:Bye for now 8154:And I have 7785:Arc de Ciel 7752:Arc de Ciel 7430:while....) 7284:groupuscule 6690:Documentary 5909:anytime. -- 5776:emailed you 5719:Greatpumkin 4116:BIO article 3627:Jim Cantore 3625:. Or maybe 3120:Our Mr. Mak 2992:Our Mr. Mak 2758:(sculpture) 2571:Malerooster 1041:established 1020:handle it. 930:Rob De Luca 573:WP:ELBURDEN 468:98.26.28.41 464:On Picatom? 451:98.26.28.41 307:Talk to me! 260:COI actions 102:Ag Sec foot 10141:Categories 9570:. You can 9172:caused by 9170:disruption 8882:Tryptofish 8769:CorporateM 8656:Tryptofish 8619:Tryptofish 8548:Acceptable 7874:, keeping 7868:verifiably 7651:reasons.-- 7575:readers.-- 7231:Tryptofish 7212:canvassing 7010:Tryptofish 6952:Glyphosate 6937:Tryptofish 6656:Tryptofish 6504:Tryptofish 5637:releases.) 5571:CorporateM 5553:CorporateM 5492:CorporateM 5411:CorporateM 5348:CorporateM 5232:CorporateM 4346:. You can 4127:Judge Judy 3465:Ritchie333 2960:. You can 2912:Thank you! 2707:. You can 2641:Canon 500D 2156:pre-rename 1896:Wim Crusio 1544:EricaL2003 1522:EricaL2003 1500:EricaL2003 970:Black Kite 920:caused by 918:disruption 112:Check plot 107:Read later 84:Censorship 9992:Archiving 9470:Canoe1967 9427:Canoe1967 9300:Canoe1967 9274:Canoe1967 9190:consensus 9188:and seek 9168:for your 9083:Miss Bono 9077:Cool! :) 9065:Canoe1967 9046:Miss Bono 9025:Canoe1967 9002:Miss Bono 8984:Canoe1967 8976:Guestbook 8940:Canoe1967 8911:Canoe1967 8841:Canoe1967 8794:Surtsicna 8738:Canoe1967 8699:Canoe1967 8652:like this 8648:WP:REDACT 8634:Canoe1967 8600:Canoe1967 8527:Canoe1967 8498:Canoe1967 8422:Canoe1967 8224:Canoe1967 8174:Canoe1967 8138:Canoe1967 8134:hamburger 8078:Canoe1967 8074:hamburger 8048:Canoe1967 8032:Canoe1967 8025:Thank you 7985:Canoe1967 7964:Canoe1967 7942:Canoe1967 7842:Canoe1967 7814:Canoe1967 7734:Canoe1967 7705:Canoe1967 7671:There is 7653:Canoe1967 7631:Canoe1967 7577:Canoe1967 7547:Canoe1967 7480:Canoe1967 7399:Canoe1967 7328:Canoe1967 7166:IRWolfie- 7096:Canoe1967 7054:Canoe1967 7029:Canoe1967 6964:Canoe1967 6902:WP:TIGERS 6864:Canoe1967 6856:new votes 6816:replacing 6795:Canoe1967 6761:Canoe1967 6731:Canoe1967 6698:Canoe1967 6630:IRWolfie- 6608:Canoe1967 6581:Canoe1967 6566:DanHobley 6462:IRWolfie- 6443:Canoe1967 6417:IRWolfie- 6368:Canoe1967 6293:Canoe1967 6263:Canoe1967 6165:Canoe1967 6137:give it! 6116:Canoe1967 6080:Canoe1967 5971:Mission 7 5964:Mission 6 5957:Mission 5 5950:Mission 4 5943:Mission 3 5936:Mission 2 5929:Mission 1 5828:Canoe1967 5816:template. 5620:Canoe1967 5586:Canoe1967 5524:Canoe1967 5430:Canoe1967 5287:Canoe1967 5211:Canoe1967 5162:Canoe1967 5144:Guestbook 5042:Carptrash 5023:Carptrash 5001:Canoe1967 4961:Canoe1967 4865:Canoe1967 4781:Canoe1967 4752:Canoe1967 4691:to avoid 4678:Canoe1967 4631:vandalize 4617:Canoe1967 4551:Canoe1967 4497:Canoe1967 4475:Canoe1967 4456:Canoe1967 4429:Canoe1967 4395:Canoe1967 4365:Canoe1967 4308:Canoe1967 4302:consume, 4215:Canoe1967 4199:Canoe1967 4175:Canoe1967 4156:WP:WEIGHT 4139:Canoe1967 4135:WP:WEIGHT 4100:Canoe1967 4074:Canoe1967 4031:Canoe1967 4004:Canoe1967 3981:Canoe1967 3933:WP:OUTING 3918:Canoe1967 3889:Canoe1967 3868:Canoe1967 3819:Canoe1967 3773:Canoe1967 3761:trouble." 3741:Canoe1967 3686:Canoe1967 3668:JPeachman 3576:Canoe1967 3527:Canoe1967 3494:Canoe1967 3436:Canoe1967 3398:Canoe1967 3356:Canoe1967 3218:Canoe1967 3106:Canoe1967 2971:Canoe1967 2919:Canoe1967 2863:Canoe1967 2848:Carptrash 2834:Canoe1967 2795:Carptrash 2738:Canoe1967 2649:Canoe1967 2620:Tiggerjay 2594:Tiggerjay 2541:Canoe1967 2491:Canoe1967 2468:Henrib736 2454:Canoe1967 2419:Canoe1967 2327:Canoe1967 2306:Canoe1967 2285:Viriditas 2268:Viriditas 2249:Viriditas 2234:Canoe1967 2201:Viriditas 2160:pre-merge 2109:Canoe1967 2081:Canoe1967 2060:Canoe1967 2012:Canoe1967 2008:WP:PETARD 1988:Canoe1967 1971:Canoe1967 1950:Canoe1967 1906:Canoe1967 1880:Viriditas 1865:Viriditas 1833:Viriditas 1796:Viriditas 1763:Viriditas 1747:Viriditas 1713:Viriditas 1699:Viriditas 1615:Viriditas 1593:Canoe1967 1418:Canoe1967 1384:Canoe1967 1306:Canoe1967 1289:Canoe1967 1258:Canoe1967 1232:Canoe1967 1207:Canoe1967 1184:Canoe1967 1129:Canoe1967 1085:Canoe1967 938:consensus 936:and seek 916:for your 895:July 2012 852:Erikeltic 832:Canoe1967 810:Canoe1967 794:Canoe1967 757:Canoe1967 742:Guy Macon 738:WP:REDACT 698:Canoe1967 672:WP:REDACT 654:Canoe1967 633:Canoe1967 616:Canoe1967 577:Canoe1967 386:Canoe1967 360:Canoe1967 334:Canoe1967 255:COI Essay 53:Wikimedia 48:Canoe1967 9669:You can 9646:Cheerios 9597:WikiLove 9517:resonate 9468:cause.-- 9210:|reason= 9166:72 hours 8731:Thoughts 7888:Addendum 7686:might be 7681:might be 7276:Monsanto 7024:Deep Web 6826:earlier. 6812:personal 6790:personal 6746:Sighola2 6713:Sighola2 6626:does not 6579:those.-- 6320:this dif 6312:this dif 6004:Get Help 5717:Thanks! 5694:You can 5149:Spamhaus 5130:You can 5108:You can 5086:You can 5068:Talkback 4940:umbrella 4590:Interior 4570:BWilkins 4532:BWilkins 4092:WP:UNDUE 3417:Interior 3376:Interior 3369:ground! 3297:probably 3064:slightly 3044:this one 2985:Jan Mak‎ 2938:Talkback 2756:The Drop 2685:Talkback 2664:BadaBoom 2185:Resolved 2095:Arcandam 2004:WP:STICK 1967:WP:POINT 1709:contribs 1695:contribs 1681:contribs 1667:contribs 1653:contribs 1639:contribs 1589:WP:POINT 1478:Resolved 1143:Talkback 1009:@MaxSem: 958:|reason= 566:ELBURDEN 545:~Eric F 289:You can 195:copyvio? 56:projects 9348:WWB Too 9318:WWB Too 9220:first. 9208:unblock 9161:blocked 9039:¿(O_o)? 8525:well.-- 8156:nowhere 8130:Big Mac 8100:You do 8070:Big Mac 7748:WP:LEAD 7645:Comment 7478:work.-- 7379:love it 6906:dispute 6858:wanted 6848:dispute 6648:WP:COIN 6491:WP:COIN 5245:simple: 4731:Richard 4246:WP:BLPN 4238:WP:ANEW 4096:WP:BLPN 3432:Spuzzum 3313:Jan Mak 3304:Snowman 3265:Snowman 3206:Snowman 3181:Snowman 3153:Snowman 3132:Jan Mak 3094:Snowman 3071:Snowman 3066:wrong. 3051:Snowman 3031:Snowman 3015:Snowman 3003:Snowman 2680:Thanks! 2647:well.-- 2358:WP:BLPN 2150:, full 2042:Hut 8.5 1821:nothing 1611:WP:NPOV 1382:ones.-- 1363:contrib 968:first. 956:unblock 909:blocked 716:WP:TPOC 353:Sandbox 142:Archive 117:Archive 74:archive 9530:Jytdog 9498:Jytdog 9494:WP:AGF 8877:WP:MFD 8815:Jytdog 8719:msg me 8646:About 8565:Jytdog 8512:Jytdog 8483:Jytdog 8466:Jytdog 8436:Jytdog 8389:Jytdog 8375:Jytdog 8359:Jytdog 8345:Jytdog 8329:Jytdog 8315:Jytdog 8298:Jytdog 8284:Jytdog 8270:Jytdog 8240:Jytdog 8207:Jytdog 8191:Jytdog 8160:Jytdog 8115:Jytdog 8014:(talk) 7904:Lexein 7880:Lexein 7799:Jytdog 7719:Jytdog 7690:Jytdog 7615:Jytdog 7594:Jytdog 7562:Jytdog 7528:Jytdog 7500:Jytdog 7461:Jytdog 7413:Jytdog 7384:Jytdog 7345:Jytdog 7217:Jytdog 6979:Jytdog 6911:Lexein 6879:Lexein 6834:Lexein 6622:WP:SPA 6542:a13ean 6496:WP:ANI 6384:Jytdog 6354:Jytdog 6330:Jytdog 6278:Jytdog 6234:Jytdog 6179:Jytdog 6139:Jytdog 6078:off.-- 5907:Ocaasi 5843:Siwash 5515:Amanda 4982:msg me 4911:msg me 4886:msg me 4805:msg me 4703:msg me 4648:msg me 4594:(Talk) 4304:create 4300:you to 4268:WP:RSN 4258:WP:ANI 4250:WP:EAR 4242:WP:RSN 3977:WP:BLP 3973:WP:TPO 3844:(talk) 3834:little 3815:WP:TPO 3799:(talk) 3789:little 3766:header 3421:(Talk) 3380:(Talk) 3293:assume 3289:called 3042:- and 3040:Google 2830:flickr 2823:I have 2452:eye.-- 2362:Sitush 2344:Sitush 1902:WP:COI 1859:, and 1812:always 1671:HiLo48 1495:Look: 1452:Re:WTF 755:all.-- 171:": --> 169:My Cat 9606:subst 9425:so.-- 9222:Bbb23 8268:Argh. 8136:. -- 7876:WP:42 7870:with 7006:point 7002:never 6759:it.-- 6694:movie 5546:break 5455:ways. 5139:Hello 4673:rider 4524:after 4516:WP:UP 4324:Hello 4277:Bbb23 4254:WP:AN 4129:edits 4050:rybec 4020:rybec 3301:Giant 3262:Giant 3203:Giant 3178:Giant 3150:Giant 3091:Giant 3068:Giant 3048:Giant 3028:Giant 3012:Giant 3000:Giant 2442:Reply 2434:Hazhk 2158:, or 1400:Usher 1277:lord. 1230:up.-- 1066:Avanu 1027:Avanu 571:From 516:? ~E 435:think 348:Right 10126:yeah 9534:talk 9502:talk 9474:talk 9431:talk 9352:Talk 9322:Talk 9304:talk 9278:talk 9226:talk 9069:talk 9029:talk 8988:talk 8944:talk 8929:talk 8915:talk 8886:talk 8845:talk 8819:talk 8798:talk 8773:Talk 8742:talk 8703:talk 8660:talk 8638:talk 8623:talk 8604:talk 8588:talk 8569:talk 8531:talk 8516:talk 8502:talk 8487:talk 8470:talk 8440:talk 8426:talk 8393:talk 8379:talk 8363:talk 8349:talk 8333:talk 8319:talk 8313:out. 8302:talk 8288:talk 8274:talk 8244:talk 8228:talk 8211:talk 8195:talk 8178:talk 8164:talk 8142:talk 8119:talk 8082:talk 8052:talk 8036:talk 8008:corn 7999:this 7989:talk 7968:talk 7946:talk 7908:talk 7884:talk 7846:talk 7818:talk 7803:talk 7789:talk 7756:talk 7738:talk 7723:talk 7709:talk 7694:talk 7657:talk 7635:talk 7619:talk 7598:talk 7581:talk 7566:talk 7551:talk 7532:talk 7504:talk 7484:talk 7465:talk 7427:this 7417:talk 7403:talk 7388:talk 7349:talk 7332:talk 7298:told 7288:talk 7235:talk 7221:talk 7170:talk 7100:talk 7082:this 7078:this 7058:talk 7050:This 7033:talk 7014:talk 6994:must 6983:talk 6968:talk 6941:talk 6915:talk 6883:talk 6868:talk 6838:talk 6799:talk 6765:talk 6750:talk 6735:talk 6717:talk 6702:talk 6692:and 6660:talk 6654:. -- 6634:talk 6612:talk 6585:talk 6570:talk 6546:talk 6508:talk 6466:talk 6447:talk 6421:talk 6388:talk 6372:talk 6358:talk 6334:talk 6297:talk 6282:talk 6267:talk 6238:talk 6211:talk 6203:here 6183:talk 6169:talk 6155:and 6143:talk 6120:talk 6084:talk 5832:talk 5754:Talk 5723:talk 5652:talk 5624:talk 5614:and 5590:talk 5575:Talk 5567:here 5557:Talk 5528:talk 5511:Ajay 5496:Talk 5434:talk 5426:here 5415:Talk 5352:Talk 5291:talk 5236:Talk 5215:talk 5181:talk 5166:talk 5046:talk 5027:talk 5005:talk 4965:talk 4869:talk 4855:and 4785:talk 4756:talk 4746:Ask 4682:talk 4621:talk 4555:talk 4501:talk 4479:talk 4460:talk 4433:talk 4419:talk 4399:talk 4369:talk 4312:talk 4281:talk 4219:talk 4203:talk 4179:talk 4165:talk 4143:talk 4104:talk 4078:talk 4044:diff 4035:talk 4008:talk 3985:talk 3964:talk 3942:talk 3922:talk 3908:talk 3893:talk 3872:talk 3823:talk 3777:talk 3745:talk 3727:talk 3690:talk 3672:talk 3635:talk 3629:. -- 3600:talk 3580:talk 3556:talk 3531:talk 3517:talk 3498:talk 3440:talk 3402:talk 3360:talk 3328:talk 3319:Mak. 3279:talk 3248:talk 3222:talk 3167:talk 3140:talk 3110:talk 2975:talk 2923:talk 2867:talk 2852:talk 2838:talk 2799:talk 2742:talk 2728:talk 2668:talk 2653:talk 2624:talk 2616:here 2598:talk 2575:talk 2545:talk 2537:duck 2525:talk 2509:talk 2495:talk 2472:talk 2458:talk 2423:talk 2366:talk 2360:. - 2348:talk 2331:talk 2310:talk 2289:talk 2272:talk 2253:talk 2238:talk 2205:talk 2113:talk 2099:talk 2085:talk 2064:talk 2016:talk 1992:talk 1975:talk 1954:talk 1910:talk 1884:talk 1869:talk 1837:talk 1800:talk 1767:talk 1751:talk 1733:NPOV 1717:talk 1703:talk 1689:talk 1675:talk 1661:talk 1647:talk 1633:talk 1619:talk 1597:talk 1587:and 1548:talk 1526:talk 1504:talk 1463:talk 1438:talk 1422:talk 1413:Done 1388:talk 1357:talk 1310:talk 1293:talk 1262:talk 1236:talk 1211:talk 1188:talk 1133:talk 1089:talk 1070:talk 1047:Neil 1031:talk 974:talk 836:talk 814:talk 798:talk 776:talk 761:talk 746:talk 740:. -- 702:talk 680:talk 668:this 658:talk 637:talk 620:talk 602:talk 598:Ronz 581:talk 551:talk 531:talk 523:talk 496:talk 472:talk 455:talk 425:talk 405:talk 390:talk 364:talk 338:talk 315:Tea? 92:More 9904:OMG 9356:COI 9326:COI 9180:at 8102:not 8004:AIR 7930:ANI 7864:lot 6977:it. 6962:.-- 6960:Bee 6822:it. 6314:by 5903:any 5870:Hi! 5811:ygm 5806:or 5648:TCO 5618:.-- 5399:do. 4795:are 4587:The 4415:TCO 3458:got 3414:The 3373:The 3124:any 2996:any 2832:.-- 2299:L@L 2152:AfD 1825:not 1816:ask 1814:to 1783:you 1779:not 1683:), 1669:), 1655:), 1641:), 1607:not 1200:COI 1000:). 928:at 914:48h 868:of 727:In 674:. 666:re 449:~E 87:ref 10143:: 9706:}} 9700:{{ 9536:) 9519:) 9511:-- 9504:) 9476:) 9433:) 9358:) 9354:· 9328:) 9324:· 9306:) 9298:-- 9280:) 9228:) 9214:}} 9206:{{ 9071:) 9031:) 8990:) 8962:) 8946:) 8931:) 8917:) 8902:) 8888:) 8880:-- 8847:) 8821:) 8800:) 8775:) 8744:) 8705:) 8662:) 8640:) 8625:) 8606:) 8590:) 8571:) 8533:) 8518:) 8504:) 8489:) 8472:) 8442:) 8428:) 8395:) 8381:) 8365:) 8351:) 8335:) 8321:) 8304:) 8290:) 8276:) 8246:) 8230:) 8213:) 8197:) 8180:) 8166:) 8144:) 8121:) 8084:) 8054:) 8038:) 7991:) 7970:) 7948:) 7910:) 7902:-- 7848:) 7820:) 7805:) 7791:) 7758:) 7740:) 7725:) 7711:) 7696:) 7659:) 7637:) 7621:) 7600:) 7583:) 7568:) 7553:) 7534:) 7506:) 7486:) 7467:) 7419:) 7405:) 7390:) 7351:) 7334:) 7290:) 7278:, 7237:) 7223:) 7172:) 7102:) 7060:) 7035:) 7016:) 7000:; 6985:) 6970:) 6943:) 6933:is 6917:) 6909:-- 6885:) 6877:-- 6870:) 6840:) 6801:) 6767:) 6752:) 6737:) 6719:) 6704:) 6662:) 6636:) 6614:) 6587:) 6572:) 6548:) 6510:) 6500:is 6468:) 6460:. 6449:) 6437:+ 6423:) 6390:) 6374:) 6360:) 6336:) 6299:) 6284:) 6269:) 6240:) 6213:) 6205:. 6185:) 6171:) 6145:) 6122:) 6086:) 6015:| 5834:) 5814:}} 5808:{{ 5804:}} 5798:{{ 5725:) 5654:) 5626:) 5592:) 5577:) 5569:. 5559:) 5530:) 5509:. 5498:) 5436:) 5417:) 5354:) 5293:) 5238:) 5217:) 5183:) 5175:-- 5168:) 5048:) 5029:) 5007:) 4999:-- 4967:) 4871:) 4817:. 4787:) 4758:) 4736:BB 4684:) 4623:) 4576:) 4574:←✎ 4566:✉→ 4557:) 4538:) 4536:←✎ 4528:✉→ 4503:) 4481:) 4473:-- 4462:) 4435:) 4421:) 4401:) 4371:) 4314:) 4283:) 4221:) 4205:) 4197:-- 4181:) 4167:) 4145:) 4106:) 4080:) 4037:) 4010:) 3987:) 3966:) 3944:) 3924:) 3910:) 3895:) 3874:) 3825:) 3779:) 3747:) 3729:) 3692:) 3674:) 3637:) 3602:) 3582:) 3569:, 3558:) 3550:-- 3533:) 3519:) 3500:) 3442:) 3404:) 3362:) 3330:) 3281:) 3258:is 3250:) 3224:) 3169:) 3161:-- 3142:) 3112:) 3104:-- 3060:if 3026:? 2977:) 2925:) 2869:) 2854:) 2840:) 2801:) 2744:) 2730:) 2670:) 2655:) 2626:) 2618:. 2600:) 2577:) 2547:) 2527:) 2511:) 2497:) 2474:) 2460:) 2425:) 2368:) 2350:) 2333:) 2312:) 2291:) 2274:) 2255:) 2240:) 2224:, 2215:us 2207:) 2199:. 2154:, 2115:) 2101:) 2087:) 2066:) 2038:. 2018:) 2010:-- 1994:) 1977:) 1969:-- 1956:) 1912:) 1886:) 1871:) 1855:, 1839:) 1802:) 1769:) 1753:) 1743:is 1738:we 1719:) 1621:) 1613:? 1599:) 1591:-- 1550:) 1528:) 1506:) 1465:) 1440:) 1424:) 1416:-- 1390:) 1366:) 1360:- 1312:) 1295:) 1264:) 1238:) 1213:) 1190:) 1135:) 1091:) 1072:) 1033:) 976:) 962:}} 954:{{ 838:) 816:) 800:) 778:) 763:) 748:) 704:) 696:-- 682:) 660:) 639:) 622:) 604:) 583:) 553:) 533:) 498:) 474:) 466:~E 457:) 433:I 427:) 407:) 392:) 366:) 340:) 58:. 45:: 10121:⚠ 10088:⚠ 10075:⚠ 10062:⚠ 10049:⚠ 10036:⚠ 10023:⚠ 10010:⚠ 9972:⚠ 9959:⚠ 9946:⚠ 9931:⚠ 9897:⚠ 9854:⚠ 9832:⚠ 9805:⚠ 9788:⚠ 9759:c 9754:t 9723:⚠ 9666:. 9608:: 9563:. 9532:( 9515:( 9500:( 9472:( 9429:( 9350:( 9320:( 9302:( 9276:( 9250:c 9245:t 9224:( 9067:( 9027:( 8986:( 8958:( 8942:( 8927:( 8913:( 8898:( 8884:( 8843:( 8817:( 8796:( 8771:( 8740:( 8701:( 8658:( 8636:( 8621:( 8602:( 8586:( 8567:( 8529:( 8514:( 8500:( 8485:( 8468:( 8438:( 8424:( 8391:( 8377:( 8361:( 8347:( 8331:( 8317:( 8300:( 8286:( 8272:( 8242:( 8226:( 8209:( 8193:( 8176:( 8162:( 8140:( 8117:( 8080:( 8050:( 8034:( 7987:( 7966:( 7944:( 7906:( 7882:( 7859:) 7855:( 7844:( 7816:( 7801:( 7787:( 7754:( 7736:( 7721:( 7707:( 7692:( 7655:( 7633:( 7617:( 7596:( 7579:( 7564:( 7549:( 7530:( 7502:( 7482:( 7463:( 7445:c 7440:t 7415:( 7401:( 7386:( 7347:( 7330:( 7315:c 7310:t 7286:( 7261:c 7256:t 7233:( 7219:( 7194:c 7189:t 7168:( 7150:c 7145:t 7124:c 7119:t 7098:( 7056:( 7031:( 7012:( 6981:( 6966:( 6939:( 6913:( 6881:( 6866:( 6860:C 6836:( 6797:( 6763:( 6748:( 6733:( 6715:( 6700:( 6688:. 6658:( 6632:( 6610:( 6583:( 6568:( 6544:( 6506:( 6464:( 6445:( 6419:( 6386:( 6370:( 6356:( 6332:( 6295:( 6280:( 6265:( 6236:( 6209:( 6181:( 6167:( 6141:( 6118:( 6082:( 5830:( 5757:) 5751:( 5721:( 5691:. 5650:( 5622:( 5588:( 5573:( 5555:( 5526:( 5494:( 5432:( 5413:( 5350:( 5289:( 5234:( 5213:( 5179:( 5164:( 5127:. 5105:. 5083:. 5044:( 5025:( 5003:( 4963:( 4867:( 4783:( 4754:( 4680:( 4619:( 4553:( 4499:( 4477:( 4458:( 4431:( 4417:( 4397:( 4367:( 4339:. 4310:( 4279:( 4217:( 4201:( 4177:( 4163:( 4141:( 4102:( 4076:( 4046:— 4033:( 4006:( 3983:( 3962:( 3940:( 3920:( 3906:( 3891:( 3870:( 3821:( 3775:( 3743:( 3725:( 3688:( 3670:( 3633:( 3598:( 3578:( 3554:( 3529:( 3515:( 3496:( 3438:( 3400:( 3358:( 3326:( 3277:( 3246:( 3220:( 3165:( 3138:( 3108:( 2973:( 2953:. 2921:( 2865:( 2850:( 2836:( 2797:( 2740:( 2726:( 2700:. 2666:( 2651:( 2622:( 2596:( 2573:( 2543:( 2523:( 2507:( 2493:( 2470:( 2456:( 2421:( 2364:( 2346:( 2329:( 2308:( 2287:( 2270:( 2251:( 2236:( 2203:( 2111:( 2097:( 2083:( 2062:( 2014:( 1990:( 1973:( 1952:( 1908:( 1882:( 1867:( 1835:( 1798:( 1765:( 1749:( 1715:( 1706:· 1701:( 1692:· 1687:( 1678:· 1673:( 1664:· 1659:( 1650:· 1645:( 1636:· 1631:( 1617:( 1595:( 1546:( 1524:( 1502:( 1461:( 1436:( 1420:( 1386:( 1354:( 1308:( 1291:( 1260:( 1234:( 1209:( 1186:( 1158:. 1131:( 1103:P 1100:T 1087:( 1068:( 1049:N 1029:( 972:( 834:( 812:( 796:( 774:( 759:( 744:( 700:( 678:( 656:( 635:( 618:( 600:( 579:( 549:( 529:( 525:) 521:( 494:( 483:? 470:( 453:( 423:( 403:( 388:( 362:( 336:( 286:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index