User talk:Bobby Cohn/Archive 4

569:

I am literate enough to get through the reports but it's a hard slog, so I am asking whether this would be any easier for you. And also asking whether there is something that can/should be said about the idea of killing anything alive in soil that will be used to grow produce. Just spit-balling. I think, as an effort to clarify the structure, I will outline this topic on my talk page, since one of the things I am asking you to look at as fresh eyes is whether it is clear what the Montreal Protocol or methyl iodide have to do with anything. Also whether it is clear that while the complaint focused on children (and given mandatory school attendance probably rightly so), these pesticide issues affect millions of people, and

3103:, please read the declination reasoning given at the draft article, and see that it says (1) the article does not meet the minimum standard of inline citations and (2) the references do not yet demonstrate the subject qualifies for an article on the basis of notability. These messages are full of links to relevant Knowledge policy that fully explain the requirements for article publication. See also, the comment I left when reviewing the article where I point to a resource for assistance with properly formatting your inline citations and then make note that as an autobiography, there will be significant hurdles to overcome to prepare the draft article for publication. You might also find more generic help at 2715:: thanks, hope you're doing well too. It’s regrettable that evidence wasn't presented during the RM. To explain my closure of the discussion, that was clearly the consensus at the time based on the participation in the RM. My preference, given that evidence, would be to revert the move and relist the discussion such that evidence and conversation could be given for and against the evidence you have presented here—I know that this is a common option at MOVEREVIEW. Before I do that, I'm just searching for policy that would support my being able to undo the close without appearing as a supervote, without having to waste editor time at MOVEREVIEW. 712:, you are correct in that adding topics on the talk page is the best way to get in touch with another editor. Good job on your first draft. I wasn't the one to leave the remark about the citation, my comment on the draft was that it was a little light on the citations, I didn't feel that it was ready for mainspace quiet yet but thought I would leave it to another reviewer if someone else felt it ready to accept. With more inline citations, I think I would feel it more acceptable and in line with our 31: 2542: 3754: 98: 3824: 1991: 3620: 2936: 647: 755:, it has to do with some sections of your draft lacking citations. Currently, there are large sections that are entirely void of citations. It is fine if that is sourced from the same material that sources other statements, those sections just need those citations to be identified so others can easily verify your work. Take, for example 1159:, in my opinion, everything south of "Writing & Organizational Techniques" is not encyclopedic. I wasn't going to delete it for you because you have references in there, but you need to ensure that you are citing to references that demonstrate the subject of your draft article (here, a specific type of essay) talk about the subject 3777:—neither of these locations are appropriate and then by duplicating them without regard for the messages left on your talk page is considered spam and disruptive. That's the purpose of your talk page, people are trying to communicate with you and help, so please read them if you are, as you say, inexperienced and looking for help. 2096:, the article has been resubmitted on your behalf. Thanks for taking the time to address the concerns, but there is no need to give me a preemptive warning to change my mind on the first review I've completed. It is a part of the AFC record and if another reviewer has a different opinion of my own they are welcome to accept it. 3802:

people like those I have worked with and has had a great deal of influence more widely. I would like to be able to bring this work to the attention of more people through wikipedia so that the ideas can benefit others. Because of my age, I am able to do only a limited amount each day. I hope to return to this tomorrow.

3744:, that is okay, everyone who edits Knowledge didn't know much when they started editing either. But when that is the case, you need to be more careful and pay attention to all the details; read and pay attention to everything you are doing if you aren't sure about it. You already have a draft located at 3596:

Hi Bobby, thanks for moving my article. I just wanted to clarify that the title should be Isabel Cañas as that is the author's official pen name. I'm still a new user so I am not sure how to change the title to "Isabel Cañas." I would love any pointers regarding that. Lauchenauer is the name they use

2485:

I, Muthamilselvi, my username is "TheValorWomanMTS", have edited my own Knowledge article for personal purposes and have not received any compensation for these edits. My edits are intended to improve the accuracy and quality of the information presented. please help me resolve the issue and redirect

2243:

Dear Marcus, Thank you for your comments on the LAPaL article. This is the first time I am editing a wikipedia article although I have several experience of writing scientific journals. I understand that the nonpromotional policy of wikipedia. I will edit the content based on that but I am still not

2065:

I must disagree with your statement in your note that “A lot of the sources cited are interviews and therefor not independent.” There is only one Q&A among the sources and I was careful to only use it to cite facts reported by the journalist in the three paragraph lead, before the Q&A begins.

573:

is without getting into the even more polluted Central Valley. Side note, I am assuming from the mention of Guelph that you are in Ontario and not necessarily familiar with the names of California regions, so let me point out a hole in the road: Central California = Central Coast + Central Valley but

568:

is that the tarps don't work very well and the methyl bromide disproportionately harmed non-whites given that agricultural communities in California are disproportionately non-white. A lot of the sources take issue with the scientific review process at EPA, and the models used to assess health risks.

538:

I think that almost all of the sources are extremely RS but hmm what I knew about the facts before I started editing this article revolved around Oaxacan migrants and agriculture on the Central Coast. I am suggesting that perhaps you have specialized knowledge that I do not. I hesitate to outline the

374:

With regards to my reasoning, I felt I expanded a lot in my AFC comment in addition to the declination reasoning, showing other articles that may be a suitable location for it. Not every example of state usage listed in the draft article even use "final five" voting, so would the explanation of those

151:

has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being

3172:

Since I moved from Sandbox to Drafts - the page is not available for me to make any amends. Can you help me retrieve it in my Sandbox please so that I can edit it within the policy framework and re-submit? It has taken me a diligent effort over some weeks to produce that and I dont have another copy

2061:

since the source is independent of Harris, is the most credible source possible concerning Grammy nominations, and, as per policy, is used to represent “straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further,

1285:

I am not sharing an account, after you asked for more information, I had to ask Daniel Calderon other details (who knows him), for example city of birth, etc. I would really appreciate it if you could take a look at my answer to your recommendations. "The recommendations were the following: Does not

1039:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Knowledge article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability

3168:

I just got the draft I created for my Vedanta guru (Swamini Brahmaprajnananda Saraswati), my teacher deleted by you. I cannot access it. This was my first attempt at it and I understand some paras may need to be re-written to give it a neutral point of view. I respect you showing me the right pages

2610:

Dr. James Alic Garang is a prominent figure in the financial and economic landscape of South Sudan, and I believe that the current Knowledge draft is timely for approval. As someone who has followed his career and the developments in the South Sudanese economy, I believe I have a good understanding

2048:

You pointed out that the Variety article I cited for the first of Harris’s two Grammy nominations only said he worked on Kendrick Lamar’s “Family Ties,” which won a Grammy. This is correct. But the Knowledge sentence has two citations - the second is directly to the website of the Grammys. The same

577:

Appreciate the input and any further suggestions. I still can't find a good inbox, also; might have to set up something bespoke, since this is *not* a court case and was specifically disallowed from being a court case. Hope this clarifies my request. Given some of the (well-sourced!) material about

306:

You mention that the topic is included within an existing Knowledge article, "Top Four Primary," but I believe it would be an inappropriate commandeering of that article to fully flesh out the Final Five Voting section. For this reason, and the depth of information in the Final Five Voting draft, I

2618:

I would greatly appreciate if you could guide me on the specific steps I can take to improve the article on Dr. James Alic Garang. I am open to any suggestions or feedback you may have, and I am committed to working closely with the Knowledge team to ensure that the information presented is of the

2614:

I would be honored to work with the Knowledge team to enhance the existing article on Dr. Garang. I am confident that I can provide well-researched and accurate information, as well as offer valuable insights and perspectives that can enrich the content. However, I also recognize the importance of

1416:

I wrote the Stefan Pastine draft entry you reviewed and rejected today. I added several external citations (SBIR/NSF, MIT Technology Review, Simems Gamesa Report). I'm just wondering whether those aren't sufficient as credible outside sources and/or if you feel like there needs to be more of them?

1236:

Hi @microbiologyMarcus me and a friend from Venezuela Daniel Calderon (who studied with Ronalds Gonzalez), We believe that Ronalds Gonzalez is one of the Venezuelans that can be highlighted as one of the top researchers in biomaterials from our country. I am from Universidad de Los Andes, the same

475:

After we talked I noticed your interest in Wikiproject Soil. Do you have an opinion on or are you familiar with soil fumigation? If so feel free to suggest sources anytime. I find it, er, interesting, that all of the EPA documents linked in the news sources are now giving 404 errors, but some have

1046:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject

443:

If you are around in a day or so I could possibly use some fresh eyes to assess how well I have explained the thing for a reader that knows nothing about all this. Don't worry, not a full-scale AfC, just whether you can actually read it without getting a headache. I'd appreciate hearing about any

3801:

I am responding to Mr. Cohn's note on August 4. I am so worry to be having these difficulties and thank you for your patience. It has been quite a few years since I have tried to write anything for other people. Mostly, I had been running a school. Ms. Kohler's work has been beneficial to young

2069:

Of course he was also interviewed as part of other, standard articles, but I assume that’s not what you meant – journalists always interview the subjects of articles and then use their judgment to determine what quotes and facts to include in those articles. There’s no prohibition on the use of

1200:

We would really appreciate if you can take a look at it now and check if now we comply with your recommendations. The recommendations were the following: Does not presently appear to meet WP:NPROF. Written in a promotional tone, not using objective and descriptive language. WP:Bare URLs require

439:

Just want to say that the article was objectively terrible on several levels and while the topic is in fact highly notable, this really would not have been at all obvious to anyone who hadn't already done some reading on strawberry pesticides, or lived in some very specific areas of California.

2606:

I have been a long-time user of Knowledge and have always been impressed by the depth and breadth of information available on the platform. As an avid learner and researcher, I have relied on Knowledge's comprehensive articles to deepen my understanding of various topics, and I am now eager to

298:

Your rejection cites this reason: "Neologisms are not considered suitable for Knowledge unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not

2812:

Marcus, thank you for your kind reply. No, there is no particular reason. I just wanted to get hold of personal data of the person (e.g., date/year of birth) and basically double-check things. As I cannot find that info (e.g. age), I am giving up on this now. Otherwise, it is fine. Yes, I (as

3498:

the sources and links to search results provided above do not meet our requirements for in-depth independent coverage from reliable sources. If the film was a milestone, someone would have published a review saying so. It is clear that your are the creator of the film, so your work here is

1811:? At present, your draft still has two inline with the text. My suggestion would be to resolve those as it is likely to be declined again on that basis, but if you feel it sufficient, you draft has been submitted for review. At the time time of writing, the AFC submission template says 2831:, that's fine. I'll keep in on my radar to do some cleanup and copy-editing next chance I get. Keep in mind that a lot of personal information may not be previously published, and if you can't find it, it's inclusion would be unsuitable for publication on Knowledge. See our policy on 2769:

Hi Marcus, I have been reminded that I have not yet worked on the submitted brief article about the EUE founder and that the time frame will expire soon. I now carefully searched for selected and included various references, and I hope that my selection is appropriate/sufficient.

2289:. It is very different than scientific writing article where you may be trying to argue a point or back up your research with previously published sources—I am sympathetic to this argument, as it is a different style of writing that requires forming a different habit or instinct. 2161:

to leave the redirect declination notice at the top and the declination on the authors talk page. My reasons for this are two fold, of course AFC/R requires you to submit sources if applicable, but also I didn't think it would meet R3 based on the fact that it would also have a

2602:

I hope this letter finds you well. My name is Brian Ngugi, and I am writing to express my interest in contributing to the Knowledge community, particularly in regards to improving the draft article on Dr. James Alic Garang, the Central Bank Governor of the Bank of South Sudan.

1559:

I am of the opinion that it is in the same boat as many food and drink topics - it may be independently notable, maybe in its native language, but good luck finding independent sources on its notability; all you will find are product listings. Maybe it deserves a spot on

2325:, Knowledge articles do not typically have conclusion sections because—as mentioned earlier—articles are not argumentative essays or papers. You will not find these sections on many articles; it is generally a good idea to familiarise yourself with the project before 2056:

In your comment, you don’t mention that I cited directly to the Grammy website to confirm his nominations when you say you can’t tell if he had actually been nominated. Perhaps this is an oversight? I hope you will agree that the Grammy website is a proper use of

2244:

sure about the references. I have given 11 references however I understand that something is wrong with the references. I would really appreciate if you could direct me the references which are in conflict with Knowledge so that I can replace those (possibly).

2566:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

302:

The article is thoroughly cited with articles in mainstream media about Final Five Voting, and the voting method has been used in major elections nationwide (described in the article) so I believe it meets the criteria for substantial use and press coverage.

1308:

and do you believe your draft article currently demonstrates that the subject satisfies one of the criteria? Second, do you have proper citations to previously published sources for the personal information you have given above. Personal knowledge is both

342:

Politics Industry Theory maintains that standard industry evaluation techniques and competition thinking like Porter’s five forces analysis can be applied to the U.S. election system to produce election results more reflective of the true preferences of

2117:

Hey MicrobiologyMarcus, we seem to have had an edit conflict on this page. Did you mean to remove the CSD template I'd put on there? I maintain that the title seems like a rather implausible phrase to refer to its target. Let me know what you think!

3780:

And then, in the same pattern, you've left three messages back to back to back without allowing me time to respond. Again, my advice is to slow down, think about what you are doing be deliberate. Read policy or help pages if you don't understand.

3271:

in the top left. Please be aware that items that are written as promotional are not always refunded, you will need to discuss more in depth with the administrator. Declaring your COI on your userpage will help in demonstrating good faith in that

1695:, not a problem. Given that the page is now in the correct location and the old page has been corrected, I have removed the declination from the AfC history and done some minor copy editing to the draft while it awaits further review. Cheers, 2813:

inexperienced wiki writer) would appreciate your opinion and learn from it. And because it was quite a bit of research work to write the first version a while ago, I tried to avoid rejection. Again, thank you for your kind reply and support.

2052:

If you go to the draft, you’ll see that in order to address your concerns, I have restructured the sentences so that the context language does not mention the Grammy awards and the Grammy award language cites directly to the Grammy website.

351:

Then, in a system known as final-five voting, the top five candidates would advance to the general election. In the general election, voters would then rank those top five candidates, triggering the ranked-choice mechanism during the vote

2569:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has

1366:: Very cryptic, but always happy to help. I definitely find reviewing good, quality articles more rewarding but sometimes you gotta go through the clean-up categories as well. I know I appreciated when someone cleaned up my first draft. 246: 2748:

I think a reasonable interpretation allows it to be applied to the former, as the former does not speak to this situation. I would invite you to present the ngram argument in the RM once I have completed relisting it. Kindly,

2150:, I did; my apologies I should have made that more clear in the edit summary. Although looking at the page history now, I will say that I'm surprised I didn't get a second edit conflict warning when I went ahead with the edit. 2073:

I thought you might want to do a fresh review before I submit this again for reconsideration. I have left a comment on top of the page that reviews the points above. I’ll resubmit in a couple of days if I haven’t heard back.

2735:

seems to suggest that the complete process for challenging a move requires the Move review process, it makes no mention of what to do in the event the closer agrees. As such, I am looking to guidance in the following section

161: 2480: 2696:, Eights Week is significantly more widely used than the other title. I don't see any evidence presented at the RM discussion to counter that. Please could you explain the reasoning behind this, or else revert the move? — 170: 1588:: fair enough. Seems to be lots of product listings, nothing too encyclopedic in any BEFORE. Suppose the article is fine as is now without any of the frivolous claims and hopefully can be cleanup with the existing tags. 3724:

Apparently my name and srticle have been deleted. Whatever i did to bring this about was not intentional. I ferl that i am b in ng penalized for something i had no idea about. Please show me how i can continue to work.

3225:

Hi Bobby, thanks for your response. I am confused how best to reach Pickersgill, I went to his page but there was no option like this to write to him. Can you please help me. Getting a bit anxious here. Thanks a bunch.

911: 360:

perhaps on Ranked-choice voting in the United States which is linked in the draft, given that all the examples seem to be American. Especially considering all of the examples don't even use final five systems as it

179: 231: 2049:

is true for the following sentence, which also provides a source providing context to Jasper’s work on the Grammy nominated album of the year, and is followed by a second citation directly to the Grammy website.

212: 3695:

Mr Cohen: I am not sure howvI have created thisvin the wrong location. I am really overwhelmed at times by wikipedia. I would likevto fix thisnpage so it meets wiki requirements. So any guidance is appreciated.

2694: 255: 216: 1447:

your draft, I declined it. As such, you are encouraged to make the necessary changes required for a mainspace article before resubmitting. At the top of the draft, the individualised instructions I left were

166: 2622:

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to the opportunity to contribute to Knowledge and to learn from the experienced editors. Please let me know how I can best assist in this endeavor.

1952:, I have resubmitted your article on your behalf. Please be patient while a reviewer gets a chance to review the draft article. I will review it for the improvments I suggested if I get the chance. Thanks, 226: 883: 207: 2743:

Closures will often be changed by the closing editor without a closure review: 1. if significant additional information or context was left out of the discussion and the closer was not aware of it.

378:

If, given all the above, you still think this topic has independent notability and the states examples are specific to "Final five" and not simply ranked choice voting, feel free to present which

119:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can

2199:

Thanks for the clarifications! I think I'll leave it as is now; in any case, our edits to the page now make its history substantive enough to be disqualified from that speedy deletion criterion.

1171:, a requirement for any article on the project. Again, this is my opinion, but university instructional material on "how to write" a compare and contrast might not be sufficient in demonstrating 984:

I read your message on why you have rejected the article. Can we speak on why you thought that the subject is not noteworthy and how I can improve the article. Thank you very much for your time.

734:

Thanks for the compliments. Did you say "With more inline citations..."? I didn't know 13 quality references were inadequate for that size of an article! But well, we always learn something new.

241: 2792:, as you made those edits, that will restart the six-month timer. I can take a look, a cursory glance shows that it will still require some copy editing and removal of promotional wording and 539:

topic on your talk page, since that will involve length, but soil fumigants are injected into the soil, which is then covered with a tarp to mitigate the drift of carcinogenic particles. From

2231: 1511: 432: 197: 2495: 1648:

I just noticed that it was the other way around - the article was just translated to the Ukrainian wikipedia today, and their userpage there already has {{Uw-translation}} from January.

433: 188: 265:

for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II.

995: 1770:, You left a note on my Stefan Pastine entry suggesting that the independent citations weren't enough in number. I added another, there are now 4 independent media refs in there. 543:

methyl bromide is the topic of Angelita C. article, and chloropicrin and 1,3-dichloropropene are alternatives to methyl bromide now that methyl iodide is no longer on the market.

2977: 1286:

presently appear to meet WP:NPROF. Written in a promotional tone, not using objective and descriptive language. WP:Bare URLs require cleanup, see WP:REFB for more information."

3883: 2958: 2929: 2915: 2887: 2866: 2852: 2828: 2814: 2789: 2774: 3347:: the draft has been resubmitted for review on your behalf. Please be patient as there are 2,690 pending draft articles and they are reviewed in no particular order. Kindly, 386:, it's philosophy is very applicable at AfC. I would reconsider if you still feel strongly given my guidance on the draft page and here, and you provide those three sources. 3886:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2431:

and thanks for your note! You're welcome, I'm more than happy to help; someone helped me by properly formatting my first draft. Welcome to Knowledge, and happy editing. —

2187:

Also, for what it's worth, I agree: if I saw that in the mainspace without the AFC wiki project on the talk page, I would agree on a speedy tag placement or a nom to RfD.

1110:

3) I am not paid or have any monetary expectation from the subject. I realized that the subject is noteworthy and that I could start my article writing journey with this.

2259: 3867: 2689:? This was proposed as "uncontroversial" two weeks ago and I contested and reverted that move, on the grounds that the "Summer Eights" name doesn't seem to comply with 282: 1251:

Would you please answer to our previous question? "We would really appreciate if you can take a look at it now and check if now we comply with your recommendations."

453: 3710:

I dont understand what you are commenting. I am only trying to fix this page. My poor understaanding of wiki is the problem. I am not responding to any one but you.

3434:, films are made into history, if you don't know. Don't be so ancient. Most of the flop films are being showcased, why not this one with a change making initiative. 1734: 1507: 621: 3766:

Please work on it there and follow editor feedback already listed. You can submit your draft for review by clicking the blue button "Submit the draft for review!"

1847:

I'd suggest you familiarise yourself with the relevant Knowledge policy, as writing a draft article can be a difficult task for a new editor. See the guidance at

3031: 3017: 2999: 2984: 2510: 2502: 2487: 1052:

Have you addressed any of the comments and feedback left by any of the reviewers at the top of the article, specifically as it relates to inline external links?

1804: 1789: 1485: 1482: 1440: 1425: 113: 91: 494:, I did some quick copy-editing for clarity and changed the lead to present-tense as is typical in court case articles that are still valid (see, for example 3803: 3741: 3726: 3711: 3697: 3536: 3522: 3495: 3481: 3383: 3368: 2462: 2448: 2428: 2413: 898: 142: 620:

Thank you for reviewing the submarine article. Though I also wanted point out, that to my understanding, the original title of the article was in line with

3591: 1301: 1287: 1266: 1252: 1238: 1217: 1202: 879: 287: 2649: 2345: 2266: 2251: 1910:

as it relates to the subject, to see what might be used to satisfy our notability requirement for articles on the project. You might also find the essay

2140: 3877: 2589: 2562: 2387: 2372: 1927: 1708: 1692: 1677: 878:

article and I want you to blank the entire sandbox and remove all the contents and corruption in it and make it an article and give it to Fishsicles.

756: 3139:: my advice is to follow the instructions on those pages to correct the issues on the draft, and then you may resubmit the draft to be reconsidered. — 1840:

It's fine if you do, these just need to be disclosed on your user page, and you are doing the correct thing by creating the draft article through the

120: 3672: 3657: 3344: 3329: 1949: 1935: 3606: 1943: 624:. The normal style is nationality, type of ship, and ship name. I just thought I would let you know, and thank you again for reviewing the article. 3136: 3122: 3100: 3085: 2530: 2109: 319: 3734: 3719: 3705: 2874: 2860: 2846: 2822: 2807: 3613: 3598: 2782: 2615:

adhering to Knowledge's policies and guidelines, and I am eager to learn from the experienced editors on how best to contribute to this process.

2292:

As an organization, the topic will need to demonstrate that it has been the topic of coverage that meets the aforementioned requirements, review

1928: 340:

In regards to notability, I personally found that the citations did not demonstrate the that the subject itself was notable. Take, for example, "

3811: 887: 3194: 1156: 1141: 702: 2194: 463:, I would be more than happy to dive into that article and provide feedback when I next get a chance. Looks like an interesting read. Cheers, 3831: 2645: 2630: 521:. What was specifically are you interested in? You wanted to add sources to the article? You think some of the sources given aren't suitable? 502: 3376: 2524: 2221: 2182: 759:, which currently has no citations, so someone could challenge that material and remove it as unsourced. You are probably familiar with our 661: 3690: 3507:. Please follow the advice you have received here and at other places on the project and stop your promotional and single purpose editing. 3158: 1861: 1493: 1467: 1398: 1376: 667: 262: 148: 2966: 2952: 2923: 2456: 2438: 1685: 2914:

Thank you. I tried to resubmit, but now the system wants template data (?). I need to read about this. It appears I cannot resubmit now.

2175:

If you think the page should still be speedied, by all means re-tag it, but that was my thinking. Thanks for the note, hope that helps —

2157:

reading of the author's edits suggested to me that they probably meant to submit a redirect for creation, so my intention was to use the

1973: 1874:

Thank you for the clean up of my draft. Any insights you could share regarding what I may need to add? Your input would be appreciated !

1328: 1295: 1280: 1246: 1231: 89: 2992: 2737: 2358: 2029: 1755: 1539:-ified the article. It cited to a product listing and was mostly health benefits and other promotional content. I'm in the process of a 1356: 769:

maintenance tag that exists for this purpose. Material will need to have sources demonstrating it has been previously published and not

3796: 2401: 2103: 1816:

This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,239 pending submissions waiting for review.

1716: 1702: 1659: 1643: 1615: 1595: 1579: 1554: 1119: 1093: 847: 833: 810: 783: 746: 726: 2470: 1959: 137: 3159: 2899: 2551: 2336:

You have mentioned your affiliation with the University of Liverpool, one of the affiliates of the topic of the draft. Please review

668: 355: 3901: 3665: 3067: 3025: 3011: 2086: 1260: 1167:

to any purpose the author or publisher of the work might have, such that it sufficiently demonstrates the subject of the article is

607: 587: 531: 485: 470: 2756: 2722: 1921: 1185: 574:

all of the areas mentioned in the article are on the Central Coast and the Central Valley has very different harvests and climates.

396: 3790: 3530: 3516: 3489: 3421: 2667: 2318:

which are inappropriate to be used inline in the article. You will note that was one of the comments I left in my original review.

1149: 633: 3475: 3461: 3443: 2111: 1667: 3573: 3244:, something I failed to mention earlier: because of your connection with the subject of your draft, you'll need to declare your 2732: 1210: 1012: 823:. The link will turn blue once a page has been created there. If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate in asking! 654:! My apologies, that reading of the article title conventions looks correct. I've swapped those pages. Thanks for the heads up, 3546:

I appreciate that you are disappointed, That is no reason to abuse the editor you are in conversation with. We are required to

3362: 3337: 3308: 3284: 3235: 3220: 2447:. I'm looking forward to my first draft article being reviewed - at least I know the info box is in good shape! All the best. 1981: 1738: 1547:

or if it should proceed to the next step... You aren't familiar with the topic at all, are you? Any opinion on its notability?

3684: 3356: 1934:@MicrobiologyMarcus - Would you kindly take a look at the amended draft with new primary sources added? Really appreciate it. 1433: 3647: 3148: 3130: 3116: 2581: 2014: 3640: 1525: 3816: 2638: 278: 3656:

thanks so much for reviewing my Knowledge article! Haven't had the time yet but I'll look at it and try to rework it now.

3453: 3435: 2762: 2517:, you are not able to publish your draft article to the mainspace without third party review from an independent editor. 1965: 1127: 3646: 2003: 1730: 906: 2962: 2919: 2870: 2856: 2818: 2778: 2034: 1797: 1342: 933: 3774: 3397:

sources here (don't worry about drafting an article or creating prose, just demonstrate the sources here) that are

3093: 2976: 2763: 1128: 416: 2421: 2380: 3035: 2731:: as promised, I've been reading a lot of policy. I'm leaving my message here more as a historical record. While 1888: 1673: 913: 690:

Psst! I'm not sure how to leave a message here, but I'm clicking on "Add topic" coz it's the only option I have.

274: 1998:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months 1604:

thanks for checking. I was initially just confused at the move history, glad it was put in an acceptable state.

3245: 2042: 2035: 1069: 578:

the EPA, I really want the article to avoid amateur error, is another reason why I am asking for your thoughts

364: 81: 69: 64: 59: 1514:

run through Google Translate (though it is written by the same user), so it may need more than basic cleanup.

3320: 2705: 2594: 2300: 2070:

articles that interview biographical subjects as that would eliminate almost all journalism from Knowledge.

3870:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 2865:

Hi Marcus or Bobby, I am not sure about the next step. Do I need to "resubmit" now? Thank you for advising.

1902:, try to demonstrate coverage of the subject in independent and reliable sources. Take a look at one of the 2907: 2611:

of his background, achievements, and the challenges he has faced in his role as the Central Bank Governor.

2577: 1748:

may contest the speedy deletion by leaving remarks arguing against the deletion on the articles talk page.

3541: 2282: 2154: 1724: 1347:

Some of them are worth reviewing, and some of them are not worth reviewing. Thanks for reviewing them.

1191: 770: 1834:

declarations that you need to disclose in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Term's of Use? See

382:

sources demonstrate as much. While that linked essay is mostly applicable for Notability discussions at

3887: 3873: 3021: 2988: 2491: 2212: 2131: 1729:

Hello, thanks I appreciate your feedback. Please is there anyway I can prevent the page from deletion?

1104:

1) I understand and improve on Inline Citation external links when making further changes to the draft.

1065: 859: 629: 615: 270: 38: 3848:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3852: 3843: 3290: 3205: 2681:

I hope you're well. I'm wondering what was your rationale for closing the requested move of the page

2657: 2585: 2555: 1793: 1501: 1489: 1429: 1394: 1352: 1056: 509:

In regards to soil fumigation, what is your concern? I hadn't previously checked, but I noticed that

2773:

Right now, I do not dare to resubmit yet. But I feel that I am done. Please, advise. Thanks a lot.

1269:

you and your friend need to both make your own unique account as this account is a violation of our

967: 3807: 3769:

The problem with the other versions of the page you created were that they were placed (1) on your

3760: 3745: 3730: 3715: 3701: 3526: 3485: 3372: 3084:

my draft was declined by you, I read your feedback but I need help to how my article will publish

2793: 2466: 2452: 2417: 2315: 2311: 1808: 1457: 1456:" You'll notice that in the draft article, there are links that are not formatted as citations but 951: 902: 875: 763: 3480:

Please review it and publish. This film is a milestone. Please remove the stop submitting option.

2800:. Unless there was a reason you didn't want your draft to be considered yet. Let me know, Kindly, 2371:

hi Marcus, I am just learning to create wikkipaedia articles. Please correct me where I am wrong

337:

it. As such, you have the option to resubmit if you would like to have another reviewer review it.

123:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 3457: 3439: 3176:

Also, any other things that you want me to keep in mind as I re-write it, please help tell that.

3039: 2903: 2840: 2801: 2750: 2716: 2661: 2573: 2518: 2444: 2432: 2395: 2391: 2352: 2326: 2307:; this language could be taken right out of a promotional pamphlet or commercial for the product. 2304: 2238: 2188: 2176: 2097: 1969: 1953: 1915: 1855: 1767: 1749: 1696: 1637: 1630: 1601: 1589: 1548: 1473: 1461: 1406: 1370: 1322: 1291: 1274: 1270: 1256: 1242: 1225: 1206: 1179: 1099: 1087: 871: 867: 860: 827: 820: 791: 777: 720: 655: 525: 464: 390: 288: 2269:, in general, writing a Knowledge article requires that you only describe what has been said in 955: 3786: 3680: 3636: 3512: 3471: 3417: 3352: 3280: 3216: 3144: 3112: 3063: 3007: 2948: 2895: 2255: 1672:

I accidentally made two pages about it, please if you can delete the first one and only review

1137:

Suggestions noted. Can you just tell me what seemed like fluff to you so that I can remove it?

963: 3836: 3304: 3231: 3190: 3104: 2376: 2202: 2147: 2121: 2082: 1825: 1712: 1681: 1654: 1610: 1574: 1520: 1115: 1008: 1001: 991: 947: 927: 843: 806: 742: 698: 640: 625: 266: 3773:

and then (2) duplicated in the draft namespace with the article title of your username, see

3628: 2066:

I took nothing from the Q&A itself. And there are no other sources in Q&A format.

3770: 3661: 3387: 3333: 3321: 2690: 2412:

for updating my info box image, and for your support of new editors. Much appreciated :-)

2025: 1939: 1899: 1821: 1561: 1407: 1390: 1363: 1348: 1172: 1168: 368: 47: 17: 819:

and clicking create source and adding some text and then publish page. Mine is located at

358:, which was my suggestion of where the content should go; see my declination comment "... 8: 3126: 3089: 2274: 1201:

cleanup, see WP:REFB for more information. microbiologyMarcus 19:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

1164: 942: 3204:, as the page has already been deleted, you need to contact the deleting administrator, 2077:

Thanks again for taking the time to do a review and for considering taking another look.

2045:. I appreciate you spending the time and I’ve made some changes based on your feedback. 3898: 3602: 3567: 3077: 2547: 2532: 2481:

answer for the review comments regards my article is moved to draft page from mainspace

1907: 1867: 1033: 603: 583: 481: 449: 3521:

Sad that you misunderstood. How many of such articles you rejected. Enjoy your power.

3002:, have you reviewed the declination reasoning given or the warning on your talk page? 476:

been archived. And someone uploaded a lot of PDFs to Commons, trawling through those.

3857: 3504: 2701: 2514: 2330: 2278: 2058: 1995: 1983: 1884: 1145: 315: 2322: 1785:

Is that sufficient, I can add some others but from my POV those cover the coverage.

1029:. As such, you still have the option to make improvements and resubmit the article. 3432: 3398: 3300: 3257: 3249: 3241: 3227: 3201: 3186: 2634: 2390:, I can only offer generic advice to generic questions. I would suggest you review 2093: 2078: 2007: 1649: 1605: 1585: 1569: 1540: 1532: 1515: 1382: 1160: 1111: 1107:

2) I will make sure to keep the point of view as neutral as possible going further.

1079: 1018: 1004: 987: 959: 923: 892: 839: 816: 802: 795: 752: 738: 709: 694: 109: 3782: 3676: 3632: 3558: 3547: 3508: 3467: 3413: 3394: 3348: 3276: 3212: 3140: 3108: 3078: 3059: 3003: 2944: 2891: 2797: 2364: 2293: 2166: 2021: 1994:

Hello, MicrobiologyMarcus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that

1911: 1868: 1848: 1565: 1305: 540: 510: 379: 104:

Hello, MicrobiologyMarcus. It has been over six months since you last edited the

2250:

Best Wishes Dr Prajith Venkatasubramanian University of Liverpool Great Britian

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3267:

After doing this, you can reach the administrator on their talk page and click

3055: 3043: 2673: 2660:. Consider adding more to address the maintenance tags in the article. Kindly, 2337: 2158: 1835: 1761: 1536: 1451: 1386: 1073: 3121:

yes, exactly I read that but i need help to publish my drafts, kindly help me

1510:

moved into mainspace. Regardless of its quality, it's an unattributed copy of

3895: 3861: 3562: 3500: 2832: 2686: 2653: 2506: 2341: 2286: 1999: 1903: 1841: 1831: 1745: 1314: 897:

puoi darmi dei suggerimenti per rendere il testo più consono a Knowledge...?

677:

I popped in to thank you for pointing out an erroneous citation on my Draft,

599: 579: 491: 477: 460: 445: 383: 105: 2890:, you may, and that will place it back in the queue to be reviewed. Kindly, 3451: 3406: 3402: 2728: 2712: 2697: 2407: 2365: 2270: 1895: 1880: 1310: 1059:

that reviewers left in the article pointing out flaws in the draft article?

326: 311: 3393:

If you still believe the subject is notable, would you be able to provide

1002:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Draft:Gaurav_Burman&action=edit

683:, the citation of which I have since removed. I may have miscopied an ISBN 3051: 3047: 2836: 2682: 1544: 1318: 713: 496: 295:

Good day, and thank you for your review of my draft, Final Five Voting.

3753: 3328:

Dear Bobby, I have edited the material. Please review. Regards, Bijoy

514: 1389:

with the items for review in user space, and some of them were crud.

3466:

Thank you for proving me with those links for consideration. Kindly,

3449: 3430: 3042:

often, as your did, suffer from failing to adhere to the policies on

2607:

contribute my own knowledge and expertise to this valuable resource.

3823: 152:

brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

2983:

Hi, Please assist. I would like to know why my article is rejected

2232:

The Long-Acting Therapeutics Patents and Licensing Database (LAPaL)

434:

Angelita C. et al. v. California Department of Pesticide Regulation

128: 247:

Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process

2839:

figures to have Knowledge pages without birthdates/ages. Kindly,

1175:, but I would concede other editors might differ on this opinion. 1078:

Please respond there and make any necessary declarations on your

2505:: thank you for your response here, but you will need to make a 1564:, where you will find other products with similar issues, e.g., 1197: 126:

Thank you for your submission to Knowledge, and happy editing.

2461:

Thank you again - my article is now published! I'm thrilled!

1990: 687:

otherwise, I have no idea how that citation happened there.

3868:

Template:Did you know nominations/The boys of Pointe du Hoc

3427: 1178:

If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. Cheers,

3675:, awesome. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, 2835:

for more information, but it is common for non-public yet

1413:

Hi MicrobiologyMarcus, thanks for your work on Knowledge.

598:

I put that outline on the article talk page if interested

1032:

Have you read the declination reason given by myself or @

3505:

you are only here to promote your work for personal gain

3034:: that's good. That means you understand that Knowledge 375:

voting systems even be applicable in your draft article?

349:. The only mention of the final-five in the article is " 2546:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2285:

and you cannot try to advocate or promote a topic, see

1454:

to understand how to convert these to inline citations.

794:, I know you're more experienced; why is my signature, 345:" the end of the history section, with the citation to 3864:

addressed 62 veteran service members present on D-Day?

1626:

In regards to the unattributed translation, I've left

874:

has been made made redundant by the publishing of the

171:

Require links for claims of specific policy violations

1636:

on the author's talk page. Thanks for catching that!

3866:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

3254:{{UserboxCOI|1=Swamini Brahmaprajnananda Saraswati}} 2619:

highest quality and meets the platform's standards.

2550:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

1824:

has been demonstrated and the article still takes a

912:

Request on 06:26:07, 12 June 2024 for assistance on

798:, in red, indicating that the "page does not exist"? 3386:, Knowledge is not concerned with significance but 3289:

Thanks. Did all that you recommended and wrote to @

1782:Mike Buetow from Printed Circuit Design & Fab. 2733:Knowledge:Closing discussions § Challenging a move 2563:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/John J. Fisher Jr. 143:RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins 3592:Isabel Lauchenauer article should be Isabel Cañas 1898:: as my concerns with the declination related to 310:I appreciate your consideration of this appeal. 2648:: I see you've already published the article at 680:Pre-Colonial Trade Routes and Networks in Africa 417:"Ranked-Choice Voting Gains Momentum Nationwide" 354:" Otherwise, the article seems to be focused on 1929:Draft:Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan 1707:thanks for your cooperation and assistance :) 1198:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Ronalds_Gonzalez 1036:? In both instances, the reasoning given said: 2013:If the page has already been deleted, you can 232:Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions 1237:University where Ronalds Gonzalez graduated. 1076:concern regarding the subject of this draft. 414: 2344:and make any necessary declarations on your 2020:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge. 2002:, so if you wish to retain the page, please 503:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 149:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/2024 review 2041:Hi Marcus - thanks very much for reviewing 1460:. These will need to be corrected. Cheers, 1313:and, given the subject, a violation of our 1196:Thank you so much for all your feedback on 307:believe it justifies having its own page. 213:Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs 1450:Inappropriate external links in text. See 3840:was updated with a fact from the article 3691:Draft Mary Conway Kohler (American Judge) 3160:Draft:Swamini Brahmaprajnananda Saraswati 669:Draft:Pre-colonial trade routes in Africa 356:Ranked-choice voting in the United States 256:Require nominees to be extended confirmed 3409:of the subject? Then I would reconsider. 3252:. To do this, copy and paste this code: 2957:This is very kind. Thank you very much. 622:Knowledge's naming conventions for ships 217:Community recall process based on dewiki 3797:My draft article for Mary Conway Kohler 2112:Draft:Super Bowl LIV: Electric Boogaloo 1744:Editors or authors of pages marked for 329:: some minor semantics here, I did not 180:Make the first two days discussion-only 167:Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA 14: 3550:, and your most recent remark was not. 1512:the same article on the Ukrainian wiki 415:Vasilogambros, Matt (March 12, 2021). 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3850:... that when delivering his speech " 3367:It has significance yet you declined 3256:as you see it on your screen to your 2943:, I have resubmitted on your behalf. 2301:§ Database highlights and added value 3561:, which is all you need to do. 🇺🇦 3448:These links also for your reference. 3036:is not a means of personal promotion 2331:only being here to promote something 2010:that it be moved to your userspace. 1807:, did you note my comment regarding 1668:About that duplicate of Abu Al-hayja 1068:that you affirmatively respond to a 1043:or the second reasoning which said: 25: 3363:Aazhi is 32 minute drama short film 2652:. Good job with the style but as a 2552:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 2017:so you can continue working on it. 1788:Thanks again for you wiki efforts. 23: 2693:. As you can see from this ngram: 1814:Review waiting, please be patient. 1443:, a small clarification: I didn't 96: 24: 3912: 3856:" on the 40th anniversary of the 3817:DYK for The boys of Pointe du Hoc 2560:The article will be discussed at 2281:language. You cannot conduct any 1317:policy if you do not have proper 3822: 3752: 3618: 2934: 2764:Draft:Mahmoud Hashem Abdel-Kader 2540: 1989: 1543:to determine if the topic meets 1129:Draft:Compare and contrast essay 1082:in accordance with our policies. 645: 29: 3882:, and the hook may be added to 3648:Far-right usage of social media 2247:Thank you for your cooperation 815:You can find your user page at 2043:Draft:Jasper Harris (musician) 2036:Draft:Jasper Harris (musician) 1381:What happened is that you and 1343:Sandboxes Submitted for Review 1055:Have you addressed any of the 880:2409:40F4:300E:27B2:8000:0:0:0 408: 13: 1: 2978:User:Collins P Mabasa/sandbox 2796:but the subject likely meets 1773:Alexaner Tulio from C&EN 3597:for their academic persona. 3501:not the purpose of Knowledge 2738:§ Challenging other closures 1820:Personally, I don't believe 7: 3503:, and your actions suggest 2329:lest someone accuse you of 2312:§ Funding and collaboration 1779:James O Donnell from MITTR 1776:Will Mathis From Bloomberg 1476:. Ill reformat those links. 1066:has asked on your talk page 299:establish its notability." 10: 3917: 3902:00:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC) 3812:19:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 3791:14:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 3735:18:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 3720:18:23, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 3706:18:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 3685:17:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC) 3666:10:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC) 3641:01:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 2595:Re: Request for assistance 2486:my article to main space. 2327:writing your first article 731:Hello, MicrobiologyMarcus! 371:for further guidance here. 291:: Question About Rejection 275:MediaWiki message delivery 3878:The boys of Pointe du Hoc 3853:The boys of Pointe du Hoc 3844:The boys of Pointe du Hoc 3607:22:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 3574:15:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 3531:14:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 3517:14:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 3490:13:42, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 3476:18:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 3462:18:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 3444:18:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 3422:17:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 3377:17:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 3357:01:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 3338:01:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 3309:19:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 3285:18:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 3236:13:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 3221:13:40, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 3195:11:50, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 3149:16:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3131:16:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3117:15:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3094:15:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3068:14:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3026:14:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3012:13:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2993:13:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2967:14:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2953:13:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2924:12:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2900:11:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2875:23:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 2861:15:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2847:15:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2823:05:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2808:11:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 2783:07:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 2757:15:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 2723:13:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 2706:11:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 2668:16:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2639:20:42, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 2590:07:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 2525:15:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC) 2496:03:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC) 2471:17:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 2457:20:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC) 2439:14:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC) 2422:07:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC) 2402:17:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2381:14:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 2359:17:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2303:, this is not written in 2260:10:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 2030:23:06, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 1974:13:24, 28 June 2024 (UTC) 1960:13:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC) 1944:13:17, 28 June 2024 (UTC) 1922:00:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC) 1889:00:04, 26 June 2024 (UTC) 1862:20:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC) 1830:Do you have any relevant 1798:20:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC) 1756:17:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC) 1739:21:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC) 1717:20:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1703:20:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1686:20:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1660:16:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1644:16:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1616:16:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1596:16:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1580:16:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1555:16:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1526:16:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1494:18:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC) 1468:18:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC) 1434:18:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC) 1399:15:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC) 1377:21:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 1357:19:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 1329:18:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 1296:17:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 1281:17:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 1261:17:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 1247:17:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 1232:16:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 1211:16:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 1186:13:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 1150:09:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 1120:07:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC) 1094:13:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) 1013:07:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC) 996:06:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC) 916:submission by Sumansindhu 907:08:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC) 674:Hi, MicrobiologyMarcus! 147:Hi there! Phase I of the 3761:Draft:Mary Conway Kohler 3746:Draft:Mary Conway Kohler 3293:. Awaiting his response. 2554:or whether it should be 2513:and then note that, per 2443:Thank you for replying @ 2222:20:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2195:20:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2183:20:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2141:20:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2104:17:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2087:17:21, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2062:specialized knowledge”. 1851:as a good place to start 1725:Madga G. Chippel Sandbox 1192:Dear @MicrobiologyMarcus 888:11:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC) 876:Sodium tetrapropylborate 848:21:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC) 834:17:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC) 811:17:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC) 784:17:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC) 747:17:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC) 727:16:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC) 703:00:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC) 662:16:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC) 634:16:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC) 3246:WP:Conflict of interest 2392:Help:Your first article 2015:request it be undeleted 1070:WP:Conflict of interest 872:User:Fishsicles/sandbox 861:User:Fishsicles/sandbox 821:User:MicrobiologyMarcus 616:Ship naming conventions 608:04:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC) 588:01:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC) 532:01:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC) 486:02:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC) 471:14:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 454:14:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 397:16:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC) 365:WP:Significant coverage 320:15:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC) 289:Draft:Final Five Voting 283:08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC) 138:21:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC) 3888:Did you know talk page 3179:Have a great weekend. 2959:There'snoplacelikehome 2930:There'snoplacelikehome 2916:There'snoplacelikehome 2888:There'snoplacelikehome 2867:There'snoplacelikehome 2853:There'snoplacelikehome 2829:There'snoplacelikehome 2815:There'snoplacelikehome 2790:There'snoplacelikehome 2775:There'snoplacelikehome 2745: 1502:Feng Qing Jin Si Baota 1321:for that information. 1064:Lastly, DoubleGrazing 1049: 1042: 363:." Take a look at our 121:request its undeletion 101: 3548:be civil at all times 3105:Help:My first article 2741: 1044: 1037: 333:your draft, I simply 198:Suffrage requirements 106:Articles for Creation 100: 42:of past discussions. 3553:Instead of arguing, 3322:Draft:Manmohan Misra 3291:Pickersgill-Cunliffe 3206:Pickersgill-Cunliffe 2509:declaration on your 1562:List of Chinese teas 1535:, I've considerably 1408:Draft:Stefan Pastine 1021:, your draft wasn't 771:WP:Original research 541:Fumigation#Chemicals 203:Proposals 16 and 16c 92:Draft:List of Emojis 90:Your draft article, 18:User talk:Bobby Cohn 3884:the statistics page 2851:Thank you, Marcus. 2658:WP:Inline citations 2656:it is lacking many 2277:sources using only 943:Draft:Gaurav Burman 757:§ Cultural exchange 444:continuity errors. 242:phase II discussion 227:phase II discussion 208:phase II discussion 162:phase II discussion 112:page you started, " 3629:Draft:Isabel Cañas 2904:MicrobiologyMarcus 2574:Extraordinary Writ 2548:John J. Fisher Jr. 2533:John J. Fisher Jr. 2445:MicrobiologyMarcus 2239:MicrobiologyMarcus 1982:Concern regarding 1768:microbiologyMarcus 1602:MicrobiologyMarcus 1474:MicrobiologyMarcus 1304:have you reviewed 1100:MicrobiologyMarcus 868:MicrobiologyMarcus 792:MicrobiologyMarcus 790:And, by the way, @ 519:*opens to do list* 517:which is, well... 157:Proposals 2 and 9b 102: 3881: 3858:Normandy landings 3653:Hey Bobby Cohn, 3545: 3542:talk page watcher 3169:to refer there. 2794:WP:External links 2650:James Alic Garang 2314:section contains 2296:for more details. 2283:original research 2220: 2139: 1996:Draft:Centra Tech 1984:Draft:Centra Tech 1914:helpful. Cheers, 1809:WP:External links 1472:Appreciate that @ 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3908: 3871: 3826: 3756: 3626: 3622: 3621: 3570: 3565: 3539: 3499:promotional and 3403:reliable sources 3255: 3032:Collins P Mabasa 3018:Collins P Mabasa 3000:Collins P Mabasa 2985:Collins P Mabasa 2942: 2938: 2937: 2843: 2804: 2753: 2719: 2664: 2544: 2543: 2521: 2503:TheValorWomanMTS 2488:TheValorWomanMTS 2435: 2398: 2355: 2321:For the section 2242: 2217: 2210: 2209: 2207: 2205:TechnoSquirrel69 2191: 2179: 2171: 2165: 2148:TechnoSquirrel69 2136: 2129: 2128: 2126: 2124:TechnoSquirrel69 2100: 1993: 1956: 1918: 1858: 1817: 1752: 1699: 1657: 1652: 1640: 1635: 1629: 1613: 1608: 1592: 1577: 1572: 1551: 1523: 1518: 1464: 1455: 1383:User:KylieTastic 1373: 1325: 1277: 1271:WP:SHAREDACCOUNT 1228: 1182: 1090: 1057:maintenance tags 972: 971: 838:Thanks, Marcus! 830: 817:User:Matandi2001 780: 768: 762: 723: 658: 653: 649: 648: 641:Romanov loyalist 626:Romanov loyalist 528: 467: 425: 424: 412: 393: 362: 353: 344: 267:theleekycauldron 136: 99: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3916: 3915: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3893: 3892: 3827: 3819: 3799: 3693: 3651: 3619: 3617: 3594: 3568: 3563: 3557:that it passes 3365: 3326: 3253: 3163: 3082: 3079:Draft:Mir Aasif 3040:autobiographies 2981: 2935: 2933: 2841: 2802: 2767: 2751: 2740:where it says: 2717: 2676: 2662: 2597: 2582:173.175.200.238 2580:) on behalf of 2571: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2519: 2483: 2433: 2410: 2396: 2369: 2353: 2236: 2234: 2213: 2203: 2200: 2189: 2177: 2172:template on it. 2169: 2163: 2132: 2122: 2119: 2115: 2098: 2039: 1987: 1954: 1932: 1916: 1872: 1869:Draft:Gia Walsh 1856: 1812: 1805:Seamus Costello 1790:Seamus Costello 1764: 1750: 1746:speedy deletion 1727: 1697: 1670: 1655: 1650: 1638: 1633: 1627: 1611: 1606: 1590: 1575: 1570: 1566:Jin Jun Mei tea 1549: 1521: 1516: 1504: 1486:Seamus Costello 1483:Seamus Costello 1462: 1449: 1441:Seamus Costello 1426:Seamus Costello 1411: 1391:Robert McClenon 1371: 1364:Robert McClenon 1349:Robert McClenon 1345: 1323: 1275: 1226: 1194: 1180: 1134:Hello Marcus, 1132: 1088: 1047:being discussed 945: 941: 918: 895: 864: 828: 778: 766: 764:citation needed 760: 721: 672: 656: 646: 644: 618: 564:The essence of 526: 511:Soil fumigation 465: 437: 430: 429: 428: 413: 409: 391: 359: 350: 341: 293: 254:(implemented): 196:(implemented): 189:Admin elections 145: 127: 97: 95: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3914: 3828: 3821: 3820: 3818: 3815: 3804:Henrybardklein 3798: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3778: 3767: 3764: 3758:Courtesy link: 3749: 3742:Henrybardklein 3727:Henrybardklein 3712:Henrybardklein 3698:Henrybardklein 3692: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3650: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3593: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3551: 3537:Vivekcreator96 3523:Vivekcreator96 3496:Vivekcreator96 3482:Vivekcreator96 3446: 3410: 3391: 3384:Vivekcreator96 3369:Vivekcreator96 3364: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3325: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3297: 3294: 3275:Best of luck, 3273: 3265: 3209: 3162: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3081: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 2980: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2863: 2766: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2746: 2725: 2675: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2626:Best regards, 2596: 2593: 2539: 2538: 2536: 2531:Nomination of 2529: 2528: 2527: 2482: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2463:Marilyn Fowles 2449:Marilyn Fowles 2429:Marilyn Fowles 2414:Marilyn Fowles 2409: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2368: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2349: 2334: 2319: 2316:external links 2308: 2297: 2290: 2233: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2173: 2151: 2114: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2038: 2033: 2000:may be deleted 1986: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1931: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1871: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1852: 1845: 1826:WP:Promotional 1818: 1763: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1726: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1669: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1631:uw-translation 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1503: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1480: 1477: 1458:external links 1420: 1410: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1367: 1344: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1263: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1176: 1131: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1084: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1053: 1050: 1015: 978: 976: 975: 974: 973: 939: 917: 910: 899:Andrea Vizzini 894: 891: 863: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 824: 801:Most obliged, 799: 788: 787: 786: 774: 735: 732: 717: 693:Best Regards. 671: 666: 665: 664: 617: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 575: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 522: 507: 436: 431: 427: 426: 406: 405: 401: 400: 399: 387: 376: 372: 338: 292: 286: 259: 258: 249: 234: 219: 200: 191: 182: 173: 144: 141: 114:List of Emojis 108:submission or 94: 88: 85: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3913: 3904: 3903: 3900: 3897: 3891: 3889: 3885: 3879: 3875: 3869: 3865: 3863: 3862:Ronald Reagan 3859: 3855: 3854: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3839: 3838: 3833: 3832:6 August 2024 3825: 3814: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3779: 3776: 3772: 3768: 3765: 3763: 3762: 3757: 3755: 3750: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3722: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3708: 3707: 3703: 3699: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3674: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3654: 3649: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3630: 3625: 3615: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3604: 3600: 3575: 3571: 3566: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3549: 3543: 3538: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3497: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3454:103.70.197.23 3452: 3450: 3447: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3436:103.70.197.23 3433: 3431: 3429: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3411: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3389: 3388:WP:Notability 3385: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3323: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3295: 3292: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3263: 3259: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3183: 3180: 3177: 3174: 3173:of the same. 3170: 3166: 3161: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3080: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2979: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2941: 2931: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2845: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2806: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2771: 2765: 2758: 2755: 2747: 2744: 2739: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2724: 2721: 2714: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2692: 2691:WP:COMMONNAME 2688: 2687:Summer Eights 2684: 2679: 2669: 2666: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2627: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2592: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2568: 2565: 2564: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2534: 2526: 2523: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2437: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2403: 2400: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2367: 2360: 2357: 2350: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2306: 2305:summary style 2302: 2298: 2295: 2291: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2248: 2245: 2240: 2223: 2218: 2216: 2208: 2206: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2193: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2181: 2174: 2168: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2137: 2135: 2127: 2125: 2113: 2105: 2102: 2095: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2060: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2044: 2037: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2018: 2016: 2011: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1992: 1985: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1966:185.26.153.26 1963: 1962: 1961: 1958: 1951: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1930: 1923: 1920: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1900:WP:Notability 1897: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1870: 1863: 1860: 1853: 1850: 1846: 1843: 1839: 1837: 1833: 1827: 1823: 1822:WP:Notability 1819: 1815: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1786: 1783: 1780: 1777: 1774: 1771: 1769: 1757: 1754: 1747: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1701: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1661: 1658: 1653: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1642: 1632: 1625: 1617: 1614: 1609: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1594: 1587: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1578: 1573: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1553: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1524: 1519: 1513: 1509: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1478: 1475: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1459: 1453: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1422: 1421:Thanks again 1418: 1414: 1409: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1375: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1330: 1327: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1307: 1303: 1302:Marquezronald 1299: 1298: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1288:Marquezronald 1284: 1283: 1282: 1279: 1272: 1268: 1267:Marquezronald 1264: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253:Marquezronald 1250: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239:Marquezronald 1235: 1234: 1233: 1230: 1223: 1219: 1218:Marquezronald 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1203:Marquezronald 1199: 1187: 1184: 1177: 1174: 1173:WP:Notability 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1138: 1135: 1130: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1085: 1083: 1081: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1058: 1054: 1051: 1048: 1041: 1035: 1034:DoubleGrazing 1031: 1030: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1003: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 993: 989: 985: 982: 979: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 944: 940: 938: 937: 935: 932: 929: 925: 922: 921: 920: 915: 909: 908: 904: 900: 893:Madilen Negri 890: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 869: 862: 849: 845: 841: 837: 836: 835: 832: 825: 822: 818: 814: 813: 812: 808: 804: 800: 797: 793: 789: 785: 782: 775: 772: 765: 758: 754: 750: 749: 748: 744: 740: 736: 733: 730: 729: 728: 725: 718: 715: 711: 707: 706: 705: 704: 700: 696: 691: 688: 686: 682: 681: 675: 670: 663: 660: 652: 642: 638: 637: 636: 635: 631: 627: 623: 609: 605: 601: 597: 589: 585: 581: 576: 572: 567: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 542: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 530: 524:Let me know, 523: 520: 516: 513:redirects to 512: 508: 505: 504: 499: 498: 493: 489: 488: 487: 483: 479: 474: 473: 472: 469: 462: 458: 457: 456: 455: 451: 447: 441: 435: 422: 418: 411: 407: 404: 398: 395: 388: 385: 381: 377: 373: 370: 369:WP:Notability 366: 357: 348: 347:Stateline.org 339: 336: 332: 328: 324: 323: 322: 321: 317: 313: 308: 304: 300: 296: 290: 285: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 257: 253: 250: 248: 244: 243: 238: 235: 233: 229: 228: 223: 220: 218: 214: 210: 209: 204: 201: 199: 195: 192: 190: 186: 183: 181: 177: 174: 172: 168: 164: 163: 158: 155: 154: 153: 150: 140: 139: 135: 133: 132: 124: 122: 117: 115: 111: 107: 93: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3894: 3851: 3849: 3842: 3841: 3837:Did you know 3835: 3829: 3800: 3759: 3751: 3723: 3709: 3694: 3655: 3652: 3623: 3595: 3554: 3426:Check these 3366: 3327: 3268: 3262:Publish page 3261: 3184: 3181: 3178: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3164: 3083: 2982: 2939: 2885: 2842:microbiology 2803:microbiology 2772: 2768: 2752:microbiology 2742: 2718:microbiology 2680: 2677: 2663:microbiology 2629:Brian Ngugi 2628: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2598: 2572: 2561: 2559: 2535:for deletion 2520:microbiology 2484: 2434:microbiology 2411: 2397:microbiology 2370: 2366:Draft:V Venu 2354:microbiology 2323:§ Conclusion 2267:Prajithkanna 2252:Prajithkanna 2249: 2246: 2235: 2214: 2204: 2190:microbiology 2178:microbiology 2133: 2123: 2116: 2099:microbiology 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2040: 2019: 2012: 1988: 1964:Many thanks 1955:microbiology 1933: 1917:microbiology 1879: 1876: 1873: 1857:microbiology 1829: 1813: 1787: 1784: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1772: 1765: 1751:microbiology 1731:102.89.22.58 1728: 1698:microbiology 1671: 1639:microbiology 1591:microbiology 1550:microbiology 1508:this article 1505: 1463:microbiology 1444: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1412: 1385:and I had a 1372:microbiology 1346: 1324:microbiology 1276:microbiology 1227:microbiology 1221: 1195: 1181:microbiology 1139: 1136: 1133: 1098:Thank you, @ 1089:microbiology 1077: 1045: 1038: 1026: 1022: 986: 983: 980: 977: 930: 919: 896: 870:, the draft 865: 829:microbiology 779:microbiology 722:microbiology 692: 689: 684: 679: 678: 676: 673: 657:microbiology 650: 619: 570: 565: 527:microbiology 518: 501: 500:in stead of 495: 466:microbiology 442: 438: 420: 410: 402: 392:microbiology 346: 334: 330: 309: 305: 301: 297: 294: 263:project page 260: 251: 240: 236: 225: 221: 206: 202: 193: 187:(in trial): 184: 178:(in trial): 175: 160: 156: 146: 130: 129: 125: 118: 103: 75: 43: 37: 3407:independent 3301:Baldeep1102 3272:discussion. 3242:Baldeep1102 3228:Baldeep1102 3202:Baldeep1102 3187:Baldeep1102 2902:, formerly 2683:Eights Week 2674:Eights Week 2599:Greetings, 2388:Vivek.feels 2373:Vivek.feels 2094:Garfield075 2079:Garfield075 1908:WP:PRODUCER 1762:Thintronics 1709:Jackhanma69 1693:Jackhanma69 1678:Jackhanma69 1586:Reconrabbit 1533:Reconrabbit 1506:I just saw 1112:Sumansindhu 1019:Sumansindhu 1005:Sumansindhu 988:Sumansindhu 924:Sumansindhu 840:Matandi2001 803:Matandi2001 796:Matandi2001 753:Matandi2001 739:Matandi2001 710:Matandi2001 695:Matandi2001 566:Angelita C. 497:Roe v. Wade 252:Proposal 25 237:Proposal 24 222:Proposal 17 194:Proposal 14 185:Proposal 13 176:Proposal 3b 36:This is an 3874:here's how 3783:Bobby Cohn 3677:Bobby Cohn 3673:Paulpaulll 3658:Paulpaulll 3633:Bobby Cohn 3631:. Kindly, 3509:Bobby Cohn 3468:Bobby Cohn 3414:Bobby Cohn 3349:Bobby Cohn 3345:Bijoymisra 3330:Bijoymisra 3277:Bobby Cohn 3260:and click 3213:Bobby Cohn 3165:Hi Bobby, 3141:Bobby Cohn 3109:Bobby Cohn 3060:Bobby Cohn 3004:Bobby Cohn 2945:Bobby Cohn 2892:Bobby Cohn 2678:Hi Marcus 2515:WP:COIEDIT 2394:. Kindly, 2155:good faith 2059:WP:Primary 2022:FireflyBot 1950:Rajeevstkt 1936:Rajeevstkt 1220:, who is " 1040:of people) 515:Fumigation 403:References 367:policy on 3771:user page 3405:that are 3269:Add topic 3258:user page 3250:user page 3137:Miraasif0 3123:Miraasif0 3101:Miraasif0 3086:Miraasif0 3038:and that 2570:finished. 2511:user page 2408:Thank you 2346:user page 2275:secondary 2006:again or 1877:mgenzac 1541:WP:BEFORE 1165:secondary 1080:user page 1025:, it was 421:Slateline 82:Archive 5 76:Archive 4 70:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3896:RoySmith 3614:Cheesy.A 3599:Cheesy.A 3559:WP:NFILM 3412:Kindly, 3399:in-depth 3299:Baldeep 3248:on your 3211:Kindly, 3185:Baldeep 2798:WP:NPROF 2351:Kindly, 2294:WP:NCORP 2271:reliable 1912:WP:THREE 1906:such as 1854:Kindly, 1849:WP:THREE 1844:process. 1674:this one 1369:Cheers, 1306:WP:NPROF 1273:policy. 1163:and are 1161:in depth 1140:Thanks. 1086:Thanks, 1027:declined 1023:rejected 934:contribs 826:Cheers, 776:Cheers, 719:Cheers, 600:Elinruby 580:Elinruby 492:Elinruby 478:Elinruby 461:Elinruby 446:Elinruby 389:Kindly, 380:WP:THREE 335:declined 261:See the 3428:sources 3056:WP:SPAM 3044:WP:NPOV 2837:notable 2729:Amakuru 2713:Amakuru 2698:Amakuru 2556:deleted 2338:WP:PAID 2279:neutral 2008:request 2004:edit it 1896:Mgenzac 1881:Mgenzac 1836:WP:PAID 1537:WP:STUB 1452:WP:REFB 1169:notable 1157:DKas321 1142:DKas321 1074:WP:PAID 956:history 716:policy. 327:Aapril3 312:Aapril3 273:), via 39:archive 3899:(talk) 3627:. See 3569:Faddle 3564:Fiddle 3324:: help 3182:Best, 2844:Marcus 2833:WP:BLP 2805:Marcus 2754:Marcus 2720:Marcus 2665:Marcus 2654:WP:BLP 2646:Bngugi 2631:Bngugi 2522:Marcus 2507:WP:COI 2436:Marcus 2399:Marcus 2356:Marcus 2342:WP:COI 2287:WP:NOT 2192:Marcus 2180:Marcus 2167:submit 2110:About 2101:Marcus 1957:Marcus 1919:Marcus 1904:WP:SNG 1859:Marcus 1842:WP:AfC 1832:WP:COI 1828:tone. 1753:Marcus 1700:Marcus 1656:rabbit 1641:Marcus 1612:rabbit 1593:Marcus 1576:rabbit 1552:Marcus 1522:rabbit 1465:Marcus 1445:reject 1374:Marcus 1326:Marcus 1315:WP:BLP 1278:Marcus 1229:Marcus 1183:Marcus 1091:Marcus 831:Marcus 781:Marcus 737:Best, 724:Marcus 659:Marcus 529:Marcus 468:Marcus 394:Marcus 384:WP:AfD 352:count. 343:voters 331:reject 3572:🇺🇦 3555:prove 3401:from 3395:three 3296:Best, 2146:Hey @ 1651:Recon 1607:Recon 1571:Recon 1531:Hey @ 1517:Recon 1311:WP:OR 964:watch 960:links 110:draft 16:< 3808:talk 3787:talk 3775:here 3740:Hi @ 3731:talk 3716:talk 3702:talk 3681:talk 3662:talk 3637:talk 3624:Done 3603:talk 3527:talk 3513:talk 3486:talk 3472:talk 3458:talk 3440:talk 3418:talk 3382:Hi @ 3373:talk 3353:talk 3334:talk 3305:talk 3281:talk 3240:Hi @ 3232:talk 3217:talk 3200:Hi @ 3191:talk 3145:talk 3127:talk 3113:talk 3099:Hi @ 3090:talk 3064:talk 3058:. — 3054:and 3052:WP:N 3048:WP:V 3022:talk 3016:Yes 3008:talk 2998:Hi @ 2989:talk 2963:talk 2949:talk 2940:Done 2920:talk 2908:talk 2896:talk 2886:Hi @ 2871:talk 2857:talk 2827:Hi @ 2819:talk 2788:Hi @ 2779:talk 2727:Hi @ 2711:Hi @ 2702:talk 2644:Hi @ 2635:talk 2586:talk 2578:talk 2492:talk 2467:talk 2453:talk 2427:Hi @ 2418:talk 2386:Hi @ 2377:talk 2340:and 2310:The 2265:Hi @ 2256:talk 2215:sigh 2159:AFCH 2134:sigh 2083:talk 2026:talk 1970:talk 1940:talk 1894:Hi @ 1885:talk 1803:Hi @ 1794:talk 1735:talk 1713:talk 1682:talk 1545:WP:N 1490:talk 1479:Best 1439:Hi @ 1430:talk 1395:talk 1387:race 1353:talk 1319:WP:V 1292:talk 1257:talk 1243:talk 1216:Hi @ 1207:talk 1155:Hi @ 1146:talk 1116:talk 1017:Hi @ 1009:talk 992:talk 981:Hi, 968:logs 952:talk 948:edit 928:talk 903:talk 884:talk 844:talk 807:talk 751:Hi @ 743:talk 714:WP:V 708:Hi @ 699:talk 651:Done 630:talk 604:talk 584:talk 571:that 490:Hi @ 482:talk 450:talk 325:Hi @ 316:talk 279:talk 271:talk 215:and 169:and 116:". 3830:On 3107:. — 2685:to 2299:In 2153:My 1766:Hi 1676:. 1424:SC 1224:"? 1072:or 914:AfC 866:Hi 459:Hi 245:): 230:): 211:): 165:): 3890:. 3876:, 3860:, 3834:, 3810:) 3789:) 3733:) 3718:) 3704:) 3683:) 3664:) 3639:) 3616:: 3605:) 3529:) 3515:) 3488:) 3474:) 3460:) 3442:) 3420:) 3375:) 3355:) 3336:) 3307:) 3283:) 3234:) 3219:) 3193:) 3147:) 3129:) 3115:) 3092:) 3066:) 3050:, 3046:, 3024:) 3010:) 2991:) 2965:) 2951:) 2932:: 2922:) 2910:) 2898:) 2873:) 2859:) 2821:) 2781:) 2704:) 2637:) 2588:) 2558:. 2494:) 2469:) 2455:) 2420:) 2379:) 2273:, 2258:) 2170:}} 2164:{{ 2085:) 2028:) 1972:) 1942:) 1887:) 1796:) 1737:) 1715:) 1684:) 1634:}} 1628:{{ 1568:. 1492:) 1432:) 1397:) 1355:) 1294:) 1259:) 1245:) 1222:we 1209:) 1148:) 1118:) 1011:) 994:) 966:| 962:| 958:| 954:| 950:| 936:) 905:) 886:) 846:) 809:) 767:}} 761:{{ 745:) 701:) 643:, 632:) 606:) 586:) 506:). 484:) 452:) 419:. 361:is 318:) 281:) 134:iz 3880:) 3872:( 3806:( 3785:( 3748:: 3729:( 3714:( 3700:( 3679:( 3671:@ 3660:( 3635:( 3612:@ 3601:( 3544:) 3540:( 3535:@ 3525:( 3511:( 3494:@ 3484:( 3470:( 3456:( 3438:( 3416:( 3390:. 3371:( 3351:( 3343:@ 3332:( 3303:( 3279:( 3264:. 3230:( 3215:( 3208:. 3189:( 3143:( 3135:@ 3125:( 3111:( 3088:( 3062:( 3030:@ 3020:( 3006:( 2987:( 2961:( 2947:( 2928:@ 2918:( 2906:( 2894:( 2869:( 2855:( 2817:( 2777:( 2700:( 2633:( 2584:( 2576:( 2501:@ 2490:( 2465:( 2451:( 2416:( 2375:( 2348:. 2333:. 2254:( 2241:: 2237:@ 2219:) 2211:( 2201:— 2138:) 2130:( 2120:— 2092:@ 2081:( 2024:( 1968:( 1938:( 1883:( 1838:. 1792:( 1733:( 1711:( 1691:@ 1680:( 1600:@ 1584:@ 1488:( 1448:" 1428:( 1393:( 1362:@ 1351:( 1300:@ 1290:( 1265:@ 1255:( 1241:( 1205:( 1144:( 1114:( 1007:( 990:( 970:) 946:( 931:· 926:( 901:( 882:( 842:( 805:( 773:. 741:( 697:( 685:— 639:@ 628:( 602:( 582:( 480:( 448:( 423:. 314:( 277:( 269:( 239:( 224:( 205:( 159:( 131:L 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index