User talk:BilledMammal

2946:. Your own analysis shows this. When you analyse a JSTOR search, you would find 16:6 for capitalising from one page of 25 results and assert this is a 3:1 ratio that supports capitalisation. No discussion would assert that a 3:1 ratio is sufficient to apply capitalisation, nor does P&G state this. This is your own interpretation of P&G (notwithstanding that your own analysis of JSTOR gives a ratio of 2.7:1). Given this, it is apparent that you have assessed the question rather than the strength of the arguments made. I see no substantial difference between your close and that by Wbm. Some of this I might overlook if it were not your choice to analyse 25 results from JSTOR but 100 results from HeinOnline on the stated basis that the former gives 25 results per page and the latter gives scrolling results. There is no substantial difference between analysing an equal number of results in each case. The rational for analysing only 25 JSTOR v 100 HeinOnline results lacks substance, The difference, however, is that a small number of results are more likely to give a skewed result (a statistical "fact"), which has happened in this instance. Considering an equal number of results as done with HeinOnline (ie 100), the conclusion is substantially different, even by the arguments that you would make. 2569:) you made on January 19. In the first edit, you removed a column from the article and said the edit summary of “Removed attackers column; see talk page”. Two minutes later (the 2nd edit), you mentioned on the talk page that you removed the columns with the reason why. That is perfectly ok to do. That said, my personal experience and advice would be to tell you to reverse that order. Basically, do the talk page message and then revert or do the larger edit change. If you wanted to hold more to the 0RR restriction, I would recommend doing the talk page message and then waiting at least 24 hours before doing a larger edit. My mentor actually recommended I wait over a week before doing the edit, to give ample time for others to chime in, especially during a debate or disagreement. I’m not saying you should wait a week, but honestly, switching the order of your edits (i.e. talk page first, then large edit) may go a long way to solving problems and disagreements. Cheers! 1029: 7748: 992: 7394: 5418: 3507: 3501: 3494: 3487: 3480: 8883: 1136: 8025:"Can fighters killed in a war they started with atrocities be victims of genocide?" is also a totally inappropriate thing to be discussing on article talk pages. I'm surprised you're suggesting it! "Who are the victims of genocide?" is not a topic of discussion for article talk pages. The appropriate discussion is "What do RS say?" In this case: "who do RSes say are the victims of this genocide?" (it's "Gazans" or "Palestinians"), and/or "what do RS say is the death toll?" 3116: 249: 1475: 9334: 8931: 5873: 5470: 4340: 4065: 3672: 3554: 3051: 3034: 3015: 3003: 1016: 1004: 564: 367: 355: 1118: 307: 21: 7038:. So the "per nom/per above" should not be given the same weight as editors who explained their thought process; there also wasn't really a discussion between the editors who stated their thoughts. So I agree with Nate here that it should have been relisted at the very least to generate a more robust discussion or closed as "no consensus". In the mean time, I think enough editors have flagged an issue with this that the discussion should be relisted. 8680: 975: 7449: 5342: 1316:. I still hope to run it at some point. If I remember right one of the reasons I hadn't started it up was that I was missing a few stub lists - I think it was non-Lugnuts created sports stubs without sigcov that I was missing and stub lists by nationality. Would you be willing, when you have the time, to make me these lists and maybe at the start of next month the sports stub contest could run, (if we can get a few other things to work out)? 7242:, and then from a lot of other people. I don't know why you wouldn't listen to SilkTork: bro is a three-time arb and has been here since forever. And that edit summary, with a link that goes nowhere, and the "Preparing to implement"--you weren't preparing, you were executing, and I think that you should not have closed that discussion if, as seems clear, you were so eager to execute. Sorry if I sound miffed, it's just because I'm miffed. 5128: 5106: 3146: 4358:(Unfortunately, this is a common issue with articles titled massacre, on both sides of any given dispute; editors argue, even when the sources don't support it, that tragedies against their POV are always a massacre, and that tragedies in line with their POV never are. It's hilariously blatant at times; in one discussion you will have an editor arguing against using massacre, saying that we have to follow the sources (eg. 4706: 6114:

not contested that "Evangelical" would be the correct name circa 2017, but the pro-"Protestant" camp was citing recent developments in the past 2 years, which cannot possibly be reflected in sources from before 2022. The nominator wrote "The onus must be on those preferring "Protestant" to demonstrate such a shift in meaning" but I'd argue that the Washington Post article I linked absolutely satisfied such a demand (

4395:

intensified, on the other diminished; mirroring political bias. So the issue is not merely one of POV, but of POV + systemic bias, and in a way that feeds into the dehumanization at work in the current ongoing genocide. So there's very little to be found hilarious about it. As editors, we very much need to be conscious of this so that we are not simply uncritically or blindly echoing the systemic biases at work.

1681: 8087:

fighters killed in a war they started with atrocities be victims of genocide?" Unless you have RS that talk about it, we're not talking about it. We have RS that give death tolls, and that's something we can talk about. I'm already pulling together some of those RSes and will start that discussion shortly, I invite you to join me there and ask you please leave those other two threads be.

2486:. IAR isn't there to allow editors, or even groups of editors, to unilaterally override established consensus. It is there to allow us to apply good sense and judgement to circumstances where, in the view of the broader community, following the letter of the rule will impede improving the encyclopedia. As a rule of thumb if you can answer "yes" to the question "Absent concerns of 9160:. You linked to an edit by David A that was on June 16, over a month later. That is not accurately described as "instrumental in opening it" in any possible way. Further, the edit isn't David opening an RM, it's David trying to bring that RM to a close. Further further, it worked, and brought the RM to successful consensus that was upheld on MR. 3979:"WP:BLUDGEON", it would be helpful - and in line with our policies on civility and aspersions - if you explained why you saw my behavior in that discussion as bludgeoning. It would also be useful if you also explained why you didn't see the contributions of editors who have made around the same number of comments as me as also bludgeoning. 6220:. If there are two sides who disagree with each other, and neither side is convincing the other, then there is nothing I as a closer can do to make them agree - all I can do is assess which side has the stronger arguments, and if each side has equally strong arguments, which sides position has more support amongst the community. 2961:

lowercase then you seem to think that they take precedence over the federal and local judiciaries of the United States and the United States Constitution as the common form of casing? No wonder there is so much controversy in these titling roundabouts when editors want to stand common sense on its head (where it seldom belongs).

9072:, and you know that's the relevant time period, not two months, how is it possible that you did not mention this very relevant time frame? Because saying "16 days" wouldn't support your point; "two months" makes it sound like a long time. You know damn well if it had been two months, I would never have deleted that RM. 2887:, where there are some striking similarities in what has occurred. Further, when 100 hits from JSTOR are considered (eliminating sources that cannot be viewed, mixed usage and capitalisation in titles where title case is being used), my observation is that we are left with 65 sources and 56% for capitalisation. 2620: 2555:

thing, but I had (have…constantly working to remind myself about it) the habit of doing that as well. More like an edit before thinking mentality is what I had. I am not saying you have that mentality at all. But from my experience, editing (i.e. reverting) before a talk page mention or brief discussion

4193: 8086:

It's just you and this other new editor who are advocating for a change and think these threads should not have been closed. So the compromise I'm offering is that we split those two things: we can talk about the change that you two want to make to the article, but we are not going to talk about "Can

6525:

BilledMammal, your edits summary is misleading, since it says "post-move cleanup", and you haven't performed the move yet. Boggled two experienced editors enough to discuss this with you on your talk. There is a difference (almost 2000 edits a bot could perform), but the practical result is the same.

4431:

I don't believe I said that at all. I said that we need to be aware of the systemic bias at work, in order that we might be on guard against it. How that plays out in the case of any particular page varies, depending on both the sourcing and the context. But language, and certain terms, should indeed

1883:

Please ignore and revert any of these that you disagree with. With that said, I'm not sure that going to AE is right at this time. Looking through this again, my interpretation is that the first, as an isolated incident, doesn't warrant action. The second is problematic even in isolation, but doesn't

932:

the primary topic (the redirect from Cro-Magnon to Early European modern humans had existed for almost five years), I don't think that an objection raised after the close that this isn't the primary topic is sufficient to overturn - although opening a new move request on that basis to a disambiguated

8347:

I think posting the name of a BLP without a source in your first response there was a serious mistake. It's almost as if you're using the talk page to make the point that this person is responsible for the genocide, or that his death was otherwise justified. That would possibly be a TOU violation, I

8277:

Who did I misclassify? I see 10 people in the discussion and 2 who sought change. If that's not the correct split, it would change my mind. But if it is, then there is no problem with an involved editor closing the discussion. (And I'm not even shutting down the discussion, I am about to restart it,

7869:

With respect to the prior move from "Ghost gun" to "Privately made firearm", as opposed to seeing it as a shift from a supposedly 'common name' as argued by the two supporting editors in the recent move request, as far as talk page discourse goes, the change was welcomed and considered as correcting

7806:

made from readily available, unregulated building blocks." However, in stating a defaced firearm is not a ghost gun,the authors make it very clear that the self-assembled nature of these firearms is the main factor, not the lack of serial numbers: "No. Defaced guns are sometimes referred to as ghost

7338:

of pages involving two large-scale American and Australian news organizations (the cite links alone?!)? I would've personally let the discussion be open a lot more; the move of anything involving either ABC is something that shouldn't be decided by such a small consensus, and we're probably going to

7075:

I've definitely seen CONSENSUS explained that way before (mostly in AfDs but I think it also came up in the Vector 2022 discussions). Instead of "per nom", an editor can highlight which part of an argument convinces them or add an actual supporting statement because consensus is about discussion and

6376:

Thanks. Perhaps something could be done to clarify the application of the long-term significance guideline so it's not seen as subjective. For example, subject all parties to the simple requirement of citing sources? For example, weigh links to new supporting evidence more than mere assertions. Same

5940:

While I've never filed an AE request, there are multiple times where I've come within a hair's breadth of doing so, and I often read reports to stay on top of recent disputes. It needs to be used more to regulate inappropriate partisan activity in contentious topics, and you're one of the few people

4314:

P.S. if there is still a concern about whether or not this would be a 1RR violation, I would be willing to ask a clarification question if those two reversions qualify as a violation of 1RR or if they do not at ArbCom. I just spent 20 minutes hunting for the place where I saw it, but my bad habit of

3852:

Perhaps I shouldn't have used JWB and instead done it manually (with only 20 pages, it would have been as easy to do manually as with JWB), but I had been using it to assist with closing move requests and I didn't give it much thought. With that said, this probably isn't an overly productive debate,

3814:

I don't agree that this constitutes consensus as Pākehā settlers is an alternative name of European settlers. In more international articles I agree that "European settlers" should be given precedence, as we discussed in the RM, but many of the articles you changed were about New Zealand and use New

2843:

Disagree, the close contains a full analysis of the two "sides" and usage. Aside from the case-counts (which is really a factor which should be lessened in these type of attempted casings) Cinderella, you really have to take into account that 1/3 of the Federal government, the Judicial branch (which

820:

If they had continued to open more requests despite people repeatedly expressing concerns then I would have had an issue with that, yes. There is also a difference between someone unfamiliar with the area and someone who is well versed in the history waging a long campaign which seemingly won't stop

699:

That was in a period of already high activity, rather than after months of inactivity (which in itself was brought on by the burnout of a lot of people caused by the moves.) Frankly I wish that you stayed forgetful of them, as it's always the exact same discussion regardless of the topic and I don't

485:

I cleaned up a lot of deleted articles from the Arizona lists and a few obvious rail sidings from Colorado. Since many states have similar lists, I wonder if it makes sense to clean these up systematically and develop consistent standards for inclusion. It would probably be uncontroversial to reduce

7970:

we discuss that underlying dispute. The "how" in the two threads I collapsed (and I will archive the second one) are absolutely unacceptable to me, and I am willing to die on that hill, I really am. The "what" I totally understand -- that is, the criticism that the sources being used in the article

7925:

Further, I don’t think it’s appropriate to equate this to the Holocaust. This war began when Palestinian militant groups attacked Israel, with the intent of massacring and kidnapping civilians. It is indisputable that the war and the aim to destroy Hamas is justified, even if some actions go beyond

6346:

To try to generalize this, to try and address your question about the the behavior and mindset of the discussion closer; when it comes to subjective questions, it is far closer to a vote than most of us would like. For example, when guideline A says we should use title "Foo" and guideline B says we

6305:, where I also then listed data points that contradict the claims that it's only nuclear fallout that is referred to as fallout because I found a couple of articles in the encyclopedia already that actually do that; one of those was about an attack on a nuclear reactor, no less. Did you see that? -- 5573:

I'd also draw your attention to 'In deciding whether and how to translate a foreign name into English, follow English-language usage.' In this case, the two most common English language usages are to use 'Cymdeithas yr Iaith' untranslated, or to give the Welsh name first and the English translation

4825:

First, it is based on the assumption that all Wikiprojects are not aligned with the broader community on the topics they are interested in. This doesn't align with the data; for example I've found no reason to believe that Wikiproject Physics or Wikiproject Lego are partisan or biased on any topic,

2928:

It is one thing to review the evidence as offered and that the evidence supports the conclusions claimed in the discussion. It is quite another to conduct an alternative analysis of the evidence offered and to apply one's own criteria not offered in the discussion to reach conclusions, particularly

2559:

lead to problems. So, with all that said, one piece of advice I may suggest is you try a brief 0RR-style mentality on CTOP articles, similar to what I do. I am not under any formal restrictions, but I have learned that living to a 0RR mentality keeps a user out of trouble and generally keeps things

783:

some people don't seem to understand that. As for my moves, these were often accompanied by actual improvements to the articles and done one-at-a-time with large breaks to give people time to object, rather than a fly-by-night bombardment which overwhelms people and means they're unable to respond.

782:

I believe you're wasting everybody else's time having to respond to your nonsense. The current titles are clearly policy compliant, but for whatever reason - whether it's because of the indigenous name, as with moves in Australia and South Africa, or whether it's just being confused by punctuation,

7880:

term of 'ghost gun' rather than "privately made firearm". Similarly, the term "ghost gun" was not considered a common name, but rather as biased, as evidenced in earlier discourse like that by Asmoaesl, on September 18, 2021, "This page has a lot of bias, quoting news articles of the left-wing and

7035:

Many of these discussions will involve polls of one sort or another; but as consensus is determined by the quality of arguments (not by a simple counted majority), polls should be regarded as structured discussions rather than voting. Responses indicating individual explanations of positions using

6234:

Yeah, I see how a finding of no consensus would be the obvious choice in cases where you don't see people explicitly changing their minds. At the same time, that requirement would be onerous, because it would give even more weight to status quo - it's actually very easy to just leave a comment and

6205:

is determined not just by considering the preferences of the participants in a given discussion, but also by evaluating their arguments, assigning due weight accordingly, and giving due consideration to the relevant consensus of the Knowledge community in general as reflected in applicable policy,

6113:

I !voted oppose and am obviously partial, but I really don't think a strong case was made by the pro-move camp on the common name, which you apparently considered controlling. Ngrams only goes back to 2017, and I strongly suspect that Britannica hasn't updated their article recently either. It's

6057:

Sorry, English is not my first language, and I don't understand your reply. The Protestant Church of Germany has a difficult relation to evangelicalism; that is not a belief but a fact. The church recently noticed, and changed their misleading name. Why we would still keep it, remains a mystery to

5828:

Possibly; I assumed that it would recognize you as such because, for example, it recognize extended-confirmed editors as auto-confirmed, but I may have been wrong - I'll take a look and ping you when fixed (or at least when I think it is; I can't test while my request for admin permissions on test

5612:

sources which use the Welsh name offer a courtesy translation and this should be used as evidence that "Welsh Language Society" is the common name (despite those same sources using Cymdeithas and Cymdeithas yr Iaith elsewhere in the article). This is in contrast to a number of sources that do not

4416:

Before I comment further I want to make sure I have understood you correctly; you are saying that, for the reasons expressed in your comment, we should expect different levels of sourcing for Israeli and Palestinian positions? For example, we need sources calling an act against Israelis a massacre

4394:

This take on the "massacre" language landscape lacks nuance. One of the big problems in the area is the extreme systemic bias in the media coverage of the conflict – something that has been covered extensively in recent reviews of the language used by outlets. Events on one side are linguistically

2937:

as supporting the present title, when ngram evidence offered in the discussion did not do this. You offered your own opinion (not evidenced in the discussion) for discarding the ngram evidence. There was however, discussion that would give reason to discard the HeinOnline search (as you did), even

2592:

And I'll also keep in mind your suggestions about talking first and then editing - you make good points, although I will say that when the material I want to remove has been recently added I normally prefer to revert to the status quo while the discussion on going on rather than leave the disputed

8225:

Editors are not going to discuss and vote on article talk pages about who should and who should not be considered a victim of genocide. Editors are not going to sort dead people into categories like "legitimate military targets" and "victims". Doing so would violate multiple site policies. We are

5047:

Why didnt the user ping me in this discussion? And Also the name Polish-Urainian conflict (1939-1947) would seem like the conflict started in 1939 which only some historians can agree on. And the name is also contradictory like in the infobox and there is no mention of 1939 in the entire article.

2938:

though you conducted your own detailed review of the result. Such a detailed analysis was not offered in the discussion. This goes beyond the source evidence as offered and what conclusions/assertions were made in respect to that evidence. The claim was that HeinOnline and JSTOR results show that

6632:

Often, when a page gets renamed leaving the base name to a disambig page, someone will shortly fix these links to the correct place. Onel and Rodw are the two users I know who fix them. I should have said about fixing these links since there would be thousands. And some of them (unintentionally)

5281:

I'm not concerned about how you came across it; I'm aware you, unlike Kashmiri, run such Quarry queries and generally monitor for this sort of thing. In addition, unlike Kashmiri, you don't have a habit of turning up at discussions and articles shortly after I edit them - while previously I have

2960:

This was a very good close and kept the well-known name used by the U.S. judiciary and the U.S. Constitution. You say that "No discussion would assert that a 3:1 ratio is sufficient to apply capitalisation", well, 75% uppercasing is more than sufficient to apply capitalization. If 25% of sources

2554:

comment: We have crossed paths a couple of times before so if I may, I wanted to let you know about something I noticed. You are probably doing it unintentionally, but you see to have a tendency to do a large revert or several reverts prior to going to the talk page. This isn’t necessarily a bad

8112:

applies. You’re also missing a few editors - it was more than myself and the OP in the first one - but honestly, we’re straying from the point. You’re involved, and shouldn’t be shutting these down, much less repeatedly doing so over objections. Instead, you should ask an uninvolved admin to do

7982:

So here's my compromise offer: I asked you, and the other editor, to bring this up in a new thread in what I see as "the right way." So instead of that, I will not self-revert, but I will start the discussion in a new thread myself, and I'll go get sources for it, too, and then we can have this

7014:

I assume you are seeing YorkshireExpat's !vote as the 'I hate Americans'? While it could have been phrased in a less confrontational manner, I saw it as a rebuttal of the oppose !votes; that while this may be the primary topic in the United States, that they dispute that it is the primary topic

5732:

it's unclear where Mario vs. Donkey Kong should go, given this result and absent a result for the AfD. For now I have left it at Mario vs. Donkey Kong (video game), although I have re-targeted the links that used to go to Mario vs Donkey Kong to Mario vs. Donkey Kong (sub-series); if the AfD is

5264:

If you are wondering how I came across this page, one can either run a Quarry query for pages misplaced into Project space or just look at our Move log. You created all of these pages in Project space and then kept moving them around to different titles so they really stood out on the Move log.

4159:

It's not POV; it's issues where the editor is failing to accurate represent the source. This can and does result in POV issues, but that isn't why I am approaching them on their talk page - while I do fix the issues when I see them, consistently adding content that fails to reflect the provided

3948:

While I have contributed heavily to the AJ discussion I don't think I have contributed more heavily than other participants - for example, Nableezy has made the same number of comments I have. Of course, "others are also bludgeoning" isn't a defense against bludgeoning, but I don't believe I am

8743:

Okay. Anyways, as I mention above, it would be better if editors made an effort to keep users from mass-creating these stubs in the future. If you look through the articles I made, at first you might suspect that I was one such user, but in fact the species I choose are "more notable" than the

4023:

Number of comments alone, while an indicator of bludgeoning, isn't proof. I welcome further discussion of the issues, if either you or Selfstudier is interested in engaging in them and explaining what you see the issue is - although I note, looking over the current page, I've made 71 comments,

7769:

From a historical standpoint, an issue that arises from this is that, at least in the United States (which appears to be so heavily emphasized in this article that it has lead to a globalize template being placed), a lack of serial numbers was a common occurrence for much of U.S. history. For

6319:

Just to clarify, I don't particularly care to try to convince you to think of the outcome of this specific Fallout discussion here, but I do want to know more about the behavior and mindset of a discussion closer to be able to format future discussions in a better consensus-building way. TIA.

4993:

Support This article covers a series of armed clashes that occurred between Ukrainian guerrillas (UPA) and Polish underground armed partisans. A suitable title for this article should be "The clashes between Polish and Ukrainian guerrilla forces in WW2". However, the proposed title is also an

4837:

Finally, as a general argument; the impact is that discussions are more likely to reflect the position of the broader community. This is generally a good thing, but it also has the effect of reducing conflict on Knowledge; many conflicts emerge because of walled gardens where a small group of

1351:

Looking at the page, it seems we need ones by sport (we have ones for Lugstubs by sport, but need other ones that include non-Lugnuts creations - it can include both (Lugstubs and non-Lugnuts stubs) or it can be a just non-Lugnuts category, whichever one is easiest for you to do) and ones for

8748:

accepted by POWO could be made into an stub, but with little potential for improvement. Earlier I counted how many plant species articles there were on Knowledge, and got 70,405. Right now I would guess that there are 72,000 which is only 20% of the total. I am sure you would agree that mass

1688:

Their talk page has a plethora of warnings and other incidents, they argued that NGO Monitor was unreliable (01:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)) (a per se not invalid position) and then attempted to use them on the AfD for EMHRM (18:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)) and there were some other questionable

508:

Hi BilledMammal, I saw this editor's question at the Teahouse and I'm following up. I see you've been editing since this was posted so I assume you saw it. Is there a reason you closed the discussion as "moved" but then didn't move the page? If there's a technical issue I can assist. Thanks.

7132:

thing that you link in your edit summaries, and I am going back through hundreds if not thousands of your edits to even find the GD discussion. I am getting VERY tempted to hit mass rollback, just to get your attention and stop you. Seriously, if you don't stop I will block you temporarily.

7169:

One comment: I realize that there may be a MR coming, but in the future, if a move involving a disambiguation page is done, multiple editors can help fix the backlinks once everything is in place using DisamAssist. A flag will indicate a high number of links to a dab page to be worked by

6286:

In this case, however, your rebuttal was a subjective one, not an objective one - it is possible for such a rebuttal to swing consensus, by convincing other editors of your point of view, but it doesn't permit the closer to down weight the !votes of those who disagreed with your rebuttal.

5661:

The two newspaper articles cited don’t even assert themself whether there is any clear ongoing boycott and are reporting that the company has recovered since the boycott, with its stock price well rising since the boycott, which is also why they are missing in the article since we don’t

6022:. I came to the conclusion that further relisting wouldn't help; instead, it would be more productive to implement the identified consensus and allow a new RM to be opened solely on the topic of where that article should go - which I encourage you or another editor to open at any time. 9207:

It shouldn’t matter whether the result is "moved" or "not moved". They are equally valid consensuses, and it makes no sense to say that it’s acceptable to have a new RM shortly after one but not after the other. I’m also not seeing that comment by the closer as recommending a new move

6017:

There was a clear consensus, both by weight of numbers and by strength of argument, to disambiguate the title. Further, the RM had been open for a month, and while discussion was continuing it wasn't getting any closer to forming a consensus on where to move the article that is now at

4507: 2901:

The difference I see between the two cases is that I reviewed provided evidence and weighted it in accordance with policy; Wbm introduced new evidence. The former is permissible and even encouraged - closers do not need to take claims about evidence on faith - while the latter is not.

6342:

The exceptions are when it is provable through reliable sources that a specific topic does not have long-term significance, or that a different topic has comparable or greater long term significance, but in this case that didn't happen and I suspect that it would be very difficult to

1786:

Your actions will also be under scrutiny, and if you are found to have misbehaved or made a blatantly invalid report it is likely that you would be sanctioned, not the editor you are making a report against. That's not to say that will happen here, but it is something to be aware of.

7165:

This appears to be my fault. I removed that redirect, when I started a separate talk discussion. I'll restore the redirect atop the discussion content to restore that link used in multiple edit summaries. In theory, the link would be the correct location once the page is actually

5554:

I believe that to be an incorrect interpretation of WP:UE, as it seems clear that 'Cymdeithas yr Iaith' fits the criteria of 'a word or phrase (originally taken from some other language) is commonly used by English-language sources.' The policy doesn't state that the English name

4849:. I think some of the editors notifying these WikiProjects are aware that they are not representative and may be trying to shape consensus to reflect their preferences, and might oppose efforts to get broader participation because it would dilute the influence of those projects. 6910:" given of the 4 support votes, half are just "per nom"/"per above" which doesn't explain why they support the nomination and if you remove those two, it becomes 2 support and 2 oppose with BilledMammal as a tie breaker determining the discussion should be closed as "support". 5265:

Typically when editors do repeated moves of pages, it's a sign of vandalism, not testing experiments. Also, any editor can look at your Contributions page after they came across one of these pages and see additional pages like this you created. It's not hard to discover them.

6888:). You are a non-admin. The discussion was rather scant for such a large move. Perhaps you should halt changing every backlink that exists on Knowledge (and notifying everyone in the process) as editors more experienced than yourself have already expressed bewilderment here. 1515:

When you look at the filter log (which can be accessed through the page history) it will tell you which filter triggered the log. 602 is the filter for these alerts; before issuing such an alert you should check through those to see if an editor has previously been alerted.

5604:

The oppose side was unable to cite a single recent reliable source that used "Welsh Language Society" on its own without "Cymdeithas yr Iaith" (I did find a Daily Mail opinion piece that did but its biases are likely identified by it following "Welsh Language Society" with

4829:

Second, it is based on the assumption that Wikiprojects that are not aligned with the broader community on some topics related to their area of interest are not aligned on all topics related to their area of interest. This also isn't true; for example, Wikiproject LGBT was

6250:

So we can't dismiss those contributions, we have to weigh them in, but we don't have to weigh everything equally. If a concern has actually been answered, and there's been no followup, it's perfectly reasonable to consider it in that context, not as a standalone immutable

2862:; closers are not required to take participants claims about evidence at face value and are permitted to validate those claims. In addition, they are there to assess the evidence through the lens of Knowledge policy, which places greater weight on higher quality sources. 8372:

I’m not sure what reliable sources you are asking for - I can provide sources showing that he planned October 7, and I can provide sources that the death toll does not distinguish between civilian and military casualties, if either of those are what you are asking for?

8241:

or some other V or NPOV problem with the death toll in the article (or any other part of the article), we can talk about that (and we will when I start the thread shortly). We don't need to talk about whether Deif was a victim of a genocide in order to talk about that.

1258:

Yeah, I shouldn’t have, but that plane is becoming increasingly silly. Boeing used to be a byword for excellence, but they’ve gone from having engineers in charge to accountants and MBA’s, and as a partial consequence are accepting greater risks than they would in the

6676:, but 11,000 edits is pushing that definition, and it would be better to get bot approval. Do you think it would be appropriate to allow "normal" users to use it if there are less than, say, 1000 edits, but require the use of a bot account if there is more than 1000? 722:

The latter two are self-evident - while MOS:SLASH has minimal bearing, if two titles are otherwise equally preferred then my belief is that MOS:SLASH can be useful in deciding which one we should use - while the former is always accompanied by significant evidence.

2708:

It is a baffling close; even ignoring that they can't explain what arguments they think were strong in opposition, they've said that the arguments in support were slightly stronger, and that combined with a 15 to 8 majority should result in a clear consensus for a

3565: 1682:

Hey, I am looking for a second opinion on a user we both have encountered, could you (as a more experienced person editor who already interacted with them) take a quick look whether their actions have reached the point of warranting more substantive actions being

5802:

There was a clear consensus to move the article at Mario vs. Donkey Kong (video game) to Mario vs. Donkey Kong, and no one appeared to care where Mario vs. Donkey Kong went - I decided that the latter could likely be decided through normal editing processes.

7060:

I realize this is getting a lot more attention now due to the fact that we have to notify every page this article is linked on, but this is a clear consensus in a discussion that has already been relisted; I don't see a justification for relisting it again.

2439:

If you wouldn't mind that might be good, although whether or not anyone else contributes is another question! Also, I know it's tricky and somewhat thankless to close discussions (especially when people complain), so thank you for taking the time to do it.

5001:

When I read Piotrus' previous comments, they were arguing for a rename that kept "conflict". I also interpreted Nihil novi's argument as being more against classifying the conflict - whether into ethnic groups or other groups - than about moving away from

9169:

I didn't vote in that RM. Neither did Selfstudier, TarnishedPath, or Sean.hoyland, WikiFouf, xDanielx, Bluethricecreamman... the other editors who commented at the AE. You opposed that RM, and David A supported it. So what? David A also wrote, in that RM

5748:

If you didn't know, then wait until people gain consensus? There's no reason to immediately close the discussion at the deadline. Even though I disagree with the move, I still think that if it is moved, a consensus on its target should have been reached.

8007:

I don’t think your compromise is appropriate either. The emerging consensus in both those discussions was not for inclusion, and as an involved editor you shouldn’t be interrupting that. As such, I again ask you to self revert, preferably restoring both

4024:

Selfstudier has made 69, Nableezy has made 96, Iskander has made 70, and Vegan416 has made 60. I'm among the most prolific, but far from the very top, and I suspect it's just a product of extensive discussions on multiple topics rather than bludgeoning.

6510:

As BusterD suggests, I could have moved ABC News to the disambiguated page and left the redirect there while retargetting the links, but there isn't much difference either way. I've also updated the edit summary, to make it clearer why I am doing this.

6264:

The closer is perfectly allowed to decide to weigh !votes with no arguments less, and to weigh arguments that were countered less, and if they find that a change will not actually cause anyone to be upset, that can still lead to a legitimate finding of

2410:

I'll be honest, your decision seems to focus on numbers rather than the substance and relative weight of the arguments. My main issue is that nobody really answered the question of why we shouldn't follow the wording used in the article's main sources.

1290:

Sorry, I’ve been trying to find some time to review my list before replying to this. If I remember my past thoughts correctly, we need a tool stronger than that query and quarry for a complete draftification process; a bot that actually reviews each

6173:

You're probably right that it will result in another RM in a year, because it is likely that sources will switch over time, but we have to wait for that switch to occur - we can't lead it. An alternative would be to seek to alter our guideline at

9029:, we're going to look at the entire situation when assessing AE reports. Bringing up the behavior of an editor that was party to a specific dispute is expected. Demanding another editor not discuss disputes you've brought to AE is inappropriate. 8744:

average species. I carefully choose only plants that are of potential interest to readers, such as invasive species, houseplants, or ones that have 500+ Google Scholar results. Most plants are uninteresting. With the flowering plants, any of the

6338:

subjective in most cases. However, that guideline is also the consensus for the community, and so as closer it is rare that it is appropriate for me to discount such votes; the community introduced a subjective guideline, and I can't reject that

1645:

While we're discussing it I will say that your point was well reasoned - that the current naming suggests that non-Anglican dioceses also existed in Manchester etc - but in the end it wasn't convincing to the editors who participated in that RM.

6239:

policy actually does not require convincing others. Instead, it advises against disruptive stonewalling (which typically doesn't happen, and didn't happen here, but just to illustrate the trend). All it says about people who stop responding is:

2844:

is the branch of government which works with and quotes the Constitution), uppercases as the common name. In fact, with the careful count summary, the complaint here should be closing the discussion as "no consensus" and not an outright oppose.

2346: 6351:

we determine which title has consensus by the level of support in the community for that title. In such circumstances, the way you get the closer to close in favor of your position is by convincing the community that your position is the right

2712:

I'll do it if you don't, but probably better you do - I appealed the last close of that proposed move (the one with the interesting close from Sceptre) - and I think an appeal from me will receive less consideration than an appeal from someone

8123:

This is why whether fighters who started the war can be victims is relevant. The argument for inclusion is that Palestinians are the victims, and thus all Palestinian casualties are victims. This is synth, and rebuttable both by reference to

4510: 3265: 1584:

I do have a bad habit of feeling that I need to reply to (almost) every reply made to my own replies, so I will try to keep that in check - limiting myself to four indented replies does sound like a good rule of thumb to help with that, thank

4913:

In the discussion, I didn't see it proven that a majority of reliable sources generally used the title; while Theoreticalmawi's method wasn't perfect, being based on sources in the article, it did attempt to address the question of whether a

1294:

It’s not only that the query will have a number of false positives - it’s sufficiently conservative that there shouldn’t be too many, although given the scale perhaps enough to scupper it. The bigger issue is that it will have a lot of false

6976:

One of the supporters only had 180 edits (and seems to be an SPA on one unrelated talk page)! That's a vote to be cast aside, one was 'per nom' without any elaboration and the other is from the UK just being like 'I hate Americans'. That is

4454:

Then can you clarify how you propose doing that? Because at the moment, it appears like you are doing it by requiring different sourcing standards for calling acts against Israelis a massacre than for calling acts against Palestinians one.

4354:

You're right; withdrawn. I'd hoped a month and a half would be long enough for the evidence to be objectively considered, but unfortunately not - assuming sources don't start using massacre I'll open a new one in three to six months as you

4189: 1877:

I've switched the focus from the use of "jew" to their response to the concerns; I see the initial use as nothing serious so long as it isn't established that they are doing it deliberately, but their response to expressed concerns is more

7774:

did not have serial numbers until 1865 (even though production began 70 years earlier). Likewise, when the Federal Government did begin considering serial number requirements in earnest, such as with a 1958 regulatory proposal by the IRS,

7100:

is the Americanisation of EN Knowledge (it's not US Knowledge) based on things like nGrams and page views when things like that are going to be inherently biased because of the US's population compared with other English speaking nations.

5518:

that I don't find your explanation satisfactory. Why have you ultimately given the 'oppose' argument more weight in your decision, or why was the evidence of the 'support' camp that 'Cymdeithas yr Iaith' is the common name not sufficient?

962:

I believe the 1st, however I suspect the move will be rejected; a similar one was considered in the past but rejected as while the format deviates from our style guideline it matches the format in reliable sources. 22:43, 26 November 2023

4613: 3399: 8387:

I'm not suggesting it wasn't. I'm not suggesting it was. I'm not discussing it, because I'm not going to talk about which BLP's death was justified and which wasn't, unless I'm quoting RSes. But hey, you do you, I'm done trying here.

3793:; I saw the RM as demonstrating consensus that the typical title we use for this should be "European settlers", particularly since much of the reason we moved the article was due to recognizability issues of the term "Pākehā" and per 7056:

interpreted that way, and I don't think it would be productive to do so. If someone writes an effective argument, it would be a waste of editor time to require those who agree with that argument to rewrite it rather than saying "per

4484:

I've been watching those colons grow with some apprehension - I should have backed out, but I do find it difficult when people are responding to me, and so have varying levels of success. I guess I need to be stricter with myself...

3223: 763:

I'm not entirely sure what your complaint is; even if you believe I am wasting my time ensuring that these articles are at their policy-compliant title (and given how much time you spent moving articles to their dual names prior to

6961:

I also found no reason other reason to discount the !votes in support; those editors were unconvinced that the topic was the primary topic by long term significance, and provided evidence to support that in the form of viewership.

3913: 2155:

When asked about his motive, he said: “Actually I was interested in seeing what kind of response the people who push for NGO Monitor being counted as a reliable site would make when it is used to support having a site they want to

1745:, where they were very dismissive of concerns about using "jew" and compared it to using "american" and "christian" - failing to recognize that using Jew as a verb is a pejorative, and the same is not true of American or Christian. 842:

We're not going to agree here; you believe my proposals are wrong, but since the broader community generally believes otherwise there is no issue with me continuing to open them and I'm not interested in discussing this further.

8163:

It gets complicated (how much responsibility do Germans, particularly Germans who supported the Nazi party, bear for starting WWII?) but I don’t think that debate is relevant here as we are also talking about leaders like Deif.

7759: 6488:

There's a completed move discussion at Talk:ABC News BilledMammal closed. I'm not sure why BM has chosen to do things this way but it's one way to do it. Over 2000 edits this morning, instead of letting the redirect sit there.

1719: 9015: 3840:

It is an alternative name, but I don't think that fact changes the fact that we have a consensus to use "European settlers", or means that we should continue using the less common and less recognizable version - this is where

2585:

I'll go provide a fuller explanation now, and it's not tedious at all; it's a perfectly reasonable request, particularly since my edits involved table and it can be difficult to see what changes have been made when tables are

797:

I'm still surprised to hear you object to my move requests with terms like "fly-by-night bombardment", given you had no objection to behavior at a greater scale in the opposite direction, like in the 14 move requests I linked

7766:

It is not the lack of serial numbers, being 'untraceable ghost' as it would, that makes this manner of firearm distinguishable, but the fact it is made by the private individual. Something better described by "Privately made

4528: 1847:

I talked to an admin, who directed me towards AE as well. Would you mind taking a look at my request (which is obviously my own and not yours) just to make sure that I did not make any obvious mistakes/didn’t miss anything?

4537: 3251: 3217: 838:

Given that the person repeatedly expressing concerns regarding my proposals is you, it seems odd to say that you would have had an issue with the proposals in the opposite direction if only someone had repeatedly expressed

3431: 3177: 5496:

Reviewing it again, I stand by my previous close. Editors in opposition argued that even sources that do use the Welsh name commonly translate it into English, and I found no basis in policy to give those !votes less

3295:, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%. 2130:

is not a usable source, describing them as “akin to one of those think tanks employed to say global warming isn't happening and it is too late to do anythng about it and it is good for agriculture and it is a Chinese

4546: 3183: 9144:

moved, and the move is endorsed at MR, it doesn't make sense to open a new RM back to the original title 16 days later. Surely you can understand the logic of this, and understand that it has nothing to do with POV

4598: 3371: 3277: 700:

have the time or the energy to counter the exact same points over and over constantly. Your insistence on using the same arguments which have been repeatedly disproven shows I'd have better luck yelling at a wall.

3357: 8295:

As for the rest, we can discuss further - once you self-revert. Surely you can see how your actions are inappropriate, and how an involved editor removing a thread when other editors believe it is appropriate is

8259:

However, this discussion is getting very deep, and the underlying point hasn’t changed. You, as an involved editor, shouldn’t be shutting down discussions, and you certainly shouldn’t repeatedly be doing so over

7807:

guns, but defaced guns are different. A defaced gun is a commercially manufactured firearm that has had its serial number obliterated.". Again, something naturally described in the title "Privately made firearm".

4579: 3867:

My concern was more about the name of the links rather than JWB. Because we both haven't agreed it would probably be worth getting more opinions from the WikiProject New Zealand noticeboard, but I am off to bed.

3327: 6981:

a consensus. For a discussion like this I would certainly not put the same weight on a lacking 'per nom' than the IP, who clearly explained their vote. This was definitely a relist without question, at minimum.

4622: 4583: 3417: 3333: 3199:, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only. 1804:

I’m not expecting you to check every edit I have ever made, but are you aware of any case where I have acted in a way that is in violation of policy (ignoring growing pains when still figuring out the basics)?

5369:

Sure; I'll add that to the known issues list and get to it next. I assume this is to minimize the impact on watch lists, as the target, typically a redirect, will usually have fewer watchers than the article?

3385: 3949:

bludgeoning that discussion or otherwise disrupting it - for example, I think my most recent comment, attempting to assess Al Jazeera's independence by a review of scholarly sources, is productive and useful.

6957:

I saw it as a clear consensus; counting the proposer, five editors supported the move, while only two opposed it - while some of the !votes for where "per nom/per above", there is no reason to discount such

5936:

I only have a few stray edits in the Israel–Palestine area, but I have a general distaste for our tolerance of editors who put their personal beliefs above the project, and this area is some of the worst of

4533: 3159: 2813: 8405:

This is why I make the point, because editors are implicitly claiming that he was without sources to support that claim, and I think that implicit claim is so extraordinary that it needs to be pointed out.

6212:

I said "significantly" because you did try to argue that it wasn't primary by long term significance. However, that position was not shared by other editors, and so its impact on the overall result was not

8348:

hope you reconsider and change that comment, we can discuss RS coverage of the death toll without naming any BLPs (without RS). At the very least, you really should add an RS there just to cover your ass.

7865:, all from more than 25 years ago. Consequently, the following comment made by WestRiding24 can be disposed of as simply false: "As for 'Homemade firearm', I don't see that term being used widely at all.". 6418:

It was opened fifteen days ago, and no additional editors participated since the last relist. However, since it has only been relisted once I don't mind relisting it again; reverted my close and relisted.

6362:, I don't believe that any editor made that claim - my reading of the discussion is that they acknowledge other topics are also referred to by "Fallout", but that this has the most long-term significance. 6154:

In case it is helpful in the future, if you want to avoid a paywall, whether for yourself or to provide the article to others, put archive.li in front of the url; while the link you provided did not work,

4593: 3271: 805:

are policy compliant, but consensus shows otherwise - of the recent move requests, both of the ones that have been closed have resulted in moves (it would be three, but you objected to one of the closes).

7795:

Even when lack of serialization is mentioned, use of the term "Ghost gun" almost always emphasizes that these firearms are homemade, again lending credence that "Privately made firearm" is a more natural

3203: 2660:

I was hoping to avoid doing so and in the process avoid drama, but it seems to have instead caused drama. I will make sure to reach out directly to users in the future, even if doing so does cause drama.

2834: 5601:

It's simply not true that "Editors in opposition argued that even sources that do use the Welsh name commonly translate it into English, and I found no basis in policy to give those !votes less weight."

4188:

error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (

1070:

before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.

9217:

The members are you and Selfstudier. With that said, believe it or not, I have been attempting to not have an issue with you; for example, I declined to bring up your multiple reverts within 24 hours (

7943:

For the purposes of discussing a discussion about "can bad people be victims of genocide?", I would equate all genocides. In other words, that is not a proper subject of discussion on the talk page of

7714: 610:; for comparison, the number of RM's I've opened - four - is far less than numbers we've seen in the past without objection, such as on 15 September 2021 when another editor opened at least fourteen: 8773: 8278:

without the BLP vio and FORUM stuff.) Also, there's no problem with an involved editor closing a BLP-violating thread. But if the split is not so lopsided, then please, tell me where I got it wrong.

6043:

I do. However, I still had to down weight those !votes, as for translations we are instructed to follow English sources where available, rather than relying on what editors believe it most accurate.

4574: 4834:

about a requested move from "Nemo (rapper)" to "Nemo (singer)"; there is no evidence or reason to believe that their partisanship or bias extends to this topic, making this notification appropriate.

3445: 4110:

I don't think it proper to warn BM re not visiting E-A's page. That is her prerogative, and she hasn't expressed any such opinion (it's not in her style in any case to waste time on these things)

3914:

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=DECT%2CDigital+enhanced+cordless+telecommunications&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3&case_insensitive=true

8823: 7715: 7368:

No, when I added the functionality months ago it was because there was a move with around 800 links that needed to be updated. I thought that was near the top of what it would be required to do.

4809: 2342: 9166:

Absolute, verifiable bullshit. Do you have any evidence that any of the editors you are referring to favored "Allegations of genocide by Israel in the 2023 Israel–Hamas war" in the previous RM?

7518:

I figured I'd ask my question to you here instead of starting a new topic; do you know if I'm allowed to comment on the telegraph close review, or is there some sort of restriction that exists?

719:

In these RM's I make three arguments; that the proposed title is preferred by reliable sources, that the proposed title is more concise, and that the proposed title better aligns with MOS:SLASH.

4608: 3237: 373: 7791:. And, I can find no major news outlets suggesting that such pre-1968 production model firearms are "ghost guns", so the emphasis on serialization imported by the 'ghost' framing is imprecise. 4815:

Considering both of these, if a forum is not roughly representative of the broader community on a specific topic then they should not be notified of discussions on that topic, as doing so can

4801: 5303: 7224:; I linked through the redirect as I wanted the link to keep working after the pages were moved, but I didn't consider that someone might open a discussion at the talk page of the redirect. 4564: 3313: 9007: 5393:

I've now updated what I can; some of it is too related to content for an editor unfamiliar with the topic to update, however, so I pinged the editor who opened the request regarding that.

8710:

As a general rule, there is nothing wrong with tagging species articles that lack secondary sources with the primary template; this is because regardless of the notability of the article

7619: 1247: 4009:

You've made ~80 comments at RSN in less than a month. You're right that you're not the only one doing similarly but you are one of if not the worst offender there regarding bludgeoning.

3923: 2534: 4555: 3299: 1968: 6162:

I've looked over the discussion again, and I stand by my close. I understand the concerns that "Evangelical" has different meanings, but it wasn't sufficient to overcome the explicit

4175: 2589:

Regarding the edit you made, I came to the conclusion that we shouldn't be linking internal discussions from the article page, but I'll explain in more depth on the article talk page.

7983:

discussion in "the right way." There is no need to re-open those prior threads when a new one can be started instead and avoids any FORUM/BLP issues, so I'll just start the new one.

5786:

I thought I successfully cleaned up the AfD? If there was something I missed, please let me know - I intend to add support for moving articles when in the middle of an AfD to Move+.

4822:

Your concern, as I understand it, is that this would apply very broadly, preventing all WikiProject notifications. However, I believe this concern is based on two flawed assumptions.

2278: 2090: 6301:

OK, but how do you not assess some of the opposition as subjective, then? :D I entered a fair bit of objective data into the discussion, and I followed it up with much more data in

5351: 4315:

not leaving edit summaries make it impossible to find. However, my understanding came from an administrator regarding a clarification of 1RR, but we can always reclarify if needed.

1631:

No no, I was just wondering. Truth be told I don't think anyone fully understood the point I was making in the move request, and now it's concluded I'm quite happy to leave it be!

8449: 5630: 5500:

Further, given the recent consensus not to move the article, there is a slightly higher bar to be met to produce a different consensus - that result has to be taken into account.

4432:

be used with a degree of consistency between articles and not merely echoed from sources in ways that enforce any systemic bias. I'm sure you've encountered reports on the issue.

3895:

I didn't see a consensus in that discussion; while you did present evidence, it was based on unreliable sources and so was not worth much in determining how to !weight the votes.

2312: 5536:

It wasn't sufficient because the 'oppose' camp argued that most of these sources provided a translation, and argued that this demonstrated that the name wasn't English and thus

4071: 3152: 5946:

You're probably right; I need to focus on some things outside of Knowledge for the next few weeks anyway, and then when I have more time to commit I want to focus on improving

5763:

Please never move an article that is in the middle of an AFD discussion. It can be very disruptive. Don't page movers look at the article and see the AFD template on the page?

1772:

Yeah, I had the same issues, and am strongly considering using an enforcement mechanism. Could you please elaborate what the warning regarding strictness specifically entails?

7306:

I now see you are a creator of this new script. In the future would you add a "mark as minor" option so bulk administrative tasks aren't so disruptive to editors' watchlists?

6178:

to prefer translations that give readers a more accurate initial impression of a topic, even when such a translation is less common - I think I would support such a proposal.

7850: 7217:

Sorry, only saw your edit your edit after replying to this section at 23:58. I stopped the script immediately, but I see you have already blocked me - can you undo that now?

6770:

There's nothing to be discussed, it's a simple misrepresentation of the source. Not an unreasonable mistake to make, but I'm not sure how you can insist it's not a mistake.

9235:

A pattern of double standards, where you are allowed to revert multiple times to close a discussion, but other editors aren’t allowed to revert multiple times to reopen one

5933:

I share your opinion that WikiProject notifications can be used as a form of votestacking, and I've voiced my concerns about the cliquey nature of WikiProjects in the past.

4838:

interested editors are at odds with the broader community. By reducing the ability of these walled gardens to be formed and maintained we reduce the potential for conflict.

7831:." It should then come as no surprise for me to state that I couldn't seem to find much as for any earlier mention of the term being used the sense given, not at least in 5257: 5121: 5099: 3410: 9101: 7260: 4841:

Regarding your example of what you see as partisan WikiProject notification (selecting three of the five tagged WikiProjects in an evidently biased manner), you may find

7737: 5116: 5094: 5063: 2697: 903:

No worries, please take your time! I failed to comment on @Chhandama's very relevant contribution to the discussion for almost two weeks, so I'd be last one to rush :) –

8362:

I am making the point that his death was justified. Of course it was; he was an active military leader who planned massacres. I’m surprised you’re suggesting it wasn’t?

1061:; Knowledge needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference. 427:

I think such a cleanup would be a good idea, but I think it will be an uphill battle to do so; people tend to point at GEOLAND even when there are no suitable sources.

7320:

Done. Sorry, when I wrote the script I didn't consider the possibility of needing to correct links across thousands of pages - I thought at most it would be hundreds.

4500: 3560: 2676: 1613:

Bad choice of words on my part; it was more in reference to the disambiguation avoiding parenthetical or comma-separated disambiguation than meeting the definition of

685:

With that said, I don't think I'm going to open many more today; I'm aiming at the low hanging fruit where usage is so lopsided that the COMMONNAME should be obvious.

26:

Sometimes this user has the attention span of a squirrel. If you were expecting a reply or follow-up to something and this user never provided one, you are invited to

9129:, Gaza genocide → Accusations of Gazan genocide in the Israel–Hamas war, back to "accusations", which basically the same as "allegations," the title we just moved it 8222:

doesn't contain the word "genocide." None of these sources support making any change to the article. There was nothing worth retaining in either of those two threads.

749:

of dual name usage instead of actually doing something productive with your time - could you please explain why you feel so aggrieved by the presence of such names?

8833: 4362:), and in a separate discussion the same editor saying the opposite, that's its obviously a massacre and thus it's appropriate to use it even if no sources do (eg. 525:

Only issue is with me; I thought I moved it at the time, I saw this message and thought I moved it after, but in both cases I was mistaken. I’ll get to it tonight.

8805:

That's a good idea. I still want to have a focus on AIP for the current ARCA, but I'll also run a broader analysis, once I'm finished making changes to the script.

7811:

Another issue is that the term "Ghost gun' simply isn't a long-standing common name for these firearms, contrary to what WestRiding24 would like others to believe.

6540:

I agree - that's why I've now reworded it, as I said. I'm not aware of any bot that would complete this task; the closest is the functionality I built into Move+.

6377:

for the people supporting, and the people objecting. Give different weight to those who just say "per nom" and those who elaborate. That would be in the spirit of

6258:

The goal of a consensus-building discussion is to resolve disputes in a way that reflects Knowledge's goals and policies while angering as few editors as possible.

4937: 4918:. As such, I gave that evidence more weight than I gave the evidence you presented, which only addressed the question of whether reliable English language sources 6268:

Obviously if you're still convinced that the arguments were equally strong on the whole, that is fine. I just want to make sure we don't treat every comment in a

4733:). You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. 3993:

I doubt that a discussion would be productive, ultimately it is not you or I who will decide the matter. I say yay, you say nay, there the matter stands for now.

3758:

I left a note too, and moved the parent article back. I also put a request at RFPP. If they comply, good and well; else I think I'll have to move to ANI. Thanks.

3744:

I've reverted their cut and paste move and left a note on their talk page about how to proceed if they wish to contest this close; hopefully they will follow it.

3441:, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms. 1819:

I'm not aware of anything, and glancing through you contributions nothing stands out - you did earn ECP quickly, but your edits while doing so appear productive.

312:

Thanks for heroic coordination of amazingly productive on-wiki community conversations about the relationship between the Wikimedia Foundation and the community.

9078:- "more than a month" would have been more accurate, and make more sense in comparison to "16 days", but hey, that wouldn't have supported your narrative as well 8181: 8032: 7979:, and we should be using sources that give the death toll for the genocide. There is a proper way to have this discussion (that doesn't violate NOTFORUM or BLP). 5356: 917:

You make some good points, but I don't think they justify overturning the result; as I understand it you are not making the argument that "Cro-Magnon" isn't the

405: 9211:

The editors opposing this new discussion favour "Gaza genocide". Further, the RM I’m referring to is the second (proposing "attempted genocide"), not the first.

9178:

evidence to support "editors are saying that discussions that propose a change in favour of their POV are allowed, while discussions against their POV are not."

9214:

David A’s edit opened up the "three options" section, which was the one that eventually found a consensus. I believe "instrumental" is an accurate description.

8925: 8451: 6819:

Well deserved! I'm going to add limits to prevent it being used by non-bot accounts when it needs to update more than a certain number of pages, perhaps 1000.

1106: 876: 6140:

Just letting you know I have seen this and am not ignoring it; I will look the discussion over again sometime in the next couple of days and get back to you.

1904:

I trust your recommendation and will sit back for now, I appreciate your assistance. Do you mind if I reach out to you if they do something actionable again?

8299:

Please, restore the discussion and add any arguments you want to add to it, rather than starting a new discussion that excludes arguments you disagree with.

7102: 4712: 4517: 2500:

Even if there had been a slim majority for your position I could not have found for it; I certainly cannot find for it when your position is in the minority.

1313: 592:

There is no need to go on such a large campaign though, especially when things had been perfectly fine without any such move requests either way for months.

9164:

Effectively, these editors are saying that discussions that propose a change in favour of their POV are allowed, while discussions against their POV are not

8211: 6066:, which has never been a cathedral. But for a present organization with a program, it is not good to have the program misrepresented in the name. My 2ct. -- 4909:

Do not use hypothetical, dissolved or defunct titles, including pretenders (real or hypothetical), unless this is what the majority of reliable sources use.

4433: 2682:

On articles about the Israel-Arab conflict non-ECP editors may only make edit requests on the talk page; as your edit was not an edit request I removed it.

1868:

I've switched from mobile diffs to diffs; for mobile users they'll turn into mobile diffs anyway, and will make it easier for editors on computers to review

1382: 9328: 5867: 5464: 5438: 4334: 4059: 3666: 3548: 3233:, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting. 3021: 2634:

For your tireless contributions in contentious topics like A-A and I-P in the name of NPOV, even despite being hauled to ANI and AE over them. Keep it up!

8128:

and by questioning whether legitimate military targets like Deif are also victims - a question that is no more inappropriate than the argument it rebuts.

9299: 9271: 9243: 8949: 8911: 8837: 8809: 8730: 8552: 8513: 8462: 8407: 8374: 8334: 8300: 8264: 8165: 8129: 8012: 7930: 7891: 7723: 7700: 7679: 7638: 7605: 7553: 7515: 7494: 7471: 7369: 7321: 7286: 7264: 7225: 7062: 7016: 6963: 6877: 6820: 6791: 6757: 6729: 6691: 6677: 6541: 6512: 6420: 6363: 6288: 6221: 6179: 6141: 6094: 6044: 6023: 5993: 5954: 5886: 5851: 5830: 5804: 5787: 5735: 5694: 5637: 5541: 5501: 5483: 5450: 5394: 5371: 5320: 5287: 5219: 5185: 5147: 5080: 5006: 4923: 4871: 4850: 4757: 4660: 4486: 4456: 4418: 4367: 4346: 4269: 4246: 4207: 4161: 4088: 4025: 3980: 3953: 3896: 3854: 3801: 3745: 3717: 3689: 3632: 3579: 3124: 3064: 3045: 3028: 3009: 2997: 2903: 2866: 2820: 2797: 2749: 2717: 2683: 2662: 2594: 2536: 2504: 2426: 2397: 2369: 1919: 1888: 1820: 1788: 1759: 1647: 1618: 1593: 1517: 1408: 1338: 1299: 1263: 1233: 1212: 1184: 1163: 1010: 998: 938: 890: 844: 824:

As for the consensus, are you referring to the same four accounts which follow each move request and don't engage on the topic beyond slashes being bad?

807: 769: 724: 686: 579: 558: 540: 526: 428: 387: 361: 335: 278: 165: 136:, I'm awarding you the EEng Grand Iron Cross of Excellence in Permutated Diction, with Platinum Edging, Laurel Leaves, and Teensy Weensy Sapphire Chips. 84: 51: 50:

Thank you for the suggestion, I will take it under serious consideration. I am genuinely tempted to change my name to "Automated Clearing House Mammal".

9100:

Jan 13 - Feb 13, Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza → Allegations of genocide by Israel in the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, not moved

6126:

title and certainly has the weight of history behind it, but I don't find this close very compelling, and it will just result in another RM in a year.

1739:

I haven't interacted with them much, and taking a glance at their contributions I'm not seeing anything else on that level, although I was concerned by

4177: 3924:

https://www.google.com/search?hl=nl&tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=intitle:Digital+intitle:enhanced+intitle:cordless+intitle:telecommunications&num=10

2353: 1660:

Thank you, I appreciate that. Sometimes the consensus doesn't go your way, that's just the nature of Knowledge! Cheers for giving your reasoning, too.

453:'s talk page. It looks to have been generated from GNIS, but the redlinks don't appea to be for deleted articles. I see no hope of getting it deleted. 8184: 3815:

Zealand English. As you already know, in New Zealand English, both terms are acceptable. I think at this current point in discussion we should follow

3610:

I think I and and others have fixed any obvious issues, and I'm looking to improve the article further. Do you see something I or others have missed?

2341:" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( 8663: 5073: 3853:

so if you still believe these edits should not have been made with JWB just say and I'll go and revert my edits and then manually re-implement them.

349: 9105:

Feb 29 - Mar 26, Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza → Attempted genocide by Israel in their 2023 attack on Gaza , not moved

8630:, whose naming discussion spanned 8 archive pages and racked up over 100,000 words (the source that the 40,000 words was pulled from in the lede of 7858: 7699:

Based on strength of argument I didn't see a clear consensus at this time. Since the discussion has never been relisted I felt one was appropriate.

6122:

name is a common compromise, which would favor "Protestant". I'm not sure if this is worth a MR because, strictly speaking, "Evangelical" isn't an

3261:, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured. 2836: 1884:

go so far as to justify action by itself in my opinion, although it would likely result in harsher sanctions if presented with something actionable.

80: 8684: 8565: 8489: 8487: 8483: 8479: 8475: 8004:

I don’t think you’re asking the right question. The question is "can fighters killed in a war they started with atrocities be victims of genocide?"

6633:

points to the US one when they are supposed to lead to the Australian version. This reminds me (even though I wasn't around editing Knowledge) the

5614: 5515: 4988: 3702:

I have moved the soundtrack page, but I think there should be a space there. I don't have PM rights, so can you have a look at it, please. Thanks.

2314: 2038: 1592:

is on open the RfC so that they can frame it as they see fit, but if they don't do so after a little prodding I'll just go ahead and do it myself.

1232:

I don’t think replying to two editors, one who directly addressed my !vote and the other who made a clear factual misunderstanding is bludgeoning.

1074: 7256:

Preparing to implement was referring to the move itself. I wanted to update the links first, so that for readers the transition would be seamless.

1207:

I didn't consider it, but you make a good point; it both makes more sense, and it is more consistent with other titles, particularly the category

204:

What about ATM Mammal? That would mean everyone who addresses you is really saying "Automated Teller Mammal Mammal", like we do with ATM machine?

8729:"; as the article says, the species was described as a new species in that source. However, I could have misunderstood; I'll try to find a copy. 4102: 2984: 2567: 1751:

I probably wouldn't take it anywhere yet, but I'm probably a little too adverse to going to AE and ANI these days; up to you what you want to do.

4831: 1467: 7011:

I didn't see it that way. We generally don't discount !votes, when policy compliant, from new editors solely because they are from new editors.

5146:

How did you find these pages? And generally, is there any urgency in deleting them that it cannot wait until after I have finished my testing?

8962:

Can you reopen the RM? I will provide the evidence from Google news that how "Ecolego" is not used by anybody but the proposed name has been.

8316:. Please don't bring up whether anyone covered by BLP is part of the death toll unless you have an RS that's specifically talking about that. 7876:

on April 22, 2022, "Folks, the lead of this article is a bit of a Frankenstein's monster - it is still written as if it is talking about the

6472:

Disregard. I don't agree with the move, but I can see my nativism driving part of that. Thanks for your several thousand edits this morning.

5665:

The notable event happened in 2023 and it does not appear clear that notability beyond it was established, thus the prior title was accurate.

4946: 4945: 7929:

Please self-revert; I don’t think it’s appropriate for involved editors to be deciding what discussions are and are not allowed to proceed.

7847:

What I did find however, is that the term "Homemade firearm" predates "Ghost gun" and is used specifically in multiple scholarly publication

5613:

translate the name and use exclusively Cymdeithas yr Iaith (even sources that might generally be considered hostile to the welsh language).

2564: 6244:

Consensus cannot always be assumed simply because editors stop responding to talk page discussions in which they have already participated.

5717: 4073: 6642: 6058:

me. They learned, and we could do the same, instead of sticking to common name. - I have no problem with a common name which is wrong for

2190:

compared using "jew" to using "american or a christian", not recognizing - or dismissing - that Jew, when used as a verb, is a pejorative.

8772: 7456: 7179: 7129: 6504: 2033: 6618:

My watchlist is flooded with the same copied and pasted edit summary about these changes. The minor edit button exists for a reason. ~~

6156: 5005:

Adding these to the two editors who opposed the move (one explicitly, one implicitly), I couldn't see a consensus to remove "conflict".

643: 6507:

that ABC News is not the primary topic. Due to the number of links that need to be retargeted, I am doing that before moving the pages.

6302: 5930:

I think your push to clean up stubs and mass-created articles is one of the project's most valuable developments in the last few years.

4864: 4649: 1994: 1887:

Instead, I would recommend sitting back and seeing how they behave, and if there are further issues then bringing the whole lot to AE.

3349:, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the 9009: 7238:

Tell me you won't continue and I will unblock you. OK? Honestly, you should have stopped at 18:31, the moment you got a message from

6924:

Saying the same thing here; the discussion wasn't well-publicized at all and having been part of unsuccessful move discussions about

5916: 4779: 4290:. You have been editing CTOPICS for a while now and have for sure learned that 1RR means a single reversion, per page, with only the 2865:

HeinOnline has continuous scrolling; there wasn't any easy cut-off point, which is why I ended up going deeper than I did for JSTOR.

1054:

is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.

4922:. However, even without considering that and just adding the two together there isn't a significant difference in either direction. 653: 628: 8631: 7788: 7076:

not votes. And given the number of editors who disagree with you, it doesn't appear that the consensus is actually all that clear.

6722: 5408: 4756:

Just noting that I’m not ignoring this; I just want to wait to reply till I have enough time to give it the attention it deserves.

4494: 4389: 4375: 1601: 7470:

We're going to wait for the Move Review to close first; once it does close, if the close is reverted, the dab page will be moved.

5727: 4812:

establishes that "biased " or "partisan" means non-representative of the broader community - it doesn't mean they have no opinion.

3578:

Of course; happy to answer as many questions as you have, although there may be a bit of a delay depending on my activity levels.

2542: 648: 9140:

If it's not moved, it makes sense to keep trying with a new RM (especially when the closer of a previous one suggests it). If it

8187:

I closed, and I don't think I missed anyone in my summary above. Who did I miss? It was only you and the OP I see seeking change.

6728:

Let's take it to the article talk page. I quoted the part of the source I thought supported the claim; maybe I misunderstood it.

5431: 4858: 4783: 4765: 4200: 3566:

I’m trying to write a page on Olivia Frank, would you be willing to answer a few questions when it comes up, as it’s I/P related?

2651: 2138: 1754:

Just as a FYI, when it comes to misbehavior in the Israel-Palestine topic area, the correct location to take issues is generally

8789: 7899: 6609: 6595: 5986: 5838: 821:

until they've either gotten rid of every dual name on wikipedia or found some other corner of wikipedia to lawyer into oblivion.

633: 489:

It's also a good reminder to go back and remove deleted articles from lists etc sicne this often isn't done by the AfD closer. –

9052: 9038: 6928:

to ABC, I would have not pulled the trigger here without at least a few more weeks and much more notice about this discussion.

5476: 5232:

Sorry, I'm focused on building an encyclopaedia and have no interest in analysing how MediaWiki software navigates to pages. —

5117: 5095: 3350: 2461: 981: 967: 5733:

closed as keep or no consensus, any editor should feel free to move the article to any title other than Mario vs. Donkey Kong.

3934: 3904: 1262:

That does work for some industries where they can accept a certain rate of product failure, but that isn’t true in aerospace.

678: 413: 395: 9157: 7624: 7613: 6434: 5962: 5636:

I saw a consensus; twice as many editors supported moving as opposed, and the arguments on each side were equally as strong.

5334: 5048:

Considering the fact that Historians cant agree on when the conflict started the term "ethnic conflict made much more sense.

4939: 4326: 3100: 2670: 1307: 715:

Your insistence on using the same arguments which have been repeatedly disproven shows I'd have better luck yelling at a wall

6428: 4931: 613: 286: 261:

Long overdue. Thank-you for your various (usually RfC-oriented) efforts to make Knowledge a different – but better – place.

9000: 7739: 7731: 7652: 6862:

I came here to say the same thing. I think the consensus is very weak for such a move. Should probably have been relisted.

6799: 6779: 6765: 6751: 5992:(On a related note, have been less than successfully at fully stepping back, although I think I have done so partially...) 5908: 5894: 5879: 4309: 4033: 4018: 3654: 3640: 3619: 3605: 3587: 2955: 2911: 2896: 2874: 2828: 2602: 1941: 1927: 1913: 1896: 1857: 1842: 1828: 1814: 1796: 1781: 1767: 1198: 64:

With Automated Clearinghouse Mammal you can certainly be confident of no pesky name conflicts with editors on other wikis.

8560: 8219: 7708: 6828: 6563: 6520: 6102: 6075: 6052: 5859: 5458: 4845:

interesting, where an editor warned me for notifying the Wikiprojects that an editor forgot to notify regarding an RfC at

3988: 1241: 946: 912: 898: 872:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

663: 548: 343: 173: 126: 9119: 9069: 8580: 8521: 8504: 8470: 7540: 7502: 7422: 7110: 7085: 7070: 7047: 6971: 6646: 5088: 4464: 4449: 4426: 4404: 4047: 4002: 3961: 2970: 2929:

when these are not specifically evident from P&G. In respect to ngrams, you have provided your own, that would group

2853: 2307: 1988: 1365: 1346: 1325: 1171: 375: 9020: 8971: 8957: 7687: 7646: 7030: 6737: 6658: 4437: 4169: 4096: 4038:

The number of comments made by an editor is an indicator and not the definition of any of disruption, bludgeon or IDHT.

3767: 3753: 3739: 3725: 3711: 3697: 2526: 2512: 1588:

I'll also be more proactive about opening RfC's when consensus is elusive; I generally prefer to let the editor who the

1430: 1416: 1192: 623: 534: 231: 213: 9171: 9126: 8919: 8817: 8764: 8738: 8173: 8158: 7926:

what is justified, and to equate the holocaust is to suggest that, at some level, Germany was justified in its actions.

7664: 7479: 7377: 7363: 7329: 7024: 7006: 5712: 5622: 5509: 5491: 4215: 3877: 3862: 3835: 3809: 2805: 2771: 2757: 2743: 2725: 2338: 2318: 2285:

This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.

2023: 1689:

statements strewn about that were at best off-topic and at worst indicative of bias (ex. 19:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)).

467:

In fact I see that most edits on the list are people removing deleted articles. It is very, very old, created in 2006.

436: 325: 9307: 9293: 9279: 9265: 9251: 8985: 8415: 8397: 8382: 8357: 8342: 8325: 8313: 8308: 8287: 8272: 8251: 8137: 8096: 8020: 7992: 7938: 7588: 7561: 6952: 6187: 6149: 6135: 6031: 6001: 5977: 5568: 5549: 5528: 5240: 5227: 5206: 5193: 5172: 5155: 5079:

When closing I prefer to include that statement as silence can only be assumed to be consensus until someone objects.

5040: 5014: 4347: 4254: 2449: 2434: 2420: 2405: 2302: 1874:

I've removed the suggestions about what action to take; better, in my opinion, to leave that entirely up to the admins

1669: 1655: 1640: 1626: 1402: 852: 833: 815: 792: 777: 732: 709: 694: 673: 668: 658: 601: 587: 9001: 8611: 6549: 6535: 6498: 6085:

Because we have a set of policies and guidelines that we use to determine an articles title, and they prioritize the

5812: 5758: 5743: 5702: 5677: 5645: 4694: 4686: 4668: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4238: 4233: 4148: 4119: 2484:

editors need to convince a significant majority of editors that this is an exceptional case and warrants an exception

2377: 2050: 1525: 1510: 520: 8865: 8845: 7315: 7294: 7272: 7251: 7233: 6714: 6685: 6441: 5379: 3086: 3072: 2791: 2691: 638: 578:

Your change reminded me of the topic; I've avoided articles whose preferred title would be impacted by your change.

496: 462: 268: 8402:

My point is that you are saying it wasn’t - when you say all casualties are victims of genocide this includes Dief.

8199: 7780: 7464: 7160: 6019: 5057: 5029:

Various factors indeed, such as the rise of a common threat, can even bring previous opponents into common alliance

4750: 3170: 3132: 1208: 515: 442: 9204:

Whether you consider the time since the RM or the move review the relevant period, the double standard is telling.

9196: 6855: 6627: 5693:

While the arguments for #1 had less weight as you point out, though not no weight, the arguments for #2 were not.

5583: 4893: 4879: 4643: 4132:

And I don't think it efficient to prolong the discussion on E-A's page as you did by saying (quite rightly) that "

1271: 1220: 758: 618: 189: 147: 110: 92: 75: 59: 9034: 8901: 8897: 8785: 8650: 7956: 7300: 7187: 6919: 6394: 6371: 6314: 6296: 6281: 6229: 5795: 5402: 5328: 5295: 4738: 4385: 3096: 2383: 41: 8808:

I'll also rename both something along the lines of "discussion participation", as that sounds like a good idea.

7918:

In this case, I can’t bring RS - my point is that RS don’t support the claims currently in the article, and the

6481: 4742: 3791:

Seek consensus for changes that could be controversial at the appropriate venue; village pump, WikiProject, etc.

2273: 8195: 6871: 2490:

concerns, would the broader community agree to make this an explicit exception in policy?", then IAR can apply.

2223: 1111: 802: 7205: 7142: 6897: 6742:

This is exactly the same source misrepresentation you were recently threatening to report another user for...

3952:

If you disagree, can you be more specific about why you think my contributions are bludgeoning or disruptive?

3539: 2884: 476: 9167: 7339:

have a review of this (previous moves of ABC US/AU topics have been much more careful and longer-discussed).

6925: 5314: 5256: 4775: 4221: 4185: 2334: 2018: 7604:

I was going to, after giving the closer some time to review my final comment, but seems I was beaten to it.

6756:

As I said, lets take it to the talk page. Perhaps I misunderstood the source when I reverted the IP editor.

6460: 5774: 1352:

athletes by nationality. A category for women might be helpful as well, as I know there's some editors from

7411: 6605: 5065: 4971:

I see more sense in rewriting the article in the broader context of Polish-Ukrainian relations at that time

4901: 4417:

for us to do so, but we don’t need sources calling an act against Palestinians a massacre for us to do so?

2986: 2643: 2219: 2006: 878: 570: 209: 7922:

is on editors who believe they do to provide sources to support that. I can’t reasonably prove a negative.

8704: 8655: 7862: 7221: 7148: 4826:

and thus it remains appropriate to notifying them about any discussion related to their area of interest.

4261: 2012: 1107: 401: 297: 6329: 5276: 1421:

The early Olympian stubs, I figured since I was so gung ho about keeping them, I ought to do some work.

218: 9115:

May 3 - Jul 3, Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza → ?, moved to "Gaza genocide"

9030: 8800: 8781: 5982: 5947: 5184:

Thank you - however, I would appreciate you answering my question regarding how you found these pages.

4734: 4381: 3930: 3684:

I think it would be reasonable to extend the consensus from the main article to the child article, per

3092: 2044: 409: 6893: 3464: 1932:

Thank you very much, I greatly appreciate you taking the time for me, particularly as I am new-ish :)

8616: 7402: 6695: 5822: 4726: 4478: 2653: 2000: 9106: 8745: 2580: 2477:

as viewed through the lens of Knowledge core policies, policies, guidelines, and the manual of style

2268: 2074: 928:

Given that this move was centered on what the common name was, and that the status quo is that this

8873: 7799: 7458: 7106: 6885: 5424: 5417: 4792: 4771: 4717: 3427:, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators. 2494: 8694: 8011:

If you still think they need to be shut down then you should ask an uninvolved admin to weigh in.

7814: 7802:

on "ghost guns", the authors, lay out their basic definition for the term: "A ghost gun is a DIY,

7438: 6672:

I'll go get a bot account approved - when I built this part of the script I thought it fell under

5449:

Didn’t even think to check for whether a dab page already existed; thank you for correcting that.

2062: 9229:) to shut down discussions on the inclusion of the death toll, even though it would demonstrate: 8627: 8366: 7828: 7784: 7672: 6844: 6775: 6747: 6601: 5904: 5845: 5594:

The "recent consensus" was imo a premature close which followed the same faulty understanding of

5385: 4323: 4306: 4137: 4014: 3650: 3615: 3601: 2951: 2892: 2577: 2298: 2234: 2187: 2172: 2159: 2152: 2143: 2134: 2123: 1982: 1937: 1909: 1853: 1838: 1810: 1777: 1377: 205: 3596:), but might look for some help either on the next one or on improvements and will reach out :) 8263:

So please, self—revert, and if you think an argument is inappropriate ask an admin to step in.

7415: 6654: 6592: 6559: 6454: 6355:

For more objective matters, present your arguments clearly and concisely, and leave it at that.

6347:

should use title "Bar", and neither side can prove the other guideline doesn't apply, then per

6195: 6090: 6071: 5918: 4907:

The specific naming convention that is relevant to that article doesn't favor English sources;

4274:

That is, in fact, two reversions within 24 hours on the same page. That is a violation of 1RR.

3138: 2731: 2162:

he also said “Well actully I wouldn't consider NGO Monitor as a reliable source for anything.”

1865:

I've switched the dates to a clearer format, to make it easier for admins to review the request

922: 908: 320: 239: 122: 7947:

Knowledge article that has "genocide" in the title. I am not, and would not, otherwise equate

7263:

require that closers do any necessary clean up tasks, including fixing mistargeted wikilinks.

2880: 2179:

as “I think it is quite interesting how Mondoweiss is actually run by jews as far as I know.”

1162:

Thank you, and Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you too! Sorry, I only noticed this now!

117:

Just a kibbitz, but I for one would find "House Clearing Automated Mammal" more evocative. :p

83:. You may have just managed to organize those words in a way that has never been done before. 47:

I laughed, twice. When I read the comment the first time, and again when I came back to reply.

9225: 9219: 9151: 9084: 8668: 8569: 8547: 8541: 8535: 8512:

However, I’m surprised you were responsible for that edit, given the serious issues with it.

8493: 7156: 7081: 7043: 6915: 6907: 6903: 6786: 6167: 5924: 5719: 5651: 4445: 4400: 4043: 3998: 3975: 3926: 2610: 2324: 1741: 1726: 1714: 1698: 1440: 1361: 1321: 8780:

And if you call it "discussion engagement" or something the name will be less inflammatory.

6889: 5482:

That's a complicated discussion; give me some time to re-evaluate and I'll get back to you.

5027:

is clearly against framing it as a 'conflict' (no matter ethnic or any other), he even says

5023:

can clarify his stance here, but I interpret his vote as a support for the proposed title. @

3063:

Since those edits are consecutive, they only count as one revert - I have not violated 1RR.

8995: 8981: 8967: 8834:

wikipedia:Bot_requests#Need_help_with_a_super_widespread_typo:_Washington,_D.C_(also_U.S.A)

7637:

I can't find it right now - there are too many archives - but there was even an RfC on it.

7599: 6623: 6269: 6163: 6086: 5410: 5386: 4730: 4226: 3763: 3735: 3707: 3110: 2966: 2849: 2522: 2396:

I've updated my closing statement. Happy to discuss further if you have further questions.

1607: 1450: 1426: 1398: 1285: 1200: 918: 164:

Although "House Clearing Automated Mammal" does suggest I am more tidy than I actually am.

8714:

applies. Database sources don't address this issues, as they don't meet the definition at

6585: 4673:

Can you quote the section of text that you believe says that similar to how I quoted from

1393:

Please ignore, I've found them again. I watchlisted them, it just doesn't show on mobile.

8: 9016:

Category:Metronome Records should not be directed to Category:Warner Music Sweden artists

8893: 8759: 8715: 8154: 7822: 7660: 7629: 7354: 7311: 7053: 6997: 6943: 6410: 6202: 6119: 6093:. When other sources catch up with the churches decision then we can rename the article. 6063: 5618: 5053: 4115: 3874: 3832: 2787: 2767: 2739: 1407:

Sorry, I've totally forgotten what this is about and now I'm curious; can you remind me?

1087: 493: 262: 5282:

tolerated it, it was a little too obvious in this case that they had found them through

2233:

Alerted about discretionary sanctions or contentious topics in the area of conflict, on

1720:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor (2nd nomination)

889:

I'll have a think on your comments and reply in the next few days; sorry for the delay.

9289: 9261: 9192: 9182:

and they are using tag-team unilateral involved closures and AE to try to enforce this.

9048: 8393: 8353: 8321: 8283: 8247: 8092: 7988: 7890:

I see you didn’t participate in the RM. Since it has never been relisted I will do so.

7771: 7586: 7538: 6851: 6771: 6743: 6673: 6131: 5900: 5579: 5564: 5524: 5312: 5283: 5238: 5204: 5170: 5036: 4636: 4318: 4301: 4010: 3646: 3626: 3611: 3597: 3573: 2947: 2888: 2859: 2572: 2445: 2425:

It's only been open for a week; I'll relist it and see if other editors have thoughts.

2416: 2294: 2068: 1977: 1933: 1905: 1849: 1834: 1806: 1773: 1665: 1636: 1126: 829: 788: 754: 705: 597: 421: 400:

Thanks for your relisting. I was referring to nominator's canvassing of the related RM

36: 9184:

So who is in this tag-team, then? And who's using AE to try and enforce what, exactly?

8330:

I didn’t read this until after I made my reply, but I believe my reply is appropriate.

7905: 3247:, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings. 7754: 7151:. Not sure what happened with the edit summaries but they did originally link there. 6650: 6589: 6555: 6531: 6494: 6477: 6175: 6067: 5754: 5673: 5160:

For testing, feel free to use test.wikipedia.org; alternatively, the Draftspace. The

4682: 3685: 3532: 3292: 2116: 1614: 1506: 1079: 934: 904: 382:

Given minimal participation I've relisted. I'm not convinced there was canvassing to

313: 133: 118: 27: 8028:

I read the two threads again, and there is no emerging consensus against inclusion.

161:

There are too many good ideas here. I might have to start messing with my signature.

8860: 8641: 8528: 8207: 7919: 7630: 7508: 7434: 7421:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Knowledge's

7247: 7201: 7152: 7138: 7077: 7039: 6911: 6834: 6705: 6634: 6411: 6348: 4846: 4628: 4441: 4411: 4396: 4039: 3994: 3968: 3816: 3678: 3082: 3057: 2639: 2472: 2056: 1387: 1357: 1332: 1317: 1157: 472: 458: 8836:

so other editors can consider it to, and if necessary I’ll modify what I’m doing?

3909:

Okay, but the reliability of the sources was not questioned during the discussion.

3213:, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections. 9112:

article would probably have some distinctions from either of the existing titles"

9043:

How about the both of you don't involve yourselves in my disputes in the future?

8977: 8963: 8238: 8125: 7693: 7171: 6867: 6841: 6619: 6448: 6011: 5443: 5024: 4977: 4656: 4291: 4145: 4082: 3912:

Here is a Google Ngram view that shows books, which are generally considered RS:

3759: 3731: 3703: 3515: 3466: 3459: 3323:, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote. 3288: 2962: 2845: 2702: 2518: 2487: 1422: 1394: 983: 510: 502: 292: 226: 184: 142: 105: 70: 8725:

specifically, I think you are mistaken about "A Taxonomic Revision of the Genus

7818: 7760:

Talk page discourse with closer before initiating move review of "Ghost Gun move

5286:. I'm hoping it will stop now they know I have clear evidence, but we will see. 4800:

I think we need to consider this in the context of two rulings from ArbCom. The

3173:

reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.

8889: 8796: 8751: 8673: 8623: 8594: 8150: 8109: 7832: 7656: 7342: 7307: 7183: 6985: 6931: 6382: 6236: 6037: 5899:

Perhaps it’s an IOS thing. I will send you a message with a very poor drawing.

5655: 5049: 4889: 4674: 4111: 3919: 3870: 3828: 2783: 2763: 2735: 2099: 1589: 1533: 765: 490: 4966: 4655:

In this case, consensus has been achieved by editing. Further, if you look at

4140:) I, and several others, agree with this assessment. On content pages, he can 2942:. A counterargument was made that the results do not actually show that it is 2091:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#ARBPIA General Sanctions

1028: 9285: 9257: 9256:

Better check those diffs and dates again, and then edit that statement, too.

9188: 9109: 9044: 9026: 8749:

producing a quarter of a million database-driven stubs would be undesirable.

8575: 8499: 8389: 8349: 8317: 8279: 8243: 8103: 8088: 7999: 7984: 7952: 7948: 7913: 7747: 7568: 7547: 7520: 7486: 7239: 7175: 7125: 6847: 6390: 6378: 6325: 6310: 6277: 6127: 5971: 5575: 5560: 5520: 5307: 5233: 5213: 5199: 5179: 5165: 5161: 5141: 5032: 4659:, you will see the only way to remove it is by getting a consensus to do so. 4222: 4141: 2441: 2412: 2391: 1731: 1703: 1661: 1632: 1353: 1277: 1252: 1066: 1051: 1022: 991: 825: 784: 750: 746: 701: 593: 404:

on that page, which is still inappropriate and may raise a systematic issue.

386:

RM, but regardless I see no reason it won't benefit from further discussion.

8882: 8461:

Can you clarify which edit violated 1RR, and which edit it was a revert of?

7854: 4508:

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.

2940:

English-language sources almost uniformly use "Full Faith and Credit Clause"

2814:

Move of “2021 Oxford High School shooting” to “Oxford High School shooting”.

2497:, and would encourage editors to simply ignore consensus they disagree with. 2195:

This is my first AE request, so I apologise in advance for any errors made.

2182:

When the issues of using "jew" in lowercase was raised, was very dismissive:

1337:

What lists were we missing? I'll try to get to them when I have the chance.

1086:

If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's

768:

being modified, I would be surprised if you did) that shouldn't bother you.

8711: 8699: 7836: 7393: 7387: 6527: 6490: 6473: 6466: 5750: 5669: 5595: 5537: 5533:

I didn't give the "oppose" arguments more weight, I gave them equal weight.

5218:

Can you explain how you came across them during this "routine monitoring"?

5020: 4955: 4678: 4298:

a violation of the 1RR rule in place and on the main war page nonetheless.

3593: 3525: 2363: 1755: 1502: 1491:

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

1135: 745:

I feel compelled to revisit this topic again. You continue to be trying to

486:

them to bluelinked articles which would cut down on a lot of the GNIS spam.

9097:. It's amazing that you even draw this comparison. The actual RM history: 8237:

Gazans or which Palestinians. The article gives a death toll. If there is

8190:

I also see a grand total of four sources posted in those two discussions:

7783:

did little to save early predecessors to what would eventually become the

8851: 8637: 8333:

However, I still believe you need to self-revert your involved closures.

8226:

absolutely not going to talk about whether Deif was a victim of genocide.

7485: 7430: 7243: 7212: 7197: 7134: 6701: 6667: 5364: 4699: 4245:

Same situation as the 1RR accusation just up the page - not a violation.

3783: 3592:

I greatly appreciate it. I mostly made it through the early stages (see:

3078: 2635: 2147: 2127: 1694:

This sequence of edits, in regards to NGO Monitor is highly problematic:

1226: 468: 454: 248: 8601:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;

7716:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kamala Harris 2024 presidential campaign

6906:

in order to look at the closure? It does feel like it should have been "

4436:

a large summary of the issue in US reporting, for example. And a recent

2619: 1474: 178:

I was imagining a robot skunk that causes unwanted houseguests to flee.

7776: 6863: 6444: 5885:

I've checked it on mobile, and I can't find the issue unfortunately...

4817:

disrupt the consensus building process by making participation lopsided

3381:, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum. 2176: 882: 448: 221: 179: 137: 100: 65: 20: 8203: 5950:

and addressing the various concerns raised with the NSPECIES proposal.

3847:

make sure that the reader knows what to expect when clicking on a link

2137:

suggested that it may be used to establish notability in an AfD about

306: 8689: 8687:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

4885: 3631:

Done some minor editing; apart from that, it looks good - well done!

3115: 3040: 2992: 1059:

it requires a good understanding of Knowledge policies and guidelines

974: 956: 7285:

Thanks. I'll hold off fixing the remaining links until that closes.

6440:

I'm leaving this message as you've previously warned Trilletrollet.

6360:

claims that it's only nuclear fallout that is referred to as fallout

5074:

User talk:TheTVExpert/rmCloser#User:BilledMammal/rmCloserExpanded.js

5072:

Coincidentally, there is currently a discussion on that question at

3145: 2517:

Not ignoring you, I'll get back to this at some point soon, thanks.

8937: 8458:

Sorry, didn’t notice that you had edited the page between my edits.

7873: 7821:. Reporting by outlets explicitly in favor of gun control, such as 6881: 6813: 6638: 6386: 6321: 6306: 6273: 5781: 5765: 5267: 4770:

This is not a rush item, and I know you have others on your plate.

2222:

are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see

1073:

If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the

30:

them or leave a message on their talk page reminding them to do so.

9242:

As this is the wrong location, please make further replies at AE.

9060:

I want to call out the obvious POV pushing that is occurring here.

5730:, I wasn't certain where to move the article now at (video game); 4614:

Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process

2102:

of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation

1758:, though be warned that they are much stricter there than at ANI. 8948:

There was no evidence provided to support the claim that it was.

8942: 8070:

Buidhe said it only matters what RSes say (same thing I'm saying)

7620:

Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography Move Decision

3889: 3842: 3823: 3794: 1312:

BilledMammal, you may remember that I few months back I proposed

1248:

Follow-up on our earlier talks on Ukrainian hromada mass creation

7885:

as opposed to "privately made firearms" as the ATF calls them.".

6645:

can lead to an idea of some busy work fixing links. Maybe using

3826:

because that is about piping links, and not alternative names. —

3437: 2837:

Talk:Full Faith and Credit Clause#Requested move 21 January 2024

9323: 9201:

Briefly, since this isn’t the right place for this discussion:

7840: 7425:, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 5319:

Almost; I intended to finish yesterday, but something came up.

5198:

Routine monitoring of Knowledge to ensure policy compliance. —

4705: 3942: 3391: 2368:

Thank you reviewing it, and I hope you have a blessed day too!

1871:

I've switched the awareness notification to the standard format

1177: 7552:

There are no restrictions that apply to the Telegraph review.

7036:

Knowledge policies and guidelines are given the highest weight

6554:

That is what confuses me, the move should've been done first.

6159:

gave me access to the article. It works in about 95% of cases.

5352:

There is an administrator noticeboard discussion involving you

4294:

being allowed. I do endorse the request for a reversion as it

3339: 2251:

Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested

8256:

You’re right, you didn’t miss anyone, you misclassified them.

7655:(I wonder if this will get reverted since I'm a non-EC user) 7128:, what is going on here? BilledMammal, I can't even find the 6880:(a quick search indicates there are over 10,000 wikilinks to 6334:

I did; the issue with "long term significance" is that it is

5631:

Please self revert the move as there was clearly no consensus

3283: 3257: 2326: 9187:

I think you have some more editing of your statement to do.

7777:

they faced heavy opposition and were ultimately watered down

6576:

The pipe trick adds the label during the edit. When you put

6118:). When the matter is unclear, defaulting to the preferred 5434:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3405: 3309:, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections. 3305: 3153:

RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I

8824:

I believe it should be "Washington, D.C.," in running text.

8191: 8073:

M.Bitton agreed with the collapsing of the first discussion

3451: 3363: 3243: 3229: 3195: 3165: 1298:

I would actually agree with withdrawing it for now, sorry.

644:

Talk:Fox_Glacier/Archive_1#Requested_move_15_September_2021

6115: 3367:, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats. 2819:

Sorry, not sure what happened there; it's been moved now.

8215: 8108:

Not against inclusion, but not for inclusion either, and

7130:

Talk:ABC_News_(United_States)#Requested_move_18_June_2024

2858:

I don't see my close of this discussion as crossing into

654:

Talk:South_Cape_/_Whiore#Requested_move_15_September_2021

629:

Talk:Franz_Josef_Glacier#Requested_move_15_September_2021

9270:

Thank you, corrected; I provided the second diff twice.

7819:

the first scholarly mention I can even find is from 2014

3189: 2730:

Ok, I'd appreciate the help. I've started a draft in my

2698:

Your thoughts on the division of space in the UNRWA Lede

649:

Talk:Riverton_/_Aparima#Requested_move_15_September_2021

8149:

Soldiers (grunts) do not start wars. Their leaders do.

7971:

currently are sources that give the death toll for the

7951:

with any other genocide or alleged genocide, including

7789:

of which much was focused on serial number requirements

6303:

Talk:Fallout (disambiguation)#some page view statistics

4501:

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

3561:

Move closed administrator review discussions to subpage

3395:, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%. 3377: 3209: 2677:

talk page post removed because article ecp protected...

1057:

Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but

634:

Talk:Lyttelton_Harbour#Requested_move_15_September_2021

8452:

Attacks on schools during the Israeli invasion of Gaza

7096:

For the record, I really don't hate Americans. What I

4538:

Require links for claims of specific policy violations

3409:, provides for a more robust alternate version of the 3077:

Lol I'll fix it tomorrow. Your edits were just wrong.

679:

Talk:Moeraki_Boulders#Requested_move_15_September_2021

8486:

undoes removes content added by me in these two edits

8079:

The only people arguing for change are you and the OP

8053:

The only people arguing for change are you and the OP

7259:

I'm not sure what you mean by the last sentence; the

6235:

not entertain a discussion any more. That is why the

4634:

Revert your moving of my comment or this goes to AE.

3353:; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation. 2495:

local consensus commonly overriding broader consensus

1722:, suggests it is suitable to contribute to notability 614:

Talk:Cape_Kidnappers#Requested_move_15_September_2021

8634:

was written long before debate actually concluded).

6694:

Not sure where the limit lies. Might want to ask on

6081:

Why we would still keep it, remains a mystery to me.

5850:

I think it's fixed now, thank you for reporting it.

5654:

speculation and you know yourself that this isn’t a

5357:

Fix round-robin moves in the rmCloserExpanded script

3423: 3319: 2207:

No previous sanctions, but warnings on the talk page

1501:

thanks for the tip, but can you explain filter 602?

664:

Talk:Paterson_Inlet#Requested_move_15_September_2021

9076:

that RM was opened just a month after a previous RM

8926:

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

5967:Could you please link me to the NSPECIES proposal? 4360:

Knowledge follows the language of reliable sources.

3345: 1974:

User who is submitting this request for enforcement

1485:

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

1045:

Hello BilledMammal, we need experienced volunteers.

624:

Talk:Southern_Alps#Requested_move_15_September_2021

9127:Talk:Gaza genocide#Requested move 7 September 2024 8606:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 8047:Dimadick's comment is unclear one way or the other 7414:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 5650:No, the arguments for the move were made based on 4518:RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins 4178:Israeli bombing of the Iranian embassy in Damascus 2503:I'm sorry, but I won't be overturning this close. 674:Talk:Hauraki_Gulf#Requested_move_15_September_2021 669:Talk:Port_Pegasus#Requested_move_15_September_2021 659:Talk:Clutha_River#Requested_move_15_September_2021 9156:False statement. The RM you linked to was opened 8067:Kashmiri said yes summary executions are included 8061:ArkHyena said prior discussions lean on no change 6116:linked again here as unlocked for non-subscribers 5439:Notice of reliable sources noticeboard discussion 5031:, which indeed happened here between AK and UPA. 4806:mostly populated by a biased or partisan audience 4134:this looks like a pattern of vexatious harassment 1748:It could just be ignorance, but it is concerning. 1710:, and suggests they peddle in conspiracy theories 639:Talk:Lords_River#Requested_move_15_September_2021 6876:This is a rather massive change you are making @ 6843:, and here's the stats on ABC News (Australia): 4348:Talk:Flour massacre#Requested move 28 April 2024 4160:source is a problem that needs to be addressed. 3524:Please, for everyone's sake, cool off a little.– 3455:, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions. 2883:in respect to the close of an RM you opened and 2563:A brief example of what I mean using two edits ( 619:Talk:Shag_Point#Requested_move_15_September_2021 376:Talk:Saikū Palace#Requested_move_24_October_2023 8685:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 5423:Hello, BilledMammal. You have new messages at 3123:Thank you! I am, and I hope you are as well :) 3022:I have sent you a note about a page you started 2537:List of engagements during the Israel–Hamas war 2493:To allow it apply more broadly would result in 2354:I have sent you a note about a page you started 1488:follow editorial and behavioural best practice; 1383:Notice of action at administrators' noticeboard 9329:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 9232:A pattern of involved closures at that article 9174:. So, pretty consistent on his part. You have 9138:These same editors had no objection to that RM 8664:Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion 7815:term "Ghost Gun" wasn't even coined until 2012 5868:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 5465:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 4960:Support the rename per my comments from before 4599:Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions 4440:specifically addressed the use of "massacre". 4335:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 4060:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 3797:we should try to use the most intuitive title. 3667:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 3549:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 3046:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 3029:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 3010:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 2998:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 2469:as viewed through the lens of Knowledge policy 2242:Additional comments by editor filing complaint 1011:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 999:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 559:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 362:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 350:Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment 9066:just two months after the previous was closed 8116:So please, self-revert and approach an admin. 8044:Kashmiri said there are more than 40k victims 7962:Here's the thing, this isn't a dispute about 4144:, thereby keeping his own house in order. -- 3645:Your changes look good. Thank you very much! 3169:, provides for the addition of a text box at 2716:I'm happy to help you draft it, if you want. 1458:To add this to somebody else's talk page use: 801:Regardless, you may believe that titles like 9108:, close writes "I think that a hypothetical 5953:Thank you for the comment; I appreciate it. 5688:That disambiguating with 2023 is unnecessary 4074:Digital enhanced cordless telecommunications 3920:https://www.google.com/search?q=intitle:DECT 3822:I don't quite understand your comment about 3716:Moved; let me know if there are any issues. 2198:Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any 8533:However, you need to self revert as well - 4580:Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs 4278:was a reversion (using the undo button) of 8369:claim that requires considerable evidence. 6254:The consensus policy subsequently states: 5164:should not be used for testing. Cheers. — 4364:making "massacre" pretty aptly descriptive 3730:Hey, the user again moved the pages back. 2030:User against whom enforcement is requested 9010:Template:No significant coverage (sports) 8038:Unbandito said yes, fighters are included 7149:Talk:ABC News#Requested move 18 June 2024 5066:And Here She Is#Requested move 7 May 2024 4804:establishes that notifications to forums 4623:Require nominees to be extended confirmed 4511:Please help translate to other languages. 2748:Thanks, I’ll reply in a couple of hours. 9172:that he finds "Gaza genocide" preferable 8774:User:BilledMammal/Bludgeoning statistics 8632:Knowledge Star Trek Into Darkness debate 7770:instance, U.S. Army weapons made at the 7427:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} 6600:I see. I was not aware of that, thanks. 4584:Community recall process based on dewiki 1617:. I'm happy to reword it if you prefer? 921:for this topic, but that this isn't the 402:Talk:Saiō#Requested_move_24_October_2023 151:Just a quibble, but a hyphen is needed: 8314:Talk:Gaza genocide/Archive 4#Death toll 7966:is in dispute, this is a dispute about 5346:Your opinion on this issue is requested 4865:Iranian consulate airstrike in Damascus 4721:from editing Knowledge for a period of 4650:Image cartoon on perennial sources page 4547:Make the first two days discussion-only 4534:Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA 2224:WP:CTOP#Awareness of contentious topics 2139:Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor 99:Thinking outside the box. Way outside. 4715:, and for edit warring, you have been 1901:Those are all good changes, thank you. 1142:Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! 8829:Looking into it, I think you’re right 6723:Please refrain from source distortion 6218:better, consensus-building discussion 5682:There were two reasons for the move: 5668:Please self revert per our policies. 4947:Polish–Ukrainian conflict (1939–1947) 4940:Ernst August von Hannover (born 1983) 2237:(see the system log linked to above). 8484:This revert (10:06, August 10, 2024) 8476:This revert (09:58, August 10, 2024) 8229:The article doesn't even talk about 8064:Cdjp1 said yes fighters are included 7870:the inherent bias in the prior title 7740:Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign 7334:You thought this would be a move of 5304:Knowledge:Move test page (protected) 4201:Better to create a separate section? 1482:adhere to the purposes of Knowledge; 1093:Cheers, and hope to see you around. 937:or otherwise, could be appropriate. 277:Thank you, it is nice to hear that. 15: 8888:thanks for your contributions!! :) 8683:There is currently a discussion at 7829:Ghost gun' is a relatively new term 6846:. That's a significant difference. 5477:Welsh Language Society move closure 2462:United States Capitol Rotunda close 1077:. You can apply for the user-right 968:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 441:Funny about that, I just mentioned 13: 9332: 8929: 7447: 7392: 6787:open a discussion on the talk page 6206:guidelines and naming conventions. 5871: 5559:be used if one exists, after all. 5468: 5416: 5335:Requested move for Twitter article 5126: 5104: 4916:majority of sources used the title 4704: 4338: 4103:Comment from "reasonable observer" 4063: 3670: 3552: 3114: 3049: 3032: 3013: 3001: 1468:Introduction to contentious topics 1116: 1027: 1014: 1002: 562: 365: 353: 14: 9346: 9002:User:BilledMammal/SPI Edit Counts 8976:Still waiting for your response. 6216:Unfortunately, I can't require a 5880:You need a left sock (for mobile) 4982:SUPPORT the proposed title change 4884:Good, glad we caught it in time. 2087:Sanction or remedy to be enforced 1918:Of course; always happy to help. 8881: 8678: 8200:Center for Constitutional Rights 7781:Assassination of John F. Kennedy 7746: 7653:Talk:Israel–Hamas war/Archive 38 7625:Notice of noticeboard discussion 6435:Notice of noticeboard discussion 6020:Right of way (public throughway) 5340: 4087:Thank you for the notification. 3505: 3499: 3492: 3485: 3478: 3171:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 3144: 2618: 2308:Notice of noticeboard discussion 2262:===Discussion concerning Name=== 1734:, !votes to deprecate the source 1473: 1314:a sports article cleanup contest 1209:Category:Settlers of New Zealand 1134: 990: 973: 868:The discussion above is closed. 305: 247: 81:Or anywhere else on the internet 19: 8292:The thread isn’t BLP-violating. 8233:, exactly, are the victims, or 7957:Palestinian genocide accusation 5713:I mentioned you in an AE report 4994:acceptable option but not ideal 4842: 4808:are considered canvassing. The 2220:contentious topics restrictions 1494:refrain from gaming the system. 1463:{{subst:alert/first|a-i}} ~~~~ 1356:who may be interested in this. 539:Done, sorry all for the delay. 9308:06:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 9294:06:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 9280:05:05, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 9266:05:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 9252:04:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 9197:04:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 9149:and some such as David A were 8986:08:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 8612:Edit warring over RFC location 7843:, or any other large database. 7798:As an example, in a report by 6840:Here's the stats on ABC News: 5658:, but policy based discussion. 4695:Clarification on 1RR in ARBPIA 1112:Taba and Nuweiba drone attacks 344:02:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC) 326:11:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC) 1: 9053:14:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 9039:20:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 9021:We're going to have a problem 8972:15:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 8958:15:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 8832:Can you make that comment at 7883:shock terms like "ghost guns" 7465:RE: ABC News (disambiguation) 7406:from editing for a period of 6926:American Broadcasting Company 4751:Partisanship and WikiProjects 2875:17:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC) 2854:14:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC) 2829:01:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC) 2772:01:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 2758:01:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC) 2744:22:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC) 2726:20:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC) 2692:00:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC) 1193:06:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC) 947:02:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 913:19:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 899:22:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC) 853:06:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 834:06:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 816:06:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 793:05:51, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 778:05:46, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 759:05:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 733:09:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 710:08:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 695:08:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 602:08:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 588:08:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 549:03:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 535:23:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC) 521:14:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC) 497:02:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC) 477:01:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 463:01:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 437:01:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 414:05:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC) 396:00:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC) 287:21:25, 3 September 2023 (UTC) 269:20:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC) 7301:thank you for your ABC fixes 7147:Here's the move discussion: 5985:; currently being discussed 5425:Talk:Theory of forms#Closure 4380:Thank you. I appreciate it. 3845:comes in, as it tells us to 2987:Full Faith and Credit Clause 2935:Full Faith and Credit clause 2931:Full Faith and Credit Clause 2671:13:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC) 2644:15:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC) 2603:02:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 2581:07:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC) 2527:15:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC) 2513:01:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC) 2450:21:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC) 2435:20:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC) 2421:20:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC) 2406:20:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC) 2384:Royal standards of Canada RM 2378:16:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 2303:17:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC) 2126:, they describe on RSN that 2024:17:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC) 1942:17:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC) 1928:17:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC) 1914:17:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC) 1897:17:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC) 1858:17:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC) 1843:10:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 1829:09:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 1815:01:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 1801:That makes sense, thank you. 1797:01:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 1782:00:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 1768:00:32, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 1670:21:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC) 1656:21:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC) 1641:21:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC) 1627:21:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC) 1602:20:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC) 1526:20:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC) 1511:21:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC) 1431:19:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC) 1417:08:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC) 1403:12:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC) 1366:19:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC) 1347:08:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC) 1326:00:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC) 1308:23:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC) 879:Early European modern humans 443:List of places in Idaho: A–K 42:Coming into the 20th century 7: 9152:instrumental in opening it. 9082:...after a previous RM was 8920:10:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC) 8902:22:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 8866:03:02, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 8846:23:03, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 8818:10:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC) 8790:00:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 8765:21:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 8739:11:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 8695:18:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 8651:21:36, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 8581:10:56, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 8561:10:45, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 8522:10:34, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 8505:10:28, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 8471:10:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 5941:trying to make this happen. 5685:That the boycott is ongoing 3351:administrators' noticeboard 2879:Perhaps you would consider 2560:on the down-low in debates. 2471:, that language comes from 1708:I see no reason to use them 1272:21:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC) 1242:13:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC) 1221:04:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC) 1172:14:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC) 219:ATM! ATM! It's me, Dorothy! 10: 9351: 9158:by another editor on May 3 8416:22:46, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8398:22:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8383:22:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8358:22:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8343:22:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8326:22:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8309:21:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8288:21:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8273:20:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8252:20:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8174:20:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8159:20:39, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8138:20:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8097:20:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 8021:19:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 7993:19:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 7939:19:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 6637:article originally called 5983:User:BilledMammal/NSPECIES 5258:Knowledge:Move test page 1 5122:Knowledge:Move test page 2 5100:Knowledge:Move test page 1 4465:04:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 4450:04:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 4427:04:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 4405:03:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 4390:22:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC) 4376:22:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC) 4327:05:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 4310:05:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 4292:basic vandalism exceptions 4255:04:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 4216:22:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 4170:15:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 4149:17:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 4120:15:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 4097:15:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 3800:Happy to discuss further. 3655:15:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC) 3641:14:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC) 3620:09:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC) 3540:21:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC) 3512: 3133:02:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC) 3101:01:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 3087:01:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 3073:01:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 2971:11:14, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 2956:02:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 2912:11:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 2897:05:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 9298:I think it is fixed now? 9008:Nomination for merger of 7900:01:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 7732:20:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 7709:02:44, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 7688:18:30, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 7665:08:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 7647:16:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 7614:03:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 7589:03:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 7562:03:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 7541:02:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 7423:guide to appealing blocks 7416:make useful contributions 6696:Knowledge talk:Bot policy 6429:21:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC) 6395:08:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC) 6372:04:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC) 6330:09:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 6315:07:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 6297:05:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 6282:10:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC) 6230:09:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC) 6188:04:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC) 6150:05:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 6136:21:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC) 6103:09:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC) 6076:09:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC) 6053:08:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC) 6032:19:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC) 6002:22:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC) 5978:21:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC) 5963:20:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC) 5909:20:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC) 5895:20:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC) 5860:09:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC) 5839:06:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC) 5813:07:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC) 5796:07:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC) 4902:Ernst August von Hannover 4048:17:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 4034:17:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 4019:17:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 4003:17:17, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3989:17:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3962:12:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3935:14:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3905:12:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3878:11:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3863:11:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3836:11:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3810:11:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3768:11:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3754:11:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3740:09:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3726:08:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3712:08:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3698:08:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3606:09:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3588:02:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 3091:1RR is not an allowance. 2806:02:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC) 2792:00:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC) 2628:The Barnstar of Diligence 2624: 2617: 2593:material in the article. 1833:Ok, thank you very much! 1133: 803:Tītī / Muttonbird Islands 571:Your recent move requests 246: 232:09:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC) 214:08:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC) 190:01:43, 11 July 2023 (UTC) 174:01:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC) 155:. You can thank me later. 148:01:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC) 127:01:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC) 111:01:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC) 93:00:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC) 76:00:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC) 60:00:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC) 9303: 9275: 9247: 9125:Sep 7 (16 days later) - 9089:moving the article to a 8953: 8915: 8841: 8813: 8734: 8705:Tagging species articles 8556: 8545:was a partial revert of 8539:was a 1RR violation, as 8517: 8466: 8411: 8378: 8338: 8304: 8268: 8169: 8133: 8016: 7934: 7895: 7800:Everytown for Gun Safety 7727: 7704: 7683: 7651:Here is one discussion: 7642: 7609: 7557: 7503:10:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 7498: 7480:10:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 7475: 7459:ABC News (United States) 7439:23:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 7410:for persistently making 7378:23:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 7373: 7364:23:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 7330:22:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 7325: 7316:22:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 7295:00:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 7290: 7273:00:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 7268: 7252:00:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 7234:00:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 7229: 7206:23:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 7188:00:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 7161:00:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 7143:23:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 7111:12:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 7086:00:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 7071:23:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 7066: 7048:23:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 7025:23:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 7020: 7007:23:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6972:23:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6967: 6953:23:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6920:22:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6898:21:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6886:ABC News (United States) 6872:20:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6856:18:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6829:23:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6824: 6800:23:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6795: 6780:23:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6766:23:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6761: 6752:23:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6738:22:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6733: 6715:23:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6686:22:51, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6681: 6659:19:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6628:14:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6610:13:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6596:13:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6586:Help:Pipe trick#Examples 6564:12:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6550:12:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6545: 6536:12:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6521:12:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6516: 6499:12:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6482:12:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 6461:03:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 6424: 6367: 6292: 6225: 6183: 6145: 6098: 6048: 6027: 5997: 5958: 5890: 5855: 5834: 5808: 5791: 5775:06:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC) 5759:02:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC) 5744:07:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC) 5739: 5703:07:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC) 5698: 5678:14:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC) 5646:06:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC) 5641: 5623:23:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC) 5584:19:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC) 5569:19:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC) 5550:18:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC) 5545: 5529:16:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC) 5510:07:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC) 5505: 5492:06:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC) 5487: 5459:17:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC) 5454: 5403:04:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC) 5398: 5380:04:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC) 5375: 5329:04:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC) 5324: 5315:18:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC) 5296:04:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC) 5291: 5277:18:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC) 5241:10:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC) 5228:09:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC) 5223: 5207:09:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC) 5194:23:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC) 5189: 5173:20:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC) 5156:00:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC) 5151: 5089:00:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC) 5084: 5058:06:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC) 5041:18:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC) 5015:10:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC) 5010: 4932:10:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC) 4927: 4875: 4859:04:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC) 4854: 4761: 4664: 4490: 4460: 4422: 4371: 4250: 4211: 4165: 4092: 4029: 3984: 3957: 3918:Looking at book titles: 3900: 3858: 3805: 3749: 3721: 3693: 3636: 3583: 3128: 3068: 2907: 2870: 2824: 2801: 2753: 2721: 2687: 2666: 2598: 2508: 2430: 2401: 2373: 2319:Redirects for discussion 1923: 1892: 1824: 1792: 1763: 1651: 1622: 1597: 1521: 1412: 1342: 1303: 1267: 1237: 1216: 1188: 1167: 942: 894: 870:Please do not modify it. 848: 811: 773: 728: 690: 583: 544: 530: 432: 391: 339: 298:A cup of coffee for you! 282: 169: 88: 55: 8628:Star Trek Into Darkness 8142:Just a linguistic point 7785:Gun Control Act of 1968 7196:STOP right now please. 5829:wiki is still pending) 4894:08:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC) 4880:08:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC) 4784:16:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC) 4766:16:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC) 4743:14:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC) 4687:15:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 4669:15:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 4644:23:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC) 4495:13:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC) 3411:optional candidate poll 2274:Statement by (username) 1969:Request concerning Name 1862:I've made a few edits: 606:I wouldn't call this a 9337: 9070:the move review closed 8934: 8626:You'd have to mention 8617:Requested move records 8146: 8120: 7779:. Even the later 1963 7452: 7397: 6902:Maybe a discussion at 5919:Welsh Language Society 5876: 5823:Move+ protection issue 5514:I have to agree with @ 5473: 5421: 5135: 5131: 5113: 5109: 4709: 4479::::::::::::::::::::::: 4343: 4068: 3675: 3557: 3119: 3054: 3037: 3026: 3018: 3006: 2782:What the actual fuck? 2475:; it is shorthand for 2358: 2279:Result concerning Name 2106:these edits violate it 1742:22:51, 20 January 2024 1727:23:45, 22 January 2024 1715:18:23, 21 January 2024 1699:13:31, 21 January 2024 1446:The following is from 1211:. I would support it. 1124: 1121: 1032: 1019: 1007: 567: 370: 358: 9336: 9031:ScottishFinnishRadish 8933: 8874:A cup of tea for you! 8801:ScottishFinnishRadish 8782:ScottishFinnishRadish 8542:04:06, 10 August 2024 8536:10:04, 10 August 2024 8145: 8119: 7451: 7396: 6904:Knowledge:Move review 5875: 5720:Mario vs. Donkey Kong 5472: 5420: 5134: 5130: 5112: 5108: 4870:You’re right, fixed. 4735:ScottishFinnishRadish 4727:Talk:Israel–Hamas war 4708: 4565:Suffrage requirements 4382:ScottishFinnishRadish 4342: 4067: 3674: 3556: 3118: 3093:ScottishFinnishRadish 3053: 3036: 3025: 3017: 3005: 2654:Talk:Israel–Hamas war 2357: 1123: 1120: 1031: 1018: 1006: 747:right the great wrong 566: 369: 357: 206:~~ AirshipJungleman29 9226:18:51, 5 August 2024 9220:18:55, 5 August 2024 8723:Asteromyia euthamiae 8548:14:04, 7 August 2024 8033:the first discussion 7738:ITN recognition for 7673:Farhang Khosro Panah 7261:closing instructions 6270:one person, one vote 5718:Erroneous move with 5411:Talk:Theory of forms 5387:Anti-Black sentiment 4797:Sorry for the delay. 4725:from certain pages ( 4713:arbitration decision 4570:Proposals 16 and 16c 4319:Weather Event Writer 4302:Weather Event Writer 4282:(1st reversion) and 3760:The Herald (Benison) 3732:The Herald (Benison) 3704:The Herald (Benison) 2573:Weather Event Writer 2146:voted to depreciate 1378:VP pump (policy) RFC 982:ITN recognition for 933:form of Cro-Magnon, 374:Contesting close of 255:The Surreal Barnstar 8180:I just re-read the 8076:Self said not forum 8050:Self said not forum 7959:, for that matter). 7827:, admit as much: "' 6196:Re: Fallout closure 6064:Frankfurt Cathedral 4793:Firefangledfeathers 4772:Firefangledfeathers 4609:phase II discussion 4594:phase II discussion 4575:phase II discussion 4529:phase II discussion 3973:Rather than merely 3139:DYK for Michi (cat) 2551:(totally not small) 1075:granting conditions 240:A barnstar for you! 9338: 8935: 8669:Arbitration notice 8365:To me, that is an 7772:Springfield Armory 7453: 7398: 7220:The discussion is 6602:Flemmish Nietzsche 5925:Unsolicited advice 5877: 5846:Extraordinary Writ 5474: 5432:remove this notice 5422: 5132: 5110: 4710: 4524:Proposals 2 and 9b 4344: 4239:23 April 2024; 2RR 4234:23 April 2024, 1RR 4069: 3676: 3558: 3120: 3055: 3038: 3019: 3007: 2611:A barnstar for you 1441:contentious topics 1199:Requested move of 1122: 1033: 1020: 1008: 568: 371: 359: 9118:Jul 22 - Aug 22, 8996:Dutch IPA (again) 8907: 8906: 8850:Will do, thanks. 8656:talk page stalker 7493:Done, thank you. 7361: 7174:, especially the 7004: 6950: 6790:and explain why. 6784:I disagree. I'll 6458: 5608:They argued that 5409:Closure of RM at 5162:project namespace 4832:recently notified 4262:talk page stalker 3546: 3545: 3542: 3438:WereSpielChequers 3111:A kitten for you! 2881:your own comments 2649: 2648: 2535:Large removal on 2269:Statement by Name 1608:Anglican Dioceses 1183:Thanks, replied. 1152: 1151: 1108:Proposed deletion 331: 330: 274: 273: 156: 34: 33: 9342: 9335: 9228: 9222: 9154: 9095: 9093:definitive title 8932: 8885: 8878: 8877: 8858: 8804: 8763: 8756: 8692: 8682: 8681: 8659: 8649: 8550: 8544: 8538: 8532: 8367:WP:EXTRAORDINARY 8208:Euro-Med Monitor 8107: 8058:The second one: 8003: 7917: 7851:such as this one 7787:from criticism, 7750: 7631:Israel-Hamas War 7603: 7583: 7580: 7577: 7574: 7571: 7551: 7535: 7532: 7529: 7526: 7523: 7457:Move review for 7450: 7428: 7412:disruptive edits 7362: 7357: 7351: 7350: 7345: 7216: 7052:I've never seen 7037: 7031:Consensus policy 7005: 7000: 6994: 6993: 6988: 6951: 6946: 6940: 6939: 6934: 6789: 6713: 6671: 6635:New York (state) 6583: 6579: 6459: 6452: 6412:Anti-Americanism 5976: 5970: 5917:Move review for 5874: 5849: 5785: 5773: 5471: 5435: 5368: 5344: 5343: 5310: 5275: 5236: 5217: 5202: 5183: 5168: 5145: 5129: 5107: 4938:Move review for 4847:Isla Bryson case 4796: 4731:Israel–Hamas war 4639: 4415: 4341: 4273: 4265: 4227:Israel–Hamas war 4086: 4072:Move review for 4066: 3978: 3972: 3927:PhotographyEdits 3873: 3831: 3673: 3630: 3577: 3555: 3537: 3530: 3523: 3509: 3508: 3503: 3502: 3496: 3495: 3489: 3488: 3482: 3481: 3473: 3472: 3454: 3440: 3426: 3408: 3394: 3392:theleekycauldron 3380: 3366: 3348: 3342: 3322: 3308: 3286: 3260: 3246: 3232: 3212: 3198: 3192: 3168: 3148: 3052: 3035: 3016: 3004: 2985:Move review for 2885:those of another 2622: 2615: 2614: 2395: 2367: 2078: 2051:deleted contribs 2022: 1995:deleted contribs 1744: 1729: 1717: 1701: 1477: 1455: 1449: 1336: 1289: 1161: 1138: 1131: 1130: 1119: 1088:discussion board 1017: 1005: 994: 977: 565: 452: 406:NmWTfs85lXusaybq 368: 356: 323: 318: 309: 302: 301: 251: 244: 243: 150: 23: 16: 9350: 9349: 9345: 9344: 9343: 9341: 9340: 9339: 9333: 9331: 9326: 9224: 9218: 9150: 9083: 9023: 9018: 9013: 9005: 8998: 8945: 8940: 8930: 8928: 8876: 8852: 8826: 8794: 8777: 8752: 8750: 8746:359,933 species 8707: 8702: 8697: 8688: 8679: 8676: 8671: 8666: 8653: 8635: 8619: 8614: 8597: 8579: 8546: 8540: 8534: 8526: 8503: 8455: 8101: 8041:M.Bitton agreed 7997: 7911: 7908: 7863:yet another one 7762: 7757: 7752: 7751: 7743: 7719: 7696: 7675: 7634: 7627: 7622: 7600:Void if removed 7597: 7581: 7578: 7575: 7572: 7569: 7545: 7533: 7530: 7527: 7524: 7521: 7511: 7490: 7467: 7462: 7448: 7442: 7441: 7426: 7419: 7390: 7355: 7348: 7343: 7340: 7303: 7210: 7034: 6998: 6991: 6986: 6983: 6944: 6937: 6932: 6929: 6837: 6816: 6785: 6725: 6699: 6665: 6581: 6577: 6469: 6443: 6437: 6415: 6272:kind of way. -- 6198: 6091:WP:OFFICIALNAME 6040: 6014: 5974: 5968: 5927: 5922: 5882: 5872: 5870: 5843: 5825: 5779: 5764: 5723: 5715: 5633: 5479: 5469: 5467: 5446: 5441: 5436: 5429: 5414: 5390: 5362: 5359: 5354: 5341: 5337: 5308: 5266: 5261: 5234: 5211: 5200: 5177: 5166: 5139: 5136: 5127: 5125: 5118:Speedy deletion 5114: 5105: 5103: 5096:Speedy deletion 5069: 5064:RM closure for 4951: 4943: 4904: 4867: 4790: 4753: 4748: 4747: 4702: 4697: 4652: 4637: 4631: 4621:(implemented): 4563:(implemented): 4556:Admin elections 4520: 4503: 4481: 4438:Intercept piece 4409: 4351: 4339: 4337: 4267: 4259: 4230: 4203: 4181: 4105: 4080: 4077: 4064: 4062: 3974: 3966: 3945: 3892: 3869: 3827: 3786: 3681: 3671: 3669: 3624: 3571: 3568: 3563: 3553: 3551: 3533: 3526: 3510: 3506: 3504: 3500: 3497: 3493: 3490: 3486: 3483: 3479: 3471: 3462: 3450: 3449:, initiated by 3436: 3435:, initiated by 3422: 3421:, initiated by 3404: 3403:, initiated by 3390: 3389:, initiated by 3376: 3375:, initiated by 3362: 3361:, initiated by 3344: 3340:Thebiguglyalien 3338: 3337:, initiated by 3318: 3317:, initiated by 3304: 3303:, initiated by 3282: 3281:, initiated by 3256: 3255:, initiated by 3242: 3241:, initiated by 3228: 3227:, initiated by 3208: 3207:, initiated by 3194: 3188: 3187:, initiated by 3164: 3163:, initiated by 3155: 3150: 3149: 3141: 3113: 3060: 3050: 3048: 3043: 3033: 3031: 3024: 3014: 3012: 3002: 3000: 2995: 2990: 2840: 2816: 2705: 2700: 2679: 2657: 2652:Bludgeoning at 2613: 2545: 2540: 2464: 2389: 2386: 2361: 2356: 2330: 2322: 2310: 2305: 2281: 2276: 2271: 2188:20 January 2024 2173:19 January 2024 2160:24 January 2024 2153:24 January 2024 2144:22 January 2024 2135:21 January 2024 2124:21 January 2024 2036: 1980: 1971: 1740: 1725: 1713: 1697: 1685: 1610: 1536: 1498: 1497: 1478: 1470: 1453: 1447: 1443: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1330: 1286:InvadingInvader 1283: 1280: 1255: 1250: 1229: 1204: 1201:Pākehā settlers 1180: 1155: 1129: 1127:Merry Christmas 1117: 1115: 1104: 1052:New Page Patrol 1025: 1015: 1013: 1003: 1001: 996: 995: 987: 984:Henry Kissinger 979: 978: 970: 959: 923:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 886: 874: 873: 573: 563: 561: 518: 505: 446: 424: 422:Lists of places 379: 366: 364: 354: 352: 321: 314: 300: 295: 267: 242: 44: 39: 37:Fabric designer 12: 11: 5: 9348: 9330: 9327: 9325: 9322: 9321: 9320: 9319: 9318: 9317: 9316: 9315: 9314: 9313: 9312: 9311: 9310: 9240: 9239: 9238: 9237: 9236: 9233: 9215: 9212: 9209: 9205: 9185: 9179: 9161: 9146: 9135: 9134: 9133: 9123: 9116: 9113: 9103: 9079: 9073: 9068:16 days after 9063: 9057: 9056: 9055: 9022: 9019: 9017: 9014: 9012: 9006: 9004: 8999: 8997: 8994: 8993: 8992: 8991: 8990: 8989: 8988: 8944: 8941: 8939: 8936: 8927: 8924: 8923: 8922: 8905: 8904: 8886: 8875: 8872: 8871: 8870: 8869: 8868: 8830: 8825: 8822: 8821: 8820: 8806: 8792: 8776: 8771: 8770: 8769: 8768: 8767: 8719: 8706: 8703: 8701: 8698: 8677: 8675: 8672: 8670: 8667: 8665: 8662: 8661: 8660: 8644: 8618: 8615: 8613: 8610: 8609: 8608: 8603: 8596: 8593: 8592: 8591: 8590: 8589: 8588: 8587: 8586: 8585: 8584: 8583: 8573: 8510: 8497: 8459: 8454: 8448: 8447: 8446: 8445: 8444: 8443: 8442: 8441: 8440: 8439: 8438: 8437: 8436: 8435: 8434: 8433: 8432: 8431: 8430: 8429: 8428: 8427: 8426: 8425: 8424: 8423: 8422: 8421: 8420: 8419: 8418: 8403: 8370: 8363: 8331: 8297: 8296:inappropriate? 8293: 8261: 8257: 8227: 8223: 8188: 8178: 8177: 8176: 8147: 8143: 8121: 8117: 8114: 8084: 8083: 8082: 8081: 8080: 8077: 8074: 8071: 8068: 8065: 8062: 8056: 8055: 8054: 8051: 8048: 8045: 8042: 8039: 8026: 8009: 8005: 7980: 7975:, not for the 7960: 7927: 7923: 7907: 7904: 7903: 7902: 7887: 7886: 7866: 7859:that other one 7844: 7833:Google Scholar 7808: 7792: 7761: 7758: 7756: 7755:Page re-moved? 7753: 7745: 7744: 7742: 7736: 7735: 7734: 7718: 7713: 7712: 7711: 7695: 7692: 7691: 7690: 7674: 7671: 7670: 7669: 7668: 7667: 7633: 7628: 7626: 7623: 7621: 7618: 7617: 7616: 7595: 7594: 7593: 7592: 7591: 7510: 7507: 7506: 7505: 7489: 7484: 7483: 7482: 7466: 7463: 7461: 7455: 7454: 7446: 7445: 7420: 7400:You have been 7399: 7391: 7389: 7386: 7385: 7384: 7383: 7382: 7381: 7380: 7318: 7302: 7299: 7298: 7297: 7282: 7281: 7280: 7279: 7278: 7277: 7276: 7275: 7257: 7218: 7194: 7193: 7192: 7191: 7190: 7167: 7122: 7121: 7120: 7119: 7118: 7117: 7116: 7115: 7114: 7113: 7103:YorkshireExpat 7094: 7093: 7092: 7091: 7090: 7089: 7088: 7058: 7012: 6959: 6955: 6874: 6859: 6858: 6836: 6833: 6832: 6831: 6815: 6812: 6811: 6810: 6809: 6808: 6807: 6806: 6805: 6804: 6803: 6802: 6724: 6721: 6720: 6719: 6718: 6717: 6708: 6663: 6662: 6661: 6615: 6614: 6613: 6612: 6580:, it saves as 6573: 6572: 6571: 6570: 6569: 6568: 6567: 6566: 6508: 6501: 6485: 6484: 6468: 6465: 6464: 6463: 6436: 6433: 6432: 6431: 6414: 6409: 6408: 6407: 6406: 6405: 6404: 6403: 6402: 6401: 6400: 6399: 6398: 6397: 6356: 6353: 6344: 6340: 6332: 6266: 6262: 6261: 6260: 6252: 6248: 6247: 6246: 6214: 6209: 6208: 6197: 6194: 6193: 6192: 6191: 6190: 6171: 6168:WP:ESTABLISHED 6160: 6152: 6110: 6109: 6108: 6107: 6106: 6105: 6083: 6039: 6036: 6035: 6034: 6013: 6010: 6009: 6008: 6007: 6006: 6005: 6004: 5990: 5951: 5943: 5942: 5938: 5934: 5931: 5926: 5923: 5921: 5915: 5914: 5913: 5912: 5911: 5881: 5878: 5869: 5866: 5865: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5824: 5821: 5820: 5819: 5818: 5817: 5816: 5815: 5800: 5799: 5798: 5722: 5716: 5714: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5708: 5707: 5706: 5705: 5691: 5690: 5689: 5686: 5666: 5663: 5659: 5652:WP:CRYSTALBALL 5632: 5629: 5628: 5627: 5626: 5625: 5606: 5602: 5599: 5592: 5591: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5534: 5498: 5494: 5478: 5475: 5466: 5463: 5462: 5461: 5445: 5442: 5440: 5437: 5428: 5415: 5413: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5389: 5384: 5383: 5382: 5358: 5355: 5353: 5350: 5349: 5348: 5336: 5333: 5332: 5331: 5317: 5300: 5299: 5298: 5260: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5249: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5245: 5244: 5243: 5133: 5124: 5120:nomination of 5115: 5111: 5102: 5098:nomination of 5093: 5092: 5091: 5077: 5068: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5045: 5044: 5043: 5003: 4998: 4997: 4985: 4974: 4963: 4950: 4944: 4942: 4936: 4935: 4934: 4920:used the title 4911: 4903: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4866: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4839: 4835: 4827: 4823: 4820: 4813: 4798: 4788: 4787: 4786: 4752: 4749: 4746: 4745: 4711:To enforce an 4703: 4701: 4698: 4696: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4651: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4630: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4616: 4601: 4586: 4567: 4558: 4549: 4540: 4519: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4502: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4480: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4473: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4392: 4356: 4350: 4345: 4336: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4312: 4284:this reversion 4242: 4241: 4236: 4229: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4202: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4180: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4104: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4076: 4070: 4061: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4007: 4006: 4005: 3950: 3944: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3916: 3910: 3891: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3850: 3820: 3798: 3785: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3680: 3677: 3668: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3608: 3567: 3564: 3562: 3559: 3550: 3547: 3544: 3543: 3522: 3513: 3511: 3498: 3491: 3484: 3477: 3476: 3470: 3463: 3461: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3442: 3428: 3414: 3396: 3382: 3368: 3354: 3324: 3310: 3296: 3284:City of Silver 3262: 3258:Reaper Eternal 3248: 3234: 3214: 3200: 3174: 3154: 3151: 3143: 3142: 3140: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3112: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3059: 3056: 3047: 3044: 3042: 3039: 3030: 3027: 3023: 3020: 3011: 3008: 2999: 2996: 2994: 2991: 2989: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2944:uniformly used 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2863: 2856: 2839: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2815: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2714: 2710: 2704: 2701: 2699: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2678: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2656: 2650: 2647: 2646: 2631: 2630: 2625: 2623: 2612: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2590: 2587: 2561: 2544: 2541: 2539: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2501: 2498: 2491: 2480: 2463: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2385: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2355: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2329: 2323: 2321: 2315:Hobby Magazine 2311: 2309: 2306: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2288: 2287: 2280: 2277: 2275: 2272: 2270: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2260: 2258: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2252: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2243: 2239: 2238: 2235:3 January 2024 2230: 2229: 2227: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2205: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2199: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2157: 2150: 2141: 2132: 2113: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2107: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2088: 2080: 2079: 2031: 2027: 2026: 1975: 1970: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1902: 1885: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1875: 1872: 1869: 1866: 1845: 1802: 1752: 1749: 1746: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1723: 1711: 1691: 1690: 1684: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1586: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1535: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1496: 1495: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1483: 1479: 1472: 1471: 1469: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1456: 1442: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1296: 1292: 1279: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1260: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1203: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1179: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1139: 1128: 1125: 1114: 1105: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1091: 1084: 1071: 1062: 1055: 1048: 1047: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1012: 1009: 1000: 997: 989: 988: 986: 980: 972: 971: 969: 966: 965: 964: 958: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 926: 925:for that name. 885: 875: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 840: 822: 799: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 720: 717: 683: 682: 681: 676: 671: 666: 661: 656: 651: 646: 641: 636: 631: 626: 621: 616: 608:large campaign 575: 574: 572: 569: 560: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 514: 504: 501: 500: 499: 487: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 423: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 378: 372: 363: 360: 351: 348: 347: 346: 329: 328: 310: 299: 296: 294: 291: 290: 289: 272: 271: 266: 263:Edward-Woodrow 258: 257: 252: 241: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 194: 193: 192: 162: 159: 158: 157: 153:House-Clearing 115: 114: 113: 48: 43: 40: 38: 35: 32: 31: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 9347: 9309: 9305: 9301: 9297: 9296: 9295: 9291: 9287: 9284:Check again. 9283: 9282: 9281: 9277: 9273: 9269: 9268: 9267: 9263: 9259: 9255: 9254: 9253: 9249: 9245: 9241: 9234: 9231: 9230: 9227: 9221: 9216: 9213: 9210: 9206: 9203: 9202: 9200: 9199: 9198: 9194: 9190: 9186: 9183: 9180: 9177: 9173: 9168: 9165: 9162: 9159: 9155: 9153: 9147: 9143: 9139: 9136: 9132: 9128: 9124: 9121: 9117: 9114: 9111: 9110:Gaza genocide 9107: 9104: 9102: 9099: 9098: 9096: 9094: 9092: 9088: 9080: 9077: 9074: 9071: 9067: 9064: 9061: 9058: 9054: 9050: 9046: 9042: 9041: 9040: 9036: 9032: 9028: 9025: 9024: 9011: 9003: 8987: 8983: 8979: 8975: 8974: 8973: 8969: 8965: 8961: 8960: 8959: 8955: 8951: 8947: 8946: 8921: 8917: 8913: 8909: 8908: 8903: 8899: 8895: 8891: 8887: 8884: 8880: 8879: 8867: 8864: 8863: 8859: 8857: 8856: 8849: 8848: 8847: 8843: 8839: 8835: 8831: 8828: 8827: 8819: 8815: 8811: 8807: 8802: 8798: 8793: 8791: 8787: 8783: 8779: 8778: 8775: 8766: 8761: 8757: 8755: 8747: 8742: 8741: 8740: 8736: 8732: 8728: 8724: 8720: 8717: 8713: 8709: 8708: 8696: 8691: 8686: 8657: 8652: 8647: 8646: 8639: 8633: 8629: 8625: 8621: 8620: 8607: 8604: 8602: 8599: 8598: 8582: 8577: 8572: 8571: 8567: 8566:Self-reverted 8564: 8563: 8562: 8558: 8554: 8549: 8543: 8537: 8530: 8525: 8524: 8523: 8519: 8515: 8511: 8509:Self-reverted 8508: 8507: 8506: 8501: 8496: 8495: 8490: 8488: 8485: 8481: 8477: 8474: 8473: 8472: 8468: 8464: 8460: 8457: 8456: 8453: 8417: 8413: 8409: 8404: 8401: 8400: 8399: 8395: 8391: 8386: 8385: 8384: 8380: 8376: 8371: 8368: 8364: 8361: 8360: 8359: 8355: 8351: 8346: 8345: 8344: 8340: 8336: 8332: 8329: 8328: 8327: 8323: 8319: 8315: 8312: 8311: 8310: 8306: 8302: 8298: 8294: 8291: 8290: 8289: 8285: 8281: 8276: 8275: 8274: 8270: 8266: 8262: 8258: 8255: 8254: 8253: 8249: 8245: 8240: 8236: 8232: 8228: 8224: 8221: 8217: 8213: 8209: 8205: 8201: 8197: 8193: 8189: 8186: 8183: 8179: 8175: 8171: 8167: 8162: 8161: 8160: 8156: 8152: 8148: 8144: 8141: 8140: 8139: 8135: 8131: 8127: 8122: 8118: 8115: 8111: 8105: 8100: 8099: 8098: 8094: 8090: 8085: 8078: 8075: 8072: 8069: 8066: 8063: 8060: 8059: 8057: 8052: 8049: 8046: 8043: 8040: 8037: 8036: 8034: 8030: 8029: 8027: 8024: 8023: 8022: 8018: 8014: 8010: 8006: 8001: 7996: 7995: 7994: 7990: 7986: 7981: 7978: 7974: 7969: 7965: 7961: 7958: 7954: 7953:Gaza genocide 7950: 7949:the Holocaust 7946: 7942: 7941: 7940: 7936: 7932: 7928: 7924: 7921: 7915: 7910: 7909: 7901: 7897: 7893: 7889: 7888: 7884: 7879: 7875: 7871: 7867: 7864: 7860: 7856: 7852: 7848: 7845: 7842: 7838: 7834: 7830: 7826: 7825: 7820: 7816: 7812: 7809: 7805: 7801: 7797: 7793: 7790: 7786: 7782: 7778: 7773: 7768: 7764: 7763: 7749: 7741: 7733: 7729: 7725: 7721: 7720: 7717: 7710: 7706: 7702: 7698: 7697: 7689: 7685: 7681: 7678:Done, sorry. 7677: 7676: 7666: 7662: 7658: 7654: 7650: 7649: 7648: 7644: 7640: 7636: 7635: 7632: 7615: 7611: 7607: 7601: 7596: 7590: 7587: 7585: 7584: 7565: 7564: 7563: 7559: 7555: 7549: 7544: 7543: 7542: 7539: 7537: 7536: 7517: 7513: 7512: 7509:Telegraph RFC 7504: 7500: 7496: 7492: 7491: 7488: 7481: 7477: 7473: 7469: 7468: 7460: 7444: 7443: 7440: 7436: 7432: 7424: 7417: 7413: 7409: 7405: 7404: 7395: 7379: 7375: 7371: 7367: 7366: 7365: 7360: 7358: 7347: 7346: 7337: 7333: 7332: 7331: 7327: 7323: 7319: 7317: 7313: 7309: 7305: 7304: 7296: 7292: 7288: 7284: 7283: 7274: 7270: 7266: 7262: 7258: 7255: 7254: 7253: 7249: 7245: 7241: 7237: 7236: 7235: 7231: 7227: 7223: 7219: 7214: 7209: 7208: 7207: 7203: 7199: 7195: 7189: 7185: 7181: 7177: 7173: 7168: 7164: 7163: 7162: 7158: 7154: 7150: 7146: 7145: 7144: 7140: 7136: 7131: 7127: 7126:User:SilkTork 7124: 7123: 7112: 7108: 7104: 7099: 7095: 7087: 7083: 7079: 7074: 7073: 7072: 7068: 7064: 7059: 7055: 7051: 7050: 7049: 7045: 7041: 7032: 7028: 7027: 7026: 7022: 7018: 7013: 7010: 7009: 7008: 7003: 7001: 6990: 6989: 6980: 6975: 6974: 6973: 6969: 6965: 6960: 6956: 6954: 6949: 6947: 6936: 6935: 6927: 6923: 6922: 6921: 6917: 6913: 6909: 6905: 6901: 6900: 6899: 6895: 6891: 6887: 6883: 6879: 6875: 6873: 6869: 6865: 6861: 6860: 6857: 6853: 6849: 6845: 6842: 6839: 6838: 6835:ABC News move 6830: 6826: 6822: 6818: 6817: 6801: 6797: 6793: 6788: 6783: 6782: 6781: 6777: 6773: 6772:IOHANNVSVERVS 6769: 6768: 6767: 6763: 6759: 6755: 6754: 6753: 6749: 6745: 6744:IOHANNVSVERVS 6741: 6740: 6739: 6735: 6731: 6727: 6726: 6716: 6711: 6710: 6703: 6697: 6693: 6689: 6688: 6687: 6683: 6679: 6675: 6669: 6664: 6660: 6656: 6652: 6648: 6644: 6640: 6636: 6631: 6630: 6629: 6625: 6621: 6617: 6616: 6611: 6607: 6603: 6599: 6598: 6597: 6594: 6591: 6587: 6575: 6574: 6565: 6561: 6557: 6553: 6552: 6551: 6547: 6543: 6539: 6538: 6537: 6533: 6529: 6524: 6523: 6522: 6518: 6514: 6509: 6506: 6502: 6500: 6496: 6492: 6487: 6486: 6483: 6479: 6475: 6471: 6470: 6462: 6456: 6450: 6446: 6442: 6439: 6438: 6430: 6426: 6422: 6417: 6416: 6413: 6396: 6392: 6388: 6384: 6380: 6375: 6374: 6373: 6369: 6365: 6361: 6357: 6354: 6350: 6345: 6341: 6337: 6333: 6331: 6327: 6323: 6318: 6317: 6316: 6312: 6308: 6304: 6300: 6299: 6298: 6294: 6290: 6285: 6284: 6283: 6279: 6275: 6271: 6267: 6263: 6259: 6256: 6255: 6253: 6249: 6245: 6242: 6241: 6238: 6233: 6232: 6231: 6227: 6223: 6219: 6215: 6211: 6210: 6207: 6204: 6200: 6199: 6189: 6185: 6181: 6177: 6172: 6169: 6166:and implicit 6165: 6164:WP:COMMONNAME 6161: 6158: 6153: 6151: 6147: 6143: 6139: 6138: 6137: 6133: 6129: 6125: 6121: 6117: 6112: 6111: 6104: 6100: 6096: 6092: 6088: 6087:WP:COMMONNAME 6084: 6082: 6079: 6078: 6077: 6073: 6069: 6065: 6061: 6056: 6055: 6054: 6050: 6046: 6042: 6041: 6033: 6029: 6025: 6021: 6016: 6015: 6003: 5999: 5995: 5991: 5988: 5984: 5981: 5980: 5979: 5973: 5966: 5965: 5964: 5960: 5956: 5952: 5949: 5945: 5944: 5939: 5935: 5932: 5929: 5928: 5920: 5910: 5906: 5902: 5901:FortunateSons 5898: 5897: 5896: 5892: 5888: 5884: 5883: 5861: 5857: 5853: 5847: 5842: 5841: 5840: 5836: 5832: 5827: 5826: 5814: 5810: 5806: 5801: 5797: 5793: 5789: 5783: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5772: 5770: 5769: 5762: 5761: 5760: 5756: 5752: 5747: 5746: 5745: 5741: 5737: 5734: 5729: 5725: 5724: 5721: 5704: 5700: 5696: 5692: 5687: 5684: 5683: 5681: 5680: 5679: 5675: 5671: 5667: 5664: 5660: 5657: 5653: 5649: 5648: 5647: 5643: 5639: 5635: 5634: 5624: 5620: 5616: 5611: 5607: 5603: 5600: 5597: 5593: 5585: 5581: 5577: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5566: 5562: 5558: 5553: 5552: 5551: 5547: 5543: 5539: 5535: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5526: 5522: 5517: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5507: 5503: 5499: 5495: 5493: 5489: 5485: 5481: 5480: 5460: 5456: 5452: 5448: 5447: 5433: 5426: 5419: 5412: 5404: 5400: 5396: 5392: 5391: 5388: 5381: 5377: 5373: 5366: 5361: 5360: 5347: 5339: 5338: 5330: 5326: 5322: 5318: 5316: 5313: 5311: 5305: 5301: 5297: 5293: 5289: 5285: 5280: 5279: 5278: 5274: 5272: 5271: 5263: 5262: 5259: 5242: 5239: 5237: 5231: 5230: 5229: 5225: 5221: 5215: 5210: 5209: 5208: 5205: 5203: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5191: 5187: 5181: 5176: 5175: 5174: 5171: 5169: 5163: 5159: 5158: 5157: 5153: 5149: 5143: 5138: 5137: 5123: 5119: 5101: 5097: 5090: 5086: 5082: 5078: 5075: 5071: 5070: 5067: 5059: 5055: 5051: 5046: 5042: 5038: 5034: 5030: 5026: 5022: 5018: 5017: 5016: 5012: 5008: 5004: 5000: 4999: 4995: 4990: 4986: 4983: 4979: 4975: 4972: 4968: 4964: 4961: 4957: 4953: 4952: 4948: 4941: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4921: 4917: 4912: 4910: 4906: 4905: 4895: 4891: 4887: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4877: 4873: 4869: 4868: 4860: 4856: 4852: 4848: 4844: 4840: 4836: 4833: 4828: 4824: 4821: 4818: 4814: 4811: 4807: 4803: 4799: 4794: 4789: 4785: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4769: 4768: 4767: 4763: 4759: 4755: 4754: 4744: 4740: 4736: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4720: 4719: 4714: 4707: 4688: 4684: 4680: 4676: 4672: 4671: 4670: 4666: 4662: 4658: 4654: 4653: 4645: 4641: 4640: 4633: 4632: 4629:1RR violation 4624: 4620: 4617: 4615: 4611: 4610: 4605: 4602: 4600: 4596: 4595: 4590: 4587: 4585: 4581: 4577: 4576: 4571: 4568: 4566: 4562: 4559: 4557: 4553: 4550: 4548: 4544: 4541: 4539: 4535: 4531: 4530: 4525: 4522: 4521: 4513: 4512: 4509: 4505: 4504: 4496: 4492: 4488: 4483: 4482: 4466: 4462: 4458: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4447: 4443: 4439: 4435: 4430: 4429: 4428: 4424: 4420: 4413: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4402: 4398: 4393: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4373: 4369: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4352: 4349: 4328: 4325: 4321: 4320: 4313: 4311: 4308: 4304: 4303: 4297: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4281: 4277: 4271: 4263: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4243: 4240: 4237: 4235: 4232: 4231: 4228: 4224: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4205: 4204: 4195: 4191: 4187: 4183: 4182: 4179: 4176:CS1 error on 4171: 4167: 4163: 4158: 4157: 4150: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4135: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4121: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4084: 4079: 4078: 4075: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4011:IOHANNVSVERVS 4008: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3977: 3970: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3946: 3936: 3932: 3928: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3915: 3911: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3893: 3879: 3876: 3872: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3851: 3848: 3844: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3834: 3830: 3825: 3821: 3818: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3807: 3803: 3799: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3787: 3769: 3765: 3761: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3682: 3679:Aadujeevitham 3656: 3652: 3648: 3647:FortunateSons 3644: 3643: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3628: 3627:FortunateSons 3623: 3622: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3612:FortunateSons 3609: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3598:FortunateSons 3595: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3575: 3574:FortunateSons 3570: 3569: 3541: 3538: 3536: 3531: 3529: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3514: 3475: 3474: 3468: 3453: 3448: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3434: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3420: 3419: 3415: 3412: 3407: 3406:SportingFlyer 3402: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3388: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3374: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3360: 3359: 3355: 3352: 3347: 3341: 3336: 3335: 3330: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3316: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3306:Novem Lingaue 3302: 3301: 3297: 3294: 3290: 3285: 3280: 3279: 3274: 3273: 3268: 3267: 3266:Proposals 12c 3263: 3259: 3254: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3240: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3226: 3225: 3220: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3206: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3191: 3186: 3185: 3180: 3179: 3175: 3172: 3167: 3162: 3161: 3157: 3156: 3147: 3134: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3121: 3117: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3061: 3058:Violating 1RR 2988: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2948:Cinderella157 2945: 2941: 2936: 2932: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2889:Cinderella157 2886: 2882: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2861: 2857: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2842: 2841: 2838: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2817: 2807: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2706: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2680: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2659: 2658: 2655: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2629: 2626: 2621: 2616: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2591: 2588: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2579: 2575: 2574: 2568: 2565: 2562: 2558: 2553: 2552: 2548:P.S. A small 2547: 2546: 2538: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2499: 2496: 2492: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2465: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2393: 2388: 2387: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2365: 2360: 2359: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2339:missing title 2336: 2332: 2331: 2328: 2325:CS1 error on 2320: 2316: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2295:FortunateSons 2290: 2289: 2286: 2283: 2282: 2261: 2259: 2257: 2253: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2244: 2241: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2231: 2228: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2206: 2204: 2200: 2197: 2196: 2194: 2189: 2186: 2181: 2180: 2178: 2174: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2166: 2161: 2158: 2154: 2151: 2149: 2145: 2142: 2140: 2136: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2118: 2114: 2112: 2108: 2105: 2101: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2089: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2076: 2073: 2070: 2067: 2064: 2061: 2058: 2055: 2052: 2049: 2046: 2043: 2040: 2035: 2032: 2029: 2028: 2025: 2020: 2017: 2014: 2011: 2008: 2005: 2002: 1999: 1996: 1993: 1990: 1987: 1984: 1979: 1978:FortunateSons 1976: 1973: 1972: 1961: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1934:FortunateSons 1931: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1906:FortunateSons 1903: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1876: 1873: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1863: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1850:FortunateSons 1846: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1835:FortunateSons 1832: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1807:FortunateSons 1803: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1774:FortunateSons 1771: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1750: 1747: 1743: 1738: 1733: 1728: 1724: 1721: 1716: 1712: 1709: 1705: 1700: 1696: 1695: 1693: 1692: 1687: 1686: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1611: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1582: 1562: 1561: 1559: 1558: 1556: 1555: 1553: 1552: 1550: 1549: 1547: 1546: 1544: 1543: 1541: 1540: 1538: 1537: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1493: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1452: 1445: 1444: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1388:List of stubs 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1334: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1287: 1282: 1281: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1230: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1202: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1159: 1154: 1153: 1147: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1137: 1132: 1113: 1109: 1092: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1076: 1072: 1069: 1068: 1063: 1060: 1056: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1030: 993: 985: 976: 961: 960: 948: 944: 940: 936: 931: 927: 924: 920: 919:WP:COMMONNAME 916: 915: 914: 910: 906: 902: 901: 900: 896: 892: 888: 887: 884: 880: 871: 854: 850: 846: 841: 837: 836: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 818: 817: 813: 809: 804: 800: 796: 795: 794: 790: 786: 781: 780: 779: 775: 771: 767: 762: 761: 760: 756: 752: 748: 744: 734: 730: 726: 721: 718: 716: 713: 712: 711: 707: 703: 698: 697: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 677: 675: 672: 670: 667: 665: 662: 660: 657: 655: 652: 650: 647: 645: 642: 640: 637: 635: 632: 630: 627: 625: 622: 620: 617: 615: 612: 611: 609: 605: 604: 603: 599: 595: 591: 590: 589: 585: 581: 577: 576: 550: 546: 542: 538: 537: 536: 532: 528: 524: 523: 522: 517: 512: 507: 506: 498: 495: 492: 488: 484: 478: 474: 470: 466: 465: 464: 460: 456: 450: 444: 440: 439: 438: 434: 430: 426: 425: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 398: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 380: 377: 345: 341: 337: 333: 332: 327: 324: 319: 317: 316:Bluerasberry 311: 308: 304: 303: 288: 284: 280: 276: 275: 270: 264: 260: 259: 256: 253: 250: 245: 233: 230: 229: 225: 224: 220: 217: 216: 215: 211: 207: 203: 191: 188: 187: 183: 182: 177: 176: 175: 171: 167: 163: 160: 154: 149: 146: 145: 141: 140: 135: 132: 131: 130: 129: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 109: 108: 104: 103: 98: 97: 96: 95: 94: 90: 86: 82: 79: 78: 77: 74: 73: 69: 68: 63: 62: 61: 57: 53: 49: 46: 45: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 9300:BilledMammal 9272:BilledMammal 9244:BilledMammal 9181: 9175: 9163: 9148: 9141: 9137: 9130: 9090: 9086: 9081: 9075: 9065: 9059: 8950:BilledMammal 8912:BilledMammal 8861: 8854: 8853: 8838:BilledMammal 8810:BilledMammal 8753: 8731:BilledMammal 8726: 8722: 8716:WP:SECONDARY 8642: 8605: 8600: 8568: 8553:BilledMammal 8514:BilledMammal 8492: 8463:BilledMammal 8408:BilledMammal 8375:BilledMammal 8335:BilledMammal 8301:BilledMammal 8265:BilledMammal 8234: 8230: 8206:said 24.7k, 8166:BilledMammal 8130:BilledMammal 8013:BilledMammal 8008:discussions. 7976: 7972: 7967: 7963: 7944: 7931:BilledMammal 7906:Please don't 7892:BilledMammal 7882: 7877: 7868: 7846: 7837:ResearchGate 7823: 7810: 7804:homemade gun 7803: 7794: 7765: 7724:BilledMammal 7701:BilledMammal 7694:Saddle Tramp 7680:BilledMammal 7639:BilledMammal 7606:BilledMammal 7567: 7554:BilledMammal 7519: 7516:BilledMammal 7495:BilledMammal 7472:BilledMammal 7407: 7401: 7370:BilledMammal 7352: 7341: 7335: 7322:BilledMammal 7287:BilledMammal 7265:BilledMammal 7226:BilledMammal 7097: 7063:BilledMammal 7054:WP:CONSENSUS 7017:BilledMammal 6995: 6984: 6978: 6964:BilledMammal 6941: 6930: 6908:no consensus 6878:BilledMammal 6821:BilledMammal 6792:BilledMammal 6758:BilledMammal 6730:BilledMammal 6706: 6692:BilledMammal 6678:BilledMammal 6651:JuniperChill 6590:SilverLocust 6556:Slatersteven 6542:BilledMammal 6513:BilledMammal 6503:There was a 6457:me on reply) 6421:BilledMammal 6364:BilledMammal 6359: 6343:demonstrate. 6335: 6289:BilledMammal 6257: 6243: 6222:BilledMammal 6217: 6213:significant. 6201: 6180:BilledMammal 6142:BilledMammal 6123: 6120:WP:ABOUTSELF 6095:BilledMammal 6080: 6068:Gerda Arendt 6059: 6045:BilledMammal 6024:BilledMammal 6012:Right of way 5994:BilledMammal 5955:BilledMammal 5887:BilledMammal 5852:BilledMammal 5831:BilledMammal 5805:BilledMammal 5788:BilledMammal 5767: 5766: 5736:BilledMammal 5731: 5695:BilledMammal 5638:BilledMammal 5609: 5556: 5542:BilledMammal 5540:wasn't met. 5502:BilledMammal 5484:BilledMammal 5451:BilledMammal 5444:La Rinconada 5395:BilledMammal 5372:BilledMammal 5345: 5321:BilledMammal 5288:BilledMammal 5269: 5268: 5220:BilledMammal 5186:BilledMammal 5148:BilledMammal 5081:BilledMammal 5028: 5007:BilledMammal 4992: 4981: 4970: 4959: 4924:BilledMammal 4919: 4915: 4908: 4872:BilledMammal 4851:BilledMammal 4816: 4805: 4758:BilledMammal 4722: 4716: 4661:BilledMammal 4635: 4618: 4607: 4603: 4592: 4588: 4573: 4569: 4560: 4554:(in trial): 4551: 4545:(in trial): 4542: 4527: 4523: 4506: 4487:BilledMammal 4457:BilledMammal 4419:BilledMammal 4368:BilledMammal 4363: 4359: 4316: 4299: 4295: 4286:was undoing 4270:BilledMammal 4247:BilledMammal 4208:BilledMammal 4194:Ask for help 4162:BilledMammal 4133: 4089:BilledMammal 4026:BilledMammal 3981:BilledMammal 3954:BilledMammal 3897:BilledMammal 3855:BilledMammal 3846: 3802:BilledMammal 3790: 3789:Rule 3 says 3746:BilledMammal 3718:BilledMammal 3690:BilledMammal 3633:BilledMammal 3594:Olivia Frank 3580:BilledMammal 3534: 3527: 3517: 3516: 3465:You've been 3460:Just curious 3452:HouseBlaster 3444: 3430: 3416: 3398: 3384: 3370: 3364:BilledMammal 3358:Proposal 16e 3356: 3332: 3328:Proposals 16 3326: 3312: 3298: 3293:HouseBlaster 3276: 3270: 3264: 3250: 3244:Lee Vilenski 3236: 3230:BilledMammal 3222: 3218:Proposals 6c 3216: 3202: 3196:Usedtobecool 3182: 3176: 3166:HouseBlaster 3158: 3125:BilledMammal 3065:BilledMammal 2943: 2939: 2934: 2930: 2904:BilledMammal 2867:BilledMammal 2821:BilledMammal 2798:BilledMammal 2750:BilledMammal 2718:BilledMammal 2703:Move review? 2684:BilledMammal 2663:BilledMammal 2627: 2595:BilledMammal 2570: 2556: 2550: 2549: 2505:BilledMammal 2488:policy creep 2483: 2476: 2468: 2427:BilledMammal 2398:BilledMammal 2370:BilledMammal 2347:Ask for help 2317:" listed at 2284: 2175:referred to 2168:Other issue: 2167: 2115: 2103: 2071: 2065: 2059: 2053: 2047: 2041: 2015: 2009: 2003: 1997: 1991: 1985: 1920:BilledMammal 1889:BilledMammal 1821:BilledMammal 1789:BilledMammal 1760:BilledMammal 1707: 1648:BilledMammal 1619:BilledMammal 1594:BilledMammal 1518:BilledMammal 1409:BilledMammal 1339:BilledMammal 1300:BilledMammal 1264:BilledMammal 1234:BilledMammal 1213:BilledMammal 1185:BilledMammal 1164:BilledMammal 1141: 1078: 1067:the tutorial 1065: 1064:Kindly read 1058: 1044: 939:BilledMammal 929: 905:Austronesier 891:BilledMammal 869: 845:BilledMammal 808:BilledMammal 770:BilledMammal 725:BilledMammal 714: 687:BilledMammal 607: 580:BilledMammal 541:BilledMammal 527:BilledMammal 503:Article Move 429:BilledMammal 388:BilledMammal 383: 336:BilledMammal 315: 293:Baby article 279:BilledMammal 254: 227: 222: 185: 180: 166:BilledMammal 152: 143: 138: 134:Newimpartial 119:Newimpartial 106: 101: 85:BilledMammal 71: 66: 52:BilledMammal 9208:discussion. 9120:move review 8910:Thank you! 8674:Attack page 8595:August 2024 8529:Vice regent 8260:objections. 8214:said 31k+. 7872:. To quote 7153:Sariel Xilo 7078:Sariel Xilo 7040:Sariel Xilo 6912:Sariel Xilo 6674:WP:ASSISTED 6647:DisamAssist 6038:Evangelical 5605:"nutters"). 5002:"conflict". 4843:#Canvassing 4619:Proposal 25 4604:Proposal 24 4589:Proposal 17 4561:Proposal 14 4552:Proposal 13 4543:Proposal 3b 4442:Iskandar323 4412:Iskandar323 4397:Iskandar323 4040:Selfstudier 3995:Selfstudier 3969:Selfstudier 3446:Proposal 28 3432:Proposal 27 3418:Proposal 25 3400:Proposal 24 3386:Proposal 18 3372:Proposal 17 3314:Proposal 14 3300:Proposal 13 3252:Proposal 9b 3178:Proposals 3 2860:WP:INVOLVED 2148:NGO Monitor 2128:NGO Monitor 2119:violations: 1878:concerning. 1534:Some advice 1451:alert/first 1358:BeanieFan11 1333:BeanieFan11 1318:BeanieFan11 1158:Neveselbert 334:Thank you! 9122:, endorsed 8978:Azuredivay 8964:Azuredivay 8727:Asteromyia 8721:Regarding 8482:in whole. 8198:said 39k, 7015:globally. 6620:Jessintime 6358:Regarding 6265:consensus. 6176:WP:ENGLISH 6170:arguments. 5726:As I said 5662:speculate. 5025:Nihil novi 4978:Nihil novi 4324:Talk Page) 4307:Talk Page) 4146:SashiRolls 4083:Jessintime 3686:WP:NOTBURO 3289:Ritchie333 3238:Proposal 7 3204:Proposal 5 3160:Proposal 2 2963:Randy Kryn 2846:Randy Kryn 2578:Talk Page) 2519:Randy Kryn 2482:Regarding 2467:Regarding 2177:Mondoweiss 2117:WP:NOTHERE 2069:block user 2063:filter log 2013:block user 2007:filter log 1615:WP:NATURAL 1551:convinced 1295:negatives. 1278:LUGSTUBS 3 1253:Come on... 1023:Invitation 935:WP:NATURAL 883:Cro-Magnon 877:Page move 511:Ivanvector 8890:xRozuRozu 8797:Viriditas 8760:reasoning 8754:Abductive 8700:Archiving 8624:Svampesky 8578:on reply) 8502:on reply) 8480:this edit 8151:Nishidani 7920:WP:BURDEN 7824:The Trace 7813:The very 7767:firearm". 7657:AndyBloch 7388:July 2024 7308:soibangla 6643:This link 6505:consensus 6467:ABC News? 6349:WP:POLCON 6339:decision. 6203:Consensus 6124:incorrect 6089:over the 5728:at the RM 5615:Morwennol 5516:Morwennol 5302:Same for 5050:Olek Novy 4989:Sleetleos 4288:this edit 4280:this edit 4276:this edit 4112:Nishidani 3871:Panamitsu 3829:Panamitsu 3817:WP:RETAIN 3190:Barkeep49 2835:Close of 2784:JoelleJay 2764:JoelleJay 2736:JoelleJay 2586:involved. 2473:WP:DETCON 2075:block log 2019:block log 1423:Red Fiona 1395:Red Fiona 839:concerns. 491:dlthewave 9286:Levivich 9258:Levivich 9189:Levivich 9145:pushing. 9045:Levivich 9027:Levivich 8574:(Please 8498:(Please 8390:Levivich 8350:Levivich 8318:Levivich 8280:Levivich 8244:Levivich 8239:WP:SYNTH 8126:WP:SYNTH 8104:Levivich 8089:Levivich 8000:Levivich 7985:Levivich 7977:genocide 7914:Levivich 7874:Fuzheado 7855:that one 7566:Thanks! 7548:JoeJShmo 7487:Platybot 7408:31 hours 7336:hundreds 7240:SilkTork 7222:this one 7172:WP:WPDAB 7033:states: 6882:ABC News 6848:SilkTork 6639:New York 6453:(please 6128:SnowFire 6062:such as 5972:Zanahary 5576:A.D.Hope 5574:second. 5561:A.D.Hope 5521:A.D.Hope 5430:You can 5309:kashmīrī 5284:hounding 5235:kashmīrī 5214:Kashmiri 5201:kashmīrī 5180:Kashmiri 5167:kashmīrī 5142:Kashmiri 5033:Marcelus 5019:I hope @ 4780:contribs 4700:May 2024 4677:please? 4657:WP:NOCON 4638:nableezy 4355:suggest. 4186:bare URL 3784:Settlers 3378:SchroCat 3210:SilkTork 2762:Posted. 2442:A.D.Hope 2413:A.D.Hope 2392:A.D.Hope 2335:bare URL 2156:remove!” 2045:contribs 1989:contribs 1962:==Name== 1662:A.D.Hope 1633:A.D.Hope 1291:article. 1227:blugdeon 826:Turnagra 785:Turnagra 751:Turnagra 702:Turnagra 594:Turnagra 9087:against 9085:closed 9062:Me too. 8478:undoes 8450:1rr at 8185:threads 8110:WP:ONUS 7878:charged 7403:blocked 7356:chatter 7098:dislike 6999:chatter 6945:chatter 6649:works? 6528:BusterD 6491:BusterD 6474:BusterD 6455:mention 6383:WP:CONS 6237:WP:CONS 5751:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ 5670:Raladic 5656:WP:VOTE 5497:weight. 5306:pls. — 5021:Piotrus 4956:Piotrus 4718:blocked 4679:Iljhgtn 4675:WP:ONUS 4206:I did? 3922:versus 3843:MOS:EGG 3824:MOS:EGG 3795:MOS:EGG 3467:trouted 2732:sandbox 2364:SunDawn 1706:, says 1590:WP:ONUS 1563:indents 1503:Irtapil 766:WP:NZNC 8855:BD2412 8638:Ahecht 7881:using 7861:, and 7841:PubMed 7817:, and 7796:title. 7431:Drmies 7244:Drmies 7213:Drmies 7198:Drmies 7176:WP:MDC 7166:moved. 7135:Drmies 6958:votes. 6702:Ahecht 6668:Ahecht 6584:. See 6379:WP:DPT 6251:!vote. 6060:things 5365:GTrang 4967:Dƶoxar 4810:second 4723:1 week 4434:Here's 4223:WP:1RR 4142:WP:FOC 4138:source 3976:saying 3875:(talk) 3833:(talk) 3518:Whack! 3291:, and 3275:, and 3079:JDiala 3041:No sig 2993:drafts 2566:& 2131:plot”. 1732:WP:RSN 1704:WP:RSN 1683:taken? 1554:after 1354:WP:WIR 957:Thanks 798:above. 469:Mangoe 455:Mangoe 322:(talk) 8938:Yikes 8712:WP:OR 8235:which 7722:Done 7029:The 6864:Srnec 6814:Whale 6445:Chess 5948:Move+ 5937:that. 5596:WP:UE 5538:WP:UE 4802:first 3424:Femke 3320:Kusma 2933:with 2713:else. 2709:move. 2327:UNRWA 2100:Diffs 1756:WP:AE 1730:- At 1718:- At 1702:- At 1560:many 1557:this 1548:ever 1259:past. 963:(UTC) 516:Edits 449:FOARP 9304:talk 9290:talk 9276:talk 9262:talk 9248:talk 9193:talk 9176:zero 9131:from 9091:more 9049:talk 9035:talk 8982:talk 8968:talk 8954:talk 8943:Move 8916:talk 8842:talk 8814:talk 8799:and 8786:talk 8735:talk 8690:Moxy 8645:PAGE 8643:TALK 8576:ping 8557:talk 8518:talk 8500:ping 8467:talk 8412:talk 8394:talk 8379:talk 8354:talk 8339:talk 8322:talk 8305:talk 8284:talk 8269:talk 8248:talk 8192:IMEU 8170:talk 8155:talk 8134:talk 8093:talk 8017:talk 7989:talk 7964:what 7955:(or 7935:talk 7896:talk 7728:talk 7705:talk 7684:talk 7661:talk 7643:talk 7610:talk 7558:talk 7499:talk 7476:talk 7435:talk 7374:talk 7344:Nate 7326:talk 7312:talk 7291:talk 7269:talk 7248:talk 7230:talk 7202:talk 7184:talk 7180:2pou 7157:talk 7139:talk 7107:talk 7082:talk 7067:talk 7044:talk 7021:talk 6987:Nate 6968:talk 6933:Nate 6916:talk 6894:talk 6890:Οἶδα 6884:and 6868:talk 6852:talk 6825:talk 6796:talk 6776:talk 6762:talk 6748:talk 6734:talk 6709:PAGE 6707:TALK 6682:talk 6655:talk 6624:talk 6606:talk 6560:talk 6546:talk 6532:talk 6517:talk 6495:talk 6478:talk 6449:talk 6425:talk 6391:talk 6385:. -- 6381:and 6368:talk 6352:one. 6336:very 6326:talk 6311:talk 6293:talk 6278:talk 6226:talk 6184:talk 6157:this 6146:talk 6132:talk 6099:talk 6072:talk 6049:talk 6028:talk 5998:talk 5987:here 5959:talk 5905:talk 5891:talk 5856:talk 5835:talk 5809:talk 5792:talk 5740:talk 5699:talk 5674:talk 5642:talk 5619:talk 5610:some 5580:talk 5565:talk 5557:must 5546:talk 5525:talk 5506:talk 5488:talk 5455:talk 5399:talk 5376:talk 5325:talk 5292:talk 5224:talk 5190:talk 5152:talk 5085:talk 5054:talk 5037:talk 5011:talk 4949:move 4928:talk 4890:talk 4886:Nurg 4876:talk 4855:talk 4776:talk 4762:talk 4739:talk 4729:and 4683:talk 4665:talk 4582:and 4536:and 4491:talk 4461:talk 4446:talk 4423:talk 4401:talk 4386:talk 4372:talk 4366:)). 4317:The 4300:The 4251:talk 4212:talk 4166:talk 4116:talk 4093:talk 4044:talk 4030:talk 4015:talk 3999:talk 3985:talk 3958:talk 3931:talk 3901:talk 3890:DECT 3859:talk 3806:talk 3764:talk 3750:talk 3736:talk 3722:talk 3708:talk 3694:talk 3651:talk 3637:talk 3616:talk 3602:talk 3584:talk 3346:Soni 3343:and 3331:and 3221:and 3193:and 3181:and 3129:talk 3097:talk 3083:talk 3069:talk 2967:talk 2952:talk 2908:talk 2893:talk 2871:talk 2850:talk 2825:talk 2802:talk 2796:... 2788:talk 2768:talk 2754:talk 2740:talk 2722:talk 2688:talk 2667:talk 2640:talk 2599:talk 2571:The 2543:P.S. 2523:talk 2509:talk 2446:talk 2431:talk 2417:talk 2402:talk 2374:talk 2337:and 2299:talk 2057:logs 2039:talk 2034:Name 2001:logs 1983:talk 1938:talk 1924:talk 1910:talk 1893:talk 1854:talk 1839:talk 1825:talk 1811:talk 1793:talk 1778:talk 1764:talk 1666:talk 1652:talk 1637:talk 1623:talk 1598:talk 1585:you. 1545:was 1542:one 1522:talk 1507:talk 1427:talk 1413:talk 1399:talk 1362:talk 1343:talk 1322:talk 1304:talk 1268:talk 1238:talk 1217:talk 1189:talk 1168:talk 1080:HERE 943:talk 909:talk 895:talk 849:talk 830:talk 812:talk 789:talk 774:talk 755:talk 729:talk 706:talk 691:talk 598:talk 584:talk 545:talk 531:talk 473:talk 459:talk 433:talk 410:talk 392:talk 384:that 340:talk 283:talk 210:talk 170:talk 123:talk 89:talk 56:talk 28:ping 9324:COI 8693:🍁 8231:who 8220:May 8218:in 8216:VOA 8212:Jan 8210:in 8204:Jan 8202:in 8196:Jul 8194:in 8182:two 8113:so. 8031:In 7973:war 7968:how 7945:any 7849:s, 7429:. 7178:. - 7057:x". 6979:not 6387:Joy 6322:Joy 6307:Joy 6274:Joy 5782:Liz 4642:- 4612:): 4597:): 4578:): 4532:): 4225:at 4190:Fix 4136:. ( 3943:RSN 3535:Kip 3528:The 3334:16c 3278:21b 2557:can 2343:Fix 2333:A " 2218:If 2104:how 1539:no 1178:Ygm 1110:of 445:on 265::) 228:Eng 186:Eng 144:Eng 107:Eng 72:Eng 9306:) 9292:) 9278:) 9264:) 9250:) 9223:, 9195:) 9142:is 9051:) 9037:) 8984:) 8970:) 8956:) 8918:) 8900:) 8896:• 8844:) 8816:) 8788:) 8737:) 8636:-- 8570:VR 8559:) 8551:. 8520:) 8494:VR 8469:) 8414:) 8396:) 8381:) 8356:) 8341:) 8324:) 8307:) 8286:) 8271:) 8250:) 8172:) 8157:) 8136:) 8095:) 8035:: 8019:) 7991:) 7937:) 7898:) 7857:, 7853:, 7839:, 7835:, 7730:) 7707:) 7686:) 7663:) 7645:) 7612:) 7582:mo 7579:Sh 7570:Jo 7560:) 7534:mo 7531:Sh 7522:Jo 7501:) 7478:) 7437:) 7418:. 7376:) 7328:) 7314:) 7293:) 7271:) 7250:) 7232:) 7204:) 7186:) 7159:) 7141:) 7109:) 7084:) 7069:) 7046:) 7023:) 6970:) 6918:) 6896:) 6870:) 6854:) 6827:) 6798:) 6778:) 6764:) 6750:) 6736:) 6700:-- 6698:. 6684:) 6657:) 6641:. 6626:) 6608:) 6593:💬 6588:. 6562:) 6548:) 6534:) 6519:) 6497:) 6480:) 6451:) 6427:) 6393:) 6370:) 6328:) 6320:-- 6313:) 6295:) 6280:) 6228:) 6186:) 6148:) 6134:) 6101:) 6074:) 6051:) 6030:) 6000:) 5961:) 5907:) 5893:) 5858:) 5837:) 5811:) 5794:) 5771:iz 5757:) 5742:) 5701:) 5676:) 5644:) 5621:) 5582:) 5567:) 5548:) 5527:) 5508:) 5490:) 5457:) 5401:) 5378:) 5327:) 5294:) 5273:iz 5226:) 5192:) 5154:) 5087:) 5056:) 5039:) 5013:) 4930:) 4892:) 4878:) 4857:) 4782:) 4778:/ 4764:) 4741:) 4685:) 4667:) 4493:) 4463:) 4448:) 4425:) 4403:) 4388:) 4374:) 4296:is 4266:– 4253:) 4214:) 4192:| 4184:A 4168:) 4118:) 4095:) 4046:) 4032:) 4017:) 4001:) 3987:) 3960:) 3933:) 3903:) 3861:) 3808:) 3766:) 3752:) 3738:) 3724:) 3710:) 3696:) 3688:. 3653:) 3639:) 3618:) 3604:) 3586:) 3287:, 3272:21 3269:, 3224:6d 3184:3b 3131:) 3099:) 3085:) 3071:) 2969:) 2954:) 2910:) 2895:) 2873:) 2852:) 2827:) 2804:) 2790:) 2770:) 2756:) 2742:) 2734:. 2724:) 2690:) 2669:) 2642:) 2636:JM 2601:) 2525:) 2511:) 2448:) 2433:) 2419:) 2404:) 2376:) 2345:| 2301:) 1940:) 1926:) 1912:) 1895:) 1856:) 1841:) 1827:) 1813:) 1795:) 1780:) 1766:) 1668:) 1654:) 1639:) 1625:) 1600:) 1524:) 1509:) 1454:}} 1448:{{ 1429:) 1415:) 1401:) 1364:) 1345:) 1324:) 1306:) 1270:) 1240:) 1219:) 1191:) 1170:) 945:) 930:is 911:) 897:) 881:→ 851:) 832:) 814:) 791:) 776:) 757:) 731:) 708:) 693:) 600:) 586:) 547:) 533:) 519:) 513:(/ 475:) 461:) 435:) 412:) 394:) 342:) 285:) 212:) 172:) 125:) 91:) 58:) 9302:( 9288:( 9274:( 9260:( 9246:( 9191:( 9047:( 9033:( 8980:( 8966:( 8952:( 8914:( 8898:c 8894:t 8892:( 8862:T 8840:( 8812:( 8803:: 8795:@ 8784:( 8762:) 8758:( 8733:( 8718:. 8658:) 8654:( 8648:) 8640:( 8622:@ 8555:( 8531:: 8527:@ 8516:( 8491:. 8465:( 8410:( 8392:( 8377:( 8352:( 8337:( 8320:( 8303:( 8282:( 8267:( 8246:( 8168:( 8153:( 8132:( 8106:: 8102:@ 8091:( 8015:( 8002:: 7998:@ 7987:( 7933:( 7916:: 7912:@ 7894:( 7726:( 7703:( 7682:( 7659:( 7641:( 7608:( 7602:: 7598:@ 7576:J 7573:e 7556:( 7550:: 7546:@ 7528:J 7525:e 7514:@ 7497:( 7474:( 7433:( 7372:( 7359:) 7353:( 7349:• 7324:( 7310:( 7289:( 7267:( 7246:( 7228:( 7215:: 7211:@ 7200:( 7182:( 7155:( 7137:( 7105:( 7080:( 7065:( 7042:( 7019:( 7002:) 6996:( 6992:• 6966:( 6948:) 6942:( 6938:• 6914:( 6892:( 6866:( 6850:( 6823:( 6794:( 6774:( 6760:( 6746:( 6732:( 6712:) 6704:( 6690:@ 6680:( 6670:: 6666:@ 6653:( 6622:( 6604:( 6582:] 6578:] 6558:( 6544:( 6530:( 6515:( 6493:( 6476:( 6447:( 6423:( 6389:( 6366:( 6324:( 6309:( 6291:( 6276:( 6224:( 6182:( 6144:( 6130:( 6097:( 6070:( 6047:( 6026:( 5996:( 5989:. 5975:꧂ 5969:꧁ 5957:( 5903:( 5889:( 5854:( 5848:: 5844:@ 5833:( 5807:( 5790:( 5784:: 5780:@ 5768:L 5755:ᴛ 5753:( 5738:( 5697:( 5672:( 5640:( 5617:( 5598:. 5578:( 5563:( 5544:( 5523:( 5504:( 5486:( 5453:( 5427:. 5397:( 5374:( 5367:: 5363:@ 5323:( 5290:( 5270:L 5222:( 5216:: 5212:@ 5188:( 5182:: 5178:@ 5150:( 5144:: 5140:@ 5083:( 5076:. 5052:( 5035:( 5009:( 4996:) 4991:( 4987:@ 4984:) 4980:( 4976:@ 4973:) 4969:( 4965:@ 4962:) 4958:( 4954:@ 4926:( 4888:( 4874:( 4853:( 4819:. 4795:: 4791:@ 4774:( 4760:( 4737:( 4681:( 4663:( 4606:( 4591:( 4572:( 4526:( 4489:( 4459:( 4444:( 4421:( 4414:: 4410:@ 4399:( 4384:( 4370:( 4322:( 4305:( 4272:: 4268:@ 4264:) 4260:( 4249:( 4210:( 4196:) 4164:( 4114:( 4091:( 4085:: 4081:@ 4042:( 4028:( 4013:( 3997:( 3983:( 3971:: 3967:@ 3956:( 3929:( 3899:( 3868:— 3857:( 3849:. 3819:. 3804:( 3762:( 3748:( 3734:( 3720:( 3706:( 3692:( 3649:( 3635:( 3629:: 3625:@ 3614:( 3600:( 3582:( 3576:: 3572:@ 3469:. 3413:. 3127:( 3095:( 3081:( 3067:( 2965:( 2950:( 2906:( 2891:( 2869:( 2848:( 2823:( 2800:( 2786:( 2766:( 2752:( 2738:( 2720:( 2686:( 2665:( 2638:( 2597:( 2576:( 2521:( 2507:( 2479:. 2444:( 2429:( 2415:( 2400:( 2394:: 2390:@ 2372:( 2366:: 2362:@ 2349:) 2313:" 2297:( 2226:) 2077:) 2072:· 2066:· 2060:· 2054:· 2048:· 2042:· 2037:( 2021:) 2016:· 2010:· 2004:· 1998:· 1992:· 1986:· 1981:( 1936:( 1922:( 1908:( 1891:( 1852:( 1837:( 1823:( 1809:( 1791:( 1776:( 1762:( 1664:( 1650:( 1635:( 1621:( 1596:( 1520:( 1505:( 1425:( 1411:( 1397:( 1360:( 1341:( 1335:: 1331:@ 1320:( 1302:( 1288:: 1284:@ 1266:( 1236:( 1215:( 1187:( 1166:( 1160:: 1156:@ 1090:. 1083:. 941:( 907:( 893:( 847:( 828:( 810:( 787:( 772:( 753:( 727:( 704:( 689:( 596:( 582:( 543:( 529:( 494:☎ 471:( 457:( 451:: 447:@ 431:( 408:( 390:( 338:( 281:( 223:E 208:( 181:E 168:( 139:E 121:( 102:E 87:( 67:E 54:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.