User talk:Anthony Bradbury/Archive16

3951:. Your sock accounts are all blocked, and you should avoid them completely under all circumstances. Make no attempt to do anything with them. If I can help with the topic you wish to edit I am happy to do so (assuming that it satisfies Knowledge criteria), but unless you say what the topic is I am unable to confirm my ability to help. On your talkpage there is, down the margin on the left, a menu list. One of the options is "tools". If a list does not appear below this, click on it and a list will appear; you will see that the sixth item on the list is "e-mail this user". To e-mail an admin go to the admin's talk page and, on his page, click on "e-mail this user". A page appears on which you can type as you wish; there is a "send" button on the page for when you are ready to do so. -- 1558: 4015:. In 2013, Pramukh was suspected for sexually abusing two other gurus. According to the conversation on the talk page in the past, these accusations should not be placed on in a Controversy section in Knowledge page because he is “relatively unknown outside of India” but in this website of the group, it states that “Spread across the world, the BAPS Global Network is composed of more than 1100 mandirs and 3,850 centers.” In the drop down list there is over 100 locations in the USA and UK and they are building the world’s largest temple in New Jersey. So it is safe to say that this he is well known to millions of people around the world as a deity and guru. The sect has also responded to the allegations and multiple third party sites verify the accusations. 1513:, in which the editor acknowledges that his/her use of multiple accounts was unacceptable, and undertakes not to do the same again. My own feeling is that, as far as the sockpuppetry issue is concerned, there is no reason not to take the editor's statement as made in good faith, and since the block no longer serves any preventive purpose, if sockpuppetry were the only issue, I would be happy to unblock. However, I am less than 100% comfortable about unblocking an editor with a clear conflict of interest, who is here only to promote a point of view, and who has vigorously done so through nearly 2000 edits in a few months. Maybe you would like to look at the unblock request and my comments about it, and indicate whether you have any opinion on the matter. 5220:

this one in form to acceptance I would like to do more writing. I also actually am using this as a way to work on my writing skills. I am serious about this and have taken Evil Beavers page on as I noticed it had been denied several times and I like a challenge. So I have poured hours of research time into locating sources and information to try my hand at creation of a legit article on the band. I know the article is not perfect and am working on it as I get time to focus on it. Will you please release it and link this article to it as the submitted draft?

496: 57: 5738: 1803: 2668:. Your draft article has been restored. It was deleted because it hadn't been worked on for six months. Please be sure to add sources that are independent of organizations related to Mr. Julian - news reports, magazine or journal articles, books, etc., which discuss him and his contributions. Then please submit it for inclusion in the main encyclopedia, because the "Articles for creation" area of Knowledge is only a temporary area for articles that are being prepared for the encyclopedia. — 5695: 3834: 373: 3254:, I appreciate the efforts to maintain copyright rights but the content that was deleted is part of a disciplinary framework and the editor who added the content to Bitrum was Prof. Søren Brier who developed the framework. He was the one who gave me the content as he wants to ensure that the description of Cybersemiotics stays the same independent of the venue. Nonetheless, I worked many hours making the entry specially for Knowledge. I am not sure how to proceed right now. 4667: 705: 2576:

place where information of that sort gets logged so that it can be reviewed later. Is that the same here? And if so, is it publicly accessible in a place that I could be pointed towards? If not, that's perfectly fine and I understand, but given that my interaction with Knowledge has been rather limited to date, I've found that my unintended involvement in this administrative action has led to my curiosity piquing with regards to how such things are processed.

4265:(p. 174). I had noted unusual activity on the article, several days ago, when an IP user was adding new honors like "All-American," etc. -- and I work a lot with college football All-American articles. Clay was not picked in the 2008 NFL Draft. Before I could explore the article's claims further, someone else nominated the article for AfD. Anyway, Clay does exist, and did play for Clemson; beyond that, I cannot yet say. I thought you should know. 1115:

respond to my formatting question; another user eventually fixed my error, but I'm still not totally sure what caused it in the first place (spacing issues, I'm sure, but I know nothing more specific than that). I won't take it personally, as I'm sure you're busy IRL, and I am too. Would you be able to point me in the direction of another potential adopter? Either way, thanks, and I'm sure I'll see you from time to time on the site.

966:

whether this has been the subject of much debate amongst you and your colleagues, and whether any of this discussion is available for me to read? In the meantime, I would be grateful if you could return the deleted material so that querents can read what shall soon be a much improved article. Actually I feel a little bit embrassed by the fact that the page is currently no. 2 on a google search but only end up with

336: 193: 2364:" which was created by me? You have cited that it is a "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion" article. But in reality this article is about an organization of social workers. Does writing about an organization of social workers seem like an advertisement to you? This organization is 100% genuine and it is situated at Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. If you still don't believe me, here is the map link: 1988: 3093:? I have been working with editors for a very long time now making all necessary changes to get this page up and abide by Knowledge guidelines. Please restore this page so I can continue modifying it until it meets the guidelines. I have been working with almost two months worth of progress and was making significant progress and have put in significant time on this article. Thank you. 39:. You deleted the article two minutes later, so I would never have had an opportunity to address any copyvio issue. Yes, there is plenty on here that needs to be deleted, and I'm not questioning the reasonableness of your decision, but people need more two minutes to address issues! Would it be possible to restore the article and I will deal with any issues within 48 hours. 4710:. It was not a well written stub, true, and it did have an encyclopedically-superfluous personal comment (a very friendly and good-faith comment actually), but it is a valid topic and did attempt to define the meaning. I was personally looking at redirecting the article to something pre-existing but wasn't sure what that should be. Any suggestions? 2935:, which states "Athletes from any sport are presumed notable if they have competed at the Summer or Winter Olympic games". Since this is at least an assertion of notability, it does not qualify for speedy deletion under A7. Also, for good measure, I've at added at least a basic reference to the page so that said status is at least not in question. 2631:"The sources are by Colleen M. McCorkell of NCAR, reporting the archiving of the extensive papers created by this meteorologist at NCAR. These are not the best sources, but they are valid. See also other improvements to content and referencing of the article, on a clearly noteworthy scientist. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 19:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)" 4128:? Literally minutes after placing the cited allegations information in the article after having it up on the talk page for a week, a user who has already tried to question your unblocking decision, reverted the edit because it "sounds like gossip." This is the patrolling of the articles that I had to deal with initially. Please help. Thank you 5138:

policy. One of my students completed this entry and, although it is true that he cut and pasted it from his word document onto wikipedia, it is well-researched, accurate, is not plagiarized and doesn't violate any copyrights. Could you please restore it as it is an important topic that warrants an entry. Thanks, Anna Pegler-Gordon.

4992:

again or if you feel her is vandalizing, then by all means make a report to the relevant place. But second-guessing a previous discussion is, in my opinion, not helpful to the project or anyone here. As far as I am concerned the matter is closed unless there is any fresh concern raised about this editor's activity since his unblock. --

3907:-- she has had solo exhibitions, her work is in major collections, she is in the Union List of Artists, etc. So I created it for her. If it's OK, I'm planning to go ahead and copy my draft to a new page under her name (without the editing history of my draft). I've never met her. She's in London, and I'm in Tokyo. Thanks. -- 2601:, where I have been working over this lunch to improve the references and address other issues? You literally deleted this while I was in the cycle of reviewing my changes, before putting them up on the Talk page. Please. Any replies other than action, please reply here, I am watching in real time. Thank you. Le Prof 535:"promotional." He is pulling from my bio/CV which may be throwing too much into the mix... I am writing to say that I am a real person and am not trying to promote anything - just trying to support my Nephew in creating a successful page. I'd like to help David out - any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. 527:

trade association, and have designed over a dozen digital domes worldwide including the Library of Alexandria planetarium in Egypt and Papalote Museo in Mexico City. I looked at some of my colleagues' Knowledge bios and realized that my background was comparable. David therefore offered to create the page for me.

3291:

copyright violation. I do not know what you mean by calling the article part of a disciplinary framework, and a verbal consent for publication given by the original author is wholly inadequate here. I gather that you are not the owner of the copyright? If so the procedure is complicated. I suggest you go to

2741:, which makes your previous posting redundant; in fact, I wonder why you made it. Anne has answered your initial question correctly; articles awaiting submission for review, or failing review, which have not thereafter been edited for at least six months may be deleted, and usually are. Yours was one such.-- 2568:, and I'm saying that in all sincerity. Despite being collateral damage, I won't try to contest it further, since I already have a previously-registered account and I can appreciate why a rangeblock may be necessary. I sincerely appreciate that you took the time to read through my request and respond. 5454:

The article needs to be moved to a more appropriate title. "Bannwald" is ok, except that very few people would think to search for it, were they so minded, under its German title. Neither "protected" nor "preserved" are entirely accurate; how about "German forests with restricted entry"? Cumbersome I

4975:

Anthony, you were aware of his socking? I cannot believe this user at all, I think he is harmful for this website. Yes everyone deserves 1 million chances but this user has socked too much and he has not contributed into any other wikipedia's sister project that could make any of us believe on him. 6

3592:

My page (Jeff Opdyke) has been fully deleted while in the process of working on it. I have for several weeks been working on revisions to make it meet Knowledge requirements and it was near completion. The progress I have made has taken me many many weeks, and I have now also lost the place to review

3566:

2170:

They were playing the same stupid game as IvanOS was. Neither of them are anywhere close to newbies and they really should know better than to edit war over a single word whose existence or lack thereof has no meaning to the vast majority of English readers. It's just plain ridiculous that we have to

1654:

Didn't you have a thought that not Knowledge page, but that content you found infringes copyrights? Did you check which content was created first? Following your logic, anyone can create webpage on some subject copying content of Knowledge, put (c) onto that newly created page, and apply to Knowledge

1326:

Far worse as this book is part of his life we are effectively barred from an entry in Wikepdia of a citizen as worthy of inclusion as any other. i would also like to know why the first review only asked for references and how much this deletion is a matter of personal bias and how much actually rests

570:

Ok, I have found the page. I have got to say that it still appears promotional (promoting yourself) and although it was not a given reason for deletion, asserted notability is questionable. You may have noticed that the article was deleted in rapid succession by three admins, of which I was the last.

3430:

and I can provide written permission for the entry Cybersemiotics that was questioned as violating copyrights. Nonetheless I understand now that I should try to explain with my own words instead of copying from reliable references. My only concern is that because the text describes a theory it would

3257:

Can the deletion be reverted? I will gladly fix any citation problems and provide any proof of copyrights and/or work the parts that could be different from the Bitrum entry. Unfortunately I do not have the latest edit of the Cybersemiotics entry and without the entry I can't ask for the scholars in

2769:

No such good fortune. Rankersbo, instead of receiving and reviewing the revised submission (16 citations, sections, and an info box, etc.), instead re-received the originally rejected and deleted draft (3 citations, one a dead URL, and otherwise a mess)—and therefore rejected it… without a look at

2090:

I have restored the article; it still fails as written to aver notability. I have put a hold tag on the talk page, but it will still be deleted (by another admin) if left in its present state. A valid reference, which is present, does not of itself confer notability, although it certainly helps, and

1694:

Submission had already been declined, as you say,more than twelve months previously, as being non-notable. The article of which this appeared to be a copyright violation was modified by you, it appears, in January of this year. I have no way of telling how extensive the modification was, nor whether

965:

This means that increasingly community members see the simple of establishing links to other language Wikipedias, which contain substantial pages on the subject in question, is an assertion of notability. However, you claim that this should be treated as "not relevant". I would be interested to know

526:

Greetings. My nephew David Lantz asked why I did not have a Knowledge page since I have spoken at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences on the future of cinema, have scores of articles published including a peer-reviewed journal, am invited to keynote at conferences, co-founded a thriving

5219:

I am trying to create a article for a Band Evil Beaver and noticed the the name space Evil Beaver is locked from creating a page. I am asking if you will unlock it so I can use it for my article I am working on. I am trying to create my first article and really trying to learn the ropes. Once I get

3929:

I wanted to know what I need to do to correctly start editing and moving on from a approved unblock requested. I am not sure how to handle clearing or archiving my user page and talk page and what to do with my sock accounts. I searched for a guide and wasn't able to located any information on this

3660:

Thank you. I had not picked up on the name of the second (or first) account, but the degree of intransigence shown here is a degree which I can recall encountering previously only once or twice in the last seven years. Why he wants two accounts is not clear to me, given that his stated reason makes

2754:

Thank you for your attention, and apologies if the assessment of non-responsiveness was unfair. I have had a week full of Admins like RHaworth that treat people poorly and deletions with a cavalier attitude. Your deletion as I worked came in the midst of this, and I likely over-interpreted silence,

2722:

You complain about my lack of response, and I feel that your complain is wholly unreasonable. Your first request is timed at 19.14 yesterday: as it happens I was otherwise engaged at that time. There is no requirement that admins, even the more active ones which I am, should be on call at all hours

1815:

We haven't properly met yet, but I have seen the tireless work you've done around the site warning users and reviewing unblock requests. While those tasks can be tedious and sometimes irritating, I really appreciate that you have taken the time to commit to them. Please keep up the fantastic work.

1760:

Thanks. I know that there are many edits (proper ones too), required to get into admin, but one cannot deny that even a person with high number of edits can be stated as one without any reasonable knowledge. I know, I have not done many edits, but I am trying to get into a proper course of editing.

1322:

I was asked the reference all material in this article which i have done but you have deleted it due to a portion of the entry being about the non-fiction book Eden - The Long walk to Justice. As Jonathan Ball's life is important and all references to the three cases fought were referenced i do not

5592:

No, with respect I should not. Admins make their own decisions, although these are susceptible to change in the event of dispute. In my opinion your article, which mentions neither Gujarat nor India, does not adequately infer notability. you have two options. If you wish I will post your text here

4991:

Yes, I am aware of his past history of socking. As was the admin who blocked him, with whom I had a discussion before, after the usual 6-month edit-free period, I unblocked him. All of the socks remain permanently blocked. I really do not understand your problem here. If you suspect him of socking

4864:

This is the specific style harassment I get from members of this group. I have not made one edit to an article, just opened up a discussion and this guy jumps down my throat to change my user name. I have asked him on my talk page to explain why. I hope he can provide a better example then a false

4749:

Sorry, but I do not feel that the content is significantly meaningful. As an aside, and not of course a deletion qualification, the title is spelled incorrectly. And, as you say, the personal comment is wholly superfluous. The article summarises as being a statement that when one looks in a mirror

4018:

So the point is that I believe that a controversy section with these allegations it is warranted with the sect’s response to the allegations. This should be included on the Knowledge page unless there are greater reasons that I am missing not to. Please let me know. I can write the section for you

3705:

I would not ever consider an unblock without discussion with the blocking admin, as I hope you would know (I have been here some long time). And as you will appreciate I was not aware of the identity of the other account until now. Blanking talk pages may be seen as acceptable, if one assumes that

3611:

I understand things cannot be plagiarized. The writing you are referring to was originally created by someone who was authorized my permission to use it. I would be happy to change it further to make sure it is not the same. I however, did not save any of my work (or my sources) outside of here on

3348:

Thanks for your response! The content posted is the official description of the framework according to Prof. Brier. It should not be an interpretation. I can have the written authorization but I need the text as I did not make a copy. Can you please revert the deletion so I could at least have the

2484:

Paco Ahlgren was speedily deleted with the reason cited 'No indication of importance'. However, the article referred to two awards the author had won. Therefore, the outcome couldn't be 'no indication of importance', at most it would have to be 'insufficient indication of importance' if you felt

1727:

I think a better path is to create a smaller stub with robust sourcing that establishes notability for this computer through 3rd party reliable sources. You should also talk to someone about the copyright on your wiki- it may be incompatible with that of Knowledge so if wiki content is ever copied

1712:

Anthony, I do not see your point. It was declined a year ago (BTW, is "notability" measurable - or it is up to personal judgement of reviewer?), then elaborated and sent for another review. Academic or not, the result is that article was killed without considering it again. Would you please return

946:

I am justified, in principle, because I am an admin here (for nearly seven years), and that is one thing that admins are entrusted with the ability to do. As to this specific page, I deleted it because it was a very short article containing no assertion of notability. Linkage to other wikis is not

5137:

Hi ... I'm interested in the deletion of the page on the 1991 Armed Forces Immigration Adjustment Act. I am a professor at Michigan State University. In my undergraduate senior seminar on US immigration policy, I have students complete or revise a wikipedia entry about a topic in US immigration

4736:

A3 is a more correct tag than G1, that is correct. But I still argue that there was indeed meaningful content, and that the article subject is indeed notable. It should not have been speedied but at the very least redirected. Can you suggest an article that this title could be redirected towards?

2889:

Hello Anthony Bradbury, I am very concerned of the aggressive language you used to block Grfr12345's request to be unblocked, posing as aggressive and intimidating by saying 'These are good questions, why did you?'. You also used this question to accuse Grfr12345 of something he may be wrongfully

2575:

as a matter of curiosity, I was trying to find out what that range had done that warranted the block in the first place, since I was only able to track down one IP address related to what I would presume was a vandalism spree. Most of the (much smaller) wikis I've used or administrated have had a

1887:

I personally wrote that page (with another administrator), and it certainly was not a soap box or a personal vendetta on my part. It even appeared on the main page in the DYK section. I also wasn't notified about the speedy deletion by the nominator, therefore didn't know about the nomination to

984:

I am aware that you have been here for many years, and have a significant editing experience.. to answer your specific question, I am not aware of any debate on the topic in question; as you probably know debate on established policies is normally only initiated if a significant policy change has

4642:

This was not a vacuous legal threat. It was a very clear and unambiguous threat, which requires an equally clear and unambigious retraction and disavowal. If you feel that asking for a commitment not to repeat the threat is inappropriate then so be it, but in my personal view this requirement is

3361:

Publications within BITrum frame, as well as the content of its websites are protected under a Creative Commons Atribución-Sin Derivadas 3.0 España License. Public reproduction, distribution and communications is allowed whenever the work and its authors are properly quoted, using as responsible

3290:

I am sorry that you were unable to respond to the deletion notification. One hour is the usual time allowed for a response, but obviously on occasion circumstances can prevent such a response from occurring. The article was deleted, not because of any problem with citations, but because it was a

1778:

My friend, I am not trying to put you down; I just do not think you are ready yet, and I am certain that this is going to be the general feeling shown. It is a fact of life that a meaningful number of edits will be needed; as I say, about 3000 is the minimum which most people will accept. And at

1130:

I don't take it personally, and you are partially correct; Although I have in my time created a significant number of articles, mainly relating to pre-dreadnought battleships, Roman emperors and medical conditions, I have of late edited almost entirely in the admin sphere. I am sorry not to have

1114:

Hi, Tony. With all due respect, I think I will decline your offer of adoption. If I'm going to be adopted, I'd like it to be by someone who does more editing within the article namespace, as I think that will always be my primary focus on this site. It also bothered me a bit that you declined to

5469:

Hi, and thanks for pondering about a more appropriate name. That is difficult, because the meaning differs. However, a Bannwald is not a forest with restricted entry, but where certain restrictions are in force. One definition given in the English wiktionary for "ban" in the paragraph about its

3067:

It is not exactly clear what you mean. If you are asking me to restore the article on this, my talkpage, the answer is no. If you are asking for it to be restored in article-space, then I must say that in my opinion it is not an article which deserves a place in Knowledge, although you have the

2696:

Tony, with deep respect for your person (as judged by your User page), and for your efforts performed at Knowledge: If you are not responsive to editors (as it appears you do not currently have time to be, see last several unanswered entries above), should you be deleting articles? Should you

2616:

The appearance of the new info box, and new references, and haphazard appearance of the article, alongside the following comment, had to make clear than an edit was in process at time of your deletion. Please, revert, so I can finish; reject the finished product, and not what I was in midst of

1658:

I hope you have looked at the submitted page's history, and saw that this page was declined more than year ago, and created even much earlier. I was told that Knowledge (represented by you) immediately deleted the article without even rejecting it on the unverified basis (please describe which

3644:

I've commented there about the other account. Its identity has not been a secret for at least a few years, yet they refuse to coherently explain why an alt is needed for certain topics. They once asked at ANI if they could select which account was blocked, and switch back and forth as needed.

1695:

it was radical or trivial. As the article had in any case been rejected the copyright issue appears to be academic. Incidentally, when you post a comment onto a talk page, it is helpful if you sign your post; either by adding ~~~~ or by clicking on the pencil icon at the top of the text box.--

534:

I can provide David with verifiable evidence of any content as requested, but without knowing what is triggering the rejections, I am at a loss to help him. And he believes that he has been blacklisted and blocked from posting anything. One reason given for deletions is that the content is

5673:

I have left the talk page, with a warning comment, on the basis that nobody is going to find it under its current labeling. I will watch to ensure that he does not transclude it into article pace. Note that the userpage dates from September last year and the talk page from four months ago.

926:

page, bearing in mind I had spent considerable energy ensuring that the page on your English Knowledge to make sure it was linked to both the German and the Serbia pages. Yet you, with all the wisdom you could muster have deleted the page. Why7 Please tell me why? I really want to know why

556:

Could you please tell me either the name of the page in question (the page under "Ed Lantz" is very short, and I suspect not the page you are talking about) or else the name of the account under which he edits. I need one or the other to find and review the article, which I am happy to do.

5245:

As you may be aware the original article was deleted by another admin some two years after my involvement, and the salting admin has commented on the current draft page. The draft is also awaiting review. I suggest you contact either the salting admin or the last admin to delete; I am

4099:

If he has been publicly accused of an offence, or has appeared in Court on a charge, and if there are reputable third-party and uninvolved references to back up the statements made, then the accusations can be mentioned. If they remain unproven unsubstantiated or unreferenced then by

5443:, because there is no English term that encompasses the German word's multiple historical meanings, though today it mostly boils down to "protected forest" or "forest preserve". So I'm wondering if I should just move it to "Bannwald". Any thoughts? Thanks in advance for your input. 2784:

Good news: Editor Rankersbo, realizing that he had rejected the Julian draft on the basis of viewing an earlier (and not the best, actual review draft) reversed his decision, and the article is back in queue. Cheers, again apologies, and thank you for your understanding. Le Prof

4865:

comparison to priestsucks. Please keep an eye out for these kinds of forms of undermining critical research about the topics. I read the username policy and I do not find my user name in violation of any policies and neither does a administrator but this person specifically does?

3431:

be best to use the description defined by the theorist who created it. I am working on a new article on Cybersemiotics and I am wondering if you could make the deleted article available for two days so I can have a better picture of what I have done wrong and where I can improve.

2405:

An organization does not have to be profit-making in order for an article about it to be promotional. I could also have cited lack of assertion of notability as a valid deletion reason, so I do not feel that restoring the article is appropriate. Feel free to take your request to

2295:

it is mentioned as per point 4 that the person is notable by winning and ATP Challenger event, and although not mentioned there that they need to have a world highest ranking of 255, he definitely fulfilled that right now. Is it not good enough for the article to be recreated?

134:

I am sure that the lady is genuine; there are, however, large numbers of actresses in India and notability here is not asserted. References alone are an insufficient assertion. If I restore the article are you happy to add whatever information makes her notable above other

5029:

Im on my mobile so checking things goes slow. You are correct that the account exists, my bad for the confusion. Those userpages were not made by this user. And any links to these pages were made by yet another user. I probably should have mentioned thatt. All the best,

4624:

Merely deleting your legal threat is not sufficient. You are required to specifically state that you disavow any legal threat made by you against Knowledge and any of its editors in relation to any edit made here, and that you agree not to make any such threats in the

2208:

I don't think you really need my permission. I'm certainly not going to block-war with you over that :) I don't block people very often, so if you have more experience doing that and you are certain an adjustment would be an improvement, please feel free to intervene.

4030:

The criteria for Biographies of living persons accused of a crime states that only if the person is considered unknown, then editors should give serious consideration to not include material in any article suggesting that the person has accused of committing a crime.

5470:

etymology is "to command", i.e. to give orders or directives which in itself is a privilege and comprises the right to grant privileges. However, a lengthy explanation is not a good title, and I'm still deliberating. Perhaps something like "privileged forests". --

1131:

answered your query; possibly the fact that I recently spent some three weeks in hospital after a heart attack and three operations, followed by a period of convalescence, may have had something to do with it. To find an adopter you can do no better than going to

3965:

Minor correction; the e-mail link only appears as I describe it if e-mail is enabled. It does not show on your page because you have not enabled e-mail (it is not compulsory), but all admins are required to enable the e-mail link, so my instructions are correct.

1148:

Wow, I had no clue about that. I lost my grandfather to heart disease when I was ten (his eighth heart attack), so I certainly understand how serious those issues can be. I hope you make a full return to the pink of health, and sorry if I seemed insensitive.

2755:

and the few Talk entries to which you had not responded. Cheers, and here's hoping for a speedy end to this "public service effort" (my retrieving a bio of a meteorologist from the deletion pile). I normally write on chemistry and pharma. Cheers. Le Prof

5428:

Hello Anthony, and thanks for your speedy deletion of the above-named article this morning. The author has re-created it, this time as a translated version of the de.wiki article. But the name is still nonsense--a completely non-existent term in English.

960:

Hi, Tony, thanks for that. Wow, an admin for nearly 7 years! That's great. I am starting to understand your feelings. However, I sometimes wonder whether admins of such long standing might take a while to understand the impact of new devlopments such as

5436:, made no reply to the message I placed on his/her talkpage, and is not a communicative editor from what I can tell, but seemingly one of those non-native speakers who likes to practice English on here on en.wiki without interacting with editors here. 1892:

are only to Canadian Conservative politicians, I suspect he is the one who has the issue. I would appreciate your restoring the page, I would do it myself, but think it would be improper as the creator without mentioning it to you first. Much thanks,

3379:

Like i said before I do not have access to the content, but whatever part was taken from Bitrum I did reference it. Maybe the quotation was not properly placed and I will definitely work with the editors of Bitrum and Prof. Søren Brier who wrote the

3930:

particular topic. I appreciate the unblock and also wanted help on a topic that I wanted to edit but I know it's a controversial topic so I just needed some help. Please let me know. Also how do we e-mail admins? Is there a link that I am missing?

3475:

It remains that, as of the deletion date, there was no article in Knowledge about the artist. The article therefore qualifies for deletion; in the event of an article about the performer being accepted in Knowledge the deletion could be reviewed.

1002:

The article is now on your talk page. I may be misinterpreting, but one or two of your edits give me the impression of being sarcastic. I would be most grateful if, in any future communication with me, you could seriously try to avoid giving that

4026:

The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field

5648:, which I agree with (having been the one to tag it). I thought you should know the same content is on their talk page. Not sure what can be done about that though; deleting the entire page may not be a good idea, and revdel seems excessive. 2075:

I beleive that this person is notable (I may not have done a good job of expressing that in the article). Could I please get you to undelete this? I'm happy for you to move it to draft:; immeidately nom for AfD; or anything else you see fit.

2951: 530:

After many hours of editing, re-editing, and a constant string of page deletions over several days, plus numerous failed attempts to acquire the reason for deletions, David has given up in frustration. And I'm feeling kinda hurt, too.

985:

been proposed. I am happy to post the article on your talk page; that will allow you either significantly to improve it, so as to comply with current Knowledge policy, or alternatively to apply for restoration of the deleted text at

1313: 1163:

Not at all; I had not widely publicized it. You may recall that I said I had a long holiday booked? It happened just a few days before we were due to travel. Nicely recovered now. but a number of e-mails failed to get answered.

1217:

for any public domain sources that he may have copied from, (as per the AFC decline statement). I have also asked Moonriddengirl to have a look for me to make sure that I haven't majorly goofed (which is entirely possible).

2175:

hot-button issue. If anything, I could have made IvanOS' block a longer one, because I've previously applied blocks to them with no apparent result. YMMV; I see you're an admin, so you can adjust block lengths yourself.

1880: 2259:

There are also plenty of articles for tennis players that have world highest rannkings outside 255, aren't those also supposed to be deleted? Just for information right now he is actually ranked 226. You can check it

3090: 4367:

The article is being considered for deletion if the expressed opinion of the community so decides. It is not appropriate to apply speedy delete, and removal of the deletion tag before a decision is reached is not

3511:

Hi there! I was just wondering how I go about getting my deleted page back in order to edit it. I believe I submitted a request to get it back, however I have not received any notice yet. Thanks for your time!

600: 629:

The page was not correctly transcluded, and hence received neither vote, nor comment, nor answers to any questions. The editor in question had only a few days experience here and only a handful of edits to his

1903:

Restored at your request. I must say that it still looks a little promotional, but I would not dream of arguing the point. Perhaps you could review it and see if you are still happy with your text as posted.

2863: 1637: 5556:

you deleted this page citing that person is not of much importance. she is mayor of largest city of gujarat and 6th largest city of india. you should have discussed matter on talk page before deleting it.

4818:

The word "swami" is variously defined, but ir commonly taken to mean "religious guru". It does not refer to any specific person ans, as such, I do not find the name objectionable. Feel free to take it to

4305:, and I strongly suspect the subject was not going to pass WP:GNG, either. That having been said, if the article gets recreated, the speedy deletion for blatant hoax is probably not available. Cheers. 4321:

All versions created by two users with very similar names (Antoniclay43 and Antonic43), probably just one person - may even be an autobiography. If they look to create again then the links will point to

3246:) On June 27, 2014 I received a message that the entry on Cybersemiotics had been tagged for deletion. One hour later the article was deleted. I was on vacation then and tried frantic to contact you and 4803:

While the sockpuppetting issues may have been addressed, I am unclear as to why you did not require this editor to change his user name, especially as he's editing articles with "Swami" in the title. --

1079:

I put DB talk on the top of a talk page as it was still there yet it said you deleted it-so sorry I brought the page back as I noticed it had no page linked to it so I was doing that at the same time!

308:

Thanks Anthony, it seems there have been some recent developments. As most of those articles are restored now we can move on from here and remerge them properly if needed in future, with the history in

3903:. I saw the person's question at the Teahouse, asking why her draft had been deleted. It was because it was about her, and she created it herself. But I think she clearly meets all of the criteria in 2435:. Now there is another article on the same subject with a slightly different title. Not realizing this, at first I cleaned up the prose in the article, including the fact that the word Kelomang means 2976: 4750:

objects seen are laterally inverted; this is technically original research, as well as being a statement of the obvious. I am not going to redirect this article, but thank you for your interest. --

3612:

Knowledge, so with this page deleted I have lost everything I was working on and don't even have any way to see where I last left off. Please restore and I can make any and all necessary changes.

3135: 5747:

Thank you for being "an Administrator on Knowledge long enough to know what I can do, and what I cannot. I am always prepared to do the first, and to consult on the second", and for seeing when

5014:. The user does not exist. There are no logs showing he exists, the page was made by another user, and any links to it are made by yet another user. Why should this not be deleted? --Sincerely, 1204: 4627:" I don't see where that's required by the legal threats policy or where it's common practice to require anything more than retraction for obviously vacuous legal threats (or most other one). 3686:

innocent). There was a whole lot of disruptive/promotional editing by the two accounts. And if the person were really interested in abiding by Knowledge's policies, perhaps they wouldn't have

2964: 2953: 2864: 2105: 2879: 1647:

I very appreciate that you take time looking for information being requested to be published on Knowledge, however I ask you to elaborate on your judgement. Please consider the following:

3138:(02:28, 22 June 2014) then fourteen minutes I mentioned to User:Sandstein that he might be a sock (02:36, 22 June 2014) and then six minutes later he voted oppose on the request move for 893: 1663:

I am the right person to talk about copyright matters on the subject (GR8BIT), and I confirm that I granted permission for the content to be published on Knowledge encyclopedia pages.

5784: 5754: 4599: 879:

OK. As you have no strong feelings about this, I've restored the previous versions (for the record) and then amended it to be a redirect. I hope this is OK. 14:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

3072:. If you want the text of the article posted to your own talk page then I can do that; let me know if this is your wish. I do not understand your comment about a large document. -- 2723:

and in all circumstances, and being logged-out for a total as of now of just under fifteen hours is not unreasonable. I have not yet dealt with your request, but will now do so. --

4706:

Thanks for deleting some of the articles I tagged for speedy when I was doing NPP earlier today. However, I disagree with your deletion under the criteria of "patent nonsense" of

5346:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 2967:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 5312:

The article is grossly promotional, and adding links will not make it less so. I am not prepared to restore it, although you have the option if you wish of lodging a request at

4522: 4280:

OK. Whether it counts as a hoax or merely misinformation becomes a discussion point; but the obvious fallback position is that he is in any case lacking wikipedic notability. --

3904: 2991: 1312: 3947:

OK. Now that your block has been released you are free, if you wish, to delete some or all of the material on your talk page. Or if you wish to archive it, instructions are at

2377:

I think these evidences are sufficient for proving that this organization is genuine. So, I request you to kindly restore the article. Sorry for my poor English....Thank You.

740: 501:

I am fresh out of wiki kittens; please accept this cake as a thank you for your support and thoughtful comments during my (now withdrawn) RfA. What doesn't kill me... Cheers,

5070:) to be deleted. Please let me know what exactly is the copyright issue and I would be grateful if you could recover the deleted page so that I could resolve the conflicts. 1761:

Oh, and I am not one who gets piled on. I know, there will be many opposes, or might be all of then as opposes. I am not afraid mate. Still, Thanks a lot for the heads up. :)

2870:

A title such as this is an assertion of notability if correct. Several of these were nominated at AFD and were kept, with some editors regarding these as inherently notable.

4492: 3682:

It never hurts to get more information, but, just so you know, I would be opposed to an unblock, at least at this point in time. There's not just socking that went on here (

2960: 2905:

It would also seem that your talk page also produces these rude, shutdown comments. And yet you block it for 'vandalism' ? These people are very civilised from what I see.

245:

Hello, recently you mass deleted a set of "Minister of..." articles. Unfortunately this included a few that should not have been deleted, but due to a misunderstanding in

4850:

Sorry, I had a look at your user page after I asked the above question. I pulled that example out of thin air and it was not constructed with you specifically in mind. --

1345: 5271:

Below are the details: 09:52, 22 October 2014 Anthony Bradbury (talk | contribs) deleted page Africell (Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G11, G12. Source URL:

3169: 2432: 5545: 3003: 2987: 2697:

perhaps recuse yourself until you have time to be responsive? Thankfully, Anne stepped in, but yours was the initial action, so the onus was on you to reply. Le Prof

3959: 2500:

Whether an author is made notable by awards depends on the significance of the awards. This author has received insignificant recognition for a self-published book.--

1186: 1172: 1158: 1143: 4585: 3900: 1923:

Hi Tony, thanks for your input on Wackslas' unblock request and for being willing to give them another chance. By the way, while you accepted their unblock request,

289: 4608: 3974: 3324: 2749: 1066: 1011: 583: 5638: 5078: 3484: 3119: 3080: 1787: 399: 5205: 4236: 1722: 1703: 143: 2425: 5324: 4261:

Antonio Clay was a three-year letterman for the Clemson Tigers (2005-07); I have verified this by reviewing the online PDF version of the 2013 Clemson football

3997: 3942: 3786: 3764: 3012: 2318: 2305: 2286: 2273: 2254: 2099: 2019: 1864: 1542: 5158: 5000: 4349: 4314: 4288: 4250: 3620: 3597: 3571: 3493: 3459: 3427: 3097: 3053: 2764: 2551: 2530: 2508: 1599: 1432: 1207:, the nominator hadn't provided a source of the copyright, and most of the text used as sources was public domain (1912/13). I have advised the author to add 5463: 5254: 4504: 4376: 3669: 3552: 2819:

just so he could get his puerile edits about a certain Rugrats character on. Any chance of locking his talk page and getting it over and done with? Thanks. --

1912: 1745: 1625: 1330:

It does not seem to me you can limit the merit of an entry because a non fiction book based on a story of public interest and fully referenced is mentioned.

443: 5708: 5605: 5388: 4758: 4744: 4731: 4579: 4335: 4137: 3888: 3847: 3223: 3037: 3028: 1945: 1462:

Why did u delete the page Mahika Sharma.. we have links for it and have the reason of making her wiki.. than why are you deleting it... please create a page

1304: 1290: 663: 638: 386: 2418: 2123: 2006: 1363: 1030:

Hey, Anthony, I'm puzzled by your deletions/restoration, the net effect of which is the talk page of the category is gone. Could you enlighten me? Thanks.--

5485: 5239: 5132: 4651: 4204: 3404: 3303: 3180: 2584: 1254: 1240: 1229: 565: 342: 177: 100: 5682: 5479: 5439:

As I suggested on the article's talkpage before it was deleted, I think if the article is worth having, the only workable title would be the German term,

4112: 2914: 2794: 2779: 2706: 2691: 2677: 2647: 2626: 997: 979: 955: 358: 5347: 5292: 4845: 4831: 4707: 4595: 3921: 3728: 3714: 3501: 3467: 2731: 2397: 2085: 1103: 1053: 874: 826: 461: 5507: 3376:

My understanding is that even if I did not have access to a written copyright I could still use the content if I quote Bitrum. Am I completely mistaken?

3151: 2858: 1095:

Just a time-lag effect, I expect. I deleted the article, then the talk page; talk page now deleted again. why it was brought back is not clear to me. --

86: 4778: 4293:

AB, the only reason I had not nominated the article for AfD myself was I was still trying to figure out what was real and what was blatantly false per

2218: 2199: 1686: 1039: 430: 318: 303: 3661:

no sense. Certainly if he is ever unblocked, which currently is of low probability, it will need to be on the basis of a single account restriction.--

3593:

everything I have written and the sources I have obtained. Please restore the article so I can continue working to make it acceptable for Knowledge.

3567:

everything I have written and the sources I have obtained. Please restore the article so I can continue working to make it acceptable for Knowledge.

3532: 3210: 4985: 4361: 4199: 3818: 3800: 3751: 3520: 3105: 3061: 3020:, he was username-blocked, and I unblocked for username change, so I am certain that a username change is being requested. I will leave it to you. -- 2494: 1651:

It is fine that several encyclopedias have same description of the subject. Knowledge is general encyclopedia, the page you found is specialized one;

1528: 1485: 4094: 4069: 2610: 1447: 1378:

into a redirect. It seems to me that the user who CSDed was only trying to get it merged with the other article, even the merge template was added (

1295:

I didn't tag the sockpuppetry. I see spamming socks all the time and trying to figure out whose is whose is too much work, so I don't tag them. --

5366: 5355: 4955: 4934: 4916: 4899: 4874: 4518: 4486: 2278:

Possibly they make a better claim to notability. I am not going to trawl through all the tennis articles here, but will look at any you nominate.--

5449: 3443: 5617: 5584: 5418: 2385: 1337: 1023: 48: 5531: 5053: 5039: 3791:

If necessary, I think I'll go back to school as your comments flew right over my head. No need to clarify, though. I'll survive unenlightened.--

2995: 282: 273:. Could you please restore all these articles to their finished state, before they were deleted to make way for their current redirect. Thanks-- 5211: 4812: 4390:-- Why not let the checkusers who monitor the unblock queue -- I'm not the only one, I'm pretty sure -- handle these rather than denying them? 4348:

If The Pakistani Urdu-language reliable newspapers References are not acceptable for English Knowledge Please Speedy delete My Created Article

4212: 2355: 2338: 1389:

But rather than me doing it, shouldn't it be undeleted and then redirected? the page has a LOT of history besides being a former FL and having

541: 469: 163: 70: 5494: 4859: 4692: 5403: 5044:

Since the account exist, ofcourse the situation is different. I agree it may all be one person. I widraw my request for now. - All the best,

4904:

Thank you for reporting me. The administrator agreed and declined your report. They stated "Not a blatant violation of the username policy."

4050: 3192: 2565: 1585: 1375: 940: 5749: 4680: 2599: 1931: 1846: 1825: 128: 5278:

The data were being changed with missing links so can you please restore the old data info. Meanwhile, we are working on fixing the links.

5106:

page. J Mark Martin is a notable person, in terms of being a pastor of one of the largest protestant churches (12,000 members) in USA see

4205: 2350: 2071:

recently. This was on my watch list and probably written by me (but I'm not sure, without access to the history). Based on the coverage in

1834: 549: 481: 56: 5067: 3654: 2842: 2588: 1497: 5423: 3916: 3632: 3605: 3284: 3139: 2770:

the real submission! What a mess this is. With the deletion while I was editing, I have to say, no good deed goes unpunished. Le Prof

2474: 2460: 1611: 1323:

see the mention of the book being a fault. in traditional encyclopedia there were always mentions of the publications and their content.

753: 3737:(edit conflict) Blanked their own talk page? I would. Maybe it's common among humans who feel they've lost an argument. In all settings. 209: 5667: 3579: 2946: 1509:

You quite rightly declined an unblock request for Redmoon660, who is blocked for sockpuppetry. There is now another unblock request at

1412: 689: 513: 231:

when you deleted it, so I saved my edit anyway and recreated it. The topic is definitely notable; the article was just poorly written.—

2240: 2185: 2061: 1222: 5796: 4717: 4636: 3506: 1978: 1779:

least four, prefereably six, months of editing through your registered account. but I quite seriously wish you well for the future.--

1276: 1124: 270: 5304: 5023: 4723:

My reason for deletion was A3, not G1. G1 (patent nonsense) was the suggestion of the NP patroller. A3 is "no meaningful content".--

3699: 2231:

Hi Tony, I would like to ask why the article was deleted? I mentioned that it is notable since he just won an ATP Challenger title.

5090: 4425: 4394: 4343: 3983:

Thank you for your help. I added my subject to your talk page. I will began archiving my talk/user pages and will build my page up.

2160: 1459: 1402: 726: 415: 258: 235: 5806:

For deleting that "Africa" WP-Book. Don't know if you saw that the creator indicated on their user talk page that they wanted it

4836:

I've asked the user to voluntarily change his name. For reference, would you find a user name like "PriestsSuck" objectionable? --

4274: 3874: 1897: 906: 5191: 5086: 4795: 4545: 4481: 4044: 4002: 3449: 2479: 1024: 26: 4790: 4565: 4591: 2899: 2593: 2145: 1631: 1504: 198:

Thanks for going through my ugly CSD marathon. I was looking forward to see which courageous mop man would pick those up haha.

5724: 5551: 4262: 3628: 2332: 1771: 1557: 1427: 246: 149: 5631: 4907:

After this, I will report you for harassment because two administrators have told you that my user name is not a violation.

4886:

You were in fact blocked indefinitely for your user name before you started sockpuppetting. So fine, I will add a report to

4598:

election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the

2825: 623: 5819: 5394: 5374: 5330: 4189: 4056: 4038: 3880:

No, that's fine. The conversation thread after my unblock refusal clearly indicates that this is the appropriate action. --

3860: 3806: 2890:

accused of. On top of that, your question did not answer the one posed by Grfr12345 as his block was definitely premature.

2854: 2816: 1682: 911: 54:

As far as I can recall, 100% of the article was copyvio or close paraphrasing. Might be better to just start from scratch.

571:

I do not feel it appropriate to restore the article, but if you would like the opinion of the community you can appeal at

119:

page. It seems genuine and notable article and have added proper references to it. Please review this and restore. Thanks

3047: 2072: 2037: 1889: 1444: 1351:

In my view the projected article is clearly promotional; but if you wish you have the option of applying for a review at

1264: 1250: 4679:

You are great wikipedia editor i aprreciate your interest in history and science. i would like to contact you email me

4227:

have previously deleted this article. I'm not sure how it keeps appearing. This article should play offense! Thanks.

2341:

keeps recreating the article. He also removed all deletion tags reviewers have put into it. Please advise. Thank you. --

1957: 1390: 810:

I have no strong feelings about it, but it was not a true dab page, in that the two articles quoted were, specifically,

804: 5300: 5068:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Draft:Sheikhul_Mashaeikh_Dewan_Syed_Zainul_Abedin_Ali_Khan_Sahib&action=edit

2815:

after the use made three unsuccessful unblock requests over posting a fake news source, amongst other maladies such as

2443:. So anyway, is this a blatant hoax do you think? Or do you suppose it could actually be a genuine attempt? I see that 1089: 4558: 4184: 4419: 3687: 3175: 2261: 2149:. I came here because I noticed there are a lot of broken redirects to this page, might want to take care of those. 858:) 22:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC) ...and it doesn't appear (IMO) that the asserted A1 criterion was very appropriate. 521: 326: 3199: 3052:

Hello. Excuse me, I have a large document. Were large contributors to this article., Please restore it here. Thanks.

1236: 680:, and it's causing a lot of formatting issues. Could you show me what I need to do to avoid these problems, please? 5316:. Also, as Knowledge accounts are for use by one person only, why are you using the pronoun "we" in your request?-- 5012: 4571:

Certainly; it was just a holiday. I know that the wikibreak message is over-complex, but it looks ok on the page.--

3528: 3147: 3125: 2165: 1918: 1493: 354: 262: 240: 3777:

Just so; my intent was mainly to educate Bbb23, for which purpose your talk page provided a setting. Thank you. --

3130:

I have strong reasons to believe that this user is a sockpuppet of Jaqeli. I suspected since June 8 and talked to

5807: 5580: 4541: 4388: 4186: 3231: 2850: 2559: 266: 254: 183: 1379: 5637: 5154: 3645:

Seriously, that was their reply to a one-account restriction. This is the mentality you are dealing with here.

2465:

Should I fix this article up some more or do you still believe that it (like the other one) should be deleted?

2393: 2119: 250: 5339: 5172: 5066:

Hi Anthony, I had provided enough citations and the person of interest is notable and still I found the page (

4183:

That is clear violation of biography of living person. To add more, Swamiblue now claims that I am vandalizing

2365: 2040:, with only a handful of exceptions, are considered notable. Maher was the founder of the congregation of the 1963:, but I thought it might help to let you know, so you can watch out and avoid similar mistakes in the future. 5527: 4657: 3639: 2424: 1885:

This page has no real value to Knowledge, is being used for someone's soap box, political gain and vandetta.

1793: 1636:

Hello Anthony, I was informed that you recently completely removed article waiting for review, located here "

1465: 486: 5110:. Some of other pastors are as notable, or less notable, but yet they do have their own wikipedia page like 4976:

month STANDARDOFFER is for those who have rarely socked, there is bigger length for people like swamifraud.

5661: 4455: 3894: 3675: 2448: 1593: 1182: 1154: 1120: 685: 451: 4051:

http://www.ndtv.com/article/diaspora/one-of-world-s-largest-temples-to-be-inaugurated-in-new-jersey-570146

4032: 5082: 5006: 4613: 4443: 3143: 2830: 1961: 870: 855: 800: 695: 350: 110: 4104:

they are not admissible. Note that on-line publications usually do not qualify as appropriate sources.--

5680: 5603: 5543: 5517: 5505: 5461: 5386: 5322: 5252: 5203: 4998: 4829: 4756: 4729: 4649: 4577: 4374: 4286: 4248: 4110: 3972: 3957: 3886: 3762: 3712: 3667: 3550: 3482: 3420: 3384: 3342: 3322: 3301: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3221: 3215:

I am, perhaps, more tolerant than some. But I have warned him, and will block on next transgression. --

3167: 3117: 3078: 3026: 2981: 2747: 2729: 2506: 2416: 2316: 2284: 2252: 2197: 2097: 2027: 2017: 1943: 1910: 1862: 1785: 1701: 1623: 1578: 1548: 1540: 1361: 1288: 1170: 1141: 1101: 1064: 1051: 1009: 995: 953: 824: 636: 581: 563: 441: 175: 141: 84: 17: 5107: 5103: 5499:

That's fine. May I say how nice it is, for a change, to have a non-confrontational discussion here!--

5407: 4701: 4449: 3624: 3601: 3575: 3497: 3463: 3101: 3057: 2447:, who wrote the article, claims to be part of a ""Free Your Knowlegde 2014" Writing Competition from 1423: 1227: 1198: 346: 2292: 1924: 5523: 5197:

You are quite right; that was careless of me. To be fair I think it was a one-off, unique error. --

5184: 4768: 4688: 4431: 4382: 2638:

Please, I am awaiting your reply, to be able to post the revision I have given hours to. Le Prof

2133: 2002: 1974: 1718: 1678: 1524: 1438: 762: 757: 402:

does not represent Harrisburg medical centre (besides naming after organisations is against policy

124: 5522:

Revoke talk page access for that guy you just blocked. Thanks for nailing it so fast, by the way.

4126: 4041: 3690:, including the Welcome message. Although that happened post-block, it still speaks to attitude.-- 771: 4437: 3840: 3833: 3584: 2941: 2920: 2226: 1258: 1244: 1178: 1150: 1116: 766: 681: 393: 379: 372: 314: 278: 91:

I have just created a new version of the article, which I hope you will find to be satisfactory.

5792: 5765: 5729: 5351: 5296: 4173:

and if there are reputable third-party and uninvolved references to back up the statements made

3854: 3814: 3782: 3747: 2598:

Can you please undo your deletion, in the last few minutes, of the Julian (meteorologist) page

2301: 2269: 2236: 2081: 1951: 1842: 1821: 1741: 1398: 887: 477: 4045:

http://dnasyndication.com/showarticlerss.aspx?nid=mImJz11JigGXnzzT4wzdp0d4AqdA/N9ShvzCIEbe/KU=

2191:

Wouldn't dream of doing it without discussion. Or after, for that matter, unless you agreed.--

5675: 5645: 5598: 5538: 5500: 5456: 5381: 5317: 5260: 5247: 5198: 4993: 4981: 4824: 4751: 4724: 4644: 4572: 4509: 4500: 4413: 4399: 4369: 4310: 4281: 4270: 4243: 4232: 4195: 4105: 4008: 3967: 3952: 3881: 3757: 3707: 3662: 3558: 3545: 3477: 3414: 3336: 3317: 3296: 3237: 3216: 3162: 3112: 3073: 3021: 2972: 2910: 2895: 2875: 2790: 2775: 2760: 2742: 2724: 2702: 2687: 2673: 2643: 2622: 2606: 2547: 2537: 2526: 2501: 2490: 2411: 2311: 2279: 2247: 2192: 2092: 2012: 1938: 1905: 1870: 1857: 1780: 1696: 1618: 1572: 1535: 1356: 1283: 1165: 1136: 1096: 1059: 1046: 1004: 990: 948: 819: 783: 749: 631: 576: 558: 436: 170: 136: 79: 2140:

I noticed you deleted this page. Why do you believe that article needed immediate deletion?

5815: 5780: 5627: 5568: 5414: 5288: 5235: 5142: 5074: 4951: 4912: 4870: 4552: 4529: 4357: 4256: 4216: 4148:

Anthony.. After reading your actual words, I think Swamiblue find it hardest to understand.

4090: 4065: 3993: 3938: 3912: 3676: 3650: 3616: 3541: 3524: 3516: 3309: 2381: 1960:

that you intended to unblock this editor, but you didn't. I have unblocked, as you can see

1767: 1762: 1670: 1607: 1510: 1489: 1481: 1416: 1369: 1211: 426: 3492:

Indeed, thank you. Please delete the leftover cover. I cannot as it is an admin function.

3033:

Based on their edits, it seems they wanted the name "Bumblebee9999"; I have renamed them.

2835:

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by

8: 5688: 5576: 5561: 5409:. Recommend changing the block of this sock puppet to revoke talk page access as well. -- 5396: 5370: 5178: 4905: 4741: 4714: 4684: 4537: 4474: 4302: 4133: 3868: 3206: 3188: 3142:(02:42, 22 June 2014). Now he is using his oppose vote as prove that he is not Jaqeli. -- 2932: 2470: 2456: 2055: 1714: 1674: 1300: 1272: 897: 832: 656: 616: 411: 220: 120: 5593:

for you to improve, or alternatively you can appeal on the basis of the preaent text at

4057:

http://www.baps.org/About-BAPS/TheCurrentSpiritualGuru-PramukhSwamiMaharaj/His-Work.aspx

4039:

http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/baps-refutes-allegations-by-former-sadhus/1186609/

4033:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Persons_accused_of_crime

366: 5621: 5150: 4298: 2936: 2812: 2389: 2113: 2068: 2033: 1455: 1341: 671: 310: 274: 232: 154:

Hello Anthony, with your last edit on your user page you have left this | }} on it. --

5788: 5761: 5720: 5701: 5694: 5611: 5108:

https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_the_largest_Protestant_churches_in_the_United_States

4632: 4619: 3948: 3810: 3778: 3743: 3439: 3400: 3292: 3280: 3272: 3131: 2884: 2518: 2373: 2369: 2297: 2265: 2232: 2077: 1998: 1970: 1838: 1817: 1737: 1520: 1394: 866: 851: 796: 545: 507: 495: 473: 159: 96: 44: 3426:

I went through the Knowledge training and read all the information on Copyright and

831:

I see what you mean about not being a true dab page. And as there's already one at

5657: 5475: 5402:

The user has placed a malicious unblock request (see his talk page). Note that the

5165: 5104:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=J._Mark_Martin&action=edit&redlink=1

5049: 5035: 5019: 4977: 4774: 4496: 4306: 4294: 4266: 4228: 4191: 3454: 2968: 2907: 2892: 2871: 2806: 2786: 2771: 2756: 2738: 2698: 2683: 2669: 2665: 2639: 2618: 2602: 2543: 2522: 2486: 2172: 2134: 2041: 1881:

I'd Rather Be Baking Cookies: A Collection of Recipes from Lisa MacLeod and Friends

1731: 1109: 975: 936: 779: 734: 594: 298: 204: 4047: 3905:

Knowledge:WikiProject_History_of_photography#Notability_criteria_for_photographers

3368: 5811: 5775: 5410: 5360: 5231: 5061: 4947: 4908: 4881: 4866: 4797: 4786: 4353: 4220: 4086: 4061: 3989: 3934: 3908: 3796: 3724: 3695: 3646: 2928: 2921: 2846: 1894: 1603: 1383: 1219: 1132: 1085: 1074: 1035: 722: 457: 422: 5737: 4683:

do not forget to send your some of your photos i would like to know your face!!

1927:. I removed the block, as that appeared to be your intent. Was that okay? Best. 603:(a page you've deleted) got any votes (were their any RfA !votes) on that page? 465: 5801: 5572: 5557: 5492: 5447: 4738: 4711: 4562: 4533: 4462: 4326: 4224: 4129: 3864: 3202: 3184: 3034: 3017: 3009: 2821: 2466: 2452: 2444: 2050: 1928: 1802: 1471: 1296: 1268: 1267:) was warned for spamming the same links. I blocked the Katie account, too. -- 892:

Hi Anthony. This spam page you deleted a couple days ago has been put back up:

775: 644: 604: 407: 5616:

please restore my article in my sandbox. I am still working on improving it.--

5268:

Can you please restore Africell wikipedia page that was deleted by your side.

2360:

Hello Anthony Bradbury, I just want to know why you have deleted the article "

5594: 5313: 5146: 4887: 4820: 4605: 4391: 4323: 4101: 3313: 3158: 3069: 2580: 2407: 2346: 2214: 2181: 2155: 2109: 1937:

I got distracted in mid-flow and failed to remove the block. My apologies. --

1853: 1451: 1352: 986: 572: 403: 116: 4242:

Speedy-deleted and salted. It can be resurrected should he become notable.--

2036:. Would you mind restoring the article, please? People with an entry in the 1239:: I would be inclined to say no until they can explain why they created the 5716: 5455:

know, but reasonably accurate and searchable in an encyclopedia context. --

4628: 3435: 3396: 3276: 3268: 2366:

http://wikimapia.org/30594031/Balarampur-Sampriti-Sangha-and-Shitala-Mandir

503: 155: 92: 40: 5126:

just to name a few. How can I help getting a page up for J Mark Martin?

4666: 4594:! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual 4053: 3899:

I've created a draft article that is similar to one you deleted. It is at

704: 5649: 5471: 5440: 5433: 5432:

Sorry to bug you with this, but I'm not sure how to proceed. The author,

5045: 5031: 5015: 2436: 1984:

Errm, after I posted that message, I saw the section above! Care needed!

1755: 971: 932: 677: 293: 228: 221: 199: 36: 4925:

blocked you before for... a blatant violation of our username policy. --

4023: 3756:

Thank you for your input, which does not in reality affect the issue. --

3136:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of the mothers of Georgian monarchs

2091:

indeed as I expect you know is obligatory for a biographical article. --

1883:, a page I created. The speedy deletion rationale by the nominator was 1382:). Probably due to being unaware about the usual way to proceed through 4926: 4891: 4851: 4837: 4804: 4782: 3792: 3720: 3691: 1205:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Lewis Earle Sandt, Pioneer Aviator

1081: 1031: 861: 846: 791: 718: 4643:

implicit in the requirement to desist from the threat already made. --

4188:

wikipedia and his edits should be reverted only if they are vandalism.

3134:

about it. After Jaqeli got blocked, the IP addres voted in support of

2965:

Jane Heathcote-Drummond-Willoughby, 28th Baroness Willoughby de Eresby

2954:

Jane Heathcote-Drummond-Willoughby, 28th Baroness Willoughby de Eresby

2865:

Jane Heathcote-Drummond-Willoughby, 28th Baroness Willoughby de Eresby

470:

User_talk:Ottawahitech#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Sucharita_Mulpuru

5489: 5444: 2246:

World highest ranking of 255 does not appear to confer notability. --

2152:

Just for reference, that article received just over 100 daily views.

916:

Please I would really really appreciate an explanation as to why you

398:

Considering the non-existence of Jude Jaxon, it seems plausible that

75: 64: 32: 5484:

Anthony, I took the liberty of copying some of this exchange to the

3385:

https://sites.google.com/site/glosariobitrum/glossary/cybersemiotics

2361: 1203:

Hello Tony, Just to let you know I reversed your speedy deletion of

5343: 5332: 2342: 2210: 2177: 2045: 967: 962: 923: 741:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive830#User:Iraag

3455:

https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Melvin_Jackson_Funky_Skull_cover.jpg

1386:, the user thought the source page should be deleted through A10. 4125:

Sorry to bug you about this again. Would you take a look at this

3352:

I checked the Bitrum Copyright disclaimer and it is is as follow:

2374:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Balarampur_Sampriti_Sangha.jpg

1374:

Hi Anthony, I just wanted to tell you that I'm going to recreate

249:

and error in procedure the following were included on that list:

5272: 4019:

and you can let me know if it’s written correctly and cited.

3389:

Thank you for helping rescue the content and your understanding,

2927:

Hi. Just as a friendly notice, I have reversed your deletion of

435:

Account is now username blocked (I was away from PC until now)--

5597:. If you would like the text posted here please let me know. -- 5365:

please restore my article in my sandbox. i will improve there--

5224: 5115: 4777:

was recreated, also seems to have some sock puppetry going on.

4042:

http://www.baps.org/Announcement/2013/Message-for-All-5347.aspx

1640:" for the purpose "(G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of 335: 192: 4175:- No one says that these charges are true, except the 2 other 1472:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:List_of_hoaxes_on_Wikipedia

5537:

As you say. I have revoked his talk page access. Thank you.--

5406:

had its talk page access revoked for abusing their talk page

4493:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Antonio Clay (2nd nomination)

2837: 2440: 1641: 5711:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

4561:. Welcome back; I hope that everything is well with you. :) 3850:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

389:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

4176: 4157: 4012: 3008:

Are you asking for a rename? If so, I can do that for you.

1413:

User talk:BrownHairedGirl#Is_this_worth_filing_at_WP:DRV.3F

840: 836: 811: 745: 4407: 2368:

and here is the link of the website of this organization:

421:

If Anthony wasn't already involved I'd block the account.

2542:

due to none response I have asked for a deletion review.

743:, I wondered if you'd consider restoring the dab page at 5111: 5097: 4352:

Or Remove the Objection Tag from the article. Thanks. --

1602:

look the same now as it did when you deleted it as A7?

1314:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Ball MBE.

815: 4024:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:CRIME#Basic_criteria

4007:

The topic that I would like your assistance on is for

3742:

I have no thoughts on any other aspect of the case. --

3706:

the messages have been read, but I take your point. --

2337:

Hello. I just wanted to notify you that the author of

2108:. Do not move it back until it is a proper article. — 5221: 1856:. I have attended already to the IP you highlight. -- 1177:

Ouch. Hope you get to make up the travel time later!

5644:

You deleted this user's user page as a violation of

5119: 1570:Have a great day, and a Dogtastic Wikibirthday!!!! 5700:Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at 5123: 3839:Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at 2310:

OK, point conceded. I have restored the article. --

1728:there it may be in violation of content licensing. 1534:

I have left my opinion on the editor's talk page.--

1475: 378:Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at 5773:Two years ago, you were the 308th recipient of my 4779:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Chticalifornia 4297:. As best I can tell the subject did not satisfy 2370:https://sites.google.com/site/wwwsampritisanghacom 4586:WikiProject Military history coordinator election 3183:, vandalism account, identical user page as you. 2431:Hello Anthony. I see that you previously deleted 1875:Hello Tony, I had just noticed that you deleted ( 4939:Anthony and Daniel have stated to you that they 4921:Might want to read what he wrote again. And the 3091:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Jeff Opdyke 4945:Not a blatant violation of the username policy. 4048:http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-3107856951.html 3805:Rest easy; I don't go to quite the extremes of 3369:http://en.bitrum.unileon.es/reproduction-rights 2737:I see that your request has been dealt with by 1282:Fair enough. Failed to spot the sockpuppetry.-- 5225:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Evil_Beaver_(2) 5116:https://en.wikipedia.org/Bill_Johnson_(pastor) 601:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Omar Choudhry 468:, you may be interested in the discussion at: 4160:who are opposing him cannot be considered as 4154:If he has been publicly accused of an offence 3719:I appreciate the courtesy, thanks, Anthony.-- 3111:Copyright violations are not allowed here. -- 2171:look at that kind of nonsense over a glaring 1376:List of recognised political parties in India 1333:I would like another opinion on this matter. 5281:Your prompt feedback is highly appreciated. 5133:1991 Armed Forces Immigration Adjustment Act 4206:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Antonio Clay 3295:and determine your best course of action. -- 227:I was removing the speedy deletion tag from 35:advised me of a proposed speedy deletion of 3922:Moving on after an approved unblock request 3140:Talk:Princess Leonida Bagration of Mukhrani 2451:in Jakarta Indonesia". Best wishes to you, 1736:may have some thoughts, I'm not a lawyer.-- 1638:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/GR8BIT 4404:Greetings Tony! A userpage you've deleted 2372:and here is the image link of this club: 1833:Also, what should be done with edits like 271:Minister of Highways, Ports & Shipping 4011:. He is an Indian guru of a group called 3258:the field to contribute to the article. 2048:, and that's why she's got a DNZB entry. 1411:Please will you respond to my comment at 4487:Someone did not receive the memo . . . . 3863:, same applies, revert me if it's bad. 2845:is very much appreciated. Many thanks. 259:Minister of External Affairs (Sri Lanka) 5112:https://en.wikipedia.org/Charles_Nieman 4054:http://www.baps.org/Global-Network.aspx 1025:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion 78:is correct, and his advice is sound. -- 14: 5488:so we can keep things together there. 3068:option of challenging this opinion at 2356:Deletion of Balarampur Sampriti Sangha 931:feel you are justified in this action. 4215:for deletion. When I looked through 3383:Here is where he is shown as author: 3250:who tagged the entry. Like I said to 3198:I suggest blocked as vandalism only, 2293:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines 504:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 5222:https://en.wikipedia.org/Evil_Beaver 5102:Hi Anthony. 5 years ago you deleted 4941:I do not find the name objectionable 4167:or has appeared in Court on a charge 3544:and follow the instructions there.-- 2579:Thanks again, and have a great day. 2143:Also, you might want to look at the 2106:User:Stuartyeates/Mary Cecilia Maher 1985: 1443:Go Won-hee is real person and here6 31:Hello. On 9 January 2014 at 15:53, 5173:put comments on someone's user page 5120:https://en.wikipedia.org/Mike_Glenn 2073:Dictionary of New Zealand Biography 2038:Dictionary of New Zealand Biography 1713:back and reconsider it? Thank you. 818:- i.e. not the same article name.-- 23: 5693: 5124:https://en.wikipedia.org/Jim_Tolle 3832: 2485:the references were not adequate. 1888:contest it. Given the nominators 1470:Aditnálta should be directed to - 894:User:Maxim trader malaysia/sandbox 739:Hi. Considering the discussion at 692:__what5 0on earth arre you doiing 591:__what5 0on earth arre you doiing 552:__what5 0on earth arre you doiing 371: 217:__what5 0on earth arre you doiing 24: 5830: 3507:Articles for creation/Eric Fisher 1994:The editor who uses the pseudonym 1966:The editor who uses the pseudonym 1956:Hello, Anthony. It is clear from 1516:The editor who uses the pseudonym 1476:http://en.wikipedia.org/Aditnálta 115:Hi There, I have recently edited 5736: 5564:) 16:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC) 5011:Hi Anthony Bradbury, concerning 4665: 4604:by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! 4344:Speedy Delete My Created Article 2817:falsely accusing me of vandalism 2564:I just wanted to say thanks for 1986: 1801: 1655:for removal of original content; 1556: 1391:important articles linking to it 703: 494: 334: 263:Minister of Finance and Planning 191: 55: 5768:) 7:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 4622:'s block, you left this note: " 4102:living persons biography policy 4003:Pramukh Swami abuse allegations 3807:some of the education committee 3450:Funky Skull deletion completion 2811:Hi, I already made my point at 2480:Speedy Deletion of Paco Ahlgren 1045:Answered on your talk page. `-- 267:Minister of Justice (Sri Lanka) 255:Minister of Defence (Sri Lanka) 27:Deletion of Sheila Bird article 5380:Restored in your talk page. -- 4652:14:16, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 4637:12:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 4609:22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 4580:12:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC) 4566:22:49, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 2986:How do I transfer my account? 2682:Thank you, will do. Le Prof 2594:Please reverse Julian deletion 2032:Hi there, you've just deleted 1632:Deletion of the GR8BIT article 1505:Unblock request for Redmoon660 676:I inserted a book source into 460:who deleted the article about 251:Minister of Sports (Sri Lanka) 13: 1: 5820:16:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC) 5797:07:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC) 5725:11:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC) 5683:22:31, 12 November 2014 (UTC) 5668:22:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC) 5552:article on meenakshiben patel 5273:http://www.lintel.com/Holding 4546:21:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 4523:Achraf Baznani (photographer) 4505:03:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 4211:Hi there. Today I nominated 4022:The criteria for notability: 3355:"Creative Commons 3.0 License 2333:Recreation of deleted article 907:20:43, 27 February 2014 (UTC) 875:22:34, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 827:11:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 805:23:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC) 727:09:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 690:01:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 664:16:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC) 639:10:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC) 624:03:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC) 584:18:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC) 566:18:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC) 550:02:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC) 514:11:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC) 482:15:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 150:User page little format issue 5632:17:21, 4 November 2014 (UTC) 5606:17:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC) 5585:16:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC) 5546:20:54, 1 November 2014 (UTC) 5532:20:46, 1 November 2014 (UTC) 5508:20:23, 1 November 2014 (UTC) 5495:19:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC) 5480:18:18, 1 November 2014 (UTC) 5464:12:29, 1 November 2014 (UTC) 5450:21:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC) 5419:16:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC) 5404:sock puppet master MRivera25 5389:12:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC) 5375:06:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC) 5356:10:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC) 5325:16:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC) 5305:12:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC) 5255:11:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC) 5240:01:05, 20 October 2014 (UTC) 5212:The salting of "Evil Beaver" 5206:19:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC) 5192:16:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC) 5159:19:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 5091:17:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC) 4781:might want to look into it. 4592:WikiProject Military history 4200:04:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC) 4138:03:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC) 2449:Jakarta Theological Seminary 1877:almost a year and a half ago 912:What on earth are you doing? 599:Hello Tony! Can I ask , did 444:17:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC) 431:17:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC) 416:16:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC) 359:23:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 319:16:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 304:15:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 283:14:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 236:16:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 210:12:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 178:22:04, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 164:22:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 144:17:32, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 129:22:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 101:11:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 87:22:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 71:19:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 49:18:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 7: 5054:16:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC) 5040:16:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC) 5024:16:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC) 5001:16:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC) 4986:10:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC) 4956:03:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC) 4935:03:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC) 4917:02:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC) 4900:23:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC) 4875:23:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC) 4860:17:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC) 4846:17:39, 8 October 2014 (UTC) 4832:10:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC) 4813:08:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC) 4791:17:42, 7 October 2014 (UTC) 4759:16:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC) 4745:15:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC) 4732:15:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC) 4718:13:53, 7 October 2014 (UTC) 4693:06:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC) 4482:18:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 4395:18:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 4377:21:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC) 4362:16:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC) 4113:20:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 4095:03:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 3859:Just to let you know about 3048:sayed mohamad bagher posaei 2521:isn't a significant award? 341:Thank you for dealing with 10: 5835: 5753:, - repeating: you are an 5338:An editor has asked for a 5176:? Please be more careful. 4336:18:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4315:18:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4289:18:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4275:16:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4251:10:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4237:01:55, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4070:04:29, 5 August 2014 (UTC) 3998:04:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC) 3975:13:57, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 3960:13:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 3943:02:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 3275:) 13:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 3252:User:Justlettersandnumbers 3248:User:Justlettersandnumbers 2959:An editor has asked for a 2851:MediaWiki message delivery 2362:Balarampur Sampriti Sangha 2124:19:42, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 2100:17:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 2086:07:54, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 2062:00:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 2020:20:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC) 2011:Slapped wrist accepted. -- 2007:11:47, 22 April 2014 (UTC) 1979:11:44, 22 April 2014 (UTC) 1946:09:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC) 1932:20:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC) 1913:15:51, 21 April 2014 (UTC) 1898:20:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC) 1865:18:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 1847:18:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 1826:17:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 1788:19:37, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 1772:17:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 1746:01:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 1723:22:23, 11 April 2014 (UTC) 1704:19:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC) 1659:copyrights were violated). 1564:Happy WikiBirthday award!! 1543:17:11, 26 March 2014 (UTC) 1529:11:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC) 1498:22:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC) 1460:14:26, 18 March 2014 (UTC) 1433:11:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 1403:17:32, 15 March 2014 (UTC) 1364:12:45, 14 March 2014 (UTC) 1346:12:33, 14 March 2014 (UTC) 1305:15:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 1291:11:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 1277:06:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 18:User talk:Anthony Bradbury 5424:"Banned" forest, redux... 4664: 3917:20:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 3889:11:24, 26 July 2014 (UTC) 3875:07:10, 26 July 2014 (UTC) 3819:22:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 3801:00:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 3787:00:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 3765:22:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 3752:22:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 3729:23:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 3715:22:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 3700:21:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 3670:21:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 3655:20:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 3633:17:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 3606:13:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 3580:13:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 3444:13:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC) 3224:20:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 3211:20:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 3193:20:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 3176:You may be interested in, 3170:20:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 3152:19:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 3120:20:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 3106:14:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 3081:09:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 3062:06:25, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 3038:12:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 3029:11:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 3013:21:44, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 2996:21:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 2977:22:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC) 2947:16:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC) 2915:08:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC) 2900:08:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC) 2433:The deer and the kelomang 1800: 1687:22:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC) 1642:http://www.msx.org/GR8Bit 1626:19:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC) 1612:18:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC) 1586:17:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC) 1555: 1223:01:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1187:00:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC) 1173:20:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 1159:19:09, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 1144:17:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 1125:17:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 1104:21:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 1090:21:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 1067:18:10, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 1054:18:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 1040:17:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 1012:18:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 998:18:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 980:17:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 956:11:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 941:01:15, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 702: 522:deletion of Ed Lantz page 380:50.121.48.234's talk page 3553:20:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 3533:13:59, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 3502:16:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 3485:10:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 3468:22:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 3405:12:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 3358:Creative Commons License 3325:20:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 3304:20:28, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 3285:13:20, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 3126:User talk:68.109.175.166 3070:the deletion review page 2880:21:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 2859:06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 2826:06:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 2795:15:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 2780:22:53, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2765:22:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2750:09:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2732:09:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2707:01:07, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2692:22:52, 22 May 2014 (UTC) 2678:22:32, 22 May 2014 (UTC) 2648:21:01, 22 May 2014 (UTC) 2627:19:24, 22 May 2014 (UTC) 2611:19:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC) 2589:15:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC) 2566:reviewing the rangeblock 2552:16:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC) 2531:18:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC) 2509:19:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 2495:14:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 2475:13:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC) 2461:00:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC) 2419:10:08, 14 May 2014 (UTC) 2398:09:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC) 2351:06:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC) 2166:Re: Edit war in progress 1919:Wackslas unblock request 1353:the deletion review page 241:Ministers of...deletions 5750:others can do the same 5284:Thank you in advance. 5227:I appreciate your time 3901:User:Margin1522/draft01 3688:blanked their talk page 3232:Cybersemiotics deletion 2560:Thanks for reviewing it 2319:11:02, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 2306:10:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 2287:10:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 2274:09:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 2255:09:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 2241:21:22, 6 May 2014 (UTC) 2219:10:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC) 2200:20:29, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 2186:19:44, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 2161:04:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 2067:I notice that you A7'd 1925:they were still blocked 643:Alrighty then! Thanks! 367:Talkback: 50.121.48.234 347:civil and polite manner 327:A cheeseburger for you! 184:A cheeseburger for you! 5698: 5639:User:Ameka Wisdom Bone 4461:, is a spambot. Best, 3837: 3089:Why was this deleted: 2517:So you are saying the 400:User:HarrisburgMedical 376: 351:Illegitimate Barrister 5697: 4673:The Original Barnstar 4009:Pramukh Swami Maharaj 3836: 3640:Apteva unblock appeal 3362:institution: BITrum." 3144:The Emperor's New Spy 2617:improving. Le Prof 2426:Deer and the kelomang 1466:Deletion of Aditnálta 1327:on Knowledge policy? 1319:The speedy deletion. 1058:Restored talk page.-- 788:. What do you think? 711:The Original Barnstar 487:Some baklava for you! 375: 290:Just letting you know 5331:Deletion review for 4350:Najmi Healing Energy 3895:Draft of new article 3677:User talk:Debraross1 3434:Thank you so much,-- 3428:Copyright Violations 2952:Deletion review for 1809:The Admin's Barnstar 1763:User:Harrybrowne1986 1600:Carolina Silverhawks 1594:Carolina Silverhawks 1511:User talk:Redmoon660 1253:) account after the 452:Just to let you know 169:Thank you; sorted.-- 5702:Gilliam's talk page 5524:NorthBySouthBaranof 5397:User:OpaqueVodville 5007:User does not exist 4773:Well it seems that 4658:A barnstar for you! 4614:odd unblock decline 4596:project coordinator 3004:Bigpolesmokerfromoh 2831:Request for comment 2146:links and redirects 1794:A barnstar for you! 839:should redirect to 833:4H (disambiguation) 696:A barnstar for you! 111:Request for restore 5757:! (6 June 2007)! 5755:awesome Wikipedian 5709:remove this notice 5699: 5518:Should probably... 5486:article's talkpage 4923:same administrator 4219:, I see that you, 3848:remove this notice 3841:Slon02's talk page 3838: 3181:User:Blackbetty412 2982:How do I transfer? 2813:User talk:Garr1984 2069:Mary Cecilia Maher 2034:Mary Cecilia Maher 2028:Mary Cecilia Maher 1549:Happy Birthday!!!! 1179:Dozzzzzzzzzing off 1151:Dozzzzzzzzzing off 1135:. Happy wikying.-- 1117:Dozzzzzzzzzing off 717:Thanks for help. 682:Dozzzzzzzzzing off 456:Since you are the 387:remove this notice 377: 5744:long enough admin 5666: 5588: 5571:comment added by 5308: 5291:comment added by 5170:Since when do we 5162: 5145:comment added by 5094: 5079:Muthalathottathil 5077:comment added by 4708:Lateral invertion 4702:Lateral invertion 4699: 4698: 4549: 4532:comment added by 4080:Any help Anthony? 3873: 3636: 3619:comment added by 3536: 3519:comment added by 3316:may be helpful.-- 3132:User:FactStraight 2519:Eric Hoffer Award 2401: 2384:comment added by 1996: 1968: 1852:Make a report at 1831: 1830: 1690: 1673:comment added by 1591: 1590: 1518: 1501: 1484:comment added by 1431: 1199:Reversed deletion 1133:the adoption link 732: 731: 519: 518: 462:Sucharita Mulpuru 364: 363: 215: 214: 5826: 5778: 5752: 5740: 5712: 5677:Anthony Bradbury 5665: 5654: 5652: 5634: 5600:Anthony Bradbury 5587: 5565: 5540:Anthony Bradbury 5502:Anthony Bradbury 5458:Anthony Bradbury 5383:Anthony Bradbury 5319:Anthony Bradbury 5307: 5285: 5249:Anthony Bradbury 5200:Anthony Bradbury 5190: 5187: 5181: 5175: 5161: 5139: 5093: 5071: 4995:Anthony Bradbury 4931: 4896: 4885: 4856: 4842: 4826:Anthony Bradbury 4809: 4796:Your unblock of 4775:Olivier Leclercq 4769:Olivier Leclercq 4753:Anthony Bradbury 4726:Anthony Bradbury 4669: 4662: 4661: 4646:Anthony Bradbury 4574:Anthony Bradbury 4548: 4526: 4517:Please redirect 4479: 4472: 4467: 4460: 4459: 4426:deleted contribs 4410: 4383:Checkuser blocks 4371:Anthony Bradbury 4331: 4283:Anthony Bradbury 4245:Anthony Bradbury 4107:Anthony Bradbury 3969:Anthony Bradbury 3954:Anthony Bradbury 3883:Anthony Bradbury 3871: 3867: 3851: 3759:Anthony Bradbury 3709:Anthony Bradbury 3664:Anthony Bradbury 3635: 3613: 3547:Anthony Bradbury 3535: 3513: 3479:Anthony Bradbury 3416:Anthony Bradbury 3338:Anthony Bradbury 3319:Anthony Bradbury 3298:Anthony Bradbury 3261:Please advise! 3239:Anthony Bradbury 3218:Anthony Bradbury 3164:Anthony Bradbury 3114:Anthony Bradbury 3075:Anthony Bradbury 3023:Anthony Bradbury 3007: 2944: 2939: 2913: 2898: 2841:. Your comments 2840: 2744:Anthony Bradbury 2726:Anthony Bradbury 2541: 2538:Anthony Bradbury 2503:Anthony Bradbury 2413:Anthony Bradbury 2400: 2378: 2313:Anthony Bradbury 2291:Okay, so in the 2281:Anthony Bradbury 2249:Anthony Bradbury 2194:Anthony Bradbury 2158: 2135:Akhtar Raza Khan 2094:Anthony Bradbury 2058: 2053: 2042:Sisters of Mercy 2014:Anthony Bradbury 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1964: 1940:Anthony Bradbury 1907:Anthony Bradbury 1859:Anthony Bradbury 1805: 1798: 1797: 1782:Anthony Bradbury 1774: 1735: 1698:Anthony Bradbury 1689: 1667: 1620:Anthony Bradbury 1584: 1581: 1575: 1574:Happy Attack Dog 1560: 1553: 1552: 1537:Anthony Bradbury 1514: 1500: 1478: 1439:you made mistake 1422: 1419: 1358:Anthony Bradbury 1285:Anthony Bradbury 1216: 1210: 1167:Anthony Bradbury 1138:Anthony Bradbury 1098:Anthony Bradbury 1061:Anthony Bradbury 1048:Anthony Bradbury 1006:Anthony Bradbury 992:Anthony Bradbury 950:Anthony Bradbury 904: 903: 864: 849: 821:Anthony Bradbury 794: 787: 769: 707: 700: 699: 661: 654: 649: 633:Anthony Bradbury 621: 614: 609: 578:Anthony Bradbury 560:Anthony Bradbury 510: 498: 491: 490: 466:Knowledge:CSD#A7 438:Anthony Bradbury 390: 349:. Best regards, 338: 331: 330: 301: 296: 207: 202: 195: 188: 187: 172:Anthony Bradbury 138:Anthony Bradbury 81:Anthony Bradbury 69: 67: 63: 59: 5834: 5833: 5829: 5828: 5827: 5825: 5824: 5823: 5804: 5776: 5771: 5770: 5748: 5741: 5732: 5713: 5706: 5691: 5655: 5650: 5642: 5625: 5614: 5595:deletion review 5566: 5554: 5520: 5426: 5400: 5363: 5340:deletion review 5336: 5314:deletion review 5286: 5263: 5214: 5185: 5179: 5177: 5171: 5168: 5140: 5135: 5100: 5072: 5064: 5009: 4929: 4894: 4879: 4854: 4840: 4823:if you wish. -- 4807: 4801: 4798:User:Swamifraud 4771: 4704: 4660: 4618:When declining 4616: 4590:Greetings from 4588: 4555: 4527: 4512: 4491:AB, it's back: 4489: 4475: 4468: 4463: 4411: 4406: 4405: 4402: 4385: 4346: 4329: 4259: 4221:User:Courcelles 4209: 4005: 3924: 3897: 3869: 3857: 3852: 3845: 3680: 3642: 3621:Matt.tennenbaum 3614: 3598:Matt.tennenbaum 3596:Thank you, Matt 3587: 3572:Matt.tennenbaum 3570:Thank you, Matt 3561: 3514: 3509: 3494:Professionalign 3460:Professionalign 3452: 3392:Claudia Jacques 3234: 3178: 3157:Please post at 3128: 3098:Matt.tennenbaum 3054:Mokhtar-saghafi 3050: 3001: 2984: 2961:deletion review 2957: 2942: 2937: 2929:Gustaf Brunkman 2925: 2922:Gustaf Brunkman 2906: 2891: 2887: 2868: 2836: 2833: 2809: 2596: 2562: 2535: 2482: 2429: 2408:deletion review 2379: 2358: 2335: 2229: 2227:Sebastian Bader 2168: 2156: 2138: 2056: 2051: 2030: 1987: 1954: 1921: 1873: 1796: 1765: 1758: 1729: 1668: 1634: 1617:Yes it does. -- 1596: 1579: 1573: 1571: 1551: 1507: 1479: 1468: 1441: 1417: 1372: 1317: 1233: 1214: 1208: 1201: 1112: 1077: 1028: 987:deletion review 922:my work on the 914: 899: 898: 890: 859: 844: 789: 760: 744: 737: 698: 674: 657: 650: 645: 617: 610: 605: 597: 573:deletion review 524: 512: 508: 489: 454: 396: 394:Jude Jaxon hoax 391: 384: 369: 329: 299: 294: 243: 225: 205: 200: 186: 152: 113: 65: 61: 60: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5832: 5803: 5800: 5746: 5735: 5734: 5733: 5731: 5730:Precious again 5728: 5705: 5692: 5690: 5687: 5686: 5685: 5646:WP:NOTAWEBHOST 5641: 5636: 5630:comment added 5613: 5610: 5609: 5608: 5553: 5550: 5549: 5548: 5519: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5425: 5422: 5399: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5362: 5359: 5335: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5265:Dear Anthony, 5262: 5259: 5258: 5257: 5213: 5210: 5209: 5208: 5180:Chris Troutman 5167: 5164: 5134: 5131: 5099: 5096: 5063: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5056: 5008: 5005: 5004: 5003: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4969: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4960: 4959: 4958: 4800: 4794: 4770: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4703: 4700: 4697: 4696: 4685:Krishnachaitan 4676: 4675: 4670: 4659: 4656: 4655: 4654: 4615: 4612: 4587: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4554: 4551: 4525:. Thank you. 4519:Achraf Baznani 4511: 4508: 4488: 4485: 4401: 4398: 4384: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4345: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4318: 4317: 4258: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4225:User:Ronhjones 4208: 4203: 4181: 4180: 4170: 4164: 4150: 4149: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4117: 4084: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4074: 4004: 4001: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3978: 3977: 3923: 3920: 3896: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3856: 3855:Toes and stuff 3853: 3844: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3739: 3738: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3679: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3641: 3638: 3610: 3586: 3583: 3560: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3508: 3505: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3451: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3432: 3424: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3393: 3390: 3387: 3381: 3377: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3359: 3356: 3353: 3350: 3346: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3233: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3177: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3161:, not here. -- 3127: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3084: 3083: 3049: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 2983: 2980: 2956: 2950: 2924: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2886: 2883: 2867: 2862: 2838:Anna Frodesiak 2832: 2829: 2808: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2633: 2632: 2595: 2592: 2561: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2533: 2512: 2511: 2481: 2478: 2445:user:BP20Benny 2428: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2410:if you wish.-- 2376: 2357: 2354: 2334: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2228: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2203: 2202: 2167: 2164: 2137: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 1953: 1952:Missed unblock 1950: 1949: 1948: 1920: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1872: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1829: 1828: 1812: 1811: 1806: 1795: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1770:comment added 1757: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1738:Obi-Wan Kenobi 1715:EugenyBrychkov 1707: 1706: 1675:EugenyBrychkov 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1595: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1567: 1566: 1561: 1550: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1506: 1503: 1467: 1464: 1440: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1409: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1316: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1232: 1226: 1200: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1111: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1027: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 913: 910: 889: 888:recreated spam 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 736: 733: 730: 729: 714: 713: 708: 697: 694: 673: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 596: 593: 589: 588: 587: 586: 523: 520: 517: 516: 502: 499: 488: 485: 453: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 395: 392: 383: 370: 368: 365: 362: 361: 339: 328: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 242: 239: 224: 219: 213: 212: 196: 185: 182: 181: 180: 151: 148: 147: 146: 121:Ashishlohorung 112: 109: 108: 107: 106: 105: 104: 103: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5831: 5822: 5821: 5817: 5813: 5809: 5799: 5798: 5794: 5790: 5786: 5783: 5782: 5779: 5769: 5767: 5763: 5758: 5756: 5751: 5745: 5739: 5727: 5726: 5722: 5718: 5710: 5703: 5696: 5684: 5681: 5679: 5678: 5672: 5671: 5670: 5669: 5663: 5659: 5653: 5647: 5640: 5635: 5633: 5629: 5623: 5619: 5607: 5604: 5602: 5601: 5596: 5591: 5590: 5589: 5586: 5582: 5578: 5574: 5570: 5563: 5559: 5547: 5544: 5542: 5541: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5529: 5525: 5509: 5506: 5504: 5503: 5498: 5497: 5496: 5493: 5491: 5487: 5483: 5482: 5481: 5477: 5473: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5462: 5460: 5459: 5452: 5451: 5448: 5446: 5442: 5437: 5435: 5430: 5421: 5420: 5416: 5412: 5408: 5405: 5398: 5390: 5387: 5385: 5384: 5379: 5378: 5377: 5376: 5372: 5368: 5358: 5357: 5353: 5349: 5345: 5341: 5334: 5326: 5323: 5321: 5320: 5315: 5311: 5310: 5309: 5306: 5302: 5298: 5294: 5290: 5282: 5279: 5276: 5274: 5269: 5266: 5261:Africell page 5256: 5253: 5251: 5250: 5244: 5243: 5242: 5241: 5237: 5233: 5228: 5226: 5223: 5217: 5207: 5204: 5202: 5201: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5193: 5188: 5182: 5174: 5163: 5160: 5156: 5152: 5148: 5144: 5130: 5127: 5125: 5121: 5117: 5113: 5109: 5105: 5095: 5092: 5088: 5084: 5080: 5076: 5069: 5055: 5051: 5047: 5043: 5042: 5041: 5037: 5033: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5021: 5017: 5013: 5002: 4999: 4997: 4996: 4990: 4989: 4988: 4987: 4983: 4979: 4957: 4953: 4949: 4946: 4942: 4938: 4937: 4936: 4933: 4932: 4924: 4920: 4919: 4918: 4914: 4910: 4906: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4898: 4897: 4889: 4883: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4872: 4868: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4858: 4857: 4849: 4848: 4847: 4844: 4843: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4830: 4828: 4827: 4822: 4817: 4816: 4815: 4814: 4811: 4810: 4799: 4793: 4792: 4788: 4784: 4780: 4776: 4760: 4757: 4755: 4754: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4743: 4740: 4735: 4734: 4733: 4730: 4728: 4727: 4722: 4721: 4720: 4719: 4716: 4713: 4709: 4695: 4694: 4690: 4686: 4681: 4678: 4677: 4674: 4671: 4668: 4663: 4653: 4650: 4648: 4647: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4634: 4630: 4626: 4621: 4611: 4610: 4607: 4603: 4602: 4601:election page 4597: 4593: 4581: 4578: 4576: 4575: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4564: 4560: 4550: 4547: 4543: 4539: 4535: 4531: 4524: 4520: 4515: 4510:Redirect page 4507: 4506: 4502: 4498: 4494: 4484: 4483: 4480: 4478: 4473: 4471: 4466: 4457: 4454: 4451: 4448: 4445: 4442: 4439: 4436: 4433: 4432:nuke contribs 4430: 4427: 4424: 4421: 4418: 4415: 4409: 4400:G11 - spambot 4397: 4396: 4393: 4389: 4378: 4375: 4373: 4372: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4359: 4355: 4351: 4337: 4334: 4333: 4325: 4320: 4319: 4316: 4312: 4308: 4304: 4300: 4296: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4287: 4285: 4284: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4264: 4252: 4249: 4247: 4246: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4222: 4218: 4214: 4207: 4202: 4201: 4197: 4193: 4190: 4187: 4185: 4178: 4174: 4171: 4168: 4165: 4163: 4159: 4155: 4152: 4151: 4147: 4146: 4139: 4135: 4131: 4127: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4115: 4114: 4111: 4109: 4108: 4103: 4097: 4096: 4092: 4088: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4072: 4071: 4067: 4063: 4059: 4058: 4055: 4052: 4049: 4046: 4043: 4040: 4035: 4034: 4028: 4025: 4020: 4016: 4014: 4010: 4000: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3976: 3973: 3971: 3970: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3958: 3956: 3955: 3950: 3945: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3931: 3927: 3919: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3890: 3887: 3885: 3884: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3872: 3866: 3862: 3849: 3842: 3835: 3820: 3816: 3812: 3808: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3766: 3763: 3761: 3760: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3741: 3740: 3736: 3735: 3730: 3726: 3722: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3713: 3711: 3710: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3678: 3671: 3668: 3666: 3665: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3637: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3594: 3590: 3585:Page deleted? 3582: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3568: 3564: 3559:Page deleted? 3554: 3551: 3549: 3548: 3543: 3542:WP:REFUND/G13 3539: 3538: 3537: 3534: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3504: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3486: 3483: 3481: 3480: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3456: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3422: 3418: 3417: 3412: 3411: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3391: 3388: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3360: 3357: 3354: 3351: 3347: 3344: 3340: 3339: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3326: 3323: 3321: 3320: 3315: 3311: 3310:WP:COPYOTHERS 3307: 3306: 3305: 3302: 3300: 3299: 3294: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3265: 3262: 3259: 3255: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3240: 3225: 3222: 3220: 3219: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3171: 3168: 3166: 3165: 3160: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3121: 3118: 3116: 3115: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3103: 3099: 3094: 3092: 3087: 3082: 3079: 3077: 3076: 3071: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3039: 3036: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3027: 3025: 3024: 3019: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3011: 3005: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2988:Bumblebee9999 2979: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2955: 2949: 2948: 2945: 2940: 2934: 2930: 2923: 2916: 2912: 2909: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2897: 2894: 2882: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2866: 2861: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2839: 2828: 2827: 2824: 2823: 2818: 2814: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2748: 2746: 2745: 2740: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2730: 2728: 2727: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2591: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2577: 2574: 2569: 2567: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2539: 2534: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2510: 2507: 2505: 2504: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2477: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2463: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2427: 2420: 2417: 2415: 2414: 2409: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2353: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2320: 2317: 2315: 2314: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2294: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2285: 2283: 2282: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2253: 2251: 2250: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2201: 2198: 2196: 2195: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2174: 2163: 2162: 2159: 2153: 2150: 2148: 2147: 2141: 2136: 2125: 2121: 2118: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2098: 2096: 2095: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2060: 2059: 2054: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2021: 2018: 2016: 2015: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1995: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1967: 1962: 1959: 1947: 1944: 1942: 1941: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1930: 1926: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1908: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1896: 1891: 1890:contributions 1886: 1882: 1878: 1871:Page deletion 1866: 1863: 1861: 1860: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1814: 1813: 1810: 1807: 1804: 1799: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1783: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1773: 1769: 1764: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1733: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1705: 1702: 1700: 1699: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1664: 1657: 1653: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1645: 1643: 1639: 1627: 1624: 1622: 1621: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1587: 1582: 1576: 1569: 1568: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1554: 1544: 1541: 1539: 1538: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1502: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1477: 1473: 1463: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1446: 1434: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1414: 1410: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1359: 1354: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1334: 1331: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1315: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1286: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1263: 1260: 1256: 1255:Katiealbright 1252: 1249: 1246: 1242: 1241:Brandiperkins 1238: 1231: 1230:Brandiperkins 1225: 1224: 1221: 1213: 1206: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1171: 1169: 1168: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1139: 1134: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1099: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1062: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1052: 1050: 1049: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1026: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1007: 1003:impression.-- 1001: 1000: 999: 996: 994: 993: 988: 983: 982: 981: 977: 973: 969: 964: 959: 958: 957: 954: 952: 951: 945: 944: 943: 942: 938: 934: 930: 925: 921: 920: 909: 908: 905: 902: 895: 878: 877: 876: 872: 868: 863: 857: 853: 848: 842: 838: 834: 830: 829: 828: 825: 823: 822: 817: 813: 809: 808: 807: 806: 802: 798: 793: 785: 781: 777: 773: 768: 764: 759: 755: 751: 747: 742: 728: 724: 720: 716: 715: 712: 709: 706: 701: 693: 691: 687: 683: 679: 665: 662: 660: 655: 653: 648: 642: 641: 640: 637: 635: 634: 628: 627: 626: 625: 622: 620: 615: 613: 608: 602: 592: 585: 582: 580: 579: 574: 569: 568: 567: 564: 562: 561: 555: 554: 553: 551: 547: 543: 539: 536: 532: 528: 515: 511: 505: 500: 497: 493: 492: 484: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 459: 445: 442: 440: 439: 434: 433: 432: 428: 424: 420: 419: 418: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 388: 381: 374: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 343:50.121.48.234 340: 337: 333: 332: 320: 316: 312: 311:Blackknight12 307: 306: 305: 302: 297: 291: 287: 286: 285: 284: 280: 276: 275:Blackknight12 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 238: 237: 234: 230: 223: 218: 211: 208: 203: 197: 194: 190: 189: 179: 176: 174: 173: 168: 167: 166: 165: 161: 157: 145: 142: 140: 139: 133: 132: 131: 130: 126: 122: 118: 117:Nikki Galrani 102: 98: 94: 90: 89: 88: 85: 83: 82: 77: 74: 73: 72: 68: 58: 53: 52: 51: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 19: 5805: 5789:Gerda Arendt 5774: 5772: 5762:Gerda Arendt 5759: 5743: 5742: 5714: 5676: 5643: 5626:— Preceding 5615: 5599: 5567:— Preceding 5555: 5539: 5521: 5501: 5457: 5453: 5438: 5431: 5427: 5401: 5382: 5364: 5348:Lulucylulucy 5337: 5318: 5293:Lulucylulucy 5287:— Preceding 5283: 5280: 5277: 5270: 5267: 5264: 5248: 5229: 5218: 5215: 5199: 5169: 5141:— Preceding 5136: 5128: 5101: 5073:— Preceding 5065: 5010: 4994: 4974: 4944: 4940: 4927: 4922: 4892: 4852: 4838: 4825: 4805: 4802: 4772: 4752: 4725: 4705: 4682: 4672: 4645: 4623: 4620:Raymond88824 4617: 4600: 4589: 4573: 4557:Glad to see 4556: 4553:Welcome back 4528:— Preceding 4516: 4513: 4495:. Cheers. 4490: 4476: 4469: 4464: 4452: 4446: 4440: 4434: 4428: 4422: 4416: 4403: 4386: 4370: 4347: 4327: 4303:WP:NGRIDIRON 4282: 4260: 4257:Antonio Clay 4244: 4213:Antonio Clay 4210: 4182: 4172: 4166: 4161: 4153: 4116: 4106: 4098: 4085: 4073: 4060: 4036: 4029: 4021: 4017: 4006: 3988: 3968: 3953: 3946: 3932: 3928: 3925: 3898: 3882: 3858: 3811:Demiurge1000 3779:Demiurge1000 3758: 3744:Demiurge1000 3708: 3683: 3681: 3663: 3643: 3615:— Preceding 3609: 3595: 3591: 3588: 3569: 3565: 3562: 3546: 3515:— Preceding 3510: 3491: 3478: 3458: 3453: 3415: 3367: 3337: 3318: 3297: 3266: 3264:Thank you, 3263: 3260: 3256: 3238: 3235: 3217: 3179: 3163: 3129: 3113: 3095: 3088: 3085: 3074: 3051: 3022: 2985: 2958: 2933:WP:NOLYMPICS 2926: 2888: 2869: 2834: 2820: 2810: 2743: 2725: 2721: 2597: 2578: 2572: 2570: 2563: 2502: 2483: 2464: 2430: 2412: 2380:— Preceding 2359: 2339:Real MD Asif 2336: 2312: 2298:MbahGondrong 2280: 2266:MbahGondrong 2248: 2233:MbahGondrong 2230: 2193: 2169: 2154: 2151: 2144: 2142: 2139: 2116: 2093: 2078:Stuartyeates 2049: 2031: 2013: 1999:JamesBWatson 1993: 1971:JamesBWatson 1965: 1955: 1939: 1922: 1906: 1884: 1879:in January) 1876: 1874: 1858: 1839:EmilyREditor 1832: 1818:EmilyREditor 1808: 1781: 1766:— Preceding 1759: 1697: 1669:— Preceding 1666:Thank you. 1665: 1662: 1646: 1635: 1619: 1597: 1563: 1536: 1521:JamesBWatson 1515: 1508: 1480:— Preceding 1469: 1442: 1415:? Thanks! -- 1395:Ugog Nizdast 1388: 1373: 1370:A10 criteria 1357: 1335: 1332: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1318: 1284: 1261: 1247: 1237:your message 1234: 1202: 1166: 1137: 1113: 1097: 1078: 1060: 1047: 1029: 1005: 991: 949: 947:relevant. -- 928: 918: 917: 915: 900: 891: 820: 738: 710: 675: 658: 651: 646: 632: 618: 611: 606: 598: 590: 577: 559: 540: 537: 533: 529: 525: 474:Ottawahitech 455: 437: 397: 288:Hi Anthony. 244: 226: 216: 171: 153: 137: 135:actresses?-- 114: 80: 30: 5689:Re: Gilliam 5441:de:Bannwald 5434:User:Zaxevi 5230:scottsdesk 4978:Bladesmulti 4497:Dirtlawyer1 4408:LucieAllman 4307:Dirtlawyer1 4299:WP:NCOLLATH 4267:Dirtlawyer1 4263:media guide 4229:Magnolia677 4192:Bladesmulti 2969:Peter James 2911:(talk tome) 2896:(talk tome) 2872:Peter James 2787:Leprof 7272 2772:Leprof 7272 2757:Leprof 7272 2739:Anne Delong 2699:Leprof 7272 2684:Leprof 7272 2670:Anne Delong 2666:Leprof 7272 2640:Leprof 7272 2619:Leprof 7272 2603:Leprof 7272 2544:Jonpatterns 2523:Jonpatterns 2487:Jonpatterns 2437:hermit crab 1732:Newyorkbrad 1212:PD-old-text 678:Ben Chapman 472:. Thanks, X 247:discussions 229:Geledi clan 222:Geledi clan 37:Sheila Bird 5812:Shearonink 5411:Hammersoft 5246:neither.-- 5232:Scottsdesk 4948:Swamifraud 4909:Swamifraud 4882:Swamifraud 4867:Swamifraud 4450:block user 4444:filter log 4392:--jpgordon 4387:Regarding 4368:allowed.-- 4354:Farha Zeba 4156:- 2 other 4087:Swamifraud 4062:Swamifraud 3990:Swamifraud 3935:Swamifraud 3909:Margin1522 3684:supposedly 3647:Beeblebrox 3521:Fisherarch 3293:WP:COPYVIO 2847:Jim Carter 1895:kelapstick 1604:Jackmcbarn 1486:Kitwalkerr 1420:HairedGirl 1408:Hi Anthony 1393:. Thanks, 1220:kelapstick 672:Formatting 509:reply here 423:Dougweller 5573:CAKrutesh 5558:CAKrutesh 5395:Block of 5367:Vipdus123 4563:Acalamari 4534:Maromania 4456:block log 4295:WP:BEFORE 4130:Swamiblue 4037:Sources: 3949:archiving 3865:Dreadstar 3308:Possibly 3203:Sepsis II 3185:Sepsis II 3035:Acalamari 3018:Acalamari 3010:Acalamari 2885:Grfr12345 2822:Marianian 2571:Even so, 2467:Invertzoo 2453:Invertzoo 2173:WP:ARBMAC 2104:Moved to 1958:this edit 1929:Acalamari 1580:you rang? 1297:Gogo Dodo 1269:Gogo Dodo 901:INeverCry 630:credit.-- 538:Best, Ed 408:IRWolfie- 33:User:Czar 5707:You can 5618:dputgr11 5581:contribs 5569:unsigned 5344:Africell 5333:Africell 5301:contribs 5289:unsigned 5166:Gordonap 5155:contribs 5147:Gordonap 5143:unsigned 5087:contribs 5075:unsigned 4542:contribs 4530:unsigned 4420:contribs 4217:this log 3933:Regards 3846:You can 3629:contribs 3617:unsigned 3589:Hello, 3563:Hello, 3529:contribs 3517:unsigned 3349:content? 2938:Canadian 2908:Aneditor 2893:Aneditor 2849:through 2807:Garr1984 2581:Aichonic 2573:strictly 2394:contribs 2386:Suman888 2382:unsigned 2157:Elassint 2120:contribs 2110:RHaworth 2046:Auckland 1835:this one 1683:contribs 1671:unsigned 1494:contribs 1482:unsigned 1452:Sunuraju 1428:contribs 1380:see here 1338:Nanavati 1265:contribs 1251:contribs 1110:Adoption 963:Wikidata 924:Geca Kon 871:contribs 856:contribs 835:, maybe 801:contribs 735:RE: HHHH 595:Question 458:wp:admin 385:You can 5808:deleted 5777:Pumpkin 5717:Gilliam 5628:undated 5612:request 5361:request 5129:Thanks 5098:Jazyfko 5062:Eldhose 4629:Protonk 4625:future. 4514:Hello, 4465:///Euro 4169:- Never 3926:Hello, 3809:. :) -- 3436:Crau999 3397:Crau999 3277:Crau999 3269:Crau999 2664:Hello, 2052:Schwede 1768:undated 1384:merging 1075:Oh oops 919:trashed 763:protect 758:history 647:///Euro 607:///Euro 542:Edlantz 464:citing 309:tact.-- 156:Ben Ben 93:Edwardx 41:Edwardx 5802:Thanks 5651:demize 5472:Zaxevi 5114:, and 5046:Taketa 5032:Taketa 5016:Taketa 4888:WP:UAA 4821:WP:UAA 4332:jones 4324:WP:AfC 4223:, and 4162:public 3540:Go to 3380:entry. 3314:WP:DCM 3159:WP:SPI 2439:, not 1854:WP:AIV 1424:(talk) 1336:Daniel 972:Leutha 933:Leutha 767:delete 404:WP:ISU 5785:Prize 4783:Wgolf 4739:Witty 4712:Witty 4177:gurus 4158:gurus 3793:Bbb23 3721:Bbb23 3692:Bbb23 3413:Dear 3335:Dear 3236:Dear 2441:snail 1644:)". 1598:Does 1450:by -- 1418:Brown 1082:Wgolf 1032:Bbb23 862:Trevj 847:Trevj 792:Trevj 784:views 776:watch 772:links 719:Iraag 345:in a 269:and 16:< 5816:talk 5793:talk 5787:, -- 5766:talk 5721:talk 5622:talk 5577:talk 5562:talk 5528:talk 5490:Eric 5476:talk 5445:Eric 5415:talk 5371:talk 5352:talk 5297:talk 5236:talk 5216:hi! 5186:talk 5151:talk 5083:talk 5050:talk 5036:talk 5020:talk 4982:talk 4952:talk 4943:and 4928:Neil 4913:talk 4893:Neil 4890:. -- 4871:talk 4853:Neil 4839:Neil 4806:Neil 4787:talk 4742:lama 4715:lama 4689:talk 4633:talk 4559:this 4538:talk 4501:talk 4438:logs 4414:talk 4358:talk 4311:talk 4271:talk 4233:talk 4196:talk 4134:talk 4091:talk 4066:talk 4013:BAPS 3994:talk 3939:talk 3913:talk 3861:this 3815:talk 3797:talk 3783:talk 3748:talk 3725:talk 3696:talk 3651:talk 3625:talk 3602:talk 3576:talk 3525:talk 3498:talk 3464:talk 3440:talk 3421:talk 3401:talk 3343:talk 3281:talk 3273:talk 3244:talk 3207:talk 3189:talk 3148:talk 3102:talk 3096:Matt 3086:Hi, 3058:talk 2992:talk 2973:talk 2943:Paul 2931:per 2876:talk 2855:talk 2843:here 2791:talk 2776:talk 2761:talk 2703:talk 2688:talk 2674:talk 2644:talk 2623:talk 2607:talk 2585:talk 2548:talk 2527:talk 2491:talk 2471:talk 2457:talk 2390:talk 2347:talk 2302:talk 2270:talk 2262:here 2237:talk 2215:talk 2211:Joy 2182:talk 2178:Joy 2114:talk 2082:talk 2003:talk 1975:talk 1843:talk 1822:talk 1742:talk 1719:talk 1679:talk 1608:talk 1525:talk 1490:talk 1456:talk 1448:here 1445:here 1399:talk 1355:. -- 1342:talk 1301:talk 1273:talk 1259:talk 1245:talk 1228:Re: 1183:talk 1155:talk 1121:talk 1086:talk 1036:talk 976:talk 968:this 937:talk 867:talk 852:talk 841:HHhH 837:HHHH 814:and 812:HHHH 797:talk 780:logs 754:talk 750:edit 746:HHHH 723:talk 686:talk 546:talk 478:talk 427:talk 412:talk 355:talk 315:talk 279:talk 233:Neil 160:talk 125:talk 97:talk 76:Czar 62:czar 45:talk 5810:. 5781:Sky 5624:) 5342:of 4521:to 4470:Car 4328:Ron 4301:or 3312:or 2963:of 2343:BiH 2044:in 2001:" ( 1973:" ( 1756:RFA 1523:" ( 1426:• ( 1235:Re 989:.-- 929:YOU 860:-- 845:-- 790:-- 652:Car 612:Car 575:.-- 406:). 300:man 295:Reh 206:man 201:Reh 5818:) 5795:) 5760:-- 5723:) 5715:– 5674:-- 5660:· 5583:) 5579:• 5530:) 5478:) 5417:) 5373:) 5354:) 5303:) 5299:• 5275:) 5238:) 5157:) 5153:• 5122:, 5118:, 5089:) 5085:• 5052:) 5038:) 5022:) 4984:) 4954:) 4915:) 4873:) 4789:) 4691:) 4635:) 4606:Ed 4544:) 4540:• 4503:) 4477:GT 4360:) 4313:) 4273:) 4235:) 4198:) 4136:) 4093:) 4068:) 3996:) 3966:-- 3941:) 3915:) 3817:) 3799:) 3785:) 3750:) 3727:) 3698:) 3653:) 3631:) 3627:• 3604:) 3578:) 3531:) 3527:• 3500:) 3476:-- 3466:) 3442:) 3403:) 3395:-- 3345:), 3283:) 3267:-- 3209:) 3201:, 3191:) 3150:) 3104:) 3060:) 2994:) 2975:) 2878:) 2857:) 2793:) 2778:) 2763:) 2705:) 2690:) 2676:) 2646:) 2625:) 2609:) 2587:) 2550:) 2529:) 2493:) 2473:) 2459:) 2396:) 2392:• 2349:) 2304:) 2272:) 2264:. 2239:) 2217:) 2209:-- 2184:) 2176:-- 2122:) 2084:) 2057:66 2005:) 1977:) 1904:-- 1893:-- 1845:) 1837:? 1824:) 1744:) 1721:) 1685:) 1681:• 1610:) 1527:) 1496:) 1492:• 1474:. 1458:) 1401:) 1344:) 1303:) 1275:) 1218:-- 1215:}} 1209:{{ 1185:) 1164:-- 1157:) 1123:) 1088:) 1038:) 978:) 939:) 896:. 873:) 869:· 854:· 843:. 816:4H 803:) 799:· 782:| 778:| 774:| 770:| 765:| 761:| 756:| 752:| 725:) 688:) 659:GT 619:GT 557:-- 548:) 480:) 429:) 414:) 357:) 317:) 292:. 281:) 265:, 261:, 257:, 253:, 162:) 127:) 99:) 47:) 5814:( 5791:( 5764:( 5719:( 5704:. 5664:) 5662:c 5658:t 5656:( 5620:( 5575:( 5560:( 5526:( 5474:( 5413:( 5369:( 5350:( 5295:( 5234:( 5189:) 5183:( 5149:( 5081:( 5048:( 5034:( 5018:( 4980:( 4950:( 4930:N 4911:( 4895:N 4884:: 4880:@ 4869:( 4855:N 4841:N 4808:N 4785:( 4687:( 4631:( 4536:( 4499:( 4458:) 4453:· 4447:· 4441:· 4435:· 4429:· 4423:· 4417:· 4412:( 4356:( 4330:h 4309:( 4269:( 4231:( 4194:( 4179:. 4132:( 4089:( 4064:( 3992:( 3937:( 3911:( 3870:☥ 3843:. 3813:( 3795:( 3781:( 3746:( 3723:( 3694:( 3649:( 3623:( 3600:( 3574:( 3523:( 3496:( 3462:( 3438:( 3423:) 3419:( 3399:( 3341:( 3279:( 3271:( 3242:( 3205:( 3187:( 3146:( 3100:( 3056:( 3006:: 3002:@ 2990:( 2971:( 2874:( 2853:( 2789:( 2774:( 2759:( 2701:( 2686:( 2672:( 2642:( 2621:( 2605:( 2583:( 2546:( 2540:: 2536:@ 2525:( 2489:( 2469:( 2455:( 2388:( 2345:( 2300:( 2268:( 2235:( 2213:( 2180:( 2117:· 2112:( 2080:( 1997:" 1969:" 1841:( 1820:( 1740:( 1734:: 1730:@ 1717:( 1677:( 1606:( 1583:) 1577:( 1519:" 1488:( 1454:( 1430:) 1397:( 1340:( 1299:( 1271:( 1262:· 1257:( 1248:· 1243:( 1181:( 1153:( 1119:( 1084:( 1034:( 974:( 970:! 935:( 865:( 850:( 795:( 786:) 748:( 721:( 684:( 544:( 506:| 476:( 425:( 410:( 382:. 353:( 313:( 277:( 158:( 123:( 95:( 66:♔ 43:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index