User talk:Amire80/Archive 2008 - January

1541:

are in Occitan there, so is the educational system, on the reverse Occitan has no real legal status in the French state and painstrikingly survives... About the policies I can say that the Occitan-Catalan/Catalan-Occitan dictionary (I'm one of the coautors) has been made because of the Val d'Aran and so has recently an Aranese (Occitan)-English-Aranese dictionary (Ryan Furness, from the University of Minnesota); until the moment there was no real bilingual dictionary aside from French-Occitan and Occitan-French. The promotion of Aranese has helped the current promotion of Occitan in Tolosa/Toulouse for instance and many projects are on the way. However those are facts and might not appear in any book so I don't know how it will please your appetite for quotations. I mean if you think the lack of quotation is such a problem, just leave it this way, I don't mind. I somewhat think it's not really fair, I don't know your knowledge of the Occitan culture, language or society but in my case I would never erase someone else's contribution (work, energy and time) unless I know very well and for sure it's wrong or not grounded. Do as you wish anyway, I have more pressing matters going on. In case you should erase something else I wrote, it would be safer to contact me on the Wikiccionari (Occitan Wiktionary) where I spend most of my time. Thanks, have a nice weekend, wish you a Happy New Year even though I'm not really sure how it applies in Israel! Best regards, coralament,

1587:

there are very few news coverage about non-statal culture in France and many of my friends have a real hard time trying to have some coverage of their events. So trying to find an article about it would take me a huge amount of time that I don't have and am not willing to spend. I mean that common sense should be enough, let's compare the current production of bilingual dictionaries or even the grammar you cited and you will see where's the main creative motor of the Occitan sphere. Moreover there's been recently the presentation of a new book written by Jusèp Loís Sans, former head of the Oficina de Foment dera Val d'Aran and currently head of some office of the Promotion of Occitan in Catalonia (at Barcelona). By the way thanks for saying the dictionary is very good! Some things are on their way but we should keep some kind of privacy so I can't talk about it openly, however if you take a look at the Avui next Saturday or rather Sunday you might get to have a better glimpse of what's going on there. I haven't read the local papers (la Dépêche and so on) to know how and when the influence of the Val d'Aran can be noticed or noticeable in Tolosa so I won't be helpful there. You could find some precious information in the paper

1592:

more than, the Valadas Occitanas) are our small piece of paradise if you ever happen to visit the other side of the Pyrenees you'll see clearly how things are and that my statement was just plainly obvious. Since you deleted it, I'll let you deal with it, my current ambitions and prospectives are the Wikiccionari and other languages Wiktionaries, the Occitan Wikibooks and if I can find some time, I'll try to create some lessons in the English Knowledge about how to learn (Languedocian) Occitan. I insist again, if you ever wish to contact me, join me in the Occitan Wikiccionari, I seldom travel to the English Knowledge. See you, bon coratge per tot,

2184: 31: 1701:

affiliation and request adding the page (including a draft of the entire page) in the talk pages. At that time it would be up to the editors to determine whether they are notable enough to have a page. Is this the correct procedure? If so, would you please provide me with the correct location where I could instruct them to post this request? If not, please let me know of the correct procedure. Thanks very much, your help as always is much appreciated.

576: 750: 1080:

myself, since it was taken by me, and since she doesn't edit on Knowledge. She wanted it to have the usual kind of copyright free. So I did my best to put it on properly, but I am not an expert. Please let me know if I need to write to her and ask her to step into the discussion and to declare that the copyrights are free for use under the Knowledge conditions. Kind regards, Sofie Van Loo, Curator/Art critic.

678: 1779:

sources as I could find that had notable mentions of this particular company- I figured it would be good practice. I think the resources you have provided me are a good starting point, and I will be in touch with any additional questions and more details if I am stuck. In general, what is your policy of sending emails directly to you in certain cases? I appreciate your time. Thanks, --

2115:

You are right about red links - they often encourage readers to write new articles, so you don't have to remove them. You should only remove them, if you have a good reason to think that there's no chance that this article will ever be written. For example, if a person's name is the link, then remove

1335:

I feel that I have much to offer as a result of my affiliation with many notable companies who have rich and varied content that can potentially be contributed to Knowledge’s various projects including but not limited to the main encyclopedia, but potentially images, audio, etc. I have an ear that is

1540:

Hi! I'm pretty sorry you erased what I had written. Unfortunately I have been really busy on the Occitan Wikiccionari and haven't been around for ages! Well, I don't know what to say, it's so obvious that I don't know what to tell. First, Occitan is cooficial in the Val d'Aran, road and street signs

1368:

It would be great to have new professional content and images on Knowledge, as long as it is licensed accordingly under Free licenses, such as GFDL or Creative Commons. Note that works licensed for "non-commercial use" are usually not accepted on Knowledge - this must a be a truly Free license. Read

154:

Hi there. I'm not sure if "Adoption" is what I need, but I'm researching the options in Knowledge for my company. We are a CAD/CAM software company. Recently it was discovered that our company (DP Technology/Esprit) is mentioned on a CAD/CAM page in Knowledge. I'm interested in learning about how

1079:

Amir - Many thanks for you kind proposition to help. I took the photo of Bracha Ettinger with the photo camera of Bracha Ettinger in Berlin last year. I gave the copyrights to Miss Ettinger. This signifies that she can do with this picture what she wants. She wanted me to put the photo in Knowledge

418:

Ok, thanks for the input. The reason I was mentioning RFC was to try to get the editor to understand that if he doesn't change undesirable things will happen. I had forgotten about the paragraph I wrote when I included that. Thanks for the input, and if the card on your page below is correct, happy

1778:

Thank you for these resources and your willingness to help. You definitely go the extra mile! I have reviewed several of the resources mentioned prior to posting on your talk page, but will review them again in more depth. I spent some time this afternoon and took the liberty of collecting as many

1700:

Greetings, one of the companies I represent is notable within their respective industry. However they currently do not have a Knowledge entry at this time. From what I understand, the process involves going to the appropriate wiki project page and putting in an introduction with full disclosure of

1591:

but they're not on the Internet yet (I don't know if they will appear there some day anyway!). As I told you before I won't spend lots of time to add such a small information when the problem with Occitan is much bigger. I'll try to talk more about it if you want to. The Val d'Aran (and even, but

1586:

Well, I wanted to know a bit more about you adn thanks about the information, I'm lucky enough to have some spare time now to read your page and know you answered here (and try to add a few more things. Well, as I told you before I'm the coauthor of the O-C-O, I'm Claudi Balaguer. You should know

1327:

Because there does not seem to be any provisions for agencies or reputation management entities in Knowledge’s guidelines, I would like to be requested for adoption into your program because I want to make sure that I never run afoul of Knowledge’s guidelines and counter to that of the passionate

1901:

I often try to look for a source myself; if i can't find, i put "citation needed"; if no-one adds it within reasonable time, i remove the information and say at the talk page what have i removed and ask other contributors to put the information if they have sources. See for example what i did at

1339:

My intentions are to be a "matchmaker" of the most relevant and notable content that can add value to Knowledge’s databases, including but not limited to areas requiring more sources, citations, and general insights. I feel that at least in the beginning, I will need assistance from a Knowledge

1454:

Hi. I don't want to undo your change without asking you about it first. Looking at what you did (which, in your edit summary, you described as "refactored citation"), it looks to me as though you took the information from the citation and put it into the text of the Talk page. Is that what you

1659:

Overall, i see that you had a pretty positive start and quickly found a niche that interests you. Unfortunately, i don't know a thing about botany, so i won't be able to help you with that, but feel free to ask me for any help about the technical side of Knowledge - editing, policies, images,

1320:

Allow me to introduce myself. I am working on managing the online reputations of many notable companies including those that break industry and mainstream news (which are often cited by other reliable sources), and companies themselves that are well-noted within their respective industries.

1104:

As for myself, I have put as user name my real name. I am a curator and art critic in Antwerp. Therefore I will be very glad if you can take me off the list that connects me to another user names, I have no experience how to deal with this. Many thanks and best wishes, Sofie Van Loo

1756:

I understand that this is a lot of reading, but that's the problem when you want to create an article about a company with which you are affiliated. If you don't abide by the rules in these pages, volunteers who check the contents of new pages are likely to tag your article as a

1571:

For example: you say that "The promotion of Aranese has helped the current promotion of Occitan in Tolosa/Toulouse". Do you have at least a newspaper article about that, in any language? If you have it, then write it and add a reference to the article. Thanks a lot in advance.

2003:'s standards this is "rogue" usage. Absurd as it may seem, there is no standardized way to distinguish in Hebrew between and . I think this is valuable information, especially if people are seeking help in "correct", i.e. standard transliteration into Hebrew (check out e.g. 132:. You've asked me to delete the Nimrod Kamer's article. But, please, can you give some page where fr-wikipedian can take source : user page of him, the "preuve" (in french, sorry) that he was blocked, ... Best regards (can you answer on my user page in fr-wikipedia please) 1559:

My knowledge of Occitan culture: I spent a few days in Val d'Aran, and was pleasantly surprised the efforts to preserve the language. In Vielha i bought the big red-yellow C-O/O-C dictionary, which is very good and also Aitor Carrera's grammar. I study Catalan in the

1812: 2111:

The dates in the fact template are not supposed to be seen in the text of the article. They insert the article into appropriate categories. Look at the bottom of the page and you'll see that the page is now in "Articles with unsourced statements since December

1404:

Thank you very much for your help and feedback. I have since gone back and made the appropriate edits. Please let me know if there are any other areas that I could fix. I will review the Knowledge Copyrights section in detail and let you know of any questions.

2092:

Should I delete dead internal links (red links to yet-non-existing wikipedia articles) when I encounter them? I thought about this: although they don't look so nice they may encourage editors to click these links and write new stubs. What do you

1331:

I understand that many Wikipedians devote a significant amount of their time making this community and knowledgebase the best it can be, and I understand and respect the mission and vision of this site and the members that make up this community.

1890:

If information seems really preposterous to you, be bold and remove immediately. (The leader of Knowledge Jimbo Wales strongly supports this opinion, and i agree.) It is especially important in articles about living people; see

1494:

Okay, cool. Wasn't sure how to accurately cite something on a Talk page. But it appears after my signature now. I would like to move it up so it is part of what I said. You may want to check after me to make sure I do it right.

264:

officially up for adoption. While I'm not exactly a new user I'd like to have mentorship and help at editing articles, as the majority of my edits are vandal reverts. I was wondering if you'd be willing to take me on as your

1476:

You put that link in as a footnote. Footnotes don't suit talk pages well. It would be enough to put it inline in your comment there on the talk page. Better yet, you could add it directly to the article, as i already

1051:

I don't need to ask David Shai. I can just read your contributions list and see that you have very similar interests to Marina T., nnimrodd, and the other Captain Sudoku friends, and i am not the first one to notice

990: 845:- the person who deleted thought that he doesn't fit the notability criteria for people. Hundreds of articles about non-important people are created on Knowledge every day, so it became a speedy deletion criterion. 291:

One tip that i already have - since you are asking for it: try to improve your spelling. The best way to do that is to use Mozilla Firefox for surfing the web and for editing Knowledge - it has a built-in spelling

984: 309:

Thanks lol, spelling is something I have always struggled with. I do use the firefox spellcheck but I'm starting to think that maybe I should start writing replys in word instead of directly into the edit box. --

898:

I was wondering if there is a program that counts your edits you made only in articles. Do you know if there is? "My preferences" counts all edits you make, whether in User pages, articles, or talk pages, right?

1567:

I suppose that you refer to the part that said "Aranese is currently one of the strongest actors in the Occitan sphere". I was really sorry to delete that information, but all information in Knowledge must have

396:

I didn't go deep into what happened there, but threatening with RFC, even in a friendly way as you did should be the very last resort. Think about it: if you want to settle things without RFC, why mention it at

1719:"The adoption program" is really nothing special - it's just there to help you find an editor who volunteers to help you in any question. So naturally, posting questions on my talk page is the right way to go. 1099:

Dear Amir If this is of any help, you can see this same photo of Bracha Ettinger taken by me freely on the net at the page of University of Puerto Rico, where Ettinger is the next Visiting Scholar and Artist.

403:

Last thing, i saw that you wrote something very long on his talk page. Writing long passages is not a bad thing, but i'd invest that energy in the article space and point the guy at the relevant policy pages.

155:

to use Knowledge, possibly create a page for our company, and once/if that is complete I may be interested in expanding to include pages in several languages representing the countries where we are located.

1881: 1343:

Thank you for your consideration for your program. I look forward to becoming a valued contributor and a positive member of Knowledge and work with you and other community members towards a common goal.

1282:

Amir: I was looking at newly created accounts, and one user (DevilKai) could possibly be using his user page to advertise his career. Take a look at it yourself and let me know if he needs warning.

522:

Amir-remember me? I have a question: Since you're an admin., can you warn an IP address not to vandalize pages while I correct the vandalism he/she made? The IP address is 96.241.20.230. Thanks!

462:

First, and important tip: Messages on talk pages should be left at the bottom of the page. It will do the right thing if you simply press the + at the top (between "edit this page" and "history").

1324:

I have been following the area of Social Media, including Knowledge, and am very sensitized to the needs of following guidelines and providing maximum value to the community first and foremost.

1168:

If you are the real Sofie Van Loo, you can be sure that i respect you. The list will be checked by other administrators, and if they will find that i am wrong, then the page will clearly say so.

1134:

uploaded the same images with similar and confusing explanation about the creator and the licensing, which makes me think that you may be related. You are welcome to reply to my suspicions at

202:

Please don't let this discourage you from contributing. I am not familiar with your company, but if you can write about it in a way that will fit the guidelines above, feel free to do it. --

1914:: There is no nice "wiki" way to it. Just go to the page that you need, copy the the URL from the address and put it in square brackets. For example, this is where you added your message: 75:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

480: 400:

Besides, i saw that that user is a suspected sock. I don't know whether it is true or not, but if he is a suspected sock, then he probably already gets enough attention from the admins.

1852:'s suggestion since this seems more constructive and (as I am a beginner user, who is likely to make more mistakes) is "safer". I would like a third opinion. What do you think Amir? 1730:(COI). It is not, by itself, a reason not to accept an article, but it does mean that you have to be especially meticulous about providing verifiable sources and asserting notability. 95: 56: 1607:

Hi again, maybe you're roaming around here. Just wanted to tell you I've answered your questions and hope you can find good reading. You can reach me there if you ever need me! Bye!

2117: 494: 1638:. Would you like to adopt me? I want to have a reference person who I can ask about editing and who looks at my edits once in a while to tell me whether I am on the right track. 1704:

As an aside: For future reference, please let me know if I am going about the adoption program the correct way, i.e. posting questions and responses on your talk page. Thanks. --

671: 1695: 1713: 802:

only mentions that the article is a " stub about a singer. You can help Knowledge by expanding it". I mean, arent the rules same for all language versions of Knowledge? --

1726:. Technically, you don't have to jump through bureaucratic hoops to create a new article. However, creating an article about a company with which you are affiliated is a 1467: 544:, pick the right warning and place it on his talk page (don't forget to sign). This is prone to mistakes, so be sure to preview the page before you place the warning. 1158: 1110: 1085: 381:

to Achim on my user talk page and how I could do better. I'm thinking maybe I should open a editor review on myself, so I was wondering your input is. Thanks, --

1449: 2105: 548: 1359: 1183: 1147: 960: 1154: 1106: 1081: 1056: 1004: 868: 739: 249: 2024: 1994: 1306: 795: 560: 67:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 1525: 1504: 1489: 643: 2169: 2147: 2129: 1953: 1935: 1802: 1788: 1773: 1736: 1687: 1439: 1414: 1393: 428: 413: 360: 346: 319: 304: 190: 1291: 1248: 211: 2116:

the link only if you are absolutely sure that the person is totally non-notable and will never have an article. You can also remove red link if it's

2071: 2065: 1601: 1581: 1068: 474: 1616: 777: 1496: 1459: 1131: 1089: 848:

If you think that this guy is notable, don't give up: you may try to re-create the article, but do your best to prove that he fits the policies at

1162: 1114: 1780: 1705: 1635: 1406: 1351: 1312: 270: 2050: 1229: 79: 1970:

a link to a reference claiming that the usage of double vav or vav with geresh is non standard, could you quote sources saying that it is?

71:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

179:

It's important to understand that Knowledge is not a place where every little thing in the world should be mentioned, but an encyclopedia.

1272: 1124:

are Sofie Van Loo. Also, it only says that the content is copyrighted, but it doesn't say that it is under the GFDL license. Please read

1026: 915: 892: 818: 724: 1135: 628: 1669: 947: 512: 453: 1999:

Ok, please go ahead and restore this information. Obviously "double-vav" and vav with a geresh are sometimes used, but according to

231: 1564:. I didn't study Occitan formally, but knowing some Catalan, i can read Occitan with some help from the grammar and the dictionary. 859:

It is quite possible that Paulinho Mocidade is not notable for the Portuguese Knowledge either, and no-one has noticed it yet :) --

141: 1550: 531: 1892: 1480:

Providing good references to information in Knowledge is probably the best thing that you can do to the project, so thank you! --

794:

2. Why different language versions of Knowledge have different notability standards. For example, I translated an article about

78:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

282: 182:

To get an idea whether an article about your company will fit into Knowledge, please read these important guideline documents:

72: 167: 1651:

It seems that you set "Raw signature" in your preferences. This is not so good - your signature should link to you user page.

1277: 1045: 1979: 954: 390: 118: 922: 83: 1868:

that user pages can contain personal info but shouldn't become personal homepages or blogs. I added some more info in

940: 1456: 1074: 551:

to report persistent vandals. (Read the instructions on that page and don't just report every little vandal there.) --

547:

You may always ask me for help with admin stuff, but since no-one can follow his talk page 24/7, you may use the page

1793:

You can send me an email any time, although i prefer to have discussions about work in Knowledge on the talk page. --

773: 1915: 1336:

close to the most breaking and notable news provided by these companies soon after it has been formally published.

1513: 1654:

SlamDiego is right about Bakelite. There are articles with too much links, but Bakelite was mostly OK about this.

1022: 978: 911: 888: 814: 720: 185: 2032: 2000: 1742: 1727: 1561: 1189: 1153:

Dear Amir To respect me, since I have put my real name, I am asking you to take me off that list. Kind regards

1094: 1825:

suggested I should write "Citation needed" when seeing another user claims a fact without referencing it (see

1748: 853: 621: 2083:

The fact template is dated by writing: {{Fact|date=January 2008}}. SmackBot dated a fact template today in

1858:: what do I write to make a link to the history page of an article? and to an older version of an article? 1120:

This is not so helpful. That site says that the photo was taken by Sofie Van Loo, but it doesn't prove that

1967: 1723: 849: 769: 586: 378: 1340:

veteran especially due to the scope of possible areas of contributions that I could potentially provide.

1254: 1055:

In that sockpuppetry case i only listed you as "possibly related". Currently i am mostly concerned about

1297:

Thanks for your attentiveness, but that's not a disaster. The rules for user pages are much more lax. --

2191: 1745:(a.k.a. WP:NOR) - especially the part about "Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources" (a.k.a. WP:PSTS) 68: 38: 1171:

Please don't remove the warnings from your page. If they are wrong, reply and say that they are wrong.

972: 1840:

suggests unreferenced statements be promptly deleted (see 19:54, 27 January 2008 Allstarecho also on

1213:, as the German article is about Hebrew Taw and the corresponding information can be found in enwiki 63: 1813:

Inserting "Citation needed" vs. deleting unreferenced statements right away and two other questions

504:

Sorry I could not be of any help in the case above, but when I work I have to concentrate on that.

436: 91: 838:

standards are essentially the same, although everyone everywhere argues about them all the time :)

1626: 195: 1036:

i didn't understand you. Thanks. I am for years in the both wikipedias. You can ask david shai.

1260: 1017: 934: 906: 883: 809: 782: 715: 566: 227: 1887:"Citation needed" should be used on information which seems reasonable, but needs a citation. 1535: 1373:

for more information. Feel free to ask me for explanations if you don't understand something.

490: 2020: 1975: 1370: 1287: 1125: 966: 527: 331: 123: 8: 2165: 2125: 2046: 1990: 1931: 1865: 1798: 1769: 1665: 1577: 1521: 1500: 1485: 1463: 1435: 1389: 1302: 1268: 1244: 1179: 1143: 1064: 1000: 864: 735: 639: 616: 556: 470: 409: 342: 300: 245: 207: 114: 87: 2143: 2101: 1949: 1944:

Thanks for the comprehensive answer! I copied it to my talk page for future reference.

1877: 1826: 1784: 1764:

Do you mind telling me what the company name is? I may try to assess its notability. --

1709: 1683: 1410: 1355: 499: 424: 386: 356: 315: 278: 137: 106: 2004: 2200: 1225: 1012: 930: 901: 878: 804: 710: 517: 507: 223: 217: 163: 47: 17: 1101: 2061: 2038: 1903: 1837: 1612: 1597: 1546: 1384:

It is customary to sign your name on talk page. You can do it by writing --~~~~. --

1041: 1031: 486: 449: 255: 146: 1660:

templates, misunderstandings with other editors, etc. I wish you a lot of luck! --

1174:

You can contact me personally by e-mail - click "E-mail this user" on the left. --

2016: 1971: 1283: 832:

Why different language versions of Knowledge have different notability standards.

523: 2199:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2138:

Thanks again! (and let me know if I start asking too many questions at once).

2084: 1849: 1822: 824: 607: 541: 129: 100: 2139: 2097: 1945: 1873: 1869: 1758: 1679: 842: 760: 690: 659: 420: 382: 372: 352: 311: 274: 133: 2056:

OK, I've reworded the close to no consensus to delete, that's reasonable. --

787:

Hey Amire, long time since we didnt talk right? Well, I have two questions.

2161: 2121: 2042: 1986: 1927: 1794: 1765: 1661: 1573: 1517: 1481: 1431: 1385: 1298: 1264: 1240: 1221: 1175: 1139: 1060: 996: 860: 834:- Every language Knowledge has autonomy to decide on its own policies. The 731: 635: 552: 466: 405: 338: 296: 241: 203: 159: 110: 2057: 1961: 1608: 1593: 1542: 1037: 445: 273:

page says you are expirenced in article editing wikiprojects. Thanks, --

2087:(first paragraph) but the date does not show. How come? Is that a bug? 1841: 1830: 1455:

intended to do? If so, I don't understand why; could you explain? See

1848:

Both users seem quite experienced. I would naturally tend to follow

1217:, despite the fact that the enwiki article covers a broader subject. 749: 575: 1829:

and my subsequent action 13:30, 27 January 2008 Nahraana on article

2012: 1236: 1872:

and think it is OK. Could you have a quick look an confirm this?

827:. You are welcome to remain my friend and ask me anything anytime. 222:

Are you still adopting users? There's a user in need of adoption.

1985:

Oh. Maybe i deleted a little too much. I'll try to improve it. --

1197:

My rationale: It may be argued, whether to interwiki from enwiki

337:

In any case - if you need any help, mentoring, ideas - ask me. --

288:

You seem to be quite experienced, but i don't mind mentoring you.

158:

Please let me know if you have any tips or helpful information!

1206: 1202: 799: 798:

but it was deleted. However, in the Portuguese Knowledge, the

677: 1512:

You don't have to, but you may read this in your spare time:

670: 1194:

Hi Amire80. I've reverted your interwiki removal on dewiki.

1458:. (Sorry, I'm not sure how to do a proper link to a diff!) 698: 481:

RE:Knowledge Bahasa Ibrani (message in the Malay Knowledge)

2008: 841:

In your case it was a speedy deletion, and the reason was

540:

You don't have to be an admin to warn vandals. Just go to

57:

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Parser bird ptic.png

1214: 1210: 1198: 995:. Feel free to copy the code to your page and use it. -- 237:

No problem. Is it you? You seem to be quite experienced.

1696:

Procedure for Proposing New Entry for Notable Company?

1381:

all the time. It's enough to just press "Enter" twice.

549:

Knowledge:Administrator intervention against vandalism

1817:

I received two contrasting opinions on this subject:

1898:

If you have doubts, ask at the article's talk page.

668: 82:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1737:Knowledge:Notability (organizations and companies) 1722:For instruction about creating a new article read 191:Knowledge:Notability (organizations and companies) 2007:, page 5, transliteration of Arabic letter waw - 1102:http://cmcep.uprrp.edu/Bracha_Ettinger/index.html 1450:Your change to my comment on Seinfeld Talk page 1733:I suggest you read these pages on the matter: 684:Wishing Amire80/Archive 2008 - January a very 1059:, who appears to be infringing copyrights. -- 240:But of course you can ask me for anything. -- 2072:Dating the {{fact}} template. Dead links. 1138:. I apologize in advance if I am wrong. -- 1136:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Marina T. 330:Word is not better than Firefox and it's 1430:I look forward to your contributions! -- 1893:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons 1313:Consideration for Your Adoption Program 791:1. How do you "graduate from adoption"? 754: 697:Don't forget to save us all a piece of 377:I was wondering your thoughts on how I 14: 2197:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1906:(check the history and the talk page.) 1641:Nahraana 13:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 651: 581:Just a happy Birthday message to you, 128:You've contacted me on fr-wikipedia : 73:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1379:You don't need to write <br /: --> 1365:No problem - you're welcome any time. 295:Feel free to ask me for more help. -- 2178: 570: 537:I see that he only did one bad edit. 465:Feel free to ask me for any help! -- 25: 1634:I saw you are open to adopt in the 1328:community that makes up Knowledge. 923:Knowledge:WikiProject edit counters 23: 676: 669: 24: 2215: 1926:: Your page is perfectly fine. -- 1916:the diff with your latest message 2182: 1514:Knowledge:Refactoring talk pages 757:Amire80/Archive 2008 - January, 748: 574: 29: 2118:really ridiculous like this one 823:1. No specific rules for that. 269:description of yourself on the 186:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 2013:Academy of the Hebrew Language 2001:Academy of the Hebrew Language 1743:Knowledge:No original research 1562:Hebrew University of Jerusalem 84:media copyright questions page 13: 1: 1759:candidate for speedy deletion 1749:Knowledge:Avoid peacock terms 1376:A couple of technical notes: 1278:Possible Adverts on User Page 854:Knowledge:Notability (people) 351:Just sent you a email. :) -- 2170:16:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2148:16:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2130:15:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2106:15:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2066:20:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 2051:14:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 2025:13:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 2011:- and other sources of the 1995:17:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 1980:16:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 1954:15:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1936:21:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1882:16:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1803:23:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1789:22:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1774:16:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1724:Knowledge:Your first article 1714:15:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1688:23:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1678:Thanks! I'll be in touch. 1670:22:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1617:22:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1602:14:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1582:13:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1551:12:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1526:06:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1505:01:07, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1490:09:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 1468:08:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 1440:15:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1415:15:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1394:09:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 1360:15:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1307:06:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 1292:00:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 1273:13:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC) 1249:23:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC) 1230:22:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC) 1184:22:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 1163:21:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 1148:08:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 1115:00:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 1090:22:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 1069:09:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 1046:17:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 1027:21:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 1005:12:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 928:Here's a quick simple tool: 916:12:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 893:21:42, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 869:21:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 850:Knowledge:Notability (music) 819:21:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 778:07:48, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 761:Knowledge Birthday Committee 747: 740:20:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 725:20:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 691:Knowledge Birthday Committee 644:09:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 629:01:18, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 588:Knowledge Birthday Committee 561:09:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 532:20:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 513:00:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 429:14:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 414:09:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 391:04:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 361:23:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 80:criteria for speedy deletion 7: 1645:Of course. You are welcome. 1209:has to interwiki to enwiki 656: 495:06:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 475:22:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 454:22:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 347:08:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 320:02:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 305:08:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 283:06:09, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 250:11:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 232:00:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 212:21:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 168:21:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 142:10:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 119:05:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 96:18:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 10: 2220: 653: 485:You're welcome! Shalom. -- 69:Knowledge:Non-free content 64:Image:Parser bird ptic.png 109:, please reply there.) -- 1836:On the other hand, user 260:Hey, I noticed you were 1075:Bracha Ettinger's photo 770:HappyBirthdayClubMember 334:, which is a bad thing. 196:Knowledge:Autobiography 2079:I have two questions: 2033:Lingua Franca Nova AfD 1261:User talk:Idontknow610 1190:Taw interwiki removals 1095:If this can be helpful 681: 674: 459:I'll gladly adopt you! 324:Oh no, don't use Word 2195:of past discussions. 1636:adoption program page 1473:Your diff link is OK. 680: 673: 61:Thanks for uploading 42:of past discussions. 1728:conflict of interest 1371:Knowledge:Copyrights 1126:Knowledge:Copyrights 763:! Have a great day! 1966:Hi Amir, since you 1895:for an explanation. 1751:(a.k.a. WP:PEACOCK) 1255:Re:Image Dudu Nobre 591:! Have a great day! 2160:You're welcome. -- 1827:User talk:Nahraana 1604:/Claudi Balaguer. 1057:User:Sofie Van Loo 682: 675: 661:Birthday Committee 176:Thanks for asking. 107:User talk:Josquius 2207: 2206: 2201:current talk page 1864:: it says in the 1509:You did it right. 1427:Everything is OK. 1347:Warmest Regards, 796:Paulinho Mocidade 767: 766: 706: 705: 688:on behalf of the 664: 595: 594: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Amire80 2211: 2186: 2185: 2179: 2039:User talk:Canley 1904:Aranese language 1317:Hello Amire80, 1025: 1020: 1015: 994: 953: 914: 909: 904: 891: 886: 881: 817: 812: 807: 755:Happy Birthday, 752: 745: 744: 723: 718: 713: 662: 657: 649: 648: 627: 619: 614: 611: 599:FROM YOUR FRIEND 589: 578: 571: 510: 437:Adoption: Sahilm 419:birthday :D. -- 327: 33: 32: 26: 2219: 2218: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2183: 2162:Amir E. Aharoni 2122:Amir E. Aharoni 2074: 2043:Amir E. Aharoni 2035: 1987:Amir E. Aharoni 1964: 1928:Amir E. Aharoni 1815: 1795:Amir E. Aharoni 1766:Amir E. Aharoni 1739:(a.k.a. WP:ORG) 1698: 1662:Amir E. Aharoni 1629: 1627:Adopt me please 1574:Amir E. Aharoni 1538: 1518:Amir E. Aharoni 1482:Amir E. Aharoni 1452: 1432:Amir E. Aharoni 1386:Amir E. Aharoni 1315: 1299:Amir E. Aharoni 1280: 1265:Amir E. Aharoni 1257: 1241:Amir E. Aharoni 1192: 1176:Amir E. Aharoni 1140:Amir E. Aharoni 1097: 1077: 1061:Amir E. Aharoni 1034: 1021: 1016: 1011: 997:Amir E. Aharoni 946: 929: 910: 905: 900: 887: 882: 877: 861:Amir E. Aharoni 813: 808: 803: 785: 732:Amir E. Aharoni 719: 714: 709: 660: 654:Happy Birthday 636:Amir E. Aharoni 620: 615: 609: 606: 587: 569: 553:Amir E. Aharoni 520: 508: 502: 483: 467:Amir E. Aharoni 442:Please adopt me 439: 406:Amir E. Aharoni 375: 339:Amir E. Aharoni 325: 297:Amir E. Aharoni 258: 242:Amir E. Aharoni 220: 204:Amir E. Aharoni 149: 126: 111:Amir E. Aharoni 103: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2217: 2205: 2204: 2187: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2133: 2132: 2113: 2095: 2094: 2089: 2088: 2085:Philo-Semitism 2073: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2034: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 1963: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1939: 1938: 1920: 1919: 1908: 1907: 1899: 1896: 1888: 1846: 1845: 1834: 1814: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1762: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1746: 1740: 1731: 1720: 1697: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1673: 1672: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1652: 1648:Two comments: 1646: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1569: 1565: 1557: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1510: 1478: 1474: 1451: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1428: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1382: 1374: 1366: 1314: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1279: 1276: 1256: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1172: 1169: 1151: 1150: 1132:User:Marina T. 1129: 1096: 1093: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1053: 1033: 1030: 1008: 1007: 926: 897: 874: 873: 872: 871: 857: 846: 839: 828: 792: 784: 783:Some questions 781: 765: 764: 753: 743: 742: 704: 703: 686:happy birthday 666: 665: 655: 652: 647: 646: 603: 602: 593: 592: 579: 568: 567:Happy Birthday 565: 564: 563: 545: 538: 519: 516: 501: 498: 482: 479: 478: 477: 463: 460: 438: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 401: 398: 374: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 363: 335: 328: 293: 289: 257: 254: 253: 252: 238: 219: 216: 215: 214: 200: 199: 198: 193: 188: 180: 177: 174: 148: 145: 130:fr:user:stef48 125: 122: 102: 99: 88:BetacommandBot 58: 55: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2216: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2193: 2188: 2181: 2180: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2114: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2091: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2077: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1922: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1910: 1909: 1905: 1900: 1897: 1894: 1889: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1857: 1853: 1851: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1760: 1755: 1750: 1747: 1744: 1741: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1732: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1702: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1658: 1653: 1650: 1649: 1647: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1639: 1637: 1632: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1590: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1570: 1566: 1563: 1558: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1536:About Aranese 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1380:<br /: --> 1378: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1367: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1348: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1322: 1318: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1218: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1195: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1170: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1155:Sofie Van Loo 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1130: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1107:Sofie Van Loo 1103: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1082:Sofie Van Loo 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1014: 1006: 1002: 998: 992: 989: 986: 983: 980: 977: 974: 971: 968: 965: 962: 959: 956: 952: 949: 945: 942: 939: 936: 932: 927: 924: 920: 919: 918: 917: 913: 908: 903: 895: 894: 890: 885: 880: 870: 866: 862: 858: 855: 851: 847: 844: 840: 837: 833: 829: 826: 822: 821: 820: 816: 811: 806: 801: 797: 793: 790: 789: 788: 780: 779: 775: 771: 762: 758: 751: 746: 741: 737: 733: 729: 728: 727: 726: 722: 717: 712: 702: 700: 695: 693: 692: 687: 679: 672: 667: 663: 650: 645: 641: 637: 633: 632: 631: 630: 626: 624: 618: 613: 612: 600: 597: 596: 590: 584: 580: 577: 573: 572: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 543: 539: 536: 535: 534: 533: 529: 525: 515: 514: 511: 505: 497: 496: 492: 488: 476: 472: 468: 464: 461: 458: 457: 456: 455: 451: 447: 443: 430: 426: 422: 417: 416: 415: 411: 407: 402: 399: 395: 394: 393: 392: 388: 384: 380: 362: 358: 354: 350: 349: 348: 344: 340: 336: 333: 329: 323: 322: 321: 317: 313: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 287: 286: 285: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 263: 251: 247: 243: 239: 236: 235: 234: 233: 229: 225: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 194: 192: 189: 187: 184: 183: 181: 178: 175: 172: 171: 170: 169: 165: 161: 156: 152: 144: 143: 139: 135: 131: 121: 120: 116: 112: 108: 98: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 76: 74: 70: 66: 65: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2196: 2190: 2096: 2078: 2075: 2036: 1965: 1923: 1911: 1861: 1860: 1855: 1854: 1847: 1816: 1703: 1699: 1640: 1633: 1630: 1588: 1539: 1453: 1349: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1323: 1319: 1316: 1281: 1258: 1219: 1196: 1193: 1152: 1121: 1098: 1078: 1035: 1009: 987: 981: 975: 969: 963: 957: 950: 943: 937: 931:Idontknow610 896: 875: 835: 831: 786: 768: 756: 707: 696: 689: 685: 683: 634:Thanks :) -- 622: 608: 604: 598: 582: 521: 506: 503: 487:אדםוןד ואודס 484: 441: 440: 376: 266: 261: 259: 221: 157: 153: 150: 127: 124:Nimrod Kamer 104: 86:. Thank you. 77: 62: 60: 43: 37: 2189:This is an 1838:Allstarecho 1235:Replied at 585:, from the 332:proprietary 267:discription 36:This is an 2017:Dan Pelleg 1972:Dan Pelleg 1866:guidelines 1862:Question 3 1856:Question 2 1842:Teddy Bear 1831:Teddy bear 1589:la Setmana 1284:Shapiros10 876:Thanks. -- 836:notability 610:ThinkBlue 524:Shapiros10 500:Mark Hucko 105:(Moved to 2076:Hi Amir, 2037:Moved to 1850:SlamDiego 1823:SlamDiego 1259:Moved to 1023:Steinmetz 973:block log 912:Steinmetz 889:Steinmetz 815:Steinmetz 759:from the 730:Thanks -- 721:Steinmetz 658:from the 518:Vandalism 262:offically 224:Jose João 218:Adopting? 2140:Nahraana 2098:Nahraana 1946:Nahraana 1924:Answer 3 1912:Answer 2 1874:Nahraana 1781:Sodazure 1706:Sodazure 1680:Nahraana 1631:Shalom, 1568:sources. 1407:Sodazure 1352:Sodazure 1237:Talk:Taw 1032:Hi Amire 941:contribs 421:Nn123645 383:Nn123645 353:Nn123645 312:Nn123645 292:checker. 275:Nn123645 256:Adoption 147:New User 134:Stef4854 2192:archive 1968:deleted 1870:my page 1222:Pjacobi 948:deleted 825:Be bold 800:article 583:Amire80 542:WP:WARN 379:replied 271:adoptee 160:DPStacy 39:archive 2112:2007". 2093:think? 2058:Canley 1761:(CSD). 1609:Capsot 1594:Capsot 1543:Capsot 1207:de:Taw 1205:. But 1203:de:Taw 1038:Shmila 1010:Thx -- 843:WP:BIO 446:Sahilm 151:Amir, 101:Slovio 1821:User 1497:Candy 1460:Candy 1052:this. 1013:Nadir 955:count 902:Nadir 879:Nadir 805:Nadir 711:Nadir 373:Achim 16:< 2166:talk 2144:talk 2126:talk 2120:. -- 2102:talk 2062:talk 2047:talk 2041:. -- 2021:talk 2005:this 1991:talk 1976:talk 1950:talk 1932:talk 1878:talk 1799:talk 1785:talk 1770:talk 1710:talk 1684:talk 1666:talk 1613:talk 1598:talk 1578:talk 1547:talk 1522:talk 1516:. -- 1501:talk 1486:talk 1477:did. 1464:talk 1436:talk 1411:talk 1390:talk 1356:talk 1303:talk 1288:talk 1269:talk 1245:talk 1239:. -- 1226:talk 1180:talk 1159:talk 1144:talk 1111:talk 1086:talk 1065:talk 1042:talk 1001:talk 985:rfar 967:logs 935:talk 921:See 865:talk 852:and 774:talk 736:talk 699:cake 640:talk 623:BLUE 617:(Hit 557:talk 528:talk 491:talk 471:talk 450:talk 425:talk 410:talk 397:all? 387:talk 357:talk 343:talk 316:talk 301:talk 279:talk 246:talk 228:talk 208:talk 164:talk 138:talk 115:talk 92:talk 2015:). 1962:vav 1556:Hi, 1215:Taw 1211:Taw 1201:to 1199:Taw 1122:you 991:spi 961:AfD 830:2. 509:Alf 173:Hi, 2168:) 2146:) 2128:) 2104:) 2064:) 2049:) 2023:) 1993:) 1978:) 1952:) 1934:) 1880:) 1844:). 1801:) 1787:) 1772:) 1712:) 1686:) 1668:) 1615:) 1600:) 1580:) 1572:-- 1549:) 1524:) 1503:) 1488:) 1466:) 1438:) 1413:) 1405:-- 1392:) 1358:) 1350:-- 1305:) 1290:) 1271:) 1263:-- 1247:) 1228:) 1220:-- 1182:) 1161:) 1146:) 1113:) 1088:) 1067:) 1044:) 1003:) 979:lu 899:-- 867:) 776:) 738:) 708:-- 701:! 694:! 642:) 605:-- 559:) 530:) 493:) 473:) 452:) 444:-- 427:) 412:) 404:-- 389:) 359:) 345:) 326::) 318:) 303:) 281:) 248:) 230:) 210:) 166:) 140:) 117:) 94:) 2203:. 2164:( 2142:( 2124:( 2100:( 2060:( 2045:( 2019:( 2009:و 1989:( 1974:( 1948:( 1930:( 1918:. 1876:( 1833:. 1797:( 1783:( 1768:( 1708:( 1682:( 1664:( 1611:( 1596:( 1576:( 1545:( 1520:( 1499:( 1484:( 1462:( 1434:( 1409:( 1388:( 1354:( 1301:( 1286:( 1267:( 1243:( 1224:( 1178:( 1157:( 1142:( 1128:. 1109:( 1084:( 1063:( 1040:( 1018:D 999:( 993:) 988:· 982:· 976:· 970:· 964:· 958:· 951:· 944:· 938:· 933:( 925:. 907:D 884:D 863:( 856:. 810:D 772:( 734:( 716:D 638:( 625:) 601:: 555:( 526:( 489:( 469:( 448:( 423:( 408:( 385:( 355:( 341:( 314:( 299:( 277:( 244:( 226:( 206:( 162:( 136:( 113:( 90:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index