User talk:Amalthea/Archive 6

8226:

It has been a buildup of things over the years and as of late. She did see a psychologist at times these last few years, and, as others have said, she was more than fit to edit Knowledge. Her honors and the people who compliment her work ethic here are a testament to that. She knows a lot about the topics she chose to work on, and Knowledge was one of the few things that kept her mind off of some of her life troubles. That is all. The same cannot be said of KimvdLinde, who admittedly hates Knowledge and who has had the same "general pattern of histrionics" leveled at her by different users because she is difficult to work with. She should not be here slinging mud at my sister. I have seen her announce that she would retire from this site. Others have said that she is always announcing her retirement. So my question to KimvdLinde is: Why aren't you retired instead of commenting on my sister's problems? Your comment should be removed.

1693:

willingness to edit within community norms. I don't see that Jack Merridew is willing to do that. My motivation is improving the encyclopedia, always. The "worship me or fear me" approach that you describe as Jack Merridew's motivation is damaging to the encyclopedia, pure and simple. If he thinks arbcom has wronged him, as far as I'm concerned he can start an RfC/U and ask the community. His guerrilla approach is certainly not going to change anything. Best I can tell though, Jack Merridew has no more interest in what is best for the encyclopedia though; He is only interested in himself.

1445:

to call them on that decision and reluctantly say that we shouldn't be supporting them in those circumstances. I'm no rebel ("famously mild" as Bishonen labelled me), but I feel I must point out that ArbCom has embarked on a road that's going to end up with a decent, valuable editor being banned for no good reason, simply so that ArbCom can maintain an illusion of infallibility. It needs folks like you to no longer validate their actions in such cases. It needs you realise that making the choice to re-block Jack just so that the template becomes 'accurate' would be an

8221:. This user's comments about my sister will always be biased. My sister was not caught socking. I was. The "Little Brother" defense that I have just read fails to consider that such defenses may be true, except to say "too bad." In this case, I can prove why it's true. There are articles, for example, I defended that were not of interest to my sister, and I used an endless supply of IP socks to edit these articles in addition to the ones she favors, sometimes from different locations to acquire a new IP. She didn't know who I was, and even scolded me at the 7039: 8777: 3228: 2478: 8331: 6197: 4067: 4136: 8458: 7985: 7936: 31: 4563: 6028:

you can see that text was copy-pasted in, then words just juggled around (which avoids duplication detector tool picking it up). These frequent claims that involve "only a few words" come from people who aren't looking at the structure of the article. You can read the source, read the article, and see that you're looking at the same thing with a few words juggled. If you've addressed that, I'm not concerned for a closer look-- feel free to remove the tag if you're satisfied.

1708:

have to ask you if you are seeing a problem where none exists? You are blocking Jack, not because of the nature of his contributions, but merely because he's making them - and that seems very wrong to me. I wish I could persuade Jack to edit from a single account in the way he did throughout 2009 and 2010, but in the end, we are wrong to enforce an unnecessary restriction on him that we don't apply to ourselves or to other editors in good standing. The crime of sock-puppetry is

5735: 2002:

you shouldn't bring a knife to a gunfight, it is only slightly less well known that it is also inappropriate to bring a nuclear weapon; the collateral damage is simply unacceptable. The chances that the editor in question has laid all his cards on the table are vanishingly small, and so are the odds of stopping him from editing by instituting these rangeblocks. Please consider lifting these blocks, as there are plenty of good edits coming from these ranges. Sincerely, --

3716:

sided with user 2005 and both have been accused. I want to weigh in on matters that I am knowledgeable (poker, board games, Hip-Hop, fitness) about, but don't want to face constant attacks on my character. So far this only seems to happen in the poker category and unfortunately for me (at least in regards to the Wikpedia), this is where I am most knowledgeable and the subject I am most passionate about. Your opinion on the best way to go about this would be helpful.

3194: 5033: 1895:- that may be true, if terribly unfortunate, but you really have accept that Jack is NOT banned, and I do think that pushing him further towards a ban by treating him as if he were already banned is appallingly counter-productive. How would you feel if someone claimed you were banned and then blocked you as if you were? Think about it, there is a human being behind the Jack avatar and it behoves us all to treat him as we would wish ourselves to be treated. 1877:. I don't care how a gnome picks the pages he edits, and I'd like to suggest that you shouldn't care either. If we didn't both know that it was Jack, surely we'd be rushing to welcome the IP and encouraging them to register an account? So what becomes so intrinsically different when it's Jack behind the IP? He didn't revert Favonian, or vandalise the article or post a penis-pic. Have we really got to the stage where we have to block users because of a 1727:) was never anything more than a joke 'Mexican bandit' that was used for fun, and it was always clearly marked as an alternate account of Jack. And yet he was pilloried for the existence of that account, when all he wanted to do was show everyone that he wasn't a threat to the wiki. The same is true now: he's not making any threats, just going about his wiki-gnoming and accepting the blocks when they are made - 'passive resistance' if you will. 5918:

someone who instilled the joy of article creation in me, and taught me the importance. Then they got blocked basically for trolling where they didn't get their (political) way, and began socking, finally just trolling. I still find that incredibly sad, but that's the way it is. It's like the friend who teaches you how to play the guitar, but you can't invite him to dinner parties anymore because he keeps spouting racist stuff in conversation.

5804: 5995:

really bad cases. :) It's still useful when stuff isn't rev deleted, and even if it is, it's a way of explaining to people what happened to the content they lost. I am inclined to use it less now than I used to - mostly when I think there's a higher chance for editor dismay or confusion and when I think there's a higher chance that the person who added the content actually could be the copyright holder, especially if it was added by an IP. --

6445: 8885: 1839:. Like I said before, my motivation is to improve this encyclopedia. If I think pulling an editor back into the fold is a net positive, I do whatever I can. With the attitude I saw from Jack Merridew over the last days, my best guess is that even if he could be convinced to edit within community norms now, it would be a string of conflicts down the line. A net negative. And I didn't think so three days ago. And I expect better from 6437: 1731:

way. He's shown us all that he could become just as much of a nuisance, but all he's actually done is carried on gnomishly making little improvements to a wide range of articles. How would you suggest he could start an RfC/U when every time he edits, he gets blocked? This isn't a user who has become irredeemable, and it saddens me that you seem to have reached that conclusion. I had expected much better. --

8683: 3572: 6554: 6527: 6519: 4896: 2276: 1040: 1596: 6570: 3739:

good faith. And if a dispute cannot be resolved on the appropriate article or article talk page, there are plenty of processes, noticeboards, project talk pages to escalate them. In areas with active WikiProjects, I like to add a neutrally worded pointers at the respective project talk page, to invite further opinions of knowledgeable editors.

5784:? If that is the case, we've had a massive upheaval and ongoing disruption at FAC based on not just one, but three returning-from-vanished or cleanstart users, which reinforces the concern about "sour grapes" coming in to play in the politicization of FAC. What evidence is there that PumpkinSky is Rlevse, beyond that it looks like him ? 8191:

persona from her real life one. Someone like that should not be editing wikipedia. Quite frankly, the response train fits quite nicely with the general pattern of histrionics I have encountered with this user, so I have a hard time believing anything is true. If I am incorrect, please feel free to contact me by e-mail with proof. --

1801:

restriction could have been lifted earlier. And I would say that Jack could have asked for it before creating joke accounts. Not great that it turned out the way it did, and maybe ARBCOM could still have lifted it. But Jack certainly made his share of mistakes, and the restriction has no significant implications. I would never have

6918:

mobile ISP too. If I, we or they choose to edit logged out, why not? Oh, and what community norm am I failing to show respect for? Would that be the protection of a grossly incivil user from having their lies exposed because ArbComm find it useful to unleash him on pushers of a POV they do not dare to censor explicitly?

7643:, and it seems the edits you made with the sock are of the same nature as those of your main account. In addition, blanking that one user page would not change anything anyway: The account page is not indexed by search engines, and the account would still be listed on the SPI page of your original account. 5066: 8190:

defence and when that was not swallowed hook and sinker, the next post is about an apparent suicide. I personally think that if someone, who posts pseudonymous, thinks that her 'reputation' is so damaged that she need to commit suicide, such a person needs to see a psychologist to untangle her online

6514:

You're right on a lot of that about the templates etc I guess, having looked at the SPI reporting pages it does seem a more clever way to have the discussion at least decentralised, and yeah, getting anyone to report in if they see stuff as a neighbourhood watch thing, I was putting this off to reply

5934:

And well, I agree that there will likely only be a few articles that have to be reworded, but we can't just ignore it either. There is reason to believe that a number of those edits introduced problematic content, turning a blind eye would in the long run damage Knowledge -- maybe not even legally in

5397:

If you start one, please make sure to word it as neutral as possible, don't just call it a biased and incorrect attempt to revive a term. I believe the best way to start an RfC like that would be to author it together with someone who holds the opposing view in your discussion. Find a neutral wording

3844:

It is blatantly obvious you are 2005's meat puppet and your views and opinions are identical to his. Either post on your own account or accept the fact your opinions are going to be merged. It is pretty simple. You can recruit and create all the accounts you like and your opinion on all of them still

2018:

38912 IPs to be exact. May sound like a lot, but the actual collateral damage always depends on the actual ranges, and I have of course looked at them before blocking. In this case, the one other regular editor affected is blocked for egregious personal attacks during the same period. The majority of

1977:

I presume you'd feel the same with my reply, it's unlikely that we are going to agree on most of this. Hopefully we at least see each other's point of view and motivation. Nonetheless, if you want me to answer specific questions, feel free to say so. In the meantime I'll skip to the bottom line: What

1888:

I do sympathise with your frustration at Jack creating accounts and then compromising them, but I can't agree that a global lock could be characterised as requiring "significant cleanup by multiple people" - pretty much one click from a functionary with the necessary privileges. But more pertinently,

1800:

4) All he wanted to do was show everyone that he wasn't a threat to the wiki? Well that turned out great. Everyone was obviously a fool to think that he might return to abusive socking. Evading a restriction or block is certainly inappropriate use of multiple accounts. You can argue that the original

1770:

1) Jack is not being disruptive? What do you call it then? Nine alternate accounts in the last few days, five of which he deliberately compromise by posting their passwords here. Each of those needs required significant cleanup by multiple people. Why is he doing that, in your opinion, but to disrupt

1730:

What I'm describing above is the reaction that seems 'normal' for folks who feel that they have been unjustly treated. From Krustofsky through Grawp to John254, they've all taken Richard III's line and socked continuously and disruptively. The amazing thing is that Jack hasn't kicked back in the same

1707:

Amalthea, I'm truly sorry you feel that way. But Jack (as good a name as any) really is not being disruptive. I've replied to you on my talk page about the IP sock - it was doing nothing that I could see other than a bit of minor gnoming - exactly what you earlier said we could turn a blind eye to. I

1679:

You know RexxS, I was writing a looong reply to you, describing my motivation, Jack's motivation, improving the encyclopedia, the use of community and community norms, why I removed the text from Jack's page, and was about to bring it all into proper shape to post it (I was a 15k of text), when I saw

1568:

The other way it's possible is if you post your password in multiple places, someone sees it and is curious enough to find out if it is the correct password. It was. Why he does these things I have no earthly idea, but it's not a good idea. Someone should scramble the passwords, as I believe they are

1513:

of others have. It's no picnic especially when he pops in randomly just to insult you, and follows you around to article after article in an attempt to undermine you in some strange way. I hope you're not disappointed that out of the four accounts he blabbed his password about recently that your talk

1421:

I can answer your question about why he's doing that. It's because he's hurt and unhappy with the seeming hypocrisy of some of our senior editors who promised him a route to return to being an editor in good standing, but never delivered on that promise after he followed that path for two full years.

1386:

He may have been wronged in the past. The recent ARBCOM cases could have found a more solomonic outcome, one with which all sides could have lived. Nonetheless, at this point in time, the person behind Barong et al. is editing outside community norms, and is plainly disruptive. If there has ever been

881:

You continue to make inappropriate use of your talk pages, so I see no motivation to restore your access to them. I believe you are aspiring to be unblocked, and are talking with another editor about the possibility of mentoring? Editing Knowledge via IP while blocked is not a good idea then, even if

8250:

I have rev-deleted the comments on the user Talk page and have semi-protected it. If true, personal information like that should not be posted by any other person (and if false, obviously it shouldn't be there). I'd strongly urge people not to discuss this matter openly like this, but take it to the

8225:

talk page because of my edit war with another user. If my posts about my sister's difficulties should be striked, then so should this user's. Saying that my sister has a general pattern of histrionics is beyond the pale. She was not mentally ill and did not attempt suicide because of this one thing.

6630:

Heh. :) Yes, it would be helpful if he changed his editing work-flow: Useful edit summaries with every edit, previewing and checking changes before saving. I have only taken a glance at the changes (and can't promise that I will be able to take a closer look); there are a couple of minor things that

6090:

Sounds good-- it's OK to use direct quotes on terms like that ... By the way, since MoonRiddenGirl is also on this page, perhaps she'll educate us ... in the Cabin case, the reason I removed text instead of tagging was that a CCI wasn't yet open at that point, and it was my understanding that if you

6075:

The structure in No 2 is now different because I put things in chronology. Repeated: There are architectural terms in the description that I don't know ("rabbitted cornerboards"), so I would not know ho to paraphrase without losing precision?? - There was no tag to be removed, just content restored.

6027:

Popping over here per your request on my talk; Gerda, it's not only the phrasing-- the problem we often see at DYK (and that folks everywhere fail to pick up on when they use tools like the duplication detector) is that the entire structure is copied. When the flow and structure matches the source,

3715:

1. Even though the technical evidence doesn't support that I am a sockpuppet of 2005, I am concerned that if I post my opinion or suggestion on a talk page where I side with him, my opinion will not only be disregarded, but I will be accused again and again of being a sockpuppet. So far, two editors

1902:

when ArbCom decided to place the restriction on him last month. He wasn't abusing multiple accounts and we all know it. So yes, I do call that decision perverse and I don't agree that anyone is under any obligation to enforce it. I'm glad you don't do Pavlovan blocks, and I hope that you'll remember

1822:

6) Gold Hat? I don't care about it. He used it and Jack Merridew for quite some time, even though there was a restriction, but nobody enforced it. Doing so with a restriction (that was set up due to abusive socking, I might add!) was not particularly clever, but as far as I'm concerned he can return

1496:

editors whom Jack continues to be disruptive towards: but I sadly believe that you think I'm one of the "problems" on the wiki like he erroneously does. If Jack became a "Grawp" because WP didn't give into his demands, that would be absurdly tragic and ironic considering his constant railing against

676:

For our project we would like to reach a goal of getting 30.000 new articles about Africa on Knowledge. I made a template for the project and I thought it would be nice to have a counter on the homepage. This way, people can see how close we are to our target. But, ok. It's not necessary, thought it

504:

My thoughts exactly and no I don't think it was discussed, perhaps you should ask Rd232 afterall, he did recreate it. I noticed that horrid editnotice at WT:FSC and blanked its respective editnotice to hide it, it states the obvious and is way too general. I'll be going to sleep now, I've got a long

6610:

My advice to you, if you don't want your accounts marked as socks of your original account, stop with inappropriate use of multiple accounts. If you want to engage in a constructive discussion about inappropriate behavior of administrators, request an unblock with your original account and become a

5917:

Well, I just found one, which I why I was asking. As for losing--these are copyright violations and that's a matter that can threaten the whole project, a project in which you have invested considerable time and energy. It's not trivial by any standard. I learned the wiki-ropes a long time ago from

3741:

Seemingly easy ways to resolve a dispute, be it persistent edit warring or recruiting like-minded editors through back-room channels, don't work in the long run. One needs to convince the broad majority of one's opinion, only that will show implicit or explicit consensus and will make other editors

3672:

FWIW 2005 ignored your warning not to revert the articles in question without first reaching consensus and has rolled them back to their previous version yet again. I started an ANI requesting, at the very least, that 2005 be blocked from reverting my edits. That one simple change would prevent all

1989:

As I see it: His path from the last few days can't get him anywhere desirable. Refusing to create an account and sticking with it, only to spite ARBCOM, won't get him anywhere either (and editing from one account isn't hard, like I said before, so the only reason I see he has is stubborn defiance).

1828:

8) the reaction that seems 'normal'? A normal reaction in any healthy community to unjust treatment is to appeal, not running amok. If you find this community unjust and consider rebelling the normal reaction then I have to disagree: I don't find the community unjust, so me preventing his rebellion

1785:

to restrict himself to one named account. Second, when he deliberately compromised some of his sock accounts, while holding back others. Third, when he deliberately compromised another sock accounts. I explicitly did not block before the AE, when I already had noticed him editing, and after the AE,

1775:

that page for cleanup. He did so because at the time, the page was at the top of Favonian's contributions; Favonian had blocked one of his IPs minutes earlier. Doing that, when I read allegations of hounding above and elsewhere, is a provocation. If Jack Merridew wants to do gnome work just for the

1444:

he's been disrupting, as I've seen no sign of it. His editing seems (as usual) to be tidying refs, non-breaking spaces and the like. I agree it's contrary to the wishes of ArbCom, but they were dead wrong in the decision they arrived at, and there does come a point where ordinary folks like me have

7067:

If I'm not mistaken none of those IPs made edits this year, so I don't see why there is any need for any action at this point? I assumed it was consensus opinion that some of the IP comments at the FAR were made by Rlevse, and he will presumably have to comment on them once he asks for an unblock.

6917:

That does not seem to be correct. It has been alleged (on no obvious grounds) that I am one, some, or all of a long list of users who are neither blocked nor banned. See for one unsunstantiated and in fact hilariously inaccurate allegation, making me responsible for all the edits on one popular

3738:

Every editor should contribute in the areas they feel most comfortable in, the areas they think they can help the most. Any active editor will get into disputes some time. Disputes should be handled calmly, by focusing on content, intent on improving the article based on policy, and while assuming

3721:

2. I would like to clean up my talk page. I actually want to delete the whole thing and "start fresh." When I deleted some things over this past week, I was told by user DegenFarang " if you keep this up they are going to block you from editing even this page." Am I allowed to clean up my own talk

2001:

Hi, Amalthea. Although I am an admin on this wiki, I am writing to you as a private individual in this instance. Sorry to interject here, but I couldn't help noticing that RexxS pointed out you have blocked 55,296 IPs in Indonesia in an effort to stop Jack from editing. While it is well known that

1936:

which gives an assessment, warts and all, that is very positive. He was commended for making a "clean return to editing". And yet, after another year of positive contributions, his request for the lifting of the remaining restrictions and a return to being an unsanctioned editor were refused. So I

1790:

given him leeway. I block when I find it likely that it prevents more damage than it causes. My assessment of it obviously differs from yours, but I certainly don't do Pavlovian blocks. We are on the way though: Enforcing bans requires blocking and reverting an editor no matter the content, and at

8025:

I find it interesting that you did make that 180, although you did give me something that I needed, and was to use a little more discretion and a few more grains of salt before blocking them. I want to hear your opinion though on possibly making webhosts hardblocked (when we get edits from it) or

6558:

I'm not sure if maybe there's some secret page that keeps track of stuff in the longterm though it seems like it would make sense for it to the stnadard to label sockpuppeteersa nd their sockpuppets uniformally so people can recognise stuff easier to report them when they arrive back on articles,

6363:

Only a few articles are left in the CCI, please have a look, I would like to see it settled. I dislike three things in "Gerda Arendt is another absolute supporter of the copyright violator under any name it chooses". I mostly dislike the "it", talking of people, second the "copyright violator", I

5994:

was created in the days before rev deletion when we had two options: either selectively delete the content or remove it from publication and hope it doesn't come back. At that point, it was to help prevent people accidentally restoring the content, because selective deletion was rare and only for

3302:

Regarding your actual question: In general, it depends: In clear cases, I do everything, including closing and archiving the case page. If I think more eyes would be helpful, I leave it open. Sometimes I think that it's better to separate the roles, and only report back on checkuser findings, and

2820:

sorry, I should have been clearer. Your warning was quite appropriate, but I think the escalation by other editors up to a block for adding an iTunes shop link to one song article went way overboard. The user made mistakes, but he's a good-faithed newbie, not a vandal. I thought that removing all

389:

The new Twinkle project has clearly been a mammoth task, and this is my recognition of everyone involved (and if I missed anyone, please let me know). The new look and feel, the new features, the prefs GUI, are all great, and rewriting it to use the API sets us up for HTML 5 (if not infinity) and

3729:

Knowledge is supposed to work based on consensus. To quote, "consensus is not determined by counting heads, but by looking at strength of argument, and underlying policy (if any). Arguments that contradict policy, are based on opinion rather than fact, or are logically fallacious, are frequently

2216:

I have nothing to do with that Keepvm user. So please feel free to check it out we have nothing in common. I have learned from my mistakes. Hopefully ENCRYPTMATRON above has to from now on, instead of accusing anyone that disagrees with him/her. All im saying is that there are reasons to why the

1985:

Cause I don't see it. As far as I can tell, his approach from the last few days has only earned him antipathy. If he is not disruptive for the sake of being disruptive, as you say, what does he want to achieve? Where does he want to be on Knowledge in a year from now? And does he see a realistic

1919:

The point is that at the time when Jack was being vilified as "blocked" or even "banned", he was neither. ArbCom didn't make that determination. They determined that he should be blocked if he failed to tell them a name of an account he wished to edit from. What an extraordinary requirement, and

1834:

10) You expected much better? Wow. When I spend an hour trying to write up a constructive and exhaustive reply to you, and get sucker-punched with another deliberately compromised sock account that needs cleaning up, my sympathies and motivation to help Jack Merridew drop to sub-zero. I expected

1151:

isn't doing any harm just sitting on the page on its own. The main reason I'm bothering to do it at all is that if a tiny, formerly 120-character-or-less article has reached over 1000 characters, something dramatic has happened to the page and while it's often been fleshed out into an acceptable

6483:

I don't see why a decentralized system would be better. For one, it's helpful in an investigation to have the archive with all previous investigations handy, including all prior accounts and comments. For another, I'd expect it would lead to much more conflict if editors felt legitimized to tag

1224:

You are right that the Jack Merridew account isn't technically blocked at the moment. The person behind the Barong account lobbied to have it unblocked, since at that time, while the account had been deliberately compromised and in consequence SUL-locked, the person behind it was not blocked or

491:

I haven't thought about it too much, but IMHO a general 'follow the rules' editnotice is not useful -- not in WP space, and not in WT space (was there a discussion about the latter anyway?). Experienced editors know that already, and whether it's really helping any newbie and preventing enough

3691:

I've also posted a great deal of evidence that the accounts in question were either socks or meatpuppets of 2005 at the ANI. Please review it. I am sure you have acted in good faith but your conclusion is wrong. Perhaps the IP's are different but everything else points to 2005 controlling the

1417:

Thanks for your measured and constructive response, Amalthea. I am aware of Jack's recent history, and while you were researching it, you may have seen the several occasions where I have expressed my strong disapproval with the way that he has been treated. I wasn't aware of the socks that he

472:

recreated the namespace notice for the Knowledge talk namespace and I myself was unaware of the Knowledge namespace editnotice of ever having existed. Perhaps individually is better... there an awful lot of "non-policy pages" :S I thought the editnotice would be useful considering policy and

4488:

Supported parameters of the quick variant were chosen after looking at a huge number of pages and analyzing the used parameters. The next most used ones are first_name and last_name which can just be combined to author though (maybe even as a template parameter default, that should still be

8135:

I know that two CUs looked into the background as response to the unblock request, but neither seems to have gotten around to act on it either way. I myself am the one person who /can't/ act on the unblock request, and it would also be improper for me to remove a message that questions the

1692:

editor here should follow, not just he. What do you call that but disruptive? You want me to make gestures of good will? If I come by editors who found themselves blocked but may prove to be constructive, I try hard to open ways back into the community for them. But those editors must show

3910:

I just re-read what I posted - it could be taken two different ways... I meant it in a nice way – your edit rate seems to have slowed ("semi-slumber"). I don't expect you to keep your eyes glued on the repo or anything. Sorry if the message seemed snarkily sarcastic – that's not my way. —

1825:

7) 'passive resistance'? Passive resistance would be if he stuck to uncontroversial anon editing. Passive resistance would be if he stuck to uncontroversial editing with a new account every day. Setting up accounts to make his point and then compromising them with provocative edits is not

454:

amount of pages and prefixes where it doesn't. RFA pages? Arbcom pages? Xfd pages? Wikiprojects? FA pages? FP pages? SPI pages? If you really only want it for policy pages, why not just add specific ones where they are needed? Is this notice useful in the first place? States the obvious,

1467:. Yes, you'd have to admit that it would have been better not to have placed it in the first place, but gestures of goodwill are what will help Jack to pull back from self-destruction. You know that's the outcome we all want. Please let's try to move nearer to that, not farther away. -- 8216:

I'm familiar with you. Why should you be contacted? Please, administrators, do not contact this person about my sister. This is one of the users my sister fought against and is one of the reasons I was tempted to sign up for an account during that time. Everyone, please take a look at

763:

a useful addition, and viable in principle, but I was hesitant to try and get the required information from the globalauth log since that has a few pitfalls: It lists items besides 'setstatus', sometimes the resulting status is hidden, and it will show incorrect results for unattached

1377:). I can only presume that the person behind the Barong account meant to still use them since he tried logging into each of them during the fifteen minutes after the block. I can only assume that he meant to keep those under covers, to repeat the same nonsense with them in the future. 7855:

like Knowledge—is a concept not many are aware is a viable option and this thread might be of general interest to other wikipedians who have a similar need. More to the point, I can’t think of any other place in the world where there is so much talent and expertise in setting up a

5144:

If you think arbcom should fulfill other roles, lobby for that. If you feel other people are better suited to help at arbcom, try to convince them to nominate themselves. Just saying that those who /are/ willing to step up (for whatever reason) that they all suck is making a point

1778:

2) I do not block because of the edits, but because of who is making them? In this case untrue. I have blocked accounts and IPs of his three times: First at AE, after I saw a provocative post somewhere, found through Jack Merridew's edits the open AE request, and acted on it, with

3764:

Thanks for the help. I will be submitting my input on various talk pages shortly and hope that things go smoothly. For some reason, I don't think its likely as two seperate users who have disagreed with DegenFarang have been added, TODAY, to his list of sockpuppets of user 2005

7288:

I'd rather keep the pages as they are: I have linked the page from at least one bugzilla report since there was confusion about the current length of working redirect chains, and the test-wiki does not necessarily have the same configuration as enWP has. The page is marked with

3170:

More importantly though, we don't want to use that image anyway! A Chinese American is still an American national. If you want to decorate the person with a flag, use the USA flag. Also, this is not an official flag! It is a satirical flag (read the text!) that someone made for

6559:

this is especially important as they are sometimes quite sneaky about it inventing multiple false identities and even personalities, to continue catching them you need to keep up with them I think. For me it was less concerns about vandalism and nonsense but the more insidious

2372:). I want to actually update that graph but am unsure what happened in the past one or two years since his unblock. Is there a good location for me to establish timelines? I just want to mark RfCs and RfArs for future reference as it had proven to be very handy in the past. -- 8931:

When you said "I know", did you mean that Khazar is working for Human rights and the progress of this project again, or also the alledged identity of BarkingMoon and PumpkinSky (see "essay" above, also about who forms the "community", the admins, the editors or the readers)?

5935:

cases like this, but it would certainly hurt our reputation. And believe me, this was not at all the outcome I was working towards over the last days, but I had little choice when he stopped responding. Admittedly, with what I know now, it was probably bound to end in drama.

4489:

comparatively lightweight). The testcases were all looking good at the time so it should render exactly the same as the base template (the apparent differences shown at the subpage (renders very slowly, naturally) are IIRC due to some odd whitespace issue and can be ignored).

2356:

Anyway, for the moment, Jack Merridew is unlike to return to editing, so I hope we can stop talking about him and go improve the encyclopedia. The SPI case about you seems, as far as I can tell based on current technical evidence, unfounded, and I will make note of it there.

8056:

You are referring to Someone? If it was merely the log I'd use much more careful language. In this case I can make a more definitive call, but I'm not comfortable discussing the details publicly. Since you may be handling the case I can send you some more details by e-mail.

6054:

I read the source from Lonehurst Cabin, then read the article, and there was no doubt I was reading the same work-- then I engaged Duplication detector to pick up specific instances, but if the structure is copied even if words are juggled, it could still be a problem.

1807:

5) Yes, I've restored the block of the Jack Merridew account. Why? Because when the courtesy was extended and the account was unblocked, that courtesy was used by Jack Merridew to try and hinder standard procedure saying "you can't do that, Jack Merridew isn't blocked"

7515:". He may have ignored editing guidelines and principles, but I can certainly see good-faithed motives for his edits. Instead of with a warning, please try to start a discussion on a more constructive note next time, particularly with unexperienced editors like here. 1133:

and its accompanying comment should be removed from the page altogether, since they no longer have any place in the article. This new category just makes maintenance easier, since nobody wants to hunt through a category of 10,000 pages just to find the ones that are

4644:

Already taken care of, as you know, main underlying IP (which was unusually static, and does not appear to be an open proxy) already blocked. Didn't actually match the technical data I know from half a year ago, but I agree that behavioral match is very clear now.

3273:

Hey, I've just looked back at your user page, and seen your Moonriddengirl userbox. So, giving the impression of being female may not be so accidental as I thought. I admire her too, but I don't want to be her: I will leave you and her to fight over the privilege.

1940:

My advice is to accept that Jack isn't out to disrupt. Let him make his constructive gnomish edits as an IP. By all means, SUL-lock his registered accounts if he "scuttles" them. But let's put away the pitchforks; he really hasn't caused that degree of problem.

8021:

No problem. My health is not something that is going to be a statically calming down over time (well at least not in the immediate future), and since it's related to personal things, i'm going to keep that discussion off wiki, but feel free to poke me off wiki

1639:: On the watchlists of Waterbuck, il fugitivo, Puputan and Nyupat - Me, Crohnie, AGK and Risker on 4 of 4; Diannaa, Bsadowski1, John Vandenberg and Newyorkbrad on 3 of 4; White Cat, MickMacNee and Gimmetoo on 2 of 4; and N419BH on only one. All, of course, had 2177:

Why are you using an IP to answer back when you have a user account? And yes you are yet again putting the blame on others instead of taking responsibility for your own actions. Not that im not to blame for some of this discussion but it takes two to tango.

393: 7149:

If I looked into this and commented on it I might indeed provide fuel for this discussion. I am intent on avoiding that because I don't regard the discussion at this point as constructive, and because I have been accused of fueling the drama in this regard

1240:, asking the person behind the Jack Merridew account to restrict himself to one account only. At that time, the Barong account which was active during that request was again deliberately compromised, and the person behind it was back to editing anonymously 1745:

Jack sheds his supporters like his socks. You need some examples? Cut your losses so you're less embarrassed than the ones who believed he wasn't socking back in the day. They probably felt like total idiots when he revealed the big lie. Jus' sayin' ;:

3004:

Think of it this way: imagine you would earn money by selling photographs. You wouldn't like it if someone just took your pictures without paying (not even asking). Copyright is important since it protects people's creations, and we must respect that.

1797:

applies to every editor. It's a policy set up by the community. If he doesn't like it, he can try and change it from within. If he tramples it to make a point, I will try and prevent that. Editing from one account only is not hard. Most editors manage

5902:

I look at a long list. Some articles are mine. PumpkinSky was tremendously helpful copy-editing my Germanic prose. Can I just say so in general? Or do I have to check off every single article? Don't we have better things to do??? Loosing such people?

213: 3692:

accounts. At least five other administrators agreed. "User:TheTakeover" first claimed he doesn't know the other sock and then admitted he lied about it and claimed they are merely close friends. I don't know how you can ignore evidence like that...

6351:

I too am distressed by how ugly this got, and am sorry that Khazar left; I have stayed away from all related discussions since Friday so I don't know what caused it, but I can guess. I'll try to help out on the CCI page some more later this week.

239: 226: 1927:

If it's any help, you can rest assured that the reason you don't see my efforts to encourage Jack in the right direction is that my communications with him are in private. I hope you'll respect that. I do think, though, that you ought to check

1249:

was opened since the person behind the Barong account disregarded the Arbcom directive. While I was aware of some mainspace edits by the person behind that account, he had returned to talk page arguments with editors he was in dispute with. He

766:

I noticed that I can get all that I need from the globaluserinfo request to the local wiki's API though, so it should now be quite simple to add that functionality. I'll look into it as soon as I can (and figure out the answer to one remaining

1439:

If we won't let Jack be a well-regarded, constructive editor, then he says to himself "Why shouldn't I become a disruptive? I won't be treated any worse." Please think carefully when you say he's editing disruptively - can you objectively say

248:

Of course. Setup looks good to me, I've moved them all in place and added a new test section to the gadgets. Have fun testing, and if you're planning a beta phase let me know so that I can change the wording of the gadget accordingly. Cheers,

8602:

Quite in general though, I don't think it's good or helpful for you to do any kind of cleanup there, I believe you and Alarbus were in a discussion that apparently was rather personal/emotional, and this situation is complicated enough as it

6322:

The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and

5315:

Ah, it is okay, not your fault, it is just one those things. Thanks for showing me that too, gives me an idea of how to do it. I'll ask around with all the other regular soap contributors to see if they would be willing. Then see if Brian is

1203:

by the meta stewards, per his own request, which is the practical equivalent of blocking here on the English Knowledge. Unfortunately, he seems to be returning back to his old ways, so it seems unlikely he will be helped by anyone right now.

3309:

template: I was still looking through contributions myself (and you beat me to reverting a series of edits that I was still looking at), still deleting pages, still tagging – I would have closed it myself once all loose ends were taken care

1521:

He is in violation of his ArbCom restrictions, which were designed to replace a previous and still-pending community ban. Thusly, that ban should technically be reinstated. BTW: there are other socks that were quietly blocked by a recused

7708:

OK, but that does not change the current notability of the website. As long as the website or project itself is not getting press coverage or coverage in other reliable sources, I don't see that we can have an article on it on Knowledge.

3147: 5141:

I disagree with your interpretation and conclusion (although I do agree with some problems you name). Arbcom's role is not to administer, and it can only affect a part of what causes contributors to leave: unresolved disputes and editor

5299:

how I started a similar probationary unblock once. Every editor is different though, you will know better what lead to the block of the account, and what happened in the time he evaded the block. Most importantly, Brian needs to

692: 1933: 5612:"rv" is probably one of the most common edit summaries, that by itself doesn't mean anything. FWIW, Mistersaxon4 has used that edit summary once, PurpleHeartEditor never, Asgardian never in his last 5000 edits, and I thrice. 6891:

Why not? Provided that until I'm banned I get treated like a normal editor, which means that my posts don't get reverted by people who simply don't like them and who justify their reversions by false assertions about me.

1712:

multiple accounts - giving the impression that there are multiple editors when there is in fact only one. I challenge anyone to show me an occasion in the past two-and-a-half years where Jack has misled anyone in that way.

1589:

That's the very reason why each of those accounts has to be SUL-locked, so they aren't open to abuse by others. I think that all compromised accounts have been locked by now, but if any are still open please report them to

7177: 8751:

Right, and there's Greenock125 where it's now close to a year without significant issues. As long as it sometimes works it may still be time well spent (although you probably had to spend many hours reviewing PJH's edits

2558:

I came here to inform you that the last issue has unexpectedly been commented upon by many editors, and that your input is not necessary any more for consensus forming. May it be that your two comments should be swapped?

3773:) of being "familiar" with user 2005 and basically said that is why you lifted the block. In that same little blurb, he continued to call me a "sockpuppet" which is very frustrating to me. Regardless, here goes nothing. 5775:

Ummmm ... ok ... I've been poking around and now I see all the similarities (that is, if we account for feigned ignorance), but can we say conclusively that they're the same, in terms of understanding his input at both

3329:

Thanks for the answers, which were interesting. While I'm here, I'll just say this. I don't off hand remember ever having communicated with you before, but I've often seen your work, and have a very high regard for it.

2793:

No worries, that's what I'm here for. That redirect doesn't appear to be contested though? Pages are typically only protected if there was recent disruption (except for some high-risk ones). I've watchlisted it though.

6462:

While existence of a tag is apparently reason enough to use it in practice, it really shouldn't be. We have lots of article tags in particular that don't really have much purpose or are used way beyond where they make

3022:

Well, ok, but listing the source is not enough (even though the warning said so): We cannot use a non-free image in this article. There really is no way around this. If you want to read up on image licenses, there is

1680:

the orange bar with another sock. You ask where Jack Merridew (I'll just call him that now) is being disruptive? He creates numerous sock accounts although he knows that the community has stark restrictions regarding

2688:

Everybody is allowed and encouraged to improve a page. Nobody owns any article here. If you cannot agree on changes, discuss them! Don't just undo each other. And, just like it says every time when you save an edit:

8386: 4148:. It's an opportunity for MediaWiki developers and Wikimedia operations engineers to come together to work on advancing Wikimedia's tools and infrastructure, focusing on Wikimedia Labs (starting with the dev-ops 1851:

is all that is required, and you will find people will give second chances. And third, and fourth. Why don't I see you trying to doing anything in that direction? Why don't I see Jack giving the community another

3071:

Thanks for pointing it out, but I'm afraid that yes, both the old blocked account and the new one belong to the same person. That person has a tendency to try and usurp all their account names that were blocked.

2161:). I don't think I'm being cynical when I think this means he's more likely to have come up with a way of covering his steps or at least muddling them, like editing at work instead of at his home, for example. 1831:

9) No, if Jack would set up one account, stick to it, and edit from it, he would 'not' get blocked and could of course appeal to the community via RfC/U. I don't see that an RfC/U would change anything, but he

4961: 2157:

Thank you (both of you). For what it's worth, as you've probably noticed, BabbaQ has been blocked before for sockpuppeteering, and told me when I confronted him about this that he had learned from his mistake

1971:

If you allow I'll skip the point-by-point rebuttal this time. I started, but as was to be expected I largely disagree with your points and find that you misunderstood me, missed the point, or are plain wrong.

375: 4002: 1230:

You will know that in late March, the person behind Gold Hat/Jack Merridew deliberately compromised ("scuttled", as he likes to euphemize it) Jack Merridew, Gold Hat, and many/all of his earlier alternate

4232:

Improving the environment that surrounds RfA in order to encourage mature, experienced editors of the right calibre to come forward, pass the interview, and dedicate some of their time to admin

5375: 8754:

Hard to say whether it has a chance of working without knowing the person. If the editor doesn't make a real effort to stay out of the areas that kept getting him in trouble, it's hard to make it work.

7617:

Posting personal information is harassment and places the victim in peril IRL. Do you seriously believe that AF does not have followers & thugs in my part of the world? Your smarter than that, S.

7344: 4400:

Thanks for getting back. I noticed the first SPI at the time and agreed with your assessment that it was no abuse in any case -- sorry that I couldn't get around looking at it in detail myself. Cheers,

3931:

Heh, no worries, I know how you meant it. Was merely a stab at myself, I'm annoyed that I can contribute so little recently. I should have put an emoticon in there somewhere, sorry for that. Cheers,

8008:

And for something completely unrelated, since I've now had a number of first-hand experiences of webhost ranges being used disruptively I've done a 180 and now rangeblock them quite liberally ... :\

1117:, which in turn allows that page to be used to find other very short pages that might be problematic (whether new, or the result of mass content removal from an existing page). Without this system, 7172:. I'll just avoid engaging Ched on this topic until then. He has his biases, and I'm unlikely to be able to correct those anyway. I do have to make a correction to what I said above though. It was 3949: 4750:. 68.62.240.86 wasn't marked as a proxy (which surprised me as an observer), but this new IP may give some insight as to how an editor from the UAE is editing through geographically diverse IPs.— 1393:

So. What do you want me do? In my eyes, the ball is in the court of the person behind the Barong account. If he wants to change policy, community norms, or his restrictions, he is welcome to try

7044:

Thanks for helping out in repairing the damage I did with my edits on Jimmy's talk page. I think I was accidently editing off of a historical page. Sorry for the confusion I caused. Cheers

3375:

When it comes to SPI, I prefer not to be the judge, jury and executioner. I see myself as the jury only; I tell the admins whether the parties are guilty or not. The admins sort the rest out. --

8218: 6316:

All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.

7851:

Indeed, this is not en.Knowledge-related conversation, but then, non-pertinent threads aren’t entirely unknown around here. Besides, the whole concept of running one’s own wiki—one that works

3048:) discuss it in-depth, like a newspaper article about it. If there are such sources, it will not be deleted. If there are no such sources, then Knowledge should probably not have a page on it. 427:

Well, you've clearly been offering support to the project, which is all part of it (and providing the barnstar, which I shamelessly ripped off) - I've got all four of the techies, thanks --

1181:

He's really done it now. All my sympathies are exhausted. I saw him do a few constructive IP edits from time to time and didn't mind, but if he returns to such disruption every few weeks …

8251:

appropriate mailing lists if necessary. I'd also suggest removing and rev-deleting the same personal information that has been posted on this page too, as it should not be here either. --

9011:

Clarification: it has been pondered also several places that BarkinkMoon and PumpkinSky are NOT the same person, collaborating yes, but two people (my POV also) - people with feelings, --

3050:

But don't panic! Like I said, we all want to make Knowledge better. And if it comes to a deletion discussion, we still have one week to discuss and decide what is best for your articles.

6976:

intentional use, where it emitted the current user in editnotices and editintros and other message-like texts in some contexts was prone to abuse; for example, imagine an a link like .

7838:

Not necessarily / OK. I have a programmer friend who might be able to set Apache to provide front-end protection to the entire wiki if that proves desirable. Fat Cow could also do it.

6167:

Yes you did. Regardless the outcome in this instance, there's a whole lot of education/communication/clarification happening, which was needed and will help at least in the future.

1929: 8946:

I know that Khazar has returned to editing. I'm not sure I understand what you want to say with "alleged identity", but in my opinion it is not helpful to ponder that at this point.

6709:

Yep, you caught me, I took a shortcut back then and hardcoded the list instead of parsing the clerk page. Will try to fix that ASAP, and have added you manually until then. Cheers,

5858: 207: 3123:

Sorry for the late reply, I thought I had made a mistake and needed to set up a new installation to test this first, but yeah, it's just not live yet, neither in 1.17 nor 1.17wmf (

1684:. He has posted user names and passwords of several of his accounts to his noticeboard. He has done so before, he presumably plans to continue to do so. He ignores rules set up by 414:

Thanks, but I didn't help at all -- I believe it was all AzaToth, UncleDouggie, Tcncv, and This, That, and the Other. Well, I carved that barnstar image, but that doesn't count. :)

7564: 1384:

If it satisfies your want for proper process, I can restore the block of Jack Merridew, Gold Hat, and Barong, and nobody will question it in light of the last few weeks' findings.

1368: 2735:

as well. I agree that as it was, the article was not a viable encyclopedic article, and it was correct to redirect it. But it may be problematic to extend the 90210 AfD to cover

1924:

make people register an account - it's utterly contrary to the Foundation policy of open editing, and you need to think very carefully about what principle you're defending here.

6786:

Not really. I told him yesterday to be constructive and focus on content and today he posts a rant and spews insults. My impression is that he will never be interested to work

4362: 390:

beyond. And considering the wide impact, the implementation went remarkably smoothly - main teething issues solved quickly, and it finally inspired me to upgrade to Firefox 4

194: 6906:

Why not? Because you seem to have no respect for community norms now either. You are already indef blocked, and not supposed to be editing here except to ask for an unblock.

2895:, and hopefully writing a nomination at the end. Like, if I did that now, I would notice that you've only been active for four months, and that RfA folks usually like to see 2401: 6091:

get to a copyvio before other hands have touched it, you should just remove it. Maybe MRG will tell us if that's correct? I also queried her talk since I wasn't certain.

3673:

of this from happening. Every single conflict 2005 and I have ever had has started with him reverting my edits. If they are really that bad another editor will revert them.

3155: 125:

Thanks for the spot check! It certainly helps spotting them when they file protected edit requests on the articles that have been semi-protected against their socking.... --

3891: 3040:

Again, you shouldn't think about "stopping" people. Think about whether she is right. Knowledge has many rules about its pages. One of them is that topics must be notable (

2330:

Sorry, should have tested it in the first place. I thought I'd use a slightly more robust way of hiding it, but some other rule with higher CSS specificity got in the way.

5586:. I'm not sure, but remember how he used PurpleHeartEditor and did a huge bunch of edits that were similar to his edit summaries? Well I think this is the case as well. 3153:

Well, like I said before, files you just find somewhere on the Internet can not be used. There are only very few exceptions, but please ask me before uploading any image.

2231:

It appears Keepvm has disappeared into the aether whence they came. I will keep an eye on them in case more activity occurs. @Amalthea- sorry I couldn't be of more help.

8006:

Right. I'll see what needs to be done, thanks! Also thanks for chipping at the SPI backlog over the weekend, even though I read you're not quite back to full health yet!

2812: 1518:

was on all four; only three others shared that honor with me. Making "3 of 4", "2 of 4", etc. were some other "demonizers", some arbs, some allies - and his other socks.

5494: 8150:

I went ahead and removed it, but decided against a revdel or protecting/semi-protecting the page. I'm definitely involved, so I won't be doing anything with my tools.

6936:. You have been blocked, and you continue to evade your block. If your original block was made incorrectly, log in to your original account and request an unblock per 6923: 5210: 4336: 3523: 3361:

Yes. "I don't off hand remember" was deliberately non-committal, because I thought we had very likely been in contact, but I just didn't recall any specific occasion.

7013:

became active again recently and came back to this IP (and others). I predicted back then that it may require re-blocking down the line, and that's what happened now.

5533:

OK. I was waiting to see for Mtking's response to your request before getting involved, but I agree that the discussion wasn't really getting anywhere at this point.

5859: 5295:

If you're willing to try and can convince Brian to do it I would actually recommend to go back to his old account (if he can still access it). If you're interested,

5215: 5204: 2166: 2136:

I've investigated some regarding BabbaQ and would like to get some more feedback since, unfortunately, there isn't a simple connection here. I'll send an email out.

1889:

why do you think he did that? He's actually just said "I could be a real nuisance, but I choose not to be; I'm abandoning these, even though I could have used them."

1405:

it. As long as he continues to edit disruptively, as he is at the moment, he leaves me no choice but to block his accounts. And start a ban discussion the next time.

492:

non-constructive edits to be worth it is very doubtful, IMHO. We're overbannering the place, IMHO. If edit notices are the norm, people won't even see them anymore.

7645:

I don't see that I'm obliged to blank the page, neither morally nor by policy; in fact I find it generally important to link accounts that advocate a position per

6897: 3991: 1340: 786: 8274: 8260: 4116: 3950: 1866:

It's ok to disagree, Amalthea, and I respect your right to do so. I'm interested in your perspective, and hope you'll remain open-minded to my take on the issues.

4340: 2693:". Other editors changing your text is a very important part of Knowledge. If Arielle Leira is editing in good faith, I cannot (and don't want to) make her stop. 1304: 794: 6319:

All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.

8585: 4627: 4526: 3787:

You are a sock or meat puppet and that tag will follow your account forever. That is until you make it completely obvious (again) and you are blocked (again).

8517:

It frustrates me that he has been unreceptive to past efforts to get him to acknowledge the issues with his editing in order to get his account unblocked. --

7102:

but shortly thereafter he withdrew his unblock request and never answered that question. Other editors would like to see this clarified for different reasons

6635:

checked to see whether he added any poorly sourced material, that plus unresponsiveness on his talk page was I believe the biggest problem with Rihannano1fan.

5398:

to sum up the dispute that you can both accept, then add brief sections for each side trying to show why that opinion is more in line with Knowledge policies.

6826: 4960: 4435: 3519: 2354:

Well, I can't help that. And I'm fairly certain I haven't accused you of anything. And no, I'm not stalking you either, I've recently edited Casliber's page.

1262: 8649: 5528: 4281: 4257: 3937: 3926: 3905: 3408: 339: 294: 279: 255: 5663: 5652: 5643: 5241: 4657: 8265:

In fact, I've redacted it, above. Amalthea, I hope you don't mind my doing that - I'll leave you to take whatever further action you deem appropriate. --

4540: 1903:

you said that the next time you consider blocking over 55,000 Indonesian IPs just to stop Jack making constructive edits (as you seem to have done today).

651:

Do you perhaps know if there is a 'counter' image/banner/template that we can put on our project page to shows how many times the template has been used?

8997:(also see above), only I was too distressed then, I didn't even know what "ArbCom" means, and I did not know how to interpret "let sleeping dogs lie". -- 8195: 5242: 4768: 4704: 4311: 2669:

for every fact. If you disagree with an edit, talk to her. We all want the article to be as good as possible. But it needs to follow Knowledge policies.

1986:

chance that his current approach will get him there? Or has he given up returning to a collaborative coexistence with the community, as is my impression?

1276: 8574: 8563: 6582: 6509: 5367: 5353: 4017: 3168:) and we can't say who created it, and it's probably a compound image anyway and we actually would have to find out who created the image of the dragon. 849: 8285: 8145: 7678:

well, as you know the Knowledge community requires that a topic must meet our notability guidelines to have a stand-alone article. Like I described at

7384: 7345: 7283: 6747: 6611:

welcomed member of the community first. Evading your block and creating mainspace (!) pages with a list of admins you find abusive will change nothing.

6564: 6381: 6048: 4815: 3730:

discounted". If an argument is policy-based, it should not matter who makes it. It also shouldn't matter whether it is voiced by 10 people or just one.

1290: 782: 436: 422: 405: 8181: 7314:(you protected the first /rd1 page so a bot wouldn't be able to touch it), excluding user created redirect loops so it shouldn't matter too much now. 5999: 2063: 518: 499: 486: 464: 8192: 7679: 5025: 3976: 1088: 995: 9171: 9149: 9123: 9105: 9038: 8915: 8897: 8877: 8859: 8841: 8823: 8063: 7558: 6849: 6821: 6498:. There are several ways to prevent disruption, and as long as we can keep the nonsense down enough to keep working on the encyclopedia it's enough. 6298: 6103: 6085: 6067: 6040: 5539: 3283: 2848:

And now for something completely different: I like your style. If you're considering an RfA down the line and want someone to pre-vet you, ping me.

9079: 7991: 7984: 7540: 6618: 5559: 4948:

From a glance, I would recommend that you don't focus on going through an RfA that much. Keep improving the encyclopedia, that's what's important.

4927: 4513: 4497: 4236:

Discouraging, in the nicest way possible of course, those whose RfA will be obvious NOTNOW or SNOW, and to guide them towards the advice pages.

2621: 2368:

That is pleasant news indeed. Unfortunately this individual has a way of "reappearing" as he did 4 times in the past (as I documented in my graph:

2159: 2098: 8235: 7660: 7633: 7612: 7487: 7460: 7449: 7396: 7132: 7080:

I agree that the disruption from those IPs was mild. They engaged in some personal attacks against Will Beback, for which they were admonished by

6950: 6927: 6875: 6313:

Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)

6274: 4047: 4033: 3824: 3810: 3796: 3701: 2170: 1937:

hope you'll indulge my scepticism about "second, third, fourth chances", as I see no evidence that even the second chance was really delivered on.

1143:

will be processed whenever I get around to it, since I'm the only one who knows about the category at the moment. It's not an urgent issue, since

895: 868:

Don't know about a ban, but the named accounts are still blocked, so as far as I can tell it is still block evasion, yes. Thanks for handling it.

863: 7972: 7909: 7594: 7433: 7418: 7336: 7305: 6715: 6660: 3210: 2131: 2114: 2081: 1217: 9091: 9074: 9063: 9049: 9020: 9006: 8970: 8952: 8941: 8926: 8667: 8494: 7231: 7089: 6912: 6901: 6373: 6358: 6256: 6238: 6179: 6114: 5955: 5941: 5912: 5826: 5796: 5770: 5442: 5424: 3370: 3356: 3339: 3324: 600: 585: 7910: 7023: 5588: 5235: 5014: 4978: 4486:

I got very distracted after creating the first one of the series -- if you start using it I can try and start work on the other important ones?

4429: 4214: 4208: 3782: 3759: 3414: 3267: 3261: 2195: 1805:

of the original restriction if Jack hadn't advertised his sock status in his signature, edit notice, talk page, and userpage from time to time.

1747: 1648: 1570: 1538: 8811: 8790: 7701: 7199: 7188: 7164: 7114: 7084:

who is a "delegate at FAR" (according to xyr user page). Besides that, some of the IPs were indeed constructive in adding references etc. So,

7075: 6990: 6741: 6014:(source) "its new owners have opened the building to the public on numerous occasions for special events, such as Historic Preservation Week." 5977: 5927: 5717: 5698: 5333: 5310: 5191: 4935: 4610: 3985: 3165: 3002:

Hmm, I'm afraid I can't help here. All images you find on the Internet are copyrighted (with few exceptions), and cannot be used in Knowledge.

2948: 2417: 1187: 820: 774: 660: 8471: 8439: 8427: 8416: 8380: 8037: 8016: 7998: 7953: 6695: 6686: 6144: 5486: 5470: 5279: 5259: 5127: 5113: 4954: 4457: 4110: 3432: 3345: 2920: 2908: 2882: 2866: 2854: 2843: 2831: 2601: 2579: 2568: 2549: 2532: 2460: 2446: 2258: 2152: 2091: 1332: 809:

An unattached account that has its unified account locked doesn't seem to display anything, which I suppose is correct behaviour. Thanks! --

737: 723: 686: 671: 646: 632: 317: 8724: 8711: 8631: 8617: 7471: 6886: 6835: 5674: 5506: 4472: 4451:

yields no results, and the person who created the page is evading his block for systematic additions of incorrect information to Knowledge.

3588: 3500: 3178: 3109: 3096: 3056: 3011: 2995: 2966: 2675: 2391: 1768:

RexxS, it appears both your perception and standards are rather selective here. I disagree with pretty much everything you've written above:

874: 804: 565: 547: 457:

Bottom line though, show me community consensus that this is useful, and that yours is the right approach. This is far from uncontroversial.

120: 8611: 8154: 8098: 8085: 7576: 7061: 6162: 5621: 5607: 5577: 5405: 4599: 4188: 4166: 3963: 3854: 3682: 3464: 3450: 3382: 2800: 2770: 2756: 2514: 2247: 2226: 2030: 2011: 1662: 1630: 1608: 359: 8541: 8512: 8315: 7923: 7903: 7158:

I understand that you are unhappy with Ched's words, but I still ask you to please let this rest for now. I can talk to Ched if you want.

5897: 5852: 5155: 4996: 3899:

Sorry for the delay, crazy times. Do keep pinging me -- may take me till the next workday till I notice, but usually no longer than that.

3078: 2788: 1619: 1584: 1563: 7522: 5161: 4324: 3545: 3033: 2382: 1996: 1859: 1700: 1476: 1412: 1169: 535: 138: 109: 8526: 5304:

to try and and edit collaboratively and in compliance with policy for this to be a success. And you will need to have nerves of steel …

4356: 3647: 3632: 3621: 3606: 3141: 3124: 2440:

The first one is actually even better than typing the second one since it expands to the canonical {{Citation needed| date=June 2011}}.

2336: 2309: 2293: 1869:

Jack is not being disruptive by any definition that I'm familiar with. Look at the edits, not the editor, for that IP that you blocked:

1761: 1552: 1076: 1057: 1033: 1018: 1007: 960: 949: 933: 8761: 8744: 6803: 6777: 6759: 6642: 6494:

still works well. We don't really have to tag each disruptive account with the name of a sockmaster (and can't anyway), and it's often

6476:

Tagging an account with a sock tag won't actually make anyone look into it, no. If you want an account checked you'll need to start an

6444: 6436: 6417: 6400: 6382: 4759: 4674: 4651: 4407: 3489: 2718: 2701: 1374: 7010: 5571:

Can you give me a specific example of an edit summary that would match Asgardian? Aston Villa F.C. would be an unusual topic for him.

3736:. But when we decide on content, we should aspire to that ideal. Arguments should never be disregarded based on who brings it forward. 1950: 1893:"Enforcing bans requires blocking and reverting an editor no matter the content, and at some point it is the least damaging reaction." 1740: 9137: 8994: 4785: 4721: 4480: 2607: 365: 7053: 2325: 989: 920: 616:

on the template page, follow the "What links here" link in the toolbox section of your sidebar. You can see the pages linking to or

450:

I noticed that you started blacklisting all pages where it didn't make sense after I deleted the namespace editnotice. There are an

8580: 7546: 7247: 5417:

A few months are gone already, I'll keep April–November for a bit to try and debug some annoying Twinkle or MediaWiki API error. :)

4832: 4568:

Thankyou for participating in my request for adminship. Now I've got lots of extra buttons to try and avoid pressing by mistake...

4448: 3246: 8026:

some derivative of that, a policy. Of course then CUs might have to issue several more IPBEs for legit editors, but we'll see. --

7423:

I can't reproduce it myself, by the way. What browser are y'all using? Any related error messages in your javascript console (see

6218: 4870: 4639: 4395: 4381: 2836:

Ah, okay. Sorry, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't doing anything incorrectly. Thank you for your clearing that up with me. -

2103: 1624:

I wouldn't recommend it though: Logging into such an account can expose you to autoblocks and potentially malicious user scripts.

1335:) was identified, I don't know how. Afterwards I found three undisclosed accounts of the person behind the Barong account, namely 1152:

article, sometimes it's because of a copy-paste or other mass of unformatted text that someone dumped on the page. Given that the

7100: 5135: 4923: 4095: 3090:

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I agree that this account was only used for vandalism, and I have taken care of it.

2608: 1916:

template on a user who isn't blocked? If that really is "standard", then somebody really, really needs to take a look at the SOP.

8432:

Not a problem, I understand. If I ask something of you then I'm on your time, not the other way around. :) I'm in no hurry. -

7511:

Please be very careful with the word "vandalism" in the future though. I have no reason to believe that Jaylon305's edits were "

7208:, mentioned above, is archived. Some is history, some still applies. Khazar's last DYK appeared yesterday. Every time I look at 4160:

Thanks, but I don't see that I will make that trip for this event (even though I'd like to to visit New Orleans at some point).

4149: 2686:, they all seem good to me. She gave a reason for every big change she made. Can you give me a link to a change you didn't like? 779:

Alrighty. Not quite sure whether an unattached account is handled correctly on all wikimedia wikis, still need to find that out.

8390: 5890:

or one of the CCI clerks. I also think that revdel isn't always necessary either -- but really, I'm out of my element there. :\

4886: 3709: 2954: 1213: 8958: 8829: 8352: 7216: 5553:

OK, I've replied there. I haven't followed the thread so far, so I'm not sure whether that's actually going to be helpful. :)

2779:

to your attention before. Just remembered it; don't mean to sound pesky. It's basically a variant of the Erin Silver page. --

8499:

Confirmed on behavioral grounds. I blocked the IP for one week. He has used this IP in the past; earlier I had noted it on a

7424: 5614:

Don't let me do your work for you, you must have noticed something specific that prompted this section, give me diffs please.

4022:

My apologies that I didn't react sooner, I was largely offline for the last two weeks, and could not take time for Knowledge.

3420:

The categories have their uses, but if they become a motivation and serve as a trophy case, I agree -- and they do here, per

2499: 2074:

and is sending it to the audit subcommittee's mailing list for discussion, but he asks that you still contact them via email.

8847: 7715: 6333:

Please stop evading your ban. Get yourself unbanned first, and then I will gladly look into whether your request has merit.

5166: 2054:

If I posted it in the wrong place, I would appreciate it immensely if you would be so kind to repost it in the proper forum.

1257:

Earlier today, the person behind the Barong account again chose to deliberately compromise some of his new accounts, namely

8173: 7625: 6919: 5296: 4245: 3529: 2632: 1160:

system was already in place, this is a convenient way of finding such pages when they might otherwise go unnoticed. Thanks

1012:

Xeno, if you want I can set up a temporary javascript solution to prevent empty edit summaries until the problem is fixed?

841: 8793:! Paraphrasing (I hope not too closely): If everybody who reads this looked at one more article it could be over today. -- 6022:(source) "the local Chinese population gradually dwindled and Bozeman's red light district soon withered and disappeared." 4580: 2363: 1397:. I'll happily turn a blind eye to his constructive anon edits and keep my arm extended with an olive branch in hand, but 8618: 7377: 7329: 6703: 6487:

In case of the edits on your user talk page, at least one of the accounts was checked, but apparently nothing came of it.

6405: 6388: 5812:

Interesting regarding the RfC: I saw that he opined there and was concerned by it already, that's a prime example of why

5547: 4668: 4590: 4588: 2648: 2162: 1870: 1140: 1109:

added to them. This adds a hidden comment to the article that increases its size by about 200 characters, and adds it to

8531:

Actually, Novaseminary pointed out a different IP than the one you blocked, and he has just left a brief comment there:

6209:

For the professional way in which you dealt with a recent investigation, including the manner of communicating results.

5801:

Among other things he acknowledged it when I talked to him via email. Everything I know lines up, it is without a doubt

8802: 8227: 6893: 5211: 4779: 4715: 4274: 3992: 3919: 3884: 1346: 272: 3422: 8673: 8372:

Gladly, but it is likely going to take me a couple of days. Any closets full of fresh skeletons I can expect to find?

7812:

You said you need help in configuring it to be private. The best approach will depend on the detailed circumstances:

7721: 5764:

Yes. I don't really have much more information than that, but no doubt that both accounts belong to the same person.

5686: 4826: 2125:: I'd rather avoid any potential for appearance of a conflict of interest and not look into a related matter myself. 1497:"trolls" like Grawp. Are you actually saying that if ArbCom doesn't reverse its nearly unanimous decision that it is 1326: 1310: 1095: 837: 330: 8596: 6339: 2429:

Why not encourage it? If you want to date the template yourself and not rely on a bot, which one is easier to type?

8551: 8186:

I think there are a few things hereto consider. Flyer22 got caught using socks, defends herself with the classical

7949: 7438:

I disabled the revision jumper, and the links are back. (I use Opera and Google Chrome) Thanks for the help. Best,

6966: 6548: 6470:. It may make sense to tag an IP if it is was used by only one person and had significant edits, but not otherwise. 4616: 4502:

Yes, I just need a way of avoiding non-implemented parameters. Could be done with templates js, perl, AWB regex...

3860: 3666: 3561: 2095: 1636: 1089: 7753:

ability to copy text or code from sections of articles in an old version and transplant it to the current version,

7170: 6484:

active accounts as suspected socks without having to present concrete evidence to back it up and "prove" it first.

4104:

OK, I'll continue categorizing them, as it looks right now he should check the category every week or so. Cheers,

2657:? Arielle Leira is correct that the article is unsourced. Truth is not enough, information mus be verifiable, see 1529:- what's up with that? Were they him or more "impersonators"? He was offered a way out and chooses to stick it up 8321: 7096: 6624: 5363: 5274: 5221: 5203: 3539: 2589: 2242: 2147: 1557:

Viewing what is on other people's watchlist is only possible at server-level, how do you claim to be doing this?

1268: 7103: 8587: 7351: 6765: 5411: 5392: 5176: 3815:

Why are you allowed to follow me around and undo everything that I do and claim you are five different people?

3207: 2991: 2423: 2100: 1724: 1360: 1122: 1110: 300: 6156:

Well. I feel like an ass, who caused a bazillion wasted editor-hours. I'm not convinced I improved Knowledge.

8532: 8270: 8256: 8166: 7029: 6731:

link (note missing language subdomain) so it wasn't automatically switched to one of the two secure variants

6187: 5725: 5600: 5171: 4698: 4268: 4057: 4024:

I believe the situation is resolved now, and judging by what I read in that section I agree with the outcome.

3913: 3878: 3218: 3206:

For wheel-warring over what amounted to an AE:Block for the simple reason that it was *wrong*. Terima kasih.

3184: 3024: 1282: 432: 401: 266: 233: 181: 165: 4904:

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.

4809: 4745: 7274:

permits userspace testing and does not prohibit any redirect in userspace, except of your main talk page.

6047:

Again, examine the structure-- not just the words and phrases. Copying the structure is copyvio. See the

6005: 5565: 5448: 5384: 4856: 4686: 4623: 3062: 2683: 1322: 1296: 1200: 1155: 1146: 1128: 220: 161: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 7848:

I'm not sure that anywhere on Knowledge is a good place to ask about setting up a MediaWiki installation.

7299:

so any bot should simply skip it -- I sure hope all bots editing arbitrary pages are exclusion compliant.

6262: 5872:

would have thought it sufficient to make sure any text you found is either removed or rewritten. I'm sure

5637:

Since you have also replied at the SPI case page I've replied there, to keep the discussion in one place.

4797: 4733: 2972: 7359: 6543:

it would be useful if tagging was more standardised maybe even done semi-automatically somehow like with

6425: 5264:

Thanks—I dropped you the note here as I didn't know if you'd see the other before the page was archived.

4844: 4692: 4303: 4196: 2691:

If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here

2468: 2048: 1483: 323: 155: 7942: 7935: 7744:

a continuous running history “article” history (“document” history in this case) all the way to day-one,

6467: 4176: 2899:

six months of activity which would earn you opposes, so I would recommend to wait at least that long. :)

2749:

I'll keep it watchlisted, but think it needs an explicit consensus before the redirect can be protected.

1101:

Very short articles (smaller than around 120 characters) that are nevertheless legitimate articles have

8865: 7687: 6845: 6126: 5359: 4803: 4739: 3535: 2520: 2094:? For the "evidence" of disruptive behaviour/suspected sockpuppeteering I already posted in this edit: 1209: 755: 699: 38: 925:

No worries. I only have intermittent online time today, else I would have cleaned it up right away. :)

712:

Once that is done, you can use the magic word PAGESINCATEGORY to count the pages in the category with

7670: 7146:

At this point, Knowledge is not improved by us trying to uncover every last detail of this situation.

6576: 5868:

I'm really not the right person to ask though, there's a reason why I stuck to the trivial edits. :)

5631: 4850: 4680: 4534: 4507: 3569:

I'm afraid CheckUser can't help in this case since the data collected from two of the three users is

2666: 2662: 2369: 2086:

Thanks. Btw, bizarrest place to post it ;), but you could please check up (checkUser or whatever) on

1364: 885: 6944:. Once you are again a member of this community in good standing we can discuss grievances you see. 4907:

If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

4266:

It seems that you have gone away... I can ask someone else if you would prefer... but who to ask? —

705:

on the page. Afterwards, make your template categorizes the pages it is put on, typically by adding

8464: 8457: 8266: 8252: 8177: 8162: 8050: 7629: 7482: 7444: 7279: 7222:@Amalthea: Thanks for cleaning up the Vanished CCI. I guess he would help, if he wasn't blocked, -- 5873: 4791: 4727: 4043: 4013: 3289: 2408: 845: 428: 397: 305: 3348:(but I only know this since this came up again a few days ago, my memory isn't any better either). 8485: 8222: 8045: 7960: 7528: 7476:

Revision jumper and twinkle are both working correctly now. Thanks for looking into this matter.

7413: 7371: 7322: 7311: 7001: 6933: 6280: 5758: 5430: 5287: 5222: 4838: 4662: 3084: 2960:

Did you take the image, or find it somewhere on the internet? If the latter, do you have a link?

2658: 2642: 2348: 2110: 2059: 1873:- there's absolutely nothing disrupted by those 3 edits, and a genuine (if minor) improvement of 1314: 854:

Amalthea, I reblocked Perseus's IP. From my understanding, he is still under a siteban correct?

508: 476: 171: 148: 7835:

should be good enough for you? Files can be configured to only be viewable if you're logged in.

7823:

Is it feasible that the site maintainer manually sets up accounts for webserver access control?

6019:"Their plan worked as the red-light district and Chinese population steadily dwindled away." vs. 4990:

Heh, no, no relation, they appear to be using my good name for their nefarious scam. :) Cheers,

1791:

some point it is the least damaging reaction. A poor choice, but less poor than the alternative.

473:

guideline templates already say "do not make changes unless they reflect community consensus". —

9167: 9145: 9119: 9101: 9087: 9059: 9034: 9016: 9002: 8966: 8937: 8911: 8893: 8873: 8855: 8837: 8819: 8798: 8231: 7263: 7227: 7128: 7049: 6979: 6369: 6244: 6175: 6099: 6081: 6063: 6036: 5951: 5908: 5792: 5251:

since you've asked on the SPI page as well I've replied there, to keep everything in one place.

4773: 4709: 4553: 4417: 3996: 3366: 3335: 3305:

In this particular case, I didn't close it because there was still stuff to do when I left the

3279: 3116: 3115: 1063: 1024: 621: 597: 8075:

Single quotes are fine as string delimiters, but you then can't use unescaped single quotes ("

7690:. In particular, this is a new and unfinished web project that is not yet covered in-depth by 6503:

I hope I got everything, feel free to call me out if I missed something or misunderstood you.

3483:

Hmm, not that I remember, but I tend to be liberal with that offer. I'll try and have a look.

2721:, and the current article didn't address any of the issues mentioned there. Not so sure about 2298:

I checked it, after a refresh. The "und-batch" tab is still showing up there? Any thoughts? —

1509:

You know, I'd bet top dollar that you've never been wikistalked by this individual: but I and

8600:: The account was used in compliance with Arbcom motion, not abusively. It was later retired. 8478: 8436: 8413: 8305:

Thanks, and good luck with him! From the little I've seen he seems enthusiastic and does not

7682:, I don't believe that the topic at hand currently meets the relevant guidelines detailed at 6841: 6648: 6539:

What I was thinking of though as well though is the more long term POV pushing RE stuff like

6304: 5522: 5388: 4820: 3850: 3820: 3806: 3792: 3778: 3697: 3678: 3508: 3477: 3472: 3316:

when I started, who he told me it doesn't really matter that much to them how I leave things.

3241: 1205: 1193: 1104: 97: 6796:

rough days at the beginning and had lost hope as well, but it's now been close to 10 months.

6676: 6288: 6134: 5460: 4942: 3159: 3132: 3128: 2653: 2283: 2121: 2070: 1816: 1810: 1781: 1047: 374: 9069: 9044: 8947: 8921: 8756: 8739: 8706: 8695: 8662: 8644: 8626: 8606: 8569: 8558: 8536: 8489: 8422: 8375: 8310: 8280: 8140: 8106: 8080: 8058: 8011: 7967: 7918: 7898: 7780: 7710: 7696: 7683: 7655: 7621: 7607: 7589: 7571: 7553: 7535: 7517: 7466: 7455: 7428: 7391: 7300: 7194: 7184: 7159: 7110: 7070: 7018: 7002: 6996: 6985: 6945: 6907: 6881: 6870: 6830: 6816: 6798: 6754: 6736: 6710: 6681: 6655: 6637: 6613: 6504: 6395: 6353: 6345: 6334: 6293: 6269: 6251: 6233: 6226: 6214: 6157: 6139: 6109: 5936: 5892: 5836: 5821: 5765: 5712: 5693: 5669: 5658: 5638: 5616: 5572: 5554: 5534: 5501: 5465: 5437: 5419: 5400: 5348: 5325: 5305: 5254: 5230: 5187: 5150: 5108: 5091: 5047:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a 5009: 5002: 4991: 4973: 4949: 4531: 4504: 4492: 4467: 4452: 4424: 4402: 4351: 4319: 4252: 4203: 4161: 4105: 4028: 3980: 3958: 3932: 3900: 3754: 3627: 3601: 3583: 3555: 3495: 3484: 3445: 3438: 3427: 3403: 3396: 3351: 3319: 3256: 3173: 3136: 3104: 3091: 3073: 3051: 3028: 3006: 2979: 2961: 2943: 2936: 2903: 2901:

Anyway, just think about it, and don't be shy if this is something that would interest you.

2849: 2826: 2795: 2751: 2744: 2731: 2696: 2670: 2616: 2596: 2574: 2544: 2527: 2509: 2441: 2412: 2386: 2358: 2331: 2288: 2253: 2126: 2076: 2025: 1991: 1854: 1695: 1625: 1603: 1407: 1182: 1052: 1013: 1002: 955: 928: 890: 869: 815: 799: 769: 718: 666: 627: 580: 542: 494: 459: 354: 334: 312: 289: 250: 115: 104: 6515:

to properly (it's nice to get such a thoughtfully laid out reply to my thrown out points

3766: 1245: 8: 9162:(Yngvadottir and I celebrating) on the Main page today, one after the other this time, -- 8367: 8032: 7477: 7439: 7275: 6732: 6597: 6560: 6540: 6150: 5996: 5481: 5341: 5270: 5123: 5020: 4931: 4576: 4091: 4080: 4039: 4009: 2917: 2879: 2863: 2840: 2564: 2540: 2456: 2268: 2237: 2142: 733: 682: 656: 642: 608: 7088:

don't see a great reason to investigate them further, but there are always disbelievers

6011:"The building is also opened for special events such as Historic Preservation Week." vs. 3494:

Reading that discussion now, the "6 months" seems to be explained by that IP block now.

1113:

for tracking purposes. The reason for all this is so that the articles don't show up on

938:

Will someone come by and re-tag the socks as socks of the proper sockmaster account? --

620:

a template there, or you can follow the link to the external transclusion counter tool:

8738:

Yes, I actually came online to have a look. I am annoyingly busy at the moment though.

8722: 8637: 8451: 7978: 7646: 7407: 7365: 7315: 6473:

Risker's note had of course more facets than just tagging an account for investigation.

5887: 5813: 5781: 5777: 4646: 4369: 3838: 3746: 2987: 2638: 2106: 2105:). I think in this case, there are good reasons to suspect sock-puppetry in this case. 2055: 1718: 1527: 1354: 1236: 1118: 1114: 859: 561: 444: 417: 47: 17: 4144: 3148:

What should I do if I doesn't want my uploaded images delete by other administrators ?

1321:. The accounts had to be SUL-locked again to prevent abuse. A bit later another sock, 9163: 9141: 9115: 9097: 9083: 9055: 9030: 9012: 8998: 8962: 8933: 8907: 8889: 8869: 8851: 8833: 8815: 8794: 8702: 8500: 8187: 8151: 8069: 7582: 7258: 7253: 7223: 7124: 7045: 7038: 6859: 6451: 6365: 6327: 6168: 6092: 6077: 6056: 6029: 5947: 5904: 5785: 5594: 5512: 5475:

Ah! So no magic tools, just good connections - plain old detective work. :-) Thanks!

5084: 4184: 3513: 3460: 3376: 3362: 3331: 3275: 3041: 2872: 2784: 2766: 2707: 2495: 2374: 2007: 1754: 1681: 1655: 1640: 1577: 1545: 1336: 972: 903: 617: 592: 7790:, which can also require username and password to read content, in combination with 5747:

Thank you "Amalthea" for giving me a chance to help out in the Knowledge community.

5347:

Whatever is easiest for you, either a comment or a new SPI section is fine. Cheers,

5058:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

3312:

That's just my way of doing it though, I don't think there's really a rule. I asked

3296:

to select a user name, thinking that it doesn't really matter, and thought it OK to

2023:

from Jack Merridew. If you want I can go count and give you a more exact estimation.

1523: 8767: 8522: 8508: 8348: 7929: 7640: 7600: 7512: 7503: 7173: 6937: 5973: 5923: 5753: 4861:

too. If these aren't checking out as proxies, my bet is a botnet-based anonymizer.—

4463: 4079:

I award Amalthea this barnstar for his great effort in dealing with sockpuppets of

3846: 3816: 3802: 3788: 3774: 3693: 3674: 3158:

has at least two problems with regards to copyright: it is used in several places (

2821:

warnings and leaving him an informal message instead would be the best way forward.

2222: 2191: 2183: 1910: 1906:

What was the "standard procedure" that Jack hindered? Do you mean the placing of a

1453: 1300: 1175: 573: 9111: 3594: 9129: 9026: 8360: 7865: 7293: 7209: 7180: 7106: 7081: 6866: 6809: 6601: 6480:

case, and present evidence why you think abuse of multiple accounts is happening.

6430: 6210: 5988: 5932:

By all means, if you know edits were just copyediting then please check them off.

5880: 5704: 5317: 5183: 5146: 5080: 5050: 4630:. Feel free to trawl through his history for fresh proxies to block if you want.— 4300: 3870: 3551: 2102:, then when the page is reverted by keepvm, he asks for the page to be protected 1946: 1736: 1472: 1388: 1165: 830: 810: 136: 8776: 8421:

I haven't forgotten you, by the way. Obligations are keeping me rather busy. :/

6394:

Hmm, and from the reply I just read I don't think that anything has changed. :/

2942:

Don't know. Bot gone wild? Seems to have stopped, so I didn't look any farther.

1525: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

8433: 8410: 8027: 7876: 7872: 7143:

I think Balloonman is correct in his analysis of the community, as he often is.

6692: 6605: 6604:. If you are concerned that I have violated any of those policies, contact the 6590: 6495: 5476: 5455: 5266: 5119: 5101: 5032: 4916: 4656:

I left a message with MuZeMike (since he blocked the original IP) as well, but

4604: 4569: 4084: 3969: 3865: 3645: 3619: 3313: 3293: 3227: 2914: 2876: 2860: 2837: 2776: 2560: 2477: 2452: 2321: 2305: 2232: 2137: 1899: 1823:

to it. Oh that's right, he deliberately compromised it and it had to be locked.

1794: 1258: 1074: 1031: 985: 945: 916: 729: 678: 652: 638: 8330: 6815:

Can, sure. Will have to go through BRFA, I'll try sometime next week? Cheers,

6196: 5866:

Heh, I was hoping to channel (guilt) some energy into the cleanup that way. :)

4066: 3162: 8717: 8655: 8406: 8402: 8398: 8394: 7831:

Is it really necessary that it's /completely/ hidden? What's good enough for

7390:

My psychic powers tell me that you should disable the revisionjumper gadget.

6941: 6773: 6491: 6477: 6413: 5820:

users with a similar history, or of any further disruption that you mention.

5044: 4984: 4866: 4755: 4635: 4562: 4391: 4377: 3733: 3579: 2983: 1874: 1714: 1533:

bum. Rehabilitation? It was never a seriously realistic goal for either Jack

1350: 1318: 855: 691:

OK. What you can do is create an appropriately named tracking category, like

557: 264:

Thank you very much for doing this. I'm just about to enable the gadget... —

7887:

As long as you have access to the database you can't ever lock yourself out

6972:

Yes, the magic word is still there, and it will still work as intended. The

6880:

And when you say "I'll respect it", do you mean that you'd respect the ban?

4135: 3732:

In reality it's not always so. Sometimes numbers matter explicitly, like at

2097:(summary: babbaQ reverts me twice, then says my edits are OK more than once 9159: 8903: 8393:), I'm not aware of any sort of skeletons. I'd also like to help out with 8107: 8092: 7691: 7271: 7153:

Once Rlevse returns, there may be a cause to investigate those particulars.

6072:

The article No 3 has many sources, sometimes more than one in one sentence.

5845: 5198: 4529:

by using the template. The others I have tried so far are more resistant.

4444: 4306: 4180: 3456: 3379: 3297: 3045: 2780: 2762: 2736: 2726: 2722: 2491: 2003: 1647:

il fugitivo. Sound about right? Only CU's could see it? I see it too ;: -->

1614: 1558: 1272: 345: 180:

I don't yet know what we're going to do with the old module subpages, like

7794:

which would allow me to exempt the main page so visitors can log in there.

6544: 5734: 8732: 8518: 8504: 8344: 8299: 7750:

ability to read rendered text and read the code of all previous versions,

6721: 6674:

But I still remembered that you gave me rollback, and also what you said

6666: 5969: 5919: 4294:

I've gone ahead and made the requested additions to the above templates.

3578:. This would need to be decided based on contributions, probably best at 3193: 3064: 2714: 2218: 2187: 2179: 2087: 1286: 790: 530: 5518:

Never mind, I've closed the discussion. It wasn't receiving much input.

4622:

He finally went past my concern threhold by editing old Brexx articles:

3767:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/2005/Archive

2859:

Thank you very much, that's very kind of you. What does pre-vet mean? -

1227:

However. It appears to me you are not aware of the recent history here.

7570:

That one is actually close enough to consider it. I'll think about it.

6547:, I had an arbitrator earlier say they found the system confusing too! 4295: 2973:

http://www.businessbhutan.bt/wp-content/uploads/2002/01/Miss_Bhutan.jpg

1942: 1732: 1468: 1161: 469: 126: 8884: 3957:

I don't quite see how I'm involved here, but it seems to be resolved.

1125:

probably isn't that useful because once the article gets long enough,

9068:

Ah, I should have actually followed the link. Auch Dir frohe Ostern!

7781:

Apache.org: “htpasswd - Manage user files for basic authentication”),

7015:

I see I've also commented then what I thought about this specific IP.

3638: 3612: 3292:: all my usual nicknames were occupied at the time, so I resorted to 2316: 2300: 1418:

recently created and must admit to some dismay at hearing about them.

1067: 980: 940: 911: 7809:

A lot of information, but I'm not sure what you are actually asking?

5376:

Knowledge administrators possibly needed to settle editorial dispute

4038:

It's alright. I can understand that you were busy. Thanks anyway. --

2490:

Thank you very much for your help and patience regarding my friend.

6769: 6409: 4970:

User talk:Amalthea/Archive 6#Category:Knowledge sockpuppets of ...?

4862: 4751: 4631: 4423:

No, it's there for a reason, see the template history for details.

4387: 4373: 4372:

violations, I changed my mind and made a formal checkuser request.—

4003:

User_talk:Chase_me_ladies,_I'm_the_Cavalry#GaryNiger_and_Gary-Niger

3300:– should have paid closer attention to Greek mythology, I guess. :) 2451:

You are right. It must be that I need time to get used to changes.

4251:

Will answer tomorrow at the latest, sorry for the delay again. :/

2539:

I have no opinion. Except that it should probably be discussed at

714:{{PAGESINCATEGORY:WikiProject Africa 2011 article drive articles}} 214:

User:This, that and the other/temp/MediaWiki:Gadget-TwinkleTEST.js

8568:

Mailed you again. Not sure if you plan to scuttle those as well.

6932:

Circumventing sanctions is a violation of the community's policy

6764:

13 hours, 59 minutes this time. I just can't fathom exactly what

3749:

for all the details. In short, yes, you can blank your talk page.

1771:

to make a point? The IP edit on your talk page: Point was how he

8343:

Right on, Amalthea. Thanks for your work in the SPI department.

8309:

to be problematic, so I would hope that this can be worked out.

5842:

I see now you used the pageid, good idea, didn't occur to me :D

3770: 3722:

page? Can I delete old things where issues have been "resolved?"

240:

User:This, that and the other/temp/MediaWiki:Gadget-morebits.css

9155: 9133: 7815:

Does it have to be accessible via Internet in the first place?

7779:, which could prevent everyone from seeing even the main page ( 6672:

I had yet to learn to keep discussions on one page it seems. :)

5065:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

4522: 2891:

an RfA, trying to identify issues that would otherwise surface

1843:, in that you try to convince Jack Merridew to make at least a 505:

day tomorrow and I need to catchup on all the sleep I missed. —

227:

User:This, that and the other/temp/MediaWiki:Gadget-morebits.js

5097:

Sure, it's gone. Next time you may want to place the template

4895: 3951:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Kaiguy817

2725:

though: The old AfD was specifically on 90210 characters, and

2217:

article is only available for admin edits right now. Thanks!--

1776:

improvement, there are a bazillion of maintainance categories.

884:

Anyway, I have restored email access to your original account

8682: 7513:

a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Knowledge

7346:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard#Special:DoubleRedirects

5182:

Thank you Amalthea, for letting me know of the discussion. -

5079:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

4318:

Crazy times. Which is good for me, but very bad for hobbies.

3876:

Ah, thank you. Where would we be without you, Amalthea?... —

2383:

User talk:John Vandenberg#Jack Merridew's continuing stalking

1932:, where he appeared to have been offered a second chance and 154:

All modules will be concatenated into one file and stored at

8474:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

8001:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

7956:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

5391:. I'd say the appropriate next step in your case would be a 2975:, please help me to give it a copyright or sources, thanks. 665:

Not that I'm aware of. What exactly do you want to achieve?

622:

http://toolserver.org/~jarry/templatecount/index.php?lang=en

8405:

wouldn't be appropriate, I'd be more than happy to help on

7270:

If you want to keep these pages, policy says that you may;

7169:

Understood, this was my inclination a few days ago as well

5946:

I checked off 28 articles, only the ones I know that is, --

4969: 4179:... what regions/continents do you find easiest to get to? 8116:

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

5582:

One example of an edit summary Asgardian usually used was

8594:

See Xeno's edit in the page history of the user page, or

8219:

User:Flyer22/"Common use" and "own" at Pedophilia article

6631:

I'd rather he wouldn't change, but that's no big. I have

5860:

Knowledge:Contributor copyright investigations/PumpkinSky

5055:

template, along with your question, beneath this message.

4447:

to support it feel free to add the information back -- a

2971:

I took the image in google image, here is the link =: -->

7818:

Yes, contributors will be on different sides of the U.S.

7765:

accompanying talk pages to engage in lengthy discussion.

7565:

Invitation to Berlin hackathon, and possible sponsorship

2615:

G3 sounds right, was only meant for disruption I'd say.

392: 114:

Nothing else came up in the ranges I looked at. Cheers,

7454:

Ah, I see it with Chrome. I'll let Hexer know. Cheers,

4350:

That's OK, thanks for double-checking the information.

1793:

3) We are wrong to enforce an unnecessary restriction?

882:

you more or less restricted yourself to your talk page.

693:

Category:WikiProject Africa 2011 article drive articles

7099:. PumpkinSky was asked about the IPs on his talk page 4527:

Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded

4175:

Thanks. You might also be interested in the upcoming

3444:

I've left them a message. Let's see whether it helps.

2508:

Huh, I was certainly not expecting that. Appreciated!

1422:

Remember what Richard III says in his opening speech?

188:* TwinkleTEST|morebits.js|morebits.css|TwinkleTEST.js 168:, most likely with exact copies in AzaToth's userspace 8814:, 719 of 729 articles were found with no problems. -- 7179:

not Nikkimaria. I'm sorry for the confusion on that.

6727:

No worries. Was not moot, by the way: The link was a

6691:

Yep, I still agree with that comment of mine too. :)

5229:

Sorry for that. Has that actually been looked into?

4363:

I'm having second thoughts about Vitorvicentevalente

4142:

Hi, Amalthea. I'd like to invite you to come to the

2887:

Someone spending time looking at your contributions

184:. Maybe overwrite them with an error message script? 8389:embarrassingly inappropriate behavior (which I did 7826:

Yes. There will only be three or four contributors.

5118:Thanks Amalthea, I added the template to my tools. 2402:

Removal of comments on George RR Martin's wiki page

8701:It would be best if you proposed that template at 7997:Message added 22:48, 18 March 2012 (UTC). You can 7140:No opinion on whether those edits were disruptive. 6565:Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Websense,_Inc. 5816:is important; I hadn't been aware that there were 4026:Again, sorry that I couldn't help you at the time. 1635:I won't do it again, believe me ;) In response to 1237:the latest arbitration request ended with a motion 840:, if you mind? No notices on my talk page either. 8597:the explanation on Ironholds' talk page back then 7832: 7680:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Tales of Amalthea 6466:IPs are generally not tagged with sock tags, see 2068:No worries. It appears Courcelles has removed it 1463:, you know – would be a step in the direction of 1121:would not be very useful. Automatically removing 8961:, but I understand that you didn't know that? -- 7992:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Jonathan Yip 7762:ability to look at ∆ edits between two versions, 5495:Notice of Administrators' Noticeboard discussion 4922:What time should I apply for RfA you can review 1501:fault a disgruntled troll is running amok? That 9132:and my Bach cantata mentioning an approach for 8791:Contributor copyright investigations/PumpkinSky 7405:Ah, very good. I was having the same problems. 7215:@ASCIIn2Bme: I have my bias also, so have you. 6310:Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes. 201:'''(please do not use this!!)'''</small: --> 9110:"Glaub nicht an Wunder, verlaß dich auf sie" ( 5293:Yes, sorry that I couldn't be of more help. :( 4341:Bulgaria in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 3771:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:JamesBWatson 9043:I don't know what you are trying to tell me. 8557:And I don't understand that either it seems. 7383: 7378: 7372: 7366: 6792:But then again, with Greenock125 I had a few 4962:Category:Knowledge sockpuppets of MosesBeacon 4436:Andorra in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 4117:Invitation to New Orleans developers' meeting 2913:Thank you, I'll certainly keep it in mind. - 2651:) hasn't edited during the last three weeks. 8401:, but if after looking into it you think an 5387:, have a look at the side bar there for the 5243:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Daniel L. Barth 4521:OK it's looking good, I have managed to get 3240:For being the best admin in the business! ♦ 2407:I had moved your comment and my response to 1425:And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover, 8463:Hello, Amalthea. You have new messages at 7990:Hello, Amalthea. You have new messages at 7941:Hello, Amalthea. You have new messages at 3801:Why is he allowed to harrass me like this? 3044:). A topic is notable if reliable sources ( 2682:If I look at Ariella Leira's last edits of 8121:The following discussion has been closed. 7739:Virtue of a wiki for collaborative writing 7509:I have stated my opinion on the talk page. 6748:Rihannafanno1/Iluvrihanna24/PhoenixJHudson 6728: 6383:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Mbhiii 6250:I don't think I have any opinion on that. 4139:MediaWiki and Wikimedia developers' meetup 3977:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/MJC59/Archive 2875:, but I'm not sure what pre-vetting is. - 2739:when there is precedence of an acceptable 2719:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ethan Ward 2411:, so that others can participate as well. 1434:And hate the idle pleasures of these days. 1062:Thanks... In the meantime, I've re-opened 200:Twinkle experimental gadget <small: --> 7310:OK, I cleared the other awkward pages at 7009:I remember, yes. One of the banned users 5026:Orphaned non-free image File:Fa Mulan.jpg 4940:I'm not sure you do, I was commenting on 3103:That account was already blocked in May. 2813:Edit summary about "overzealous warnings" 1428:To entertain these fair well-spoken days, 1313:), by posting usernames and passwords to 1090:User_talk:Thehelpfulone#Twinkle_blacklist 996:Bug related to $ wgCheckUserForceSummary? 372: 8957:It was pondered before, see above, with 7756:ability to see who made what edits when, 7097:"misdirection" and "Hollywood theatrics" 4134: 3611:You should do something about that! =) – 8828:You may be interested in thoughts that 7911:WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/William313 7770:Configuring the wiki for private access 7759:ability to add pithy comments to edits, 5107:on the page to alert an admin. Cheers, 4224:RfA reform: ...and what you can do now. 3288:Heh, no, I'm not (self-)diagnosed with 2823:Again, nothing wrong with your warning. 1898:It's a myth that Jack was in breach of 978:Nevermind, handled by another CU. :) — 160:The morebits library will be stored at 14: 8161:< Personal information redacted -- 5383:for content disputes I'd refer you to 5072:To opt out of these bot messages, add 4215:News and progress from RfA reform 2011 3415:Category:Knowledge sockpuppets of ...? 3268:SPI closure: Admin and checkuser roles 888:-- feel free to contact me from there. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 9054:Happy Easter, one after the other, -- 6549:User_talk:Elen_of_the_Roads#Trollolol 5886:though, so maybe it's best to ask at 3344:Thanks! And I believe we last talked 2019:edits from these ranges in June came 1688:(not arbcom) he breaks policies that 176:mw.loader.load('ext.gadget.Twinkle'); 8533:User talk:68.203.251.2#Billy Hathorn 8136:appropriateness of a block I placed. 7062:Do you want me to put up a SPI page? 6654:Sure, thanks for taking care of it. 6551: 6524: 6523:) but that's probably it really lol 6516: 6490:For trivial vandalism or disruption 5741:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar 5358:I decided to create a new section.-- 4152:), and to train and to squash bugs. 1990:So what does he want, specifically? 1613:Cool story Doc, thanks for sharing. 1514:page was not on a single watchlist. 25: 9096:10.000 Easter eggs on my talk ;) -- 8848:... we'll never know the true story 5162:Can you help me get this change in? 3652: 1871:Special:Contributions/180.241.11.97 1847:to edit within community norms. An 1141:Category:Long monitored short pages 695:or some such, and put the template 536:Can you delete a page in test-wiki? 23: 8681: 8619:User:I'm sorry about your trousers 8456: 7983: 7934: 7649:. Why should I then grant you the 7639:Linking those two accounts is not 6443: 6435: 5031: 4894: 3455:Thanks again for your efforts. -- 1431:I am determined to prove a villain 1387:behavior that can summarized as a 24: 9195: 8993:I agree, I should have pursued a 8832:thinks should become an essay, -- 8337:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 8169:) 13:48, 23 March 2012 (UTC): --> 7219:about the term "correct", please. 7205: 7120: 6203:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 6108:Thank you for responding, Sandy! 4481:Virtual barnstar of wonderfulness 4466:does not list Andorra either ... 4073:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 2609:he Last Username I Could Think Of 1820:). Talk about a kick in the face. 838:Special:EmailUser/SEPTActaMTA8235 366:Twinkle, Twinkle, little barnstar 331:MediaWiki talk:Gadget-morebits.js 8883: 8775: 8677: 8581:Help us develop better software! 8329: 7747:one‑click ability to undo edits, 7547:Documentation for gadget authors 7248:Self redirects in your userspace 7037: 6596:Kindly review it yourself, plus 6568: 6567: 6552: 6525: 6517: 6364:don't see the term justified. -- 6195: 5984:Not sure where to put this, so: 5802: 5733: 4890: 4561: 4441:No need for the personal attack. 4129:New Orleans Wikimedia Hackathon 4065: 3570: 3226: 3192: 2476: 2385:. Keep it in one place, please. 2274: 1594: 1382:Why is he doing that? I ask you. 1038: 391: 373: 351:Aww, I missed deployment day. :/ 29: 8789:Thank you for reviewing in the 8718: 7889: 7881: 7850: 7837: 7825: 7817: 5136:Arbitration Committee Elections 4368:Once Vitorfatale wandered into 1930:Jack's unblock in December 2008 1246:arbitration enforcement request 208:MediaWiki:Gadget-TwinkleTEST.js 103:Will do–tomorrow, if I may. :) 8588:user:Uncontroversial Obscurity 8486:User talk:Orlady#Billy Hathorn 7775:Via the Apache’s wbserver tool 7425:WP:Reporting JavaScript errors 7212:, other problems seem smaller. 6468:WP:SPI/AI#Blocking and tagging 4887:Survey for new page patrollers 4357:08:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 4325:08:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 4312:14:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC) 4282:10:14, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 4189:10:49, 19 September 2011 (UTC) 3710:Some help would be appreciated 3027:, but it's a bit complicated. 2955:Copyright and source for image 1123:Category:Monitored short pages 1111:Category:Monitored short pages 13: 1: 9136:are featured together on the 8824:08:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 8803:07:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 7917:Thanks, handled now. Cheers, 7200:08:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 7189:00:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 7165:23:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 7133:23:29, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 7115:23:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 7076:22:37, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 7054:02:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 7024:01:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 6991:19:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 6951:23:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 6928:22:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 6913:19:03, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 6902:13:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 6887:13:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 6876:13:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 6850:18:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 6836:14:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 6822:22:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 6804:19:07, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 6778:03:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 6760:15:06, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 6742:10:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 6716:09:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 6696:10:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 6687:00:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 6661:00:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 6643:16:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 6619:15:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 6583:13:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 6510:18:18, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 6418:01:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 6401:21:04, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 6374:20:40, 19 February 2012 (UTC) 5326: 5192:14:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 5156:11:34, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 5128:01:35, 16 November 2011 (UTC) 5114:12:45, 15 November 2011 (UTC) 5069:to file an un-delete request. 4968:I'd rather you wouldn't, see 4602:. I'd appreciate your input. 4598:We have started a discussion 4449:cursory search at Google news 4258:08:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC) 4209:08:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC) 3303:maybe leave a recommendation. 3298:name myself after an asteroid 2186:) 16:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)-- 1881:which arises when he makes a 234:MediaWiki:Gadget-morebits.css 182:User:AzaToth/twinklespeedy.js 166:MediaWiki:Gadget-morebits.css 7692:reliable third-party sources 6608:to have my actions reviewed. 6459:Lots of points to reply to: 6359:18:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 6340:17:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 6299:20:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC) 6275:15:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC) 6257:18:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 6239:18:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 6219:20:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 6180:17:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 6163:17:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 6145:15:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 6115:21:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 6104:14:41, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 6086:14:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 6068:14:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 6041:14:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 6000:11:55, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 5978:01:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 5956:10:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 5942:01:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 5928:01:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 5913:00:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 5898:23:45, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 5876:had a good reason to create 5853:21:57, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 5827:20:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 5797:19:54, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 5771:19:47, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 5718:10:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 5699:08:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 5675:11:57, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 5664:16:35, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 5653:16:06, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 5644:15:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 5622:15:30, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 5608:15:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 5578:12:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 5560:18:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 5540:08:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 5529:08:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 5507:11:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 5487:02:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 5471:17:49, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 5443:11:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 5425:11:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 5406:18:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 5368:21:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 5354:20:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 5334:17:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 5311:16:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 5280:01:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 5015:13:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 4997:11:07, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 4979:11:08, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 4955:11:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 4936:01:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC) 4871:20:27, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 4760:17:05, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 4652:10:39, 21 October 2011 (UTC) 4640:18:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 4611:08:54, 16 October 2011 (UTC) 4581:16:10, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 4541:23:34, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 4246:No, not the repo this time.. 3769:. He has also accused you ( 2761:Thanks for your efforts. -- 2684:Miss Asia Pacific World 2011 2633:Miss Asia Pacific World 2011 221:MediaWiki:Gadget-morebits.js 195:MediaWiki:Gadget-TwinkleTEST 162:MediaWiki:Gadget-morebits.js 7: 8409:as a non-admin clerk. :) - 6704:My clerckship and the chart 6450:Wikipedians also recommend 6389:Iluvrihanna24/Rihannano1fan 6268:Replied at your talk page. 5548:Personal Version of Twinkle 5260:20:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 5236:18:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC) 5149:instead of constructively. 5061:If you receive this notice 4624:Sundays at Tiffany's (film) 4514:21:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 4498:18:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 4473:22:10, 7 October 2011 (UTC) 4458:21:08, 7 October 2011 (UTC) 4430:20:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC) 4408:19:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 4396:01:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 4382:19:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 4167:11:55, 31 August 2011 (UTC) 4111:11:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC) 4096:20:22, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 4048:12:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC) 4034:07:33, 31 August 2011 (UTC) 4018:01:24, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 3986:12:52, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 3964:12:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 3938:12:32, 14 August 2011 (UTC) 3927:09:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC) 3906:08:17, 14 August 2011 (UTC) 3892:08:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC) 3255:Odd standards you have! :) 3156:File:China America flag.jpg 3127:, relevant changes were in 1934:his review in December 2009 1920:totally unenforceable! You 1459:template – it really isn't 1001:I'll look into it! Cheers, 836:Also, could you email me @ 156:MediaWiki:Gadget-Twinkle.js 10: 9200: 9172:08:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC) 9150:12:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 9124:07:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC) 9106:08:44, 14 April 2012 (UTC) 9021:13:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 9007:11:08, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 8971:10:22, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 8953:10:19, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 8942:06:12, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 8927:08:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 8916:23:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC) 8898:23:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 8878:08:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 8866:Great Dismal Swamp maroons 8762:09:33, 10 April 2012 (UTC) 8725:15:14, 10 April 2012 (UTC) 8575:11:45, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 8564:11:44, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 8542:23:13, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 8527:15:21, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 8513:15:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 8495:08:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 8465:TheGeneralUser's talk page 8440:19:21, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 8428:19:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 8417:22:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 8381:21:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 8353:16:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8316:19:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8286:13:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8275:13:48, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8261:13:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8236:20:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8196:13:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8182:05:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8155:01:12, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8146:00:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8138:I'll ping some more folks. 8099:01:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8090:Ahh, thank you very much. 8086:00:22, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 8064:08:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC) 8038:19:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 8017:14:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 7973:14:38, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 7950:02:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 7924:18:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 7904:11:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 7871:can simply be copied. Use 7716:14:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 7702:11:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 7688:Knowledge:Notability (web) 7661:18:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 7634:17:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 7613:16:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 7595:18:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 7577:18:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 7559:18:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 7541:18:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 7176:who warned one of the IPs 7119:Seemingly unrelated topic 7068:Who insists where on what? 6563:style pushing as I saw on 5167:Upcoming developers' event 4145:New Orleans Hackathon 2011 3855:08:46, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 3825:01:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 3811:01:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 3797:01:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 3783:01:23, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 3760:20:25, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 3702:05:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 3683:05:10, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 3651:P.S. Thanks for the reply 3648:19:53, 5 August 2011 (UTC) 3633:19:48, 5 August 2011 (UTC) 3622:19:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC) 3607:19:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC) 3600:You presume correctly. :) 2378:19:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 590:Heh, that explains it :-) 9092:11:00, 8 April 2012 (UTC) 9075:07:44, 8 April 2012 (UTC) 9064:22:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 9050:19:49, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 9039:23:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 8860:13:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC) 8842:07:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 8774: 8745:19:49, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 8712:19:49, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 8674:Dispute resolution survey 8668:19:49, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 8650:11:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC) 8632:11:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC) 8612:18:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 8328: 7786:And via a combination of 7722:Setting up a company wiki 7523:11:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC) 7488:18:49, 8 March 2012 (UTC) 7472:17:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC) 7461:10:01, 8 March 2012 (UTC) 7450:23:13, 7 March 2012 (UTC) 7434:16:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC) 7419:16:36, 7 March 2012 (UTC) 7397:11:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC) 7385:00:12, 7 March 2012 (UTC) 7337:23:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 7306:16:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 7284:13:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 7232:07:40, 7 March 2012 (UTC) 6790:others on those articles. 6286:Makes sense, fixed & 6194: 5732: 5687:sind deine Ohren brennen? 5389:dispute negotiation steps 4703:seems clearly related to 4133: 4128: 4064: 3589:22:42, 30 July 2011 (UTC) 3501:08:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 3490:08:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 3465:14:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC) 3451:14:44, 24 July 2011 (UTC) 3433:14:26, 24 July 2011 (UTC) 3409:08:14, 24 July 2011 (UTC) 3383:23:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 3371:09:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC) 3357:20:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 3340:19:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 3325:19:23, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 3284:19:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 3262:11:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 3247:17:01, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 3225: 3211:02:55, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 3208:Uncontroversial Obscurity 3191: 3179:18:31, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 3142:11:26, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 3110:14:45, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 3097:14:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC) 3034:09:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 2573:Oops, you're right, yes. 2475: 2461:18:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 2447:18:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 2418:15:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 2392:19:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 2370:User:White Cat/RFAR/graph 2364:19:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 2337:15:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 2326:15:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 2314:That fixed it, thanks! — 2310:15:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 2294:06:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 2259:18:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 2248:18:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 2227:16:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 2196:16:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 2171:15:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 2153:15:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 2132:15:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 2115:14:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 2082:14:31, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 2064:14:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 2031:08:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 2012:23:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1997:21:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1951:18:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1879:perception of provocation 1860:11:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1786:when I saw anon edits. I 1762:03:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1741:22:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 1701:12:43, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 1663:07:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1631:21:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 1620:21:08, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 1609:20:44, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 1595: 1585:20:39, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 1564:12:40, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 1553:03:56, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 1537:this "failed community". 1477:01:52, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 1413:20:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC) 1225:banned from editing enWP. 1218:20:31, 25 June 2011 (UTC) 1188:09:58, 25 June 2011 (UTC) 1170:21:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 1096:Re: monitored short pages 1077:13:17, 21 June 2011 (UTC) 1058:10:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC) 1034:02:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 1019:22:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 990:08:35, 21 June 2011 (UTC) 961:17:33, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 950:17:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 934:17:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 921:17:23, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 896:19:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 886:User:Perseus, Son of Zeus 875:19:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 864:18:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 850:17:58, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 821:23:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 805:09:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 775:08:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 738:11:19, 14 June 2011 (UTC) 724:13:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 687:12:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 677:would look nice. Thanks. 672:10:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 661:10:38, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 601:11:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 586:11:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 579:Yep, Twinkle was broken. 379: 8552:You never did understand 8188:My Little Brother Did IT 8124:Please do not modify it. 6967:revisionuser magic trick 6602:Wikimedia privacy policy 5968:I resemble that remark! 4617:Prettybeautifulnailsalon 4386:Checked, and unrelated.— 3861:Rhydian article - thanks 3667:Thanks for the attention 3290:gender identity disorder 3079:17:43, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 3057:18:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 3012:18:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 2996:00:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 2967:15:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 2949:00:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 2921:21:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2909:13:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2883:13:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2867:12:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2855:11:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2844:10:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2832:09:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2801:13:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 2789:05:36, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 2771:12:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2757:11:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2702:11:24, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2676:10:08, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2622:19:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC) 2602:10:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC) 2595:Appears to be resolved. 2580:16:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC) 2569:15:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC) 2550:10:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC) 2533:10:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC) 2526:Appears to be resolved. 2515:19:48, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 2500:18:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 2409:Talk:George R. R. Martin 2252:Thanks for handling it! 1682:legit alternate accounts 1395:within the current norms 1008:11:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 728:Yes! It worked, thanks. 647:12:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC) 633:10:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC) 566:17:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC) 548:16:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC) 519:12:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 500:12:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 487:12:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 465:11:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 437:18:13, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 423:18:10, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 406:18:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 360:07:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 340:10:17, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 318:07:14, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 295:10:34, 16 May 2011 (UTC) 280:10:31, 15 May 2011 (UTC) 256:10:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC) 139:13:11, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 121:10:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 9082:! follow the link ;) -- 8995:clarification last year 8223:physical attractiveness 8079:") inside the message. 7879:for more complex pages 7861:Trivial templates like 7312:Special:DoubleRedirects 6865:Sorry, I meant to say " 6625:Review help appreciated 5393:WP:Request for comments 5223:User talk:Cezary Baryka 5216:Template:Cite web quick 5212:Nomination for deletion 5205:Template:Cite web quick 5083:and leave a message on 4202:Thanks, taken care of. 3742:enforce that consensus. 3626:I really shouldn't. :p 2775:Sorry for not bringing 2590:Request template coding 2381:Duplicate comment from 2122:asked another CheckUser 1323:The Inheritance of Loss 1315:User talk:Jack Merridew 174:will contain one line: 172:User:AzaToth/twinkle.js 110:22:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 8686: 8461: 7988: 7939: 7352:Twinkle rollback links 7264:User:Amalthea/rdtarget 6448: 6440: 6053: 5412:Mass deletion for MOTD 5177:Twinkle tag suggestion 5037: 4899: 4177:Brighton, UK hackathon 4150:virtualization cluster 4140: 3997:Template:Di-no license 3993:Nomination for merging 3025:WP:File copyright tags 2424:Encourage substitution 1391:-violation, it's this. 1023:That would be great. – 708:]</includeonly: --> 301:New release editnotice 8864:Recommended reading: 8685: 8460: 7987: 7938: 7653:of blanking the page? 7465:Should now be fixed. 7379:WP Edits: 520,896,469 7030:Some baklava for you! 7011:I mentioned back then 6729:http://wikipedia.org/ 6447: 6439: 6052: 5385:WP:Dispute resolution 5172:Substitution checking 5074:{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} 5035: 4898: 4138: 3979:for details. Cheers, 3536:Palakkappillilachayan 2825:Thanks & Cheers, 2717:since it was part of 2435:{{cn|date=June 2011}} 1885:edit to the article?? 1505:created the monster? 1449:; while removing the 353:Good work, everyone! 42:of past discussions. 9154:For more enjoyment: 8385:Other than possibly 8133:My thoughts exactly. 7943:MuZemike's talk page 7788:$ wgGroupPermissions 7684:Knowledge:Notability 6578:Mistress Selina Kyle 6006:Paraphrase, but how? 5566:Suspected Sockpuppet 5449:Detecting public IPs 5360:The Devil's Advocate 5085:my owner's talk page 4628:Marry Me (2010 film) 3234:The Admin's Barnstar 3200:The Special Barnstar 2745:Kelly Taylor (90210) 2741:Beverly Hills, 90210 2732:Beverly Hills, 90210 2484:The Admin's Barnstar 1643:on their watchlists 1365:Nantucket sleighride 707:<includeonly: --> 8322:A barnstar for you! 8267:Boing! said Zebedee 8253:Boing! said Zebedee 8163:Boing! said Zebedee 6545:the Wikilove button 6426:Thanks for helping. 6188:A barnstar for you! 6049:Plagiarism Dispatch 5726:A barnstar for you! 5692:War zu langsam. :) 4197:Possible sockpuppet 4058:A barnstar for you! 3219:A barnstar for you! 3185:A barnstar for you! 2667:WP:reliable sources 2663:WP:Inline citations 2541:Template talk:ambox 2469:A barnstar for you! 2049:Checkuser privilege 1978:does Jack Merridew 1156:short pages monitor 1147:short pages monitor 1129:short pages monitor 909:Thanks so much! -- 429:Boing! said Zebedee 398:Boing! said Zebedee 324:Twinkle test gadget 8902:Khazar is back as 8687: 8472:remove this notice 8462: 7999:remove this notice 7989: 7954:remove this notice 7940: 6867:effectively banned 6606:audit subcommittee 6449: 6441: 6127:Edit Warring / 3RR 5525: 5076:to your talk page. 5038: 4943:this edit of yours 4900: 4141: 2521:Please participate 1119:Special:Shortpages 1115:Special:Shortpages 1105:subst:long comment 756:Lock status/popups 18:User talk:Amalthea 8808: 8807: 8693: 8692: 8625:Removed, thanks. 8358: 8357: 8297: 8296: 8193:Kim van der Linde 8171: 7845:Other questions: 7799:Seeking your help 7792:$ wgWhitelistRead 7728:Executive summary 7671:Tales of Amalthea 7624:comment added by 7606:I don't see why. 7364:I'm seeing them.— 7360:talk page stalker 7259:User:Amalthea/rd2 7254:User:Amalthea/rd1 7059: 7058: 6677:half a year later 6496:counterproductive 6263:Shrikatnv's block 6224: 6223: 5751: 5750: 5668:... and replied. 5632:SPI of Tartanator 5527: 5521: 5332: 5126: 4928:Mohamed Aden Ighe 4914: 4913: 4586: 4585: 4544: 4517: 4464:the official page 4316:Thanks, Ioeth! :/ 4310: 4278: 4242: 4241: 4156: 4155: 4101: 4100: 4094: 3923: 3888: 3656: 3252: 3251: 3216: 3215: 2999: 2982:comment added by 2505: 2504: 2377: 1641:Lord of the Flies 1484:talk page stalker 700:Tracking category 411: 410: 276: 245: 244: 238:Create by moving 225:Create by moving 212:Create by moving 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 9191: 9128:On this day the 9072: 9047: 8950: 8924: 8887: 8812:For a quick view 8779: 8772: 8771: 8759: 8742: 8720: 8709: 8678: 8665: 8647: 8629: 8609: 8599: 8586:Jack Merridew / 8572: 8561: 8539: 8492: 8484:Left comment at 8475: 8425: 8378: 8333: 8326: 8325: 8313: 8283: 8159: 8143: 8126: 8113: 8112: 8095: 8083: 8078: 8061: 8051:Magic pixie dust 8035: 8030: 8014: 8002: 7970: 7957: 7921: 7901: 7897:Does that help? 7891: 7883: 7870: 7864: 7857: 7839: 7827: 7819: 7793: 7789: 7778: 7713: 7699: 7658: 7636: 7610: 7592: 7588:You're welcome. 7574: 7556: 7538: 7520: 7485: 7480: 7469: 7458: 7447: 7442: 7431: 7416: 7410: 7394: 7387: 7380: 7374: 7368: 7363: 7334: 7327: 7320: 7303: 7298: 7292: 7197: 7174:User:Dana boomer 7162: 7073: 7041: 7034: 7033: 7021: 6988: 6948: 6934:WP:Sock puppetry 6910: 6884: 6873: 6833: 6819: 6801: 6757: 6739: 6713: 6684: 6679: 6658: 6640: 6616: 6598:checkuser policy 6573: 6572: 6571: 6557: 6556: 6555: 6530: 6529: 6528: 6522: 6521: 6520: 6507: 6398: 6356: 6337: 6296: 6291: 6272: 6254: 6236: 6199: 6192: 6191: 6172: 6160: 6142: 6137: 6112: 6096: 6060: 6033: 5993: 5987: 5939: 5895: 5885: 5879: 5848: 5824: 5806: 5805: 5789: 5768: 5737: 5730: 5729: 5715: 5710: 5707: 5696: 5672: 5661: 5641: 5619: 5606: 5575: 5557: 5537: 5526: 5523:Northamerica1000 5519: 5504: 5484: 5479: 5468: 5463: 5454:Because I trust 5440: 5436:Answered there. 5422: 5403: 5351: 5330: 5324: 5321: 5308: 5278: 5257: 5233: 5153: 5122: 5111: 5106: 5100: 5075: 5054: 5040: 5012: 4994: 4976: 4952: 4945: 4891: 4860: 4833:deleted contribs 4813: 4786:deleted contribs 4749: 4722:deleted contribs 4702: 4675:deleted contribs 4649: 4609: 4572: 4565: 4558: 4557: 4539: 4512: 4495: 4470: 4455: 4427: 4405: 4354: 4345: 4339: 4322: 4298: 4280: 4276: 4271: 4255: 4220: 4219: 4206: 4164: 4122: 4121: 4108: 4090: 4087: 4069: 4062: 4061: 4031: 3983: 3961: 3935: 3925: 3921: 3916: 3903: 3890: 3886: 3881: 3757: 3650: 3643: 3630: 3617: 3604: 3586: 3574: 3573: 3498: 3487: 3448: 3430: 3425: 3406: 3354: 3322: 3308: 3259: 3244: 3230: 3223: 3222: 3196: 3189: 3188: 3176: 3139: 3107: 3094: 3076: 3054: 3031: 3009: 2998: 2976: 2964: 2946: 2906: 2852: 2829: 2798: 2754: 2699: 2692: 2673: 2659:WP:VERIFIABILITY 2656: 2619: 2599: 2577: 2547: 2530: 2512: 2480: 2473: 2472: 2444: 2415: 2389: 2373: 2361: 2334: 2291: 2286: 2281: 2278: 2277: 2256: 2245: 2235: 2150: 2140: 2129: 2124: 2079: 2073: 2028: 1994: 1975: 1915: 1909: 1857: 1819: 1813: 1784: 1759: 1752: 1698: 1660: 1653: 1628: 1617: 1606: 1601: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1582: 1575: 1561: 1550: 1543: 1487: 1458: 1452: 1410: 1248: 1243:12 days ago, an 1239: 1206:TeleComNasSprVen 1185: 1159: 1150: 1132: 1108: 1072: 1055: 1050: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1029: 1016: 1005: 958: 931: 893: 872: 818: 813: 802: 772: 721: 710:to the template. 704: 698: 669: 630: 599: 595: 583: 545: 517: 497: 485: 462: 420: 395: 383:Twinkle Barnstar 377: 370: 369: 357: 337: 315: 306:Popups image fix 292: 278: 274: 269: 253: 202: 191: 190: 177: 134: 118: 107: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 9199: 9198: 9194: 9193: 9192: 9190: 9189: 9188: 9130:Easter egg tree 9070: 9045: 9027:He was despised 8948: 8922: 8770: 8757: 8740: 8735: 8707: 8698: 8676: 8663: 8658: 8645: 8640: 8627: 8622: 8607: 8595: 8591: 8583: 8570: 8559: 8554: 8537: 8490: 8481: 8476: 8469: 8454: 8423: 8376: 8363: 8324: 8311: 8302: 8281: 8141: 8122: 8111: 8093: 8081: 8077:You're invited 8076: 8072: 8059: 8053: 8048: 8046:Sockpuppet Case 8033: 8028: 8012: 8003: 7996: 7981: 7968: 7963: 7961:Teahouse invite 7958: 7947: 7932: 7919: 7914: 7899: 7868: 7862: 7833:the ArbCom wiki 7791: 7787: 7776: 7736: 7729: 7724: 7711: 7697: 7673: 7656: 7619: 7608: 7603: 7590: 7585: 7572: 7567: 7554: 7549: 7536: 7534:Replied there. 7531: 7529:Comments Needed 7518: 7506: 7483: 7478: 7467: 7456: 7445: 7440: 7429: 7414: 7408: 7392: 7357: 7354: 7349: 7330: 7323: 7316: 7301: 7296: 7290: 7250: 7195: 7160: 7123:, see above, -- 7082:User:Nikkimaria 7071: 7064: 7032: 7019: 7006: 7003:User:125.7.71.6 6999: 6986: 6969: 6946: 6908: 6882: 6871: 6862: 6831: 6817: 6812: 6799: 6755: 6750: 6737: 6724: 6711: 6706: 6682: 6675: 6669: 6656: 6651: 6638: 6627: 6614: 6593: 6569: 6553: 6526: 6518: 6505: 6456: 6455: 6433: 6428: 6396: 6391: 6386: 6354: 6348: 6335: 6330: 6307: 6294: 6287: 6283: 6270: 6265: 6252: 6247: 6234: 6229: 6190: 6170: 6158: 6153: 6140: 6135:Already replied 6133: 6129: 6110: 6094: 6058: 6031: 6008: 5991: 5985: 5937: 5893: 5883: 5877: 5863: 5846: 5839: 5822: 5803: 5787: 5766: 5761: 5759:Pumpkin Sky CCI 5756: 5728: 5713: 5708: 5705: 5694: 5689: 5670: 5659: 5639: 5634: 5617: 5587: 5573: 5568: 5555: 5550: 5535: 5520: 5515: 5502: 5497: 5482: 5477: 5466: 5459: 5451: 5438: 5433: 5431:Unblock on hold 5420: 5414: 5401: 5378: 5349: 5344: 5319: 5306: 5290: 5288:Brian IP Hopper 5265: 5255: 5246: 5231: 5226: 5219: 5208: 5201: 5179: 5174: 5169: 5164: 5151: 5138: 5109: 5104: 5098: 5094: 5073: 5048: 5029: 5028: 5023: 5010: 5008:Not at all. :) 5005: 4992: 4987: 4974: 4965: 4950: 4941: 4926:and explain. -- 4919: 4889: 4818: 4771: 4707: 4660: 4647: 4619: 4603: 4595: 4570: 4556: 4493: 4483: 4468: 4453: 4445:reliable source 4438: 4425: 4420: 4403: 4365: 4352: 4347: 4343: 4337: 4320: 4273: 4267: 4253: 4248: 4243: 4225: 4217: 4204: 4199: 4162: 4157: 4119: 4106: 4088: 4060: 4029: 4005: 4000: 3981: 3972: 3959: 3954: 3933: 3918: 3912: 3901: 3883: 3877: 3873: 3868: 3863: 3845:counts as one. 3841: 3755: 3712: 3669: 3639: 3628: 3613: 3602: 3597: 3584: 3571: 3516: 3511: 3496: 3485: 3480: 3475: 3446: 3441: 3428: 3421: 3417: 3404: 3399: 3352: 3346:three weeks ago 3320: 3306: 3270: 3257: 3242: 3221: 3187: 3174: 3150: 3137: 3120: 3105: 3092: 3087: 3085:User:Malingsial 3074: 3068: 3052: 3029: 3007: 2977: 2962: 2957: 2944: 2939: 2904: 2850: 2827: 2815: 2796: 2752: 2710: 2697: 2690: 2671: 2652: 2635: 2617: 2612: 2597: 2592: 2575: 2545: 2528: 2523: 2510: 2471: 2442: 2426: 2413: 2404: 2387: 2359: 2351: 2332: 2289: 2282: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2254: 2243: 2233: 2148: 2138: 2127: 2120: 2077: 2069: 2051: 2026: 1992: 1973: 1913: 1907: 1855: 1829:is also normal. 1815: 1809: 1780: 1755: 1748: 1696: 1656: 1649: 1626: 1615: 1604: 1593: 1591: 1578: 1571: 1559: 1546: 1539: 1481: 1456: 1450: 1408: 1244: 1235: 1234:In early June, 1201:globally locked 1196: 1183: 1178: 1153: 1144: 1126: 1102: 1098: 1093: 1068: 1053: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1025: 1014: 1003: 998: 975: 956: 929: 906: 891: 870: 833: 816: 811: 800: 770: 758: 719: 702: 696: 667: 628: 611: 593: 591: 581: 576: 543: 538: 533: 506: 495: 474: 460: 447: 418: 368: 355: 348: 335: 326: 313: 308: 303: 290: 271: 265: 251: 199: 189: 175: 151: 149:Twinkle rollout 132: 116: 105: 100: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 9197: 9187: 9186: 9185: 9184: 9183: 9182: 9181: 9180: 9179: 9178: 9177: 9176: 9175: 9174: 9152: 9126: 9108: 9009: 8990: 8989: 8988: 8987: 8986: 8985: 8984: 8983: 8982: 8981: 8980: 8979: 8978: 8977: 8976: 8975: 8974: 8973: 8880: 8806: 8805: 8786: 8785: 8783:reviewing eyes 8780: 8769: 8766: 8765: 8764: 8753: 8748: 8747: 8734: 8731: 8730: 8729: 8728: 8727: 8716:Thanks :-) -- 8697: 8694: 8691: 8690: 8689: 8688: 8675: 8672: 8671: 8670: 8657: 8654: 8653: 8652: 8639: 8636: 8635: 8634: 8621: 8616: 8615: 8614: 8604: 8601: 8590: 8584: 8582: 8579: 8578: 8577: 8566: 8553: 8550: 8549: 8548: 8547: 8546: 8545: 8544: 8529: 8480: 8477: 8468: 8455: 8453: 8450: 8449: 8448: 8447: 8446: 8445: 8444: 8443: 8442: 8373: 8371: 8362: 8359: 8356: 8355: 8340: 8339: 8334: 8323: 8320: 8319: 8318: 8301: 8298: 8295: 8294: 8293: 8292: 8291: 8290: 8289: 8288: 8247: 8246: 8245: 8244: 8243: 8242: 8241: 8240: 8239: 8238: 8205: 8204: 8203: 8202: 8201: 8200: 8199: 8198: 8174:140.98.210.233 8139: 8137: 8134: 8128: 8127: 8118: 8117: 8110: 8105: 8104: 8103: 8102: 8101: 8071: 8068: 8067: 8066: 8052: 8049: 8047: 8044: 8043: 8042: 8041: 8040: 8023: 8009: 8007: 7995: 7982: 7980: 7977: 7976: 7975: 7962: 7959: 7948:Message added 7946: 7933: 7931: 7928: 7927: 7926: 7913: 7908: 7907: 7906: 7895: 7894: 7893: 7885: 7877:Special:Import 7873:Special:Export 7859: 7843: 7842: 7841: 7829: 7821: 7810: 7806: 7805: 7801: 7800: 7796: 7795: 7784: 7772: 7771: 7767: 7766: 7763: 7760: 7757: 7754: 7751: 7748: 7745: 7741: 7740: 7737: 7734: 7731: 7730: 7727: 7723: 7720: 7719: 7718: 7705: 7704: 7695: 7677: 7672: 7669: 7668: 7667: 7666: 7665: 7664: 7663: 7654: 7644: 7626:173.206.240.19 7602: 7599: 7598: 7597: 7584: 7581: 7580: 7579: 7566: 7563: 7562: 7561: 7548: 7545: 7544: 7543: 7530: 7527: 7526: 7525: 7516: 7510: 7505: 7502: 7501: 7500: 7499: 7498: 7497: 7496: 7495: 7494: 7493: 7492: 7491: 7490: 7479:Alpha_Quadrant 7474: 7441:Alpha_Quadrant 7400: 7399: 7388: 7353: 7350: 7348: 7343: 7342: 7341: 7340: 7339: 7286: 7276:Nyttend backup 7267: 7266: 7261: 7256: 7249: 7246: 7245: 7244: 7243: 7242: 7241: 7240: 7239: 7238: 7237: 7236: 7235: 7234: 7220: 7213: 7156: 7155: 7154: 7151: 7147: 7144: 7141: 7135: 7069: 7063: 7060: 7057: 7056: 7042: 7031: 7028: 7027: 7026: 7016: 7014: 7005: 7000: 6998: 6995: 6994: 6993: 6983: 6980:bugzilla:19006 6977: 6968: 6965: 6964: 6963: 6962: 6961: 6960: 6959: 6958: 6957: 6956: 6955: 6954: 6953: 6920:94.196.120.180 6861: 6858: 6857: 6856: 6855: 6854: 6853: 6852: 6811: 6808: 6807: 6806: 6797: 6791: 6783: 6782: 6781: 6780: 6749: 6746: 6745: 6744: 6723: 6720: 6719: 6718: 6705: 6702: 6701: 6700: 6699: 6698: 6673: 6668: 6665: 6664: 6663: 6650: 6647: 6646: 6645: 6636: 6626: 6623: 6622: 6621: 6612: 6609: 6592: 6589: 6588: 6587: 6586: 6585: 6534: 6533: 6532: 6531: 6501: 6500: 6499: 6488: 6485: 6481: 6474: 6471: 6464: 6442: 6434: 6432: 6429: 6427: 6424: 6423: 6422: 6421: 6420: 6390: 6387: 6385: 6380: 6379: 6378: 6377: 6376: 6347: 6344: 6343: 6342: 6329: 6326: 6325: 6324: 6320: 6317: 6314: 6311: 6306: 6303: 6302: 6301: 6282: 6279: 6278: 6277: 6264: 6261: 6260: 6259: 6246: 6245:Future of MOTD 6243: 6242: 6241: 6228: 6225: 6222: 6221: 6206: 6205: 6200: 6189: 6186: 6185: 6184: 6183: 6182: 6152: 6149: 6148: 6147: 6128: 6125: 6124: 6123: 6122: 6121: 6120: 6119: 6118: 6117: 6073: 6044: 6043: 6024: 6023: 6020: 6016: 6015: 6012: 6007: 6004: 6003: 6002: 5997:Moonriddengirl 5981: 5980: 5965: 5964: 5963: 5962: 5961: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5933: 5930: 5891: 5867: 5862: 5857: 5856: 5855: 5838: 5835: 5834: 5833: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5829: 5811: 5760: 5757: 5755: 5752: 5749: 5748: 5744: 5743: 5738: 5727: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5721: 5720: 5688: 5685: 5684: 5683: 5682: 5681: 5680: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5648:You got mail. 5633: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5627: 5626: 5625: 5624: 5615: 5613: 5567: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5549: 5546: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5514: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5496: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5489: 5450: 5447: 5446: 5445: 5432: 5429: 5428: 5427: 5418: 5413: 5410: 5409: 5408: 5399: 5396: 5382: 5377: 5374: 5373: 5372: 5371: 5370: 5343: 5340: 5339: 5338: 5337: 5336: 5294: 5289: 5286: 5285: 5284: 5283: 5282: 5252: 5250: 5245: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5225: 5220: 5218: 5209: 5207: 5202: 5200: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5178: 5175: 5173: 5170: 5168: 5165: 5163: 5160: 5159: 5158: 5143: 5137: 5134: 5133: 5132: 5131: 5130: 5093: 5090: 5089: 5088: 5077: 5070: 5059: 5056: 5027: 5024: 5022: 5019: 5018: 5017: 5004: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4986: 4983: 4982: 4981: 4964: 4959: 4958: 4957: 4947: 4938: 4918: 4915: 4912: 4911: 4910: 4909: 4908: 4905: 4901: 4888: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4618: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4594: 4587: 4584: 4583: 4566: 4555: 4554:A beer for you 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4518: 4490: 4487: 4482: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4443:If you have a 4442: 4437: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4419: 4418:Diff templates 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4364: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4346: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4317: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4261: 4260: 4247: 4244: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4234: 4227: 4226: 4223: 4218: 4216: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4198: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4170: 4169: 4154: 4153: 4131: 4130: 4126: 4125: 4120: 4118: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4099: 4098: 4081:Diogomauricio3 4076: 4075: 4070: 4059: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4040:Michaeldsuarez 4027: 4025: 4023: 4010:Michaeldsuarez 4004: 4001: 3999: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3971: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3953: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3897: 3872: 3869: 3867: 3864: 3862: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3840: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3743: 3740: 3737: 3731: 3724: 3723: 3718: 3717: 3711: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3686: 3685: 3668: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3596: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3566: 3565: 3549: 3533: 3520:Rahuljohnson4u 3515: 3512: 3510: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3479: 3476: 3474: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3440: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3416: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3398: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3373: 3349: 3317: 3311: 3304: 3301: 3294:Special:Random 3269: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3250: 3249: 3237: 3236: 3231: 3220: 3217: 3214: 3213: 3203: 3202: 3197: 3186: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3172: 3169: 3154: 3149: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3119: 3117:bugzilla:23819 3114: 3113: 3112: 3100: 3099: 3086: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3067: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3049: 3037: 3036: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3003: 2956: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2938: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2902: 2900: 2869: 2824: 2822: 2819: 2814: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2777:Silver (90210) 2750: 2748: 2709: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2695:Kind regards, 2694: 2687: 2679: 2678: 2634: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2611: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2591: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2553: 2552: 2536: 2535: 2522: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2503: 2502: 2487: 2486: 2481: 2470: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2433: 2425: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2403: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2355: 2350: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2270: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2075: 2050: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2024: 2017: 1987: 1983: 1976: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1938: 1925: 1917: 1904: 1896: 1890: 1886: 1867: 1863: 1862: 1853: 1845:minimum effort 1833: 1830: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1806: 1799: 1792: 1777: 1769: 1765: 1764: 1728: 1704: 1703: 1694: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1611: 1569:still active. 1519: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1432: 1429: 1426: 1419: 1406: 1392: 1385: 1383: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1255: 1241: 1232: 1226: 1221: 1220: 1199:Jack has been 1195: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1136: 1135: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1064:bugzilla:27078 1010: 997: 994: 993: 992: 974: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 954:Evidently. :) 926: 905: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 889: 883: 879: 878: 877: 842:173.49.140.141 832: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 798: 780: 768: 765: 762: 757: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 717: 715: 711: 709: 625: 615: 610: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 575: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 551: 550: 537: 534: 532: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 493: 458: 456: 446: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 415: 409: 408: 386: 385: 380: 378: 367: 364: 363: 362: 352: 347: 344: 343: 342: 325: 322: 321: 320: 311:Done, thanks! 307: 304: 302: 299: 298: 297: 285: 284: 283: 282: 259: 258: 243: 242: 236: 230: 229: 223: 217: 216: 210: 204: 203: 197: 187: 186: 185: 178: 169: 158: 150: 147: 146: 145: 144: 143: 142: 141: 99: 96: 93: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 9196: 9173: 9169: 9165: 9161: 9157: 9153: 9151: 9147: 9143: 9139: 9135: 9131: 9127: 9125: 9121: 9117: 9113: 9112:Mascha Kaléko 9109: 9107: 9103: 9099: 9095: 9094: 9093: 9089: 9085: 9081: 9078: 9077: 9076: 9073: 9067: 9066: 9065: 9061: 9057: 9053: 9052: 9051: 9048: 9042: 9041: 9040: 9036: 9032: 9028: 9024: 9023: 9022: 9018: 9014: 9010: 9008: 9004: 9000: 8996: 8992: 8991: 8972: 8968: 8964: 8960: 8956: 8955: 8954: 8951: 8945: 8944: 8943: 8939: 8935: 8930: 8929: 8928: 8925: 8919: 8918: 8917: 8913: 8909: 8905: 8901: 8900: 8899: 8895: 8891: 8886: 8881: 8879: 8875: 8871: 8867: 8863: 8862: 8861: 8857: 8853: 8849: 8845: 8844: 8843: 8839: 8835: 8831: 8827: 8826: 8825: 8821: 8817: 8813: 8810: 8809: 8804: 8800: 8796: 8792: 8788: 8787: 8784: 8781: 8778: 8773: 8763: 8760: 8750: 8749: 8746: 8743: 8737: 8736: 8726: 8723: 8721: 8715: 8714: 8713: 8710: 8704: 8700: 8699: 8684: 8680: 8679: 8669: 8666: 8660: 8659: 8651: 8648: 8642: 8641: 8633: 8630: 8624: 8623: 8620: 8613: 8610: 8598: 8593: 8592: 8589: 8576: 8573: 8567: 8565: 8562: 8556: 8555: 8543: 8540: 8534: 8530: 8528: 8524: 8520: 8516: 8515: 8514: 8510: 8506: 8502: 8498: 8497: 8496: 8493: 8487: 8483: 8482: 8479:Billy Hathorn 8473: 8466: 8459: 8441: 8438: 8435: 8431: 8430: 8429: 8426: 8420: 8419: 8418: 8415: 8412: 8408: 8404: 8400: 8396: 8392: 8391:apologize for 8388: 8384: 8383: 8382: 8379: 8369: 8365: 8364: 8354: 8350: 8346: 8342: 8341: 8338: 8335: 8332: 8327: 8317: 8314: 8308: 8304: 8303: 8287: 8284: 8278: 8277: 8276: 8272: 8268: 8264: 8263: 8262: 8258: 8254: 8249: 8248: 8237: 8233: 8229: 8224: 8220: 8215: 8214: 8213: 8212: 8211: 8210: 8209: 8208: 8207: 8206: 8197: 8194: 8189: 8185: 8184: 8183: 8179: 8175: 8170: 8168: 8164: 8158: 8157: 8156: 8153: 8149: 8148: 8147: 8144: 8132: 8131: 8130: 8129: 8125: 8120: 8119: 8115: 8114: 8109: 8100: 8097: 8096: 8089: 8088: 8087: 8084: 8074: 8073: 8065: 8062: 8055: 8054: 8039: 8036: 8031: 8024: 8020: 8019: 8018: 8015: 8005: 8004: 8000: 7993: 7986: 7974: 7971: 7965: 7964: 7955: 7951: 7944: 7937: 7925: 7922: 7916: 7915: 7912: 7905: 7902: 7896: 7892: 7886: 7884: 7878: 7874: 7867: 7860: 7858: 7854: 7847: 7846: 7844: 7840: 7834: 7830: 7828: 7822: 7820: 7814: 7813: 7811: 7808: 7807: 7804:Contacting me 7803: 7802: 7798: 7797: 7785: 7782: 7774: 7773: 7769: 7768: 7764: 7761: 7758: 7755: 7752: 7749: 7746: 7743: 7742: 7738: 7733: 7732: 7726: 7725: 7717: 7714: 7707: 7706: 7703: 7700: 7693: 7689: 7685: 7681: 7675: 7674: 7662: 7659: 7652: 7648: 7642: 7638: 7637: 7635: 7631: 7627: 7623: 7616: 7615: 7614: 7611: 7605: 7604: 7596: 7593: 7587: 7586: 7578: 7575: 7569: 7568: 7560: 7557: 7551: 7550: 7542: 7539: 7533: 7532: 7524: 7521: 7514: 7508: 7507: 7489: 7486: 7481: 7475: 7473: 7470: 7464: 7463: 7462: 7459: 7453: 7452: 7451: 7448: 7443: 7437: 7436: 7435: 7432: 7426: 7422: 7421: 7420: 7417: 7412: 7411: 7404: 7403: 7402: 7401: 7398: 7395: 7389: 7386: 7381: 7375: 7369: 7361: 7356: 7355: 7347: 7338: 7335: 7333: 7328: 7326: 7321: 7319: 7313: 7309: 7308: 7307: 7304: 7295: 7287: 7285: 7281: 7277: 7273: 7269: 7268: 7265: 7262: 7260: 7257: 7255: 7252: 7251: 7233: 7229: 7225: 7221: 7218: 7214: 7211: 7207: 7203: 7202: 7201: 7198: 7192: 7191: 7190: 7186: 7182: 7178: 7175: 7171: 7168: 7167: 7166: 7163: 7157: 7152: 7148: 7145: 7142: 7139: 7138: 7136: 7134: 7130: 7126: 7122: 7118: 7117: 7116: 7112: 7108: 7104: 7101: 7098: 7094: 7090: 7087: 7083: 7079: 7078: 7077: 7074: 7066: 7065: 7055: 7051: 7047: 7043: 7040: 7036: 7035: 7025: 7022: 7012: 7008: 7007: 7004: 6992: 6989: 6981: 6975: 6971: 6970: 6952: 6949: 6943: 6939: 6935: 6931: 6930: 6929: 6925: 6921: 6916: 6915: 6914: 6911: 6905: 6904: 6903: 6899: 6895: 6890: 6889: 6888: 6885: 6879: 6878: 6877: 6874: 6868: 6864: 6863: 6851: 6847: 6843: 6839: 6838: 6837: 6834: 6828: 6825: 6824: 6823: 6820: 6814: 6813: 6805: 6802: 6795: 6789: 6785: 6784: 6779: 6775: 6771: 6767: 6763: 6762: 6761: 6758: 6752: 6751: 6743: 6740: 6734: 6733:by javascript 6730: 6726: 6725: 6717: 6714: 6708: 6707: 6697: 6694: 6690: 6689: 6688: 6685: 6678: 6671: 6670: 6662: 6659: 6653: 6652: 6649:Thehelpfulbot 6644: 6641: 6634: 6629: 6628: 6620: 6617: 6607: 6603: 6599: 6595: 6594: 6584: 6581: 6580: 6579: 6566: 6562: 6550: 6546: 6542: 6538: 6537: 6536: 6535: 6513: 6512: 6511: 6508: 6502: 6497: 6493: 6489: 6486: 6482: 6479: 6475: 6472: 6469: 6465: 6461: 6460: 6458: 6457: 6453: 6446: 6438: 6419: 6415: 6411: 6407: 6404: 6403: 6402: 6399: 6393: 6392: 6384: 6375: 6371: 6367: 6362: 6361: 6360: 6357: 6350: 6349: 6341: 6338: 6332: 6331: 6321: 6318: 6315: 6312: 6309: 6308: 6305:MSU Interview 6300: 6297: 6290: 6285: 6284: 6276: 6273: 6267: 6266: 6258: 6255: 6249: 6248: 6240: 6237: 6231: 6230: 6220: 6216: 6212: 6208: 6207: 6204: 6201: 6198: 6193: 6181: 6177: 6173: 6166: 6165: 6164: 6161: 6155: 6154: 6146: 6143: 6136: 6131: 6130: 6116: 6113: 6107: 6106: 6105: 6101: 6097: 6089: 6088: 6087: 6083: 6079: 6074: 6071: 6070: 6069: 6065: 6061: 6050: 6046: 6045: 6042: 6038: 6034: 6026: 6025: 6021: 6018: 6017: 6013: 6010: 6009: 6001: 5998: 5990: 5983: 5982: 5979: 5975: 5971: 5967: 5966: 5957: 5953: 5949: 5945: 5944: 5943: 5940: 5931: 5929: 5925: 5921: 5916: 5915: 5914: 5910: 5906: 5901: 5900: 5899: 5896: 5889: 5882: 5875: 5871: 5865: 5864: 5861: 5854: 5851: 5850: 5849: 5841: 5840: 5828: 5825: 5819: 5815: 5809: 5800: 5799: 5798: 5794: 5790: 5783: 5779: 5774: 5773: 5772: 5769: 5763: 5762: 5746: 5745: 5742: 5739: 5736: 5731: 5719: 5716: 5711: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5697: 5691: 5690: 5676: 5673: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5662: 5656: 5655: 5654: 5651: 5647: 5646: 5645: 5642: 5636: 5635: 5623: 5620: 5611: 5610: 5609: 5604: 5603: 5598: 5597: 5592: 5591: 5585: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5576: 5570: 5569: 5561: 5558: 5552: 5551: 5541: 5538: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5524: 5517: 5516: 5508: 5505: 5499: 5498: 5488: 5485: 5480: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5469: 5462: 5457: 5453: 5452: 5444: 5441: 5435: 5434: 5426: 5423: 5416: 5415: 5407: 5404: 5394: 5390: 5386: 5380: 5379: 5369: 5365: 5361: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5352: 5346: 5345: 5335: 5331: 5329: 5323: 5322: 5314: 5313: 5312: 5309: 5303: 5298: 5292: 5291: 5281: 5276: 5272: 5268: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5258: 5248: 5247: 5244: 5237: 5234: 5228: 5227: 5224: 5217: 5213: 5206: 5193: 5189: 5185: 5181: 5180: 5157: 5154: 5148: 5140: 5139: 5129: 5125: 5121: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5112: 5103: 5096: 5095: 5086: 5082: 5078: 5071: 5068: 5064: 5060: 5057: 5052: 5046: 5042: 5041: 5039: 5034: 5016: 5013: 5007: 5006: 4998: 4995: 4989: 4988: 4980: 4977: 4971: 4967: 4966: 4963: 4956: 4953: 4946:, not on you. 4944: 4939: 4937: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4921: 4920: 4906: 4903: 4902: 4897: 4893: 4892: 4872: 4868: 4864: 4858: 4855: 4852: 4849: 4846: 4843: 4840: 4837: 4834: 4831: 4828: 4825: 4822: 4817: 4811: 4808: 4805: 4802: 4799: 4796: 4793: 4790: 4787: 4784: 4781: 4778: 4775: 4770: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4757: 4753: 4747: 4744: 4741: 4738: 4735: 4732: 4729: 4726: 4723: 4720: 4717: 4714: 4711: 4706: 4700: 4697: 4694: 4691: 4688: 4685: 4682: 4679: 4676: 4673: 4670: 4667: 4664: 4659: 4658:216.6.232.238 4655: 4654: 4653: 4650: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4625: 4621: 4620: 4612: 4608: 4607: 4601: 4597: 4596: 4592: 4582: 4578: 4574: 4567: 4564: 4560: 4559: 4542: 4537: 4536: 4533: 4528: 4524: 4520: 4519: 4515: 4510: 4509: 4506: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4496: 4485: 4484: 4474: 4471: 4465: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4456: 4450: 4446: 4440: 4439: 4431: 4428: 4422: 4421: 4409: 4406: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4367: 4366: 4358: 4355: 4349: 4348: 4342: 4326: 4323: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4308: 4305: 4302: 4297: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4283: 4279: 4270: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4259: 4256: 4250: 4249: 4235: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4222: 4221: 4210: 4207: 4201: 4200: 4190: 4186: 4182: 4178: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4168: 4165: 4159: 4158: 4151: 4147: 4146: 4137: 4132: 4127: 4124: 4123: 4112: 4109: 4103: 4102: 4097: 4093: 4086: 4082: 4078: 4077: 4074: 4071: 4068: 4063: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4032: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4015: 4011: 4007: 4006: 3998: 3994: 3987: 3984: 3978: 3974: 3973: 3965: 3962: 3956: 3955: 3952: 3939: 3936: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3924: 3915: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3904: 3898: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3889: 3880: 3875: 3874: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3843: 3842: 3826: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3768: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3758: 3753: 3748: 3744: 3735: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3720: 3719: 3714: 3713: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3671: 3670: 3654: 3649: 3646: 3644: 3642: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3631: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3620: 3618: 3616: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3605: 3599: 3598: 3590: 3587: 3581: 3577: 3568: 3567: 3563: 3560: 3557: 3553: 3550: 3547: 3544: 3541: 3537: 3534: 3531: 3528: 3525: 3521: 3518: 3517: 3509:China America 3502: 3499: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3488: 3482: 3481: 3478:Iluvrihanna24 3473:User:Hosokawa 3466: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3449: 3443: 3442: 3434: 3431: 3424: 3419: 3418: 3410: 3407: 3401: 3400: 3384: 3381: 3378: 3374: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3355: 3347: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3323: 3315: 3307:{{confirmed}} 3299: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3272: 3271: 3263: 3260: 3254: 3253: 3248: 3245: 3239: 3238: 3235: 3232: 3229: 3224: 3212: 3209: 3205: 3204: 3201: 3198: 3195: 3190: 3180: 3177: 3167: 3164: 3161: 3157: 3152: 3151: 3143: 3140: 3134: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3121: 3118: 3111: 3108: 3102: 3101: 3098: 3095: 3089: 3088: 3080: 3077: 3070: 3069: 3066: 3058: 3055: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3038: 3035: 3032: 3026: 3021: 3020: 3013: 3010: 3001: 3000: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2974: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2965: 2959: 2958: 2950: 2947: 2941: 2940: 2922: 2919: 2916: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2907: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2881: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2868: 2865: 2862: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2853: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2842: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2830: 2817: 2816: 2802: 2799: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2755: 2746: 2743:article with 2742: 2738: 2734: 2733: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2713:I agree with 2712: 2711: 2703: 2700: 2685: 2681: 2680: 2677: 2674: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2655: 2650: 2647: 2644: 2640: 2639:Arielle Leira 2637: 2636: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2620: 2614: 2613: 2610: 2603: 2600: 2594: 2593: 2581: 2578: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2551: 2548: 2542: 2538: 2537: 2534: 2531: 2525: 2524: 2516: 2513: 2507: 2506: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2488: 2485: 2482: 2479: 2474: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2445: 2439: 2434: 2431: 2430: 2428: 2427: 2419: 2416: 2410: 2406: 2405: 2393: 2390: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2376: 2371: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2362: 2353: 2352: 2349:Jack Merridew 2338: 2335: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2318: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2302: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2292: 2285: 2273: 2272: 2260: 2257: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2246: 2241: 2240: 2236: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2215: 2214: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2163:83.242.172.80 2160: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2151: 2146: 2145: 2141: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2130: 2123: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2107:ENCRYPTMATRON 2104: 2101: 2099: 2096: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2080: 2072: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2056:ENCRYPTMATRON 2053: 2052: 2032: 2029: 2022: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1995: 1988: 1984: 1981: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1926: 1923: 1918: 1912: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1894: 1891: 1887: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1875:J. M. Coetzee 1872: 1868: 1865: 1864: 1861: 1858: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1818: 1812: 1804: 1796: 1789: 1783: 1774: 1767: 1766: 1763: 1760: 1758: 1753: 1751: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1729: 1726: 1723: 1720: 1716: 1711: 1706: 1705: 1702: 1699: 1691: 1687: 1686:the community 1683: 1678: 1677: 1664: 1661: 1659: 1654: 1652: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1629: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1618: 1612: 1610: 1607: 1600:wikimedia.org 1588: 1587: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1576: 1574: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1562: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1551: 1549: 1544: 1542: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1526: 1524: 1520: 1517: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1495: 1491: 1485: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1465:de-escalation 1462: 1455: 1448: 1443: 1438: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1424: 1423: 1420: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1411: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1390: 1381: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1345: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1295: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1281: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1267: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1253: 1247: 1242: 1238: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1223: 1222: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1202: 1198: 1197: 1194:Jack Merridew 1189: 1186: 1180: 1179: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1157: 1148: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1130: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1106: 1100: 1099: 1091: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1071: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1049: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1032: 1030: 1028: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1017: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1000: 999: 991: 987: 983: 982: 977: 976: 962: 959: 953: 952: 951: 947: 943: 942: 937: 936: 935: 932: 924: 923: 922: 918: 914: 913: 908: 907: 897: 894: 887: 880: 876: 873: 867: 866: 865: 861: 857: 853: 852: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 834: 822: 819: 814: 808: 807: 806: 803: 796: 792: 788: 784: 778: 777: 776: 773: 760: 759: 739: 735: 731: 727: 726: 725: 722: 713: 706: 701: 694: 690: 689: 688: 684: 680: 675: 674: 673: 670: 664: 663: 662: 658: 654: 650: 649: 648: 644: 640: 636: 635: 634: 631: 623: 619: 613: 612: 602: 598: 596: 589: 588: 587: 584: 578: 577: 567: 563: 559: 556:Thank you. -- 555: 554: 553: 552: 549: 546: 540: 539: 520: 515: 511: 510: 503: 502: 501: 498: 490: 489: 488: 483: 479: 478: 471: 468: 467: 466: 463: 453: 449: 448: 438: 434: 430: 426: 425: 424: 421: 413: 412: 407: 403: 399: 394: 388: 387: 384: 381: 376: 371: 361: 358: 350: 349: 341: 338: 332: 329:OK. FYI, see 328: 327: 319: 316: 310: 309: 296: 293: 287: 286: 281: 277: 268: 263: 262: 261: 260: 257: 254: 247: 246: 241: 237: 235: 232: 231: 228: 224: 222: 219: 218: 215: 211: 209: 206: 205: 198: 196: 193: 192: 183: 179: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 157: 153: 152: 140: 137: 135: 131: 130: 124: 123: 122: 119: 113: 112: 111: 108: 102: 101: 98:A quick check 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 9164:Gerda Arendt 9160:Osterbrunnen 9156:Bach cantata 9142:Gerda Arendt 9116:Gerda Arendt 9098:Gerda Arendt 9084:Gerda Arendt 9080:Frohe Ostern 9056:Gerda Arendt 9031:Gerda Arendt 9013:Gerda Arendt 8999:Gerda Arendt 8963:Gerda Arendt 8959:Geometry guy 8934:Gerda Arendt 8908:Gerda Arendt 8890:Gerda Arendt 8870:Gerda Arendt 8852:Gerda Arendt 8850:(6 March) -- 8834:Gerda Arendt 8830:Geometry guy 8816:Gerda Arendt 8795:Gerda Arendt 8782: 8696:Welcomeen-or 8643:Sure, done. 8336: 8306: 8279:Not at all. 8228:210.51.43.82 8160: 8123: 8108:User:Flyer22 8091: 7888: 7880: 7852: 7849: 7836: 7824: 7816: 7650: 7620:— Preceding 7415:(talk to me) 7406: 7331: 7324: 7317: 7224:Gerda Arendt 7206:Human rights 7204:The section 7193:Ok, thanks. 7125:Gerda Arendt 7121:Human rights 7092: 7085: 7046:Geoffbrigham 6997:Your dilemma 6973: 6894:94.197.43.34 6793: 6787: 6753:Ok, thanks! 6632: 6577: 6575: 6561:WP:PAIDWATCH 6541:WP:PAIDWATCH 6366:Gerda Arendt 6346:Human rights 6227:All the best 6202: 6132:Yeah, yeah. 6078:Gerda Arendt 5948:Gerda Arendt 5905:Gerda Arendt 5869: 5844: 5843: 5837:Tr:In Bruges 5817: 5807: 5740: 5703:Traurig ;-) 5649: 5601: 5595: 5589: 5583: 5327: 5318: 5301: 5147:disruptively 5092:Kind request 5062: 5030: 4853: 4847: 4841: 4835: 4829: 4823: 4806: 4800: 4794: 4788: 4782: 4776: 4769:98.98.237.70 4742: 4736: 4730: 4724: 4718: 4712: 4705:68.62.240.86 4695: 4689: 4683: 4677: 4671: 4665: 4605: 4530: 4503: 4143: 4072: 3640: 3614: 3575: 3558: 3542: 3526: 3439:Donna Martin 3402:Sure, done. 3397:Twinkle sync 3363:JamesBWatson 3332:JamesBWatson 3276:JamesBWatson 3233: 3199: 2978:— Preceding 2937:I am puzzled 2896: 2892: 2888: 2740: 2737:Donna Martin 2730: 2729:was part of 2727:Donna Martin 2723:Donna Martin 2645: 2483: 2432:{{subst:cn}} 2315: 2299: 2238: 2143: 2071:in this edit 2020: 1979: 1921: 1892: 1883:constructive 1882: 1878: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1835:better from 1802: 1787: 1772: 1756: 1749: 1721: 1709: 1689: 1685: 1657: 1650: 1644: 1579: 1572: 1547: 1540: 1534: 1530: 1515: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1493: 1489: 1464: 1460: 1446: 1442:whom or what 1441: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1371: 1357: 1343: 1337:1942 Porsche 1329: 1307: 1293: 1279: 1265: 1251: 1069: 1026: 979: 939: 910: 618:transcluding 594:Steven Zhang 541:Sure, done. 513: 507: 481: 475: 451: 382: 288:Sure, done. 128: 127: 78: 43: 37: 9140:, enjoy! -- 7647:WP:SCRUTINY 6768:was about.— 5814:WP:SCRUTINY 5342:Xebulon SPI 5142:misconduct. 5021:Lenna image 4816:69.34.37.32 4370:WP:BADCHART 4008:Bumping. -- 3847:DegenFarang 3817:DegenFarang 3803:TheTakeover 3789:DegenFarang 3775:TheTakeover 3747:WP:BLANKING 3694:DegenFarang 3675:DegenFarang 3243:Dr. Blofeld 3065:User:Fatcud 2715:Erin Silver 2269:Quick query 2092:User:Keepvm 2088:User:BabbaQ 2016:Hi Diannaa, 1531:everybody's 1301:il fugitivo 1254:to do that. 609:Count pages 36:This is an 8638:Repository 7952:. You can 7409:Rcsprinter 7367:cyberpower 7210:his legacy 7181:ASCIIn2Bme 7107:ASCIIn2Bme 6454:with tea. 6292:. Thanks, 6281:'moreinfo' 6211:ASCIIn2Bme 5657:Received. 5461:he said so 5184:Yellowdesk 5003:Editnotice 4851:block user 4845:filter log 4804:block user 4798:filter log 4740:block user 4734:filter log 4693:block user 4687:filter log 4589:About the 4535:Farmbrough 4508:Farmbrough 4269:This, that 3914:This, that 3879:This, that 3839:Input/Help 3552:Achayan.rj 3042:WP:NOTABLE 2873:WP:VETTING 2287:. Cheers, 1522:arbitrator 1447:escalation 767:question). 470:User:Rd232 445:Editnotice 333:. Cheers, 267:This, that 9138:Main page 9025:Passion: 8846:See also 8368:SPI/CLERK 8070:Geonotice 7777:.htpasswd 7641:WP:OUTING 7583:My header 7091:accusing 6938:WP:APPEAL 6842:T. Canens 6693:Acalamari 6323:properly. 6151:Thank you 5808:Confirmed 5513:A request 5456:myles325a 5120:Hoverfish 4857:block log 4810:block log 4746:block log 4699:block log 4606:Kosm1fent 4591:JESC 2012 4275:the other 4085:CT Cooper 3920:the other 3885:the other 3514:Checkuser 3133:rev:83034 3129:rev:82804 3063:Block of 2915:SudoGhost 2877:SudoGhost 2861:SudoGhost 2838:SudoGhost 2654:This edit 2626:Thanks! 2561:Debresser 2453:Debresser 1259:Waterbuck 1231:accounts. 1139:Pages in 973:Need help 904:Thank you 781:Testing: 764:accounts. 730:Riannedac 679:Riannedac 653:Riannedac 639:Riannedac 452:enourmous 273:the other 129:Jezebel's 90:Archive 8 85:Archive 7 79:Archive 6 73:Archive 5 68:Archive 4 60:Archive 1 9071:Amalthea 9046:Amalthea 8949:Amalthea 8923:Amalthea 8920:I know. 8768:Precious 8758:Amalthea 8741:Amalthea 8708:Amalthea 8664:Amalthea 8661:Thanks. 8646:Amalthea 8628:Amalthea 8608:Amalthea 8605:Cheers, 8571:Amalthea 8560:Amalthea 8538:Amalthea 8491:Amalthea 8470:You can 8452:Talkback 8424:Amalthea 8377:Amalthea 8374:Cheers, 8312:Amalthea 8282:Amalthea 8142:Amalthea 8082:Amalthea 8060:Amalthea 8013:Amalthea 8010:Cheers, 7979:Talkback 7969:Amalthea 7966:Thanks. 7930:Talkback 7920:Amalthea 7900:Amalthea 7712:Amalthea 7698:Amalthea 7657:Amalthea 7651:courtesy 7622:unsigned 7609:Amalthea 7591:Amalthea 7573:Amalthea 7555:Amalthea 7552:Thanks. 7537:Amalthea 7519:Amalthea 7504:Comment? 7468:Amalthea 7457:Amalthea 7430:Amalthea 7393:Amalthea 7302:Amalthea 7196:Amalthea 7161:Amalthea 7072:Amalthea 7020:Amalthea 7017:Cheers, 6987:Amalthea 6984:Cheers, 6978:Bug was 6947:Amalthea 6909:Amalthea 6883:Amalthea 6872:Amalthea 6840:Thanks! 6832:Amalthea 6818:Amalthea 6800:Amalthea 6756:Amalthea 6738:Amalthea 6712:Amalthea 6683:Amalthea 6657:Amalthea 6639:Amalthea 6615:Amalthea 6600:and the 6506:Amalthea 6452:biscuits 6397:Amalthea 6355:Amalthea 6336:Amalthea 6295:Amalthea 6271:Amalthea 6253:Amalthea 6235:Amalthea 6232:Thanks. 6159:Amalthea 6141:Amalthea 6111:Amalthea 5938:Amalthea 5894:Amalthea 5823:Amalthea 5767:Amalthea 5695:Amalthea 5671:Amalthea 5660:Amalthea 5640:Amalthea 5618:Amalthea 5574:Amalthea 5556:Amalthea 5536:Amalthea 5503:Amalthea 5467:Amalthea 5439:Amalthea 5421:Amalthea 5402:Amalthea 5350:Amalthea 5307:Amalthea 5275:Contribs 5256:Amalthea 5253:Cheers, 5249:Hi Dori, 5232:Amalthea 5152:Amalthea 5110:Amalthea 5011:Amalthea 4993:Amalthea 4975:Amalthea 4951:Amalthea 4924:my edits 4827:contribs 4780:contribs 4716:contribs 4669:contribs 4648:Amalthea 4494:Amalthea 4491:Cheers, 4469:Amalthea 4454:Amalthea 4426:Amalthea 4404:Amalthea 4353:Amalthea 4321:Amalthea 4304:contribs 4254:Amalthea 4205:Amalthea 4163:Amalthea 4107:Amalthea 4030:Amalthea 3982:Amalthea 3960:Amalthea 3934:Amalthea 3902:Amalthea 3896:Sarcasm? 3756:Amalthea 3629:Amalthea 3603:Amalthea 3585:Amalthea 3562:contribs 3546:contribs 3530:contribs 3497:Amalthea 3486:Amalthea 3447:Amalthea 3429:Amalthea 3405:Amalthea 3353:Amalthea 3350:Cheers, 3321:Amalthea 3318:Cheers, 3258:Amalthea 3175:Amalthea 3138:Amalthea 3106:Amalthea 3093:Amalthea 3075:Amalthea 3053:Amalthea 3030:Amalthea 3008:Amalthea 2992:contribs 2984:Hosokawa 2980:unsigned 2963:Amalthea 2945:Amalthea 2905:Amalthea 2897:at least 2871:I found 2851:Amalthea 2828:Amalthea 2797:Amalthea 2753:Amalthea 2698:Amalthea 2672:Amalthea 2649:contribs 2618:Amalthea 2598:Amalthea 2576:Amalthea 2546:Amalthea 2529:Amalthea 2511:Amalthea 2443:Amalthea 2414:Amalthea 2388:Amalthea 2360:Amalthea 2333:Amalthea 2290:Amalthea 2255:Amalthea 2178:Thanks-- 2128:Amalthea 2078:Amalthea 2027:Amalthea 1993:Amalthea 1856:Amalthea 1826:passive. 1725:contribs 1715:Gold Hat 1697:Amalthea 1627:Amalthea 1605:Amalthea 1592:stewards 1409:Amalthea 1389:WP:POINT 1375:contribs 1361:contribs 1351:Czolgosz 1347:contribs 1333:contribs 1311:contribs 1297:contribs 1283:contribs 1269:contribs 1214:contribs 1184:Amalthea 1176:Good eye 1134:largest. 1054:Amalthea 1015:Amalthea 1004:Amalthea 957:Amalthea 930:Amalthea 927:Cheers, 892:Amalthea 871:Amalthea 856:Syrthiss 801:Amalthea 771:Amalthea 720:Amalthea 668:Amalthea 629:Amalthea 582:Amalthea 574:Testing? 558:Askarmuk 544:Amalthea 496:Amalthea 461:Amalthea 419:Amalthea 416:Cheers, 356:Amalthea 336:Amalthea 314:Amalthea 291:Amalthea 252:Amalthea 117:Amalthea 106:Amalthea 8904:Khazar2 8719:ɑηsuмaη 8366:For an 8361:Pre-vet 8152:AniMate 8094:MBisanz 8034:(ʞlɐʇ) 7853:exactly 7735:Details 7325:Helpful 7150:before. 6860:Request 6810:SPI bot 6431:Thanks! 6328:Request 6171:Georgia 6095:Georgia 6059:Georgia 6032:Georgia 5847:Snowolf 5788:Georgia 5706:Pumpkin 5602:✐ Deeds 5590:Abhijay 5043:I am a 4593:article 4525:out of 4307:twinkle 4181:Sumanah 3871:Twinkle 3457:James26 3380:ɐuɐʞsǝp 3314:a clerk 3125:see SVN 2781:James26 2763:James26 2708:Request 2492:Diannaa 2004:Diannaa 1911:blocked 1900:WP:SOCK 1852:chance? 1795:WP:SOCK 1710:abusing 1507:Really? 1492:one of 1488:RexxS: 1454:blocked 1363:), and 1273:Puputan 831:Request 514:10:25pm 482:10:04pm 39:archive 8519:Orlady 8505:Orlady 8407:WP:AIV 8399:WP:AN3 8395:WP:AIV 8345:Drmies 7866:nbhyph 7601:Outing 7484:(talk) 7446:(talk) 7294:nobots 6942:WP:GAB 6591:Outing 6492:WP:RBI 6478:WP:SPI 6463:sense. 5989:Cclean 5970:Drmies 5920:Drmies 5888:WT:CCI 5881:Cclean 5782:WT:DYK 5778:WT:FAC 5754:Thanks 5596:☎ Talk 5297:here's 5051:helpme 4917:Active 4573:rose64 4523:London 4277:(talk) 4272:, and 4233:tasks. 3970:Govynn 3922:(talk) 3917:, and 3887:(talk) 3882:, and 3866:Thanks 3734:WP:RfA 3637:Bah! – 3580:WP:SPI 3377:(ʞɿɐʇ) 2893:during 2889:before 2661:. Add 2219:BabbaQ 2188:BabbaQ 2180:BabbaQ 2021:by far 1849:effort 1782:a plea 1645:except 1511:plenty 1461:needed 1319:WP:ANI 1287:Nyupat 275:(talk) 270:, and 9134:peace 9114:), -- 8752:...). 8703:WT:TW 8656:Hello 8437:Ghost 8414:Ghost 7890:Good. 7856:wiki. 7272:WP:UP 7217:Think 7137:Hmm. 6680:. :) 6289:works 6169:Sandy 6093:Sandy 6057:Sandy 6030:Sandy 5818:other 5786:Sandy 5483:lozzo 5464:. :) 5328:the 1 5102:db-u1 5063:after 4985:Spam? 4296:Ioeth 3595:D'oh! 3576:Stale 3046:WP:RS 2119:I've 1943:RexxS 1922:can't 1803:known 1773:chose 1733:RexxS 1690:every 1616:pablo 1560:pablo 1499:their 1469:RexxS 1401:must 1252:chose 1162:Gurch 817:fisto 812:Menti 626:HTH, 509:James 477:James 455:IMHO. 133:Ponyo 16:< 9168:talk 9158:and 9146:talk 9120:talk 9102:talk 9088:talk 9060:talk 9035:talk 9017:talk 9003:talk 8967:talk 8938:talk 8912:talk 8906:, -- 8894:talk 8882:Now 8874:talk 8868:, -- 8856:talk 8838:talk 8820:talk 8799:talk 8523:talk 8509:talk 8503:. -- 8501:list 8434:Sudo 8411:Sudo 8397:and 8387:this 8370:? ;) 8349:talk 8307:want 8271:talk 8257:talk 8232:talk 8178:talk 8167:talk 7686:and 7630:talk 7373:Chat 7280:talk 7228:talk 7185:talk 7129:talk 7111:talk 7050:talk 6924:talk 6898:talk 6846:talk 6827:BRFA 6794:very 6788:with 6774:talk 6766:this 6414:talk 6370:talk 6215:talk 6176:Talk 6100:Talk 6082:talk 6064:Talk 6037:Talk 5974:talk 5952:talk 5924:talk 5909:talk 5793:Talk 5780:and 5714:talk 5650:GotR 5500:OK. 5478:Joja 5458:and 5364:talk 5320:Rain 5316:too. 5302:want 5271:Talk 5267:Dori 5199:Okay 5188:talk 5124:Talk 5081:here 5067:here 4932:talk 4867:talk 4839:logs 4821:talk 4814:and 4792:logs 4774:talk 4756:talk 4728:logs 4710:talk 4681:logs 4663:talk 4636:talk 4626:and 4600:here 4577:talk 4532:Rich 4505:Rich 4462:And 4392:talk 4378:talk 4301:talk 4185:talk 4092:talk 4044:talk 4014:talk 3975:See 3851:talk 3821:talk 3807:talk 3793:talk 3779:talk 3745:See 3698:talk 3679:talk 3653:here 3641:xeno 3615:xeno 3556:talk 3540:talk 3524:talk 3461:talk 3423:this 3367:talk 3336:talk 3280:talk 3171:fun. 3131:and 2988:talk 2785:talk 2767:talk 2643:talk 2565:talk 2496:Talk 2457:talk 2322:talk 2317:Cirt 2306:talk 2301:Cirt 2284:Done 2223:talk 2192:talk 2184:talk 2167:talk 2111:talk 2090:and 2060:talk 2008:talk 1980:want 1947:talk 1832:can. 1788:have 1757:talk 1737:talk 1719:talk 1658:talk 1637:this 1580:talk 1548:talk 1516:Mine 1503:they 1494:many 1473:talk 1403:take 1369:talk 1355:talk 1341:talk 1327:talk 1317:and 1305:talk 1291:talk 1277:talk 1263:talk 1210:talk 1166:talk 1070:xeno 1048:Done 1027:xeno 986:talk 981:Cirt 946:talk 941:Cirt 917:talk 912:Cirt 860:talk 846:talk 734:talk 683:talk 657:talk 643:talk 637:Ty! 562:talk 433:talk 402:talk 346:Ping 164:and 8733:PJH 8603:is. 8403:RfA 8300:SPI 8022:to. 7676:Hi, 7427:)? 7332:One 7318:The 7095:of 6869:". 6770:Kww 6722:Thx 6667:Hey 6633:not 6410:Kww 6406:FYI 5874:MRG 5709:Sky 5599:) ( 5381:Hi, 5214:of 5045:bot 4863:Kww 4752:Kww 4632:Kww 4571:Red 4388:Kww 4374:Kww 3995:of 3310:of. 3135:). 2818:Hi, 2665:to 2375:Cat 2244:Man 2149:Man 1841:you 1837:him 1798:it. 1750:Doc 1746:--> 1651:Doc 1573:Doc 1541:Doc 1490:I'm 1349:), 1299:), 1285:), 1271:), 1212:• 1066:. – 761:Hi, 614:Hi, 531:IRC 396:-- 9170:) 9148:) 9122:) 9104:) 9090:) 9062:) 9037:) 9029:-- 9019:) 9005:) 8969:) 8940:) 8932:-- 8914:) 8896:) 8888:-- 8876:) 8858:) 8840:) 8822:) 8801:) 8705:. 8535:. 8525:) 8511:) 8488:. 8351:) 8273:) 8259:) 8234:) 8180:) 8172:. 8029:DQ 7882:OK 7869:}} 7863:{{ 7783:or 7632:) 7382:) 7376:)( 7297:}} 7291:{{ 7282:) 7230:) 7187:) 7131:) 7113:) 7105:. 7093:me 7052:) 6974:un 6926:) 6900:) 6848:) 6829:. 6776:) 6735:. 6574:-- 6416:) 6408:.— 6372:) 6217:) 6178:) 6138:. 6102:) 6084:) 6076:-- 6066:) 6039:) 5992:}} 5986:{{ 5976:) 5954:) 5926:) 5911:) 5903:-- 5884:}} 5878:{{ 5795:) 5584:rv 5366:) 5273:⁘ 5190:) 5105:}} 5099:{{ 5053:}} 5049:{{ 4972:. 4934:) 4869:) 4758:) 4638:) 4579:) 4538:, 4511:, 4394:) 4380:) 4344:}} 4338:{{ 4187:) 4083:. 4046:) 4016:) 3853:) 3823:) 3809:) 3795:) 3781:) 3700:) 3681:) 3582:. 3463:) 3426:. 3369:) 3338:) 3282:) 2994:) 2990:• 2787:) 2769:) 2567:) 2543:. 2498:) 2459:) 2324:) 2308:) 2234:TN 2225:) 2194:) 2169:) 2139:TN 2113:) 2062:) 2010:) 1974::) 1949:) 1941:-- 1914:}} 1908:{{ 1814:, 1739:) 1602:. 1535:or 1475:) 1457:}} 1451:{{ 1399:he 1216:) 1168:) 1158:}} 1154:{{ 1149:}} 1145:{{ 1131:}} 1127:{{ 1107:}} 1103:{{ 1051:. 988:) 948:) 919:) 862:) 848:) 793:, 789:, 785:, 736:) 703:}} 697:{{ 685:) 659:) 645:) 564:) 512:• 480:• 435:) 404:) 64:← 9166:( 9144:( 9118:( 9100:( 9086:( 9058:( 9033:( 9015:( 9001:( 8965:( 8936:( 8910:( 8892:( 8872:( 8854:( 8836:( 8818:( 8797:( 8521:( 8507:( 8467:. 8347:( 8269:( 8255:( 8230:( 8176:( 8165:( 7994:. 7945:. 7875:/ 7694:. 7628:( 7370:( 7362:) 7358:( 7278:( 7226:( 7183:( 7127:( 7109:( 7086:I 7048:( 6982:. 6940:/ 6922:( 6896:( 6844:( 6772:( 6412:( 6368:( 6213:( 6174:( 6098:( 6080:( 6062:( 6051:: 6035:( 5972:( 5950:( 5922:( 5907:( 5870:I 5810:. 5791:( 5605:) 5593:( 5395:. 5362:( 5277:☽ 5269:☾ 5194:. 5186:( 5087:. 5036:⚠ 4930:( 4865:( 4859:) 4854:· 4848:· 4842:· 4836:· 4830:· 4824:· 4819:( 4812:) 4807:· 4801:· 4795:· 4789:· 4783:· 4777:· 4772:( 4754:( 4748:) 4743:· 4737:· 4731:· 4725:· 4719:· 4713:· 4708:( 4701:) 4696:· 4690:· 4684:· 4678:· 4672:· 4666:· 4661:( 4634:( 4575:( 4543:. 4516:. 4390:( 4376:( 4309:) 4299:( 4183:( 4089:· 4042:( 4012:( 3849:( 3819:( 3805:( 3791:( 3777:( 3696:( 3677:( 3655:. 3564:) 3559:· 3554:( 3548:) 3543:· 3538:( 3532:) 3527:· 3522:( 3459:( 3365:( 3334:( 3278:( 3166:3 3163:2 3160:1 2986:( 2918:™ 2880:™ 2864:™ 2841:™ 2783:( 2765:( 2747:. 2689:" 2646:· 2641:( 2563:( 2494:( 2455:( 2320:( 2304:( 2280:Y 2239:X 2221:( 2190:( 2182:( 2165:( 2158:( 2144:X 2109:( 2058:( 2006:( 1982:? 1945:( 1817:2 1811:1 1808:( 1735:( 1722:· 1717:( 1486:) 1482:( 1471:( 1372:· 1367:( 1358:· 1353:( 1344:· 1339:( 1330:· 1325:( 1308:· 1303:( 1294:· 1289:( 1280:· 1275:( 1266:· 1261:( 1208:( 1164:( 1044:Y 984:( 944:( 915:( 858:( 844:( 797:. 795:4 791:3 787:2 783:1 732:( 716:. 681:( 655:( 641:( 624:. 560:( 516:• 484:• 431:( 400:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index