178:(it seems to be used in too cavalier a way for the most part), perhaps this once it is useful. Particularly since we seem to have imported a conflict from nl: and the admins there have been invited to comment here. I'm sure our processes are hair-raising enough without having to go through them twice! As you say, if either user simply refuses to acknowledge the RfC on these grounds, we will go to Arbitration. Part of the reason we didn't go direct to RfAr is because we are third-parties bringing the case and imagine the Arbitrators would want to see good evidence that we weren't just interfering but had tried to help. -
151:. I have previously considered submitting a mediation request, but both of these users ignored my request that they agree to mediation, and I was under the impression that mediation could only procede with the consent of the users involved. Is it totally without precedent for a RfC to include two users? It seems to me that we could have filed separate RfC's, but they would be essentially duplicates of each other. I also think that it is difficult to consider the behaviour of each user separately from that of the other. Thanks,
31:
401:
613:
its very nice of you to welcome me, so my talk page is no longer blank. Most of my contributions here are minor, so I do not attract much attention, I think. I am in
Knowledge for some months, but nearly only in the German part of it. My English is not so bad I hope but there are many people who are
164:
I was going to leave almost exactly the same message. Also note that both users have explicitly rejected offers of informal mediation from both myself and JeremyA and have rejected the
Arbitrators authority to intervene. Process is less important than outcome remember, and most of the RfC rules are
195:
Thanks for the welcome. Yes - the formatting clearly needs practice, but looking at the source of other articles helps. I don't know right now what I have especially to add, though have put in a tiny piece on a gallery in
Rotterdam that I know well as practice (Rotterdam being badly represented in
277:
I can't recall ever receiving a more gracious note than the one you just left on my talk page. There are times that I find myself wondering why the heck I keep coming to this site...and it's kindness like that which helps me remember. Thank you so much. -
257:
Well, I was trying to figure out a way to put a talk page link on my signature that would be unique to me- so I hauled out a thesaurus, looked under talk, and then negotiate, and I found "parley". I haven't seen anyone else use it, so I'm pretty happy with
165:
to prevent frivolous filings. This is certainly not one of those, as you will be aware from reading the evidence. Nevertheless, if you insist that the only useful way to proceed is with separate but essentially duplicative RfCs, we shall so file. -
635:
wiat I don't know how can you show me oh and if you have AIM or MSN Messenger can you give me your screen name I think it would be more useful to me if we chatted but if you don't want to I understand, merci(Thank You :fench)
626:
I'm sorry but I did what you told me but the images still don't show up on the page. I really need your help. HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!02:10, 31 August 2005 (UTC)02:10, 31 August 2005 (UTC)~Aug.30, 2005 10:10pm
221:
On a side note, do you know of any groups that specialize in cleaning up pages, or any page that has a list of pages that need to be cleaned? I feel this is the best way to learn how
Knowledge works.
630:
640:
687:
665:
651:
637:
148:
199:
Being an ex-magazine sub-editor (copy-checker in USan) and non-specialist, was contemplating joining up for the 'clean-up' detail some time when I am less busy...
566:), and yet it so often makes life on the wikipedia so much easier. I hereby award you this barnstar for having the guts to say sorry. Happy editing! --
454:
Well, you being the earner of so many awards, you deserve to have a tidy awards section. But if you don't want one, that's totally fine with me. ā
319:
690:
218:
Hey, Ryan, thanks for the warm welcome you gave me. The links that you provided were definitely useful, and I'm still reading through them now.
158:
520:
169:
182:
668:
654:
142:
230:
534:
when I try to add a picture to the pages they never go through even though they said so. And i have the copyright and every thing.
247:
377:
310:
Haha, I may close full days of VfD now but to tell you the truth, I had ~60 Knowledge namespace edits when I was nominated. :O
614:
better, so I concentrate on that where I'm better. Hopefully I didn't make too much mistakes here. Thanks a lot, Gerhard aka
304:
208:
516:
By the way, I like the idea of the sacraments, but does Holy Orders mean that I have to be an admin to become a priest?
202:
A noble project and I'd like to find a way to help. Oh - and I got the four tilde thing just before you told me, thanks.
529:
510:
359:
282:
492:
264:
94:
681:
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
111:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
213:
295:
I was just looking at your voting policy and if you abided by it, you wouldn't vote support for me OR Essjay!
606:
437:
Thank you for your message! It was quite helpful. If I need anymore help, I will be sure to message you.
38:
344:
335:
449:
659:
645:
475:
364:
235:
592:
330:
Hello, I'm trying to show some people off my friends list a new society, somewhat similar to
290:
47:
17:
408:
Thank you for the loan. Punk. Sheesh, punk kids these days...*grumbles inaudibly*Ā ; - ) --
244:
8:
621:
497:
355:
315:
300:
243:
Ditto above, nice to be welcomed in such a friendly manner. Hope I can be of some use. --
205:
383:
Hmmmm...I was thinking something taller. How do you reach home row keys all at once? --
502:
Eminence, I would be honored! Do we make beer like German monks or bourbon candy like
262:
455:
374:
325:
272:
155:
673:
338:. Its still in its early stages but nonetheless I'd appreciate it were you to join.
583:
425:
413:
388:
489:
190:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
443:
349:
339:
311:
296:
279:
252:
678:
can you come online please I really need help my AIM sn is "Naraku aka Hell"
686:
can you come online please I really need help my AIM sn is "Naraku aka Hell"
570:
544:
259:
227:
175:
537:
517:
507:
483:
331:
152:
615:
421:
409:
384:
179:
166:
420:
In the words of Rose Nylund: "Blow it out your tubenburples."Ā ; - ) --
503:
567:
174:
Thank you. Whilst I generally don't have all that much time for
563:
400:
369:
Hmmm, I would have imagined you to be .... less .... yellow.
553:
395:
105:
432:
631:
I don't know how to give you the image but I'll try
562:(with the exception of the names of a few towns in
137:Archive 6 (August 19, 2005 - August 26, 2005)
132:Archive 5 (August 6, 2005 - August 19, 2005)
127:Archive 4 (August 4, 2005 - August 6, 2005)
122:Archive 3 (August 2, 2005 - August 4, 2005)
117:Archive 2 (August 1, 2005 - August 2, 2005)
112:Archive 1 (July 22, 2005 - August 1, 2005)
196:that list). Must find an image for that.
530:I really need help Aug,29, 2005 10:12pm
399:
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
25:
550:----- 04:53, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
542:Thanks for your support on my RFA.
149:RfC for Mario Roering and Peter Lee
23:
143:RfC of Mario Roering and Peter Lee
24:
701:
607:Many Thanks for your Kind Welcome
581:Moved to Gifts and Awards page.
147:Hi! I read your comments on the
29:
13:
1:
577:12:41, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
558:Nothing's harder to say than
480:06:26, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
446:02:45, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
416:12:30, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
602:12:51, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
450:Your awards being cleaned up
428:02:42, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
391:11:35, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
7:
691:03:57, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
669:03:51, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
655:03:50, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
641:03:49, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
618:16:03:59, 2005-08-30 (UTC)
521:17:24, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
511:17:22, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
493:06:55, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
378:10:59, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
360:06:25, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
320:20:02, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
305:19:50, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
283:14:17, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
265:14:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
248:10:48, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
231:09:23, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
209:09:16, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
183:16:46, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
170:04:27, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
159:04:18, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
10:
706:
488:Replied in the archive
405:
214:Thanks for the welcome
682:Its says your offline
674:Its says your offline
622:It still Doesn't work
403:
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Acetic Acid
688:Fullmetal Alchemist
666:Fullmetal Alchemist
652:Fullmetal Alchemist
638:Fullmetal Alchemist
664:I HATE MY SPELLING
406:
575:
549:
479:
471:
463:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
697:
601:
597:
591:
586:
574:
571:
547:
543:
473:
467:
459:
352:
347:
342:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
705:
704:
700:
699:
698:
696:
695:
694:
684:
676:
662:
648:
633:
624:
609:
599:
593:
589:
584:
572:
556:
545:
540:
532:
500:
486:
452:
435:
398:
367:
350:
345:
340:
328:
293:
275:
255:
245:Mike Pilowin CA
238:
216:
193:
145:
108:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
703:
683:
680:
675:
672:
661:
660:I MEANT FRENCH
658:
647:
646:IT MEANT FENCH
644:
632:
629:
623:
620:
612:
608:
605:
604:
603:
555:
552:
539:
538:Jtkiefer's RFA
536:
531:
528:
526:
524:
523:
499:
496:
485:
482:
451:
448:
440:Thanks again!
434:
431:
430:
429:
397:
394:
393:
392:
375:Kim Nevelsteen
372:
366:
365:self-portrait.
363:
327:
324:
323:
322:
292:
289:
287:
274:
271:
269:
254:
251:
237:
236:Another Thanks
234:
215:
212:
206:Tarquin Binary
192:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
144:
141:
140:
139:
134:
129:
124:
119:
114:
107:
104:
102:
98:
97:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
702:
693:
692:
689:
679:
671:
670:
667:
657:
656:
653:
643:
642:
639:
628:
619:
617:
598:
596:
588:
587:
580:
579:
578:
576:
569:
565:
561:
551:
548:
535:
527:
522:
519:
515:
514:
513:
512:
509:
505:
495:
494:
491:
481:
477:
472:
470:
466:
462:
458:
447:
445:
441:
438:
427:
423:
419:
418:
417:
415:
411:
402:
390:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
376:
370:
362:
361:
357:
353:
348:
343:
337:
333:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
302:
298:
291:Voting policy
288:
285:
284:
281:
270:
267:
266:
263:
261:
250:
249:
246:
241:
233:
232:
229:
225:
222:
219:
211:
210:
207:
203:
200:
197:
184:
181:
177:
173:
172:
171:
168:
163:
162:
161:
160:
157:
154:
150:
138:
135:
133:
130:
128:
125:
123:
120:
118:
115:
113:
110:
109:
103:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
685:
677:
663:
649:
634:
625:
610:
594:
582:
559:
557:
541:
533:
525:
501:
487:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
442:
439:
436:
407:
368:
329:
294:
286:
276:
268:
256:
242:
239:
226:
223:
220:
217:
204:
201:
198:
194:
146:
101:
78:
43:
37:
611:Hello Ryan,
585:Acetic Acid
498:Monasticism
36:This is an
95:ArchiveĀ 10
504:Trappists
404:Returned.
336:Esperanza
326:Esperanza
312:Redwolf24
297:Redwolf24
280:Lucky 6.9
273:Thank you
90:ArchiveĀ 9
85:ArchiveĀ 8
79:ArchiveĀ 7
73:ArchiveĀ 6
68:ArchiveĀ 5
60:ArchiveĀ 1
554:Barnstar
546:Jtkiefer
396:Returned
260:Scimitar
258:itĀ ;).--
240:Hi Ryan
228:Koblentz
106:Archives
518:Psy Guy
508:Psy Guy
444:Tiffany
433:Thanks!
351:dwolf24
224:Thanks
191:Cheers!
153:JeremyA
39:archive
616:Perrak
490:Tintin
422:Essjay
410:Essjay
385:Essjay
253:Parley
180:Splash
176:WP:IAR
167:Splash
156:(talk)
650:SORRY
564:wales
560:sorry
469:OCKER
461:ESSED
332:WP:KC
16:<
595:talk
484:Nick
476:talk
426:Talk
414:Talk
389:Talk
356:talk
316:talk
301:talk
568:fvw
506:?
424:Ā·
412:Ā·
387:Ā·
373:--
371:;)
358:)
334:,
318:)
303:)
64:ā
600:)
590:(
573:*
478:)
474:(
465:R
457:M
354:(
346:e
341:R
314:(
299:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.