Knowledge

User talk:Damianmx

Source 📝

238:
classification isn't really about how we perceive these values as humans. Years ago, at first, I was also puzzled with these cold, cool, warm and hot classifications of climate and I used to think they were misleading. However it is just how these climates are classified scientifically. Anything that lies in the subtropical and oceanic climate zones has a so called "cool" winter, as the mean temperature is above freezing during their coldest month. This isn't something specific to Tbilisi either, you can look at many other cities to see what I'm talking about. For example, Berlin, it is a cold city right? It is also classified as having "cool" winters, even though it has a lower mean temperature during its coldest month compared to Tbilisi. This is why I had to change the wording, not that I am trying to downgrade Tbilisi. As for the figures, I am not making anything up. The weather data on the Tbilisi article is provided by Pogoda.ru.net and the Hong Kong Observatory. And the rules for classifying climates are stated on the Köppen climate classification page. I just apply these rules to the given set of data on the respective pages, as do other editors. However you know what would be a constructive argument? Providing official meteorological data from the State Meteorological Service of Georgia. It would be beneficial to change these secondary sources with the official data from the official source of the respective country. Since I don't speak any Georgian, and you do, you can go ahead and find the website to publish these figures. As for the 3RR rule, you don't need to only revert from the revert button to qualify as a revert. Manual changes are also inclusive.
1183:
with the exact same matters/stuff/pattern as you did back then, when, according to your own words, at that time you were still a "immature high school kid"? Just for a thought. Having said that, I'd like to state to the reading admins here that even though Damianmx's "revelation" or "confession" sounds promising on paper, please keep in mind that this was his third unblock request. Given that his previous two unblock requests were to blatantly deny any sockpuppetry, and were rightfully so declined, another one would have most definetely have resulted in a revokement of talk page access. Obviously, to keep the dialogue going, he "suddenly" changed the approach and admitted that this account is another sock on the final and last unblock request ticket. Even though shortly before he literally completely denied any remote sockpuppetry links. Nevertheless, I do hope for him that he can indeed do what he pledges to do and return in the distant future as a good standing Knowledge member. Bests -
28: 905:
But because I made a mistake of IP/Account puppetry years ago when I was still an immature High School student, I got caught up in an endless loop of blocks and comebacks. When I was first blocked I was not told anything about a fresh start, so I kept coming back in disguise, which eventually turned into a pattern. I guess I was also motivated by spite: as you may note, many of the previous SPIs were revenge investigations opened by users who themselves turned out to be indefinitely blocked puppets with a grudge. I know well that this does not excuse my behavior, but I just wanted to provide some context for my urge to keep coming back just to prove some other puppet reincarnations wrong. A very immature mistake, either way.
1151:. I was about to give notice to the user about the edits I disagreed with, until I saw the indef. block. Is it acceptable and/or worth going through the edits from the user and undoing the ones that are a problem? From what little I have seen, I do not expect the other edits by this account will be much help to wikipedia. I do not know if that is allowed even if a user has an indef. block or not. I believe I have read of cases in the mainstream media where the work of COI editors was carefully looked at and reverted. -- 804: 618: 455: 1072:"Banned users seeking a return are well-advised to make significant and useful contributions to other WMF projects prior to requesting a return to English Knowledge per this 'offer'. Many unban requests have been declined due to the banned user simply waiting the six months out, without making any contributions to other projects." 1335:
the obscurity and specialization of the subject. Damianmx was making both sort of edits: he was a bad editor not because of his socking, but because of his editing aims revealed through his content additions. While LouisAragon's comments got overly personal and off-topically insulting, I see where he was coming from.
1334:
It is very easy to make good edits on obscure subjects. It is also very easy to make bad ones, to make deliberately bad ones, to knowingly insert content ranging from distortions to blatant lies to make the articles follow your agenda. And it is easy for that faulty content to remain there because of
1319:
Most of the further edits I saw were not as bad as the ones I recently fixed. I trust more expert editors in the subject matter where Damianmx edited will be a better judge than me if anything still needs to be fixed. I think these other pages have enough activity that any major problems would have
1182:
For 6 years you're intermittently socking on Knowledge. From 2010 up to including right now, anno 2016. This is not the place to find a solution for your extreme insecurities and doubts regarding Georgia. You tell that "back then" you were "still a immature high school kid". Well, why do you continue
560:
is it wrong for me to read those past arguments to decide what's the appropriate course of action? Yes, I've lived in Tbilisi and edit Georgia-related articles, so what? so do countless other editors. Instead of placing Georgia squarely in Western Asia, as LouisAragon insists, I put it "on the border
84:
I don't mind it either way. The original page was deleted because it was an unsourced list of disparate culinary topics, which could not stand as an article of its own and added no value. If you want to create a disambiguation page and list cuisine pages for individual Balkan countries for reference,
908:
As I have grown and learned a thing or two on this site, I decided to move away from serial evasion and hope to turn into a more legitimate editor. In fact, excluding this account, I have not produced socks in years, which is in stark contrast to how many I hatched before. Some of the recent blocked
284:
It is true that Tbilisi is relatively drier compared to some other regions of Georgia, however still too far off from the threshold to be mentioned. It is similar to some regions in Germany and South Eastern Britain. As for the continental influences, I find it fit to be mentioned in the article. In
201:
What makes you think that I or anyone else here cares what climate classification Tbilisi falls under? If you think the maps and other climate content is wrong, provide sources, instead of doing original research and throwing around your purported climate expertise. But whatever you add, saying that
61:
as the editor that proposed the "Balkan cuisine" article for deletion. GB fan has just deleted the expired Prod, and I've noticed that various redlinks are left. I was wondering if you thought it would be better simply to remove the redlinks, or alternatively to recreate the page as a disambiguation
913:
was indefinitely blocked on "behavioral grounds" as my sock but she really, really had nothing to do with me - I have no idea who she is. But I guess at this point any bold or argumentative user on Georgia-related articles is assumed to be me. I now realize that this ends up hurting everyone who is
185:
I am warning you one last time, even though you have violated the 3RR rule. You still have time to revert your own changes, if not I will have to report you. I'm not your enemy, nor of Georgia. I love Georgian cuisine, have lots of Georgian friends to name a few. I am in fact improving the article,
129:
If you continue to revert authentic edits and show more disrespect, I will need to report you for vandalism. If you do not have the knowledge and expertise on climates, better to leave it to people who do, or at least have the incentive to learn. The map is incorrect, and not only for Tbilisi. What
904:
The truth is that the facts laid out in my previous SPIs, although at times misleading and exaggerated, are largely true. I have been active on Knowledge for quite a few years under different names, and have created countless pages and thousands of edits and media, many of which I was thanked for.
337:
I'm sure neither you or I have any desire to enter into an edit war, and from what you've said on the Sputnik talk page I think we're broadly in agreement. Can we try to improve the article in such a way that the tenets of Knowledge are placed at the centre though? Let's try to work on a wording
258:
I understand your reasoning about "cool" vs "cold", but keep in mind that Knowledge is not a scientific journal and the readers don't care about the classification terms as much as what those terms convey. I think the best way to avoid confusion is to say that "winters in Tbilisi are classified as
1088:
A few things. First, Satt 2 was set up with an e-mail address. Therefore, if you've forgotten the password, you should be able to retrieve it. Second, if you have a plausible reason why the unblock request cannot come from the master account, you should make it when you request an unblock, and it
105:
Damian salams gitvli, aseti damwerlobit da ucnauri qartulit imitom gwer rom arc targmna shedzlon da arc enis dadgena :D. Shen tu gaqvs rame socialuri qseli mitxari da shevxmiandet. Aqtiuri redaqtori xar da urtiertanamshromloba sachiro sakitxebze gamogvadgeba, me chemi saxelit vidzebnebi zukeris
1033:, for instance), I suppose you ask for CLEANSTART if you like, if you want to drop the old names completely. I also appreciate your honesty and, if you indeed keep out of trouble (meaning, away) for six months, this is no doubt going to count in your favor. And by that time you might convince 1295:
were at many of the same articles and would revert each other, and I think Hyrudagon usually was the last to revert. Damianmx also had similar encounters with LouisAragon. I don't know the subject matter well enough to know who was more correct, or if it is more of a judgment call based on
1220:
If the editor made poor edits, they need to be taken care of. I am not ready for some blanket condemnation, by the way, nor do I have an opinion on earlier edits from earlier accounts. I do wish to note that I just removed some commentary from another editor that struck me as personal and
237:
I am not thinking anything, just replying to what you are saying. And I am not throwing around "my expertise", I was coerced to make a defence due to your harsh and insulting comments. My intention was only to warn you not make changes so boldly. Yes, Tbilisi winters are cold, but climate
561:
of Eastern Europe and Western Asia", so what? That's what the cited sources say. I question that Georgia is part of imaginary Greater Iran, so what? So would any editor with even slightest knowledge of Georgia. This is a typical vindictive nationalistic retaliation, nothing more.
130:
matters is the climate data from weather stations. But the more important thing is you need to respect other editors on Knowledge. You can't insult people. I give it to your inexperience, if you don't follow the Knowledge etiquette, your account will be banned indefinitely.
1089:
will be considered along with everything else. Finally, as to whether you should contribute to other projects, I would think it depends on whether you used other accounts on those projects as well. If you did, you're effectively socking again, which is not a good thing.--
262:
As for your other point, I could not find official raw climate data, but the Tbilisi Mayor's Office gives the following climate classification for Tbilisi in Georgian: "moderately warm semi-arid to moderately humid subtropical transitional climate"
355:
I guess we won't be having a dialogue then, which is a shame. If you actually read what I've written and looked at my edits, you'd see that I've made no attempt to remove anything. Which is ironic, given that you - repeatedly - have.
338:
which works, ie neither biased for or against the subject, rather reflecting as accurate a portrayal of it as is possible. I'm here, and I'm actually pretty much in agreement with you. let's have a dialogue rather than an edit war.
435:
When I said that, I was actually referring to the CIA source, which clearly put it under Central Asia with a sliver of land in Europe. I have no issues with the current Britannica wording, it just happened to be part of the same
404:"While Kazakhstan was not considered by authorities in the former Soviet Union to be a part of Central Asia, it does have physical and cultural geographic characteristics similar to those of the other Central Asian countries." 266:. It sounds complicated but largely true based on my observations. It is some central parts of Tbilisi near the river that can get lush, but on the outskirts you can clearly see dryness and nothing more than some shrubbery.-- 285:
fact I was thinking about it myself as well. Btw, I hope now you see it wasn't original research I was proposing. I am just trying to maintain the linear consistency between climate sections of articles.
928:
I appreciate the honesty, but given your arguments just above, I don't think you fully understand what behaviour is expected of editors in good standing. You may want to check out the
548:. I copied it word for word because it was exactly what I needed at the moment. Do scholarly works become useless because they were cited by someone? The veracity of those sources was 544:
so I could respond. There is nothing in that "evidence" that supposedly ties me to some banned users years ago. The book quote which they cited as an example of my sock puppetry was
149:. Have your work published first and then you can cite it. I already provided one source and I don't think anyone should have to take just your word that you're a climate expert.-- 787:). I also note that you haven't actually denied sockpuppetry yet. You may wish to explicitly do so in order that the next reviewing administrator takes that into consideration. -- 1074:. Does that mean I am encouraged/allowed to edit Wiktionary, Commons etc, in good faith? Either way, lets just hope I can still figure out how to access that old account...-- 259:'cool' because their average temperature is just above freezing; however, temperatures can fall double digits below freezing level, which has resulted in deaths in the past." 414:"Despite its bi-continental placement, Khazakhstan's physical, cultural, and geographic characteristics are more similar to those of the other Central Asian countries." 163:
I hope now we are on the same page that it isn't original research :) Btw I removed Tbilisi from the Köppen article, as it isn't the best example for the climate type.
186:
which is full of biased statements such as the one stating the all green Tbilisi is borderline semi-arid. But it seems you only see what you want to perceive..
1320:
been identified already or will be corrected fairly quickly if any exist. I'd be happy to add a couple of those pages to my watchlist if anyone requests. --
966:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
758:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
609:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
364: 339: 917:
After years of puppeteering and resulting collateral damage, it is a tough call to give me a clean start but if I am given one, I will make the best of it.
868: 682: 519: 909:
users are not affiliated with me at all and are rather victims of circumstances. For instance, it was recently brought to my attention that some poor soul
1025:
Damianmx, I think "standard offer" was maybe the best thing to expect under the circumstances--I hadn't seen, for instance, your "collection" from 2011.
1344: 202:
winters in Tbilisi are "cool" is just misleading. There have been instances of people freezing to death, I would not descibe that as "cool" winters.
773:
automatically denied. I looked into the situation. Although you claim you were blocked on 'behavioral evidence', that comment actually refers to
1329: 376: 1192: 1115: 981:, I was not asking to be unblocked immediately, just for a possibility down the road. I don't know how else this is supposed to be done. 704: 572: 541: 540:
This is a malicious block request by a user with some serious grudge against me, who did not even have the courtesy to let me know he
322: 203: 94: 1262: 308: 294: 275: 247: 214: 172: 158: 445: 232: 1213: 139: 1083: 1098: 124: 1176: 984:
You can request an unblock six months from now, but generally the request must came from the master account, in this instance
1046: 844: 784: 733: 658: 495: 1234: 372: 427: 1149: 951: 743: 722:
The CU investigation did indeed produce something. Unfortunately for you, previous technical evidence had been archived.
594: 119: 1016: 796: 584: 1283:
I looked over a good number of the Damianmx's edits. No question for me that Damianmx made improvements by creating
941: 195: 1221:
patronizing, and I have a certain amount of sympathy for the user--which says nothing about the edits. So go ahead,
347: 1340: 816:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
630:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
467:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
386: 71: 1253:
Thanks for the feedback from each of you. And yeah, I thought that comment you removed was a bit over the top. --
1029:
is, as usual, right; however, if you are unblocked after the standard offer is accepted (by you) and approved (on
391:
It's ironic for you to revert my edit with a caption of "not what the source says" when that's exactly you did in
1108: 1002: 1062:
thanks for pointing that out, I had no idea what "standard offer" was until now but it sounds good by me. Also
839: 653: 490: 862: 676: 513: 831: 708: 645: 549: 482: 17: 27: 996: 827: 641: 478: 392: 85:
I think that would be fine. In fact, that's probably how it was supposed to have been in the first place.--
1336: 853: 667: 504: 146: 114: 914:
gracious enough to edit or expand these neglected topics, which is not something I'd want to continue.
180: 897:
after discussing the aspects of my case at length, I decided it was time to come clean and hope for a
1284: 817: 778: 631: 468: 872: 849: 686: 663: 523: 500: 1325: 1258: 1172: 1156: 1071: 811: 625: 462: 368: 343: 835: 649: 486: 858: 730: 672: 509: 108: 67: 50: 313:
Btw i offer to change the heading for this conversation, to its old and less hostile version.
1288: 1204:, sure, if you like you're welcome to help clean up the problems left behind by this editor. 1188: 1148:, I just reverted a bunch of edits from this account, none of which had improved the article 332: 100: 145:"What matters is the climate data from weather stations." It sounds to me like you're doing 910: 898: 774: 360: 318: 304: 290: 243: 191: 168: 135: 545: 8: 1321: 1254: 1222: 1201: 1168: 1152: 423: 555: 1145: 724: 79: 63: 1230: 1184: 1139: 1042: 990: 960: 752: 603: 1094: 1012: 792: 580: 314: 300: 286: 239: 187: 164: 131: 1292: 1209: 937: 419: 51: 1075: 822: 636: 473: 437: 267: 224: 220: 206: 150: 86: 1030: 929: 299:
One thing to add though, semi-arid is defined for steppe vegetation only.
1226: 1131: 1057: 1038: 985: 892: 58: 62:
page linking to the culinary articles for the various Balkan countries.
1162: 1090: 1065: 1026: 1008: 788: 576: 1205: 1123: 1034: 976: 933: 1225:, and do what you can to improve our beautiful project. Thank you, 264: 711:. What does that even mean, can anyone claim whatever they want? 707:
did not produce anything. Instead I was blocked on some dubious
948:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
740:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
591:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
968:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
760:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
611:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
810:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
624:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
461:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
399:
Encyclopedia Britannica you linked to actually says:
546:already on that talk page before being archived 703:Why was my review automatically denied? The 219:Also, take note that I have not broken the 573:Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Satt_2 1159:) 09:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC) correction: 26: 14: 709:"behavioral evidence (non-CU block)" 1070:just to be clear, I just read that 57:Hi there. I was directed to you by 24: 889:Earlier I had a serious talk with 802: 616: 453: 25: 1368: 1291:. Most recently Damianmx and 125:Your edits to climate sections 40:To leave a message, poke me... 13: 1: 7: 814:, who declined the request. 628:, who declined the request. 465:, who declined the request. 10: 1373: 1193:22:50, 5 August 2016 (UTC) 418:Not what the source says. 95:17:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC) 72:14:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC) 1345:16:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC) 1330:04:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC) 1285:Mariam Jambakur-Orbeliani 1263:17:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC) 1235:12:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC) 1214:11:53, 24 July 2016 (UTC) 1177:09:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC) 1099:23:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC) 1084:23:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC) 1047:22:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC) 1017:22:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC) 952:guide to appealing blocks 942:21:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC) 797:23:17, 12 June 2016 (UTC) 744:guide to appealing blocks 734:00:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC) 595:guide to appealing blocks 585:22:58, 12 June 2016 (UTC) 446:18:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC) 428:09:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC) 377:18:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC) 348:14:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 323:15:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 309:07:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 295:07:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 276:06:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 248:06:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 233:05:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 215:05:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 196:05:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 173:11:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC) 159:05:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 140:05:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 1079: 441: 387:Not what the source says 271: 228: 210: 154: 120:12:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC) 90: 1109:Edits from this account 705:checkuser investigation 575:confirms sockpuppetry. 1337:Tiptoethrutheminefield 807: 769:Note: Your review was 621: 458: 47: 1289:Art Museum of Georgia 859:change block settings 806: 673:change block settings 620: 510:change block settings 457: 395:in the first place. 30: 1037:as well. Take care, 223:, count carefully.-- 147:WP:Original Research 409:...while you wrote: 808: 622: 459: 181:Climate of Tbilisi 48: 46: 45: 542:opened an inquiry 380: 363:comment added by 36: 33: 16:(Redirected from 1364: 1166: 1143: 1135: 1127: 1119: 1069: 1061: 1006: 980: 965: 959: 896: 878: 876: 865: 847: 845:deleted contribs 805: 757: 751: 728: 692: 690: 679: 661: 659:deleted contribs 619: 608: 602: 559: 550:first questioned 529: 527: 516: 498: 496:deleted contribs 456: 379: 357: 117: 111: 83: 21: 1372: 1371: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1160: 1144:: Coming from 1137: 1129: 1121: 1113: 1111: 1063: 1055: 988: 974: 971: 963: 957: 956:, then use the 945: 919: 911:Olivia Winfield 890: 866: 856: 842: 825: 818:blocking policy 803: 775:Olivia Winfield 763: 755: 749: 748:, then use the 737: 726: 713: 680: 670: 656: 639: 632:blocking policy 617: 614: 606: 600: 599:, then use the 588: 563: 553: 517: 507: 493: 476: 469:blocking policy 454: 389: 358: 335: 183: 127: 115: 113: 109: 103: 77: 55: 44: 42: 35: 32: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1370: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1322:David Tornheim 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1287:and improving 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1255:David Tornheim 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1223:David Tornheim 1202:David Tornheim 1196: 1195: 1169:David Tornheim 1153:David Tornheim 1110: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1050: 1049: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 946: 930:standard offer 926: 922:Decline reason 887: 883:Request reason 880: 801: 800: 799: 738: 720: 716:Decline reason 701: 697:Request reason 694: 615: 589: 570: 566:Decline reason 538: 534:Request reason 531: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 411: 410: 401: 400: 388: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 365:Jackinscotland 340:Jackinscotland 334: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 297: 279: 278: 260: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 182: 179: 178: 177: 176: 175: 126: 123: 107: 102: 99: 98: 97: 54: 52:Balkan cuisine 49: 43: 38: 37: 34: 31: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1369: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1164: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1141: 1133: 1125: 1117: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1067: 1059: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1004: 1001: 998: 995: 992: 987: 983: 982: 978: 973: 972: 970: 969: 962: 955: 953: 944: 943: 939: 935: 931: 925: 923: 918: 915: 912: 906: 902: 900: 899:WP:CLEANSTART 894: 886: 884: 879: 874: 870: 864: 860: 855: 851: 846: 841: 837: 836:global blocks 833: 832:active blocks 829: 824: 819: 815: 813: 812:administrator 798: 794: 790: 786: 783: 780: 776: 772: 768: 767: 766: 762: 761: 754: 747: 745: 736: 735: 732: 731: 729: 719: 717: 712: 710: 706: 700: 698: 693: 688: 684: 678: 674: 669: 665: 660: 655: 651: 650:global blocks 647: 646:active blocks 643: 638: 633: 629: 627: 626:administrator 613: 612: 605: 598: 596: 587: 586: 582: 578: 574: 569: 567: 562: 557: 556:D.Papuashvili 551: 547: 543: 537: 535: 530: 525: 521: 515: 511: 506: 502: 497: 492: 488: 487:global blocks 484: 483:active blocks 480: 475: 470: 466: 464: 463:administrator 447: 443: 439: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 425: 421: 416: 415: 408: 407: 406: 405: 398: 397: 396: 394: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 345: 341: 333:Sputnik Edits 324: 320: 316: 312: 311: 310: 306: 302: 298: 296: 292: 288: 283: 282: 281: 280: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 256: 249: 245: 241: 236: 235: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 199: 198: 197: 193: 189: 174: 170: 166: 162: 161: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 143: 142: 141: 137: 133: 122: 121: 118: 112: 101:Aqa mshvidoba 96: 92: 88: 81: 76: 75: 74: 73: 69: 65: 60: 53: 41: 29: 19: 18:User:Damianmx 1112: 999: 993: 967: 949: 947: 927: 921: 920: 916: 907: 903: 888: 882: 881: 854:creation log 821: 809: 781: 770: 764: 759: 741: 739: 723: 721: 715: 714: 702: 696: 695: 668:creation log 635: 623: 610: 592: 590: 571: 565: 564: 539: 533: 532: 505:creation log 472: 460: 417: 413: 412: 403: 402: 390: 359:— Preceding 336: 184: 128: 104: 80:Polly Tunnel 64:Polly Tunnel 56: 39: 1185:LouisAragon 1140:LouisAragon 110:g. balaxaZe 1146:WP:backlog 850:filter log 664:filter log 501:filter log 315:Berkserker 301:Berkserker 287:Berkserker 240:Berkserker 188:Berkserker 165:Berkserker 132:Berkserker 106:qselshi.-- 1293:Hyrudagon 950:read the 869:checkuser 828:block log 742:read the 683:checkuser 642:block log 593:read the 520:checkuser 479:block log 436:revert.-- 420:Quackriot 393:your edit 1076:Damianmx 997:contribs 840:contribs 823:Damianmx 785:contribs 727:itsJamie 654:contribs 637:Damianmx 491:contribs 474:Damianmx 438:Damianmx 373:contribs 361:unsigned 268:Damianmx 225:Damianmx 207:Damianmx 151:Damianmx 87:Damianmx 961:unblock 863:unblock 753:unblock 677:unblock 604:unblock 514:unblock 1296:taste. 1227:Drmies 1132:Drmies 1058:Drmies 1039:Drmies 986:Satt 2 893:Drmies 221:WP:3RR 59:GB fan 1163:Bbb23 1116:Bbb33 1091:Bbb23 1066:Bbb23 1031:WP:AN 1027:Bbb23 1009:Bbb23 1003:count 954:first 789:Yamla 746:first 597:first 577:Yamla 1341:talk 1326:talk 1259:talk 1231:talk 1210:talk 1206:Huon 1189:talk 1173:talk 1157:talk 1124:Huon 1095:talk 1080:talk 1043:talk 1035:Huon 1013:talk 991:talk 977:Huon 938:talk 934:Huon 793:talk 779:talk 725:OhNo 581:talk 442:talk 424:talk 369:talk 344:talk 319:talk 305:talk 291:talk 272:talk 244:talk 229:talk 211:talk 205:. -- 192:talk 169:talk 155:talk 136:talk 91:talk 68:talk 1007:.-- 901:. 873:log 820:). 771:not 687:log 634:). 552:by 524:log 471:). 1343:) 1328:) 1261:) 1233:) 1212:) 1191:) 1175:) 1167:-- 1136:, 1128:, 1120:, 1097:) 1082:) 1045:) 1015:) 964:}} 958:{{ 940:) 932:. 924:: 885:: 867:• 861:• 857:• 852:• 848:• 843:• 838:• 834:• 830:• 795:) 765:} 756:}} 750:{{ 718:: 699:: 681:• 675:• 671:• 666:• 662:• 657:• 652:• 648:• 644:• 607:}} 601:{{ 583:) 568:: 536:: 518:• 512:• 508:• 503:• 499:• 494:• 489:• 485:• 481:• 444:) 426:) 375:) 371:• 346:) 321:) 307:) 293:) 274:) 246:) 231:) 213:) 194:) 171:) 157:) 138:) 93:) 70:) 1339:( 1324:( 1257:( 1229:( 1208:( 1187:( 1171:( 1165:: 1161:@ 1155:( 1142:: 1138:@ 1134:: 1130:@ 1126:: 1122:@ 1118:: 1114:@ 1093:( 1078:( 1068:: 1064:@ 1060:: 1056:@ 1041:( 1011:( 1005:) 1000:· 994:· 989:( 979:: 975:@ 936:( 895:: 891:@ 877:) 875:) 871:( 826:( 791:( 782:· 777:( 691:) 689:) 685:( 640:( 579:( 558:: 554:@ 528:) 526:) 522:( 477:( 440:( 422:( 367:( 342:( 317:( 303:( 289:( 270:( 242:( 227:( 209:( 190:( 167:( 153:( 134:( 116:★ 89:( 82:: 78:@ 66:( 20:)

Index

User:Damianmx

Balkan cuisine
GB fan
Polly Tunnel
talk
14:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Polly Tunnel
Damianmx
talk
17:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
g. balaxaZe

12:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Berkserker
talk
05:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
WP:Original Research
Damianmx
talk
05:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Berkserker
talk
11:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Berkserker
talk
05:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Damianmx
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.