Knowledge

Unique name assumption

Source 📝

160: 36:
often tacitly included in Database Management Systems (e.g. SQL) in his 1984 article "Towards a logical reconstruction of relational database theory" (in M. L. Brodie, J. Mylopoulos, J. W. Schmidt (editors), Data Modelling in Artificial Intelligence, Database and Programming Languages, Springer,
104: 44:
does not make this assumption, but provides explicit constructs to express whether two names denote the same or distinct entities.
225: 28:. In logics with the unique name assumption, different names always refer to different entities in the world. It was included in 60:
is the OWL property that asserts that two given names or identifiers (e.g., URIs) refer to different individuals or entities.
201: 54:
is the OWL property that asserts that two given names or identifiers (e.g., URIs) refer to the same individual or entity.
113: 220: 21: 194: 70: 33: 175: 130: 41: 230: 8: 187: 109: 95: 25: 171: 214: 99: 75: 29: 129:
Tao, Jiao; Sirin, Evren; Bao, Jie; McGuinness, Deborah L. (2010).
145: 159: 50: 167: 128: 212: 195: 94: 108:(2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. p. 333. 202: 188: 105:Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach 20:is a simplifying assumption made in some 213: 154: 146:OWL Web Ontology Language Reference 13: 14: 242: 158: 40:The standard ontology language 226:Ontology (information science) 139: 122: 88: 1: 81: 174:. You can help Knowledge by 132:Integrity constraints in OWL 7: 64: 10: 247: 153: 221:Knowledge representation 71:Closed-world assumption 37:1984, pages 191–233). 34:closed-world assumption 170:-related article is a 18:unique name assumption 32:'s discussion of the 26:description logics 183: 182: 58:owl:differentFrom 238: 204: 197: 190: 162: 155: 148: 143: 137: 136: 126: 120: 119: 92: 59: 53: 246: 245: 241: 240: 239: 237: 236: 235: 211: 210: 209: 208: 152: 151: 144: 140: 127: 123: 116: 96:Russell, Stuart 93: 89: 84: 67: 57: 48: 12: 11: 5: 244: 234: 233: 228: 223: 207: 206: 199: 192: 184: 181: 180: 163: 150: 149: 138: 121: 115:978-0137903955 114: 86: 85: 83: 80: 79: 78: 73: 66: 63: 62: 61: 55: 24:languages and 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 243: 232: 229: 227: 224: 222: 219: 218: 216: 205: 200: 198: 193: 191: 186: 185: 179: 177: 173: 169: 164: 161: 157: 156: 147: 142: 135:. Proc. AAAI. 134: 133: 125: 117: 111: 107: 106: 101: 100:Norvig, Peter 97: 91: 87: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 56: 52: 47: 46: 45: 43: 38: 35: 31: 27: 23: 19: 176:expanding it 165: 141: 131: 124: 103: 90: 39: 17: 15: 231:Logic stubs 76:Coreference 215:Categories 82:References 30:Ray Reiter 102:(2003) . 65:See also 22:ontology 112:  51:sameAs 168:logic 166:This 172:stub 110:ISBN 49:owl: 16:The 42:OWL 217:: 98:; 203:e 196:t 189:v 178:. 118:.

Index

ontology
description logics
Ray Reiter
closed-world assumption
OWL
sameAs
Closed-world assumption
Coreference
Russell, Stuart
Norvig, Peter
Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
ISBN
978-0137903955
Integrity constraints in OWL
OWL Web Ontology Language Reference
Stub icon
logic
stub
expanding it
v
t
e
Categories
Knowledge representation
Ontology (information science)
Logic stubs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.