63:
126:
22:
810:
is that an appeal must be based solely on "points of law", and not on "points of fact". Appeals are frequently based on a claim that the trial judge or jury did not allow or appreciate all the facts; if that claim is successful the appeal judges will often order a trial "de novo". In order to protect the individual's rights against
937:
on the record," in which the Law
Division makes new findings of fact and conclusions of law based on the record produced in the municipal court's trial (i.e. based on the transcript of the municipal court proceeding and any physical or documentary evidence presented to the Municipal Court), but does
832:
for courts of appeal. Sometimes, particularly potent issues are brought before an appeals court, such as a constitutional determination made by a lower court, or summary judgment granted by a lower court. When this sort of issue is on appeal, the court of appeals will review the lower court decision
809:
from an appellate proceeding is that new evidence may not ordinarily be presented in an appeal (though there are rare instances when it may be allowed—usually evidence that came to light only after the trial and could not, in all diligence, have been presented in the lower court). The general rule,
833:"de novo" or from the beginning. In this process, the panel of judges for the court of appeals will review the lower court's reasoning and fact-finding from the beginning, based on the record. This is a high level of scrutiny that is more likely to result in reversal or remand of an issue.
920:
to circuit court: "This Court has repeatedly held that the effect of an appeal to circuit court is to 'annul the judgment of the inferior tribunal as completely as if there had been no previous trial.'" Some states use a system combining aspects of traditional appeal and absolute trial
871:
review refers to the appellate court's authority to review the trial court's conclusions on questions of the application, interpretation, and construction of law. Generally, the proper standard of review for employee benefit decisions, such as the denial of benefit claims, is
836:
This is in contrast to more relaxed standards of review such as "clearly erroneous" or "substantial evidence." These relaxed standards usually do not result in reversals, as the court of appeals grants more deference to the judgment of the lower courts.
904:
for a brand-new trial. Unlike the appellate court which only examines the issues raised in the original trial, in a trial de novo a brand new trial takes place. The
876:. Also, where the appellate court undertakes judicial review of compulsory arbitration proceedings that were required by statute, the reviewing court must conduct a
753:
595:
957:
in the review process (this is usually before it reaches the court system). Sometimes administrative decisions may be reviewed by the courts on a
929:, decisions in minor criminal and traffic cases heard in the state's municipal courts may be appealed to the Law Division, Criminal Part of the
900:, and criminal offenses with a penalty of imprisonment of less than six months, then provide the ability to appeal a loss to the trial court of
73:
746:
858:
739:
995:
190:
243:
162:
634:
683:
688:
403:
227:
209:
169:
107:
49:
1150:
785:
is a Latin expression meaning "afresh", "anew", "beginning again", hence the literal meaning "new trial"). A trial
639:
254:
176:
147:
143:
35:
850:
285:
644:
259:
158:
629:
280:
394:
1160:
943:
930:
905:
333:
296:
1155:
89:
557:
136:
518:
513:
290:
1068:
613:
550:
313:
901:
694:
362:
301:
183:
8:
545:
450:
424:
326:
1019:
949:
893:
829:
495:
465:
430:
85:
81:
41:
846:
679:
540:
535:
505:
811:
790:
500:
490:
389:
356:
1120:
624:
470:
814:, ordering a trial "de novo" is often the exclusive right of an appeal judge.
1144:
953:. If the determination made by a lower body is overturned, it may be renewed
913:
897:
1043:
880:
review of the interpretation and application of the law by the arbitrators.
664:
480:
460:
435:
420:
399:
268:
889:
854:
778:
577:
347:
319:
926:
802:
725:
669:
440:
793:
when the original trial failed to decide in a manner dictated by law.
970:
606:
587:
582:
455:
384:
817:
For example, a system may relegate a claim of a certain amount to a
125:
1077:
996:"Second Chances: What Appellate Courts Can (And Cannot) Do For You"
718:
415:
372:
674:
445:
1020:"First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995)"
975:
707:
818:
567:
916:(2003), about the practice of an appeal from district court
822:
601:
828:
In
American federal courts, "de novo" can also refer to a
767:
150:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
1142:
805:systems, one feature that distinguishes a trial
821:but preserve the right to a new trial before a
888:In the United States, some states provide for
1080:, US: Courts, April 17, 2003, Case No. 021781
747:
70:The examples and perspective in this article
50:Learn how and when to remove these messages
1110:, 267 N.J. Super. 102, 104 (Law Div. 1991)
938:not hold any evidentiary hearings itself.
754:
740:
228:Learn how and when to remove this message
210:Learn how and when to remove this message
108:Learn how and when to remove this message
1143:
148:adding citations to reliable sources
119:
56:
15:
13:
941:It is often used in the review of
14:
1172:
1125:LII / Legal Information Institute
840:
31:This article has multiple issues.
883:
255:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
124:
61:
20:
135:needs additional citations for
39:or discuss these issues on the
1113:
1101:
1092:
1061:
1036:
1012:
988:
640:Notwithstanding verdict (JNOV)
1:
981:
796:
260:Doctrines of civil procedure
7:
964:
781:" by a different tribunal (
84:, discuss the issue on the
10:
1177:
944:administrative proceedings
395:Case Information Statement
906:Supreme Court of Virginia
857:against convictions in a
789:is usually ordered by an
630:As a matter of law (JMOL)
1098:N.J. Ct. R. 3:23-8(a)(2)
527:Resolution without trial
1151:Latin legal terminology
947:or the judgements of a
519:Request for production
514:Request for admissions
552:Involuntary dismissal
902:general jurisdiction
695:Declaratory judgment
363:Forum non conveniens
246:in the United States
144:improve this article
90:create a new article
82:improve this article
72:may not represent a
925:; for instance, in
645:Motion to set aside
546:Voluntary dismissal
451:Indispensable party
425:affirmative defense
950:small claims court
859:magistrates' court
830:standard of review
496:Initial conference
481:Pretrial procedure
1070:Santen v. Tuthill
910:Santen v. Tuthill
847:England and Wales
770:, the expression
764:
763:
238:
237:
230:
220:
219:
212:
194:
118:
117:
110:
92:, as appropriate.
54:
1168:
1161:Appellate review
1135:
1134:
1132:
1131:
1117:
1111:
1105:
1099:
1096:
1090:
1088:
1087:
1085:
1075:
1065:
1059:
1058:
1056:
1054:
1044:"Legal Glossary"
1040:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1030:
1016:
1010:
1009:
1007:
1006:
992:
898:traffic offenses
756:
749:
742:
553:
541:Summary judgment
536:Default judgment
286:Federal question
240:
239:
233:
226:
215:
208:
204:
201:
195:
193:
152:
128:
120:
113:
106:
102:
99:
93:
65:
64:
57:
46:
24:
23:
16:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1156:Legal procedure
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1129:
1127:
1121:"trial de novo"
1119:
1118:
1114:
1106:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1083:
1081:
1073:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1052:
1050:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1028:
1026:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1004:
1002:
994:
993:
989:
984:
967:
886:
843:
812:double jeopardy
799:
791:appellate court
760:
731:
700:
667:
658:
627:
618:
614:Burden of proof
562:
551:
510:
501:Interrogatories
475:
409:
390:Cause of action
387:
357:Change of venue
340:
316:
307:
295:
283:
245:
244:Civil procedure
234:
223:
222:
221:
216:
205:
199:
196:
159:"Trial de novo"
153:
151:
141:
129:
114:
103:
97:
94:
79:
66:
62:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
1174:
1164:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1137:
1136:
1112:
1100:
1091:
1060:
1035:
1011:
986:
985:
983:
980:
979:
978:
973:
966:
963:
931:Superior Court
885:
882:
845:In the law of
842:
841:United Kingdom
839:
798:
795:
762:
761:
759:
758:
751:
744:
736:
733:
732:
730:
729:
722:
714:
711:
710:
704:
703:
702:
701:
699:
698:
692:
686:
680:Attorney's fee
677:
672:
661:
659:
657:
656:
647:
642:
637:
632:
621:
617:
616:
611:
599:
592:
591:
590:
585:
574:
571:
570:
564:
563:
561:
560:
555:
548:
543:
538:
532:
529:
528:
524:
523:
522:
521:
516:
509:
508:
503:
498:
493:
487:
484:
483:
477:
476:
474:
473:
468:
463:
458:
453:
448:
443:
438:
433:
428:
418:
412:
411:
410:
408:
407:
397:
392:
381:
376:
375:
369:
368:
367:
366:
359:
351:
350:
344:
343:
342:
341:
339:
338:
330:
323:
310:
308:
306:
305:
299:
293:
288:
281:Subject-matter
277:
272:
271:
265:
264:
263:
262:
257:
249:
248:
236:
235:
218:
217:
132:
130:
123:
116:
115:
76:of the subject
74:worldwide view
69:
67:
60:
55:
29:
28:
26:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1173:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1148:
1146:
1126:
1122:
1116:
1109:
1108:State v. Loce
1104:
1095:
1079:
1072:
1071:
1064:
1049:
1045:
1039:
1025:
1021:
1015:
1001:
997:
991:
987:
977:
974:
972:
969:
968:
962:
960:
956:
952:
951:
946:
945:
939:
936:
932:
928:
924:
919:
918:trial de novo
915:
911:
908:said this in
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
884:United States
881:
879:
875:
870:
866:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
838:
834:
831:
826:
824:
820:
815:
813:
808:
804:
794:
792:
788:
784:
780:
777:means a "new
776:
775:
769:
757:
752:
750:
745:
743:
738:
737:
735:
734:
728:
727:
723:
721:
720:
716:
715:
713:
712:
709:
706:
705:
696:
693:
690:
687:
685:
684:American rule
681:
678:
676:
673:
671:
666:
663:
662:
660:
654:
652:
648:
646:
643:
641:
638:
636:
633:
631:
626:
623:
622:
620:
619:
615:
612:
609:
608:
603:
600:
598:
597:
593:
589:
586:
584:
581:
580:
579:
576:
575:
573:
572:
569:
566:
565:
559:
556:
554:
549:
547:
544:
542:
539:
537:
534:
533:
531:
530:
526:
525:
520:
517:
515:
512:
511:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
492:
489:
488:
486:
485:
482:
479:
478:
472:
471:Other motions
469:
467:
464:
462:
459:
457:
454:
452:
449:
447:
444:
442:
439:
437:
434:
432:
429:
426:
422:
419:
417:
414:
413:
405:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
386:
383:
382:
380:
379:
378:
377:
374:
371:
370:
365:
364:
360:
358:
355:
354:
353:
352:
349:
346:
345:
336:
335:
331:
329:
328:
324:
322:
321:
315:
312:
311:
309:
303:
300:
298:
294:
292:
289:
287:
282:
279:
278:
276:
275:
274:
273:
270:
267:
266:
261:
258:
256:
253:
252:
251:
250:
247:
242:
241:
232:
229:
214:
211:
203:
192:
189:
185:
182:
178:
175:
171:
168:
164:
161: –
160:
156:
155:Find sources:
149:
145:
139:
138:
133:This article
131:
127:
122:
121:
112:
109:
101:
91:
87:
83:
77:
75:
68:
59:
58:
53:
51:
44:
43:
38:
37:
32:
27:
18:
17:
1128:. Retrieved
1124:
1115:
1107:
1103:
1094:
1082:, retrieved
1069:
1063:
1051:. Retrieved
1048:Brett Wilson
1047:
1038:
1027:. Retrieved
1023:
1014:
1003:. Retrieved
999:
990:
958:
954:
948:
942:
940:
934:
922:
917:
909:
894:small claims
890:bench trials
887:
877:
873:
868:
867:
862:
844:
835:
827:
816:
806:
800:
786:
782:
773:
771:
765:
724:
717:
689:English rule
650:
649:
635:Renewed JMOL
605:
594:
466:Intervention
461:Interpleader
436:Counterclaim
400:Class action
361:
334:Quasi in rem
332:
325:
318:
297:Supplemental
269:Jurisdiction
224:
206:
197:
187:
180:
173:
166:
154:
142:Please help
137:verification
134:
104:
95:
71:
47:
40:
34:
33:Please help
30:
933:for "trial
914:265 Va. 492
855:Crown Court
653:(new trial)
506:Depositions
320:In personam
1145:Categories
1130:2022-06-24
1029:2021-09-19
1024:Justia Law
1005:2021-09-19
982:References
927:New Jersey
803:common law
797:Common law
726:Certiorari
670:Injunction
558:Settlement
441:Crossclaim
170:newspapers
36:improve it
971:New trial
892:only for
861:are held
607:voir dire
588:defendant
583:plaintiff
491:Discovery
456:Impleader
385:Complaint
373:Pleadings
291:Diversity
98:July 2011
86:talk page
42:talk page
965:See also
719:Mandamus
625:Judgment
416:Demurrer
406:) )
404:2005 Act
314:Personal
200:May 2008
80:You may
961:basis.
959:de novo
955:de novo
935:de novo
923:de novo
878:de novo
874:de novo
869:De novo
863:de novo
853:to the
851:appeals
807:de novo
787:de novo
783:de novo
774:de novo
675:Damages
655: )
651:De novo
604: (
578:Parties
446:Joinder
423: (
402: (
302:Removal
184:scholar
1084:May 2,
1053:20 May
976:Appeal
772:trial
708:Appeal
665:Remedy
596:Pro se
421:Answer
327:In rem
186:
179:
172:
165:
157:
1074:(PDF)
819:judge
779:trial
568:Trial
431:Reply
348:Venue
191:JSTOR
177:books
88:, or
1086:2010
1055:2020
1000:CCBJ
823:jury
602:Jury
163:news
801:In
768:law
766:In
146:by
1147::
1123:.
1078:VA
1076:,
1046:.
1022:.
998:.
912:,
896:,
865:.
849:,
825:.
45:.
1133:.
1089:.
1057:.
1032:.
1008:.
755:e
748:t
741:v
697:)
691:)
682:(
668:(
628:(
610:)
427:)
388:(
337:)
317:(
304:)
284:(
231:)
225:(
213:)
207:(
202:)
198:(
188:·
181:·
174:·
167:·
140:.
111:)
105:(
100:)
96:(
78:.
52:)
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
