39:
108:, and was injured. The train had pulled up just past the platform, and so the ramp she stepped out on was slippery. A special jury found the railway to have been negligent, and so Mrs Thompson sought damages for personal injury. She had been given an excursion ticket by her niece, which said "Excursion. For conditions see back" which in turn referred to the Railway's timetables and excursion bills. The timetables could be bought for sixpence said the tickets were issued on condition that holders "shall have no rights of action against the company
310:
273:
252:
231:
198:
120:... however caused." A jury found that the company had not taken reasonable steps to bring the conditions to the notice of Mrs Thompson and awarded damages. But then the judge, as a matter of law, held that when the ticket was accepted the contract was complete, and so the jury was not entitled to find as they did. Mrs Thompson could not read.
131:
held that, regardless of whether Mrs
Thompson could read, she was bound by the contract, and the indication of further conditions by reference was sufficient notice. He said "we feel no difficulty in coming to a conclusion."
17:
242:
88:, English courts continue to assess on an objective basis whether reasonable notice has been given of terms and conditions so as to incorporate them in the contract.
80:
425:
284:
84:
as part of "a bleak winter for our law of contract." Although the same decision would not be reached today because of the application of the
171:
335:
376:
128:
363:
349:
97:
135:
420:
164:
139:
221:
85:
430:
209:
157:
321:
435:
38:
309:
272:
251:
230:
197:
304:
267:
225:
192:
246:
387:
263:
71:
8:
367:
353:
325:
339:
290:
300:
75:
188:
414:
149:
101:
96:
Mrs
Thompson slipped on a ramp while disembarking a train operated by
74:
case, concerning the exclusion of liability. It was described by
105:
81:
George
Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd
67:
Thompson v London, Midland and
Scottish Railway Co Ltd
32:Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Rly Co Ltd
18:Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co
412:
286:Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd
179:
165:
172:
158:
37:
426:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
336:HIH Casualty Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank
14:
413:
377:Interpreting contracts in English law
153:
364:Oceanbulk Shipping SA v TMT Asia Ltd
350:Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd
98:London, Midland and Scottish Railway
24:
25:
447:
308:
271:
250:
229:
196:
116:... injury (fatal or otherwise)
399:
86:Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
13:
1:
393:
210:Hartog v Colin & Shields
7:
213:[1939] 3 All ER 566
145:
123:
10:
452:
322:ICS Ltd v West Bromwich BS
222:Canada Steamship Lines v R
59:Contract, exclusion clause
421:English contract case law
374:
360:
346:
332:
318:
297:
281:
260:
239:
218:
206:
185:
180:Construing contract terms
58:
53:
45:
36:
31:
268:[1976] 1 WLR 989
91:
247:[1953] 2 QB 450
368:[2010] UKHL 44
354:[2009] UKHL 38
326:[1997] UKHL 28
340:[2003] UKHL 6
305:[1986] QB 644
291:[1980] UKHL 2
226:[1952] AC 192
388:English contract law
264:The Diana Prosperity
72:English contract law
431:1930 in British law
243:Rose Ltd v Pim Ltd
193:(1871) LR 6 QB 597
383:
382:
129:Lord Harnworth MR
112:... in respect of
63:
62:
16:(Redirected from
443:
436:1930 in case law
406:
403:
313:
312:
287:
276:
275:
255:
254:
234:
233:
201:
200:
174:
167:
160:
151:
150:
119:
115:
111:
41:
29:
28:
21:
451:
450:
446:
445:
444:
442:
441:
440:
411:
410:
409:
404:
400:
396:
384:
379:
370:
356:
342:
328:
314:
307:
301:Thake v Maurice
293:
285:
277:
270:
256:
249:
235:
228:
214:
202:
195:
181:
178:
148:
126:
117:
113:
109:
94:
76:Lord Denning MR
49:Court of Appeal
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
449:
439:
438:
433:
428:
423:
408:
407:
397:
395:
392:
391:
390:
381:
380:
375:
372:
371:
361:
358:
357:
347:
344:
343:
333:
330:
329:
319:
316:
315:
298:
295:
294:
282:
279:
278:
261:
258:
257:
240:
237:
236:
219:
216:
215:
207:
204:
203:
189:Smith v Hughes
186:
183:
182:
177:
176:
169:
162:
154:
147:
144:
125:
122:
100:at 10pm, from
93:
90:
70:1 KB 41 is an
61:
60:
56:
55:
51:
50:
47:
43:
42:
34:
33:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
448:
437:
434:
432:
429:
427:
424:
422:
419:
418:
416:
402:
398:
389:
386:
385:
378:
373:
369:
366:
365:
359:
355:
352:
351:
345:
341:
338:
337:
331:
327:
324:
323:
317:
311:
306:
303:
302:
296:
292:
289:
288:
280:
274:
269:
266:
265:
259:
253:
248:
245:
244:
238:
232:
227:
224:
223:
217:
212:
211:
205:
199:
194:
191:
190:
184:
175:
170:
168:
163:
161:
156:
155:
152:
143:
141:
137:
133:
130:
121:
107:
103:
99:
89:
87:
83:
82:
77:
73:
69:
68:
57:
52:
48:
44:
40:
35:
30:
27:
19:
401:
362:
348:
334:
320:
299:
283:
262:
241:
220:
208:
187:
134:
127:
95:
79:
66:
65:
64:
26:
142:concurred.
136:Lawrence LJ
415:Categories
405:EWCA Civ 5
394:References
102:Manchester
140:Sankey LJ
146:See also
124:Judgment
54:Keywords
118:
114:
110:
106:Darwen
92:Facts
46:Court
138:and
104:to
78:in
417::
173:e
166:t
159:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
