Knowledge

The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography

Source 📝

193:
I mean Afro-Eurasian regions like South Asia and East Asia. They are less convincing when they divide the Western Hemisphere into three regions, according to different and incompatible principles. North America and Ibero-America are defined by language and European colonial heritage, whereas ''African America,'' including the Caribbean islands and coastal Brazil (but not the American South) is defined by race. If language and culture are the criteria, shouldn't Britain be united with North America, Australia and New Zealand -- and Spain and Portugal with Ibero-America? In the map that Lewis and Wigen offer, Britain and Spain are assumed to have more in common with each other -- and with Scandinavia and Italy -- than either has with its former colonies. But these are quibbles. Debating these matters is not just important; it is fun. The very fact that their work stimulates such questions is a tribute to the authors. In ''The Myth of Continents,'' Lewis and Wigen have written an entertaining and informative account of the way our maps show us the world that we want to see.
177:
historical review, its deconstruction of spatial and cultural notions, and its proposal of a revised world-region scheme. However, Fang noted some shortcomings, such as the need for in-depth discussion on comparable units, the limited exploration of oceanic cultural differences, and the book's concentration on Euro-American views. Despite these limitations, Fang saw the book as a valuable critique inspiring further studies in geography, history, anthropology, and political science.
988: 27: 1000: 290:
the Sahara Desert. Perhaps the most vexing continents, however, are Asia and Europe, the boundary between them being the tinder for many scholarly disputes. Martin and Wigen object, above all, when geographical determinism creeps into our talk of these "continents," as if the land forms themselves and their analytical separability explain why people live and think differently in these places.
282:, which they define as "the set of spatial structures through which people order their knowledge of the world" They find that geographies are "much more than just the ways in which societies are stretched across the earth's surface. They also include the contested, arbitrary, power-laden, and often inconsistent ways in which those structures are represented epistemologically." 247:. The authors' focus on historical processes and their critique of traditional geographical categorizations, such as Eurocentrism and the nation-state concept, were commended. Hooson acknowledged the book as a thought-provoking and scholarly tour de force, suggesting it should be essential reading for those interested in understanding the evolving nature of our diverse planet. 976: 575: 302:, while acknowledging the utility of the book, characterized it as "pretentious" and its argument as "rather conventional and indeed rather conservative." He particularly took issue with the authors' introduction of the term "metageography," dismissing it as an ostentatious substitute for "world cultural geography." This critique prompted a discussion in the 231:, with a positive acknowledgment of Afrocentric views challenging the Eurocentric perspective. Despite some critiques of the proposed alternative world regional framework, Stock commended the authors for producing a scholarly and thoroughly referenced volume that encourages a reevaluation of how we conceptualize large-scale territorial divisions on Earth. 208:. The review noted the book's thorough exploration of the historical and ideological aspects of these constructs, with a particular focus on the arbitrary nature of continental divisions. Kelly appreciated the authors' proposal of a modified world regional scheme that considers historical processes over specific diagnostic traits. 211:
Tim Unwin acknowledged the book's sound historical interpretation and analysis of overarching terms used to describe the world order but criticized its exclusive focus on large-scale structures, such as continents and world-systems theory. Unwin noted the authors' rejection of postmodern perspectives
192:
Having criticized many others for their conceptual maps of the contemporary world, the authors are to be commended for their courage in setting forth their own ''refined world regional scheme.'' Their treatment of region as a surrogate for religion and culture works pretty well in Old World -- oops,
289:
What is "mythical" about the canonical seven continents we learned in school is that their sometimes arbitrary boundaries can derail our generalizations about culture and history. The way "Africa" is used in much Afro-centric scholarship, for example, overlooks the cultural divide marked roughly by
250:
In his review, David C. Engerman, commended Lewis and Wigen for their critical examination of geographic categories, particularly continents. Engerman focused on the authors' challenge to traditional dichotomies between "East" and "West," questioning stereotypes associated with each. He noted the
218:
commended the book as a crucial exploration of critical metageography, emphasizing the significance of understanding how we structure our world spatially. Taylor emphasized the book's identification and critical examination of four geographical myths: continents, nation-states, east and west, and
151:
Lewis and Wigen challenge conventional geographical divisions, arguing that concepts like East vs. West, First World vs. Third World, and the traditional seven-fold continental system oversimplify and misrepresent the world. The authors trace the historical development of these misconceptions and
176:
Xing Fang commended the book for challenging the conventional construct of continents, West and East, nation-states, and isolated civilizations. Fang appreciated the book's post-modern approach, emphasizing fluidity and multiplicity, and its organized composition. He highlighted its thorough
200:
considered the book a serious and well-researched scholarly work that challenges conventional spatial divisions like continents and argues that they are arbitrary and discursive rather than scientific. Cosgrove also highlighted the authors' awareness of postcolonial sensibilities and the
294:
Kipp confessed "I found myself in a defensive mood during much of this book, and sometimes bored with what I thought I already knew about Eurocentrism, Orientalism, and the social construction of all scholarly categories and boundaries. The total effect, however, is finally arresting."
160:, and communication technologies on global perspectives, urging a more thoughtful and geographically informed approach to understanding human diversity on a planetary scale. The authors propose a new approach based on historical processes rather than diagnostic traits, aiming to combat 278:, and geographic education. Because it summarized classic and contemporary research, the volume was "an important stepping-stone between frequently obtuse, jargon-laden academic works on the one hand, and popular views of geography on the other." Lewis and Wigen's concern is 234:
David Hooson described the book as a timely exploration of how humanity has conceptualized distinct regions since classical times. Hooson highlighted the book's emphasis on questioning age-old assumptions and reexamining global schemes proposed by scholars like
259:, and Samuel Huntington's "clash of civilizations" approach. Engerman appreciated the authors' proposed alternative of "world regions," emphasizing their historical self-consciousness and humility in addressing the complexities of geographic categories. 212:
and their attempt to develop a new metageography. While expressing disappointment with the book's proposed world regionalization scheme, he acknowledged its value in offering insights into the historicity of geographical terms.
222:
In his review, Robert Stock noted the authors' critical examination of metageographical constructs, including the classical Greek division and the seven-fold continental scheme. The review highlighted the book's exploration of
306:, where Lewis and Wigen offered a response. In turn, Blaut conceded, stating, "Perhaps I placed too much emphasis on the shortcomings; if so, it was due to the somewhat off-putting tone of the book." 576:"General - Martin W. Lewis and Kären E. Wigen: The myth of continents: a critique of metageography. xv, 344 pp. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1997. 19.95, £15.95)" 156:
assumptions, exploring the evolution of continental divisions and recent shifts in macro-regions. The analysis also considers the impact of economic changes, the end of the
219:
geographical concordance. He praised the authors for historicizing these myths and providing cartographic summaries that challenge conventional perspectives.
152:
highlight the interconnectedness of Europe, Asia, and Africa as part of a single landmass. The Myth of Continents emphasizes how cultural concepts shaped our
204:
In his review, Philip F. Kelly lauded the authors for critically examining common global categorizations such as continents, world regions, and
755: 895:
Lewis, Martin W.; Wigen, Karen (2000). "Third Worldism or Globalism? Reply to James M. Blaut's Review of the Myth of Continents".
407: 363: 476: 122: 831: 26: 325: 1020: 140: 84: 201:
contradictions involved in embracing them while remaining committed to universal canons of scholarship.
966: 808: 165: 756:"Review: The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography, by Martin W. Lewis and Karen B. Wigen" 353: 1025: 303: 205: 1030: 931: 857: 620: 252: 430: 256: 244: 240: 8: 951: 912: 877: 800: 955: 916: 881: 775: 730: 685: 640: 595: 550: 513: 452: 403: 359: 236: 117: 980: 943: 904: 869: 767: 722: 677: 632: 587: 442: 395: 389: 275: 215: 262:
Barney Warf noted that readers would find it a "useful volume" which dealt with
1004: 636: 299: 197: 591: 447: 136: 1014: 779: 734: 689: 644: 599: 554: 517: 456: 326:"The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography | Department of History" 279: 153: 670:
Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines
992: 267: 263: 228: 224: 185: 161: 947: 908: 873: 271: 74: 538: 399: 987: 710: 665: 501: 771: 726: 681: 255:'s ideas and their broader critique of Eurocentrism, Afrocentrism, 157: 621:"Book Review: The myth of continents. A critique of metageography" 431:"Book Review: The myth of continents: A critique of Metageography" 711:"Review of The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography" 666:"Review of The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography" 539:"Review of The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography" 502:"Review of The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography" 135:
is a book by American geographer Martin W. Lewis and historian
858:"The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography (Review)" 285:
The anthropologist Rita Kipp in reviewing the book wrote:
580:
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies
964: 932:"On Myths and Maps: A Rejoinder to Lewis and Wigen" 391:
The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography
355:
The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography
132:
The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography
49:
The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography
1012: 352:Lewis, Martin W.; Wigen, Kären (Aug 11, 1997). 16:1997 Book by Martin W. Lewis and Kären E. Wigen 394:(1 ed.). University of California Press. 816:(4). University of Florida Board of Trustees. 388:Lewis, Martin W.; Wigen, Kären E. (1997). 387: 351: 25: 825: 823: 446: 753: 506:The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 499: 1013: 820: 708: 618: 832:"Book Review: The Myth Of Continents" 663: 573: 536: 798: 428: 383: 381: 347: 345: 320: 318: 619:Taylor, Peter J. (September 1999). 13: 543:Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 139:. It was published in 1997 by the 40:Martin W. Lewis and Karen E. Wigen 14: 1042: 754:Engerman, David C. (1998-11-01). 429:Fang, Xing (September 26, 2022). 378: 342: 315: 180:In his review of the book in the 998: 986: 974: 923: 888: 849: 792: 747: 702: 657: 251:authors' extensive rebuttal of 612: 567: 530: 493: 469: 422: 141:University of California Press 85:University of California Press 1: 309: 104:United States, United Kingdom 7: 625:Progress in Human Geography 435:Journal of Eurasian Studies 10: 1047: 637:10.1177/030913259902300327 574:Unwin, Tim (Feb 5, 2009). 171: 146: 830:Kipp, Rita Smith (1999), 809:African Studies Quarterly 760:Pacific Historical Review 592:10.1017/S0041977X00018425 537:Kelly, Philip F. (2001). 477:"Ever Since Gondwanaland" 448:10.1177/18793665221129885 166:environmental determinism 116: 108: 100: 90: 80: 70: 62: 54: 44: 36: 24: 936:Journal of World History 897:Journal of World History 862:Journal of World History 856:Blaut, James M. (1999). 500:Cosgrove, Denis (1999). 304:Journal of World History 930:Blaut, James M (2000). 298:Geographical historian 20:The Myth of Continents 1021:1997 non-fiction books 709:Hooson, David (1998). 664:Stock, Robert (1999). 292: 257:world-systems theories 195: 948:10.1353/jwh.2000.0003 909:10.1353/jwh.2000.0017 874:10.1353/jwh.2005.0002 799:Warf, Barney (1998). 287: 206:East-West dichotomies 190: 839:ASIANetwork Exchange 330:history.stanford.edu 276:postcolonial thought 241:Immanuel Wallerstein 715:Geographical Review 481:archive.nytimes.com 400:10.1525/j.ctt1pnv6t 45:Original title 21: 66:Geography, history 19: 409:978-0-520-20742-4 365:978-0-520-20743-1 245:Samuel Huntington 128: 127: 101:Publication place 1038: 1003: 1002: 1001: 991: 990: 979: 978: 977: 970: 960: 959: 927: 921: 920: 892: 886: 885: 853: 847: 846: 836: 827: 818: 817: 805: 796: 790: 789: 787: 786: 751: 745: 744: 742: 741: 706: 700: 699: 697: 696: 661: 655: 654: 652: 651: 616: 610: 609: 607: 606: 571: 565: 564: 562: 561: 534: 528: 527: 525: 524: 497: 491: 490: 488: 487: 473: 467: 466: 464: 463: 450: 426: 420: 419: 417: 416: 385: 376: 375: 373: 372: 349: 340: 339: 337: 336: 322: 154:metageographical 92:Publication date 29: 22: 18: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1026:Geography books 1011: 1010: 1009: 999: 997: 985: 975: 973: 965: 963: 929: 928: 924: 894: 893: 889: 855: 854: 850: 834: 829: 828: 821: 803: 797: 793: 784: 782: 772:10.2307/3641189 752: 748: 739: 737: 707: 703: 694: 692: 662: 658: 649: 647: 617: 613: 604: 602: 572: 568: 559: 557: 535: 531: 522: 520: 498: 494: 485: 483: 475: 474: 470: 461: 459: 427: 423: 414: 412: 410: 386: 379: 370: 368: 366: 350: 343: 334: 332: 324: 323: 316: 312: 216:Peter J. Taylor 174: 149: 93: 32: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1044: 1034: 1033: 1028: 1023: 1008: 1007: 995: 983: 962: 961: 922: 887: 868:(1): 205–210. 848: 819: 801:"Book Reviews" 791: 766:(4): 610–611. 746: 727:10.2307/215816 721:(2): 323–325. 701: 682:10.2307/486402 676:(1): 184–186. 656: 631:(3): 484–485. 611: 586:(1): 204–205. 566: 549:(1): 109–111. 529: 492: 468: 421: 408: 377: 364: 341: 313: 311: 308: 300:James M. Blaut 253:Karl Wittfogel 237:Arnold Toynbee 198:Denis Cosgrove 182:New York Times 173: 170: 148: 145: 137:Kären E. Wigen 126: 125: 123:978-0520207431 120: 114: 113: 110: 106: 105: 102: 98: 97: 94: 91: 88: 87: 82: 78: 77: 72: 68: 67: 64: 60: 59: 56: 52: 51: 46: 42: 41: 38: 34: 33: 30: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1043: 1032: 1031:History books 1029: 1027: 1024: 1022: 1019: 1018: 1016: 1006: 996: 994: 989: 984: 982: 972: 971: 968: 957: 953: 949: 945: 942:(1): 93–100. 941: 937: 933: 926: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 891: 883: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 852: 844: 840: 833: 826: 824: 815: 811: 810: 802: 795: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 750: 736: 732: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 705: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 660: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 615: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 570: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 533: 519: 515: 512:(1): 99–101. 511: 507: 503: 496: 482: 478: 472: 458: 454: 449: 444: 440: 436: 432: 425: 411: 405: 401: 397: 393: 392: 384: 382: 367: 361: 357: 356: 348: 346: 331: 327: 321: 319: 314: 307: 305: 301: 296: 291: 286: 283: 281: 280:metageography 277: 273: 269: 265: 260: 258: 254: 248: 246: 242: 238: 232: 230: 226: 220: 217: 213: 209: 207: 202: 199: 194: 189: 187: 183: 178: 169: 167: 163: 159: 155: 144: 142: 138: 134: 133: 124: 121: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 89: 86: 83: 79: 76: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 50: 47: 43: 39: 35: 28: 23: 939: 935: 925: 903:(1): 81–92. 900: 896: 890: 865: 861: 851: 842: 838: 813: 807: 794: 783:. Retrieved 763: 759: 749: 738:. Retrieved 718: 714: 704: 693:. Retrieved 673: 669: 659: 648:. Retrieved 628: 624: 614: 603:. Retrieved 583: 579: 569: 558:. Retrieved 546: 542: 532: 521:. Retrieved 509: 505: 495: 484:. Retrieved 480: 471: 460:. Retrieved 441:(1): 82–83. 438: 434: 424: 413:. Retrieved 390: 369:. Retrieved 354: 333:. Retrieved 329: 297: 293: 288: 284: 268:Afrocentrism 264:Eurocentrism 261: 249: 233: 229:Afrocentrism 225:Eurocentrism 221: 214: 210: 203: 196: 191: 186:Michael Lind 181: 179: 175: 162:Eurocentrism 150: 131: 130: 129: 48: 272:Orientalism 75:Non-fiction 1015:Categories 785:2023-12-19 740:2023-12-19 695:2023-12-19 650:2023-12-19 605:2023-12-19 560:2023-12-19 523:2023-12-19 486:2023-12-19 462:2023-12-19 415:2023-12-19 371:2023-12-19 335:2023-12-19 310:References 981:Geography 956:145577317 917:143947387 882:161487395 780:0030-8684 735:0016-7428 690:0008-3968 645:0309-1325 600:1474-0699 555:0022-4634 518:0022-1953 457:1879-3665 81:Publisher 158:Cold War 55:Language 1005:History 967:Portals 845:(3): 15 172:Reviews 147:Summary 63:Subject 58:English 954:  915:  880:  778:  733:  688:  643:  598:  553:  516:  455:  406:  362:  243:, and 188:wrote: 37:Author 993:Books 952:S2CID 913:S2CID 878:S2CID 835:(PDF) 804:(PDF) 109:Pages 71:Genre 31:Cover 776:ISSN 731:ISSN 686:ISSN 641:ISSN 596:ISSN 551:ISSN 514:ISSN 453:ISSN 404:ISBN 360:ISBN 227:and 164:and 118:ISBN 96:1997 944:doi 905:doi 870:doi 768:doi 723:doi 678:doi 633:doi 588:doi 443:doi 396:doi 143:. 112:344 1017:: 950:. 940:11 938:. 934:. 911:. 901:11 899:. 876:. 866:10 864:. 860:. 841:, 837:, 822:^ 812:. 806:. 774:. 764:67 762:. 758:. 729:. 719:88 717:. 713:. 684:. 674:33 672:. 668:. 639:. 629:23 627:. 623:. 594:. 584:62 582:. 578:. 547:32 545:. 541:. 510:30 508:. 504:. 479:. 451:. 439:14 437:. 433:. 402:. 380:^ 358:. 344:^ 328:. 317:^ 274:, 270:, 266:, 239:, 184:, 168:. 969:: 958:. 946:: 919:. 907:: 884:. 872:: 843:6 814:1 788:. 770:: 743:. 725:: 698:. 680:: 653:. 635:: 608:. 590:: 563:. 526:. 489:. 465:. 445:: 418:. 398:: 374:. 338:.

Index


Non-fiction
University of California Press
ISBN
978-0520207431
Kären E. Wigen
University of California Press
metageographical
Cold War
Eurocentrism
environmental determinism
Michael Lind
Denis Cosgrove
East-West dichotomies
Peter J. Taylor
Eurocentrism
Afrocentrism
Arnold Toynbee
Immanuel Wallerstein
Samuel Huntington
Karl Wittfogel
world-systems theories
Eurocentrism
Afrocentrism
Orientalism
postcolonial thought
metageography
James M. Blaut
Journal of World History

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.