91:, hypothetical stories are used to help the tester think through a complex problem or system. These scenarios are usually not written down in any detail. They can be as simple as a diagram for a testing environment or they could be a description written in prose. The ideal scenario test is a story that is motivating, credible, complex, and easy to evaluate. They are usually different from test cases in that test cases are single steps while scenarios cover a number of steps of the key.
1131:
1121:
200:
Under special circumstances, there could be a need to run the test, produce results, and then a team of experts would evaluate if the results can be considered as a pass. This happens often on new products' performance number determination. The first test is taken as the base line for subsequent test
59:
In order to fully test that all the requirements of an application are met, there must be at least two test cases for each requirement: one positive test and one negative test. If a requirement has sub-requirements, each sub-requirement must have at least two test cases. Keeping track of the link
83:
For applications or systems without formal requirements, test cases can be written based on the accepted normal operation of programs of a similar class. In some schools of testing, test cases are not written at all but the activities and results are reported after the tests have been run.
196:
Besides a description of the functionality to be tested, and the preparation required to ensure that the test can be conducted, the most time-consuming part in the test case is creating the tests and modifying them when the system changes.
46:
can be built to produce the desired coverage of the software being tested. Formally defined test cases allow the same tests to be run repeatedly against successive versions of the software, allowing for effective and consistent
178:
In a database system, you may also be able to see past test results and who generated the results and the system configuration used to generate those results. These past results would usually be stored in a separate table.
99:
A test case usually contains a single step or a sequence of steps to test the correct behaviour/functionality and features of an application. An expected result or expected outcome is usually given.
42:
objective, such as to exercise a particular program path or to verify compliance with a specific requirement. Test cases underlie testing that is methodical rather than haphazard. A
211:
or clients of the system to ensure the developed system meets the requirements specified or the contract. User acceptance tests are differentiated by the inclusion of
67:
A formal written test case is characterized by a known input and by an expected output, which is worked out before the test is executed. The known input should test a
38:
is a specification of the inputs, execution conditions, testing procedure, and expected results that define a single test to be executed to achieve a particular
64:. Written test cases should include a description of the functionality to be tested, and the preparation required to ensure that the test can be conducted.
607:
1124:
990:
919:
535:
394:
260:
813:
716:
298:
600:
793:
660:
645:
560:
506:
481:
434:
333:
949:
876:
866:
711:
640:
1134:
1000:
929:
871:
593:
939:
798:
665:
175:
These steps can be stored in a word processor document, spreadsheet, database or other common repository.
861:
856:
670:
1056:
904:
899:
851:
828:
808:
526:
Managing the
Testing Process: Practical Tools and Techniques for Managing Hardware and Software Testing
224:
24:
1155:
1061:
1051:
964:
763:
746:
655:
473:
914:
758:
969:
726:
721:
386:
414:
325:
788:
741:
374:
1086:
924:
783:
773:
685:
630:
616:
31:
8:
1106:
1091:
959:
823:
731:
675:
466:
61:
1096:
736:
440:
318:
48:
1010:
768:
556:
531:
524:
502:
477:
430:
419:
2014 International
Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence
390:
375:
329:
256:
207:, which use a variation of a written test case, are commonly performed by a group of
444:
1081:
1025:
803:
695:
690:
422:
248:
169:
Larger test cases may also contain prerequisite states or steps, and descriptions.
88:
39:
579:
349:
1101:
954:
934:
818:
680:
252:
204:
20:
215:
or positive test cases to the almost complete exclusion of negative test cases.
19:
This article is about the term in software engineering. For the legal term, see
1005:
909:
650:
382:
1149:
985:
753:
72:
1020:
1015:
944:
138:- Conditions that must exist or preparation required before test execution.
68:
426:
277:
127:- The expected outcome and how to determine whether it has been realized.
1030:
995:
585:
212:
182:
172:
A written test case should also contain a place for the actual result.
43:
778:
208:
16:
Specification of a software test, its objective and its procedure
60:
between the requirement and the test is frequently done using a
635:
835:
155:- whether this test case is automated or not and, if so, how.
415:"Equilibrium of Decision-Making Process in Financial Market"
377:
Agile
Testing: A Practical Guide for Testers and Agile Teams
1046:
247:. Iso/Iec/IEEE 24765:2010(E). 2010-12-01. pp. 1–418.
553:
UAT Defined: A Guide to
Practical User Acceptance Testing
472:(2nd ed.). Boston: Thomson Computer Press. p.
299:"Writing Test Rules to Verify Stakeholder Requirements"
372:
496:
94:
523:
465:
317:
1147:
464:Kaner, Cem; Falk, Jack; Nguyen, Hung Q. (1993).
463:
497:Hambling, Brian; van Goethem, Pauline (2013).
245:Systems and software engineering -- Vocabulary
601:
499:User Acceptance Testing: A Step-by-step Guide
102:Additional information that may be included:
366:
608:
594:
501:. BCS Learning & Development Limited.
342:
555:. Pearson Education. pp. Chapter 2.
550:
799:Software development process/methodology
615:
109:- A unique identifier for the test case.
1148:
373:Crispin, Lisa; Gregory, Janet (2009).
315:
78:
71:and the expected output should test a
589:
521:
408:
406:
350:"An Introduction to Scenario Testing"
275:
1120:
814:Software verification and validation
717:Component-based software engineering
54:
412:
13:
457:
403:
14:
1167:
794:Software configuration management
661:Search-based software engineering
646:Experimental software engineering
573:
1130:
1129:
1119:
95:Typical written test case format
544:
515:
641:Empirical software engineering
580:Software Test Case Engineering
490:
316:Beizer, Boris (May 22, 1995).
309:
291:
269:
237:
1:
230:
121:- The exact steps to perform.
666:Site reliability engineering
253:10.1109/IEEESTD.2010.5733835
201:and product release cycles.
7:
671:Social software engineering
324:. New York: Wiley. p.
278:"What Is a Good Test Case?"
218:
10:
1172:
809:Software quality assurance
522:Black, Rex (August 2009).
225:Classification Tree Method
115:- The test case objective.
25:Test case (disambiguation)
18:
1115:
1074:
1039:
978:
892:
885:
844:
704:
623:
468:Testing Computer Software
965:Model-driven engineering
764:Functional specification
747:Software incompatibility
656:Requirements engineering
759:Enterprise architecture
551:Cimperman, Rob (2006).
276:Kaner, Cem (May 2003).
970:Round-trip engineering
727:Backward compatibility
722:Software compatibility
530:. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
23:. For other uses, see
789:Software architecture
742:Forward compatibility
427:10.1109/CSCI.2014.104
149:- name of the tester.
44:battery of test cases
1087:Computer engineering
784:Software archaeology
774:Programming paradigm
686:Software maintenance
631:Computer programming
617:Software engineering
421:. pp. 113–121.
32:software engineering
1107:Systems engineering
1092:Information science
872:Service orientation
824:Structured analysis
732:Compatibility layer
676:Software deployment
185:often also contain
113:Description/summary
79:Informal test cases
62:traceability matrix
1097:Project management
862:Object orientation
829:Essential analysis
737:Compatibility mode
413:Liu, Juan (2014).
49:regression testing
1143:
1142:
1070:
1069:
1011:Information model
915:Incremental model
769:Modeling language
537:978-0-470-40415-7
396:978-81-317-3068-3
320:Black Box Testing
262:978-0-7381-6205-8
55:Formal test cases
1163:
1156:Software testing
1133:
1132:
1123:
1122:
1082:Computer science
890:
889:
804:Software quality
696:Systems analysis
691:Software testing
610:
603:
596:
587:
586:
567:
566:
548:
542:
541:
529:
519:
513:
512:
494:
488:
487:
471:
461:
455:
454:
452:
451:
410:
401:
400:
380:
370:
364:
363:
361:
360:
354:
346:
340:
339:
323:
313:
307:
306:
295:
289:
288:
282:
273:
267:
266:
241:
205:Acceptance tests
89:scenario testing
40:software testing
1171:
1170:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1139:
1111:
1102:Risk management
1066:
1035:
974:
955:Waterfall model
925:Prototype model
920:Iterative model
881:
857:Aspect-oriented
840:
819:Software system
700:
681:Software design
619:
614:
582:By Ajay Bhagwat
576:
571:
570:
563:
549:
545:
538:
520:
516:
509:
495:
491:
484:
462:
458:
449:
447:
437:
411:
404:
397:
371:
367:
358:
356:
352:
348:
347:
343:
336:
314:
310:
297:
296:
292:
280:
274:
270:
263:
243:
242:
238:
233:
221:
125:Expected result
97:
81:
57:
28:
21:Test case (law)
17:
12:
11:
5:
1169:
1159:
1158:
1141:
1140:
1138:
1137:
1127:
1116:
1113:
1112:
1110:
1109:
1104:
1099:
1094:
1089:
1084:
1078:
1076:
1075:Related fields
1072:
1071:
1068:
1067:
1065:
1064:
1059:
1054:
1049:
1043:
1041:
1037:
1036:
1034:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1006:Function model
1003:
998:
993:
988:
982:
980:
976:
975:
973:
972:
967:
962:
957:
952:
947:
942:
937:
932:
927:
922:
917:
912:
910:Executable UML
907:
902:
896:
894:
887:
883:
882:
880:
879:
874:
869:
864:
859:
854:
848:
846:
842:
841:
839:
838:
833:
832:
831:
821:
816:
811:
806:
801:
796:
791:
786:
781:
776:
771:
766:
761:
756:
751:
750:
749:
744:
739:
734:
729:
719:
714:
708:
706:
702:
701:
699:
698:
693:
688:
683:
678:
673:
668:
663:
658:
653:
651:Formal methods
648:
643:
638:
633:
627:
625:
621:
620:
613:
612:
605:
598:
590:
584:
583:
575:
574:External links
572:
569:
568:
561:
543:
536:
514:
507:
489:
482:
456:
435:
402:
395:
383:Addison-Wesley
365:
341:
334:
308:
290:
268:
261:
235:
234:
232:
229:
228:
227:
220:
217:
194:
193:
190:
167:
166:
161:
156:
150:
144:
139:
136:Pre-requisites
133:
128:
122:
116:
110:
96:
93:
80:
77:
56:
53:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1168:
1157:
1154:
1153:
1151:
1136:
1128:
1126:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1100:
1098:
1095:
1093:
1090:
1088:
1085:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1077:
1073:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1055:
1053:
1050:
1048:
1045:
1044:
1042:
1038:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1026:Systems model
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
983:
981:
977:
971:
968:
966:
963:
961:
958:
956:
953:
951:
948:
946:
943:
941:
938:
936:
933:
931:
928:
926:
923:
921:
918:
916:
913:
911:
908:
906:
903:
901:
898:
897:
895:
893:Developmental
891:
888:
884:
878:
875:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
853:
850:
849:
847:
843:
837:
834:
830:
827:
826:
825:
822:
820:
817:
815:
812:
810:
807:
805:
802:
800:
797:
795:
792:
790:
787:
785:
782:
780:
777:
775:
772:
770:
767:
765:
762:
760:
757:
755:
754:Data modeling
752:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
733:
730:
728:
725:
724:
723:
720:
718:
715:
713:
710:
709:
707:
703:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
644:
642:
639:
637:
634:
632:
629:
628:
626:
622:
618:
611:
606:
604:
599:
597:
592:
591:
588:
581:
578:
577:
564:
562:9780132702621
558:
554:
547:
539:
533:
528:
527:
518:
510:
508:9781780171678
504:
500:
493:
485:
483:1-85032-847-1
479:
475:
470:
469:
460:
446:
442:
438:
436:9781605951676
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
409:
407:
398:
392:
388:
384:
379:
378:
369:
351:
345:
337:
335:9780471120940
331:
327:
322:
321:
312:
304:
300:
294:
286:
279:
272:
264:
258:
254:
250:
246:
240:
236:
226:
223:
222:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
192:Configuration
191:
188:
187:
186:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
165:
162:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
143:
142:Test category
140:
137:
134:
132:
131:Actual result
129:
126:
123:
120:
117:
114:
111:
108:
105:
104:
103:
100:
92:
90:
85:
76:
74:
73:postcondition
70:
65:
63:
52:
50:
45:
41:
37:
33:
26:
22:
1021:Object model
1016:Metamodeling
945:Spiral model
845:Orientations
552:
546:
525:
517:
498:
492:
467:
459:
448:. Retrieved
418:
376:
368:
357:. Retrieved
344:
319:
311:
302:
293:
284:
271:
244:
239:
203:
199:
195:
189:Test summary
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
163:
158:
152:
146:
141:
135:
130:
124:
118:
112:
107:Test case ID
106:
101:
98:
86:
82:
69:precondition
66:
58:
35:
29:
712:Abstraction
385:. pp.
355:. Cem Kaner
303:StickyMinds
183:Test suites
1031:View model
996:Data model
450:2019-10-22
359:2009-05-07
231:References
213:happy path
153:Automation
119:Test steps
1040:Languages
285:STAR East
209:end-users
159:Pass/fail
36:test case
1150:Category
1135:Category
1001:ER model
867:Ontology
779:Software
705:Concepts
445:15204091
219:See also
1125:Commons
950:V-model
164:Remarks
886:Models
636:DevOps
624:Fields
559:
534:
505:
480:
443:
433:
393:
332:
259:
147:Author
1062:SysML
986:SPICE
979:Other
940:Scrum
900:Agile
852:Agile
836:CI/CD
474:123–4
441:S2CID
353:(PDF)
281:(PDF)
1047:IDEF
991:CMMI
877:SDLC
557:ISBN
532:ISBN
503:ISBN
478:ISBN
431:ISBN
391:ISBN
389:–5.
330:ISBN
287:: 2.
257:ISBN
34:, a
1057:USL
1052:UML
930:RAD
905:EUP
423:doi
387:192
249:doi
87:In
30:In
1152::
960:XP
935:UP
476:.
439:.
429:.
417:.
405:^
381:.
328:.
301:.
283:.
255:.
75:.
51:.
609:e
602:t
595:v
565:.
540:.
511:.
486:.
453:.
425::
399:.
362:.
338:.
326:3
305:.
265:.
251::
27:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.