182:
the DPRAM test-and-set, the memory is set only when the test succeeds, and the value to set and the test condition are specified by the CPU. Here, the value to set can only be 1, but if 0 and 1 are considered the only valid values for the memory location, and "value is nonzero" is the only allowed test, then this equates to the case described for DPRAM hardware (or, more specifically, the DPRAM case reduces to this under these constraints). From that viewpoint, this can, correctly, be called "test-and-set" in the full, conventional sense of that term. The essential point to note is the general intent and principle of test-and-set: a value is both tested and set in one atomic operation such that no other program thread or process can change the target memory location after it is tested but before it is set. (This is because the location must only be set if it currently has a certain value, not if it had that value sometime earlier.)
168:. That is, no other process must be able to interrupt the function mid-execution, thereby seeing a state that only exists while the function executes. That requires hardware support; it cannot be implemented as shown. Nevertheless, the code shown helps to explain the behaviour of test-and-set. NOTE: In this example, 'lock' is assumed to be passed by reference (or by name) but the assignment to 'initial' creates a new value (not just copying a reference).
42:) operation. The caller can then "test" the result to see if the state was changed by the call. If multiple processes may access the same memory location, and if a process is currently performing a test-and-set, no other process may begin another test-and-set until the first process's test-and-set is finished. A
593:
When processor P1 has obtained a lock and processor P2 is also waiting for the lock, P2 will keep incurring bus transactions in attempts to acquire the lock. When a processor has obtained a lock, all other processors which also wish to obtain the same lock keep trying to obtain the lock by initiating
292:
The code also shows that there are really two operations: an atomic read-modify-write and a test. Only the read-modify-write needs to be atomic. (This is true because delaying the value comparison by any amount of time will not change the result of the test once the value to test has been obtained.
181:
Not only is the code shown not atomic, in the sense of the test-and-set instruction, it also differs from the descriptions of DPRAM hardware test-and-set above. Here, the value being set and the test are fixed and invariant, and the value is updated regardless of the outcome of the test, whereas for
458:
at a time. The rest of the processes will keep spinning until they get the lock. It is possible that a process is never granted the lock. In such a case it will loop endlessly. This is a drawback of a spin lock implementation as it doesn't ensure fairness. These issues are further elaborated in the
128:
CPU 1 issues a test-and-set instruction to write to "memory location A". The DPRAM does not immediately store the value in memory location A, but instead simultaneously moves the current value to a special register, while setting the contents of memory location A to a special "flag value". If at
119:
Whether or not CPU 2 was trying to access the memory location, the DPRAM performs the test given by CPU 1. If the test succeeds, the DPRAM sets the memory location to the value given by CPU 1. Then the DPRAM wipes out its "internal note" that CPU 1 was writing there. At this point, CPU 2 could
132:
Whether or not CPU 2 was trying to access the memory location, the DPRAM now performs CPU 1's test. If the test succeeds, the DPRAM sets memory location A to the value specified by CPU 1. If the test fails, the DPRAM copies the value back from the special register to memory location A. Either
107:
When CPU 1 issues a test-and-set instruction, the DPRAM first makes an "internal note" of this by storing the address of the memory location in a special place. If at this point, CPU 2 happens to issue a test-and-set instruction for the same memory location, the DPRAM first checks its "internal
609:
When we consider fairness, we consider if a processor gets a fair chance of acquiring the lock when it is set free. In an extreme situation the processor might starve i.e. it might not be able to acquire the lock for an extended period of time even though it has become free during that time.
60:
This code assumes that the memory location was initialized to 0 at some point prior to the first test-and-set. The calling process obtains the lock if the old value was 0, otherwise the while-loop spins waiting to acquire the lock. This is called a
98:
test-and-set instructions can work in many ways. Here are two variations, both of which describe a DPRAM which provides exactly 2 ports, allowing 2 separate electronic components (such as 2 CPUs) access to every memory location on the DPRAM.
65:. At any point, the holder of the lock can simply set the memory location back to 0 to release the lock for acquisition by another--this does not require any special handling as the holder "owns" this memory location. "
434:
keyword. In absence of volatile, the compiler and/or the CPU(s) may optimize access to lock and/or use cached values, thus rendering the above code erroneous. Conversely, and unfortunately, the presence of
868:
87:(32-bit comparand) offers a more general solution to this problem, and in some implementations compare-double-and-swap (64-bit comparand) is also available for extended utility.
594:
bus transactions repeatedly until they get hold of the lock. This increases the bus traffic requirement of test-and-set significantly. This slows down all other traffic from
613:
Storage overhead for TSL is next to nothing since only one lock is required. Uncontended latency is also low since only one atomic instruction and branch are needed.
164:
The test and set instruction, when used with boolean values, uses logic like that shown in the following function, except that the function must execute
129:
this point, CPU 2 issues a test-and-set to memory location A, the DPRAM detects the special flag value, and as in
Variation 1, issues a BUSY interrupt.
293:
Once the code writes the initial value, the result of the test has been established, even if it has not been computed yet — e.g., by the == operator.)
108:
note", recognizes the situation, and issues a BUSY interrupt, which tells CPU 2 that it must wait and retry. This is an implementation of a
587:
The four major evaluation metrics for locks in general are uncontended lock-acquisition latency, bus traffic, fairness, and storage.
116:
using the interrupt mechanism. Since all this happens at hardware speeds, CPU 2's wait to get out of the spin-lock is very short.
892:
846:
451:
in C/C++ is quite vague, not all compilers will do that. Consult your compiler's documentation to determine if it does.
454:
This spin lock function can be called by multiple processes, but it is guaranteed that only one process will be in the
873:
821:
773:
602:
misses. It slows down the overall section, since the traffic is saturated by failed lock acquisition attempts.
656:
Anderson, T. E. (1990-01-01). "The performance of spin lock alternatives for shared-money multiprocessors".
912:
907:
80:
76:
27:
632:
165:
35:
712:
428:
The lock variable is a shared variable i.e. it can be accessed by all processors/threads. Note the
186:
133:
operation wipes out the special flag value. If CPU 2 now issues a test-and-set, it will succeed.
141:
Some instruction sets have an atomic test-and-set machine language instruction. Examples include
54:
43:
886:
707:
606:
is an improvement over TSL since it does not initiate lock acquisition requests continuously.
627:
603:
66:
692:
46:(CPU) may use a test-and-set instruction offered by another electronic component, such as
8:
725:
842:
817:
814:
Fundamentals of parallel computer architecture : multichip and multicore systems
673:
595:
430:
154:
796:
729:
717:
665:
637:
455:
302:
158:
84:
20:
877:
599:
590:
Test-and-set scores low on two of them, namely, high bus traffic and unfairness.
72:
31:
174:
TestAndSet(boolean_ref lock) { boolean initial = lock; lock = true;
444:
150:
146:
579:
is the lock variable. The process doesn't return unless it acquires the lock.
447:
to ensure that operations are committed to memory, but since the semantics of
443:
guarantee that reads and writes are committed to memory. Some compilers issue
901:
677:
622:
749:
864:
239:// use of shared memory (i.e., non-cached values), protection from compiler
233:// This should be interpreted as pseudocode for illustrative purposes only.
109:
721:
360:// was 0, however, then it indicates the lock was **not** locked before we
881:
236:// Traditional compilation of this code will not guarantee atomicity, the
354:// value. If the previous lock value was 1 then the lock was **already**
351:// test_and_set() function locks the lock and returns the previous lock
153:). Those that do not can still implement an atomic test-and-set using a
16:
CPU instruction to set a memory location to 1 and return its prior value
363:// locked it, but now it **is** locked because we locked it, indicating
345:// Spin lock: loop forever until we get the lock; we know the lock was
669:
39:
357:// locked by another thread or process. Once the previous lock value
348:// successfully obtained after exiting this while loop because the
113:
62:
57:
can be built using an atomic test-and-set instruction as follows:
460:
582:
75:(1991) proved that test-and-set (1-bit comparand) has a finite
797:
Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau and Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau (2015).
95:
47:
889:- C-callable routine written in Sun SPARC assembly language
136:
90:
50:; a CPU itself may also offer a test-and-set instruction.
308:
142:
420:// release lock when finished with the critical section
296:
658:
IEEE Transactions on
Parallel and Distributed Systems
405:// only one process can be in this section at a time
83:for at-most two concurrent processes. In contrast,
476:; A "jump to" tag; function entry point.
305:is by using a test-and-set based lock as follows:
899:
512:#0 ; Was flag zero on entry_region?
242:// optimizations, or other required properties.
30:is an instruction used to write (set) 1 to a
583:Performance evaluation of test-and-set locks
120:issue a test-and-set, which would succeed.
869:Encyclopaedia of Delay-Insensitive Systems
466:
711:
655:
836:
811:
690:
137:Software implementation of test-and-set
91:Hardware implementation of test-and-set
900:
830:
801:(0.91 ed.). Arpaci-Dusseau Books.
309:Pseudo-C implementation of a spin lock
839:Fundamentals of Parallel Architecture
34:and return its old value as a single
799:Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces
189:, the implementation would be like:
297:Mutual exclusion using test-and-set
13:
539:; will have set it non-zero; thus,
14:
924:
858:
691:Herlihy, Maurice (January 1991).
497:; into the register reg and flag
491:; Test and Set Lock; flag is the
230:// -- Start of atomic segment --
880: (archived 2006-02-05), by
494:; shared variable; it is copied
805:
790:
766:
742:
700:ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst
684:
649:
560:#0 ; store 0 in flag
542:; we have claimed the resource
533:; Exit; i.e., flag was zero on
275:// -- End of atomic segment --
149:and its successors (including
123:
102:
1:
841:. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
643:
575:is an atomic instruction and
527:; flag was non-zero on entry.
536:; entry. If we get here, tsl
79:and can solve the wait-free
7:
693:"Wait-free synchronization"
633:Load-link/store-conditional
616:
500:; then atomically set to 1.
10:
929:
887:int testandset(int *lock)
521:; Jump to enter_region if
874:"Wait-free Test-and-Set"
524:; reg is non-zero; i.e.,
470:
312:
191:
545:; associated with flag.
467:Assembly implementation
44:central processing unit
893:Intel Developer Manual
774:"IBM Knowledge Center"
750:"BTS—Bit Test and Set"
187:C programming language
69:" is another example.
837:Solihin, Yan (2016).
812:Solihin, Yan (2009).
754:www.felixcloutier.com
722:10.1145/114005.102808
628:Test and test-and-set
604:Test-and-test-and-set
301:One way to implement
67:Test and test-and-set
913:Computer arithmetic
908:Concurrency control
461:performance section
366:// we own the lock.
566:; return to caller
848:978-1-4822-1118-4
155:read-modify-write
81:consensus problem
920:
853:
852:
834:
828:
827:
809:
803:
802:
794:
788:
787:
785:
784:
770:
764:
763:
761:
760:
746:
740:
739:
737:
736:
715:
697:
688:
682:
681:
670:10.1109/71.80120
653:
638:Compare-and-swap
578:
574:
567:
564:
561:
558:
555:
552:
549:
546:
543:
540:
537:
534:
531:
528:
525:
522:
519:
516:
513:
510:
507:
504:
501:
498:
495:
492:
489:
486:
483:
480:
477:
474:
456:critical section
424:
421:
418:
415:
412:
409:
406:
403:
400:
397:
394:
391:
388:
385:
382:
379:
376:
373:
370:
367:
364:
361:
358:
355:
352:
349:
346:
343:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
303:mutual exclusion
288:
285:
282:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
264:
261:
258:
255:
252:
249:
246:
243:
240:
237:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
194:#define LOCKED 1
159:compare-and-swap
85:compare-and-swap
77:consensus number
21:computer science
928:
927:
923:
922:
921:
919:
918:
917:
898:
897:
878:Wayback Machine
861:
856:
849:
835:
831:
824:
816:. p. 252.
810:
806:
795:
791:
782:
780:
772:
771:
767:
758:
756:
748:
747:
743:
734:
732:
695:
689:
685:
654:
650:
646:
619:
585:
576:
572:
569:
568:
565:
562:
559:
556:
553:
550:
547:
544:
541:
538:
535:
532:
529:
526:
523:
520:
517:
514:
511:
508:
505:
502:
499:
496:
493:
490:
487:
484:
481:
478:
475:
472:
469:
445:memory barriers
426:
425:
422:
419:
416:
413:
410:
407:
404:
401:
398:
395:
392:
389:
386:
383:
380:
377:
374:
371:
368:
365:
362:
359:
356:
353:
350:
347:
344:
341:
338:
335:
332:
329:
326:
323:
320:
317:
314:
311:
299:
290:
289:
286:
283:
280:
277:
274:
271:
268:
265:
262:
259:
256:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
238:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
179:
139:
126:
105:
93:
73:Maurice Herlihy
32:memory location
17:
12:
11:
5:
926:
916:
915:
910:
896:
895:
890:
884:
871:
860:
859:External links
857:
855:
854:
847:
829:
822:
804:
789:
765:
741:
713:10.1.1.56.5659
706:(1): 124–149.
683:
647:
645:
642:
641:
640:
635:
630:
625:
618:
615:
584:
581:
471:
468:
465:
313:
310:
307:
298:
295:
192:
170:
151:z/Architecture
147:IBM System/360
138:
135:
125:
122:
104:
101:
92:
89:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
925:
914:
911:
909:
906:
905:
903:
894:
891:
888:
885:
883:
879:
875:
872:
870:
866:
863:
862:
850:
844:
840:
833:
825:
823:9780984163007
819:
815:
808:
800:
793:
779:
775:
769:
755:
751:
745:
731:
727:
723:
719:
714:
709:
705:
701:
694:
687:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
652:
648:
639:
636:
634:
631:
629:
626:
624:
623:Fetch-and-add
621:
620:
614:
611:
607:
605:
601:
597:
591:
588:
580:
548:leave_region:
473:enter_region:
464:
462:
457:
452:
450:
446:
442:
438:
433:
432:
306:
304:
294:
190:
188:
183:
177:
173:
169:
167:
162:
161:instruction.
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
134:
130:
121:
117:
115:
111:
100:
97:
88:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
68:
64:
58:
56:
51:
49:
48:dual-port RAM
45:
41:
40:interruptible
37:
33:
29:
26:
22:
838:
832:
813:
807:
798:
792:
781:. Retrieved
777:
768:
757:. Retrieved
753:
744:
733:. Retrieved
703:
699:
686:
661:
657:
651:
612:
608:
592:
589:
586:
570:
518:enter_region
453:
448:
440:
436:
429:
427:
375:test_and_set
300:
291:
200:test_and_set
184:
180:
175:
171:
163:
140:
131:
127:
118:
110:busy waiting
106:
94:
71:
59:
52:
25:test-and-set
24:
18:
882:Yehuda Afek
865:Description
778:www.ibm.com
664:(1): 6–16.
178:initial; }
124:Variation 2
103:Variation 1
38:(i.e., non-
28:instruction
902:Categories
783:2016-11-21
759:2016-11-21
735:2007-05-20
644:References
166:atomically
708:CiteSeerX
678:1045-9219
600:coherence
617:See also
449:volatile
437:volatile
431:volatile
399:critical
336:critical
315:volatile
281:oldValue
245:oldValue
224:oldValue
172:function
114:spinlock
63:spinlock
876:at the
730:2181446
402:section
263:lockPtr
254:lockPtr
212:lockPtr
185:In the
845:
820:
728:
710:
676:
278:return
269:LOCKED
176:return
36:atomic
23:, the
867:from
726:S2CID
696:(PDF)
596:cache
571:Here
439:does
381:&
369:while
96:DPRAM
843:ISBN
818:ISBN
674:ISSN
598:and
577:flag
554:flag
551:move
488:flag
408:lock
384:lock
333:void
321:lock
145:and
55:lock
718:doi
666:doi
573:tsl
563:ret
530:ret
515:jnz
506:reg
503:cmp
482:reg
479:tsl
441:not
318:int
221:int
206:int
197:int
157:or
143:x86
112:or
19:In
904::
776:.
752:.
724:.
716:.
704:13
702:.
698:.
672:.
660:.
463:.
396:);
390:==
339:()
53:A
851:.
826:.
786:.
762:.
738:.
720::
680:.
668::
662:1
557:,
509:,
485:,
423:}
417:;
414:0
411:=
393:1
387:)
378:(
372:(
342:{
330:;
327:0
324:=
287:}
284:;
272:;
266:=
260:*
257:;
251:*
248:=
227:;
218:{
215:)
209:*
203:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.