121:
103:
72:
131:
21:
273:
I continue to be unable to see the merit of this template, and I have trouble imagining how anything of value could result from editing the list of elements on this template. You have not explained your statement about "validity of youth empowerment as a topic," leading me to think that this is
283:
Let's wait a minute and see if anyone else contributes to the convo. You framed this conversation as a personal attack, and I believe we should see what other WP editors have to say. Matter of fact, if you are going to continue to make this personal, go ahead and post it at TfD. -
254:
is unlikely to recall these as "Youth
Empowerment" organizations. I could go on and on, but I hope you grasp my point that you are viewing the world through a filter of your own personal perspectives, and that this is a POV, not an neutral and objective
230:, or most of the other articles that are now displaying this template. From the POV of a LGBT activist interested in the Day of Silence, that event is an LGBT event, not a Youth Empowerment event, and it has nothing to do with topics like
293:
My concern is related to the template, which I think detracts from most of the articles it was added to, but if you want to view this as a personal attack, so be it. I will take this to TfD to expand the
191:
I don't see the point of this template, except perhaps as a way to gather/advertise the personal interests of one particular
Knowledge contributor. That's not a good reason for creating a template.--
206:
51:
41:
218:
The taxonomy isn't at all obvious unless you have a particular POV. From the POV of a person who is 62 years old and is experiencing employment discrimination related to
247:
264:
If the template topics are too ambitious then edit them. However, the validity of youth empowerment as a topic that needs a template isn't about POV. -
298:
288:
278:
268:
259:
213:
323:
195:
328:
251:
153:
186:
205:
of subjects. The template is helpful and noteworthy; its not redundant; it is used; and it is from a NPOV, all per
144:
108:
83:
238:. Professional educators, who generally happen to be adults, are likely to perceive that articles such as
235:
27:
152:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
243:
89:
20:
8:
239:
285:
265:
231:
227:
210:
136:
246:
are about educating youth, not about empowerment of youth. A former member of
120:
102:
317:
30:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
295:
275:
274:
merely a statement about your personal commitment to youth empowerment.--
256:
223:
192:
149:
202:
130:
219:
148:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
126:
222:, the article about Ageism has nothing to do with
315:
252:Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee
82:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
316:
142:This template is within the scope of
71:
69:
65:
15:
88:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
340:
324:Template-Class sociology articles
248:Students for a Democratic Society
329:NA-importance sociology articles
129:
119:
101:
70:
26:This template was nominated for
19:
162:Knowledge:WikiProject Sociology
165:Template:WikiProject Sociology
1:
156:and see a list of open tasks.
7:
187:Is this template necessary?
10:
345:
299:01:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
289:23:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
279:23:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
269:22:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
260:21:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
236:Company of Young Canadians
214:19:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
196:18:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
114:
96:
244:Experiential learning
145:WikiProject Sociology
50:, 14 March 2007, see
201:There is an obvious
168:sociology articles
84:content assessment
40:, 3 May 2011, see
184:
183:
180:
179:
176:
175:
64:
63:
60:
59:
336:
240:Service-learning
170:
169:
166:
163:
160:
139:
134:
133:
123:
116:
115:
105:
98:
97:
75:
74:
73:
66:
32:
31:
23:
16:
344:
343:
339:
338:
337:
335:
334:
333:
314:
313:
189:
167:
164:
161:
158:
157:
135:
128:
12:
11:
5:
342:
332:
331:
326:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
255:perspective.--
232:Generation gap
228:Day of Silence
188:
185:
182:
181:
178:
177:
174:
173:
171:
154:the discussion
141:
140:
137:Society portal
124:
112:
111:
106:
94:
93:
87:
76:
62:
61:
58:
57:
56:
55:
45:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
341:
330:
327:
325:
322:
321:
319:
300:
297:
294:discussion.--
292:
291:
290:
287:
282:
281:
280:
277:
272:
271:
270:
267:
263:
262:
261:
258:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
216:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:
198:
197:
194:
172:
155:
151:
147:
146:
138:
132:
127:
125:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
104:
100:
99:
95:
91:
85:
81:
77:
68:
67:
53:
49:
46:
43:
39:
36:
35:
34:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
190:
143:
90:WikiProjects
79:
47:
38:No consensus
37:
224:Unschooling
318:Categories
52:discussion
42:discussion
286:Freechild
266:Freechild
211:Freechild
159:Sociology
150:sociology
109:Sociology
203:taxonomy
80:template
28:deletion
296:orlady
276:orlady
257:orlady
220:Ageism
193:orlady
86:scale.
78:This
242:and
234:and
209:. -
48:Keep
250:or
207:TfD
320::
226:,
92::
54:.
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
