552:
dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?
539:
dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?
580:
Thank you for finally providing a test case that shows a difference between the existing code and the proposed new code. I do see a tiny difference in the line spacing that I suppose is an improvement. I am going to hope that this update will not break any of the 13,000 existing uses of the template.
551:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum
538:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum
725:
Hampshire 132 (John Small 58, T Sueter 29) & 154 (T Sueter 32, John Small 25, W Barber 25); All-England 187 (W Palmer 52*, Childs 38, T White 24) & 100-4 (J Boorman 55, W Palmer 30*). Coulsdon batsman Will Palmer, who had an outstanding season in 1773, scored 52* and 30* in totals of 187 and
222:
Test cases are for showing the differences, if any, between the live template and a sandbox. I looked at the
Russian template, but I was unable to see how it is relevant here, or relevant to putting a div tag after a markup bullet. I have added yet another test case showing a whole paragraph inside
689:
This is the first match since cricket’s statistical record began where some bowling and fielding details are known, though no credit was given to the bowler when a batsman was out other than by being clean bowled, a convention in scoring that was not rectified until well inside the 19th century.
674:
This is the first match since cricket’s statistical record began where some bowling and fielding details are known, though no credit was given to the bowler when a batsman was out other than by being clean bowled, a convention in scoring that was not rectified until well inside the 19th century.
207:
is supposed to be an inline piece. If a whole paragraph or many paragraphs are supposed to be in small print, a block tag is necessary, which this template provides. Otherwise it would get wrong line spacing and probably other flaws. (Isn't this the reason why this template exists at all? Linter
692:
The card includes the first known instance of "hit wicket" (by John
Minshull) and it is not mentioned again until 1786. It is believed that it was usually recorded as "bowled" so it is possible that, on this occasion, Minshull hit the wicket when not taking strike (e.g., hit the wicket whilst
678:
The card includes the first known instance of "hit wicket" (by John
Minshull) and it is not mentioned again until 1786. It is believed that it was usually recorded as "bowled" so it is possible that, on this occasion, Minshull hit the wicket when not taking strike (e.g., hit the wicket whilst
492:
does the trick (for a long time already), but in
English Knowledge, no template does.If you choose not to make the edit (although I don't see any reasons why not—after all, the change doesn't change anything for the worse), I'll just have to create a separate template for the script's needs.
328:
I understand what a block-level element is. It's the reason that I created this template. What I don't understand is the difference that I am supposed to see between your proposed sandbox version, if I copied it correctly, and the live version. Perhaps you could create a new test case that
854:
on the samples above, and oddly, I get the identical result: the two blank lines in the 3-paragraph sample are retained, but the single blank line in the 2-paragraph sample is lost. I'll play around with it some more and look at reporting the template bug on
Phabricator.
820:
This seems anomalous to me. I recommend simplifying this test case as much as possible, preferably without using the template (just use div tags). If you can replicate it with just a few lines of one word each, submit a bug on
Phabricator. Let me know if you need help. –
690:
Lumpy seems to have been the best bowler in the game, taking five wickets bowled and likely had more from catches. The All-England team was a strong Kent & Surrey combination with Joseph Miller scoring 73 in their innings of 177.
675:
Lumpy seems to have been the best bowler in the game, taking five wickets bowled and likely had more from catches. The All-England team was a strong Kent & Surrey combination with Joseph Miller scoring 73 in their innings of 177.
156:
Thanks. I have marked this as a misuse of the template for now, but I am open to change that makes the template better. If you can provide a better test case that shows the benefit of the sandbox version over the existing in-line
66:
I use the template with lists in the first parameter frequently, but I am open to improvements. Can you please make your recommended changes to the template's sandbox, and then add test cases to the template's testcases page? –
311:
344:
895:, in which I restored the previous version of this template to the sandbox and got the expected result. The sandbox template renders as expected. We may need to adjust this template further. Maybe
714:
Hampshire 132 (John Small 58, T Sueter 29) & 154 (T Sueter 32, John Small 25, W Barber 25); All-England 187 (W Palmer 52*, Childs 38, T White 24) & 100-4 (J Boorman 55, W Palmer 30*).
223:
smalldiv and its sandbox. I don't see a difference. If you want to demonstrate the benefit of your proposed change, please do so using a test case. I am unable to read your mind. –
483:
used for communicating on wiki projects needs such a block-level "small" template to use for editors' comments on talk pages if they opt to wrap the whole comment's content in the
283:
for its contents is the same as its closest parent block-level element.As a result, whenever there is a comment in a discussion or otherwise contents of a list item in the
480:
428:
content of an item inside a list. Not a sentence in otherwise normal-sized item narration, but the whole content of an item. An alternative would be to use full-fledged
60:
16:
624:
590:
502:
390:
356:
338:
323:
232:
217:
176:
151:
132:
76:
687:
Hampshire 77 (T Brett 26; E Stevens 2w) & 49 (G Leer 15; E Stevens 3w); All-England 177 (J Miller 73, R Simmons 20; W Hogsflesh 3w, T Brett 2w).
671:
Hampshire 77 (T Brett 26; E Stevens 2w) & 49 (G Leer 15; E Stevens 3w); All-England 177 (J Miller 73, R Simmons 20; W Hogsflesh 3w, T Brett 2w).
381:
is actually needed and the live template does not work properly? Again, I am open to being persuaded, but I'm having to do all of the work here. –
788:
110:
48:
347:
that you marked as a misuse (which I insist is not), the live version works incorrectly. The template can't be used in lists.
314:. And while for text outside of lists you can use the present template, in lists, you can't currently. Has it become clearer?
806:
802:
479:
syntax. But the reason I'm interested in this template (and why using the above syntax is not an option) is that the script
361:
So the whole line height thing is not relevant? I am having trouble following you. The test case with the bullet should use
781:
652:
620:
498:
352:
319:
213:
147:
128:
56:
717:
Coulsdon batsman Will Palmer, who had an outstanding season in 1773, scored 52* and 30* in totals of 187 and 100-4.
908:
861:
830:
886:
815:
899:
has an idea about how to get both their desired line spacing and our expected line break rendering to work. –
896:
616:
494:
348:
315:
209:
143:
124:
52:
488:
tag, which they often do. This way their comment would get the correct line spacing. In
Russian Knowledge,
734:
248:
139:
192:
I suppose a test case should be for testing, not for showing benefit.Semantically, any text wrapped in
891:
It appears that the change discussed at length in the above section may have caused this problem. See
892:
679:
running, perhaps). This was another "first" for
Minshull who scored the first known century in 1769.
414:
This is exactly why "the whole line height thing" is relevant. If the test case with the bullet uses
693:
running, perhaps). This was another "first" for
Minshull who scored the first known century in 1769.
273:
489:
307:
186:
120:
255:
8:
904:
826:
586:
386:
334:
228:
172:
106:
72:
884:
859:
813:
779:
870:
843:
795:
758:
704:
661:
609:
375:
85:
37:
use the template inside lists (this is, among other things, handy in discussions);
900:
836:
822:
767:
599:
582:
418:
405:
396:
382:
365:
330:
287:
266:
241:
224:
201:
168:
161:
116:
102:
95:
68:
22:
809:, where there is only one blank line in the text, the blank line is ignored. —
881:
856:
810:
776:
424:, the contents get the wrong line spacing. Again, we are talking about the
303:
237:
I can't understand why you can't see the point. The different between the
33:
and a newline to kill three birds with one stone, making it possible to:
371:, since an in-line element is called for. Can you show a case in which
47:
Currently the template can do only the last. Here's a test page:
595:
Thank you. Well, I was sure that if you've seen how text in
247:
template and this template is that this template creates a
40:
use the template with newlines at the beginning and end;
615:
looks without a bullet, you'll be able to extrapolate.
880:, so obviously the output is going to be identical! —
119:: To get the right line spacing. See the examples at
185:To get the right line spacing. See the examples at
17:Make it possible to use the template inside lists
697:which correctly reproduces the two blank lines.
730:which doesn't reproduce the single blank line.
839:: Thanks for your reply. I tried replacing
258:CSS property is calculated relative to the
411:, since an in-line element is called for.
401:The test case with the bullet should use
737:, where I'm trying to fix the misnested
329:demonstrates the difference clearly. –
262:of the element. On the other hand, the
81:I see your first example, but why use
49:User:Jack who built the house/Smalldiv
754:, but the question remains, why does
532:Block-level tag, correct line spacing
801:, but, if you compare the tables in
733:Why is that? The text is taken from
167:template, please add such a case. –
878:<div style="font-size:85%;": -->
876:'s source code, I see it also uses
851:<div style="font-size:85%;": -->
745:I know there are workarounds using
13:
545:Inline tag, incorrect line spacing
14:
928:
653:Blank lines not always preserved
254:. In block-level elements, the
43:put lists inside the parameter.
1:
625:21:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
591:21:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
503:21:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
391:15:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
357:12:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
339:21:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
324:16:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
233:16:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
218:08:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
177:05:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
152:00:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
133:00:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
111:18:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
77:18:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
61:18:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
909:14:48, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
887:06:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
862:23:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
831:17:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
816:15:19, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
782:13:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
310:and on the test page in the
208:errors occur for a reason.)
7:
735:1773 English cricket season
308:the Russian template's page
10:
933:
306:, as you can see both on
897:Jack who built the house
617:Jack who built the house
495:Jack who built the house
429:
349:Jack who built the house
316:Jack who built the house
210:Jack who built the house
144:Jack who built the house
125:Jack who built the house
53:Jack who built the house
490:ru:Template:Block-small
298:tags, they get a wrong
187:ru:Template:Block-small
121:ru:Template:Block-small
893:this set of test cases
787:I see the lint errors
481:Convenient Discussions
807:the repaired version
803:the original version
302:, which means wrong
272:template creates an
764:behave like this? (
312:section you created
740:...</small: -->
486:...</small: -->
296:...</small: -->
195:...</small: -->
25:: I suggest using
700:But when I apply
553:
453:"font-size: 85%;"
31:<nowiki /: -->
29:trick instead of
27:{{#if: 1 | ... }}
924:
879:
875:
869:
853:
852:...</div: -->
848:
842:
800:
794:
771:
763:
757:
753:
748:
741:
709:
703:
666:
660:
614:
608:
604:
598:
550:
487:
476:
473:
470:
467:
464:
461:
457:
454:
451:
448:
445:
442:
439:
436:
433:
423:
417:
410:
404:
380:
374:
370:
364:
297:
292:
286:
271:
265:
246:
240:
206:
200:
197:and, therefore,
196:
166:
160:
101:in this case? –
100:
94:
90:
84:
32:
28:
932:
931:
927:
926:
925:
923:
922:
921:
877:
873:
867:
850:
846:
840:
798:
792:
789:were fixed here
765:
761:
755:
750:
746:
738:
728:
727:
719:
707:
701:
695:
694:
681:
664:
658:
655:
612:
606:
602:
596:
557:
556:
540:
528:
484:
478:
477:
474:
471:
468:
465:
462:
459:
455:
452:
449:
446:
443:
440:
437:
434:
431:
421:
415:
408:
402:
378:
372:
368:
362:
294:
290:
284:
269:
263:
244:
238:
204:
198:
193:
164:
158:
98:
92:
88:
82:
30:
26:
19:
12:
11:
5:
930:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
752:...</p: -->
739:<small: -->
724:
723:
712:
686:
685:
669:
654:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
555:
554:
542:
541:
537:
529:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
485:<small: -->
430:
413:
295:<small: -->
194:<small: -->
191:
182:
137:
136:
135:
45:
44:
41:
38:
18:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
929:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
890:
889:
888:
885:
883:
872:
865:
864:
863:
860:
858:
845:
838:
834:
833:
832:
828:
824:
819:
818:
817:
814:
812:
808:
804:
797:
790:
786:
785:
784:
783:
780:
778:
773:
769:
760:
747:<br /: -->
743:
736:
731:
722:
718:
715:
711:
706:
698:
691:
684:
680:
676:
672:
668:
663:
657:When I apply
626:
622:
618:
611:
601:
594:
593:
592:
588:
584:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
549:
548:
547:
546:
536:
535:
534:
533:
527:Demonstration
504:
500:
496:
491:
482:
427:
420:
412:
407:
398:
394:
393:
392:
388:
384:
377:
367:
360:
359:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
327:
326:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
289:
282:
278:
276:
268:
261:
257:
253:
251:
243:
236:
235:
234:
230:
226:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
203:
190:
188:
180:
179:
178:
174:
170:
163:
155:
154:
153:
149:
145:
141:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
112:
108:
104:
97:
87:
80:
79:
78:
74:
70:
65:
64:
63:
62:
58:
54:
50:
42:
39:
36:
35:
34:
24:
774:
744:
732:
729:
721:I get this:
720:
716:
713:
699:
696:
688:
683:I get this:
682:
677:
673:
670:
656:
544:
543:
531:
530:
425:
400:
304:line spacing
299:
293:template or
280:
274:
259:
249:
184:
46:
20:
866:Looking at
300:line-height
281:line-height
256:line-height
250:block-level
91:instead of
751:<p: -->
901:Jonesey95
837:Jonesey95
823:Jonesey95
768:Jonesey95
710:to this:
667:to this:
583:Jonesey95
397:Jonesey95
383:Jonesey95
345:test case
331:Jonesey95
279:"small".
260:font-size
225:Jonesey95
169:Jonesey95
117:Jonesey95
103:Jonesey95
69:Jonesey95
23:Jonesey95
882:Bruce1ee
871:smalldiv
857:Bruce1ee
844:smalldiv
811:Bruce1ee
796:smalldiv
777:Bruce1ee
759:smalldiv
705:smalldiv
662:smalldiv
610:smalldiv
376:smalldiv
86:smalldiv
458:Content
399:: : -->
343:In the
277:element
252:element
791:using
772:FYI).
742:tags.
726:100-4.
275:inline
849:with
600:small
475:: -->
469:</
466:: -->
460:</
456:: -->
447:style
438:: -->
426:whole
419:small
406:small
366:small
288:small
267:small
242:small
202:small
183:: -->
162:small
96:small
905:talk
827:talk
805:and
621:talk
587:talk
499:talk
441:<
432:<
387:talk
353:talk
335:talk
320:talk
229:talk
214:talk
173:talk
148:talk
140:Done
129:talk
107:talk
73:talk
57:talk
749:or
181:Hm?
907:)
874:}}
868:{{
847:}}
841:{{
829:)
799:}}
793:{{
762:}}
756:{{
708:}}
702:{{
665:}}
659:{{
623:)
613:}}
607:{{
605:/
603:}}
597:{{
589:)
581:–
501:)
472:ul
463:li
444:li
435:ul
422:}}
416:{{
409:}}
403:{{
389:)
379:}}
373:{{
369:}}
363:{{
355:)
337:)
322:)
291:}}
285:{{
270:}}
264:{{
245:}}
239:{{
231:)
216:)
205:}}
199:{{
175:)
165:}}
159:{{
150:)
142:.
131:)
123:.
109:)
99:}}
93:{{
89:}}
83:{{
75:)
59:)
51:.
903:(
855:—
835:@
825:(
775:—
770::
766:@
619:(
585:(
497:(
450:=
395:@
385:(
351:(
333:(
318:(
227:(
212:(
189:.
171:(
146:(
127:(
115:@
105:(
71:(
55:(
21:@
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.