22:
71:
53:
247:
141:
123:
151:
299:
237:
213:
924:
I don't expect everybody to see problems with the template, especially those who favour the less usable one over the more usable one, but I also don't expect people to not see problems for the sake of personal preference. As you conveniently can't see anything wrong with the template at the moment,
756:
And for what it's worth, I prefer the "white" navbox to the "silver" one because the various font sizes used don't look disproportionate, the links to articles are bigger and not made to fit in as small a space as possible, and the colours used allow for consistency across other navigational boxes.
846:
If four people to one say delete in an AfD debate, it is a consensus, therefore as far as I think, this should be considered as a consensus... we all prefer it, it looks better aesthetically as it's smaller and not unneccessairly wide like the other one. You are the only person who has had an issue
805:
I'm thinking about other people; last time I checked, that wasn't selfishness. Unnecessarily small links with little space between them aren't easy for everybody to click. Also, only the four other people that are aware of this discussion and have commented prefer this infobox, and they aren't
774:
no-one likes your one. It is UGLY. Look at desperate housewives navbox. they use one like ours. Look at One Tree Hills ect. also your "VALID" reasons are oppinions - while you may feel like that others dont. Why shouldn't a votE of been used. That allows people to say witch one they prefur. Stop
882:
That all depends on whether or not anybody knows this discussion exists and whether they use
Knowledge enough to feel the need to make a comment. But the fact that anybody is bringing up any problems should be enough to show that there is something wrong with the current template design.
836:
No, I raised it in a place where it was unlikely to get a response and never said that it was guaranteed to get one. The problems that I raised have not been addressed, so until somebody can comment on why the problems I have brought up are not an issue, the matter is far from settled.
903:
Yes, but while the problems others have with the table using the navbox class are related to how it looks, mine are with the usability of the customised one, and I feel usability is more important than aesthetics; Knowledge is an encyclopaedia after all, not a fansite.
368:
I could easily say the same for the revision that keeps getting reverted to. I think the current design looks tacky and unprofessional. Reasons for why the one that uses the navbox table class looks less aesthetically pleasing?
742:
Sixteen hours is hardly enough time to allow a consensus to be reached, and I don't think a vote should have been used anyway; none of my problems have been addressed (or even brought up) in discussion. I'll be adding this to
824:
You've raised it elsewhere and noone else has involved themself - as far as I'm concerned the matter is settled and the template should stay the same until such time that it is contested by someone other than you.
389:
I'm not sure what you mean by "one or two lines", but the width can be changed, though I think the table looks better when the characters aren't on two lines unnecessarily. Is that the only problem with it?
721:
Can anybody give a good, valid reason for why the "silver" navbox is better than the "white" one, which uses the navbox table class and thus is consistent with other navboxes across
Knowledge?
794:
That is unhelpful, and is quite rude. However, I agree that J Di should accept that the silver one is preferred generally, and therefore should be kept, as he is the only one contesting this. -
591:
470:
308:
223:
335:
some one commented on my page why do i keep removing the skins template of the skins pages - and i havent removed it off anythin - i have a life- i want it on there -
1059:
1064:
1069:
1049:
744:
1054:
1044:
913:
I fail to see the problem with the usability of this template, to be honest I just think you're being slightly pedantic about it now. -
1074:
1029:
179:
929:
919:
908:
898:
887:
877:
866:
853:
841:
831:
810:
800:
761:
737:
394:
384:
373:
363:
1039:
1034:
269:
422:
971:
819:
985:
858:
The outcome of an AfD depends on the weight of votes, not the number. As I have pointed out before, I am the only person
428:
1024:
175:
165:
128:
89:
775:
changing it as no-one else likes it. IT IS SELFISH TO CHANGE SOMETHING THAT JUST YOU DONT LIKE, WHEN MOST PEOPLE DO.-
88:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
602:
260:
218:
673:
558:
412:
273:
351:
1010:
587:
463:
406:
Well, if it's being raised, I'll side with
Trampikey. If you want to do a vote to clear it all up, go ahead.~
78:
58:
347:
It's always nice to see your edits get reverted with no reason given. Does anybody want to give a reason?
925:
I'll come back to this discussion at a later date, hopefully when there are more impartial people around.
33:
698:
689:
678:
529:
651:
378:
It's too long and has one or two lines. I think it looks better compact, instead of stretched amd thin. -
965:
342:
709:
433:
997:
I know this has not brought up discussion for about 10 years, but would it be a good idea to link to
725:
975:
615:
492:
478:
731:
Aesthetics, compactness. Not that a reason needs to be given now a consensus has been reached... -
1006:
595:
459:
357:
Frankly, the one you keep changing it to is less aesthetically pleasing than the current one. -
39:
892:
But that applies also to your template, which at least three people have a problem with... -
981:
815:
Right, so if nobody wants to reply to my last comment, I'll take that as an all clear...
8:
776:
669:
623:
512:
500:
174:-related issues on Knowledge. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
656:
1002:
871:
But surely if anyone else had a problem as strong as yours they would comment also? -
715:
568:
446:
252:
992:
265:
268:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
926:
915:
905:
894:
884:
873:
863:
849:
838:
827:
816:
807:
796:
758:
733:
722:
695:
685:
663:
583:
544:
380:
359:
336:
1018:
643:
635:
520:
508:
579:
156:
639:
619:
611:
607:
516:
488:
484:
264:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about
704:
407:
332:
why did someone change it back to the ugly one??? i like the silver one
246:
70:
52:
847:
with it so far - I think you should just leave it now, to be honest. -
418:
Right... Well, if the width is the only problem, I'll fix it later.
631:
496:
419:
391:
370:
348:
140:
122:
170:, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
84:
747:
in hope that uninvolved editors will give a less biased opinion.
298:
627:
504:
171:
236:
212:
970:
Should the 2nd
Generation not get their own articles now?
862:
that has a problem with the template as it currently is.
326:
242:
146:
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1001:of the articles, and then redirect if necessary?
806:permitted to speak on behalf of everybody else.
1016:
272:. For how to use this banner template, see its
552:
745:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Style issues
1060:Template-Class British television articles
559:
545:
1065:NA-importance British television articles
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1070:British television task force articles
1017:
258:This template is within the scope of
76:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
1050:Template-Class television articles
297:
188:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies
14:
1086:
1055:NA-importance television articles
1045:WikiProject LGBT studies articles
309:the British television task force
191:Template:WikiProject LGBT studies
683:With the vde thing at the top. -
282:Knowledge:WikiProject Television
245:
235:
211:
162:This template is of interest to
149:
139:
121:
69:
51:
20:
1075:WikiProject Television articles
285:Template:WikiProject Television
1030:NA-importance Bristol articles
306:This template is supported by
1:
1011:19:35, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
98:Knowledge:WikiProject Bristol
92:and see a list of open tasks.
1040:Template-Class LGBT articles
1035:WikiProject Bristol articles
101:Template:WikiProject Bristol
7:
440:
429:Which one do people prefer?
10:
1091:
909:17:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
899:20:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
888:19:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
878:21:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
867:21:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
854:21:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
842:19:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
832:19:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
820:19:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
811:19:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
801:19:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
762:09:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
738:17:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
726:15:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
710:14:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
699:21:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
690:21:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
679:21:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
438:
423:08:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
413:23:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
395:22:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
385:22:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
374:21:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
364:21:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
352:21:20, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
1025:NA-Class Bristol articles
986:09:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
930:08:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
920:11:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
536:
482:
457:
443:
305:
230:
134:
64:
46:
166:WikiProject LGBT studies
302:
261:WikiProject Television
588:Unseen Skins episodes
301:
178:or contribute to the
779:20:32 24 March (UTC)
624:Michelle Richardson
513:Michelle Richardson
288:television articles
270:join the discussion
266:television programs
79:WikiProject Bristol
966:Character Articles
860:that has commented
703:Silver, with vde.~
662:as i created it -
530:or this one: White
343:Reverts of my edit
303:
34:content assessment
649:
648:
527:
526:
523:
473:
324:
323:
320:
319:
316:
315:
253:Television portal
206:
205:
202:
201:
116:
115:
112:
111:
1082:
989:
561:
554:
547:
541:
534:
533:
483:
458:
441:
434:This one: Silver
290:
289:
286:
283:
280:
255:
250:
249:
239:
232:
231:
226:
215:
208:
207:
196:
195:
192:
189:
186:
159:
154:
153:
152:
143:
136:
135:
125:
118:
117:
106:
105:
104:Bristol articles
102:
99:
96:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1015:
1014:
995:
979:
968:
718:
659:
654:
603:Main characters
566:
565:
539:
532:
450:
436:
431:
345:
329:
287:
284:
281:
278:
277:
251:
244:
221:
193:
190:
187:
184:
183:
155:
150:
148:
103:
100:
97:
94:
93:
12:
11:
5:
1088:
1078:
1077:
1072:
1067:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1027:
994:
991:
984:comment added
972:147.197.190.40
967:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
767:
766:
765:
764:
751:
750:
749:
748:
719:
717:
714:
713:
712:
701:
692:
681:
664:User:Russell29
658:
655:
653:
650:
647:
646:
626:
605:
599:
598:
584:Jamie Brittain
577:
573:
572:
564:
563:
556:
549:
538:
537:
531:
528:
525:
524:
503:
481:
475:
474:
456:
452:
451:
444:
435:
432:
430:
427:
426:
425:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
344:
341:
340:
339:
337:User:Russell29
333:
328:
325:
322:
321:
318:
317:
314:
313:
304:
294:
293:
291:
257:
256:
240:
228:
227:
216:
204:
203:
200:
199:
197:
161:
160:
144:
132:
131:
126:
114:
113:
110:
109:
107:
90:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1087:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1063:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1020:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
990:
987:
983:
977:
973:
931:
928:
923:
922:
921:
918:
917:
912:
911:
910:
907:
902:
901:
900:
897:
896:
891:
890:
889:
886:
881:
880:
879:
876:
875:
870:
869:
868:
865:
861:
857:
856:
855:
852:
851:
845:
844:
843:
840:
835:
834:
833:
830:
829:
823:
822:
821:
818:
814:
813:
812:
809:
804:
803:
802:
799:
798:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
778:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
763:
760:
755:
754:
753:
752:
746:
741:
740:
739:
736:
735:
730:
729:
728:
727:
724:
711:
708:
707:
702:
700:
697:
693:
691:
688:
687:
682:
680:
677:
675:
671:
665:
661:
660:
645:
644:Abigail Stock
641:
637:
636:Anwar Correll
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
606:
604:
601:
600:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
578:
575:
574:
571:
570:
562:
557:
555:
550:
548:
543:
542:
535:
522:
521:Abigail Stock
518:
514:
510:
509:Anwar Correll
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
480:
477:
476:
472:
468:
466:
461:
454:
453:
449:
448:
442:
439:
424:
421:
417:
416:
415:
414:
411:
410:
396:
393:
388:
387:
386:
383:
382:
377:
376:
375:
372:
367:
366:
365:
362:
361:
356:
355:
354:
353:
350:
338:
334:
331:
330:
311:
310:
300:
296:
295:
292:
275:
274:documentation
271:
267:
263:
262:
254:
248:
243:
241:
238:
234:
233:
229:
225:
220:
217:
214:
210:
209:
198:
194:LGBT articles
181:
177:
173:
169:
168:
167:
158:
147:
145:
142:
138:
137:
133:
130:
127:
124:
120:
119:
108:
91:
87:
86:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
1003:Solitude6nv5
998:
996:
969:
914:
893:
872:
859:
848:
826:
795:
732:
720:
705:
694:Agree Mikey
684:
667:
596:Episode list
580:Bryan Elsley
567:
551:
465:Unseen Skins
464:
460:Episode list
445:
437:
408:
405:
379:
358:
346:
307:
259:
185:LGBT studies
176:project page
164:
163:
157:LGBTQ portal
129:LGBT studies
83:
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
980:—Preceding
640:Effy Stonem
620:Chris Miles
612:Sid Jenkins
608:Tony Stonem
540:This box:
517:Effy Stonem
501:Chris Miles
489:Sid Jenkins
485:Tony Stonem
1019:Categories
592:Soundtrack
479:Characters
471:Soundtrack
279:Television
219:Television
180:discussion
916:Trampikey
895:Trampikey
874:Trampikey
850:Trampikey
828:Trampikey
797:Trampikey
777:Russell29
734:Trampikey
696:Reedy Boy
686:Trampikey
632:Jal Fazer
497:Jal Fazer
381:Trampikey
360:Trampikey
993:Proposal
674:contribs
576:General
467:episodes
455:General
30:template
982:undated
657:Silver:
224:British
95:Bristol
85:Bristol
59:Bristol
716:White:
628:Maxxie
616:Cassie
505:Maxxie
493:Cassie
327:Change
36:scale.
706:Zythe
652:Votes
569:Skins
447:Skins
409:Zythe
172:LGBTQ
28:This
1007:talk
976:talk
927:J Di
906:J Di
885:J Di
864:J Di
839:J Di
817:J Di
808:J Di
759:J Di
723:J Di
670:talk
560:edit
553:talk
546:view
420:J Di
392:J Di
371:J Di
349:J Di
999:all
978:)
1021::
1009:)
672:)(
642:•
638:•
634:•
630:•
622:•
618:•
614:•
610:•
594:•
590:•
586:•
582:•
519:•
515:•
511:•
507:•
499:•
495:•
491:•
487:•
469:•
462:•
222::
1005:(
988:.
974:(
825:-
676:)
668:(
666:-
312:.
276:.
182:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
