113:
85:
39:
21:
488:. Apologies if my utterances to that effect were unduly gnomic and jargonistic, as is not uncommonly the case in these parts. (I also notice I'm entirely inconsistent over time over the imminence of a re-split, mind you, but fortunately the erratic nature of my crystal ball materially affect what I think we should do at this point.)
512:
To put it simply, stub categories need a reasonable population to be useful to editors (WP:WSS uses a threshold of 60-65 stubs as a minimum for a new category). Each stub category has a dedicated template - sometimes (rarely) two or more dedicated templates. There may not be enough UK-med-org stubs
200:
and as such the admins over at SfD put it up for deletion. I have made a copy of the debate below. Basically, it was decided that the category should also include non NHS stubs. If you want to reverse it you will have to start a new SfD discussion and go with whatever consensus comes of that.
407:
Rename category (one way or another). Keep NHS-stub, possibly add additional template as per
Grutness: if there's a lot of private hospitals, medical charities, etc, kicking around we might be splitting the NHS ones back out soon enough.
286:
455:
UK-med-org-stub, as it'll take a long while to be viable separately from the NHS ones. If the type is renamed and rescoped, the NHS-stub template should obviously be kept for clarity, so there'd be no real "information loss".
149:
426:
by expanding abbreviation. I think the NHS has a large enough number of articles to qualify for its own stub category (It is at 98 stubs at the time of writing and still growing). Also, it is a useful marker for the
238:. DO NOT simply ignore WP consensus by re-creating the template. Wholesale changes to templates used on large number of articles can cause severe problems for Knowledge's servers.
50:, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the
173:
NHs stubs are obviously a subclass of UK medical organisation stubs - that is why I have made this reversion, and categorised NHs stubs within UK medical organisation stubs.--
216:
290:
230:
The page is now protected in the form it was after the vote taken through the proper
Knowledge process page. If you wish to argue that decision, do so at
513:
for their own category, but there would be nothing wrong with having both them and the NHS stubs going into one category with a more all-inclusive name.
187:. Creation of new stubs and recategorisation of old ones needs to be approved before they can go ahead, otherwise the admins will just revert you.
255:
428:
119:
90:
205:
525:
281:
269:
Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
541:
Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
400:
391:
191:
501:
497:
I think I will politely back out of this discussion. I think I am way out of my depth, and I'm getting so confused my head hurts. :(
492:
474:
460:
431:
to quickly identify which articles the editors need to work on. Grutness' idea of a UK-med-org-stub might a useful addition as well.
412:
224:
294:
231:
470:", but when I say the same thing the idea is suddenly illogical. Can you please explain if I am missing something? Thank you.
435:
352:
51:
46:
26:
184:
480:
Because I was suggesting an "upmerged" NHS-stub, if the category were to be rescoped, you were proposing a separate
263:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above.
298:
_Category:National_Health_Service_stubs-Extract_of_17th_May_2006_SfD_discussion-2006-05-17T05:59:00.000Z": -->
288:
_Category:National_Health_Service_stubs-Extract_of_17th_May_2006_SfD_discussion-2006-05-17T05:59:00.000Z": -->
250:
177:
155:
419:
303:
376:
369:
197:
443:
440:
359:
320:
356:
310:
124:
98:
8:
519:
385:
244:
334:
168:
498:
471:
432:
345:
202:
188:
235:
485:
397:
349:
196:
I think the creation of this stub missed out the proposal stage as set out in
514:
380:
239:
306:
Wasn't proposed, but used on 74 articles, and looks like a useful child of
484:, which as I say, would not be viable according to the size guidelines in
221:
174:
489:
457:
409:
278:
287:
112:
84:
535:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
38:
20:
468:
Keep NHS-stub, possibly add additional template as per
Grutness
54:, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
375:
or similar, to allow for the addition of such things as the
330:
category to expand abbreviation, possibly rename template (
297:
154:
This article has not yet received a rating on
Knowledge's
466:Can you please clarify something for me? You say "
183:Unfortunately, you will need to take this through
122:, a project which is currently considered to be
444:_Category:National_Health_Service_stubs": -->
441:_Category:National_Health_Service_stubs": -->
436:_Category:National_Health_Service_stubs": -->
420:_Category:National_Health_Service_stubs": -->
360:_Category:National_Health_Service_stubs": -->
357:_Category:National_Health_Service_stubs": -->
353:_Category:National_Health_Service_stubs": -->
304:_Category:National_Health_Service_stubs": -->
134:Knowledge:WikiProject National Health Service
137:Template:WikiProject National Health Service
256:Extract of 17th May 2006 SfD discussion
295:Category:National Health Service stubs
232:Knowledge talk:Stub types for deletion
365:would it be worth enlarging this to
118:This article is within the scope of
120:WikiProject National Health Service
13:
198:Knowledge:Stub#New stub categories
60:Knowledge:WikiProject Stub sorting
14:
553:
63:Template:WikiProject Stub sorting
140:National Health Service articles
111:
83:
37:
19:
234:, or repropose the template at
44:This template is maintained by
274:The result of the debate was
1:
451:There's not much logic to an
7:
10:
558:
153:
106:
32:
538:Please do not modify it.
526:01:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
502:00:54, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
493:00:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
475:00:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
461:23:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
437:22:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
413:07:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
401:07:13, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
392:06:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
377:Voluntary Aid Detachment
354:05:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
282:19:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
266:Please do not modify it.
251:06:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
225:08:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
206:07:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
192:07:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
178:07:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
47:WikiProject Stub sorting
131:National Health Service
91:National Health Service
396:A good idea, I think.
66:Stub sorting articles
215:See new discussion
291:Category:NHS stubs
276:rename and rescope
156:content assessment
522:
388:
247:
166:
165:
162:
161:
78:
77:
74:
73:
549:
540:
520:
445:
442:
421:
386:
374:
368:
361:
358:
339:
333:
325:
319:
315:
309:
305:
299:
289:
268:
245:
142:
141:
138:
135:
132:
115:
108:
107:
102:
95:
87:
80:
79:
68:
67:
64:
61:
58:
41:
34:
33:
23:
16:
15:
557:
556:
552:
551:
550:
548:
547:
546:
545:
536:
429:NHS WikiProject
372:
370:UK-med-org-stub
366:
337:
331:
323:
317:
313:
307:
301:
264:
258:
171:
139:
136:
133:
130:
129:
96:
93:
65:
62:
59:
56:
55:
12:
11:
5:
555:
544:
543:
531:
530:
529:
528:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
416:
415:
405:
404:
403:
300:
285:
272:
271:
259:
257:
254:
228:
227:
211:
210:
209:
208:
170:
167:
164:
163:
160:
159:
152:
146:
145:
143:
116:
104:
103:
88:
76:
75:
72:
71:
69:
42:
30:
29:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
554:
542:
539:
533:
532:
527:
524:
523:
516:
511:
503:
500:
496:
495:
494:
491:
487:
483:
479:
478:
477:
476:
473:
469:
464:
463:
462:
459:
454:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
439:
438:
434:
430:
425:
414:
411:
406:
402:
399:
395:
394:
393:
390:
389:
382:
378:
371:
364:
363:
362:
355:
351:
347:
343:
336:
329:
322:
312:
296:
292:
284:
283:
280:
277:
270:
267:
261:
260:
253:
252:
249:
248:
241:
237:
233:
226:
223:
219:
218:
213:
212:
207:
204:
199:
195:
194:
193:
190:
186:
182:
181:
180:
179:
176:
157:
151:
148:
147:
144:
127:
126:
121:
117:
114:
110:
109:
105:
100:
92:
89:
86:
82:
81:
70:
53:
49:
48:
43:
40:
36:
35:
31:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
537:
534:
518:
481:
467:
465:
452:
423:
418:
417:
384:
341:
327:
321:med-org-stub
302:
275:
273:
265:
262:
243:
229:
214:
172:
123:
57:Stub sorting
52:project page
45:
27:Stub sorting
499:Road Wizard
472:Road Wizard
433:Road Wizard
311:UK-org-stub
203:Road Wizard
189:Road Wizard
453:additional
94:Unassessed
398:Conscious
350:Conscious
346:WP:WSS/ST
169:Reversion
515:Grutness
482:category
381:Grutness
335:NHS-stub
240:Grutness
236:WP:WSS/P
125:inactive
99:inactive
486:WP:STUB
424:Rename
328:Rename
293:-: -->
222:Smerus
175:Smerus
158:scale.
521:wha?
490:Alai
458:Alai
410:Alai
387:wha?
342:list
316:and
279:Alai
246:wha?
217:here
517:...
383:...
344:at
340:),
242:...
185:SfD
150:???
379:?
373:}}
367:{{
348:.
338:}}
332:{{
326:.
324:}}
318:{{
314:}}
308:{{
220:--
422:*
128:.
101:)
97:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
