244:
between static and dynamic columns, as my coding knowledge is limited on that point. But, certainly, you would want to use the template which would work for the majority of browsers. I still think that two columns would be better than three because of the width going off the page (at least in the browser I'm using--Firefox), because if there are three columns, then the font size will be smaller, and I have problems reading smaller font (see WP:ACCESS). I have no qualms about establishing a compromise, I just don't like the way it is now, because it's too wide for my screen.
32:
81:
63:
135:
315:
Yes, it looks better already! There are also a few templates that need to be updated to their current page names, so that it "blacks out" the template name on each /doc pg. On hold, Administrator note and
Bureaucrat note are 3 that I can see, right now. I'll take a look tomorrow too, as it's getting
169:
I have spent time today trying to re-organize this page, and it has been reverted. I changed the columns from three to two, since three was going off the page to the right (it was too wide). I also corrected the code on several of the templates, and removed unnecessary whitespaces. The templates are
243:
I don't see a problem with using "div col" instead of "multicol", in fact, I think it's easier to work with. Sorting by color and size is okay with me too, but there are a few tweaks in reordering that need to be done yet, even when sorting by color and size. I'm not real clear about the difference
190:
We can certainly have a compromise on several of your points there, but before we start, it definitely isn't "more of a mess than what I left it in". If anything, it is exactly in the same "mess", no more no less. I am not saying this to nitpick; but establishing a compromise needs being realistic,
433:
is more flexible and more space-saving, and could be expanded to include the "Specific-use" stuff as separate sections, but doing this – in a way that retains the purpose of using this page as a collapsed page-bottom transclusion in template documentation – would come at the cost of getting rid of
271:
Please the result of my edit, if you haven't: I applied Div Col. It works like a charm on 800×600 screen. (I use
Firesizer in Firefox.) I checked using Firefox developer tool and I see that font size remains the same. Perhaps the smallness of font is how it feels to you. (Or perhaps I am missing
211:
Alphabetical sorting is the worst form of sorting and one that is not helping at all. It is meant to help searching easier when the name is known but that only applies to print material. Nowadays, web browsers are all equipped with search functions. In addition, remember the name of templates is
170:
grouped by color and type of mark. Then, they are alphabetized within their groups. I think that the template should be changed back to my last edit, and if anyone can improve upon this "See also" documentation, then please do. As of right now, it is more of a mess than what I left it in.
436:
Someone more clever and patient than I am could probably figure a way to extract this data into some data sets in the background that were then used on-the-fly to populate both pages in different formats, but this would be a big job and it would make maintenance more difficult.
358:. While I wouldn't build this into every talk page, it's handy to add in collapsed form to the Editnotice of one's user talk page, if one makes frequent use of such tags for one's own discussion/task management purposes, especially with
285:
Now, I'm not against tweaking colwidth or the order of items until we find the sweet spot. If you have anything in mind, or just want to test stuff, please go right ahead. It seem we have an agreement on the majority of stuff right
208:. Static column sizing is deprecated anyway; one of the reasons behind its deprecation is that it always leaves a lot of people unhappy. Like now. We just have to have a compromise on the minimum width of the columns.
96:. This particular template is especially important to the project because it is used in the maintenance of other templates. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
150:
423:
394:
453:
349:
325:
310:
253:
238:
179:
164:
434:
the other page's "Opposite Tag" columns. That doesn't seem like a real loss, since it's just kind of someone's opinion and very incomplete.
419:
403:
396:
389:
215:
About the rest, I concede my point of view. I don't mind about whitespace or whether there is comma or em dash after a link.
97:
448:
380:
344:
93:
88:
68:
416:
43:
141:
408:
337:
306:
234:
445:
377:
49:
429:
Yeah, these are clearly duplicating the same idea, but the formats are radically different.
212:
almost impossible. Sorting them by color and size (current state of affairs) is much better.
321:
249:
175:
8:
302:
230:
17:
440:
371:
202:
362:
317:
245:
171:
80:
62:
92:, a group dedicated to improving the maintenance of Knowledge's
198:
About the columns, we can apply the dynamic column sizing with
134:
354:
moved it so it would be available on my archive pages, too)
86:
This template (like all templates) is within the scope of
272:
something. If you can reproduce, please let me know.)
350:Template:Editnotices/Group/User_talk:SMcCandlish
42:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
14:
397:Knowledge:List of discussion templates
342:I've thought of another use for this:
165:Re-organization of the /See also page
31:
29:
129:
25:
404:separate list of the same templates
48:It is of interest to the following
23:
145:
140:This template was considered for
24:
466:
406:. May be it worth to join them?
345:User talk:SMcCandlish/Editnotice
133:
79:
61:
30:
191:isn't it? Here is what I offer:
106:Knowledge:WikiProject Templates
109:Template:WikiProject Templates
13:
1:
100:and see a list of open tasks.
7:
431:Template talk:Done/See also
390:13:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
326:01:12, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
311:01:06, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
254:00:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
239:00:43, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
180:00:08, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
10:
471:
454:00:48, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
424:18:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
74:
56:
89:WikiProject Templates
148:. The result of the
316:late here. Thanks,
222:What do you think?
112:Templates articles
44:content assessment
18:Template talk:Done
162:
161:
146:2017 September 30
128:
127:
124:
123:
120:
119:
462:
452:
422:
414:
411:
388:
367:
361:
355:
207:
201:
147:
137:
130:
114:
113:
110:
107:
104:
83:
76:
75:
65:
58:
57:
35:
34:
33:
26:
470:
469:
465:
464:
463:
461:
460:
459:
438:
412:
409:
407:
400:
386:
369:
365:
359:
357:
353:
347:
340:
338:Alternative use
205:
199:
167:
111:
108:
105:
102:
101:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
468:
458:
457:
399:
393:
384:
348:
343:
339:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
300:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
228:
224:
223:
219:
218:
217:
216:
213:
209:
193:
192:
187:
186:
166:
163:
160:
159:
138:
126:
125:
122:
121:
118:
117:
115:
84:
72:
71:
66:
54:
53:
47:
36:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
467:
456:
455:
450:
447:
444:
443:
432:
428:
427:
426:
425:
421:
418:
415:
405:
398:
392:
391:
382:
379:
376:
374:
364:
351:
346:
327:
323:
319:
314:
313:
312:
308:
304:
303:Codename Lisa
301:
299:Best regards,
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
231:Codename Lisa
229:
227:Best regards,
226:
225:
221:
220:
214:
210:
204:
197:
196:
195:
194:
189:
188:
184:
183:
182:
181:
177:
173:
157:
153:
152:
143:
139:
136:
132:
131:
116:
99:
95:
91:
90:
85:
82:
78:
77:
73:
70:
67:
64:
60:
59:
55:
51:
45:
41:
37:
28:
27:
19:
441:
435:
430:
401:
372:
341:
168:
155:
149:
87:
50:WikiProjects
39:
442:SMcCandlish
402:There is a
395:Merge with
373:SMcCandlish
318:Funandtrvl
246:Funandtrvl
172:Funandtrvl
151:discussion
98:discussion
258:Hi again.
103:Templates
94:templates
69:Templates
410:DAVRONOV
142:deletion
40:template
203:Div col
363:Resbox
46:scale.
154:was "
38:This
16:<
413:A.A.
322:talk
307:talk
286:now.
250:talk
235:talk
176:talk
156:keep
451:😼
387:ⱷ≼
383:≽ⱷ҅
185:Hi.
144:on
439:—
370:—
368:.
366:}}
360:{{
324:)
309:)
252:)
237:)
206:}}
200:{{
178:)
158:".
449:¢
446:☏
420:⚑
417:✉
385:ᴥ
381:¢
378:☏
375:☺
356:.
352:(
320:(
305:(
248:(
233:(
174:(
52::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
