253:
235:
263:
22:
81:
53:
183:
203:
352:
box in the interurbans page? I'm just not following how that's useful. I get how history is useful. The pages for the interurbans are very useful and interesting. And I think those articles should be linked from the lines in qusetion (you'll notice I linked to on from the yellow line as applicalbe). I just don't get the connection when listing all the current lines. --Tedernst
95:
453:
SPUI, did you read the guideline page I linked? Please let us know how you see the interurbans in this box fitting in with the guideline, or if this is a special case that doesn't fit in the guideline, please explain that to. Saying it just should be one way doesn't make it so. Please explain your
351:
I don't understand that. The el is a current system so having a box on the current lines showing other current lines is logical and useful. The interurbans have never been part of that system, having ceased to exist as this system was created. And why would it make sense to put the current lines
325:
yes, the interurbans operated on the tracks now known as a el. How does that make them on-topic for a box that lists the current el lines? I'm fine with the current lines having information about their history and links to the interurban articles, but there's no reason for them to be in this box,
372:
The el is not a system that has existed since 1892. There were many different train lines that eventually were unified. The box is called CTA and is labeled
Chicago Transit Authority and Chicago L. The Chicago L page doesn't even mention the interurbans at all. It does say the oldest segments
510:
Hey, this ranks about 5,678,837th on the list of most important things to fix on
Knowledge, but ... what's the rationale behind the current order in which the lines are listed on this template? When I re-added Pink Line, I put it right after Red Line, as the order appears to be the visible light
412:
The defunct lines and names no longer in use are an interesting historical topic, but it seems rather silly to include them in the template, which needs to be kept rather minimal as it appears on several pages. Is the suggestion that the CTA template should include links to the rest of the CTA
495:
article. However, this template is also used on several CTA articles and a left-aligned table often conflicts with the table of contents on these articles. I would suggest either creating a new left-aligned template or otherwise removing it completely from the
Chicago article. --
463:
Thanks for renaming the template and making the el the focus. I like those changes. I still don't understand how the interurbans articles fit in with the blue line, red line, etc articles per the guideline page for boxes. Help me understand your reasoning?
402:
where it talks about how to use series boxes. I don't see how the articles about interurbans fit in with the articles about the CTA lines and thus should be linked through this box. Could you please let me know how you see things in light of this link?
511:
spectrum (ROY-G-BIV), with brown added at the end. Would it not make more sense, though, to put them in chronological order of when service began, or in alphabetical order? Or maybe I have OCD. Just throwing it out there.
356:
The way I see it, the el is a system that has existed since 1892, and the navbox should reflect that, as it is better to add the small amount of removed lines to the box than to make a separate box for those.
473:
This is still the template for the
Chicago L, and as such has all the lines on it. It needs to be kept short, because its a template, and the former interurbans are much more properly grouped with
373:
date to 1892, but that's hardly the same thing. It's clearly talking about a present day system. What's the wikipedia policy on disagreements such as these?
604:
336:
Why should the box be limited to current el lines? It should list former lines as well, which includes the interurbans that operated along the el. --
669:
689:
674:
694:
399:
554:
652:
638:
613:
598:
579:
520:
699:
679:
709:
445:
432:
392:
345:
714:
684:
584:
719:
704:
491:
The alignment for this template was changed from right to left a few times, apparently because of flow problems with the
212:
67:
500:
133:
129:
192:
63:
515:
481:
468:
458:
417:
407:
377:
330:
277:
240:
643:
413:
services (i.e. bus lines)? If so, it would be rather pointless as there aren't any articles to reference.
125:
116:
58:
33:
366:
287:
492:
39:
649:
635:
624:
610:
595:
576:
551:
497:
8:
525:
486:
588:
512:
383:
The box is about the L. The link to the CTA is because the CTA relates to the L. --
320:
646:
632:
607:
592:
573:
548:
561:
544:
528:
428:
388:
362:
341:
268:
121:
663:
505:
478:
465:
455:
442:
414:
404:
374:
327:
137:
104:
252:
234:
565:
532:
80:
52:
423:
Nah, it should be a template about rail operations in the El system. --
424:
384:
358:
337:
540:
536:
124:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
569:
283:
182:
474:
202:
120:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
587:
does not quite work either. I propose a new article called
128:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
94:
282:, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
326:
nor for the box to appear on the interurbans pages.
258:
661:
477:and its lines than with the current CTA trains.
585:Right-of-way (transportation)#Rail right-of-way
400:Knowledge:Categories, lists, and series boxes
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
670:Template-Class rail transport articles
662:
690:Template-Class Rapid transit articles
675:NA-importance rail transport articles
274:This template is within the scope of
114:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
695:NA-importance Rapid transit articles
521:Yellow Line (CTA) Red Line (CTA) etc
15:
165:Associated projects or task forces:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
700:WikiProject Rapid transit articles
201:
181:
14:
731:
680:Template-Class Stations articles
261:
251:
233:
93:
79:
51:
20:
710:Template-Class Chicago articles
715:NA-importance Chicago articles
210:This template is supported by
190:This template is supported by
1:
685:WikiProject Stations articles
296:Knowledge:WikiProject Chicago
134:WikiProject Trains to do list
720:WikiProject Chicago articles
705:All WikiProject Trains pages
639:20:48, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
614:20:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
516:23:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
482:17:51, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
469:17:03, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
459:06:15, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
446:15:25, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
433:03:00, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
418:23:42, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
408:21:02, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
393:20:55, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
378:15:52, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
299:Template:WikiProject Chicago
146:Knowledge:WikiProject Trains
7:
599:01:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
580:23:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
555:17:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
367:20:38, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
346:16:05, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
331:16:02, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
149:Template:WikiProject Trains
10:
736:
653:02:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
564:does not make any sense.
543:won't do. But what about
288:Chicago metropolitan area
246:
213:WikiProject Rapid transit
209:
189:
164:
160:
74:
46:
572:are not helpful either.
454:reasoning. Thank you.
501:21:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
152:rail transport articles
547:? There is a problem.
206:
186:
205:
185:
193:WikiProject Stations
605:level grade railway
278:WikiProject Chicago
398:I've been reading
207:
187:
117:WikiProject Trains
34:content assessment
630:Can you help out?
526:Yellow Line (CTA)
318:
317:
314:
313:
310:
309:
228:
227:
224:
223:
220:
219:
112:
111:
727:
628:
589:at-grade railway
560:In this context
304:
303:
302:Chicago articles
300:
297:
294:
271:
266:
265:
264:
255:
248:
247:
237:
230:
229:
172:
162:
161:
154:
153:
150:
147:
144:
97:
88:
87:
83:
76:
75:
70:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
735:
734:
730:
729:
728:
726:
725:
724:
660:
659:
625:SmokeDetector47
622:
603:I also propose
523:
508:
498:SmokeDetector47
489:
323:
301:
298:
295:
292:
291:
267:
262:
260:
170:
151:
148:
145:
142:
141:
113:
99:
98:
61:
12:
11:
5:
733:
723:
722:
717:
712:
707:
702:
697:
692:
687:
682:
677:
672:
658:
657:
656:
655:
631:
629:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
562:street running
545:street running
529:Red Line (CTA)
522:
519:
507:
504:
488:
485:
451:
450:
449:
448:
436:
435:
396:
395:
370:
369:
349:
348:
322:
319:
316:
315:
312:
311:
308:
307:
305:
273:
272:
269:Chicago portal
256:
244:
243:
238:
226:
225:
222:
221:
218:
217:
208:
198:
197:
188:
178:
177:
175:
173:
167:
166:
158:
157:
155:
122:rail transport
110:
109:
100:
92:
91:
86:
84:
72:
71:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
732:
721:
718:
716:
713:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
693:
691:
688:
686:
683:
681:
678:
676:
673:
671:
668:
667:
665:
654:
651:
648:
645:
642:
641:
640:
637:
634:
626:
621:
615:
612:
609:
606:
602:
601:
600:
597:
594:
590:
586:
583:
582:
581:
578:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
558:
557:
556:
553:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
527:
518:
517:
514:
503:
502:
499:
494:
484:
483:
480:
476:
471:
470:
467:
461:
460:
457:
447:
444:
440:
439:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:
420:
419:
416:
410:
409:
406:
401:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
376:
368:
364:
360:
355:
354:
353:
347:
343:
339:
335:
334:
333:
332:
329:
306:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
270:
259:
257:
254:
250:
249:
245:
242:
239:
236:
232:
231:
215:
214:
204:
200:
199:
195:
194:
184:
180:
179:
176:
174:
169:
168:
163:
159:
156:
139:
138:Trains Portal
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
118:
108:
107:
106:
105:Trains Portal
101:
96:
90:
89:
85:
82:
78:
77:
73:
69:
68:Rapid transit
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
566:Ground level
524:
509:
490:
472:
462:
452:
411:
397:
371:
350:
324:
276:
275:
211:
191:
132:. See also:
126:project page
115:
103:
102:
40:WikiProjects
29:
533:Grade level
513:Wiki Wistah
664:Categories
647:Peter Horn
633:Peter Horn
608:Peter Horn
593:Peter Horn
574:Peter Horn
549:Peter Horn
130:discussion
650:User talk
636:User talk
611:User talk
596:User talk
577:User talk
552:User talk
487:Alignment
644:At grade
541:at-grade
537:at grade
466:Tedernst
456:Tedernst
405:Tedernst
375:Tedernst
328:Tedernst
321:Untitled
136:and the
64:Stations
30:template
570:surface
493:Chicago
293:Chicago
286:or the
284:Chicago
241:Chicago
143:Trains
59:Trains
36:scale.
531:etc.
506:Order
479:siafu
475:Metra
443:siafu
441:Why?
415:siafu
28:This
568:and
535:and
429:talk
425:SPUI
389:talk
385:SPUI
363:talk
359:SPUI
342:talk
338:SPUI
539:or
666::
591:.
431:)
391:)
365:)
357:--
344:)
171:/
66:/
62::
627::
623:@
427:(
387:(
361:(
340:(
290:.
216:.
196:.
140:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
