1212:(1. it hasn't changed all that much since 2014, and, 2. by your logic, no statement on Knowledge should be made in present simple tense as all things are potentially subject to change and all sources have by definition been written in the past). Now you're contesting the meaning of the phrase itself, and the syntax of the description, saying "Even if we were to accept that this description is current, we would still need to say "described". "Pro-market" can mean different things, so we can ever really say anyone *is* pro-market." By that logic, we cannot definitively claim anything *is* anything, since every source will by definition contain a description which could conceivably be incorrect. By this logic, you should be insisting on rewriting half the article.
1432:, however, let me just point out that it is SDS party dogma that all prominent media organisations both at home and even abroad constitute part of the leftist political opposition to the party - do you really think an interlocutor who is a supporter or member of SDS would find 24ur or Dnevnik or Svet24 or RTV any more "hygienic" than Mladina? As I've noted, even "biased" sources (sources with a clear editorial stance) are entirely acceptable as per Reliable sources criteria, so your objection/suggestion is not only merely a matter of cosmetics, but a futile one at that.
575:
673:
649:
683:
243:
222:
253:
1047:
quoted as a political scientist although he's trained as a sociologist; and he's the sole and only reference in this regard (the other article quotes Rizman and bases his whole analysis on him - so it's Rizman all over again, with a detour). Jambrek's quote doesn't refer at all to the period 1996-2000 (when he was in fact a supporter of the party), but to the period of the economic populist turn (ie. 2009-2011): check the date and the quotes.
565:
544:
191:
1238:"SDS is pro-market" would require a lot better sourcing, in my opinion, than a blog post from 2014 and the claims of the party themselves. As you point out, whether or not "pro-market" means anything and what it should be applied to is the domain of economists. If we had several economists stating that SDS is pro-market (and had found none explicitly disagreeing) then this would be good sourcing for such a bold statement.
745:
777:
992:
I guess it's because in Europe, differently from the U.S., conservativism was historically not neccessarily liberal (that is, pro-free makret, individual freedom, etc.); an important part of
European conservativism has been anti-Capitalistic, and before World War Two also anti-democratic. That is why
824:
Is Janša's communist background really relevant in this case? At the time, the only way to enter politics was by joining the
Communist Party, and virtually all of the major political figures in Slovenia have some sort of a communist background. Also, Janša was prosecuted for his critics of the Party
1266:
Alright. I modified the section to use more equivocal language. Dating the claims does not appear to be the precedent on
Knowledge, so claims are generally assumed to be current until updated (consider what such pedantic standards would mean for e.g. scientific articles where the accepted dogma may
1241:
Perhaps I wasn't clear on what I meant by "more meaningful". I don't want to get into a philosophical debate. I just meant that the meanings of "privatisation", "de-regulation" etc are much clearer. Furthermore, we have several sources stating that SDS is in favour of those things, so lets state
1211:
By the way, don't you think you're taking this a bit too far, really? First you objected on the grounds of the source not being independent (which it was). Then you objected based on the age of the reference (4 years), claiming "SDS has changed a lot over the years so I think the date is important"
1046:
Hey y'all! I have some problems with the section "Radical
Populist Turn". If I remember correctly, the section used to be called "Conservative Turn" which is more neutral. There's little sourcing for the party's radical populism of that period: and the two mentioned are problematic. Rudi Rizman is
1280:
Seeing that many
Knowledge articles have no inline citations, I think the claim passes the burden of proof by itself. However, the claim is bolstered by the context of the article; that is listing the pro-market policies the party has advocated bolsters the claim by putting it in a clear context
943:
etc.). But if you take in account their programs and policies, I'm not sure how compatible they are. Someone who promoted a program similar to the SDP, would probably be left-of-the-centre in U.S. politics. In the
European context, I'd say that the SDP policies are the closest to the Portuguese
1328:
Sorry about the "blog post" comment. The format/software used by the democratic society is that of a blog. Nonetheless, this should be treated as the considered opinion of potentially notable organisation. I don't want to imply that this is the throwaway comment of some random person on the
1205:
So what exactly is your question? I think the phrase "pro-market" is quite well understood to refer to policies which generally promote a free market economy/economic liberalisation. What do you consider a "more meaningful" discussion? I'll leave the intellectual exercises regarding what exact
1183:
I think this term could mean different things to different people. For example, if the government regulates mergers to ensure competition between companies, is this "pro-market" because a market requires competition, or is it the opposite, because it is government interference in the capital
1427:
In some instances, Mladina is used in the /* Criticism and controversies */ section where biased notable sources are entirely acceptable in any case, in other instances, it is used to back up basic statements of fact (some of which simply went unreferenced before I sought out sources for the
1298:
International (English-language) media does not pay much attention to day-to-day party political affairs. Some specific policy proposals of the party may have been reported in
English by STA, RTVSLO, or Slovenia Times. However, most concrete examples would likely need to be translated from
1267:
always be changed at any moment - after all, all claims are potentially erroneous in light of newer information). Just to be clear, the source was not a "blog post", but a profile of the party by a non-profit NGO (apparently) specialising in
European political affairs analysis.
1406:
tags to the article. It is against basic writing hygiene to use the leftist
Mladina to source an article on their political adversary. Not only is it impossible to distinguish fact from fiction in such clearly ideological sources, but the whole perspective is most probably
1336:
Amusingly, looking at that old post of mine, I can see I use the phrase "advocates for the free market", which is basically the same as "is pro market"! All I can offer in my defence is that I was using a short hand on a talk page and not writing an encyclopedia
1023:
Oh I see! You should add this information to the article about
Liberal conservatism. So it is pretty much conservatism with elements of free market and more individual freedom. Then I guess we don't need to have Conservatism mentioned in the party's ideology.
919:
Thanks a lot. So SDP would be comparable to Republican Party in US and American conservatism, right? I already read that article, but it is really confusing - it doesn't clearly say what is the meaning of the term in modern European politics.
1428:
article). Mladina has a good online article archive, so it was a handy source for the pre-2010 period. For the more general discussion of why I think Mladina is generally a reasonably acceptable source regardless, refer back to our exchange
1299:
Slovene-language news articles. I may add more details on the party's policy proposals/positions in the future, however, I think the article does give sufficient information to satisfy the standards of an encyclopedic overview as is.
1366:"Pro-market" is always "deregulation, privatisation, tax cuts and labour market flexibility" because any government interference never brings more competition, then they ruin in the end. That's how everyone understands the term. --
897:, not liberal in the American sense of the word) in the economic sense, promoting economic freedom and individual responsibility, and a reform of the classical welfare state while maintaining some kind of security net. Check out
153:
938:
Yes, it would be comparable insofar as they are both on the right side of the left-right division of the political spectrum. This is important also because of international relations (the SDP gets support from the
1187:
As Jay points out, there are lots of sources that talk about SDS favouring deregulation, privatisation, tax cuts and labour market flexibility. So let us talk about those more meaningful things instead.
974:
I see...I only don't understand why isn't liberal conservatism simply called conservatism - it seems same to me - conservative on moral and social issues, free-market policy on economic issues. --
1100:
878:
In what meaning is liberal conservatism listed here? As Conservative on moral and social issues, or as more libertarian, promoting individual liberty with economic freedom? Thanks --
147:
1118:
1114:
1410:
Mladina is used in as much as 69 instances. This source should be replaced with a more reliable one and the material should be left out if there is no replacement available. --
631:
858:
1. Its name SDS was most of the time of its history read as 'Social-Democrat Party'. They changed it only a few months ago to 'Slovenian Democratic Party'.
1507:
861:
2. Now it may be a member of EPP, but at first it applied for a membership of another EU party - either Socialists or Liberals (I can not remember which).
521:
1235:
Yes "SDS has been described as broadly pro-market" is correct. I would prefer "In 2014 SDS was described as broadly pro-market", but either is correct.
1033:
1014:
983:
965:
929:
910:
44:
735:
309:
754:
659:
1005:
etc., frequently based on religious and traditional hierarchic values rather than on liberal values that have inspired the American constitution)
383:
370:
1348:
1308:
1253:
1226:
1512:
1166:
865:
1502:
1497:
1482:
1206:
policies promote a free market and which don't to the economists/philosophers of economics and go with what sources state for the time being.
1177:
729:
621:
518:
1375:
376:
168:
1487:
1477:
135:
79:
1467:
509:
498:
299:
1199:
1096:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1056:
887:
1472:
597:
354:
1517:
1492:
1462:
845:
513:
379:
85:
129:
868:
825:
in the infamous Trial of the Four and he doesn't associate himself with his communist past. Besides, other party articles (
1447:
1429:
705:
275:
1367:
1217:
Just to get this strait; you'd consent if the phrasing was changed to "SDS has been described as broadly pro-market."?
945:
940:
588:
549:
125:
30:
1330:
436:
334:
1078:
344:
339:
361:
329:
175:
1061:
469:
99:
1414:
1117:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1171:
1086:
696:
654:
266:
227:
104:
20:
873:
826:
490:
397:
74:
993:
in Europe, liberal conservativism is a rather different tradition from mere conservativism (which was often
819:
1161:
494:
202:
1390:
1052:
1010:
961:
906:
830:
65:
1325:
I can accept the article as it is now. Thank you for discussing it and coming to a compromise solution.
1136:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
141:
1285:. Thus, the reader can infer the validity of the general claim from subsequent more contextual details.
1077:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1070:
24:
838:
1281:
without having to reference the specific policies in direct relation to the more general statement
392:
704:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
596:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
274:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1152:
450:
386:
190:
109:
1121:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1371:
1137:
1074:
1048:
1006:
957:
902:
850:
802:
809:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
1408:
1124:
1041:
444:
208:
893:
Both, in fact: conservative in regards to moral issues and traditional values, and liberal (
1144:
898:
502:
8:
1443:
1304:
1222:
810:
580:
55:
1344:
1249:
1195:
1103:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
70:
1143:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
474:
1381:
1029:
979:
925:
894:
883:
423:
51:
801:] The anchor (#Disintegration of Yugoslavia) is no longer available because it was
789:
478:
455:
161:
688:
484:
428:
417:
258:
1439:
1300:
1218:
1002:
405:
1109:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
432:
1456:
1361:
1340:
1245:
1191:
1090:
998:
1087:
https://archive.is/20120801150748/http://volitve.gov.si/dz2011/en/index.html
459:
1400:
1025:
975:
921:
879:
842:
593:
1422:
1411:
1329:
internet, which is a meaning of that can be taken from the word "blog".
1110:
413:
682:
672:
648:
994:
797:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
953:
409:
949:
701:
463:
271:
242:
221:
864:
Please someone with accurate information add this to the article.
564:
543:
1081:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
855:
Two things should be mentioned about the history of SDS:
744:
834:
1331:
I have been at the other end of this issue in the past
160:
700:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
678:
592:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
570:
270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
248:
15:
1180:let's talk about the use of the term "pro-market".
1113:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
734:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1454:
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1099:This message was posted before February 2018.
174:
1508:Unknown-importance political party articles
377:Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands
188:
1091:http://volitve.gov.si/dz2011/en/index.html
1069:I have just modified one external link on
1242:that they are in favour of those things.
1455:
1513:Political parties task force articles
1503:Start-Class political party articles
1498:Unknown-importance politics articles
1483:Low-importance Conservatism articles
771:
694:This article is within the scope of
586:This article is within the scope of
264:This article is within the scope of
184:
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
941:International Republican Institute
743:
606:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism
14:
1529:
1488:WikiProject Conservatism articles
1478:Start-Class Conservatism articles
1073:. Please take a moment to review
609:Template:WikiProject Conservatism
437:Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
1468:Mid-importance Slovenia articles
775:
681:
671:
647:
573:
563:
542:
321:WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:
251:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
626:This article has been rated as
304:This article has been rated as
1473:All WikiProject Slovenia pages
714:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
284:Knowledge:WikiProject Slovenia
1:
1518:WikiProject Politics articles
1493:Start-Class politics articles
1463:Start-Class Slovenia articles
1448:11:43, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
1415:03:13, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
1167:05:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
752:This article is supported by
717:Template:WikiProject Politics
708:and see a list of open tasks.
600:and see a list of open tasks.
287:Template:WikiProject Slovenia
278:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
846:21:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
841:) do not include such data.
755:Political parties task force
505:Selected article and picture
7:
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
1534:
1130:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1071:Slovenian Democratic Party
1066:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
869:11:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
736:project's importance scale
632:project's importance scale
310:project's importance scale
25:Slovenian Democratic Party
1376:19:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
1057:13:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
751:
733:
666:
625:
558:
398:Russia–Slovenia relations
316:
303:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1349:13:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
1309:12:47, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
1254:11:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
1227:11:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
1200:09:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
1034:20:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
1015:20:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
984:19:17, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
966:19:12, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
930:15:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
911:15:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
888:01:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
589:WikiProject Conservatism
1062:External links modified
946:Social Democratic Party
748:
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
874:Liberal conservatism?
747:
612:Conservatism articles
522:requested photographs
445:Education in Slovenia
100:Neutral point of view
1111:regular verification
899:Liberal conservatism
697:WikiProject Politics
267:WikiProject Slovenia
105:No original research
1101:After February 2018
581:Conservatism portal
514:unassessed articles
1391:unreliable sources
1155:InternetArchiveBot
1106:InternetArchiveBot
820:Janša's background
749:
512:the quality of 35
485:Portal maintenance
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1386:I have added the
1131:
1049:Viator slovenicus
1007:Viator slovenicus
958:Viator slovenicus
903:Viator slovenicus
895:classical liberal
817:
816:
803:deleted by a user
792:in most browsers.
770:
769:
766:
765:
762:
761:
720:politics articles
660:Political parties
642:
641:
638:
637:
537:
536:
533:
532:
529:
528:
290:Slovenia articles
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1525:
1426:
1405:
1399:
1395:
1389:
1365:
1165:
1156:
1129:
1128:
1107:
811:Reporting errors
779:
778:
772:
722:
721:
718:
715:
712:
691:
686:
685:
675:
668:
667:
662:
651:
644:
643:
614:
613:
610:
607:
604:
583:
578:
577:
576:
567:
560:
559:
554:
546:
539:
538:
479:Siddharta (band)
364:
355:tasks you can do
318:
317:
292:
291:
288:
285:
282:
261:
256:
255:
254:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
216:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1453:
1452:
1420:
1403:
1397:
1393:
1387:
1384:
1359:
1174:
1159:
1154:
1122:
1115:have permission
1105:
1079:this simple FaQ
1064:
1044:
952:, or the Irish
876:
853:
822:
813:
795:
794:
793:
776:
719:
716:
713:
710:
709:
689:Politics portal
687:
680:
657:
611:
608:
605:
602:
601:
579:
574:
572:
552:
475:Gregorij Rožman
429:Edvard Ravnikar
418:Predjama Castle
360:
349:
289:
286:
283:
280:
279:
259:Slovenia portal
257:
252:
250:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1531:
1521:
1520:
1515:
1510:
1505:
1500:
1495:
1490:
1485:
1480:
1475:
1470:
1465:
1451:
1450:
1436:
1433:
1383:
1382:Biased sources
1380:
1379:
1378:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1338:
1334:
1326:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1243:
1239:
1236:
1230:
1229:
1214:
1213:
1208:
1207:
1173:
1170:
1149:
1148:
1141:
1094:
1093:
1085:Added archive
1063:
1060:
1043:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1018:
1017:
1003:traditionalist
989:
988:
987:
986:
969:
968:
948:, the Finnish
935:
934:
933:
932:
914:
913:
875:
872:
852:
851:History of SDS
849:
821:
818:
815:
814:
808:
807:
806:
790:case-sensitive
784:
783:
782:
780:
768:
767:
764:
763:
760:
759:
750:
740:
739:
732:
726:
725:
723:
706:the discussion
693:
692:
676:
664:
663:
652:
640:
639:
636:
635:
628:Low-importance
624:
618:
617:
615:
598:the discussion
585:
584:
568:
556:
555:
553:Low‑importance
547:
535:
534:
531:
530:
527:
526:
525:
524:
516:
506:
481:
466:
447:
439:
420:
406:Inner Carniola
400:
389:
351:Here are some
348:
347:
342:
337:
332:
326:
323:
322:
314:
313:
306:Mid-importance
302:
296:
295:
293:
276:the discussion
263:
262:
246:
234:
233:
231:Mid‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1530:
1519:
1516:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1506:
1504:
1501:
1499:
1496:
1494:
1491:
1489:
1486:
1484:
1481:
1479:
1476:
1474:
1471:
1469:
1466:
1464:
1461:
1460:
1458:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1435:Kind regards,
1434:
1431:
1424:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1413:
1409:
1402:
1392:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1363:
1358:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1339:
1335:
1332:
1327:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1284:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1244:
1240:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1215:
1210:
1209:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1179:
1169:
1168:
1163:
1158:
1157:
1146:
1142:
1139:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1126:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1102:
1097:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1067:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1042:possible bias
1035:
1031:
1027:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
999:authoritarian
996:
991:
990:
985:
981:
977:
973:
972:
971:
970:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
942:
937:
936:
931:
927:
923:
918:
917:
916:
915:
912:
908:
904:
900:
896:
892:
891:
890:
889:
885:
881:
871:
870:
867:
862:
859:
856:
848:
847:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
812:
804:
800:
799:
798:
791:
787:
781:
774:
773:
757:
756:
746:
742:
741:
737:
731:
728:
727:
724:
707:
703:
699:
698:
690:
684:
679:
677:
674:
670:
669:
665:
661:
656:
653:
650:
646:
645:
633:
629:
623:
620:
619:
616:
599:
595:
591:
590:
582:
571:
569:
566:
562:
561:
557:
551:
548:
545:
541:
540:
523:
520:
517:
515:
511:
507:
504:
500:
499:announcements
496:
492:
488:
486:
482:
480:
476:
473:
471:
467:
465:
461:
457:
456:Ajdovi žganci
454:
452:
448:
446:
443:
440:
438:
434:
430:
427:
425:
421:
419:
415:
411:
407:
404:
403:Unreferenced:
401:
399:
396:
394:
390:
388:
385:
384:Metlika black
381:
378:
374:
372:
368:
367:
366:
363:
358:
357:
356:
346:
343:
341:
338:
336:
333:
331:
328:
327:
325:
324:
320:
319:
315:
311:
307:
301:
298:
297:
294:
277:
273:
269:
268:
260:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
218:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1385:
1368:85.249.40.80
1282:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1175:
1172:"Pro-market"
1153:
1150:
1125:source check
1104:
1098:
1095:
1068:
1065:
1045:
877:
863:
860:
857:
854:
823:
796:
788:Anchors are
785:
753:
695:
627:
603:Conservatism
594:conservatism
587:
550:Conservatism
495:Did you know
483:
468:
449:
441:
422:
402:
391:
369:
353:
352:
350:
305:
265:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
433:Škofja Loka
414:Pavel Golia
199:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
1457:Categories
1407:distorted.
1176:Following
1162:Report bug
995:autocratic
460:Čop Street
1440:Jay Hodec
1301:Jay Hodec
1219:Jay Hodec
1184:markets?
1145:this tool
1138:this tool
954:Fine Gael
410:Litostroj
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1362:Yaris678
1341:Yaris678
1337:article!
1246:Yaris678
1192:Yaris678
1151:Cheers.—
950:Kokoomus
711:Politics
702:politics
655:Politics
519:Take/Add
464:Radenska
371:Requests
281:Slovenia
272:Slovenia
228:Slovenia
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1075:my edit
1026:Novis-M
976:Novis-M
922:Novis-M
880:Novis-M
866:NikNovi
843:edolen1
805:before.
630:on the
503:suggest
489:Update
442:Expand:
424:Cleanup
335:history
308:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1423:TadejM
1412:TadejM
1283:per se
510:assess
501:, and
393:Wikify
205:scale.
126:Google
1178:this,
508:Help
451:Stubs
362:watch
345:purge
340:watch
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1444:talk
1430:here
1396:and
1372:talk
1345:talk
1305:talk
1250:talk
1223:talk
1196:talk
1053:talk
1030:talk
1011:talk
980:talk
962:talk
926:talk
907:talk
884:talk
786:Tip:
491:News
470:NPOV
387:(sl)
380:(sl)
330:edit
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1438:-J
1401:POV
1119:RfC
1089:to
839:SLS
835:NSi
827:LDS
730:???
622:Low
365:):
300:Mid
176:TWL
1459::
1446:)
1404:}}
1398:{{
1394:}}
1388:{{
1374:)
1347:)
1307:)
1252:)
1225:)
1198:)
1132:.
1127:}}
1123:{{
1055:)
1032:)
1024:--
1013:)
1001:,
997:,
982:)
964:)
956:.
928:)
920:--
909:)
901:.
886:)
837:,
833:,
831:SD
829:,
658::
497:,
493:,
477:,
462:,
458:,
435:,
431:,
416:,
412:,
408:,
382:,
375:,
156:)
54:;
1442:(
1425::
1421:@
1370:(
1364::
1360:@
1343:(
1333:.
1303:(
1248:(
1221:(
1194:(
1164:)
1160:(
1147:.
1140:.
1051:(
1028:(
1009:(
978:(
960:(
924:(
905:(
882:(
758:.
738:.
634:.
487::
472::
453::
426::
395::
373::
359:(
312:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
