74:
53:
546:. I've admitted to my mistake and I actually learnt something extra about Knowledge Policy (re non-free images), normally I'd thank you but your manner is so odiously belligerent a compliment might go to your head. You on the other hand have zero humility; you feel the need to deny a blatant fact when it is presented to you; because to you admitting a mistake is a sign of weakness and that really isn't/shouldn't be the case. At the end of the day all I am saying is you should maybe consider the way you revert edits when necessary, you clearly feel threatened by such a criticism. That isn't rational.
458:
be the second time as well. I don't understand why you did this twice in a row, is it a belligerent attitude of "What I'm doing is right, I don't need to explain myself"? Or that you just didn't think/care/you could only see your point of view and not understand why someone else was questioning you? As editors we have a duty to avoid edit warring and we do this through clear communication, this is why I used your talk page and this talk page as well as being a bit clearer then yourself in the edit log. You did not, make sufficient efforts to avoid an edit war, indeed you actively broke
215:
22:
318:
492:
I don't have a failure to understand, once you'd actually cited the policies correctly I could tell that your reversion was in compliance with Wiki policy because there was something to refer to. Just because you might know all the acronyms in this area of Wiki policy does not mean that everyone else
457:
You did not link the policies straight away for others (including myself) to verify that what you were doing was correct, you merely posted a series of acronyms in the edit log repeatedly: If it was an insufficient means of communicating what you were trying to say the first time, then it is going to
264:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
194:
I'm not sure the list is accurate for 1945-1951 and possible not also for 1951-1955. From memory of reading, the "shadow cabinet" in 1945-1951 was a grouping of senior ex ministers without speciic portfolios but rather speaking on a variety of topics (though inevitably with a bit of specialisation by
399:
keeps deleting it without giving clear reasons as to why or linking to any policy etc. I will restore the image once more and refer them to the talk page, if he/she reverses it again without coming to the talk page that will constitute an edit war. I can't see any reason for us not to be able to use
582:
OH, a technicality, of course there is a massive difference between 24hours and 25hours and 8minutes...not really. You are basing your argument on a technicality, what you did was still bad practice and had you communicated properly sooner, you'd have only had to make 1 reversion (certainly no more
186:
I've added the note about the term falling into disuse under
Thatcher (Howe is given the title 'Economic Spokesman' in 1979 Campaign Guide - the full manifesto). I've also added that there is a claim on the title from Vince Cable. It is pertinent since he now gets credited with it as regularly as
453:
In future when citing policies justifying the removal of sourced material can you please cite the relevant policies properly and when challenged more then once, you should immediately post your reasoning on the talk page, it's how most of us regular contributors conduct ourselves. Indeed you could
477:
Gosh, I've just been concentrating on nonfree content policy compliance for two and a half years, using a standard process and pretty uniform edit summaries, and have done more editing in the area than your account has total edits. No more than one other editor has complained, and he promptly got
511:
I think your inadequate grasp of policy is quite clearly demonstrated by your false accusations that I broke 3RR. Rather than going on tendentiously about your nonconsensus interpretation of policy, you should be reviewing your work with nonfree images and cleaning up whatever other mistakes you
842:
died. Many consider
Stanley would have been Chancellor after the next election had he lived, but I am not sure he was formally Shadow Chancellor and he is not in the list, but it seems a bit of a coincidence that this date appears. There was an additional complication at this time in that
493:
does and it is unreasonable to expect people to; this is why it is important to link and cite policies properly. I have conceded that your edit was right but you seem so short of humility that you can't admit that had you gone about things a different way, you wouldn't have had to break
344:; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Knowledge. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
901:
as key contenders to be appointed to the office . Thus I would think Howe did not start until 12 February at the earliest. Carr's departure date is more problematic as it could be argued that all office became vacant on
Thatcher's election as the new leader.
462:
in correcting this mistake and that simply wouldn't have been necessary had you gone to the talk page. I hope you bare this in mind in the future. That said I do accept your reversion was correct. It's just you went completely the wrong way about doing it.
583:
then 2). Well done for waiting that extra hour and 8minutes, technically it makes all the difference but in practice it was still bad practice. I really am astounded as to just how arrogantly belligerent you come across on here, it's really quite sad.
917:
I would note that
Margaret Thatcher's own memoirs make clear she did not start appointing the Shadow Cabinet until after she had met with Ted Heath on 12 February and after Carr had said he would only accept the position of Shadow Foreign Secretary.
439:). Your suggestion of vandalism and the warning you posted on my talk page are thoroughly groundless, and you should retract them, and keep in mind that removal of such obvious copyright policy/NFCC violations is exempt from 3RR/edit warring limits.
738:
800:
767:
623:
187:
George
Osborne. I've also added the note about how media outlets often call him an econmic spokesman. I can find lots of examples, but didnt think it worth bothiering. I thought the title confusion worth clearing up.
676:
614:
828:
795:
762:
199:, which certainly suggests the idea that Butler was "Chancellor in waiting" wasn't current then. Then I don't think Labour introduced the formal portfolio system until about 1955, although I'm not 100% sure.
146:
Hi - this is a funny choice of article theme. The term 'Shadow
Chancellor' was invented in the 1980s I believe - it was certainly never used by Howe (who was referred to as 'Chief Economic Spokesman').
532:
2. 21:45, 14 September 2014 Hullaballoo
Wolfowitz (talk | contribs) . . (6,365 bytes) (-46) . . (remove per NFCC8 and NFLISTS, also no FUR; Undid revision 625560512 by Owl In The House (talk)) (undo)
700:
705:
638:
643:
733:
124:
671:
535:
3. 19:32, 15 September 2014 Hullaballoo
Wolfowitz (talk | contribs) . . (6,365 bytes) (-46) . . (as before, clear NFCC violation; Undid revision 625618654 by Owl In The House (talk)) (undo)
261:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with
Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
435:#8, since you don't need an image to understand he held the position, and you can't include a nonfree image on a page without an appropriate article-specific nonfree use rationale (per
381:
1009:
250:
222:
114:
284:
209:
592:
577:
555:
521:
506:
487:
472:
448:
150:
Also, the list was missing Ken Clarke, who was Shadow
Chancellor for a few weeks after the 1997 election - he did actually give a series of Oral Questions to Gordon Brown.
816:
1004:
848:
308:
659:
529:
1. 18:24, 14 September 2014 Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk | contribs) . . (6,365 bytes) (-46) . . (fails NFCC#8, also no valid article-specific NFCC rationale) (undo)
195:
those who'd held the relevant job in government). Certainly Butler's appointment in 1951 is commented on in biographies as having surprised some, who seemed to expect
886:, but I do not think she appointed her Shadow Cabinet until the following day (I do not have her memoirs to hand to confirm). Certainly the next morning's edition of
90:
721:
783:
169:
made reference to it. I'll add Kenneth Clarke, who was indeed there from May to July 1997. Meanwhile, irritating the Lib Dems is just a happy coincidence.
81:
58:
242:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
927:
860:
478:
himself blocked, as I recall, over related issues. Your failure to understand basic NFC requirements is the only real cause of problems here.
266:
851:
and the university seats were abolished, and up to that point he was still seen as a likely Chancellor in a future Conservative government.
879:
947:
421:
303:
203:
294:
The date of the Maudling-Heath handover is wrong: Heath was already Shadow Chancellor when he was elected party leader in July 1965.
911:
239:
258:
254:
231:
196:
981:
838:
Is there a source for the date Butler became Shadow Chancellor. I note that 10 December 1950 - the date cited - is the date
844:
833:
177:
270:
809:
847:
had been the last Chancellor in a Conservative government, but had not stood in the 1950 election as he was an MP for
743:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
652:
401:
377:
573:
542:, you did not instigate dialogue on a talk page, therefore you did not make sufficient efforts to avoid breaking
517:
483:
444:
73:
52:
86:
805:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
772:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
714:
685:
324:
153:
This list will also irritate Lib Dems who call their Shadow Chancellor 'Shadow Chancellor' not unreasonably!
824:
791:
776:
758:
747:
729:
696:
667:
634:
33:
373:
588:
569:
551:
513:
502:
479:
468:
440:
417:
405:
396:
226:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
865:
404:. The addition of the image makyes the article more complete and is therefore a constructive edit.
280:
89:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
820:
787:
754:
725:
692:
663:
630:
681:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
619:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
289:
893:
indicated that no appointment had been made as Shadow Chancellor and wrongly speculated about
584:
547:
498:
464:
413:
299:
200:
39:
739:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
8:
409:
276:
710:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
648:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
390:
227:
978:
883:
801:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
768:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
428:
328:
923:
907:
856:
295:
141:
454:
have linked the policies in the edit log, you did have enough characters to do so.
427:
You're dead wrong. As I indicated, nonfree images shouldn't be used in lists per
753:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
691:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
894:
889:
839:
629:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above.
432:
363:
349:
174:
408:'s editing in this regard seems far from constructive and may even constitute
998:
875:
565:
561:
543:
539:
494:
459:
436:
356:
352:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
898:
497:
and we wouldn't be having this conversation now. Anyway, no hard feelings.
243:
919:
903:
871:
852:
624:
240 F 146445266 ewos9Tpw9TVLhBAxfbBzFIUjpHo8jnpD (cropped) (cropped).jpg
214:
878:
replaced him on that date. That is the date of the final ballot of the
677:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
615:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
170:
317:
157:
I researched the list and found the term was in use in the 1950s.
400:
this image as it is also the main image on the main article for:
162:
706:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
644:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
874:
ceased to be Shadow Chancellor on 11 February 1975 and that
238:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
166:
362:
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try
526:
For clarity here are your 3 reversions of the same edit:
1010:
High-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
210:
Fair use rationale for Image:Roy Jenkins, Brussels.jpg
190:
I was going to ask about the list - is it complete?
99:
Knowledge:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
355:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
309:
File:Denis Healey.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
269:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
102:
Template:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
1005:List-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
966:
996:
395:I added an image of John Smith to the table and
815:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
782:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
720:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
658:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
948:"Top Tories may not serve under Mrs Thatcher"
564:, because you make three gross errors above.
327:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
880:1975 Conservative Party leadership election
939:
82:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
21:
19:
412:. I have referred the user to this page.
972:
870:I am not sure that it is correct to say
570:The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo)
514:The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo)
480:The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo)
441:The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo)
105:Politics of the United Kingdom articles
997:
945:
370:This notification is provided by a Bot
259:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline
977:. London: Harper Press. pp. 176–177.
79:This article is within the scope of
15:
975:Margaret Thatcher the Autobiography
560:I quite seriously suggest you read
359:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
213:
14:
1021:
946:Warden, John (12 February 1975).
402:John Smith (Labour Party leader)
316:
257:. Using one of the templates at
72:
51:
20:
323:An image used in this article,
223:Image:Roy Jenkins, Brussels.jpg
119:This article has been rated as
928:20:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
849:Combined Scottish Universities
593:22:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
578:21:55, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
556:21:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
522:20:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
507:04:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
488:22:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
473:20:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
449:19:30, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
422:05:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
271:Media copyright questions page
96:Politics of the United Kingdom
87:Politics of the United Kingdom
59:Politics of the United Kingdom
1:
912:22:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
796:11:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
763:19:37, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
672:17:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
285:21:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
240:boilerplate fair use template
93:and see a list of open tasks.
834:Butler date and predecessors
267:criteria for speedy deletion
204:17:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
7:
973:Thatcher, Margaret (2013).
734:13:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
701:04:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
406:User: Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
397:User: Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
382:15:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
10:
1026:
861:22:50, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
431:, the usage clearly fails
364:Commons Undeletion Request
331:for the following reason:
251:the image description page
125:project's importance scale
829:21:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
304:10:54, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
253:and edit it to include a
118:
67:
46:
639:03:23, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
232:explanation or rationale
178:22:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
374:CommonsNotificationBot
218:
28:This article is rated
810:Reginald Maudling.jpg
325:File:Denis Healey.jpg
234:as to why its use in
217:
333:Copyright violations
882:, which was won by
653:Smith 1990 crop.png
952:The Glasgow Herald
821:Community Tech bot
788:Community Tech bot
755:Community Tech bot
726:Community Tech bot
693:Community Tech bot
664:Community Tech bot
631:Community Tech bot
357:fair use rationale
255:fair use rationale
219:
34:content assessment
983:978-0-00-742528-0
884:Margaret Thatcher
845:Sir John Anderson
388:
387:
337:What should I do?
329:Wikimedia Commons
139:
138:
135:
134:
131:
130:
1017:
988:
987:
970:
964:
963:
961:
959:
943:
866:Carr- Howe dates
715:Robert Carr2.jpg
686:Robert Carr2.jpg
585:Owl In The House
548:Owl In The House
499:Owl In The House
465:Owl In The House
414:Owl In The House
348:If the image is
320:
313:
312:
230:but there is no
201:Timrollpickering
197:Oliver Lyttleton
107:
106:
103:
100:
97:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1016:
1015:
1014:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
984:
971:
967:
957:
955:
944:
940:
868:
836:
817:nomination page
803:
784:nomination page
777:GaitskellMP.jpg
770:
748:GaitskellMP.jpg
741:
722:nomination page
708:
679:
660:nomination page
646:
617:
393:
311:
292:
212:
144:
121:High-importance
104:
101:
98:
95:
94:
62:High‑importance
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1023:
1013:
1012:
1007:
990:
989:
982:
965:
937:
936:
932:
931:
930:
895:Edward du Cann
890:Glasgow Herald
867:
864:
840:Oliver Stanley
835:
832:
813:
812:
802:
799:
780:
779:
769:
766:
751:
750:
740:
737:
718:
717:
707:
704:
689:
688:
678:
675:
656:
655:
645:
642:
627:
626:
616:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
536:
533:
530:
455:
392:
389:
386:
385:
367:
366:
360:
353:
339:
338:
321:
310:
307:
291:
290:Maudling-Heath
288:
277:BetacommandBot
211:
208:
207:
206:
181:
180:
143:
140:
137:
136:
133:
132:
129:
128:
117:
111:
110:
108:
91:the discussion
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1022:
1011:
1008:
1006:
1003:
1002:
1000:
985:
980:
976:
969:
953:
949:
942:
938:
935:
929:
925:
921:
916:
915:
914:
913:
909:
905:
900:
896:
892:
891:
885:
881:
877:
876:Geoffrey Howe
873:
863:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
841:
831:
830:
826:
822:
818:
811:
808:
807:
806:
798:
797:
793:
789:
785:
778:
775:
774:
773:
765:
764:
760:
756:
749:
746:
745:
744:
736:
735:
731:
727:
723:
716:
713:
712:
711:
703:
702:
698:
694:
687:
684:
683:
682:
674:
673:
669:
665:
661:
654:
651:
650:
649:
641:
640:
636:
632:
625:
622:
621:
620:
594:
590:
586:
581:
580:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
558:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
534:
531:
528:
527:
525:
524:
523:
519:
515:
510:
509:
508:
504:
500:
496:
491:
490:
489:
485:
481:
476:
475:
474:
470:
466:
461:
456:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
425:
424:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
398:
384:
383:
379:
375:
371:
365:
361:
358:
354:
351:
347:
346:
345:
343:
336:
335:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
315:
314:
306:
305:
301:
297:
287:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:. Thank you.
272:
268:
262:
260:
256:
252:
249:Please go to
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
224:
216:
205:
202:
198:
193:
192:
191:
188:
184:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
155:
154:
151:
148:
126:
122:
116:
113:
112:
109:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
18:
17:
974:
968:
956:. Retrieved
951:
941:
933:
899:Keith Joseph
887:
869:
837:
814:
804:
781:
771:
752:
742:
719:
709:
690:
680:
657:
647:
628:
618:
394:
369:
368:
341:
340:
332:
293:
275:
263:
248:
235:
221:
220:
189:
185:
182:
158:
152:
149:
145:
120:
80:
40:WikiProjects
958:9 September
872:Robert Carr
342:Don't panic
296:BartBassist
999:Categories
934:References
538:You broke
429:WP:NFLISTS
391:John Smith
183:Hi David,
30:List-class
410:Vandalism
159:The Times
350:non-free
244:fair use
228:fair use
142:Comments
433:WP:NFCC
163:April 8
123:on the
954:. p. 1
920:Dunarc
904:Dunarc
853:Dunarc
566:WP:CIR
562:WP:3RR
544:WP:3RR
540:WP:3RR
512:made.
495:WP:3RR
460:WP:3RR
437:WP:FUR
36:scale.
171:David
979:ISBN
960:2020
924:talk
908:talk
897:and
888:The
857:talk
825:talk
792:talk
759:talk
730:talk
697:talk
668:talk
635:talk
589:talk
574:talk
552:talk
518:talk
503:talk
484:talk
469:talk
445:talk
418:talk
378:talk
300:talk
281:talk
236:this
175:Talk
167:1957
115:High
819:. —
786:. —
724:. —
662:. —
161:of
1001::
950:.
926:)
910:)
859:)
827:)
794:)
761:)
732:)
699:)
670:)
637:)
591:)
576:)
568:.
554:)
520:)
505:)
486:)
471:)
447:)
420:)
380:)
372:--
302:)
283:)
246:.
173:|
165:,
986:.
962:.
922:(
906:(
855:(
823:(
790:(
757:(
728:(
695:(
666:(
633:(
587:(
572:(
550:(
516:(
501:(
482:(
467:(
443:(
416:(
376:(
298:(
279:(
127:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.svg){kind=small}
