316:
295:
417:
396:
140:
189:
168:
199:
485:
22:
80:
53:
736:, thanks so much for all these thoughts, and apologies for being away from the thread/article for a while - just amidst a ridiculously busy week at work! However, next week I should be able to make a start on this. A REDD+ and UN-REDD split would be great as a starting point, but as you say both need a bunch of work to ensure they can be understood as distinct from each other.
633:
the 3 and how they are distinct from each other, so while I do agree with the comments that REDD and REDD+ should be in the same article (as was correctly mentioned, one superceded the other), I feel that as UN-REDD is a completely separate mechanism it merits its own article (albeit with some rewrites to make the distinction clearer).
506:
589:
says the article should absolutely be divided. Currently, it seems like the article contains two separate topic - REDD+ and UN-REDD Programme. In fact, the article itself recongises that these are two distinct programs. Both of them are notable, but in the interests of being concise/not confusing the
632:
Good to know - I saw the merger notice literally the minute after I posted this so feel pretty dumb for not checking beforehand! I do regret not being around for the merger discussion, as I do think UN-REDD and REDD+ should be separate. It seems in the discussion like there was some confusion around
613:
and I feel it would be better rewritten to remove duplication and excess detail rather than split. However that would be a big job and as I am not going to do it I guess I should not vote on this split proposal unless someone else volunteers to do the work. Dunno if it would be beyond the scope of
717:
happy to hear you have time for rewriting! Much of the exisitng content on REDD/+ focuses on dense technical descriptions of the conventions and policies behind REDD/+, so not much use to a lay person who is just trying to wrap their head around what REDD+ even is in the first place.
775:
Hi, really sorry but work got incredibly busy so I don't think I'll be able to put work into this for a wee while. Earliest I can do anything is
September unfortunately. Should have said something but I am so caught up in other things that it slipped my mind! Apologies again.
693:
article as long as the distinctions between the two are apparent from the first few sentences of the lead - I'd strongly advocate for one of those italicised sentences "This article is about... for ... see " at the top of the page (forgive me, not sure if it has an official
636:
However, that's just my feeling on it, and if a consensus has already been reached then I'll stick with that. I can crack on with rewriting as I'm very much in the REDD+ space right now (literally just finished a uni course on it!) - will update in a separate section here.
697:
A lot of the confusion I was hearing from users around REDD vs UN-REDD I think results from the articles not doing a great job of explaining the concepts they are about from the outset. It's likely most people would be more reading
794:
Hi, no worries! I just wanted to check if you had anything planned before I do any editing. I'll see if I can put some time into this article in the meantime, but welcome your insights when you have time.
130:
710:
I don't suppose there is something one resonably could add to the title of "UN-REDD Programme" to further differentate it from REDD+? Like "(governance)" or something?
838:
375:
120:
467:
366:
556:
853:
277:
96:
833:
573:
873:
379:
356:
739:
As I say, I'll make a start next week and can maybe give you a ping through on the next pages to get some thoughts, hopefully by next Friday.
603:
898:
863:
546:
267:
87:
58:
878:
848:
903:
615:
888:
610:
457:
332:
868:
843:
522:
893:
243:
858:
804:
789:
770:
752:
323:
300:
149:
63:
513:
490:
433:
883:
761:
are you still planning to work on this article? I've been holding off editing, but am keen for the article to improve.
727:
668:
650:
627:
216:
173:
225:
424:
401:
211:
33:
315:
294:
585:
As previously noted, the article is way too long - it's currently at 98kb, which is around about where
239:
416:
395:
232:
articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly
800:
783:
766:
746:
723:
644:
597:
521:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
432:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
331:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
95:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
92:
673:
Hiya, unfortunately I haven't had any time to work on this and I'd welcome contributions from @
229:
706:, but with all these confusing acronyms they might land up on UN-REDD Programme by accident. @
39:
233:
8:
796:
778:
762:
758:
741:
733:
719:
714:
707:
674:
656:
639:
592:
221:
21:
586:
204:
139:
664:
623:
590:
two, it seems logical to split up the article into two separate (and shorter!) ones.
579:
659:
and yourself no doubt know better than me whether this should be one article or two
374:
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our
428:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of
188:
167:
328:
827:
518:
198:
660:
619:
677:(thank you!) After looking at the article(s) I wouldn't be opposed to a
505:
484:
429:
575:
687:
Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries
79:
52:
517:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
327:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
194:
91:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
611:Talk:United Nations REDD Programme#Merger Proposal
825:
839:Mid-importance International relations articles
105:Knowledge:WikiProject International relations
854:WikiProject International relations articles
108:Template:WikiProject International relations
616:Knowledge:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
618:but I could ask if no one steps forward.
834:C-Class International relations articles
874:High-importance Climate change articles
220:to improve Knowledge's coverage of the
19:
826:
899:Low-importance organization articles
864:High-importance Environment articles
511:This article is within the scope of
422:This article is within the scope of
341:Knowledge:WikiProject Climate change
321:This article is within the scope of
85:This article is within the scope of
15:
879:WikiProject Climate change articles
849:WikiProject United Nations articles
531:Knowledge:WikiProject Organizations
344:Template:WikiProject Climate change
88:WikiProject International relations
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
904:WikiProject Organizations articles
534:Template:WikiProject Organizations
138:
14:
915:
889:High-importance Forestry articles
252:Knowledge:WikiProject Environment
504:
483:
415:
394:
314:
293:
255:Template:WikiProject Environment
197:
187:
166:
111:International relations articles
78:
51:
20:
869:C-Class Climate change articles
844:C-Class United Nations articles
655:Great that you are rewriting. @
551:This article has been rated as
462:This article has been rated as
361:This article has been rated as
272:This article has been rated as
125:This article has been rated as
442:Knowledge:WikiProject Forestry
242:and leave any messages at the
1:
894:C-Class organization articles
525:and see a list of open tasks.
445:Template:WikiProject Forestry
436:and see a list of open tasks.
335:and see a list of open tasks.
147:This article is supported by
99:and see a list of open tasks.
859:C-Class Environment articles
7:
10:
920:
557:project's importance scale
468:project's importance scale
367:project's importance scale
324:WikiProject Climate change
278:project's importance scale
240:Knowledge:Contributing FAQ
150:WikiProject United Nations
131:project's importance scale
884:C-Class Forestry articles
805:12:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
550:
514:WikiProject Organizations
499:
461:
410:
373:
360:
309:
271:
182:
146:
124:
73:
46:
790:07:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
771:10:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
753:13:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
728:10:45, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
669:06:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
651:21:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
628:14:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
604:10:13, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
347:Climate change articles
217:WikiProject Environment
214:article is part of the
102:International relations
93:International relations
59:International relations
224:. The aim is to write
143:
28:This article is rated
537:organization articles
142:
681:(incl redirect from
425:WikiProject Forestry
258:Environment articles
574:Split article into
376:recommended sources
212:environment-related
609:It was merged per
205:Environment portal
144:
34:content assessment
704:UN-REDD Programme
691:UN-REDD Programme
580:UN-REDD Programme
571:
570:
567:
566:
563:
562:
478:
477:
474:
473:
448:Forestry articles
389:
388:
385:
384:
288:
287:
284:
283:
244:project talk page
161:
160:
157:
156:
911:
786:
781:
749:
744:
647:
642:
600:
595:
539:
538:
535:
532:
529:
508:
501:
500:
495:
487:
480:
479:
450:
449:
446:
443:
440:
419:
412:
411:
406:
398:
391:
390:
349:
348:
345:
342:
339:
318:
311:
310:
305:
297:
290:
289:
260:
259:
256:
253:
250:
207:
202:
201:
191:
184:
183:
178:
170:
163:
162:
113:
112:
109:
106:
103:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
16:
919:
918:
914:
913:
912:
910:
909:
908:
824:
823:
784:
779:
747:
742:
645:
640:
598:
593:
583:
536:
533:
530:
527:
526:
493:
464:High-importance
447:
444:
441:
438:
437:
405:High‑importance
404:
363:High-importance
346:
343:
340:
337:
336:
304:High‑importance
303:
274:High-importance
257:
254:
251:
248:
247:
230:well-referenced
203:
196:
177:High‑importance
176:
110:
107:
104:
101:
100:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
917:
907:
906:
901:
896:
891:
886:
881:
876:
871:
866:
861:
856:
851:
846:
841:
836:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
797:TatjanaClimate
780:OliverEastwood
763:TatjanaClimate
759:OliverEastwood
743:OliverEastwood
737:
734:TatjanaClimate
720:TatjanaClimate
715:OliverEastwood
711:
708:OliverEastwood
695:
675:OliverEastwood
657:TatjanaClimate
641:OliverEastwood
634:
594:OliverEastwood
582:
572:
569:
568:
565:
564:
561:
560:
553:Low-importance
549:
543:
542:
540:
523:the discussion
509:
497:
496:
494:Low‑importance
488:
476:
475:
472:
471:
460:
454:
453:
451:
434:the discussion
420:
408:
407:
399:
387:
386:
383:
382:
371:
370:
359:
353:
352:
350:
338:Climate change
333:the discussion
329:Climate change
319:
307:
306:
301:Climate change
298:
286:
285:
282:
281:
270:
264:
263:
261:
237:
209:
208:
192:
180:
179:
171:
159:
158:
155:
154:
145:
135:
134:
127:Mid-importance
123:
117:
116:
114:
97:the discussion
83:
71:
70:
68:Mid‑importance
64:United Nations
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
916:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
890:
887:
885:
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
857:
855:
852:
850:
847:
845:
842:
840:
837:
835:
832:
831:
829:
806:
802:
798:
793:
792:
791:
788:
787:
782:
774:
773:
772:
768:
764:
760:
756:
755:
754:
751:
750:
745:
738:
735:
731:
730:
729:
725:
721:
716:
712:
709:
705:
701:
696:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
672:
671:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
653:
652:
649:
648:
643:
635:
631:
630:
629:
625:
621:
617:
612:
608:
607:
606:
605:
602:
601:
596:
588:
581:
577:
558:
554:
548:
545:
544:
541:
528:Organizations
524:
520:
519:Organizations
516:
515:
510:
507:
503:
502:
498:
492:
491:Organizations
489:
486:
482:
481:
469:
465:
459:
456:
455:
452:
435:
431:
427:
426:
421:
418:
414:
413:
409:
403:
400:
397:
393:
392:
381:
377:
372:
368:
364:
358:
355:
354:
351:
334:
330:
326:
325:
320:
317:
313:
312:
308:
302:
299:
296:
292:
291:
279:
275:
269:
266:
265:
262:
245:
241:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
213:
206:
200:
195:
193:
190:
186:
185:
181:
175:
172:
169:
165:
164:
152:
151:
141:
137:
136:
132:
128:
122:
119:
118:
115:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
777:
740:
703:
699:
690:
686:
682:
678:
638:
591:
584:
552:
512:
463:
423:
362:
322:
273:
215:
148:
126:
86:
40:WikiProjects
587:WP:SIZERULE
380:style guide
249:Environment
234:categorized
222:environment
174:Environment
828:Categories
689:) and a
439:Forestry
430:forestry
402:Forestry
378:and our
661:Chidgk1
620:Chidgk1
555:on the
466:on the
365:on the
276:on the
226:neutral
129:on the
30:C-class
732:Heya @
694:name).
36:scale.
702:over
700:REDD+
679:REDD+
576:REDD+
238:Read
210:This
801:talk
785:talk
767:talk
757:Hi @
748:talk
724:talk
685:and
683:REDD
665:talk
646:talk
624:talk
599:talk
578:and
458:High
357:High
268:High
228:and
547:Low
121:Mid
830::
803:)
769:)
726:)
667:)
626:)
62::
799:(
765:(
722:(
713:@
663:(
622:(
559:.
470:.
369:.
280:.
246:.
236:.
153:.
133:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.svg){kind=small}
