Knowledge

Talk:Osbern fitzRichard

Source đź“ť

194: 173: 204: 592: 21: 675: 670: 665: 655: 650: 645: 569: 296: 278: 142: 125: 66: 505: 306: 634:
Please do something more productive with your time than demanding that reviews look just how you want them to. Your time is yours to waste, but you are also wasting my time, and preventing a perfectly good article from hitting the main page for the sake of bureaucracy. My tick confirmed that the
635:
criteria were met; that's what it's there for. If you want me to say the words again, I will do so for the sake of the article, but encourage you to ask yourself why you felt the need to demand this.
704:
if you haven't noticed, DYK is nothing but bureaucracy. Please spend a few hours building a prep set and see how easy it is to make sure all the criteria have been covered in every review.
86: 469: 260: 429: 117: 508:
Article looks good to me (though I have not checked the source). I am just worried that the hook does not quite make sense. How about the hook below?
113: 781: 250: 581: 517: 791: 713: 615: 558: 776: 771: 323:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 425: 801: 796: 324: 413: 226: 691: 786: 766: 493: 328: 727: 332: 52: 217: 178: 365: 319: 283: 38: 32: 751: 153: 388: 43: 734: 193: 172: 679: 659: 639: 603: 225:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
141: 434: 540: 455: 159: 102: 81: 409: 8: 687: 577: 513: 747: 555: 535: 489: 450: 209: 97: 709: 611: 530: 445: 106: 65: 48: 373:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
311: 720: 405: 222: 699: 683: 597: 573: 509: 379:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
760: 743: 551: 485: 705: 629: 607: 203: 591: 674: 669: 664: 654: 649: 644: 568: 391:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 76: 331:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 295: 277: 638:
I am about to provide "a review that explicitly confirms that the
504: 678:. I just provided "a review that explicitly confirms that the 658:
This sentence is "a review that explicitly confirms that the
602:
please provide a review that explicitly confirms that the
470:
Template:Did you know nominations/Siege of Hull (1642)
116:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 301: 221:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 199: 118:
Template:Did you know nominations/Osbern fitzRichard
41:
at the time (May 5, 2022). There are suggestions on
47:for improving the article. If you can improve it, 758: 393:No further edits should be made to this page 139: 89:). The text of the entry was as follows: 114:Knowledge:Recent additions/2020/February 759: 112:A record of the entry may be seen at 20: 317:This article is within the scope of 215:This article is within the scope of 135: 60: 15: 782:Low-importance Middle Ages articles 158:It is of interest to the following 13: 123: 14: 813: 792:All WikiProject Middle Ages pages 235:Knowledge:WikiProject Middle Ages 124: 777:Start-Class Middle Ages articles 673: 668: 663: 653: 648: 643: 590: 567: 503: 477:: other hook suggestions welcome 304: 294: 276: 238:Template:WikiProject Middle Ages 202: 192: 171: 140: 64: 19: 772:Knowledge Did you know articles 376:Please do not modify this page. 341:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 255:This article has been rated as 802:WikiProject Biography articles 797:Start-Class biography articles 533:as a tenant-in-chief in 1086, 448:as a tenant-in-chief in 1086, 344:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 229:and see a list of open tasks. 787:Start-Class history articles 767:Former good article nominees 752:17:12, 1 February 2022 (UTC) 714:23:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC) 692:08:22, 6 February 2020 (UTC) 616:22:38, 5 February 2020 (UTC) 582:07:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC) 559:17:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC) 518:17:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC) 494:17:50, 25 January 2020 (UTC) 414:06:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC) 329:contribute to the discussion 85:column on 11 February 2020 ( 7: 389:Knowledge talk:Did you know 381:this nomination's talk page 109:as tenant-in-chief in 1086? 10: 818: 529:... that, because he held 261:project's importance scale 37:, but it did not meet the 289: 254: 187: 166: 75:appeared on Knowledge's 606:have been met. Thanks, 385:the article's talk page 366:Did you know nomination 218:WikiProject Middle Ages 680:five main DYK criteria 660:five main DYK criteria 640:five main DYK criteria 604:five main DYK criteria 148:This article is rated 129: 492:). Self-nominated at 320:WikiProject Biography 127: 39:good article criteria 444:... that by holding 241:Middle Ages articles 103:English feudal baron 33:History good article 29:was nominated as a 536:Osbern fitzRichard 451:Osbern fitzRichard 347:biography articles 210:Middle Ages portal 154:content assessment 130: 98:Osbern fitzRichard 73:Osbern fitzRichard 27:Osbern fitzRichard 497: 363: 362: 359: 358: 355: 354: 271: 270: 267: 266: 134: 133: 101:is considered an 59: 58: 51:; it may then be 809: 703: 682:have been met". 677: 672: 667: 657: 652: 647: 642:have been met." 633: 601: 594: 571: 539:is considered a 531:Richard's Castle 507: 483: 454:is considered a 446:Richard's Castle 400:The result was: 378: 349: 348: 345: 342: 339: 325:join the project 314: 312:Biography portal 309: 308: 307: 298: 291: 290: 280: 273: 272: 243: 242: 239: 236: 233: 212: 207: 206: 196: 189: 188: 183: 175: 168: 167: 151: 145: 144: 136: 126: 107:Richard's Castle 105:because he held 68: 61: 23: 22: 16: 817: 816: 812: 811: 810: 808: 807: 806: 757: 756: 723: 718: 697: 662:have been met" 627: 595: 572:Approved ALT1. 441: 439: 435:Article history 374: 368: 346: 343: 340: 337: 336: 310: 305: 303: 240: 237: 234: 231: 230: 223:the Middle Ages 208: 201: 181: 152:on Knowledge's 149: 44:the review page 12: 11: 5: 815: 805: 804: 799: 794: 789: 784: 779: 774: 769: 755: 754: 739: 738: 731: 722: 719: 717: 716: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 585: 584: 562: 561: 550:Works for me. 545: 544: 523: 522: 521: 520: 481: 480: 479: 478: 472: 460: 459: 438: 437: 432: 422: 420: 416: 398: 397: 369: 367: 364: 361: 360: 357: 356: 353: 352: 350: 316: 315: 299: 287: 286: 281: 269: 268: 265: 264: 257:Low-importance 253: 247: 246: 244: 227:the discussion 214: 213: 197: 185: 184: 182:Low‑importance 176: 164: 163: 157: 146: 132: 131: 121: 111: 110: 69: 57: 56: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 814: 803: 800: 798: 795: 793: 790: 788: 785: 783: 780: 778: 775: 773: 770: 768: 765: 764: 762: 753: 749: 745: 741: 740: 737: 736: 732: 730: 729: 725: 724: 715: 711: 707: 701: 696: 695: 694: 693: 689: 685: 681: 676: 671: 666: 661: 656: 651: 646: 641: 636: 631: 617: 613: 609: 605: 599: 593: 589: 588: 587: 586: 583: 579: 575: 570: 566: 565: 564: 563: 560: 557: 553: 549: 548: 547: 546: 542: 538: 537: 532: 528: 525: 524: 519: 515: 511: 506: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 495: 491: 487: 476: 473: 471: 467: 464: 463: 462: 461: 457: 453: 452: 447: 443: 442: 436: 433: 431: 427: 424: 423: 419: 417: 415: 411: 407: 403: 396: 394: 390: 386: 382: 377: 371: 370: 351: 334: 333:documentation 330: 326: 322: 321: 313: 302: 300: 297: 293: 292: 288: 285: 282: 279: 275: 274: 262: 258: 252: 249: 248: 245: 228: 224: 220: 219: 211: 205: 200: 198: 195: 191: 190: 186: 180: 177: 174: 170: 169: 165: 161: 155: 147: 143: 138: 137: 122: 119: 115: 108: 104: 100: 99: 94: 91: 90: 88: 84: 83: 78: 74: 70: 67: 63: 62: 54: 50: 46: 45: 40: 36: 35: 34: 28: 25: 18: 17: 733: 726: 684:Josh Milburn 637: 626: 574:Josh Milburn 541:feudal baron 534: 526: 510:Josh Milburn 482: 474: 465: 456:feudal baron 449: 418: 401: 399: 392: 384: 380: 375: 372: 318: 256: 216: 160:WikiProjects 96: 93:Did you know 92: 82:Did you know 80: 72: 71:A fact from 42: 31: 30: 26: 484:Created by 232:Middle Ages 179:Middle Ages 150:Start-class 87:check views 53:renominated 761:Categories 406:Cwmhiraeth 700:J Milburn 598:J Milburn 338:Biography 284:Biography 128:Knowledge 95:... that 77:Main Page 49:please do 744:Ealdgyth 552:Ealdgyth 486:Ealdgyth 466:Reviewed 402:promoted 735:article 728:article 721:Sources 706:Yoninah 630:Yoninah 608:Yoninah 475:Comment 426:Comment 259:on the 79:in the 156:scale. 748:talk 710:talk 688:talk 612:talk 578:talk 556:Talk 527:ALT1 514:talk 490:talk 430:view 410:talk 327:and 742:-- 428:or 404:by 387:or 251:Low 763:: 750:) 712:) 690:) 614:) 580:) 554:- 516:) 468:: 421:( 412:) 383:, 746:( 708:( 702:: 698:@ 686:( 632:: 628:@ 610:( 600:: 596:@ 576:( 543:? 512:( 496:. 488:( 458:? 440:) 408:( 395:. 335:. 263:. 162:: 120:. 55:.

Index

History good article
good article criteria
the review page
please do
renominated

Main Page
Did you know
check views
Osbern fitzRichard
English feudal baron
Richard's Castle
Knowledge:Recent additions/2020/February
Template:Did you know nominations/Osbern fitzRichard

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Middle Ages
WikiProject icon
icon
Middle Ages portal
WikiProject Middle Ages
the Middle Ages
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Biography
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑