Talk:List of Air episodes/Archive 1

1918:

hoping that would have been apart of this poll, but it was suggested to take this one step at a time and just choose a template first. I understand that you've updated your template to mimic the Japanese episode template, but there are still other concerns, such as the template being in the "care" of a WikiProject, where more editors are likely to voice future input. And even the episode title formatting is apart of this, although minor to some. Ending the poll now means using the Japanese episode template, according to consensus, it does not mean that we forget about this and you keep getting to "run the show". Sure, you considered our input now when you were under pressure from this poll, but what about later? --

467:. OMG, Planetes, and FMA definitely did NOT go thought a "heavy peer review". This is not an article about the Air anime, but about the Air TV series. The OMG list could be renamed, but because it so clearly covers the topics of several different works it's not as confusing. FMA's movie was apart of the same plot as the episodes, so it would make sense to include it. These articles should make it extra clear that these two stories are unrelated as far as being canon to each other. It's confusing, it's unnecessary, and it only serves to "fluff" the article. -- 31: 1428:: My major reason for supporting this format is that the seperation between English, kanji, and romaji titles is much more clear and is better. Also though, the reason that anime episode lists are more able to use DVD covers instead of American TV series is because anime is commonly only released a couple of episodes per DVD. With American shows, you have them released as complete seasons, so it's much harder to use a DVD cover image as 24 epiodes might be using the same cover. -- 736:: I think it goes along better with the page and is more compact and thus easier to scan the page. It's not always about the eye candy since this is an encyclopedia after all and thus shouldn't the information about the actual episodes be more important than the way they are displayed? That being said, I'd say just stick with the current standard format using the Japanese episode template. Besides, I already hate how warped this discussion and article have gotten.-- 1842:. It seemed... pointless. One thing I don't want to do is needlessly hide wikicode. The table header really only would need to be written once, while episode entries could easily be added and reworded many many times. So really, only episode entries, which will get much more editing traffic, need the simple "interface" as well as being able to easily convert/ update/ change formats in the future without having to do a lot of editing on the episode entry level. -- 405:

likely to come up during the candidacy. I agree that where something was shown doesn't matter, but that's not my point. The point is these are two very different works both based on the same game. This is not like a movie based off the anime series. If it was a movie based off the Air TV series then I wouldn't have a problem listing a movie with a group of episodes. Unlike our style disputes, this is actually

1917:

Actually, even those minor details seem to be apart of which style and template editors wish to use in the poll. And one other thing, I still wish to discuss the idea of not using DVD covers beside the episode entries, but rather, using them in their own table with information about the DVDs. I was

389:

Lets see. Nihonjoe agrees with me (thats one other person). Two featured lists (articles surviving heavy peer review) have a movie section (meaning its not problematic). Do we not consider Star Wars movies to be "epidoes"? (somehwat). Perhaps stargate can have a movie section. The place it aired (big

1194:

Which also clearly shows the unnecesary amout of whitespace. (2 lines of them). On Naruto list people were complaining about one extra line (which is temporarily blank). Large tables break wikitable on firefox borwser. On your example several of the verticle vertical lines are missing. That fails to

404:

No.. no he didn't agree with you. I think he was trying to explain to me why you added the movie to the article. "Two featured lists", those are articles YOU edited, there's no weight in that argument. And, again, featured list criteria says nothing about these types of issues, so the issue is not

2191:

did. As for why they put the kanji/kana and romanization on the line below the English title, I can only guess that it is because anime titles can sometime be very long and this way just looks cleaner when that's the case. I also don't think there is a need to distinguish between kanji and kana; it

2045:

was created 5 december 2005. The current version of my template is a copy paste of it. The main two differences is that the parameters passed now have variables, and other is that image is now passed to the template. The cols and rows parameter does not exist on LOE templates. Those parameters make

1957:

It's not up to me alone, as you can see there are several other editors who are agreeing with the reasons behind what I am suggesting. I cannot decide for them, even if I wanted to. If you ignore the results of this straw poll it will be you who is blocked, not because a poll is final, but because

925:

I was shocked to see these two side by side and realize how very little difference there is. With this conflict escalating to the point of a vote, I was expecting something drastically different. In the past I have commented that I like the OMG style list, and was rather confused when I clicked the

490:

Did.. you not read my message? I addressed when it was logical to include a movie entry and when it was not. It's impossible for me to agree with you because you lack basic logic in this issue. It's confusing to the reader, it's harmful to the article, and it looks sloppy. Why would I go back on my

337:

I agree, strongly. For one, a movie is not an episode. Of course it's related, that's why we have links and nav templates and the main article mentioning both. But this is a list for the Air TV series, not non-TV-series-canon movies that were done by a different group! If you wish to link to it,

138:

How YOU will be writing the article? Excuse me, but I started on this list (via the main article) before you did. You are NOT the only editor of these articles, your personal preference has no more significance than my personal preference (although I have stated reasons to use the other format for

2057:

Your example was most insightful. Based on that I have attemped something new in hopes that it could be something we all could agree on. I call it a coprimise because it is more like what you want than it was before. Is it not? By doing so, I have pulled back some of the conditions I seeked. Hence

181:

This is a list for the Air TV series, why is one entry about the movie in here? I could see if the two were related, but they are both very different with their story, done by different groups of people. Not only is this confusing to the reader, but it seems sloppy, like the list isn't enough on

1543:

Okay, it seems that the only real difference between the two templates is the placement of the episode number, and the placement of the romaji and kanji/kana titles. Outside of that, they are pretty much the same. Perhaps one (Cool Cat's) could be used for lists using the DVD cover shots, and the

440:

This article should be and is about the anime Air. Game, Manga as well as soundtracks disqualify to be on the list. Movie, OVA, TV episodes do qualify. Both (movie and anime) have a similar plot, identical characters (though few only make cammo appearances), identical title. We are not mentioning

364:

Stargate is not an anime list and unlike Air that thing has ten seasons. A featured list, (OMG list) has dvd covers and comunity has not objected its presence during candidacy. I do not see any reason why this anime list should be treated any more diferently than OMG list. Since movie has its own

243:

Hmm, it is true that the series and movie for FMA do follow each other closely (and I've heard the movie called the unofficial 52nd episode since there were only 51 and 1 missing in the final season), so that sort of makes sense. But I do agree with the Air movie and it is of my opinion it should

148:

Err? I have been writing the episode summaries. I have initiated the list article etc. Now I however understand why are you this hostile towards my presence here. You have been blabering about policy and standards to promote your personal preferance (as you put it). I find that interesting as per

2155:

It is more likely for an anime episode to have a kanji/romaji title than an english air date. Most anime never air in the US. At the very least this one (AIR TV) hasn't. The first line should be reserved for information that is more likely to apply to all anime lists and second line for optional

901:

I do not think I was lecturing. On my version of the template, kanji is given priority on the proposed version its at the second line and is ambigious. It may very well be kana. My version clearly identifies it. I frankly am not certan of the issue here, both templates present the same amount of

2013:

templates was because you couldn't achieve the layout you originally wanted? But instead of looking at the example as a compromise, you created a new template—and no, it is not an "old" template but a brand new template you created as a reaction to this poll—that behaves almost exactly like the

1892:

I acknowlege the result of the poll and have adjusted "my version" of the template to follow the markup and appearance of the LOE templates. I comprimised everything but the place where episode names and numbers appear. I think such a minor diference isn't worth a discussion. We all have better

1292:

Both you and Ned Scott have personal attachments to your respective templates. As such, neither of your two opinions should contribute to the final decision on account of bias. I have personal attachments to the LOE template and the wikiproject it's associated with as well. This is why I am not

1691:

Ned the thick lines are not my favorite peice of work nor do they bother me as much as they bother you (I just dont care either way) but any border with less than 5px thickness breaks on firefox. Find a way to fix that and I will live with that. The only fix I currently know is thick borders.

1036:

The table header is irrelevant to this poll. We can use either one regardless of the outcome, both tables headers would work. I actualy do not like thick borders all that much either but any other style I tried does not work well on firefox. I welcome alternatives but so far I have not seen

1572:

I don't think that should be part of this poll. Basic format should be decided first, and then we can worry about DVD covers vs. episode screenshots, IMHO. As it is, I prefer elements found in both, and think a hybrid would be fine. I used the FMA episode list as the basis for creating the

1250:

The TV screen shots of individual episodes are really not the right way. If you look at the various star Trek lists for instance, you will see that most of the screencaps are unintelligable. At best, you can tell there is a peson or a ship but it isnt any more significant. Furthermore

117:

Negative. It was not within 24 hours. I have no intention of allowing you to dictate how I am supposed to be writing lists. I will be using dvd covers, I will not comprimise from that. I will be using the table markup identical to the Oh My Goddess, Planetes, and Fullmetal featured

312:

I give list of oh my goddess episodes as example. none of the series are related including the movie. Air movie and tv series are somewhat related (they have a similar yet distant plot). It is perfectly usefull to link the movie. I do not see a reason why it is inaproporate.

261:

The Ah! My Goddess OVA and movie as well as mini series detach from the plot. Yet they exist on the featured list. There is absolutely no harm putting explanation to the movie to the article. I really hate to discuss every minor point of my edits on air related articles.

884:"Giving pride of place" means, loosely, giving priority. I understand the point of romaji titles, so please don't lecture me. Perhaps my comments were ambiguous, but when I refered to "template," I meant that what I would like from the LOE-Japanese template is that the 2148:

TheFarix, second line should be for additional info. The official title (which often is in kanji) should be on the first line along with airdate and episode number. Everything else can be considered "trivia" (no insult intended, just being blunt). Allow me to explain:

379:

Stargate being animated or not doesn't matter. Being animated doesn't change the fact that it's a list of episodes from a TV series. I understand your words, but I disagree with your reasons, and I am not the only one (see above). See where I'm going with this? --

2144:

Very well we can go that direction. I did not suggest modifying the LOE template to meet my demands as I felt that would be me being way out of line. I also did not want to add aditional complexity to the template. Since that is not an issue I can gladly accept

354:

it'd make sense. Cooperation doesn't mean ignoring simple and painfully clear logic. If no one has a strong reason to include it then it goes off the article and gets a sentence that mentions it, but makes it clear that it is not apart of the series. --

1635:

So it is completely unnaceptable to use my format? Also please dont talk about me in 3rd person on the thread I am involved. I do not mind people editing my work. It has been done before. See history of Oh My Goddess!. Note how many edits preceed mine.

1556:

This is also about the format of using DVD covers on the side vs no images or individual screenshots, as well as the THICK lines. DVD covers only help identify an episode if you own the DVD.. Also, the Japanese episode list template is in the care of

989:

The "chunky" looking borders are good enough to make it through FAC. positions of the romaji and kanji are easy to follow and organised unle your version. A straw poll and hours of discussion just for how a table looks should be a first on wikipedia.

1133:, I think this one looks better, especially with Air's beautiful DVD covers....but that's beside the point. I'm still concerned about image cluttering, and I don't think an image for every episode is necessary. And precedence is not an issue here. 2118:

I also feel it is more aproporate to sort animes titles in 3 scripts (english, kanji, romaji) in a vertical format as all of them are just too short and can easily fit a single line even on very low resolutions. Is this illogical and

2053:

2159:

How do we clarify what the script is. Is it Kanji? Katakana? Traditional chineese? Simplified chineese? Ancient Greek? Romaji? I for one can't necesarily tell the diffrence between katakana from kanji. I really want to avoid an ugly

1307:

I agree with that assesment and have modified my argument accordingly, However I think it is safe to conclude that neither markup "sucks" as both have been used in featured lists. Fearued lists are "the best wikipedia has to offer".

860:

from the OMG format to the LOE-Japanese template. I have issues with how the template gives pride of place to unofficial romaji titles and how the official Japanese titles are a little small, but its aesthetic value outweighs those

302:

The movie is basically unrelated to the TV series and the movie now has it's own article. This is confusing to the reader and inappropriate. The information is just being placed here to look pretty, instead of being useful. --

244:

have never been made since it does nothing for the main story except tell it the same way with different circumstances; therefore they can be seen as alternate universes of each other, which is sometimes seen in anime (like in

409:

in that it is very confusing to the reader and is needlessly redundant. This is not.. lets mention every work based on Air game on every Air article. This is nothing more than article filler to make it seem larger. --

2186:

states that the English form should come first followed by kanji or kana and then the romanization if it is different then the English form. This order should also apply to episode titles and it appears that is what

327:

I say we move the movie mention to its own article and make a link there from here. The reason: this is a list of Air episodes, and the movie is not an episode. Especially given that the movie has its own article.

1544:

other could be used for episode lists with screenshots for each episode? Cool Cat's seems to be designed more for using the DVD cover with multiple episodes (or that's what it's mostly been used for, anyway). ···

1123: 2127:

This is one issue you may just have to give up in order to reach a compromise. After all, there is absolutely no need for there to be two templates that essentially does the same thing with the same parameters.

1971:

When I deleted my own comments, I did so because I feel they are inaproporate mostly to the spirit of what we want to achiev and to evade an unnecesary confrontation. Hence I will not comment on the response.

1666:

The wheel (my template) predates the LOE one. I merely modifed it to be compatible with LOE as a gesture of good faith and as a comprimise. Not a whole lot of good faith is leaking from you with that comment.

1255:

speaking, I am not sure we can claim fair-use on episode screenshots used like this. DVD covers on the other hand are from amazon.com and are promotional by nature. It is less likely for companies to complain.

1706:

This isn't true. I frequently see (and have created) wikitables with borders of 1px, and they appear fine in Firefox on both Mac OS X and Windows XP SP2. Perhaps you have a corrupted version of Firefox.

458:

Just because something didn't come up during an FLC doesn't make it a non-issue for all lists of episodes. In all honestly, Featured lists should be renamed to Good lists, as they are more inline with a

703: 680: 1172: 1153: 926:

first link to find... it looks exactly the same? So after comparing it turns out it doesn't, but it is very, very close. So on that note, I would say I prefer this style by a very, very small amount. -

2192:

is usually not specify anywhere else on Knowledge and it hasn't presented a problem that I know of. But this issue should probably be taken over to the templates' talk page for further discussion. --

365:

article we just give a very brief summary. Just because something has its onw article disqualifies it from being on this list. There is nothing logical about removing information from wikipedia. --

1619:

templates as new demands come up. But instead of working within the existing templates and help improve them, Cool Out fights them outright and has now resorted to creating his own replacement. --

1296:

Featured lists are (or at least should be) determined based on content and not layout. Any discussions on what is featured and what is not should have no bearing on which template was/is used.--

829:

Well. for one I really really am tired of the changing concensus. Few months ago people almost crucified me for using episode screenshots on lists, now I get crucified for using DVD covers. --

2222:

You can count me out of that argument. I don't have a particular interest in how the title information is formatted, just that it is consistent with WP:MOS-JA, makes sense, and done using a

513:

Here's what I see happening (that makes sense): One, we remove the Air movie listing. Or, two, we keep it, merge the soundtrack listing, make a manga listing, and then rename the article to

2095: 1997: 1962:

issues. You have a failing argument and want me to compromise? All I have to do is stand back and let other people tell you the same thing I've told you. There's nothing to compromise. --

1497: 711: 476:

I do not see any fluffing. But as other examples exist (of a movie being posted on an episode list) I do not see the problem. Why is it imposible for you to agree with me on any point? --

1851:

We could give it optional parameters. It wouldn't save time since we would copy paste anyways... But code would be less misterious to a newbie. I particularly do not care either way. --

816:

I don't see why you can't use the DVD covers as the episode screenshots? Or use one table for the DVDs and then use (or don't use) screenshots for the episodes in a different table ala

600:, but seeing as how Cool Cat is not open to discussion or forming a consesnous I feel this is the best way to quickly resolve this matter. The messages on this talk page as well as on 1595: 1835: 613: 1750:

My belief is "border colapse" was/is one of the things firefox doesn't like. This may be a mediawiki bug as well. After all the css send to firefox is different from ie IIRC. --

699: 668: 2042: 1263: 625: 437:

Every featured list goes through heavy peer review. If such an issue does not come up on a FAC (enough to prevent promotion), it probably is not a big deal (nothing harmfull).

714:). WP's LOE episode templates are easy to use, with clearly marked parameters. The template also makes use of individual episode screenshots seen on most lists of episodes. 1741:

I've seen that before too and it just seems to be flaky in firefox (comes and goes). I wonder if enforcing a border (say border: 1px solid black !important;) would help?--

527:

Negative on that. You can start a list for media, that I wont object. But I prefer having a seperate list-article strictly confined to anime (tv episodes/movies/ovas). --

2061:

As unlikely as this sounds, we can agree on how this should be. In fact, so far we have actualy agreed on certain points such as the templates markup, and tables header.

79:

If there are differences of opinion, please hash them out here rather than filling the edit history of the main article with pointless reverts. Thank you both. (^_^) ···

1839: 1432: 1143: 870:

Err.. The POINT of romaji is that english speaking people are able to read it. The template as is does NOT give pride to anything. How the heck can it gove pride? --

1501: 1280: 674: 1259: 1080: 728: 226:

But, story wise, the FMA movie is related to the episodes. Here it is not. Also, Cool Cat, who formatted that article, is probably why it's listed there. --

1076:

per TheFarix's example as my concerns were addressed. Now that the tables are basically the same, I vote for this because this one just looks so much better.

865: 767: 441:

every work based on air game on every article, we are mentioning every anime based on the air game. There is no harm in multiple referances whenever relevant.

1443:

Please post a list of links to these lists and indicate which lists use which template. This will make it easier to do a comparison between them. Thanks! ···

1117: 740: 2152:

It would be easier to follow. On some anime episode names can be rather in consistant in length. When placed in individual cells, this issue is compensated.

936: 2247: 2213: 2173: 2069: 1977: 1932: 1907: 1856: 1817: 1808: 1755: 1732: 1697: 1672: 1641: 1480: 1402: 1352: 1313: 1276: 1223: 1200: 1105: 1052: 995: 971: 907: 875: 834: 807: 777: 695: 664: 591: 532: 481: 449: 395: 370: 318: 293: 267: 158: 129: 96: 1896:

I believe on this list "my version" (not that it is any more different than the other version now) is preferable as episode titles are ridiclously short.

1258:

Both of the LOE templates make heavy use of meta temlates. Meta templates should be avoided if they are not making peoples and/or coders life any easier.

772:

I never gave such an argument. My argument is that TV scren shots are bad and DVD covers should be used instead. This is what the whole thing is about. --

2038:

It achieves 90% of the things I want because the templates were never all that diferent. They are much more similar since my modifications to my version.

608:, pretty much give you an idea of the dispute between Cool Cat and I. In a nutshell, I think the list, as well as most lists of this nature, should use 601: 514: 347: 1484: 1004:

ill-relevant, the borders were not a factor in the Featured list candidacy. If one wishes to make it clearer about what titles are what, they could do

211:

But in that case, would that mean they consider the movies as "episodes" or should the article title be changed more to "List of (Series) animation"?--

1966: 1160: 545: 359: 1606: 1508: 609: 553: 332: 1981: 1945: 1936: 1922: 1860: 1846: 1736: 1722: 1630: 1583: 1565: 1491: 1227: 1213: 1189: 1056: 1028: 999: 984: 536: 495: 485: 471: 414: 399: 384: 374: 322: 307: 297: 283: 271: 230: 202: 162: 143: 133: 112: 2251: 2237: 2217: 2203: 2177: 2139: 2073: 2033: 1821: 1789:

and use template "pieces" that fit a specific need: header, footer, episode w/screenshot (or DVD cover), episode w/o screenshot, etc. Thoughts? ···

1713: 1701: 1676: 1661: 1645: 1406: 1388: 1356: 1340: 1317: 1204: 975: 911: 896: 879: 811: 797: 781: 605: 453: 256: 100: 215: 2244: 2210: 2170: 2066: 1974: 1929: 1904: 1853: 1814: 1805: 1759: 1752: 1745: 1729: 1694: 1669: 1638: 1399: 1349: 1310: 1300: 1273: 1220: 1197: 1049: 992: 968: 961: 904: 872: 838: 831: 824: 804: 774: 529: 478: 446: 392: 367: 315: 290: 264: 155: 126: 93: 1590:

Although, if the straw poll fails, I wouldn't object to TheFarix's compromise format being used. I made the same suggestion on the 9th, during

945: 1561:, where I believe suggestions, changes, and growth will be more welcome, considering Cool Cat's reactions to people "editing his work". -- 1040:

Not all data should be presented in columns, but episode names should. It is much more easier to follow it. I do not see the relevance of

91:

There is a diference in taste. I prefer the format I use on all other featured lists, one of them passed regardless of Ned's objection. --

85: 724:(although I think it should be). Featured list status seems to be the only pro-argument I can see for the other template and style. -- 2110:

compromise. I honestly don't see the need to create a new template for something that can be incorporated into the existing template.

1574: 689:, I not only think this looks better, but I think it's easier to read. I'll repeat some of my reasonings from my past comments, " 1992:

Oh good grief, exactly what is wrong with the example I gave? It achieves 90% of the things you originally wanted while using a

1889:

Ok, this poll is now pretty much pointless since the original gap is no longer present. This poll no longer is being helpfull.

1795: 1021: 752:

templates would be easier to understand and edit. I also don't buy Cool Cat's argument that this list won't be able to achieve

1911: 1438: 1373:. The former is much easier on the servers then the latter. But your new template really is nothing more then a fork of the 521: 186: 1591: 1476: 193: 1951: 1550: 1535: 1517: 1449: 1247:. I'd like to note I oppose the exitance of this poll. Don't vote for everything. Having said that here are my rationale: 707: 717: 66: 1878:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

1345: 1009: 702:), and has been very well received so far. Meanwhile, the OMG inspired/Cool Cat episode template has some objections ( 567:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

1041: 1615:

templates are adaptable with some minor tweaking of the templates. But that should be part of the evolution of the

1209:

Firefox's bugs are apart of the criteria? I think not. I've looked at the list under Firefox, it doesn't break. --

2079:

The cols and rows parameter does not exist on LOE templates. Those parameters make the dvd covers more managable.

2041:

I did not want to edit the old version so as not to break the existing usage (on this very article for instance)

74: 1468: 1460: 491:

editing "morals" just to get along with an editor who only wants to do things his way, regardless of logic? --

339: 1088:

The Japanese version looks better and is compatible with WP:LOE and thus better maintainable in the future. -

1464: 902:

information only its just that my version presents it in a more organised manner which you consider bad... --

857: 748:: Looking strictly from the standpoint of someone who may edit this article in the future, using one of the 933: 1456: 1156:), and the DVD covers can be placed on their own little table above, like what is done in many lists. -- 1097: 817: 1033:

So we are talking about minor diferences now, since original argument of easy use is no longer relevant.

464: 38: 1773: 2058:

comprimised. I thought by making it more like LOE template would make it eaiser to resolve the issue.

2047: 1899:

I am eager to archive this discussion, get the article unlocked and continue with episode summaries.

1783: 1521: 1472: 277:

If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it.

47: 17: 1599: 1005: 753: 721: 1165: 643: 288:

Which doesnt mean the movie can't be on the article. What I ment was maybe we should cooperate? --

2242:

I think what I propose is consistant with that. Nihongo template occupies one line by default. --

1262:(as of now) has a similar usage (same parameters) while using less code. I intend to overide the 653: 1801:

Well. the header is the standard wikitable and the foother is just "|}". Really unnecesary. IMHO

1727:

It is true. A strange bug that can be resolved with a reinstaling firefox. We both are right. --

252:). If the Air movie stays, then I believe the article title should be changed to reflect that.-- 460: 950:

The "drastic difference" is in the underlying markup of the list and is what is in dispute. --

704:

Knowledge:Featured list candidates/Featured log/June 2006#List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes

192:

I think it may be partially because other similar lists have the movie(s) listed as well (see

2018:

templates, thus a fork of the original, and then call it a compromise. But you only did that

346:, and they're more related to each other than the Air TV series and Air movie! If this was 121:

As a result the lock, I will be unable to improve the list. I will wait till lock is lifted.

1884: 1577:

page, though I didn't use any templates as I didn't know about all of them at the time. ···

8: 1524:. This should help bring more attention to this straw poll beyond the partys involved. -- 1397:, but since you have a predetermined opinion I wont discuss this any further with you. -- 1958:

it's obvious now that you are not willing to work with other editors. You have serious

1366: 2233: 2199: 2135: 2029: 1657: 1626: 1531: 1384: 1336: 1185: 957: 793: 763: 587: 597: 980:

That, the chunky looking borders, and positions of the romaji and kanji and such. --

176: 1347:

I count a serious amount of if/else statements there, what are you talking about? --

2183: 930: 1429: 1140: 1134: 1093: 1077: 343: 329: 1718:

Same here, works great on Firefox 1.0.5.4 and Safari 2.0.3 on Mac OS 10.4.6. --

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1963: 1942: 1919: 1843: 1719: 1603: 1562: 1505: 1488: 1210: 1157: 1025: 981: 725: 629: 621: 617: 542: 518: 492: 468: 411: 381: 356: 304: 280: 227: 183: 140: 109: 2228: 2223: 2194: 2188: 2130: 2107: 2024: 2015: 2010: 2001: 1993: 1959: 1790: 1708: 1652: 1621: 1616: 1612: 1578: 1558: 1545: 1526: 1444: 1379: 1374: 1370: 1331: 1326: 1180: 952: 893: 862: 788: 758: 749: 691: 647: 582: 575: 197: 150: 105: 80: 786:

You may not have directly stated it, but your arguments clearly imply it. --

1114: 1101: 737: 253: 212: 1742: 1297: 966:

That no longer is the case though, the markup has been made identical. --

942: 927: 821: 249: 2165:

May I ask the logic why kanji, and romanji is placed on the second line?

2098:, I'm trying to get some new parameters installed, including one called 1329:

templates use meta-templates. Yours, on the other hand, uses one (1). --

1089: 1927:

I suggest we discuss this issue about the show via user talk pages. --

1012:, etc. Not all data should be given columns. Note the transition of 1872:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

941:

It came to a vote because one person's work will be wiped out.--

578:

maintained template, 20% for using Cool Cat's original template.

561:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal.

1941:

This concerns everyone who wishes to edit the Air articles. --

1650:

When all you ended up doing is just reinvent the wheel, yes. --

700:

Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Japanese episode list (no image)

669:

Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Japanese episode list (no image)

245: 2090:

now exist in the templates and it is far less ambiguous then

1834:

This was something that was considered for the forerunner of

2004:

templates better and easier to use in a situation like this.

802:

Do not imply things from my statements. I despise that... --

1394: 1323:

Both of the LOE templates make heavy use of meta temlates.

1996:

template. That is what is called a compromise. I've even

1502:

Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:List of Anime Episodes TV

694:'s template itself is used in over 20 articles already ( 675:

Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:List of Anime Episodes TV

673:

Other articles that use Cool Cat's layout and template

644:

Example of Japanese episode template (no image) layout

606:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Air dispute

279:

says that right on the bottom of the edit screen. --

182:

it's own that we have to add something unrelated. --

1481:

Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Japanese episode list

696:

Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Japanese episode list

665:

Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Japanese episode list

2106:. By supporting these changes, I am trying to help 656:

as the list currently stands at time of straw poll.

2009:Wasn't the originally reason you were against the 1485:Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:List of Anime Ep TV 1152:The style I recommend also has a no image format ( 888:(in whatever script or language) be listed before 1124:Cool Cat's List of Anime Ep TV style and template 1779:Perhaps it would be good to go the route of the 517:. It might be nice to have a manga listing. -- 1455:For the featured lists? For the WP:LOE style, 612:'s style guidelines and it's episode template, 139:reasons OTHER than my personal preference). -- 541:We're not talking about your preference.. -- 2046:the dvd covers more managable. See usage on 1218:Discussed below as I am sure you know. :) -- 681:WP:LOE's style and Japanese episode template 620:about episodes. Cool Cat wishes to use his 390:theater, tv screen) doesnt really matter. -- 1812:23:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC) Sure, why not. -- 708:Talk:List of Naruto episodes#Reorganisation 2102:, which can probably be shortened to just 1893:things to do than discuss this to death. 1154:Template:Japanese episode list (no image) 554:Straw poll for which episode table to use 1496:Seems the Cool Cat template got renamed 1168:of what this page would look like using 756:status by using one of the templates. -- 628:. This style is also seen on 3 of the 6 616:. This style can be seen on 3 of the 6 1575:List of Highschool! Kimen-gumi episodes 610:WikiProject List of Television Episodes 596:So it's come to this. We all know why 14: 2208:Hai! I have responded to you there. -- 1195:meet a featured list criteria IIRC. -- 1022:Talk:List of Sex and the City episodes 712:User talk:Cool Cat/Archive/2006/06#Air 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2050:. Is this illogical and unreasonable? 1592:List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes 1477:List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes 892:provided for anglophones' benefit.-- 194:List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes 25: 2096:Template talk:Japanese episode list 338:then fine, but do not include it. 23: 1498:Template:List of Anime Episodes TV 1293:contributing a support for either. 1010:List of Digimon Adventure episodes 24: 2279: 2094:. And if you see my posts to the 1266:as soon as this page is unlocked. 1042:List of Sex and the City episodes 1325:This isn't true, neither of the 1173:Japanese episode list (no image) 29: 1467:. For the OMG/Cool Cat style, 716:" Also, style layout is not a 1836:Template:Japanese episode list 1469:List of Oh My Goddess episodes 1461:List of Stargate SG-1 episodes 614:Template:Japanese episode list 340:List of Stargate SG-1 episodes 13: 1: 1465:List of The Simpsons episodes 886:official titles used in Japan 624:inspired style and template, 572:The result of the debate was 2043:Template:List of Anime Ep TV 1264:Template:List of Anime Ep TV 654:Example of Cool Cat's layout 626:Template:List of Anime Ep TV 7: 2022:I presented the example. -- 1479:. For examples one can use 1457:List of South Park episodes 890:unofficial transliterations 818:List of South Park episodes 10: 2284: 2252:23:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 2238:22:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 2218:22:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 2204:21:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 2178:20:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 2140:19:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 2074:18:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 2048:List of Planetes episodes 2034:14:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1982:19:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1967:12:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1946:12:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1937:11:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1923:06:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1912:00:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1861:12:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1847:06:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1822:00:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1796:21:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 1760:23:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 1746:18:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 1737:06:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 1723:05:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 1714:23:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1702:21:32, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1677:12:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1662:22:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1646:21:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1631:20:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1611:As my example shows, the 1607:20:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1584:23:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1566:20:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1551:20:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1536:12:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1522:Knowledge:Current surveys 1509:18:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1492:03:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1473:List of Planetes episodes 1450:03:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1433:17:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1407:19:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1389:18:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1357:17:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1341:17:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1318:16:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1301:15:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1281:12:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1228:07:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 1214:18:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1205:14:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1190:14:02, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1161:05:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1144:22:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1137:05:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1118:00:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 1106:22:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1081:22:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1057:21:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1029:19:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1000:19:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 985:18:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 976:16:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 962:15:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 946:15:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 937:15:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 912:17:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 897:17:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 880:16:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 866:14:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 839:16:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 825:14:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 812:13:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 798:12:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 782:12:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 768:12:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 741:05:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 729:03:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 522:02:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 385:20:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 375:15:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 360:05:20, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 333:03:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 323:03:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 308:19:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 298:13:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 284:18:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 272:11:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 257:03:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 231:03:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 216:02:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 203:02:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 187:02:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 163:11:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 144:02:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 134:22:48, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 113:19:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 101:15:21, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 86:07:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 18:Talk:List of Air episodes 1875:Please do not modify it. 1840:Template:Digimon episode 659:Other articles that use 592:20:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 564:Please do not modify it. 546:05:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 537:17:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 496:21:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 486:09:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 472:19:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 454:09:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 415:05:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 400:17:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 1998:proposed new parameters 1596:Featured list candidacy 1516:Last night, I placed a 1393:I see no evidence of a 1287:2 Points of contention: 858:Excel Saga episode list 75:Please, no edit warring 1102:WikiProject Television 661:Japanese episode list 42:of past discussions. 1950:my responce to your 1365:difference between 1139:Changing my vote. 1008:or what's used in 856:I've switched the 2250: 2216: 2176: 2072: 1980: 1935: 1910: 1859: 1820: 1811: 1758: 1735: 1700: 1675: 1644: 1405: 1355: 1316: 1279: 1226: 1203: 1055: 998: 974: 910: 878: 837: 810: 780: 602:Talk:Air (series) 574:80% for using an 535: 515:List of Air media 484: 452: 398: 373: 348:List of Air media 321: 296: 270: 196:for example). ··· 161: 132: 99: 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2275: 2243: 2209: 2169: 2065: 1973: 1952:deleted comments 1928: 1903: 1877: 1852: 1813: 1804: 1793: 1788: 1784:Infobox animanga 1782: 1751: 1728: 1711: 1693: 1668: 1637: 1581: 1548: 1447: 1398: 1348: 1309: 1272: 1219: 1196: 1177: 1171: 1048: 991: 967: 903: 871: 830: 803: 773: 646:as presented by 632:about episodes. 566: 528: 477: 465:Featured article 445: 391: 366: 342:doesn't include 314: 289: 263: 200: 154: 125: 92: 83: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2283: 2282: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2226:template. ;) -- 1887: 1882: 1873: 1791: 1786: 1780: 1776: 1709: 1579: 1546: 1500:, and examples 1445: 1441: 1367:ParserFunctions 1175: 1169: 1126: 683: 562: 556: 344:Stargate (film) 198: 179: 81: 77: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2281: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2166: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2146: 2122: 2121: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2082: 2081: 2062: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2039: 2006: 2005: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1955: 1948: 1886: 1883: 1881: 1880: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1775: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1716: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1440: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1371:meta-tempaltes 1304: 1303: 1294: 1289: 1288: 1268: 1267: 1256: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1147: 1146: 1125: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1108: 1083: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1045: 1044:to this topic. 1038: 1034: 948: 923:Support but... 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 743: 731: 722:Featured lists 682: 679: 678: 677: 671: 657: 651: 640: 639: 637: 630:Featured lists 618:Featured lists 598:polls are evil 570: 569: 557: 555: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 511: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 442: 438: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 259: 236: 235: 234: 233: 221: 220: 219: 218: 206: 205: 178: 175: 174: 173: 172: 171: 170: 169: 168: 167: 166: 165: 122: 119: 108:violation. -- 76: 73: 70: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2280: 2253: 2249: 2246: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2230: 2225: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2215: 2212: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2196: 2190: 2185: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2175: 2172: 2167: 2164: 2158: 2154: 2151: 2150: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2132: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2119:unreasonable? 2116: 2115: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2080: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2071: 2068: 2063: 2060: 2056: 2054:unreasonable? 2052: 2049: 2044: 2040: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2026: 2021: 2017: 2012: 2008: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1983: 1979: 1976: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1965: 1961: 1956: 1953: 1949: 1947: 1944: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1934: 1931: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1921: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1909: 1906: 1900: 1897: 1894: 1890: 1879: 1876: 1870: 1862: 1858: 1855: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1823: 1819: 1816: 1810: 1807: 1802: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1794: 1785: 1778: 1777: 1774:Template idea 1761: 1757: 1754: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1744: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1731: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1721: 1717: 1715: 1712: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1696: 1690: 1678: 1674: 1671: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1654: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1643: 1640: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1582: 1576: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1549: 1542: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1528: 1523: 1519: 1510: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1448: 1434: 1431: 1427: 1424: 1408: 1404: 1401: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1351: 1346: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1328: 1324: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1312: 1306: 1305: 1302: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1275: 1270: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1254: 1249: 1248: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1229: 1225: 1222: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1199: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1174: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1145: 1142: 1138: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1127: 1119: 1116: 1113:As above. -- 1112: 1109: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1084: 1082: 1079: 1075: 1072: 1058: 1054: 1051: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 997: 994: 988: 987: 986: 983: 979: 978: 977: 973: 970: 965: 964: 963: 959: 955: 954: 949: 947: 944: 940: 939: 938: 935: 932: 929: 924: 921: 913: 909: 906: 900: 899: 898: 895: 891: 887: 883: 882: 881: 877: 874: 869: 868: 867: 864: 859: 855: 852: 840: 836: 833: 828: 827: 826: 823: 819: 815: 814: 813: 809: 806: 801: 800: 799: 795: 791: 790: 785: 784: 783: 779: 776: 771: 770: 769: 765: 761: 760: 755: 754:Featured list 751: 747: 744: 742: 739: 735: 732: 730: 727: 723: 719: 715: 713: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 688: 685: 684: 676: 672: 670: 666: 662: 658: 655: 652: 649: 645: 642: 641: 638: 635: 634: 633: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 599: 594: 593: 589: 585: 584: 579: 577: 568: 565: 559: 558: 547: 544: 540: 539: 538: 534: 531: 526: 525: 524: 523: 520: 516: 497: 494: 489: 488: 487: 483: 480: 475: 474: 473: 470: 466: 462: 457: 456: 455: 451: 448: 443: 439: 436: 416: 413: 408: 403: 402: 401: 397: 394: 388: 387: 386: 383: 378: 377: 376: 372: 369: 363: 362: 361: 358: 353: 349: 345: 341: 336: 335: 334: 331: 326: 325: 324: 320: 317: 311: 310: 309: 306: 301: 300: 299: 295: 292: 287: 286: 285: 282: 278: 275: 274: 273: 269: 266: 260: 258: 255: 251: 247: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 232: 229: 225: 224: 223: 222: 217: 214: 210: 209: 208: 207: 204: 201: 195: 191: 190: 189: 188: 185: 164: 160: 157: 152: 147: 146: 145: 142: 137: 136: 135: 131: 128: 123: 120: 116: 115: 114: 111: 107: 104: 103: 102: 98: 95: 90: 89: 88: 87: 84: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2227: 2193: 2129: 2117: 2103: 2100:ImageRowSpan 2099: 2091: 2087: 2078: 2023: 2019: 2000:to make the 1901: 1898: 1895: 1891: 1888: 1885:Lets move on 1874: 1871: 1800: 1651: 1620: 1540: 1539: 1525: 1518:notification 1515: 1442: 1425: 1378: 1377:template. -- 1362: 1330: 1322: 1252: 1244: 1179: 1130: 1129: 1110: 1085: 1073: 1017: 1013: 951: 922: 889: 885: 853: 787: 757: 745: 733: 690: 686: 660: 595: 581: 573: 571: 563: 560: 512: 461:Good article 406: 351: 276: 180: 78: 60: 43: 37: 2160:disclaimer. 1598:, as shown 861:concerns.-- 250:Tenchi Muyo 36:This is an 1430:SeizureDog 1361:There's a 1260:My version 1166:An example 2184:WP:MOS-JA 2104:ImageSpan 1964:Ned Scott 1960:ownership 1943:Ned Scott 1920:Ned Scott 1844:Ned Scott 1720:Ned Scott 1604:Ned Scott 1563:Ned Scott 1506:Ned Scott 1489:Ned Scott 1211:Ned Scott 1158:Ned Scott 1026:Ned Scott 1020:notes on 982:Ned Scott 726:Ned Scott 663:template 543:Ned Scott 519:Ned Scott 493:Ned Scott 469:Ned Scott 412:Ned Scott 382:Ned Scott 357:Ned Scott 305:Ned Scott 281:Ned Scott 228:Ned Scott 184:Ned Scott 177:The movie 141:Ned Scott 110:Ned Scott 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 2229:TheFarix 2195:TheFarix 2131:TheFarix 2088:LineSpan 2025:TheFarix 1653:TheFarix 1622:TheFarix 1541:Comment: 1527:TheFarix 1520:over at 1439:Comments 1380:TheFarix 1332:TheFarix 1181:TheFarix 1111:Support. 1098:contribs 1086:Support. 1018:director 953:TheFarix 894:Monocrat 863:Monocrat 854:Support. 789:TheFarix 759:TheFarix 648:TheFarix 636:Examples 583:TheFarix 1426:Support 1253:LEGALLY 1245:Support 1131:Support 1115:Kunzite 1074:Support 746:Support 738:Juhachi 734:Support 687:Support 463:than a 407:harmful 350:, then 254:Juhachi 213:Juhachi 39:archive 2224:WP:LOE 2189:WP:LOE 2108:WP:LOE 2016:WP:LOE 2011:WP:LOE 2002:WP:LOE 1994:WP:LOE 1743:Will2k 1617:WP:LOE 1613:WP:LOE 1559:WP:LOE 1375:WP:LOE 1327:WP:LOE 1298:Will2k 1014:writer 943:Will2k 928:Goldom 822:Will2k 750:WP:LOE 718:factor 692:WP:LOE 576:WP:LOE 246:Gundam 151:WP:OWN 118:lists. 106:WP:3RR 2156:info. 2145:that. 2020:after 1602:. -- 1504:. -- 1487:. -- 1090:TheDJ 1024:. -- 352:maybe 16:< 2234:Talk 2200:Talk 2182:The 2136:Talk 2030:Talk 1658:Talk 1627:Talk 1600:here 1532:Talk 1483:and 1395:fork 1385:Talk 1369:and 1363:huge 1337:Talk 1186:Talk 1094:talk 1037:any. 1016:and 1006:this 958:Talk 794:Talk 764:Talk 720:for 667:and 604:and 588:Talk 153:. -- 2248:out 2245:Cat 2214:out 2211:Cat 2174:out 2171:Cat 2092:Row 2070:out 2067:Cat 1978:out 1975:Cat 1933:out 1930:Cat 1908:out 1905:Cat 1857:out 1854:Cat 1818:out 1815:Cat 1809:out 1806:Cat 1792:日本穣 1756:out 1753:Cat 1733:out 1730:Cat 1710:日本穣 1707:··· 1698:out 1695:Cat 1673:out 1670:Cat 1642:out 1639:Cat 1594:'s 1580:日本穣 1547:日本穣 1446:日本穣 1403:out 1400:Cat 1353:out 1350:Cat 1314:out 1311:Cat 1277:out 1274:Cat 1224:out 1221:Cat 1201:out 1198:Cat 1141:_dk 1135:_dk 1078:_dk 1053:out 1050:Cat 996:out 993:Cat 972:out 969:Cat 931:‽‽‽ 908:out 905:Cat 876:out 873:Cat 835:out 832:Cat 820:.-- 808:out 805:Cat 778:out 775:Cat 622:OMG 533:out 530:Cat 482:out 479:Cat 450:out 447:Cat 396:out 393:Cat 371:out 368:Cat 330:_dk 319:out 316:Cat 294:out 291:Cat 268:out 265:Cat 248:or 199:日本穣 159:out 156:Cat 130:out 127:Cat 97:out 94:Cat 82:日本穣 2236:) 2202:) 2168:-- 2138:) 2128:-- 2064:-- 2032:) 1972:-- 1902:-- 1838:, 1803:-- 1787:}} 1781:{{ 1692:-- 1667:-- 1660:) 1636:-- 1629:) 1534:) 1475:, 1471:, 1463:, 1459:, 1387:) 1339:) 1308:-- 1271:-- 1188:) 1178:-- 1176:}} 1170:{{ 1104:) 1100:• 1096:• 1047:-- 990:-- 960:) 796:) 766:) 710:, 706:, 698:, 590:) 580:-- 444:-- 313:-- 262:-- 124:-- 2232:( 2198:( 2134:( 2028:( 1954:: 1656:( 1625:( 1530:( 1383:( 1335:( 1184:( 1092:( 956:( 934:⁂ 792:( 762:( 650:. 586:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index