80:
53:
90:
183:
22:
359:
The fact that Eyman moved money from the campaign to himself literally has nothing to do with the bill itself and should immediately be removed. It's not even an outcome of the bill, it's a side effect that came up years later. This feels like it's put in there to, again, push people against the bill
347:
Specifying "Opposition and
Outcomes" breaks the impartiality that's supposed to be on Knowledge. It gives readers of this article a slanted view against I-200. Proponents are only mentioned once in the entire section, and it's only for refutation. This section also trivializes support of the bill by
367:
Instead, this section should be changed to be only outcomes as this can be more neutral. There are legitimate concerns that minorities don't get involved anymore, but there needs to be evidence showing a decline and linking that decline to I-200. This section currently only focuses on one specific
372:
it, and gives the reader an unfair and slanted view on the state's handling of higher education, and thus their view on the bill. If the outcomes section were fair, it would not only include more recent data, as this is from 2006, it would also include all racial and ethnic groups and how college
376:
There needs to be some serious work done to either fix this section or remove it entirely as it's too biased in one direction for the general population to get a non-biased view on. I personally believe that an outcomes section is not bad, just finding several non-biased sources and writing
348:
putting "colorblind" in quotes, a dubious claim as it has no reference to back up that proponents actually say I-200 pushed towards a colorblind society. Colorblind is also a non-neutral term that some left leaning individuals have problems with (see
355:
The quote cited in this section has emotionally charged language, and while that's not bad, since it's in conjunction with the generally negative view of the bill, the section again pushes people towards one direction.
273:
397:
I have broken the criticisms and outcome section, and added some sources. I believe your worries could be alleviated by another section of support before the opposition section.
291:
287:
434:
239:
173:
120:
137:
429:
163:
454:
444:
424:
197:
127:
391:
231:
449:
439:
406:
342:
132:
240:
http://web.archive.org/web/20150505075813/http://www.sos.wa.gov/office/404.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/elections/1998/i200_legaltext.aspx
115:
337:
111:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
243:
103:
58:
192:
63:
214:
290:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
33:
309:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
230:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
349:
402:
21:
294:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
387:
310:
352:), making the proponents' arguments a straw man rather than showing their argument fairly.
329:
297:
39:
317:
264:
95:
8:
398:
360:
since the sponsor of the bill is corrupt. This is clearly illogical because it relies on
276:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
244:
http://www.sos.wa.gov/office/404.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/elections/1998/i200_legaltext.aspx
316:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
383:
325:
227:
79:
52:
380:
Let me know your thoughts on this and hit me up to try and solve this section.
369:
223:
282:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
418:
108:
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
283:
361:
182:
350:
https://everydayfeminism.com/2015/02/colorblindness-adds-to-racism/
249:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
368:
minority group, American
Indians. This twists information,
234:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
232:
User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ
412:+1ing the above comment. This page is clearly biased
435:
Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
85:
286:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
416:
373:rates have been effected by this initiative.
272:This message was posted before February 2018.
19:
222:I have just modified one external link on
417:
430:Low-importance United States articles
261:to let others know (documentation at
101:This article is within the scope of
15:
377:impartially will be the hard part.
148:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
455:WikiProject United States articles
445:Low-importance Washington articles
425:Start-Class United States articles
181:
151:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
466:
226:. Please take a moment to review
343:Section: Opposition and Outcomes
88:
78:
51:
20:
450:WikiProject Washington articles
440:Start-Class Washington articles
168:This article has been rated as
1:
392:05:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
190:This article is supported by
7:
10:
471:
303:(last update: 5 June 2024)
219:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
174:project's importance scale
407:00:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
189:
167:
104:WikiProject United States
73:
46:
338:03:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
109:United States of America
215:External links modified
193:WikiProject Washington
186:
154:United States articles
28:This article is rated
185:
284:regular verification
96:United States portal
274:After February 2018
253:parameter below to
122:Articles Requested!
279:InternetArchiveBot
187:
34:content assessment
336:
304:
212:
211:
208:
207:
204:
203:
462:
332:
331:Talk to my owner
327:
302:
301:
280:
268:
156:
155:
152:
149:
146:
98:
93:
92:
91:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
16:
470:
469:
465:
464:
463:
461:
460:
459:
415:
414:
345:
335:
330:
295:
288:have permission
278:
262:
217:
153:
150:
147:
144:
143:
142:
128:Become a Member
94:
89:
87:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
468:
458:
457:
452:
447:
442:
437:
432:
427:
410:
409:
399:Captchacatcher
370:cherry picking
344:
341:
328:
322:
321:
314:
247:
246:
238:Added archive
224:Initiative 200
216:
213:
210:
209:
206:
205:
202:
201:
198:Low-importance
188:
178:
177:
170:Low-importance
166:
160:
159:
157:
141:
140:
135:
130:
125:
118:
116:Template Usage
112:
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
68:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
467:
456:
453:
451:
448:
446:
443:
441:
438:
436:
433:
431:
428:
426:
423:
422:
420:
413:
408:
404:
400:
396:
395:
394:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
374:
371:
365:
363:
357:
353:
351:
340:
339:
333:
326:
319:
315:
312:
308:
307:
306:
299:
293:
289:
285:
281:
275:
270:
266:
260:
256:
252:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
233:
229:
225:
220:
199:
196:(assessed as
195:
194:
184:
180:
179:
175:
171:
165:
162:
161:
158:
145:United States
139:
136:
134:
131:
129:
126:
124:
123:
119:
117:
114:
113:
110:
106:
105:
97:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
59:United States
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
411:
384:Gett Numbers
382:
379:
375:
366:
358:
354:
346:
323:
298:source check
277:
271:
258:
254:
250:
248:
221:
218:
191:
169:
133:Project Talk
121:
102:
40:WikiProjects
265:Sourcecheck
30:Start-class
419:Categories
362:ad hominem
64:Washington
318:this tool
311:this tool
324:Cheers.—
334::Online
251:checked
228:my edit
172:on the
259:failed
138:Alerts
36:scale.
403:talk
388:talk
255:true
292:RfC
269:).
257:or
242:to
164:Low
421::
405:)
390:)
364:.
305:.
300:}}
296:{{
267:}}
263:{{
200:).
62::
401:(
386:(
320:.
313:.
176:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
