806:
the premise. For example, Groundhog Day, "A man is stuck reliving the same banal day over and over, thousands of times." Someone would hear that and say, oh, that's an interesting premise, I wonder what I would do in that situation, I can see what that's a good movie idea, etc. But something along the lines of When Harry Met Sally, which can be pitched as "Two people fall in love over a twelve year relationship filled with ups and downs", well, that is not immediately enthralling just as a premise. In that way, Buried ("A man is buried alive!") would classify as high concept, because someone is grabbed immediately by the simple premise. I guess the polar opposite of a "high-concept" movie would be a meandering drama, where not a ton happens, but the relationships between the characters are put on display. And of course a million movies fall in between, but hopefully that clarifies?
784:, but for example a film on time travel or dreaming would generally be HIGH CONCEPT because there is a lot of breathing room for the director to develop a compelling movie within. When pitching a movie, one would think of a 'high concept' movie as one where the plot device, once explained, immediately indicates the potential for a good film as there are many possibilities for the plot to carry the film. I say generally that a movie focused on relationships lower concept as the success of the film is more dependent on the quality of the production (good acting, well developed execution of scenes, etc.).
777:
exactly the OPPOSITE of 'high concept' to me: The concept restricts the movie to a very narrow plot device and gives the director very little opportunity to create situations with the plot device that move the film forward--so the quality of acting, cinematography the execution of narrow plot options becomes more critical. I know that's superficial as the 'roominess' of a plot device varies, but the idea behind a high concept movie is that when immediately hearing the idea, you can see ROOM for the plot to grow easily because the device gives rise to so many possibilities.
64:
113:
95:
123:
21:
261:"The term is also applied, often disparagingly, to films that are pitched and developed almost entirely upon such a simply stated premise rather than standing upon complex character study, cinematography, or other strengths that relate more to the artistic execution of a production rather than simply an engaging high concept premise with broad appeal." Umm, sure.
920:, so that there is some uncertainty as to the precise semantic value it would hold: how to set it linked to other notions. The noun-phrase, until your critic in the above section "analogous narrative" can be answered smoothly, is extremely an advertizing super weapon, and the article, not absolutely certainly up to it now. I hope this helps. --
554:
do with the way the story is written. It has nothing to do with the content of the story, follow? High concept exists in the minds blockbuster screenwriters and in the dicks of big time producers. It's a vague fleeting term that has no place in traditional academia. And frankly someone trying to come up with a wiki on it is kind of pathetic.
442:-- I'm pretty sure Star Wars is the exact opposite of high-concept. How can you deliver it as a pitch? Try convincing a marketing executive that "the mythological voyage of the hero, in space" is a good idea for a film. "High Concept" doesn't mean "easy to fit into a genre" like you claim, dude... it means "easy to pitch."
787:
Other movies you could say have lower concepts: About
Schmidt, Before Sunrise/Before Sunset, Lost in Translation, Gerry, Cube, the Exam. If High Concept is defined as the plot idea driving the movie, then perhaps distinction is needed between movies that are 'high concept' but very plot opportunity
776:
I'm a bit confused about the inclusion of Buried. To me high concept means a movie with a plot device that gives room to a lot of plot *opportunities* and scenarios to build a movie around. Buried, where the whole movie is contained to a story about a guy in a coffin, would be an example of what is
692:
I've deleted the 'star vehicles' section. the films listed there were mostly not high concept films per the article's own definition (raiders of the lost ark was anything but 'high concept.' The entire list and article needs work, as the list of films in the whole piece seems to be 'films that some
553:
High
Concept is NOT an ironic term, not in a literary definition. Every movie can be summed up in a single sentence. It's called a logline. Any screenwriter knows that, and should have blasted this article a long time ago. High Concept is a HIGHLY CONCEPTUALIZED far reaching idea. High concept has to
981:
Strictly speaking if it exists as a noun you're right. I'd also prefer a title without an hyphen, although the article is discussing "a term applied to.." and mainstream dictionaries seem to do the same. Also
Heitmueller seems reluctant to make use of the noun, he soon is shortening it into "HC". In
805:
I think the distinction between 'high concept' and 'low concept' (if such a term exists) isn't necessarily to do with the number of possible endings, or where a film could go, but more along the lines of someone being able to say "Oh, I understand why that would make a good movie" after hearing only
421:
High
Concept is a 'fine art' term that applies to theater or film in genres that hold true to rules. Examples: A horror film firghtens, a science fiction film is based on a fictional fact of scientific principle, a cowboy movie, song, or painting is predicated on the fact that there are workers of
543:
by, I believe, Bob
Mandello of NPR--that described the "high concept" concept as "the fewer words you need to describe the film to the audience, the more high concept it is--and the worse it's likely to be." He went on say "'Schwarzenegger and DeVito are twins' is only five words." As such, most of
604:
I removed two tags from the article, one for unreferenced, another claiming "original research". I see three references in the article, so that one seemed unjustified. And I see no argument being made on this talk page that claim that the article's claims go beyond what the references support.
487:
I agree, this article really needs some work. The description given in the current article is so vague that the majority of movies could be considered "high concept". The reader has zero chance of being able to distinguish a high-concept movie from one that isn't. The first paragraph, which should
1070:
The article makes no reference to written work that I can see. The HC idea is strongly debated among writers, with some believing it's the only way to publishing success. I'd hesitate to identify specimen HC novels, though others probably could. But the term is not confined merely to cinema/TV
1043:
I don't think "Locke" qualifies as high-concept. The way the film is shot is unusual and often noted, but the plot itself does not depend on some easily summarised, unusual premise. If you were to describe the film as "it's just Tom Hardy in a car", that doesn't tell you anything about the plot.
733:
This article needs a complete rewrite. The "High
Concept" (it's meant to be ironic...) is concept of making TV and Movies(ect) simple as possible, to appeal to as many people as possible. Basically to make TV shows and Movie summoned up in two sentences. Examples are: Avatar, Titanic, Spider man,
462:
near as i can tell from this article, any movie with a plot and a budget could be shoehorned into high concept. there are many statements of things high concept is or usually is, but they are all vague and general. i would love to see a list of things high concept is NOT (with examples). thanks.
562:
I noticed this sentence in the article: "a common occurrence is themed products sold at fast-food restaurants such as McDonald's." I think most people reading this article know what a fast-food restaurant is, it they are interested they read the article about them. McDonalds doesn't need to get
289:
Well, while the second paragraph talks about what the plot of a high concept is, it doesn't come out and say what High
Concept means. The article describes the properties of a High Concept film without actually defining it. I had to look up the MTV reference to actually get a proper definition.
422:
a class that deal with live stock that are mainly cattle. The term 'high concept' refers to art works based on a strict use of catagorical thematic choosing that offers specific rules to devise an exicution for its intended purpose; i.e. film, painting, sculpture, a photograph, et. al..
476:
This sentence is in the second paragraph: "Often in high concept, characters and scenes that at first seem unnecessary are later used to reveal or explain a plot twist." Since this is true for lots of other films, why is it necessary to include it here ?
392:
Who cares? The phrase 'high concept' obviously needed explanation (see the discussion on the Snakes on a Plane article), and SoaP is a movie that fits the phrase 'high concept' perfectly. Where this article originated is irrelevant. It's factual and
488:
summarize the article, tells the reader virtually zero. I'd reqrite the article, but I personally know very little about what "high-concept" actually means (that's why I came to this article). After reading the article, I think I know even less. ;)
625:"While the movie suggested an exciting and original concept that attracted attention prior to its release, audiences didn't go see it, showing that the commercial appeal of even a widely advertised high concept movie isn't guaranteed."
948:
It is found used as an adjective unless in statements like "high concept is a term which.." then "if you understand what we're suggesting then you know what we're talking about". Which makes it a coloration, thus an adjective.
1096:- the one opposition relates to use of the title as an adjective, but one argument for the move is that it should be considered a noun (concept) rather than an adjective, which seems generally accepted among commentators.
223:
The term "High
Concept" seems to contradict the definition. "High Concept" SHOULD mean "character development...etc." But "Low Concept" SHOULD mean "an easily-summarized plot." I don't get it. (David Lafleche)
1221:
in reverse was done without discussion, and while the editor who moved the page is right that dictionaries do indeed use hyphenation, they (the editor) failed to mention that dictionaries also say it's then an
1342:
I do not see what is precisely your point unless in MOS:HYPHEN you mean: "To link related terms in compound modifiers: (...) ,usually not hyphenated when used predicatively." If so, the same guideline adds
1140:– I'm not a native speaker of English, but unless I'm mistaken, the phrase should only be hyphenated if used as an adjective before a noun. So, we could have e.g. a high-concept work that is high concept.
990:". So I would stand, and prefer a noun title covering the article but there should be no possible ambiguity, which means that the linguistics we're discussing had to be obvious to the reader as well. --
628:
I doubt many people thought the movie would be original, they saw it because they thought it would be outrageously cheesy. Also, audiences did see it - compare the budget to the gross on its page.
472:
agreed, it just sounds like a term for a movie made to maximize profit, in which case, Jaws and Star Wars are definitely not the earliest examples. so i still don't know what 'high concept' means
756:, which probably is also its logline, and with a focus on plot rather than characters. Some would say it shouldn't have intellectual pretensions. No, I don't want the job of rewriting it.
202:
This article is missing a vital component; it fails to address video games. A high concept is a very important stage in the initial development of any game meant for market distribution.
1393:
Correct usage is mostly hyphenated as a modifier (“a high-concept video”), but to just refer to the idea is properly un-hyphenated (“from high concept to deep character development”). The
373:
Is it just me or does the repetition of 'High
Concept' make it sound like an infomercial rather than an article? Also, is the release date for Snakes on a Plane really relevant? --
864:
I think he is trying to get rid of the "what if" sticker glue, so that high concept is a more complete and complex model of concentrate, not necessarily a "what if" each time. --
788:
restrictive (such as Cube, Groundhogs Day, the Exam, Gerry, Buried) and movies that are very high concept with wide plot opportunities (Butterfly Effect, Inception, Star Trek).
771:
914:
658:
447:
320:
704:
213:
795:
196:
719:
I thought this term also described an elaborate conception of a movie, a game or something similar, contrary to a "low" concept. Is there something to that? --
742:
227:
195:
I've seen a couple articles make reference to the term "high concept". If this article is up to snuff, I'll go ahead and linkify those to this article. --
291:
331:
246:
986:". Then Wyatt makes it a thing: "The emphasis on narrative as the driving force behind high concept (...)", ..perhaps. We get back soon to a simple "
879:
799:
687:
537:"High concept" has never meant "certain sell"; it means "film completely summarized by a simple description". There was a perfect film review--of
720:
815:
1304:
514:(cop obsessively chases robber) - in which the USP is pairing two great actors, a celebrated director and some of the best reviews of the year.
1033:
518:
383:
1247:
1212:
451:
374:
735:
1333:
563:
mentioned here, it feels very much like 'product placement' to me. This entire article seems to have been written by marketing people...
907:
1385:
1277:
708:
1360:
765:
714:
280:
1407:
294:
382:
I have a sneaking suspicion that this article is in fact part of "Snakes of a Plane"'s high-powered internet marketing campaign.--
1166:
999:
976:
958:
943:
929:
873:
723:
360:
242:
1348:
404:
1257:
324:
1115:
752:
it doesn't seem to me to be ironic. It does describe a type of work, one with a simple and original (but not too original)
1291:- The two titles are functionally identical with neither having any real benefits or drawbacks when compared to the other.
1128:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1085:
654:
262:
1417:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1239:
1204:
1180:
1141:
1051:
1025:
984:
high concept can be understood as a narrative which is very straightforward, easily communicated, and easily comprehended
898:
none. The adjective appears much more often in the article than the noun does, but adjectives are not usual as titles. —
443:
423:
316:
217:
1260:. Note that according to MOS nouns and noun phrases are the usual standard but not an absolute requisite yet. They give
502:
that will bring an audience to a film regardless of who made it, who's in it, or positive reviews. For example, compare
1435:
1430:
700:
576:
567:
254:
209:
28:
673:
Since when is terrorism a genre of movie? All of the movies listed here could just as easily be called action movies.
647:
I removed the section relating to music as it was ambiguous and completely unreferenced. 20:26, 10 December 2009(UTC)
791:
557:
37:
738:
637:
149:
41:
1349:
there should be no possible ambiguity, which means that the linguistics we're discussing had to be obvious as well
1021:
858:
492:
270:
662:
431:
141:
1345:
Where there would otherwise be a loss of clarity, however, a hyphen may be used in the predicative form as well
1111:
917:
811:
532:
467:
548:
481:
1227:
594:
416:
Agreed. The article mentions Jaws and Star Wars but then doesn't go on to explain why those are High
Concept.
306:
190:
153:
145:
1080:
343:
682:
75:
1059:
612:
386:
1300:
1261:
821:
746:
508:(boy starts WWIII) - without major stars, a world-famous director or Academy-award worthy reviews - with
377:
913:
The formula in itself is a to us still under-determined extrapolation from conceits similar to those by
1161:
736:
http://www.screenwritinggoldmine.com/forum/showthread.php?s=9d27f30e5baec0a15df4a13aeb205ca7&t=4416
499:
136:
100:
1231:
44:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about
807:
617:
439:
845:
The link doesn't help me understand what "an analogous narrative" might be. From context, perhaps
266:
49:
1295:
may apply unless more specific manual of style elements mean one title is preferred to the other.
1243:
1208:
1145:
1055:
1029:
581:
427:
63:
967:
can be a verb, too. A better example of the noun usage: "Examples of high concept include..." —
1376:"not hyphenated (...) unless they are permanent compounds attested as dictionary headwords." --
1296:
457:
250:
498:
As far as I'm concerned, this is the true definition of High Concept: A story proposal with a
239:
wow a whole article that manages talk about something without actually describing what it is.
1329:
1156:
515:
81:
1107:
1099:
1076:
1047:
781:
761:
696:
678:
650:
633:
599:
234:
205:
1235:
544:
the films on the "prime example" list are very poor fits to the "high concept" concept. --
8:
1381:
1356:
1273:
1264:
as a sample in agreement with what I had kept in mind; (as above), then remains whether
1218:
995:
954:
925:
869:
753:
642:
525:
276:
Apparently you didn't read it too closely. The second paragraph is the basic definition.
1065:
1373:
1321:
1184:
972:
939:
903:
854:
668:
539:
489:
1402:
1325:
1292:
573:
564:
1072:
1020:, seeing you both discussed the hyphen in this article's name, I'll point you to
757:
728:
674:
629:
140:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
1377:
1352:
1313:
1269:
1017:
991:
950:
921:
865:
529:
464:
303:
1424:
1253:
1103:
1038:
587:
545:
478:
357:
340:
1265:
1137:
1133:
1013:
968:
935:
899:
850:
832:
However, it is important to differentiate a high concept narrative from an
401:
313:
45:
33:
1176:
572:
I changed the article, please comment if you think it should be reverted.
1399:
609:
591:
277:
128:
1317:
608:
Them things are too easy to throw around, and too slow to go away. -
1223:
833:
846:
734:
ect. Not a great source, but only one I can use this back this up.
504:
157:
440:
http://www.writersstore.com/high-concept-defined-once-and-for-all/
112:
94:
1268:
needs its sub-grouping to filmmaking, which IMO.., it does not. -
622:
I removed the following sentences regarding Snakes on a Plane:
510:
1316:. With a hyphen, it seems like an adjective. See also the
1256:, tho there is a category for Naming convention articles:
982:
Wyatt, Guber is mixing determination and qualification: "
780:
Maybe I'm confusing this with a different term (such as
524:
It's listed in a few dictionaries that can be cited, eg
438:
Umm... consider a reasonably well-written article like
1175:
Example references that don't use hyphenation include
526:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/High%20concept
118:
302:
Could we get a partial list of high concept movies?
772:Inclusion of Buried and what 'high concept' means
1422:
590:idea which came in the early to mid-1970s ? --
156:. To improve this article, please refer to the
693:snob feels superior to' and that's about it.
356:I added a few, hopefully others will add more
61:
152:. To use this banner, please refer to the
880:who will rid me of this turbulent hyphen?
339:Sounds like a good idea, I'll start one.
314:https://www.imdb.com/interest/in0000037/
1423:
1258:Category:Knowledge naming conventions
1238:; they all describe the adjective. --
1187:. The ones that do, write about high
1124:The following discussion is closed.
825:
134:This article is within the scope of
57:
15:
688:Deletion of 'star vehicles' section
370:this article doesn't seem to clear
80:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
1447:
1347:". If I can dare, quoting myself
1312:: The proposed form is more of a
715:literally: high (quality) concept
1413:The discussion above is closed.
150:regional and topical task forces
121:
111:
93:
62:
19:
1395:New Oxford American Dictionary
918:Cultural-historical psychology
468:00:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
405:04:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
1148:) 11:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
663:20:26, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
577:10:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
568:20:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
493:17:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
482:14:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
432:05:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
400:Maybe. But not well written.
218:06:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
32:for general discussion about
1086:Requested move 29 March 2021
1060:10:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
1022:Requested move 29 March 2021
874:16:43, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
613:19:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
295:22:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
7:
1262:Above-the-line (filmmaking)
1000:15:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
977:08:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
959:07:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
944:17:53, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
930:12:55, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
908:04:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
891:properly has a hyphen, the
859:22:25, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
519:22:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
412:Is Star Wars high-concept?
387:15:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
361:16:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
344:16:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
325:03:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
10:
1452:
1408:20:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
1305:06:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
1278:18:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
1248:12:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
1213:12:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
1116:02:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
1034:12:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
816:22:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
683:03:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
500:Unique Selling Proposition
378:21:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
271:02:43, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
166:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
1436:WikiProject Film articles
1431:Start-Class film articles
1397:gives examples of both. —
1386:09:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
1361:09:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
1334:19:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
1167:22:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
1081:13:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
766:13:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
747:21:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
709:21:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
595:19:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
586:Doesn't this link to the
533:23:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
452:08:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
307:23:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
281:15:27, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
199:20:05, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)
169:Template:WikiProject Film
106:
88:
1415:Please do not modify it.
1126:Please do not modify it.
915:the school of Vygotsky's
800:00:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
724:11:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
638:18:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
549:15:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
230:23:46, 22 February 2014‎
330:I second that request.
70:This article is rated
245:comment was added by
191:Uncategorized remarks
1185:stevenpressfield.com
808:Cuttycuttiercuttiest
782:Premise (filmmaking)
558:'product placement'?
36:. Any such comments
822:analogous narrative
142:join the discussion
1322:Compound modifiers
1127:
76:content assessment
31:
1374:Compound modifier
1297:HumanBodyPiloter5
1169:
1125:
1102:comment added by
1062:
1050:comment added by
988:usage of the term
843:
842:
699:comment added by
653:comment added by
618:Snakes on a Plane
278:matt kane's brain
258:
231:
208:comment added by
188:
187:
184:
183:
180:
179:
144:and see lists of
56:
55:
27:
1443:
1149:
1118:
1045:
826:
711:
665:
516:Johann Schlinker
240:
225:
220:
197:Morpheuspictures
174:
173:
170:
167:
164:
137:WikiProject Film
131:
126:
125:
124:
115:
108:
107:
97:
90:
89:
73:
67:
66:
58:
23:
22:
16:
1451:
1450:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1130:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1097:
1088:
1068:
1041:
882:
824:
774:
731:
717:
694:
690:
671:
648:
645:
620:
610:Smerdis of Tlön
602:
584:
582:Disaster movies
560:
460:
241:—The preceding
237:
228:Thundermist0416
203:
193:
171:
168:
165:
162:
161:
127:
122:
120:
74:on Knowledge's
71:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1449:
1439:
1438:
1433:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1388:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1337:
1336:
1320:discussion of
1307:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1252:I checked the
1215:
1131:
1122:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1087:
1084:
1067:
1064:
1040:
1037:
1018:User:Askedonty
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
881:
878:
877:
876:
849:is intended? —
841:
840:
837:
830:
823:
820:
819:
818:
773:
770:
769:
768:
730:
727:
716:
713:
689:
686:
670:
667:
655:65.175.252.222
644:
641:
619:
616:
601:
598:
583:
580:
559:
556:
522:
521:
485:
484:
459:
458:as opposed to?
456:
455:
454:
435:
434:
418:
417:
410:
409:
408:
407:
395:
394:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
349:
348:
347:
346:
328:
327:
300:
299:
298:
297:
284:
283:
263:24.211.215.187
236:
233:
192:
189:
186:
185:
182:
181:
178:
177:
175:
133:
132:
116:
104:
103:
98:
86:
85:
79:
68:
54:
53:
50:Reference desk
38:may be removed
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1448:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1428:
1426:
1416:
1409:
1406:
1404:
1401:
1396:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1368:
1367:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1308:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1287:
1286:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1240:143.176.30.65
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1220:
1216:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1205:143.176.30.65
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1168:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1147:
1143:
1142:143.176.30.65
1139:
1135:
1129:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1095:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1063:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1052:89.150.26.234
1049:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1026:143.176.30.65
1023:
1019:
1015:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
985:
980:
979:
978:
974:
970:
966:
962:
961:
960:
956:
952:
947:
946:
945:
941:
937:
934:Not a whit. —
933:
932:
931:
927:
923:
919:
916:
912:
911:
910:
909:
905:
901:
897:
894:
890:
887:
875:
871:
867:
863:
862:
861:
860:
856:
852:
848:
838:
835:
831:
828:
827:
817:
813:
809:
804:
803:
802:
801:
797:
793:
789:
785:
783:
778:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
750:
749:
748:
744:
740:
737:
726:
725:
722:
712:
710:
706:
702:
698:
685:
684:
680:
676:
666:
664:
660:
656:
652:
640:
639:
635:
631:
626:
623:
615:
614:
611:
606:
597:
596:
593:
589:
588:disaster film
579:
578:
575:
570:
569:
566:
555:
551:
550:
547:
542:
541:
535:
534:
531:
527:
520:
517:
513:
512:
507:
506:
501:
497:
496:
495:
494:
491:
483:
480:
475:
474:
473:
470:
469:
466:
453:
449:
445:
444:70.173.45.111
441:
437:
436:
433:
429:
425:
424:207.177.237.6
420:
419:
415:
414:
413:
406:
403:
399:
398:
397:
396:
391:
390:
389:
388:
385:
380:
379:
376:
371:
362:
359:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
345:
342:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
326:
322:
318:
317:98.110.243.10
315:
311:
310:
309:
308:
305:
296:
293:
292:69.205.160.34
288:
287:
286:
285:
282:
279:
275:
274:
273:
272:
268:
264:
259:
256:
252:
248:
244:
232:
229:
221:
219:
215:
211:
207:
200:
198:
176:
172:film articles
159:
155:
154:documentation
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
130:
119:
117:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
96:
92:
91:
87:
83:
77:
69:
65:
60:
59:
51:
47:
43:
39:
35:
30:
26:This page is
25:
18:
17:
1414:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1369:
1344:
1309:
1288:
1266:High-concept
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1162:
1157:
1152:
1151:
1138:High concept
1134:High-concept
1132:
1123:
1098:— Preceding
1093:
1069:
1046:— Preceding
1042:
1014:User:Tamfang
1012:
987:
983:
964:
896:high concept
895:
892:
889:high-concept
888:
885:
883:
844:
790:
786:
779:
775:
732:
718:
701:68.63.111.13
691:
672:
646:
627:
624:
621:
607:
603:
600:Tags removed
585:
571:
561:
552:
538:
536:
523:
509:
503:
490:SuperMachine
486:
471:
461:
411:
381:
372:
369:
332:Benbenbenben
329:
301:
260:
247:210.55.0.195
238:
235:Poor Writing
226:— remark by
222:
210:67.42.13.235
201:
194:
135:
82:WikiProjects
46:High concept
34:High concept
1326:BarrelProof
893:noun phrase
836:narrative.
792:96.50.87.54
695:—Preceding
649:—Preceding
643:Recent Edit
574:Squishycube
565:Squishycube
204:—Preceding
129:Film portal
72:Start-class
29:not a forum
1425:Categories
1318:MOS:HYPHEN
1219:2012‎ move
1177:utexas.edu
1153:Relisting.
1073:Chrismorey
1066:Literature
758:Chrismorey
739:82.29.4.50
675:Webster100
630:Rodeosmurf
158:guidelines
146:open tasks
42:refactored
1378:Askedonty
1353:Askedonty
1293:WP:RETAIN
1270:Askedonty
1232:Macmillan
1224:adjective
1203:, etc. --
1158:Vaticidal
992:Askedonty
951:Askedonty
922:Askedonty
886:adjective
834:analogous
669:Terrorism
530:Tshannon0
304:Attakmint
1226:", e.g.
1217:And the
1199:concept
1191:concept
1112:contribs
1104:Ceyockey
1100:unsigned
1048:unsigned
847:allegory
721:Gohnarch
697:unsigned
651:unsigned
546:womzilla
505:Wargames
479:WMMartin
358:Tronbarr
341:Tronbarr
255:contribs
243:unsigned
206:unsigned
1400:Michael
1391:Support
1314:WP:NOUN
1310:Support
1289:Neutral
1236:Merriam
1201:premise
1181:mtv.com
1163:prophet
969:Tamfang
936:Tamfang
900:Tamfang
851:Tamfang
754:Premise
729:Rewrite
402:Rintrah
48:at the
1372:: Per
1370:Oppose
1228:Oxford
1195:, high
866:Dorebo
592:Beardo
393:clear.
384:pjandy
78:scale.
1193:films
1094:Moved
1039:Locke
540:Twins
1382:talk
1357:talk
1330:talk
1324:. —
1301:talk
1274:talk
1244:talk
1209:talk
1146:talk
1108:talk
1077:talk
1056:talk
1030:talk
1024:. --
1016:and
996:talk
973:talk
965:term
955:talk
940:talk
926:talk
904:talk
884:The
870:talk
855:talk
812:talk
796:talk
762:talk
743:talk
705:talk
679:talk
659:talk
634:talk
511:Heat
448:talk
428:talk
321:talk
312:See
267:talk
251:talk
214:talk
163:Film
148:and
101:Film
1254:MOS
465:dan
375:ruk
257:) .
40:or
1427::
1384:)
1359:)
1351:--
1332:)
1303:)
1276:)
1246:)
1234:,
1230:,
1211:)
1183:,
1179:,
1136:→
1114:)
1110:•
1079:)
1058:)
1032:)
998:)
975:)
963:A
957:)
949:--
942:)
928:)
906:)
872:)
857:)
839:”
829:“
814:)
798:)
764:)
745:)
707:)
681:)
661:)
636:)
528:--
463:--
450:)
430:)
323:)
269:)
253:•
216:)
1405:.
1403:Z
1380:(
1355:(
1343:"
1328:(
1299:(
1272:(
1242:(
1222:"
1207:(
1197:-
1189:-
1150:—
1144:(
1106:(
1075:(
1054:(
1028:(
994:(
971:(
953:(
938:(
924:(
902:(
868:(
853:(
810:(
794:(
760:(
741:(
703:(
677:(
657:(
632:(
446:(
426:(
319:(
265:(
249:(
212:(
160:.
84::
52:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
