Talk:Footprints (poem)

1962:) AFAIU IINM it is claimed, that the parable had appeared in one of the ancient XV century Byzantine manuscripts presently stored in the Vatican Library, written by a monk-scribe Basil who was kinda a secretary of his Mentor and monastery Elder, another unnamed monk to whom this parable initially belonged! I googled it in English and found NO INFORMATION on that tho I am a poor researcher. Anyways, thought this might be useful to you in some way or another. I'm really new to Wiki and this is the first time I clicked the TALK button. Some other links (in Russian) 1368:" in a listing of "notable residents or natives." Should anything be done to revise that entry? Note that a decision by the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York (EDNY) is not necessarily binding outside the EDNY itself in the United States and probably has no binding effect at all outside the United States. That being the case, would anyone object if, assuming I can figure out a graceful way to do so, I were to insert a brief line somewhere mentioning Powers and distinguishing her from the unrelated but confusingly like-named 74: 53: 22: 1680: 1581: 84: 1143:

disputed, and give interested readers pointers to the Poetry Foundation article where they can learn further details. In disputed cases, getting too much into details invariably results in strife and poor prose: someone will claim that their side is not covered fairly and you end up with articles which are half copyright registration claims - something very few readers are likely to be interested in.

1628: 1174:'s good faith and bold removal of the authorship information, since it is verified and seems relevant to the article. Just as a btw, the information about June Hadden Hobbs' views is not about authoriship as such, but concerns the origin of the narrative idea, so should stay even if authorship information was removed. I declare an interest - I put that snippet in! 1538:

Testimonial to Mr. Wm. M. Flood, Wood's Burlesque Troupe and a a host of volunteers. It lists many performmances by various actors. One of them reads: Dramatic Readings; also one reads 'Footprints in the sands by W. M. Flood. The broadside is a woodcut print. It was engraved by Adrian Probasco, Philadelphis and was printed by Ledger Job Print, Philadelphis.

1073:

scrutiny. It seems like the point of this line is to say, in effect, "It's a chintzy, silly poem, but God bless 'em, those Christians love it". It would be dubious to include the line even if it was sourced, since, like I said, the same could be said of any literary creation, but sourcing would at least make it less opinion-y. Just a thought.

1100:

I have removed all specific claims of authorship. Knowledge is not the place for discussing and resolving copyright disputes nor is it interesting in a larger context, it is sufficient to note in this article that the original authorship is uncertain and disputed. Those who wish to discuss it in more

1660:

The article observes that Margaret Fishback Powers has a registered copyright as author of the poem, and has licensed the work to dozens of companies including Hallmark Cards and Lenox gifts. Mrs. Powers is also the owner of the trademarks FOOTPRINTS and FOOTPRINTS IN THE SAND, which are registered

1387:

No objections having been forthcoming, I took the liberty of adding a one-sentence clarification about M.F.A., taking care not to mention M.F.P. by name so as to avoid inviting specific mention of the other claimants. If anyone has problems with what I did, the "revert" button is always available.

971:

By the way, if you can beat say, a police polygraph examiner, by any means that you choose, I will give in to your point of view. (but you cannot). Neither can Zangre, Fishback, Carty nor any of the others who are claiming my poem. That is why they refuse to take a police examiner's polygraph test.

946:

The keys here are, I think, verifiability and neutrality. It's no good just saying "proved by polygraph". If an editor can find a reliable source - preferably multiple reliable sources - for the fact that the polygraph happened and what the result was, and it is written up in a neutral way then I

657:

You have included an author (Floyd Keeton) in your list of authors for this poem based on I know not what. In attempting to verify his alledged authenticity I contacted the Montgomery county historical society in Red Oak Iowa where his papers are supposed to be housed. They inform me that they have

1852:

The most dominant usage in prose is in the context of fictional or actual adventure or mystery stories or articles. Prominent fictional stories would include Daniel Defoe's 1719 novel Robinson Crusoe; and Nathaniel Hawthorne's Foot-prints on the Sea-shore, first published in the journal Democratic

578:

According to American copyright law copyright is automatic to the author so no one but the author can legaly register copyright. Since the copyright office does not verify nor authenticate applicants for registration, anyone can purchase a copyright registeration. Such registerations are not legal

557:

1872:

This section might make an interesting blog post, but I'm afraid I'm not currently convinced that very much of it belongs on this Knowledge page, unless reliable sources can be found for all the assertions made, and tying them to the Footprints poem. (Even then they might be better as a separate

1142:

The details of the dispute of the authorship are not essential to notability of this piece. You're suggesting causality in the wrong direction: The many authorship claims are not the cause of the fame of this poem, they are with large probability a result of it. We do note that the authorship is

572:

The poem titled FOOTPRINTS IN THE SAND has been claimed by many persons over the years since it's release, however two of the named individuals that you have included never actualy claimed to author the poem. Hausen is being held up by Carty in some manner to declare the histirical origin of the

1537:

I don't know who originally wrote the poem 'Footprints in the sand, but I can tell you that I have a broadside, which is dated November 15, 1869. The broadside is an announcement of a Minstral Troupe appearing at Friendship Hall in Philadelphia on Nov. 15, 1869. It is titled Grand Complimentary

1404:

Someone started to detail claims again; I've trimmed the entry back, but now M.F. Powers is cited by name. I'd be perfectly happy with writing her name back out entirely, but I'll leave that to other hands. I would, however, urge that we retain the disclaimer about Margaret Fishback Antolini to

1318:

To the anonymous user: you're welcome to discuss proposed additions to the article here, but please understand that wikipedia is a collaboratively edited encyclopedia. You'll need to engage with the editors here and follow our rules and guidelines if you wish this article to reflect your input.

1304:

No complaints or discussion for over a day, so I've restored that revision with some additions: the text about June Hadden Hobbs' views and an AF 447 mention. I don't think this version lacks any significant information of the old revision, except authorship claims & copyright registration

456:

Note for posterity: first of all, it's a Knowledge policy (I don't know the name offhand) to keep material of uncertain copyright status off of wikipedia, out of caution. So this removal is correct as of now. But, secondly, if the publication date really was 1963, if it was initially published

553:

The poem titled FOOTPRINTS IN THE SAND has been claimed by many persons over the years since it's release, however two of the named individuals that you have included never actualy claimed to author the poem. Haussing is being held up by Carty in some obscure roll to bolster Carty's claims to

1072:

Unless somebody wants to add sourcing in linking to literary criticism of the piece, it seems out-of-place to note that critics have debated the literary merits of the piece in the intro. This could doubtlessly be said of every piece of literature or writing that's ever gotten any degree of

986:

a) email addressees are not reliable sources; b) Even if something is delivered, there is no authentication that what is delivered is a valid copy of the authentic, original results; c) There is no way to determine how much coaching was given, prior to the test being administered;

1861:

exists; but that doesn't provide references for any of the other statements - by what authority do we establish that adventure and mystery stories are "the most dominant usage in prose" of the phrase? Just demonstrating that one such story exists isn't sufficient to state this.

1237:. Sometimes, as with Shakespeare, authorship has great historical significance and significant impact on interpretation and on scholarly work. That isn't the case here. This is just airing claims, some good faith, some probably not, and none illuminating the underlying meaning. 926:

from the article. For starters, the results of the test are not publicly available. Secondly, polygraph tests measure neuromuscular responses. Thirdly, training on how to "defeat" a polygraph test is available throughout the world. Fourthly, at best, polygraph tests indicate

334:

to the poem by three different people, and maybe more. Probably at least two of those claims must be unjustified (and maybe all of them are). But there might be one claimant who does hold a valid and justifiable copyright in the poem, even if we don't know which one that is.

1841:

To add a statement to a Knowledge article, you need a reference for that specific statement, and a reference that it is relevant to the topic being discussed; not merely evidence that the thing you are talking about exists. For example, from the top of this section:

262:

This "poem" is typically four or five paragraphs long. There's no meter, rhyme, or rhythmic intent. There are no well-placed line breaks, no toying with language, no artful structuring. It's obvious that this is more of an essay than a poem. Should it be moved to

1123:

Authorship is part and parcel of the notability of this specific poem. As such, to not list who the alleged authors are, and the results of the court cases about authorship, is to deliberately and wilfully omit the significant datapoints about this specific

732:

66.228.221.110 claimed: Date of original publication: June 6,1922. Place of original publication: Published by the founding father of Library week from Hopewell, New Jersey. Publisher Robert Louis Scharring-Hausen, Ella H. Scharring-Hausen's husband.

750: 564:

There is NO DOUBT. Stevenson proved in court that her copyright is the valid copyright of the work. She has forensic evidence dealing with the date of composition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.101.153 (talk) 22:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

1953: 789:

because, as written, it is meaningless. If "cites", rather than "sites" is meant, it is still a meaningless statement. If, instead, "issued citations" is meant, then a reference to lawsuits that have been filed by Carolyn Joyce Carty is needed.

759:"If you saw upon the sea-shore the print of one human foot, you would conclude, that a man had passed that way, and that he had also left the traces of the other foot, though effaced by the rolling of the sands or inundation of the waters." 1270:

In addition, no-one has attempted to improve the, to outsiders largely incomprehensible, list of conflicting authorship claims since my note above (except for a banned user who had returned to push her own views). I still contend that

703:

The article says "is now public domain property and was later copyrighted by Mary Stevenson Zangare in 1984." Either the poem is under copyright, or it is public domain. With a 1984 copyright date, it would not be public domain today.

221:

Actually the dispute found its with to federal court and the Stevenson claim of copyright was upheld as first. There is a forensic report that places a copy written in her hand on period paper and ink and pencil to the middle 1930s.

1846:

Prior to its appearance in the late 1970s as a key phrase in the poem, and its popular tile, the phrase "footprints in the sand" occurred in limited (but occasionally widely read) contexts, including prose, published work titles, and

433:

3) If, as you claim, this was written in 1963, then as you say it is almost certainly still in copyright. Therefore, it cannot be reproduced in Knowledge without a specific set of rights being given away by the copyright holder.

1505:

A random anon saying so is not a valid source for whether permissions have been granted, and you've not provided one shred of evidence for any of the many naked assertions you've made on this talk page over the past 13 years.

1896: 303:

If there is no recognized author, there is no copyright on it, right? I have a store-bought cross with this poem written on it hanging on my child's wall. May I copy the words from it onto the page for this article?

1251:

P.S. Legal suits, counter-suits can be endless. It isn't an encyclopedia's purpose to document uncited perceptions of the legal status of situations in flux. Wiki isn't a battleground, a soapbox, or a kangaroo court.

584:

As long as there is doubt as to the author of the poem it seems improper to credit it to any other than "Author anonymous" as it was origionaly released. Carty is the only author who copyrighted "author anonymous."

658:

no record of Floyd Keeton having written the poem "footprints in the sand" in thier records. In view of this I think you should give serious consideration to removing his name from the list of authors of this poem.

856:

Legal action (2007) in the Eastern District of New York (federal court) .. judge ruled a default. She was first. The other claimants are no longer a factor. Carty's claims are valid with the release of the entire

1345:

Legal suits are NOT endless. A 2007 USDC/EDNY case verified Stevenson's copyright of the poem. There has been no further litigation. All other parties who surface here were on the losing end of the decision.

561:

As long as there is doubt as to the author of the poem it seems improper to credit it to any other than "Author unknown" as it was origionaly released. 12.73.18.153 (talk) 07:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

763:

i.e. both feet belong to one (human) body; the missing prints have been erased (whereas int he poem they were never there. There is no reference to divine companionship or assistance. Regards,

1425:

Given that the article includes an entire section about adaptations, which starts off with the song, do we still need the cross reference at the top reading approximately "for the song see..."?

683:

You'll note that this article doesn't mention Montgomery County Historical Society in Red Oak, Iowa. It does provide the copyright data of the publication that contains his version of the poem.

772: 554:

authorship and Mary Stevenson is being held up as author by her step son. Both of these represent unsubstantiated allegations which are inappropiate for inclusion in an encyclopedia format.

1977: 840:

Sharring-Hausen's account is contradicted by McCarty's account. The matter was settled in USDC/EDNY. Stevenson's copyright prevailed. The other claims of authorship have no legal standing.

736:( I removed that content from where it was intermixed with those of the above poster. This anon editor (66.228.221.110) also edited other posts written by other people on this talk page.) 1749: 1820: 1481:

He also did, as have dozen's of others, released unauthorized versions and uses. To date only a couple of persons have been granted lyric permissions. Edgel Groves is not one of them.

1043:

No. Just because it can, doesn't mean that it's relevant. You could sing it to the tune of Billy Joel's We Didn't Start the Fire if you tried; doesn't mean it belongs in the article.

903:

Sharring-Hausen's account is contradicted by McCarty's account. The matter was not settled in USDC/EDNY. Stevenson's copyright. The other claims of authorship have no legal standing.

1204:

rewrite it into coherent text instead of a laundry list of conflicting claims and uninteresting copyright registration notices (for inspiration, see the Poetry foundation article).

1904: 1767: 1763: 1865:

Finally, the relevance of the content to the article needs to be established - to add to the article about the footprints poem content about Robinson Crusoe is, I'm afraid,

889:

because she does not appear have publicly claimed that this work is her. If Ella Scharring-Hausen did make such a claim, then where she made such a claim needs to be cited.

1857:

That first paragraph has no references at all. On whose authority are the contexts declared "limited"? In the second paragraph, the reference demonstrates that the work

1973: 670: 318: 427:

1) The page says elsewhere that the author is unknown; if you add a paragraph stating who the author is, you would need to change the other part of the page as well.

1616: 1556: 590: 718:

Given that the article states that there are three entities claiming copyright, and that that the version published here is under copyright, I deleted the poem.

1668: 1571: 978: 666: 462: 457:

without a copyright notice (as some sources claim), then it would be "In the public domain due to failure to comply with required formalities", to quote the

1882: 1829: 1612: 1552: 1452: 264: 193: 1652: 1620: 249: 348:

The Stevenson copyright claim supercedes the others. The federal court decision actually forbid one party from every claiming any rights whatsoever.

292: 1664: 1657:

In "Authorship and origins," after the sentence citing Aviv's Poetry Foundation article, the following summary of that article should be inserted:

1929: 342: 140: 1305:

numbers. For that, we point the interested reader to the Poetry Foundation article which covers it in far better detail than this article can do.

322: 1672: 834: 818: 378: 363: 1426: 1406: 1389: 1373: 825:

I don't have access to PACER, but I found a couple of unreliable sources on the Internet that implied the plaintiff prevailed in their claims.

298: 1643: 956: 1291: 1261: 1246: 1821: 1159: 1133: 1815: 1220: 1183: 1090: 973: 966: 543: 1834:

I'm afraid this section still has the same issues I tagged it with earlier this month, perhaps more so. I wonder if you've read the

1745:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1414: 1397: 244:

This article should not be used as a platform for arguing one claim of authorship over any others. Knowledge places heavy stress on

1524: 501: 404: 1735: 1496: 1475: 1335: 912: 898: 470: 2001: 310: 167: 130: 1959: 1564: 1704: 1969: 2006: 1996: 1608:

Remove the copyrighted text referring to the footprints poem under the photo. This text is copyrighted and cannot be used.

1082: 1074: 1021: 1001: 940: 674: 461:. So, if someone definitively proves the first publication at some point, it might very well turn out to be public domain. 314: 493: 1916: 1560: 1488: 1460: 1347: 1067: 1013: 993: 904: 841: 745: 727: 450: 370: 355: 234: 226: 586: 1948: 868: 849: 799: 282: 215: 106: 1727: 1355: 692: 652: 1439: 1434: 873: 252: 196: 1887: 1710: 620: 277:

I agreed with this concern, but google revealed that at least one person who asserts authorship calls it a poem (

1766:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1835: 1532: 965:

Thanks for the clarification! Actualy the polygraph in question is available to anyone by simply e-mailing to

271: 1381: 207:

The page seems to be arguing with itself about authorship. This is inappropriate for an encyclopedia format.

1117: 1061: 1810: 1233:

I'm inclined to note conflicting claims in a single brief sentence, largely for the reasons articulated by

968:

and requesting it. Of course you will only get a copy of the original. The examination ID is # TPOSOSO7128

412: 225:

No one else can produce a shred of concrete evidence to prove a prior claim, had a day in court, and lost.

97: 58: 33: 643:. Furthermore, polygraph tests results are unreliable. I also added back the reference listing template. 1006:

This is a bogus entry. Webb refused to appear in a civil case in federal court to "prove" his position.

430:

2) You make a claim as to who the author is without giving any sources where that claim can be verified.

180: 1785:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1921: 1726:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1257: 1242: 289: 917: 882:

because the other claimants also have a line or two about their copyright filings, or lack thereof.

787:

Carolyn Joyce Carty sites copyright infringement on all parties named except Ella H. Scharring-Hausen

1873:"Footprints in the sand" article, as the vast majority of the section doesn't relate to the poem.) 1272: 1086: 1078: 466: 339: 1372:

Antolini, who wrote entertaining light verse for US magazines in the '30s through the '60s or so?

1081:) 16:32, 4 June 2009 (UTC) A mother carries a baby, they are by the water, not quite understanding 602:

LMFAO no, an improper registration is in no way, shape, or form "theft." That's not how it works.

105:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1801: 1587: 1492: 1456: 1420: 1351: 1129: 1017: 997: 936: 908: 894: 864: 845: 830: 814: 795: 741: 723: 698: 688: 648: 548: 518:(of which "The Lord" is a very common rendering in English, representing "Adonai"), or I suppose 374: 359: 230: 202: 21: 1770:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

809:. This way the article can explain the case, without running into too much legal terminology. 1786: 1736:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080213002152/http://musicnews.virginmedia.com/news/?news_id=52026

1364:

includes one of the authorial claimants, Margaret Fishback Powers, as the "acclaimed author of

1360:

I do hope this doesn't fall into the category of belaboring a defunct equine, but the article

573:

poem. Carty's claims the authorship of Mary Stevenson's version as Ella H. Scharring-Hausens.

281:), and other results have more along those lines. For more input, i'd suggest listing this at 1960:

https://yandex.ru/search/?text=размышления+смиренного+сердца+архимандрита+Амвросия+(Погодина)

1944: 1936: 1773: 1639: 1253: 1238: 286: 39: 369:

Reproduction in part or in whole is forbidden without prior permission and written consent.

1912: 1793: 1692: 1548: 1512: 1484: 1471: 1448: 1361: 1179: 1049: 1009: 952: 768: 662: 608: 481: 458: 392: 351: 8: 1954:"Reflections of the Humble Heart" old Byzantine manuscript earlier mention of the parable 1900: 780: 336: 1033: 1752:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1739: 1165: 1125: 1095: 1027: 932: 890: 860: 826: 810: 791: 737: 719: 684: 644: 630: 539: 446: 268: 239: 1792:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

534:, though I'm not sure everyone who uses this poem has that particular deity in mind). 1932: 1719: 1430: 1410: 1393: 1377: 1369: 421: 1940: 1635: 1328: 1284: 1213: 1152: 1110: 157: 1908: 1723: 1687: 1507: 1467: 1175: 1044: 948: 764: 603: 476: 387: 278: 176: 1032:

This can be sung to the Londonderry Air/O Danny Boy tune and can be found here:

245: 212: 1758:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 751:

Hume's references to footprints in "An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding"

1990: 1878: 1866: 535: 519: 442: 257: 89: 1661:

in the United States and abroad for a broad array of products and services.

640: 1444:

In 1981 Edgel Groves released the first known song version of this poem.

1759: 1321: 1277: 1234: 1206: 1169: 1145: 1103: 636: 635:

I deleted the email address that was in the references, as it fails both

568:

On 20110623212527 66.228.221.110 rewrote the above paragraphs to read:

189: 1926: 1892:

Google Books search indicates an appearance in a March 1977 edition of

1365: 755:

Hi All, I have removed the Hume reference. It is just not relevant:

172: 1966: 437:

I hope this explains my changes; feel free to come and discuss it at

1963: 1874: 887:

All claims regarding her authorship have been made by third parties

507: 1679: 1983:

corrections: ...found NO INFORMATION... (initially i missed NO)

510:

goes to a page discussing what a lord is. There's obviously also

420:

Hello. Thank you for adding the text of the "Footprints" poem to

83: 73: 52: 102: 1541:

I don't know if this is the same poem but one has to wonder.

1275:

is a better resource to our readers than the current version.

880:

She did not register a copyright with the US Copyright Office.

417:...and left this on the talk page of the person who added it: 1869:

unless you have an article that specifically links the two.

523: 515: 1730:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1575: 1405:

counter the frequent misattributions of this text to her.

248:, and is therefore not the place for airing such matters. 859:

No supporting evidence was provided for that alteration.

854:

User 66.228.221.110 altered the above statements to read:

511: 188:

Good call, seems it is Stevenson - will correct it now.

330:

The problem is that there are at least three copyright

1036:

Could someone insert this into the main page, please?

1034:

http://www.raglan.churchuk.net/Footprints2%20text.htm

1838:

policy, and in particular the section on synthesis?

1740:

http://musicnews.virginmedia.com/news/?news_id=52026

101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 79: 1762:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1686:-- no sources provided to validate that assertion. 1822:Popular usage of "footprints in the sand" section 931:an individual has. As such, facts are irrelevant. 475:There's no need to reply to a comment from 2008. 1988: 947:don't think there would be a problem. Regards, 1748:This message was posted before February 2018. 506:I wondered whether to make "The Lord" a link; 279:http://www.footprints-inthe-sand.com/index.htm 1572:Edit request from Donetalking45, 23 June 2011 990:daoist|talk]]) 18:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 19: 1718:I have just modified one external link on 1653:Edit request from KipDutine, 10 April 2012 1939:mass). I wonder where that comes from... 579:but represent theft by the purpetrators. 558:but represent theft by the purpetrators. 1899:which was the in-house newspaper of the 1634:Not certain about the copyright issue. 714:Under what conditions was it published? 424:. I have removed it for three reasons: 1989: 299:Can we reproduce the text of the poem? 1935:wrote the poem (song was used in the 95:This article is within the scope of 15: 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 1967:https://vk.com/wall-54923863_11704 1101:detail can do so in other places. 711:When was the poem first published? 14: 2018: 1964:https://vk.com/wall-28075391_4380 1722:. Please take a moment to review 283:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Poetry 1678: 1626: 1579: 82: 72: 51: 20: 162:Is it Stephenson or Stevenson? 135:This article has been rated as 2002:Low-importance Poetry articles 1836:Knowledge:No original research 1463:) 11:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 957:21:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 922:I've been deleting the phrase 819:13:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 693:14:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 494:21:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 471:07:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 386:That ain't how it works, fam. 1: 1917:20:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC) 1903:. There is also a newsletter 1883:18:39, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 1221:20:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 1184:09:56, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 1160:21:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC) 1134:21:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC) 1118:16:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC) 941:21:59, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 899:04:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 800:04:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 1888:Earlier appearance in print? 1859:Foot-prints on the Sea-shore 1476:16:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 1336:20:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 1292:13:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 1262:03:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 1247:03:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 1002:02:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 593:) 07:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 544:17:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 451:17:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 323:05:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC) 293:20:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 272:13:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 253:08:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 216:01:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 197:11:13, 4 December 2005 (UTC) 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Poetry 7: 2007:WikiProject Poetry articles 1997:Start-Class Poetry articles 1958:Here (in this Russian book 1867:original research synthesis 1816:12:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC) 1602:to reactivate your request. 1590:has been answered. Set the 1091:08:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC) 773:11:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 183:) 21:29, Sep 19, 2005 (UTC) 118:Template:WikiProject Poetry 10: 2023: 1779:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1715:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1705:04:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC) 1673:20:13, 10 April 2012 (UTC) 1565:03:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1525:04:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC) 1062:04:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC) 977:Above unsigned comment by 621:04:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC) 405:04:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC) 141:project's importance scale 1978:01:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1644:09:47, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 1621:21:47, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 1435:18:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC) 1398:18:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC) 1382:23:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC) 869:11:16, 24 June 2011 (UTC) 746:11:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC) 728:21:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 707:The critical issues are: 677:) 00:54 25 September 2009 653:18:26, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 1949:00:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC) 1497:23:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 1440:First known song version 1415:22:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 1356:23:08, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 1168:, hence I have reverted 1022:23:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 913:23:08, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 874:Ella H. Scharring-Hausen 850:23:08, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 835:21:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 379:23:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 364:22:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 343:00:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC) 235:23:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 1922:Adhemar de Barros claim 1711:External links modified 211:Agreed. I took it out. 1907:. Can these be added? 1533:Footprints in the sand 595: 581: 575: 502:wikilink of "The Lord" 439:Talk:Footprints (poem) 267:or something similar? 28:This article is rated 1937:Air France Flight 447 1200:If you must have it, 924:verified by polygraph 582: 576: 570: 313:comment was added by 1760:regular verification 1362:Tillsonburg, Ontario 885:I've been re-adding 878:I've been re-adding 549:claims to authorship 526:is a page about the 459:Commons:Hirtle_chart 413:Removed text of poem 1901:Napa State Hospital 1750:After February 2018 807:legal case template 785:I've been deleting 1804:InternetArchiveBot 1755:InternetArchiveBot 1334: 1290: 1219: 1158: 1116: 265:Footprints (story) 98:WikiProject Poetry 34:content assessment 1933:Adhemar de Barros 1780: 1720:Footprints (poem) 1703: 1606: 1605: 1568: 1551:comment added by 1523: 1487:comment added by 1465: 1451:comment added by 1370:Margaret Fishback 1333: 1320: 1289: 1276: 1218: 1205: 1157: 1144: 1115: 1102: 1068:"Literary Merits" 1060: 1012:comment added by 918:Polygraph Testing 679: 665:comment added by 619: 492: 422:Footprints (poem) 403: 354:comment added by 326: 184: 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 2014: 1833: 1814: 1805: 1778: 1777: 1756: 1702: 1700: 1699: 1696: 1690: 1682: 1630: 1629: 1597: 1593: 1583: 1582: 1576: 1567: 1545: 1522: 1520: 1519: 1516: 1510: 1499: 1464: 1445: 1331: 1326: 1324: 1287: 1282: 1280: 1254:Piano non troppo 1239:Piano non troppo 1216: 1211: 1209: 1172: 1155: 1150: 1148: 1113: 1108: 1106: 1059: 1057: 1056: 1053: 1047: 1024: 678: 659: 618: 616: 615: 612: 606: 491: 489: 488: 485: 479: 402: 400: 399: 396: 390: 366: 308: 163: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 47: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2022: 2021: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2013: 2012: 2011: 1987: 1986: 1970:176.100.125.139 1956: 1924: 1890: 1827: 1825: 1808: 1803: 1771: 1764:have permission 1754: 1728:this simple FaQ 1713: 1697: 1694: 1693: 1688: 1655: 1627: 1595: 1591: 1580: 1574: 1546: 1535: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1508: 1482: 1466:(moved here by 1446: 1442: 1423: 1421:Cross reference 1329: 1322: 1285: 1278: 1214: 1207: 1170: 1153: 1146: 1111: 1104: 1098: 1070: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1045: 1030: 1028:Footprints Hymn 1007: 991: 920: 876: 783: 753: 701: 699:Copyright Issue 667:71.193.188.125 660: 633: 613: 610: 609: 604: 551: 504: 486: 483: 482: 477: 415: 397: 394: 393: 388: 349: 309:—The preceding 301: 260: 242: 205: 203:Dispute on Page 160: 121:Poetry articles 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 2020: 2010: 2009: 2004: 1999: 1985: 1984: 1955: 1952: 1923: 1920: 1889: 1886: 1855: 1854: 1849: 1848: 1824: 1819: 1798: 1797: 1790: 1743: 1742: 1734:Added archive 1712: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1654: 1651: 1649: 1647: 1646: 1611: 1604: 1603: 1584: 1573: 1570: 1534: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1441: 1438: 1422: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1401: 1400: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1265: 1264: 1249: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1137: 1136: 1097: 1094: 1083:173.62.160.246 1075:167.219.88.140 1069: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1039: 1029: 1026: 989: 984: 983: 982: 981: 979:71.193.134.106 975: 969: 960: 959: 919: 916: 875: 872: 838: 837: 822: 821: 782: 779: 777: 761: 760: 752: 749: 716: 715: 712: 700: 697: 696: 695: 632: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 550: 547: 503: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 463:Dingolover6969 414: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 346: 345: 337:Metropolitan90 315:74.121.120.227 300: 297: 296: 295: 259: 256: 241: 238: 219: 218: 204: 201: 200: 199: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Low-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2019: 2008: 2005: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1995: 1994: 1992: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1968: 1965: 1961: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1931: 1928: 1919: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1895: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1870: 1868: 1863: 1860: 1851: 1850: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1837: 1831: 1830:Themysteryguy 1823: 1818: 1817: 1812: 1807: 1806: 1795: 1791: 1788: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1775: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1751: 1746: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1716: 1706: 1701: 1691: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1650: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1613:Donetalking45 1609: 1601: 1598:parameter to 1589: 1585: 1578: 1577: 1569: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1553:9thstinstpete 1550: 1542: 1539: 1526: 1521: 1511: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1489:24.46.101.153 1486: 1479: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453:Hirules house 1450: 1437: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1348:24.46.101.153 1337: 1332: 1325: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1293: 1288: 1281: 1274: 1273:this revision 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1250: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1231: 1222: 1217: 1210: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1167: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1156: 1149: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1114: 1107: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1063: 1058: 1048: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1037: 1035: 1025: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014:24.46.101.153 1011: 1004: 1003: 999: 995: 994:71.236.242.44 988: 980: 976: 974: 970: 967: 964: 963: 962: 961: 958: 954: 950: 945: 944: 943: 942: 938: 934: 930: 925: 915: 914: 910: 906: 905:24.46.101.153 901: 900: 896: 892: 888: 883: 881: 871: 870: 866: 862: 858: 852: 851: 847: 843: 842:24.46.101.153 836: 832: 828: 824: 823: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 803: 802: 801: 797: 793: 788: 778: 775: 774: 770: 766: 758: 757: 756: 748: 747: 743: 739: 734: 730: 729: 725: 721: 713: 710: 709: 708: 705: 694: 690: 686: 682: 681: 680: 676: 672: 668: 664: 655: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 622: 617: 607: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 594: 592: 588: 580: 574: 569: 566: 562: 559: 555: 546: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 520:God of Israel 517: 513: 509: 495: 490: 480: 474: 473: 472: 468: 464: 460: 455: 454: 453: 452: 448: 444: 440: 435: 431: 428: 425: 423: 418: 406: 401: 391: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 376: 372: 371:24.46.101.153 367: 365: 361: 357: 356:24.46.101.153 353: 344: 341: 338: 333: 329: 328: 327: 324: 320: 316: 312: 305: 294: 291: 288: 284: 280: 276: 275: 274: 273: 270: 269:Dyfsunctional 266: 255: 254: 251: 247: 237: 236: 232: 228: 227:24.46.101.153 223: 217: 214: 210: 209: 208: 198: 195: 194:81.99.181.231 191: 187: 186: 185: 182: 178: 174: 171: 169: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 90:Poetry portal 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1957: 1925: 1893: 1891: 1871: 1864: 1858: 1856: 1840: 1826: 1802: 1799: 1774:source check 1753: 1747: 1744: 1717: 1714: 1683: 1663: 1659: 1656: 1648: 1631: 1610: 1607: 1599: 1588:edit request 1543: 1540: 1536: 1480: 1443: 1424: 1359: 1344: 1201: 1099: 1071: 1038: 1031: 1005: 992: 985: 928: 923: 921: 902: 886: 884: 879: 877: 855: 853: 839: 806: 805:I added the 786: 784: 776: 762: 754: 735: 731: 717: 706: 702: 656: 634: 587:12.73.18.153 583: 577: 571: 567: 563: 560: 556: 552: 531: 530:and not the 527: 505: 438: 436: 432: 429: 426: 419: 416: 368: 347: 331: 306: 302: 261: 243: 224: 220: 206: 165: 161: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 1941:WhisperToMe 1930:stated that 1636:Jnorton7558 1547:—Preceding 1483:—Preceding 1447:—Preceding 1164:Agree with 1008:—Preceding 857:collection. 781:The Lawsuit 661:—Preceding 350:—Preceding 250:Ben Parsons 30:Start-class 1991:Categories 1927:Air France 1909:Sheila1988 1894:Imola News 1811:Report bug 1592:|answered= 1468:Springnuts 1366:Footprints 1176:Springnuts 1096:Authorship 949:Springnuts 765:Springnuts 631:References 246:neutrality 240:Neutrality 170:comment by 166:preceding 1905:from 1976 1794:this tool 1787:this tool 1665:Kipdutine 287:"alyosha" 213:Miss Dark 1800:Cheers.— 1684:Declined 1561:contribs 1549:unsigned 1485:unsigned 1461:contribs 1449:unsigned 1166:jonathon 1126:jonathon 1010:unsigned 933:jonathon 891:jonathon 827:jonathon 811:jonathon 792:jonathon 720:jonathon 685:jonathon 675:contribs 663:unsigned 645:jonathon 536:Marnanel 522:, since 508:The Lord 443:Marnanel 352:unsigned 311:unsigned 190:(source) 181:contribs 168:unsigned 158:Spelling 1853:Review 1847:poetry. 1724:my edit 1544:````` 1427:Drhoehl 1407:Drhoehl 1390:Drhoehl 1374:Drhoehl 1235:henrick 929:beliefs 139:on the 1698:Jester 1518:Jester 1323:henrik 1279:henrik 1208:henrik 1202:please 1171:henrik 1147:henrik 1105:henrik 1055:Jester 614:Jester 487:Jester 398:Jester 340:(talk) 332:claims 307:David 290:(talk) 112:Poetry 103:poetry 59:Poetry 36:scale. 1596:|ans= 1586:This 1124:poem. 641:WP:RS 532:being 258:Poem? 173:Mhari 1974:talk 1945:talk 1913:talk 1897:link 1879:talk 1695:SWAT 1669:talk 1640:talk 1632:Done 1617:talk 1557:talk 1515:SWAT 1493:talk 1472:talk 1457:talk 1431:talk 1411:talk 1394:talk 1378:talk 1352:talk 1330:talk 1286:talk 1258:talk 1243:talk 1215:talk 1180:talk 1154:talk 1130:talk 1112:talk 1087:talk 1079:talk 1052:SWAT 1018:talk 998:talk 953:talk 937:talk 909:talk 895:talk 865:talk 846:talk 831:talk 815:talk 796:talk 769:talk 742:talk 724:talk 689:talk 671:talk 649:talk 639:and 637:WP:V 611:SWAT 591:talk 540:talk 528:name 524:YHWH 516:YHWH 484:SWAT 467:talk 447:talk 395:SWAT 375:talk 360:talk 319:talk 231:talk 177:talk 1875:TSP 1768:RfC 1738:to 1594:or 512:God 192:-- 131:Low 1993:: 1976:) 1947:) 1915:) 1881:) 1781:. 1776:}} 1772:{{ 1671:) 1642:) 1619:) 1600:no 1563:) 1559:• 1495:) 1478:) 1474:) 1459:• 1433:) 1413:) 1396:) 1380:) 1354:) 1260:) 1245:) 1182:) 1132:) 1089:) 1020:) 1000:) 955:) 939:) 911:) 897:) 867:) 848:) 833:) 817:) 798:) 771:) 744:) 726:) 691:) 673:• 651:) 542:) 514:, 469:) 449:) 441:. 377:) 362:) 335:-- 321:) 285:. 233:) 179:• 1972:( 1943:( 1911:( 1877:( 1832:: 1828:@ 1813:) 1809:( 1796:. 1789:. 1689:⇒ 1667:( 1638:( 1615:( 1555:( 1509:⇒ 1491:( 1470:( 1455:( 1429:( 1409:( 1392:( 1376:( 1350:( 1327:• 1283:• 1256:( 1241:( 1212:• 1178:( 1151:• 1128:( 1109:• 1085:( 1077:( 1046:⇒ 1016:( 996:( 951:( 935:( 907:( 893:( 863:( 861:p 844:( 829:( 813:( 794:( 767:( 740:( 738:p 722:( 687:( 669:( 647:( 605:⇒ 589:( 538:( 478:⇒ 465:( 445:( 389:⇒ 373:( 358:( 325:. 317:( 229:( 175:( 164:— 143:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index