Knowledge

Talk:Duluth (disambiguation)

Source đź“ť

882:("much more used than any other topic covered in Knowledge to which the same word(s) may also refer"). Also, per the principle of least surprise. I agree with Station1 that we want to minimize user encounters with dab pages. In this case (assuming the move succeeds) a plain search for Duluth will take them to this article (through a redirect, unfortunately, but that's another issue). Most will be where they want to be right away. Most others will be one 33: 457:), and it's an arduous, tedious process sorting out the few articles that need to be corrected. (This, of course, can also be an argument for keeping things the way they are in this case, since it would be really hard to find the few Georgia links that would show up.) If we're not going by page links, though, let's just say that Duluth, Minnesota is a major port and the center of a metropolitan area, while Duluth, Georgia is a suburb. -- 82: 64: 834:
Using this as an example, as things now stand 3500-4000 viewers per month are surprised they landed on a dab page and need to click through. If Duluth redirected to Minnesota, only a quarter to a half that many would be surprised they were at Duluth, Minn, and need to click through (estimating based
342:
Numbers of incoming links are highly unreliable. They can show that there is a clear need to disambiguate, but not the opposite. They don't show the opposite because it is so easy to "game the system" to make a case for a given "primary topic" by going through the list and fixing links that intend
379:
It is interesting to do a Google search just on "Duluth -Knowledge" (so as to exclude wikipedia results). Of the first 100 returns, it looks like over 85 directly relate to the Minnesota city or attractions in it, and 10-12 to the Georgia one. (There is some duplication so I didn't make an exact
283:
There is also the novel by one of the most well known authors in the world. Also, for all you know someone from Georgia went through to fix most of the links to their town (not likely, but possible). My point is that "what links here" should never be used as a factor in deciding whether to move a
678:
since it is not clear that with everything on the dab page that there is a primary use. Duluth is more then the two cities which is all everyone seems to be focusing on. Also leaving the dab page where it is makes disambiguation cleanup possible. Moving a dab page needs a strong consensus and a
804:
Because dab pages are not articles. No reader expects to wind up on a dab page and ideally no one ever should. In cases where article titles are ambiguous, we should serve the majority. A hatnote is usually the more unobtrusive way to direct the minority. Sure, there will be a few cases where a
819:
Gee, that is why dab pages exist. Article links should not drop the reader at a dab page. However if a reader tries to go to an ambiguous name, they should wind up at a dab page and not a page that is not what they are looking for. Its the principle of least surprise.
244:
The Georgia town is just as notable and has good claim. Incoming links are NOT a reliable indicator since many people (including myself) try and make sure links to disambiguation pages get fixed to point to the right page.
327:
When I start fixing ambiguous links and every article but one so far links properly to Duluth, Minnesota, that is a very strong indication to me as to what the primary topic is. (Sorry about my lousy indenting skills.)
587:. Duluth, Minnesota is well-known not only for its size, but importance as a port. Where one use is primary or more common the name is often used for the article on that use, even though other uses exist. 617:
in its title. Folks looking for an airport, school, depot, religious institution, or Precambrian rock formation are not likely to just search for the single word. We should eliminate the excess.
903:. I don't think it's been demonstrated that the Georgia town is "just as notable", and the page views show that this article is much more often searched for by readers than the other one. 471:
A primary topic is supposed to be "clearly" primary. In 2009 to date, the prime contender for primary topic article gets 3.4 times more page views than one other article. --
657:, when there is a cluster of articles related to a geographic name, and the base name is ambiguous, it is especially helpful to have a dab page occupy the base name. -- 717:: those articles are on the dab pages because the incoming links to the dab so often intended an article in the cluster other than the presumptive "primary topic". -- 170:
to move at this time. I am closing this move discussion so primarily due to its having been running for so long, and without prejudice against a re-proposal.
709:
This is why even if there were no Duluth GA the disambiguation page should remain here. There are similar clusters of related articles on the dab pages
878:
When one topic on a dab page gets over 3 times as many hits as the second most popular topic, and all the others are related to the first, that's a
704: 577: 799: 688: 895: 726: 554: 515: 494: 480: 466: 352: 790:
I don't understand why editors don't like dab pages. Not every article needs to be the primary use and not every page will have a primary use.
604: 337: 260: 236: 912: 858: 844: 829: 814: 485:
Una, could you clarify that? Does the 3.4 figure apply to primary topics across Knowledge, or for Duluth, Minnesota versus Duluth, Georgia?--
666: 432: 400: 886:
from getting to their intended destination, while only the rare remainder will have to click to and sift through the dab page. Perfect. --
781: 751: 644: 626: 299: 278: 564:- Not that this has any bearing on the outcome of this discussion, but there's a funny tale about how Duluth, Georgia, got its name. See 958: 654: 108: 944: 695:
The reason everyone is focusing on the two cities is that all of the other uses have some relation to the city in Minnesota. --
214: 104: 89: 69: 922:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
184: 756:
They are very useful comparisons in terms of what actually needs to be disambiguated. Many of the incoming links to
565: 423:
Why is it unlikely? I think it is normal practice by someone who isn't really into fixing links to dab pages. --
931:
I just now accidentally hit the "enter" key while undoing an edit. What I meant to type was " graduated from
849:
Well if half as many are not there for Duluth, Minnesota, then it is clear that there is no a primary topic.
44: 17: 631:
Fixed. Those items were added after discussion started and are certainly not useful or recommended by
926: 769: 94: 194: 99: 940: 879: 700: 573: 542: 490: 462: 333: 210: 141: 32: 743:, there are many other places that share that name. It really isn't a very useful comparison. 269:
But it's unlikely anyone would fix only the links meant for Georgia while ignoring Minnesota.
854: 825: 795: 684: 304:
Should "never" be used? Sorry, but that's simply untrue. Consider the Knowledge guideline:
50: 805:
primary use can't be determined among several possibilities, but they are a small minority.
891: 8: 777: 722: 662: 550: 511: 476: 428: 348: 309:
Tools that may help determine a primary topic, but are not determining factors, include:
178: 172: 840: 810: 640: 622: 600: 396: 292: 274: 253: 232: 772:. Hence the subsets. (I see the Weymouth subset got deleted; I've restored it.) -- 936: 908: 748: 696: 569: 538: 499: 486: 458: 329: 206: 202: 850: 821: 791: 761: 680: 454: 383:
The issue here is one of where to draw the line. Certainly no one would say that
227:, and only 5 of 43 incoming mainspace links intended for Georgia (now corrected). 887: 503: 224: 935:", as an example of why Duluth University should remain linked on this page. -- 773: 718: 658: 546: 507: 472: 424: 344: 952: 836: 806: 636: 618: 596: 392: 287: 270: 248: 228: 904: 744: 592: 391:
should be a dab page; but at some level a name should be disambiguated.
449:
I don't know, I find that hard to believe. I've tried that method with
450: 613:
As an aside-- one thing this page does not need is every entity with
757: 732: 710: 765: 736: 714: 632: 588: 388: 740: 384: 198: 190: 81: 63: 205:, which is the overwhelming primary use of the term.-- 107:, where you can join the project or contribute to the 156:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
97:pages on Knowledge. If you wish to help, you can 950: 87:This disambiguation page is within the scope of 566:Duluth, Minnesota#The Untold Delights of Duluth 313:* Incoming wikilinks from Special:WhatLinksHere 453:(looking for links that are supposed to go to 319:* Google web, news, scholar, or book searches 93:, an attempt to structure and organize all 30: 760:intend one of several articles related to 679:strong case. That case is not made here. 103:attached to this talk page, or visit the 43:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 14: 951: 316:* Knowledge article traffic statistics 768:intend ditto some article related to 655:repairing incoming links to dab pages 150:The following discussion is closed. 117:Knowledge:WikiProject Disambiguation 26: 120:Template:WikiProject Disambiguation 49:It is of interest to the following 24: 223:. Gets 2-4 times the pageviews of 25: 970: 764:. Many of the incoming links to 959:WikiProject Disambiguation pages 918:The discussion above is closed. 502:gets 3.4 times the pageviews of 80: 62: 31: 913:07:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 896:21:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 859:18:50, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 845:08:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 830:21:50, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 815:23:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 800:21:09, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 782:15:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 752:11:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 727:05:09, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 705:17:59, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 689:02:46, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 667:16:06, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 645:17:23, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 627:14:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 605:13:56, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 578:13:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 555:04:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 516:04:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 495:12:22, 18 September 2009 (UTC) 481:16:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 467:12:44, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 433:04:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 401:17:40, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 353:16:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 338:15:43, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 300:22:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 279:21:03, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 261:20:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 237:20:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 215:16:22, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 13: 1: 7: 185:10:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC) 10: 975: 945:12:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC) 90:WikiProject Disambiguation 770:London Borough of Enfield 75: 57: 920:Please do not modify it. 153:Please do not modify it. 541:doesn't seem to be the 195:Duluth (disambiguation) 123:Disambiguation articles 322: 307: 41:disambiguation page 45:content assessment 927:Duluth University 653:In my experience 539:Duluth, Minnesota 500:Duluth, Minnesota 203:Duluth, Minnesota 166:: the result was 164:Closing statement 139: 138: 135: 134: 131: 130: 16:(Redirected from 966: 762:Weymouth, Dorset 455:Washington, D.C. 343:other topics. -- 297: 295: 290: 258: 256: 251: 201:can redirect to 183: 181: 175: 155: 125: 124: 121: 118: 115: 102: 84: 77: 76: 66: 59: 58: 36: 35: 27: 21: 974: 973: 969: 968: 967: 965: 964: 963: 949: 948: 929: 924: 923: 835:on pageviews). 595:are examples. 504:Duluth, Georgia 293: 288: 286: 254: 249: 247: 225:Duluth, Georgia 179: 173: 171: 160: 151: 144: 122: 119: 116: 113: 112: 98: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 972: 962: 961: 928: 925: 917: 916: 915: 898: 884:hat link click 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 692: 691: 672: 671: 670: 669: 650: 649: 648: 647: 608: 607: 581: 580: 558: 557: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 381: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 325: 324: 323: 321: 320: 317: 314: 264: 263: 239: 188: 187: 159: 158: 146: 145: 143: 142:Requested move 140: 137: 136: 133: 132: 129: 128: 126: 114:Disambiguation 95:disambiguation 85: 73: 72: 70:Disambiguation 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 971: 960: 957: 956: 954: 947: 946: 942: 938: 934: 921: 914: 910: 906: 902: 899: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 880:primary topic 877: 874: 873: 860: 856: 852: 848: 847: 846: 842: 838: 833: 832: 831: 827: 823: 818: 817: 816: 812: 808: 803: 802: 801: 797: 793: 789: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 754: 753: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 729: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 707: 706: 702: 698: 694: 693: 690: 686: 682: 677: 674: 673: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 651: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 629: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 611: 610: 609: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 583: 582: 579: 575: 571: 567: 563: 560: 559: 556: 552: 548: 544: 543:primary topic 540: 536: 533: 532: 517: 513: 509: 505: 501: 498: 497: 496: 492: 488: 484: 483: 482: 478: 474: 470: 469: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 434: 430: 426: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 354: 350: 346: 341: 340: 339: 335: 331: 326: 318: 315: 312: 311: 310: 306: 305: 303: 302: 301: 298: 296: 291: 284:page or not. 282: 281: 280: 276: 272: 268: 267: 266: 265: 262: 259: 257: 252: 243: 240: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 219: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 186: 182: 176: 169: 165: 162: 161: 157: 154: 148: 147: 127: 110: 106: 101: 100:edit the page 96: 92: 91: 86: 83: 79: 78: 74: 71: 68: 65: 61: 60: 56: 52: 46: 42: 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 937:Ken Gallager 932: 930: 919: 900: 883: 875: 697:Ken Gallager 675: 614: 584: 570:Ken Gallager 561: 534: 487:Ken Gallager 459:Ken Gallager 330:Ken Gallager 308: 285: 246: 241: 220: 207:Ken Gallager 189: 168:no consensus 167: 163: 152: 149: 105:project page 88: 51:WikiProjects 40: 18:Talk:Duluths 851:Vegaswikian 822:Vegaswikian 792:Vegaswikian 681:Vegaswikian 593:Minneapolis 888:Born2cycle 731:With both 451:Washington 197:— so that 180:barbarian 109:discussion 774:Una Smith 739:, unlike 719:Una Smith 659:Una Smith 547:Una Smith 545:here. -- 508:Una Smith 473:Una Smith 425:Una Smith 345:Una Smith 174:Skomorokh 953:Category 837:Station1 807:Station1 758:Weymouth 733:Weymouth 711:Weymouth 637:Station1 619:Kablammo 597:Kablammo 393:Kablammo 271:Station1 229:Station1 905:Jafeluv 901:Support 876:Support 766:Enfield 737:Enfield 715:Enfield 633:MOS:DAB 589:Atlanta 585:Support 562:Comment 389:Atlanta 380:count.) 221:Support 933:Duluth 741:Duluth 676:Oppose 615:Duluth 535:Oppose 385:London 242:Oppose 199:Duluth 191:Duluth 47:scale. 749:wiser 745:older 568:. -- 506:. -- 294:Spyke 255:Spyke 39:This 941:talk 909:talk 892:talk 855:talk 841:talk 826:talk 811:talk 796:talk 778:talk 735:and 723:talk 713:and 701:talk 685:talk 663:talk 641:talk 623:talk 601:talk 591:and 574:talk 551:talk 512:talk 491:talk 477:talk 463:talk 429:talk 397:talk 349:talk 334:talk 275:talk 233:talk 211:talk 387:or 955:: 943:) 911:) 894:) 857:) 843:) 828:) 813:) 798:) 780:) 747:≠ 725:) 703:) 687:) 665:) 643:) 635:. 625:) 603:) 576:) 553:) 537:— 514:) 493:) 479:) 465:) 431:) 399:) 351:) 336:) 328:-- 289:TJ 277:) 250:TJ 235:) 213:) 193:→ 177:, 939:( 907:( 890:( 853:( 839:( 824:( 809:( 794:( 776:( 721:( 699:( 683:( 661:( 639:( 621:( 599:( 572:( 549:( 510:( 489:( 475:( 461:( 427:( 395:( 347:( 332:( 273:( 231:( 209:( 111:. 53:: 20:)

Index

Talk:Duluths

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Disambiguation
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Disambiguation
disambiguation
edit the page
project page
discussion
 Skomorokh
barbarian 
10:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Duluth
Duluth (disambiguation)
Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota
Ken Gallager
talk
16:22, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Duluth, Georgia
Station1
talk
20:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
TJ
Spyke
20:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Station1

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑