Knowledge

Talk:Battle of Pydna

Source đź“ť

554:
though I did refer the addition to another regular contributor before adding it. I did not remove or replace any existing material. Much of what happened 2,174 years ago must be speculative. No mention is made in the article of the use of elephants, for example, though they are believed to have been moved down from present day Kokkinopilo on platforms using tree trunks as rollers. Living in Katerini, which is as near the site of the battle as one is likely to get, considerable interest is taken locally in this battle. I apologise for not having marked the article to be watched - only by using a facility can one learn its effectiveness, and I would have replied earlier. However, I stick by my original additions. I would be interested to know who you refer to as the "original sources". J F C Fuller, who is quoted, "was a vigorous, expressive and opinionated writer of military history and of controversial predictions of the future of war" according to his entry in Knowledge. Local Greek historians, including Dimitrios Pandermalis, (Professor of the University of Athens and responsible for the restoration of the ruined city of Dion and much else) support the view put forward in the addition. It has been suggested that Emilio Pavlos's retreat was a deliberate feint, as he had realised that the Macedonian forces would have trouble manoeuvring the Sarissa phalanx on the uneven ground of the foothills of Mount Olympus. It is also claimed that Perseus left the battlefield virtually as soon as the fighting started, citing an injury, and that his troops were therefore without a visible leader. I live there and have visited the probable sites - and present day politics in Greece are not that far removed from those of the Macedonian era.
801:
diversified; portions of it were hard pressed, and other portions were dashing forward. Thereupon he came up swiftly, and dividing up his cohorts, ordered them to plunge quickly into the interstices and empty spaces in the enemy's line and thus come to close quarters, not fighting a single battle against them all, but many separate and successive battles. These instructions being given by Aemilius to his officers, and by his officers to the soldiers, as soon as they got between the ranks of the enemy and separated them, they attacked some of them in the flank where their armour did not shield them, and cut off others by falling upon their rear, and the strength and general efficiency of the phalanx was lost when it was thus broken up; and now that the Macedonians engaged man to man or in small detachments, they could only hack with their small daggers against the firm and long shields of the Romans, and oppose light wicker targets to their swords, which, such was their weight and momentum, penetrated through all their armour to their bodies. They therefore made a poor resistance and at last were routed."
603:, and which took place during the night which preceded the decisive battle of Pydna. The agreement of the calculated with the observed eclipse, in either case, was far from being stisfactory; especially when we consider the great confusion which the supposition of either of them being the correct one would imply in the Roman calendar. I have since given the subject further consideration, and have apparently had such perfect success that I am unable to understand why either of the eclipses there considered should ever have been regarded as the correct one. For I find that in the year 172 B.C., of ordinary chronology, there was an eclipse of the moon on September 3, which agrees so perfectly with the historical account of the event that it seems impossible to withhold the conclusion that this is really the eclipse to which the historian refers. 797:"When the first line had thus been cut to pieces, those arrayed behind them were beaten back; and though there was no flight, still they retired towards the mountain called Olocrus, so that even Aemilius, as Poseidonius tells us, when he saw it, rent his garments. For this part of his army was retreating, and the rest of the Romans were turning aside from the phalanx, which gave them no access to it, but confronted them as it were with a dense barricade of long spears, and was everywhere unassailable. 432: 74: 53: 22: 317: 481: 84: 179: 158: 389: 378: 367: 448: 275: 247: 356: 345: 621:; and hence we may infer that the Roman calendar at that time was practically free from the confusion which afterwards crept into it during the period of civil wars of Rome. I think we may therefore confidently give, for the true date of the battle of Pydna, September 3, 173 B.C.; which precedes the date usually assigned to that event by four years. 747:
I saw the additions on the cavalry array and I was wondering if someone found any ancient sources on the cavalry formation. Neither Livius nor Polybius or Plutarch giove information on the exact array of the cavalry as far as I know, with the exception of Livius saying that the cavalry fled unscathed
553:
The addition was not original research, as per Wiki policy, but based on A History of Macedonia by Alekos Angelides (in Greek) and A H Scullard's A History of the Greek World. Being relatively new to Wiki the only reason the addition was "anon" was due to my being unaware of the etiquette involved -
678:
It does not appear that Pallus was intent on flanking the rear of Perseus and therefore Pallus knew beforehand what vulnerability were apparent in the Phalanx formation. Although commanding 40,000 men to an unrehearsed position is rather difficult, it appears that Perseus exposed his intentions to
569:
reads a lot like someone's pet theory. There certainly isn't any evidence for this in any of the original sources. The whole section describing the Macedonian aristocracy as being angry with Perseus due to him favoring the Phalanx is particularly weird: 1) The Macedonian Phalanx was the established
800:
But the ground was uneven, and the line of battle so long that shields could not be kept continuously locked together, and Aemilius therefore saw that the Macedonian phalanx was getting many clefts and intervals in it, as is natural when armies are large and the efforts of the combatants are
804:
There's no description of some arranged plan or deliberate ploy; Aemilius sees an opportunity and makes haste to sieze it. According to this account then, it seems instead that the Romans were legitimately put to flight, but that they were subsequently able to rally and turn upon their
608:
According to my computation the eclipse commenced at 11h 58m in the evening of September 2, and ended at 2h 58m on the morning of September 3. The middle of the eclipse was therefore at 1h 28m in the morning, Pydna mean time. The eclipse was very nearly total, having a magnitude of
617:'s account in all respects except that of totality; but it was so nearly total that the slight discrepancy in that respect would carry very little wight in the question of its identity. The calendar date of the eclipse, September 3, is the same as the date assigned by 671:. The Macedonians reportedly had some kind of outcry that defeat was at hand for them until the eclipse passed, and the Romans were given an explanation that the eclipse is part of nature and natural, so the Romans did not panic. 515:
We essentially have one map on the left indicating a north south setup and the one on the right a east west setup with the Macedonians having their backs to the Aegean. The later seems more detailed but seems a weird setup.
439: 257: 732:
Towards the end of the main battle section, it states that afterwords, Macedonia was divided into 3 Republics. On the political aftermath section it states that Macedonia was divided into 4 Republics. Which is it?
748:
because it was posted behind the phalanx, but this could very possibly mean that it could flee because the phaanx had not yet broken, thus the enemy cavalry was maneuvering to this end.
455: 261: 229: 869: 794:
Can we get some citations for the idea that the Roman retreat, which incited the phalanx to pursue and lose cohesion, was indeed planned? Plutarch, for example, describes it thusly;
874: 648:
For what it's worth, I agree with Stockwell, on different grounds; and it should be noted that non-English-language scholars very often give 172 (not 173, by the way). See
704:
the battle had begun. The problem appeared when the Macedonian cavalry, peculiarly enough, refused to engage thus enabling the enemy to attack the flanks of the phalanx.
548: 854: 574: 527: 219: 580:
I fully agree. The section has been added by an anon. editor, and I've always highly suspected of it; at the least, I found it highly speculative, so I'll remove it.
780: 859: 810: 330: 679:
Pallus and Pallus then trapped Perseus in the foothills where he either knew of the advantage or created an advantage. No general falls back and attacks to win.
849: 190:, a group of contributors interested in Knowledge's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our 642: 195: 287: 140: 879: 191: 186: 163: 599:
In my communication of April 2, I have discussed two exlipses of the moon, each of which has been supposed to be the one which was predicted by
884: 864: 700:
There was no problem of being outflanked at the start of the battle. The wording in the article seems to suggest that there was such a problem
649: 316: 839: 751:
One more thing is that what according to Poseidonius injured Perseus could be an arrow or a javelin, so this is why I stick to "missile".
667:
The battle date is shortly after June 21-22, 168 B.C., after a recorded eclipse of the Moon, but the exact date is not known, according to
775:
Thing on the side says 38k roman troops, one of the paragraphs reads 29k troops, where did nine thousand men disappear to or appear from?
894: 889: 531: 662: 721: 834: 510: 282: 252: 130: 844: 291: 545:
The link from Milo links to a Milo who existed in the 6th century BC, the battle happened 160BC, seems like an error to me.
523: 829: 814: 776: 737: 806: 784: 106: 682:"The battle is often considered to be a victory of the Roman legion's flexibility over the phalanx's inflexibility, 492: 789: 584: 765: 727: 656: 286:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 595:
Found this interesting astronomical text from 1891 which puts the date of this battle September 3, 172 BCE
97: 58: 33: 560: 501: 497: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
21: 570:"power" behind the throne since Phillip, and 2) Perseus was in fact stationed with the cavalry. 770: 742: 39: 717: 519: 8: 684:
some argue that the loss was actually due to a failure of command on the part of Perseus
688:
the Macedonian did not have an answer to the problem of being out flanked by the Romans
761: 711: 653: 600: 542:
why dont u idiots put a map showing what part of the plant this battle took place.
626: 754:
And the Macedonian casualties according to those writers are "more than 25.000"
590: 823: 734: 668: 89: 555: 686:. Now whilst this is true to a small extent it doesn’t hide the fact that 757: 707: 693:
Problem faced by every general in history: It is possible to be flanked
431: 581: 487: 697:
Solution discovered by most: Employ reserves or screen with cavalry
630: 614: 480: 73: 52: 549:
Sources for suspect section (Macedonian political manoeuvring.)
178: 157: 102: 650:
the discussion in my footnote to Plutarch's Life of Aemilius
447: 634: 618: 194:. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our 274: 246: 870:
Start-Class Roman and Byzantine military history articles
875:
Roman and Byzantine military history task force articles
613:
on the moon's northern limb. This agrees perfectly with
486:
A fact from this article was featured on Knowledge's
328:
This article has been checked against the following
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 79: 567:
Macedonian political manoeuvering behind the scenes
537: 855:Mid-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles 821: 860:All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages 440:Roman and Byzantine military history task force 204:Knowledge:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 850:Start-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles 207:Template:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 19: 280:This article is within the scope of the 880:Start-Class Classical warfare articles 822: 300:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 290:. To use this banner, please see the 885:Classical warfare task force articles 865:Start-Class military history articles 303:Template:WikiProject Military history 187:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 475: 184:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 15: 840:WikiProject Greece general articles 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 895:Selected anniversaries (June 2008) 890:Selected anniversaries (June 2007) 573:I suggest the section is removed. 446: 430: 315: 210:Classical Greece and Rome articles 14: 906: 479: 387: 376: 365: 354: 343: 273: 245: 177: 156: 82: 72: 51: 20: 663:Fuller's Account of Battle Date 224:This article has been rated as 135:This article has been rated as 511:Maps contradicting each other? 1: 835:Low-importance Greek articles 815:20:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC) 785:00:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 845:All WikiProject Greece pages 805:now-disorganised pursuers. 532:00:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 456:Classical warfare task force 283:Military history WikiProject 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Greece 7: 118:Template:WikiProject Greece 10: 911: 830:Start-Class Greek articles 585:11:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 348:Referencing and citation: 230:project's importance scale 141:project's importance scale 766:12:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC) 738:13:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 722:09:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 657:10:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 454: 438: 413: 409: 327: 306:military history articles 268: 223: 201:Classical Greece and Rome 172: 164:Classical Greece and Rome 134: 67: 46: 458:(c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD) 414:Associated task forces: 359:Coverage and accuracy: 623: 605: 451: 435: 392:Supporting materials: 320: 28:This article is rated 728:Article contradiction 625:--John N. Stockwell, 606: 597: 565:The whole section on 450: 434: 319: 258:Roman & Byzantine 639:What do you think? 381:Grammar and style: 334:for B-class status: 790:'Planned retreat'? 452: 436: 321: 288:list of open tasks 98:WikiProject Greece 34:content assessment 724: 522:comment added by 508: 507: 474: 473: 470: 469: 466: 465: 462: 461: 405: 404: 361:criterion not met 350:criterion not met 292:full instructions 240: 239: 236: 235: 151: 150: 147: 146: 902: 715: 675:Interpretation: 601:Sulpicius Gallus 561:Suspect section? 534: 483: 476: 421: 411: 410: 395: 391: 390: 384: 380: 379: 373: 369: 368: 362: 358: 357: 351: 347: 346: 325: 324: 308: 307: 304: 301: 298: 297:Military history 277: 270: 269: 264: 253:Military history 249: 242: 241: 212: 211: 208: 205: 202: 181: 174: 173: 168: 160: 153: 152: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 85: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 47: 31: 25: 24: 16: 910: 909: 905: 904: 903: 901: 900: 899: 820: 819: 792: 773: 745: 730: 665: 627:Cleveland, Ohio 593: 563: 551: 540: 517: 513: 419: 393: 388: 382: 377: 371: 366: 360: 355: 349: 344: 305: 302: 299: 296: 295: 255: 209: 206: 203: 200: 199: 166: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 83: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 908: 898: 897: 892: 887: 882: 877: 872: 867: 862: 857: 852: 847: 842: 837: 832: 791: 788: 772: 769: 744: 741: 729: 726: 696: 674: 664: 661: 660: 659: 592: 589: 588: 587: 575:Michael.akinde 562: 559: 550: 547: 539: 536: 524:46.244.167.125 512: 509: 506: 505: 484: 472: 471: 468: 467: 464: 463: 460: 459: 453: 443: 442: 437: 427: 426: 424: 422: 416: 415: 407: 406: 403: 402: 400: 398: 397: 396: 385: 374: 363: 352: 338: 337: 335: 322: 312: 311: 309: 278: 266: 265: 250: 238: 237: 234: 233: 226:Mid-importance 222: 216: 215: 213: 182: 170: 169: 167:Mid‑importance 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Low-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 121:Greek articles 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 907: 896: 893: 891: 888: 886: 883: 881: 878: 876: 873: 871: 868: 866: 863: 861: 858: 856: 853: 851: 848: 846: 843: 841: 838: 836: 833: 831: 828: 827: 825: 818: 816: 812: 808: 802: 798: 795: 787: 786: 782: 778: 777:67.248.210.31 771:Roman troops? 768: 767: 763: 759: 755: 752: 749: 743:cavalry array 740: 739: 736: 725: 723: 720:was added at 719: 713: 709: 705: 703: 698: 694: 691: 689: 685: 680: 676: 672: 670: 669:J.F.C. Fuller 658: 655: 651: 647: 646: 645: 644: 640: 637: 636: 632: 628: 622: 620: 616: 612: 611:eleven digits 604: 602: 596: 586: 583: 579: 578: 577: 576: 571: 568: 558: 557: 546: 543: 535: 533: 529: 525: 521: 503: 502:June 22, 2008 499: 498:June 22, 2007 495: 494: 489: 485: 482: 478: 477: 457: 449: 445: 444: 441: 433: 429: 428: 425: 423: 418: 417: 412: 408: 401: 399: 394:criterion met 386: 383:criterion met 375: 372:criterion met 364: 353: 342: 341: 340: 339: 336: 333: 332: 326: 323: 318: 314: 313: 310: 293: 289: 285: 284: 279: 276: 272: 271: 267: 263: 259: 254: 251: 248: 244: 243: 231: 227: 221: 218: 217: 214: 197: 193: 189: 188: 183: 180: 176: 175: 171: 165: 162: 159: 155: 154: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 90:Greece portal 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 807:88.97.76.224 803: 799: 796: 793: 774: 756: 753: 750: 746: 731: 706: 701: 699: 695: 692: 687: 683: 681: 677: 673: 666: 641: 638: 624: 610: 607: 598: 594: 572: 566: 564: 552: 544: 541: 518:— Preceding 514: 491: 329: 281: 225: 192:project page 185: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 716:—Preceding 496:section on 493:On this day 370:Structure: 30:Start-class 824:Categories 488:Main Page 262:Classical 196:talk page 631:April 21 615:Plutarch 520:unsigned 331:criteria 718:comment 556:Harfo32 490:in the 228:on the 139:on the 817:Imrix 758:GK1973 708:GK1973 702:before 591:Dating 112:Greece 103:Greece 59:Greece 36:scale. 582:Aldux 811:talk 781:talk 762:talk 712:talk 654:Bill 643:link 635:1891 619:Livy 538:Milo 528:talk 500:and 735:Jon 714:) 690:." 220:Mid 131:Low 826:: 813:) 783:) 764:) 652:. 633:, 629:, 530:) 420:/ 260:/ 256:: 809:( 779:( 760:( 710:( 526:( 504:. 294:. 232:. 198:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Greece
WikiProject icon
Greece portal
WikiProject Greece
Greece
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Classical Greece and Rome
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
project page
talk page
Mid
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Military history
Roman & Byzantine
Classical
WikiProject icon
Military history WikiProject
list of open tasks
full instructions
B checklist
criteria

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑