Knowledge

Talk:Alt-right pipeline

Source đź“ť

923:
summarizes that one paper's explanation of radicalization (I chose to use that because it's the only source that covers both general radicalization and the alt-right pipeline specifically in detail), but there's one sentence there that reflects similar info elsewhere in the article, so I've added those sources.I was hesitant to add more images, because I don't want to "highlight" any particular offender or instance of something like this, where I suspect the threshold for being undue is much more sensitive. I know I can be a bit pickier on "image relevance" than some editors, but I'd rather images that directly apply to the concept (or a specific aspect of it) as a whole.
128: 107: 138: 233: 212: 243: 21: 1449: 1418: 1384: 1331: 1307: 1285: 1263: 1226: 1204: 1152: 1130: 1071: 1014: 76: 331: 535:
regular commentary within BreadTube of the community “cannibalizing” itself. Moreover, many BreadTubers recognize that the community’s infighting interferes with its ability to come together for tactical unity in promoting leftist ideas or action. As BreadTube creator Secular Talk (2020) noted in a video, infighting renders the community “politically impotent and ineffectual.”
759: 608:
That line was the whole point of using this specific source. If I wanted to write about BreadTube in general, there are plenty of other sources about it. This specific source supports the fact that elements of the alt-right pipeline were adopted by BreadTube, which is what's relevant to this article.
569:
I am concerned about the overall verifiability of the article if you think it's acceptable to cite a source that doesn't compare two things for such a comparison and convert mentions of some BreadTube creators making videos critical of "capital" or "capitalism" into describing BreadTube in general as
506:
Per the source one would assume that BreadTube does not have a unified stance on capitalism as social democrats are not anti-capitalist. It does not describe BreadTube as anti-capitalist either so your edit does not really fix the OR issue. Why not just go with what most sources about BreadTube have
468:
If you are a hard line “scary” leftist and don’t feel like hiding your viewpoint or getting involved in political games, I would suggest building a community between channels espousing your vanguard views and the more popular issue based left channels. If you are more moderate or undecided, try to do
603:
is attributed to BreadTube as a whole, and the section about BreadTube and capitalism is a valid source for the claim that it's broadly opposed to capitalism. I also don't think that it's original research to say that opposition to capitalism is equivalent to anti-capitalist.And yes, the source does
539:
Note that a "pipeline" in this context isn't a uniform group of people. The alt-right pipeline, for example, consists of IDW types, leading into alt-lite types, and only then into alt-right types. The majority of "steps" are not alt-right, but it's still associated with alt-right politics. Likewise,
475:
So the source supports that BreadTube uses the same pipeline process to move viewers farther left as a direct response to the alt-right pipeline. With that said, I do notice that this article makes the jump from "opposes capitalism" to "far-left" without a source in between. I feel like that borders
428:
It does not support far left or the implication that BreadTube is similarly extremist to the alt-right movement. I haven't looked at the NYT source but I would question giving a news article more weight than scholarly research. Therefore, I would suggest removing any reference to left wing extremism
922:
The most difficult part of writing this article has been managing the OR magnet that it's become. I've removed a few of the things you've mentioned entirely because it looks like they might have been unsupported additions that I missed in my cleanup efforts. Paragraph one of "Psychological factors"
657:
to describe it as such in this case, and I edited the page earlier to (hopefully) remove everything that might imply it. And as long as it's not in a way that might be considered close paraphrasing, then I have no issue with using "leftist", "left-wing", or another similar term used by the sources.
387:
Many political movements have been associated with the pipeline concept. The intellectual dark web, libertarianism, the men's rights movement, and the alt-lite movement have all been identified as possibly introducing audiences to alt-right ideas, despite none of them had any control over YouTube's
1497:
Found another problem. Further down in the article it says: "The alt-right pipeline has been found to begin with the intellectual dark web community". If the pipeline is a conceptual model, how can it be "found to be begin" with something? Conceptual nodels aren't found to be begin with something.
528:
The source supports that it opposes the politics of the alt-right pipeline, but not that it's trying to prevent "pipeline" radicalization. It's derivative of the alt-right pipeline, and an article on the topic wouldn't be complete without mentioning how it influenced the creation of BreadTube as a
534:
The BreadTube community notoriously exists in a constant state of existential crisis, which is evident in discourses about the community’s disunity. First, the community hosts a spectrum of beliefs, ranging from Social Democratic to Maoist, which has engendered considerable infighting. There is
631:
While avoiding close paraphrasing is important, sometimes it is necessary to use the same word as the source uses for verifiability reasons. Political ideologies are one example because different words used can have different meanings. Even a direct copy of three words or less is not usually
316: 632:
considered a close paraphrasing issue. If the source describes BreadTube as attempting to counteract the alt right pipeline, it's not acceptable to portray it as "radicalization" without support from reliable sources because one might perceive some BreadTube creators as extremist. (
570:
being "anti-capitalist" or "far left" despite the source not making any such claim. Nor does the source suggest that BreadTube is a "similar pipeline radicalization system" compared to the alt-right pipeline. In fact, the only time radicalization is mentioned in the source is
502:
So why doesn't this go into the "concerns and prevention" section if it was set up to counter the alt-right pipeline? The only reason BreadTube would be worth mentioning in this article at all is the fact that it began as a countermeasure to the alt-right
609:
I'll also note that there was a second source that reinforced some of this, but it seems that you've removed it. If you feel that there's a way to word these claims that's truer to these sources without repeating them, I'm open to suggestions.
343: 1438:
In my opinion, more media could be added to further illustrate the article. Perhaps photos of some personalities in a multiple image box under "Content", or a photo of the mosque under "Concerns and prevention".
1179:
This phenomenon of algorithmic filtering can create echo chambers, which can make the deprogramming process extremely difficult for individuals who are deeply entrenched in this content sphere and community.
419:
The research paper cited that mentions BreadTube in the context of alt-right pipeline as "far-left radicalization". Where is this claim coming from? The only times the cited source mentions alt-right are
393:
I believe this is important to put on here because all of those groups you mentioned are vehemently against the alt-right movement, but YouTube lumped them into the pipeline without their permission.
1172:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). 388:
decision to place nazi videos in the sidebar of their videos, and have been vehemently protesting YouTube to stop placing nazi videos in the side bar of their videos since 2017
400: 1219:
The article is well-cited to reliable sources. I spotchecked a few random citations while reading just to ensure it's supported, and they all came up clean. No OR visible.
1503: 1487: 317:
The alt-right pipeline isn't real, and was invented by TERFs to victim blame transwomen, male victims of rape, and victims of police brutality, for their own bigotry
1169: 884:, I'm done with my review- I'll tidy up things once the comments have been addressed. Very high quality article, I'm impressed by the work you've done here! 797: 404: 32: 764: 1527: 653:
I definitely agree regarding claims of radicalization; even though the pipeline process is described as "radicalization" in other sources, it would be
321:
Fuck you TERFS! This was all your fault! We have no control over Youtube algorithm or the mainstream media or either of the two political parties.
299: 194: 422:
BreadTubers share a collective interest in amplifying the visibility of leftist content and counteracting the so-called alt-right pipeline on YouTube
1191:
I question para 1 of "Psychological factors". There's only one citation for the whole paragraph. Could this possibly be supported by another source?
1278:
Article addresses the process of the pipeline, the content involved in it, and psych factors, and concerns/prevention regarding it. All good here.
1023: 769: 1096: 1196:
Otherwise, the article contains citations to reliable sources; most are journal articles, with some news articles and reports- all reliable.
529:
similar pipeline radicalization system. And there's an entire section in the source specifically about BreadTube's opposition to capitalism.
429:
and move the mention of BreadTube to the "Concerns and prevention" section, especially since it has an explicit focus on deradicalization. (
787: 540:
the majority of "steps" in BreadTube aren't necessarily far-left, but it's still associated with far-left politics such as anti-capitalism.
324: 595:
If the issue is that the article doesn't use the same wording, I'm going to be wary about that after the many hours I've spent addressing
1401: 1491: 1482:
Is "proposed conceptual model" what we call conspiracy theories now? Because this pipeline sure looks like a conspiracy theory to me.
945:
Fair enough on the images, and I understand the OR issues, especially with such a niche (yet fascinating) subject. Good to go for GA!
371: 1552: 1537: 289: 184: 1477: 1100: 1092: 408: 1557: 1542: 1084: 975: 940: 1507: 914: 457:
It directly compares and equivocates the structure of the alt-right pipeline to that of BreadTube (per the quotes you cited)
743:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1473:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1547: 1532: 1499: 1483: 836: 265: 160: 46: 675: 648: 626: 590: 564: 523: 497: 1431: 351: 1522: 1088: 1317: 991: 792: 38: 480:, but just to be safe I've swapped it out in the article so the term "far-left" is no longer sourced to Cotter. 1324:
There's definitely opportunity for bias, but as far as I can see, no editorial bias is visible. All good here.
1235: 1213: 256: 217: 151: 112: 543:
The actual term that the source uses is "leftist". I have no objection to using this term (if it still passes
445: 1393: 1036: 875: 637: 579: 512: 434: 87: 840: 731: 815: 53: 1063:
Otherwise, the prose is extremely well-written and very impressive. I could see this going to FAC soon.
1405: 1161: 1165: 1080: 933: 668: 619: 557: 490: 264:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
159:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1397: 1294: 1115: 950: 889: 850: 830: 706: 606:
Many BreadTubers seek to create a “leftist pipeline” as a counterforce to the alt-right pipeline.
426:
Many BreadTubers seek to create a “leftist pipeline” as a counterforce to the alt-right pipeline.
414: 334:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
59: 1344: 1272: 1032: 811: 1138:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with 93: 20: 1239: 924: 881: 659: 610: 548: 481: 454:
It identifies BreadTube as "leftist" and in opposition to capitalism throughout the article
396: 8: 1321:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 532:
Also, the source does support that BreadTube doesn't function effectively as a pipeline:
367: 1427: 946: 919: 885: 846: 826: 702: 469:
the same for the more issue based left channels and the moderate edutainment channels.
42: 137: 127: 106: 1370: 1366: 633: 575: 508: 430: 1374: 1106:
No fiction, lists, or words to watch present. Complies with other MoS standards.
963: 902: 863: 719: 654: 355: 347: 248: 143: 1139: 1048: 596: 544: 477: 363: 1516: 970: 909: 870: 726: 1293:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see 818:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 693: 1343:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 845:
An intriguing phenomenon, and I'm glad it's up at GAN- will review soon.
642: 584: 517: 439: 242: 232: 211: 380: 599:
complaints at GA/FA. It seems to me the description in the source of
330: 956: 895: 856: 712: 261: 156: 1035:
or similar to convert dates in refs. I also suggest adding
1056:
Though the amount of organized hate groups has decreased,
155:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1145:
Citations are placed in a proper "References" section.
260:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 238: 133: 604:describe BreadTube in the context of the pipeline: 1024:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 1514: 45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 1441:Image is relevant and properly captioned. 1528:Social sciences and society good articles 325:Wiki Education assignment: Senior Seminar 33:Social sciences and society good articles 462:ranging from Social Democratic to Maoist 401:2600:1700:B970:9460:1934:5592:5D40:3551 1515: 507:to say and refer to it as left-wing? ( 1026:; spelling and grammar are correct. 739:The following discussion is closed. 254:This article is within the scope of 149:This article is within the scope of 75: 73: 69: 15: 1022:. the prose is clear, concise, and 92:It is of interest to the following 13: 385:I tried editing Knowledge to say " 339: 335: 14: 1569: 41:. If you can improve it further, 1553:Low-importance politics articles 1538:Mid-importance Internet articles 1469:The discussion above is closed. 1447: 1416: 1382: 1329: 1305: 1283: 1261: 1224: 1202: 1150: 1128: 1069: 1012: 342:. Further details are available 329: 241: 231: 210: 136: 126: 105: 74: 19: 601:speaking out against capitalism 294:This article has been rated as 189:This article has been rated as 1170:could reasonably be challenged 274:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 169:Knowledge:WikiProject Internet 29:has been listed as one of the 1: 1558:WikiProject Politics articles 1543:WikiProject Internet articles 1411:Image is properly CC tagged. 1402:valid non-free use rationales 1037:Template:Use American English 547:) or another if appropriate. 466:It quotes one user as saying 460:It describes the pipeline as 362:— Assignment last updated by 277:Template:WikiProject Politics 268:and see a list of open tasks. 172:Template:WikiProject Internet 163:and see a list of open tasks. 1448: 1417: 1383: 1330: 1306: 1284: 1262: 1245:Earwig shows no violations. 1225: 1203: 1151: 1129: 1070: 1013: 7: 1508:20:11, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 1492:20:05, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 1478:"Proposed conceptual model" 816:Talk:Alt-right pipeline/GA1 10: 1574: 1548:GA-Class politics articles 1533:GA-Class Internet articles 1300:Stays focused throughout. 1140:the layout style guideline 451:Looking at Cotter (2022): 409:16:19, 26 March 2023 (UTC) 300:project's importance scale 195:project's importance scale 1354: 1249: 1110: 1000: 990: 976:02:15, 25 July 2023 (UTC) 941:01:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC) 915:00:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC) 876:23:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC) 841:23:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC) 732:02:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC) 372:18:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC) 293: 226: 188: 121: 100: 1471:Please do not modify it. 987: 741:Please do not modify it. 676:20:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC) 649:20:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC) 627:20:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC) 591:19:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC) 572:far-right radicalization 565:18:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC) 524:17:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC) 498:17:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC) 446:16:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC) 1523:Knowledge good articles 1430:to the topic, and have 1079:. it complies with the 1058:- decreased since when? 1033:Template:Use dmy dates 82:This article is rated 1254:Broad in its coverage 346:. Student editor(s): 39:good article criteria 1347:or content dispute. 1236:copyright violations 1214:no original research 1121:no original research 415:Failed verification? 257:WikiProject Politics 152:WikiProject Internet 1271:. it addresses the 1168:. All content that 354:). Peer reviewers: 1459:Overall assessment 1398:copyright statuses 1361:, if possible, by 1101:list incorporation 742: 344:on the course page 88:content assessment 57:: July 25, 2023. ( 27:Alt-right pipeline 1498:They're made up. 1467: 1466: 1432:suitable captions 1404:are provided for 1350:No edit warring. 1234:. it contains no 974: 967: 960: 939: 913: 906: 899: 874: 867: 860: 806: 805: 740: 730: 723: 716: 674: 625: 563: 496: 411: 399:comment added by 314: 313: 310: 309: 306: 305: 280:politics articles 205: 204: 201: 200: 175:Internet articles 68: 67: 64: 1565: 1451: 1450: 1420: 1419: 1406:non-free content 1386: 1385: 1333: 1332: 1309: 1308: 1287: 1286: 1265: 1264: 1228: 1227: 1206: 1205: 1162:reliable sources 1154: 1153: 1132: 1131: 1073: 1072: 1039:or appropriate. 1016: 1015: 985: 984: 968: 961: 954: 936: 931: 929: 907: 900: 893: 868: 861: 854: 760:Copyvio detector 748: 747: 724: 717: 710: 671: 666: 664: 645: 622: 617: 615: 587: 560: 555: 553: 520: 493: 488: 486: 442: 394: 374: 352:article contribs 341: 337: 333: 282: 281: 278: 275: 272: 251: 246: 245: 235: 228: 227: 222: 214: 207: 206: 177: 176: 173: 170: 167: 146: 141: 140: 130: 123: 122: 117: 109: 102: 101: 85: 79: 78: 77: 70: 62: 60:Reviewed version 51: 23: 16: 1573: 1572: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1513: 1512: 1480: 1475: 1474: 1083:guidelines for 1081:Manual of Style 996:Review Comment 934: 927:Thebiguglyalien 925: 882:Thebiguglyalien 810:This review is 802: 774: 745: 736: 735: 734: 696: 669: 662:Thebiguglyalien 660: 643: 620: 613:Thebiguglyalien 611: 585: 558: 551:Thebiguglyalien 549: 518: 491: 484:Thebiguglyalien 482: 440: 417: 383: 361: 327: 319: 279: 276: 273: 270: 269: 249:Politics portal 247: 240: 220: 174: 171: 168: 165: 164: 144:Internet portal 142: 135: 115: 86:on Knowledge's 83: 58: 12: 11: 5: 1571: 1561: 1560: 1555: 1550: 1545: 1540: 1535: 1530: 1525: 1511: 1510: 1479: 1476: 1468: 1465: 1464: 1462: 1452: 1444: 1443: 1435: 1421: 1413: 1412: 1409: 1387: 1379: 1378: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1334: 1326: 1325: 1322: 1310: 1302: 1301: 1298: 1288: 1280: 1279: 1276: 1275:of the topic. 1266: 1258: 1257: 1247: 1246: 1243: 1229: 1221: 1220: 1217: 1212:. it contains 1207: 1199: 1198: 1194: 1193: 1173: 1155: 1147: 1146: 1143: 1133: 1125: 1124: 1108: 1107: 1104: 1093:words to watch 1074: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1051: 1049:internet memes 1027: 1017: 1009: 1008: 998: 997: 994: 989: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 821: 820: 804: 803: 801: 800: 795: 790: 784: 781: 780: 776: 775: 773: 772: 770:External links 767: 762: 756: 753: 752: 746: 737: 700: 699: 698: 697: 695: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 541: 537: 530: 504: 473: 472: 471: 464: 458: 455: 416: 413: 382: 379: 377: 336:9 January 2023 326: 323: 318: 315: 312: 311: 308: 307: 304: 303: 296:Low-importance 292: 286: 285: 283: 266:the discussion 253: 252: 236: 224: 223: 221:Low‑importance 215: 203: 202: 199: 198: 191:Mid-importance 187: 181: 180: 178: 161:the discussion 148: 147: 131: 119: 118: 116:Mid‑importance 110: 98: 97: 91: 80: 66: 65: 50: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1570: 1559: 1556: 1554: 1551: 1549: 1546: 1544: 1541: 1539: 1536: 1534: 1531: 1529: 1526: 1524: 1521: 1520: 1518: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1500:188.100.52.69 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1484:188.100.52.69 1472: 1463: 1460: 1456: 1453: 1446: 1445: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1422: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1388: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1335: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1320: 1319: 1314: 1311: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1296: 1295:summary style 1292: 1289: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1274: 1270: 1267: 1260: 1259: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1230: 1223: 1222: 1218: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1201: 1200: 1197: 1192: 1189: 1188: 1186: 1185: 1183: 1182: 1180: 1174: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1156: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1141: 1137: 1134: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1085:lead sections 1082: 1078: 1075: 1068: 1067: 1064: 1059: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1050: 1046: 1044: 1043: 1041: 1040: 1038: 1034: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1011: 1010: 1006: 1003: 999: 995: 993: 986: 977: 972: 965: 958: 952: 948: 947:MyCatIsAChonk 944: 943: 942: 937: 930: 928: 921: 920:MyCatIsAChonk 918: 917: 916: 911: 904: 897: 891: 887: 886:MyCatIsAChonk 883: 880: 879: 878: 877: 872: 865: 858: 852: 848: 847:MyCatIsAChonk 843: 842: 838: 835: 832: 828: 827:MyCatIsAChonk 825: 819: 817: 813: 808: 807: 799: 796: 794: 791: 789: 786: 785: 783: 782: 778: 777: 771: 768: 766: 763: 761: 758: 757: 755: 754: 750: 749: 744: 733: 728: 721: 714: 708: 704: 703:MyCatIsAChonk 677: 672: 665: 663: 656: 652: 651: 650: 647: 646: 639: 635: 630: 629: 628: 623: 616: 614: 607: 602: 598: 594: 593: 592: 589: 588: 581: 577: 573: 568: 567: 566: 561: 554: 552: 546: 542: 538: 536: 531: 527: 526: 525: 522: 521: 514: 510: 505: 501: 500: 499: 494: 487: 485: 479: 474: 470: 465: 463: 459: 456: 453: 452: 450: 449: 448: 447: 444: 443: 436: 432: 427: 423: 412: 410: 406: 402: 398: 391: 389: 378: 375: 373: 369: 365: 359: 357: 353: 349: 345: 340:28 April 2023 332: 322: 301: 297: 291: 288: 287: 284: 267: 263: 259: 258: 250: 244: 239: 237: 234: 230: 229: 225: 219: 216: 213: 209: 208: 196: 192: 186: 183: 182: 179: 162: 158: 154: 153: 145: 139: 134: 132: 129: 125: 124: 120: 114: 111: 108: 104: 103: 99: 95: 89: 81: 72: 71: 61: 56: 55: 48: 44: 40: 36: 35: 34: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1481: 1470: 1458: 1454: 1440: 1437: 1426:. media are 1423: 1392:. media are 1389: 1362: 1358: 1355: 1340: 1336: 1316: 1312: 1290: 1273:main aspects 1268: 1253: 1250: 1231: 1209: 1195: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1178: 1176: 1175: 1166:cited inline 1157: 1135: 1120: 1114: 1111: 1076: 1062: 1055: 1054: 1045: 1042: 1030: 1029: 1019: 1005:Well-written 1004: 1001: 926: 844: 833: 823: 822: 809: 798:Instructions 738: 661: 641: 612: 605: 600: 583: 571: 550: 533: 516: 483: 467: 461: 438: 425: 421: 418: 395:— Preceding 392: 386: 384: 376: 360: 328: 320: 295: 255: 190: 150: 94:WikiProjects 52: 43:please do so 31: 30: 26: 1396:with their 1359:Illustrated 964:also not me 903:also not me 864:also not me 812:transcluded 720:also not me 1517:Categories 1240:plagiarism 1181:- Uncited 1116:Verifiable 765:Authorship 751:GA toolbox 356:Hinrichs23 348:Beet skeet 37:under the 992:Attribute 824:Reviewer: 788:Templates 779:Reviewing 694:GA Review 503:pipeline. 364:Acsieling 1428:relevant 1365:such as 1345:edit war 971:still no 910:still no 871:still no 837:contribs 793:Criteria 727:still no 701:Passed. 655:WP:SYNTH 397:unsigned 271:Politics 262:politics 218:Politics 166:Internet 157:Internet 113:Internet 84:GA-class 47:reassess 1318:Neutral 1097:fiction 597:WP:CLOP 545:WP:CLOP 478:WP:BLUE 381:My edit 298:on the 193:on the 1400:, and 1394:tagged 1367:images 1341:Stable 1099:, and 1089:layout 957:not me 896:not me 857:not me 713:not me 644:buidhe 586:buidhe 519:buidhe 441:buidhe 90:scale. 54:Review 1375:audio 1373:, or 1371:video 1363:media 1119:with 1031:*Add 988:Rate 814:from 1504:talk 1488:talk 1164:are 951:talk 935:talk 890:talk 851:talk 831:talk 707:talk 670:talk 621:talk 559:talk 492:talk 424:and 405:talk 368:talk 338:and 1297:). 1238:or 1047:Wl 574:. ( 476:on 390:." 290:Low 185:Mid 49:it. 1519:: 1506:) 1490:) 1461:. 1457:. 1434:. 1424:6b 1408:. 1390:6a 1377:: 1369:, 1356:6. 1339:. 1315:. 1291:3b 1269:3a 1256:: 1251:3. 1242:. 1232:2d 1216:. 1210:2c 1160:. 1158:2b 1142:. 1136:2a 1123:: 1112:2. 1103:. 1095:, 1091:, 1087:, 1077:1b 1020:1a 1007:: 1002:1. 953:) 892:) 853:) 839:) 709:) 640:) 636:· 582:) 578:· 515:) 511:· 437:) 433:· 407:) 370:) 358:. 63:). 1502:( 1486:( 1455:7 1337:5 1313:4 1177:* 973:) 969:( 966:) 962:( 959:) 955:( 949:( 938:) 932:( 912:) 908:( 905:) 901:( 898:) 894:( 888:( 873:) 869:( 866:) 862:( 859:) 855:( 849:( 834:· 829:( 729:) 725:( 722:) 718:( 715:) 711:( 705:( 673:) 667:( 638:c 634:t 624:) 618:( 580:c 576:t 562:) 556:( 513:c 509:t 495:) 489:( 435:c 431:t 403:( 366:( 350:( 302:. 197:. 96::

Index

Good articles
Social sciences and society good articles
good article criteria
please do so
reassess
Review
Reviewed version
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Internet
WikiProject icon
icon
Internet portal
WikiProject Internet
Internet
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Politics
WikiProject icon
icon
Politics portal
WikiProject Politics
politics
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑