40:. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with the redirect I am proposing to delete except that it adds overhead to maintaining the redirects ... both case versions should point at the same article, which is easy to do but could be avoided as the double-capital version is an unlikely search candidate and is not a properly formed article title.
76:
as a chemist, frequently the minor discrepancies in a simple wording will be entered into a search field. Having all common capitalizations redirect to one place is very convenient for users, in this specific case redirecting to
16:
44:
85:
68:
18:
8:
57:
53:
33:
25:
82:
41:
65:
78:
37:
61:
29:
81:makes the most sense scientifically speaking.
13:
14:
99:
60:redirect to same place (probably
19:Knowledge:Redirects for deletion
1:
86:15:54, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
69:16:25, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
45:21:24, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
7:
10:
104:
32:. There also exists a
95:
58:Acrylic compound
54:Acrylic Compound
34:Acrylic compound
26:Acrylic Compound
103:
102:
98:
97:
96:
94:
93:
92:
22:
12:
11:
5:
101:
91:
90:
89:
88:
71:
21:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
100:
87:
84:
80:
75:
72:
70:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
48:
47:
46:
43:
39:
35:
31:
27:
24:
23:
20:
73:
49:
79:Acryl group
52:but ensure
38:Acryl group
42:Courtland
83:Das Nerd
66:Henrygb
62:Acrylic
30:Acrylic
17:From
74:Keep
64:) --
56:and
50:Keep
36:→
28:→
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.