Knowledge

Supplier evaluation

Source đź“ť

61:, organizational structure and processes and performance. Performance generally includes quality and delivery: research by Valerie Stueland published in 2004 found that in her study of supplier evaluation, every example she reviewed used both quality and delivery as evaluation factors. Based on the information obtained via the evaluation, a supplier is scored and either approved or not approved as one from whom to procure materials or services. In many organizations, there is an "approved supplier list" (ASL) to which a qualified supplier is then added. If rejected, the supplier is generally not made available to the assessing company's procurement team. Once approved, a supplier may be reevaluated on a periodic, often annual, basis. The ongoing process is defined as supplier performance management. 75: 179:
There are various benefits associated with an effective supplier evaluation process such as mitigation against poor supplier performance or performance failures. The benefits typically include sourcing from suppliers that provide high standards of product and service levels whilst offering sufficient
52:
departments, and forms part of the pre-qualification step within the purchasing process, although in many organizations, it includes the participation and input of other departments and stakeholders. Most experts or firms experienced in collecting supplier evaluation information prefer doing so using
31:
by quantitative assessment. The aim of the process is to ensure a portfolio of best-in-class suppliers is available for use. Supplier evaluation can also be applied to current suppliers in order to measure and monitor their performance for the purposes of ensuring contract compliance, reducing costs,
220:
Within established procurement teaching, the Carter 10Cs model is one model in use. This model looks at ten aspects which can be evaluated before contracting with a business, to reduce the risks associated with supplier selection and as part of ongoing supplier performance appraisal. The ten Cs
216:
Some of the challenges associated with supplier evaluation may be mitigated by the use of appropriate tools. For simple projects a spreadsheet can be used. But as evaluations become more complex or more frequent data management and data integrity issues become significant. Web Electronic RFP /
180:
capacity and business stability. Supplier evaluation can help customers and suppliers identify and remove hidden cost drivers in the supply chain. The process of evaluating performance can motivate suppliers to improve their performance.
551: 606: 217:
Tendering systems are often used for initial selection projects. Some products provide functionality for combining both initial selection and ongoing evaluation and benchmarking.
656:
Ray Carter MA MCIPS MCMI Cert Ed – Author of “Practical Procurement” “Practical Contract Management” and “Stores and Distribution Management” and creator of the 10 (c) model
264:
Communication efficiency (does the organization have support technology of information integration to support collaboration and co-ordination in the supply chain?).
491: 450: 487: 202:. Such a department can take a considerable amount of resources, thus management's commitment and support of a supplier evaluation process is essential. 440: 610: 495: 529: 572: 57:
or interview, sometimes even a site visit, and includes appraisals of various aspects of the supplier's business including capacity, financials,
543: 147: 119: 590: 513: 499: 458: 631: 126: 96: 372:"Probabilistic Approach to Multi-Stage Supplier Evaluation: Confidence Level Measurement in Ordinal Priority Approach" 166: 133: 104: 705: 582: 576: 710: 115: 100: 278: 444: 326: 322: 53:
five-step processes for determining which to approve. Their processes often take the form of either a
346: 277:(FSQS) is a collaborative due diligence system currently used for supplier evaluation by 29 major UK 191: 446:
Supplier evaluation and performance excellence: a guide to meaningful metrics and successful results
544:"An Investigation on the relationship for supplier performance metrics and supply chain strategies" 85: 700: 140: 89: 607:"Using effective supplier appraisal techniques to improve the supply chain. - Strategy squared" 330: 37: 28: 668: 314: 310: 211: 634:, 89th Annual International Supply Management Conference, April 2004, accessed 5 July 2023 8: 523: 486: 404: 187: 632:
Supplier Evaluations: Best Practices and Creating or or Improving Your Own Evaluation
586: 509: 454: 409: 391: 342: 286: 237:
Commitment to Quality (does the organization effectively monitor and manage quality?)
58: 234:
Control of process (can the organization control its process and offer flexibility?)
505: 399: 383: 294: 282: 254: 428:
Purchasing Performance: Measuring, Marketing, and Selling the Purchasing Function
306: 302: 298: 33: 387: 338: 334: 694: 395: 371: 54: 186:
To mitigate this, large corporations typically have a dedicated department (
413: 258: 183:
There are several other challenges according to the supplier evaluation.
228:
Competency (are the organization, its people and its process competent?)
225:
Capacity (does the organization have the capacity to deliver the order?)
655: 49: 290: 74: 199: 24: 244: 240:
Cash (does the organization have a strong enough financial base?)
350: 195: 27:
and refer to the process of evaluating and approving potential
48:
Supplier evaluation and take-on is a continual process within
681: 318: 250:
Culture (are the supplier and buyer cultures compatible?)
243:
Cost (is the product or service offered at a competitive
473:
Baily, P., Farmer, D., Jessop, D. and Jones, D. (1998),
645:
Retail Product Management: Buying and Merchandising
578:Data engineering issues in e-commerce and services 692: 439: 275:Financial Services Supplier Qualification System 552:Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology 349:and Weatherbys Bank. The system is operated by 571: 369: 194:to evaluate if the company should engage the 528:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 103:. Unsourced material may be challenged and 370:Mahmoudi, Amin; Javed, Saad Ahmed (2022). 403: 273:In the UK financial services sector, the 167:Learn how and when to remove this message 64: 353:-based company Hellios Information Ltd. 333:, Rugby and Hinckley Building Society, 257:, funded legitimately, does not engage 693: 501:Purchasing and Supply Chain Management 268: 475:Purchasing Principles and Management 101:adding citations to reliable sources 68: 671:, DPSS Ltd., accessed 18 March 2021 565: 536: 480: 433: 13: 14: 722: 73: 674: 661: 649: 637: 624: 599: 467: 420: 376:Group Decision and Negotiation 363: 1: 356: 477:, London: Pitman Publishing 7: 327:Nationwide Building Society 253:Clean (is the organization 10: 727: 680:Hellios Information Ltd., 388:10.1007/s10726-022-09790-1 221:listed by Ray Carter are: 209: 43: 658:, accessed 18 March 2021 205: 706:Supply chain management 329:, NFU Mutual PCF Bank 711:Management cybernetics 684:, accessed 5 July 2023 331:Royal and Sun Alliance 293:, Allied Irish Bank, 188:Procurement Department 65:Benefits and drawbacks 38:continuous improvement 426:Roylance, D. (2006), 192:cost-benefit analysis 116:"Supplier evaluation" 315:Lloyds Banking Group 313:), Hastings Group, 212:Procurement software 198:or perform the task 97:improve this section 492:Robert B. Handfield 430:, Gower Publishing 287:insurance companies 17:Supplier evaluation 451:J. Ross Publishing 321:, Masthaven Bank, 283:building societies 269:Financial Services 23:are terms used in 21:supplier appraisal 630:Stueland, V. J., 592:978-3-540-35440-6 515:978-0-324-38134-4 488:Robert M. Monczka 460:978-1-932159-80-6 343:Tokio Marine Kiln 177: 176: 169: 151: 59:quality assurance 718: 685: 678: 672: 665: 659: 653: 647: 641: 635: 628: 622: 621: 619: 618: 609:. Archived from 603: 597: 596: 569: 563: 562: 560: 559: 548: 540: 534: 533: 527: 519: 506:Cengage Learning 484: 478: 471: 465: 464: 441:Sherry R. Gordon 437: 431: 424: 418: 417: 407: 382:(5): 1051–1096. 367: 295:Arbuthnot Latham 190:) that performs 172: 165: 161: 158: 152: 150: 109: 77: 69: 726: 725: 721: 720: 719: 717: 716: 715: 691: 690: 689: 688: 682:FSQS for Buyers 679: 675: 666: 662: 654: 650: 642: 638: 629: 625: 616: 614: 605: 604: 600: 593: 585:. p. 290. 570: 566: 557: 555: 546: 542: 541: 537: 521: 520: 516: 508:. p. 810. 496:Larry Giunipero 485: 481: 472: 468: 461: 453:. p. 232. 438: 434: 425: 421: 368: 364: 359: 307:Clydesdale Bank 303:Bank of Ireland 299:Bank of England 271: 214: 208: 173: 162: 156: 153: 110: 108: 94: 78: 67: 46: 12: 11: 5: 724: 714: 713: 708: 703: 701:Business terms 687: 686: 673: 660: 648: 636: 623: 598: 591: 564: 535: 514: 479: 466: 459: 432: 419: 361: 360: 358: 355: 339:Shawbrook Bank 305:, BNP Paribas 291:Aldermore Bank 270: 267: 266: 265: 262: 251: 248: 241: 238: 235: 232: 229: 226: 207: 204: 175: 174: 81: 79: 72: 66: 63: 45: 42: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 723: 712: 709: 707: 704: 702: 699: 698: 696: 683: 677: 670: 669:The 10c Model 664: 657: 652: 646: 640: 633: 627: 613:on 2019-03-28 612: 608: 602: 594: 588: 584: 580: 579: 574: 573:Juhnyoung Lee 568: 554: 553: 545: 539: 531: 525: 517: 511: 507: 503: 502: 497: 493: 489: 483: 476: 470: 462: 456: 452: 448: 447: 442: 436: 429: 423: 415: 411: 406: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 366: 362: 354: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 263: 260: 256: 252: 249: 246: 242: 239: 236: 233: 230: 227: 224: 223: 222: 218: 213: 203: 201: 197: 193: 189: 184: 181: 171: 168: 160: 149: 146: 142: 139: 135: 132: 128: 125: 121: 118: â€“  117: 113: 112:Find sources: 106: 102: 98: 92: 91: 87: 82:This section 80: 76: 71: 70: 62: 60: 56: 55:questionnaire 51: 41: 39: 35: 30: 26: 22: 18: 676: 663: 651: 644: 643:Varley, M., 639: 626: 615:. Retrieved 611:the original 601: 577: 567: 556:. Retrieved 550: 538: 500: 482: 474: 469: 445: 435: 427: 422: 379: 375: 365: 311:Virgin Money 274: 272: 219: 215: 185: 182: 178: 163: 154: 144: 137: 130: 123: 111: 95:Please help 83: 47: 36:and driving 20: 16: 15: 667:Carter, R. 309:(including 259:child labor 231:Consistency 32:mitigating 695:Categories 617:2007-09-17 558:2011-03-21 357:References 323:Metro Bank 210:See also: 127:newspapers 50:purchasing 524:cite book 396:1572-9907 335:Santander 157:July 2023 84:does not 29:suppliers 583:Springer 575:(2006). 498:(2008). 443:(2008). 414:36042813 261:, etc.?) 200:in-house 25:business 405:9409630 255:ethical 141:scholar 105:removed 90:sources 44:Process 589:  512:  457:  412:  402:  394:  351:Oxford 196:vendor 143:  136:  129:  122:  114:  547:(PDF) 279:banks 245:price 206:Tools 148:JSTOR 134:books 587:ISBN 530:link 510:ISBN 455:ISBN 410:PMID 392:ISSN 285:and 120:news 88:any 86:cite 34:risk 19:and 400:PMC 384:doi 347:TSB 319:LV= 99:by 697:: 581:. 549:. 526:}} 522:{{ 504:. 494:, 490:, 449:. 408:. 398:. 390:. 380:31 378:. 374:. 345:, 341:, 337:, 325:, 317:, 301:, 297:, 289:: 281:, 247:?) 40:. 620:. 595:. 561:. 532:) 518:. 463:. 416:. 386:: 170:) 164:( 159:) 155:( 145:· 138:· 131:· 124:· 107:. 93:.

Index

business
suppliers
risk
continuous improvement
purchasing
questionnaire
quality assurance

cite
sources
improve this section
adding citations to reliable sources
removed
"Supplier evaluation"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
Procurement Department
cost-benefit analysis
vendor
in-house
Procurement software
price
ethical
child labor
banks
building societies

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑