Knowledge

Standard penetration test

Source 📝

129: 825: 678: 724: 637: 625: 736: 787: 712: 613: 760: 32: 813: 801: 837: 748: 861: 777: 700: 601: 334:
with a slightly different tip shape, so the disturbance of the sample is minimized, and testing of structural properties is meaningful for all but soft soils. However, this results in blow counts which are not easily converted to SPT N-values – many conversions have been proposed, some of which depend on the type of soil sampled, making reliance on blow counts with non-standard samplers problematic.
849: 649: 137: 470:
Youd, T. L.; Member, Asce, I. M. Idriss, Chair; Fellow, Asce, Ronald D. Andrus, Co-Chair; Arango, Ignacio; Castro, Gonzalo; Christian, John T.; Dobry, Richardo; Finn, W. D. Liam; et al. (2001). "Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on
176:
AS 1289.6.3.1. The test provides samples for identification purposes and provides a measure of penetration resistance which can be used for geotechnical design purposes. Various local and widely published international correlations that relate blow count, or N-value, to the engineering properties of
337:
Standard penetration test blow counts do not represent a simple physical property of the soil, and thus must be correlated to soil properties of interest, such as strength or density. There exist multiple correlations, none of which are of very high quality. Use of SPT data for direct prediction of
333:
The standard penetration test recovers a highly disturbed sample, which is generally not suitable for tests which measure properties of the in-situ soil structure, such as density, strength, and consolidation characteristics. To overcome this limitation, the test is often run with a larger sampler
197:
by blows from a hammer with a mass of 63.5 kg (140 lb) falling a distance of 75 cm (30 in). The sample tube is driven a total of 45 cm into the ground and the number of blows needed for the tube to penetrate each 15 cm (6 in) interval up to a depth of 45 cm
222:
Another benefit of the test is the collection of a disturbed soil sample for moisture content determination, as well identification and classification purposes. While sample quality is generally not suitable for laboratory testing for engineering properties because of the disturbance of the soil
230:
level, the soil may become loosened. In certain circumstances, it can be useful to continue driving the sampler beyond the distance specified, adding further drilling rods as necessary. Although this is not a standard penetration test, and should not be regarded as such, it may at least give an
254:
One approximate relationship between SPT N-value, relative density, and bulk density for coarse-grained material can be seen in the table below. This is cited in the US Army Corps of Engineers engineering manual publication on sheet pile design developed after Terzaghi and Peck (1948) and Teng
250:
Despite its many flaws, it is usual practice to correlate SPT results with soil properties relevant for geotechnical engineering design. SPT results are in-situ field measurements and are often the only test results available. As such, the use of correlations has become common practice in many
209:
The test may be stopped if any of the following conditions are met: (1) a total of 50 blows have been applied in any one of the 15 cm (6 in) intervals, (2) a total of 100 blows have been applied over the total 45 cm (18 in) depth, or (3) there is no observed advance of the
218:
The great merit of the test is that it is simple, inexpensive, and widely used. The soil strength parameters which can be inferred from SPT results are approximate, but may give a useful guide in ground conditions where more advanced laboratory testing is not practical or possible.
338:
liquefaction potential suffers from roughness of correlations and from the need to "normalize" SPT data to account for overburden pressure, sampling technique, and other factors. Additionally, the method cannot collect accurate data for weak soil layers for several reasons:
192:
The test uses a thick-walled sampling tube, with an outside diameter of 5.01 cm (2 in) and an inside diameter of 3.5 cm (1.375 in), and a length of at least 60 cm (24 in). The sampling tube is driven into the ground at the bottom of a
198:(18 in) is recorded. The sum of the number of blows required for the second and third 15 cm (6 in) intervals of penetration is termed the "standard penetration resistance" or the "N-value". N-value provides an indication of the 185:
A borehole shall be advanced incrementally to permit intermittent or continuous sampling. Intervals are typically 1.5 m (5 ft) or less in homogeneous strata. Tests and sampling should be done at every change in strata.
342:
The results are limited to whole numbers for a specific driving interval, but with very low blow counts, the granularity of the results, and the possibility of a zero result, makes handling the data cumbersome.
628: 739: 392:
ASTM D1586/D1586M–18. 2018. Standard Test Method for Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshokocken, PA.
715: 763: 549: 816: 498: 168:. This test is the most frequently used subsurface exploration drilling test performed worldwide. The test procedure is described in ISO 22476-3, 703: 1680: 1514: 96: 189:
After the borehole has been advanced to a desired depth and excess cuttings have been removed, testing and sampling can be conducted.
49: 68: 223:
causing changes in engineering properties, the use of a thin-walled tube sampler may result in less disturbance in soft soils.
1685: 1559: 353:
A variety of techniques have been proposed to compensate for the deficiencies of the standard penetration testing, including the
75: 513: 414: 542: 516:[Beware, soft ground and the standard penetration test] (in Japanese). Public Works Research Institute. Archived from 82: 431:"ASTM D1586 / D1586M - 18 Standard Test Method for Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils" 64: 969: 567: 535: 345:
In loose sands and very soft clays, the act of driving the sampler will significantly disturb the soil, including by
115: 242:, and others. When used for this purpose, the N-value should be normalized to a standard overburden stress level. 53: 1217: 1098: 640: 454: 349:
of loose sands, giving results based on the disturbed soil properties rather than the intact soil properties.
484: 1530: 1130: 575: 375: 89: 19:
This article is about testing of geotechnical properties of soil. For testing of computer systems, see
1433: 1509: 1499: 1371: 1361: 1191: 929: 727: 558: 161: 469: 1349: 1324: 1264: 944: 885: 443:
US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering Manual EM 1110-2-2504, Table 3-1, dated 31 March 1994>
42: 1612: 1423: 1237: 1073: 1048: 899: 878: 770: 1299: 1108: 616: 492: 370: 354: 411:
Knappet, J.A. & Craig, R.F. (2012) Craig's Soil Mechanics. 8th ed. Abingdon: Spon Press.
1652: 1504: 1461: 1354: 1279: 662: 173: 231:
indication as to whether the deposit is really as loose as the standard test may indicate
8: 1428: 1418: 974: 959: 919: 892: 667: 657: 1379: 1088: 871: 790: 459:. Ithaca, New York: Electric Power Research Institute. pp. 2–17 to 2–26. EL-6800. 1476: 1222: 1113: 1083: 934: 517: 346: 235: 234:
SPT can also be used for empirical determination of a sand layer's susceptibility to
1526: 1413: 1304: 1269: 1244: 1103: 924: 480: 20: 751: 1642: 1466: 1384: 1319: 1314: 1212: 1078: 949: 804: 160:) is an in-situ dynamic penetration test designed to provide information on the 1589: 1481: 1398: 1202: 964: 954: 840: 380: 239: 165: 1519: 1674: 1617: 1456: 1334: 1329: 1284: 1053: 824: 677: 128: 1637: 1632: 1622: 1602: 1289: 1232: 1063: 780: 723: 636: 527: 689: 624: 430: 1647: 1344: 1227: 1166: 735: 227: 786: 711: 612: 1471: 1451: 1339: 1151: 1146: 1068: 1058: 939: 684: 604: 358: 1627: 1607: 1493: 1309: 1294: 910: 852: 652: 203: 31: 1657: 1544: 1274: 1249: 1176: 1093: 759: 194: 812: 800: 1597: 1569: 1254: 1181: 1171: 1161: 1156: 864: 836: 399:
A Guide to Practical Geotechnical Engineering in Southern Africa.
199: 145: 141: 747: 1579: 1574: 1564: 1554: 1486: 1259: 1207: 1017: 860: 776: 699: 600: 245: 1032: 848: 648: 177:
soils are available for geotechnical engineering purposes.
136: 1027: 1022: 1012: 1007: 1002: 987: 169: 456:
Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design
473:
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
226:
When the test is carried out in granular soils below
140:
Standard penetration test N values from a surficial
56:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 471:Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils". 1672: 16:Geotechnical engineering test of soil properties 543: 238:, based on research performed by Harry Seed, 557: 497:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 453:Kulhawy, F. H.; Mayne, P. W. (August 1990). 452: 406:An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering. 246:Correlation with soil mechanical properties 210:sampling tube during 10 successive blows. 550: 536: 401:4th ed. Cape Town: VIVO Design Associates. 116:Learn how and when to remove this message 485:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817) 135: 127: 511: 1673: 404:Holtz, R.D. & Kovacs, W.D. (1981) 202:of the ground, and it is used in many 531: 206:geotechnical engineering formulae. 54:adding citations to reliable sources 25: 1681:In situ geotechnical investigations 13: 14: 1697: 568:Offshore geotechnical engineering 180: 859: 847: 835: 823: 811: 799: 785: 775: 758: 746: 734: 722: 710: 698: 676: 647: 635: 623: 611: 599: 357:, in-situ vane shear tests, and 30: 41:needs additional citations for 1686:Geotechnical penetration tests 505: 463: 446: 437: 423: 415:University of Missouri – Rolla 1: 1218:Mechanically stabilized earth 386: 970:Hydraulic conductivity tests 7: 1531:Stress distribution in soil 364: 328: 65:"Standard penetration test" 10: 1702: 681:Pore pressure measurement 512:Zatsuwa, Monosagu (2005). 408:New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 376:Geotechnical investigation 18: 1588: 1543: 1442: 1434:Preconsolidation pressure 1406: 1397: 1370: 1190: 1139: 1126: 1041: 995: 986: 909: 829:Standard penetration test 587: 574: 565: 154:standard penetration test 930:California bearing ratio 728:Rotary-pressure sounding 559:Geotechnical engineering 162:geotechnical engineering 1350:Geosynthetic clay liner 1325:Expanded clay aggregate 945:Proctor compaction test 886:Crosshole sonic logging 872:Nuclear densometer test 629:Geo-electrical sounding 417:Class notes on the SPT. 361:velocity measurements. 213: 132:Symbol used in drawings 1613:Earthquake engineering 1424:Lateral earth pressure 1049:Hydraulic conductivity 900:Wave equation analysis 879:Exploration geophysics 771:Deformation monitoring 740:Rotary weight sounding 149: 133: 791:Settlement recordings 716:Rock control drilling 617:Cone penetration test 397:Braatvedt, I. (2008) 371:Cone penetration test 355:Cone penetration test 139: 131: 1653:Agricultural science 1355:Cellular confinement 520:on January 20, 2013. 514:"気をつけよう,軟弱地盤と標準貫入試験" 267:Bulk density (kg/m) 174:Australian Standards 50:improve this article 1545:Numerical analysis 1429:Overburden pressure 1419:Pore water pressure 1199:Shoring structures 1074:Reynolds' dilatancy 975:Water content tests 960:Triaxial shear test 920:Soil classification 893:Pile integrity test 1520:Slab stabilisation 1500:Stability analysis 150: 134: 1668: 1667: 1539: 1538: 1515:Sliding criterion 1477:Response spectrum 1393: 1392: 1223:Pressure grouting 1122: 1121: 982: 981: 935:Direct shear test 641:Permeability test 347:soil liquefaction 326: 325: 236:soil liquefaction 126: 125: 118: 100: 1693: 1527:Bearing capacity 1414:Effective stress 1404: 1403: 1305:Land reclamation 1245:Land development 1140:Natural features 1137: 1136: 1104:Specific storage 993: 992: 925:Atterberg limits 863: 851: 839: 827: 815: 803: 789: 779: 764:Screw plate test 762: 750: 738: 726: 714: 702: 680: 651: 639: 627: 615: 603: 585: 584: 552: 545: 538: 529: 528: 522: 521: 509: 503: 502: 496: 488: 467: 461: 460: 450: 444: 441: 435: 434: 427: 261:Relative density 258: 257: 121: 114: 110: 107: 101: 99: 58: 34: 26: 21:Penetration test 1701: 1700: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1664: 1643:Earth materials 1584: 1546: 1535: 1444: 1438: 1389: 1366: 1320:Earth structure 1315:Erosion control 1213:Ground freezing 1203:Retaining walls 1186: 1128: 1118: 1079:Angle of repose 1037: 978: 912: 905: 904: 865:Visible bedrock 817:Simple sounding 805:Shear vane test 581:instrumentation 580: 578: 570: 561: 556: 526: 525: 510: 506: 490: 489: 479:(10): 297–313. 468: 464: 451: 447: 442: 438: 429: 428: 424: 389: 367: 331: 248: 216: 183: 122: 111: 105: 102: 59: 57: 47: 35: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1699: 1689: 1688: 1683: 1666: 1665: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1650: 1645: 1640: 1635: 1630: 1625: 1620: 1615: 1610: 1605: 1600: 1594: 1592: 1590:Related fields 1586: 1585: 1583: 1582: 1577: 1572: 1567: 1562: 1557: 1551: 1549: 1541: 1540: 1537: 1536: 1534: 1533: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1510:Classification 1507: 1502: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1484: 1482:Seismic hazard 1479: 1469: 1464: 1459: 1454: 1448: 1446: 1440: 1439: 1437: 1436: 1431: 1426: 1421: 1416: 1410: 1408: 1401: 1395: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1388: 1387: 1382: 1376: 1374: 1368: 1367: 1365: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1352: 1347: 1342: 1332: 1327: 1322: 1317: 1312: 1307: 1302: 1297: 1292: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1272: 1267: 1262: 1257: 1252: 1247: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1205: 1196: 1194: 1188: 1187: 1185: 1184: 1179: 1174: 1169: 1164: 1159: 1154: 1149: 1143: 1141: 1134: 1124: 1123: 1120: 1119: 1117: 1116: 1111: 1109:Shear strength 1106: 1101: 1096: 1091: 1086: 1084:Friction angle 1081: 1076: 1071: 1066: 1061: 1056: 1051: 1045: 1043: 1039: 1038: 1036: 1035: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1015: 1010: 1005: 999: 997: 990: 984: 983: 980: 979: 977: 972: 967: 965:Oedometer test 962: 957: 955:Sieve analysis 952: 947: 942: 937: 932: 927: 922: 917: 915: 907: 906: 903: 902: 896: 895: 889: 888: 882: 881: 875: 874: 868: 867: 856: 855: 844: 843: 841:Total sounding 832: 831: 820: 819: 808: 807: 796: 795: 794: 793: 783: 767: 766: 755: 754: 743: 742: 731: 730: 719: 718: 707: 706: 695: 694: 693: 692: 687: 673: 672: 671: 670: 665: 660: 644: 643: 632: 631: 620: 619: 608: 607: 596: 595: 593: 582: 572: 571: 566: 563: 562: 555: 554: 547: 540: 532: 524: 523: 504: 462: 445: 436: 421: 420: 419: 418: 412: 409: 402: 395: 393: 388: 385: 384: 383: 381:Soil mechanics 378: 373: 366: 363: 351: 350: 343: 330: 327: 324: 323: 320: 317: 313: 312: 311:1 750 - 2 245 309: 306: 302: 301: 300:1 750 - 2 100 298: 295: 291: 290: 289:1 530 - 2 000 287: 284: 280: 279: 276: 273: 269: 268: 265: 262: 247: 244: 240:T. Leslie Youd 215: 212: 182: 181:Test procedure 179: 164:properties of 124: 123: 106:September 2014 38: 36: 29: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1698: 1687: 1684: 1682: 1679: 1678: 1676: 1659: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1651: 1649: 1646: 1644: 1641: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1631: 1629: 1626: 1624: 1621: 1619: 1618:Geomorphology 1616: 1614: 1611: 1609: 1606: 1604: 1601: 1599: 1596: 1595: 1593: 1591: 1587: 1581: 1578: 1576: 1573: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1561: 1558: 1556: 1553: 1552: 1550: 1548: 1542: 1532: 1528: 1525: 1521: 1518: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1498: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1488: 1485: 1483: 1480: 1478: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1465: 1463: 1462:Consolidation 1460: 1458: 1457:Frost heaving 1455: 1453: 1450: 1449: 1447: 1441: 1435: 1432: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1409: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1396: 1386: 1383: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1375: 1373: 1369: 1363: 1360: 1356: 1353: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335:Geosynthetics 1333: 1331: 1330:Crushed stone 1328: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1316: 1313: 1311: 1308: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1285:Cut-and-cover 1283: 1281: 1278: 1276: 1273: 1271: 1268: 1266: 1263: 1261: 1258: 1256: 1253: 1251: 1248: 1246: 1243: 1239: 1236: 1234: 1231: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1198: 1197: 1195: 1193: 1189: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1163: 1160: 1158: 1155: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1132: 1125: 1115: 1112: 1110: 1107: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1095: 1092: 1090: 1087: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1077: 1075: 1072: 1070: 1067: 1065: 1062: 1060: 1057: 1055: 1054:Water content 1052: 1050: 1047: 1046: 1044: 1040: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1004: 1001: 1000: 998: 994: 991: 989: 985: 976: 973: 971: 968: 966: 963: 961: 958: 956: 953: 951: 948: 946: 943: 941: 938: 936: 933: 931: 928: 926: 923: 921: 918: 916: 914: 908: 901: 898: 897: 894: 891: 890: 887: 884: 883: 880: 877: 876: 873: 870: 869: 866: 862: 858: 857: 854: 850: 846: 845: 842: 838: 834: 833: 830: 826: 822: 821: 818: 814: 810: 809: 806: 802: 798: 797: 792: 788: 784: 782: 778: 774: 773: 772: 769: 768: 765: 761: 757: 756: 753: 752:Sample series 749: 745: 744: 741: 737: 733: 732: 729: 725: 721: 720: 717: 713: 709: 708: 705: 701: 697: 696: 691: 688: 686: 683: 682: 679: 675: 674: 669: 666: 664: 661: 659: 656: 655: 654: 650: 646: 645: 642: 638: 634: 633: 630: 626: 622: 621: 618: 614: 610: 609: 606: 602: 598: 597: 594: 591: 586: 583: 577: 576:Investigation 573: 569: 564: 560: 553: 548: 546: 541: 539: 534: 533: 530: 519: 515: 508: 500: 494: 486: 482: 478: 474: 466: 458: 457: 449: 440: 432: 426: 422: 416: 413: 410: 407: 403: 400: 396: 394: 391: 390: 382: 379: 377: 374: 372: 369: 368: 362: 360: 356: 348: 344: 341: 340: 339: 335: 321: 318: 315: 314: 310: 307: 304: 303: 299: 296: 293: 292: 288: 285: 282: 281: 277: 274: 271: 270: 266: 263: 260: 259: 256: 252: 243: 241: 237: 232: 229: 224: 220: 211: 207: 205: 201: 196: 190: 187: 178: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 147: 143: 138: 130: 120: 117: 109: 98: 95: 91: 88: 84: 81: 77: 74: 70: 67: –  66: 62: 61:Find sources: 55: 51: 45: 44: 39:This article 37: 33: 28: 27: 22: 1638:Biogeography 1633:Hydrogeology 1623:Soil science 1603:Geochemistry 1362:Infiltration 1290:Cut and fill 1233:Soil nailing 1099:Permeability 1064:Bulk density 828: 781:Inclinometer 704:Ram sounding 589: 518:the original 507: 493:cite journal 476: 472: 465: 455: 448: 439: 425: 405: 398: 352: 336: 332: 253: 249: 233: 225: 221: 217: 208: 191: 188: 184: 157: 153: 151: 112: 103: 93: 86: 79: 72: 60: 48:Please help 43:verification 40: 1648:Archaeology 1372:Foundations 1345:Geomembrane 1228:Slurry wall 1167:Water table 1131:Interaction 1127:Structures 1114:Sensitivity 911:Laboratory 322:> 2 100 278:< 1 600 264:SPT N-value 251:countries. 228:groundwater 1675:Categories 1505:Mitigation 1487:Shear wave 1472:Earthquake 1467:Compaction 1452:Permafrost 1443:Phenomena/ 1340:Geotextile 1265:Embankment 1255:Excavation 1192:Earthworks 1152:Vegetation 1147:Topography 1069:Thixotropy 1059:Void ratio 1042:Properties 940:Hydrometer 685:Piezometer 605:Core drill 387:References 359:shear wave 316:Very dense 272:Very loose 172:D1586 and 76:newspapers 1628:Hydrology 1608:Petrology 1496:analysis 1494:Landslide 1399:Mechanics 1310:Track bed 1295:Fill dirt 1280:Terracing 853:Trial pit 668:Statnamic 653:Load test 204:empirical 144:in south 1658:Agrology 1547:software 1445:problems 1275:Causeway 1250:Landfill 1177:Subgrade 1094:Porosity 1089:Cohesion 365:See also 329:Problems 255:(1962). 195:borehole 1598:Geology 1570:SVSlope 1380:Shallow 1300:Grading 1238:Tieback 1182:Subsoil 1172:Bedrock 1162:Topsoil 1157:Terrain 950:R-value 913:testing 663:Dynamic 590:in situ 588:Field ( 319:> 50 308:30 - 50 297:10 - 30 200:density 146:Florida 142:aquifer 90:scholar 1580:Plaxis 1575:UTEXAS 1565:SVFlux 1555:SEEP2D 1407:Forces 1260:Trench 1208:Gabion 1018:Gravel 658:Static 294:Medium 286:4 - 10 92:  85:  78:  71:  63:  1560:STABL 1033:Loess 996:Types 305:Dense 283:Loose 275:0 - 4 97:JSTOR 83:books 1385:Deep 1028:Loam 1023:Peat 1013:Sand 1008:Silt 1003:Clay 988:Soil 690:Well 499:link 214:Uses 170:ASTM 166:soil 152:The 69:news 1270:Cut 579:and 481:doi 477:127 158:SPT 52:by 1677:: 1529:* 495:}} 491:{{ 475:. 1133:) 1129:( 592:) 551:e 544:t 537:v 501:) 487:. 483:: 433:. 156:( 148:. 119:) 113:( 108:) 104:( 94:· 87:· 80:· 73:· 46:. 23:.

Index

Penetration test

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Standard penetration test"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message


aquifer
Florida
geotechnical engineering
soil
ASTM
Australian Standards
borehole
density
empirical
groundwater
soil liquefaction
T. Leslie Youd
soil liquefaction
Cone penetration test
shear wave
Cone penetration test

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.