31:
349:
309:
In a 7-2 opinion, the
Supreme Court held that prosecutors could use a suspect's refusal to submit to a blood test as evidence of guilt, and the introduction of this evidence at trial does not violate the suspect's Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination. Writing for the Court's majority,
247:
case in which the Court held that prosecutors may use a suspect's refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test as evidence of guilt and that the introduction of such evidence at trial does not violate the suspect's Fifth
Amendment privilege against self incrimination.
314:
concluded that "the state did not directly compel respondent to refuse the test." Additionally, Justice O'Connor wrote that a "simple blood-alcohol test is so safe, painless, and commonplace" that a suspect would not feel coerced to refuse the test.
270:, a split of authority emerged in state courts with regard to whether the Fifth Amendment's privilege against self incrimination prohibited the use of a suspect's refusal to submit to a blood test as evidence of guilt.
297:
At trial, Neville filed a motion to suppress all evidence associated with his refusal to take a blood alcohol test on the grounds that it violated his privilege against self incrimination. The
301:
agreed that admitting evidence of
Neville's refusal to take the test violated his privilege against self incrimination, and state prosecutors appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
711:
294:, officers placed Neville under arrest. Officers asked Neville if he would submit to a blood-alcohol test, but he refused, stating “I'm too drunk, I won't pass the test.”
230:
618:
552:
438:
413:
367:
75:
290:
without stopping. When officers asked
Neville to step out of his car, he "staggered and fell against the car to support himself." After failing several
372:
263:
226:
325:
about the consequences of refusing the test because officers made it clear that a refusal to submit to a test may lead to "adverse consequences."
274:, for example, passed a statute that stated a person's refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test “may be admissible into evidence at the trial.”
706:
362:
701:
35:
337:
intended to adopt a broad and liberal interpretation of the Fifth
Amendment privilege against self incrimination.
298:
674:
244:
638:
111:
262:(1966), the Supreme Court held that the extraction and analysis of blood samples does not violate the
124:
A suspect's refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test may be admitted as evidence of guilt at trial.
318:
Justice O'Connor also ruled that suspects who refuse to submit to a blood test are not entitled to
656:
433:
258:
311:
191:
147:
420:
622:
556:
442:
417:
283:
67:
647:
445:
386:
8:
378:
291:
171:
629:
559:
319:
330:
326:
183:
179:
159:
139:
665:
70:
167:
695:
271:
54:
683:
155:
282:
On the evening of July 19, 1980, Mason Henry
Neville was stopped by two
354:
208:
O'Connor, joined by Burger, Brennan, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist
86:
266:
privilege against self incrimination. However, in the years following
287:
82:
460:, 459 U.S. at 558 ("we granted certiorari to resolve the conflict").
348:
333:
wrote a dissenting opinion in which they argued that the Court in
286:
police officers after they observed
Neville's car drive past a
107:
30:
472:, 459 U.S. at 556 (citing S.D.Comp.Laws Ann. § 32–23–10.1).
712:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
368:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 459
344:
484:, 459 U.S. at 554; see also Brief for Petitioner,
373:Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
693:
570:
568:
277:
405:
403:
565:
601:, 459 U.S. at 570 (Stevens, J., dissenting).
508:
506:
400:
503:
363:List of United States Supreme Court cases
304:
694:
18:1983 United States Supreme Court case
57:, Petitioner v. Mason Henry Neville
13:
562: (1982) (granting certiorari).
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
723:
707:United States Supreme Court cases
625:553 (1983) is available from:
607:
347:
29:
592:
580:
542:
702:1983 in United States case law
530:
518:
491:
475:
463:
451:
426:
1:
539:, 312 N.W.2d 723 (S.D. 1981).
394:
299:Supreme Court of South Dakota
278:Arrest of Mason Henry Neville
251:
243:, 459 U.S. 553 (1983), was a
7:
488:, 459 U.S. 553 (U.S. 1983).
340:
245:United States Supreme Court
216:Stevens, joined by Marshall
10:
728:
684:Oyez (oral argument audio)
225:
220:
212:
204:
199:
133:
128:
123:
118:
99:
94:
62:
49:
45:Decided February 22, 1983
42:
28:
23:
615:South Dakota v. Neville
549:South Dakota v. Neville
486:South Dakota v. Neville
434:Schmerber v. California
410:South Dakota v. Neville
259:Schmerber v. California
240:South Dakota v. Neville
43:Argued December 8, 1982
24:South Dakota v. Neville
148:William J. Brennan Jr.
577:, 459 U.S. at 562-63.
284:Madison, South Dakota
227:U.S. Const. amends. V
387:Rochin v. California
305:Opinion of the Court
292:field sobriety tests
675:Library of Congress
379:Breithaupt v. Abram
192:Sandra Day O'Connor
172:Lewis F. Powell Jr.
81:103 S. Ct. 916; 74
589:, 459 U.S. at 566.
527:, 459 U.S. at 556.
515:, 459 U.S. at 555.
500:, 459 U.S. at 554.
144:Associate Justices
236:
235:
180:William Rehnquist
160:Thurgood Marshall
719:
688:
682:
679:
673:
670:
664:
661:
655:
652:
646:
643:
637:
634:
628:
602:
596:
590:
584:
578:
572:
563:
546:
540:
537:State v. Neville
534:
528:
522:
516:
510:
501:
495:
489:
479:
473:
467:
461:
455:
449:
430:
424:
407:
357:
352:
351:
331:Justice Marshall
312:Justice O'Connor
140:Warren E. Burger
129:Court membership
104:State v. Neville
33:
32:
21:
20:
727:
726:
722:
721:
720:
718:
717:
716:
692:
691:
686:
680:
677:
671:
668:
662:
659:
653:
650:
644:
641:
635:
632:
626:
610:
605:
597:
593:
585:
581:
573:
566:
547:
543:
535:
531:
523:
519:
511:
504:
496:
492:
480:
476:
468:
464:
456:
452:
431:
427:
408:
401:
397:
353:
346:
343:
327:Justice Stevens
307:
280:
264:Fifth Amendment
254:
184:John P. Stevens
182:
170:
158:
90:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
725:
715:
714:
709:
704:
690:
689:
657:Google Scholar
609:
608:External links
606:
604:
603:
591:
579:
564:
541:
529:
517:
502:
490:
474:
462:
450:
425:
398:
396:
393:
392:
391:
383:
375:
370:
365:
359:
358:
342:
339:
306:
303:
279:
276:
253:
250:
234:
233:
223:
222:
218:
217:
214:
210:
209:
206:
202:
201:
197:
196:
195:
194:
168:Harry Blackmun
145:
142:
137:
131:
130:
126:
125:
121:
120:
116:
115:
101:
97:
96:
92:
91:
80:
64:
60:
59:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
724:
713:
710:
708:
705:
703:
700:
699:
697:
685:
676:
667:
658:
649:
640:
639:CourtListener
631:
624:
620:
616:
612:
611:
600:
595:
588:
583:
576:
571:
569:
561:
558:
554:
550:
545:
538:
533:
526:
521:
514:
509:
507:
499:
494:
487:
483:
478:
471:
466:
459:
454:
447:
444:
440:
436:
435:
429:
422:
419:
415:
411:
406:
404:
399:
389:
388:
384:
381:
380:
376:
374:
371:
369:
366:
364:
361:
360:
356:
350:
345:
338:
336:
332:
328:
324:
322:
316:
313:
302:
300:
295:
293:
289:
285:
275:
273:
269:
265:
261:
260:
249:
246:
242:
241:
232:
228:
224:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:Case opinions
198:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
146:
143:
141:
138:
136:Chief Justice
135:
134:
132:
127:
122:
117:
113:
109:
105:
102:
98:
93:
88:
84:
78:
77:
72:
69:
65:
61:
58:
56:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
614:
598:
594:
586:
582:
574:
548:
544:
536:
532:
524:
520:
512:
497:
493:
485:
481:
477:
469:
465:
457:
453:
448: (1966).
432:
428:
423: (1983).
409:
385:
377:
334:
329:, joined by
320:
317:
308:
296:
281:
272:South Dakota
267:
257:
255:
239:
238:
237:
221:Laws applied
187:
175:
163:
151:
103:
95:Case history
74:
55:South Dakota
53:
15:
421:553, 561-62
156:Byron White
696:Categories
395:References
355:Law portal
252:Background
87:U.S. LEXIS
85:748; 1983
335:Schmerber
288:stop sign
268:Schmerber
83:L. Ed. 2d
63:Citations
613:Text of
446:757, 765
341:See also
323:warnings
205:Majority
648:Findlaw
630:Cornell
599:Neville
587:Neville
575:Neville
525:Neville
513:Neville
498:Neville
482:Neville
470:Neville
458:Neville
321:Miranda
213:Dissent
119:Holding
687:
681:
678:
672:
669:
666:Justia
663:
660:
654:
651:
645:
642:
636:
633:
627:
390:(1952)
382:(1957)
190:
188:·
186:
178:
176:·
174:
166:
164:·
162:
154:
152:·
150:
108:N.W.2d
106:, 312
621:
555:
441:
416:
114:1981)
110:723 (
100:Prior
623:U.S.
557:U.S.
443:U.S.
418:U.S.
112:S.D.
76:more
68:U.S.
66:459
619:459
560:971
553:456
439:384
414:459
256:In
231:XIV
89:129
71:553
698::
617:,
567:^
551:,
505:^
437:,
412:,
402:^
229:,
79:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.