31:
277:, the Court held that states could admit evidence against defendants even if the evidence was obtained in violation of the Vienna Convention. The Court reasoned that the exclusionary rule is idiosyncratic to American jurisprudence and so could not have been in contemplation by other nation-states when they ratified the Vienna Convention.
261:
Both
Sanchez-Llamas and Bustillo filed state habeas petitions in their respective cases arguing that their right to consular notification had been violated. In both Oregon and Virginia, the courts ruled that because the claims were not argued at the trial court level they were procedurally barred.
258:
for beating a man to death with a baseball bat. Neither man had his consulate informed of the charges against him, as is required by
Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.
407:
262:
The supreme courts of Oregon and
Virginia both upheld the states' procedural bars. The two cases were then consolidated and argued before the United States Supreme Court.
417:
72:
283:
However, the
Supreme Court was unwilling to rule whether or not Article 36 created individual rights that had to be honored in state criminal proceedings.
402:
412:
231:
108:
280:
The Court also held that
Article 36 claims not timely brought could be procedurally barred by state procedural default rules.
271:
35:
322:
223:
357:
107:
States could admit evidence against defendants even if the evidence was obtained in violation of the
366:
95:
64:
8:
348:
166:
301:
227:
134:
293:
375:
67:
158:
146:
250:
after engaging police in an armed confrontation. Mario
Bustillo, a national of
170:
142:
396:
384:
274:
178:
154:
126:
83:
79:
255:
251:
247:
243:
230:
that was admitted into court in violation of
Article 36 of the
30:
408:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
211:
Breyer, joined by
Stevens, Souter; Ginsburg (Part II)
195:Roberts, joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito
394:
222:, 548 U.S. 331 (2006), was a case in which the
324:The Supreme Court, 2005 Term — Leading Cases,
418:United States treaty interpretation case law
344:, 548 U.S. 331 (2006) is available from:
226:held that a state court did not have to
265:
246:, was convicted of attempted murder in
232:Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
395:
242:Moises Sanchez-Llamas, a national of
18:2006 United States Supreme Court case
13:
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
429:
403:United States Supreme Court cases
334:
29:
54:Moises Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon
413:2006 in United States case law
316:
1:
327:120 Harv. L. Rev. 303 (2006).
309:
254:, was convicted of murder in
237:
7:
286:
224:United States Supreme Court
10:
434:
385:Oyez (oral argument audio)
207:
199:
191:
186:
120:
115:
106:
101:
91:
59:
49:
42:
28:
23:
342:Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon
219:Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon
24:Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon
203:Ginsburg (in judgment)
78:126 S. Ct. 2669; 165
45:Decided June 28, 2006
43:Argued March 29, 2006
266:Opinion of the Court
167:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
131:Associate Justices
302:Medellin v. Texas
270:In an opinion by
215:
214:
109:Vienna Convention
425:
389:
383:
380:
374:
371:
365:
362:
356:
353:
347:
328:
320:
294:Breard v. Greene
228:exclude evidence
116:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
20:
433:
432:
428:
427:
426:
424:
423:
422:
393:
392:
387:
381:
378:
372:
369:
363:
360:
354:
351:
345:
337:
332:
331:
321:
317:
312:
289:
268:
240:
169:
159:Clarence Thomas
157:
147:Anthony Kennedy
145:
135:John P. Stevens
87:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
431:
421:
420:
415:
410:
405:
391:
390:
367:Google Scholar
336:
335:External links
333:
330:
329:
314:
313:
311:
308:
307:
306:
298:
288:
285:
267:
264:
239:
236:
213:
212:
209:
205:
204:
201:
197:
196:
193:
189:
188:
184:
183:
182:
181:
171:Stephen Breyer
143:Antonin Scalia
132:
129:
124:
118:
117:
113:
112:
104:
103:
99:
98:
93:
89:
88:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
430:
419:
416:
414:
411:
409:
406:
404:
401:
400:
398:
386:
377:
368:
359:
358:CourtListener
350:
343:
339:
338:
326:
325:
319:
315:
304:
303:
299:
296:
295:
291:
290:
284:
281:
278:
276:
273:
272:Chief Justice
263:
259:
257:
253:
249:
245:
235:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:Case opinions
185:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
133:
130:
128:
125:
123:Chief Justice
122:
121:
119:
114:
110:
105:
100:
97:
96:Oral argument
94:
90:
85:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
341:
323:
318:
300:
292:
282:
279:
275:John Roberts
269:
260:
241:
218:
217:
216:
179:Samuel Alito
174:
162:
155:David Souter
150:
138:
127:John Roberts
71:
53:
15:
200:Concurrence
397:Categories
310:References
238:Background
84:U.S. LEXIS
82:557; 2006
80:L. Ed. 2d
60:Citations
340:Text of
287:See also
256:Virginia
252:Honduras
192:Majority
92:Argument
349:Cornell
208:Dissent
102:Holding
388:
382:
379:
376:Justia
373:
370:
364:
361:
355:
352:
346:
305:(2008)
297:(1998)
248:Oregon
244:Mexico
177:
175:·
173:
165:
163:·
161:
153:
151:·
149:
141:
139:·
137:
86:5177
73:more
65:U.S.
63:548
68:331
399::
234:.
111:.
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.