659:
405:
926:
1148:
693:
data well. On the other hand, if non-random structure is evident in the residuals, it is a clear sign that the model fits the data poorly. The next section details the types of plots to use to test different aspects of a model and gives the correct interpretations of different results that could be observed for each type of plot.
707:
A basic, though not quantitatively precise, way to check for problems that render a model inadequate is to conduct a visual examination of the residuals (the mispredictions of the data used in quantifying the model) to look for obvious deviations from randomness. If a visual examination suggests, for
662:
An illustrative plot of a fit to data (green curve in top panel, data in red) plus a plot of residuals: red points in bottom plot. Dashed curve in bottom panel is a straight line fit to the residuals. If the functional form is correct then there should be little or no trend to the residuals - as seen
825:
Cross-validation is the process of assessing how the results of a statistical analysis will generalize to an independent data set. If the model has been estimated over some, but not all, of the available data, then the model using the estimated parameters can be used to predict the held-back data.
780:
being estimated is relatively close to the size of the data set. In this situation residual plots are often difficult to interpret due to constraints on the residuals imposed by the estimation of the unknown parameters. One area in which this typically happens is in optimization applications using
692:
If the model fit to the data were correct, the residuals would approximate the random errors that make the relationship between the explanatory variables and the response variable a statistical relationship. Therefore, if the residuals appear to behave randomly, it suggests that the model fits the
525:
as a measure of model validity is that it can always be increased by adding more variables into the model, except in the unlikely event that the additional variables are exactly uncorrelated with the dependent variable in the data sample being used. This problem can be avoided by doing an
712:(a relationship between the variance of the model errors and the size of an independent variable's observations), then statistical tests can be performed to confirm or reject this hunch; if it is confirmed, different modeling procedures are called for.
775:
for assessing the correctness of the functional part of the model can aid in interpreting a borderline residual plot. One common situation when numerical validation methods take precedence over graphical methods is when the number of
757:
Graphical methods have an advantage over numerical methods for model validation because they readily illustrate a broad range of complex aspects of the relationship between the model and the data.
653:
1152:
841:, which is used to test the statistical validity of meta-analysis summary estimates. Essentially it measures a type of normalized prediction error and its distribution is a linear combination of
468:
are random, and checking whether the model's predictive performance deteriorates substantially when applied to data that were not used in model estimation.
564:
and the corresponding prediction of the response computed using the regression function. Mathematically, the definition of the residual for the
498:
close to 1 does not guarantee that the model fits the data well. For example, if the functional form of the model does not match the data,
17:
837:
A development in medical statistics is the use of out-of-sample cross validation techniques in meta-analysis. It forms the basis of the
715:
Different types of plots of the residuals from a fitted model provide information on the adequacy of different aspects of the model.
990:
435:
962:
456:
is the process of deciding whether the numerical results quantifying hypothesized relationships between variables, obtained from
345:
943:
969:
578:
335:
976:
557:
1033:"Measuring the statistical validity of summary meta-analysis and meta-regression results for use in clinical practice"
1009:
299:
958:
1175:
884:
879:
350:
288:
108:
83:
1170:
947:
210:
831:
820:
169:
834:, is substantially higher than the in-sample mean square error, this is a sign of deficiency in the model.
560:
from a fitted model are the differences between the responses observed at each combination of values of the
1113:
899:
889:
483:
428:
800:
658:
510:
values, but data that sometimes clearly does not fit the regression line. Instead, the data sets include
371:
904:
340:
309:
236:
1139:
330:
319:
283:
190:
983:
391:
262:
185:
78:
57:
730:
of residuals versus predictors; for data collected over time, also plots of residuals against time
1125:
936:
874:
808:
751:
421:
314:
1085:
491:
460:, are acceptable as descriptions of the data. The validation process can involve analyzing the
278:
273:
215:
1135:
894:
777:
766:
503:
465:
62:
1090:
854:
702:
561:
386:
376:
257:
225:
180:
159:
67:
8:
909:
869:
786:
782:
515:
457:
304:
205:
200:
154:
103:
93:
38:
1057:
1032:
827:
804:
796:
709:
685:
the vector of explanatory variables, each set at the corresponding values found in the
535:
409:
138:
123:
799:
of the residuals can indicate model misspecification, and can be checked for with the
1062:
551:
404:
195:
98:
52:
771:
Numerical methods also play an important role in model validation. For example, the
1052:
1044:
864:
220:
149:
859:
772:
477:
461:
381:
88:
133:
1164:
252:
128:
1130:
1066:
727:
720:
118:
790:
164:
113:
1086:"Model performance analysis and model validation in logistic regression"
1103:
793:
is another area in which graphical residual analysis can be difficult.
449:
1048:
747:
734:
925:
741:
569:
511:
1083:
527:
494:
with an intercept, it ranges between 0 and 1. However, an
1156:
530:
of the statistical significance of the increase in the
506:
consists of four example data sets with similarly high
760:
648:{\displaystyle e_{i}=y_{i}-f(x_{i};{\hat {\beta }}),}
581:
1030:
950:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
1084:Arboretti Giancristofaro, R.; Salmaso, L. (2003),
696:
647:
719:sufficiency of the functional part of the model:
1162:
733:drift in the errors (data collected over time):
1131:NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods
1157:National Institute of Standards and Technology
1126:How can I tell if a model fits my data? (NIST)
1110:(Second ed.), Macmillan, pp. 593–600
429:
814:
436:
422:
1056:
1010:Learn how and when to remove this message
464:of the regression, analyzing whether the
726:non-constant variation across the data:
657:
545:
502:can be high despite a poor model fit.
14:
1163:
1102:
737:of the response and errors versus time
482:One measure of goodness of fit is the
948:adding citations to reliable sources
919:
826:If, for example, the out-of-sample
24:
1077:
761:Quantitative analysis of residuals
708:example, the possible presence of
471:
25:
1187:
1119:
1151: This article incorporates
1146:
924:
403:
935:needs additional citations for
885:Statistical model specification
880:Statistical conclusion validity
697:Graphical analysis of residuals
351:Least-squares spectral analysis
289:Generalized estimating equation
109:Multinomial logistic regression
84:Vector generalized linear model
1024:
723:of residuals versus predictors
639:
633:
611:
13:
1:
915:
832:mean squared prediction error
807:can be checked for in any of
689:observation in the data set.
678:response in the data set and
170:Nonlinear mixed-effects model
1114:University of Michigan Press
1031:Willis BH, Riley RD (2017).
900:Coefficient of determination
890:Statistical model validation
484:coefficient of determination
7:
848:
372:Mean and predicted response
18:Regression model validation
10:
1192:
905:Lack-of-fit sum of squares
818:
764:
700:
549:
534:, or by instead using the
475:
165:Linear mixed-effects model
1140:Eberly College of Science
1112:; republished in 1997 by
331:Least absolute deviations
1108:Elements of Econometrics
845:variables of degree 1.
839:validation statistic, Vn
815:Out-of-sample evaluation
740:independence of errors:
79:Generalized linear model
959:"Regression validation"
875:Resampling (statistics)
801:Durbin–Watson statistic
752:normal probability plot
1176:Regression diagnostics
1153:public domain material
1037:Statistics in Medicine
664:
649:
518:, or non-linearities.
492:ordinary least squares
410:Mathematics portal
336:Iteratively reweighted
1171:Validity (statistics)
895:Validity (statistics)
767:Regression diagnostic
746:normality of errors:
661:
650:
562:explanatory variables
546:Analysis of residuals
521:One problem with the
454:regression validation
367:Regression validation
346:Bayesian multivariate
63:Polynomial regression
944:improve this article
855:All models are wrong
830:, also known as the
783:designed experiments
703:Statistical graphics
579:
516:high-leverage points
466:regression residuals
392:Gauss–Markov theorem
387:Studentized residual
377:Errors and residuals
211:Principal components
181:Nonlinear regression
68:General linear model
910:Reduced chi-squared
870:Prediction interval
787:Logistic regression
568:observation in the
458:regression analysis
237:Errors-in-variables
104:Logistic regression
94:Binomial regression
39:Regression analysis
33:Part of a series on
828:mean squared error
805:heteroskedasticity
797:Serial correlation
710:heteroscedasticity
665:
645:
504:Anscombe's quartet
124:Multinomial probit
27:Statistics concept
1136:Model Diagnostics
1043:(21): 3283–3301.
1020:
1019:
1012:
994:
803:. The problem of
636:
552:residual analysis
486:, often denoted,
446:
445:
99:Binary regression
58:Simple regression
53:Linear regression
16:(Redirected from
1183:
1150:
1149:
1111:
1099:
1071:
1070:
1060:
1049:10.1002/sim.7372
1028:
1015:
1008:
1004:
1001:
995:
993:
952:
928:
920:
865:Prediction error
821:Cross-validation
773:lack-of-fit test
654:
652:
651:
646:
638:
637:
629:
623:
622:
604:
603:
591:
590:
438:
431:
424:
408:
407:
315:Ridge regression
150:Multilevel model
30:
29:
21:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1161:
1160:
1147:
1122:
1080:
1078:Further reading
1075:
1074:
1029:
1025:
1016:
1005:
999:
996:
953:
951:
941:
929:
918:
860:Model selection
851:
823:
817:
769:
763:
705:
699:
683:
672:
628:
627:
618:
614:
599:
595:
586:
582:
580:
577:
576:
554:
548:
480:
478:Goodness of fit
474:
472:Goodness of fit
462:goodness of fit
442:
402:
382:Goodness of fit
89:Discrete choice
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1189:
1179:
1178:
1173:
1144:
1143:
1133:
1128:
1121:
1120:External links
1118:
1117:
1116:
1100:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1017:
932:
930:
923:
917:
914:
913:
912:
907:
902:
897:
892:
887:
882:
877:
872:
867:
862:
857:
850:
847:
819:Main article:
816:
813:
765:Main article:
762:
759:
755:
754:
744:
738:
731:
724:
698:
695:
681:
670:
656:
655:
644:
641:
635:
632:
626:
621:
617:
613:
610:
607:
602:
598:
594:
589:
585:
550:Main article:
547:
544:
476:Main article:
473:
470:
444:
443:
441:
440:
433:
426:
418:
415:
414:
413:
412:
397:
396:
395:
394:
389:
384:
379:
374:
369:
361:
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:
348:
343:
338:
333:
325:
324:
323:
322:
317:
312:
307:
302:
294:
293:
292:
291:
286:
281:
276:
268:
267:
266:
265:
260:
255:
247:
246:
242:
241:
240:
239:
231:
230:
229:
228:
223:
218:
213:
208:
203:
198:
193:
191:Semiparametric
188:
183:
175:
174:
173:
172:
167:
162:
160:Random effects
157:
152:
144:
143:
142:
141:
136:
134:Ordered probit
131:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
81:
73:
72:
71:
70:
65:
60:
55:
47:
46:
42:
41:
35:
34:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1188:
1177:
1174:
1172:
1169:
1168:
1166:
1159:
1158:
1155:from the
1154:
1141:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1123:
1115:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1087:
1082:
1081:
1068:
1064:
1059:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1027:
1023:
1014:
1011:
1003:
992:
989:
985:
982:
978:
975:
971:
968:
964:
961: –
960:
956:
955:Find sources:
949:
945:
939:
938:
933:This article
931:
927:
922:
921:
911:
908:
906:
903:
901:
898:
896:
893:
891:
888:
886:
883:
881:
878:
876:
873:
871:
868:
866:
863:
861:
858:
856:
853:
852:
846:
844:
840:
835:
833:
829:
822:
812:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
792:
788:
784:
779:
774:
768:
758:
753:
749:
745:
743:
739:
736:
732:
729:
728:scatter plots
725:
722:
721:scatter plots
718:
717:
716:
713:
711:
704:
694:
690:
688:
684:
677:
674:denoting the
673:
660:
642:
630:
624:
619:
615:
608:
605:
600:
596:
592:
587:
583:
575:
574:
573:
571:
567:
563:
559:
553:
543:
541:
539:
533:
529:
524:
519:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
479:
469:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
439:
434:
432:
427:
425:
420:
419:
417:
416:
411:
406:
401:
400:
399:
398:
393:
390:
388:
385:
383:
380:
378:
375:
373:
370:
368:
365:
364:
363:
362:
358:
357:
352:
349:
347:
344:
342:
339:
337:
334:
332:
329:
328:
327:
326:
321:
318:
316:
313:
311:
308:
306:
303:
301:
298:
297:
296:
295:
290:
287:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
271:
270:
269:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
253:Least squares
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
243:
238:
235:
234:
233:
232:
227:
224:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
189:
187:
186:Nonparametric
184:
182:
179:
178:
177:
176:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
158:
156:
155:Fixed effects
153:
151:
148:
147:
146:
145:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
129:Ordered logit
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
75:
74:
69:
66:
64:
61:
59:
56:
54:
51:
50:
49:
48:
44:
43:
40:
37:
36:
32:
31:
19:
1145:
1107:
1095:
1089:
1040:
1036:
1026:
1006:
997:
987:
980:
973:
966:
954:
942:Please help
937:verification
934:
842:
838:
836:
824:
809:several ways
795:
770:
756:
714:
706:
691:
686:
679:
675:
668:
666:
565:
555:
537:
531:
522:
520:
507:
499:
495:
487:
481:
453:
447:
366:
310:Non-negative
1104:Kmenta, Jan
791:binary data
572:is written
320:Regularized
284:Generalized
216:Least angle
114:Mixed logit
1165:Categories
1091:Statistica
1000:March 2010
970:newspapers
916:References
778:parameters
735:run charts
701:See also:
450:statistics
359:Background
263:Non-linear
245:Estimation
1098:: 375–396
748:histogram
634:^
631:β
606:−
558:residuals
536:adjusted
226:Segmented
1106:(1986),
1067:28620945
849:See also
742:lag plot
570:data set
512:outliers
341:Bayesian
279:Weighted
274:Ordinary
206:Isotonic
201:Quantile
1058:5575530
984:scholar
300:Partial
139:Poisson
1065:
1055:
986:
979:
972:
965:
957:
528:F-test
258:Linear
196:Robust
119:Probit
45:Models
991:JSTOR
977:books
789:with
667:with
663:here.
490:. In
305:Total
221:Local
1063:PMID
963:news
750:and
556:The
1053:PMC
1045:doi
946:by
448:In
1167::
1096:63
1094:,
1088:,
1061:.
1051:.
1041:36
1039:.
1035:.
811:.
785:.
542:.
514:,
452:,
1142:)
1138:(
1069:.
1047::
1013:)
1007:(
1002:)
998:(
988:·
981:·
974:·
967:·
940:.
843:χ
687:i
682:i
680:x
676:i
671:i
669:y
643:,
640:)
625:;
620:i
616:x
612:(
609:f
601:i
597:y
593:=
588:i
584:e
566:i
540:2
538:R
532:R
523:R
508:R
500:R
496:R
488:R
437:e
430:t
423:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.