27:
211:
It is true, the indictment sets forth, that the defendants refused to work under such rates, which were more than enjoined by the statute, for that is only two shillings a day; but yet these words will not bring the offence, for which the defendants are indicted, to be within the statute, because it
191:
A group of workers had founded the London
Journeymen Tailors' Union and held a strike the following year. In response, the Journeymen Tailors, London Act 1720 was passed. A case was brought that the union constituted an unlawful conspiracy.
335:
419:
212:
is not the denial to work except for more wages than is allowed by the statute, but it is for a conspiracy to raise their wages for which these defendants are indicted...This indictment need not conclude
383:
163:
to trade unions. It held that strike action amounted to an unlawful and criminal conspiracy. This attitude prevailed through the 19th century, until trade unions were made lawful by
Parliament in the
201:
371:
433:
665:
443:
396:
348:
262:
44:
91:
297:
168:
63:
207:
However, it was not for refusing to work that the defendants were indicted, but "for conspiring." As the judgment of 6 November 1721 stated:
407:
70:
77:
645:
59:
246:
615:
204:. It found, however, that it was unnecessary to rely on the Act, because the union's actions were unlawful at common law.
466:
505:
110:
311:
84:
323:
48:
650:
285:
655:
478:
239:
660:
172:
37:
526:
232:
180:
164:
8:
175:
confirmed unions' legality at common law once more, and now the position is reflected in
587:
579:
611:
591:
571:
176:
563:
531:
605:
639:
575:
516:
501:
224:
521:
273:
454:
359:
160:
156:
583:
551:
216:, because it is for a conspiracy, which is an offence at common law."
26:
567:
490:
607:
British
Working Class Movements: Select Documents, 1789-1875
200:
The court heard that the agreement would be contrary to the
666:
History of the textile industry in the United
Kingdom
552:"English Combination Acts of the Eighteenth Century"
51:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
637:
159:case, concerning the historical attitude of the
299:Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Co Ltd v Veitch
169:Conspiracy, and Protection of Property Act 1875
610:. Springer. 25 December 2015. pp. 88–89.
337:Merkur Island Shipping Corporation v Laughton
254:
240:
421:British Airways Plc v Unite the Union (No 2)
247:
233:
385:Universe Tankships Inc of Monrovia v ITWF
111:Learn how and when to remove this message
638:
228:
60:"R v Journeymen-Taylors of Cambridge"
549:
49:adding citations to reliable sources
20:
467:Laval Un Partneri Ltd v Svenska BAF
202:Journeymen Tailors, London Act 1720
152:R v Journeymen-Taylors of Cambridge
126:R v Journeymen-Taylors of Cambridge
13:
14:
677:
372:UCL Hospitals NHS Trust v Unison
312:JT Stratford & Son v Lindley
25:
36:needs additional citations for
646:United Kingdom labour case law
598:
543:
434:Metrobus Ltd v Unite the Union
324:Torquay Hotel Co Ltd v Cousins
1:
627:
144:Contract of employment, terms
7:
286:Taff Vale Railway Co v ASRS
220:
195:
10:
682:
479:Demir and Baykara v Turkey
498:
487:
475:
463:
451:
446:ss 20-22, 220-221 and 241
441:
430:
416:
404:
394:
380:
368:
356:
346:
332:
320:
308:
294:
282:
270:
260:
255:Collective action sources
143:
138:
130:
125:
537:
186:
134:(1721) 8 Mod 10, 88 ER 9
173:Trade Disputes Act 1906
16:English labour law case
556:Law and History Review
550:Orth, John V. (1987).
218:
527:UK labour law history
214:contra formam statuti
209:
277:(1853) 2 E&B 216
181:ILO Convention No 87
165:Trade Union Act 1871
155:(1721) 88 ER 9 is a
45:improve this article
651:1721 in British law
179:, particularly the
656:1720s in case law
617:978-1-349-86219-1
512:
511:
177:international law
148:
147:
121:
120:
113:
95:
673:
622:
621:
602:
596:
595:
547:
532:US labor history
422:
386:
338:
300:
249:
242:
235:
226:
225:
123:
122:
116:
109:
105:
102:
96:
94:
53:
29:
21:
681:
680:
676:
675:
674:
672:
671:
670:
661:1721 in England
636:
635:
630:
625:
618:
604:
603:
599:
548:
544:
540:
513:
508:
494:
483:
471:
470:(2008) C-319/05
459:
458:(2008) C-438/05
447:
437:
426:
420:
412:
400:
390:
384:
376:
364:
352:
342:
336:
328:
316:
304:
298:
290:
278:
266:
256:
253:
223:
198:
189:
117:
106:
100:
97:
54:
52:
42:
30:
17:
12:
11:
5:
679:
669:
668:
663:
658:
653:
648:
634:
633:
629:
626:
624:
623:
616:
597:
568:10.2307/743940
562:(1): 175–211.
541:
539:
536:
535:
534:
529:
524:
519:
510:
509:
499:
496:
495:
488:
485:
484:
476:
473:
472:
464:
461:
460:
452:
449:
448:
442:
439:
438:
431:
428:
427:
417:
414:
413:
405:
402:
401:
395:
392:
391:
381:
378:
377:
369:
366:
365:
357:
354:
353:
347:
344:
343:
333:
330:
329:
321:
318:
317:
309:
306:
305:
295:
292:
291:
283:
280:
279:
271:
268:
267:
261:
258:
257:
252:
251:
244:
237:
229:
222:
219:
197:
194:
188:
185:
146:
145:
141:
140:
136:
135:
132:
128:
127:
119:
118:
101:September 2022
33:
31:
24:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
678:
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
644:
643:
641:
632:
631:
619:
613:
609:
608:
601:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
546:
542:
533:
530:
528:
525:
523:
520:
518:
517:UK labour law
515:
514:
507:
503:
497:
493:
492:
486:
481:
480:
474:
469:
468:
462:
457:
456:
450:
445:
440:
436:
435:
429:
424:
423:
415:
410:
409:
403:
398:
393:
388:
387:
379:
374:
373:
367:
362:
361:
355:
350:
345:
340:
339:
331:
326:
325:
319:
314:
313:
307:
302:
301:
293:
288:
287:
281:
276:
275:
269:
264:
259:
250:
245:
243:
238:
236:
231:
230:
227:
217:
215:
208:
205:
203:
193:
184:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
153:
142:
137:
133:
129:
124:
115:
112:
104:
93:
90:
86:
83:
79:
76:
72:
69:
65:
62: –
61:
57:
56:Find sources:
50:
46:
40:
39:
34:This article
32:
28:
23:
22:
19:
606:
600:
559:
555:
545:
522:US labor law
489:
477:
465:
453:
432:
425:EWCA Civ 669
418:
406:
382:
370:
358:
334:
322:
310:
296:
284:
274:Lumley v Gye
272:
213:
210:
206:
199:
190:
151:
150:
149:
107:
98:
88:
81:
74:
67:
55:
43:Please help
38:verification
35:
18:
455:The Rosella
444:TULRCA 1992
397:TULRCA 1992
360:BBC v Hearn
349:TULRCA 1992
263:TULRCA 1992
640:Categories
628:References
408:P v NASUWT
399:ss 226-234
161:common law
157:labour law
71:newspapers
592:147554627
576:0738-2480
502:UK labour
482:ECHR 1345
491:RMT v UK
411:2 AC 663
389:1 AC 366
341:2 AC 570
327:2 Ch 106
221:See also
196:Judgment
183:and 98.
167:and the
139:Keywords
131:Citation
375:ICR 204
363:ICR 686
85:scholar
614:
590:
584:743940
582:
574:
506:unions
315:AC 269
303:AC 435
289:AC 426
171:. The
87:
80:
73:
66:
58:
588:S2CID
580:JSTOR
538:Notes
351:s 244
265:s 219
187:Facts
92:JSTOR
78:books
612:ISBN
572:ISSN
504:and
500:see
64:news
564:doi
47:by
642::
586:.
578:.
570:.
558:.
554:.
620:.
594:.
566::
560:5
248:e
241:t
234:v
114:)
108:(
103:)
99:(
89:·
82:·
75:·
68:·
41:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
