Knowledge

R v Associated Northern Collieries

Source 📝

31: 403: 328: 223: 159: 444: 277: 92: 140:
I convict the defendants, and each and every of them, of the several offences severally found against them respectively as above stated.
468: 283: 107: 192: 410: 437: 242:
each of the 40 defendants (16 individuals, 22 corporations and 2 commercial trusts) of cartel offences against the
215: 473: 463: 418: 430: 52:
The King and the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth v The Associated Northern Collieries and others
478: 354: 41: 373: 264: 333: 311: 164: 69: 8: 369:"Coal vend case: an official threat to purchase against vend: the Newcastle conversation" 337: 315: 168: 73: 368: 204: 414: 457: 211: 207: 30: 236: 200: 127: 262:
The trial was eagerly followed in the news media. Newspapers such as the
251: 239: 247: 402: 218: 235:
Following a trial in the original jurisdiction of the High Court,
196: 378: 203:
in this decision were later set aside by the Full Court (
268:
regularly reported on the daily course of the trial.
321: 455: 339: 170: 111: 96: 75: 438: 278:Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead 93:Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead 355:Australian Industries Preservation Act 1906 195:concerning the activities of the Coal-Vend 445: 431: 29: 304: 302: 300: 16:Judgement of the High Court of Australia 361: 347: 193:decision of the High Court of Australia 456: 297: 284:Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Moorehead 244:Australian Industries Preservation Act 108:Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Moorehead 397: 329:Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v The King 257: 224:Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v The King 160:Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v The King 13: 309:R v Associated Northern Collieries 182:R v Associated Northern Collieries 24:R v Associated Northern Collieries 14: 490: 401: 250:law based on the United States' 1: 469:High Court of Australia cases 290: 199:. The convictions entered by 417:. You can help Knowledge by 7: 271: 230: 10: 495: 396: 157: 150: 145: 138: 133: 123: 118: 103: 88: 83: 65: 57: 47: 37: 28: 23: 409:This article related to 42:High Court of Australia 474:1911 in Australian law 374:Sydney Morning Herald 334:[1912] HCA 58 312:[1911] HCA 73 265:Sydney Morning Herald 165:[1912] HCA 58 70:[1911] HCA 73 464:Australian law stubs 246:, a (now repealed) 426: 425: 316:(1911) 14 CLR 387 286:(1912) 15 CLR 333 258:Political context 178: 177: 104:Subsequent action 486: 479:1911 in case law 447: 440: 433: 405: 398: 391: 390: 388: 386: 365: 359: 351: 345: 341: 325: 319: 306: 280:(1909) 8 CLR 330 172: 119:Court membership 113: 98: 77: 61:22 December 1911 33: 21: 20: 494: 493: 489: 488: 487: 485: 484: 483: 454: 453: 452: 451: 395: 394: 384: 382: 367: 366: 362: 352: 348: 326: 322: 307: 298: 293: 274: 260: 233: 153: 17: 12: 11: 5: 492: 482: 481: 476: 471: 466: 450: 449: 442: 435: 427: 424: 423: 411:Australian law 406: 393: 392: 360: 346: 320: 295: 294: 292: 289: 288: 287: 281: 273: 270: 259: 256: 232: 229: 188:Coal-Vend Case 176: 175: 155: 154: 151: 148: 147: 143: 142: 136: 135: 131: 130: 125: 121: 120: 116: 115: 105: 101: 100: 90: 86: 85: 81: 80: 67: 63: 62: 59: 55: 54: 49: 48:Full case name 45: 44: 39: 35: 34: 26: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 491: 480: 477: 475: 472: 470: 467: 465: 462: 461: 459: 448: 443: 441: 436: 434: 429: 428: 422: 420: 416: 412: 407: 404: 400: 399: 380: 376: 375: 370: 364: 357: 356: 350: 343: 335: 331: 330: 324: 317: 313: 310: 305: 303: 301: 296: 285: 282: 279: 276: 275: 269: 267: 266: 255: 253: 249: 245: 241: 238: 228: 226: 225: 220: 217: 213: 209: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189: 184: 183: 174: 166: 162: 161: 156: 149: 144: 141: 137: 134:Case opinions 132: 129: 126: 124:Judge sitting 122: 117: 109: 106: 102: 94: 91: 87: 82: 79: 71: 68: 64: 60: 56: 53: 50: 46: 43: 40: 36: 32: 27: 22: 19: 419:expanding it 408: 383:. Retrieved 381:. 6 May 1911 372: 363: 353: 349: 327: 323: 308: 263: 261: 243: 234: 222: 187: 186: 181: 180: 179: 158: 152:Overruled by 146:Laws applied 139: 89:Prior action 84:Case history 51: 18: 252:Sherman Act 458:Categories 338:(1912) 15 291:References 169:(1912) 15 110:(1912) 15 74:(1911) 14 248:antitrust 240:convicted 95:(1909) 8 66:Citations 272:See also 237:Isaacs J 231:Decision 216:O'Connor 205:Griffith 201:Isaacs J 128:Isaacs J 385:10 July 191:) is a 58:Decided 358:(Cth). 212:Barton 197:cartel 413:is a 379:Trove 332: 221:) in 185:(the 163: 38:Court 415:stub 387:2018 214:and 340:CLR 171:CLR 114:333 112:CLR 99:330 97:CLR 78:387 76:CLR 460:: 377:. 371:. 342:65 336:, 314:, 299:^ 254:. 227:. 219:JJ 210:, 208:CJ 173:65 167:, 72:, 446:e 439:t 432:v 421:. 389:. 344:. 318:.

Index


High Court of Australia
[1911] HCA 73
(1911) 14 CLR 387
Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead
Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Moorehead
Isaacs J
Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v The King
[1912] HCA 58
(1912) 15 CLR 65
decision of the High Court of Australia
cartel
Isaacs J
Griffith
CJ
Barton
O'Connor
JJ
Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v The King
Isaacs J
convicted
antitrust
Sherman Act
Sydney Morning Herald
Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead
Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Moorehead



[1911] HCA 73

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.