1210:
313:
270:
1216:
249:. The UK government introduced £1,200 fees to bring a typical case to an employment tribunal through the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013 (SI 2013/1893).
736:
931:
784:
1067:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1007:
1002:
997:
992:
974:
900:
774:
1278:
753:
729:
908:
497:
1288:
914:
831:
722:
880:
841:
1072:
483:
253:
196:
806:
1283:
1093:
816:
116:
108:
72:
457:
947:
920:
96:
1259:
959:
770:
605:
563:
523:
386:
104:
76:
941:
836:
801:
745:
1088:
511:
369:
1293:
1110:
134:: The Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013 which imposed fees on appeals from employment tribunals is unlawful
619:
401:
324:
281:
92:
691:
591:
535:
1170:
647:
577:
1098:
874:
826:
821:
471:
1115:
1103:
953:
100:
406:
1120:
846:
415:
1233:
1252:
1225:
1161:
1132:
780:
672:
811:
419:
1149:
429:
362:
112:
633:
221:
1245:
240:
225:
8:
1175:
581:
623:
609:
1125:
651:
637:
567:
553:
391:
714:
443:
355:
149:
595:
461:
447:
433:
213:
75:
EWHC 218 (Admin); Divisional Court of the
Administrative Court EWHC 4198 (Admin);
57:
29:
539:
1166:
200:
305:
The
Supreme Court unanimously held that employment tribunal fees were unlawful.
252:
The Lord
Chancellor purported to exercise this power under section 42(1) of the
1229:
549:
139:
1272:
1209:
661:
347:
217:
224:
judgment of the
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. It held that fees for
1137:
258:
245:
229:
192:
312:
269:
868:
1154:
1142:
1181:
156:, it was likely that it was not discriminatory in its application.
228:
are unlawful because they impede access to justice, and defy the
975:
List of judges of the
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
142:
law as it has the effect of preventing access to justice.
744:
40:R (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor
1270:
499:Market Invest Ltd v Minister for Social Security
243:claimed that fees for employment tribunals were
377:
195:, Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013,
179:: Neuberger, Mance, Kerr, Wilson, Reed, Hughes
1253:
730:
363:
152:was not considered as the Order was unlawful
173:Neuberger, Hale, Mance, Kerr, Wilson, Hughes
73:Divisional Court of the Administrative Court
1260:
1246:
737:
723:
692:"Employment tribunal fees regime unlawful"
485:Ready Mixed Concrete Ltd v SS for Pensions
370:
356:
254:Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
197:Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
1279:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom cases
1228:, or its constituent jurisdictions, is a
148:, obiter: While discrimination under the
458:Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof
1289:United Kingdom constitutional case law
1271:
1192:Justices shown in order of appointment
718:
351:
1203:
909:The Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers
606:Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd
564:Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford) Ltd
524:Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gardiner
387:Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Wurttenberg
307:
264:
256:. Unison claimed that the order was
77:Court of Appeal of England and Wales
746:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
13:
14:
1305:
1111:Judiciaries of the United Kingdom
1094:House of Lords judicial functions
915:The Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury
620:Muscat v Cable & Wireless Plc
1214:
1208:
832:Lord Stephens of Creevyloughgare
402:Pfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz
311:
268:
1284:2017 in United Kingdom case law
592:Carmichael v National Power plc
536:Lee Ting Sang v Chung Chi-Keung
1171:Secretary of State for Justice
684:
512:O’Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc
1:
948:The Baroness Hale of Richmond
921:The Baroness Hale of Richmond
701:
648:Muschett v H M Prison Service
578:McMeechan v SS for Employment
1232:. You can help Knowledge by
1099:List of House of Lords cases
472:Cassidy v Minister of Health
210:R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor
21:R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor
7:
1116:Courts of England and Wales
842:Lord Richards of Camberwell
343:
300:
10:
1310:
1202:
1121:Courts of Northern Ireland
942:The Lord Hope of Craighead
771:The Lord Reed of Allermuir
416:Employment Rights Act 1996
378:Workplace protection cases
1226:law in the United Kingdom
1224:This article relating to
1190:
1162:Law officers of the Crown
1133:Law of the United Kingdom
1081:
985:
969:
930:
899:
890:
859:
807:Lord Briggs of Westbourne
794:
763:
752:
673:United Kingdom labour law
658:
644:
630:
616:
602:
588:
574:
560:
546:
532:
520:
508:
494:
480:
468:
454:
440:
426:
413:
398:
383:
191:
186:
163:
127:
122:
88:
83:
68:
63:
53:
45:
35:
25:
20:
1294:United Kingdom law stubs
709:A Casebook on Labour Law
678:
235:
1150:Law of Northern Ireland
430:Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher
837:Lady Rose of Colmworth
817:Lord Hamblen of Kersey
711:(Hart 2019) ch 3, 149
634:James v Greenwich LBC
222:UK constitutional law
226:employment tribunals
171:Lord Reed's opinion:
1176:Middlesex Guildhall
177:Lady Hale's opinion
1126:Courts of Scotland
323:. You can help by
280:. You can help by
138:under English and
1241:
1240:
1197:
1196:
981:
980:
855:
854:
668:
667:
444:Jivraj v Hashwani
341:
340:
298:
297:
206:
205:
150:Equality Act 2010
1301:
1262:
1255:
1248:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1212:
1204:
897:
896:
802:Lord Lloyd-Jones
785:Deputy President
761:
760:
739:
732:
725:
716:
715:
696:
695:
688:
500:
486:
372:
365:
358:
349:
348:
336:
333:
315:
308:
293:
290:
272:
265:
84:Court membership
30:UK Supreme Court
18:
17:
1309:
1308:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1215:
1213:
1207:
1200:
1198:
1193:
1186:
1167:Lord Chancellor
1077:
977:
965:
933:
926:
892:
886:
861:
851:
790:
755:
748:
743:
704:
699:
690:
689:
685:
681:
669:
664:
654:
640:
626:
612:
598:
584:
570:
556:
542:
528:
516:
504:
498:
490:
484:
476:
464:
450:
436:
422:
409:
394:
379:
376:
346:
337:
331:
328:
321:needs expansion
303:
294:
288:
285:
278:needs expansion
238:
201:judicial review
182:
159:
12:
11:
5:
1307:
1297:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1265:
1264:
1257:
1250:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1221:
1195:
1194:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1185:
1184:
1179:
1173:
1164:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1101:
1091:
1085:
1083:
1079:
1078:
1076:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1020:
1015:
1010:
1005:
1000:
995:
989:
987:
983:
982:
979:
978:
973:
971:
967:
966:
964:
963:
957:
954:The Lord Mance
951:
945:
938:
936:
928:
927:
925:
924:
918:
912:
905:
903:
894:
888:
887:
885:
884:
878:
872:
865:
863:
857:
856:
853:
852:
850:
849:
844:
839:
834:
829:
824:
819:
814:
809:
804:
798:
796:
792:
791:
789:
788:
778:
767:
765:
758:
750:
749:
742:
741:
734:
727:
719:
713:
712:
703:
700:
698:
697:
682:
680:
677:
676:
675:
666:
665:
659:
656:
655:
645:
642:
641:
631:
628:
627:
617:
614:
613:
603:
600:
599:
589:
586:
585:
575:
572:
571:
561:
558:
557:
550:Hall v Lorimer
547:
544:
543:
533:
530:
529:
521:
518:
517:
509:
506:
505:
495:
492:
491:
481:
478:
477:
469:
466:
465:
455:
452:
451:
441:
438:
437:
427:
424:
423:
414:
411:
410:
399:
396:
395:
384:
381:
380:
375:
374:
367:
360:
352:
345:
342:
339:
338:
318:
316:
302:
299:
296:
295:
275:
273:
237:
234:
204:
203:
189:
188:
184:
183:
181:
180:
174:
167:
165:
161:
160:
158:
157:
143:
140:European Union
128:
125:
124:
120:
119:
93:Lord Neuberger
90:
89:Judges sitting
86:
85:
81:
80:
70:
66:
65:
61:
60:
55:
51:
50:
47:
43:
42:
37:
36:Full case name
33:
32:
27:
23:
22:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1306:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1276:
1274:
1263:
1258:
1256:
1251:
1249:
1244:
1243:
1237:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1222:
1211:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1189:
1183:
1180:
1177:
1174:
1172:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1160:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1148:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1131:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1109:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1084:
1080:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
999:
996:
994:
991:
990:
988:
984:
976:
972:
968:
961:
958:
955:
952:
949:
946:
943:
940:
939:
937:
935:
929:
922:
919:
916:
913:
910:
907:
906:
904:
902:
898:
895:
889:
882:
879:
876:
873:
870:
867:
866:
864:
858:
848:
845:
843:
840:
838:
835:
833:
830:
828:
825:
823:
820:
818:
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
799:
797:
793:
786:
782:
779:
776:
772:
769:
768:
766:
762:
759:
757:
751:
747:
740:
735:
733:
728:
726:
721:
720:
717:
710:
707:E McGaughey,
706:
705:
693:
687:
683:
674:
671:
670:
663:
662:UK labour law
657:
653:
650:
649:
643:
639:
636:
635:
629:
625:
622:
621:
615:
611:
608:
607:
601:
597:
594:
593:
587:
583:
582:EWCA Civ 1166
580:
579:
573:
569:
566:
565:
559:
555:
552:
551:
545:
541:
538:
537:
531:
526:
525:
519:
514:
513:
507:
502:
501:
493:
488:
487:
479:
474:
473:
467:
463:
460:
459:
453:
449:
446:
445:
439:
435:
432:
431:
425:
421:
417:
412:
408:
404:
403:
397:
393:
389:
388:
382:
373:
368:
366:
361:
359:
354:
353:
350:
335:
326:
322:
319:This section
317:
314:
310:
309:
306:
292:
283:
279:
276:This section
274:
271:
267:
266:
263:
261:
260:
255:
250:
248:
247:
242:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:UK labour law
215:
212:
211:
202:
198:
194:
190:
185:
178:
175:
172:
169:
168:
166:
162:
155:
151:
147:
144:
141:
137:
133:
130:
129:
126:
123:Case opinions
121:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
71:
69:Appealed from
67:
62:
59:
56:
52:
48:
44:
41:
38:
34:
31:
28:
24:
19:
16:
1234:expanding it
1223:
1199:
1089:Constitution
883:(since 2020)
875:Mark Ormerod
827:Lord Burrows
822:Lord Leggatt
708:
686:
646:
632:
624:EWCA Civ 220
618:
610:EWCA Civ 217
604:
590:
576:
562:
548:
534:
522:
510:
496:
482:
470:
456:
442:
428:
400:
385:
329:
325:adding to it
320:
304:
286:
282:adding to it
277:
257:
251:
244:
239:
209:
208:
207:
176:
170:
153:
145:
135:
131:
79:EWCA Civ 935
64:Case history
49:26 July 2017
39:
15:
1138:English law
962:(2018–2020)
956:(2017–2018)
950:(2013–2017)
944:(2009–2013)
923:(2017–2020)
917:(2012–2017)
911:(2009–2012)
877:(2015–2020)
871:(2009–2015)
847:Lady Simler
652:EWCA Civ 25
638:EWCA Civ 35
568:EWCA Civ 37
554:EWCA Civ 25
332:August 2017
289:August 2017
259:ultra vires
246:ultra vires
230:rule of law
193:Rule of law
164:Concurrence
117:Lord Hughes
109:Lord Wilson
1273:Categories
1178:(location)
869:Jenny Rowe
812:Lord Sales
781:Lord Hodge
764:Leadership
702:References
101:Lord Mance
1155:Scots law
1143:Welsh law
1104:Law Lords
986:Judgments
960:Lord Reed
934:President
901:President
881:Vicky Fox
862:Executive
775:President
154:ab initio
146:Lady Hale
136:ab initio
132:Lord Reed
113:Lord Reed
105:Lord Kerr
97:Lady Hale
1182:UKSCblog
893:justices
756:justices
503:2 QB 173
489:2 QB 497
475:2 KB 343
407:C-397/01
344:See also
301:Judgment
187:Keywords
54:Citation
1082:Related
754:Current
596:UKHL 47
527:ICR 612
515:ICR 730
462:UKSC 32
448:UKSC 40
434:UKSC 41
405:(2005)
392:C-66/85
390:(1986)
214:UKSC 51
58:UKSC 51
46:Decided
970:Judges
932:Deputy
891:Former
795:Judges
540:UKPC 1
241:Unison
860:Chief
679:Notes
236:Facts
216:is a
26:Court
1230:stub
1169:and
1073:List
1068:2024
1063:2023
1058:2022
1053:2021
1048:2020
1043:2019
1038:2018
1033:2017
1028:2016
1023:2015
1018:2014
1013:2013
1008:2012
1003:2011
998:2010
993:2009
660:see
220:and
420:230
327:.
284:.
1275::
418:s
262:.
232:.
199:,
115:,
111:,
107:,
103:,
99:,
95:,
1261:e
1254:t
1247:v
1236:.
787:)
783:(
777:)
773:(
738:e
731:t
724:v
694:.
371:e
364:t
357:v
334:)
330:(
291:)
287:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
